The Highwire with Del Bigtree - CANCERS & DEATH ON THE RISE: IS THE COVID VAX TO BLAME?

Episode Date: June 13, 2023

From Episode 323: Crisis of TrustBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We've been covering here the excess mortality during the pandemic years. A lot of researchers, a lot of politicians have been scratching their head and saying, why has excess mortality gone up in countries when this vaccine has been rolled out during COVID? It's supposed to prevent death, prevent hospitalization, severe hospitalization, but we're seeing excess mortalities go up from the EU parliament testimony there to other countries as well. We're seeing and people are saying someone should do something about this, so we should look into it. Well, in Germany, researchers have.

and now we have really the best paper to date on excess mortality. And this is it right here. Estimation of excess mortality in Germany during 2020 to 2022. So they looked at the reported deaths versus the statistically expected all-caused deaths. And this is, again, this is one of the best statistical estimates we have to date. And let's look at their results. Let's dive right in here. Because a lot of people are talking about this paper right now.

It says the results. The results show that the observed number of deaths in 2020 was close to the expected number with respect to the empirical standard deviation. Approximately 4,000 excess deaths occurred. By contrast, in 2021, the observed number of deaths was two empirical standard deviations above the expected number, and even more than four times the empirical standard deviation in 2022. So you're talking about a four-sigma event at that point.

Wow. And now let's go even further. We're just going to go right through this paper and dissect it because, again, it's one of the best representations now we have to talk about this and very, very method. and scientific way. So they go on to write this. The mortality wave at the turn of the year from 2020 to 2021 is characterized by a strong age dependency, which follows the age dependent risk of COVID-19. Excess mortality is higher and older people and is completely absent in the age groups below 30 years. This pattern is substantially changed from April 2021 onward at the time when more and more

people were vaccinated. So what they found were younger people were starting that. age-dependent curve kind of just evaporated. And it wasn't so much the older people. It was younger people now. There was not. For anyone still tuning, you know, just tuning in or didn't follow the science of the high wire back through COVID, we were all announcing. And everyone knew, really, that was reporting on this, that the age demographic that was really being, you know, affected by COVID, was over the age of 80 or maybe 75, depending on where you were looking, usually other comorbidities, but it really affected that older age group. And there was even discussion, on the fact that in many of these countries, they had such a mild flu season the year before

that maybe some of those people that would normally die in a flu season, they were elderly and feeble and not healthy, that they weren't lost. And so maybe this, you know, this extreme number we were seeing in the elderly was also due the fact that they had sort of lived a year longer than usual because they had such a mild previous flu season. So all of those are things that we had discussed, but all of it was about it was just the elderly that were truly being affected here. All right. So just wanted to sort of remind people of those thoughts. Absolutely. And this paper is incredible in the way that a lot of previous analysis would kind of ask the question, but they wouldn't really say, you know, it may have been this,

it may have been that. This paper goes on in a more bold step. And it says this. This is about German surveillance. It says, given the temporal relationship between the increase in vaccinations and excess mortality, it seems surprising that a respective safety signal has not been detected in the pharmacovilligilance by the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which is responsible for that's kind of like their CDC, which is responsible for the safety monitoring of drugs in Germany, a closer inspection of the methods used by the PEI to monitor possible deadly side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations reveals that a flawed safety analysis is used that will not indicate a safety signal, even if a vaccine causes extremely large numbers of unexpected deaths. And this leads them to say this. And this

is really one of the takeaway sentences here. It says from the perspective of pharmacovililance, the simultaneous onset of excess mortality and vaccinations represents a safety signal. And, you know, obviously we've talked about this. Hypothetically, we said, well, yeah, there seems to be something, but to see it in writing, to see it from a statistical standpoint of highly researched numbers and dates and years is really, I mean, this is a moment in history, I do believe, not to put too much weight on this paper, but it's really a lot of, turning point in the conversation at this point. Well, I mean, here in the United States of America, we keep putting up the open

VAERS numbers, which is it bears, you know, over 30,000 reported deaths. And every time we have put in FOIAs or asked the FDA to respond, they say, we just don't see a signal. I mean, it is literally more deaths in this one vaccination period by one vaccine than all the deaths ever reported to the VAIR system of every other vaccine combined. And they're saying, yeah, we just don't see anything here. I mean, look at this. This is what happens.

I mean, we're talking usually four to 500 deaths a year, which I still think is ridiculously high for a product being forced on people. But 2021, 2022, through the roof, the deaths that are being reported specifically because of the vaccine. And then forget about all of the other issues, weakening immune systems we've talked about and other issues, cancers and things that made the long-term issues being caused by these vaccinations. Right. And so the researchers go on to say this. As in figure eight, which we're going to look at in a second, the obvious hypothesis of a decrease in excess mortality with an increased number of vaccinated persons is not correct. They just go out right there and say it. They say during periods when many persons were vaccinated, excess mortality seems to have increased more strongly compared to the same periods in the previous pandemic year. Now let's look at this chart. This is figure eight. And you can see here in the red cumulative of a number of excess deaths. You can see around at the end of the end of the end of the year. And of 2020, that's when they start vaccinating, you can see the spike and it kind of, you could just draw a line right up there to the end of 2022. And those blue and green lines there, that's the cumulative number of people fully vaccinated, triple vaccinated. And you can see as that number, as those numbers go to the right, that red number goes up. You don't want that red number going up. That's the excess deaths.

That should be going down as more triple and fully vaccinated people become vaccinated. And it's, it's really the opposite. We're seeing an opposite signal. And so reading this paper. I just want to state the most obvious point here. You look at you basically plateau. You've vaccinated everybody. This was the vaccine that was supposed to end the pandemic that were being told, oh, keeps you out of the hospital. Then why the heck, when you're at their highest vaccine rates,

do you continue to accelerate and climb in death? The very least, what we can see is the vaccine did nothing at all. But I think what they're saying is, no, no, it's much worse than that. clearly is contributing to death. So the vaccine at the very least did nothing to protect anybody so the entire purpose of it was a lie. And now we're seeing a bigger problem. Not only was it not effective, it appears to be detrimental to your health. Yeah. And you know, reading this paper for the first time, I kept hearing talking points in my ear from the media saying, well, you know, excess deaths happen because they closed down medical centers. People couldn't seek medical care. And I was hearing,

well, the lockdowns really, you know, it caused a lot of excess mortality. But the researchers say this in their analysis. It says it seems also very unlikely that the abrupt increase in mortality in spring of 2021, 2021 is due to delayed or avoided clinical services, which should lead to much smoother changes or due to side effects in COVID-19 measures. This is more unlikely in the year 2022 when excess mortality increases even further, despite a decrease in reported COVID-19 deaths and alongside clinical care should slowly return to normal. So as clinical care is hearing to normal, as these medical centers were opening up,

COVID deaths were going down at the end of this, that curve, that red curve on that, that graph should have been slowly going down at that point if that hypothesis was correct that we've been hearing in the media, but it was not. Wow. Amazing. I mean, we look explosive. And we look around. And so, you know, the European Union has talked about this. They were seeing that. And we're looking at the current excess mortality numbers. And let's look at, Canada. So this is from David Dixon on Twitter as a data analyst. And you can see even in Canada here in 2022 in that gray line, that's the excess mortality. And they use 2019 as a baseline. And you can see there in 2022 that excess mortality is way up there. In the red, that's COVID related. And

in the kind of the orange color, that's non-COVID related. And you can see the COVID related, the red bar that really never much changes much. In fact, it goes up in 2022. But that excess mortality is just surging. You see the same thing in Japan. They use something called crude mortality, but it's basically the same thing. It's excess deaths per 100,000. You can see there, it's up plus 103 deaths per 100,000. In 2022, it's the highest. And it's a similar trend that we're seeing in Germany here. So this paper cannot be talked about enough. And I urge other researchers out there to continue researching this topic, because the data is there. and this can be built upon. This is one of the largest topics of our time that we need answers to.

And speaking of patterns, we've seen, we've seen this issue. We're seeing a pattern. When there is an issue with the vaccine, the pattern seems to be a normalization of that issue. So we saw with myocarditis. When kids started getting myocarditis, we saw the headlines, well, you know, kids normally get myocarditis is something that just happens in that age group. And we saw, you know, defibrillators being put at schools everywhere. And even with thrombosis and strokes, when those started to come up, we saw headlines. Is it too young to have a stroke? No, you can have them at any age.

And so now we're seeing. When you're watching football, did you know that watching sports on television causes heart attack? I mean, all of this. Like, oh, really, I don't remember that ever being an issue. But now it suddenly is, and it's natural. It's all natural. Or in some cases, you know, they've talked about how COVID causes the swelling in the heart, right? Oh, no, it's caused by COVID.

which we've debunked, you know, endlessly here. Exactly, exactly. Now, the studies are showing that there is a major myocarditis risk for kids, especially in certain age groups and males. And now we've been tracking the increased cancer rates. We've had Dr. Ryan Cole on to talk about what he's seeing in his practice. But we've talked about these cancer rates have been rising throughout the pandemic. And it was actually you who said, wait for it.

They're actually going to blame the cancer rates, the rising cancer rates on the virus itself and say the virus causes cancer. Right. And Delware here. May 23rd, 20203, a paper has been pushed out rapidly from my understanding. And this is it. Possible cancer causing capacity of COVID-19 is SARS-CoV-2 an oncogenic agent. And it says this.

We have reviewed the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 on the vulnerability and susceptibility of specific organs to cancer development. It is important to note that the cancer-related effects of SARS-CoV-2 proposed in this article are based on the ability of the virus and its proteins to cause cancer, but that the long-term consequences of this infection will only be illustrated in the long run. So they're saying, you know, this is just a hypothesis. There's mechanisms, but we don't really have the data to show this, but we're just hypothesizing this.

And notice a key point here, they say the virus and its proteins. Well, you know, there's a major protein there that they could have talked about, and there's literature called the spike protein. Right. They did not name the spike protein. and you know i suggest the reason i did not name the spike protein is if they mentioned that the public would have a very big problem because we know through studies that the spike protein in vaccinated people sticks around in your body in the exosomes and outside the cells for four months so if this thing is

cancer causing if the spike protein is cancer causing vaccinated people have this thing for a long time natural infection they're clearing it faster and they brag they bragged in the vaccine that you're going to have more spike protein production than in a natural infection. And so if people start putting two and two together, say, wait a minute, why was I being injected with a cancer-causing agent? And we have, you know, I'm not going to drag us through all the toll-like receptor, you know, investigation. But this vaccine, the one difference between the natural spike protein and the vaccine spike protein is this pseudo-uridine injection, where they basically mutate this spike protein so that it puts your toll-like receptors to sleep. Your toll-like receptor,

are the guardians of your immune system that detect cancer and ask your immune system to fight cancer. This vaccine was designed to put those guardians to sleep. And we've been saying we believe you're going to see a rise in cancer. Now, of course, they've got to cover this up by saying, oh, it's COVID. And honestly, Jeffrey, why I knew this was coming is it was really the benefit. For those that made this vaccine, the benefit was that it didn't work. And it was actually going to help them protect themselves because everybody that got the vaccine also got infected two or three times. So it sets us up an ability to say, well, it's probably

COVID that caused it since everybody has getting cancer had COVID. What I would say is we need to see a study of those that got COVID that never got the vaccine compared to those that did get the vaccine since essentially almost every on the planet has now had COVID and who has the higher cancer rates. You know they're never going to do that study. Instead, they're going to put it out there and hide this mistake that they've made. And we're really worried about the numbers that are coming our way. This wave looks like it's going to be huge. Right. And that study you're suggesting is kind of the vaccinated and vaccinated study that we've been asking for the entire childhood schedule to see what health outcomes are better. So that's going to be a talking point, a rally cry.

But let's go back to this study. Let's look at one of the images from the study. And this is kind of their hypothesis of these possible oncogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. So they have the renin angiotensin, aldosterone system. That's kind of the maintenance of the blood pressure and the vasculature in the body. And then they straight up call it a viral, viral mutageny, and then inflammatory cascades of the virus. So those are the kind of the ideas of the virus and these, these proteins, these idea of these nebulous proteins, we're not really going to say which ones, but they're saying this could be the possible mechanisms. And throughout this time, again, throughout this pandemic, we've seen cancer rates rise. We've seen people say, well, it's because

the medical system has been shut down. But now we're seeing another data point that's really concerning. We're seeing a shortage in cancer drugs, which is going to, you know, obviously is pointing to a rise in cancers with people taking these. So in Michigan here, this is one of the first headlines. I saw Michigan lawmakers in D.C. call for action in cancer drug shortages. And it says the nationwide shortages of critical cancer drugs, specifically cisplatin and carboplatin are causing hospitals and health systems in Michigan across the country to ration products and delay needed treatments for cancer patients, the lawmakers said in a statement. But then, see this article they're talking about more not just a couple here as cancer drug shortages grow some

doctors are forced to ration doses or delay care 14 cancer drugs are in shortage according to the food and drug administration so you know above again above we just talked about the first study to kind of hypothesize that it's the the proteins and the virus that's causing the cancer but over the last three years of this show we have shown you study after study showing that the parts of the mRNA vaccine, the constituents of that are upregulating, downregulating the immune system leading to dysfunction. So we have this new study as well out the same month. So we have these competing studies, these rails of ideas. And it's important to really let truth come to the surface here. IGG4 antibodies induced by repeated vaccination may generate immune tolerance to the SARS-CoB2 spike

protein. And they go on to say this. It's an incredibly strong study. Emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated a repeated vaccination with the MRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism. Rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Well, Del, just like you said, you know, you get the vaccine and people have these

reinfections. They initially said, if you get the shot, you'll never get the vaccine. You won't be a reservoir for the vaccine. So are there... For the virus. Yeah. Yeah. For the virus.

Sorry. And so are there other problems with reducing the immune system? Well, the study goes on to say this. They give six points. But number two, specifically for this subject, M RNA and inactivated vaccines temporarily impair interferon signaling, possibly causing immune suppression and leaving the individual in a vulnerable situation against any other pathogen.

In addition, this immune suppression could allow the reactivation of latent viral bacterial or fungal infections and might also allow the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells. Wow. It goes on to say this. Number four, the combined immune suppression produced by SARS-CoB to infection and further enhanced by vaccination could explain a plethora of autoimmune conditions such as cancers, reinfections, and deaths temporally associated with both. It is conceivable that the excess deaths reported in several highly COVID-19 vaccinated

countries may be explained in part by this combined immunosuppressive effect. Wow, it's all crumbling down. A lot of pieces of the puzzle coming together here in the scientific literature. These are big, big landmark studies that we really should be paying attention to. Amazing. I mean, this show, we talk about it all the time as some of the most painful I told you shows I've ever experienced. I mean, I'm thankful for all the people I know that tune into this show and watched them sort of protected themselves, at least stopped taking consistent rounds one after the other because as we're seeing,

the more you take, I think the Cleveland Clinic study that we've talked about before, that the more vaccines you take, the more doses, the more likely you are to be infected. All of this is adding up to the same problem. Immune suppression, you're no longer being protected, is doing the opposite negative efficacy, now immune system suppression, all things that if you've been watching the high wire, you would have known almost from day one. We were pointing out these issues. Some of them we saw in the animal trials before this vaccine was ever injected to a human being.

to a human being. Right, right.