The Highwire with Del Bigtree - COVID BOOSTERS GO BUST

Episode Date: July 21, 2022

The scientific literature is now loudly signaling the failure of Covid booster vaccines. In the UK, negative efficacy is spelling disaster for their vaccine push while natural immunity again reigns supreme with a new bombshell finding out of Qatar.#NaturalImmunity #VaccineEfficacyBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We're going to go right into the boosters. We're talking third, fourth, fifth boosters. We've been covering this. But let's look at one of the voters. We have Dr. Paul Offutt. He's on the Verback Committee. He's voted for vaccines. He's voted for the boosters.

But let's listen to what he had to say about the recent boosters for the Amacron variant, which is the variant that is dominant right now going through its several variations of its variant. Here's what he had to say in an interview recently. Normally you get the EUA submission from the company, which is 85 to 100 pages long. And then you get the FDA's review of all. those data. It really is hardening. I mean, it is a very thorough review. Not here. Here it was 22 pages from the FDA, which included a half a page on Pfizer's data and a half a page on Modernist data. You could get that from the press release. In fact, it was no more detailed,

frankly, than the press release. So I just thought the question we're being asked is, in the end, always, is do the benefits outweigh the risks, even though the risks are generally small and sometimes unknown, that's always the question. Do the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the I didn't see the benefits. I was surprised, actually, frankly, that of the 21 voting members, 19 voted yes, because I just didn't see the evidence for that. And we'll see how this plays out. I mean, this was something that I think that was desired by this administration.

I could be wrong. But the other thing that was odd about this meeting was that we're an advisory committee. We're being asked for our advice. So normally what happens is they just present the data. here's the data, what's your advice? And people can ignore our advice. I mean, I'm in academic medicine. People ignore my advice all the time.

But make the best advice. So here, on the other hand, they had somebody from WHO, Contra Subural, who presented their opinion about this. And their opinion was they thought this was a good idea. And then you had the FDA presenting, where they also had an opinion. That's unusual. And then the next day, you know, you read a public health announcement from a a press release from HHS Health and Human Services that says that the government has decided to

purchase at least 100 to 5 million doses from Pfizer with up to 300 million doses. It was a little unclear from that press release, but they mentioned that we had just made this decision the day before. So you just sort of felt like the fix was in a little bit here. Maybe that's not the right phrase, but it was something that they wanted. And I felt like we were being led here with a critical lack of information. so we'll see how this way now but i like this you know this is i mean this is a remember paul in the early days of the pandemic when we were talking about the possibility of a

vaccine happening in a year and you and i were both skeptical and part of the skepticism was we were worried that it was going to get kind of steamrolled through in a politicized way that was going to sacrifice the integrity of the process of review the science and potentially vaccine uptake across other vaccines if you screw this one up. And there was concern that Trump was going to try to rush it through, et cetera. Then the vaccine happens. And now we're expressing concern that, well, it just seems like it doesn't matter what politicians in office. There's always some kind of agenda. And there's always a concern that is it influencing how we actually process these FDA-type strategies? And everything you said is, so let me just recap a little bit. Number one,

they're looking at just neutralizing antibody levels in a way that doesn't even really quite take into account the control group, the way you pointed out, the idea that, okay, so it makes 1.75 the levels of neutralizing antibodies, but so did Moderna relative to Pfizer in the early days, and that did not translate into a nearly 2x fold improvement in prevention of severe disease or even infection. So these numbers do not necessarily correlate to efficacy. We're asking now for a logistic shift where potentially billions of dollars are at stake to transform a vaccine from the ancestral strain to a new bivalent strain, including these Omicron-specific boosters, without clear and compelling evidence that it's actually going to improve the outcome we care about most,

which is protection against severe disease. And yet it seems like the burden of proof for FDA seems to be going down and down and down instead of being at a level that you're comfortable with. Is that an accurate summary of what you said? No, exactly. I mean, it's so incredible for people that maybe don't watch this show and don't really know who Paul Offit is, Z-Dog, I can say this, that I am written about in Paul Offutt's books, that I'm a dangerous person, I spread misinformation, all those things, he hates the high-wire, he hates our nonprofit, and for the first time ever, I can officially say I am completely in totally aligned with Paul Offit and Z-Dog. So let me take them up. Can I have the

camera here, Dr. Paul Offutt and ZDorp. Now that you are on our side and obviously are anti-bactors when it comes to voting in this booster, isn't it time we actually sit down since we have the common ground? I knew you were going to be here and I want to, I want to personally all congratulate you because I know when you have this conversation, you know I'm going to play it on my show because it's exactly what I've been saying about all the other studies that you've approved and thought you were going along with. In fact, when you said that you were worried about how fast they were moving that COVID vaccine, you weren't very loud about that. You didn't stay very loud about it. I'd like to know,

and maybe sit down on the stage sometime. They explained to me how you got comfortable with how fast that vaccine is rolled out and how you got comfortable with them erasing the control group. Like, let's have that conversation. And then how do you discount all the deaths and injury and everything we're seeing in bears when the only thing we've ever known about bears is it's underreported, not overreported. Those are just a couple of questions. You can prepare for them. But whenever you're ready to have the honest conversation that you're clearly now appear to be ready to have, Let's do this. Yeah, Adele, several people besides those two, experts from all around the world,

were very worried about the effectiveness of these boosters, talking immune exhaustion, talking, you can't keep boosting. So now we have ABC News, again, sounding like the highwire, because we've covered these studies. Check out this headline, ABC News, COVID boosters might be less than 20% effective after a few months. Study, this is against an Amacron variant. But let's finish off here with two studies. Very important studies. And these are studies if you're watching. You can take these to your representatives and show them to them.

This will make change happen. This is out of the UK. This is a study title. Increasing SARS-CoV-2 cases, hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated elderly populations during the Omicron variant surge in the UK. This is almost a year's monitoring. Remember the elderly population is why we rolled these vaccines out in the first place. We're supposed to be protecting. Protect the elderly. So this is what they say. This is what they've came to their conclusion. The vaccine effectiveness for the third dose was in negative since December 20, 2021. If you just make that clear to people, a negative effectiveness means it is increasing your risk of getting sick with COVID. Increasing your risk. Getting this vaccine and this booster is increasing your risk of being sick with COVID.

Yes. And we're finding this in the studies now. This is in the studies. They go on to say with a significantly increased proportion of SARS-CoV two cases, hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccine. a decreased proportion of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among the unvaccinated. And it caused them to conclude the following. There is no discernible vaccine effectiveness among 18 and older years of age,

vaccinated third dose population since the beginning of the Omicron variant surge. They go on to say, the increased cases with significantly increased hospitalizations and death among the elderly population during the Omicron Variant surge underscores the need to prevent infection and the elderly, irrespective of vaccination status with uniform screening protocols and protective measures. This is Dr. Peter McCullough 101, early protocols. Whether you have the vaccine or not, get those early protocols. And that's what they're saying.

Well, then that's some of the conversations we've got coming up with certainly Dr. Pierre Corey, Richard Erso, Dr. Robert Malone, just right around the corner. There's a travesty. There's been a crime that's happened here. I'm giving you a talk tomorrow on Friday, 9th of the morning, the COVID crimes. this is huge. And it's what we said, right? We said this.

You're not going to be able to hide this. In the end, the truth will come out. You cannot rush products on the market the way they just did. And I've said it from the beginning. If this COVID vaccine doesn't kill us, this approach to medicine eventually will. We cannot keep producing products that the pharmaceutical industry

that pays out billions of dollars for killing us all the time from lying about safety. Well, now they're not going to do any safety trials. They're just going to then use emergency use authorization to force everybody to take it. If we continue down that path, there is no way we are here for another 10 to 20 years. We're going to wipe ourselves out with this product or another one in the future. Right. And the conversation is two directions. We have the vaccine and we have natural immunity.

So listen to this study. This is out of Qatar. Qatar has had amazing data collection through this COVID pandemic. And now the pandemic's over. This is the study title, Duration of Immune Protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection in Qatar. So they looked at their databases and they said this, effectiveness of primary infection against severe critical or fatal COVID-19 reinfection was 97.3% irrespective of the variance of primary infection or reinfection with no evidence of waning. Wow. Similar results were found in subgroups analysis for those 50 and over years of age, period. The naturally infected, naturally immune, the far-secure immune system, which is what you would have heard, day one on the highway. You heard it before there was a COVID pandemic.

You heard it all the way through. And now the jig is up. We're right. They're wrong. It sucks to be them.