The Highwire with Del Bigtree - COVID QUESTIONERS DEEMED ‘DOMESTIC TERRORISTS’
Episode Date: August 9, 2023A trip down memory lane chronicling how Homeland Security labeled us all ‘domestic terrorists’ for trying to warn people about the harms of the COVID shots, masking kids, warnings and attacks mean...t to achieve COVID compliance. Will the same op be run during a climate emergency?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Remember, they did not test the vaccine. Pfizer, Moderna, they did not test this to see if it stopped transmission.
We reported that right before the vaccine started going in the arms.
And then it took a full, it took quite some time, took many months for Rochelle Walensky to admit this.
Remember in 2021 when she said this?
What about all the fully vaccinated people who get the breakthrough infection?
Can they pass it on?
Could they pass it on to their children?
Could they pass the virus on to older people, especially more vulnerable people with
the underlying health conditions.
And that's exactly the point that we made in our guidance.
So yes, they can with the Delta variant.
And that was the reason that we changed our guidance last Tuesday.
Our vaccines are working exceptionally well.
They continue to work well for Delta with regard to severe illness and death.
They prevent it.
But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission.
Every time I hear that, and I know that the haters out there will say, well, it wasn't their fault.
Delta came along and took away.
that was always the problem, right? The reason why we've never had a vaccine that can do anything against
flu or COVID is that these are highly mutable, you know, viruses. They mutate super fast, and it's
always been known in a cycle. They will mutate too fast to be able to have anything that can
effectively stop it other than a natural immune system and a full total destruction of the virus
inside the body, which vaccines cannot achieve. And so I just want to take that argument away right there.
That's why the vaccine was always stupid.
It was always stupid because COVID obviously was going to mutate faster than you would be able to do anything about with the vaccine.
And so the headline there, August 6, 2021, fully vaccinated people who get COVID-19 breakthrough infection can transmit the virus.
Remember, she said our data is now showing.
Well, the data never really showed it stops transmission because they never tested for it with Pfizer-Moderna.
So what did that lead to on August 16th?
So about 10 days later, 2021, New York City.
put forward an executive order, an emergency executive order.
Remember, it's known that these vaccines don't stop transmission or infection.
It doesn't stop New York City from doing this emergency order.
And it says in this order, whereas this order is necessary because the propensity
of the virus to spread person in person.
It goes on to say the CDC has stated that vaccination is the most effective tool to mitigate
the spread of COVID-19 and protect against severe illness.
Well, it doesn't do one of those things.
It was just admitted, but they said that anyway, they put this forward.
and New York City was then sued.
Plaintiffs who operate small theater venues brought a lawsuit forward against New York City
against what was called their key to New York City.
The key to New York City is this emergency order.
And they said it violated their right to free speech.
And here's they lost.
They ended up losing this court case.
And this is what the judge wrote in the decision said this about New York City's emergency order.
Here, the city clearly had not.
an important, indeed compelling interest in promoting vaccination to combat the spread of COVID-19,
although it didn't stop it. And this interest would have been achieved less effectively absent key to New York
City, which again is untrue. The program was reasonably tailored to the challenge of preventing the
spread of COVID-19 by incentivizing vaccination. Again, win some, we lose some. We're talking about
marocodytis. People are, the headlines are out there. It's on people's minds. But then some of these
court cases, there was a lot of wins that we celebrated, but some of them ended up like this.
And why are we talking about all of this? I'll tell you why, because during that whole time,
not only did we have an uphill battle against legacy media and trying to get this narrative out
against full censorship, we were called domestic terrorists. Remember this, February 7, 2022,
summary of terrorism threat to the U.S. Homeland. This is the Department of Homeland Security. And it says
the proliferation of false and misleading narratives, which so discord or undermine public,
trust in U.S. government institutions. For example, there's widespread online proliferation of false or
misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19. What about COVID-19?
Just the word COVID-19? Well, it was stuff we were talking about. Marocarditis, thrombosis. And what did that
lead to? And death rates below 1%, things like that. Yes. And so the agency, the CESA agency,
This is a cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency.
We reported on them before and what happened.
They were an agency that was monitoring foreign threats to the homeland.
This is under Department of Homeland Security.
Then they moved to election meddling.
And then they kept going and they moved into the COVID-19, the health space.
And then they moved into just online information.
And at that point, you're getting, you started to see this rise of this homeland security,
digital structure and headlines like this, cyber agency beefing up disinformation and misinformation
team, and this is the head, Jen Easterly, she says this in the article.
One could argue we're in the business of critical infrastructure, and the most critical
infrastructure is our cognitive infrastructure.
So building this resilience to misinformation and disinformation, I think, is incredibly important.
Dell, they own your mind.
That's what they're saying.
We think your mind is our job to keep safe.
your cognitive infrastructure.
So we're going to roll this out.
Well, there's just been recently a U.S.
Representatives' in-term staff report
on the weaponization of government.
And they look directly at CISA,
this agency, and all of the
techniques they were using during those years
that we're talking about here.
And this is some of the highlights.
They say this in the report.
CISA moved its censorship operation
to the CISA-funded nonprofit
after CISA and the Biden administration
were sued in federal court.
was Missouri versus Biden case. Implicitly admitting that its censorship activities were unconstitutional.
Then it goes on and it shows an update and this is what it says here. This is a meetings for one of
their meetings and it says subcommittee members return to the recommendation for CSA to amplify
trusted information and discuss designated a point of contact as a clearinghouse for trusted
information. Ms. Spalding and Ms. Hale suggested designating the Isaacs as a clearinghouse for
information to avoid the appearance of government propaganda.
Wow.
So they're saying, we're doing government propaganda.
We're doing it.
How do we avoid?
Just hide it.
Just mask it.
Make it look pretty.
Put some lipstick on it.
Right.
And again, that Isaacs is a nonprofit, the information sharing and analysis center, this is a
nonprofit place.
They're saying, can we, look, we're getting sued.
Can we just dump all our dirty laundry on this nonprofit so it doesn't come out in the court
case?
So that is the bludgeon they use to try to really beat back the truth.
During this pandemic, during this, what we're told was this emergency.
