The Highwire with Del Bigtree - COVID RELAPSE

Episode Date: July 22, 2022

Big Success At Freedom Fest; Masters of The Covid Disaster; Mask Mandates Signal Covid Relapse; Exodus at CDC, NIH; Unvaxxed Woman Wins Fight for Transplant; Have You Been Chosen?Guests: Leilani Lutali, Jaimee FougnerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world,

it's time for us all to step out onto the high wire. Boy, it feels good to have Terra firma here again under my fingers while I say that. Of course, we're all recovering from just an amazing trip last week. If you're watching the High Wire, you know we were in Las Vegas for Freedom Fest. It was an outstanding experience all the way around. You know, we had the whole team flew our whole set out there with a few tweaks, a different desk. But I just, my team did such an amazing job putting it all together. Then I had the opportunity to give multiple talks.

This is one of them where I talked about, you know, the lies around the vaccine and around Ivermectin and talk to media, which was amazing. I mean, the whole event, just to really get to places we hadn't been before, to new hearts and minds. And I will tell you, this panel may ultimately be a game changer. I think it was one of the best panels I've ever been involved with, and many at the conference says it was the best thing there. Robert Malone, Pierre Corey, Erso opened up. We were in the zone. It's all I can say.

Like, sometimes panels are a little clumsy. This was nailed to the wall. Hopefully we'll have an opportunity to show that whole thing to you in the future. But I will say this. While we were doing that panel, like at the beginning of it, I asked the audience, and I think this is critical to know. You know, I started out thinking, you know, who are we here? We went to Freedom Fest, which is really a liberal,

authoritarian conference to reach new eyes and ears and hearts and minds with our message about science and the need for transparency and science. So stepping out from that audience for that panel, I didn't really know where we're at. So the first questions I asked was, you know, how many of you among you used hydroxychloroquine during this COVID crisis? And I would say, you know, five to 10 percent actually raised their hands. And I said, how many of you used ivermectin? And I was shocked to find, I would say that was probably about 40% of the audience raised their hands, which is really cool. And then I said, you know, how many of you got the vaccine for COVID? And over half of the audience raised their hands. I said, well, I think this would be very interesting to you. I say this because

obviously with those players, Malone, Pierre-Core, Urso, this was not going to be a pro-vaccine space. But one of the brilliant things I asked Malone, as many of you know that watched them on our show, did you get the vaccine? He said, yes. I will say this, that as we, laid out all the issues around this vaccine, the denial of Ivermectin, no one in that audience left. In fact, as the conference, as the panel went on, more and more people filled the room, which says to me, honestly, we're in a much different space now. For those of you that have been afraid of this conversation, I will tell you out of this experience that what I saw is people that had the vaccine started to take notes and saying, you know what? And coming up to me and saying,

you know, I wasn't happy about what I heard. It wasn't really what I was planning. planning on hearing, but I know I needed to hear that. We, this is a moment. This is a real transitional moment that we felt in Vegas where I think there are more and of us that are now recognizing the lives that have taken place. We're coming from all sides of the aisle that was once pro-vaccine, anti-vax, vaccine, vaccine, whatever you want to call it. We're all now recognizing that the truth is what's the most important.

So it was such an amazing event. You know, I think the Malone and Corey and Urso panel might have been the highlight, but, you know, another serious highlight was getting to go to the Rand Paul luncheon. This was spectacular. Rand Paul spoke several times, but very candidly in front of a small group. And I had the opportunity to not only sit at this table, but really have some solid conversation with the guy that we've been celebrating here on the high wire. So in many ways, that's a bucket list moment right there that I hope will lead to, you know, more understanding as we talk to more and more politicians about this issue. And of course, you know, as you know, I had to get out onto an actual high wire.

This was the final attempt with my shirt and tie on. Those of you know, I did it in a short sleeve shirt first. And then my executive producer called said she didn't like the short sleeves. So I had to attempt it again. What you didn't see in this video, the true behind the scenes, is I fell like three times with the shirt and tie on off the wire. In fact, I was making it, like the first time I was like made it halfway fell, then a quarter of the way, then an eighth, I was moving the wrong direction. It was so hot. I was thinking to myself,

if I don't make it this next time, there it is. Somebody captured their phone. It was 111 degrees in that moment. And maybe you remember, when I'm getting the call, I have to do it again, that this is, you know,

the attitude of my executive producer, Jen, as she walked to finally meet us. Hey guys. Hey. It's hot out here. Yeah, it is. Obviously, she noticed it was hot out there. It was 111 degrees.

and not to really joke about it, our producer on that was there working on this and one of our lead camera ops ended up being carted off to urgent care. This is Stephanie. Our hero, Stephanie has always put it out for the team. She had, she got heat stroke. I looked across at her. She was starting to stagger. It wasn't looking very good.

We rushed her to urgent care. I only say this to say that not only do I step out on the high wire, do I put it all in the line, The people that work on this show, that bring this to you every week, they really put it on the line, even putting their own health aside sometimes to get the shot, to get it done so that we can get the truth out to the people. I just want to take this opportunity to say for those of you that support the high wire, I want to be so clear on how important it is how we make the high wire work. We are not sponsored by anybody, any sponsor. It doesn't matter if it's people that might seem like they're on our. side like a vitamin company. Here's what would happen if I have a vitamin company that wants to advertise on our show. They'll call me, say, Del, you're doing a lot of talk about

ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. Those are actually drugs. We don't like that you're talking about monoclonal antibodies. Now look, I use vitamins for the major part of what I do. And we've talked about vitamins, but as soon as you bring in different, you know, companies, they're going to have attitudes about what is being spoken about. Doesn't matter what side of the course drug companies would tell us we can't talk about vitamins or all the other things. I don't want any of that. We want to be completely free. This is a space where you get to see the news totally unadulterated by agendas and financial interests. The only interest here is the truth, which I think is becoming one of the most rare precious metals on this planet. Truth is really a commodity we have to

protect here and you're making that happen. But I want you to imagine what it cost to bring our whole team, an entire set, all of our lights, get it into the middle of the entire event center there, and then put this production on in front of everybody. Why is it important? Because that reached a brand new set of eyes and ears, and we are now moving. We're now in conversations with entities that have never really discussed this topic that are now saying, we're going to watch the Highwire Dell. We'd like to work with you further.

All of that, you are making possible. when you're a sponsor for the high wire. So what you think, I mean, it's so important to recognize that it's just not one thing you're part of. You're not just making this incredible show happen. You are funding those lawsuits that are winning, including the case, the minor consent for vaccination in Washington, D.C., all of these cases

against government health agencies that we've won, all of that being funded. But here's another place that you don't normally think about. You gave us the opportunity to cast a wide fish net off the side of a boat. We've never gone off of to grab a whole new school of hearts and minds, the fish, if you will, that are going to get us to the future. Everything we do here is not just, as I've said, preaching to the choir.

I really feel that what we're here to do is to enroll as many people as we can. We need the world to shift on this. And so hopefully you recognize that we're achieving that through these efforts. And you're also learning how you can reach out to those loved ones around you and start helping them shift and understand what can be somewhat complicated, but really, if broken down, a lot of that we're going to do today, we're going to go through, for those of you, they're brand new, they're joining us from Freedom Fest.

You're about to watch the Highwire what we do. And remember, if you are just joining us now, one of the most important things you can do is sign up to our newsletter. If you're watching on our website right now at thehighwire.com, just scroll down to page and become a member of our newsletter. It doesn't cost you anything. Become a Highwire Insider. This is important because all the science we're going to show you today, all the videos

we're going to show you today, they're going to arrive in your inbox, in your email, as a hyperlink where you just click on it and you can go right to those sites. You can read the articles and the journals and the studies we're going to be talking about because the entire purpose of the high wire is to be as transparent as absolutely possible. We call it the high wire protocol, which is we put our evidence in your hands. I don't ever want to hear you just trust, well, I just trust the, experts on Dell's show. No, don't trust any experts. I don't even want you to trust me implicitly. What I want you to do is say that's very interesting, Dell, but I want to read where that

came from. We have to obviously grab certain paragraphs out of these studies, so in essence, it's cherry-pig. We're choosing what we want you to see, but then we're handing you the whole study so you can read the whole thing yourself so that you are fully informed. That's why our nonprofit is called the informed consent action network. We are fighting for a public citizenry that is fully informed. So on that note, a really interesting video took place. Last week, we shared with you that Deborah Birx is now admitting that, yeah, I mean, it really was ultimately just wishful thinking or hope that the vaccine would be affected,

but we had no way of knowing. Our studies weren't even looking at the sort of long-term effects or ability to stop the virus. So all of that is coming clear. And remember, from the very beginning of the highway, our biggest frustration is why is no one asking Anthony Fauci the obvious questions. Where is your data coming from? How can you prove that there's asymptomatic carriers? You know, what is the actual death rate,

something that they have never, ever stated on any one of the side shows or the CNN and the MSMECs, but in playing these White House press conferences, why has no one stayed in the obvious? And they will never put themselves in front of a question. Well, one of the big kingpins of this entire disastrous approach to a virus called coronavirus over the last two years was obviously Matt Hancock, who is the former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care in England. Remember, this is the guy

that really celebrated the imperial model by Neil Ferguson that predicted these outrageous death rates. Two million people are going to die in America and, you know, hundreds of thousands in the UK. And so it was just all based on, you know, whatever, fantasy. And so finally, just this last week, a video came out where a citizen journalist got into a room where Matt Hancock said that he wanted to take some questions. I think this is very important for all of us, because remember, we never get to ask these questions. We never got to know where their evidence was coming from and why this was happening. This is a little bit of a long video, but honestly, this is what the high wire has been about from the beginning. All of

this we knew to be true. Why is it that no one was allowed to talk about it? This is Matt Hancock talking to a small group of people and luckily one of our own got on the inside. You're going to find this fascinating. You know, it is worth touching on, I don't know whether we were going to come to this, that we did end up in a tangle a couple of times in the stats agencies. And the, you know, to a degree that was, that was, a lot of that was quite unfair because they approached as if we had a classic 40-year-long data series and the accusation which was false was that we're playing fast and loose with it. The truth was we were short of data and the measurability of some of that data was really, really tough as in the accuracy of the data.

I don't mean that in a benevolent sense, just the ability to match the data we were publishing to the truth of what was going on on the ground. The questions I'd really like to answer are the things where you think that what I've said is rubbish. Do we have any questions from the floor? The entire principles you've started with the lockdowns with, the motions with, were based effectively on an unproven, at least at that time, a totally unproven argument that asymptomatic infection was a significant factor driving transmission. and there was no evidence for that whatsoever. The only evidence was based upon one German woman,

so one Chinese woman in Germany, who was taking large amounts of hyper-proofing in order to prevent her from her from the symptoms. Now, I'm not saying that pre-symptomatic people who were just becoming ill couldn't transmit, at least in that first phase, but there was actually no evidence backing that up. Second point, there's a couple of points,

so if you don't want, I'll put them all together so you can tie them up. The lockdown, you mentioned the lockdown measures and the forecasts. Neil Ferguson, because you said there wasn't 40 years of data, Neil Ferguson has been working on forecasting for decades, and the fact that the matter is, all his epidemiological forecasts have been wrong, every single one of them,

and not by a factor of one or two, but by a factor of 10 or 20 or 30 or 40, BSC, swine flu, bird flu, you name it, every single case, he was vastly incorrect. And the argument that there would have been 500,000 K dead, had there not been a lockdown, has no basis in fact. It's pure speculation. But because you can compare it with other countries around the world, and you can see, for example, in Sweden or even North Korea now, for God's sake, or Belarus, or anywhere else in Africa, there's no evidence whatsoever that the lockdowns made any difference in a beneficial difference to the number of deaths.

And there's a just a citation for that. John E.Nedis, the leading epidemiologist in the world, along with many other experts, were banned from being on the YouTube and Facebook. And they were slandered and denigrated. And the government ministers should be protecting free speech. I was arrested six times for trying to defend free speech. So why don't you defend free speech and democracy in science? So the second point you make, sir, kind of demonstrates exactly what I was saying earlier, which is that making forecasts is hard, right?

And making forecasts of what would happen if you did nothing and then doing something and the forecast not coming true does not disprove the foreshould. But now we know. Hold on. I'm answering the question. Thank you. So in a way, your question has demonstrated why. it's really hard to communicate this stuff in the public now.

The second point on asymptomatic transmission is really important, and maybe I should have brought itself as a different example. There was not the formal evidence of asymptomatic transmission on a clinical trial basis, and therefore it didn't get into the formal advice to me, but we knew that there were a lot of stories of it happening. What peer-reviewed documents proved it? What peer-reviewed documents? Well, we were locked out home for two years, yeah.

We got a right to ask the... Were the Minister responsible? I'll handle it. Mr. Sir, you've had your say. This session is about how we measure these things better in future. Well, you ask for criticism? No, I'm afraid I'm not going to take anything further from you. Okay, okay.

Because you've had your saying, you've asked your questions, two of them. I've just answered one, and I was halfway through answering the second, when you started talking again. The science, yeah. That's enough, thank you. You've had your questions. I'm now going to complete answering them, then I'm going to go on to other people.

Asymptomatic transmission is a classic example of that middle group of problems, right? It was really important that we found out whether there was asymptomatic transmission or not, and it didn't become a formal finding until the start of April. Yet we were worried about it happening before that. And so making decisions in the face of that uncertainty was

one of the challenges. I'm sorry, what was the evidential paper that showed that? What was the paper that showed that? What paper showed that? He just said he was provided with that evidence in April. What paper showed it? That unfortunately has all we've got time for because you need to move on to the next stage. But Matt, thank you so much for joining us. Well, if nothing less, and it's certainly a good case of careful what you wish for, of course, Matt Hancock's saying, I really just want to get questions from somebody that thinks what I've said is full of rubbish.

And then what he gives is an answer is total rubbish. I mean, and really it's the question that we all need to be asking ourselves and, frankly, was not answered there, which is this entire idea of an asymptomatic carrier being the one spreading the virus would have been brand new. This would be one of the first viruses that this would be. was ever recognized as a serious issue. In fact, you have to say it was a manufactured concept. And so what he was saying early on is,

we didn't have any data to prove what we were doing. We just had an idea that maybe this was possible. And then, you know, so this asymptomatic is why we're all locked down. Because every other time we deal with the virus, whether it was polio or smallpox, or no matter how awful, what we do is take symptomatic people and we quarantine them. And those that were directly around the symptomatic people, sometimes a serious disease, right there.

But you never took all the population that are walking around healthy, breathing, fine, and say, you know what, you're a danger to society. We need to wrap your face and cloth so that you cannot breathe the air and you gotta lock you in the house. And by the way, we're gonna take your job away, your place of business.

We did this in the United States of America, in the UK, places where we have democracies and republics, where we're supposed to be in control of our own lives. They destroyed the world we lived in based on a false assumption an asymptomatic carrier being problematic. And by the way, there are headlines that have pointed out.

We've now seen studies that show that asymptomatic were fears about asymptomatic COVID spread overblown and infected people without symptoms are two-thirds less likely to pass virus on study finds. I mean, these are everywhere now. So the guy's asking you a perfectly good question. He's saying, where's this study you're talking about? I mean, okay, you just said you wanted to answer a hard question. You said sometime in April there was a study that showed you were right about asymptomatic,

Because I'd like to see that too. The high wire would like to see that study. What are you talking about? And by the way, never provides it. The guy even follows him out the door. Never says, let me get your number. Let me get a secretary. I don't remember the name of it.

Can someone give me the name? It's all total and complete baloney. We watch this with Deborah Birx. Folks, you've got to start recognizing these are government officials that literally had the ability to take our lives away and they can't even explain or point to data

after it's all over. They still have a. no data to show you. And speaking of Neil Ferguson, this guy makes such a great point. Do you realize the United States of America followed this buffoon? This buffoon, professor of Imperial College, impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 mortality and health care demand. I mean, this was all the stuff that they were putting out their deaths in the population, but there's a great article that came out sort of showing all the mistakes this guy's made. And I want to discuss that because that's what the gentleman asked the question.

for lockdown, model resigns in disgrace. Well, he resigned because while he was locking everybody else down, he got caught not locked down, actually sleeping in another man's wife's bed. For what it's worth, I don't care what you think about that, but he has bigger problems than that, the fact that he really sucks at his job. In fact, his history has been to overblow situations that affect people's lives. Ferguson has been wrong so often that some of his fellow modelers call him the master of disaster. disaster.

Ferguson was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of 11 million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease. A total disaster. Charlotte Reed, a farmer's neighbor, recalls, I remember that appalling times. Sheep were left starving in fields near us, then came the open air slaughter, the poor animals were panic-stricken. It was one of the worst things I've ever witnessed and all based on a model. Ifs, buts, and maybes.

It proved to be ridiculous. In 2002, Ferguson predicted that by 2080, up to 150,000 people could die from exposure to mad cow disease, the BSE issue in beef. In the UK, there were only 177 deaths from BSE. In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009. And then in 2009, a government estimate based on Ferguson's advice said a reasonable worst-case scenario was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths.

In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the UK. Remember, swine flu was a disastrous vaccine. They pulled that from the shelves. That was a whole mess put together by Neil Ferguson's. Imperial model could be the most devastating software mistake of all times. You got attacked and criticized by all of his fellow, fellow, um, epigestion. geneticists and all of these people doing the math. What is it? Epidemiologists, that was the word I was trying to come to. So look, here's the point. Here's the point. It's a really good question to be

asking. Why is it? Does the UK keep going to the one man who is a disaster when it comes to predictions? Has been overblowing it every single time. And by the way, Matt, you know, Hancock says, I'm going to answer you two questions. There were three questions, and the third one was the most important. If, as you have stated clearly, as Deborah Burke said, you really don't know that the data is all speculation and a bunch of hypotheticals, ifs, ands, or buts, that you are using wishful thinking

and you're now trying to get some sympathy for what it was like to have to make these decisions without any really decent data. The biggest question is this. Why were you censoring then? Why were you shutting off all of the great epidemiologists like John E. Anini's who was brought up by this reporter, who has never failed. He is literally one of the most impeccable epidemiologists we have in the world that was saying the opposite of what Neil Fergus was saying. He's written several papers, yet this guy is banned every time he posts one of his studies on YouTube or Facebook.

It's yanked. He's never on CNN. He's never on the BBC. Neither is Sinatra Gupta, which is right down the road at Oxford, who is the header of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, all of their statements. Martin Koldorf, Dr. J. Batacharya, everything they've said now is like a time capsule, like wrapped in gold because they were dead right that the biggest issues were going to be from the lockdown. The biggest hardships would be the lockdown. Far worse than the virus, we now know that to be true. All it is to be said that I want to say, I told you so.

I told you we would eventually be here. Yes, sure, I suppose it was a bit of a gamble that we always just seemed to be coming down the exact opposite side of our own government in the United States of Tony Fauci and Deborah Birx and all these people in the White House. But it was because we were reading the science. We actually know how to read.

We weren't trusting experts, which is what apparently the news agencies around the world, like New York Times and Washington Post and BBC, as long as Anthony Fauci says it, It must be true as long as Deborah Burke says it, oh, well, then it must be true. Only now we know it wasn't true, that they were speculating and guessing and shutting down the people that in the end were the ones that were right the whole time. And now we have laws all across the United States of America and around the world that

seek to take away licenses from doctors that go against the Deborah Berks's and the Matt Hancock's of their government. If you go against the government, then your license needs to be. taken away. Do you see how utterly terrifying that is? Even now that they're admitting they were all dead wrong, we're all supposed to be being held hostage by their words. There's a lot of work to do here, folks, but while they're rolling in it and now they're admitting to it and they're eating crow, let's make sure they eat the whole damn crow, shall we, so that we never do this again. All right, we have a huge show coming up, lots of science coming away to discuss a lot of the

policies that are out there about what the vaccine did and did not do, what masks do and do not do? And are we sort of sliding right back in to that same dark hole we have finally recovered from? We're going to talk about all that with Jeffrey Jackson coming up right now. All right, Jeffrey. Did you get some sleep after Vegas? I mean, that was such an amazing time, wasn't it? Just catching up right now. Just catching up. What do you have for us this week?

Well, if, Del, if you people watching are living in L.A., they probably already know what I'm about to say. But for everybody else, take this as a warning, this headline. It's July 2022 and masks are likely coming back indoors in Los Angeles. It says here, Los Angeles County officials have mandated indoor masking requiring face coverings at indoor restaurants, bars, cafes, and businesses as a measure that will return as soon as July 29 if community transmission and hospitalizations. do not improve. So it's not, it's kind of a headline that's a little deceiving. It's not happening. They're announcing it's going to happen on July 29th if these hospitalizations do not come down. Now, going a little bit south down to San Diego, they're already putting masks back on kids in

San Diego Unified School District. And this is the headline here. Masks are now required indoors at San Diego Unified School District, schools and offices. Now, this is already affecting kids because kids are in summer school. And they're obviously keep they're going to try to keep this on for the push going back into school for fall. Now, one of their board presidents, the board trustee, Sharon Whitehurst Payne, she was on a local San Diego interview, a news station there. And she was asked by the interviewer if kids who don't feel comfortable putting masks on, what should they do? Take a listen to what she had to say. Parents who don't want to wear a mask indoors in school. Are there any other options for them?

For the fall, there are some options. They can go to our school that's online. They can opt not to return to the regular school, but to go to the school where they don't have to go to school at all other than via Zoom. And that's the easiest way for folks. What about the summer school? What if they were already enrolled in the summer school

and now they get this mask mandate and they're not comfortable with wearing a mask? They really should wear the mask. But if they're not comfortable, what should they do? They should just make it know that they don't feel comfortable and at that point, just not return. I can't. I'm sure I'm not the only one whose blood is boiling right now

when you listen to that. And I just want to say, can you imagine, I mean, some of this has got to me on purpose. Can you imagine a generation of children that whether they liked it or not had to cover their smiling faces, had to suck in, you know, their own exhumant, that they're exhaling out,

they're no matter under whatever protest. In fact, we hear about how they're sent out in the hall or the denied recess if they're caught pulling their masks down too many times. The level of compliance and drones that are being created by our school systems through this type of effort, and I know you're going to get into how it's just not even scientifically based, but the human spirit, what they're doing to these children, that generation will be so malleable and pliable to whatever political system

wants to run their lives. It's incredible. It's so terrifying. I can see this in China fine, but here in the United States of America, anybody pushing this with the science we now know should be arrested as far as I'm concerned. This is an abomination. I want to say, I just want to give a shout out right now because here in Texas, we've been really good on this. But my wife, you know, we worked as soon as this started happening in schools,

my wife went and built a homeschool co-op with several parents where we brought in teachers. We kept the education going. But our kids never saw a mask on their face. There are ways through this. We stood against it even when that was here in Texas. Texas and we all have to stay. We've got to start creating these environments that allow our children to be children and allow them to have, you know, an inner instinct and intuition and the ability to say, no, I don't like this. And I'm not doing it. I can't imagine the generations, but those of us that are protecting our kids right now, you're looking at the future leaders of the world, no doubt, because I can't imagine these kids that have just learned to comply what they're going to turn into. And that statement by her that we just listened to was shockingly ignorant and reckless. It's one thing about the masks.

And we're going to cover this in just a moment about the science, the growing body of science that masks are really inefficient. But to keep kids out of school, this is not debatable at this point, the damage that has caused. So when she says, don't come back, absolutely reckless and shockingly ignorant. It keeps running through my mind. So keep in mind, Los Angeles County, San Diego Unified School District. They're looking at hospitalizations and they're looking at cases.

And there is an internal briefing by LAC plus USCS, L.A. County and University of Southern California, that's a medical system, gigantic medical system in California, internal briefing by some of their leaders about what they're seeing on the COVID side. This was on July 14th, right before these announcements of masking came in. Listen to this. I was talking about the weather continued blankety blankiness. It's just the same. It's not changed. It's been the same. It's like two months of the same. You can see county-wide numbers with the top graph. It's just, you know, it's like plateaued and it's not going down. It's sort of trickle up a little, but really not much. It's just been like that. And we're getting thousands of cases per week across the county. The numbers at LAC COVID positive tests have continued to go up. But this isn't because we're seeing.

a ton of people with symptomatic disease getting admitted if you go to the bottom graph, it's the same thing. We're seeing a lot of people with mild disease and urgent care or ED who go home and do not get admitted. And of those who are admitted, they're 90% of the time not admitted due to COVID. Only 10% of our COVID positive admissions are admitted due to COVID. Virtually none of them go to the ICU. And when they do go to the ICU, it is not for pneumonia. They are not intubated.

They are not these horrible 100% FIOT. We haven't seen one of those since February. I mean, that is really such critical information. It just shows you, you know, why aren't these people in the same room? Why is the information not penetrating this agenda-driven administration in San Diego and in Los Angeles and, of course, Sacramento?

I want to make a statement here because there is, you know, on this show, we present a lot of different science and a lot of different perspectives. And this kind of came up. This is the sort of discussion about the BA4, BA5 variant that seems to be more infectious than Omicron. I keep seeing the little ticker from the CDC showing that more and more the country is in a high level of infection. But let's be clear. They've already stated we're going to have to learn to live with this. We're going to talk about why the vaccine is the cause for this continued rise in infection rates. But there was something that happened last week in a video Robert Malone had stated before at the state capital here in Texas in the video we played He said look I was wrong about this and so was Geert van den Bosch talking about the BA 4 BA5 variant And a lot of people wrote into our show and in fact Geert van and Bosch I think is a little bit frustrated

Saying we're undermining what he thinks is really important he still believes that this virus is driving A mutant there or an escape mutant that could ultimately be very very very problematic for the world. So let me just clarify because we have a lot more conversations off screen. What Robert Malone is saying is that he is not down with fear porn. He wrote a whole article about, we talked about it, that we shouldn't be running around alarmist and in fear, because that just puts the government back in control of our lives. And what I think he's saying is something we have to recognize, the BA4-5, which is clearly more infectious. It's, you know, it's very, it's really, we have a high-level infection, but we're not being hospitalized and we're

not dying, then there's no reason to be creating a level of fear that allows them to say, see, now we got to mask you, now we got to do all these other things. And so I want to say that, you know, though it may come across, they're like, whoa, are you against Geert now? I think all of these guys are right at different times and in different focused perspectives of the conversations we're having. We will continue to bring Geert Van den Bosch on to share with us how he thinks the virus is mutating advancing. We'll continue to have Malone that will challenge that at times, sometimes agree. what science is. I want to make this clear over and over again. We are not an agenda driving network here. We are seeking the truth like you should be. We are asking the questions of all the

best. And by the way, that's how science works. Rarely do they agree. In fact, when they're all in lockstep agreement and they're censoring somebody that's not in agreement, that's the moment you should get really terrified about what's going on. And so I want to clarify that because a lot of people have written in. I think BA4 or 5 does not prove to be this deadly, long infection variant that we've announced it could be. Doesn't mean there's not one in the future, but right now, I think Malone's making the point. Let's not turn this into fear porn from our side.

And both of those gentlemen are prolific writers. Malone at his substack and Vanne Bosch, he has his own website. And they put out tons of information. So if you wanna stay up to speed on that, we obviously cover this on the show. We have them on, but check out their websites too. Those doctors at LA County, USC said three huge pillar pieces

that we've covered on this show to drive home. And it happens so fast. One, they said that only 10% of the people coming were for COVID. Now, we've covered this before. This has been, this is really the epidemic. Was people coming in with like a broken toe or a sprained ankle, they get tested and go,

oh, you have COVID. All of a sudden, that's in the case rates. These people aren't seeking in hospital. That's a hospital driven test. Like in the hospital, hospital says tested positive. Right, got it. Yes.

And this was driving up children hospitalizations early on when they were really drumming up support for the vaccine. they came out and said, well, it's not the case. And then we knew the Omicron variant was infectious, but it was not putting people on ventilators. It was actually, you know, a couple articles are calling it nature's vaccine. So these people are getting, you know, so to speak, probably really great natural immunity. So just wanted to add those pieces in there. But this is not a California phenomenon with this masking. In Germany, they're trying the same thing. But it's even

crazier. Listen to this headline. It's not a politico. COVID mask will return in Germany, says justice minister, says in the article, while the summer COVID-19 wave, was flattening, the government was preparing a response for an onslaught in the fall and winter, which it would present to Parliament for legislative approval in September. So really read that sentence there. More crystal ball silence there, right. Yeah. Cases are going down, but we're going to vote on legislation in September because we think they're going to go up in fall and winter. Okay. But one of the things here, we have a great new mask study that's adding to this, this just breadth of mass studies we already have here. And this was.

out of North Dakota. If you want to look this up, it's called Association between School Masked Mandates and SARS-CoV-2 student infections, evidence from a natural experiment of neighboring K through 12 districts in North Dakota. So you had these two districts, Fargo and West Fargo, right next to each other.

One had a mask mandate, one didn't. And this is what the authors found. We observed no significant difference between student case rates while the districts had differing mass policies, nor while they had the same mask policies. The IRRs, that's incident rate ratio, that's cases, across the two periods were also not significantly different.

Our findings contribute to a growing body of literature which suggests school-based mask mandates have limited to no impact on the case rates of COVID-19 among K-12 students. And this is, you know, this is a lot. We read a lot, we show a lot of science on this show. So let's just go to the charts. This is sometimes just conveys the information even better.

So this is the chart here, Fargo v. West Fargo. Now that black line are the masked students. This is the weekly percentage of students testing positive. And you see it kind of chrises and crosses from September, first of September, all the way to December. And then a big spike. That's the Omicron surge. And you notice the black line, those are the masked kids. They had a harder time.

They had more cases in that cohort than the unmasked students at the school. And then they both went down at a similar rate. And then just to show you the rates that were found in here, here's a bar graph. This is basically similar rates of COVID case infections, the IRR rates, incident rates. Wow. It's basically the same between the schools. almost no difference. So that's what we're looking at here. But okay, so we're showing masks might not work against COVID, but there's another issue we have here. We have these

masks. We're wearing them daily, weekly, they're in our cars, they're stuffed in our purses. What is that doing? They can't be that clean. You can't tell me these things are clean. Well, a study for looking at volunteers in Japan is finding some really interesting information. So this is the study here, bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic. So they looked at these things, and they also took into account people, how they, how they use transportation. Are they on buses? Are they in trains?

Are they in their own private? And then personal hygiene. Do they gargle when they get home? All of this. And this is what they found. They write, we found several pathogenic microbes, bacillus sereris, staphylococcus, saffrophicus, Aspergillus, microsp. We also found no association of mask-attached microbes with the transportation methods or garcinoccus.

We propose that immunocompromise people should avoid repeated use of prevent microbial infection. Absolutely incredible. And just to drive this point home, we have an image from the study. They cultured all of these fungal cultures and bacterial cultures, and this is what they found here, just a huge amount of them. But you look across the top and it says pathogenicity. These are things that are pathogenic to humans, really not good to have on your mask. That's why they say if you're immunocompromise, you want to really keep replacing your mask. in your mask because all of those things with pluses, one, two, three, four, five, six pluses

are all pathogenic hanging around on these masks. It's really amazing. It's like the worst things, the worst pathogenic ones are the ones the most alike. 38%, 30% of people had this in their masks. I mean, this isn't just like some slight issue. It's that those are huge, terrifying numbers that we're doing to ourselves. And then you think about, you know, when you have a waiter that keeps pulling it down to talk to you and touching it, touching it, touching the pet, touching the check,

they're handing to you, touching the table, all the people putting their mask on the table. I mean, this whole thing is so disgusting. I've said, I want to do a video where we just do the same thing with underwear. Take it off, hanging around your mirror, put it back on, take it off, put it on the table in the dining room, you know, put them back on. It's the same thing, right? We know this for a fact, this is not healthy, and forget about, these are adults doing that. You imagine what the kids are doing with these masks?

My God, this is so stupid. So we're looking at this like 10,000 foot view, and it appears that the masks are trying to come back in here. And one of those data points is the renewal of the public health emergency. This was by HHS Secretary Javier Bacera. And this is it right here. This is right off their website, HHS.gov. And again, this isn't just once or twice. This is the 11th time, by my count, this thing has been renewed.

And, you know, what this does is people are asking, well, why is this renewed? Well, it does a lot of things in the back end with Medicaid. It keeps people enrolled. There's a lot of access or further access to telemedicine. But one of the big things it does is it keeps those emergency use authorization products like vaccines on the market. If this emergency was not renewed, everything under EUA is gone that day. What does that mean? What does that mean?

What does that mean? Safety trials to get approved and all of those things. So what would that leave us? Do we get a chance to look into that? Yeah. What does that leave us? If EUA, you know, goes away, who is getting, who gets the COVID vaccine and who doesn't at that point? So we have only two vaccines in the market if EUA goes away.

We have Pfizer's vaccine, which is the marketing one is called commonarity. And that's for 12 years and older. So they'll get a vaccine. And Moderna's, it's called Spike Vax. That's for 18 years and older. Everything else, forget about boosters, forget about kids vaccines, forget about infants off the table. Those are all EUA currently. So we have two vaccines, basically for 12 and 18 years of Boulder, respectively.

So while they're telling you to learn to live with it, this has been a disaster. The virus is never going away. We need to stay in a constant state of emergencies so that we never have to do a proper safety test, is what they're essentially saying. And we can just tell you the vaccine's great, even though we have no proof to prove that, like Matt Hancock said, just running on no data and a bunch of wishful thinking. And anyone that speaks out against us should lose their license or be censored. It's great world. Those are very important dimensions of this extension.

Yeah, it's great. Luckily, so many of you are watching this show now and waking up. It's great. Well, some of the other people that are not happy about this and the masking are Governor Ron DeSantis. He's out of Florida. He's been very vocal lately on anything that looks like it's going to go back into an unscientific pandemic response.

Here was him on Twitter. He said, forced masking is back in California. Leftist states cannot help themselves. They're philosophically addicted to mandates and restrictions. In Florida, we know what freedom looks like, and this isn't it. We will never allow the left to cease power and impose mandates on Floridians. So I guess that's a little refreshing. If you're living in California, looking at Florida, seeing what they're doing there.

You know, that's probably why there's a big exodus to the places like Texas, like Florida, for a lot of people that lived in California like yourself. Yep. It's true. I mean, look, we didn't feel like when I travel to California, when I travel to these places like New York, I try to remind that audience, I know you're getting a... sense of what the world is, but you are living in a bubble here. There are places all over this country that are living freely and not locked down right now, not wearing masks, having perfectly

normal lives. So I would definitely recommend this. If you live in California, New York, these places, you see this all coming back, take a road trip, hop in a car, rent a car, get an RV and go out and check out the rest of the country and say, is there anywhere else I could live if I was allowed to be free? Right. And we run with a lot of stories here early on. We run with a lot of things that sometimes may not be fully developed yet because we sent something here. We see something in the data that's lining up that is truthful. And this was one of the stories now as it comes out in the mainstream, sometimes weeks, sometimes years later.

We have to do a flashback just to remind people that we did cover this. So in April in 2021, we covered this story. Take a look at this. Take a step back and see what we got here. In February, basically mid-February, we started to see these reports out of Israel because they were one of the first countries to really blanket their population with these Pfizer shot. It's in mid-February. Some vaccinated Israeli women report irregular menstrual cycles bleeding. It says in here several Israeli women who received the coronavirus vaccine have posted on social media

in recent days that they had been experiencing irregular menstrual cycles and abnormal vaginal bleeding. The health minister received similar reports from 13 women saying their period came early, while others reported irregular bleeding between their menstrual periods. So this is such an interesting story because it's being driven by social media, people reporting on social media. Now remember, the COVID vaccine trials, all of them, they were not reporting this. They were not keeping track of any changes in cycles or menstruation. So people are having to take to social media to really talk about this because they are experiencing this.

So this was in the daily mail. I want to add is somewhat shocking because I remember what we did report is you weren't really allowed to be pregnant in any of these trials. And in fact, you weren't supposed to be having sexual intercourse during these trials. So there was something about fertility or, you know, germline transfer or things that we've talked about that had them concerns. So it's amazing that nowhere in the trials was a group actually watching, you know, the heart of fertility being, you know, menstruation and ovulation. Wow, yeah, I remember that. And there's so many people were writing to the show talking about this issue, people that were seeing, you know, all of these issues.

And, you know, it went a step further. A lot of people that weren't vaccinated, but had someone that just been vaccinated around them, suddenly they were having a shift in their menstrual cycle. But so is there new data coming out on this? There is, yeah, and so many stories. We all hear these stories. And just remember when we were hearing these stories early on, this is what the headlines were telling us.

No data on COVID vaccines to menstrual. changes, U.S. experts say. Here's another one. No, we don't know if vaccines change your period. And it goes on to say, so far there's no data linking the vaccines to changes in menstruation. Even if there is a connection, one unusual period is no cause for alarm. And then even Reuters here, here's a great headline. It's two pieces of unscientific data in one headline. Vaccines not linked to menstrual changes. COVID flu shots can go together. But we do have new data on this. And it started really in January of this year. The National Institutional, of Health did its own study on a U.S. cohort. And this was at their own website right here.

You can go to their own website and see this. COVID-19 vaccines linked a small increase in menstrual cycle length. And this is the study here, association between menstrual cycle length and coronavirus disease, 2019, vaccination. And what they did find was it wasn't quite a day. It was like 0.64 or something of a day plus or minus on the front end and the back end of the cycles. But one of the explanations was, well, it could be stress from the pandemic response. The lockdowns are really stressing people out. The stress has been known to change menstrual cycles and links of a period. So in their study, this is the NIH again, this is what they write.

Our results cannot be explained by generalized pandemic stress because our unvaccinated control groups saw no changes over a similar time period. very important piece of information there from that study and now this is the this is the big story really and that survey those those social media responses were actually collected a doctor outside the U.S. government did a survey a large survey of people and this is what she found in her colleagues this is the headline here I believe CBS News menstrual changes after COVID vaccines may be far more common than previously known so this is the new headline this is where it's at right now and this is the

study here investigating trends in those who experienced menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Now the real the big takeaway from this study that everybody's reporting on is this right here in this sample it says 42% of people with regular menstrual cycles bled more heavily than usual. Wow. Okay that's what we have here. Big big story. I believe 44% saw no change and then there was some people that were in neither neither category. But if you read into the article a little more this research study. This is what the mainstream is not reporting on. Among non-menstruating premenopausal respondents, 1,815 of them, on hormonal treatments, a majority 65.7% experience breakthrough bleeding after a vaccine.

And then this is another data point, super important, among postmenopausal people. So these, the period stopped. I believe in the study it was for 12 months or longer. No cycle. Among postmenopausal people who were not on any hormonal treatments, 238 of them. Breakthrough bleeding was reported by 66% of respondents. So they started bleeding again. And there's another chart. Again, if we're just looking at really the bombshell things that the mainstream should have reported on, this is a chart of some reproductive issues. We have endometriosis, fibroids, PCOS. And you can see all of these after the vaccination reported heavier bleeding every single one of these categories. So it appears from this study, this survey,

that reproductive issues are exacerbated by the vaccine. You know, and I suppose people that are brand new watching this today could be saying, so what, all right, so you have more bleeding. But the question that we try to ask ourselves is it's not normal. And what is it really leading us to understand? What do we know? I mean, we were told this vaccine goes into your arm, stays in your arm, the antibodies are made in the arm,

and therefore it doesn't affect any other parts of the system. When a vaccine that has nothing to do with your fertility starts affecting your, you know, fertility abilities or, you know, the part of your body that leads to fertility, we should really be alarmed. It's like, oh, well, yeah, we see that problem, but we're all moving on. And, you know, I know we've talked about the study where they showed, you know, where the vaccine went in the body. And this was it out of Japan. And what this ended up discussing and showed over time was that it went to your organs, it went to the brain. but one of the heaviest places this vaccine seems to land is right in the, I believe it is, total lipid concentration in the ovaries was through off the charts.

Just within hours, look at that, within the quarter of an hour, they're seeing it there. And by the end, 12.3, whatever the measurement is there, but was very high when we looked at all the other organs. So it's settling down in the ovaries, and then they start bleeding, even menopausal women. I'm sorry, we should be along. This is not where the vaccine should be. It's not supposed to be having anything to do with your ovaries. And so these are the types of things we've been reported. And by the way, I want to tell you folks what it's like to having been an Emmy Award-winning producer,

as Jen Sherry, my executive producer is from the doctors working for CBS. You know, when I read The New York Times and Washington Post and all these of The Guardian, they attack, I mean, you can't imagine what it's like to be the highway. We, enough of you are watching that they literally reach out to us to, like, berate us on our approach. all the time. So when we show you all these times where we were right and they were saying, oh, you know, fact check, this isn't correct, we're having to answer emails. I have to sit there and answer these fools and send them to science. Of course, they usually don't respond or write some article has nothing to do with my response, but it's just part of what you don't see,

this attack by stupid people trying to, you know, talk down to me and Jeffrey and all of us on this team. We're fine with it because there's a real power to knowing you're right. But just know that all that is taking place. And how many times do we get to come back here and drag New York Times through the mud and say, told you so again. Guess you got this one right, too. That's right. We're going to do it again.

And boy, they get hopping mad when you start showing some evidence of issues with the vaccine when it comes to fertility, reproduction, menstruation. Yeah. That's a really hot button topic. It's really interesting how they just launch out at that. But let's go on. So we're looking at the menstruation issues, but let's look at really that one, in my opinion, one of the biggest stories. They push through a vaccination in children and infants for the emergency use authorization.

It's been about a month now, and it's really getting some pushback here. And here's one of the headlines. This really kind of just drives at home. People are really thinking for themselves here. Parents are really innocent having this. This is CNN. About 300,000 children under five have received at least one COVID-19 shot, White House says. you look at that headline you think oh not bad it's a lot of kids but then it says this approximately

300,000 children under age five in the US about 2% of that age group have received at least one shot of COVID-19 vaccine since it was recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month so parents are not jumping up I mean this is this is such great news and I feel terrible for those 300,000 kids I believe you've been abused by your parents from their lack of understanding there it's a negligent act but truthfully, the fact that 98% of the children have avoided this, that the parents are waking up is a testament to the moment we now find ourselves in. It's really, really fantastic. And it shows that we're going to be having much different conversations

as we go into discussing childhood vaccine programs, the 1986 Act protections. These were all the conversations I was having with Rand Paul and several others in Vegas saying, look, the public is no longer supporting these things. We want transparency. want liability back on the industry. We want help getting back to a free market society that's based on freedom and personal choice. And so I'm telling you that there's ears opening up to all of this because so many people are now waking up to the truth. And so many people, including

us, couldn't believe they did it for the infants. Over the past year, we've reported on this, just to give people an idea of why only 2% of parents are really jumping at this, they have pushed the fear so hard in this child age group on the parents that it's backfired almost every time. So this is in 2021 December, it's the New York State Health Department. They issued a health advisory warning of an increase in pediatric hospitalizations associated with COVID-19. So you think that would be a big deal. Oh my gosh. New York State Health Department is doing this. And it says here, the risks of COVID-19 for children are real, says acting state health commissioner, Dr. Mary Bassett. We are alerting New Yorkers to this recent striking.

increase in pediatric COVID-19 admissions so that pediatrician parents and guardians can take urgent action to protect our youngest New Yorkers. So they're laying this groundwork, striking case increase. Oh my gosh, emergency, emergency. But then she comes out and she's called out during a public Q&A session at one of her events. Look at this. The numbers that we gave on pediatric admissions weren't intended to make it seem that children were having, you know, having a, an epidemic of infection. These were small numbers that we reported in our health alert. That was based on 50 hospitalizations and I've now given you some larger numbers, but there's still small numbers. It really is to motivate pediatricians and families

to seek the protection of vaccination. It's amazing how vulnerable you are in this country if you do not read, right? You can tell we put it in there. All this stuff ends up at the bottom of the list. Well, it was there. We said it was only 50 students, but we're really emphatic at the top where we know most of your doctors. Literally what's she's saying. Your doctor is so stupid that didn't matter. It was 50. We wanted to inspire them to vaccinate every kid or to mask every kid or to do what was necessary. And so for that, yeah, we were a little infatic and really made it sound like it's a lot when really it wasn't that much at all. I mean, it's really

it's amazing that she feels comfortable making that statement. We purposely used language to evoke a motion of fear so you get vaccinated or so you get the vaccine when it becomes available. I mean, it's exaggerating. Somebody even call it lying to do this, but they're not alone. The New York Times was caught too. And this was in the run-up to this vaccine. So a lot of parents that didn't read or physicians that didn't read between the headlines

or watch the show were thinking with this in their head. Maybe even people that voted on this thing if they had a chance to vote at ASIP, we're thinking there's an emergency. There's a striking increase in New York. I have to vote this vaccine through. So here's the New York Times. They said there was a huge hospitalization rate in kids, but they were caught too. This is right around the same time frame.

New York Times retracts massive exaggeration of children hospitalization by hospitalized by COVID-19. It says on Wednesday, Times readers were told that nearly 900,000 children have been hospitalized with COVID-19 since the pandemic began. A correction issued on Thursday notes that the correct number is 63,000 between August 2020 and October 2021, which. which means Mandevelli, that's the writer in the New York Times, exaggerated the number of child hospitalizations by 8337,000 cases.

Amazing. Leave that up, though. Let's go ahead and point out the other word you've got to pay attention to when you're reading these things, because the times we're told that nine have been hospitalized with COVID-19. This width is everything. I would guess that even those 63,000 are going to be what the doctors in the L.A. just said. Well, sure, there's those being said they're 100.

hospitalized, but they were in for other reasons, and we happen to test them while they were in. That is those 63,000. How many kids fell out of a tree? All the things that kids do, wreck their bicycle, all of those things. They're in the hospital. Oh, and you have COVID. Now you're hospitalized with COVID. The whole thing is such a scam from top to bottom, but then getting caught with massive exaggerations. You know, maybe Neil Ferguson should go work for the New York Times. It looks like you fit right in there. Well, and some people get. caught and other people brag so this this this we're gonna call it misinformation disinformation by their own terms it reaches all the way up to the White

House so when we when we see people not believing the public health agencies not even believing the administration that's currently in or the one before that we go to this this story this was dr. Deborah Burke she came out with a new book recently and people are tearing this book apart and tearing what she has set and really putting a spotlight on it because it's very questionable if it's even legal. So this was from the Brownstone Institute. This is a great article by Jeff Tucker. Dr. Burks praises herself while revealing ignorance, treachery, and deceit. This is directly from her book. She writes this, quote, after the heavily edited documents were returned to me,

she's talking about the COVID briefings that go to the president. I'd reinsert what they had objected to, but place it in those different locations. I'd also. reorder and restructure the bullet points so the most salient the points the administration objected to most no longer fell at the start of the bullet points i shared these strategies with the three members of the data team also writing these reports our saturday and sunday report writing routine soon became write submit revise hide resubmit so you she's admitting that she's i mean i don't know if that's treason is that sedition but you have uh the the white house to say here's our issue with what you're saying.

By the way, this is probably Scott Atlas sitting next to Donald Trump saying, that's not true, that's not true. All the things that we related to, that's not accurate. You can't put that there, oh, great, we'll make a point of that. And they go and put it at the bottom of the bullet points so that it's there, they can say, hey, we did it. But then she pushed up the agenda by her and Tony Fauci and those that were pushing the Ferguson model

and everything to continue to bludgeon us with fear and misinformation. And she's bragging about it. Bragging about defying the President of the United States of America and the other scientists on staff. I mean, it's really horrifying. And you're right, questionable if it's even legal. And she talks quite a bit about not using the word lockdown, although she wanted these mitigation techniques.

She knew if she used the word lockdown, she would just basically can, so there was some manipulation there. But then she goes on to write this. Fortunately, she says, this strategic sleight of hand worked, that they never seemed to catch this subterfuge, me to conclude that either they read the finish reports too quickly or they neglected to do the word search that would have revealed the language to which they objected. I felt confident I was giving the state's permission to escalate public health mitigation with the fall and winter coming.

Oh my God. We have literally a one-handed architect behind mitigation, I mean, otherwise known as lockdowns, and she's kind of pulling these strings in a big way. And this, you know, trickles down to the schools as well because they were taking their orders from these reports as well. Look what she's saying. She's using the power of the White House but manipulating their language, like saying they didn't recognize that I had gone against what they were saying. They felt like it was there. Maybe they weren't reading it. But then I was able to lock places down, do things that only the White House had the power to do, but they didn't realize they weren't dictating it I was. I mean, that is

so crazy that you would ever even admit that. I mean, that's talk about, you know, you know, a pinky, you know, secret, you know, there were the friend or a blood oath that should have remained. They're not published for the world to see. Well, you know, my father used to always say pride goes before a fall. We'll see how far she falls after this

latest mistake. Absolutely. Yeah. This, we talked about this. This could be a whole segment of what i mean this is just a couple tidbits of data manipulation but there is so much so many other things in this book it's very interesting just to see how she was so bold to come out with this so yeah well one of the reasons we're we're looking at all these these issues with children in the vaccines and all the data manipulation is the agencies that are responsible for promoting this vaccine approving it testing it they have lost complete uh really complete integrity and honor in the eyes of the American public for a long time now. We've reported on this, but now within the agency,

Morales hit the ground and people are jumping ship. And this is a new article by Johns Hopkins, Marty McCarrie, Public Health Expert, and Tracy Hogue. She was an epidemiologist for the Department of Health in Florida. And they write this. This is the title, U.S. Public Health agencies aren't following the science officials say. And what they did was they interviewed a bunch of people within the agency who wanted to remain anonymous, but wanted to kind of blow the whistle and say how bad things are in there. And so they wrote some of their comments. And here you go.

Buckle up. It says here, quote, it's like a horror movie. I'm being forced to watch. And I can't close my eyes, one senior FDA official lamented. People are getting bad advice and we can't say anything. It says that particular FDA doctor was referring to two recent developments inside

the agency. First, how, with no solid clinical data, the agency authorized vaccines for infants and toddlers, including those who already had COVID. And second, the fact that just months before the FDA, bypass their external experts to authorize booster shots for young children. They go on to write,

the NIH's Vaccine Research Center had many of its senior scientists leave over the last year, including the director, deputy director and chief medical officer. They have no leadership right now. Suddenly, there's an enormous number of jobs opening up at the highest level positions, one NIH scientist told us. They go on to say, the CDC has experienced a similar exodus. Quote, there's been a large amount of turnover. Morale is low. One high level. level official at the CDC told us things have become so political. So what are we are we there for? Question mark. Another CDC scientist told us, I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I'm embarrassed. Wow. And really to drive this home, Dr. McCari has been going on a national

media circuit to really sound the alarm on this in a big way. Here is him on Fox News. Take a listen. Good. There's a lot of smart people at these agencies that very senior. levels and they're not taking the political hand down from the White House. They see the problems with the data and they're very frustrated. Many are leaving all three leaders of the vaccine research center at the NIH have left the agency after long careers. The two top vaccine experts at the FDA quit in protest over political interference. And many people at the CDC told me that people are getting bad advice and we can't say anything. They're not allowed to go to the media. And at the center of it is the treatment of children, Pete. The vaccine, the vaccine,

trial in Kids Center 5 failed. Vaccines in babies and toddlers. That study was done and it showed no benefit. Now, why are we even doing clinical trials if when you get a negative result showing it has no benefit, they're approving it anyway. You're making a mockery of the process. This is what people within the agencies are very frustrated about. This is why they're leaving. Moderna's vaccine had a 4% efficacy. And Pfizer, the results were so bad with no statistical significant. is that one of the internal people within the CDC told me that you can inject a child with the vaccine or squirt it in their face and you'll get the same benefit. Wow. I mean, I try to imagine if I ever dreamed I would see these types of reports, you know,

before COVID hits years ago in the work we were doing. But my God, I mean, and it's what I said, right? Not only are you destroying our faith in vaccines, but in health care, in the CDC, the FDA. I stood at the CDC and said at those ACIP meetings, you are going to destroy faith in your own institution if you keep passing things when the trials don't stand up to the evidence, you know, give us the evidence that the thing works or that it's effective or that it's safe. You got to stop doing this. And here we are where even scientists are leaving the CDC and the FDA, rightfully so. It's a sinking ship. Yeah, and I remember, that's a great point. I remember when you called that. I was sitting in the crowd watching that and thought,

I hope this doesn't come to pass. I really hope they changed their way. But after all of this, have they changed their way? Are these health agencies listening? Are the people inside actually able to make a difference after Makari's out there? Let's look at HHS's own Twitter page for the childhood vaccination. And this is what they're right. Nothing matters more than keeping them safe. If your child is six months or older, you can now help protect them from severe COVID illness by getting them a COVID vaccine. Talk to your child's doctor about vaccines and visit. So this is the video that's attached to that. Take a look at this. pure propaganda, I will say, beautifully done.

So I am so proud of all of you viewers out there in all of America, the 98% of you that watched this total pile of puke and didn't let it change your decision-making skills. It really is a testament because it's a powerful commercial, right? Sweet little chubby feet walking down the sidewalk and who doesn't want to protect a baby? I mean, this is evil. It's evil stuff now because the only science we see is of detriment.

to these kids. They have no need for it. They've had no risk the entire thing. And yet, you know, in the face of, you know, people running out of the CDC and FDA, this is what they're still doing the public. They're going to fry. This will not go down. It will not age well, guaranteed, as it hasn't so far. Right. Incredible marketing. You can almost feel your heart open up a little bit watching that. And then you realize who made it and it goes, nope, back to closing. And, you know, if you're feeling that way, you're not the only one because this is Dr. Veney Prasad. He's been really outspoken throughout this entire pandemic on the data. He's really a stickler for the data.

And he writes this, he looked at that commercial. He looked at that tweet and said this, just a lie. There are no randomized data, nor even a single observational study that is shown a reduction in severe disease in this age group, six months to four years old. Government sponsored misinformation from the administration seeking to police misinformation, pathetic. And let's look at some actual data that is coming out here. This is out of Iceland.

So people looking for the data outside the U.S. government agencies, check this study out. SARS-CoVe 2 infections in Icelandic children close follow-up of all confirmed cases in a nationwide study. They have a great data collection here, and they say this. The researchers write, during the first three waves of the pandemic, SARS-CoVe 2 infections in Icelandic children were mild and none were hospitalized. The most common symptoms were respiratory symptoms followed by fever, headache, and tiredness. incredible that none were hospitalized. So we're seeing these COVID hospitalizations spiking here in the U.S. You have to wonder, are they really coming in for COVID symptoms?

Or are they coming in for something else when another country is saying we're not seeing any hospitalizations here. Exactly right. It's amazing. It's really amazing. And Del. Yeah. Yeah. So I just wanted to finish with one point here. This is something with the kids that we have brought experts on throughout our two years, covering this pandemic. And that was the big piece, like the big milestone, caution, do not pass go on this piece. They're vaccinating adults. They're boosting adults. Don't touch these kids. They have robust immunity. They're not getting these infections as severely as adults. And here's just a look at how many people we had on warning this, the warning the public. Take a look.

We absolutely should not be vaccinating the children. Basically, the children have very active robust immune systems. They're very good at clearing viruses and viral infections. And they elicit an immune response against all of the proteins in the virus. These experts who don't understand anything about the evolutionary dynamics or the pandemics are saying, yes, we have low cases, disease cases for the kids. But we need to vaccinate them because look, we have a tremendous impact on transmission. If we are not now going to vaccinate these people. What we are going to do is that we will take away this capacity of sterilizing immunity. Then we leave a population that nobody can sterilize. Yeah, we can

completely forget about herd immunity. Can you imagine what this means if you are now going to suppress this innate immunity on a permanent basis? Look at the countries with the lowest vaccination rate. That's where it's going back down the baseline. Because they let them. the children get it. And they used early treatments and people have broad natural immunity. When they approved this COVID vaccine for infants and toddlers, we're being told this is a study of 4,500 kids, but it's not. It's a study of just over 1,000 kids. Did they give us a reasoning or a protocol why those other 3,000 disappeared and what parameters they used to take them out of the study or did they just disappear? It's mostly children that haven't.

had a third dose. They haven't given a reason why they haven't progressed. It's important to note that if you set out to do a trial in 4,500 children, there's a reason that number selected. It's not random. It's selected on the basis of statistical analysis and how many you need in order to demonstrate an effect. So if you've got only a third of that, that just raises huge question. The reason that you ask statisticians to be involved to get the right number at the beginning of a trial is because it's utterly unethical to inject people, especially children, with a chemical to try and learn something, if at the end of it you can't possibly learn anything because you didn't do enough. It is clear the risks of the vaccines

are far greater than the risks of COVID-19. There's mechanisms and there's data and the data is one in about least one in 2700 of these kids are getting milditis. It is not mild. The tissue repair, wound healing, scarring with my background, it doesn't come back. My son got the Pfizer shot. That night, my son started feeling some discomfort, especially on his right side, and some swelling in his neck. Over the next five days, his swelling increased more and more,

so that his neck was so swollen, he couldn't move it from side to side. He was stuck in a permanent position kind of like this because the swelling was so big and so great that it was pretty tight. I took him into the emergency room, and they did a CT scan, and the doctor came in, and sat down and she said, okay, we're going to have to transfer your son to primary children's hospital to the emergency room there because he has blood clots in his brain.

The blood clots could have killed him. Everest is nothing like he was before. And I did that. I mean, I let them do that. The vaccines cause myocarditis. There's no controversy here. They're saying it cause my... They need to say that it can cause mycarditis and it can take your life.

I was a father of a 16-year-old son. A single parent. I raised my boy since they was a baby. He meant the world for me. We got the Pfizer vaccine because I thought it was to protect him. I thought it was the right thing to do. It was like playing Russian roulette. My government lied to me. They said it was safe.

This is my daughter Maddie. When she was 12 years old, she was... She participated in the Pfizer COVID vaccine trial for 12 to 15 year olds at Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It's been over nine months since she got her second dose. She can't walk. She's in a wheelchair. She is an NG tube for all of her nutrition. She has constant pain in her stomach, back and neck. Chest pain, severe chest pain.

The way she described it, it felt like her was being, her heart was being pulled out of her neck. She can't feel her legs, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine. Why the heck would we vaccinate a child against a disease that they're not at risk,

using an experimental vaccine that has no long-term, term safety studies, it makes no sense at all. We see this extreme collectivism in which people participate in rituals without being aware that they participate in rituals and with an absurd willingness to sacrifice everything, their wealth, their health, the future of their children, the lives of their children, everything in order to belong to that mentally intoxicating collective experience. One death is too many. Do not vaccinate your children.

There is no sense in this. This is just going to be a major disaster. It's amazing when you look back at that work. And I think all of those scientists you're looking at are pro-vaccine. Most of them made vaccines, their entire careers, distributed them, developed them, for them to be saying these things all on the high wire, nowhere on MSNBC, CNN, you know, on occasion,

maybe Fox, Tucker Carlson's been pretty good. good. But, you know, when we look at the work we've done and we see the effects, we see 98% of people rejecting the propaganda, it just shows you the power of truth, right? I mean, when Robert Malone said, truth is like a lie and all you have to do is set it free, it will do the rest. I mean, it is true. And it's such an honor to work with you, Jeffrey. The stories you're pulling up, no one else is seeing this. And it's hard, right? Who has time in their day? So for those of you out there joining us. Even if this show, you don't mind not have the time for the whole high wire.

We're breaking up the pieces. All of this will be pieces. The Jackson Report will just be a small piece for you to watch that you can send to friends, all of that. Do it in doses. However you have to get it, what I want you to know is we work all week long to make sure that everything that is shared here is scientifically accurate, that we have

multiple sources to what's going on. And Jeffrey, you're such a huge part of that research. It's an unending task. You do it brilliantly. So thank you for all of your work. Thank you, Del. And for the viewers, please share these clips and these links. That's the biggest honor you could show us. And this is going to get the information out and create 10,000 more Dr. Malones or 10,000 more Dr. McCullough. And hopefully we can change this thing really fast. Yeah. All right, Jeffrey, I'll see you next week. Great work. Well, you know, when you think about the misinformation and like who's doing the reading, who's caught in the balance, you know, you wonder how much does the president actually know? We now know that despite, what Donald Trump might have wanted or those around him that Deborah

Burks was undermining him and putting something out as the press releases to the networks and thus affecting all of our lives. And how far is that lead? Well I will announce today that you know as all things being equal and the fact that we know there's very high infection rates all over the world whether or not they're deadly or not is a different discussion but amongst those that have been caught in the balance as it will I am here to that as you may have heard, our own president. The leader of the free world is now been infected with the coronavirus. Biden test positive for COVID-19, White House says, I don't know how

many boosters he's had. He's been lined up in front of cameras multiple times. They've obviously quarantined people around him and try and protect him. But all those measures, just like Tony Fauci had issues just a few weeks ago, people claiming, well, thank God he got the vaccine or he'd be dead right now, which flies in the face of their entire exaggerated issue. you with asymptomatic carriers. I don't understand how you don't know that you were in an asymptomatic care. Thank God I got this vaccine. I'm only really sick when there were millions and millions of people that didn't even have any symptoms at all. And so the whole thing is such a disaster. But I want to remind you that, you know, I don't know that it's lying. I think as a president,

there's so much going on. You're obviously listening to your health officials. Do you know it was exactly one year ago today, right, in the middle of discovering, that President Biden has COVID that he made this statement. You're okay. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. July 21st, 2021, there it is. If you get the vaccine, you're not going to have these infections. We know this. That's what he was told. Obviously, that's what Deborah Birx told him. That's what, you know, Anthony Fauci or whoever he's listening to is telling him. So he's out stating. And so when you hear them backtracking now, saying, oh, we never said it was going to stop you from being.

We just said that it was going to reduce, you know, the symptoms and all that. That's baloney. When you go back, you can see it. We have it all on tape. It's all been happening real time. You know, unlucky for them there's this new thing called video cameras. And once you've said it, it's locked away forever. There's no unwriting what's already been written.

And this, the high wire, one of the things we are is an archive, a time capsule, if you will, of all the stupidest things ever said during COVID by all of our leading officials. get into some of the details here though because there's several arguments being made we still hear that the virus is still here because of the unvaccinated or the unvaccinated are the ones that are ending up in the hospital we have shown you time and time again that that just is not the case it's not accurate anywhere we look frankly any of the science from around the world except the united states of america and i want if you live in america you should be so disgusted right now that we have the worst news the the biggest lies the most

propaganda you will find anywhere in the world. We're doing the worst data collection. We're taking our hospital systems that are all agenda driven. They're washing their own data as though Deborah Brooks is in charge of every hospital, getting rid of censoring those doctors that are trying to speak out, trying to show the truth, trying to help their patients. There is a little video that came out this week that I think really depicts this in a very smart way. Somebody took the data of the vaccine rates of Australia and the hospitalization rates and the death. rates and compared them to the African country Niger. So Niger and Australia.

Why? Because they have almost the exact population at roughly, I think it's 25 million people, but totally different vaccine rates. Just watch this to just get a sense of how would you explain this if you were a scientist. Take a look. So here you can see they're talking about the vaccine doses. That's Australia. Look at the bottom.

Stay on the bottom line is Niger. They're just not getting vaccinated. That was the case for whatever reasons. Now look at what the cases are doing. Australia up and down on this massive roller coaster. These are daily new confirmed cases. You have a little bit of a moment there for Niger, not much. You think it would be over.

But look at this is just recently. This is after locking down their islands, keeping everyone 100,000 in the day were reported there at one moment. I mean, it's horrible. All the time, Niger is all the way down there. Now let's, I think it's deaths that are next. COVID deaths. Here we go. Now, sure, early on, Niger had some issues,

everybody but look at Australia look what happens here I mean look at this it's absolutely outrageous compared to the unvaccinated nation and the vaccinated nation same populations I would guess even same I would guess temperatures I don't know what you're gonna try and excuse there but here's the point that was made when that guy was questioning Matt Hancock we now have evidence we now have African nations we have Swedish nations we can look at lockdowns we can look at vaccinations how do you you plan on get away with masking us again? How do you plan on getting away with trying to mandate

a booster or make us wear masks on airplanes? How do you plan on doing that? And how do you plan on blaming the unvaccinated for all of this? Well, I want to get into some details here. A little bit of of the science. For those of you that are new and those of us that need to keep sort of refresh your memory on what we're talking about, here's the headline that I think is coming out of the UK, very important. COVID-19 is the UK on the brink of a new wave. and is immune imprinting to blame. This is something Dr. Robert Malone's substack has covered very well.

Scientists tell Sky News that it is getting harder to predict how the UK will fare with different COVID variants because of immune imprinting, which means everyone's immune system reacts to them differently depending on their specific infection and vaccine history.

Now, immune imprinting is sort of a newer term, something we used to refer to as original antigenic sin. I have talked a lot about this issue. In fact, is this where I was going to do the example? Let's look at some headlines. Okay. Oh, yeah, I want to talk about this.

So here's some of the headlines that have gotten to this almost accidentally. That's what the UK is saying is we're talking about original antigenic sin, which is that, you know, the vaccinated are somehow creating situations where they can be infected by mutants because their bodies aren't working right. Here was an article that came from the Washington Post, but it's written by Philip Krause, Marianne Gruber, by the way, those are two of the FDA officials that defected when we talk about this mass exodus. They finally got so tired of the propaganda and having decisions made by policy and politicians, not scientists, that they left. And then our favorite Paul Offutt that wrote this article.

Now, the article is, we don't need universal boosters. We need to reach the unvaccinated. It's also possible, they say in this article, that repeatedly training the immune system to fight the original virus could reduce the effectiveness. of a variant-specific booster. This phenomenon called original antigenic sin, or immune imprinting, as we're calling it now, has been observed with influenza and human papillomavirus vaccines. In fact, I will also add a very important one,

which is the protussis vaccine. We've won lawsuits on this very issue. In other words, for those not in immediate need of a boost, there may be a significant advantage to waiting until a booster more closely aligned with circulating variants becomes available. Boosting on the original antigen could be, counterproductive. You know, it's so important to understand that this is an issue. And what they're saying is that if you keep vaccinating, you end up developing an immune system that actually is not

robust and it is not broad-based enough to protect you. And so I want to sort of, I've dealt with this before. And back some time ago, I tried to explain original antigenic sin after talking to geared Van de Boch. We have another study. All right, decreased breadth of the antibody, I'm getting a little ahead of myself, decreased breadth of the antibody response to the spike protein of SARS COVID2 after repeated vaccination. Now, this is what we've seen. This is a recent study, and it's really interesting. The blue there are those that have not received a vaccine. And what they're showing you is the immune response, how robust of an immune response you're having to the different variants.

So in case the alpha, look at the pre-vaccine, it didn't get a vaccine, they're having this major, this high level of immune response ready to fight the disease. Once you've had one vaccine, it's slightly less. It's still pretty good, but it's slightly less.

But look at PD2, that's after the second vaccination. Your immune response to a virus entering your body is so completely inhibited and reduced there. And it happened in this study with every single strain. Wuhan, same thing. You're great with your pre-vaccine, your robust innate immune system that get bandenbos, but after one vaccine, it's reduced slightly,

but that second vaccine is terrible. Now you're not really fighting. Your immune system isn't awake enough to fight. Same thing with the Kappa ratio there. And so super interesting graphs that are now coming out, showing what we have said from the beginning. Now, to do a little bit of a flashback and get to the fact that I've explained this before,

when I travel the country, There is one video, all of you, pull me aside for and say, you, I did not understand it until this video. So since there's so many brand new people now joining us, and I think for all of us to better be able to discuss this with our loved ones, as we shift the consciousness of the world now around this topic, it doesn't hurt to watch it again. Of course, I'm talking about the football analogy. Remember, this is about original antigenic sin, also called immune imprinting, but this idea that you create specific antibodies when you're vaccinated, unlike the broad-based, non-specific antibodies that are just moving through your body freely right now that will protect you from any variant. What happens if you only make them see one?

Here's the football analogy again. For those of you, that missed it. If you ever played any sports, soccer, football, hopefully this makes some sense to you. But on our team, in our immune system, we have what are called nonspecific antibodies. They have, he called it broad spectrum. It's a broad spectrum, low affinity. They don't care who is coming across. In this case, let's look at the other team.

Let's say these are all variants of coronavirus. We got the A variant, F, T, R, L, Y, X. Okay. Now, it doesn't matter who gets the ball in this case. When we have nonspecific, anyone that comes across. So let's say X gets the ball, running back, gets the ball, comes running over here, boom, right here, nonspecific antibodies, boom, tackle.

dead, not going anywhere. But let's say it's a different play. Let's say they decide they, you know, we're going to run Y. So they run Y with a roundabout coming through here, boom, it doesn't matter. Non-specific, we see the Y too. It doesn't matter. We're going to go after anything because it's non-specific. It's brilliant. These are brilliant antibodies you have as your natural immune system. What if it's a trick play? What if they toss it to A and over here tries to get through? It doesn't matter. Bam, non-specific is going to go after the A variant too. This is how your immune system works and it's fantastic. Now let's talk about what happens when we're given a vaccine.

All right. Here we go. Go to the next one. So in this case, in this case, we're not going to move into vaccine-induced antibodies. As he said, they're long-lived. They don't go away. This isn't a drug that's going to wear off two days from now. We say, you know what?

You had an allergic reaction. We're not going to do that drug anymore. It is in you forever. There's no getting this thing out. And what did it just do? It created what he called specific antibodies. Specific antibodies is now what we're going to discuss. So now in this scenario playing football, essentially everyone on the team has been told,

you're looking for X. The antibody created, in this case, for the spike protein, the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that we first saw at the very beginning before there's any variance, our vaccine is going to make you fight that really well. So how is it work? Well, it's great. The coach basically said, I know for a fact that X, the running back back there, is going to get the ball. So everyone on the team key on X. Great. So X gets the ball. Boom, comes through. It doesn't matter, man. They're all going to jump in there. Yeah, ha. Yay. The fact thing's awesome. It totally stopped the virus.

Okay? But now here is the problem he's talking about. This entire team can only respond to X. It only understands that. It is a specific, it's an antibody specific to the virus it's looking for. So what happens if Y gets the ball? What if the team they know? It doesn't matter if the coach said it was going to be X. It doesn't matter. Y gets the ball.

Y comes around, boom, goes through here, can go anywhere they want. X does nothing. Boom, win. We're in the end zone. We just won. Virus wins the whole game. because no one on the team was waiting for X, was planned for X. In fact, they were told, don't go near X.

I mean, don't go near Y. Okay? All right. But here's something that I didn't understand. I understood that, and we've talked about that basically on the show, not in this way. But it goes one step further, and this is what I think, oh, actually I did that wrong. Hold on one second. Boom.

Bam. Here we go. All right. here's what I did not understand about the immune system last week that I do now. When he says that the vaccine-induced antibodies are long-lived, it means they're going to be there forever, he also basically explains that they are more robust. The virus-specific antibodies, the specific ones, they're more robust, and they out-compete your non-specific natural immune antibodies. So in this case, you do have some natural nonspecific antibodies in there

that could handle any one of the variants. But the problem is these guys are bullies. They're bigger. They're stronger. They're more specific and they're ready to do their job. So if Y gets the ball and starts coming around, our non-specific antibodies going to want to jump in there. Unfortunately, our vaccine induced is going to push this out of the way and become a blocker to make sure that that antibody or that virus gets all the way in and wins and gets the touchdown and could possibly leave you dead. This vaccine is bullying away your remaining natural immune system. You do have these, but they're never going to work again. Do you realize how whole, horrifying this is. Now think about the hundreds of millions of people that are lining up around the

world, that are lined up outside of stadiums right now because CNN and Tony Fauci just said, I love this vaccine. Well, Geert here, one of the leading scientists in vaccine and immunology in the world is telling you, everybody getting the vaccine is destroying their innate immune system. those immune antibodies that were non-specific that could have handled any of those thousands of variants we just saw you they're designed for it by being vaccinated you just assured yourself that there are no antibodies inside of you to fight the variance so if we have strayed far enough away from the vaccine induced variant that we were looking at the original spike protein everyone that is vaccinated is now in horrible, horrible trouble. They're going to be attacked by variants and their

bodies will not mount a defense. We are talking about carnage like we've never seen. Well, you know, when we watch the progression of this issue, we have watched this. Right now, what I think is very fascinating about BA4 and 5 is we are seeing the Amokron in general, but it's getting more more infectious, right? And what Gier Van Bosh and a lot of scientists, we have shown you study after study after study around the world is showing negative efficacy after the second, and especially the booster shots. They wane so quickly now, but they don't bring you back to stasis. They don't bring you back to that place where your innate immune system would defend itself. It's doing exactly what we were worried about, which is now there are higher rates of infection,

increased infection rates amongst those have been vaccinated. Meaning the vaccine is now assisting the virus and infecting you. That's one of the immune enhancement issues. Luckily, so far, it is not reaching into the lungs and infecting the lungs and causing what would be a much more deadly outcome. But as we're seeing rising rates, as Gerbann & Bosch will tell you, I'm sure we'll have them on in the future, we are pressuring this virus. It will eventually figure its way out there. So all of this is so important because they are going to try. I think it is clear now that just as Germany is saying, we're worried about the fall. I know why they're worried about the fall because their vaccine is a disaster

and maybe just maybe it's starting to even dawn on them that they've created a problem that they don't know how to fix and masking and things that don't work in lockdowns. It's all they have. And what else are they going to do? I don't know. More boosters, more of the same. You know, it's the definition of insanity.

If it didn't work the first down, just keep doing it and doing it over and over and over again. Now, this is the plan. But they are going to have a fall guy. It's always going to be us. It's always going to be the high wire. It's going to be like, no, you're the reason we're having the trouble we are. Well, I want to point out that we already talked just a couple of weeks ago about this study that came out. It blows it all apart.

Natural immunity is 97% effective against severe COVID-19 after 14 months. For over a year, which is as long as the study went, those that had been previously infected still had a robust protection. Still cannot catch other variants coming in. It is the best immunity there is. Now they're at least admitting to natural immunity, which I said to Rand Paul, who mentioned natural immunity multiple times in his speeches, I said, I just, I want to thank you for the people for reminding us that natural immunity exists when all of medicine seemed to abandon that concept.

Now, what we're going to be blamed for, well, it's because the unvaccinated spread of the virus. They're the ones that kept the virus alive. So not true. So totally not true. Think about, let's just be reasonable here for a second. If the unvaccinated have robust over a year, you know, ability to protect themselves, it's because they fought the whole thing off naturally.

They developed an immunity to every part of the virus, all of the different proteins, not just the one-spite protein, that singular specific protein that the vaccine led their bodies to. They got the whole dang picture. So it doesn't matter what happens. Every part of it would have to mutate to be shocking to the naturally immune person. And meanwhile, even any adjustments, we're re-boosting. and we have proof of that. It's the vaccinated where the vaccine is not killing the virus.

It is not neutralizing. It's what we call a leaky vaccine. And everybody getting it is now getting sick two, three times, four times over and over and over again. Here is a study that's so important. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, this is the old one, right? Evolution revealing vaccine-resistant mutations in Europe and America. We've shared this with you before, but I want to show you again. By tracking the evolutionary trajectories of vaccine-resistant mutations in more than 2.2 million

SARS-CoB2 genomes, we reveal that the occurrence and frequency of vaccine-resistant mutations correlate strongly with the vaccination rates in Europe and America, meaning when we looked at 2.2 million people, you know where they had the highest rates of mutant strains? Was in the higher vaccinated places. Those that had less vaccinations, lower rates had less of the wild mutant strains. So when they're going to try and tell you it's the unvaccinated, it's the vaccinated that are creating these mutant strains. This is part of what we're discussing.

Dr. Robert Malone brought in another issue about those that are immune-suppressed having issues, but I'm still standing with the science here. Then let's look at what they saw in this study. It was really interesting because of some fascinating graphs. Predominence of antibody resistance, SARS-Govietteamines and vaccine breakthrough cases from the San Francisco Bay Area in California. Look at what they discovered here. Now look at this.

This is the graph back when it was done. On the left, you have the unvaccinated. The first circle is the hospitalized-based testing. Now look at Delta. At the time Delta was that variant, everyone was really afraid of. In the unvaccinated, we were still mostly alpha. We would get that, and I think you had immunity, so you weren't able to catch Delta. But look at the fully vaccinated.

Where was Delta spreading? It was spreading the fully vaccinated, that maroon strip there, way more delta in the vaccinated the exact same time and the exact same places. Then look at the community-based testing. Same thing, you know. It was mostly alpha for the unvaccinated, tiny. a little bit of Delta, but in the vaccinated, Delta was reigning supreme. They were carrying and spreading and I think creating access to this mutant virus. And so this is going to be the

issue we deal with as we go into the future. And there's a great new study out, which is why I've sort of set all of this up so that we are well aware of where we come from and where we are now. Natural immunity is best. It always has been, but here's the study to prove it. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, coronavirus 2, naturally acquired immunity, those that had the infection versus vaccine induced immunity, though it had only been vaccinated, reinfections versus breakthrough infections, a retrospective cohort study. So they simply looked at those who never got the vaccine, but did get infected, how were vulnerable were they to future variants? And then those that weren't infected, but only got the vaccinations. Here it is, folks. Here's the reality.

The SARS-CoV-2 naive vaccinees, those that only got the vaccine had a 13-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with a Delta variant compared to unvaccinated previously infected individuals. 13-fold, 13 times, otherwise known as a 1,300% increased risk of developing being reinfected with a future variant compared to those who had natural immunity. There is only one way out of this, and it's what we have to talk about. Man, we've got to protect these kids. These kids because they're really, because only 2% of them are vaccinated, we still have 98% of them holding down herd immunity. And by the way, we now know that at least 80% of every country, especially here in the United States of America, has already been infected.

So we're through it. Your kids have already caught it. Your baby's already had it. If you think they need a vaccine, it's probably because you never saw them have symptoms. That's how good their their immune systems are. We've got to stop this insanity right now. We cannot loud. We cannot loud. for there to be this sort of regression. We cannot go back into masking. We can't go back into lockdowns. And for God's sake, we've got to stop this stupid vaccine. That is the case.

And that's where we're at. So for those of you that are watching and been watching the high wire, you've watched this progression, we now have studies that have nailed home, have cemented our time caps on the ground that we've been right the whole time. Well, when you think of those that were hanging the balance, when they were pushing this agenda, this dangerous agenda, of vaccinating when they never did the proper safety studies or any of those things. So many people's lives were hamming in the balance.

We talked about the jobs that were lost and, you know, the economy that was destroyed and our poor kids wearing masks. But there's been an issue we've covered so many times, which is what about those people that do need to get into a hospital that do have need life-saving interventions? Yet this vaccination is getting in the way. Of course, I've talked about those that needed heart transplant. I mean, you know, liver transplants and kidney transplants. hospital system says it will deny transplants to the unvaccinated in almost all situations. The

Washington Post was bragging back in October 6th of 2021. Well, one of those stories was on our show. I'm talking about Lelani who found Jamie. Lelani who needed this transplant. She was not vaccinated because she had a kidney issue. She also had a religious belief that she didn't want to deal with the boarded field cell lines being used to develop these vaccines. But she found her own donor who also was unvaccinated. they were ready to go, but then the hospital said, no, I'm sorry, you're going to die because you won't get a vaccine for what we're calling a deadly virus. Made no sense then. Doesn't make sense now, but for those of you that missed it, this is what that story was about.

I was diagnosed January of 2020 with stage four kidney disease. It was a little bit of a surprise because I don't know what happened to stages one, two, and three. If you're on a list for a transplant and you're waiting for years, dialysis can keep you alive. But once you've had dialysis, it also kind of shortens up the number of years that you live. I met with the transplant team to discuss what my options would be with them. And after a month of testing, I was then accepted to the transplant program. What happens if you don't get a transplant or do dialysis? Death is certain. Death is 100% certain.

So Laylani and I met in January of this year. We started a Bible study. It was about the end of July that Laylani announced she had been approved for the transplant list. And I said, what's the link to sign up? And I signed up that day to be a donor for her. I went over to the hospital, had the blood work done. I got the call saying, hey, we got your test results back. Everything looks awesome.

And it looks like, you know, you could be the potential donor for her. And I said, awesome. I said, what's next? What do we do next? You know? And then she says, have you been vaccinated for COVID-19? And I said, actually, no, I haven't. And I can't because of my religious beliefs on the vaccine. And she said, oh, well, then your journey ends here. And I said, what do you mean? She said, well, we now require our donors to be vaccinated. She says, we require our recipients to be vaccinated as well. So both of you will have to be vaccinated in order to continue this process. I got the news at that point that they weren't going to move forward. And I think it was an utter shock. I had not been vaccinated for COVID because of my faith belief about the sanctity of life. I knew that fetal cell tissues lines had been used to develop and test the vaccine. And those were taken from aborted fetuses.

I have to be honest, I ask myself, would I give up my beliefs to get some extended life? And because of my faith, I just could not find a way to go forward knowing what I know. This decision really comes down to a life or death decision. But don't let the tears make someone think that there's no peace because I have peace in my decision. even if I don't get help, my prayers that others can get help. This is a life and death decision for you. What does it finally come down to for you? As I looked around and I see people losing their jobs, their livelihoods,

as I see parents coming forth saying, my eight-year-old has just been removed from the transplant list, and they're already on dialysis. So if there's nothing past dialysis, that child will die. I couldn't stay quiet any longer. I had to come forth. We're people. We're not ideologies.

We're not some random thought. Anti-vaxxers. We're humans. Here in Texas, we saw a headline in the newspapers. This is what it said. Texas welcomes patients denied life-saving organ transplants in Colorado because of COVID vaccination status. They're really hospitals in Texas that are looking into this?

Those words are sincere. We have several hospitals in the great state of Texas that are offering to do the transplant. We've begun the transplant application process and hopefully we'll have an answer here soon. There's such an amazing story of faith and conviction while so many of us were having to ask questions, am I just going to get the vaccine so I can go to work. Can you imagine the question, am I going to just get the vaccine so that I can survive? But we have an update, I'm told. and so I'm joined right now by Laylanie and Jamie.

So Laylani, Jamie, tell me where you're at right now and what's the update? We're alive. I can see that. And we're here at the twice bless house, which is a housing medical center for transplant patients. And so we had our surgery last Tuesday and I came skidding in with the medical center.

about five kidney and today I said at 69% of my kidney function, which is in the normal. Yeah, so it's awesome. Wow, congratulations. So you're in Dallas, you just had surgery. You know, Jamie, it's always amazing to see people that are willing to sort of give a part of themselves. But this has been an especially,

especially, you know, it's one thing to make the decision, but to go through this journey with Lailani and how difficult it's been, how do you feel now that you're finally through it and there's been success? Del, I feel so blessed. We have been through the ringer over the last several months,

just trying to get to transplant. But every step of the way, God has been extremely faithful in walking with us through this journey. and we're just so amazed that we're on the other side of this and just able to give him glory for where we're at today. I know one of the questions is, you know, when people are going through these,

you know, should I be public about it, does that make my situation worse? You know, we weren't the only, I know mainstream media didn't really cover your story, but you did, you know, go on several sort of alternate media spaces, including the high wire. Do you feel like that had any effect on, you know, your ability to find a hospital and get,

to this final result? You know, I think there probably was some added effect, but we, this was a lone journey. I think there's so many people out there trying to figure out what to do, how do you go about getting to another hospital. We've heard repeated stories of hospitals actually denying transplants and then on top of it not providing a referral for those patients to go elsewhere. And I'm so thankful. thankful that Jamie and I are just stubborn cusses because once I was told no, I wasn't going to take a no.

And I started looking for myself. And it really came down to, I need to value my life. And so I needed to be my own advocate. And God gave me Jamie another warrior to stand beside me. And we went out and did our research and looked around and made endless phone calls and decided for myself that Texas is going to be. the best spot for me to come. When you finally got in to the hospital in Texas, was there any talk of the vaccine issue? Was it just not on the table? How different was it from your experience in Colorado? Very different. Actually, I started first with Medical City in Fort Worth,

was introduced to a surgeon there, a transplant surgeon, from a connection that I have on LinkedIn. And when we met with them, you know, I'd ask the surgeon, but the philosophy was around the vaccine. And he said, you know, we highly recommend it, but it's your choice. It's, that's a decision you have to make. And that's all I needed to hear was that it was my choice, not their choice. So we started initially down that path with Medical City. And there were some circumstances that happened where Jamie had some complications. in terms of how her kidneys are made up, that we weren't able to ultimately go to medical

city, which is what took us ultimately to Baylor. And Baylor was fantastic. On my side of it, you know, they asked had you had COVID, and I actually just recently had COVID this past January, and he says, oh, well, you have natural antibodies, that's all you need. And there was no other further discussion about COVID or the vaccine at all. The same for me. I was never, I actually was never asked whether I was vaccinated or not.

one of the nurse practitioners had asked me if I had COVID and I said yes. In fact, I had gotten an antibody study done before I came to Texas. And I had my first and only case of COVID July of 2020. And back in February, this past February, before we came down to Medical City, I had that antibody test done. And I'm still kicking strong and healthy with those antibodies in me. I'll say, Lailana, you look fantastic. I mean, you know.

I feel a thousand times better. I mean, you do. Jamie, it must be amazing to just, you've been around her so much. I mean, to just watch that life force. And it truly is. I mean, you know, it's one of the things I want to make clear because, you know, I get attacked from being anti-science, anti-medicine. What just happened?

This surgery you just got truly is the miracle of medicine. There are so many great doctors and great scientists. that are out there. We just reported earlier scientists that are leaving the CDC, leaving the FDA because they're so tired of the lies and the deceit, the lack of transparency, the lack of good science. But it's so important that we remember when we allow these doctors to do their job, and we don't get the government forcing upon them. And I wonder how many doctors in Colorado they're having to tell you you need that vaccine. Don't want to have to say that. Don't want that to be the policy. And as we sit here in the United States of America,

It's like you're, it's like two different worlds, it seems. For you, in one hospital, it's like the world's going to come to an end if you didn't get the vaccine. And in the same country, just across, you know, a state line, you have a hospital's like, oh, we don't care if you want to tell us, great, but, you know, you're free to make decision on your own. What do you think, you know, just when you think about the repercussions of this nation, what has to happen? What type of healing beyond the physical healing you're going to have? Do you think about what we need to do to start sort of being more open with each other and moving to a better place? Well, first and foremost, Jamie and I both feel like we've been allowed this experience so that we can continue forward, helping guide and direct others in our sphere of influence, telling our story, being encouraging.

We've created a Facebook group on Facebook called Medical Mandates, Are You Kidney Me? And we've had a number of people join that with their own stories, similar to ours across the states. And so people are sharing information. People are saying, hey, if you can't get it here, here are some states around you that you should explore. So I think being willing to tell the story. There's a scripture that I love out of Revelation that says that we overcome by the power of our testimony. And so it's the storytelling. You know, as a Polynesian, we're storytellers.

And I think when we share with one another hope and joy and encouragement, it takes light and it puts it into the darkness and it obliterates it. And so just I think be an advocate also for yourself. Do the reading, research. Stop relying on others always to do for you what you should do for yourself. I think that's been an encouragement that we've been giving to people. If you're told no, go away from the no. Go find your yes. And so I think just on a practical everyday level,

that we share the story, we get information out, we provide resources, people such as yourself are telling the truth, you know, other people that have come around us continue to tell the truth and stand bold and courageous in that truth, I think is super important. And I think as we've seen over this past three years, you know, there's a weariness that has set in on our nation because I think even those who had believed that it was important to, you know, there's a weariness that is had believed that it was important to get a vaccine, are now at a place where there's huge buyer's remorse for many people. And I think there's a light that's starting to turn on for a lot of people

who are saying, wow, what did I do? You know, I trusted. And I think you always have to test all things and ask yourself, is this truth or is this propaganda? And we've been fed a lot of propaganda over the last three years. Indeed. Jamie, did you ever lose faith? Joy's feel like this would be the outcome? Well, you know, when we found out I had three vessels on my left kidney,

which made that kidney not transplantable. And Medical City had turned us down for that, you know, for about, I said I had about a 12-minute tantrum where I thought, what are you doing here, Lord, because I don't know what I don't understand. And then God came through. He pointed us in the direction of Baylor. And Baylor said, that's fine. We'll take your right kidney.

Your right kidney's perfect. So, you know, I had about 12 minutes of lack of faith, I think, in frustration where I thought, maybe this isn't the path we're supposed to be on. And God said, no, I'm just moving you somewhere else. And as soon as I gave up my kicking and screaming, throwing water bottles across the room, I saw God work. And I said, if you want to see God work, just get out of the way and hang on. That's right. And we held on and here we are. Well, it's so great to see you. You seem so happy for all the right reasons. And I love your message. You know, we are here. We're not, you know,

we don't have control of how this all turns out. But what we can is we can testify to the truth. We can keep speaking to the truth and push that light into the darkness. And that's how we get through this as you've come through this incredible journey. Your story really is, I believe, a metaphor for all of us, that there is light at the end of this if we are not afraid to stand in our truth. And nothing represents that better than the two of you, standing in your faith, standing in truth with literally life hanging the balance. It's an honor to know you. And I want to thank you for taking the time to continue to share your story with us. Thank you so much, Del, and all glory to God. All glory to God. Amen. Thanks for time.

truth and turn our story. You bet. You guys take care. Thank you very much. Thank you. All right. Well, we've talked about it before, you know. Who are your people? Who are the people that are out there speaking the truth? Who are willing to stand? You know, sometimes when we're traveling, it's hard to know, you know, who's on my side, who's not. But there's one easy way to do it.

Maybe you need a highwire hat or a shirt. Or maybe you need to show us how you highwire. Take a look at this. Hey, High Wire Insiders, do you walk down the street and get recognized for your High Wire gear? Oh my gosh! You watched the High Wire? Love it. Do you sport your High Wire T-shirt in public to start a meaningful conversation? Get vaccinated.

Don't you mean get vaccinated? No, I mean vaccinated. Let me tell you why. If you like to wear your Be Brave Ball Cap around town or sip your organic iced magealete from the new High Wire Cork Tumblr, Send us a quick video rocking your favorite highwire look and explain what it means to you to support the work we do by stepping out on the highwire of life in our merch. Be brave. Hey, Del, we love wearing a highwire here because every time we do, we know where to find our tribe. Email us your video at how I highwire at the highwire.com and join the thousands of highwire insiders who find their tribe simply by being brave.

hashtag how I highwire. All right, well, let's have some fun there. We love to see your videos. It's great to know who our community is out there. A lot of those are the community we have right here in Texas. So many in school together, our children together. It's an amazing community. If you're looking for somewhere to live in you're in California, New York,

definitely loving it out here, you know, in the dripping springs and Spicewood area of Texas just outside of Austin. There's other great places to, you know, Arizona. And I think Idaho is probably pretty good. But look, as you're out there and you want to know who your tribe is, this is a great way to do it. It's also a great way to support the work that we do. But in the end, we really just want to know a little bit about you. So send those videos, it be great to see you in your high wire gear.

All right. Well, speaking of community and being out there and testifying to our truth and what's going on, there's a statement that you all keep bringing up that I had a really sort of funky thought. This can be risky right now. I know my team's like, I don't know. I'm going to share it with you. It's just a thought I had. as I was actually in Las Vegas, and I was driving to meet a friend of ours in Utah for a quick

little meeting right on the border, it was pretty close, and I was really contemplating a thought that so many of you keep bringing me. Everywhere I go, someone, at least one person says, Dole, don't you think that this is eugenics? This is population reduction. They're using the vaccine to reduce the population. Now, if you're watching this show, you know that this is an evidence-based, fact-based show. I've told you many times. I look at you. I look at you. at a lot of things, but if I can't prove it, it doesn't really appear here. Well, this is one of those moments. I'm just going to speculate for a second about this idea, you know, this idea that they would use a vaccine or do something to like kill off some giant part of the population. So I was driving,

and maybe it was because the sun was beating down at a 115 degrees and you see the buzzards circling and it took me to another space, but I said, let me embrace this thought for a second. And what came about as I embraced the thought was the thought, I'm not sure you're all having, but I'm going to share it with you. So let's just, if we will, imagine a world where there are people that are so concerned about resources that they believe the only way we save the planet, we save our species, like Bill Gates so clearly says, we've got to reduce the population. Now, I know he has said that. The question is, are they going to actively do something so aggressive that are literally just like very quickly, white, you know, hundreds of millions, if not billions of people off the planet. But let's say there are.

Let's say there are people that are in high place of power, maybe even above our government, that are looking at water shortages, which is something that we're dealing with. You got super high heat in the UK. You know, we're hearing, you know, you guys are over 100-something degrees there, which is like nuts. I forget how you do it in your Celsius thing. We don't understand that, but this is one of the issues. Here in America, I mean, here in Texas, we're seeing no rain. We have it for a couple years.

California. We're all fighting each other for some little couple droplets out of the Colorado River right now. I got a call last week that we're not allowed to water lawns and you can't even put in a garden now if you want. Only those gardens already exist. So really scary stuff. You got food supply issues which we're talking about. And so let's just imagine that all those things are naturally occurring events, which is part of what would have to play into this, I guess. And then there's a group of people that are like, look at our days are numbered.

The species is going to die off. we have got to secure our supplies of food and water and protect it. We've got to reduce this population. And so I thought, like, this is what I do, right? I mean, I started out as a movie writer that's really, I've told you all. I don't have a background in medicine. I got into journalism and ended up working the doctor's television show and the Dr. Phil show, all of that. But my first entree into Hollywood was I was a screenplay writer.

So you write for the bad guy, just like you write for the good guy. It's one of the interesting things is that my bad guy has to be. just as believable as my good guy. So I have this thing that naturally happens where I jump into the other side. So I imagine, okay. So I've got to wipe out, let's say, I don't know what the Georgia Guidestone said,

was it two thirds of the planet? So we're gonna kill two thirds of the planet. Well, how would you do that? I mean, you're not really gonna get away with just kicking in people's doors randomly, grabbing them and throwing them into an incinerator or something, right? You need to like, at least to be better if you just gave people a choice.

Or in fact, you would have to imagine, if there really is this group of people that you're all talking about out there that are conspiring to wipe out a huge part of the population, you have to imagine they would want to select the best and the brightest to remain, right, to have those that would believe in good science and be able to conduct good science and maybe get us to Mars or all these other places they're dreaming of. I mean, you can't wipe out the smart people, right? So you would want some sort of coaling of the herd that you control, but you'd want it to seem like it was a choice, I guess, right?

We have to make it a choice. So now I was thinking, wow, okay, if that was the setup, then, and if this vaccine, as we are seeing, this is the one thing I will tell you, with all of those scientists, you see us report, these montages that have come in from the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology himself, Dr. Robert Malone, to Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president of the immunology side and virus side of Pfizer. You've got Yert Van der Vosch, who ran the Ebola trials. I mean, these aren't just, you know, some slacker scientists. We are literally talking about like leaders in their fields have come forward to point out how dangerous this vaccine is, whether it's going to cause incredible levels of cancer like we're seeing, the heart attacks, the blood clots, you know, or Gert van and Bosch, the virus we cannot stop that could wipe so many people out. Let's just assume because you're coming up.

Talk to those of you that saying they're doing it on purpose now. This is population reduction. then here's the thought I have for you, because you're coming to me and saying it as though we're under attack by this group of people that are trying to reduce the population. And as I thought through the whole thing, I thought, well, are you under attack? Or is there a chance you're being chosen? Because let's be clear, it was obvious that we didn't have to look far to find out that every trial of a coronavirus vaccine that was done to. and animals had disastrous outcomes. I've talked about this a million times.

Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccine leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS coronavirus. I've said this over and over again. The animals suffered what they called antibody dependent enhancement where no matter what version of the vaccine they were given, the vaccine seemed to enhance the disease and help the disease kill the animal. That's where we were the moment. Donald Trump's headline was, I'm going to warp speed this vaccine out to the population.

Operation Warp Speed unveiled by Trump aims for coronavirus vaccine by years end. So right here, right here, let's say you've got this deadly product. This is a good one. Killed all the animals in the animal trial, but you're totally upfront about that, but you had to read. You had to actually go to places like the highway,

but you had to be able to read a study and say, well, hold on a second. I'm not sure that I want to see a warp speed of a vaccine, which you're telling me, you're actually going to skip the safety trials. So we know that the history was it was deadly in animal trials, and now you're telling me you're going to skip the safety trial. See, maybe you, maybe this was part of this test, right?

Well, they're telling us right up front. Deadly vaccine with animals going to skip the safety trials and then start giving it to you. And then tell you it's like incredibly effective, like more effective than anything we've seen even though we start watching everybody saying that, getting sick. And then they tell you you you need another one. And we have signs that tells you coming from all over the world.

You can find it, you can read it. FDA authorizes for it, fifth booster doses for various groups, even though the very best, the very science is saying it's reducing your immunity it's making you more more vulnerable it's giving you you know this this this negative effect negative efficacy all of that is right up front but you had to be a reader you had to be someone that was reading all this stuff and so therefore there was a selection process is it possible i mean i'm just going there on the hypothetical idea that this vaccine is being used as an agent to reduce the population. If that's the case, then maybe you weren't under attack.

Maybe these people we see as our enemy aren't necessarily our enemy. For those of us that did the reading and read the writing that was right there on the wall, we didn't get the vaccine, right? You didn't get the vaccine. And so as I thought about this, I mean, what would that mean? This is a crazy thought, right? It's a bit like a little bit of a lucid dream. And then I thought, Does Bill Gates come up at some point, throw his arm around me and say, Del, you're the man. I love what you did here. I mean, you really did your job exactly how we needed you too.

I mean, yes, we put out all the propaganda, but that's because we had to wipe out a huge part of the world. And I'll be honest with you, Del. I'll be honest with you. We thought we may have overplayed our hand. We were a little bit nervous there that maybe everybody's going to get this vaccine and they're all going to die. And then the whole point of the mission would be lost.

But you, Del, thank God for you. you came along and enough people woke up that we can be assured that there will be enough people on this planet to carry the lineage in our species forward and to really be those nurturers and those protectors of the earth going forward. I don't know, but this is what I come to. If you are going to carry that thought that they are doing this on purpose, then you must recognize that they're not attacking you, they obviously chose you. You must be the chosen one. Maybe not chosen by God, but chosen by Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab. I don't know what that does for your perspective, but for those of you carrying this thought, that that is the mission, then you

must recognize that you are not the enemy, you were the goal. Think about that. I'm going to ponder it for a while as I ponder all things. This is the high wire. We're not afraid to ponder anything to ask any questions. We will not be censored. It is all here on the table for us all to share. We are fully transparent. Look in your inbox for the truth and the facts that we shared here today in every show we've ever done for all of you brand new viewers from Las Vegas and around the world. This is the high wire and we'll see you next week.