The Highwire with Del Bigtree - DEADLY PROTOCOLS

Episode Date: October 28, 2022

ICAN Set to Sue Your State; Bombshell V-Safe Finding; NY Court Rules For Unvaxxed; ICAN National Poll Reveals Biggest Voting Block; A Deadly Protocol;GUESTS: JP Sears; Sarah Mitchell, RN, BSN, C-EFM; Stacy OgrayensekBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning.

Good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. I want to welcome all of you new viewers that have joined us upon the realization that the CDC no longer cares about the health of your children. Of course, I'm talking about the fact that, as you know, last week, the CDC decided to allow ASIP, the advisory committee on immunization practices to add the COVID vaccine, the untested COVID vaccine that never got proper FDA approval, to be added to the childhood schedule. And there's lots of questions. Will that mean that it'll be mandated in order for our children to go to school?

All that will be decided in the future. But for all of you that are joining us for the first time, or maybe just watched last week's show for the first time, I want to explain that this is not like any other news show that you're going to watch, because we hand you all of our evidence. That's right. Get used to brand new thought, which is totally transparent news. We give you all the information that will be shared

on this show today, meaning all the, studies, all the videos, links to all of it will be in your hands on Monday after today's Thursday show. All you have to do is has registered your email with us so that you're part of our newsletter. This is a part of changing news as we know it, getting back to what news should be, which is things that you can trust with real information you can have in your hands, not a bunch of so-called experts telling you what their opinion is, and I don't care if it's Tony Fauci or a doctor or a surgeon or the head of a medical school. It's still their opinion if they They can't put evidence in your hands and that's what we seek to do here on the high wire.

Now one of the other things that's special about the high wires, not only do we have this great show, this show is actually just an educational program that's delivered to you by our nonprofit, the informed consent action network. Our mission statement for the informed consent action network is we are dedicated to eradicating manmade disease. So we're investigating everywhere we think that industries and products are making us sick. In many cases, this appears to be things like the COVID vaccine. Now, in order to get to the bottom of this conversation, sometimes it's being hidden from us.

Just like every other product that might injure people, you've got to take them to court. We have a powerful legal team headed by Aaron Siri, which brings lawsuits on behalf of the informed consent action network so that we can get to the bottom of it. So unlike every other news agency that you watch, not only do we report on the news, when we see a problem, we want to do something about it. And so then we bring in our lawyers to sue and get to the bottom of it. We've had legal wins against the FDA, CDC, National Institutes of Health, Health and Human Services, and many civil cases. We've even stopped things like the law that mandated that children be allowed to give themselves a vaccine or approve a vaccine in Washington,

D.C. That law was passed. It was in action, and we used our informed consent action network to stop it sent in our lawyers and stop that legal case. So that's just a part of what we do. Now, to open up this show, I'm going to revisit a legal case where we won the VSAFE data. This was a lawsuit against the CDC essentially that was trying to block the data that was collected specifically for COVID. Now we have a system called VERS, the vaccine adverse events reporting system. This is where people or doctors report their injury if they feel like something happened

after the vaccine, but they wanted to be more specific with the coronavirus vaccine, knowing that this had never been properly tested for on human beings. We were really just right in the middle of the trials when it was rushed out warp speed as we all hurt. And we're back, folks that are watching live. We just had about a 10-minute breakdown there because of a blackout, which reminds me for all of you watching for the first time. Yes, we are litigious.

Yes, we sue the government. Yes, we're totally transparent with all of our. information, but there's also one little difference. We have been censored off of Facebook and YouTube, and every once in a while we get attacked by an electromagnetic pulse weapon. I'm just kidding. We think that somebody in the neighborhood just turned off all the power. We're hearing it happened all over the neighborhood. But let me get back to my point. So the point being, we have bears, the vaccine adverse events reporting system that's there for all vaccines. The CDC decided they wanted something more specific since we were skipping out of the proper

safety trials using the emergency use authorization, the EUA authorization to break the COVID vaccine out early for the Trump mandated warped speed approach towards vaccination. Because of that, essentially, everyone in this country and around the world were turned into test subjects. You were actually a part of a giant clinical trial. How are we going to track whether you were injured or not? Maybe this vaccine isn't as good as we thought. Maybe it kills people. Some sort of tracking system need to be in place and therefore they created the V-Safe system. And so the headlines would say said this about our winning that lawsuit. ICan and Siri Glimstad forced CDC to release V-Safe data.

We discovered that 7.7% of all the 10 million users that use this experienced health events due to COVID-19 vaccines. This was just a few weeks ago. That was October 5th when that headline came out. And we built a dashboard for all of the world to use this. data. You can go to I can decide.org slash vSafe and check that out. And there you can click through it and see how it works, how many different people were writing in their injuries, what kind of injuries they had, and, you know, all of the data that the CDC would provide. Now, they didn't

want to give us this data, even though it was supposed to be totally transparent. This is the kind of thing we start out as a Freedom of Information Act request, because essentially the CDC is our employees. We are over them. This is a nation governed by the people. So just like I can check the emails of people that work for me in my business, I can also do that of those people that work for us, like the CDC and the FDA. So they push back, we won in court, we got that data. Now, we've discovered something through further litigation of this data.

There's some things that they're trying to keep away from us, open field data and other things like that. But in looking at it, I want to talk about something we brought up as soon as we showed you, we had this data and we put the dashboard up. Many of you were asking, but I mean, these injuries that the people were being asked about in this app weren't like the most serious injuries. Let's bring up that V-Safe app. These are the questions that people were asked for the first week or seven days after being vaccinated that, you know, applied to be a part of the B-Safe system. If you look, there it is.

They were asking, did you have chills? Did you have a headache? Do you have joint pains, muscle or body aches? Fatigue or tiredness. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, rash, not in. including the immediate area around the injection site or none of the above. That was it. For the first seven days, that's all they cared about.

Now, many of you who are watching the high wire and we were asked the same questions, I mean, what happened to like myocarditis swelling in the heart, which was something that we knew was happening very early on. There were headlines about that or blood clots that were taking place. I mean, there was the myocarditis studies done about it. Rise in myocarditis. It was like off the charts. and then there was blood clots and thrombocytopinia and, you know, all of these different issues that we were reading about coming out of the trials like very early on, why didn't BeSafe ask about the most obvious things, the things that we were seeing all around us? Instead, it was just headache and chills. Now, if you look at the list they gave you, let's bring that up one more time because I want to make this point. If you checked any of these boxes at any time of that week, I assure you the CDC would have said, oh, that's great. Even if you check it.

checked every box, I got chills, headache, joint pains, muscle aches, fatigue, you name it, diarrhea, the CDC would have said, that's proof that the vaccine is working. Your immune system is actually dealing with the spike protein, it's developing antibodies, and in that process, you're getting a light version of the illness. So even if you checked all of those boxes, they would have said, look, the vaccine is safe because they weren't asking about all the major issues that were out there. Now, our question was, did they just seriously not know about it? Were they absent of mind when we're thinking about making this app that if they were going to track the actual analysis?

And do we have why they made the BSAP app? I think we have that sentence about why they developed it. The B-safe, this is what? What is B-safe? These B-safe provides personalized and confidential health check-ins via text message and web surveys so you can quickly and easily share with CDC how you or your dependent feel after getting the COVID-19 vaccine. This helps this information that helps CDC monitor. the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in real time.

The safety. Now I already said if you checked all those boxes, they would still say it's safe. Those aren't really deadly problems. So moving on. Where were they going to track the deadly problems and why weren't they asking the questions? Well, we just discovered through litigation

that they actually did know. In fact, what did they consider the biggest issues, the ones that we should be specifically looking at? They had a chart themselves in their own paperwork. Take a look at this. This is the attachment to, this is the attachment to, is January 28, 2021. We now know that the adverse events of special interest to the CDC were as follows. Remember, these are the adverse events, those injuries of special interest, meaning

this is what we're most concerned about with this vaccine. Acute myocardial infarction, meaning heart attack, antiphylaxis, which is the reason they were making you wait 15 minutes in the waiting room after you got the vaccine in case you collapse, coagulopathy, which is the blood clots. We saw all the headlines about COVID-19 disease. Death, obviously, we're seeing athletes die by like the thousands falling on football fields all over the world. Gian Barre's syndrome, which is paralysis, Kawasaki's disease, a major autoimmune disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and also in adults. Myocardis, periocarditis.

There it is. The number one conversation in the world today is how many children are having their hearts swollen for no reason. Narcolepsy was a problem. Pregnancy, sure. Let's see if your pregnancy was affected. Did you miscarry? Where was that button on this app? Or seizures, convulsion, stroke, or transverse myelitis,

the other way you can get polio-like paralytic symptoms. That is what the CDC was worried about. They built an app to make sure that none of us caught those things. And if they did, they could stop the system right down. And what did that app do? It actually made it almost impossible to put any of those points in there. There is no question asking you about any of those things. Imagine how hard it is to write in a box that you are having a myocardial infarction

would have been a lot easier in the middle of that heart attack to just click a button, but they weren't going to make it easy like that. No, they said if there's anything else like all the things we're actually concerned about, you're going to have to write those into an open box. You were just looking at the screen right there. We can bring it up. You see these open boxes, there's a 250-word box where you can write in there. And I assure you, they're trying to keep us from getting that information.

Think about this. Think about this. If the CDC cared about you, if they knew they were rushing this product out to you, if they knew they had to track and red flag as soon as there was any kind of problem, why are all the problems they're actually concerned about in admitting themselves saying the most specific issues we are thinking of right now, none of them. They avoided putting any of them into the app. This shows you how rigged this system is. It's what I've been trying to tell you for years. This is how all the science on vaccines is being done. They tell you it's safe by doing what? Sticking their heads in the sand and making sure that there's absolutely no way to discover the issues that they themselves are actually concerned about.

It's a great way to do science. It defies everything we know about the scientific method. I can assure you we are bringing strong lawsuits and we will get those open fields. By the way, over six million entries are in that open fields box. Remember, we have just over 10 million people that use FESafe, and there's over 6 million written in issues that we don't know what they are in those open boxes right there. I think there's some juicy stuff in there. Now, I'm not saying that out of 10 million, 6 million people wrote in. Maybe several people wrote in multiple times like, I'm getting worse.

I think I'm going to die. Why is nobody doing anything about this? We don't know. But we're going to know, and you're going to find it first right here on the informed consent action networks educational program, the high wire. I also want to point out I told you last week that any state that attempts to try and pass this COVID-19 vaccine and make it mandated in order for your children to go to school, we're bringing a lawsuit. We stated it so loud to the world that even Epoch Times heard us. This is their headline.

Lawyers prepare to sue any state that requires COVID-19 vaccination to attend school. It goes on to say the informed consent action network, ICANN, run by TV host Del Bigtree, has pledged to finance up to 50 lawsuits. Aaron Siri, who frequently represents the group, said, ICANN has told us it will financially support a challenge against any state. So if all 50 states require it to attend school, ICANN will support challenging the mandate in every single one of those states, Siri told the epoch times, the process would require finding parents or others who want to challenge any mandates that arise,

but the funding and legal representation for such suits are in place. Why do I say this? How am I allowed to make that statement? How are we setting ourselves up for literally lawsuits against government officials all across this country? Maybe as high as 50 states. I don't think so when we're going to look at the amount of states that are pushing back. But we are here for you. But that means we need you to be here with us.

Do you think this little studio we have that can actually be wiped out by a blackout because no one told us about it? You never see that on NBC or NBC or CBS or any of those things. We're doing this with the best capability we have. So how are we going to bring the lawsuits and win the way we've been winning? Because you are going to help us. Folks, it is time to stop watching this from your Barkle Loungeer and complaining about the news that you see. You are part of a different process here.

You get to be a part of making the news here. So every time we have a lawsuit win, wouldn't be a lot better to say, yeah, great, I can. I'm glad you did it. And be able to say, great, I can. I'm a part of the informed consent action network. me, my $1, my $5 a month actually made a difference. We won lawsuits that kept our kids from getting this untested, deadly for some people, vaccine.

You can do that. We need your help right now. Please become a recurring donor. Just go to www.Ican decide.org. Also at the top of the page of the highwire.com, if you're watching there, just hit donate today, donate to ICAN, and become a recurring donor. It literally is changing the world. And yes, just like I said last week, we still have that standing 100,000 matching fund for this month.

For those of you that decide this is my day, this is the day I actually become an active participant in the world I'm living in instead of one that's just watching it go by me. If this is your day, that donation you make, if you become a return-curring donor, it will be doubled. Or if you want to make a one-time donation, that would be awesome too. Please help us do what no network has ever done before. Held the government, held industry, held the world accountable for the news that they're foisting upon us.

All right, we've got a huge show coming up. We're going to dive in the travesty of forced hospitalization, remdesivir, and ventilations. But before we do that, as I said earlier, we have been the victims of censorship. We've been censored by YouTube and Facebook and other social media companies. you've watched it happen. We have a government that says that they want to censor us, that they actually believe in censorship. Can you believe that? Literally our First Amendment right. When our founding fathers sat down, they thought of all the rights endowed to us by God, what should we put is the number one right? What is the most important thing a human being should have after leaving the oppression

of the king in England? I know. How about the right to speak your freaking mind and give your opinion and say what you think. Well, imagine if someone was brave enough and bold enough to maybe even make fun of that and stand out there and say, hey, please censor this. Well, someone has it's America's favorite funny man, J.P. Sears. He's got a brand new show exactly named. Please censor this. Check that out. I don't want to talk about politics tonight. One side is very pro-gun. The other side is very anti-gun. I don't think they thought through that strategy. Women's sports?

Still way too competitive for me. So what I think I'm going to start doing is identifying as a kid. Start playing peewee football. And I think gluten is the Donald Trump of the food world. A lot of people say they're intolerant. Most of those people go home and crave it, don't they? Joe Biden died two years ago.

Do you all ever see the movie Weekend at Bernice? Push him out on stage. Time to give a speech, Joe. I don't believe in reality anymore. In our next pandemic, if we ever have a real one, I'm so jaded by this one, I don't trust anybody. Like, there could be bodies getting vaporized in front of me. I'll be like, I don't believe it.

Walk right into it. Oh, fuck. I live in Texas. We don't need vaccines. We have guns. All right, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined by J.P. Sears. Man, you know, I don't know if you know this or not, but I'm actually in competition with you. I mean, well, or at least it's style.

I'm trying to see what actually penetrates more people. Actual transparent news or making fun of everybody about the news. And, you know, you got millions of followers out there. We're running neck and neck. So it's a really good battle right now. I think so. Which, by the way, a few minutes ago, I was running late. I was outside.

I think I might have accidentally turned the power off to the building. Hopefully it didn't affect anything. No, nothing. We're fine. We're fine. Didn't notice anything. And so glad to be here with you, brother. It's great to have you here.

Now, I mean it. Like, you know, comedy is so important. You know, it's so important that we be able to laugh. And this idea, I mean, just the idea that a comedian is saying, you know, censor this. And we're seeing censorship of comedians. You know, when you look at comedy, I don't think there's anything more terrifying than the idea that comedians are being told those things you can't crack jokes about. Yeah, that's the least funny thing going on in the world.

And I think comedians are kind of like the canary in the coal mine. Censorship, never good, always terrifying results, never been on the right side of the history. But when you start to see comedians crumbling, that's the canary in the coal mine. And I think that really lets us know, hey, we got to really stand up for our human rights. I mean, a lot of people mistakenly think, like, free speech, that's just an American thing. No, it's a human rights thing. After World War II, they were gathering like, how can we never let what happened in Germany happen again?

They formed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and I think it was Article 19 named Free Speech. That is a basic human right. And it's our responsibility to retain our right. And I think we're living in a time where we're seeing some canaries in the coal mine go down. So I think it's really a wake-up call for people to claim. their power and keep speaking their minds, including comedians, but more importantly, everybody else.

You know, it's got to be difficult. I mean, it's always difficult. I mean, I remember growing up with, you know, Eddie Murphy and Delirious and pushing the racial space that we believed in and sexuality and homosexuality, all of that, like really, you know, confronting it. And I imagine a comedian has got to ask the main question, which is too soon, right? Like, at what point is this joke, you know, given COVID and you were really, you know, you sort of moved in that COVID space, how do you navigate that? Do you think about that at all? Is it? I do. That too soon question is a good one to be asked. And I think there's a time when it has an answer and it applies and a time when it doesn't apply. I think comedy can be too soon when something genuine happens.

Like there's real tragedy. Someone loses a loved one or there's some big mass. unfortunate occurrence. But when something happens that's based on lies, it's not too soon. Like yesterday is the right time to start speaking up about it, to start using comedy to shine the light of awareness on lies, hypocrisy, and corruption. So early on in the pandemic, I start to realize, I don't think this is about a virus. There's a virus, but I don't think this is about a virus. So for me, it wasn't too soon.

It was a call to action to use a language of comedy, to connect with people and hopefully get them to laugh, brighten their day, but more so laugh their way into a little bit more critical thinking about what's going on in the world. Well, I mean, we've talked a lot about on the show this idea of mass formation or a mass psychosis, several different psychologists have talked about how

there was this real brainwashing. And by the way, that television has got this monchum going all day long, you know, there's a few things that can break through, you know, I think that level of brainwashing. And I think it's emotion and one of the best emotions is comedy, making us laugh because it breaks us, because what it's doing, it's literally the antithesis, it's the alter ego to the fear that's being driven into us, right? Like, pure fear is how they're brainwashing us. What's the only way to undo it, you know? I'm trying to use facts, you know, and transparency, but probably the greatest thing is the exact opposite

on the color wheel, which is comedy. I, man, I think that's so well said, Del. I mean, you look at hypnosis 101 and mass formation psychosis is just hypnosis, with a lot of patients at one time. You have to be afraid to be hypnotized. So as you outline the antidote for that is not to be afraid, but that fear is embedded very strong. So we need strong patterns of interrupt to break through the fear so a different emotion can penetrate. And I think ultimately that's love, but what's the jackhammer that can create cracks

within the fear to let the love pour in? I think comedy is one of the jack hammers. Facts are one of the jack hammers. I mean, we need both of these things drilling down through the mass formation of fear that people are in. When, you know, we were, as I said, we were both hitting this from all sides. And remember, we stood together in Washington, D.C. at an incredible rally. I mean, just the setting to be standing in the Lincoln, in front of the Lincoln Memorial, and then looking out at the monument. And I don't know about you.

You know, you were there all day, you know, hosting, you know, the emcee of the event to see the thousands, tens of thousands of people pouring in to speak. What did that as a comedian? You know, even where I came, I'm just never imagined standing in that moment. What was that like for you? You know, man, it was such an honor and it was unreal. I got a text right after the event was over from my sister-in-law, and she said, what was that like?

And I said, I'm not exaggerating. It felt like we were in the presence of God. I mean, it felt like something beyond us. I mean, the mass of tens of thousands of people that were there, that's measurably. substantial but it just felt like there was something far more than that supporting the freedom movement and I might be out to lunch on this one but personally I think freedom is God's way I think we're born in freedom I think we return to a state of freedom after this experience and this beautiful life we're gifted with

so it felt like God freedom is his way so it just felt like the presence of God presence of freedom was pouring over everybody And it just seems to me like, yes, that was a beautiful afternoon, but it felt like that event, it set something in motion that is still in motion that's lasted long after that afternoon ended. You know, it's interesting. You know, I worked in Hollywood for many, many years, and you're using some buzzwords that aren't really popular there, you know, God and freedom. when I think of the comedians I grew up with, I tend to think comedians sort of are liberal leaning, right? It's very sort of anti-God, anti-family. You know, you have sort of gone into this space

that very few have gone before. So how did you get started? Like, you know, how did you decide to be a comic that shared a different, you know, I don't know, political view or human view? How did it start? Yeah, well, I think I got started before I thought I was getting started. So back in maybe about 2006, a friend of mine recommended I watched these old DVDs of a comedian named Bill Hicks.

Oh, yeah. It is amazing. Now, Bill Hicks died in 1993. Stuff's still available. So I started watching it, and he was funny beyond belief. But I saw him doing something I never saw other comedians before. Like I grew up watching Eddie Murphy, Delarius, hilarious. But I saw Bill Hicks using the language of comedy to deliver a deeper message to get people to think about things, to shine the light of awareness on some corruption that was going on in his time.

So that planted a seed. And then fast forward, I'm, you know, as an adult, I'm doing health coaching, personal training with people loving it. But I kept having these inconvenient ideas come to my mind. Like, oh, I want to convey this concept using the language of comedy. But then, you know, my limiting thinking, I'd bump into it. Like, well, I'm not a comedian. And like, I want to make this comedy video, but I don't even know how to make comedy videos. But the idea had to be born.

Eventually, I just like, all right, I'm going to make this one comedy video. I uploaded it back October 5, 2014, just thinking it's going to be a one-time thing. It'll be crappy. But the idea will have been done. I'll get off my chest. won't give me at staring my ceiling. Exactly. I can't take it.

But it woke something up inside of me. I had never had a real creative outlet. Nothing in the arts. And it was so internally satisfying to me. So a few weeks later, I decided, whoa, maybe I could make another comedy video. Then I kept doing that, still no plan. And then just beautiful opportunities started to open up

the creative momentum. I was getting more inspired by it. I start to meet people, appreciating these videos, which was codependent, but very encouraging. And then I've just been rolling along, forest gumping my way along. Never had a plan. Still don't have a plan other than doing my best to follow what feels appropriate in the moment. And the moments of the past few years, though I had been established as a comedian, the internal call was, well, I have to be bold. and unapologetically speak my mind if that's about God,

if that's about freedom, if that's about politics, I have to do it. And I've seen some examples, Bill Hicks, George Carlin, and I owe it to my son and other people's children around the world to do my small part of helping wake people up through laughter. So speaking of your son, the new entry in the world, which I'm sure had a huge effect on your comedy.

When we're looking at this special, please censor this. One of my favorite moments is this moment where you're talking about your son. Everybody, take a look at this. I love how clumsy the little guy is. You know, he's all uncoordinated because he's a toddler.

The other day, he was just standing next to me, and he fell over. I was like, son, you could be the president one day. It's pretty good. Funny if it weren't so absolutely terrifyingly true, but you said something that I think is so important for people to hear, because I get this all the time. You know, what is it I can do? You know, I feel the pressure of the freedom in the world around me that I grew up in, the freedoms that we could run down the street and do whatever we want. You know, we could, you know, say what we wanted.

Comedians were allowed to say what they wanted and all that's pressing in. but it's so important because I say the same thing that you did, which is, you know, they're like, I want to start a new hospital system or we need a new insurance system. I was like, yeah, that's great, but you're a doctor or something. Why don't you start by like maybe just design a clinic that you run yourself and see, you know, start taking patients. Like start where you're at.

I think that we really, you know, I'm sure people think you thought, if I do a comedy video, someday I'll have millions of viewers and, you know, I'll be able to buy a mansion in Texas or whatever it is. It just, it doesn't start there. It starts with a thought you can't let go of. There's something guiding you, which I think is God, that I think we're just vessels. And the difference between you and somebody out there in our audience today is simply you just stopped overriding yourself with that, you know, it's a dumb idea.

I'm not a comedian and said, let me just do it. Let me do one. Yeah. I think the least effective way for anybody to help the world with where we're at is to think in the grandiose sense, how do I reach 10 million lives? Right, right. I mean, you and I are lucky to reach millions of people,

but I don't even think that's where we're most effective, though it has purpose, it's effective. I think the most important contributions, weirdos like you and I make that everybody can make is starting local. What can I do in my world today to make a difference if that's one person? If that's, maybe I start a clinic and do it that way,

Maybe I start a blog, but are we aligning our words and our actions with our hearts and what our hearts know to be true in our day-to-day lives? That to me is the most important thing because I think that means we're vibrating at the frequency of freedom. And that's what the world needs more of. We don't need three cells of the body of humanity to do grandiose things. We need all cells in the human body to do little things. to make a big difference. Yeah. You know, it's amazing as you sort of commit to it

and you drive it out there. You know, what you were saying is people think about, oh my God, you reach millions of people, but the most powerful thing is the exponential value of communication, right? I mean, I think that that's what we share, is we're just communicators. And what I always thought, when I started the high wires, I don't care if it's 10 people.

If this show gets to 10 people, go, oh my God, that finally sounded like, the truth, they will start sharing that truth with their people. And if those 10 people tell 10 people, then that's 100 people, and then 10,000 people, you know, and just within moments, you're in millions. And we don't know that that sort of butterfly flapping its wings. Every human being has that ability. Yeah. You know? Now, because you've been at this for years, and I have too, I wonder if you have a sort of a similar sensation, which is, do you start to take more risks because you realize I am being guided,

that there is something that seems to be, and you and I have such an incredible community now in Texas. So many people are finding successes they never dreamed of, and the world's saying, oh my God, you're taking so much risk. It's like, dude, try it. Try it on for side. Wait until you see what happens when you start going with that intuition and you start realizing if I don't step out here.

I realize every time we don't go, where we're really being challenged inside of ourselves to go, that's the only failure that I've run into. I agree. All of us have two choices. Take risks based on the guidance of our heart or play it safe. Right. Irony is, I think playing it safe is the most dangerous thing we can do in the world.

Great. Because we just look what will happen down the line if we keep playing it safe. But taking a risk, not only does that help contribute to the better world, but I think it gives us a better state of mind as well, because taking a risk is called personal freedom. Our heart's guiding us to take a risk, and we don't do it, guess what? We've just become the tyrant of our own selves and nabbed our own freedom, censored ourselves, tyrannized ourselves.

Don't do that. That's scary. Cool. Now I'm indoctrinated by my own fear propaganda. But if we hear the call of our heart, it wants to do something, feels risky. I think freedom is allowing ourselves to do it. And ironically, doing the risky thing, I think it truly is the safest thing we can do to our world. I agree with you in some ways. And when you said it and it just appeared to me, it's really only risky to the smallest part of ourselves. That's it. Right? The most limiting part of ourselves. That bold warrior inside of us.

And that risky voice really slowly starts to just disappear on you as you do it more and more. and you realize not going where I'm being guided to go is the riskiest thing. That's where I could run into failure. And I hope that, you know, as you're out there, people watch this incredible special and laugh themselves stupid, that they realize that this just started with a guy who's a personal trainer that said, let me make a video. It's spectacular. You know, I do the news.

But one of my favorite things about what you do is when you do your version of the news. Oh, you watch those videos. I do. It's so funny, man, because it just takes the piss out of the whole thing. Let me ask you this. There is some breaking news. Okay. And I'd be curious, could I, like, maybe share the news?

I happen to bring my best suit with me. Do you mind? No, I think you should, absolutely. I'd be honored. This is going to be great. Let me sit there. Oh, you even want my chair. Thank you for offering that.

Okay, you know what they say about letting your understudy on, right? Yeah. Okay, well, let's see. Let's see how this goes. This is going to be fun. Thank you. Dallas. This background sucks. Can we get something different guys? Should be good. Ah, yes. It's so nice of you to have me to do this. It's all about sharing.

Being guided to do this. I don't see how it feels risky, you know, but but let's see how this goes. God wants this to happen. I'll take it from here, Del. Okay. It's nice suit, by the way. Thank you. I get them. It's about time the mainstream media infiltrated, the high wire. Welcome to We Lie to You News. Tonight we'll be invading your mind with lies you can trust, which is only for your protection.

Trust us. And today's segment is brought to you by Pfizer. And in absolutely no conflict of interest that we're willing to acknowledge, Our top story today is about Pfizer. We're learning that Pfizer contributed to the $61.8 million in donations raised for Biden's inauguration. But as many are just now finding out, the company is catching some backlash. Why is that? Well, dangerous free-thinking morons believe there's corruption involved,

where Pfizer makes big money donations to do not. donations to Biden administration, who then tries to mandate Pfizer's vaccines to millions of Americans. But is there corruption? I think the answer you'll be coerced into believing at the end of our three points of Pfizer innocence special report tonight will be known. Let's dive head first into the shallow end of that pool. Point number one, Pfizer, who's paid the largest criminal fine in U.S. history, makes life-saving

vaccines and they just want to help people and save lives. And $2.3 billion is the exact amount they've had to pay on that criminal fine. Point number two of Pfizer's innocence. They, along with their good friends at the FDA, tried to conceal their vaccine safety data from the public for 75 years. And if you don't think about it, wouldn't you just want to think you just want to think that if they had something to hide, they'd want people to know about it sooner, so they wouldn't ask for so long. That's very normal behavior. Just like the next time

you're pulled over in your car and the highway patrolman says, let me see your license and registration, just tell them you'll be happy to hand it over in 75 years. Should go pretty well. Third point of Pfizer's innocence, as you know, several weeks ago while testifying before the European Union, a Pfizer executive admitted that the company has never tested their vaccine to see if it stops transmission. This is placed on top of their already solid foundation of a house of cards where it's also been proven that their vaccine also doesn't stop infection. But miscarriages, heart attacks in young people, Sudden death?

Well, Pfizer's not liable for any of this. So legally speaking, who cares, right? These vaccines are safe and effective. Trust us. This just in! 80 young doctors in Canada have died since the vaccine mandates started. Well, upon investigation, which probably isn't going to happen, I don't think they'll find anything.

unusual about those unusual deaths. It was probably just a nasty case of sudden adult death syndrome going around. So in conclusion, is Pfizer corrupt? Absolutely not. They're innocent. All they wanted to do was throw Biden a beautiful inauguration party that he probably doesn't remember. And they just want to help you too. Pfizer is not in this, not in this, for the money. They don't even care about that. Oh also Pfizer just reads the price of their vaccines by 400% all hail Pfizer. That's it for tonight's news. These have been lies you can trust. But remember that only works if you comply. Now let's throw it over to the Jackson report. Oh my god,

Jeffrey Jackson? I'm such a big... All right, all right, all right. I think we get the idea. I don't want you to steal the seat forever. J.P.C.C. Sears, everybody, fantastic. And make sure that you check out his show. Please censor this.com. Please censor this.com. Don't miss this. You're going to laugh your butt off.

It's a great way to introduce those friends that haven't been able to wake up yet, to pull them out of that mass formation. Go ahead and get a copy of Please Censor This at PleaseCensor This.com. We love J.P. Sears. Awesome having him here today. Thanks, JP. All right, Jeffrey. I know that it's time. This is going to be a strange transition as we move out of comedy news into actual news. So what's affecting us in the world today?

Yes, interesting transition indeed. So we have a conspicuous level of a seasonal childhood illness. This is RSV respiratory syncytivirus. It appears to be happening out of season again. Take a look at this news. All right. The alarming rise in the number of children hospitalized with respiratory illnesses. across the nation are seeing record setting occupancy levels. Children with RSV overwhelming hospitals nationwide pushing emergency centers to the brink. The surge so severe one children's hospital in Connecticut is now using temporary units to handle their patients. RSV is not a new virus but this spike and the rate of infections is certainly new. Hospitals in at least 34 states now reporting the surge children sick with the virus. The common complaint with RSV is a runny nose, cough, fever.

Really high fevers, difficulty breathing. It's a lot of work to breathe. He would cough until he vomited. But in certain individuals, when it goes from the upper respiratory tract into the lungs, it can actually cause more severe disease. RSV cases typically peak in December to mid-February. But this month, the hospital has more RSV cases than any other respiratory illness, including COVID.

My big worry coming into this winter is that we could have a convergence of RSP and flu and COVID and other respiratory viruses. Okay. So to be clear, when we talk about RSP, just on top of this, it's really not an issue for adults. It's a fairly mild virus, but the concern has always been, you know, infants, young children getting RSP, right? I mean, that's... Right. Yeah, yeah, young children that really haven't been exposed to it, not having that natural immunity. But it is seasonal. We see it every year. And understand to frame this story a little bit moving into it,

you know, we're looking at a lot of different angles here. The fear of COVID has essentially died down. The vaccination uptake has been dismal in children. And we do know that in early 2023, HHS has said that the vaccination market, the MRNA COVID vaccination market, is going to the free market. So no more government subsidies. So we have also been seeing this push to add the COVID vaccine to the flu jab. So we're seeing all these factors and what great way to drum up some fear around that would be to show a lot of RS fear, a lot of flu cases and really focus on that and scare people. And we know that fear is the tactic that has been used for the last two years. We know that from the behind the scenes documents from the SpyB UK nudge groups. They use fear.

So, you know, just putting that out there, perspective, before we go through these headlines, There's a lot of narratives that are at play here, and we're kind of just jumping into this investigating. So the idea, I mean, really, COVID doesn't, it seems to have lost its fear of value and its hooks in humanity. Nobody's getting the booster anymore. The vaccines are sitting on shelves. But they're thinking, if we package this and flu and flu and get them in there and get the vaccines. I mean, you know, whether or not that's the case, it certainly is one of the possibilities of why we're suddenly seeing the news as dramatic as it is. because we've watched the news be used as this propaganda machine for selling what is now a vaccine that didn't really work all around the world. Right, right.

So let's jump into these headlines just to give an idea of maybe what's going on out there. So San Diego getting hit kind of hard with this, here's the headline, nearly 40% of students absent at San Diego school as wave of illness signals fierce flu season. Now it says flu season there, but you start reading into the article and they say, well, everyone tested negative for COVID. So it's either flu or RSV, but we really don't know for sure. But then you look at the hospitals just down the way. This is the headline here.

Hundreds of children hospitalized with RSV in San Diego. So you can kind of maybe guess where that's going. Virginia, similar headlines, nearly half of students at Virginia High School are absent with flu-like symptoms. District says, Alabama, similar situation. Austinville Elementary going virtual after RSV flu outbreaks. It says in there, according to a release from Decatur City's school. Nearly 100 students are out sick and 17 were sent home today due to an illness on top of that

Almost 30% of staff at the school are out with fever and other symptoms So you know I have to say I mean because we've looked at these headlines and we get so used to like crazy dramatic headlines, but when I think about my childhood I don't ever remember a school year Where half the kids were not in the building or half the teachers I mean I don't know in the audience if you're out there I just do you remember stories like this? I just don't remember stories like this. Hinton flu was around then RSV was around then. It's really those are pretty shocking numbers. It's not like 5% which would be a bad day, 5% of the school's missing. Half the schools out like you're walking through empty halls and they're not been sent home because they tested positive for COVID. They just have decided

they're so sick they can't come to school. It's really bizarre. Yeah, yeah. That's a great point. And in North America, this is the seasonality of this RSV. So we're seeing a similar situation in Canada looking at those headlines of what to know about RSV, a virus surging among young children in Canada. And then in Quebec, same thing, soaring RSV rates and parts of Quebec lead national cases, strain hospital staff. Now let's look at a study here because we talk about the seasonality. And the Journal of Infectious Disease post, this was in 2018, mind you, before the pandemic. So we have kind of uncorrupted data. reported probably the most robust study on the seasonality. Looked at over two decades of data from

all around the world. And let's look at this chart here from the study. And you can see, you know, at the top there, North America's in blue, May, June, June, July, July, August. There's not much going on with RSV. It's only at the bottom left. You see November to December. You see that orange, which is increasing RSV activity. And then December to January is when that seasonality happens. This has been the regular case for for for decades where RSV becomes the epidemic during that time. So that's that's kind of the background. So let's go to the CDC now. So the CDC has been monitoring RSV. They have a pretty good monitoring system there. And let's look at their

charts. So this is the national trends monitoring. And they have a chart here. Now that blue you see that blue line. That's the antigen detection. So you can see last year it was unseasonably early it was in the summer in fact April March and April and then the big month there was in May you just see it shoot straight up but then this year April May you're seeing a rise again and same with September so you're you're still seeing it in unseasonably early times especially last year so that leads us to question what is going on and so and I want to point out too as I'm looking at this and I know we're not a lot of news to get through, but we are now talking about two separate viruses

breaking free of their characterizations and their seasons all at the same time, right? I mean, coronavirus, same thing. Always a winter illness. It's part of the cold and flu season every single year for like a century until we hit 20, you know, 2020 and 2021 and obviously coming into now. And now we're seeing as starting last year this RSV. suddenly. I mean, it's weird. It's like someone's got a remote control and suddenly viruses that have been working a certain way for like ever since the dawn of man are suddenly

jumping out and changing how they acted. It defies reason that this would be driven just by the same nature that was driving it over all the time we've been on this planet. I don't know. I'm just putting it out there. One seemed, I mean, I thought it was ridiculous when I saw a coronavirus in the middle of the summer. Like, it's spiking in the middle of the summer. We've never seen a cold in the middle of summer. Now RSV is changing. We really got to start asking us, both things, as you said at the top, is this just hype?

Is it manufactured? Or are we doing something that's affecting the actual natural course of these viruses? Right. And so what are the two big things that have been done over the last year as well? Number one is the vaccine. This is what we'll start leading this investigation.

So in the clinical trials, was there any evidence that these vaccines were increasing RSV or risk? respiratory diseases and people that took them. Let's look at Moderna's vaccine. This is the EUA. This is on the FDA's website, Moderna COVID-19 vaccine pediatric EUA. This is their decision memorandum. So we look at some of the data. This isn't two to five-year-olds. This is what they say. Within 28 days after vaccination, some respiratory tract related infections were reported with greater frequency in the MRNA 1273. That's Moderna's vaccine group. Then in the placebo group,

Events of pneumonia were reported by 0.3% and 0% of MRNA 1273 and placebo recipients, respectively. And then respiratory, sinceitial virus, RSV, infection was reported by 0.4% and less than 1% of mRNA 1273 and placebo recipients, respectively. So 2 to 5 year olds, you're seeing an increase. So four times, four times the amount of RSV in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group that hadn't received it. Right. And remember, these are these are this age group of these kids that are really out of school right now. Let's look at the six to 11 year olds. Same information data set, same sheet from Moderna. This is within 28 days after vaccination. Some respiratory track infections related patients were reported more frequently in the vaccine group compared to the placebo groups,

such as respiratory, sensitive virus infections. 0.3% versus 0% and upper respiratory track infection, 3.9% versus 2.5%. So you're giving a shot to kids that's increasing their upper respiratory tract infections by, you know, with RSV quite a bit actually. And so that's that's modernis. So let's look at Pfizer's. Fisors trial data, you know, we go in and out of this all the time. This is their six month to four year old third dose, a division memo. This is from the FDA again. And this is for the booster. We talk about serious adverse events, SAEs. It says SAEs reported in the bn t 162b2 group included rsv bronchialitis five participants then it goes on to say a serious adverse events reported in the placebo group included bronchialitis and rsv bronculitis three participants

so you have five in the in the vaccine group and three in the placebo group so again across the board with fisa or moderni you're seeing an increase in rsv after the shot so this led us to say we went to our lawyers at i can and we had them send a letter to cede director, Rochelle Walenski. This is that letter. It was just sent regarding increased rate of respiratory, sensitive virus, RSV, and children who received COVID-19 vaccine. And it says, in part, given the CDC's robust and ongoing data collection among those tested for and positive for RSV, please let us know the percent of children who have tested positive for RSV, who have had, who had received a COVID-19 vaccine prior to their RSV diagnosis. Really important

Right, very simply put, when 40% of a school went, you know, out of the school, did we test them to see if those that got RSV had gotten the COVID vaccine and compared that to the amount that had not gotten the COVID vaccine? I mean, this is such critical science. And as we said, at the very top of the show, the CDC loves to approach versus the scientific method. They like the head in the sand method, which is let's don't ask any of the obvious questions. Like, why do we suddenly have outbreaks of RSV beyond anything we've ever seen before? could it possibly be that injection that we know lowers the immune system and showed within 28 days an increase in RSV? And by the way, folks, I know these seem like small numbers point something. That's all the numbers that they force this vaccine on you.

The death rate of COVID was 0.27 percent, okay? So they act like out of control and say everyone needs to lock down over an issue that killed 0.27% of people. So we should be alarmed at 0.3% or 0.4% or these, you know, these numbers as we're seeing them. also want to point this out, they only looked at it for 28 days. What if the fact is that slowly your immune system just gets more and more overpowered by this vaccine and can't work? And now we see half 50%, which is what we're seeing these schools. Is it possible that the 40 or 50% they're leaving the school happen to be going through that because of the vaccination? Look, we don't know, but what's curious is why no one in media and no one at the CDC is asking the most obvious

question. I always say this. If you get food poisoning, all of a sudden, out of nowhere, you're vomiting and it's coming out of, you know, every horse orifice in your body, what's the first question you ask yourself? What did I eat last night? When we start seeing RSV outbreaks like we've never seen before, we should ask ourselves, what did we do this year that we never did with these kids any year before? Right. And so that leads us to the second point. The other thing we did with these kids was despite what you're hearing in the media, this is the lockdown apology tour where everyone from Fauci to Jha are saying well we never locked down schools we want of these open so but regardless of that CNN is running headlines like this they're calling it an

immunity gap pandemic immunity gap is probably behind surge in RSV cases scientists say and they're saying this immunity gap was created by the pandemic behaviors so again it's this languaging not the lockdowns but the pandemic behaviors those same behaviors that caused a mental health crisis and drops in math and reading scores and everything else but they're saying because they kept these kids out school they didn't chance to develop natural immunity. They had the masks on. This is another possible avenue for this. So this is something that's... I mean, it shows you how desperate they are to protect the vaccine, because the vaccine should be the obvious. If, and by the way, if you're going to look at lockdowns, shouldn't you also be looking at vaccines? Vaccines are affected the immune system

that would be blocking RSV. The immune system isn't working against RSV? Why would that be? But it's amazing they'll throw themselves under the bus under masking and lockdowns saying, well, they were effective because the kids didn't catch the viruses they would normally catch. the mild versions, and they really had a year off from interaction with bacteria and viruses, so their immune systems have dropped down, because as we've been saying on this show, folks, you need to be in constant contact with the viruses and bacteria in your world. That's how you always stay immune. It's like not working out and letting all of your muscles atrophy.

You can't let your immune system atrophy. Jeffrey, I was on a plane recently, and it's getting harder and harder when I see those two people on the plane wearing the mask, healthy people wearing masks. They're the only ones doing it. I want to say you do know that if that vaccine works, which all the science says it doesn't, but if it works, it's doing you a disservice because right now you're hiding from Omicron. You're not breathing in Amacron, which is a super mild version of coronavirus, but it is still mutating and there could be a future variant that gets really deadly.

And had you caught Amacron when it gave you almost no symptoms, you would have an immunity that would probably stand up or at least reduce the symptoms of that future more dangerous. deadly variant, but you're taking yourself, you're resting your immune system, you're arrested development on your immune system, just like they're now telling everyone in newspapers we did to our kids, people wearing masks. You are doing this to yourself. If the max vaccine, if the mask works, you are blocking your body from continuing to stay up to speed in this race to stay healthy in a world that is, by the way, always filled with bacterias and viruses. Right. And so what did the ASIP committee do last week that we reported on. They recommended the vaccine, the childhood vaccine,

on the schedule. So what that does is it sets up, as we talked about the beginning of the show, the informed consent action network has stated they will sue any state that tries to add this to this schedule for entry for school kids to go to school. And you tweeted last week a day before ASIP's decision, this tweet here. And it says the ASIP at CDC is about to make a decision that will kill innocent children for no reason. Mark my words, this will be recorded in history as the moment the majority of Americans turned against the CDC. And then you ask them people to write a comment at the CDC. Well, we may not have to wait for history to play out because almost reflexively governors started one by one to take a stand against what ASIP did. Here's the headline here, right after that

happened. Growing number of governors reject COVID vaccines for school entry after CDC vote. And in there, it lists a bunch of governors, but we made a map of this just to give people a snapshot instead of reading it for them. And really, there's about 28 states that have not committed to not adding this to schedules. Other states in red and blue here, the red states already have laws, executive orders on the books over the over this past year, stating that they will not require COVID vaccines for kids as a condition of school entry. The blue states there are saying the governors have stepped up and said, we are not going to mandate this. And what does that look like? Some of these governors took to Twitter right after that. This is Iowa governor, Kim Reynolds.

She tweeted this, under my watch, there will be no COVID vaccine mandates for kids, period. In fact, we signed a law that prevents it. It's the parents decision, not the government's. Montana's governor, Greg Giaforte, I trust parents to raise their kids, he writes, and do what's best for their kids' health. On my watch, the state of Montana will not mandate the COVID vaccine. Fantastic. This is really, I mean, we've really been waiting for politicians to step up and start talking like this. I mean, it happened just really overnight. Thanks to, unfortunately, the CDC and ASIP's recommendation.

But looking at this, taking a view out here and looking at this from a bigger picture, we had ICANN, the Informant Consent Action Network. We commissioned a national poll by a professional polling agency. It was McLaughlin Associates in September 2022, right before this vote happened. at ASIP. And we asked some really pointed decisions here. And let's look at some of those answers. And you can find this poll at ICandecide.org or at the highwire. I can national poll results mixed on mandates, clear on medical freedom. So let's look at some of these results. So the first one here, it says, do you believe your rights were violated by government mandates and lockdowns during the recent COVID-19 pandemic? 44% said yes, which is massive. Remember 15 days to slow the spread,

probably would have been zero because everyone was was was was complying but it's rising and rising by each month and each year that those mandates were still on so you have a voting block there and then six a 50% said no and then six percent said don't know or refuse now drilling down to the actual politics let's talk about candidates this is its next question are you more likely it asks or less likely to vote for a candidate who supports mass social distancing vaccine and testing mandates 54% said they're more likely to 33% said they are less likely to which is again gigantic now we're talking about

actual numbers at the voting booth this is what perks up politicians and potential candidates ears this is what they want to see they want to see these numbers this growing really voting base i mean yeah we can look at the i mean this is what i try to tell people stop looking at the people that are brainwashed that 54% to see 33% that are adamantly saying absolutely i will go against the candidate that says they will use those measures again, that's a voting block. That is a very large group of the population. And yes, it is. And one of the most shocking numbers are really not shocking if you're sitting in our seats here, but this was the question that was asked, and it's one of the most overarching questions about Liberty. Are you more likely or less likely to support a candidate

who supports policies empowering citizens to make medical decisions for themselves and their families? A whopping 78% said they're more likely to vote for that candidate. Only 11% said they're less likely. So this is a resounding red beacon for candidates that are running. This is your talking points here for the candidates. This is really something that's important for Americans, according to this poll. It's amazing because it really, when people try to think, how do I language this to my friends or look at what we're seeing here,

this is a languaging issue in many ways. It's something we all have to work on. If you talk about mandates, I mean, these folks, I mean, the majority said, oh, I'm happy to be mandated in lockdown, which is not giving me personal freedom. But ask the question about making your own medical decisions for yourself. First of all, they didn't see them masking as a medical decision. Maybe they didn't see vaccination as a medical decision. I'd be curious what that question was.

But we have to start pointing out that these are your medical choices. Your body, your choice should be a slogan across, you know, this vaccine issue as much as this being used by littables for other reasons. But it just shows you they do believe in medical freedom. They just don't understand that there's a part of medical freedom that they're giving away. And I think that that's, I've had a lot of success just dwelling right in there with my friends and saying, look, I know you love Biden's vaccine, but what if Trump gets reelected and one of his cronies that you don't trust? You think it's all corrupted, makes a new product that you don't need. Trump's, you know, and I use the opposite side, right, with my friends.

I don't, nothing against Trump, but as an example, I'll say, what if, you know, they get some drug, you don't know, some vaccine, don't need and then the government forces it into you. You'll be down with that. Well, no, I mean, I trust Biden, but I said so you're making decisions to give your freedoms away. And that means any present in the future has that power over you. So, you know, those are the places when people ask, how do I have this conversation? Go to where they're at and then imagine what would be their scariest scenario. Would you like it if Hitler was, you know, passing a vaccine that you had to take? Then would you believe in mandated vaccines? There's a way to get through to people on these conversations and we'll watch because at the heart of it, 78% people want medical freedom.

And the medical decision of one's personal body should be the last line in the sand that's crossed, not the first boundary that's broken as this, because we can see it just snowballs from there. So let's look at Australia. This isn't just an American phenomenon. So looking over at Australia, where they had one of the hardest lockdowns outside of China, Australia, New Zealand, this is the headline out of here. This is COVID poll. They did a similar poll. A pulse check of Australia as we exit the pandemic. And it writes, more than half of respondents either said they regret getting vaccinated or were unvaccinated and happy with their decision. Only 35% out of more than 45,000 people said they were vaccinated and would make the same decision again. So this is what you're

looking at. It seems to be kind of a theme that's going across the world. I've been saying we are the majority. 65% of Australia is now against the man, you know, the recommendation of vaccines by their health department. I think we're in the same place. When only 30, percent of those that got the vaccines are now getting the boosters. Folks, it's our moment. You should not be afraid to have this conversation with anybody right now. The odds are in your favor. The person you're talking to is open to this conversation now.

And, you know, Del, the conversation is about obviously medical choice for yourself and your family, but also for your employment, too. We saw a lot of people get fired. And one of the few politicians that jumped in on this, when it really mattered last year, was Governor Ron DeSantis from Florida. Listen to what he had to say the day he passed the bill at a press conference almost a year ago today. We're really excited to be here,

especially because when I signed this legislation today, you know, we hear so much about all these things, mandates, restrictions, tearing people down. Today, we lift people up. We provide protections for people. No nurse, no nurse, no firefighter, no police officer, no trucker, no anybody should lose their job because of these COVID jabs. And that's what we're doing.

We're making sure that people have a right to earn a living, people have a right to have protections in their place of employment, and that parents have protections to be able to direct the upbringing of their kids. And if you look at what we're doing today, Florida is leading. This is the strongest piece of legislation that's been enacted anywhere in the country in this regard, and we're awfully proud to be able to do it here today. It's an amazing moment. Incredible. And so that was a year ago.

Now we're seeing politicians having to backtrack because their constituents didn't put a hard enough line in the sand. Just recently, the premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith. Now, she's only two weeks in office, mind you. So just keep that in mind. She was asked a question at a press conference by a journalist from Rebel News. Listen to what transpired. During your campaign, you said that not only would you issue an apology to those prosecuted during COVID restrictions, but you would also grant them amnesty.

When can we expect those apologies? I can apologize right now. I'm deeply sorry for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to discrimination as a result of their vaccine status. deeply sorry for any government employee that was fired from their job because of their vaccine status and I welcome them back if they want to come back as for the amnesty I have to get some legal advice on that and so I've already asked my staff to request that advice so I can see how we would be able to proceed on that my view has been that these were political decisions that were made and so I think that they could be political decisions to offer a reversal but I do want

I guess so lovely advice on that first. Wow, good job Edmonton on voting in someone with blood coursing through her brain. Fantastic. And you heard her say she believes these are political decisions, not medical, because it wasn't done out of a medical necessity. It was a political decision. And so really, Del, I mean, overnight we're seeing politicians just popping up like mushrooms talking about this stuff.

So this is a candidate for the governor of New York. He is challenging Kathy Hochel. This is Lee Zeldon. And during the debates, just a couple days ago, he went all in. Listen to this. All right. My opponent just said she will not mandate COVID vaccines at this time. Let me be clear to all of the parents who are out there.

I will not mandate COVID vaccines for your kids ever. I don't believe that there should be COVID vaccine mandates right now for our kids at SUNY and CUNY and community colleges and elsewhere. Where just over a year ago, a whole bunch of heroes were turning to zeros, tens of thousands of people because of my opponent's health care worker COVID vaccine. What about polio vaccine? Would you? I believe that, let's just finish the point.

I believe that that mandate was wrong and that everyone who has been fired should be offered their jobs back with back pain. There shouldn't be any special celebrity COVID vaccine mandates like what we saw for people who played for the Mets or the Yankees or the Nets. If you want to have a special celebrity exemption, how about the NYPD officers, FDNY, teachers, healthcare workers. I do not support COVID vaccine mandates. in any way, shape, or form.

You want to deal with a health care worker shortage upstate in hospitals, having services impacted. Well, then offer the people their jobs back. And by the way, do it with back pay. Wow. I mean, we are in a different world now where, you know, in a debate using the vaccine issue as his calling card. That is stunning. Brilliant.

Primetime TV, Dell. And so mandating shots for kids, rehiring workers, this isn't just a political hot potato. It's gaining steam and the legal battleground. Check out this headline from Fox News. This has just recently happened just a couple days ago. New York Supreme Court reinstates all employees fired for being unvaccinated. Orders back pay. This is U.S. District Judge David Hurd.

And let's take a look at this ruling because there's some really interesting things that are said in this ruling. You know, harkening back to what we talked about last week. It says here, being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting COVID-19. As of the day of this decision, CDC guidelines regarding quarantine and isolation are the same for vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The petitioners should not have been terminated for choosing not to protect themselves. I mean, incredible wording. And it goes on to say this. Ordered.

You go to the second line down that the terminated petitioners are hereby reinstated to their full employment status effect of October 25, 2020, at 6 a.m. And then final line ordered that the petitioners are entitled to back pay and salary from the date. of termination. Absolutely incredible ruling. And, you know, this is going to set off some momentum. Will it be a precedent for other rulings moving forward? We really don't know. It absolutely will be. I mean, I can guarantee you, Aaron Siri, just put that in the books and in future lawsuits that we will have across this country that will be the argument. How can you mandate a product that doesn't do what it, your entire premise of a childhood vaccine program is we're vaccinated to protect those that can't vaccinate or to protect

grandma. This vaccine does not do that. So the mandate it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Nobody is protecting anybody else. And we know that COVID's not a risk to these children. It's a 0% risk or to be totally accurate. 0.002% risk of dying from COVID if you're between the age of 0 and 18. I think this is going to be destroyed in every courtroom we enter into. And hopefully the governors will take care of this for us. I think we have like what, something like 28 more states to go, but we're off to a good start with somewhere around 22 saying, oh, hell no. Right. And a quick side note on that ruling and the reporting surrounding it from my understanding, unfortunately, that was only for the 18 plaintiffs that were in that lawsuit. It wasn't for all

New Yorkers, firefighters at all that were that were fired for unvaccinated status. Yeah, but guess what happens when, you know, thousands and thousands of people realize, wait a minute, I can win and get back pay. The courts were about to be filled, uh, overnight and someone will make a very quick decision, I think, to say, we can't do this to the court system. Just go with what they said. I think that that I'm sure that's where this is going to end up going. Right. And it, you know, hopefully it will leak into the medical community too. Check out this headline from MedPage. This is really shocking. It's from a new report. Over 333,000 healthcare workers left jobs in 2021. Now, the report doesn't say anything about

vaccination status being fired because of the vaccine issues. it said left jobs. It doesn't say why they left their jobs. So kind of just leave that in your in your mind while you're reading this. An estimated 117,000 physicians left their jobs, including 15,000 in internal medicine, 13,000 15 in family practice and 10,874 in clinical psychology. It goes on to say since 2020, one in five healthcare workers have quit their jobs and survey suggests that up this 47% of health care workers plan to leave their positions by 2025, the report said. So Dell, 117,000 physicians left their job in 2021. You divide that by the number of weeks. You're looking at over 2,000 physicians a week. Amazing. That is an incredible gap. That's what Lee Zeldon was saying, too.

You know, we have a shortage in health care workers. You want to get them back? Get rid of this stupid vaccine mandate that you pass such a great point across this nation. And I remember, wasn't Rhonda Santa said, hey, if you got fired up in New York, come on down to Florida. We need you here. We have hospitals open and we're hiring. Right. Exactly. And so this may be the new legal battleground is the medical the medical issue being pushed on that piece now del we're talking about lines in the sand we're talking about medical decisions your body lines in the sand how far will this go well in the UK we're seeing the first of its kind headlines and we're going to report on it but first just to give a quick background we're talking about we're

talking about cars and mobility you could argue that this outside of your body a car is one of the biggest personal freedom symbols of independence of mobility of you know even wealth and status and free choice because you can go where you want to go. Well, those were kind of targeted by what was called Agenda 21. This was in 1992, Rio de Janeiro, almost all the UN member states signed on to this. And let's look at one of the quotes here from Section 7. They are aiming to integrate land use and transportation planning to encourage development patterns to reduce transport demand. So that means reduce cars.

B, adopt urban transport programs favoring high occupancy public transit, in countries as appropriate. And then finally encourage non-motorized modes of transport by providing safe cycleways and footways and urban and suburban centers in countries as appropriate. So that was in 1992. That's that rolled into agenda 2030 with the sustainable development goals that we talk about here quite a bit. The UK government funded a study by a group called the UK fires. And this is a document that was put out just about a year ago. And they have a very interesting, a very interesting image in there. It's kind of like a blueprint for timelines to look at. And this is, we're looking at 2020 to 2029. So we're in this decade right now. And here's the plan. Road vehicles, develop,

development of petrol diesel engines ends. Any new vehicle introduced from now on must be compatible of net zero. You go down to rail, growth in domestic and international rail as substitute for flights and low occupancy car travel. That's your car. And what about flying? All airports except Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast, closed with transfers by rail. So you're talking about some pretty big things here.

And remember... All remaining airports closed 2030 to 2049. It says right next to that. I mean, it's just... So we're going into the dark ages. These people dream about a world where we are stuck in our cave community. And they say, you know,

future technologies are going to be great, but they're not here yet, so we still have to implement this. And it's under this umbrella of agenda 2030. It's called different things in different places. In California, just a couple months ago, we read this headline. Gavin Newsome made a proclamation here, California, to ban the sales of new gasoline cars. Well, that's right out of that playbook.

And Agenda 2030 was floated almost immediately during the pandemic. In October of 2020, this was the headline. The 2030 Agenda as blueprint for a. post-COVID world. Remember, we're just getting into the COVID response. We're trying to understand this thing. And you have Klaus Schwab come out of the shadows and say this is an incredible opportunity to implement these sustainable development goals. Well, what does that look like on the ground? What does it really look like? Well, let's take a look at Oxford. This is a city in the UK. Oxford's set to cut its famous traffic jams by degrees. The university city will be divided into six

districts and motorists will get fined if they leave their neighborhood too often. Can't believe him reading this, but here it is. It's 150,000 residents will be allowed to use their cars as much as they like within their district and will be given free permits, allowing them to drive to other districts on 100 days a year. If they exceed this limit, they will be fine, possibly 70 euros, a journey or a day. And then it goes on and give a bunch of bureaucratic language here. A maximum of three permits, a household will be allowed if there are several adults with cars registered to the address. The restrictions will take place between 7 a.m., 7 p.m., blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Just a lot of rules to follow here, but really the key quote, let's look at this.

At the heart of the plan is a desire to reduce traffic and make city living more pleasant, creating a 15-minute city within a small walking radius, a concept L popularized during the pandemic. Oh my God. You know, we were imprisoned during the pandemic. It wasn't popularized. Watch the languaging people, popularize. So this is not just happening in one place. Remember, when you see something pop up out of nowhere and be implemented rapidly,

You really have to question what's behind this. Canterbury, another city, doing pretty much the same thing over in the UK. Canterbury City Council traffic ban moves stepped forward despite opposition. And there has been quite a bit of opposition and news reporting on this. And it says the project, which is a part of the council's draft local plan will mean direct trips to supermarkets, retail parks, or GP surgeries will be prohibited in a bid to encourage walking, cycling, and public transport use. Here we go. Minor roads and rat runs linking each of the. the zones will be closed with drivers forced to either ditch their cars or use the bypass to

dip in and out of the five neighborhoods. So you see, if you want to go to the supermarket or go to your GP for a surgery right down the road, you can't do that. You have to go on this loop and maybe take some extra time because I guess it's more efficient or it's better for the environment, I guess, or just don't use your car at all. Maybe just ride your bike to the GP for the surgery. Meanwhile, all the people passing these laws and writing about these laws are flying on private jets all over the planet, sitting in chauffeur-driven limousines and Rolls Royces. I mean, it's enough to make you puke. And, you know, I look at this, I say it before, I'm still environmentalist, folks. I still want clean air. I want clean water. I want clean food supplies. But where all this stuff is

going, this has nothing to do with making the world a safer, healthier places. This is all about control, imprisoning us, and it's why we're going to continue to track these incredible stories, infringements upon our God-given unalienable rights, inalienable rights. So Jeffrey, amazing reporting, as always, such important stuff. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Del. All right.

We'll see you next week. Okay, so if you like what Jeffrey Jackson shared here, you should definitely check out his written materials on the highway. Just go to the Jackson Report on the highwire. It gets a lot deeper into all of these conversations. that we're having. Look, you know, we just came out of a pandemic where we were locked down. Many people lost their jobs because they wouldn't take an untested vaccine. There are courtrooms all over the country now ruling in favor of those people. But how many died during that?

How many people starved? How many families couldn't be fed or couldn't take care of their children while we were all under what are now proven to be illegal mandates? This idea of controlling where you can drive. It may seem across the pond right now. You're going to go to sleep on this? You're say, well, I live in America, that'll never happen here. I'm in Canada. I'm sure you all saying that would never happen here until what you went through up there in Canada, through the pandemic, and now you're having to elect people that are telling you that will never happen again. But how many places are they going to control? What did they just show us? Where do they show us about a world? Where are they willing to control us? They want to control our jobs. They want to

control our food supplies we've talked about. But what about, you know, outside of just the medicine injecting us to the things. Remember when it used to be like the doctor-patient relationship and remember when you would go into the hospital, you know, it's sort of like, you know, let's know what the patient thinks, what they think is important or, you know, you were taught to be the advocate for your spouse, your wife, your husband, your child, but what if you couldn't get into them? What if you were locked out? That's right. So many of you have written into this show about the issue of essentially watching your loved ones kidnapped, whether they were just dying of old age or COVID or cancer,

you couldn't get to them, you couldn't help them. What if you didn't agree with the treatment that was going on there? What would you do about it? That is the story or the set of stories we're about to tell you. I assure you, you may want to just take a moment, take a deep breath, because this is absolutely infuriating. that this is happening in a free country in what is supposed to be the best hospital systems in the world.

I'm a registered nurse, and I've been a labor and delivery nurse for eight years. So I helped deliver babies, helping the parents through the birthing process, being part of the care team, just to make sure we have a healthy mom and baby. I just really love working in the hospital, and I love my job. A SARS-like virus, which has infected hundreds in China, has now reached the United States.

Initially, just like a lot of people, I think we were really afraid with COVID. We heard what they said on the news. Information was all over the place. It was all new. We didn't know what to do. So we were taking all the precautions with everyone else was, you know,

on lockdown, wearing masks. And I remember specifically seeing a video online saying, if you go to the hospital, you know, don't take remdesivir. You could get kidney failure, liver failure, then you could fill up with, you know, flu, you could fill up with, you know, and then they're putting people on ventilators and nobody's getting off the ventilators and people are dying.

It's like pretty much a recipe for disaster. So knowing those statistics about that medication, I thought that it was a pretty dangerous drug to be taking a chance with. It was about November 7th when my daughter Harper and my husband, Kyle, started getting sick. I got into looking at some treatments that were available for early COVID and And that's when I kind of came across Ivermectin. Kyle went to the urgent care here in town and got tested. They wouldn't fill the Ivermectin.

So we tried another pharmacy and they wouldn't fill it either. So then Kyle felt like he was having a little bit of difficulty taking a deep breath. So I took him to the urgent care and they checked him in and said his auction was 91% and they said that he was hypoxic and they couldn't treat him or see him. and that he needed to go to the ER. So I drove him to the ER.

The hospital was Beaumont in Royal Oak, Michigan. It is the same hospital system, but not the actual hospital that I worked at. They weren't allowing any visitors in. So Kyle went in the ER by himself. And they said that the chest x-ray showed that he had atypical pneumonia consistent with COVID. They said they were going to watch him for observation

and they were going to give him steroids. I would try to, you know, get him to talk to the nurses. or doctors and communicate that back to me because I know the lingo and I know a lot more about things and labs and tests and stuff that he does, but it was still difficult to get, you know, the full picture of what was going on. They started right from within the first 24 hours talking about him receiving remadezavere. They said that that was part of their protocol that they used to treat COVID patients and that he should consider that.

All the nurses, all the doctors were telling him, you need to take this, you need to take this, We don't know what's going to happen. If you don't take this, I said, nope, absolutely not. I heard that drug is toxic, it's bad. We don't want that, you're doing okay. He starts getting worse, starts requiring more oxygen. He felt very pressure to take the remdesivir. And it was like the whole world against me.

It was like me telling him not to. He decided he was going to try it. He wanted to get better. Well, obviously, you know, we've had a lot of conversations about remdesivir on this show. I mean, this, by the way, was a failed Ebola drug. It was so toxic in the Ebola trials, randomized controlled trial of Ebola virus, disease, therapeutics.

It was so toxic. This is the story. On August 9, 2019, when 681 patients had been enrolled, the data and safety monitoring board conducted an interim analysis on data from 499 patients and on the basis of two observations, Recommend terminating random assignment to ZMAP and Remdesivir. 50%, I believe, if I'm correct, of the people were dying in the group using remdesivir.

It proved to be more dangerous than Ebola itself. And they pulled it and said, no, this isn't going to work. So now we have COVID, not Ebola, a death rate of about 0.27%. And they want to give it to everybody in a hospital. It never made any sense. It's crazy how fast they push this. and we've reported, I'm not going to get into all now, the failed trials, the manipulation by Tony Fauci and NIH to manipulate this study, change the endpoints, everything to try and make it look successful. It's been a disaster. Well, you know, Sarah obviously, you know, had tried to get ivermectin other things, but now you're in that vulnerable position. Your husband's in a hospital. There's not much you can do. He is being inundated by people who, by the way, are only being told there's only one way to deal with this, which is this failed Ebola drug,

this toxic Ebola drug, and they want to give it and eventually he decides to say yes. Let's see how it turned out after that choice. It was a day before Thanksgiving. We were video chatting and I could just tell like he was off and he said he had like a bad night. Her chest and neck was hurting a little bit and his back was hurting. They did x-ray and it turned out that he was just. He had a hole in his lung or a new mothorax, and they said it was a very tiny hole at the time, but there was air escaping from the lungs to outside of the lungs.

The hole did get bigger, and they did put in a chest tube. The next day the resident called me, and he called me from Kyle's phone, so I was kind of shocked by that, but he said to me, Mrs. Mitchell, your husband's auction is dropping, and we need to put him on a ventilator to save his life. He held the phone for me to talk to Kyle, and I said, I love you. He said, I love you. They originally told me that he would be on a vet

for like two or three to five days. His body was just tired. On December 6th is when they finally lifted the COVID precautions, and I was allowed to visit him. So I was able to go in there from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily. It was horrifying. him like that. I would tell him it's okay. Keep fighting. Don't listen to them. We're going to get through this. You're strong. We need to. His kidney lab started to go bad. So the doctor started him on dialysis the next day. Right after Christmas, I remember. They called me in the morning and told me that I need to get there because they

They had been manually bagging him for like an hour. And because his auction kept dropping, Kyle's oxygen was 37%. His face was beat red. Lo and behold, he actually had a hole blown in his lungs from the ventilator. They told me, I think the COVID is just getting worse. And he was requiring more blood pressure medication.

They weren't able to dialysis anymore because his blood pressure was so low. So that fluid was just filling up in his lungs and his body. blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen all started a tank. And the nurse checked his pulse. She said he didn't have a pulse. So she pulled the emergency cord and code blue.

Everybody ran in. She jumped on his chest and started doing CPR. And one of the nurses said, is this what you want them to do? And I'm like, I don't know. I don't know what to do. And she said, remember I told you nobody makes it this long? He fought so hard.

He's been through so much. He's fought so hard for you and your family, and he just can't fight anymore. We went in the room, and I asked the attending at the time, the attending physician, I said, what would you do? I don't know what to do. And he said that I would tell them to stop, because it's just going to prolong his death.

And I looked at my mother-in-law and she shook her head, yes, and we told them to stop. And Kyle was gone immediately. We've been together for 14 years and we've been married for, well, this July after we passed would have been eight years. I know one day I look back and it will be happy memories, but right now it's hard to look. Look at everything they took away from me. My husband Kyle was 39 years old. He was one of the kind. kind. Always happy, always having a good time, always dancing around. He was a life of the party.

I really should consider what they to be and millions of people and families. I don't know how they can sleep at night. I'm joined now by Sarah Mitchell. Sarah, first of all, I'm still, sorry for your loss. I think watching that myself one of the most shocking things is how young your husband Kyle was. I mean we hear about this disease affecting those over the age of 80, suffering them C.O.P. Diabetes unhealthy people. Kyle seemed like a very healthy person. Yes, he was. I think that we were fooled to believe that yeah we were young and healthy and you even if we did get the virus, that we would be okay.

So when, you know, from a perspective, I mean, these stories are always different when you're a medical practitioner yourself. What were the things that stood out to you in your years of work in a hospital that maybe you think should have been done differently? There were a lot of things. First, I was very shocked.

about how things went. First off, I wasn't allowed there, which I understood at first because I also was sick with COVID. But after that, I never realized that they would kick me out for 21 days, very little communication. It was very little with Kyle at the beginning as well because he had the machines, the masks on and stuff. So it was hard to communicate with him and he was very tired.

Just trying to communicate with the doctors, the treatments that we were asking for, the pressure that he was getting for the treatments that they wanted to push on him. I was just met with a lot of resistance and I felt betrayed. I felt isolated. It was just kind of unbelievable being a health care professional myself, every question that I had about things like his rising white blood cell count and asking about like him potentially have an infection, like the viral pneumonia turning to bacterial pneumonia that kind of just blew me off. They were gaslighting me. So that was very shocking to me to experience all of that. It was very

horrifying experience. Now ultimately he starts, you know, obviously needing dialysis, which means he's going through, you know, kidney failure. Did he, did that happen prior to the administration of remdesivir? No. Kyle was healthy. He'd been to the doctor every year regularly. He had sleep apnea, that was his only medical history. The labs when he was first admitted, his kidney levels were normal. And they started to go up a little bit, and then they got really bad, yeah, after the REMdesivir. About two weeks after, I believe, two or three weeks after the REMDazivir is when they got to a critical range, and they needed to do the dialysis.

Do you, as a nurse practitioner, believe that that remdesivir is connected to the kidney issues? issues. Absolutely. Yeah. Um, and you had done some reading. I mean, you went in sort of, and this is what I find really shocking about your story is, you know, a lot of people don't know what's going on. They just handed loved ones over, but you came in in a fairly knowledgeable space. You really had the ability, you've done some research to guide your husband through this process, but instead it's, did you feel like the hospital was fighting you? Oh yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. I will in that, I didn't know as much as I know now and during the process what I learned,

because there was an aspect of kind of working in the hospital throughout the pandemic, kind of being brainwashed, how bad it was and what we were doing and, you know, the whole healthcare hero, they kind of make you believe, like, what you're doing is the right thing. And, you know, I can see how nurses that work in the COVID floors, because I was a labor and delivery nurse, so I didn't work with sick COVID patients, but I can see how that narrative you know, can make them believe, you know, COVID's so bad, no matter what we're doing, you know, it's just the COVID. But they're not trying anything else.

Right. They just keep using the same thing saying, it's deadly. What do you think, I mean, how much do you think the treatment of COVID was what was deadly compared to the COVID? I mean, is there any way to even decipher that for yourself? Yeah. I think that at this point in time, all of the data that we've seen and everything that's coming out the history of remdesivir,

the condition of my husband before he got COVID and pneumonia, just what they treated him with and refused because they refused our right to try. They would not let us use any medications even though they were prescribed from a doctor, you know, outside of the hospital. I was met with resistance trying to get the prescription filled. I was met with so much resistance in the hospital.

Every doctor I talked to, they weren't gonna try anything. They weren't going to try breathing treatments. They weren't going to give him higher dose steroids. They gave him a baby dose of steroids. They wouldn't try Evermectin. They wouldn't try. I mean, I can go on and on. Like every day I was looking, trying to figure out what we could do.

And every single day, they would just shut me down and tell me whatever information I was trying to present to them was skewed. And that the data that I had and the doctors that I was following at that time that they were deceiving me. And so, yeah. I absolutely believe the history of the Remdesivir and my husband's condition prior, it points to that being the cause of the kidney failure and him filling up with fluid in ultimately his death.

We also have this issue of the ventilators, and I'm not sure if you're aware of it, and part of, you know, for the audience that's watching, you know, I know one of the reasons you decided to this story is you want to try and help educate on what you've learned. One of the things that we learned very early on was there was a real concern of the use of ventilators on people because there was a thought that maybe this isn't a respiratory illness. They're calling it, you know, an atypical pneumonia, meaning a very light pneumonia, why are we venting these people? For those of you watching, very early on, I think one of the more outrageous moments, I would almost call it a Paul Revere moment in the middle of COVID was an ER doctor by the name of Kyle Cytton. He came out after having been in ER all day and put out a YouTube video saying, I think we're dealing with this in the wrong way. I think it's important to visit this right now as we think about Sarah's story.

This is Kyle Seidel in the middle of the pandemic saying, I don't believe this is an upper respiratory illness the way we're treating it. Take a look at this. This is Dr. Cameron Kyle Seidel, ER and Critical Care Doctor from New York City. nine days ago, I opened an intensive care unit to care for the sickest COVID positive patients in this city. In these nine days, I have seen things I have never seen before. In treating these patients, I have witnessed medical phenomenon that just don't make sense in the context of treating a disease that is supposed to be a viral pneumonia. Nine days ago, I presumed I was opening an intensive care unit to treat patients with a virus causing a pneumonia that was ravaging lungs across the world, starting out as something mild, cough, a source of, sore throat and progressively increasing in severity until ultimately ending in something called

acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS. This is the paradigm that every hospital in the country is working under. And yet everything I've seen in the last nine days, all the things that just don't make sense, the patients I'm seeing in front of me, the lungs I'm trying to improve, have led me to believe that COVID-19 is not this disease and that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue. In short, I believe we are treating the wrong disease, and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time. As New York City appears to be about 10 days ahead of the country, I feel compelled to get this information out. COVID-19 lung disease, as far as I can see,

is not a pneumonia and should not be treated as one. Rather, it appears as if some kind of viral-induced disease, most resembling high altitude sickness. It is as if tens of thousands of my fellow New Yorkers are on a plane at 30,000 feet and the cabin pressure is slowly being let out. These patients are slowly being starved of oxygen. I have seen patients dependent on oxygen, take off their oxygen, and quickly progress through a state of anxiety and emotional distress, and eventually get blue in the face, and while they look like patients absolutely on the brink of death, they do not look like patients dying of pneumonia. I have never been a mountain climber, and I do not know the conditions at base camp below the highest peaks in the world, but I suspect that the patients I'm seeing in front of me

look most like as if a person was dropped off on the top of Mount Everest without time to acclimate. I don't know the final answer of this disease, but I'm quite sure that a ventilator is not it. It's amazing to see that that statement was made by Dr. Kyle Seidel back to the in March of 2020. There seem to be some adjustments, but as we're hearing in this story, still the ventilator is there. We hear so many stories about these ventilators. And, you know, Sarah, when we think about, you know, the treatment, I just keep thinking,

you're asking for ivermectin hydroxychloroquine. The doctors that were supporting that, the studies being done around the world were showing that that was how, like, you had to fight this infection. there's more of a blood infection that was keeping oxygen from being carried in the blood that ivermectin hydroxychloroquine were ways to kill this virus in the cells so that you could start absorbing blood again. Is there anything in that sort of description that makes you think that's part of the problem with how your husband was being treated? Yeah, yeah, correct. I believe that what they're doing in the hospitals are going about it wrong.

You just kind of have to look at the history, and I don't understand. why they can't look at that and see, like, we're doing X, Y, and Z, and everybody's dying. So I don't understand why they're not trying different things, and, you know, looking outside of the box, like these other doctors that have been swept under the rug, censored, all of that. If all your patients are dying, wouldn't you question it? Why aren't we trying different things? Anything. I would try anything to save my husband at that point, and I just met with so much resistance,

and they made me feel like I was crazy and I was the bad guy. and these other doctors were, they were wrong, and it was going to be their way, they were going to stick to their protocol, their standard of care, and that was the end of every conversation I had with them. I can't imagine the frustration under those circumstances. So take me to the moment you get the call from the hospital, they're going to put your husband on a respirator now, or on a ventilator. What was that exchanged with your husband? It kind of caught me off guard. I guess I was getting ready for the day and my kids getting them where they got to go,

my daughter's school. And we had talked to prior to that because that's when he first got the pneumothorax where I drove to the hospital and they refused to let me in there talk to my husband face-to-face still at that point. He said he was stable, which he was not. So when they called me in the morning, I kind of had an inkling that it was getting to that point. And, you know, I was very afraid. We were both very afraid, and I think that fear is a very powerful thing.

So he was getting worse and worse, and they kept talking about the vendor. They kept talking about, you know, how he was going to get worse, and they didn't know if he was going to make it. So when I got that phone call, I didn't know what to do. They told me, your husband's auction is dropping, and we have to put him on a ventilator to save his life. And so I was so scared that I said, I didn't say okay, but it was. They like held the phone, Kyle's phone to him, and I told him I love him, and he said, I love you.

I said, I love you, and he said, I love you. And that was the last time I talked to my husband. That's how I went down, but it was just fear. That was the last time you ever heard his voice. Mm-hmm. So from every time visiting him after that... He was on the ventilator, heavily sedated, paralyzed. All right.

Well, your story isn't the only story out there. I can't tell you how many times we've heard this taking place. You know, for those of you watching, I know so many of you have written into the show, I'm sure you're saying, oh my God, that's just like what happened to my mother or my husband or my wife or, God forbid, your child. The stories are flooding in from hospitals all around, you know, and in the face of, you know, saying things to a loved one like, I don't think they're going to make it. you would think at that point you would be able to try a different approach. Okay, your approach is not working for my loved one.

How about Ivermectin hydroxychloroquine? I know many of you are saying to yourself, well, I would have that knowledge. I would know to go in there. Clearly, Sarah had some sense of that. But what if you really pushed and got it to move? Would that make a difference? Believe it or not, this next story comes from the exact same hospital system. Take a look at this.

March 2020, the media started talking about COVID and the symptoms that people were having. We were riding on the side of caution. We had groceries delivered to the house. We would take zinc and high levels of vitamin D. In November of 2021, my husband became sick, started having flu-like symptoms. It was running a fever for a few days,

and then things started to turn more into respiratory issues. issues. He ended up waking me up about four in the morning and saying that he thought he wanted to go to the ER just to go ahead and get the steroid shot. I took Ryan over to Beaumont Hospital in Dearborn, Michigan. As we're driving to the hospital, I told him, I'm very worried about you going if they tried to put you on a COVID protocol. I said, I'm worried I might not, but I'll get you back out of there. And he said, I know not to take from Decevere. I know not to do a ventilator. I'm an American. I have rights to say no to something I don't want to take. And we didn't know how wrong that would be. Since I was not allowed to go into the ER with Ryan,

most of our communication was through text messages. But then the first few hours that Ryan had gotten there, at some point they had given him a chest x-ray and diagnosed him with pneumonia. They wanted to keep him still for observation. They did start to bring up a remdesivir, and he had told them no. I had made sure I called and told them no. I said, I want to make sure it's in his records that he is not to get remdesivir.

The very next day that he was in the hospital, he woke up with the IV in his arm. He never even knew that they did it. Within the first few days, they started telling me that they were watching his kidneys closely. So I asked the doctor, did he get remdesivir? We know romedosevere can cause kidney problems. And he admitted, yes, well, it can. But I don't have his charts in front of me to know if he was given that or not.

And then I'd have a nurse on the phone. Same thing telling me, I don't have that notes in front of me. You'll have to talk to a doctor. After a while of calling and got a different nurse on the phone. And so I said, you know, I heard about this new drug called Ramdicevere that's supposed to be given to COVID patients. And I heard it's pretty effective. Is there a way to see if my husband can be given that if he hasn't already?

And when I said it like that, she goes, oh, let me look in his chart and said, oh, yes, he was given remdesivir as soon as he came in. Ryan never had problems with his kidneys prior to going into the hospital. So after just a week of being in the hospital and being given remdicevere, my husband's kidneys were now at a 6% function. He had to go on full-time kidney dialysis. thin two days. I got a call about two in the morning the doctor telling me I needed to convince my husband to go on a ventilator and he thought it would give his body rest and I said no like I'm not going to tell him to go on a vent. He's breathing on his own. He just had his mat has oxygen completely off and was wearing two face masks like why would I tell him to be going on a ventilator

if he can breathe and he said there's one nurse here pushing me to go on a vent. I told her no way in hell am I going on a vent, don't bring it up again. His oxygen was doing really good. He said he was at like 98% and that they're talking about putting him in a step down unit because he's doing so well. That same doctor calls me up again, tells me that I need to push my husband to go onto a vent. And he said, well, to be honest with you, we told your husband that we are going to vent him with or without his consent. And I just was jaw drop. I said, well, that's illegal.

And as soon as I said that, he slammed the phone down on me. I tried to get a hold of a doctor. I need to get a doctor on the phone right away. I need to talk to someone. No doctor is available. And my husband was no longer replying to any text messages. And the doctor had called me two hours later and told me that he had vented my husband two hours ago.

After I learned that my husband was vented, that was probably the scariest feeling at that point when now they still won't let me into the hospital. So it took a patient advocate calling and asking the infectious disease doctor if I could get in there. It's a danger to my safety with being on a COVID floor. But as soon as my husband's vented and he can no longer talk for himself and say what happened, I could be on a COVID floor 12 hours a day. So then I was able to go up there.

I was standing over him and at one point he opened his eyes. And oh my gosh, you know, his eyes were open. I was like, Ryan, can you hear me? And he was making a lot of facial movement so I knew he could move his face. So I said, Ryan, can you raise your eyebrows for me? And he raised his eyebrows. And I told him I loved him. I said, Ryan, I love you.

And I'm fighting for you to get you out of here. I'm joined now by Stacy. Again, your husband, just like Sarah's so young, is saying, don't worry, honey, there's no way. This is the United States of America. They're not going to put me on some drug I don't want. They're not going to ventilate me if I don't want to. And yet, you have to be telling this story.

What are your thoughts just as you reflect on this right now? It still feels like I'm in a bad dream. It feels like I'm the one that's going to be waking up. Someone's going to tell me I've been in a coma for the last few months. It feels surreal that our health care system would do something like they had done for him and failed us. I mean it does, you know, in your situation, let me understand this correctly in case I get it wrong.

He's doing better. You said, you know, not only is he not. you know, not only is he not wearing oxygen a certain point, but they're putting masks on him when he's not wearing oxygen? Yeah, he said he was double-masked. He's double-masked. So a guy who is, you know, obviously trying to get healthy, and the moments where he takes the oxygen off,

they're making him double-mask in that hospital. Yeah. That seems insane. It does. And even under those circumstances, he's breathing on his own through a double mask, they move him out of, I'm assuming, like an ICU, space into a step-down unit or were going to?

I think they're going to. They were going to because he was progressing. Yes. So how shocking was it when in that time where he's doing better he's on the rise, you get a call that he has to be ventilated? Very. He told me that the nurses were telling him he was going to be going into a step-down unit and he even asked his own aunt who is a nurse, what does that mean?

And she said it means you're getting closer to coming home. And he even responded like every day I've been doing better and better. So we were under the impression that things were looking good. And when he had text me and showed me that his oxygen was at 98%. I assumed everything was fine. And at that same time that he was texting me, that's when the doctor was on the phone with me trying to convince me to get my husband to go on a vent. He's at 98% oxygen level and the doctor is trying to convince you he needs a ventilator.

He was. Yeah. Well, you know, I know that because of these situations you both find yourselves like really in a deep investigation on what's going on here. You're obviously here on the high wire to get your story out. I know you're not alone. I, you know, I met you out there on, you know, when I was speaking, I believe in, was it Utah or Michigan, Michigan.

But there's a lot of evidence now that there's a incentivized system. When we try to understand how you take someone at a 98% oxygen level, why would you ventilate them? I want to, for those of you that are watching this show, and maybe haven't seen just a couple of weeks ago, we brought on two lawyers that are bringing lawsuits in California with almost these identical stories that they're fighting in court. This is what they had to say about the crazy incentivizing system around the way. around just getting you into a hospital, getting you in an ICU bed, getting you on remdesivir, and putting you on a ventilator. Essentially all these things that are having a horrible track record,

about nine out of ten dying that goes through that entire system, the amount of payouts that are coming every time you step along that system are incredible. Take a look at this. When they were seeking emergency use authorization approval, the panelists that went in front of the CDC to ask for that, nine of them were from the NIH. Nine of them from the NIH had financial ties to Gilead Sciences. Oh my God. The maker of Remdesivir.

Right. That's where the money trail starts. In California, there are three ways to treat somebody. Outpatient, inpatient, non-complex, inpatient complex. You treat them as an outpatient, give them some, give them something that works, give them some Ivermectin, send them home.

$3,200 is the average charge rate in California. Okay. If you treat them as a non-complex patient inpatient, you let them have a room in the hospital, we're talking $11,000 and change. But get this. If they become a complex patient, and all that's required is you either intubate them

or you put them in the ICU, or you say they're in the ICU, maybe they're just in a room. At that point, they're a complex patient. Average charge rate is $454,000 in change. On top of that, our government has incentivized the use of REMDesivir, to the exclusion of other remedies. If you don't offer ivermectin, you don't offer hydroxychloroquine,

you just offer rindexibur. Now you get a code and you get a 20% bump on the entire hospital stay. That's another $90,000 on 450, roughly. I'm just using round numbers here. Outrageous numbers, and we had been reporting on this, you know, all the way back from Scott Jensen, who is now running for political office up in, Minnesota. So, you know, when you hear these stories from doctors, they were saying we were being

told by our hospital that they have to, you know, move in this direction. Your stories, you know, when you hear that, when you hear that, you know, was there the possibility that could have given a steroid or something? Do you think it's possible that your husband could have been given an outpatient treatment? Just get some oxygen into him. Give him a steroid, even better looking back. I can't imagine what you think had some ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine or something up front, so you could just give them an outpatient situation. But when you hear that there was an incentivization to take these patients, and as soon as they admit them, boom, tens of thousands of dollars.

If they can get them into an ICU bed, hundreds of thousands of dollars. If they put them on a ventilator and remdesivir, and, you know, nearly half a million dollars your husbands, you know, are now worth to that hospital. So does that somehow put some puzzle pieces together when you look at what was taking place? Yeah, absolutely it does. When Kyle was in the hospital and afterward, I just took a deep dive. And once you start reading and learning and hearing the right people, it all makes sense now.

I feel like he had a target on his back the moment he walked into that hospital. You know, the place where you're supposed to go, where you think that you can get help when you're sick and you're in trouble. Somehow that's all out the window. Informed consent has gone out the window. I think that's a huge problem with the REM Dezavir. I was telling my husband what I knew about Remdesivir, or what I'd heard about Remdesivir, but they're telling him the complete opposite.

I honestly don't know what they were telling him, but he was afraid they were fearing him, they bullied him into it. So yeah, it does make sense why they won't go outside of their protocols because it's all about money. And for you, you're talking about informed consent, you didn't even get any form of that. I mean, you were getting bad information, but you, you know, ultimately consented because your husband's like everyone's saying, I'm right. You're like, well, I mean, what am I going to do?

I'm not going to go against the whole system. But you're saying no. Your husband's saying no, don't touch me with that. And you suspect I think he might already be on it. I mean, it's outrageous. You have to lie. You have to play a game. Like play positive, you said.

You said, you know, I've heard of this thing, Remdesivir. is there any chance my husband could get it because you know deep down they're lying to me. And then what's that moment like when she admits it? I just feel like someone had hit me in the gut because I knew. My husband had knew that there was a money incentive as well because he's an insurance agent. So he knew that he didn't want to go on it for that reason. And besides what everyone was saying was side effects of it. And when she told me that he had gotten it since he came in,

I just felt like someone that kicked me in the gut, because I knew, because they've been telling me all along, they were watching his kidneys closely. So I had an inkling, and then when they said it, I just knew, like, okay, now we're in a fight for our lives. And both of your husbands end up on dialysis. No history of kidney issues in either. As far as I know, done a lot of reporting on COVID.

There's no understanding that COVID causes kidney failure. You would think someone in the same hospital system would wake up to, I think this treatment is causing kidney failure. We're adding a deadly problem to a complication. How does this make any sense? Well, they should know when they're giving medications what the side effects are. So if they were giving true informed consent, they should know that it causes kidney failure in 53, whatever percent of the patients that they give it to. Like you said before, it was shut down in the Ebola trials. So if they did not know that information, then they should not be giving that to their patients.

That goes for the doctors. That goes for the nurses that are blindly administering it. So, yeah. And I had a respiratory, I don't know if she's a nurse or a doctor or therapist that was in there. I had talked to her and said, you know, how many of these patients that are on these dialis machines have been given remdesivir? And at first she put her head down and was like, oh, I don't know. And then before she left the room, she stopped at the doorway, kind of looked over her shoulder at me and said, all of them. All of them.

All of them. Well, you know, in Sarah's case, you know, things really got out of control fast. But imagine that you have the knowledge and you decide, there's got to be something I can do to reverse this. They're moving against me. They put my husband on Remdesivir and lied to me about it. They just vented him, you know, everything is going in the wrong direction. I'm not a part of any of this. Can I find someone in this hospital that will listen to me?

I imagine for all of you watching the high wire, you think, oh, that would be me. I'd be able to get out of this situation. You're never going to believe what happened in Stacey's story. Take a look at this. When I was sitting up there with him, I started to look at his IV and starting to pay attention to what he was on. His blood pressure meds, prophyl, and fentanyl. I asked the nurse in the room, I said, what is he being given that's going to actually help him get better?

And the nurse looked at me and said, well, nothing, but as all were allowed to give him. It was after that that I started to really like go home and replaying all this stuff in my head. Thinking, oh my goodness, I have to now fight for his life. When I researched, finding out that I could legally record these conversations, So I started to do that. I asked one nurse not just earlier this week.

I said, what is it that you're giving him here that's helping him get off of that vent? And she said, there's nothing. It makes no sense at all. It makes no sense at all. There's something in the patient's rights where they be allowed legally to take their own medication. There is. And you are next to kin. So you're making the decisions for him when he can't.

So you are, his eyes, ears, mouth, knowledge, everything. everything. So yeah, we would have to do everything in our power that you guys want. Knowing that I had to lawyer up and tried to get him help, we went to court and tried to get his right to try to get onto his home meds. Had a hearing, the judge had refused to allow Ryan his right to his home meds, and then also said that he wasn't going to allow an appeal. About five weeks into Ryan's hospital stay at Beaumont. He was doing pretty bad as oxygen was starting to drop now from being on events so long He was struggling I was sitting with Ryan and I just started to pray over him

I put my hand on him and I was praying on him and telling God to please lead me to the right people So I just started asking anybody who would listen and seeing who could break this protocol and I came across this other doctor He's heard the studies about Ivermectin and that he was willing to give him the Ivermectin and that he was willing to give him the Ivermectin The next day my husband had this first dose of Ivermectin, and in less than 24 hours, his blood oxygen went from that 64% to 100%. And every day he was coming off the vent more and more. In the first time ever, he was holding his own with his blood pressure and his heart rate. Sadly on day four, two infectious disease doctors had come in, Dr. Hannity Das, and Dr.

James Sunstrom. Dr. Doste revoked his order that was given. She had stopped the use of ivermectin immediately and put it in her notes that they don't allow veterinarian meds to be given, and she signed herself off of his case. Ryan's health started to decline. He started to go back to needing the vent 100%,

and his oxygen was starting to drop again. Monday morning, approximately around 3 a.m. The good doctor had to be able to get to be in 10. told me you need to come down here. I think we are losing Ryan. As I got there, I got into the hallway and I was standing outside his room and they were trying to do an emergency prone on Ryan's, so they were flipping him to his stomach, see if they could get his oxygen back up. I played my wedding song for Ryan one more time. I thanked him for coming into my life and all that he's done for me. I hope that God put him in my life for a reason.

If it wasn't for me to bring Ryan home to me, there has to be a bigger reason for that. It has to be. When I was with him and holding his hand when he took his last breath. I absolutely blame the hospital for his death and every single hand that touched Ryan that kept that protocol going. It's such an emptiness. I'm just merely existing now. These hospitals have no idea what they took from me. I can't replay it back.

Watch this story. I can't help but think that the hospital murdered your husband. I mean, the one thing I can say is you can't have any guilt. You worked so hard. You went to court systems. You went beyond the court system. You found a doctor, which must have been virtually impossible to do in this system. You finally achieve what I'm sure Sarah wished had been possible in any way.

They deliver ivermectin. and it's working. Yeah. It was starting to work. And I think any reasonable person, even if it wasn't working, what difference does it make? Right? I mean, I just sit here thinking,

so what? You're telling me my husband's going to die anyway. He's taking something that his kidneys are feeling. You can see the photos of his hands are swelling. He's on death's door. What difference does it make? Let the woman have her. Revivirmectin. Right. Is that right? Right. For someone to come in and take that away, tell me the moment you found that out that they were going to take back all that you'd done to make happen. They actually kind of kept that from us as well. That was something that kind of found out through the good doctor finding out about it

when it was going to be given the fourth day. That's when the doctor had found out that they, had revoked it. They never made no attempt to contact me to talk to me in any way. Let us know what was going on. And it took the chief of staff trying to get involved to try to help my husband and fighting to get that back on him. But we were unsuccessful at the hospital. And the only thing I could think of, I did check in to one of the doctor to see how much they're paid by what drug companies. And I did see that the, um, I did see that Chief what they call them. He's a head of infectious disease.

He's actually paid by Gilead, so that could have been a motive. Wow. This doctor shows up, obviously, out of nowhere, takes ivermectin out of the, and then just walks off and never... He signed yourself off. Hit and run. Hit and run. You know, similar stories, but different for you, Sarah, as a nurse.

I mean, just sitting here, let's just look at Stacey's story. What is it to think that medical professionals, I mean, I think we're all under the assumption that doctors are doing what's what. They're trying, they're doing their best. I could understand, you know, as we said, maybe remdesivir is it's all you know. You're being told this is what works. But in this story, they see a patient that seems to be coming around. How do you describe, how do you explain a medical professional? Forget about the whole system.

A medical professional that takes that away. It's infuriating. I think that I'm ashamed. I was ashamed to be a nurse for a long time after all this. I've left the hospital since. I cannot be a part of it. I cannot believe that people are being a part of it. I think that blood is on their hands and there's no excuse.

There's no excuse for that. Why would you do that? You have a duty to do no harm as a doctor, as a nurse, as any healthcare professional. And in that case specifically, where you see that he was getting better, and then you just took it away. Why? I don't know why they took it away. It was like a contest of egos or what? I don't know.

That's a human life. It's like some doctors don't even have any nurses, I guess, too, don't have any regard for human life. And that, to me, is sickening. It's infuriating. I'm ashamed that I was in and, inadvertently, you know, working in a hospital involved at all. I've never had my hands in any COVID patients at all, but still I felt like I have to get out of there.

I cannot be a part of that. And, and they are failing. They are failing. I'm not doing it anymore. I will not be a part of it. They should be ashamed of themselves. And I just pray that more people will stand up. And, you know, it doesn't matter.

You're going to lose your job, maybe, potentially, or whatever. But there's better things out there. you need to be brave and courageous and stand up and do what's right. You have to do what's right. So there's no excuse that's evil. What was that call like from the brave, courageous doctor that got the Ivermectin to your husband when he had to tell you, I'm sorry. What did he comment on it at all, what he thought about the fact that that was being taken away?

He thought it was a turf war. He said it was that he felt like they were just, they thought he was overstepping his boundaries as a doctor taken over. for that patient, but it was our right to be able to choose him as Ryan's doctor. Just like that it was supposed to be his right to use his home meds, so they broke a lot of rights in there. And we, he cried with us when Ryan had passed away. He told us that Ryan, we had a lot of them telling us that Ryan was a victim of medical tyranny.

You know, we had people just, He was just a turf war there and no one was thinking about what was best for Ryan and what was best for us. It was just about obeying orders and keeping their paychecks, worrying about their own paychecks. When you try to imagine that doctor that goes out of his way to bring in a different approach, I have to think about Dr. Palmerich who has been on our show before. You know, this guy is one of the leading ICU. ICU doctors in the world. He has published more peer-reviewed studies than any living ICU doctor at the time. And in his hospital was having a 50% reduction in deaths from

COVID in the ICU, meaning the extreme cases, not the early cases. He's getting them when they're all the way far along. And he is using things like Ivermach and hydroxychloroquine, other drugs and steroids that he's put together out of his own investigation. This is a hearing that Senator Ron Johnson had. Thank God for people like Senator Ron Johnson that brought this to light. This was the second opinion hearing that he had with doctors. Imagine, you know, you're the doctor trying to help and you're seeing it work. Imagine you're a doctor that knows it's working.

You can prove it. You can prove it amongst the staff around you. This hospital may be just like the ones that are being discussed here that are killing their patients, putting them on dialysis, they're all dying, yet there's this shining light having a 50% reduction until they do the same thing to him. They take his tools away. This is him describing what that feels like for a doctor.

What's happening now is completely unprecedented in the history of medicine and across the world. We have the federal government, we have state agencies and hospitals telling doctors how to practice medicine. They're interfering with a sacred patient physician relationship. They are telling doctors to be doctors. So I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then, this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system,

but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? This said, I can use remdesivir. And then I will quote, there was an added section. Do not endorse section, which includes medications that may cause harm, and efficacy is not supported in peer-reviewed, published RCTs. These medications will not be verified or dispensed. for the prevention or treatment of COVID.

This list includes either mectin, becalutamide, etopsycide, fluvoxamine, deutesteroid, and finestoride. And then just to stick it to me, they added acorbic acid. The healthcare system was effectively preventing me treating my patients according to my best clinical judgment.

And then how did this progress? I objected. So the first week I was in the ICU, I didn't know what to do. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had seven COVID patients, including a 31-year-old woman. I was not allowed to treat these patients. people. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people die. I then try to sue the system. And you know what they did? They did something called peer sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of seven most outrageous crimes that I had committed, and that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients, they immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed and posed such an outright threat to these patients, ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50%, those of my colleagues.

I then went on through the sham peer review. I went to a kangaroo court where they continued, this and the end result was I lost my hospital privilege and was reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank. So here I was standing up for patients rights and this hospital, this evil hospital ended my medical career. So that's what they do. It's an outright outrage. It's evil to the core. Incentivizing the road to death is apparently what has happened in hospitals all across this country. We have heard so many stories.

You're getting a very vivid one of two of them today. And when you listen to Merrick, you have to think about a half a million dollars can be made if we use remdesivir, if we put them on ventilators, if we don't let guys like Paul Merrick deliver any of the protocols that they are showing success with. It's not like they're making up their minds, 50% reduction in death, and he lost his job because it doesn't make the same amount of money to save patients. We are making our money by, I think, essentially killing them. And then any doctor that steps up and fights and says, I'm not going to listen to you, I signed a patient oath, a Hippocratic oath to do no harm. They're the ones having the licenses under review. They're the ones that now have a law in California saying that they should be investigated.

I mean, we are, I mean, you know, as a medical practitioner, these are like dark ages. These are witch trials. This is crazy what you found yourselves in the middle of. But again, from that medical perspective, a doctor saying, I mean, he's showing, we all assume if you're the guy showing success, everyone's gathered around you saying, tell me what you're doing. The opposite is the case. Yeah. It's terrifying.

I never thought that I would see these days. You know, it's just mind-blowing. I don't know how else to put it. It's scary. When you think of this hospital, when you think of the doctors that, you know, treated your husband, you know, are the doctors victims here?

Or what guilt should they carry for this? That they have a lot of blood on a lot of blood on their hands from innocent lives. Just I had one doctor say it directly to me that he had to put his livelihood in his paycheck first. and I looked at him and said, you know, you should be putting my husband's life above your paycheck. You know, that's my livelihood that's sitting there. He's everything to me, he's my whole life.

And they should be filling so much guilt for what they've done. They're going to stand before the Lord one day with all this blood on their hands. So no matter what, there will be accountability when we're another. But I would like to see it done while we're all here as well. I don't want this to just be a story about this heart. horrible time. You tell a story about Ryan and your husband. What do you want us to remember about him?

Oh, gosh. He was like my best friend. We grew up together as we met when we were 15. He's such a hard worker and he would do anything for anybody. He loved taking care of the veterans. Love supporting our police officers. All the elderly always loved him since he worked with insurance and life insurance. He had a very, very big funeral.

A lot of people came to it, very well known. Everyone loved Ryan. He'd just get along with a stranger so easily. Always wanting to help everyone. And then when he needed the help, the hospital system filled him. It sure did. And for you, I mean, you have children, right? Yeah.

How old are your kids? My son, Mark, is 15. and my daughter Harper is seven. Oh, that must have been so difficult for them. Yeah, yeah. It's very hard. When, you know, as they grow up, what will you try to remind them about their father?

Just remind them how much he loved them. I know my son Mark will remember a lot more because he's always, they've been so close with Kyle and my son Mark were very close. were very close. They were like best friends. They did everything together basically. My son used to play travel hockey and so Kyle was the biggest cheerleader and he was there for all of that. You know just just remember how happy he was and how much full of life he was and always helping people. He's very generous and just my daughter is very similar to my husband.

So she looks a lot like him too. So I think that's good but you know we feel him close. to us and we know that he's with us so that brings a little bit of comfort to us. So just you know continuously reminding them they're they have a long road of not having their dad and that's very hard for me and for them. So you know we have a long way to go. Well I mean there's nothing really that can be said at this time you know how hard this must be but I do want to say that You know, through all of this, there's so many people that are going through incredible hardships

that have been brought upon us unfairly, wrongly, perhaps even illegally, and I know you're both working on legal cases to make this right, but I want to say that I really think what you're, by being brave enough to tell your story here, it's really the court of public opinion that shifts this, and we are going to continue to shine the light on this hospital, the atrocious, and what they did in taking care of your husbands or, you know, the opposite. Yeah. But, you know, I pray for your strength. I believe you're right. I believe those that, you know, that leave before we do or are here with us.

And I just want to know that you have our support, and there's millions of people that are here with you. Yeah, thank you. And there's a lot of stories like ours. We have this opportunity. You gave us this great opportunity to scream it from the rooftops. And there are a lot of people who have had very similar stories, thousands and thousands, that we all try to stick together. And you know, people know that this is an isolated event and what's really going on.

So I appreciate you having us here to have this platform. It's our honor. Thank you for your courage. Thank you, thank you. Thank you. Stay seen. Well, you know, in these times, In these times where the system seems to be against us, the most important thing is no matter what to be as educated as we can be.

That's why the high wire delivers this program every week. And we also know that there's a lot of people out there that can't handle the whole two and a half or three hours that that's here. For those of you, they're brand new. There's a lot of science. There's a lot of evidence. We also shorten this down for you. And that program is called Get Vaccinated. Folks, it's time for you to get vaccinated.

The Highwire is launching a brand new campaign to arm you with the facts. In short videos you can share anywhere, featuring the world's leading experts on COVID-19, vaccines and everything in between. Natural immunity appears to be robust, complete, and durable. These are the drop-the-mike, fully cited facts to help you, the super spreaders of truth. in this real war of misinformation. Share the link, download the short video, and post to your favorite social media platform.

All you have to do is go to thehighwire.com slash debt vaccinated for all of the latest short videos. And make sure to grab your Get Vaccinated merch at thehighwire.com. Click shop for the latest in highwire gear. We want you armed with the facts online and on the front lines. Get the facts, lose the fear at the highwire.com. You know, you saw our, you know, a flashback with Dr. Paul Merrick. The newest get vaccinated video you can find is Dr. Paul Merrick, who actually showed incredible success, did studies and proved that with vitamin C, he could dramatically reduce sepsis in hospitals, which is the number one cause of death in hospitals.

So he was literally on the verge of saving millions of people around the world when he was fired for being so successful against COVID also. I mean, it's just the atrocities are incredible. This is what we're going to do here on the high wire. We are not here celebrating pharma, obviously. Look, they have their place. Let me be perfectly clear. I've had surgeries. I've had things.

I'm not here to see an end to pharma. There are products that we all use at different times in our lives. But the point is we're supposed to have regulatory agencies that make sure that those products are safe. We're supposed to have a doctor-patient relationship so our doctors can decide what's right for us and our patients, not the head of the hospital, not Tony Fauci. There shouldn't be the outlaw of ivermectin in products that doctors like Paul Merrick and Peter McCullough and all of these great scientists and doctors that have been on our show. We shouldn't be taking tools away from people.

At the same time, out of the one side of our mouth, we're taking away on the other side of our mouth telling the world, we don't know anything about COVID. We're trying to understand it. Well, while you're trying to understand it, why don't you let those that seem to have a better graphs do what's working for them? I mean, it really, but we're trying to be reasonable here in situations that are so incredibly unreasonable. This isn't.

There is no place in reason when moneyed interests are taking over. when the dollar is what's driving decisions, when a patient could be making your hospital like $5,000 if it's a flu when you send them home, or a half a million dollars if you can manage to kill them when they come in with COVID. This is going to be a blight in the history books of science and medicine. I think, you know, all of those doctors and nurses, and I have friends that are among them will have to, you know, in that moment, later, on in life when they are meeting that time, they will have to reconcile with themselves. Those that don't find themselves in court systems and potentially being arrested for crimes

against humanity, which is really what is taking place here. Remember, those Nazi doctors that were on trial during the Nuremberg Codes, they said exactly what we're going to hear from these doctors that treated these husbands in these stories. They're going to say, I was doing what the hospital told me to. I was doing what the head of the health agency for my country told me to do. I was supposed to test on young children. It wasn't my fault that they were dying and the tests that we were doing. That was what I was told to do.

I kept, yes, I was using remdesivir. Yes, everyone I put it on did happen to get kidney failure. There's a lineup for the dialysis machines in my hospital. But that's not my fault. Really? It's not. Wake up. If you're a doctor or nurse right now, wake up because I will not defend you.

No one will. We will not defend this. You're supposed to have a brain and even more importantly you're supposed to have a heart. And you're supposed to have the ability to look around you and say, wait a minute. This doesn't make any sense. Is COVID killing this people or is it the drugs we're putting them on? And if I have to tell the patient we don't have any treatment other than remdesivir and if we take them off, there's nothing else that exists. If I have to tell you, don't look at those studies that are showing incredible success with every other drug but the one we're giving you, you should think twice. And when you see a problem, if you see an added illness like kidney failure that isn't even a part of COVID being caused by the drug you're using, then you must stop and say, my God, I'm killing people and I will stop. So to the nearly 30%

of doctors that rejected this vaccine and started pushing back. and the brilliant ones that have all been here at this desk, fighting for the truth, standing up against their licenses being revoked under attack by idiots like Gavin Newsom that are working for the destruction of humanity. We have choices that can be made. Here in America, we are about to go into an election

that is so important. I am not going to tell you who to vote for. I don't care. I know that there are Democrats that are on our side. There are Republicans on our side, but you better be asking the right questions about what they think about medical care. Do I have the right to decide what is injected into me, what drugs I take, whether I go on to a ventilator or not? Tell me right now because it's going to decide how I vote for you. Do I have the right to decide how my body is treated in a hospital?

Do I have a right to decide what's injected into my body? Do I have a right to decide what's injected into my children's body? What is your concept of parental rights? Does the government own my child or am I in charge of my child until they're 18? These are really simple freaking questions, folks. And you better be asking them. And you better be listening for them when they're in the debates. Because the future of how we live in this planet, the future of us, someday, each one of us, unfortunately,

will probably have to cross through the doors of a hospital for one reason or another. And God forbid they decide to kill us when maybe all of us. we had was light pneumonia and could have been sent home, but they didn't tell us they would have lost a half a million dollars by letting us go. We make the difference. Your donations to places like the Highwire and to our legal team so that we can help in stories like this, you make that possible. Where else do you get to do that?

Where else do you get to make a difference? Please, this is one of the things you can do is help us bring these stories, but not just bring these stories, but like no other news agency, fight to change these stories. We have matching funds available. We want to thank the family that's made that possible. I want to thank Sarah and Stacey for bringing their stories to us. It takes so much courage. And I want to thank them for their courage in these situations.

How hard they fought for their husbands. I know their husbands are thankful for that too. We're all in this together. We cannot just sit back and play victim cards, and we cannot elect people that tell us we are just victims. We need to go and make a difference in our governments all around the world. All around the world this is happening, which is what shows you. This is a global problem, being driven by a small group of globalists.

The high wire is covering all of this. you should be informing yourself as best you can. Turn off the lies, turn on the truth, turn the high wire, and I'll see you next week.