The Highwire with Del Bigtree - DECADES OF FRAUD PLAGUE SCIENCE

Episode Date: August 30, 2022

The CDC’s fall from grace around the Covid Pandemic Response, brings into focus years of fraud plaguing Science and Public Health. With claims of misconduct, and bad research behavior going back decades, some top Officials believe up to HALF of all scientific literature may be untrue.#PlagueOfScience #ScienceFraud #CDC #InformedConsentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

It's amazing to me, Jeffrey, how these people like Rochelle Walenski and Tony Fauci can just parade in front of the camera, basically grovel and say, oh, our bad, leave it to us, we're going to fix their own problem. Let us do our own investigations in here. We totally messed up, but that's on us. I mean, the way they do it without any sort of sense of actual morality or ethics or understanding or admitting what actually went wrong, which was sort of hiding the truth from the public. Right. And for people just tuning in right now, you would have known this if you're watching the high wire over the last two years,

that the science, as we were taught to believe, has failed in spectacular ways and continues to fail with absolutely devastating consequences, as we've reported over the last two years. But the question really is, is this isolated within the walls of the CDC? Is it just a couple my bads on some scientists in the CDC? see one of the bedrocks of what we do here at the highwire is to question scientific consensus. We don't just look at scientists or settled science and say, that's great. You can use that now as, you know, wield that as an authoritarian hammer and command us on

what to do with our lives. We investigate the science. And now looking side to side with our viewers, we're all on the same level here, even new viewers. We can look at this through a whole new lens, something we've been reporting on for many, many years. And this is questioning the science. So in July 2021, about a year ago, this was reported in the BMJ. It was a, it was a commentary. It was by Richard Smith. He was a former head editor at the BMJ. And he wrote this. This is the title, time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven

otherwise. And he says in there, we have, we have now reached a point where those doing systemic reviews must start by assuming that a study is fraudulent until they can have some evidence to the contrary. I mean, this is like a submission statement of what we do here. But this isn't something that just was a phenomenon of the COVID response and all of the bad science that was really held up there by these institutions like the CDC. This has been going on for years, if not decades. This is a article, a commentary by Richard Smith. I'm sorry, Richard Horton. He is the editor-in-chief of the Lansing. it. And in 2015, he wrote this titled, What is Medicine's Five Sigma? In there, he writes, the case against science is straightforward. Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may

simply be untrue. We aid and abet the worst behaviors. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. The apparent endemicity of bad research behavior is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. And boy, was that really a prophecy really to what we saw here with COVID? And now we bring us just, you know, this is what I've been saying. This is the scientific method. The scientific method is supposed to be to challenge any theory, to challenge any new product. And by the way, that's also the job of the fourth estate of the fourth branch of government as defined by our founding fathers. The media, the news should never

be afraid to ask the obvious questions, even if it means. be uncomfortable for government or institutions or corporations. That is our job, yet we have been assaulted. Everyone that has come forward saying, ah, hold on a second. That science, there is other science refuting exactly what was just said there. If you did not go along with the CDC, they literally tried to create a ministry of truth to shut you down. And now it's the very CDC that we're supposed to just bow down to and answer to without ever questioning, is now questioning itself, is now supposedly going to reorganize itself.

So where do we go from here? Have we learned the lesson that science lies? That when you say to some of the biggest corporations being Pfizer and Moderna and Sinofia Ventus and all of these AstraZeneca's, these companies that make billions and billions of dollars, when you say to them, rush a product to us and we will get it to our population as fast as possible, and you will stand to make tens, if not hundreds of billions of dollars within the next year or two, do you think under those circumstances there's just a possibility that that you'll stand to make tens, they may lie and sweep some of the problems under the rug.

I mean, come on now. This is what the Lancet and the British Medical Journal have been screaming about. And they're the two of the top journals where all of this garbage is being published that our CDC and our FDA are pointing to. And who's getting ridiculed? Those of us who have never been buying it from the beginning.