The Highwire with Del Bigtree - DOCTORS DOWN UNDER MAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COVID VAX INJURIES

Episode Date: February 5, 2023

An underreported story of great significance as a top Australian medical society has just given notice to its doctors that they aren’t covered for damages from the Covid shots.#AMPS #InformedConsent #VaccinateAustraliaBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

This is a huge story we're about to report, and it really received almost no attention in the media. So we know about this idea of indemnity for the vaccine manufacturers and actually for the doctors and nurses who were doing the injecting as well to basically shield them from any liability, any pushback from all these injuries we're seeing. You know, during COVID or even before COVID for the childhood schedule, something has happened in Australia. And it was in this notice, really illegal notice. This was the Australian Medical Professional Society. This was put forward on January 11th, 2023. And let's look at this. This was to doctors, physicians, nurses.

This is what they say. So imagine you're a doctor. You've been giving this vaccine out and you get this. Dear medical professional, administering of COVID-19 vaccination is likely not an indemnified action. This is notice of your obligations, risks, rights, and potential risks. And it goes on to say on the 2nd, July, 2021, in 28 August 2021, the former federal government announced a proposed medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering the COVID-19 vaccines.

Recent correspondence from government advisors outlines that such an indemnity scheme was never established per se, unlike the case with COVID-unlike the case with manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines, there appears to be no government liability protection beyond the vaccine injury COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme. Now, we're going to keep breaking this apart and then we'll talk about it. this important. So they start going at a couple other angles here. So this is all in one document. Government and A.H.PRA correspondence outline practitioners obligations to obtain informed consent. So they're saying, hey, by the way, you need to get informed consent. And this is what that

look like. The Australian immunization handbook further states for consent to be legally valid. It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion, or manipulation. It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it at any alternative options have been explained to the person. Not a lot of that going on in Australia. Wow. But then it says this, hey, remember that informed consent we told you you had to give people? Oh, by the way, you're also being threatened by your boards for misinformation.

So you better walk that tightrope. It says the 9 March 2021 joint statement by H-PRA and national boards threaten regularly. action, quote, for anti-vaccine messages and professional health practices and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims, including on social media. Regardless, evidence from reputable sources demonstrates that COVID-19 provisionally approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immunocompromising effects. Doctors have a duty to warn patients of any material risk associated with the treatment as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion. Oh, my God. I'm going to frame that paragraph. That is.

absolutely priceless. It's sort of the modern version of the Catch 22, if you remember that book or that movie. I mean, basically, what we're telling you is that if you say anything bad about this vaccine that could be construed as misinformation, we're going to take your license. But do know that the things that those anti-vaxians are saying that there are real problems and side effects of these vaccines are true. And if you didn't warn your patients about that, you could be liable. I mean, what do you do with that as a doctor? Like, Blah-blah-bl-bl-bl-bl-bl-bl-bl-blah-l-l-dra-crazy. And remember, the government who grants dad in saying,

we will protect you, has left you hanging out in the wind. So I reached out to a legal professional in Australia who said, basically, since this government scheme is not in place, they'll have to turn to their medical indemnity insurance, which every practitioner, medical practitioner in Australia has to have to practice medicine. So now their personal medical indemnity insurance, they have policy terms. So it's up to. to this point where, and this is the unknown question,

do those policy terms cover if the patient was not given proper informed consent or if they were manipulated into getting this vaccine and coerceding you getting this vaccine? So what do the policy terms, and that's gonna be handled there. So the doctor, if those policy terms don't handle that, it may look like the doctor is gonna be on the line

to pay for this and to fight this in court on their own without help. So this is a huge, this is a really big step in this whole big situation here. So as we go. I want to say, have news for Australia out there. Yes, ICANN is looking at teaming up with lawyers in Australia. We love this opportunity.

I'm sure we are not alone. So get ready for a wave of lawsuits against doctors for all of those that have been injured in Australia. And then I think all of it, ultimately, I hope that once the doctors start losing their practices and their money, then we'll turn and sue their own government for having put them up to this, forcing them basically to give this vaccine without. warning people of the dangers, threatening them that they would take away their license if they told their patients the truth. I think the ultimate harm is being done by the government, so I'm sorry that we're going to have to use you doctors that were just shills in the middle of this entire experience. But boy, we just keep pulling the bricks away. Eventually this castle

is going to come crashing down. And if you look at history, it's not a surprise. The enforcers of these type of agendas always are the first to get thrown under the bus. And so let's pull us out to a wider view here, like a 10,000 foot view of indemnity. So at the time in 2021, India, you saw the headlines, India was facing, you know, millions of cases of COVID, the surge. And all of a sudden, in the middle of that, you saw this headline in February of 2021. Pfizer withdraws application for emergency use of its COVID vaccine in India. So India held the line and did not allow those MRNA vaccines to come in. They used kind of in-house vaccines. They created their own vaccines. They used them in the population and, you know, proclaimed to

success story there. But now we're finding out why that was because Pfizer wanted to have indemnity. This was the this was the headline that just happened recently. Pfizer tried bullying India to accept indemnity clause for COVID vaccine claims minister Rajiv Chandra Sikar. So understand like Israel had this same Israel was famously the first country to basically sign their entire population away to lab rats for Pfizer, but open air testing on these MRI vaccines there. And that was the indemnity clause that they had to sign on to. And the other countries had to do that as well. India said no, which is a really big deal.

And that brings us here to the U.S. We're really starting to get to the heart of this here. We have Representative Louis Gomer who put forth a bill. This is the headline coming out of there. Gomer files bill to hold pharma accountable. This is H.R. 9366. And basically to amend the Public Health Service Act to a whole, to hold vaccine manufacturers liable for those injuries caused by the vaccine,

especially when it's subject to a public health service. mandate. So my gosh, I mean, this is a slow pitch softball here for the COVID mandate that came forward with people losing their jobs. I can taste it, man. I think the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program is hanging the balance. I think it's vulnerable now. I think it is time for us and others like us, all those groups out there, all of you that are at state capitals, I think it's time to start saying it is time to remove this liability protection. We would never see a disastrous vaccine like this, destroying lives, crippling people, heart attacks, all of it, if they were going to be liable for it. Let the free market decide what comes onto the market,

and let the free market have to face the consequences of their products like every one of us that have businesses have to.