The Highwire with Del Bigtree - EP 357: BORDERLINE

Episode Date: February 2, 2024

Did Del Just Find Video Of The Moment the Lab Leak Happened?; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on All-Time LOW Confidence in Medical Professionals and public institutions, new information on CDC coding data exposes just how wrong they were about COVID; Citizens are activating to oppose the current ‘open border’ policy of the current administration, while Del speaks to a correspondent who has been documenting the US-funded journey of illegal immigrants all the way down to the Darien Gap in Panama.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now.

All right, everyone, we ready? Yes. Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out onto the high wire. Well, have you been watching this show over the last several years, you know that we were one of the first ones to really discuss whether or not the COVID virus. SARS-CoV-2 escape from a laboratory in Wuhan. Well, now in this moment, we are about to break video footage,

surveillance footage that may have actually captured exactly how this event went down. Take a look at this. Okay. Obviously, I hope you know that I'm kidding. At least I hope that's not the Wuhan Laboratory. But that video just shows how ridiculous this whole world we're living in, you know, it is right now. I mean, when we think about it, we have laboratories just like that one that are doing gain of functional research, literally, you know, developing bio weapons. And the way

that they're getting away with it, because there's been many treaties trying to say that it should be illegal, is they say, well, they're studying on how to create vaccines to stop future pathogens. So in this process, as long as they're making a vaccine at the same time that they're making a deadly bio weapon, then all this research makes sense to some really stupid people that have way too much power right now in the world. As we've reported just a few weeks ago, a new coronavirus in a lab looks like it has the ability to kill 100% of the time. And still, this is not, the Wuhan laboratory is not the first time we've heard about a lab leak. In fact, that very lab had issues with leaks. And we've had leaks at bio-weapons labs here in America. This is an issue, which is why

all of us should make this one of our top issues when we think about, you know, who we're going to elect. These are conversations that our future presidents need to be talking about, which is, are you going to stop this gain of function research that can escape from a lab? I mean, think about it. No matter what we do, we're like drinking clean water and reading the ingredients on all of our food that we're bringing into our house and maybe we're really smart reading the ingredients list on vaccines. Meanwhile, some idiot somewhere has got a deadly that's about to slip through a seal in a door and come out. And in case you ever find someone in a Latin, you know, out in a Wuhan fish market looking

like this, you may want to run for your life. Folks, this isn't a joke. This is a world gone mad. And we need to do something about it. We've got to start getting involved in our politics. We have to understand what's taking place. We've got to be asking the right questions. And we cannot just look the other way any longer and think, oh, they're scientists.

They've got this. They know better. The truth is it looks more and more like this virus that swept the world came from inside a lab, which means it's man-made. It's not natural. This is not a natural experience. We've shown you different studies on the Omicron virus. It looks like there's a manual insert into the virus, which means someone could be manipulating the health of the world. We can't allow that to be. be the case. We can't do all this great work to protect our children, take care of our children, try to make sure they're healthy while we have man-made bio-weapons running around the earth. This is what we do here at the high wire. We're going to continue to bring lawsuits to bring transparency to our government that appears to have been in the middle of this fiasco. We're not looking the other way. I think that Tony Fauci is now admitting he did fund the Wuhan lab after telling Rand Paul you don't know what you're talking about. I'm done with liars. I don't care who you work for. I especially don't care if you work for the government. We're coming after

you no matter who you are. The truth is everything. And that's a lot of what we're going to talk about today. Coming up later on in the show, I'm going to be talking to Michael Yon, who has been at the Darien Gap. He has been following this migration, this, you know, essentially an invasion that's taking place in America. It's now one of the biggest stories. In fact, it is the biggest story in the United States of America. For the first time, polls are now showing

that the number one concern for people in America is our border. Are we safe? Are we protecting ourselves? And immigration has just surpassed our economy in things that people care about. So whether or not you think this is inside the high wires wheelhouse,

we're going there because everyone's going there and we're going to bring someone that really knows how to talk about the things that no one else is really talking about. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. Jeffrey, that video with the mouse, I mean, every time I see it, it's just, it's outrageous that this is how things are done. And it's just that simple, right? Something clinging to your clothing, you know, walks out, you breathe it in, you have a little bit of a cold, who knows what happens from there. So, very, very important that we keep up. you know, a spotlight on these issues.

I'm sure we'd all be terrified if we really knew what was going on in these safety labs at that level. But a lot of people are celebrating at the recent news coming out of the World Health Organization and doctor, I'm sorry, not a doctor, I always make that mistake. Tadros Gabriasis, he is the director of the World Health Organization. And remember, WHO, they supported lockdowns, they supported the vaccine, COVID vaccine, they supported social distancing, majority of their fundings from Bill and Melinda Gates and all of the issues caused by the failed pandemic response

that they supported, they're using those issues to try to basically grab more power in the form of this WHO pandemic treaty. But they run into a problem, and they're on the defense. Take a look. All right. This work is not easy. And it's occurring in a very difficult environment.

The IMB and the IHR working group are operating, I mean a torrent. amid a torrent of fake news, lies and conspiracy theories. There are those who claim that the pandemic agreement and IHR will cede sovereignty to WHO and give the WHO Secretary the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries. You know this is fake news, lies and conspiracy theories. You know these claims are completely false. You know that the agreement will give WHO no such powers because you are writing it.

We cannot allow this historic agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged by those who spread lies either deliberately or unknowingly. We need your support to counter these lies. I love this video. Folks, I mean, you know, a lot of you have come up to me when I run into you in airports and restaurants and, you know, you're really panicked about this WHO tree as you should be and as we have been reporting. But nothing says you're winning, like hearing the people that are trying to pass something as ridiculous as this saying that these are all lies, everything is saying and stating what

we're saying, which is you're not allowed to take our sovereignty away, not this nation, no nation, and more and more nations are stepping up to the point where now he's, you you know, begging for, you know, I guess world leaders to try and stop what they want to call misinformation. But then it begs the question, doesn't it, Jeffrey? If you are trying to control the world, then what difference does it make if this thing doesn't pass? What is so dynamic and incredible about this historic global treaty that you're not willing to just let it go when nations are saying, you're not going to tell us what to do? That's all we're saying. You're not going to tell us what to do. We can't have this. That's not what we're doing. I mean, he's so

confused, but we've clearly got them on the run. Everybody, you know, this is what we do on the highway. We've got to take these moments to really celebrate how effective we've been. And you've been at sharing videos. I know it's not just us. Lots of people are waking up to this. But every time you share those videos, every time you talk to a friend, this is what makes change in the world.

And this is one of those moments. And leaders anywhere droning on about misinformation and conspiracy theories, they don't have the same sting they used to as they did before COVID. These things are actually where people start their investigations when you see a leader really just ringing their hands about these conspiracy theories. Well, here's the headline here. Remember, he's saying we're working amid a torrent of fake news and lies. So headline global pandemic agreement at risk of falling apart, WHO warns, and they're going to be voting on that at the World Health Congress in about four months here in May. So they're obviously coming down to the finish line. But this speaks to an overall theme.

We saw this at the end of Davos, the WEF World Economic Forum meeting in Davos. We saw this at the end of that. The entire organization put the name of this year's WF meeting as rebuilding trust, because all of the trust they lost during the pandemic. This is out of Associated Press. Here's the headline at the end of that week. At Davos, leaders talked big on rebuilding trust. Can the World Economic Forum make a difference?

But it even trickles down to the individual person. Here's a new Rasmussen poll that just came out, though. You're going to love this. Because of the failed COVID response, basically a majority of Americans think it's more important to research health issues than simply trusting experts. And we can read in this article that says the latest Rasmussen reports national telephone and online survey finds that in terms of their own health care decisions, 35% of American adults believe it's safe to trust advice from experts, while 58% say it's important to do your own research. All right. Cue the Rocky Music. I mean, we've done it. People are waking up. Stop trusting his lab coach. This isn't a religion. You're not bowing down to some faith. You actually have to use your mind,

do your own research, and start asking the right questions. I love this poll. And as you see people in leaders in healthcare, leaders in government going, why could this be? I don't know why people don't trust this anymore. Let's look at why. Let's go to Scotland where there's an inquiry happening right now into their COVID response. We have Diva Sridhar. She's the chair of the global public health at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and was the advisor to the now disgraced, former First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon. And so this is the headline coming out of there. Nicola Sturgeon's advisor says, I was wrong to push for zero COVID. That's out of daily mail. She says this, this was a mistake I made using the words elimination, she told the COVID inquiry, adding that

maximum suppression would have been a more appropriate phrase. Other experts who spoke at the inquiry said that the Scottish government's refusal to accept that COVID was here to stay led to a much slower release of social restrictions than was necessary. So they kept people locked down for longer because of this. And so she goes on to say this. Speaking on Tuesday, Professor Sridar claimed she never believed that zero COVID could be achieved and instead likened it to an aspirational public health campaigns that sought to end malaria and tuberculosis. So we have leaders pushing these edicts, these zero health edicts, the vaccinations that don't believe in them. This is where we're at right now.

This is why people don't trust them. And that's just one headline. Let's keep going. Just last week, out of Canada, a gigantic blemish, another blemish on Trudeau's back. Really, here it is. Judge rebukes Trudeau for not justify use of emergencies act to break convoy. Remember that as a trucker convoy. They froze bank accounts.

They used militarized police to beat people. They arrested people. A judge has found that to be not justified. Obviously, the government's going to appeal this. But for right now, that stands, and that stands as a big W for the people that wanted freedom in that country. Now, let's talk about the people in the legacy media and their trust that's been declining for years, but it's hit runaway speed. Let's talk about the BBC. They have a COVID inquiry going over there in the UK.

Here's headlines coming out of that. BBC misrepresented virus to boosts. lockdown support says top scientists. Now, this is Professor Mark Woolhouse. He's actually testifying here. He's a professor of infectious disease and epidemiology, also at the University of Edinburgh. And he was an advisor to the Scottish government during the pandemic. And he says this. This is from the article. Professor Woolhouse said the public was, quote, not given accurate information about COVID in the early stages of the pandemic. Some media sources, notably the BBC television news did repeatedly misrepresent the risk posed by COVID, he said.

One example is that they gave the impression that hospitals were being overwhelmed during the first wave. Some mainly in London were, but overall hospital bed occupancy was at an all-time load during that period. A second example, he says, is that they routinely reported deaths of healthy young adults, thereby giving the impression that these were common. In reality, such deaths were extremely rare. The great majority of COVID deaths occurred in the elderly frail and infirm.

he concluded possibly this kind of coverage was an attempt to back up government public health messaging. For example, the hugely misleading claim that we're all at risk. Wow. Yeah. Well, I mean, we were telling you we are not all at risk. We've been saying that from the beginning. We celebrated the Great Burlington Declaration as soon as it came out. And we'd even been reporting on many of those scientists and doctors before they even got involved with the Great Barronton Declaration.

but basically said all along, we should be taking care of those that are at risk, which is just this very small group of elderly with comorbidities and let everybody else. And I got a lot of heat for this, go out and catch this cold so that we can get to that herd immunity place. We got shut down on that reporting, but I stand by that. And now this, you know, esteemed professor and scientist is saying exactly that. They overstated, overplayed the hand just to scare us. That was what the messaging was. was to scare us, talk about zero COVID, something they knew was not possible.

They knew we were all going to have to catch this cold eventually, too. Only they didn't lose their YouTube channels when they, you know, avoided saying it. Well, the entire legacy media complex that supported all of these lives is in big trouble. It's often the people within the echo chambers of these legacy media complexes that are the last to know when their ship is sailed. This is Wall Street Journal head CEO Emma Tucker. Listen to what she had to say. If you go back really not that long ago, as I say, we owned the news.

We were the gatekeepers, and we very much owned the facts as well. If it said it in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, then that was a fact. Nowadays, people can go to all sorts of different sources for the news, and they're much more questioning about what we're saying. So it's no longer good enough for us just to say, this is what happened, or here's this is the news. we have to explain our, almost like explain our working.

So readers expect to understand how we saw stories. They want to know how we go about getting stories. We have to sort of lift the bonnet, as it were, and in a way that newspapers, you know, aren't used to doing and explain to people what we're doing. We need to be much more transparent about how we go about collecting the news. Oh, my God.

I'm getting so excited, Jeffrey, from this show. I can't sit still in my chair. amazing. I want to take this moment to everyone that maybe if you're new to the high wire, just to say that this is exactly what we are demanding from the news. I know that she's shocked that now she actually has to show her the work, the way that we all had to in school when it came to math. Where did you come up with it? How did you get to this conclusion? They were so used to owning the news, owning the truth, the facts. We own the facts. No one questioned us. We could say whatever we want and everyone believed it. Well, that is why we started, you know,

our movement for transparency. We call it the High Wire Protocol. I've sent this to every major news organization saying, I want you to do your news the same way that we do based on accuracy, integrity, independence, accountability, and transparency. As you know, if you're watching this show, all you have to be is signed up to our newsletter, and we send you all of the documents that back up what we're saying.

Right now you can do if you're on thehighwire.com, just scroll down right there, if you're not receiving it, and sign in there. This is what makes us different than the Wall Street Journal. This is what they're just learning how to do and they don't know. They're not designed to do this. This is exactly how we're designed. I hand you all of our evidence. Every Monday, you will have this in your inbox, proof of what we've said, where we got our articles from, why we're saying what we're saying, how we've triangulated our story. Nobody else is doing this for you. And now that they're having to, they're getting pissed off about it. I want you to know it started here. And I want you to know that it's penetrated at this

level that now everyone is starting to demand this from the major news agencies. That's because of your support. So right now, we always talk about all the legal work we do, but look what we're doing to journalism right now. Look what we've done to the WHO treaty. Look what we're doing to the Wall Street Journal that is now going to have to start being honest with you or you're not listening to them. This is a part of what you're a part of when you are in the informed consent. Action Network. You're our network. You're getting the story out. So please help us continue to fund this incredibly important mission that we're on. All you have to do is go to the top of the page right now on the high wire or ICAN. Tag that, donate to ICAN and become a recurring donor. We make it really easy. Just sign up and think about it. Whether it's a $5 cup of coffee or maybe a $24 dinner, if you can even get dinner anymore for $24. We're asking that. once a month donate to ICANN so we can continue this very important work that I can have Jeffrey continue to work with all the scientists he's working around the world to bring you the story before

everyone else does stories that all the time when we're looking back on how we reported on it we are one of the only ones that can say in almost every situation that had to do with the pandemic we got it exactly right you didn't get that anywhere else and now we're forced the Wall Street Journal to change their ways you're making that happen you're done your $5, your $10 makes a difference, we're going to make it easy. You can text 720-22, type in the word donate, and we will just send you a little link right there. Honestly, if all of you just gave a $1, you can't imagine how many more lawsuits we could bring. You can't imagine how much faster we could go to trying to free the five, which is to bring back the religious exemption to vaccination in the five holdout states.

This is all a part of our plan, but we're limited. We're only limited by your support. The more you give, the more we can do. It's just that easy. I hope you'll join the mission. All right. Sorry to sidetrack us there, Jeffrey. But, man, I'm in a really good mood right now.

So, yeah, you should be, because there you have Wall Street Journal, CEO, Emmett Tucker, saying, we don't know in the news anymore. And people want transparency. We lost the narrative because people want facts. They want to know where we got our facts from. Well, we saw what that happened. We saw what that looked like during COVID. when they didn't have to show people where they got their facts from,

they just threw a bunch of scary percentages and numbers at people in order to get them to take that COVID shot. And we're dealing with the aftermath of that. But that's what this is what that look like. Take a look. All right. This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated. By and large, this is an epidemic that's occurring in the unvaccinated.

We have a pandemic among a non-vaccin vaccine. The real problem, I think, right now in this country, is that we need to vaccinate the unvaccinated. People who are not fully vaccinated are eight times more likely to test positive, 41 times more likely to be hospitalized, and 57 times more likely to die compared to people who are vaccinated. Over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated. 99.5% of COVID-19 deaths and 97% of hospitalizations are. among the unvaccinated. Nearly every death from COVID-19 is a preventable tragedy.

You are 17 times more likely to go to the hospital if you're not vaccinated, 20 times more likely to die. And those are significant serious statistics. 89% of people hospitalized here are unvaccinated. 91% of COVID patients who've died in Mississippi are unvaccinated. If you look at the deaths due to COVID-19 in the United States, 99.5% of them are among unvaccinated people and 0.5% are among vaccinated people. Put it bluntly in very stark terms, essentially anyone who is hospitalized for COVID right now,

or is in an ICU from COVID right now, is there by choice? Is there because they didn't make the effort to get vaccinated? Wow, they were really sure about themselves and has a very, very, very, specific numbers. I mean, that one was kind of mind-blowing. 99.5% of the people that are dying from COVID are unvaccinated. So I'm assuming we are going to take a deeper look at those numbers. Yeah, you got to wonder where'd they get those? Because, I mean, those are scary numbers and that was used to get those vaccination rates up. And remember, just before we get into this investigation, because we're going to show you, the CDC, remember, only counted you as

vaccinated two weeks after your second dose. So if anything, anything happened in that window, that two weeks, death. Well, I mean, by the way, the whole month after your first shot, you're unvaccinated. Two weeks after your second shot, you're unvaccinated. So basically any side effect happened to the unvaccinated, which was crazy, and we've reported on that. And that's, yeah, that's already been established. That's old news. But we're going to go into a little deeper investigation here and want to thank Chief Nerd

at Twitter on X for really doing some great investigation work on this piece. So we go to our world data and we look at the death rate. This is in the United States, COVID-19, weekly death rate by vaccination status, all ages. And if you just watch the media try to scare you there with those scary, scary percentages, you can look at this chart and go, wow, looks like they're right. You can see in the orange there, the vaccinated spikes up right around November 2021. And these are unvaccinated people that were dying according to this chart. And this is from the Centers for Disease Control.

This is their source data. So this is something that should be, this is a big deal. And so let's go to the CDC actually and see how they source this data for this chart. So we go to the actual website, CDC, and it says in this web page how they source it. It says an unvaccinated person had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen and has not been verified to. who have received COVID-19 vaccine. So seems pretty cut and dry. We can't verify you, therefore you're unvaccinated. Well, we go to this article here talking about electronic health records,

because this really gets to the root of it, why electronic health records haven't helped US with vaccinations. So this was during the pandemic. And it says in here, if you get the shot at a local hospital that is affiliated with your doctor, the vaccination information might show up in your electronic health record, EHR. However, if it doesn't, or you can, you can, get the shot through a pharmacy like CVS, your vaccination information may end up stranded on the little paper CDC vaccination card you receive with your shot. The onus will be on you to give your doctor your vaccination information, which will have to be manually, hopefully without error, entered into your EHR. Goes on to say, as a result, the information public officials

need to determine who has been vaccinated and where scarce vaccine supplies need to be allocated next is less accurate and timely than it needs to be. So right there, you know, you know, You have an article. Just cursory, you know, hey, there's a problem here. It looks like, you know, there's kind of a big problem with translating this information. It's amazing, too, because people assume that all we have medical health records. They assume that whether you're at CVS or remember when those giant parking lots where people just lined up like all these giant events to get people vaccinated. So in all of those situations, all the millions of people that did it that way. And by the way, who wanted to go in a hospital during COVID? In fact, you were told, don't come to the hospital. We're too busy.

We're overwhelmed. Do this somewhere else. So we're finding out now that if you weren't in that hospital that you ended up with when you were sick, then your records aren't there. And so what you're saying is this is what they were saying is you're being put into a category of basically like an unknown vaccine status. Right, right. And so you have these electronic health records just to break this down simply. That's what happens at your doctor. So you have this trusted doctor, you go to get COVID shot.

That's in your electronic health records, your EHR at that doctor's office. And then with a little luck, that will go into an immunization information system that's higher up the food chain at the state level. And then that's where public health officials can really pick this data, use it for studies, really see what's going on there. Problem is they weren't talking to each other. So we now have a study that confirms that. So we have this study titled assessing the immunization information system.

Remember, that's the big umbrella at the top of the food chain, an electronic health record interface accuracy for COVID-19 vaccinations. So it says in this study, this project started with what seemed like a simple goal. Identify patients not vaccinated against COVID-19, then provide targeted outreach to those patients. However, it was much harder than anticipated to obtain an accurate list of unvaccinated patients. At the time of the initial assessment in December of 2021, the interface between the clinic, EHR and the IIS was only activated for adult patients by manual query of the ISS on an individual patient-by-patient basis.

So these researchers are saying, this is supposed to be simple, but we have to manually do it on a patient-by-patient basis to really understand who has received this shot and who was unvaccinated. This is going to be a big deal. Well, it's amazing about this just really quick to point out to people, and this is what your research is so amazing. Jeffrey is this is not an article being written by anti-vaxxers or someone trying to prove that the unvaccinated did something different. This was a group saying we want to get to those unvaccinated people so that we can warn them and promote to them that you need to get vaccinated. But when we

went into the system, we couldn't figure out who was who. We honestly could not figure out who the unvaccinated were because we couldn't tell if you've been vaccinated or unvaccinated because those records were not available. And that's what's amazing, right? It's from their own side saying this was a mind-boggling problem. And why couldn't they do that? That's the key. And this is what they described. They said the EHR, electronic health records system used is epic. So epic is that company, a private company that handles all this. It says the COVID-19 vaccination status is defined within the EHR in four different ways. Fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, postponed or unknown. So that's what your doctor

gets to choose from. It says the status is unknown if there is no record of COVID-19 vaccine. When the ISS is queried, if there is no record of COVID-19 vaccine administered, the vaccine status remains unknown within the EHR. There is not an option to change the status to unvaccinated. That is incredible. I mean, people think about the video we played at the top of this. 99.8% of the people in the hospital that are dying or unvaccinated, now we know the computer system being used to calculate that doesn't even have a category for unvaccinated. Where were they getting this information? They're making this giant assumption that everybody in this unknown category is unvaccinated. That is crazy. So, Del, let's report on some of our own percentages here. So this is

what the researchers found. After doing all of this research, finding that they don't have an unvaccinated category, they write this. When a manual query for all 4,100, 114 patients with unknown vaccination status was done, we found 44% of our patients with unknown vaccination status were previously vaccinated. They concluded when the interface between the patient chart and the local immunization information system depends on manual query for the transfer of data, the COVID-19 vaccination status for a panel of patients is often inaccurate. Now let's go back to that chart from our world data and let's look at it again.

that unvaccinated spike, that actually should be unknown. And we know by this study now that that unknown spike, 44% of those people were vaccinated. So when we talk about excess deaths and your government is sitting there going, oh, we don't really know where to look. This is where you start looking. You have a spike in deaths in your weekly rate

and you have basically 44% by this study showing that these were vaccinated people. And if you go back to that chart, you can actually see underneath that tracking at the same spike is vaccinated, vaccinated without bivalent booster. So even the vaccinated show a spike in death. And above that, the unknown do as well.

So there's two data points to look at. And, you know, people may look at this and say, well, that was in 2021. So they've obviously, they've fixed that by now. They must have fixed it right away because that would have been a problem trying to count that the whole pandemic and having it not be efficient. Well, here's Rochelle Wollinsky, kind of the disgraced CDC director that had to step down. Here's her final congressional testimony at a hearing before she left the CDC. Listen to what she has to say about data.

You mentioned during the opening statements, you said, or actually during the open question, you said that we didn't get information on vaccinated and hospitalizations would surprise me. I thought we did have some of that. I imagine I also carried over to ICU visits and probably deaths too because we don't have that. Just to be clear, we don't have that at a national level. We at CDC collect data and cohorts. that we can follow that for vaccine effectiveness studies. But at a national level, we get hospitalization data.

We get hospitalization for COVID data. But at a national level, we have never been able to get hospitalization, vaccination, and COVID. Yeah, so that worries me because it seems to skew the data. And I see you nod your head. Yes, I agree. Well, I think it just speaks to the real challenges in our data flows and our ability to give data back to the American people when we don't have full line of sight of all the data that people are interested.

I do want to emphasize that we did not get data in aggregate. We are again, just to be clear, we're not looking for PII here. We did we did not get data in aggregate on vaccination and hospitalizations. All that data that you're filling out in the EHR does not translate into public health data. Wow. Okay, so hold on a second. I want to do something, Jeffrey, we don't usually do. Folks, we now know that 44 percent, so roughly 50 percent of the people.

We were told 99.5 percent were on vaccinated. cut that in half. That means there was an equal share at best of people that were vaccinated, unvaccinated, dying and in the hospital, the numbers are totally off. This thing was a total scam. And now the head of the CDC's admitting to the Congress, we didn't have any of that data. I know you think because even you were filling out that data that somehow we got it, that was a part of the health records. Then what were you saying on television? Jeffrey, I want to take that moment. Just remember, folks, what she just said. And let's play the video we played at the top of this and watch a sack of liars that are now running our country.

This is what happened. This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated. By and large, this is an epidemic that's occurring in the unvaccinated. We have a pandemic among a non-vaccinated. The real problem, I think, right now in this country, is that we need to vaccinate the unvaccinated. People who are not fully vaccinated are eight times more likely to test positive, 41 times more likely to be hospitalized and 57 times more likely to die compared to people who are vaccinated.

Over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated. 99.5% of COVID-19 deaths and 97% of hospitalizations are among the unvaccinated. Nearly every death from COVID-19 is a preventable tragedy. You are 17 times more likely to go to the hospital if you're not vaccinated, 20 times more likely to die. And those are significant serious statistics. 89% of people hospitalized here are unvaccinated. 91% of COVID patients who've died in Mississippi are unvaccinated. If you look at the deaths due to COVID-19 in the United States,

99.5% of them are among unvaccinated people. And 0.5% are among. among vaccinated people. Put it bluntly in very stark terms, essentially anyone who's hospitalized for COVID right now or is in an ICU from COVID right now is there by choice. Is there because they didn't make the effort

to get vaccinated? And now we know they had none of that information. We're doing the work here to rewrite history. And on that subject, let's take a little time to do a deep dive into history and do a little history lesson. So in 1949, Chinese communist leader Mao Zey Tong took power in China. And just nine years later, he announced the great leap forward. This was an economic and social campaign that was supposed to last four years, but they scrapped it. One of the things they did was they abolished private ownership of farms. So you cannot

own anything. So all traditional household farms are transformed into large-scale collectives, animals, the household tools, everything, your land, it was all given to the government. And essentially at that point, everyone was equal because they had to work on the collective as well. So you had no more landowners. And well, how did that work out? There's a paper that was written on this, a really in-depth examination. And it's titled Great Leap Forward or Backward, anatomy of a central planning disaster. It says in there, starts in 1958. It says, in 1959, grain output in China fell precipitously by 15%. It declined by another 16% in 1960.

Based on census data, tomographers were able to infer from extrapolations of Chinese mortality trends that the total number of premature deaths between 1959 and 1961 range from 18.48 to 30 million, if these estimates were accurate in the order of magnitude, this famine would still be the worst in world history in terms of loss of human life.

Now, I'm going to get to why I'm covering that in a second. But breaking news right now is what's happening at the European Commission headquarters in Brussels. They've been surrounded by protesting farmers. We've been covering this, Germany, Italy, France have been protesting throughout the last couple months. They have converged in Brussels and they've surrounded this building here. We have some footage. Police have shot rubber bullets. There's fires. There's barricades. It's getting a little hairy. Wow, look at that. Yep.

And all the leaders from the EU are in, at that building, they have met to discuss Ukraine funding, which has went through to the tune of $54 billion and continued Ukraine funding. So they're not happy. The farmers are not happy because of the green restrictions that are being put on them, the cuts to their agricultural fuels. This is a sustained protest. And so this is just more footage coming out of this. And you can go on social media as well and there's just tons of footage from all

of major news organizations now covering this. So this is not something that's happening. So similarly, you have the European Union. We're seeing it here an attack on farming. You have John Kerry saying the global warming is now caused by farmers, by ranchers. They're going after our food supply, our farmers. And as you're pointing out, this is what China did

when they were basically, you know, taking full control of the people's rights. Right, and people out there maybe are looking and going, well, these are just large agricultural farms. These are not talking about my little garden plot in my backyard. Well, check out this headline. Carbon footprint of homegrown food five times greater than those grown conventionally. So yes, your homegrown garden is part of the net zero target.

And this is what the point I'm trying to make here, because it's not just large farms. It's your backyard farms. It's how you grow. Everything. It's a quality and equity. No one will be left behind. Everyone will be treated equally. It's amazing just to think, like, now plants. Plants are causing global warming.

Like, I go back to my childhood. Like, as a kid, you're like, you know, plant a tree, plant a garden. That is what, you know, turns the CO2 into oxygen. This is just, it is 1984, right? It's just the opposite of what is true is what's being advertised. And people, some people, I guess, are buying it. And we talk about, you know, I let in with this, with what. happened in China because we talk about equality and equity in these words. And so we go to the United Nations and they have a research paper. It's titled, Research for Social Change Transformations to Equity and Sustainability. Those are these key words. And it says the achievement, the achievement of desirable development outcomes through just and participatory processes

is ultimately a political project. So right there it says your government will drive this. Social change inevitably involves contestation of ideas and interests between different groups and requires the redistribution of resources and entitlements, the improvements in the institutions of governance that manage collective concerns at different levels. So redistribution of resources. So how is this being done? Well, we look across America and we see a lot of different leaders, governors, representative, congressmen, congresswoman, and they all have different ideas on this, and we voted them in, but there is an underbelly, there's a layer that we don't have control of, and these are called the C40 cities. So these are your leaders of your cities, your

major cities. In the United States, we can check out 14 major cities here, but these are throughout the world. They're all signed on in this. In the U.S. we have L.A., San Francisco, Austin, Houston, Miami, D.C., Philly, New York, on and on. And so what do they do? Well, it's not their mayors that are actually running this. The C-40 cities, all of these leaders are pledged to an agreement, and it's run by Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, and a mayor of Freetown Sierra Leone. So these are two co-chair. And they're the people running this. And they have pledged. They have an equity pledge.

And what is that pledge to deliver, among other things, bold climate action that benefits all residents equitably. So here we are again. They are working on the behalf of not you who voted them in or the boards who voted them in. They're working on behalf of this global consortium of sustainable equity climate change net zero seekers. And they even have their own research paper that came out. It's called the future of urban consumption in a 1.5 degrees Celsius world.

This is again the C40 Cities report. And in there, under food consumption interventions, they have a little chart, and we can look at that now. So here by 2030, coming up pretty quick, about six years, this is the progressive target. They say that per person per day, people can only eat 2,500 calories. Well, if you go to the right, you see an ambitious target, if they're really do good, zero meat consumption, zero dairy consumption is gone. So you can see why they're just trying to, they don't want to, like China, they don't want to collectivize and control these farmers. They just

want them gone. And again, 2,500 calories per person per day. So they say this, into that chart, adopting dietary change is the consumption intervention with the greatest potential for emissions reductions. Adopting a healthy diet, i.e. lowering meat and dairy intake would would contribute 60% of the emissions reductions, 43% and 70% respectively, while the remainder is likely associated with reduced calorie intake. So where all the farmers going, they're going, they're trying to get them out of here and they want you to eat less. That's the bottom line here for the environment, of course. And you can see again, the historical account of what happened in China where they actually kept the farms, they just tried to collectivize them a little bit under

a communist regime. That was terrible. But what happens when you try to just get rid of them? This the point we're trying to make here. This is why farmers are protesting all throughout the European Union. Why we should be supporting them. I mean, they are fighting for us right now. They're fighting to be allowed to still feed us real, R-E-A-L food. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. Amazing. Wow. Well, Jeffrey, this is something that's not going away. Yeah. Amazing reporting, Jeffrey, that was a mind-blower. I was really giddy there at the top, but you managed just rounded off with some Very scary movement. But look, it's our next mission, right? We've got to stop this. We've got to stop the destruction of our farms. So keep up the great work, Jeffrey. Really appreciate it. It's great having you on the team, as always. Absolutely, time. It's time to get active. Everybody, it's time to get active now. That's it. Let me just hit it again, folks. We don't just report here on the high wire we bring lawsuits. We will be suing to make sure that your food supply continues to work, that we have real farms. And we're going to stand up for farmers.

all of that is made possible. Wherever we need to bring change, we don't just report on it. We actually do something about it. So please become a recurring donor. There's no other experience. You name them. Someone go ahead and tell me who else is doing this out there. In all the social media world that you're watching,

who is reporting the honest truth news that stands up over time and then is going out of their way to go and sue the government and stop things in their place and sue agencies to make sure that we push back and gain control of our sovereignty, of our food supply, of our, you know, body integrity. All of that is what we do here. I think we're one of a kind to everyone that makes that possible. I really want to thank you now. Okay, the biggest conversation happening in the United States of America right now is just miles away from me here in Austin, Texas.

On the border of Texas, there's a standoff going on. There's people that are, you know, trying to say we deserve to have a border. Many, you know, politicians that are trying to fight this for saying, without a border, you have no nation. This is a major conversation going on, as I said at the top of the show. Recent polling just last week shows that this has now become the number one issue in America. And it's not just red, it's not just blue. Everybody's concerned.

New York schools, children being moved out of schools in order to keep immigrants warm. This is a massive problem. What's behind it? what's going on. I've got one of the, I think, most dynamic individuals that can bring them some real clarity coming right up. If you happen to be, you know, coming out of a coma for the last month or so, then maybe you didn't see this in the news. The scale of the problem is unprecedented. Stories say they are overwhelmed. Encounters have now exceeded 250,000.

The border has never been worse. New concerns on the southern border has more. As more migrants risk their lives to enter the U.S. A stampede of people rushing down to the edge of the river just after midnight, but they went rushing into the water and crossed illegally right into Eagle Pass. The state of Texas has been left pretty much abandoned by the federal immigration authorities. And we know this migrant flow is going to continue based on what's happening south of the border last month at the border crossing between Colombia into Panama, nearly 82,000 migrants crossed. The Columbia is where they gather to go through the Dary and Gap.

Panama is an invasion portal to the United States, and there's huge numbers of people coming from about 150 countries. And they come through Colombia, and then they head through that jungle called the Dairy and Gap. Texas is blocking federal agents from processing migrants in a public area of Eagle Pass. State authorities late Wednesday began adding razor wire, fencing, and gates to shut off access to Shelby Park and an area. under a port of entry bridge. Texas's Republican Governor Greg Abbott deployed National Guard troops to the park. They are now preventing U.S. Border Patrol agents

from entering and patrolling the area. This part of the border is a common spot for migrant crossings. Federal government says border patrol agents can no longer access or view the stretch of the border. Just last month, there was a historic surge of migrants that illegally crossed into this very property. Overwhelming border patrol and the state

of Texas as part as Governor Abbott's emergency declaration. The state of Texas is also now arresting migrants who illegally cross into this park and this state. That is a massive change in procedure in this park. The Department of Homeland Security issuing a letter to the state's attorney general demanding Texas immediately cease and desist any actions that block border patrols full access to the U.S. Mexico border in and around the Shelby Park area. Essentially saying that if the state and the Texas National Guard do not remove all barriers to this park by Wednesday that DOJ is going to consider all other options available to restore border patrol access to the border.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton fired back in a letter this afternoon saying Texas isn't backing down. The Supreme Court tonight giving the Biden administration a win its effort to remove that wire fencing. Five to four vote now clears the way for federal agents. to actually cut down the wire, which administration officials have called dangerous and inhumane. It means federal agents can resume cutting razor wire, but Governor Abbott says the state will keep adding more wire, saying the state's constitutional right to defend itself outweighs federal law.

The Constitution itself is the supreme law of the land. The Constitution itself provides Texas with a right of self-defense in this case, because the United States has abandoned its responsibility to defend in Texas. All right. Well, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by X Green Beret, war correspondent, and probably one of the biggest experts on this immigration crisis going on. Michael Yon. Thanks, Del. It's a pleasure to have you back on the show. Thank you for having me back on. It's been a year, right?

Yeah, it's been a year. And what a crazy year it's been in many ways. you predicted that we would hit this sort of crisis point. I mean, it was fairly obvious to anyone looking at it. But first of all, let me ask the question. I know you've been in Panama for months. We've been talking to you. There's even a moment where I was trying to see if I could get down there. But why are you in Texas right now?

What brings you up here? Well, I'm in Texas for border issues as well. But you know, as I was watching in the control room and you're talking about the death jabs, it's just amazing how this hybrid war that we're in, it has so many facets, right? Yeah. I mean, it's got the, obviously, the pharmacide, which is absolutely massive.

And then the demographic war that's going on, which is massive. I mean, I'm down in places like Morocco and Lithuania and Netherlands, Japan, looking at the same thing. I go, you know, on the ground to all these places, right? So I've just gotten back from the Dairy and gap a day and a half ago. I was down there with actually Brett Weinstein and Dr. Chris Martinson and Van der Steele and Maseko Guna Ha, the whole game, right? Yeah. Yeah. And, you know, Brett is something else.

When you get into the jungle, a lot of things. A lot of people are kind of afraid of the jungle. I was afraid that Brett was going to disappear in the jungle and not come back. Never come back. The man loves the jungle. But, I mean, it was a lot of fun with Brett. An unexpected side turn. We were looking for bats in the jungle.

But one of the things I think that Brett learned, if you talk with him, is that the ecosystem that creates these invasion flows. And that's what they are. It's quite massive. It's quite organized. It's very professional. And in fact, well, a day and a half ago, before I jumped on the airplane, I was at their headquarters in Panama.

In Panama City, something called the City of Knowledge, right? And the City of Knowledge now, well, it used to be Fort Clayton, for those who know about Fort Clayton. So this used to be sort of American territory on the canal there. And was it, I believe, was it Jimmy Carter that sort of handed that back? Right. And so in 1999, it officially went back to Panama. So it was Fort Clayton at that time.

We basically gave them Fort Clayton with the keys and the doors. Beautiful base, and it's right next to the Miraflores locks, for those who know what I'm talking about, and the Pan American Highway Bridge, or some people call it, the old Zonians would call it the Thatcher Ferry Bridge, right? Well, that's the bridge for Highway 1 that goes over the Panama Canal. And so about 62 of the NGOs, IGOs, and nonprofits, such as IOM, highest, NRC, all these acronyms that a lot of people probably don't know what I'm talking about. But anyway, it's a who's who in the zoo. hundreds of millions, if not billions of U.S. dollars are pumping into this. It's mostly the United States that's funding our own invasion.

A lot of people don't realize that. So you're saying that down where we used to, you know, now it is set up in what used to be sort of American, you know, military territory. Now it's all these NGOs from around the world, giant buildings, tons of money pouring in, all as a part of an effort to help these migrants or invaders, as you call them, from almost every nation in the world to take a free trip through Panama on your way up to our wide open border. Is that, is that?

Yeah, it's epic. I mean, I could talk for days about it, so I'll try to summarize. Okay. For instance, there's different ecosystems of people coming in. There's the Chinese as an example. Okay. They have their own sort of a pipeline within a pipeline. Many of the Chinese will come in through Quito, Ecuador.

Then they'll go up through Columbia. Actually, Anthony Rubin, my good friend who just went through there. And they advertise us. We found this on Chinese advertisement that's on their social media on go to, here's how you get into America and become an American. Take a look at this, folks. It's just going to blow your mind. This is advertising for the trip into America. My only question there is, why don't they hop on the scooter sooner?

You know, like it's just, but I mean, outrageous, right? Like, you know, and I wonder, do you think, you know, when we think about the border and the drug cartels are playing such a major part of this, I mean, it's almost. like their travel agents to the world right now, bringing people through them. There's a chance they paid for that ad, right? Like, come on down to Panama. We'll get you into America. Oh, absolutely.

You've got another video that is straight up a travel agency. And we know a lot about their travel networks. We know many of their snakeheads. The snakehead is the Chinese name for coyotes. Okay. And actually, I'd like to shout out for our China team for finding so many of these videos and so much of the information, which is in Mandarin.

And so every day they're scouring the net. For instance, we see how they get Vietnamese passports, Cambodian passports, passports from Laos. So, I mean, we see how they do this all over the place. So the bottom line is, for instance, actually, many of the Chinese don't go through Kito or Columbia or the Darying Gap. Many bypass, they'll fly straight to Mexico City if they can, or to Kankoon. They'll go on vacations in Kankoon and link up with their snake heads there, do a vacation, and then they come across the borders in places like McAllen and Yuma and San Diego. And so it goes on and on.

That's the Chinese ecosystem. And within the Chinese pipeline, there's sub-pipelines. Some are coming up to run illegal or legal marijuana grows in Maine and Oregon, Oklahoma, California. What are they putting in this marijuana, right? I mean, obviously you're dealing in the farmer world and the chemical world. I mean, they're in the fentanyl world and they're in the marijuana world. They're doing huge marijuana grows, right? So there's Chinese that are coming in at that level.

You have a video of one of these guys. I don't know if he's Chinese or from some Asian country that you think could potentially be a bad guy. Let's just take a look at this and you can explain to me what we're looking at. Okay, this is at San Vicente camp down in Darien province. This is the camp that's secretary of Homeland Security, Homeland Security, uh, from where? Yes, yes, yes, yes. De, where is this?

What? What? What? No, no, no, I don't care of video. Okay. Which country are you from? Delete it. I'll tell you about it.

What? Do you speak English? Delete the video and I'm going to tell you everything about it. Delete the video. Please, no, I'm not going to tell anything to it. No, no, no, before I get mad, please delete it right now. You got me, lady. Where are you going?

You gotta stop that video. I don't like it. I don't like lady. I'm being reasonable. Please, please delete it. I'm pretty sure you're a spy. I can tell. Oh, come on, you're shooting.

You're a spy, brother. Okay, I'm gonna tell everything. about it. They're They're American. I can tell them. You go, you're going to tell meaguer and I can tell meaguan, I can tell everything about it. You'll leave the way to you. I'm going to get into

there, all right. Why don't you come sit with us? What? Can you sit with us? Sit with us here. We're at the restaurant. Let's go. Let's go. Come on. Okay, we then talked with him for an hour and a half, right? His name is Lu Sean Zhao. He didn't tell us that, but we figured it out through various means.

He said that that's him. So, we we got one of his ID cards back in China. So the bottom line is, is he had, for the next hour and a half, he talked about, he told his story, right? And he said that he had bought a boat from a Scotsman in Nassau, the Bahamas. China has a huge embassy in the Bahamas, by the way. He said he bought it for $5,000. He was headed to Florida. He said he ran out of fuel.

And the U.S. Coast Guard picked him up. We were able to confirm the U.S. Coast Guard did, in fact, pick him up. So he was deported somehow back to the Bahamas. The Bahamas, he said, was deporting. We've got this on audio. The Bahamas was deporting him back to China. he connected in Cuba and in Cuba he told us that he changed his flight to Kido Ecuador and that's when he got into the ecosystem right so then he goes through

Colombia through Darien and there's this one place that I wait to talk with them as they come out of the as they come out of the jungle and that's the spot I just happened to be with Anthony Rubin and other so that's why there was so let's talk about this because this is what really fascinating and we've been talking to you while you were down in Panama is there's these gigantic camps right they fly in and there's just these massive of clear cuts where it looks like they're clearing out forests and these camps are just getting bigger and bigger. Some of them filled with Venezuelans, I guess, and Chinese. Are they now, do they all congregate

together or the camps sort of secular? Are they like in their own, with their own groups? Like, but how big are these camps? What are we talking about? Okay, that's an interesting question. The camps are clearly growing. I go out to the camps often and we drone the camps or I just go walk around in them with the Indians, Embraah Indians, Kuna Indians. Okay. And also sometimes I just go back with airplanes, charter them, so I can't get higher and see more. You can't see much of them on Google Earth, by the way.

But in any case, the camps not only are getting bigger and more, they're just more efficient. Like, for instance, the camp that he's going to is called San Vicente Camp, right? Okay. And I've spent months right beside that camp in a hotel called Tenose, right? Now there's an office right beside about 40 meters away from the front gate of San Vic. I call it China Camp. Okay. There's a, there's a highest office there. Highest is the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, right?

Now, Secretary of Homeland Security, Mayorkas used to be a board member on Highest. Really? Yeah, and in fact, I was getting ready to rent that house, and Highest rented it before I could get it, right? Okay. So, but that's right beside what we call China Camp. Now, when Secretary of Homeland Security, Mayorkas, flew to Darien on April 18th of 2022, I had been waiting for him for four days. And he landed in four Blackhawks, landed right in front of me, went right past the highest office, and went into San Vicente camp. Now, they have, he has pledged money to build it, which he has. So that camp is now, you can see the drone footage of the day he's in it. That's it. Wow, look at that. That's his people going in right there. That's, he's in the middle of that so we're funding this. We're funding this. We're funding. We're paying to make these camps

as stopovers to make it comfortable for you while you prepare yourself. to come into our country illegally. And there's IOM, or in Spanish, it's OIM. They are the main engine of the invasion. That's something I took breath to see. What does OIM stand for? And IOM is the international organization for migration. Okay.

So IOM or OIM, depending on your language, right? Okay, very good. They are the main engine for this. Of course, that engine did not create itself. They are a subcomponent of the United Nations. So if you go to the city of knowledge in Panama City right next to Mirro Flores-Lawks, old Fort Clayton, the IOM has the number, they have the best office space. Their flag flies over where the U.S. flag used to fly.

IOM flag, right? And so they've got office number 110. So if you look that up on the map, it's the best office space in all of Panama, I would say. It overlooks. No, let me, like I would think, you know, office of migration, you would think they're working on getting you proper paperwork, figuring out who you are, but that's not what they're doing. they're, I mean, they're not planning a migration. They're planning invasion. They're helping you come to our country illegally. They're not there saying, how do we do this legally for you?

Are they? I mean, no, in fact, one of the things that highest does who works in their office is very close to IOM. Well, there's their office up in the city of knowledge in Panama City. And then there's the office down in Darien. So the IOS. Okay. Yep. The IOM actually, anyway, not to go into that, but Highest often coaches people on how to, what to say when you get to the U.S. border, how to get through the Mexican border and all these sorts, you know, what to tell people and that sort of thing,

how to fill out the paperwork, how to say that, you know, you're running from that situation and that sort of thing. So Highest helps with a lot of legal information, and I can give you tons more on them. It's a who's who in the zoo. And you were telling me when you were down there that you were, you know, you had these images of just boats full of, at that moment, Chinese just coming up the river,

just moving. And then I feel like you said to me that we're even building bridges and like making pathways and roadways by which the amount of time it used to take you to get through the garian gap to get up to the American border that we're helping reduce that time. So that's happening faster. Tell me a little bit about that. Oh, very fast. For instance, we know of one Chinese from China, not from, you know, Malaysia or something. And he, got all the way through and up to Brooklyn and got a driver's license in about 10 days. 10 days? Yep.

That's pretty fast. But keep in mind, the Chinese are coming into their own ecosystems, right? So a lot of the Chinese will go to Flushing, New York, others go to Brooklyn, others go to California, Florida. But they're going into their own ecosystems, right? It's interesting, too. I want to go back to H highest. That's very important.

Secretary of Homeland Security was a board member on Hias. If you go to Hias.org, you'll see them congratulating him when he gets to be nominated for the Secretary of Homeland Security. Now, highest, if you look on their highest.org, you'll see all these donors, like there's nine different Shapiro's and there's Pritzker's and all these guys. And it's interesting because a huge, the majority of people coming through right now are from Venezuela. There's a massive amount of Hespaula in Venezuela. And they speak Spanish fluently, right? They have a very close relationship Venezuela does with Iran. If you're Iranian, you can come right in and get a new passport immediately. But there are a lot of Hespaala who already live there.

Right? And they have... So Hezbollah, who we are now really actually in a conflict with, we've got, you know, what is starting to feel like the, the, a potential war going on up, you know, in the Middle East, all those things going on. So that Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed, you're saying that they have people in Venezuela now. Straight up. I mean, not just now, but for generations, they speak Spanish. There's people back in that area of the world who speak Spanish.

In Iran. Like, you can find Spanish speakers in Iran. In Syria and Lebanon. And so what's interesting is that, for instance, recently I had lunch with a Jewish friend in Panama. Three of his family members were killed in a bombing in 1994. And in Panama, and within one day of that, there was another bombing at a Jewish center in Argentina, which killed 80, 85 people. And three of his family members were killed on the Panama bombing in 1994. So interestingly, the guy, the mastermind, who's believed to be the Hesplah mastermind of the 1994 bombing, he owns a bar in.

Venezuela right now. I mean, you can't make up this stuff. It's like, you know, Stephen King. I mean, so we've got, and I keep warning my Jewish friends, do you understand huge amounts of Jewish money is pumping Hespa law into the United States? They're going to meet you on the golf course in Fort Lauderdale. And this is, this is no kidding, full contact. And, you know, you see Mayorkas is down there. We've got some videos, I guess, of some of these bad dudes that you've managed to capture as they're sort of coming in. Let's take a look at it. Let's take a look this. Guns tattooed on his face, which...

Gangster. I mean, that doesn't look good. I suppose it could just be a fashion choice. But, you know, when we look at this, I'm hearing reports. I don't know if this is true. The news can be sensational. But some people are saying that there's potential that Venezuela is tempting prisons and sending them up into our country.

Now, whether or not that's happening or not, I don't know if you know that, but it could happen, right? It would be a good idea if you want to save money on, you know, spending on your own problem people. Just go ahead and send them up through this open border. Who's going to stop them? Cuba style. You know what I mean,

a good person to talk with about this is Joseph Humeyer. In fact, he just flew in recently to Guatemala to meet with my team and brief for a couple days. He is very knowledgeable on Venezuela and other parts of the world around there. And he can talk your ear off. He's an incredibly intelligent man. And he can tell you about the Esbalah presence there and how they're made of structures in Central America and whatnot. You know, I was just up in Guatemala and Belize and El Salvador and Honduras looking at the same issues, right? In Panama, of course. There is basically a four-lane highway coming up to the United States. It's not literally four-lane. in some places it is. But I mean, but we are being invaded. So we've got this mainline injection

coming through. If you can get your feet into South America, you can get to anywhere in the United States very quickly, right? Especially if you've got money and your Chinese and those sorts of ecosystems are very quick. Like the Chinese, they don't take the hard route through the Darying Gap. There's many routes to the Daring Gap. If you've got money, it's just like a two-day vacation trip. Really? It's literally like a vacation. It's like some of those adventure vacations that I've taken in Nepal or something, right? I mean, it's really like, what's the slowest way? When you talk about like that the time that it used to take, I mean, before this was paying attention to, if people were hiking, making their way, how long did that journey, as we understand it, right?

We think of people in South America or something that are oppressed. They're coming here as refugees. How long did that journey used to take through the Darien Gap, you know, Panama and up in America? What would the average time take? Previously, it would be in the months often. Months. For instance, just going through the dairy, seven, ten days if you're lucky. Okay.

That was a really tough trip. Huge death toll. Even, say, three years ago, Chuck Holton and I were down there, and we guessed that the death rate was probably 10%. How do they die? What are they dying of? They die on the mountain of death,

Montanidaoamwerta, or they die on what's called the four crossings. They get killed by the Indians out there and the FARC on the other side and Columbia side. They die. They just disappear often, malaria, Some literally get hypothermia.

You actually cross over the, well, the mountain of death is the continental divide, right? So they actually cross the continental divide coming in. It's not very high, it's like 4,000 feet or whatever. But you can get, I mean, a lot of them get hypothermia. You know, that jungle floor is quite cold actually if you're sleeping on it. So they're wet, they're sweaty. A lot of them, their feet are just completely ate up because they go to sleep with their boots on or their shoes on. You should see their feet coming out.

But the Chinese take a much easier route. a much easier route. They're more sophisticated. They've got their, for them, they come out clean, smiling. You know, they're like selfies, you know. And by the time they come over Yuma, they're really in good condition, the Chinese, because they're coming through their own organized Chinese system. Now we have images you have of the actually these NGOs go around handing out rape kits of these giant compounds. This is a, you know, what's in this? What is, I mean, it's amazing to me like here you might need this, here you go. What's in there? Yeah, that's IOM or Oh, I am, and she's Venezuelan.

And that's Masaco Ganaha on the left. And Matt Tomlitt, somebody I'd go to the Darian with a lot. And so she gave us one of her raped kids. She had already made it through. And that has female condoms, male condoms, the abortion pills, that flashlight, I accidentally dropped it and it shattered. I mean, it's, you know, probably made in China. But IOM hands these things out.

And, you know, because so many women and children get raped out there. And that's the thing, too. Like when we think about the humanitarian side, I mean, I think part of this argument's been going on in America, which I think is starting to shift. It's starting to turn, which is, oh, you know, it's a humanitarian mission. We've got to allow these people in, you know, they're really, you know, being oppressed wherever they are. They're in danger. I spent some time at the border just last year, and I'll say that when I was there, we went in the middle of the night, and it was all Africans.

and the busloads would show up. They would cross a border. At one point, it was all Congolese for the most part. And then there was another one that was more Middle Eastern. And I think, honestly, of all the people we saw, about four or five hundred come through that night, I would say maybe three or four actually were making an asylum claim that I'm in danger. My government is trying to kill me, whether or not that's true or not. Everybody else was just like, I just want a job, I want American dream.

and that's not what this is about. There's a reason, you know, and humanitarian-wise, they're all paying the cartels. I mean, and more and more reports, their cartels are making more money now of running our border than they ever used to make off of drugs. Oh, I could go on for hours. I mean, for instance, every day there's flights from Africa that go through Istanbul, that go through Bogota, and then they come up. Now, if you fill out the CBP1 app, which is an app that many have on their telephone,

just download it. then you can just fly straight from Colombia or Guatemala to the United States. Many of the people don't cross the border that way. They come in through Atlanta or Los Angeles or Houston or whatever, right? And if you're in an airport and you see people with the IOM bag or OIM bag, you'll know they're probably in that ecosystem. A lot of them actually are coming up through the Canadian border. That's the border nobody really talks about, but that's a massive,

it's the biggest border in the world. And so actually some of the Chinese we know now are taking boats up to Canada and coming through that way, right? So they're hitting us from every, different direction like a hydro. They're coming in on student visas, work visas. They're just sneaking over the border. They're flying in on swift air flights 24-7. Now, you've been looking this for many years and a lot of the reporting now is that it's worse than it's ever been. Is that true? Do you feel like it's worse than it's ever been? Are we just now suddenly paying attention

to it? It's objectively worse than it's ever been. And I can tell you, you know, like last year when I sat in the same chair talking with you, I didn't predict what was happening now. It was, it was. It I could, like in the Iraq and Afghan wars, a lot of people credited me with good prediction skills. And I'm like, actually, it was already happening. You know, I'm just telling you what's already happening. Like, I'm telling you that they're building more infrastructure and they're adding more buses to the routes in Panama. So it looks like a prediction when I say more people are going to come when I'm like, well, I just saw them building the new camps and putting new buses in the routes.

And the house and the rest are bringing more people down, right? So, I mean, they're clearly, you know, it's the ecosystem down in Colombia and Ecuador and whatnot are being plused up. And so, yeah, it's not much of a prediction. It's kind of cheating. I know the answer in the back of the book. Where's Panama out with this? I mean, I would think there must be money pouring in just from people coming in. They're coming from nations all around the world.

Are they getting funding out of this? Is there a reason why they're allowing these gigantic camps to be set up as just a holding place for people that are trying to get to our country? Why would they even put up with it unless they're making money off of it? Oh, yeah, they make money. You make money every step of the way. That's one of the things that IOM and USAID and the rest will do is they create sort of a business model, right? So they create a self-igniting. Like if IOM and the rest disappear right now, the routes are now open and they are now internally funded.

There's an internal rate of return at this point, right? I mean, without any external funding going in, this machine is working, right? because every taxi driver, every hotel, every boat drivers, they all make money, right? And so a lot of the aliens coming through, like the Chinese, they are funding their own way. A lot of the others from places like Congo, they're being funded, and they'll tell you that at times. They're like, I don't know who bought my airplane ticket. I don't know. But, yeah, some of the people, in fact, just with Chris Martinson and Brett Weinstein just a few weeks ago down there, I think the guys were from Congo, actually.

And we've got it on video. And the guy was like, I don't know who bought the ticket, right? I was sitting right there with him at one of the camps. Actually, right next to where the guy was saying, you know, the Venezuelan gangster. So we're hearing, and I don't want to make this political. I don't, this is not a political show, like who's in charge of what. But I do hear Joe Biden saying, I need funding that like as though he somehow wants to stop. This is nothing in my mind that sees any attempt to actually stop this.

Myorcas, you have incredible photos. around a camp, seeing it. So this is my question. America, you would think we would be funding like how to stop, you know, this surge coming. And I think so many of us has been focused on like the border, whether or not we have a wall or not. Do we fund the wall? Do we take down the wall?

That's been the whole argument. You're talking about long before there's a wall, there's a whole funding system that is setting up this massive push towards our country. Is America funding that? Are we funding that earlier like, you know, first stop, Panama, are we funding that? Oh, Brett Weinstein and Dr. Martinson, Ann Van der Steal, Masaco, Ghanah, Chuck Colton.

We were all just down there together, looking at it again. I think if you have Brett on, he's gonna have some things to say, because he saw it with his own eyes. And, you know, people ask me all the time, who's funding this? And I'll say the United States, and they'll say, but yeah, but actually who's funding? I'll say like America.

But who's actually behind it? I'm like, the United States of America is doing it full stop. We are the number one funder of IOM. Number two is Germany. Number three is Canada. I was just over it in El Salvador. Let me read this quote. The WHP is a US government supported program that has operated since 2011.

The State Department's Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration provides funding as a contribution to IOM to implement the program. U.S. Department of State is funding this, you know, this company that runs these camps and teaches people what they need to say for every stop along the way so that they have the smoothest trip straight through our border. More than 200 NGOs, IGOs, and nonprofits. That might be 254 or something like that. And then there's all these, they're hard to track, actually.

It's like tracking water flows in the jungle. But there is a, but the main funder is the United States. I was just up in El Salvador and went to the Iowa. I always go to the IOM offices, right? And so there was an IOM office in El Salvador, and it's in the same building as the Canadian consulate. Now, keep that in mind, as I tell you, just before that, we were in Honduras,

went to the IOM office, and they're in the same building as the Canadian consulate or embassy in Honduras, right? Why? Canada is the number three funder of IOM. And, in fact, Honduras just kicked Taiwan out, and now IOM is moving to the old Taiwanese embassy. And we went there as well. There was IOM cars coming and going. You know, we went over and

talked with the, there's much more going on than, you know, there's, there's the energy routes. I mean, what we're really talking about here is Panama is one of the most vital pieces of terrain on earth, right? I mean, there's the Panama Canal, and then there's the Pan American Highway, and then just its location, right? And so one of the things that we're talking about is the intercontinental railway down in South America, the corridors that are coming up through Texas, you know, the I-64 corridor. I mean, we could go on for hours about this, but there's reasons why I go to these certain places, like why I took Jordan Peterson around Netherlands. It's about these energy routes and these.

What is that energy route? What do you mean by that? For instance, actually, let's talk about just shipping. Like the Panama Canal, which opened in 1914, the United States, of course, finished or made it. And then you've got right often, I'll leave Panama and go to Netherlands. Now, you'll see a railway that goes all the way from Shanghai to Rotterdam, right? The biggest harbor in Europe, and it's one of the top ten in the world. And just south of Rotterdam is Antwerp, or the second largest harbor, right?

Two of the top ten in the world. But that railway from Shanghai, I've been to that side of it, empties out at Rotterdam. And at Rotterdam, or in Netherlands, they're working on Tri-State City. Tri-State City, we talked about a year ago, right? And now they've made a lot more progress in that one year. Tri-State City is this smart city they want to make with 30 million people that will have both of those harbors. And the Chinese railway goes right to it. A lot of this is about corridors, right?

You'll see, for instance, RGV down in McAllen and Brownsville and whatnot. That is I-64 corridor. It comes right all the way down through Central America, through Darien. They're building a bridge and Darien. I just took Brett Weinstein to it. Yeah, what is that bridge for why make it, why build a bridge? Why, like, they're making it easier, faster to move. They're going to open up to Columbia.

Now, when I talk with Panamanians about this, including government people, they're like, there's not any bridge being built down there. I'm like, you see the mud on my boots? I was just down there hours ago, right? In fact, I just took Brett Weinstein down again and Dr. Martinson and the rest. And Ann Vandersteel made a video from the bridge they're building now. And it went viral. They translated it to Spanish.

And the Panamanians are like, what? They're bridging dairy. Now, you know, the government says, no, they're just going out to this one village down there and whatnot. But they're clearly opening. The Chinese have published a book, right? Well, at first they published it in Spanish. I've got it in English. And they talk about how they're going to open the Dary and how it's going to connect with the biocientic corridor down in South America and what they're doing in Ecuador, what they're doing in all these different places, right?

That's why I was just up in El Salvador looking at a port that they're, you know, they're working on up there. And I mean, when I was in San Salvador, Chinese Communist Party is putting, I always go and look at museums. I look at archaeological warfare, which is very important. And I look at their bookstores and their libraries, right? So it went to El Salvador. I'm looking at libraries. So Chinese Communist Party is putting in a library now, seven floors. I was just in it like a month or so ago.

And it's got a big Chinese Communist Party flag, a big CCP flag out in the front in downtown El Salvador, or San Salvador, right? You see that emblem on the lower left, it looks like sort of like a flower? Yeah. That's China aid. That's like USA, but that's China aid, right? I was just over in our, that, that's the library, actually. And, and, and, and, but I didn't take that photo. But anyway, but that, that, that, that, that, that emblem, I was just over in Armenia and Georgia, looking at this as well. And you'll see that little emblem all over the place. So let's get to, you're obviously there. I get it. You're watching these patterns. I want to get sort of the question I was asked people, who is the they, what is the why?

You're talking about China. You're talking to CCP. Why are they, I mean, why are they pushing all these Chinese on purpose to leave their own continent, their country, to land here and push through illegally, not legally, to go into our country. They're planning the route. They're putting them there. They're making it easy. They're coming with money. I mean, you call it an invasion.

What is the plan? Why is this going on? Different groups have different ideas, right? China. What's their plan? China to take the United States, straight up. And for instance, they do a huge information. Keep in mind, I've written three books on Chinese information more.

Unfortunately, they're all in Japanese. They're not in English because I've been working to wake up Japan. But the bottom line is, for instance, when I was just down in Honduras, we went there specifically to look at this archaeological thing. So they've got Chinese archaeological teams down there trying to persuade the Mayans that you're our long-lost cousins. right. And so and all these bad white people came and took your land, right? So they do this all over. So you're really Chinese. Oh yeah, they do it with us. They're convincing them that they're Chinese. Oh, straight up. And they do the same when Okinawa. So they came across the very, you know, the great Barrington, you know, frozen and that's the Native Americans and ultimately South Americans

and everything. This is, and they come and pitch this story and say you're one of us. Straight up. And so, for instance, I was just, I was just on Roiton, the island in Honduras. First, we were on the mainland. And then we went to Rooton. And I was. I was meeting with an interesting fellow. I say, do you know any people in the top levels of the Honduran government that's been to China recently? And he said, yeah, actually, I know a general. He was the top general, actually. He was like their chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

And he's been, he's of Chinese descent, so they invited him over. So I said, oh, that's interesting. Can we invite him to dinner tomorrow? And he's like, well, he's in Togusa, which is like an hour flight away. And I said, can we fly him in? So we flew him in the next day we had dinner with him, right? And he talked, we talked for, I don't know, three, four hours. And he talked about how he was, his grandfather, I think, came over in 1924-ish.

And so he's what they will call overseas Chinese. So they took him over to China six or seven times, showed him the graves of his family and had a parade. They always have a parade for him. Have it, you know, I see this all over, right? And so they had a parade for him. And now he is what they call an overseas Chinese, right? They're like, look how great he is. He was the top general of the, is very interesting guy.

And I think a very smart man. But he's sympathetic, obviously, now to the plan and, to move people. They pull you in, right? They pull you in. And so, for instance, I spent about a year running around China. It's quite an interesting place. But so in any case, he's what's called an overseas Chinese, right?

So they do this all over the world, like in Thailand, Malaysia or whatever. They get the people that are in key positions. They'll recruit influential children through their Confucius Institutes, one of which, or two of which, at least, are in Panama City, one of which is just near the IOM office. If you don't know at Confucius Institute, those guys are important, right? Okay. Whole different story. I've been fighting them for 11 years now.

But the Confucius Institute, all right, let's go back from overseas Chinese to what they're doing with the information war. You'll see, for instance, in the United States, they're trying to persuade Chinese that, hey, we built all these roads to Yellowstone and all this stuff, right? Wow. You'll see actual, you know, Chinese ranger, forest ranger saying, you know, hey, this is actually built by. I read a book about the intercontinental. Is it true? I mean, would you say it's true? There's probably is true to it.

There probably is, like the Intercontinental Railway. I read a book on that by Gordon Chang. Not the Gordon Chang on my friend on Fox, but the other Gordon Chang. And in fact, I messaged to Gordon Chang. I was like, yeah, I just read your book. He goes, that's the other Gordon Chang. I was like, anyway, he was an interesting book. But it was about how the Chinese were involved in building the intercontinental railway, right?

And how the Irish and others built it from one direction and the Chinese from the other. But what they're trying to do is claim basically ownership. We did all these things. we are actually all these indigenous people are actually descendants of the China. When I was in Tibet, interestingly, I learned that they were trying to make a connection between Navajo and Tibetans, right? Like, hey, we have the same jewelry, our faces look the same, and they actually do to me. Yeah, I've seen some of that conversation.

Okay. Why would America be funding this? And, you know, I look at the WEF. I know the WEF is at the same. A lot of these funding bodies that are funding all of these things are also part of of WEF, you just had the whole meeting in Davos, they're telling everybody, everyone's going to be a renter, no one's going to own anything, you're going to be happy. Does that play in here somehow to this invasion of America? And ultimately, why would, this is what I always struggle

with, is I don't care what party you're in. Why would anybody that gets the job to be leader of the free world as president of the United States want to support a global move to just wipe out our own borders. Like, what do you be like, I'm king of the world, man? I got like America, why would you, what would be the motivation to destroy your border and weaken your own power, weaken the power of the United States of America?

That's what I've never been able to put together. Why would you do that? Well, you know, when it comes to the paradigm that I used to look at the world, anytime I feel the emotion of surprise, I know my paradigm is off. And I can tell you're feeling that emotion. I'm surprised, right, right, yeah.

And I don't mean like to surprise you wake up with a snake in your bed. But, yeah, and also your paradigm should be really predictive, right? It's quite clear, by the way, that intergenerationally meet dog kings have been installed. Dog king is an old information war term from Sweden, Norway, where you would run off an enemy king and you would make a literal dog into a king, right? Give it a crown and a throne and have a translator and say, this is your king. And people are like, well, that's a dog. like, well, it's your king, right?

You'll do what the dog says, and the dog, this is its translator. Yeah. And so the dog king, this is an old term, it's not used much anymore, but as somebody who studies information more, we run into this, our team does. Yeah. So, and so what this does is it demoralizes the subjects of the dog king, and it emboldens your enemies, right? So you can see Biden is a clear meat puppet.

He's a dog king. You can see so many, Trudeau, he's a dog king, right? He's obviously not fit to be a barista, right? And so we see this in many countries where these dog kings have been installed. They'll do anything. Biden, obviously, even before he was in this mental state, was as corrupt as corrupt can possibly be. There's nothing that he won't do. It's clear.

And so they have over space. Abbott is clearly a member of Weft, right? And so it's very easy to predict that what's happening in Eagle Pass, for instance, is nonsense. I spent a lot of time down in Eagle Pass. You know, so we've got the... That's what's going on right now. Right. I mean, I would push back on that a little bit, but I mean, I'm not as deep in as you are.

I will say this about Abbott. And again, this isn't like a political show. But I would say that Abbott has pulled off one of the greatest media, you know, coups around this issue, which is by busing these people all around the country, I think you can give him, you know, make, you can say he's responsible for this change in the polling around this, which is now everybody's concerned. So whether he's corrupt or I don't know, but I do know this. That move was brilliant and that move has got attention now. Finally, something you've worked at for so long, has gotten national, if not world attention by doing that. By saying this is all of you. It's not just my problem down here.

I'm going to make it everybody's problem. I think that's pretty brilliant. I see it completely the opposite, actually. He's injecting them deeper into our system. He's clearing the banks of the Rio Grande and the. camps that are can do more camps are being built in Texas by the way and and and he's clear in the banks and getting more in here right uh clearly the invasion continues now he could stop this he could stop it with vehicle inspections there's many ways he has mechanisms that he could definitely

put mexico on its back foot but he doesn't right for instance right now he just ran over to mumbai right and why did he run to mumbai specifically by by the way as soon as i saw that he was in india i thought you know he probably went to mumbai and why did i think Mumbai because that fits the paradigm. Mumbai is the beginning of the new Indo-European corridor right the Indo-European you know what I'm talking about right yeah the Indo-European corridor starts at Mumbai and I think it's not a coincidence that he often goes to McCown I was at Macaughan last year when he came and he was at the Hyatt Hotel I think it was and he was this close to me and he was you know out there

talking and people in Macaunt I talked with the mayor and people are like wow he always comes down to Macaul okay well he comes to Macaughan because I That's part of the I-69 corridor that goes up to Detroit, where World Economic Forum has another headquarters in Detroit. You know, they're clearly making a move for the Great Lakes. But anyway, World Economic Forum and CCP, you asked that question, the Chinese Communist Party, right? They are co-sanguinated. They cooperate closely. Now, my team and I have looked at this a lot for the last couple of years.

Who's Zoom and who? Who's in charge? Yeah. One partner is dominant over the other. I think, I'm unclear about this, but I think that the Chinese Communist Party is the dominant partner. It's unclear. They both know they're going to fight. He's any partners being America or China.

You feel like China's dominating. World Economic Forum is not America. Okay. These are like-W-EF and China. Is that what you're saying, are the two partners? Yeah. Okay.

Because, you know, they have annual meetings in China as well, right? Right. And you'll see the Chinese always at divos and whatnot. And so anyway, but you got to keep in mind they have different end goals. For instance, when I was in Hong Kong, you know, at that 2019, 20, before they finally sort of took Hong Kong. Yeah. There were Chinazi signs everywhere.

I mentioned this last year when we were together. And I asked many Chinese, or Hong Kongers, I often ask the same question over and over. Why do you call them Chinese? And they're like, well, because fascism is when government and business are just entwined and you can't tell them apart. And then you just add a huge racial component. And they're like, you know, the Han Chinese of the Chinese Communist Party are incredibly racist. And they are. I've spent about a year running around China.

It's over the top. And the Chinese Communist Party is crystal clear that they want to make the world genetically Chinese. They don't hide it. They say it. They write it. They say it in speeches and books. Let's take a break from that.

There's a convoy right now right here just outside of Austin. This is it. We the people taking our border back. Take our border back convoy. There's a bunch of cars and trucks getting together. and our friends, Laura Logan, who you know is preparing to be a part of this convoy and Dr. Pete Chambers.

And my understanding is they're standing by, can just talk to us about what's happening with that right now. All right. There's Lara now. Hey, Dr. Pete Chambers. So you guys, what is this convoy about? And why do you think this is important? Well, I believe it's important because it's going to shed light on the open. open border policy which is resulting in second and third order effects of an invasion on this border.

We're talking about chemical warfare, that's fentany, we're talking about human trafficking. That's children, women that are being used as pawns and sometimes worse. And that's what I believe it is. But they're going to shed light to that. Laura, I know that you have, we've spoken many times. This has been an issue you've been covering for years. It feels like it's coming to a climactic point. I've been reporting all during this show.

now for the first time ever, it appears that in America, this is polling as the number one issue for most Americans passing economy during a presidential campaign. Why is that? Why is this suddenly now finally getting the attention that I think you've been trying to bring to it for many years? Because of the scale, Del, because we've never seen anything like it in recorded history, not since this country was founded. And for a long time, they were able to keep the scale hidden. of the first things they did was deny the media access to the border patrol, you know, the processing centers and all the areas down at the border to keep them away. And then if you remember, there was a sort of a slip-up with the Haitians because there were

all those images that got out of the Haitians like over 12,000 gathered under the bridge. And what did they do? The moment that got national attention, they dispersed everybody. So a big part of the open borders policy of this administration has been to make sure that nobody can see it. They want nobody to be able to see what they're doing. And the moment you get all those people gathered together, the jig is up, right? The deception is over. So that's why it's coming to attention now. But it really should have been, you know, should have come to everybody's attention right from the very beginning. And then Michael, you know, he's seen the pipeline,

right? So people are just dealing with what is right here on the doorstep, but also all across the U.S. now. And they're not even looking at the millions and millions and millions of people still on their way. So this is not going to get any slower. What I do know is the Biden administration has made a deal with the Mexican government, with AMLO, the leader of Mexico, to kind of slow things down, because this is embarrassing them, because this is an issue that unites the whole country. It doesn't matter if you're Democrat-Republican or you're black or white or you're Hispanic. This is why down at the border, there was an historic flip in the last election, right? Where you had a county down in Laredo that had been for, it had been blue forever and it went for

Donald Trump. It's because this is not a racial issue and they can push the race component all they like. They can say over and over again, this is, you know, this wouldn't be happening if these people were white and it's a lie. So that lie never ever sticks, right? But they've used it very successfully to suppress the conversation. And now it's of such a scale. It's erupting and people don't understand.

Pete can tell you he's been down in all these small areas along the border. They've been overrun. Ranches have been overrun. People's private property decimated. I live, you know, about 200 miles from the border. Even here, businesses are being told to close at 3 in the afternoon instead of 5. Because the local sheriffs say, we can't protect you. And, you know, right near your business is a waypoint, right?

Where they sleep on their way to the ice. 10 corridor to go through Bayer County, where more than half the people who are trafficked in this country go through Bear County leads you right to Houston. So, I mean, this is a crisis of unimaginable proportions because Border Patrol thought, well, you know, when we hit a certain point, they're going to push back like they always do. No, that didn't happen. You know, and then it just kept climbing and climbing and climbing and nobody does anything about it. And, you know, Michael's points about Governor Abbott are pretty interesting because, you know, there's a lot that Abbott could have done, that he hasn't, and he does make a big show about it. This is a big show down now. But I, and to clarify one point, I'm not part of the convoy. I'm here to cover the convoy for one very specific reason, which is that I'm afraid that they will try to manipulate this and represent it as another fake insurrection or as an act of domestic terrorism or something like that, which is not true. I mean, Doc Chambers here, you know, the media has thrown us versions over his character,

over his record, that he's not really a green beret when he was a flight surgeon, for goodness sake, for third group special forces. He was, you know, he was very well thought of during his time in the military and is still highly regarded and respected by everybody. So you have good people who have given up everything, who are, you know, who are doing this for nothing. They're not getting paid to do this, but they see the crisis. They understand the ramifications and they're standing up to do something about it.

Then they get vilified by the media so that they can make this all about race when it has nothing to do with race. Dr. Chambers, this is something we've talked about it. I know you've been going down, as Laura has said, visiting these different places. I mean, on both sides of the border, we're allowing the drug cartels to run both sides of the border. This is dangerous, not just for the towns on our side of the border, but all of these individuals and towns that you use. to be safe and quiet, they're being affected. I mean, we are literally just deferring all of our, like our immigration system to the cartel. I mean, what are you seeing?

How dangerous is that for the future of this nation? That's completely dangerous. There's a national security issue and it's a semi permissive environment all the way up. It used to be to Fow Fierius, which was about 90 miles in. That was a year and a half ago when I was serving in uniform for Governor Abbott. on task force operation Lone Star. Now it's all the way across Texas.

It's moved up into Arkansas. It's up into Oklahoma. It's moving up the corridors very quickly because the numbers are pushing this human osmotic pressure, as Michael Yon, you just had on, calls it, is exactly what's pushing that specific permissiveness. That's not good. Do you think, I mean, you know, Michael's saying that he believes America is funding this. Is that your sense, Dr. Chambers, when you're looking at you. Yes, sir. There are portions of it. Yes, sir. We have receipts on that. There are portions of that that are through Todd Bensman. You can talk to him, Center for Immigration Studies. He has the receipts, and we work with these gentlemen. And we collectively, we the people are doing this. That's why this convoy is doing this. And I am working as a liaison to law enforcement who is understanding that the importance of the people. Because when the people start speaking and they're working peacefully and they're assembling, this brings light to it. This convoy is not 700,000 trucks as it was originally.

spoken. This is several hundred, but what this has brought is light to this. And that will then speak constitutionally. I want to just speak to the money part of it. You know, a government report just came out where they admitted that they had spent 20 billion on resettlement in 2021 and 22 alone. $20 billion, $5 billion of that went to unaccompanied minors. And they haven't come up with the figures for 2003 yet. I just want to say, I can't. this strongly enough, right? Because I'm a mama bear. So I'm a journalist, but I'm also a mother. And when you hear, as we have, as they've admitted, that some 85,000 children have gone missing. You've got a company like MVM that's moving 9,000 kids, and they don't know. These guys who move the kids,

they're not allowed to talk to them. They're not allowed to help them. These kids are begging them. Please don't take me there. I don't know these people. This is when they're supposed to be going to their sponsors. Remember the whole point of unaccompanied minors, right? The idea. The idea was you're coming here without your parents because your parents, your family, are already here and you're coming to be reunited. But instead, these kids are going into the foster care system. What? Why?

I mean, the foster care system is in an absolute shambles. It's a disgrace. They've been complicit in trafficking kids for years, along with the family courts. And so now you're going to take illegal immigrant children who do not even speak English, many of them and you're going to put them in the foster care system is that a better life are these kids really going to get a better life than the one that they had when they were in their own country in their own culture everybody spoke the language and they knew people and they knew how to navigate that terrain here what are they they're absolutely nothing and and no one has

addressed this issue if these are unaccompanied minors coming to be reunited with their families where are the families no they're going to sponsors these sponsors sometimes are getting 10 20, 50, 100 kids. When, you know, there's a woman Tara Rodas. That's a woman you should have on your show. She's also connected to a whole bunch of other whistleblowers. She works in the Inspector General's office. She amazingly still has her job, right?

It's incredible. And Tara went down there as a volunteer because they put out an old call across the government because they don't have enough people to process. She speaks Hispanic. She thought she was going to be playing jigsaw puzzles, you know, and helping kids color and just keeping them company until they got to their families. Instead, she found that the government was trafficking kids. Because think about this, the people who bring the kids to America's door, right?

That's one job. So you've got the traffickers that deliver them to the border. Then Border Patrol receives them. Their orders from the federal government are that you have to receive them, and then you process them. And then what do you do? You hand them over to an NGO or to HHS who hands them over to an NGO. And then they bring in a contractor, right, like MVM, and they move them. to wherever you want them to go.

They get someone to phone and say, I'm the sponsor. Can you imagine that a sponsor just has to make a phone call? You don't have to see any real documentation. They get fake papers all the time. And then we, the taxpayer, pay to fly them halfway across the country or wherever it is they're going to,

and then we house them and so on. So we're getting them to the destinations where the traffickers want them. And I'm working with a group that's done counter-trafficking since the 90s. I mean, they got a list of kids that were missing. the first two that they looked into, a boy and a girl, they found that they had been delivered to sex workers.

Okay, so it's very, to me, I just think it's unbelievable. There's all these people out there that say, oh, shame, these poor people, you know, it's really cruel. We've got to let them in. You need to understand that you're letting that child in and sending it to a sex worker so that that child can be raped every single day until they die. And they get, they're violently abused, they're often tortured. They endure unimaginable things, and they usually lost, the average child lost around two years before they're murdered. So this is not a better life. And you've been lied to and deceived.

It's really important that people understand. Sure, there are some people that come here and have a chance at a better life. But they're minuscule because, as Michael Young has said, as Dog pointed out, the people running this and getting rich of this, getting the richest are the most violent. transnational criminal organizations in the world. And I find it very hard to be. I know they're not doing it without the, you know, sort of the permission of the Biden administration, at best, permission, because before Biden even took office, he sent Jake Sullivan and other emissaries from his administration all over Latin America to do public speaking to a, letting everybody know that the border was going to be open. They wanted the outcome they have, and that's why they don't call it a crisis.

Amazing, Laura. Thank you for joining us today. Any last words? I know you guys, you know, we're going to be tracking this convoy and I want to hear all about it. Dr. Chambers, any last thoughts before we let you go? Yeah, you know, I'm going to continue to work here to make sure that the infiltrators are pointed out because we have the names of the infiltrators and we know who they are. And they are going to, they have to understand that there is law and the Constitution of the state of Texas and the United States will uphold those laws and we will continue to work. work with law enforcement to make that happen. I really appreciate both of you.

They're on the radar. Texas, yeah, there are several different Texas militia groups, but we're going to, we have them on the radar and we're going to, and the eyes of Texas are upon you. We're watching now. And you know, Dale, that's like one, that's one of the most important things because nobody here wants this to turn into another fake insurrection, right?

Everybody here that I have spoken to is peaceful, low-abiding, They support the sheriffs, local law enforcement. They support, you know, the governor and the attorney general took this position on Article 4 of the Constitution on states' rights. People here want a secure border, but they're not going hunting down migrants and all the other BS that so much of the media is talking about. They're desperate to create some kind of false flag event here. And there's a lot of people are staying away because they say, well, you know, I don't want this to be another gender. January 6, right? I don't want to get caught up in this. Is this going to be unsafe? Well, I mean, that is the problem, right? That is part of what they've done, too, is to scare us

away from our right to assemble, to make it a bad thing, to make it seem like a violent thing. And I really think what we have got to celebrate is, you know, the right to peaceful protest. I'm glad you're there. I know that, you know, you're part of making that stay peaceful. Good. All right. Well, I appreciate you to join us. Thank you so much for taking the time and bringing us up to date on this convoy that's taking place right now as we speak. Take care. God bless. Del you're three minutes up the road.

Get your ass down here. I'll see you all in about 15 minutes. All right. Well, I'm going to send Michael all the way. See you now, Michael. Very good. Take care. All right.

Well, sort of to wrap this up, right? I mean, this thing is coming to a head in this country. And, you know, they bring up a good point. We've got to handle this in a peaceful way. You know, what do you think? is the answer? What's the takeaway for people watching right now? What can we do to make a difference on this issue? And we're a nation of diversity, right? I mean, that's what makes us great. We've all ultimately, you know, come from, you know, every corner of the earth, and that diversity is what

makes us powerful. It's what makes us unique. We have every religion represented, every race, But, you know, we have to have rules. We have to have a border or then, you know, what are we? Are we, you know. So how do we get to? What do we need to do right now? Well, I think a lot of people don't realize we are actually in a war. And that's not an overstatement.

It's a clear war. It's a hybrid war. The issues that you cover with pharma constantly are a huge component. I mean, obviously, those have been devastating already. And you know better than anybody how this is that trajectory. quite concerning, to put it mildly. And then there's the demographic war, which is intense.

Economic war, of course. And then there's one thing, you know, I warned about a couple of years ago, when the Panama Canal has problems, watch the Sue as. And magically it is now, right? Right. And, you know, the Panama Canal has obvious problems now

for water issues and whatnot. And the global shipping is taking a big hit. This is a big deal. Whole separate topic, but it's related to the larger hybrid. war that's unfolding. I, you know, as a war correspondent and somebody who studied war for many years and many wars and conflicts, I don't see how this ends with anything less than huge bloodshed. Because this is, the reason I've spent most of my life overseas out of the United States, right?

Even though my English is fluent, and I'm American hardcore, but I'm mostly downrange. I'm mostly in the countries these people come from, right? Almost 100 countries that I've been to now, right? And so what I'm seeing is some fish don't mix well in the same aquarium. Diversity can be very important. It can also be a shot in the heart, right? For instance, now we have many what I call anthroinsula, human islands forming. For instance, we used to have that in Germany, with Germans, of course, New Brownfields and whatnot.

They would just charter ships and move the whole village over. And, of course, they would speak German and stay German up until World War I and World War II. It became unfashionable to speak German. But what I'm getting to is when you come over with enough people in your various ecosystems, your anthroinsula to create little balkanization, actually, it will end up being the end of your country. Certainly a country like the United States. I was just down in Belize, and I looked for the Mennonites, actually, because I wanted to talk with them about different things. And of course, they're still speaking NATO Deutsch, you know, low German, and very interesting people. But you'll see these, one of the things that creates an anthroinsula is when you, in other words, like a spot of oil in the water, is whether or not that culture will marry into the other culture, right? And for instance, the Mennonites don't marry in much, as you can imagine. And that's what we have a lot now.

We have big huge groups of Somalis, big huge groups of this, that, and the other. You know, who's who in the zoo? And on the fish chart of, you know, which cultures mixed together, let's say Filipinos are green, green, green, green, amber with other Filipinos, Green, Green, Filipinos get along with everybody. Chechins are red, red, red, red, amber with other Chechens. So keep in mind, again, I spend, I'm usually the Zeno. I'm usually the one, sometimes the only white man I see for like a month is when I shave occasionally, right?

And so I'm usually out there alone in China or someplace, right? So I, you know, I see a lot of different cultures and I see how they interact with each other. For instance, Kurds. I get along great with Kurds, whether I'm up with them in northern Iraq or whatever, or Kurdistan. as they would call it. But you know, the Kurds, when they go, for instance, in Japan recently, Kurds will go, when you have Kurds and Turks together or Kurds and Arabs, they're going to fight. I mean, you've got these, or Kurds and Kurds. So the Kurds just had a big knockdown drag out recently in Japan. It was Kurd on Kurd. And then the injured went to the hospital, and the Kurds showed up to the hospital,

and they're fighting each other at the hospital. The Japanese were like, what's going on? I'm like, well, that's how Kurds roll. And you've welcomed them into Japan, and now you're going to have to deal with it. I mean, bottom line. Wow. Well, obviously, I think that one of the things that, at least around this topic, the one thing that gives me hope is that we need to sort of start uniting as Americans. We've got to start coming together. The pressures on this country and the pressures on this dream, this dream of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are real. They're coming from border issues.

They're coming from AI technology, central banking, digital. digital currencies, all of these things we talk about in our show are very, very pressing issues that could rob us like literally overnight of any concept of freedom, where we're actually free to drive where we want, talk to who we want, say what we want, gather with who we want. I think that issues like this, it feels like this country is all starting to at least someplace saying, you know what, I think we have some common ground in this issue. I think around the pharmaceutical industry and, you know, faith in experts. We're starting to, as was he said today, you know, 58% are now saying,

I don't think you just trust these people, think you have to do your own homework. It feels like this pressure is making us wake up in a lot of ways. Are we going to wake up in time? Well, I know this will be very unpopular, but we're going to need mass deportations if we're going to stay together. And again, I spend most of my time downrange. and these other countries and I've been in a lot of wars and a lot of conflicts

and I see what's coming. That's why I returned to the United States in 2020 because I can see, I feel like an oncologist who has treated cancer for years and years and suddenly you walk into the room, I don't need the x-rays, I can smell it, right?

And I can smell war coming here. It clearly is. And it's intentional. It's a hybrid war. You can see the demographic war that's unfolding is this is same as happening in Europe. They're a little bit more advanced stages than we are. You can see, for instance,

tri-state city. The Netherlands and others are taking the farms away. Right now, as we say, you've got, you've got, you know, the parliament and the EU surrounded right now by farmers that have just had it, you know, going after, you know, a way of life and going after a food supply. Well, I mean, you know, you're not alone. I've had other people that have sat here and, you know, many predictions, 2024 is, you know, a lot of people predicted this is that we're all. We're on the verge of a civil war here in America. I pray that that's not true. I pray that you're wrong.

I pray it's not true as well. You know, I pray that you're wrong. Because I've been in civil wars, and it's about the ugliest thing except for famine. Yeah. The civil wars are absolutely, don't want any part of it. That's why I came back doing anything I could to derail it,

avert it, you know, stop it, slow it down. But in fact, it's picking up steam. Because people are not recognizing who's actually doing this. For instance, the United States is invading itself because they have been captured by world economic form. And again, they are co-segonated with the Chinese Communist Party, right? I do believe, I think, I'm unclear, actually, I'm unsure, but I think the dominant party in that is the CCP over Wef.

They will fight each other eventually, though, because they have different in-state goals. They have short-term and intermediate goals that are overlap quite a lot. For instance, destabilizing, you know, taking Panama, taking all of Central America. When you go up through, I've been to every country in Central America, from Canada to Colombia, inclusively, right? I've looked at this in great detail. You can see where bit by bit they are setting, listen, most of the war, when you're going

up against sophisticated enemies, most of the war is fought before the first shot is fired. It's setting the table. Amateurs are always talking about sparks. What will the sparks be on? It's not about sparks. It's about conditions. It's about setting conditions. And they have been setting demographic conditions, economic conditions.

pharmacological conditions. I mean, I don't know where this vaccine ends up, but you can clearly see it's damaging our military. It's causing a lot of the most serious people to get out. Look what it's doing to our airlines industry. Anyway, I don't need, you're the last person on the world. Well, look, I'll just say this, Michael, you're one of these interviews that it's like, I just feel like I just got through the introduction to a giant book. We'll have to have you on again soon, but thank you for bringing some perspective. This Darien Gap thing is very disturbing. that our own country is fast-tracking people from all around the world. I don't know how we would ever stop terrorists. In fact, it doesn't look like we care.

And so huge questions around why this is happening, but I hope you'll continue to keep us informed as you have and I look forward to the next time you come in. Please come to Darien with me. Okay. You'll see it. All right, sounds good. All right. Thank you, sir. Thank you, Michael. Thank you. Well, you know, there's so many different ways, as I've said that we're under attack, under attack, one of the big things we talk about on this show and really what got me started into, you know, I find myself in these amazing conversations like this, but it all really started around the tack on our children when I started recognizing that the pharmaceutical industry was putting its bottom dollar ahead of children. One of the biggest issues that represents this is autism, something that's grown from one in 10,000 into 1960s and is now somewhere around 1 in 30. Folks, That is a horrifying statistic. One in 30 from one in 10,000, just in a few short decades.

What is happening? I mean, when we're looking at the possibility that boys potentially could be, they're more affected that they may be somewhere around 1 in 18, 1 in 20 diagnosed with autism, a lifelong condition that, you know, I don't mean to speak anything negative, but it's difficult if we could protect these kids, if we could have them be healthy and certainly those that are going through this. How do we make them healthier? This is a question that so many of you, whether you're involved in it or you know somebody

it does, we all know somebody now. This isn't Rain Man a movie anymore where we're like, wow, that was a wild story. I've never seen that before. Now we all know it. Now it's all around us. Well, something has to be done to stop it. Something has to be done to help these children to make them as healthy as they can possibly be. That's why there's a really important conference going on this weekend in San Antonio, Texas.

I'm going to be speaking there with other leading officials on these topics. This is what that is all about. So my dream for probably a good 10 years or so has been to run an autism event. To really educate those parents on addressing those underlying conditions associated with autism. and truly, truly hearing from the best speakers that there are on the planet. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Del Bigtree, Mickey Willis, all these doctors that have been on the forefront, Dr. Jerry Cartsonel, Dr. Brian Hookard, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. Peter McCulloch, Dr. Peter McCulloch, Dr. James Nuswander, Jeff Sewell, and daughter Sienna and Olivia, the Spellers' community,

and Don Marie Gavin, and all these amazing doctors, scientists, and parents on how to address the underlying biological conditions associated with autism and other neurological disorders. Hello everyone, this is Andy Wakefield. I'm excited to announce that we will be hosting an exclusive. event at the Autism Health Summit in San Antonio on February the 3rd. At the event we will be showing the trailer and select scenes from our new movie Protocol 7. And following the presentation, we will have a Q&A with two of the lead actors from the movie, the writer-director, and our producers. This is a one-of-a-kind experience you will not want to miss. There's a lot of bad stuff that's happening.

And what is almost invisible to the eyes, the good stuck in time. And I believe we're heading towards a wellness that we've not experienced in many, many decades or generations. It's important though, regardless of what kind of power we think we hold or don't hold, that we understand that it's imperative that we all step forward. We need to research. We need to find out because the people are watching this probably think, me alone can't save the world. But if we get a community, if we get a group, We can really affect the world. I'm really happy to be supporting the Autism Health Summit.

This is something that's really needed. It's a real growing issue. So if you know anybody, this is an event they're not going to want to miss. The Autism Health Summit in San Antonio, Texas, February 2nd through 3rd. I'll be there speaking on Saturday. Also, if you want to see me speak, I'm going to be in California speaking at the Conscious Life Expo. That's happening. I'm going to be speaking on Sunday, February 11th.

I think that's between that 2 and 3.30, something like that, California time. And then the next day I'm on a panel on Monday about health freedom. So both of those are great events. If you want to come out, see me speak, see some of the other great people that are featured at both of these events. You know, this show has been a roller coaster ride. Many times it is. I walk away sometimes thinking, you know what? I'd watch that show.

I mean, you never know what's going to happen on the high wire. You never know what we're going to talk about. That's because, honestly, we are following the stories that interest us, that we think would interest you because it involves all of our lives. It involves our safety, our sovereignty, and the decisions we make. I want to put out there that, you know, we're interviewing people that we can find that have perspectives. Whether or not I agree on that perspective or not, I think you deserve to see all of the different ideas that are out there

and then come to your own decisions, your own conclusions. I want to make this clear. This show is not about final solutions. This is about working our way through. I'm not presenting what I know to be the truth and how we answer it and how we fix it. What you're watching is an ongoing investigation. We're putting our evidence as we're finding it and we're showing you where we're finding it and the people that are bringing it to us.

So you are a part of this. You are part of this network that is taking place. This is, you know, a give and go. We're working in this together. Your support makes this show possible and your support allows us to bring lawsuits even against the government of the United States when we think they're hiding information from us. And we've had amazing victories in discovery and we're making transparency happen. We can't be afraid of these conversations. It's while we find ourselves in all of these difficult positions we're in.

I am happy to report. Let's not forget the opening of the show how many things are moving our direction. It looks like the WHO treaty is struggling. It's falling apart. It's under attack, not by misinformation, but by truth. The Wall Street Journal is not complaining about the fact that, you know, it can't tell the truth. It's complaining about the fact that it has to prove its truth. That means we're getting somewhere.

That means we still make a difference. That means we're voting for our dollars. It matters. It matters what we say. It matters what we do. And no matter what you're doing in your life, career right now, you must recognize, please recognize, this may be the most important time in human history.

It is certainly the most important time in American history. We're under threat. That means it's all of our job to come together to unite and stop that threat. That's what the high wire is all about, and I'll see you next week.