The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 330: COLLATERAL DAMAGE

Episode Date: July 29, 2023

Ice Cube and Tucker Carlson Go Viral Over Vaccine Choice; Jefferey Jaxen Reports Reveals it’s not All Roses For The Weight Loss Wonder Drug, Ozempic; Massachusetts Moves against Medical Freedom; Biden Wants to Make the Pandemic Preparedness Office Permanent; Former BlackRock Portfolio Manager, Edward Dowd, joins Del with some of his most shocking data yet, which suggests the collateral damage from the Pandemic Health Response. Guest: Edward DowdBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening.

wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out into the high wire. You know, it's amazing. What a difference a year makes. I mean, when we start to look back at some of the things that happened and how the language around all of these conversations about COVID, about pandemics, about vaccines, about lockdowns, it all seems to be shifting. It feels like the world is waking up. And a lot of people that were awake, but weren't admitting it, are now saying, yep, I was always awake. This week, a lot of attention has been brought to Ice Cube. If you remember back in 2021, he was fired off a set. This was what the tweet said.

Ice Cube will no longer star in, oh, hell no. A perfect title, actually, for this for Sony after declining a request from producers to get the COVID-19 vaccine. He was set to be paid $9 million. Now the headlines are talking about how he's basically bragging. Ice Cube seems pretty proud about losing $9 million because he wouldn't get vaccinated. Tucker Carlson recently caught up with him and had a very interesting interview. Take a look at this. Why wouldn't you take the backs?

You had a direct order to take it. You were told to take it. Yeah, I'm not real good with direct orders. But on a whole other note, it wasn't ready, you know. It was six-month, you know, kind of rush job. And I didn't feel safe. But they told you you were safe. I know what they said.

I know what they said. And I heard them, I heard them loud and clear. But it's not their decision. There's no repercussions if they're wrong. But I can get all the repercussions if they're wrong. Was it a tough call for you? No. It wasn't a tough call.

You know, I wanted to be an example for my kids. kids, you know, really make sure they didn't take it either. Show them that I, you know, I want to stand on my convictions and that I was willing, you know, to lose $9 million and more because we've probably lost more, you know, since then. The idea is that people who stand on their convictions are heroes, they're brave, they have principles,

you know, they're the people we look to for inspiration. But in this case, with this decision and these principles, you were not hailed as a hero. No. You were attacked. Why won't you get the vaccine, man? Hey, look, man, I'd just rather be myself than take that vaccine like you other three billion bozos.

I never told anyone not to get vaccinated publicly. That was never my message to the world. I didn't even want people to know whether I got vaccinated or not. vaccinator or not. Do you know anyone who was injured by the vaccine? I do and they suffer every day and it's it's hard to watch. Sometimes you got to let people know what's going on so you can actually move the needle. I choose to be vocal if it's true why can't I say it? Well you can't say it because it is true. There it is now that's the problem with the world today. Thinking something is not a crime saying it is not

out of crime. You know what I mean? So I just tell what's real. You know, if the truth hurts, say ouch. Well, there it is. Speaking truth of power, as he has most of his career and really coming out now. Apparently, he's even gotten some trouble with his new basketball league. And he's speaking out about Ice Cube goes off on the NBA mainstream media and gatekeepers for trying to sabotage his brand, the big three, because he isn't a part of their club. I'm going on an F, the gatekeepers podcast tour to get the message out to the people. Hey, you know, maybe we'll get lucky. Ice Cube, won't you drop in studio here on that tour? And we'd love to have a conversation because we've been calling you a hero all the way through.

That's what the High Wire does. Got a huge show coming up, another big hero a little bit later on in the show, Edward Dowd. I don't know about you, but it just feels like there's this new wave of strokes and heart attacks and blood clots. And, you know, is the leading cause of death now suddenly? we're going to get into all of those details. Is it really on the rise? But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. You know, we've been featuring comedians and now musicians, you know, all these people from Hollywood that seem to be towing the line for a long time.

They're breaking ranks. It's an amazing moment. It is an incredible moment. And speaking of Hollywood, there's a hot new drug out there, and it's an injectable drug. It's not a COVID vaccine. It's a diabetes medication vaccine. It's a weight loss drug. It's something, but a lot of people are clamoring for this thing.

Take a look. All right. The hottest drugs in the country right now. The medication has taken Hollywood by storm. It's the talk of TikTok. I just start dropping pounds left and right. The topic, OZempic, has over 300 million views. People looking to lose weight have a new tool in their arsenal.

Baby, the hype is real. Prescription drugs called semi-glutide that come in a now unmistakable pen. Ozympic and Wagovi, the brand names for semi-glutai drugs that were developed to help people with type 2 diabetes. They've been out for a long time for people with type 2 diabetes. Now, some of them have FDA approval for treating obesity. They're incredibly effective for weight loss.

Ozambic works, they make you feel full, they raise insulin levels, they decrease gastric emptying and they do work. The weight just started falling off. I have been on some gluteite for a total of 10 weeks now. And after 20 weeks, I am now 68 pounds. Big names like Elon Musk, Amy Schumer, and Chelsea Handler have admitted taking it. And from celebrities to social media influencers, this trend has taken the weight loss world by storm. Jolo, you look thin.

Thank you. Ozampi? Yep. What housewife isn't on Ozampi? Not one. Any side effects? No. Really?

Just not hungry. Okay. Is it safe? Yes. It's considered to be generally. very rare side effects of pancreatitis. How much are you expecting this drug to increase demand or how much demand for this drug are you expected to be increased in the next five to ten years?

We expect this would be a very, very significant part of our business. We're just getting going, so it's a very, very sizable market. And this is a gigantic market, obviously, weight-loss drugs have always been one of the leading contenders, especially in a nation like America that is struggling with obesity on such a major level and diabetes and all those things. So this certainly is played into that. And it does appear that, you know, almost everybody is taking this thing right now.

I mean, I hear reports, you know, my hair salon is offering OZempi, as he called it. And certainly clinics and, you know, it just seems like it's everywhere and everyone's down. There's commercials everywhere for this thing. And you mentioned all those people that woke up during COVID to the realities of how pharmaceutical companies operate, how messaging works.

Let's take those people along a ride of what we do here. And we dig deeper into these drugs. So the first really red flag is that pharmaceutical exec saying, it's a sizable market. Anytime there's this much hype around a drug, this much marketing, this much push, this possibility for this much money to be made. We have to pump the brakes, have some caution here,

and let's look at some realities, have a black and white conversation about this thing and let's look through the hype. So in 2021, when we were focused on the pandemic, everyone was focused on the pandemic, This was the headline that came out. FDA approves new drug treatment for chronic weight loss management first since 2014. They've been working on these for a long time.

And then sure enough, the American Academy of Pediatrics, these make kind of the rules for children in the United States. They came out and jumped right on board of the bandwagon. So you just saw all the Hollywood hype. They have the adults. It's at hair salons. Your doctors give them out like candy. What about the kids? American Academy of Pediatrics said, we got you covered.

Here's the headline here. Consider drugs and surgery early for obesity and kids. New guidelines say, waiting doesn't work. And it says children struggle with obesity, struggling with obesity should be evaluated and treated early and aggressively, including with medications for kids as young as 12. Aggressively with medications, again, here's another red flag. We're treating kids aggressively as young as 12 with medications that just were recently approved off-label with a injectable diabetes drug.

Third red flag. Wow. We have Boris Johnson, obviously someone that was at the lead of the COVID pandemic response in the UK. He steps down, goes directly into writing op-eds. And what does he do for his first op-ed? Does he talk about his experience with the COVID response? No, he pushes this drug. The wonder drug I hoped would stop my 1130 fridge raids for cheddar and Trezo didn't work for me.

And you start reading this article, and it sounds like it was written by a pharmaceutical rep. Listen to this. It's a cinch, said the doctor. all you need to do is inject a tiny dose of clear ozympic fluid into your abdomen once a week and hey presto no more rating the fridge at 1130 for cheddar and treaso washed down with a half a bottle of wine it's a dark life you got there for it's like i don't think an ejection's gonna help on that one but so but now we start uncovering the story so this thing's been out a couple years it's all the rage but then you start seeing headlines like this and we're no stranger to these type of headlines is ozimpic causing a wave of suicidal americans fda has received 60 reports of side effects and drug maker nova nordus says it's taking the issue very seriously amid fears of five million people taking the shot we go to ozimpics package insert it's required we know these with vaccines it's required for every drug and injectable product talk about everything including harms and adverse events you can look on this product everywhere and you see nothing about the word suicidal

ideation suicidal attempts suicidal anything so we got a problem we're giving this thing out in mass quantities we have i mean a large marketing campaign and we have a side effect that is obviously a really big deal that's no one no one's really talking about we're just starting to see in the headlines this is roiders not only is the fdaa looking at this but the european union is looking at this as well e u investigates ozimic weight loss drug saxendra after suicidal thoughts reported there's a lot of brand names of these drugs so just try to follow me on that yeah says although iceland's regulator has flagged only three cases the issue of suicidal thoughts linked to weight loss drugs is and has hobbled previous attempts by the drug industry to develop lucrative weight loss drugs.

So we have a history now. And it says here, in clinical trials for Ozypic and Sexendra, Novo excluded people with a history of psychiatric disorders or recent suicidal behaviors. So, Del, they stack the deck in the pre-licensure trials. Where have we saw that? Where have we seen this before? Yeah. And it's almost like they knew there might be an issue. Yeah, exactly.

And so we go on and it says here, Sinoffi's accomplia in the article of Reuters, which never won U.S. approval, was withdrawn in Europe after, in 2008, after being linked to suicidal thoughts. So we have drugs being withdrawn, exactly, weight loss drugs, being withdrawn because of suicidal thoughts.

So, I mean, there's a lot of breadcrumbs here to follow. So I started digging even more and we see this study. We have a systemic review of, this is the post-marketing withdrawal of anti-obesity medical product because of adverse drug reactions. We go into the study and we see this written. The authors identified 25 anti-obesity medications withdrawn between 1964 and 2009. Did you know that me? I didn't. 23 of these were centrally acting via monoamine neurotransmitters. Case reports were cited as evidence for withdrawal in 80% of instances. Here we go. Psychiatric disturbances,

cardiotoxicity mainly attributed to re-uptake inhibitors, and drug abuse or dependence, attributed to neurotransmitter releasing agents. Together accounted for 83% of the withdrawals. And the conclusion the authors gave was this. Most of the drugs that affect monoamine neurotransmitters licensed for the treatment of obesity over the past 65 years have been withdrawn because of adverse reactions. The reason for withdrawal raised concerns about the wisdom of using pharmacological agents that target monoamine neurotransmitters and managing obesity.

So, Dell, guess what Ozypic and Wagovi and all of these drugs plunding the market are? They are the same monoamine transmitters. They're acting on the same parts of the brain. And if you go to the Mayo Clinic, they actually do have the warnings. So all of these drug brand names are, the drug is semi-glutide. And so you go to the Mayo Clinic and you look under semi-glutide and you see this. This medicine may cause some people to be agitated, irritable, or display other abnormal behaviors, and may also cause some people to have suicidal thoughts and tendencies or to become more depressed.

You know what's so upsetting about this? It's the same story we see when we've covered vaccines or everything else. And this is what it is. It's the regulatory agencies, folks. They're the ones that are part of the corruption. This is what, you want to talk about a swamp? This is it. Because look at this.

For 65 years, you're telling me, they know that this line of drugs, that this approach towards weight loss causes suicidal thoughts. when they're overseeing and looking into the trials for a Zempic, wouldn't you think if your regulatory agencies care about you, they would at least ensure that the one thing this trial was doing was ruling out the fact that it would cause suicidal thoughts. That's the one thing you know you should be looking for and instead you look the other way while they take away anyone that has depression or any problems that might be affected this way. So you let them stack their own deck. It's not like this is accidental. This didn't just show up as this one drug suddenly has this problem. Literally So the entire line of drugs like this for 65 years has one major problem and your regulatory

agencies just push it all the way through. You've got children being recommended to take this thing and oh, all of a sudden you have a rise in school shootings and couldn't have anything to do with pharmaceuticals. It's all about guns. This is the problem, this country, it's the problem with our regulatory agencies and it's why we are very focused on stories just like this. And Del, I think we are part of just a small handful of voices in the darkness here against this massive marketing campaign to say, hey, we need to take a deeper look at this because, as you said,

65 years of history with dangers here, this is why this is more dangerous. The only type of hype I've seen around drugs like this before is the opioids, oxycontin, Zoloft, the SSRI, depression medication. Those things were blockbuster drugs, and they were kind of a new version of these drugs. So you can almost, you know, we're not going to, but one could give a pass to the regulatory agencies and say, well, this is a novel product. We're just hitting the market with it. You know, as we know, they didn't do the correct studies. But with this drug, you have this history. So there's no excuse. And so we look at the prescription chart of how many of these scripts are going out. And we can see in like 2019, you know, just probably a couple hundred thousand, 2020. But by 2022, we're up to about

five million. And 2023 is where this aggressive marketing campaign is really taking off. So I would imagine that is going to probably at least double. It's hard to imagine it's only five million people when I run into as many people that are taking this, as many doctors as I know that are giving it. Five million is a pretty small amount of people inside, you know, the 330, 40 million, wherever the count is at now in America. So it seems like it must have exploded recently. I'm going to have to agree with you on that exactly because of headlines like this, because they're actually having shortages of these drugs. When have you heard of shortages of drugs that are just coming out? This is the headline Novo Nortis Diabetes Drug Ozympic back in supply in U.S. after months of shortage.

And so starting to research this topic, I'm seeing the headlines of the suicidal thoughts, but then more headlines start coming. And this drug really has an uphill battle for itself. This was out of CNN. So this drug slows the gastric emptying of the stomachs. You feel full or longer. This is CNN. They took blockbuster drugs for weight loss and diabetes. Now their stomachs are paralyzed.

Oh my God. So, I mean, listen to these stories in here. These are just people that have these experiences. It says, and even now, being off the medication for almost a year, I'm still having a lot of problems, Alan said. She said she was at urgent care recently after vomiting so much that she became dehydrated. Another person said in September 2020, her vomiting got much worse. Standing in front of her classroom, right, said. She began having burps that smelled so strongly of sulfur and rotten eggs that the kids began to comment on it.

What is that? Where is that coming from, they ask? So I don't even know what to say it. Well, what we have to say into our audience out there is that these are pharmaceutical products. They have side effects. We have shown you time and time again that you are not being told the truth. Even here, reading the product insert, you won't get the truth, which is rare. Usually there's some truth to be found hidden in the fine print, as they say.

But even here, your regulatory agencies are going out of the way to, to produce. protect the company over you. This is something that's got to change immediately. It's a major part of the work we do. But I also want to say what's interesting about this, right? The suicidal thoughts connected to your gut biome. I think right now, as I'm reflecting back on Zachary Bush, who is just one of the dynamic and brilliant minds that we've been lucky enough to interview on the show, and I'll probably try and get him sometime in the near future. But all the discussions he's had about how your stomach is really your second brain, so much of your serotonin and a lot of your, you know, emotional, uh, chemicals that are moving your body are directly connected to your digestion.

Folks, if there's one thing you do not want to mess with in this world, it's your digestion. Okay, it just because I get it, you know, we're all, you know, having difficulty, finding time to work out or really watch our diet, watch our food. But when you start messing with your stomach, God knows what can go wrong. What will happen to our children? And what is the future of this? How many of these drugs, if you start slowing your digestion, slowing the whole way, you were absorbing, you know, toxins and nutrients into your body, you know, we just have no idea

with the long-term effects of that all, all for some sort of short-term gain. You know, I just keep thinking growing up, my dad said, you know, there's no such thing as a free ride, everything has consequences, there's a payment for everything, just be aware of that, be smart, you know. It's just, all of this sounds a little too good to be true. Apparently now, showing us once again, that's the case. Yeah, and it's so important for people to do their own research, like we always say. And, you know, if you know somebody that's taking this and they're open to another form of information,

maybe send them this clip and just plant a bug in their head so they can monitor their own thoughts. They can monitor their own health while they're taking this because, you know, a lot of times do you think, well, it's just another weight loss drug. I'll just take this. It's no big deal. It's not really that big of a deal. So, Del, last week, we talked about an unredacted version of an email by Tony Fauci at the beginning of the pandemic. He was giving an update to all of the people.

people that he was talking to, trying to figure out, where this thing came from? What kind of works going on in China? He had virologists. He had people like Jeremy Ferrar at the Welcome Trust, really quarterbacking it as well. He had Francis Collins, NIH. Well, that became unredacted by the select subcommittee that has been looking at the coronavirus response and all of its faults. And so we know that now. And what's happened is we have Ram Paul, Senator Ram Paul, and he has called for basically Fauci to have prosecution for lying under oath. This is what that look like in the media. All right.

Anthony Fauci came before my committee. He said, absolutely, he funded no gain of function research in China. But we now have an email from him where he describes the research they're doing and says, you know what? We are suspicious of the lab because we know they are doing gain of function research. He describes the project, but the project he described is the project he thinks. So everything he's been telling us from the very beginning has been a lie. We've documented that it's a lie and it's a felony to lie to Congress.

And so I've referred him not once but now twice to the Attorney General of the United States for prosecution. But as you know, this Attorney General is the most partisan Attorney General we've ever had. And it's good luck on getting him to do his job. Once again, watching this government just cover up for all sorts of problems, all, you know, and this is a big one, right? This is going to be big. our government agencies, you think about all the line that went on, our president, you know,

pushing a vaccine that ended up not stopping transmission. This was promised, jobs taken away, economy destroyed, and all of it around this virus that we have said from the beginning, looks like it's got Tony Fauci's fingerprints all over it. Yeah. And, you know, at the beginning, too, you had two camps that were really trying to figure out what was going on. You had Fauci Collins, Jeremy Ferrar, these higher ups at NIH, Bethesda, Bethesda boys, they called them. And then you had the virologists, the actual nuts and bolts scientists,

the evolutionary scientists. And that was the other camp. And they had their own separate conversations. And what came out of all of that was the paper. This was the paper. Remember, everyone was trying to figure out what happened. Where is this going? The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.

This was published in nature. And this really, at the beginning of the pandemic, killed the conversation of the lab situation. the lab leak. And yet it says here, our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. And so what that did, and that was early on in the pandemic, that just kicked off. The media ran with this, hook line and sinker. That's what it looked like. Check this out. This whole notion that the coronavirus was developed in a Chinese lab. That has been debunked. The people saying it's man-made, that's been pretty much completely debunked,

The scientists say no, when you look at its genetic makeup and the science behind it, it has not been altered. Dr. Anthony Fauci rejected the conspiracy that coronavirus was man-made in a lab in Wuhan, China. This could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated. A lot of people that write love that phrase, escape from the lab, because it sounds like something from a Marvel movie or a comic book. It sounds like they're talking about a man-made virus that China was weaponizing that got out of control. You see, it turns out, Corona was never just a virus. No, it was actually a weapon created to take old people out. Donald Trump is still pushing the debunked bunkum,

despite his own intelligence community's findings that that is simply not true. It's really incredible to watch how poorly all of those news reporters are aging on this subject. I don't know that we've heard an apology from any of them and why anyone tunes in to hear what they have to say. what you saw is the failure of modern, you know, news agency or reporting, which is it's doing the same thing as science. It's running on assumptions. It's running on expert opinion. And frankly, to all of my peers out there in journalism, you know, you're supposed to have a little red flag go off. When you recognize that over the years, Tony Fauci has been embroiled in an argument over whether we should be doing gain of function research. Clearly, if something went wrong, you know, someone close to that would be trying to cover it up.

So the way they took it hook, line and sinker from this guy, Tony Fauci, of all the people in the world, it didn't take rocket scientists to say, you know what? This guy has got his fingers in this space. We certainly can't just take his word for it. The first thing he would obviously do is try to cover this up. And yet that instinct does not seem to exist in journalism anymore, except, you know, in a very few places,

and the two of us are sitting here on the high wire for everybody that was paying attention. We were skeptical from the beginning. And by the way, sacrificed our YouTube channel, sacrificed our Facebook channel for stating the obvious, which is we do not see the evidence that you can prove that this is a natural virus. And what ultimately ends up being the truth is not important because what we're going to go through is kind of a forensic. It's not important for this segment. What we're going to go through is kind of a forensics of how the medical community creates a narrative. And you just saw the end result of that. media just grabs it and repeats. So we have, thanks to the coronavirus, the select committee and the

coronavirus for pandemic, we have the Slack channel. So the Slack is a private communications messenger system. And that's the second camp, the virologists and the scientists, they were using as one of the forms of their communication was this Slack channel. They were communicating with this, not Fauci, not Collins. They weren't on here. But the virologists were. And one of them was Christian Anderson. He's Scripps Institute. He's one of the authors on the Proximal Origin. And he was one of the leaders when he started reading this Slack, these Slack messages, one of the leaders in really driving this narrative in a gentle way and sometimes not so gentle. So let's look at some of the messages here. So this was February 1st. So this was right when it was

all kicking off. Fauci's going, what the heck's going on? I need meetings. These guys are talking behind the scenes. Christian Anderson says this. I think the main thing still in my in my mind is that the lab escape version of this is so freaking likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario pretty strong statement that's a strong statement that's a strong statement completely opposite by the way that it looks like it came from the lab okay completely obvious a completely opposite of what he wrote and put his name on in proximal origins but let's continue he goes on to say this. Both Ron and Christian, now those were other scientists, both Ron and Christian

are much too conflicted to think about this issue straight. To them, the hypothesis of accidental lab escape is so unlikely and not something they want to consider. Now, Christian Anderson goes on to say this. The main issue is that accidental escape is in fact highly likely. It's not some fringe theory. I absolutely agree that we can't prove one way or the other, but we'll never be able to. However, that doesn't mean that by default, the data is currently much more suggestive of natural of a natural origin as opposed to for instance for example passage it is not the fear and cleavage site is very hard to explain now then you have the addition of another scientist this is andrew rombalt he's from the university of edinburgh a molecular evolutionary professor and he goes on to say this now we start talking politics he says given the s show you can kind of fill in the blank there that would happen if anyone serious accused the chinese of even accidental release,

my feeling is we should say that given there is no evidence of a specifically engineered virus, we cannot possibly distinguish between natural evolution and escape. So we are content with describing it to a natural process. Wow. I mean, just pause there for a second. Right. Saying because we're kind of afraid of China,

we have evidence, but we really don't have the smoke and gut evidence. So let's just forget all that and let's just, let's just put this thing to rest. Yeah, I mean, for everyone that may be watching, watching the Highwire new. If you're watching for some time, you're now going through all the videos, all of the Stanley Plotkin on the stand for vaccines.

Where there's an absence of science, I assume safety and all of these things. Assumption, assumption, assumption, assumption. It is horrifying the day you wake up and recognize that science, the word is you knew it, where it was proving a point, proving a hypothesis, challenging it. I don't know how many decades ago that disappeared,

but clearly the science we switched, women now is just a religion, it's political, and what you are watching is how opinion and assumption and a desire to paint a picture overcomes and succeeds in drowning out the actual truth. And it's really, really horrifying, and this is in almost every branch of science now, totally corrupted just as I sat here in my debate with Neil deGrasse Tyson and I said, science is dying, I am desperately asking you to help me try to revive it. It's so scary to watch this. happening and how many millions of lives are affected by these types of you know political discussions not science discussions right and so you have rambalt says you know

we don't want to really do any kind of accusations towards china at this point so christian anderson but this is still early february the first week in february christian anderson says this to to the china comment yep i totally agree that that's a very reasonable conclusion wow although i hate now although i hate when politics is injected into science but it it's impossible not to, especially given the circumstances. We should be sensitive to that. Plus, none of this matters at this moment. Then he goes on to say this. I'm starting to think that for outbreak research, the bio RXIV really needs to start screening submissions. It's a slippery slope, but it's justified at this stage. Just leave that up for a second. I just, just leave that up.

Everybody, take a look at this. You know, we talked about Andrew Hill and how he, you know, turncoats on the entire discussion around ivermectin and those things. But look at this. This guy started out by saying, I am, it is so friggin' obvious this came from a lab. And look how quickly he sells out. I mean, what a weak human being. And this is when we talk about Nazi Germany. How do people go down that slippery slope? Not that I'm calling Christian Anderson and Nazi, but this is the compromise of humanity.

And where does he go? At first, it's like, no, I mean, anybody that's saying this, you know, didn't happen to lab is crazy. We got to, like, forget about our friends that are just totally addicted to lying to the people. And then he ends up saying, not only am I totally in agreement, oh, well, lie to the people, we better start, you know, censoring all of the documents coming in to the open space science community because if we don't stop it there, the truth might actually get out of it. I mean, look how quickly this guy just throws science to the wind and becomes a shill for the lie. Unbelievable.

And these messages have not just passed in the dark of the night. So the media is picking up on this. A lot of people are talking about this. This is one of the headlines here. Prominent scientists downplayed COVID Lab League theory to avoid upsetting China. But, you know, it makes me think we start seeing all of this. And we think back to how hard comedians were aggressively, basically attack, neutralized, destroyed during the pandemic. Because they were able to just take these complex ideas and break them down to simple things.

And who would have thought that John Stewart, of all people, would have probably had this thing sewn up in the early days? The greatest scientific mind of our times. Yeah, I mean, with a monologue like this, remember this? Check a look. What do you mean, but do you mean like, perhaps there's a chance that this was created in a lab, there's an investigation? A chance.

Well, I'm, I, I, I, I, I, if there's evidence I'd love to hear, I just don't know. There's a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan China. What do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask the Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab? The disease is the same name as the lab.

That's just a little too weird, don't you think? And then they asked those scientists, they're like, how did this, so wait a minute, you work at the Wuhan Respiratory Coronavirus Lab. How did this happen? And they're like, a pangolin kissed a turtle. And you're like, no.

The name of your lab, if you look at the name, look at the name, can I, let me see your business card. Show me your business card. Oh, I work at the coronavirus lab in Wuhan. Oh, because there's a coronavirus loose in Wuhan. How did that happen? Maybe a bat flew into the cloaca of a turkey, and then it sneezed into my chili,

and now we all have coronavirus. Like, okay, okay, okay. What about this? What about this? Listen to this. Wait a second. Wait a second. All right.

Oh, my God. Oh, my God. There's been an outbreak of chocolatey goodness near Hershey, Pennsylvania. What do you think happened? Like, oh, I don't know. Maybe a steam shovel made it with a cocoa bean. Or it's the chocolate factory. Maybe that's it.

Not that he gets it all right, but it seems like he's aging pretty well with that scientific statement, right? there. And so as you would think, there is a petition out there now to retract this paper, to kind of reshuffle the deck on the science. This is biosafety now.org's petition. Retract the proximal origins of SARS-CoV to a fraudulent paper on the origin of COVID-19. Anybody can go there, sign that petition now if you think want your voice to be heard on this and really just try to get science back to a neutral spot after this, this dark age of suppression and manipulation and

narrative control. That's where that's that's where we're at right now with this. I love it. Let's bring that back up everybody because this is where we get to have some fun on the highwire. Let's show them they want to get what do they need another 1,000 there. I think we got that. Let's do this. Everybody grab change.org slash p slash retract dash the dash proximal dash origin dash of dash stars dash cove dash two. We will also have that in our comments. And if you are part of a newsletter, you will receive that. But let's show them what we can do here in the highwire. Let's just push that right over the top because this is important. That has to be retracted.

This is an abomination of science. It cannot stand. And it's all a part of our, you know, goal to eventually see Tony Fauci put in a trial. And we've got to start removing the science that they faked and lied about. And this is where we have power, right? This is where we can speak out. This is a part of our cancel culture. Let's cancel bad science, shall we?

And so afterwards, this thing is kind of receding. COVID's kind of in the rearview mirror and we have, you know, the medical industrial complex. People talk about that all the time, but we've had this like branch off, this little bubble that came off of that of a pandemic industrial complex. It's his own, it's his own thing with its own marketing arm and its own products and its own, you know, striving for its own individual offices and power systems. And products that look like this. You may see this on your kid's shelf, a virus playset.

Plagues of the 21st century. Yes, that's right. COVID, flu, SARS, Zika, measles, have your kids spread knowledge and not disease. Be the super spreader of knowledge. Wow. So you get to have a plush toy with your favorite, I guess, virulent disease. You too can raise your own personal hypochondriac. Exactly.

I don't know if that person would be very fun at parties or events. But anyway, so in seriousness, the White House has launched an Office of pandemic preparedness and response. This is the kind of the newsletter that went out or the press release. And we go into this here and it says this. What is it going to do? It's going to coordinate the administration's domestic response to public health threats that have pandemic potential or get this or just may cause significant disruption. That's a nebulous term.

And strengthen domestic pandemic preparedness. This includes ongoing work to address potential public health outbreaks and threats from COVID-19, monkeypox, polio, avian and human influenza and RSV. And then it gets into the nuts and bolts. How is it going to do that? Specifically, OPP will oversee efforts to develop, manufacture, and procure the next generation of medical countermeasures, including leveraging emerging technologies

and working with HHS on next generation vaccines and treatments for COVID-19 and other public health threats. And Dell, it's not a fleeting moment this thing's going to be in the White House. It's permanent. This is stat news. White House launches permanent pandemic office. And those were the words in that press release. This is going to be a permanent position.

It's in the executive branch of the White House. So this thing is sitting. It's encapsulating right in the president's office, if you will. You have this vacuum seal pandemic office. And think about why they're doing that. So who are they putting at the head of this? Remember, we did a whole expose on Dr. Deborah Birx. Yes.

Where she came from, the military background she had, the National Security Council. She was thrust to the head of that. she was put and she was basically responsible for the pandemic response. Well, and pointed out that she came from the military with the scarfs threw us all off, but the truth is she should have been standing there in epaulets because in many ways this was a, you know, national security, Department of Defense. It was a military operation that was taking place on America, whether it was just a test run or was just, but if we had seen her standing there in military garb, saying things that she did,

I think we would have realized that this was much more of a martial law. state that was locking us down and not necessarily a fluffy, you know, let's all, you know, staying this together and be healthy. And right. And remember Scott Atlas's book, he was a coronavirus advisor to Trump who came in there. He said, some weird things happened. She's going out and publicly countering what the president's saying. She's saying the opposite. No one can criticize her. She's doing all the state visits on her own. I mean, this lady was really heading things up. So who's heading this pandemic office in the White House, this new one now? A retired major general Paul Fredericks. Now, who is he? He came from the Pentagon. He was a medical advisor to the Department of Defense COVID-19 Task Force, and he was from the National Security Council, just the place that Deborah Birx was heading during the COVID response. He was from the National Security Council, and he's now been picked to come up to the office and run this thing. So this makes me think when we start connecting dots. So we have this plug-in-play situation here, and it's a closed system.

So it's already in there. You have ex-military running it from the Pentagon, and you're not going to get this porous boundaries. You're not going to get a Scott Atlas floating in there and disrupting things. You're not going to get a Robert Redfield. It's just saying like, hey, we really need to investigate Wuhan, China. This thing is closed, start to finish. They're going to work on the vaccine development from that space.

But remember, the WHO has the legally binding treaty that it's been working on for the international health regulations. And here's a headline from just a couple months ago. So there's a lot of moving parts that seem to be jelling, how the World Health Organization could fight future pandemics. It says here they have a target date of May 24 for a legally binding agreement to be adopted by the UN Health Agency's 194 member countries. And we have Tadros in there saying that this is a generational commitment. That's the words he's using.

So this is something they really want to make sure sticks and not go back to the old way, he's saying. And remember, we have Jeremy Ferrar going in there as the chief scientific officer of the WHO. He at the Welcome Trust co-founded CEPI. So there's a lot of players that are now moving into this space and making this like some big league movements right now. We have to pay attention to this. We have to get out front of this. It's really amazing.

In many ways, as you were sort of talking about this, I just thought this is the new war economy, right? This is the war on, you know, nature, on disease. on the pandemic and the military is running it, not doctors, military. And you know, you think about all of those dystopian novels and especially in 1984 that has some distant war that doesn't really make sense to anybody, but it keeps us all sort of locked in our own space trying to stay safe. This is just this ongoing, an intangible, invisible war that we are pouring billions and billions of dollars.

And the pharmaceutical industry is pouring billions of dollars into our government officials and buying up our regulatory agencies that are refusing to do any proper safety trials. I mean, the whole thing is really, really a mess. These are dark times, you know, and there's some solutions there. I think the beauty is the work that you're doing that we're doing here on the High Wire,

other podcasters, guys like Ice Cube, they're going to get out there and start speaking truth to power. This is a moment for the people to really step up and make a difference. So just thank you for doing these deep dives. everyone else is afraid to go. It's really great work. And especially Jeffrey, I want to thank you because you do, you go beyond, you know, sometimes just doing the investigations. You were just in

giving testimony in Massachusetts where they're trying to, you know, this archaic idea of removing the religious exemption from vaccinations, right after we won it back in Mississippi, having lost it since 1979, there's still states that want to move back into the dark ages and take away people's rights to opt out or to have a religious perspective. Maybe they don't want to be injecting aborted fetal DNA into their children. But you gave a great testimony, so I want to play that right now. Let's take a look at this. I sit here as a medical health journalist for nearly a decade,

telling the story of parents that you've heard here. This is a common story telling the story of parents who had vaccine injuries. Their children have had vaccine injuries after mandated vaccines. We hear a lot about the immunocompromise child, excuse me, immunocompromised child in these bills trying to protect them. But there's another side of the story. There's vaccine injury. It is real.

And it's been paid out to a tune, as you heard of over $4 billion by the vaccine injury compensation program. This is a liability-free product that market forces do not apply to it as it applies to the rest of the products out there. Unfortunately, these parents have been discriminated against. and essentially neutralized by the media, trying to tell their story, and also by public health agencies, and as you've heard by the medical profession, when they try to get their children help they need. One of the things that we're left to do is to use legal actions

and journalists that are outside the corporate media, if you will, that are influenced by Big Pharma as they take their money. And the legal actions that have been pushed towards public agencies like the CDC have found things like this. CDC and NIH unable to provide a single study to support the safety of injecting aluminum adjuvants, which are widespread in childhood vaccines. CDC concedes it's never conducted a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. These are things that we need answers to.

These are inconvenient facts that should have been debated publicly in the public space. And unfortunately, they haven't been. We've just finished a COVID response where the CDC has admitted it did a lot of wrong things at her public trust. Unfortunately, I was expecting to see bills that would enshrine more public trust and these civil liberties in these bills. And I'm unfortunately not seeing that. Amazing job, Jeffrey. And just to point out to everybody, I mean, it's not easy to get on those microphones. I find that to be some of the most stressful things I've ever done is sort of speaking to, you know, in those political spaces.

But no teleprompter, no script, Jeffrey. That was awesome. And, you know, I also want to point out that the video. glitching was theirs that's how the feed came out it's not us you know having a mistake with the video that was the best that it came out but um and also you know Aaron Siri weighed in so let's go ahead and listen to that and I'm going to ask you a few questions is Aaron Siri that I think came in on via Zoom or something like that to this same hearing take a look at this good afternoon my name is Aaron Seer I'm an attorney my firm has over 30 professionals that engage purely in vaccine related

work we do not represent pharmaceutical companies so we we we people are in injured by vaccines, we do vaccine policy work. We brought, for example, a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., challenging a law that had permitted doctors of vaccinate, majors without parental consent that got struck down. We also recently brought a lawsuit in Mississippi, which challenged a lack of religious exemption

there in a federal court held that it violated the First Amendment right to free exercise, not to have a religious exemption. And the state of Mississippi has now reinstitute a religious exemption in that state. You've heard a lot of testimony today from parents. Some of the very motive. I really do want to stress these are real, real hardships.

These families are going to suffer greatly if you remove the religious exemption. Folks don't always listen to what parents have to say, but when they're telling you, this is their convictions. You should trust and you should believe, and that's what this country was founded upon, was letting people live out their convictions. And if I can't appeal to your emotion, maybe I can appeal to some of your logic. Let me read you some quotes. Here's a quote from the CDC about an activated polio vaccine,

the only vaccine for polo using that it's for last 20 years. Quote, IPV, inactuated poliase vaccine, does not contain a virus and cannot cause disease. It protects people from polo disease, but does not stop transmission of the virus, end quote. That's the CDC because it creates a systemic immunity in the blood. It doesn't create any mucosal immunity with poliopulipherates. The same is true of at least four of the six vaccines that you are talking about.

They do not prevent transmission. Not my words. That's the government words. There is what you're told about vaccines. And there's a reality. When you litigate it, you have to actually look at the facts and proof. And I can tell you what you're often told is not accord with what the fact show. Thank you.

Wow. Amazing. I mean, you know, I can's own Aaron Siri there. And he puts that he points out such a great point. You know, you're talking about the injuries. These are real. These people are real. They need a recourse. They need to be a way to opt out. We need to be able to have people that can avoid being injured. But as he pointed out, four of the six of these products, we've talked about a lot. Don't stop transmission. Just like COVID had the same issue. And at the heart of these laws is always we've got to protect the immune suppressed child. How do you protect the immune suppressed child if all you're doing is creating asymptomatic carriers. In fact, most of these vaccines, what we find is that they're more likely to be carriers after they get the vaccine because their body never mounts a totally, you know, virus-killing defense. It leaves it linger around in their bodies, so they keep carrying it around the immune-suppressed child.

This is where we've been attacking this and having a lot of effect around the nation. But what all's going on in Massachusetts? Is this the only law? I mean, it just seems like, you know, they're really out of step with America, right? now and where people are at. Yeah, that's a great analysis. And Massachusetts is one of the big pushes right now. And it's interesting because obviously we've been covering these legislative push since

California, like 2014, 2015. And that was before the pandemic response. As I said, in my testimony, everything changed. The public trust is not a given right now. We have people questioning, you know, asking questions. And then we have RFK Jr. going on. trying to push this debate people now in their minds are like wait a minute we should have a big open debate about all vaccines so this legislation is is interesting because it's a little myopic in

that it's picking up at the same pace it did before the as if coronavirus response never happened as if people are still in that same thing so massachusetts right now we have a bill it's h h 2151 the companion bill is s 1458 but what this is doing is it's lowering the age of consent for vaccination. So remember in Washington, D.C., we had this idea of the minor, they passed this bill of the minor consent. And they brought that down. It was covering it at the time to the age of 11. They said, we think that's reasonable. And they're using this words. We're going to try to remove the parent barrier. Because 11-year-old has a full understanding of all of their, you know, previous issues, health issues that their parents have been watching. And they know all about

their own, you know, health history. Right. And the question would be, Do they know about vaccine injury moving forward? Do they know about the signs and symptoms of that if their parents are kept in the dark of the vaccination? The parents, are they able to watch out for this child after the vaccine to see if they develop anything? So they, Massachusetts is pushing forth this bill to lower the age of consent to whatever, no, no, any age.

And they're also, that same bill also allows schools, daycare, colleges to establish their own vaccine policies. And they can actually add more vaccines that are on the schedule. And remember, Dell, the COVID, vaccine, it has been pushed to the recommend. And we covered this about six months ago when I was in studio. We really have to watch for the beginning of this school year because Rochelle Winski, the ex-CDC director said, the only reason we put this on the schedule was so we can get paid

for lower, for lower income children, had nothing to do with science. So if these schools now add this COVID-19 vaccine as a requirement for school entry, it's going to be very interesting because there's really no science. And the only CDC director said that. So another bill is H-604, and his companion bill is S-1391. This one's, among other things, it's going to try to remove the religious exemption. So Massachusetts, if this goes through, will be amongst a minority of states that have no religious exemption. Maine.

And one of the focuses, it will become one of the focus of the highway to go in and bring a lawsuit to stop these bills. That's what they're going to do because that's where we can actually make a difference. You know, obviously they're trying to preempt that, bring some truth to power. But if they decide to push forward with this, we're going to do something about it. Right, right. And the final bill here is H582. And it brings, it actually gives doctors and medical professionals a kind of a wider breath for medical exemptions. It protects them against any retributions, kind of like we saw in California.

Doctors were losing their license left and right. And they were actually losing those for just speaking out during the COVID-19. response. So this is kind of something that's attempting to protect that those movements against those doctors. So however you feel about these these bills, it's important. You can sign up for online testimony. You can show up in person as these things move forward. It's just important to keep an eye out for these things in your states. And again, it seems like Massachusetts is kind of a frontrunner right now in pushing this legislation. But I know other states are starting to gear up to in time for the school, it's the school year to start. All right, everybody. Well, look, you can

sit back and just watch and see how your world gets taken away from you. You can step up and do something about it. Jeffrey Jackson, thanks for stepping up. I mean, that was amazing. Great testimony and again, great reporting this week. I'll see you next week. All right, you're welcome. Thank you.

All right. Well, you know, every once in a while on the high wire, you know, things perhaps don't get stated exactly right. And we want to make sure that you can be confident that when you are watching the high wire that we have done our due diligence and we have the science nailed to the the wall. This is one of those moments where I'm going to have to say that we didn't fully state something right. This was revolving around the story around trans men or trans women. I forget which way that goes, but that wanted to chest feed and were taking drugs so that they could lactate.

We talked about how this drug had a lot of side effects. It was dangerous. Should be taken for short periods of time. And they were over the top that it was like twice as much as they should be taking. This would that moment look like at Freedom Fest. Take a look at this. she was able to express droplets of milk. The domperidone dose was increased to 20 milligrams po quid. So now we have 20 40 60 milligrams a day. Double a dose every day. Double dose every day. Max dose. So Jeffrey was stating that there was three doses throughout the day. Well, we have a very smart audience of doctors and nurses. Many of you wrote in this is what one of those statements was. Nurse Penny here, quid is four times a day, not three. QD is daily. Poe means per OS, which means by mouth.

This means that the patient was getting 20 milligrams four times daily. The max safe dosage for the adult was exceeded by 50 milligrams daily. What might this mean long term for the child? I guess all that screaming Fauci and company did about requiring randomized double-blind placebo controlled trials only matters when the NIH, CDC, and FDA are trying to block early and effective treatment for COVID-19. So we were right that they were taking way beyond the max dosage. It was just worse than we thought.

But we wanted to make that clear to everybody that, and we want to thank those people. Always you should write in. This is important to us that we get it right. And so in this case, it's one of the rare moments. I think that this may actually be like our second correction, but correcting ourselves is part of the high wire protocol. And this is, if you want to find out where that is, you just have to go, to the highwire.com, scroll to the bottom of the page, and you can read all about it right there.

The Highwire Protocol. It lists what this means. It also talks about the fact that we will correct statements if we get it wrong. But most importantly, there is correction of errors or misstatements made in an episode of the Highwire shall be corrected in the following week's episode or no later than four weeks from original air date of said error. For those of you that may be brand new, this is a protocol that we're demanding all other news agencies use, which is we hand you our data, we hand you our science. You will never hear. Well, Tony Fauci said that it didn't come from a lab. It was natural. Therefore, it's been debunked. No one hasn't. You have an expert that is a bias because his fingerprints are all over the cookie jar that he stole a cookie from.

And so that won't happen here. We're going to send you our science, our data. It's given to you every Monday after a Thursday show. It's shocking how few of you really take, you know, use of this. You should be signing up right now because this is how you win your arguments at the dinner table with family and friends. Just go. All you have to do is put in your email address right there. We don't give it out to anybody else. This is what we can connect with you. But also, you can get all the science, all the evidence, all the links to the videos, everything.

You don't have to go trying to figure it out. It's right there in your inbox so that if you see something you like, you can look deeper into it. If you want to question our science where we're coming from, you get to read all of it. So that's the high wire protocol, folks. This is how we do it. So as I said, there are laws. They are still trying to take away your rights. There's an authoritarian regime, if you will, that is attempting to take away control of

your own body. I've said it before. If you don't have the right to decide what's going into your body, then you have the same rights as a farm animal. Forget about being a free citizen. The government considers you property. If you don't want to be property, and if Massachusetts decides to pass that law, Or maybe you want to fight the other states that have already taking away the right to religious exemption.

This is a spiritual war. This is a war of light and darkness. And I can, our nonprofit and our legal team is the most successful group to ever fight in the health freedom space, to fight for your religious rights. And we need your help now. There are, you know, more attacks are coming. We are going to jump into courtrooms, but it's very expensive. You can't imagine the millions and millions of dollars it takes to fight these in every. every state, everywhere it's happening, and you are making that possible.

So for every one of you out there that has been a sponsor and helping us, I want to thank you for all of you that are watching this show that enjoy what we're doing, love hearing about the great wins like the big win in Mississippi that we celebrated just over a week ago, adding, bringing back the religious exemption that was gone since 1979. Instead of going, wow, great job guys, you get to pat yourself on the shoulder and said, I actually did something that means something in what appears to be more and more a meaningless and crazy and chaotic world. If you want to feel that, then want to become a recurring donor. Just go to the top of the page right now, the highwire.com or at Ican decide.org, hit the donate to I can

button. Become a recurring donor. We're asking for $23 for $23, but you can make it whatever you want. I don't care how much it is. I want you to feel what it feels like to be a part of change, to actually feel how good it feels to make a difference in this world. All right, well, speaking of this crazy world, I don't know about you, but it just seems to me that, you know, we were doing a lot of reporting. We were talking about athletes that are collapsing in, you know, soccer fields, in softball fields, and in practices and games all around the country. And then there seemed to be, I don't know if social media shut those stories down,

but it seemed like that kind of quieted down. and I think we all thought maybe we're through it. And then suddenly, just over this last week, it's just felt like just more and more stories, like there's this wave happening. You know, I don't know if there is, but this is what it's looked like in the news. Bronny James suffered cardiac arrest while at a practice.

He was live on air when Shaka Hislop suffered a medical emergency. Ori Kelly recovering this morning after collapsing in public, reportedly now being treated for blood clots. Jamie Foxx now reported. quarterly recovering out of physical rehabilitation center. It specializes in treating patients with stroke and brain injuries. The twos running out of me. I just don't want you to see me like that, man.

She passed out at dinner after her heart began beating rapidly, saying Kelly was out for a while. She was carried to a friend's car and rushed to Cedar Sinai Hospital, where doctors reportedly found multiple blood clots near her vital organs. Tomorrow morning, Beyond Sanders, set to have emergency surgery to blood plots in his legs. Senate Monarch leader Mitch McConnell had to be escorted away from the cameras after freezing. Good by virus in cooperation and a string of...

Are you good? Mitch? Hey Mitch? Let's check it. Anything else you want to say? I'm sure to go back to you. Do you want to say anything else to the press? Okay. Okay. Alyssa Carlson suddenly collapses during the live 7 a.m. broadcast.

Our colleague Elise Finch passed away yesterday. Her death is sudden and unexpected, leaving us all trying to understand how this could happen to our beautiful Elise, who was just 51 years old. The cardiac arrest, what exactly triggered that, what caused that. That's what the doctors are going to be sort of investigating. It's still unclear what sent Jamie Fox to the hospital. I went to hell and back. This is a significant issue, and it is a medical emergency.

It's not clear if weather played a factor. This is rare. Just as I said when we were playing the athletes, the videos, that we have not, I want to be clear, we have not done an investigation to find out if all these individuals have gotten the vaccine. We don't know for sure whether or not these incidents have anything to do with the vaccine. But what we're asking as journalists, as reporters and as a network right now is, do we ever remember a time? where there was this many incidences of people collapsing, of having blood clots, of having heart attacks, of having strokes, and then this term suddenly,

died suddenly, is now everywhere. I even saw a meme recently that really stuck with me, is the leading cause of death now suddenly. We've been looking at data around the world, but we're not alone. This isn't a conspiracy theory, really. This is one headline that is obviously alarmed. Experts call for urgent investigation as excess death spark dangerous theories.

Obviously they're worried about our imaginations running away with why are people dying at higher rates. This is what it says though, and this is something we've talked about. A particular concern is the 15 to 44 age group where cumulative deaths are tracking above all recent years, including 2020. That's the youth of America, those are young people and the healthy working group in American around. the world. I'm joined right now by someone that I think really has had a really beautiful objective view on this, not necessarily a medical view, but just a numbers crunching view, because he used to be an executive at Black Rock, crunching numbers, what he does. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Edward Dowd. Hi, Edward.

Thanks for having me on, John. Good to be here. Thank you. It's good to have you. And again, under, you know, really horrific, for really horrific reasons. But I've been thinking about you a lot. I really have because we keep watching, especially data in England. I'm not sure. Our data in America, it just feels like it's being corrupted on purpose or is just tracking really slow. But when we look out there, there's just this an alarming trend. And is it our imagination or how bad, you know, how bad is it? No, it's not our imagination. And you mentioned, in the lead up to introducing me, there seems to be a new rash of incidents

of celebrities and athletes collapsing and what have you recently. And the metadata actually supports that. US disabilities, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, hit a high in September of 22. We started accelerating in September of 21, February of 21. We added 3.2 million Americans to the disability survey.

And then the rate of change, kind of stopped and it was hovering around the old highs and then in May it broke to a slight new high and then in June we added 850,000 people so we added 1.2 million in two months. So there's something going around in the general population that's re-accelerating something. And anecdotally, I don't have the data yet but I'm hearing from some of my insurance whistleblowers that their short-term and long-term disability numbers are accelerating again. They're having panic meetings about it, but most times they don't mention the obvious elephant in the room. They see excess deaths amongst the millennials 25 to 44

and their group life insurance continuing at abnormally high rates around 23, 24% excess mortality. So this, whatever's going on, we all know what we think it is. Whatever's going on is a disaster. And you know, recently we just dropped our UK disability down. Before we get into that, before we get in that, Edward, I just want to talk to you one minute because the anecdotal part of this that has actually been dystopian for me is I travel the country a lot. And everywhere I go, the people I talk to, every restaurant I walk into has a help wanted sign. Everywhere I go, I talk to construction, you know, contractors. Like, I can't find anyone to do the work. I can't find workers. Everywhere I go, I was just, I flew into Memphis

and they said we don't have any rental cars. There was one budget rental car, and there was that one place had a line that was like out the door and down the block, and the rest of them were just people sitting there, and then some guys said, it's not that they don't have cars, they don't have workers to bring the cars

or wash the cars or whatever it is, and I don't know, but it is starting to feel like images of the Soviet Union, you know, where there's breadlines for the one, you know, thing that's available, and we just keep here. hearing that there's, I mean, I keep hearing the economy's great. We have a very low unemployment rate. How do you have a low unemployment rate? And all the jobs that used to be filled just

three years ago, we had a working nation. We had restaurants where the service was great. Now I can't find anybody to bring me, you know, some ketchup. I mean, it's like we're grinding to a halt. And I just keep thinking we're being lied to. This is like there's no one here to work. Where are these people. I mean, is this what this is? You and I are characters in a dystopian film, unfortunately, and we're in the know, and many people aren't. And the numbers are actually reaffirming what you just said. So the disability numbers went up to $4.2 million from a survey in the U.S. So that's an additional 4.2 million disabled workers. More than half of those are employed. So the employed workforce,

hit hard so that's disabled we also have a category called injured so there's two things going on you get people getting kicked out of the workforce through death that were employed that's small number relative to the numbers we're talking about then disability then we have a category called injured where they're chronically sick that data we found at the u.s bureau labor certificate as well where our lost work time is 13 standard deviations above 20-year average meaning you know people are missing work and so what that does So you have the disabled, you have the people who are chronically ill, and you have those who are left who are okay having to cover for these people and their staff shortages, help wanted signs. And it's dystopian.

The antacroses are coming in hard and fast. Friend just flew here to Maui. There were mechanical issues on the plane. They had to swap out planes. And it's mechanical because they don't have people to do the work. Right. Colonel Teresa Long in the military talked to me months ago saying, if we continue along this path between the disabled, the dead, and the injured, and the fact that, that they can't recruit to the woke political environment.

We won't have a standing military in five years. Meaning for one pilot to fly, it's 10 support people behind that pilot. And what you said about the enterprise, run a car, same thing. The supply chains are breaking down. The Fed, the Federal Reserve is looking at the employment number, which is wrong.

Luke Gromman, a mainstream economist, pointed out the disability figures going to new highs. And he said maybe there's something going on here. didn't mention the vaccine, but now it's getting into the mainstream conversation that something is going on with our workforce. I was with you in December in front of Senator Ron Johnson. I said this is a national security concern. And it is, and it continues to be. Wow. All right. So let's look at these numbers you've got coming out of UK, because I think this is sort of gives us an understanding of what we're really dealing with. Yeah. So what you're looking at is the percentage clearances. Oh,

Those are the absolute numbers, but I have the percentage clearances. So just really quickly, let me show this. I just want to show this since we're looking at it, folks. When you look at the years, these are just all the different illnesses that have been reported, I think, and the actual hard numbers, right? You have the disabilities. The disabilities. You have the averages there is 2016 and 19 at $485,000, I think that is. Look at 2020.

It stays about the same. 2021. It ticks up. Okay. Now we've got hard COVID in there, $585,000. But look at 2022. I mean, it's a skyrockets. That makes no sense if you believed vaccines work.

If you believe that we were supposed to be making ourselves healthy and safer, something went catastrophically wrong in 2022. I mean, that blew my mind that number. It was mind-blowing. Yeah, let me just describe this data set. So this is a government disability system. And you put in a class. claim and on average 40% of the claims are cleared.

That's what a clearance is. So you get paid, you get paid by the government, 60% are denied. That ratio has stayed the same throughout COVID. There was, and we disclosed this in our report, there was a problem during COVID of approving the clearances that got up to a high of 24 weeks average to clear a claim in August of 2021.

It came down to 16 weeks for 2022. and as of Jan 23, it's 14 weeks. So the data in 2022 is pretty clean. 2021, there might be some issues, but the bottom line is something has gone horribly wrong in the UK and the disability system. So first, is it systemic fraud? If it is, the UK government should pay us

the finance technologies a big fact consulting fee. We just uncovered the biggest fraud ever. If it's not fried, what is it? I believe it's the vaccine, but if it's not the vaccine, what is it? Why aren't you talking about it? Because if you don't address this, your pension system will go broke.

These numbers accelerated in 22. We can't wait to get our hands on the data that comes out soon for the up-to-date 23 numbers. So this is the standard deviations above the trend. The total, the trend. So really quickly, explain to me what a standard deviation is. What does that mean? So there's what's called an average. And around the average, there are occurrences that,

come up over time and it's a normal distribution curve. A one standard deviation is pretty normal, two standard deviation, okay. That's deviation from the average. Three is when you start to get pretty excited on Wall Street and in science land. That's an anomaly. It happens 0.3% of the time. That's three standard deviations.

What's going on in the UK system, total body systems, all across the spectrum, 34 standard deviations on an annual basis. Now, on a monthly basis, basis that would come down because there's more occurrences but you know who cares 34 is what we call black swan event that's like as likely as a black hole appearing off the orbit of the earth swallowing us in a year it's just doesn't happen unless something's changed it happens if something's changed so something's changed right right but so it was a gigantic change all right here we

have another one this is excess yield you give me clearance disease score age group and now we're at 61.4 standard deviation. Hematological. Yeah, so this is hematological. So it's 61 standard deviations above the, the trend that we identified, the four-year trend. And then percentage-wise, that's 555% in 2020 over trend, excess over trend. And hemetology, again, on a monthly basis, the standard deviation will come down. We have that data available as well.

It's 25% percent. 25 standard deviations, but still, 2561, this is a joke. And hematological, again, we're not doctors. We don't pretend we're doctors. We're just giving this data. And we called on scientists and doctors to explain this. We tried to say, hey, if it's not the vaccine, what is it? This needs to be investigated.

The regulatory authorities at least need to admit this is going on. And it's devastating. This is a disaster. And we suspect what we're seeing in the UK is definitely how. happening in the US. If we had access to that data, we'd probably see similar numbers. There are some organizations working on getting that data and there's FOIA requests in. We hope they get it, give it to us, we'll do what we did with the UK. So what do you know, you are, as you sit there looking at the world as I am, what do we

do? I mean, it does, it is really starting to get eerie, you know, planes being canceled. It's to point now if it's you know if it's within a five-hour drive I'm just going to drive because I can't risk missing an event because my planes are getting canceled I keep hearing we don't and it's always now it's just there's not a pilot we don't have a pilot we don't have the staff we don't have a pilot meaning it just it's uh yeah yeah yeah it's paperwork oh we have to uh check up on some paperwork it's all lies and uh it's getting affecting the health care system as well yeah we're gonna gonna drop a study on the n hs that's

the UK health system and their absence rate and work time loss, which is very similar to the general population. So health care is collapsing. You won't ever see the headline, but you'll hear the anecdotes. For instance, on Maui, someone went to the emergency room. I heard a story, and they didn't get seen for 13 hours. You can fly to Australia from Hulu in 13 hours. So it's either get serviced at the emergency room on Maui or go to go to Australia, Sydney. This is a joke, and that's only going to get worse. You can, you know, in a year, it'll probably be you could go to Sydney and back and still make your emergency room appointment. This is where we are. And it's going to affect our economy for years to come.

We're going to have to take precious resources and wealth to take care of the disabled and the sick. Unless, unless we have a come to Jesus moment. We have some adults in Congress that call me, Dr. Malone, Peter McCullough, you, others to testify so that we can then address the problem, which is your immune. system has gone haywire. That's why it's presenting in so many different fashions. Yeah. Cancers are now starting to pick up in 2022. There they were we have here. Here look at this here. The cancer folks there's the cancer that we're seeing 15.9 standard deviation rise in the data coming out of the UK. I looked at I

looked at just one age category under you can go into the total cancer is the human system then we have the underlying causes that we have breast cancer in the data I just looked at 25 through 29 and I saw breast cancer was up 174% from trend in 2022 now is that normal do women normally get breast cancer at such a young age or is that I'm not a doctor maybe a doctor could answer that for me it was something like 17 standard deviations so I you know we're you know we're asking for help we don't pretend we're doctors and this data is free and available for all doctors to use. And please explain, write papers. You know, you can't debunk the data,

but you can certainly you can come up with your reason as to what's going on there. I mean, you're absolutely right. And this is the issue, is that what we're saying is there is a crisis going on. We have a major problem. We can't fix it if we can't address it. And I think about the billions and billions of dollars, 10 billion dollars spent just to promote the COVID vaccine on news channels in America. How about we get together, say we have a problem, we have an autoimmune disease crisis, we have a cancer crisis, we have a blood clotting crisis, we have a stroke crisis, and we've got to figure out what's going on. How about a few billion dollars in the people that have been calling this out and predicted this to begin with in that think tank as we figure

out how do we heal these people? How do we get people back up and running and into the workforce instead of, you know, turning a blind eye. It's really, it's always, it's so interesting to see it from your perspective because, you know, you're just, you're not attached to the, you know, the medical side of it, the story. You're just crunching numbers as you would. Are there going to be financial, you know, advantages to some people that are studying this? Is anyone sort of, I've asked you this before, but what does this do to markets? Well, eventually the asset markets are going to figure this out. We're in the process of that probably starting to happen this fall.

There's going to be a global economic collapse because of this, you know, health care is going to become scarce. People are going to get sick. Product productivity will drop. Productivity is one of the biggest drivers of our economies. Demand will drop. So it's coming. It's called deflation. And Carlos Allegri and Yuri Nunes, my two partners and I, Carlos put out of paper. saying that deflation is coming. That's what we're seeing coming in the first and second

quarter of next year. So all this inflation talk will be replaced with a deflation talk. And deflation is a credit contraction, a destruction, a destruction of credit, and a slowdown in economic activity. And, you know, I suspect this is so bad and what's gone is so bad that the powers of being needed distraction to cover this up. And that's usually war. And unfortunately, Warren Buffett agrees with me. He sold the Taiwan Sunday conductor stock in the first quarter. And he actually highlighted war as one of the reasons he got out of the position. Wow.

I mean, we just, we need a distraction at that level. This headline just came in when we think about the myocarditis and the issue with our youth. Look at this. This is a study of sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidents after COVID-19, a booster vaccination. And it says this, in conclusion, using action. CERVNA, 1273 vaccine associated, mild transient, myocardial injury was found to be much more common than previously thought.

It occurred in one out of 35 people. It's unbelievable that one in 35 of the millions and millions that have gotten this vaccine swelled their heart. And they're saying, oh, it's not a big deal. Don't worry, you know, it's a light swelling of the heart, if you will. Mild. Mild. Just, uh...

They call it mild. I've talked to doctors. There's no such thing as mild myracoditis. So that's, that's just marketing spin from the, uh, the propagandists as far as I'm concerned. And we've got this, uh, this is the last slide we have for me. This is the cardiovascular. We are at 19.3, uh, standard deviations above, uh, normal. Um, you know, and I, the ones that scare me really, what's scary is these sort of

strokes, we're starting to see the blood clots, but especially cancer. You know, these are things we wouldn't have seen early on. These things take a little bit of time to develop. I'm really worried that we're just going to start seeing an acceleration there. You know, who knows? Yeah, so the cancer numbers were this in 2020 cancers went up in that UK PIP system, 1.78% 6.4% in 2021, 35% in 2022. And that's what we call an accelerates.

And if this was a gross stock chart, I would be buying this hand over fist expecting it to continue to like pop higher. That's unfortunately what I see. Wow. What is the best way to follow the work that you're doing so that we can sort of check in and keep track and all that stuff? Yeah. So our website is finance technologies.com. We have all of our reports there under the humanities project tab and then you go to projects. We have all cause mortality by different countries. We have We analyze the Pfizer clinical trials. We look at disability data in the US and the UK now. We have absence and work time loss reports. We look at theirs and the hospitalization rate. So we really, what we, we're investors.

And investors, you have an analyst mosaic. Our thesis is the vaccine is causing this damage. And the mosaic and the reports we drop are basically a preponderance of the evidence that at this point, Anybody with any kind of like critical thinking skills would say, you know, these guys are on to something big here. Yeah. I mean, we're, you know, we're not doing double-blinded studies vaccinated because we don't have the money nor would that get approved. But yeah, if this was Wall Street and this was a stock, we'd be right and early and we'd be thumping our chest.

But unfortunately, this is tragic. And we're trying to get the adults in the room to stop this. Pull the vaccines and talk about healing the damage. And until we do that, this tragedy is going to continue to grow. I mean, what's amazing about when I think back, no matter what anyone thinks, you made these predictions a couple years ago. As this started, we've been following you. And everything you've said so far is aging well.

It's a horrible reality, as is the things that we've stated here on the high wire. I think that we've got to start looking at the people that have been getting this right. I think, you know, in many ways we should be canonizing the Peter McCullas and Robert Malones and these doctors and scientists that put it all in the line, have had their licenses, you know, under attack for stating what was obvious and these were top, you know, medical, you know, professionals. It is clear they had it right and the rest of the world got it wrong. We better figure out what's going on here. Edward Doubt, go ahead. What was your last thoughts? I just wanted to say all the people are heroes. When they got canceled, I'm just a curious

person. I, like a moth to a flame, I went and read everything they said and it resonated with me. And I was lucky enough to meet Dr. Malone on this island. And my journey started. I said, I'll look at the financial side of this, the insurance companies and the funeral homes. And from there, I built a team. So I think these guys deserve to be canonized. They did put it all in the line.

So I just appreciate them and you, people like you and others. So this has been a team effort to get the truth out there. And I think we're winning slowly because word of mouth is spreading. I'm going to put out on Twitter soon, our website traffic. it's really starting to take off now. I'll show you eventually like when we started and it's really accelerating. The word of mouth is spreading, thank God.

That's good to hear, thank God, lots of work to do. Glad to know you're out there and I look forward to seeing again soon. Thank you for taking the time to bring us this very important information this week. Thank you, Del. Take care. All right folks, well, you know,

we've got to wake up the world. One of the ways we're doing it is through books and reading, I can, has our own press right now. I have two amazing books right now. If you don't have these, you should, the war on Ivermectin, and I'm unvaccinated, and that's okay. We just talked about this last week.

It's skyrocketing book sales, but all of these are available at the ICANN bookstore. But this is what our press company is all about. Take a look at this. At the informed consent action network, we are always working hard to inform, educate, and bring you the truth. That's why I'm excited to announce

our new book and publishing division, I can press. Leveraging the power of the written word, ICAN Press is partnering with dynamic writers, medical professionals, and experts dedicated to the truth, building a library that will captivate and empower and inform you and your family. ICANN press has already launched The Informant, an online monthly magazine, creating news from ICANN and the Highwire offered exclusively to our recurring donors. Sign up for the informant at Ican Decide.org slash the informant. Now, ICANPress is bringing you two must-have books. First, the war on ivermectin from author Dr. Pierre Corey details a relentless attack on a decades-old, Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have ended the pandemic.

The war on ivermectin is available now, also available I'm unvaccinated and that's okay. A children's book by Dr. Shannon Croner, which empowers parents to talk to the children about the decision to not vaccinate and how to navigate any negativity they may encounter out in the world. Buy these must-have books wherever books are sold, and that I can tell you. decide dot shop start building your library from i can press today well i want to thank all my guests edward dowd jeffrey jackson who just keeps rocking out every single week i just want to let you know there's a great event happening next weekend in san diego and that is the spellers we've talked about this this is that new communication um uh concept that's being used by those that are suffering from you know or on the autism spectrum

so that they can actually communicate. There's a charity golf. This is a par three. It's a lot of fun. Barbecue, all of that. If you want to join in Oceanside, that's where it's taking place. We're one of the big supporters and presenters there.

It'd be great to see you out there supporting a really great cause. And, of course, you know, all the information will be available to you right here in the comments. We will also have it available to you. But be a sponsor. Get involved. You know, Ohana is really working to sort of build a space, a day space where children and adults on the spectrum can experience life in a grander way and maybe work towards more independence, something that we are really excited to be a part of. So next weekend, Ohana, you know, is putting on this incredible golf event, the charity golf event, August 4th. You can get your tickets today.

just go to Speller's FreedomFoundation.org slash ohana dash golf. I just want to say, you know, sometimes it can seem grim. It is really hard to watch all of these stories out there of, you know, beautiful people, young athletes that lives are being changed, you know, possibly forever. But we've got to think about, number one, how do we start helping these individuals? How do we come up with cures and how do we make sure this never happens again? We can look at the dark side of this, but we can also look at the gift. The gift right now is it is becoming really clear that this is no longer, these aren't conspiracies, these aren't theories, these are the realities that we're living in.

So it's getting easier and easier and easier to have these conversations with your friends. But that's why a children's book, like I'm unvaccinated and that's okay. or the war on Ivermectin, a very logical perspective. And it's not just about one drug. It's about repurposed use of drugs. The pharmaceutical industry is trying to take every drug that is Alph Patton and just throw it in the garbage can and make it disappear. There may be a gem in there. It could be the future cure for cancer or, you know, some virus like COVID has proved to be the case.

And we've also got to start rallying the troops because we need some hearings on this. We need Nuremberg 2.0 to happen. here in the United States of America. People were denied life-saving drugs. People were forced to take an untested product. And there's so many people that still don't fully get how dangerous that product was. What they do seem to be understanding

is how ineffective it was. After four and five shots, they're still getting COVID two and three times. So much more to discuss here. But I want to thank all of you that support the work that we're doing. I want to thank you because you are sharing this show. you're sharing our books so that we can spread the word. That is how we make a difference.

If we just sit here and keep the information to ourselves, then I think we just get depressed. If we take this information and go out and help wake people up, you'll get to see how good it feels when you realize that a light bulb just went off. I'm lucky to have that experience on an almost daily basis, but it's possible for all of us. Get out there. Share the truth.

Do it in a nice way. Be kind. These are scary times. Try not to just scare somebody with shock value, but lead them to the light. It is the moment that we need right now. We need that light. We need a better world. And we are a part of making that happen here at the High Wire.

And I want to thank you because really it's just one person, one show. It's when you share what you learn, when you share what you know, when you courageously speak out. That's when the world listens. That's when the world becomes a better place. I want to thank you for your courage. I want to thank you for being a highwire supporter. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next week.