The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 337: LET FREEDOM SING

Episode Date: September 15, 2023

‘NoVax’ Novak Djokovic Wins Moderna-Sponsored U.S. Open; Country Music Star John Rich Tells The Country Truth; Are all COVID Variants Man-made?; Was Every Omicron Variant Man-made?; Africa: The Accidental COVID Experiment; Member of European Parliament, Christine Anderson Speaks Out Against The Threat of The W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty in the European Union; The Launch of ICAN Legislate Guests: John Rich, Christine Anderson, Aaron Siri, Esq.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning.

Good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. You know, a lot of times in these days, I hear people say, you know, where are the heroes? We're the people that our children can look up to. And I would say that this week we got to see a true hero, someone that stood for freedom and liberty

in the face of his own career being destroyed by it. At the pinnacle and the moment he was alive on this earth, all of it being torn away. it didn't matter he stood for the truth. Who am I talking about? Novak Djokovic takes the U.S. open. Take a look at this. When you do come back here this week,

is there any sort of lingering anger or disappointment that, you know, I should have been here last year? I felt sad for not being able to participate, but this year is, I mean, this year is this year. Matt Stukovic. Okay. Saddam Hussein. Saddamich.

Sensational. From two sets to love for the eighth time. Can you give us a glimpse into what it takes to be still getting better at this age? I have something in my legs left. You know, I still feel I have something to give to the sport. There's a 36-year-old competing with 20-year-olds. Keep things quite simple and stick to the routines that brought me to where I am. Yeah, set up, man.

Jockov is on. Game. Not easy, but you got a fight and... As the song went, a few five minutes ago, you got to fight for your right to party. You got a fight for your right to ball. Novak Djokovic on his way to a 10th appearance in a final. He's now set to face off against Daniel Medvedev. A grand slam champion again.

Novak Djokovic reclaims his crown in New York. The crisis has just got Zadbe Grisa. Amazing. I believe. athletes you'll ever see in any sport and reaches his 24 major championship. Well, you know, I suppose there's someone watching this show right now that maybe has been under a rock the whole time saying, what the heck does Novak Djokovic have to do with the high wire in a show that focuses on medical freedom? Well, as many of you probably remember,

I hope most of you do, Novak Djokovic was basically banned from the open tour. He was stopped did the Australian Open, French Open, and the U.S. open, right at the primus career, right? He was about to break every record in tennis staring them in the face, suddenly because he wouldn't get the COVID vaccine, they were going to ban him from all those sports. This is what he said in the middle of that, just to reflect on, I need the power and the beauty of this guy. I understand that not being vaccinated today, I, you know, I'm unable to travel to most of the tournaments at the moment. And that's a price you're willing to pay. That is the price that I'm willing to pay.

Ultimately, are you prepared to forego the chance to be the greatest player that ever picked up a racket, statistically, because you feel so strongly about this jab? Yes, I do. But as things stand, if this means that you miss the French Open, is that a price you'd be willing to pay? Yes, that is the price that I'm willing to pay. And if it means that you miss Wimbledon this year, again, that's a price you're willing to pay? Yes. I know that.

Why? Because the principles of decision-making on my body are more important than any title or anything else. I don't think there was a more profound voice through COVID than any. Novak Djokovic getting headlines all around the world for even and even being quarantined in Australia during the open there. And when you think about what he was up against and what he had on the line, yes, certainly many of you, you know, stood down, walked away from your jobs, which is huge supporting your family. I'm not going to say that that is any less a feat, but imagine spending your life as a dream of being the greatest ever and then right at that

pinnacle moment, you have it all taken away. Well, it didn't stop. and the U.S. Open represents his 24th major win. That is the most of any man in the history of tennis. He's tied with one other woman, who my understanding wasn't a part of the professional Open series the way it is now, but still he's now tied. One more makes him the greatest of all times without question. So to Novak Djokovic, certainly we are, you know,

just celebrating that win. And I just want to say every once in a while, something happens in life that, you know, I'm gonna put it on the table the time types of thoughts that still run through my head. Elon Musk, just over a year ago, admitted when someone asked him, do you think we're living inside of a Matrix? And he said he had some actual computation.

I don't remember what it was, one in a billion, but there's a chance that all of this is just some sort of video game we're living inside of. And it's moments like this that make me question that. Just for a moment, try to contemplate what are the odds that the one human being on the earth in all of sports and maybe got more. more attention than anybody during a mandated vaccine program stood his ground, took headlines worldwide, and his name is Novax. Well, it's Novak, but seriously, pretty dang close, really strange. Is someone in there programming this whole thing going, come on, people,

wake up. This isn't real. I don't know. But to add irony to the whole thing at the U.S. Open, of course, they're sponsors, and they have the shot of the day. Well, he didn't just have the shot of the day, the shot of the match. He had the shot of the tournament and the shot of the year. And this is who was sponsoring that shot. Well, we'll take you to the Nodernas shot of the day, and it was, here's the final one. Lease there. So the shot of the day brought to you by Moderna. The shot of the day brought to you by the guy that beat everybody else that got that stupid vaccine. Well done, Novap. We're really proud of you. Seriously, a hero.

in this world today. Hopefully one day we'll get you right here on the set of the highway. I'd love to talk to you about all that went through your mind going through that. What an incredible testament to sportsmanship and freedom and liberty and all that that entails. We're talking a lot about that today. I've got Christine Anderson, one of the most outspoken members of the European Parliament joining me. So a hero there when it comes to politicians. We've got Novak in sports. And what about music? How about all those people that, you know, travel the world doing concerts

and suddenly that was torn away from them? Well, just like that, one of the biggest stars of the country western scene, John Rich, stood his ground all the way through the mandates, everything, said, oh, hell no. And you better not put that anywhere near my audience if they want to see me. This is John Rich. Everybody, we are here with the party. This is the party right here.

This is Big and Rich. Joining me now is country music star John Rich, now the great John Rich. Country music superstar. An unapologetic patriot, John Rich. Award winning a songwriter. A man who needs no introduction to much of our audience, John Rich, one of the biggest names in country music. One of the biggest country acts in the entire world. Mr. John Rich.

Thank you, Jimmy. What up, guys? Come on into my house. John Rich's new song, Progress, has everybody buzzing after reaching number one. weekend. On a red card me, baby. Come on your cameras and everything. You know what's coming.

I'm offended. You're afraid. Let's all get... Reach number one in the billboard sales chart across all genres and that is despite the fact that you have no radio support and no record label support. America feels exasperated. They feel shredded. They feel shredded. They feel angry.

They feel sad. I think we're all watching our country be systematically dismantled in front of our eyes. And it's being dismantled by people. who say they are progressive. But meanwhile, the only thing I see and everybody else sees in this country is regression and destruction and all these terrible things.

It's the opposite of progress. People are sick and tired of being lied to, manipulated, marketed to. They see through the nonsense at this point. And so when you bring them the real truth and you really sing from the heart and you don't edit it and it's not censored by a record label, they respond.

People want to be told the truth. told the truth. When you mandate experimental medication, there's a little something people can read called the Nuremberg Code. I'm a dad, I'm a patriot, I'm a small business owner. John Rich, you are the real look like. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined by country western superstar John rich right now. John, what a pleasure to have you here on the high wire. Thank you, Dale. That was quite a sizzle real man. You dug deep for some of that stuff. Well, you're quite a superhero to us here at the highwire. I mean, you know, all through COVID, I come from Hollywood. You know, I worked in Hollywood. Everyone I knew just seemed to throw in the towel and bend a knee to

an authoritarian, you know, regime. And I would guess, was that similar in the world of music? Yes, so in my world, in the concert world, most of the venues, almost all of them, a few of them held out, but almost all the venues put in these protocols that said, the artists can't enter the building unless they show their medical papers. The fans can't come to the concert unless they prove to us that they've had certain medical procedures done. And so when all that started to break out, it was real simple for me. I said, well, then I guess we're not doing any concerts. Because I'm not going to be the bait on the hook that gets somebody to go out here

and do something against their better notions just because they want to get out of the house. and come see a concert. I'm not going to be a part of it. Actually, it might have been a lawsuit with one guy who sued us for canceling the show. Even though the contract originally had nothing in there about any COVID protocols, COVID happened after we booked the show. So in essence, it was a different contract because he added all these new rules. And I said, hey, I'm not doing it. And the guy sued us.

We had sent all his money back. He didn't lose a nickel. Send his money back. Still sued me. I beat him in court. He appealed it. Now I've got to go do it again, but I don't care. Listen, there are certain things in this life that you do not back away from.

You do not let them bend you, break you, you just don't do it. And I think medical autonomy is one of those things. I couldn't agree with you more. I mean, if we don't control our own bodies, then we cannot, I think, describe ourselves as free in any way. I always say, I think you have the same rights as a farm animal, if you're just going to be injected with, you know, whatever the government wants to put into you. But, you know, and you would imagine that in the country, Western world, which is sort of, you know, I mean, it's the heart of America. It's the ranchers. It's the farmers. I mean, it comes from what built this country and has always stood for freedom, that that would be just held tantamount as a principle in that space.

Were you, did you feel like a lot of the country Western world and your peers and music sort of held your position and we're standing with you on standing up for your right to body autonomy? Hell no. Hell no they didn't. I was so disappointed and so many artists that I've known my whole career. Listen, some of the biggest artists in country music, I won't say some, I'll say most of the artists in country music, the big ones especially, fired their bus drivers, their bands, their crew, their light guys, their sound guys. They fired everybody. A lot of these guys that have been rolling with them for 10, 15, 20 years. I mean, when you're on a tour bus and you tour like that, you become like family members. I mean, you're literally living together, rolling down the road together for long, long periods of time, many, many years.

In Big and Rich, we were actually hiring guys that were getting dropped from other big acts for not taking the vaccine. and like they would go, hey man, I just got fired from, you know who. I said, are you kidding me? He fired you over that? Yeah, I said, how long you worked with him? 16 years. I mean, this story went on and on and on. And guess what?

Now that we know that the vaccine doesn't stop transmission, it doesn't keep you from getting sick. If anything, it's worse for you than taking it at all. Guess how many of those people have been hired back by those country artists? That'd be a total of zero. Really? None of them have been hired back. None. And I've checked with them. I've checked up with these musicians and said, hey, did so-and-so-ever hire you back? Hell, no, they didn't hire me back. So what are you doing? Well, I'm playing with somebody else now, or I'm focusing on the studio or whatever. I mean, it wrecked people's lives. And if the country fans knew what some of the guys and gals out there that act like them and talk like them, but behind the scenes are absolutely not like them. If they knew that, man, you'd have a whole different crop of singers out there.

right now. Why do you think they don't hire back? Is that they don't want to look them in the eyes and recognize or have to admit in some way that they were wrong? Or is it just some power trip that you don't do what I say? And I just, you know, I mean, that's how this has to roll here. And it doesn't matter what it was about. I mean, what is the psychology of that? I mean, you probably nailed it on both counts. I mean, number one is they don't want to admit that they were wrong. But, you know, it's interesting. I just saw in New York. I just saw in New York State that the Supreme Court there in New York State ordered all the nurses to be hired, I'm sorry, all the teachers to be hired back and give them back pay. You probably saw that

article. I'm sure they'll appeal it and try to keep that from happening. But the same thing should be happening across the country. People that had to go through that, police, military, teachers, nurses, doctors, whoever, musicians, you know, anybody that got whacked over not taking experimental vaccine should be going after them legally. I think they have the grounds now to stand there and probably get their jobs back and get back pay and everything else. But that was a horrible thing. A part of that sizzle that you showed is when I brought up to an interviewer, I said, yeah, that violates a little thing called the Nuremberg Code. If you go back and read the Nuremberg code, it doesn't take long, it's only about two pages of rules that they established in an

international court after World War II when the Nazis carried out all their medical experiments. on people. One of the first things it says is you cannot coerce, punish, or otherwise force someone against their will to take an experimental medical procedure, end of sentence. So explain to me how this has managed to roll out all these years and now I turn the television on and here they are again promoting the vaccine again. Del, I just hope at some point people are finally held to account for what they've done to our country. Do you think they're going to try to do this again? I think they're going to try, but I think it's going to be a lot different response this time. You know, we now know that masks don't do anything other than back your kids up in school.

It messes them up. It makes you sick breathing into the mask. You know, a mask is considered an experimental medical device by the FDA. If you go on their website and read about it, in the NIH, too, you look up mask and it's considered an experimental medical device as it pertains to stopping the transmission of the United States. You look up mask and it's considered an experimental medical device as it pertains to stopping the transmission of a virus. Now, this is all coming from a country music singer with a high school diploma who grew up in a trailer in Texas. Okay? This information is readily available. I think if they try to roll this out again, two things will happen.

The fury that will come from American citizens, not just on the right. I'm talking across the board is going to be like nothing they have ever seen. So in a way, I kind of hope they do try it again because I think unity will happen in our country when the level of anger and pain gets high enough where we're all feeling it at the same rate. Well, you tweeted that out almost exactly. I think we're about to find out just how much of a backbone. We, the people actually have. You know, the vice is about to start turning again, but I don't think it will work out like it did last time. I have faith that our fellows it is will lean into the pressure and not budge an inch. I would agree with you. I think when we look at the numbers on this, you know, you can look at the failure and people can look at the dark side. I like to look at the light. I've always been a glass is half full kind of guy. 30% of this country rejected this vaccine under the, I would say, the most highly funded propaganda, you know, machine that's ever been. And you have to imagine, you know, that other 70%, probably half of them only got the vaccine because they were either. probably not able to work. They couldn't support their families. They absolutely used coercion,

threatening to take away your job if you didn't get the vaccine, which you're right is an absolute violation of the Nuremberg Code. But as you sit there, right, and you know, I mean, you just tout it, you sound like a scientist, but the truth is, is, you know, a high school education is all you would need, and probably less to do some really basic reading. I think for a lot of us, there's been this self-reflection on what makes me different than all my friends around me. Did you go through that as you tried to talk, sent in your friends? Did you lose friends over this? And have you sort of tried to figure out what makes you different than all these other probably robust,

pro-America, pro-freedom people that you thought would have been standing with you? That's a great question. I will tell you that one thing that I consistently pray for and I ask God to give me is not success and not popularity. I don't ask for those things. It's discernment. That's the thing I asked for. In a world that is absolutely swallowed up with lies,

and everything's a lie all the time. You don't know who's telling you the truth, because the answer is most of them are not. There's lies on top of lies. And then you've got these huge decisions to make, and you don't know what the truth is. I pray for discernment that, hey, God, put something in me, make me feel a certain way,

that's correct, that's true, and I will follow whatever that is. And so I felt that way about the vaccine. I felt that something wasn't right about it. And listen, I'm a Trump supporter, and Trump was all about the vaccine. You know, warp speed and everything else. So it wasn't like, hey, I'm gonna, if Trump says it's good, I'm going.

Nah, I'm gonna stand back and look at this for a minute. And I think we were right. I mean, so many people now are damaged from adverse effects from this vaccine. I've got a family member that is. There's a country singer who I won't name, and she's had mild carditis now for the last 16 months, can't tour. You know?

I mean, it's terrible what it's done to people. And so I think discernment is something. If you're a Christian and you really, you believe in God, you know he's there and you're his. He owns you. You need to ask him for discernment, because this is not the last batch of lives we're going to have to live through. This is going to continue on,

and it's probably going to get more and more complicated to try to understand what the truth actually is. I absolutely agree with you. It's one of the things that we try to get across on this show, though. It's mostly news. I say the same thing. You have an intuition inside of you. God does speak to us.

And these are confusing times. We've gotten so used to listen to experts thinking, oh, they must be telling me the truth. They wouldn't have this many experts saying it if it wasn't true. But now I think there is the gnashing of teeth as though it's Armageddon for so many people that just watch, you know, regulatory agencies they believed in and trusted and experts that are now dead wrong. They, we now know, as I'm sure you know, you clearly are well read on this topic.

They didn't even test to see if this product could stop transmission in the trials, which I just think is the ultimate, just sad statement about the state of interest science. Well, Dale, they were giving it to, Del, they were giving it to pregnant women all over the United States, and they had never tested it on a pregnant woman or to see what it would do to an unborn child. Not once. They had no idea. And so they're telling them,

you got to take it, and you've got to protect your kid. I mean, monsters, absolute monsters. I think Fauci is one of the biggest monsters that ever walked the planet. You and I both. I've said multiple times, I won't be happy until we see that guy in jail.

How do you do your research? I'm sure everyone's going, where do you get your information? How are you this on top of it? I mean, you know, that wasn't in the newspaper. We weren't reading that they're, you know, never tested on pregnant women. So how do you do your research? Well, listen, I mean, you can go to the own websites of the people that are lying to you.

You know, so if Fauci says, well, the NIH and the CDC and the WHO said, blah, blah, blah, or whatever, then go to those websites and start digging down through their pages and find what they actually wrote about their testing or what results they actually had. It's all there. And then you find it and you read it four or five times and you go, hang on a minute. This says they did not ever test it on pregnant women. It says it right here. That because it was an emergency authorization use, they didn't have to.

They just went on and moved ahead with it. I mean, so, you know, for a side of the country that it's so atheistic in the way that they think, they sure asked us to have a hell of a lot of faith, didn't they? I mean, that's nothing but faith. Hey, trust me. Have faith in my word, have faith in what I'm telling you, and stick this in your arm, and your baby will be fine, and you'll be fine. Well, that's a hell of a lot of faith to exert on anyone, much less another human being like that

that's being bought and paid for by Big Pharma. I'll tell you what, man. I think I just found my new guest anchor. If we ever need someone to, like, fill in here, if you ever have some time off, you're doing it right. John Rich, I want to change the subject just for a second, because, you know, clearly you are, you got your eyes are clear. And it's not just on the vaccine issue. I understand you're even starting a bank.

Tell me why. Why is that something, the old glory bank. Why do we need a bank from John Rich? Well, so Dr. Ben Carson, Larry Elder, myself, some guys that had come from the banking world for many, many decades that are all patriots. And we had a conversation after Justin Trudeau shut down the trucker protest by freezing all their bank accounts. That was his final backbreaking move. He froze their bank accounts. If a tow truck company refused to tow the trucks out, he'd freeze their bank accounts.

He'd freeze your boss's bank accounts, your friends and family's bank accounts. I mean, that's how we did it. Same thing happened down in Brazil when the Bolsonaro election was going on. A bunch of people happened. Nigel Farage just got kicked off of all his banking here about two months ago. So if you think that that can't happen in America, then you're just not paying attention. There are people in places of power in our country that fantasize and are just salivating at the thought of someday we'll be able to freeze the bank accounts of people who we don't like what they have to say. So O'Glory Bank was established for that exact reason that this is a bank where you will never be penalized for exercising your constitutional rights. Now, how pathetic is it that that has to

be a platform for a bank to stand on. But it is and it's necessary. People feel like they want to run for the hills these days, but what hill are you going to run to? Because the enemies bought all the hills. They own the city and they own the country. They own every hill surrounding your town. There's nowhere to go unless we build new hills to run to. That's what Old Glory Bank is. And tens of thousands of people have opened up accounts. We just started doing small business loans back in July. And people are realizing, yeah, this version of America is not a safe place at the moment. All right. Tell me about your new album. Are we, you know, what's the tour going to look like? Are you going to squeeze in dates before they try to shut us down again? What's the plan?

Well, I got a new record called The Country Truth, and it's called that because most every song on it would never be played on a radio station. A record label would have never touched it. But there's songs that are true and they're from my perspective how I see things. There's funny songs on there. You played a piece of I'm offended. That's kind of put a grin on your face about how absurd culture has gotten. But there's a lot of songs, man, on there that just talk about God, family, country and how I see things. The record came out two or three weeks ago was actually the number one most downloaded record on iTunes for the whole week, the week that it came out. So, you know, there are ways to still go out here and compete at a high level, even without

the big music industry behind you. Thank goodness. It's called the fans. It's called the fans. I appreciate everybody that went out and supported my music. So for everyone, young people out that are looking, maybe getting into music, and I think it feels so daunting. My wife was a musician. I have some experience with being on the road and tour with bands. But, you know, recently Oliver Anthony put out a song on his own, being offered record deals. He's turning them down, doesn't want to be controlled by record labels. Is that the right move? Is that, is that the way, you know, you should do music these days? Well, if you're a guy like Oliver Anthony, listen, can you imagine him walking into Sony or Universal or Warner Brothers and singing

Richmond north of Richmond and calling out Epstein Island and calling out welfare and on and on and on? I mean, they would have escorted him out of the building for triggering them. violating their safe space. There's no way in hell. But it's funny, he puts the song out. It becomes the biggest song in the world, and these record labels are grobbling at his feet. We'll give you millions of dollars, man, just sign on the bottom line. And to his credit, he has not taken the bait, and he has remained independent. I hope he stays independent, just like he is for the rest of his life. I think he's a powerful, important poet in our country at a very, very important time. Well, so are you. I hope you remain independent. You have been a

powerful force for truth when so few were. It's an honor to know you. We're so honored to have you join us today. I really appreciate you taking the time and I know everyone, audience, is going to go out and buy that album. So I look forward to seeing you out there on tour. Appreciate it, Dale. You have a great day. Thanks, brother. You take care. All right. Well, after that awesome opening, I'm totally pumped. It's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, riding a real high here. Are you plan on bringing this down. Oh, man, that's some pressure there coming after John Rich. All right.

Well, I'll tell you what, we're going to go from hero to anti-hero. We're going to go to, or maybe I should say anti-American, and just give the juxtaposition here from what we just saw. So, you know, it's no by policymakers that a lot can be done in times of war that can't be done in peacetime. But the problem is wars only happen. Thank God, very few times in a century. So early during the COVID response, the failed COVID response, a lot of policymakers were paying attention.

A lot of world leaders were paying attention going, wait a minute, we can radically change society and get policies really implemented in a rapid succession under a public health emergency. So in 2021, you started seeing headlines like this. Everybody's jumping on the public health emergency. Climate change is the greatest threat to public health. All the top medical journals warn. So they all in concert said, sounds like a great idea. Let's just file this under there. But then came New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham, and she decided to take this one step further.

Listen to this press conference that just happened recently. In this public health order, which is affected today, September 8th, which lasts 30 days. And then we'll, like all the other public health orders, we will either amend or renew or adjust depending upon where we are. So effective immediately, no person other than a law enforcement officer or licensed security officer shall possess a firearm either openly or concealed within cities or counties, averaging 1,000 or more violent crimes for 100,000, and more than 90 firearm-related emergency department visits. We're suspending open and concealed carry.

You took an oath to the Constitution. Isn't it unconstitutional to say you cannot exercise your carry license? With one exception, and that is, if there's an emergency, and I've declared an emergency for a temporary amount of time, I can invoke additional powers. No constitutional right in my view, including my oath, is intended to be absolute.

Even her oath is not absolute. That was very telling, I think. So where have we heard this for? Just 30 days she said, no, she's not going to cancel it. She said that we're going to just go ahead and maybe renew it or just reformulate it. This sounds a lot like just 15 days to slow the spread. Just 15 days and then we're going to reevaluate this situation. situation. People are pretty sick of this. And you know, another point she was saying, besides the obvious, this is an infringement on the Second Amendment of the Constitution by all intents purposes. But she says, any place with a thousand or more violent crimes for 100,000

people, she's basically talking about Albuquerque, one of the largest cities in New Mexico. But advocates of the Second Amendment will say, well, this is exactly where I need my concealed carry is where there's a lot of violent crime because this is why I have it for self-defense. So the reasoning is very interesting, but this isn't a surprise. There's a lot of bills in the United States right now and a lot of states that are being attempted to address some of the issues around gun violence. Now, it's interesting because in May of 2023, you started seeing headlines like this. America's gun violence is a public health emergency. There we go again, but politics and the courts prevent a proper response.

May another one, one way to prevent gun violence, treat it as a public health issue. well, that's just what Governor Grisham did. And this is the headline she created with that press conference. Gun violence declared a public health emergency. Bingo. So let's look at that public health order. So this is from the New Mexico. Now, it's not the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms division of New Mexico ATF.

This is from the public health department of New Mexico. This is the actual public health order. And it says, therefore I, Patrick M. Allen, secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health, in accordance with authority vested in me by the Constitution and the law of this. the state of New Mexico and directed by the governor persuading to the full scope of emergency powers under the all hazards emergency management act do hereby declare that gun violence and drugs drug use constitute conditions of public health importance so here we go all hazards emergency public health emergency this is this is how they're filing any it seems like any type of a

big political hot button issues is filing underneath that and they can you know attempt to really radically change society even if it goes goes against the Constitution. So in that health order, it also states that Bernadillo County Sheriffs are to, their department is to dispatch additional officers and resources to deal with this problem. So Bernard County Sheriff John Allen got wind of this.

He made his own press conference, and it sounded a little bit like this. The Burnedleo County Sheriff's Office will not enforce this segment of the order. Will I understand the urgency, The temporary ban challenges the foundations of our Constitution, but most importantly, it is unconstitutional. My oath was to protect the Constitution, and that is what I will do. The governor made it clear in her press conference.

She knew we as law enforcement did not agree with the order, and as a result, this was solely her decision. Other than this ban being unconstitutional, here are other reasons why I will not enforce them. order. One, what many forget, is I have enough violence here in Bernalio County. I do not want to have political violence towards my deputies or here in Bernalillo County. My job is to keep the peace and to make sure that the citizens of Bernalio County are safe and I do not believe that this order will help me do so. I'm a law enforcement professional. This order will not do anything to curb gun violence other than punish law-abiding citizens from the more constitutional right to self-defense. It is quite irritating for me to see how this 30-day ban completely

overshadowed the robust conversations that we had with the governor in the office on what we are going to do to curb gun violence and for people to stop being victims. It's one of the things that we learned through COVID as I toured the country. I didn't realize, I always sort of struggled with it. What's the difference between a police officer and a sheriff? But the sheriff is sworn to uphold the Constitution. That is their job. And many of the sheriffs were the ones that pushed back on COVID. You know, even right here, I think was in Dripping Springs or Hayes County where we do this show. Our sheriff said, I am not going to push forward the, you know, the, what is it, the quarantine or the driving. There was like times you could drive and couldn't. He just said, I'm not going to get

involved in that. It's unconstitutional. So thank God for sheriffs. And should we ever find ourselves in a struggle again, remember it's your share. sheriffs that are going to be there for you. So when those elections come up, when you're thinking about a sheriff, don't just look the other way. These sheriffs ended up having a lot of power to protect our rights if they believed in them. So another thing that you should be looking at in your county

and get to know your sheriff, super important for the times ahead. Yeah, that's golden advice. And so Sheriff Allen gets this public health order across his desk. Understanding that this is the first time, really, in the history of United States, has been a health emergency ban on part of the Second Amendment. But also this goes against a Supreme Court decision from just last year saying that the Second Amendment does allow for people to carry their gun outside of their home for self-defense. So there's a double negative there. So strike one, the sheriffs are against. But now you have this is like if it wasn't so, if it wasn't so serious, it'd be like a soap opera.

We have Governor Grish immediately responds to this. Here's the headline. Stop being squeamish. Governor responds to BCSO, not enforcing 30-day gun ban. She says this, I don't need a lecture on Constitution. from Sheriff Allen. What I need is action. What we need is for leaders to stand up for the victims of violent crime. We're giving you the tool, Sheriff Allen. Now stop being squeamish about using them. I'm reading this, Del. And you know, there's a behavior of a public health official when they make some type of policy that is questionable. But then there's a behavior of a public health official, a whole separate action that really should be paid attention to when their sheriffs won't enforce it or their other people won't enforce it. Now how do they, they act. This is very telling, but it got worse for Governor Grisham because the attorney general of the state of New Mexico also went. This is New Mexico AG Raul Torres. This is the headline. AG says he won't defend Lujan Grisham administration in gun order lawsuits. An amazing statement here. He says this, quote, though I recognize my statutory obligation as New Mexico's chief legal officer to defend state officials when they are sued in their official capacity, my duty to uphold and defend the constitutional rights every citizen takes precedent. Torres's letter stated, simply put, I do not believe that the

emergency order will have any meaningful impact on public safety. But more importantly, I do not believe it passes constitutional muster. And so this is interesting. This is really, obviously, a public health disaster for the governor, but it's a microcosm of how fast things can turn around in, we'll call it the post-COVID era it took it took you know over a year sometimes two years for the legal actions to start really rolling for masks get rolled back for people to get their jobs back their payback this took about a week now here's the headline of reuters u.s judge freezes new mexico governor's gun ban so it's done she's it's it's it's d oa not going to happen this is a temporary This is a temporary freeze, but I don't see this thing being pushed back.

This has been an absolute nightmare and disaster. Your AG, your sheriffs, they're not going along with you. And the public essentially has turned on her as well. So it'll be really interesting to see how this change is moving forward. I think she might need to just go back and maybe reformulate a plan. How about go back to read the Constitution of the United States of America? I think just start there. I think that that should be your punishment is you actually have to read a little bit of history,

find out what you're actually talking about. And Jeffrey, one of the things that strikes me, and I think it's the important part of the story. I mean, guns isn't necessarily a conversation that we get into a lot here on the high wire. But you and I, when we started working the high wire, when we started the highway back in 2017, and prior to that, I'd been speaking all over the world saying this vaccine issue, this medical freedom issue, is going to prove to be the most important, the biggest issue of your time. This is the tip of the spear of how they're going to try and take your rights away.

And here's exactly what we're seeing proven over and over again. What is it they used to take your guns away? A health emergency. What is it that they took your rights to control what was in your body? What did they take your job away with? A health emergency.

And so it's proving, you know, unfortunately, that we did have vision on that. And the high wires now diving into so many different spaces, whether it's financing. When you look at the World Monetary Fund and the World Economic Forum, it's all coming back to health emergencies, the WHO. We're going to get deep into that with Christine Anderson coming up.

But at the center of all this, everyone has their issues that care about. This is why we've been so dedicated to health because this is their way in. This is what they're going to try and pierce, you know, the Constitution of the United States of America with is this health emergency. Well, we're in an emergency, therefore I'm allowed to take all your rights away. No, you're not, thank God, that so many officials in New Mexico are standing up right now. Absolutely. And let's talk about health for a second. So, let's talk about propaganda in health, more importantly, something we've been really just trying to pick apart from day one with this COVID situation. So a video came across our desk at the High Wire from UNICEF. And it was a kind of Hollywoodish version video.

And it just had our jaws on the ground. So we'd like to share with the audience. Take a look. In 2020, scientists developed a life-saving COVID-19 vaccines in record-breaking time. It was miraculous. It saved the lives of my parents and grandparents. In just a few months, nearly everybody in my country got the vaccine. I lost my mother right at the start of the pandemic. So many doctors and nurses got sick. School closed down.

But then came the vaccine. You've said life would return to normal. You restored our hope. And you promised you wouldn't stop there. You said you'd help other countries. You promised to share vaccines with the whole world. To make sure it ended everywhere, for everyone. But it took too long.

You bought up supplies and held them back. Just in case. You let people and other countries suffer. Doctors and nurses kept getting sick. Teachers died. You let the virus carry on, going round and round and round and round. Changed into even more dangerous variants. Then it all came back again and again, again.

Schools closed again. Life kept getting turned upside down. But all of us, things could have worked out so differently. So differently. You knew that no one is safe. One is safe until everyone is safe. I feel like there should be a law against using children for fear porn, but, you know, that's just gross. So I can't let this stand.

I have to break this down a little bit. So, I mean, there's so many untruths in this video. We could do an entire segment on it. But just really quick, the young actress says, I lost my mother at the start of the pandemic. Well, do you remember they were holding back early treatment at the start of the pandemic? They were telling people just to basically go home so you can't breathe, then come in the hospital. put you on a ventilator. We know how that turned out. No Ivermectin, no vitamin D, no exercise. They were denying everybody calling conspiracy

theories for trying to do that. And then they said, schools closed, then they came the vaccine. Well, actually schools closed and they held kids hostage, even though against the direction of people like the Great Barrington Declaration and so many other public health experts, schools closed because of the teachers' unions and policymakers shut them down and you held them hostage until these kids were at almost no risk had the vaccine. Now some of those little girls' classmates, their male classmates, have a heart conditions because of that vaccine. And then also, you know, they said that the virus kept circulating in circulates because they never tested the vaccine to stop transmission. But they lied to you

and said it did stop transmission. Yeah. But finally, the life saving shot, that life saving shot that they're propagandizing you with that only 5% of Africans have had, they say in this video, says UNICEF. Well, let's see how Africa has done. Let's look at 2020. Let's look at the headlines to really fact check UNICEF. Royters, 2020. Puzzled scientists seek reasons behind Africa's low fatality rates from pandemic. Hmm. 2021, scientists mystified, weary as Africa avoids COVID disaster. But they didn't get the lifesaving vaccine.

Maybe the COVID disaster is the vaccine itself potentially. I mean, we know that, but it's outrageous to be reading it. Right. So let's go back to a segment in a topic that we've discussed before talking about Africa. So former president of Tanzania, John Magafouli, he came out during the vaccine rollout. Remember, they're trying to give vaccine. They're trying to vaccinate Africa. They're trying to vaccinate his country.

And he went to on a podium. He went in a public discussion and said this. Take a listen. There are some Tanzanians who recently traveled abroad in search of the coronavirus vaccine. These people brought the virus into a country when they returned. Let us stand firm. This vaccine is not good at all. all. We need to put God first in fighting against this dangerous disease, but at the same time,

take health precautions to protect ourselves against this disease as advised by our health experts. We have lived for over a year without the virus, and the good evidence is most of you here don't wear masks. Wow. This vaccine is no good at all. He's starting to sound like Peter McCullough in retrospect. Yeah. So we have articles, Wall Street Journal, of course, he was attacked relentlessly because of this. So this is the Wall Street Journal in February of 2021. Tanzania shunned lockdowns. Now it's rejecting COVID-19 vaccines. So it goes in there and talks to their chief medical officer. And she says this, we are not yet satisfied that those vaccines have been clinically proven safe. Dr. Guajima said in a news conference flanked by unmasked

by unmasked government health officials. During her conference, Dr. Guajima, a medical doctor with a master's degree in public health, displayed several trades with local herbs that she said could be used to make anti-coronavirus remedies, otherwise known as early treatment that is the local population has at their fingertips. I mean, this is what was going on in that country. So now what was happening was they were getting all of these testing kits there. So you're not going to take the vaccine, well, at least start testing your population, keep doing this. So the health department under direction of the former president we just saw started testing things besides people like goats and papayas,

And this is the headline here, Tanzania. It's one of my favorite headlines. Testing Kitt's question after goat and papaya test positive. So they're saying, look, obviously these tests aren't accurate. We know they're not accurate because of the high cycle threshold rate that was required to find these virus detection particles. But this is a whole new thing. So obviously this made a lot of people mad.

And then shortly after President Magafouli disappeared from the public for for weeks on end, it was a big mystery, and then he was pronounced, he was announced dead. This is the headline Tanzanese Maghuli laid to rest after mysterious death. We really don't understand what happened. His wife had come out and said he's had a long-time heart condition, and that's what proved fatal. But really, the whole purpose of going into this conversation is we have a natural experiment. So we have, like UNICEF said, only 5% of Africans have had the vaccine.

That's clearly not what's going on in the rest of the world. The rest of the world is 80, 90, nearly 100. Or if you talk about boosters, 110, 150% vaccinated because they're getting so many other shots. So we have Tanzania. Let's look at, as you've talked about before, really comes down to all-cause mortality. We're not talking about hard conditions or emergency room visits. Talking about all-cause mortality. Let's look at how, because if the vaccine was life-saving, it should save lives.

It should have an effect on all-cause mortality. So let's look at the two largest states in the United States, Texas and California. California and compare that with how Tanzania did. And together, they're almost about the same populations when you add California and Texas together compared to Tanzania. And here you see in blue Tanzania starting at 2014 going to 2021. It's basically going down. You get a little spike there in 2015, but that blue line, you see it going down, down, down.

And then the pandemic comes 2019, 2020, 2020, 2021. Not much of a rise there where starting in 2019, the orange line and the gray. Ray line representing Texas and California, you see those spike up from 2019 to 2020. They go up. And then again, the vaccine's already being distributed at that point and they still keep going up into 2021. And these are similar population sizes, right? When we compare Tanzania with California, Texas, if you're going to say density questions like that, they're fairly similar. Absolutely. Tanzania has about 63 million. California has about 39 million. Texas is about

29 million. So you add those two together. We're talking about the same size populations. But now let's stay in that same graph and let's talk about the percentage increase from the previous year. So California and Texas, starting in 2019 to 2020, you have 21.5% increase in all-cause mortality per 100,000 people in Texas and 18.7% in California. But then, again, the vaccines are rolled out at that point. Going to 2021, it's still going up. Texas, 6.1% all-cause mortality goes up. Why? 5.1% California goes up. Why? Tanzania, we have 2.8% in 2020 and then 0.6% in 2021. I mean, we really should have seen, especially in 2021, we should have seen that percentage jump up because they didn't get their life-saving vaccines.

Now, it makes me want to like meet that head of the health department in Tanzania that was handing out local herbs and traditional healing methods saying that this is going to stop COVID. But it sure as heck looks like it did. So instead of making fun of her, maybe we should go over there and figure out what it is she did exactly. I mean, outrageous results there in the rest of the world all over. Similar meridians everywhere are just struggling. Amazing. And we've had Edward Dowd on here. He's the analysts looking at all-cause mortality in children in the UK and the workforce,

comparing that to insurance actuaries. So really what they compare, because the big deal is you compare it with the use. years before the pandemic because you get a baseline. So let's do that with this chart. Let's stay with this chart one more time. Percent increase compared to the last five years before the pandemic. So starting around 2015 to 2019. And you see Texas in California, Texas is 24% increase in 2020 compared to the five years before.

32% increase in 2021 compared to the five years before. California, 22% in 2020, 28% in 2021 just keeps going to growing up Tanzania, negative 10%, compared to the previous five years before the pandemic, and negative 9% in 2021. So that is extremely, extremely telling chart. And again, we have this microcosm of a natural study extremely important. And this is not lost on a lot of the experts out there. We had Gert van der Bosch on and he specifically pointed to African children as being kind of a

reservoir. Take a look at what he said about that. Okay. I'm always saying Africa will win the countries that barely vaccinated their people. You see this, for example, now in South Africa, I don't know whether you have seen these curves. You have a steep increase of one Omicron variant, and then it was calm, like, for a few months, and then you had another steep curve. You don't see this in our countries anymore, in the highly vaccinated countries. South Africa has approximately 30, 35 percent of vaccinated people,

So you still have an important young population that can clear the virus and that is how these waves can still be brought down But yeah, as I was saying this is this is going to be dramatic for highly vaccinated countries and I really cannot imagine if we if we don't intervene with mass antiviral chemoprophylaxis I, you know, yeah, of course you could say we need a baby boom to immediately dilute this whole thing so that we have heard immunity, but that cannot happen within a short time. You could say we can have massive immigration from people coming from poorly vaccinated countries. But like, for example, now with Ukraine, et cetera, what I'm seeing is that they get already vaccinated at the border when they come in, right? So none of this is going to help. And, you know, this cannot be put back into balance without major sacrifice.

If you don't act on the virus, if you don't want to do this, and you just drive it into more and more infectious variants, then the other alternative is, of course, the host population. I mean, what else? It is not 25 different factors that are countries. contributing to this. You hear us all the time talking about infectious pressure and immune pressure, right? And that is the two factors you can play with. It's amazing when you sort of reflect on that. What he's saying really simply put is that Africa didn't get vaccinated. They have true immunity. They've achieved herd immunity. It's celebrated clearly all the headlines now show us that he was arguing that the stupidest that we could do in America was to vaccinate our children, that that was the last reservoir capable of herd immunity that had super low, risk that could actually protect the rest of us, build that, you know, herd immunity. And he thought

that if you vaccinate the children, this virus is just going to keep coming around like they're reporting. They think it's going to happen again. They think it's happening now. Some states starting to mask up because we weren't able to reach herd immunity. And he predicted there may be a moment in the history where we would start importing people from Africa to bring their immunity here to try and get a level playing field since all of the vaccinated are not contributing to herd immunity. they're carrying this virus because the vaccine is a leaky vaccine, cannot stop the virus, unlike the unvaccinated, who caught it, kill it dead, and now have, you know, a much more robust immunity. So it's super interesting now to be looking at these statements that were made

in the middle of it and now proving to be true. And it looks like this natural experiment, the window for this natural experiment, is now closing because as we saw at the beginning of our pandemic response, you saw social media influencers like Jennifer Aniston, and people doing really kind of pushing this vaccine same things happening in africa right now here's are the headlines just recently tanzania mobilizes musicians and influencers to shed the legacy of its covid denying ex-president and then here's from the w hos regional office in africa right from their website from below 10 to 51 percent tanzania increases coven 19 vaccination coverage it says from a poor coverage of 2.8 of the total population by mid-juary 2020 tanzania recorded an exponential increase to 51 percent

as of April 2023, and that is increasing since that article as well. I mean, one day you know for sure is not happening those ads. They're not telling the people in Africa you did better than every other nation in the world. You are healthier right now than every other nation in the world. They're lying to them. They're poisoning them. This just shows how sick and demented WHO and these world, you know, authoritarian organizations called NGOs as though somehow they're benefiting this world.

And let's continue to talk about the virus. We've talked a lot here about the lab origin, about that conversation. Was it manmade? Did it come from nature? There's a new gigantic bombshell study. I can't overstate the importance of this. And we're going to get to it in just a second because we have to really understand the importance of this. So remember, there's been a back and forth conversation. We had the internal emails from Fauci, from Collins, from Jeremy Farrar, from Christian Anderson, the virologist, all saying at the beginning, of this COVID pandemic, essentially, that look, there's big questions here. This thing looks like it was, it looks like there was some lab fingerprints on it, if you will, but we're just going to go out and kind of kill that conversation. But then the big organizations, they all had their own feelers out there. And so you started to see in early 2023 here, this is the headline, lab leak, most likely origin of COVID-19 pandemic energy department now says, and that's the agency revising its assessment based on new intelligence. And then just a month later, that was in February and March,

just a month later, you had the FBI. They had their own team out there. FBI director Ray acknowledges Bureau assessment that COVID-19 likely resulted from lab accident. And now the CIA, so this is the New York Post. The CIA had their own people looking into it. They're jumping over, according to this whistleblower. CIA tried to pay off analysts to very findings that COVID lab leak was likely whistleblower. So there's two committees here. There's the intelligence committee. and the select subcommittee on the pandemic, the coronavirus pandemic. And they have both sent a letter to the head of the FBI,

Director Burns. And this is a fascinating point here. This is still a developing story. The letter says this, according to the whistleblower, this is a CIA whistleblower, the agency assigned seven officers to a COVID discovery team. The team consisted of multidisciplinary and experienced officers with significant scientific expertise.

According to the whistleblower, At the end of its review, six of the seven members of the team believe the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The seventh member of the team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe COVID-19 originated through zoonosis. The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position. Wow. So the CIA is doing what the CIA does, really just manufacture consent here on a small level within that team. Meanwhile, our YouTube channel and Facebook channel were being taken down and others like

us for daring to report that there were scientists saying that this looked like it was more likely lab origin than natural origin. None of the fact checkers that attacked us or those that took down our pages have ever apologized. But are bad. As it turns out, we relied to and we listened to the wrong people. You don't hear anyone on MSNBC or CNN or any of these news agencies apologizing to the people. And here we have all of the top people that were behind the lie, driving the lie. Now whistleblowers are exposing everything. And it's very important. So remember, we had the original strain, the alpha strain, then the delta

we were told was extremely deadly and we had to get vaccinated for this. Kids stay out of school. But then the Amacron strain came. The Amacron is this dominant lineage. It was first identified in South Africa in late November 2021. And what was interesting about the Amicron strain? Well, we'll go to Dr. Valentin Brutel on Twitter. He's a German virologist.

And he says this about the Amicron strain. The SARS-2 evolved in complete isolation. That's what he's talking about. While all other variants of concern originated from circulating SARS-2 variants, Amacron originated from a most recent common ancestor, that was not circulating anymore for more than a year. And we have a picture here.

He added to this. This is called a phylogenetic tree. And you can see here at the bottom, you have all of the mutations, all those little dots. They're building upon, building upon, mutating, mutating. And then this red rocket line comes out of nowhere. That's Amacron. It's not playing with any of those other people. It comes out from early 2020 strain and just shoots over all of those and starts its own tree

and dominates the rest of the viral strange. So there was a lot of people around the world going, wait a minute, where did this come from? How was it so potent on the population, it became the dominant, how to just replace everything else that's been doing its time in nature? And where did it come from? It was not related to any of the most recent, you know,

evolutions. It went all the way back as those sort of a, you know, it's almost like the Neanderthal man suddenly pops into, you know, is walking down the mall and you're like, wait, well, hold on a second. Where'd you just come from? Right. And that's what happened with this virus. Right. And, you know, there's a lot of theories about that. Well, maybe an immunocompromised person just had it and they were isolated for a really long time. And then they just popped out of nowhere in 2021. But the problem was it was immune to a lot of the antibodies that

were out there, which is totally against that theory. So some Japanese researchers started to look at some databases of a lot of the variants. And this is the study. This is really, this is, to me, this is like Fauci's original internal email where we finally saw, oh my gosh, there's actually something here. This is a genetic version of that. So unnatural evolutionary processes of SARS-CoB2 variants and possibility of deliberate natural selection. So they looked at these variants from around the world, a lot in the United States, but someone from India, Bangladesh, other countries as well. There's a storehouse of these. And they wrote this to determine the order of mutations. They're looking at how these things order themselves, only in the Omicron variant, leading to the

formation of the SARS-CoV-2 Amacron variance, we compared the sequences of 129 Amacron VA-1-related, 141-1-related, and 122-B-A.2-2-related isolates. That's almost 400 isolated variants they're comparing, and attempted to clarify the evolutionary processes of SARS-CoB2 Amacron variants, including the order of mutations leading to their formation and the occurrence of homologous recombination. They continue. As a result, we concluded that the formation of a part of Amicron isolates BA1, BA1, and BA2 was not the product of genome evolution, as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homogalus recombinations. They go on to say reverse genetics.

They found evidence of reverse genetics. They say reverse genetics experiments are an essential part of virus research and is inimical to virus research to consider that artificially synthesized viruses were deliberately spread throughout the world. However, now that reverse genetics has become common in virus research, we believe it is not scientific to discuss the mutation process of SARS-CoB-2 without excluding the possibility of artificially synthesized viruses. So a lot was said there, but let's just key in on something, reverse genetics. So they found evidence. Basically, they went in and said, let's just see just how scientific testing was. It's like a double negative without excluding,

But what they're saying is if we can exclude, you know, scientific manipulation here, we can't keep talking about the evolution of this virus, right? And so what they're looking at is 400 versions of Omicron, right? This isn't Delta or all the others. It's just the Omicron variants. So all the Omicron variants from around the world, they line them up, and they're trying to figure out which one came first. They figure, you know, by doing this reverse, you know, analysis, you know, deconstructing it,

They can find where the changes happen and then build that, like, as we saw, that sort of tree where, you know, this one came first. Then it added this little hairy function and then it grew some, you know, toes and eyes or whatever. But we see that evolution and they're able to structure it. What they want to do is structure which came first. This is the sampling, I think, of their original strains, not just Amacron, but you see how that works. They build on each other. That's what they're looking for, is which one came first, okay? Right.

And they're saying, you know, let's focus on Amicron. because we know the phylogenetic tree of a lot of other ones but omicrons this mystery so let's now that it's been out there let's take all these strains and let's rebuild this thing let's look at it so they use the word reverse genetics so let's talk about what is reverse genetics so we go to this article outside the study it's basically it's an approach researchers used to discover the function of a gene by tinkering with it and analyzing the effect so it says in this article reverse genetics has many important therapeutic applications so again researchers this is just a common thing they're doing especially in engineering of vaccines against viruses or the reconstitution of a viral genome.

In vaccine development, reverse genetics can be used to create viral strains that have reduced that have reduced pathogenicity, but still be able to be robustly recognized by the immune system to lead to the creation of antibodies against the virus. Well, isn't that interesting? Because in nature, the actual publication nature, it says this about the amicron strain when it came out looking at the research. It said, omicron, increase transmissions. disability and decrease pathogenicity. Kind of exactly what you would do for vaccine development. Now, stay with me here for a second.

So now let's look at some basics on mutations. So we're going to bring a chart here. There's a substack that has a very basic chart, and they wrote about this. Substack is under a pseudonym of PMSI. And there's a picture in this substack article about just the basics of viral mutations. So you see all these letters, and you see the original mutation up there. And then you go down to the mutation one line. And you can see that red G is now formed.

It goes from a C in the original virus. And then to the mutation one, it goes to a G. That G tracks all the way down that column. That G is now embedded in that viral genome, never to go back to a C again. And then you look at the mutations down the line. The G, another G turns to a blue A. You have a T turning back to a G, a yellow G.

And so on those columns, once those mutations happen, they're baked in the cake, if you will. They're never going to change back. Now, let's go back to the Japanese researchers and their study. Almost 400 variants of this Amacron variant. This is what they found. They put their own tree together. And it sure looks pretty systematic.

So that's BA1. Now, you notice there's white step ladder there. The white step ladder there are places where the mutation has been removed. But you notice when it steps down to the next step, that mutation that was removed is put back in, and another one is removed, and so on and so forth, down this step process. Well, that's interesting.

So they looked at three variants of Amicron. Now let's look at BA1.1. Let's look at that image. Same conversation, same image. So what they're saying is there's clearly a splice where this is being removed. It doesn't, in the evolution of something, it doesn't grow an arm,

and then the next day suddenly doesn't have that arm anymore. And then you lose, you know, if we thought about this way as you're going down on one group you've lost an arm, then the arm is back, but now you've lost a leg, then the leg is back, now you've lost a foot. And it's perfectly lining up on this graph. And that's supposed to be natural. And they're saying there's no way this is natural, right? Right. And the mutations happen.

There's no uniform way mutations happen. That's really the definition of them. They mutate. It's chaos. something that you can't it's chaos exact you can't predict that so let's look at the facility looked at three versions of this and just to finish that off we have the b a 2 image this is the final variant they looked at obamacron wow same pattern so this is what the researchers then write they say this study aims to point out that sars covito has undergone unthinkable mutations

based on conventional coronavirus mutation mechanisms and we hope that the possibility of artificial creation is included in serious discussions on the formation of SARS-CoV-2 variants. So let's go to that. Let's be really clear that I'm getting this right. There was always this thought that was Amacron created almost to sort of be an antidote to what was happening with Delta. It peers out of nowhere.

There's speculation that this might be coming from a lab. But then even if that happened, or like if you think the original version, then it starts mutating on its own and it runs in its own life. What they seem to be saying here is that we don't, just think the original first Amicron came from a lab. We think every single one of these variations of the 400 is coming from a lab because we're seeing this really strange anomaly where each one's being maneuvered, removing the one little part of it in a very systematic manner. So they're saying

Omicron didn't essentially, if they're right, didn't mutate at all. These are just 400 different lab creations that are being spread all over the world. Is that essentially what this is sort of alluding to it's a big assertion and they're very careful with their wording if you go back and read that article anybody can get this they sign up for a newsletter they'll get it Monday morning this the link to this this research it's a it's a very thick read it's very in-depth but they're very careful with the wording but that seems to be what they're suggesting they're saying it look at least at least given this evidence we need to approach this conversation have this in the debate when we're talking about the origins of this thing so as as I was saying

There's not a lot of coverage on this as of yet. There's a substack written by somebody named PMSI. They covered this study. And they titled there, I mean, they were a little looser with it. They said unnatural evolution, indisputable evidence of deliberate and systemic creation. But they said this. They looked at those step processes that we just looked at, all three of those graphs, if you will, with the missing mutations.

And they wrote this about that. They said perfect reversion of mutations like this on such a scale is completely implausible by any natural process. The variants found by Tanaka and Miyu Zawa, those are the Japanese researchers, can best be described as a panel of reversion mutations. This kind of panel is exactly what a research would create to systemically test the contribution of different elements of a virus to its activity. So they're saying, this is exactly what you would do if you start tinkering with a virus, trying to figure out which one does what in a systemic process. And so the final piece of this study, this study this japanese study has a lot of interesting conversations and evidence in there but when

when something mutates whether it's a cancer virus or a SARS virus in this case there's only two types of mutations it has they're called they're technically called synonymous and non-sononymous so a synonymous mutation is a silent mutation it's functionally silent it's evolutionary neutral it's not going to do anything it's just there it's adding and crewing in the background it's not non-sononymous is what really starts pulling the levers of these things. This is what makes it more pathogenic. This is what makes it more transmissible or less transmissible. It's the stuff that really matters.

So this is what the researchers also wrote. They said, concerning the genetic variation of the spike protein of these variants, most of the mutations were non-sinonymous, meaning they were dealing with some pretty big movers and shakers when it comes to the amino acid sequences. They said there were no synonymous mutations in the alpha, beta, gamma, delta, or mu variants, but only one each in the Lambda and Omicron variants.

So to say that a different way, in nature, viruses have more synonymous or silent mutations. That's because they're working. I try to imagine this again, like in cartoon world, the virus can grow some crazy purple hairs, some yellow hair, and a bunch of things that aren't gonna affect your health at all, because it's just, they're just,

They're just different viruses that are selecting and it's chaos, right? And some, one of those things might be, you know, in the end, non-sononymous, which means this really affects you. Actually, this makes it more infectious. But it developed a whole lot of other things that didn't matter. And what they're saying is those all a lot of other things aren't happening at all. This thing isn't mutating in any other place except exactly where it's precisely affecting the human experience with it. Right.

That's what they're saying. Serious changes was all that happened to this. No accidental. none that didn't make it more powerful in some important way, which is just, again, it's like someone's thinking about it and working with it specifically. Right, and so playing with this idea, playing with this idea that they're suggesting

that there may be a possibility of this thing being synthesized by man's hand. Wouldn't that be what a lab team would do or a scientist would do? Let's not deal with these synonymous mutations because they don't concern me, because they're not going to do. they're not going to do anything in the end. I want to deal with prime movers, the non-sononymous mutations that are going to actually have changes of this virus that I want to see changed.

We don't know, but this is a big, big study to move this ball forward. And, you know, along with all the departments, the CIA, the FBI, Department of Energy, moving forward and saying there is a probability now, possibility now that this thing was created in a lab, this adds a big, big component to the scientific conversation, which has been slow, obviously, in the public space, because it's very technical, but this is a big conversation now. We're getting to the root of something, I think. Let me ask you a question. Is this still a preprint? Is this, is this been published yet? This is still a preprint, yes. Okay, so for our audience that's watching this right now, we are breaking you science that is still being peer reviewed right now. There may be

peer review that happens. Scientists come in and say, we don't think this study was done. done properly. In fact, I'm sure the CIA and everybody else is going to come in and try and knock this down because it puts a giant fingerprint on what's happening here. And so to be clear, don't go running out and say, oh my God, the high wire just proved that all the variants of Omicron were manmade. What we're saying is there's a study right now that is showing that and I think more studies have to happen. But one of the reasons we decide to report something is, as we've told you before here on the high wire, we're tracking the whole story. We're tracking what science is being done, what it knows for sure, what it doesn't, as we try to figure out what is going on here.

And one of the things I think, and it just occurred to me, Jeffrey, because we've been working on this all week, one of the conversations that we have and we're looking into is the investment in super infectious vaccines, the idea that they want to make vaccines that you only have to give the people that want it, but it infects all the people that don't want it. And we also are looking into the aerosolization of vaccines, which is being invested into. And one of the questions that comes up from me here is, wait a minute, if they're finding all of these lab-created versions of Omicron, which did somehow seem to overcome Delta and sort of slow the spread of Delta, is it possible?

We have already all been in contact with maybe the first purposely released virus or fake virus or vaccine of some sort. All of this again, speculative. But we're gonna keep bringing you the science, folks. But I wanna make sure that you just sort of put this on your shelf right now the way we are and say super interesting. More science needs to be done.

But we wanna make sure you heard it here first that there are real scientists looking into this now. And that would be very shocking to find out that Omicron never actually naturally evolved, that all of them were laboratory creations. Super fascinating, really, really interesting. Yeah, this is just the start of this conversation. And, you know, it's in the public space, and that's what we're reporting on.

All right. Jeffrey, great reporting. It's amazing. Some of the stuff you dig up around the world. It's really great. All right. I'll see you next week. Okay. Well, look, again, what is the high wire doing?

We are a port of a real investigation. Remember, when we do this work, I will tell you one thing for sure. Pfizer is not funding the high wire to do this investigation. Certainly not the CDC. or the NIH or, you know, Pfizer, Moderna. We're never going to get the shot of the day from Moderna. We have government agencies that literally censored us on purpose, try to get our YouTube or did get our YouTube shut down,

our Facebook, things like that. And so while all of this is going on, we're the only source that is running investigations as we're finding them. We are keeping you up to date. No one else, I swear to God, look all week long and see if anyone else is going to tell you that this investigation is going on

Beyond just was the original strain coming from a lab? Well, how about Omicron? And what if we found out that every variant is coming from a lab? What does that mean about the world you are living in? You are watching them take away your guns based on health. You're watching the CIA was paying people off and, you know, that were wanted to say that it looks like this came from a lab. We have corruption everywhere we're looking and there is only one network

that has honestly been calling this out from the beginning. And we'll tell you if it ends up proving out that the variance were somehow naturally happening. We'll show you that science too. But no one is putting you in a front row seat to the biggest game being played in the world right now. We're doing it. And the only way we can is with your support because we're not getting help from anybody else. So if this is the type of news you want, if you want to know the next time of pandemic's happening and you want to be able to tell your friends, hey, you better come watch the highwire

because they're the only ones that got it all right during the original pandemic. They were the ones that told me to not get the vaccine because they'd never been tested. It wasn't going to stop transmission. And they were right. Do you realize how many lives we're saving? Do you realize what's happening here? You make that possible when you become a recurring donor. So if you haven't done it already, I believe this is the most important program in the world today

and the work that we're doing, the lawsuits we're bringing to get to the truth. Hit donate at the top of your page. Go to ICAN or the high wire. hit our donate button and then just type in your information. We're looking for you to be recurring donors so we know what we can investigate, what we can sue, what we can do, $23 a month for $203 would be awesome, but so at a dollar if that's all that you can afford. Or maybe you don't want to get that Starbucks coffee this week.

You know, once a month I'm going to just cut back on the caffeine, and I'm going to throw that $6 a month to the high wire because they're actually making a difference in the world. We make it easy for you. just text a 72022, type in the word donate, and you'll get an immediate text, and you just click on it, and it makes it that easy so that you can start helping us do this incredible work. There is a lot we need to figure out because everything, and my upcoming guests, I'm sure, will say the same thing.

We are under siege. The WHO is going to try and overcome your constitution. Forget about the governor in New Mexico. We have gigantic, world-dominating power structures that are writing and signing contracts with every country in the world to overcome our Constitution, to make sure they just override it for all 50 states. The next time there's a what? A health emergency. Who's going to be there when that happens, telling you the truth? I only know of one network that got it right the whole time, the high wires.

So please help us out. Well, my next guest, you know, I think of people that are brave. And look at who we've had on today. We've been talking to Djokovic. We got to talk to John Rich, who stood up against the system in his music world. But can you imagine being a politician in the middle of all this, trying to tell the truth when everyone else around you seems bought out. You're on television.

All the big baddies that you know from world economic form and the WHO are watching you. I'm sure they know where you live. Can you imagine speaking your truth in there and sounding this freaking amazing? Christine Anderson is a German politician. Ms. Christian Anderson, a member of the European Parliament from Germany. Christine Anderson, representing the alternative for Germany party. Whenever a government claims to have the people's interest at heart,

you need to think again. There has never been a political elite, sincerely concerned about the well-being of regular people. What makes any of us think that it is different now? It is very clear what they have in store for us, and it is, in fact, to establish erect a totalitarian regime. An unelected body like WHO, who is controlled and run by multibillionaires should never be allowed to act in place.

of a democratically elected government. Never, ever. How are you going to go against WHO? They're funded by the richest of the super rich people in the world. They don't care. They have all the money, and they don't care about fundamental rights or democracy. A prime minister who openly admires

the Chinese basic dictatorship who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his, own citizens as terrorists just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy should not be allowed to speak in this house at all mr. Trudeau you are a disgrace for any democracy please spare us your presence this vaccine campaign it will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history and moreover it will be known as the biggest

crime ever committed on humanity. I dare the European Commission and the German government. Throw me in jail, lock me up and throw away the key for all I care. But you will never be able to curse me into being vaccinated if I, the free citizen that I am, choose not to be vaccinated. You cannot comply your way out of a tyranny. It is impossible. Trying to do so, you will only feed a gigantic alligator in the hopes of being eaten last. I am determined to leave my children a free and democratic society.

And this I will fight for tooth and nail. End your silence. Speak up. For God's sake, stop complying. rebelling. They're out to get you if you do not resist. No one grants me freedom, for I am a free person. Well, it's my absolute honor to be joined now by Christine Anderson. Christine, you are a rock star. We love you. We've been fans all the way through COVID. Thank you for joining us today. Thank you for having me. And that was a very nice kind of. compilation. Thank you. Well, you've said a lot of brilliant things, and it has seemed that you're all on your own. We sort of mine all of the governments of the world throughout COVID to see who really seemed to recognize the lies that were taking place. And from my vantage point,

you're outnumbered out there. Is that wrong? Are you getting a lot of support from your other parliament leaders, or is it a lonely world out? there telling the truth well I am getting support obviously but on the other hand it is a lone world I mean when you look at it we started out it was four four parliamentarians and we said enough already and we are going to speak out and it was like an association between any peace you know it was across various groups so and we started out with four people. And we are now up to about 12 who are willing to show their camera.

There is a couple more in the background that cannot really afford to go forward and, you know, be publicly known as dissenters. But when you look at EU Parliament, if things go really, really well in plenary for us, for our side, the most we can hope for. is 150 votes and that's it things really go well but there is 705 sitting members so just to put a perspective on we are outnumbered and i always say you know our my hope or our hope lies with the people because we represent the people we really serve the people and we act in the best interest of the people so once again I have to thank each and every one that took to the street and yeah simply started saying no to all this madness because that's the support

that we need and that's the strength you know that or the strengths we we kind of got that kept us going so thank you to all the people that actually did they know Let me ask a question for, I mean, a large part of our audiences in the United States. I don't think, I think many of us don't fully understand the parliamentary system. You're from Germany. How does it work? I mean, do the people of Germany elect you? How many go over from Germany and represent in this European Parliament?

Just give me a sort of a quick rundown of how this system works out there. Well, how does it work? That's just the point. It doesn't. Especially EU Parliament or the whole EU institutions and all of that. It is a democracy illusion. So, you know, just starting with Parliament. It is actually an insult to every democratically elected parliament that the EU Parliament is called

a Parliament. We are not Parliament. We lack certain, you know, competencies that every Parliament has. So we cannot initiate legislation for one. So what we do in Parliament is actually vote on resolutions, which is like, you know, writing a letter to EU Commission. You know, it would be nice if you could do this, that, or the other. But I mean, if they don't, then they don't.

So we have nothing to decide. That's the point. We don't have control of a budget, which is good, because if EU Parliament had control, over budget that would mean the national parliaments who are in fact democratically elected would have to surrender their control over budget. So this is like, like I said, it's a democracy illusion. And I would like to say the whole EU construct, it's not only undemocratic, it's downright anti-democratic. But it's part of the scheme.

And but it seems to be wielding at least a large conversation. And one of the issues that you're really getting into is W.H.O. In many ways, yes, these things have no power, but these sort of, you know, kangaroo, you know, parliaments and these, these NGOs that used to just be, oh, I guess you're working with sick kids in Africa, that's okay. but these things that seem to just be theater are are tending to have more and more sway in the world, are they not? They absolutely do.

And, you know, it's not just NGOs, you know, and as you rightly said, at some point, they had some legitimacy, you know. They were helping, you know, kids in Africa. Well, you know, by all means, go and do it, you know. We would support and fund me. know we would support and fund you whatever but they were taking over the world they're running the world but it's it's not just that it's think tax you know

just looking at there's one organization it's called the roundtable of industrialists so it's like the 50 representatives of the 50 largest global corporations they're part of that roundtable of industrialists and they were literally dictating legislation to the governments, you know. And then it's being sold as something brilliant that the government came up with to, you know, relieve the burdens on the people. Yeah, right. Seriously, our democracies, especially in the Western democracies, they have become a scam at this point.

And if people knew how the democratic process is actually worked in the parliaments, I guarantee you, they would get out, you know, whatever weapons they have and they would run them out of town, seriously. Wow. So one of the things you are doing, though, in the European Parliament that I love is you are bringing expert witnesses. You did throughout COVID to discuss some of the problems with the vaccine, problems with how it's finance, questions, some of the most important questions I think have come up. I think about, I think is it Robert Ruse was his name who asked the question of Janine Smalley from Pfizer. Did you test to see if the vaccine could stop transmission before it was released to the public? I mean,

because you're bringing people like that in, demanding that the heads of Pfizer come in, you are at least using that position to, I think, get, I don't, is it? Is it a lot? Is it it sworn testimony that they're giving, but you're getting testimony on cameras. Do they swear in to be there? No, unfortunately not. So this committee, what you're talking about, there was a special committee. Okay. And it was not an investigative committee. And we pushed really hard to get an investigative committee because then we would have actually been able to compel people to show up in front of our committee so that the jean small that the CEO representative she was sent instead of uh albert burla the CEO of Pfizer right we actually wanted that committee but he declined he just said well you know

don't feel like it or whatever um we we invited Ursula von der Leyen who uh negotiated these despicable deals yeah uh with the with a pharmaceutical companies via short text messages and she refused us to disclose these messages, but we actually had no power. But this committee actually, when it was set up, I was kind of surprised that they did set it up. And the title of the committee was lessons learned from COVID. And I was like, what? They really want to like, you know, get into things and, you know, start investigating. No, no, they didn't want to do that. What they wanted, they didn't want to look at, was this vaccine, in fact, safe and effective?

Were there fundamental rights abused? You know, did we harass people, stigmatized people, did we ostracized people? That's not what they wanted to look at. What they wanted to look at was, where did we fail to get the people, to do what we wanted them to do. Oh my God. That's what the... And that's what the entire committee pretty much was set out to do.

Now in this committee, we, because, you know, behind the scenes, we were pushing as hard as we could to get as many people from our side into this committee, which actually succeeded. So despite everything we uncovered in this committee, despite all the lies we accomplished, we accomplished, we exposed in this committee. When it came down to it, we were still in the minority and this report that came out of this committee, it's not the paper word that it's written on. I mean, they repeat every single freaking lie. Every single. So, but what we did do, yeah, we kind of exposed it.

people know about it. And yeah, we do use the possibilities we have by calling these events, you know, organizing these events, bringing in all kinds of people. But the EU is quick to the nouns, you know, this is not an official EU kind of thing, whatever, you know, it's like the small French minority. They're doing their thing.

But the thing is this, in the beginning they were laughing at us. They were not taking us seriously at all, you know. But ever since we held the International COVID Summit 3 in Brussels, and I mean, we're renowned scientists there, they are starting to take us seriously. And we noticed that, I mean, when you have people stepping off the elevator, just because I step on the elevator, you know, you know what's going on.

Yeah, I know. There's some good. It's fantastic. And look, you have the same advantage. We have. We got censored. We were kicked off of social media channels. But now I can at least every time New York Times or Washington Post wants to ask me a question about misinformation that says, you're the one that's suffering from misinformation.

I'm the one that God's right in the world now knows it. The vaccine couldn't stop transmission. And you reported that. You keep having these hearings, though, and bringing in great scientists. And I want you to know for what it's worth. people like us and you know organizations like ours in the high wire and our non-profit are usually the material that you are bringing up so i want you to keep up that great work in fact yesterday you had a really brilliant panel of scientists and specialists this was the health of democracy

under the w hos new proposed rules um everybody take a look at this this just went down yesterday Please join me and my colleagues in welcoming the experts who took the time, who put in all of the effort, and thanking them for their commitment, their courage and their determination to uphold freedom, democracy and the rule of law. We are here today because we are all concerned by the World Health Organization's strong pressure, to extend its powers, its structural and its financial capacities with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries and over the self-determination of the people. WHO did an awful job in managing the COVID crisis with a number of severely detrimental non-evidence-based recommendations leading to losses in physical physical and psychological health, loss of lives of many human beings in Europe and throughout the world.

Why should we bestow more power and responsibilities to this organization? Over the past years, unelected global entities such as the WHO, but also our governmental structures and their experts, pushed the narrative that one method, one treatment fits all. They told us what injections we need to use, ignoring safe and effective repurposed drugs. The European Union digital COVID certificate was and is absolutely lacking in scientific evidence and a clear instrument of discrimination and a clear instrument for pushing the citizen to the so-called vaccination with experimental genetic engineering-based substances. The WHO is standing behind these vaccines.

They are far more of a problem than a help to the European Union. And it's my belief that the European Union, the United States, and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO and leave the WHO to its own endeavors. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer. layer that somehow another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit. Well, I'm going to tell you, since its formation in the 1940s, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent.

The new WHO rules establish a regime that creates a virtually insurmountable tension with the constitutional and international legal obligations of its member states, and thus threatens to undermine the principles of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The pandemic treaty and the amendments to the international health regulations that have been discussed here are just one huge step forward at the level of the use of propaganda to convince the population, to accept the replacement of a democratic system, by a technocratic system. The power will not be anymore in the hands of the people.

And therefore, these negotiations have to be stopped immediately. Everyone is committed to one goal and one goal only. And that is to serve the people and to fight for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. Really powerful. How important is this WHO treaty, this set of rules that governments around the world appear to be poised to sign onto? I mean, it appears from my perspective and as obviously some of the specialists there, that this is a goal to create, as you well put, you know, a government outside of all governments that overrides our own constitutions and our rights to citizens in the countries and override the political leaders. and override the political leaders that we have voted into place to govern us.

Yeah, well, that's, you know, like the scheme that is going on right now, especially with WHO. So when I spoke about COVID committee and the lesson they wanted to learn was, you know, where did we fail to get people to do what they needed to do or they needed them to do, is, well, WHO seems to be the key. Because the problem is that the elected governments, especially in the Western democracies,

they eventually will be up for re-election. And if they infringe on fundamental rights, if they harass people, stigmatize people, ostracize people, harass people, you know, and coerce people into things they don't want to do, they may not be elected again. And that's a real problem. So if the elected governments and the democracies can say, well, you know, have been up to you, we would have never done that to you. But it's the WHO that's saying that now. So we have nothing, you know, no repercussion. And this is the thing that also holds true for the whole EU institutions.

In the national, in the national member states, every party, that is along those lines, will tell their people, well, we would not have post that on you. We would not have passed that legislation, but it came from EU and there's nothing we can do about. So it's kind of like, you know, blaming the other guy. On top of that, it's removing democratic processes

further and further away from the people because the political accountability, which is like, you know, the key to a democracy, see, you know, in of itself. And they no longer want this. They no longer want the people to know who is actually responsible for decisions. And even if the people knew who was responsible for it, and they should not have any repercussions. And this is the game they are playing.

So at WHO, I mean, it's just one aspect. It's just one single aspect of it. There is so many others. You know, talk about climate change. Talk about this whole transgender madness. I could go on and on and on. And the people need to understand and they need to see. I mean, this is the fragmentation.

You know, look at this issue, this issue, this issue. They need to connect the dots. Because take all of these programs, whatever the governments are pushing right now, take it up to the next level, and see how is it possible that this issue and this issue can be used to abolish freedom, democracy, and the rule of law? And there you go. Every single thing they're pushing right now, every single agenda they're pushing right now, it's all about stripping the people of their rights, taken away freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. And, you know, literally,

taking whatever tax money they can to impoverish and ultimately enslave all the peoples around the world. This is how big all of this is. It's a very interesting point you make that I hadn't really considered, which is what you're saying is you are seeing a lot of leaders that wanted to sort of defer their responsibility to other organizations. They would prefer to be in a position that says, hey, just tell me what to do and I'll do it. And then I don't have to be responsible. I can just say I was told to do it. And it really is what I feel like in the world.

And maybe you're explaining some things from me because it looks like leaders in the United States of America. I think our president, I've said it before. I don't feel like our government is any longer the decisions in our laws are not being written inside of our own borders. It feels like it's coming from outside. and I'm thinking who would want the job of president and then defer all of the power of that position to be leader of the free world and we have someone that's clearly not the person

that's running this. It's obviously, I think it's obvious to everyone right now just based on the health status of our president that there is something else that is making decisions for our country. But it really had occurred to me that that is what's happening in power structures all over that real leaders, real thinkers like yourself, have a very hard time rising up to the political

systems. It's those that will do what they're told. And then when they get to that final leadership position, of course they're going to defer that power because that's how they got there. They never got there as leaders. They never got there for being critical thinkers and standing on their own against, you know, wrongdoing. They got there because they just tow the line and they want any amount of tugboats to yank on them as they can get. Right. You're absolutely right about that. But, you know, like I said, you know, the problem for, I call them, the globalitarian misanthropists, you know, for lack of a better word, but I think that's very fitting.

They are actually running the world. And, you know, for the most part, the democratically elected leaders, whether it's, you know the german government or you know orsula funderline the EU commission president or even you know take your your joe biden or you know justin trudeau that sorry excuse for a prime minister you know they are all puppets yeah they are not running the shell they are not they are puppets. They're just, you know, repeating whatever lies, whatever lines they are, they've been given, you know, from whoever. But it's these globalitarian misanthropists. And from their perspective, democracy, oh my God, that's so, it's such a nuisance to them, you know,

you have to ask the people, seriously, but the people don't want what they want. Because, you know, let's say they want to eat steak, but they aren't allowed to eat steak. But they're anymore because, you know, it's obviously killing the planet. So, but the global or misanthropist, they still want a steak, you know? So they come up with this, yeah, eat bucks, you know, whatever. So there is like this, all of these layers are going on. But it's seriously, there is a few people actually pulling the strings behind the scenes. And it's not Klaus Schwab either, by the way. I mean, he is the idiot. putting his face in the camera and just, you know,

repeating whatever agenda they came up with and, you know, advocating that. No, it's really about, we will actually look at a world that we no longer recognize. And especially in the Western democracies. And why do I always stress the Western democracies? Well, very simple. I don't expect freedom democracy in the rules,

of law in, let's say China. No, I don't. You know, that's a totalitarian regime. I don't expect democracy there. I don't expect in North Korea. And I do not expect it in Russia either, to be quite frank. Yeah. So this is happening. What we're seeing is happening in every single Western democracy. But what they can't do to abolish them. They can't, you know, show and say we don't want to vote anymore and you know we need to get rid of democracy but because the people don't want what the globalitarian misanthroat was so um this is not working uh so what they do instead is gas light uh you know uh framing something it's about your health it's about we need to break this new wave you know of uh COVID what's coming but like I said before

it was never about breaking any waves. It was always about breaking people. That's what it was about. So they want to cut down on the fundamental rights because people having the right to take the streets and assemble freely. No, you can't have that. Because then someone may notice

that the emperor actually is naked. Right. If people say he's naked, right. So they need to cut down on all of that. of that then you have to fight against you know disinformation a hate speech this is all this is a censorship and these are the very signs of totalitarian regimes that's what it is all about well i mean in you they cannot come out you know so they need to gaslight people into thinking we are the good guys you know we are trying to protect all of your health whatever it is we

want to save the planet and don't you want to save the planet? No one is going to say I don't want to save the planet, but the measures they're imposing will not save the planet. All it will do is to abolish freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, and it will impoverish and enslave people. That's the end goal. When I, you know, when we look at this issue, When you talk about authoritarian governments, obviously you're from Germany.

I did some time, I was when I was in musical theater years ago, I toured all over Germany and the Broadway touring company of Hare, the musical. And everywhere I would go, the youth in Germany would say to me, I'm sorry for Nazi Germany. It seemed really weird to me to be apologizing for something that clearly this generation had, to me, had nothing to do with. But there is a sensitivity there. And so when you look at Germany and honestly, some of the best data that we're seeing in all-cause mortality, we saw it first in Germany. You were the first ones to have some lawsuits and some insurance data that came forward and shows that your all-cause mortality is up through the roof since the vaccine.

We're seeing things coming out of Germany that the insurance companies are paying for vaccine injury at numbers that they're not happy with. So there's a lot being revealed there. But when we look at Germany now as a democracy, is there an added, you know, sensitivity for you of this idea of authoritarian regimes? Because you seem so passionate about it. And I would think rightfully so, and it's amazing to see Germany in the middle of it. And then on the other hand, to watch Israel put their entire, you know, to watch Netanyahu, basically hand his entire nation over to a Pfizer deal. And then the history of that, it's like these old guards are coming back up now. And we're having to face our demons, I feel like, as a species.

Yeah. Well, I will have to say, unfortunately, you are not right. I would have thought, and I really wish, that it would have been Germany out of all countries, you know, to recognize what is about to happen here, to establish yet another totalitarian kind of group thing, kind of thing, right? But the majority of Germans actually did not recognize it. So, and that is really frustrating.

And sadly, I have to say, the ones that scream loudest, never again, And the ones that are determined to fight the beginnings, they wouldn't recognize the beginnings if they jumped up and bit them in their freaking faces. The ones that are so determined and they're convinced that would have fought fascism back then in the 30s. Right.

You know, they would not recognize fascism if it literally jumped up and bit them in their faces. So if you want to talk about fight beginnings. That actually means you need to have an understanding of how it began back then. Because the Nazis did not start out by rounding up people and transporting them off to pens. It started way before that. It was little steps, one step at a time. So in the beginning, you know, the Jewish people weren't allowed to sit on benches anymore. Well, you know, what's the big deal with the, you know, like the rationalization of it?

They can sit on another bench. And the next step, they weren't allowed to own pets anymore. Well, you don't need a pet to be happy in life, right? So next step was, well, no, you cannot even marry a Jew anymore. So it went on and on and on. And the really scary part about this is the Nazis were elected in 33. That's when they came to power. It took them five years up until the point when they were actually capable of passing legislation to openly discriminate against Jewish people and ostracize them, you know, deprive them of their rights or whatever.

It took them five years. How long did it take them this time? Not even one year. And the majority was all for it. They were literally begging the government for more restrictions and for bashing down harder on the ones that would not comply. One year. This is scary.

This is really scary. It absolutely is. My last question to you because you know, you're one of these people, you're, you know, you're walking around other politicians from other countries. Are they going to, do you feel? feel like there's another lockdown in our near future? Do you think, I mean, they seem to, this seemed to be more about just a vaccine or a virus. This, as I agree with you, was about how much control can we assert on humanity right now. Do you feel like that they want to do this more, that

we should be expecting another attempt, whether this winter or somewhere in the near future, a crisis where they lock us down again in our houses around the world? Yeah, well, not only that. Okay, so number one is yes, this whole covert thing seems to be starting again. There's already talk about, you know, masking up again, like in Israel. There are certain places that already imposed mask mandates. There is, from what I know, universities in the United States, they already, you know, reintroduced the mask mandates.

It is, yeah, and there is like this new MRI shot for a vaccine, this the Marnay shot for this new variant, whatever. Yes, it is coming again. They will try again. And what I said yesterday in the conference that we heard about earlier, I promise the people that, me and my colleagues, we will never stop standing up for the people.

We will never stop being on their side. We will continue our fight. But I asked them, or you know kind of said but we we need a promise from you too and the promise is you need to say no so if they want you to mask up say no if they want you to take i don't know the 18th or 19th booster or whatever say no don't do it if they impose a curfew on you once again simply say no Because that's the support we need at this point, you know, people saying no and not going along with this anymore, not supporting this anymore. So the second issue is this whole COVID thing is just one aspect.

Take the climate change, you know, we're all going to die. Seriously, this time for real, you know, kind of, at least that's what your TV is telling you. So they're already talking about climate lockdowns. There's counties in Great Britain that already passed legislation that would enable them to impose climate lockdowns, meaning if you know whatever number exceeds whatever thresholds, they can lock you down and then you will stay in your assigned area, which leads us up. to these despicable 15-minute ghettos. That's just the preparation for future climate lockdowns.

And I swear to God, it's true. Because what they realized during COVID is when they imposed these curfews, and in Germany it was like you were not allowed to leave your house with, you know, for more than 15 kilometers. Well, why did they have to allow you at least this 15 kilometers? kilometers radio radius well because the infrastructure wasn't set up and they will do that within 15 minute get-outs you will have everything you need for your daily need within a 15-minute walking distance and if you think that the next lockdown you know you will be allowed to

move 15 kilometers around your house now you won't Don't even count on that. It will lock you down seriously. Well, Christine, it's really great to know that you're out there. I'm glad that your numbers are growing, 12, and then hopefully on a good day, 150 that might have the guts to vote. You are clearly driven, inspired, you're inspiring. And I want you to know that, you know,

we have millions of people watching you from the high wire here. Keep up the good work. Don't lose hope. It's people like you are the only chance we have. Thank you so much. And I can guarantee you I will never lose hope. The day I lose hope is the day that I die. All right. Well, we will pray for your safety so that that day is a long way off.

Christine, keep up the great work. We love you. Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. Wow. Well, I mean, look, it's amazing, isn't it, when you can talk to someone on the other side of the earth, really, and it feels like it's happening right next door.

We're all having the same experience, and that should set off some red flags for you. Why is it that all the same exact issues we're having here in the United States of America are the same exact issues that are happening in Germany and Europe? It doesn't happen naturally like that, right? Where is the evolution of that virus? It's supposed to take time for we all have different issues and then suddenly they, you know, spread. out across other borders, whether it's transgender or banking issues. They're all just happening at once as though their lab created, as though someone is manufacturing these things and dumping them on us in a very artificial way.

So these are the types of things we can continue to discuss here on the Highwire. And one of the things that we did is we've started the Freedom Files. This is some interviews that we did while we're at Freedom Fest. For those of you that have been checking out for the last few weeks, every Monday, we're dropping two new interviews. This week we have the founder of Education Choice. That's Robert Enloe. And we have David Sinclair,

who had some pretty shocking thoughts about your cell phone. This is just a taste of what next week has to offer. Governments and law enforcement have been in bed with the telecommunications operators for decades. Verizon AT&T mobile are obligated by law to collect a record of every single phone call you make and receive and every single text message you send and receive.

The operators are collecting your location 24 by 7. They're collecting all your internet activity, all your app usage, financial transactions, pretty much anything you're doing on your mobile phone, and often things you're doing in the real world. They're using your mobile phone to collect that and maintain that data, and they have that data. When I came back to the US in 2019, I was shocked to discover that I'm surveilled more in the US than I ever was when I was living abroad. Really? And I said, you know what? There's got to be a simple solution to this. Files dropping this Monday, you'll know when all the types of things we do out there, all the extracurricular work we're doing, is happening. If you're signed on to our newsletter, all you have to do to find that is just

scroll down the page on the high wire and sign up, just give us your email and we will give you all the up-to-date videos that are being released along with basically a transcript, if you will, of all of the science and studies and videos that are presented every on our show on Thursday, on Monday, you receive the exact links for being a part of our newsletter. All you have to do is give us to your email. It doesn't cost anything that's funded on the show on Thursday. On Monday, you receive the exact links for being a part of our newsletter. All you have to do is give us to your email. It doesn't cost anything that's funded on the backs of those that do donate to us to make that possible for all of you. Speaking of the work that we do, many of you know that we have a very robust legal team. I think, in fact, probably the most powerful legal entity to ever work for a

nonprofit in the health space. We've had won more lawsuits against government agencies than any other nonprofit in the health freedom space. We've won against. the CDC, Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and many others. And you watched recently as we won back the religious exemption from Mississippi. It was lost since 19, was it 78, 79, so for a very long time. But there has been work that we've been doing outside of that legal work, right? We have the media we do, the legal work, and many of you have watched as I go and speak to politicians. and on occasion we touch into some legislation.

Well, we don't want to dabble anymore. We've decided to dive straight into that, and so we're building a new entity. At least a new entity is being built under the ICAN name, and that is ICANN legislate. We're going to get directly involved with legislation. We have been involved, but now it's for real. And to join me right now to talk about is Aaron Siri,

the lawyer for ICANN, who has been, doing a lot of this work and legislation working with politicians all across this country, but now you're taking it to another level. Tell me about it. Oh, sure. Hi, Del. You know, ICAN has formalized the legislative work it's doing under ICANN, which is a C4 versus the current ICAN, which is a C3, hence the legal or have you, And, you know, an ICAN legislate has asked us in the same manner that we do legal work for ICAN when it comes to advocating, you know, acting as a watchdog, changing cultural cognition, and actually bringing suit to that safeguard or expand people's rights in the space. So those three things. It's asked us to do a fourth thing, a fourth leg to the chair, basically, which is also engage in legal work around legislative efforts.

of model bills, model constitutional amendments, advocacy work, and so forth. It makes a lot of sense, I mean, because obviously the legal work that you're doing has opened up a treasure trove of understanding around health freedom. And these things are so intertwined, right? Many of the things that we're looking at is, is a law just? Is it just? Is legislation, you know, justly applied? And it feels like in many ways in the legal space, you're sort of after the fact, right?

you're trying to beat back what's already happened or to stop something that's in action. You know, it would be really great if, you know, in legislation, you could get in there beforehand, plant some seeds that actually grow into trees to protect us instead of just playing defense all the time. So I'm really psyched you're doing that work. So just tell me about just very quickly the different sort of, you know, buckets, if you will, that I can legislate is looking at. Oh, absolutely. So, you know, over the years in terms of the,

the work you've been doing for ICANN, not ICANN, legislate, hasn't gone unnoticed, whether it's the lawsuits on behalf of the members of the military, whether it's states, going after states for not having an exemption or for having mandates that shouldn't have, or whether it's going up to federal mandates. It's caught the attention of lots of legislative representatives on the federal and state level, and they contact our firm for various things related to vaccines because of that work. And so ICANN legislates, in some ways, an outgrowth of that. is to be able to take all those relationships, all of that work, and centralize it, and make it far more effective. And so in that regard, ICANN legislate has broken itself down, as I understand, it's basically three to four categories, I guess you can look at it, of buckets.

So the first one is model bills. And on the ICANN legislate website, there's a number of model bills that are intended to protect. the rights of people to make their own medical decisions. I believe, and for example, one of the bills relates to saying that, look, if you're gonna mandate anything, then you shouldn't be able to mandate anything that doesn't at least meet certain minimal safety requirements. For example, you can sue the manufacturer for harm.

Right. Or the clinical trial relied upon to license it at a placebo control, things like that. Or another bill that would, make it a company liable if anybody in that state was received a vaccine that was intended to be self-spreading to help limit the ability to do that or other bills that require all the legislative reps to get the shots before they can mandate it a whole host of bills including bills just straight prevent mandating any medical product where you can't sue the manufacturer for injuries

so that's one category are various model bills you can actually see there's a map on each of those bills and you could see where they've been already proposed and where folks are working on getting them proposed. Right. The section category is a constitutional amendment. And so there is one constitutional amendment that I can legislate has decided to focus on. And the text for it's right there on the screen. No law.

Let me read that. No law may require or coerce a person to receive or use a medical product or impose a penalty or deprive a benefit from refusing a medical product or refusing to disclose. whether a person has received a medical product. It's a constitutional amendment. Okay. And it's intended, and it's really focused on state constitutions, because in the state level,

you can amend constitutions in many states based on referendums, based on popular initiatives, bypassing the legislative representatives. And so there's going to be a concerted effort, and there already is in some states to try and get that into the state constitutioners, Once you do, you know, then you're right. Then we don't need to start, we don't need to bring lawsuits all the time.

It is constitutionally protected and the legislature can't pass laws. They're infringing on people's individual and civil rights. The third category on the ICANN legislate website involves advocacy updates. And that's just updating, you know, the various work that ICANN is doing in the advocacy space, including, for example, you know, when we testify, Dell, you testify legislative houses, regarding this issue. You know, I just testified yesterday. Jeffrey Jackson just did a couple weeks ago.

You know, and so I think this will be a place to be able to gather those testimonies and put them there as well as, you know, we're sending letters out to legislative representatives in some instances to every single legislative representative in the entire state saying, hey, your bill is either unconstitutional or is wrong for various reasons. And in the past, we've done that, half of ICAN legislate, and said, look, if you pass this, we're going to sue you. So, and you'll be able to now actually, you know, we've been sending those letters, but now there'll be a place to actually put those letters somewhere so that everybody can read them and use them in those states. Great. Oh, and then finally, there is this incredible initiative.

you know and it's a natural outgrowth outcropping of everything that i can does it's called the medical liberty pledge and you know it's the it's on the i cam legislate website you can click the medical liberty pledge button and it takes you to the medically liberty pledge website and um yeah and on this website you can see there's almost 300 members of state and and the federal level and some local level that have signed the medical liberty pledge. And what is that pledge? If you, you know, on the page there, you could pull it up. It says, I'll read it to you.

It says that every single one of those 300 elected representatives, they have signed a pledge that says, I hereby pledge that as an elected official, I will oppose any government action and repeal veto any law that will coerce or require any American to acquiesce to a medical, product or procedure. Fantastic.

So that's something that people can get on. They can find that pledge. They can go and talk to the representatives, I imagine, and say, look, if you want me to vote for you, I want you to sign this pledge. And as you said, over three, I think it just posted yesterday or today, right? They've been working for some, it takes some time to get 300 signatures. But this is how change is made. This is people, you know, boots on the ground going.

And I think what's great about this is it gives you sort of a reason to go in the door of your senator or assembly member, right? It gives you a reason to be there. A lot of times it's like, what am I doing here? What am I asking for? This is really simple. Then from there, there'll be a natural conversation about, you know, what brings you to this conversation and you can talk about the things that matter to you. But I love this because this is basically, you know, giving these leaders of ours. Like this is how I need you to promise that you're going to work in the world in the future and COVID gives I think got such a great context

To this conversation because I mean really a lot of politicians now You know have an allergy to ever going through something like that again again just the way we do So I think it's a great time to be rolling with a pledge like this and I know you guys are Working hard to get out there and get as many signatures as possible Yeah, I mean it's again like I said it's a natural outgrowth of everything that we do for before I can. I'll add this too. Sometimes when politicians,

they're scared to stick their neck out on this issue because there's a lot of form of money, there's a lot of other special interests that don't want parents to have their right to choose, you know, what medical procedures, for example, they get or their children get or they get. And what this does is it lets those politicians be able to ban together.

You know, in some of the states, there's almost 40 state elected officials that have signed the pledge. You know, you could, try to pick off one or two, you're not picking off 30% of your legislative house that easily. And it lets them lock arms on this super important issue. As you know, Bdellell, as I say often, you know, the right to choose what medical procedures you get is a fundamental right because if there's a medical procedure you don't want, even

if you love every mandated medicine today, if the day comes where there's a mandated medical procedure you don't like, you don't want, and you can't get a job, you can't go to school, you can't participate in civil society without getting it, then you no longer have rights in that, in an instant. So it is a fundamental critical right. And I'm hearten that so many legislative representatives around the country have signed this pledge. And I've done so without frankly, almost any publicity around this pledge. This has all been done by word of mouth. And this actually might be the first time that the medical liberty pledge has been, really, there's been any public announcement about it. So hoping those numbers well.

All right, Aaron, you do such fantastic work for us. You're a superhero. I've said it before. I think you're going down in history as one of the great constitutional attorneys of all times. Really awesome that you're helping on the legislative front. You know, really, I think in many ways it's less that you're helping. You've been doing that. I know who you've been talking to.

I know what effect I'm seeing when I'm seeing some of the language in coming in these congressional hearings. I was like, that voice sounds familiar. But now people are going to be able to track it with this brand new. website I can legislate.org and I think it links through also from our I can decide and and all of our you know we'll interlink all of our websites but this is this is really an exciting day because it's something that we talked about for a long time and now because you know all of the energies that are surrounding these conversations are making this possible so I appreciate Aaron all the work that

you do thank you all right thanks for joining us. I'll talk to you soon. All right, well, look, check out the new website. Super interesting information there. And it's going to be a place where you can see all the legislative work, which is going to be affecting states just like yours. And it's going to be a great place to look how you can take action. And that's what this is all about. I'm going to keep saying it. You know, I know we all want to move on and we don't want to just dwell here, but we are showing you all of the types of heroes that are out there that stand up and make a difference, that use their voice and speak their truth. You know, if we all did that at one time, none of these issues

would exist. They would be gone immediately. If the billions of us around the world suddenly recognize the power that we have, instead of being afraid, the reason they got away with COVID is we just weren't talking. And I think it was after generations and generations of being told to be politically correct, right? Don't bring up politics at the dinner table. Don't mess up Thanksgiving, talking about religious rights and things like that. It's just awkward for everybody. Well, here's the deal. It's time to be awkward.

It's time to be outrageous. It's time to reach down inside that in yourself and find that Christine Anderson inside of you and say, I'm going to speak the freaking truth because the world and the future of my children depends on it. We are breaking amazing science here for you, things that you can continue to investigate, things that you can look into. We're telling you our truth.

We're telling you where we're going. We are totally transparent. If we mess something up, ever, we'll let you know. But you can count on the fact that in many, many ways, we don't care who we offend. If you're offended, then that's okay. You're allowed to be. This is the United States of America anyway, and it sounds like in Germany, they think the same way. It's called freedom of speech.

If you're offended, get over it. Maybe do some research. But don't let those that are offended stop you from saying what you believe. That is the most important thing of all. And imagine a world where your children are not legally allowed to talk about what they believe. It's time to stop worrying if everyone's offended. I'll see you next week. It seems like these days

No matter what you say Someone's losing their ever loving mind It's like they're looking for a reason To have the fragile feelings hurt Every single time My country truck I gas it up You got your fancy Tesla hooked up to a plug

I know you're mad You think I'm bad Because I'm breathing free, it's lasting, you're still stuck behind your mask, and I'm offended. Just a minute you can't amend the First Amendment, you're offended, I defended all. Let's take another sip. Don't hold back. I pray to God.