The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 346: MIGHTY MOMS

Episode Date: November 17, 2023

Covid Vax Mandate Ban Passes in TX; Mom’s Across America reports shocking findings in fast food; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on The Fall of Bayer, a Tidal Wave of Health Problems in America, and Did the FCC just take over the internet?; Brianne Dressen and React-19’s study of vaccine injury looking for participants; ICAN Announces the ‘Million Dollar Match to Free The Five’ CampaignGuests: Jackie Schlegel, Zen Honeycutt, Brianne DressenBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the informed consent action network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning.

Good afternoon. Good evening, wherever you are out there in the world. It's time for us all to step out onto the high wire. Well, these are amazing times, and we keep celebrating here on the high wire. All of the different winds, all the movement we're starting to see in the world, the conversations that are changing. Many of them are changing because of the work that we're doing here that you're sharing the message. There's also warrior mothers all across this country that have built a movement that seems almost unstoppable.

headlines talking about it all the time. There's winning and then there's winning. And when I'm talking about winning, take a look at this. Governor Abbott signing a bill into law to ban private employers from having COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Governor Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 7 into law today. Senate Bill 7 will ban private employers from requiring their workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Private employers who require employees to get a COVID vaccine or take.

adverse action against an unvaccinated employee could face a $50,000 fine. The Republican governor has long taken a stance against vaccine requirements. SB 7 is now law in the state of Texas. It's long past time to put COVID behind us and restore individual freedom to all Texas. Texas is not the first state to create some sort of ban on workplace vaccine mandates. And the state already prohibits governments from requiring COVID vaccinations. SB 7 becomes law more than two years after Houston Methodist Hospital ousted 150 employees for refusing to get vaccinated for the coronavirus.

The new law does not exempt hospitals and health care facilities from the ban, but does allow them to require unvaccinated workers take precautions. It was been a priority for him since the beginning of this year when he said that he wanted to end all COVID restrictions. entirely and he there saying again that this is the final piece of that. This bill is extraordinarily important when it comes to individual freedom of the people in the state of Texas including the freedom of all Texans to make their own decisions about what health care they want to access and what health care

they want to reject. I've said it several times when we were leaving California with our family and ultimately the high wire in our cast and cruelt. We landed in Texas. One of the reasons was Texas just had such a great group of people that were really changing this conversation with the legislator, with the Senate, with the health committees. When I would come in, I said, I don't know what you're doing here, but you have got real open eyes now listening to this conversation

about medical freedom and about the vaccine issue. Well, at the heart of that is Jackie Schlegel, founder and co-director of Texans for Medical Freedom. It is my honor and pleasure to be joined now by Jackie. Congratulations. I am so excited to be here. Look, the reality is, is the last 30 days have been so intense. The last two years, we just came off a grueling legislative session,

but the result of that is the most sweeping bill that we have seen in the country to ban COVID vaccine mandates. I mean, there's several things about this that I think are really exciting. Number one, it's something you've been at for years. Yeah. And we've talked about that and this work that you're doing. But I don't think I've seen, you know, first of all, Texans, one of the things I've liked here is I said, you've been in an offensive position. When people ask me, what do we do?

What we should be doing in legislation? I said, get out of a defensive position and get into an offensive position. So we've been bringing a lot of bills here and being proactive. But what makes this unique is I don't think. I think I've seen, correct me if I'm wrong, someone out there might be, you know, correct me, but standing with the governor in these images, seeing you standing up there on the stage, usually when we've had successes, they still kind of keep us in the dark, and you're right there with Governor Greg Abbott's arm around you.

It just shows what it means to develop relationships. And I want to talk to you a little bit about that. How important was it, you know, all the years you've been working on this, there are times, in California, work that we've done where people will really be, you know, bring animosity towards a governor, towards people saying they're not listening to me. Sure. I know you've had a different approach. Tell me about that.

Absolutely. Well, first, I just have to say thank you to Governor Abbott and his team. These conversations started two years ago with medical freedom. For me and you, it's something that we've been talking about for years. We go back in our community. This is something that we live and breathe. But for many of our elected officials, this is a new. conversation, a new topic. Two years ago, I sat down with the governor's team. Again, thank you to

them for giving me the opportunity. And slowly, but surely, we have walked hand in hand to pass policy in the state of Texas to protect your rights. And that's what it takes. It's very rarely is this just one bill, one stop. I mean, this is a process. We had incredible senators, representatives who have been working with us hand in hand for the last two years to come to this point where we have the most sweeping legislation in the entire country. I'm incredibly proud of that. And you have something beautiful here. Can we like pull this up and just I want to touch it? It is the most beautiful. I will allow you to touch it. This is what it feels like when the governor hands you and this is like the actual bill. There it is with the signature on it. And how do you have it?

I mean like what how did you just get handed to you? I haven't really seen this before. I'm going to tell you. my jaw dropped. When the governor, you know, I was invited to the signing, which was such an honor. Again, I worked hand in hand with Senator Mays Middleton, Representative Jeff Leach, as you saw in the photo, there were so many representatives who have walked this journey with us at Texans for Medical Freedom the last two years. Look, it was so the negotiations, the intensity of getting this bill to the finish line. was unlike anything I had ever been a part of. And our elected officials said, you know what? We are going to stand strong no matter what the lobby does,

no matter what the associations do, no matter what the pressure is, we are going to stand with you. We are going to stand with Texans for medical freedom, and we're going to stand with the citizens of Texas to get this bill done. So to be up there on that stage with the governor and to have him turn to me, address me, name and say, I want you to have this and handed to me. I have no words.

This is Texans for Medical Freedom. This is the last eight years. This is everything we've worked for. And we're just getting started. This is the first of much more to come. You know, it's interesting. We've had Amy Bond perk out of California, you know, really I can work with them. And changing the way that we're doing this, right?

Like we actually hired a lobbyist there. Developing relationship is something that we're, really, and I think you're one of the pioneers of that great work, there's other great states. I mean, we're not the only ones. But there really is this shift. When I started, there's a lot of like anger and rage, especially in California, SB 277. Rightfully so. And I even got caught up in it, right? I mean, there's a famous video where I was chasing Senator Richard Pan down a hallway. And, you know, as you mature, you realize there's better ways to actually do this, that we don't want to be offensive anyway. We want to be invited into the room.

And I just feel like this is showing in so many headlines that we're now seeing this huge shift in this conversation because I think that we are starting to become clear that our position, you know, medical freedom, right to body autonomy, is the most reasonable position and the most American, you know, position you could possibly have. It literally is all right. and I feel like that is starting to really penetrate in government agencies across the country. A thousand percent. And to your point, this just didn't happen overnight. Right. You know, we've been at this for many years. I've been building the relationships. The associations that even fight against us now are recognizing us as stakeholders.

We are being invited into those meetings to have the conversations with them because they know the tide is turning here. and our elected officials are proudly standing with us. So you're saying even the lobbyists for pharma are now like addressing you and recognizing you have a seat at the table where they used to say, don't listen to those crazy people. They're a bunch of emotional lunatics. I mean, honestly, that's where this started. It was just everyone was getting written off. Now they're addressing you differently, taking you seriously. They thought they were going to get an exception for medical providers on this bill. They fought tooth and nail to get that exception. And again, And I just have to.

So you're talking about like the nurses and doctors and hospitals saying you're working with patients. They have to be, the hospital has to be allowed to. We want to carve out. Force that group to take this vaccine. And they didn't even get that. We want to carve out. And our elected officials, again, they knew what they were getting themselves into. We sat down before this session even started.

And we openly discussed it. And we made the decision. There would be no carve out. And every single day, I want to give a shout out to doctor. Tom Oliverson, Stephanie Click, a representative in the house, a registered nurse who fought tooth and nail to make sure that we had the strongest bill to protect all Texans, including those on the front lines in our hospitals. Our nurses, our students, our doctors, they are protected and is because our elected officials stood strong. The advocates here in the state of Texas,

we played the long game. We were calm. We were. reasonable. We got in. We had the meetings. We took the winds everywhere we could get it. And we slowly built up until this moment. This bill carries a $50,000 administrative fee of fine if you try to implement a COVID vaccine. This is a hefty fan. Fine. This is five times greater than Florida's bill. And I just point that out to say that if you hang in there, if you do the, work. If you continue to advocate, yeah, we finally have a seat at the table. We are finally getting medical freedom in the place that it should be. I'm so proud and I'm so grateful for the many Texans and the many people who have moved here out of state and who understand

this issue's not going away. This isn't one bill. This isn't one legislative session. You need an organization. You need an advocate who takes these issues and gets in there and does does the work and sees this policy to the finish line. And we're going to come back and do it again in another year. Amazing. Jackie Schlegel, Texas for Medical Freedom. Let me touch it just one more time. Seriously, congratulations. Such an amazing achievement.

Really a representation to everyone around the country that, you know, how important this work is, people need to get involved with their local chapters or local groups, you know, dealing medical freedom, get to the capital. All of these parents have been visiting and, visiting with representatives, it is really turning the tide. And it really couldn't happen, you know, a moment too soon. This is our win. This is our win for everybody in the entire country, not just the state of Texas. And I want, you know, individuals to feel compelled to advocate, to follow our work and get inspired and do something in your state because we can do it.

We can get it done. Fantastic. Great work. So proud of you, Jackie. Thank you. All right. Well, look, we have a huge show. We're going to be a huge show. to be talking to some other powerful warrior moms. I got Zen Honeycut from moms across America has been looking into the chemicals in the fast food being delivered to your kids at lunchtime in schools across this country. What did she find? It's going to blow your mind. And later on in the show, Bree Dresson from React 19 is working on a study with the University of Baltimore looking at COVID vaccine injury. This is a one-of-a-kind moment. There's a deadline moving in. We're going to ask you to help us with that. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report.

All right, Jeffrey, man, I love winning. I love the smell of winning in the morning. Yeah. Well, Del, this is really great news. That's an amazing story. And another huge barometer of parents making the decisions, exercising the rights over their bodily autonomy and that of their children's is all encompassed in this headline right here from AP News. U.S. childhood vaccination exemption has reached their highest level ever. This was from a study by the CDC. It was published in their MMWR. That's their in-house scientific journal. And this is what it reports. We can go right to that study. And it's looking at the coverage in children in kindergarten this school year, 2022, 2023. And it says this, exemptions increased in 40, 40, 40 states and D.C. with 10 states reporting an

exemption from at least one vaccine for greater than 5% of kindergartners. This is something we've reported. We've tracked throughout the COVID pandemic, this increase of people being, let's use the words of the media, hesitant, skeptical. And why has this happened? Is this a surprise to anybody? Not watching this show, but we've just finished three years

of watching the most rushed and bumbled vaccine rollout we've ever seen. Efficacy trials were not adequate. They didn't even test for transmission. now we know it doesn't stop them and the safety trials bordered on criminal and if anybody anybody in this vaccine conversation before COVID came to the shores knows that this is how it's done and this is what you said you said look it's a big mistake that they're going to do this same kind of cut and pace safety trial and efficacy trial in full view of the public and the big secret is

the safety trials are the public that's the big secret for people that have been in this for a long time. So when we see this, we see this exemption rate rising, it's because the rollout of the COVID vaccine was so bad and the safety issues still ongoing are so bad that people, it forced people to go, wait a minute. They've rubber stamped this unanimously at almost every ASIP meeting. What have they been doing with vaccines before I was awake to this issue? Oh my God. And when people look into this, when they look at our ICAM page with the ICANHS debate, they see we've been on this since 2016. going back and forth with these, with these regulatory agencies and what the evidence they're showing is so small that it leads people to say, I'm going to make my own decision here.

Yeah. So here's another issue. The COVID vaccine, this thing's pushed. It's obviously the COVID, the coronavirus for children is a minuscule threat compared to these older adults that we were told we have to shield. But they did this. The CDC ACIP committee added it to the childhood schedule. This is the headline CDC adds COVID-19 shots to list of.

routine vaccines for kids and adults. That gave cover to schools so schools could say, what? You're going to need that COVID shot now for your kids to go to school if they want to. And this was what Washington, D.C. did. But now we see this headline. It's a full reversal. DC students will no longer need to vaccinate against coronavirus. And it says in here, lawmakers added a coronavirus vaccination to the city's list of required immunizations and hopes of curbing the virus in schools. But thousands of families failed to meet deadlines. members reverse the measure unanimously and without any debate. I mean, that is just old school pushback, right?

And it really shows all that is really necessary is just defiance. Just defy ridiculous laws. Do not comply. Do not comply is all it takes. These people didn't have to march the capital. They just said, nope, not doing it. And enough people just said not doing it that they realized, okay, we're going to look really bad here. What are we going to do?

We start locking kids out of school. And so those parents in Washington, D.C. just said, oh, hell no. And now they're going to have to change the law and change the law. I mean, it's just this is what I would. I think the heart of the high wire is really just trying to impress upon people how much power we have as individuals, especially in the United States of America. And hopefully we will, you know, continue as this movement grows, as more and more people start realizing they are allowed to speak truth of power.

They're allowed to defy the power of the United States of America because it is actually the government that works for us. We are not the slaves of the government. In fact, they are, you know, under us. They're on our leash, and we're putting them back on that leash. And I hope around the world other citizens are recognizing, you know what? That should be our model too. Right. And if it can be done in D.C., it can be done anywhere.

Because remember, D.C. has one of the hardest pushes for vaccination. They were trying to allow children to get vaccinated without parental consent or knowledge. That bill was being fought for in D.C. And our legal team was the one that really stopped. They passed it. I mean, they passed that law. They passed it. And we went in and shut it down. Took it to court and won and said, no, that is illegal.

You are not allowed to give a child a vaccine without telling the parents. And the main reason being that the only way the mandates have ever been allowed to be passed is they have to at least tell you that there's a vaccine adverse events reporting system. You have to know that there's this kangaroo court that won't work for you. but you got to know about it and you're not being informed about it if your child's getting the vaccine and they're not telling you. And so that was the major gist, the heart of that case and we got it struck down just many of the amazing lawsuits that I can and our attorneys at Aaron Serian Klimstad have been winning. It's very, very exciting. Yeah. And I mean, looking back, that was one of the high watermarks of recklessness with his childhood vaccine schedule.

Dwarfed only now by winning back the exemption, the religious exemption from Mississippi. So, you know, We just keep beating our own records. It's really very cool. And all in such a short time. It's just, we're trying to impress. I'm trying to impress upon the public here. How fast this turnaround has happened in such a short time. It's been working behind the scenes, so to speak, out of the greater world, the greater public's view for a long time. A lot of people doing a lot of hard work, but it's broken through now. It's very clear. And here's another thing that may have been leading to people's changing attitudes on this childhood vaccination schedule is reporting. You and I are kind of like old school reporting. We used to get called a lot of names,

but now it's just common sense to ask these questions. And even local reporting, here's a headline. This is starting to look more like this. People are just asking these questions. Orange County 15-month-old dies two days after well-visit vaccinations. Here's some of this tragic story that thankfully is now getting the attention it deserves. Take a look. All right.

Happy birthday, dear Melody. Melody Rain just celebrated her first birthday in July. Everything about her was just pure light. She loved to dance. She loves her sister. Three months later, the 15-month-old toddler from Greenwood Lake died. Two days after a routine well visit and three vaccines. The final result was the cardiac arrest.

It just completely shut her entire body down. Catherine Palombie says her daughter showed no signs that anything was wrong until that day. Hospital records show the baby suffered organ failure. They brought me into the room. I watched. I just seen her laying there. They said time of death, 1113, and I just completely hit the floor. And I put the cross in here and everything. These are the flowers from the funeral. Yes. We reached out to the Herbert Canya group in Warwick where Melody was seen, but they declined to comment. According to the CDC, up to 10 vaccines are recommended for 15-month-olds. And Melody's record show she had three for Veracella, DTamp, and Hib.

Catherine believes they were too much for her daughter's body to handle. Trust your gut and don't let them push anything onto your children. I think people that are just tuning in, waking up, maybe COVID woke them up. Maybe you're watching this show for the first time. You can't imagine what a sea change that represents. There has been a blackout on any conversation about vaccine injury and certainly vaccine death, SIDS, all of it for over a decade now. media has not been covering it.

COVID broke that seal. This is the biggest mistake they ever made, Jeffrey, because they did it. As we said, made the sausage right in front of the public end have denied all of the harms. Everyone, we saw the recent article that you brought up just over a week ago. 25% of Americans believe they know somebody that was killed by the COVID vaccine. 40% say that they are leaning in believing that direction that they know somebody and would actually, and the people would sign up for any sort of class action lawsuit. and yet the CDC still says it's not happening.

It's that level of defiance against the reality of what's going on that I think is blowing this open. Reporters saying, oh, come on. And now we are starting to see a shift. We were seeing news stories covering vaccine injury again, as they should have been the whole time. This is all a part of what we're talking about, this huge shift in the consciousness around this conversation now in America.

It's amazing. And it's a huge story. And should we be questioning it? Remember, if we look at the public health side, we're supposed to understand that these vaccines are making us healthier. We're the healthiest nation in the world, and we need all these vaccines to keep us safe. That's the talking point. We're the most vaccinated country in the world, and it's for our health.

Just remember that. So the problem is, like last week we report on this, we see headlines coming from the U.S. and the CDC like this. The U.S. infant mortality rate rose last year. The CDC says it's the largest increase in two decades. And then this headline out of stat news, life expectancy for men in U.S. falls to 70. 63, six years less than women per study. And you go in here and you read it and it says,

the decline in life expectancy in the U.S. suggests that advancements in medical treatment are no longer sufficient to counter ongoing public health crises. This is Brandon Yan. He's the lead author of the study. He says, we have a health care system that is very advanced in treating illnesses and advanced diseases.

But for the most part, it is not very good when it comes to preventative care. Now, in 2019 in the U.S., that number was 78.8, almost 79. So we dropped a ton. Now, understand where we're at. Japan, Korea, Portugal, UK, all Italy, all 80 years and older. Wow. China and Turkey are like 78 years.

So we're 73. We're scraping the bottom of the barrel. So this is why people are questioning this larger, what's going on? What are we doing more than other countries? What have we done the last three years, especially? These are the big questions people are asking. And it's okay to ask them. People have the right to ask them and the right to make their own choice.

Absolutely. And I think what you see here is the argument farm has been making is they've taken over our hospital systems, taken over our doctors. Our doctors have been turned into drug pushers. That's basically all they do. They've got a drug to deal with whatever situation. Couldn't possibly be your diet. Couldn't possibly be the fact that you're not exercising or maybe you're just not drinking enough water. Forget all that. Just start taking drugs. And they've been bragging about how, oh, we've extended your life expectancy. Extended your life expectancy. Well, we've been reporting. And now it is just on this major decline. And you're right, and the article's right, they suck at preventative care. Injecting yourself with pharmaceutical products to make yourself healthier in the future, clearly is not working. I mean, this is a disaster. We're the most vaccinated nation in the world. We take more drugs than anyone in the world. The pharmaceutical industry is a part of the American lifestyle,

and it is clearly now killing us. It is time to eradicate them to get them out of our government, get them out of our regulatory agencies, stop using the NIH to produce nothing but drugs, and start using the NIH to investigate what are these drugs doing to our society? This is a huge week. There's so many longstanding stories that we've been tracking for many years that are coming to a hedge just this week. And it's trying to do this.

So let's jump to this story here. Speaking of really making people's making their own decision, this is the story of Bear, Bear Pharmaceutical Company. They're from Germany. In 2016, they acquired Monsanto for over $60 billion. This was the largest ever by a German buyer, largest ever investment acquisition by a German buyer ever. And of course, at that point, investors jumped on board. This was the greatest thing.

This huge juggernaut, Bear and Monsanto, obviously acquiring Monsanto because of their their flagship product for Roundup. Yeah, great product. Good idea, Bear. Genius. Right. And one of the things Bear didn't tell its investors is there is a global groundswell. basically yearly marches against Monsanto. People do not like this company.

There's some major issues with our products, but that was swept under the rug. Well, there's lawsuits, and that's where Brent Wisner comes in. This is attorney, Brent Wisner. He was on our show. He won the first lawsuit, helped DeWain Johnson. He was the plaintiff, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from glyphosate use. He was spraying it in public parks. And so these lawsuits just keep coming and coming and coming

for these cancer cases and things just really race to ahead at the end of October here. So I'm going to run through three quick Reuters headlines just to give you the space of this. October 20th, bear must pay $1.25 million in Roundup Cancer Trial jury fines. Seven days later, Bear order to pay $175 million in latest Roundup cancer trial. And then another one, just a couple days later, October 31st, Bear ordered to pay $332 million in Roundup Cancer Trial. So of course, that leads to some questions. You get some really nervous investors at that point who were already on edge over what's been going on over the last three or four years.

So this is Reuters again. Bear investor urges rethink after latest glyphosate defeat. It says in here, after this week's loss, investor nervousness is mounting about the company's future litigation liabilities. At the last count, settlements were still pending in 47,000 of the approximately 160,000 claims filed, according to Bear. I mean, just think when you're looking at hundreds of millions of dollars per case and 160,000 or whatever in the queue, man, that spells trouble for that investment by Bear. And the Bear has been having a big problem trying to settle all those cases, trying to come to an agreement like Johnson Johnson or like the Sackler family and the opioid situation. Bear is not having that type of success. So this is the headline.

Now you're seeing out of Reuters. There's bare ways break up options as management jobs cuts loom. So last year, they posted a quarterly gain of 546 million euros. This quarter, it posted a net loss of 457 billion euros. So this is a huge change. Cities are pulling around up from parks and playgrounds. This product is not popular. And the scientists are really backing up a lot of the science

and digging into this a lot more. what's happening now, so putting bear aside for a second, the overall background in the United States, just like in 1986 when the 1986 Act passed, giving vaccine manufacturers basically liability from these lawsuits, so many people are suing us for these vaccines because they're getting harm by, they're getting harm by our shots. We're going to need protection if you want us to keep making shots. And so that's what the government essentially did. But similar thing is happening now. This is called the Agriculture Labeling Uniformity Act.

And this is Kerry Gilliam. She's been reporting on this topic of pesticides for over a decade. And she wrote this in The Guardian, it's an abomination, the headline, it's an abomination battle brewing over proposed US laws to protect pesticides companies. So if we go to this law and we look at it, it's some legal easing here, but I'm going to break it down to the best of my ability here. So this is the Agriculture Labeling Uniformity Act. And it says in here, it shall be applied to require uniformity in national pesticide labeling. So they want all the same label and all pesticides. So remember, big part of this lawsuit was people were not informed of the dangers on the labeling. So they're saying, well, just don't worry about that anymore. No matter what new science comes forward,

we're just going to have a one-stop shop on the label here. It may cause harm, you know, use it your own risk. That's going to cover us blanket. But then it goes on to say this. It says, and this act prohibit any state instrumentality or political subdivision thereof or a court from directly or indirectly imposing or continuing in effect any requirements for or penalize or hold liable, any entity for failing to comply with requirements with respect to labeling or packaging that is in addition to or different from the labeling or packaging approved by the administrator under such an act. So basically it's saying you can't sue us in court. And these court cases that are happening, this is going to provide some background.

You can't sue us. Municipality, cities, you can't remove these things because the labeling wasn't adequate or because some science you think may be there. If it's not in the label, you can't make these administrative decisions. So this is a big, this is a bit. And of course, all pesticide companies are backing this, all the lobbying companies. It hasn't passed yet, right? This is just like a proposed law. I mean, if this doesn't show people where we're at now that this is complete and total regulatory capture,

these regulatory agencies, you've been trusting with your life, the CDC, the FDA, all under the HHS, you know, mothership, HRSA in this case, trying to block literally like liability protection for chemicals being sprayed on your food and things that you care about your children. You're going to have no right to sue because the government is no longer your government. Your government is now owned by these pharmaceutical companies, by these petroleum and agricultural companies that are just destroying our lives. and our government is helping them do it and protecting them.

This is why we are so involved in this space right now, bringing lawsuits and everything else. We've got to stop this. I mean, this insanity must end now. It's crazy. And so over in the European Union, they give authorization to glyphosate this chemical for a 10-year block.

So that authorization is actually up now. And so in October, there was a re-vote because the entire European Union, all the representatives have to vote. on this and there needs to be something called a qualified majority which is over 50%. So to re-up this thing for another 10 years. So this was in October the headline, EU can't reach decision on prolonging the use of chemical herbicide glyphosate. So that's good news because it's good news if you know the science and you're been following this because they're saying let's pause

this for a second. We need to do more studies on this and that's what there was not the qualified majority. And one of the reasons is because new science, not just cancer, but Parkinson's, this was in the Lancet. They're saying the inadequacy of current pesticide regulations for protecting brain health, the case of glyphosate and Parkinson's disease. So just like we had on the attorney for fluoride being put in the water, they said, yeah, fluoride's great for your teeth. But remember on the stand, we played that clip and they said, well, did you check for children's brain health? Well, no, we didn't really do those studies. So this is a similar thing that's happening. We have glyphosate. It's safe for use and we're finding this cancer issue, but now we're finding a Parkinson's issue possibly with

these pesticides and glyphosate specifically. So the European Union has paused that vote. It was supposed to vote today for another trying to basically get this consensus. They voted, and here's the headline, EU to renew herbicide glyphosate approval for 10 years. But if you go into this article and you look at this, it says this qualified majority was not hit. So again, They were not able to hit this qualified majority. So what happens, the rules is if they do not hit the qualified majority, the European Commission steps in and they make the choice. And what they're going to do or what they have signaled, they're going to do is step in and

approve it. So this is essentially a phantom consensus. So you're going to hear in the headlines, the EU approved it. It's all okay. And they're going to use this in the courtroom. The pharmaceutical, the bear in the lawsuits, they're going to say the EU has up this for another 10 years, it's safe, but there was no consensus. So it's very important little piece to really take home from this. Looks like over there in Europe, you guys have got to do your work too. We all do.

You know, you are being robbed blind, where they're making you point to all the other issues you're screaming at and you're trying to decide the news has got you yelling about, you know, this inconsistency or that or how your neighbor's screwing you, you know, they're running out. They're running out the door with all of your, you know, freedoms and your health in their hands. This is crazy. It must be all around the world, we have got to now stand up against our governments that are clearly now being purchased by these giant mega international corporate interests. Absolutely. And so, Del, let me shift gears a little bit. We're going to take a unique look at the United States right now in an interesting view here. And it starts with this story.

Fed up migrants who trekked thousands of miles to U.S. already heading home. American dream doesn't exist. What they're talking about in this article are Venezuelans who came from the border. we're bused to Chicago and they're saying, look, I mean, besides the fact that Chicago in the fall and moving into the winter is freezing, but they're saying, look, the American dream doesn't exist. We've tried and we're going back home. They're getting tickets. They're flying back, doing whatever they can to do this. And so why is this happening? Why is all of this happening? Well, taking a look at one of the big issues here, the United States has a credit rating, just like you and I have credit ratings. There's credit rating agencies. And if we have good

we can take out loans, have low interest rates. If we have bad credit, we don't get those kind of luxuries. Well, for a country, it's the same thing, except also countries, people invest in their bonds, buy their bonds, their safe countries to do business in. Well, this just happens to the U.S. This was just over the summer. Fitch downgrades U.S. credit rating, citing mounting debt and political divisions. First time this has ever happened.

Then just recently, Moody's changes U.S. credit outlook to negative. This was in New York Times. another big hit. And I'm looking over these headlines and I'm seeing something, I'm seeing something that looks like this. So we're going down, but then I see this headline. El Salvador is rating raised by S&P on local debt financing. S&P is another rating agencies. And so I look and say, well, this is a central American country. And this, a lot of these people are coming up from these areas, South America, Central America, to the United States. And their credit ratings being raised. What did El Salvador do? Well,

you see this headline just about two years ago. El Salvador became the first country to adopt Bitcoin as an official currency. So one of the issues here in the U.S. is the rising inflation rates, the purchasing power of the dollar. It's really causing some hardship for people to just try to live a daily life. So El Salvador said, we're going to take this cryptocurrency, the first one, and it's decentralized. We're going to try it as an official currency. And so far, it looks like it's really been a good payoff. This is kind of the exact opposite of a central bank digital currency where everything would be central through the Federal Reserve. The Bitcoin is completely decentralized. So you look at the World Bank, they release rankings every year,

and they classify countries by income level. Well, if you look here at the most recent rankings, El Salvador just made a jump. They went from lower middle income to upper middle income on their way to high income, which is where the U.S. is in other countries. So this is another positive thing. But what's most interesting about this story is we had the president of El Salvador interviewed by Tucker Carlson. This was before Tucker Carlson left Fox. And, And it's an interesting view because this is an El Salvadoran president who is looking in to America from outside and listen to what he had to say. The demise of the U.S. has to come from within. The enemies have to be inside, not really outside.

No external enemy can cause so much damage as internal, as an internal operation. You're watching internal operations here. You can see them in cities. cities that were pristinely beautiful 30 years ago are wasteland right now

you would see people I mean I'm from El Salvador third world country in Central America and myself I can see cities here

and say I don't want to I wouldn't live here so that would be unthinkable three decades ago totally unthinkable that a Salvadoran

wouldn't want to live in the U.S. main city in the U.S. main city I mean, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, yeah. Well, Philadelphia, Baltimore. It's really amazing, you know, and it's true. We are experiencing a crushing demise here in America in fighting like we've never seen, political divisions, which is some of the downrating that's happening,

where we came to communicate with each other. The news agencies, I believe, are fueling that rage against our neighbors, when honestly, the truth is if we turned off our television, sets and started talking about the issues that actually affect our lives, we would find that we are all in agreement. And the real problem is the propaganda coming from our television, the division being driven by a government that we are pointing out as being owned and run by industries and outside influences, if not controlling us, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization,

the World Bank, IMF, all of these things are like working to pull us apart. You know, I was just in, you know, as he talks about it, we see like the squalor and things that are happening in big cities. The crime rates are up. I was in Portland, Oregon recently for an event, and I went to CVS because I needed deodorant. And I swear it was the craziest thing I've ever seen. It was empty shelves just like this. And there was like one shelf that had deodorant, and there was locks on it. And it was locked away.

I had to find the one person that isn't employing anybody. Nobody can work here because the place isn't making any money at all. I found the one person that's supposed to help, took me 20 minutes, came up and he's unlocking the deodorant. I said, really, you got to lock deodorant? He says literally the only things left in this door are what under lock and key. They're taking advantage of some law that's like as long as it's under $1,000 or something, you can walk right out the front door and you're actually, you're the one in trouble if you reported.

If you call the police and it was under $1,000, you're in trouble for even bothering them. I mean, this is what's happening to the United States of America. And you just, you know, and I said to the guys like, I don't see that in Texas. Like, no, you don't. Because in Texas, people own guns. Now, I don't know, you know, how that weighs in. But it is amazing we are seeing this happening in what was supposed to be the beacon of light and hope and the greatest nation in the world. A lot of people know something's going on.

And there's a lot of moving parts to this story as well. But watching the president there of El Salvador, it reminds me of the interview that G. Edward Griffin did. And he's really one of the founding followers. of alternative research. We had him on the show actually just recently. And this was an interview he did so many decades ago with a Russian KGB defector Yuri Besmanoff. And Besmanoff gave kind of a brief overview of how things like this may have happened. Take a listen if you didn't hear this before. You spoke several times before about ideological subversion. That is a phrase that I'm afraid some Americans don't fully understand. When

The Soviets use the phrase ideological subversion. What do they mean by? Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate, all word and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do, all American mass media has to do, is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it. There is no mystery.

There is nothing to do with espionage. I know that espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic. It sells more deodorants through the advertising, probably. That's why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bone type of thrillers. But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, an opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures,

actively in the language of the KGB or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the sense of information. in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country. It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and it's divided in four basic stages. The first one being demoralization it takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students. in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy.

In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result, you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the 60s dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated.

They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind, even if you expose them to authentic information, even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people, you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society. It's really unbelievable to hear that. You could have said 40 years ago, and obviously Ed Griffin, who, by the way, is the central

point of, you know, Plandemic, the Great Awakening, which we launched here on the High Wire if you haven't seen it. You know, it's just a brilliant film that deals a lot with the work that Ed Griffin did this interview. But think about what he's saying, and when you think about the news right now, how many universities have children that actually, like students, college students, that build believe that communism just hasn't been, just hasn't been actualized the right way. We should be moving in a communist direction. You can clearly see. He's saying, we're going to be inside your

schools. We're going to be teaching your kids. And when you talk about demoralization, one of the stats that's up right now, under 20 percent, I mean, like, you know, like I think it's down to like 18 percent of students, college students in America have hope for America. The rest believe that it's just a dismal. There's no hope. I'm never going to be able to own a home. The dream of America is dead. So, I mean, whether or not the KGB did this or not, boy, did that guy prophesize 40 years ago, almost to the date now,

where we now find ourselves where, you know, third world nations are looking down on us. Yeah, and the takeaway, one of the takeaway from that for me was, it's not the Russians did this. It's psychological warfare. And we saw lots of groups. And really, as we've talked about on this show, when you dig down,

a lot of these groups are connected by the, So when you see like the psychological warfare that happened during COVID-19, especially in the UK with the Nudge units and the Psiops, this is alive and well. And making us turn each other in, as the El Salvador president said, right? It's internal. You are eating yourself. We can't. There's nothing that could come from the outside and do as much damage to America as is being

done inside of America to each other. Right. And, you know, we look at cities like the El Salvadoran president said, San Francisco. He said, I wouldn't want to live there. And San Francisco is, it's a beautiful city of many rights, but we all see that something is not right. And it's happened very quickly. And a lot of people aren't questioning it.

What's going on? How did this happen so quickly? Why aren't people living in the city addressing this? Why are people turning a blind eye to this when like the El Salvadorian president is saying, I don't want to live there? And this is another thing that we've, people from the outside that aren't operating with, let's just call it this American mindset of looking the other way. for a lot of people are pointing this out.

And another media that's pointing this out is Chinese media. This is kind of embarrassing, but this is the headline here. San Francisco is slammed as ruined city and hell in Chinese media ahead of APEC summit. So the APEC summit just ended. But this is what this article says. While the city gears up for the event, U.S. Chinese radio use the headlines, Ghost Town, San Francisco, to have major blood exchange as APEC will bring the safest week in history to the city. Other headlines include the phrases, garbage city, ruin city.

and fallen city as crippling drug issues and widespread homeless problems continue to cause problems for the city. And then we look at Reuters, San Francisco patches over homelessness, drug abuse for APEC. And then another headline, drug addicts homeless plaguing San Francisco's downtown miraculously disappear ahead of Biden and Gigi Ping's summit. So they were the governor of New York, I'm sorry, the governor of California, Gavin Newsom and the mayor of San Francisco, they've made really no real effort to clean this situation up to help these people to get them off the street and all of a sudden when you have this summit you have the chinese leader coming in they miraculously disappear and where did they go everyone's questioning these things and this is what gavin newsome had to say

by take a listen that's that's my emphasis i see what you see and and we all want and see a brighter future as well and so i'm really excited i i know folks say oh they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APEC. We've been having different conversations. I cannot believe he admitted that though you've been complaining about this for years, your businesses are leaving. The entire mall of all the expensive shops now are boarded up. You know, in downtown San Francisco, there, one of the big shopping hubs is totally closed down. But when a dictator from China comes over to visit, Gavin Newsom is so embarrassed about what his house looks like. He finally cleans it up for the dictator's arrival. And to think that this may be the future of, you know, American political royalty, as many people, you know, are starting to think this might, you know, this might be the guy that jumps in to replace Biden if he's not able to run. And God help us if people that, you know, you know, you know, only clean up their own house when dictators visit, you know, start running this name.

I mean, I guess they already are. I mean, when we look at this whole nation, it's, I don't want to, you know, we're not here to get political, but we're in a bad shape here. It's really embarrassing and so unnecessary when, you know, we could have jobs just cleaning up. You said, give people the, you know, hope in America again. It would really, really nice to see. It's just, wow. And we have to question, you know, we really have to question, where are our, you know, we when, you know, countries like North Korea or even China, when the media spotlights on them, they have a perception that they put forward, that it's not in alignment with how their country lives on a day-to-day basis. And that's just what happened in San Francisco right now. So we

really have to question, what are we really doing here? What are we allowing these leaders to get away with? Because there's a lot of questions, hard questions that have to be asked and a lot of solutions that have yet to come. Amen. All right. Jeffrey, really great reporting. A lot of hope in it, but also, you know, need for us to work harder for more hope. Absolutely. So keep up the great work and I'll see you next week. All right, though. Thanks. All right, take care. All right, well, look, when it comes to success, as you see the headlines, more and more people are now questioning the vaccine program. We're very happy about that. I mean, I, you know, whether or not you should really, if you're questioning, how is it, this organization feels comfortable

celebrating the fact that people are backing away from the vaccine program, then you should be visiting our website, the informed consent action network. I can decide.org is where all of our papers, in fact, our interaction between health and human services and our nonprofit, we sent a letter with citations. You can click on them and see all the science that we laid out that shows that this vaccine program is a disaster.

We happen to know that the CDC, FDA, NIH, all work together to try and answer our query. and we got a giant letter back. And then we responded. We took six months, had all of our scientists and experts and legal help from attorneys Aaron Siri and his team to go comb through it. And then we respond to that letter with all that's wrong and what they're lying to the world about. We've never gotten a response back on that.

But that makes up a book that we put out that you can also get online, the Vaccine Safety Project. You'll find it on the website. where all that information is laid out for you. It's part of what we're doing as bringing transparency to this conversation. You just got to look at it. As this vaccine program has increased, we have seen the increase of autoimmune disease and neurological disorders. We had roughly 12% autoimmune and neurological disorders in the 1980s

before the 1986 vaccine's Recompensation Program happened. At that point, we were getting about 10, 11 vaccines by the time we were 18. As soon as we took away liability from the industry, it exploded. And then by the 2000s, we were getting 53 doses at 72 vaccines if you separate them out. And look what happened to our chronic illness rate. Now, more than half of our kids as of 2011 have a permanent really disability, either a neurological or an autoimmune disease that'll be dealing with the rest of their lives. This program, we believe, has just substituted what tend to be trivial childhood illness and replaced it with, permanent lifelong autoimmune disease. I'm not saying vaccines are the only things that do it.

Also, all the pharmaceutical products that we take, the drugs that are in our, you know, water systems, but also fluoride and pesticides and herbicides. I mean, look, it's a toxic soup we've been living in, but this is what I want to say. Doesn't matter what you want to blame, here's who you should blame, your regulatory agents, the CDC, the FDA that we have shown you all day long right now on this show are obviously working for these, you know, corporations that are poisoning you. And all our regulatory agencies are doing is trying to protect them, not us, protect them from being able to be sued so that they can continue to poison us.

Well, all of this is leading to a huge change. And there was a big headline this week about some of the work that we've been doing. Here it is. You want to talk about a seed change. Anti-Vaxers are now a modern. political force. This is Politico Magazine. Earlier this year, a lawsuit funded by the anti-vaccine group informed consent action network forced Mississippi to allow religious exemptions for mandatory childhood vaccinations for the first time in more than four decades. That case, perhaps the greatest

policy achievement for the movement to loosen vaccine requirements in schools or workplaces, alarmed public health experts. We have done it. And you think that the, you know, the meta or the, exemption rates were high this year. Wait till you see Mississippi added to this. And here's the point. We are going after the other five states that are trying to forcibly vaccinate your children and give you no choice. There are the five holdout states, California. You've got Maine, New York, Connecticut, West Virginia. All of those are still holding out and giving you no option. This is one of the primary goals of the work that we do here, that you always have an option to opt out, that the government does not own you. You are not a farm animal. And I mean that. I'm not

joking. If you can be injected with products, you do not control, or your children can be inject with products outside of your wishes. If you've looked at the ingredients or if you looked at the side effects and you say, no, not for my babies. If they can still inject that child, then that child is a farm animal owned by a farmer. They're being treated just like a farm animal injected by your government without your control. We are going to put an end to that. And we have gotten a lot of help. We have got some of our biggest donors have decided to help us over the to the end of the year to do this work. We want to take out, you know, all of the forced vaccinations across this country and make sure that every state has the right to opt out.

It's a huge lift. And so several of our donors have gotten together and here's what they're offering. A one million dollar match for every dollar we raise between now and the end of the year, it will be matched up to $1 million. So this is an opportunity to double your impact today. If you've been one of those people sitting back and watching and saying, you know, I'm glad that people are donating, I see all the great work, but I, you know, I'm a little too busy, or maybe I don't have enough money right now, do you realize, you can't imagine what we could do if every one of you today just said, I'll give a dollar, I'll give one dollar a month. You have no idea what we could achieve if you just did that. And how hard is it? You see a QR code there. Well,

if you're on your phone, just screen grab this image right now. This is how this works. And then once it's a photo, all you have to do is touch that QR code. It'll take you right to the million dollar match. Or you could easily just type in, I can decide.org forward slash match to double your money today. Be double trouble in this situation. As we start bringing the law to make sure that you control your rights and your body. And thank you so much to those sponsors out there that are making this possible, that are willing to match up to a million dollars for every one of you. Please make this that day you decide to get involved.

Text, match M-A-T-C-H-2-72022 right now. And watch your money get doubled and bring double the trouble to all the government agencies that are trying to rob you of your rights. That's what we're doing and they're right. Mississippi was one of the biggest accomplishments in history when it comes to medical freedom and we're not going to stop there with your help. So thank you for donating today. It's really, really important. Okay, when we talk about warriors and it's been amazing to have this show, the Highwire, where we get to talk to people like Jackie Schlegel, show you those victories. Well, one of our favorite guests has been on time and time again is

Zen Honeycutt with moms across America doing brilliant work dealing with your food supply. A huge issue, not only injecting you with poisons, but as we already showed you, they want to get away and create liability protection for chemicals that are poisoning your children. Not of Zen Honeycutt has anything to do with it. Take a look at this. I am so very excited to have Zen Honeycutt, the founding director from moms across America. Zen Honeycutt from moms across America. Honeycut heads moms across America, a group form to raise awareness about toxic exposures. This is not what I set out to do. I was a former fashion designer. And then my kids got

all, they all got sick. And like millions of moms and dads across America, you know, I did not know what to do. I did not know why. So I dove into the food supply, GMO's and glyphosate. We want to trust that what is in the grocery store is safe. And the shocking reality is that in many cases it's not. Moms Across America is a national organization of Unstoppable Moms. And we started this because we really want to empower moms and have healthy kids. And that's our tagline, empower moms healthy kids. We're so proud and happy to have thousands of volunteers across the country, to have groups

around the world, to have spoken around the world, to have been in over a dozen international movies around the world. The mission is to empower millions to educate themselves about GMOs and related toxins, to offer GMO-free and organic solutions, and through Through empowering local leadership, we create healthy communities together. There are GMO foreign proteins in our food since 1996. They first started in the milk, and then they put them in soy and corn, which is in everything that we eat.

I was shocked that these foreign proteins were in our food without our knowledge, without our permission, and without labeling. Most common GMOs are GMOs that are genetically engineered to withstand herbicides, as you see being sprayed right now. This is predominantly GMO, soy, and other crops that are genetically engineered to withstand glyphosate, the toxic chemical ingredient in Roundup. And what we're looking at is not just having one company stop using glyphosate, we're going after entire industries.

We need to make sure that this chemical is banned. And as a mother, I will not stand for this. I ask every single person to become an activist, to share with everybody to do whatever you can and to be very vocal about it. Well, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by Zen Honeycutt making the trip out. Thank you for joining us. You are just a force to be reckoned with. You know, you just don't stop.

And I want to thank you for that because it's, we have to be relentless because the opposition is just all over everything we're doing. Thank you so much. I want to thank my team. There are so many people at Moms Across America. have done things like sent in samples of their breast milk, you know, and their children's urine and the school lunch samples and the fast food samples that we're going to be talking about today. So it's not just me. It's an incredible team, as you know, with your team.

You know, one of the things we're talking about preparing for this show, and, you know, some of us are, you know, we cross a spectrum of generations. But my understanding now that what we're going to talk about is that schools have turned to fast food restaurants to make the school meetings. So all the food pyramids and whatever, whether that was good or bad, has been thrown out. And now is it true that companies like McDonald's are who are making our school lunches? DEL, we were shocked to find out last year when we tested school lunches, 43 school lunch samples in that process that the school food lunch directors, the directors for the school lunches, they go to big conferences and there's booths set up.

And there are fast food companies offering samples of their food. And that's how they choose what is going to be served. to our children. Now previously they couldn't advertise that. There wasn't any advertising that that was actually happening to the children, but since Impossible Foods has started to sort of infiltrate our school lunches, pretty soon Lunchables. What is impossible foods? Is that a company? Yeah, that's fake, burgers. Big burgers, so that's, they're moving to school, okay. So now they were able to brand and let the children know on the menu, it's an impossible, so

they're marketing to our children in school lunches, and then luncheables will be doing that as well. And so we confirmed with the school nutrition association and other school food directors that that's what's happening. Fast food companies are supplying school lunches to our children. There are 30 million school meals that are served every day to our children. And the majority of the ingredients are derived from genetically modified foods like soy and corn. And also they're predominantly derived from crops that are sprayed with glyphosate as a drying agent like wheat and peas and beans and legumes and things like that. So the wheat is mostly, it's consistent.

as we'll get into with glyphosate. So that's why we tested fast foods. So you went in and decided to test fast foods because they're the ones supplying this food supply to our children. You know, are you worried? Even just doing the show, I just think these are giant massive corporations. Are you worried about lawsuits or anything like that when you start on this journey? I mean, you're about to call out huge companies for, you know, inadequate nutrition. Anybody can sue for anything, but what we did was sent samples to a lab. They tested, and we were reporting the results. Okay. So, you know, these are the results. These are what they are. I have had some harassment, but, you know, we're going to keep going. So how about we look into what you found?

What is the headline here? Oh, my goodness. Our food is incredibly toxic. School lunches, first of all, just to backtrack to last year, 43 school lunches we tested. because 40 is a statistically significant number that the EPA and the USDA are not supposed to ignore, right? We found that 95.3% were positive for glyphosate, and in comparison, the detox project that tested a couple of a year or so before that,

and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency found that about 60% of the grocery store samples were positive for glyphosate. So 95.3% positive for glyphosate in our school lunches, and this is a known carcinogen, as you have reported, an endocrine disruptor, it causes liver disease at very low levels. A new study out shows that it contributes to leukemia in animal studies, especially in young rats. Over 50% that died were young rats.

And so we're very concerned about leukemia and rising levels in children. And there's been, I believe, a 37% increase in childhood leukemia just, you know, just in the past 10 years. So also it's a key later. It makes the minerals that of any living thing that it's a, you know, touches it makes the minerals unavailable, the vitamins and minerals. And it's also an antibiotic. Just real quickly, because I think this is something that we've reported a lot on and I have a new audience all the time. You know, this was really glyphosate was an industrial chemical used to

clean out boilers and pipes and rust that they would put it in so it would suck all the rust and contaminants out of the pipes. Keylating. Yes. We're keylating to pull it out and then someone accidentally spilled this stuff on the ground. It killed every plant in sight. And then they said, oh my god let's use it as an herbicide and start killing weeds and then we made genetically modified crops that when you put this deadly chemical on them they won't die i mean just this is basically the cycle we're now in so we're eating genetically modified food that's simply the only modification was just make sure that this deadly toxic poison doesn't kill it so now we're eating that poison and whatever happens with a plant that is now resistant to deadly chemicals and what's it doing inside of our

body. But as you said, if it chelates all the minerals and things out of pipes, imagine what it's doing inside of your body. And it's a huge antibiotic, right? It's killing your bacteria and things like that. Yeah, it kills your bacteria as well. Dr. Don Huber, who's a 60-year plant pathologist, says that the way glyphosate function is it basically gives the plant aids. It strips it of its immune system. So the normally harmless bacteria in the soil can kill it. So imagine what that's doing to our bodies. Wow. Yeah. So the way that it functions is very, very harmful. And we spray 280 million pounds of it a year on our, just on our food crops still, as a drying agent and on GMO crops. So it's sprayed not just on the GMO crops that are genetically engineered to withstand it.

It's also sprayed as a drying agent so that the farmer can harvest it faster, predominantly on wheat, also on oats and peas and beans and legumes and things like that, a lot of grains. So they dry those too, like also every dry grain that. It's. If it's not organic, if it's not organic, most likely will have glyphosate on it. So if you're not eating organic, you are eating glyphosate in practically every meal. And that's what we found in the school lunches, 95.3% positive for glyphosate. We found 74% positive for other harmful pesticides. 74% positive.

And there were 27 different harmful pesticides. And nobody's testing what is the synergistic effect of that, right? We know when we put vinegar and baking soda into a volcano in second grade, you know, what happens? But what happens when there's 27 different pesticides going on in our children's food for school lunches? Yeah. And then we found 100% positive of the school lunch samples positive for heavy metals. And some of them levels 6,923% higher than what the EPA allows in drinking water. And these are highly carcinogenic and neurotoxic heavy metals in our food supply.

And we believe this is predominantly coming from the manure that's coming from the confined animal feeding operation, you know, outlets that have thousands and thousands of cows. The Roundup has been found to have heavy metals in it. The cows eat the grains that we, as we talked about, are sprayed with glyphosate as a drying agent, glyphosate herbicides. And it does not wash dryer cook off. So it goes into their feces, into the manure, and our crops are fertilized with them. And then the heavy metals, you know, accumulate. So very concerning levels of heavy metals in school lunches. And then also there were veterinary drugs and hormones found in school lunches,

abysmally low levels of minerals. So school lunches, very toxic. We found out that fast food suppliers supply school lunches. We said we got to test fast food too. Okay. Okay. Yeah. So we tested the top 20 fast food brands and we added in in and out because a couple of our board.

Not a fast food brand? It is, but it's number 33. Oh, got it. It's not the top 20. I was like, you sure that's fast food. Yeah, it is. But it's number 33, but our board members, you know, really insisted because it's been seen as one of the most healthy of the fast food brands.

The potatoes being chopped right here, right? Yes. Yeah, I mean, they're trying. They definitely are trying, right? So we wanted to test them too to see maybe they are healthier. Unfortunately, we found that they have issues too in and out. So we'll get into that. So the fast food brands 100% positive for glyphosate, Dell.

100%. Wow. And then the harmful pesticides, it was 76% positive for harmful pesticides. The highest level of, let me backtrack, the highest level of glyphosate was in Panera bread. Panera? Yes. And they claim, they have a no-no list. They claim wholesome, good, clean food.

So we want people to petition Panera. We have a petition on our website, petition them to. put glyphosate on their no-no list because if we could accomplish that that would be a very big deal for the food supply so pannar bread was highest to what I think and this is something that when we think of this desiccant drying plants it's it's got to be even worse than using it on GMO plants because it's the last contact it has no rain there's no moment where it gets washed off it's like literally let's kill this plant and then harvest it you know they don't have and if

it doesn't wash off all that wheat all that's getting ground up is just the thing it did was get coated in glyphosate and what out of the tricks I mean correct me if I'm wrong it will say and this is I think you know I haven't read much about this but I read the bread it says you know non-GMO and you go oh great but it doesn't say organic so non-gm. Well wheat isn't a GMO product. No it's not but they're using glyphosate to kill it but by not making GMO now it still dies and that's the whole point so when you're seeing non-GMO people think oh that means it's healthy no

It's being covered with a chemical, one of the worst chemicals known to man. Yeah, non-GMO Project Verified does not have anything to do with glyphosate. So that product could still be derived from crops that are highly sprayed with glyphosate. It's very disconcerning. That's why we encourage USDA organic with, you know, along with that. But regeneratively grown organic, there's new brands out there that are very important for making sure it's not sprayed with glyphosate. So, yeah, Panera bred the highest, Arby's was next. than harmful pesticides, 76% positive for harmful pesticides.

And one thing that was really concerning was that, for instance, the Pizza Hut pizza, the cheese pizza along with pepperoni didn't have harmful pesticides detected. But the vegetable top pizza for Pizza Hut had 21 parts per billion of harmful pesticides. They both had glyphosate because of the grains, right, in the pizza. But so what we see from things like the Heartland Health Research Alliance, that is they showed that if Americans could just eliminate, just switch out their vegetables and fruit to organic, we would eliminate 98% of our pesticide consumption. So we're seeing that the harmful pesticide consumption, not glyphosate, right?

Other harmful pesticides is coming from the fruits and vegetables. So if you're not eating organic and you're telling children for their school lunches to have an apple, to have these other fruits and vegetables, you're actually contributing more pesticides to their diet if it's not organic. So we are adamantly opposed to any nutritionist or doctor or school lunch director telling the kids, eat more fruits and vegetables if they're not saying, eat more organic fruits and vegetables.

It's very, very important. Yeah, what's such a bummer about that is just so when you think about the socioeconomics around that, we buy organic for our family, but it's gotten, it's very expensive. And I used to say you just got to make that sacrifice. But now I look at people are, you know, as is being reported, you know, coming up short, $5,000 short, your average household is $5,000 short of their expenses in a year.

And then you add organic. And one of the things that I think is we've got to really look at is all the subsidies go into this crappy food. Right? I mean, like you look at a cap and crunch. This is, like, I mean, just call out any of this toxic stuff that kids get. get, it's cheaper than the organic food, but it goes through all sorts of manufacturing that should be expensive, but they're being subsidized by our government when you look into it. I mean, imagine if we're subsidizing the organic side of food so that make it more affordable

to people, or at least given an even playing field. That's what needs to happen. And also, I'm a little disturbed that, for instance, a CEO of McDonald's makes $21 million a year, $1.8 million a month. An average worker at McDonald's makes $26,000 a year, $2,000 a month. And the average American spends $10,000 a year on their medical bills. Wow. So how is that worker even getting by?

Right. You know, I mean, they can absolutely afford to do some quality to control, to make sure that these foods don't have heavy metals and toxins in them. And that absolutely needs to happen. So we have more results from the fast food. So the fast food also was 100% positive for glyphosate. I mean, sorry, 100% positive for heavy metals. Cadmium was one of the highest level.

And the cadmium, the highest level of cadmium was found in the in and out French fries. Sorry Californians. Really? Yeah. And then the highest level of lead was found in a sonic cheeseburger. That was 912% higher than what the EPA allows in drinking water. And these, you know, these heavy metals again are very carcinogenic, you know, neurotoxic. We also found veterinary drugs and hormones in these fast foods.

And that was very disturbing as well. 40 to 60 percent of the top 10 samples, we only tested the top 10 for these veterinary drugs because it's very expensive. 40 to 60 percent had monosin or naracin. These are antibiotics that are ionopores, meaning they bust through cell barriers. And these particular antibiotics are extremely toxic to horses and dogs at very low levels and cause their hind legs to go paralyzed. Wow.

I don't know what that's doing to the human population. They're doing the children that are eating that. Everybody I know, like, everybody I know knows somebody with some type of, like, neuropathy or, you know, restless leg syndrome or something going on with their legs. You know, there's a lot of people. So I'm just speculating. Yeah. May or may not be related, but that's, you know, you just don't know. This is what, to me, the NIH show, like, you know, billions of dollars.

This is what they should be studying. Not how to pump out the next drug and get a patent on it, you know, to deal with the problems or the autoimmune disease in this country. How about what's causing these autoimmune diseases? I mean, there's no money. being put in at all and we know we're in a crisis. And by the way, I keep quoting that number 54% chronic illness in America. That number was 2011 from a 2006 study. Can you imagine where we're at now? And they're not giving us, they're not doing that study anymore. We don't know because I am sure it is off the charts. I think it's more like 80. I think it's probably more

80%. Yeah, somewhere around there. Yeah. And and then we also found a, an anti-parasitic called Narcobazine, which is used for coccasitis and chickens, but it's also an aviary contraceptive. They actually use it to prevent pigeons and geese from laying eggs around airports and state capitals and things like that around the world. So that was found in a Chick-fil-A sandwich. So what is that doing to Americans on a daily basis?

Fertility, crashing. Eating an aviary contraceptive. And we don't know that it's in the school lunches, but if fast food suppliers are supplying to school lunches, what is that doing to our children eating these veterinary drugs on a daily basis? So we're extremely concerned about veterinary drugs being in the school lunches. I also want to mention that the heavy metal issue is very important. Dr. Michelle Perro, who wrote the book, What's Making Our Children Sick,

pointed out that this Tosca bill that passed a couple years ago around the toxic and pesticide chemical act, they excluded pesticides, but they kept heavy metals in. So according to the EPA's own regulations, they should ban school lunches and fast food. food because of the levels of heavy metals in them. Wow. It's off the charts, the amounts of heavy metals that we're getting. So that's a very important factor. Then the next thing we tested for was, oh no, one more thing is today we're announcing

that we tested for industrial chemicals. We haven't announced this before. This is just brand new. We were talking to you and you said this is just coming in today. Yes, brand new news. So I might have to look at the screen a little bit on this one. But we had the highest levels there. There we go.

Jack in the Box, the one sample of Jack in Box, which was the Cheeseburger sample, had this chemical isobutal methyl ethyr, which is known as propane, over 14 million parts per billion. So that's 14,000 parts per million, but over 14 million parts. Yes, in this per serving. And this can cause difficulty concentrating, headaches, nausea, dizziness, weakness, and lightheadedness. The same sample also had over 6.6 million parts per billion per serving. serving of this chemical called butenodial. And it's a central nervous system depressant. And I want people to read these side effects and think about if your family member has exhibited these. Central nervous system toxicity, meaning serious breathing problems, coma, amnesia, combativeness, confusion, agitation, vomiting, seizures, and very slow heartbeat. I know so many people whose children or their husbands or their family members are aggressive after eating junk food. Yeah. This is not okay with me, Del.

Right. Well, I mean, when you see all the discussions about violence in schools, a terrible story out of Nevada this week of a teenager being, you know, beat to death by other kids. And just what is that rate? What is it that? It's just like turning people into just violent beings. Yeah.

And it's breaking up marriages. It's destroying friendships. and relationships, and I'm extremely disturbed about that. So I really would ask people before they make people wrong or, you know, just have major arguments. Think about look at the food that what are people eating and try to be supportive there. So, yeah, the industrial chemicals were off the charts and very disturbing. We have more information that will be coming out about that. And one disturbing thing that Dr. John Fagan, who is the head of the lab where we got this

testing done and coordinated out of Health Research Institute labs, he said, that there were more toxins in the fast food than there were nutrients. Wow. Yeah, we tested for minerals as well. And the mineral levels were so low that just one example, for instance, copper, a person would have to eat nine servings of Chick-fil-A chicken nuggets in order to get their recommended daily level intake of copper. And copper is very important in children, especially with autism,

have an imbalance of copper and zinc. So across the board, the minerals were abysmally low. not sufficient for proper human function. For instance, vitamin B three levels were so low. There was no vitamin B nine and 12 in any of the samples tested. And that's imperative for cognitive function. So if that's all that children are eating, you know, low-income children are only eating these school lunch meals a day.

Which is what, and that is, I mean, the beauty of the school lunch and was one of the travesties of, you know, sending everyone home during COVID, was so many of these kids that's the only meal they're getting. And these families that are underserved, that school lunch program is a lifesaver for these kids. And then just think what they're getting is just a bunch of toxins and more chemicals than nutrients. It's really sad.

It's a travesty. Yeah, there definitely should be more money allotted for school lunches and it should be for organic food. Yeah. We'll get into that. So then the next thing was we tested for vitamin Bs, vitamin B3 and all, as I mentioned, vitamin B9 and B12, have been connected to aggressive and violent behavior, a deficiency of them. So you don't have vitamin D.B in there. Yeah. So there's a book called

Food and Behavior, A Natural Connection by Barbara Reed-Stitt, and she is a Lifetime Achievement Award winner. She studied the food supply for over 20 years. She studied criminals, parolees, and serial killers and high school dropouts. And what she found that the one thing that they all had in common was not their socioeconomic background or their race, as you might suggest, looking at the prison system. It was actually, whether or black or white or any race or rich or poor, they bragged that they lived on junk food. And, you know, they were minerally deficient. She tested them and they were low in vitamin Bs. And when she replaced the food in the prisons or in the high schools with whole healthy foods, for instance, in one prison, the recidicism rate switched instead

of 70% going out and coming back, 70% stayed out. And in the high school, out of 5,000 kids... Just by changing their diet. Just by changing their food. Yep. And in the high school, instead of 500 kids dropping out, only 14 kids dropped out that year. Wow. And there's another prison study that showed in just, I believe it was two weeks.

There was a 37% to a 50% drop in aggressive behavior just when a certain control group of prisoners got minerals and supplements. Wow. And this is echoed in an animal study as well. This is very important. and I'm so glad to be able to tell this story, because I think it's so impactful. There was a farmer in Germany that saw a decline of hamsters in his field.

He had a monocrop cornfield. We know what that means. You know, pesticides, herbicides. The soil was like sand. It was very deficient. And this farmer reported it to the University of Strasbourg, and a scientist named Matil Tissier studied these hamsters. And what they found was a very disturbing behavior.

These hamsters, the mother hamsters, were cannibalistic. They were eating their young on the first day of life. And when they tested these hamsters, they found that they were completely devoid of one vitamin, vitamin B3. And when they administered the vitamin B3, the violent behavior completely stopped. Wow. Wow. So this begs to question, right? What if we could diminish or stop a lot of violent behavior in America by simply having nutrient-dense food or supplementation? What if we could do that, Del?

What if children did not have to be dying in school shootings? What if we didn't have to have two mass shootings a day? Yeah. You know? And we hear from our moms across America that this is what they're, this is the case. This is what they're begging us to do. Yeah. For instance, we had a mom from San Anna Call us and she said that she was translating for her friend that was with us, a low-income, single mom, four kids with a language barrier.

So she was telling us, my friend wants me to call you and tell you that, um, that, you was a low-income, you're not, um, when her child was nine years old, her son, he had mental health issues. And the school ignored her until one day they called her and said, you need to come pick up your son. He just threatened to blow the school up with a bomb and kill everyone in it. And she said, well, I told you he has mental health issues and we need help. And so they said, okay, we'll send him to a psychiatrist. So they did.

And this psychiatrist prescribed after assessing an SSRI, an antidepressant. Put him on drugs. Put him on drugs. But. Where the side effect on the box is like suicidal ideation. and, you know, the possibility to become a school shooter. It doesn't quite say that, but issues with... You read labels.

Preycy depression, yes. So first he said that, and then she said, well, what about side effects? Are you sure? Isn't there anything else we can do? And he said, or you can look at what's in the food. What are you feeding him? And she said, well, pizza, you know, much like what's up on the screens here, pizza, you know, hot dogs, donuts, you know, whatever I can get into him.

And he said, well, have you thought about the preservatives, the dyes, the chemicals, the pesticides, the GMOs, all of that in the food? She said, no. And he said, well, you could either feed him organic or you can give him this drug for the rest of his life. So this mom decided to feed her child organic. She did rice and bean, organic rice and beans. You can do that very cheap, $1.65 a meal maybe, right? And within two weeks, the teachers from the school called her and said, we don't know what you're doing, but this is a completely new human being.

Wow. In just that short of very time. Two weeks. And she called me at that time because there had just been another school shooting in Florida. You remember that one? It was just the day before. And she said, Zen, I want you to keep doing what you're doing. I want moms across America to get the word out because I know that my son, who's now 17,

would be one of those kids that would go to Walmart and buy a gun and shoot kids at a school. That's a very hard thing for a mother to admit. But she said, but he won't do that because he's eating organic food. He's healthy. He's responsible. He's creating community gardens in the area. And I said, you know what? You created a new future for your son.

And not only for your son, but you created a new future for everybody at that school because they're not traumatized. And you might even be creating a new future for all of America because he could run for office, create a service, create a product or something that will make a difference. I mean, think about the inventors of, you know, Google or Facebook or whatever, right? Like, it just takes one or two people sometimes to start something that makes a huge difference for the rest of the world. So that's why we do what we're doing because we want our children and our family members to be able to live up to. their fullest potential. And right now, Dell, the entire American population is being poisoned with neurotoxins, endocrine disruptors, hormones, things that destroy our hormones, and cause people to have mental illness and to have physical, you know, health problems, chronic

illnesses. So I can't emphasize this enough how important it is to not just to go organic, but to get involved and to take actions so that every single human being has access to safe, non-toxic nutrient-dense food, not just the people who can afford organic. Like enough enough, enough is enough with that. Like you're saying, you can afford it. I can afford it, but a lot of people cannot, and that affects our entire community. I just think about, you know, obviously I am in, you know, I'm sort of like less government in every way. But when I look at school systems, these types of things where I feel like, you know, our audience says,

And the last thing I want is my dollar is going to making a school more expensive, or is it my responsibility to give organic school. It would be expensive. It will certainly increase the cost of tuitions, you know, and public schooling, whatever that is. But what are we, of all the things we invest in? You know, we invest in wars all over the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars, nobody bats an eye.

Yes. Right? Bailing out Silicon Valley banks, a little bit of whining, and then we all move on. But God forbid you decide, you know what? how about we invest in the children of America and make sure that all they eat is organic food when they're in schools? They may not get it home, family, but at least there we're making sure they're not being poisoned.

So many people would just be like, oh, I just, why would we waste our money there? And then you think about this. Well, your kids at that school. And even if your kids got the organic lunch, what happens if they're in one of the, if a fight breaks out? Or God forbid a school shooting to think that we could have done something that, you know, did something there. And for anyone that's watching and thinking, oh, that's crazy, it's not.

I mean, all the science that we've been showing over the last several years here on the high wire is showing how more and more we're recognizing that the gut biome is really your second brain. And in many ways, serotonin, all of these things that we thought were affecting emotions, is not coming from your brain, it's coming from your digestive system. And Zach Bush, so many great, you know, things that he's worked on showing that we're not even absorbing the nutrients that we are getting. minimized because our biome is so messed up and just all of these things investing back into humanity here and into our food systems and you know all of this there's so much we could do to make this world a better place and it's not it's not that hard really let's just take all the money in the

ridiculous places we spend it bombing the world how about we go into like you know and other countries have done it for instance there's a movie called the french organic food revolution where the mayor saw that kids were getting cancer and he saw the chemicals being sprayed on the nearby orchards. He took the money that they were giving to those chemical-using farmers and gave it to the school instead and said, use this for organic food. He created a market for organic food by giving the money to the schools. And so that's what we need to do in America today. This current administration has set aside a whole lot of money right now for farm to school meals. That is happening. However, there's a couple problems.

Like for instance in Wisconsin, one of our advisors, Mark Dudla from Dudla Farms, is a regenerative organic farmer. He can now send food to schools in Wisconsin for free for them. They have got, you know, there's a certain allotment. But if they order flour from, beans from him or flour from him, they have to have a way to make it. A lot of these schools no longer have scratch kitchens. Right. They only have these trays that they put in microwaves and heat up this food. So instead of making more airplanes to bomb other people, how.

How about putting scratch kitchens back into our schools and empowering the schools to be able to buy local food that's organic, that's regenerative organic, and making the food in their kitchens. And there's a couple organizations that have done that. Turning Green has an organization called Conscious Kitchen. And so they're in California. You can follow them. And then there's another woman named Hilary Boynton that I met recently at the Children's Health

Defense Conference. She has a company called School of Lunch.com. And so you can go and get training there on how to bring in your local, regeneratively grown, organic food into your schools and make it at your school. And so there are solutions, you know, things that are happening. Also, anything that happens at just sort of the, like if you're in a school, do you have any power there to get parents together? Can you put pressure as this all bigger? Is it state-run issues? Like, what are you seeing out there if you want your school to change these things?

You can do that. And Hillary Boynton from School of Lunch has pointed out that that is possible. And there is money now grants that people can apply for to get better school lunch food, to get better meals. It is challenging because a lot of the people at the schools will say, oh, well, we have to get, you know, I think it's 15% of the food, the commodities from the USDA, we have to get. But there is, there's wiggle room there, right?

That's only 15%. So the rest of the food, you can source locally. you can have the money shifted towards those local sources, and there are more bills coming out to make that happen. There's a bill from Christina Shelton that is out right now that I just want to point people's attention to. We have an article on it on our website on Moms Across America. She has a bill that's for healthy school lunches for more money for healthy school lunches.

However, it misses the mark because it's not for organic food. You know, paying more money for this toxic food is just poisoning our children more. Right, right. So we really want to make sure that that bill is amended, and we're asking people to go to our website, to go to their senators and representatives, and tell them co-sponsor the bill only if that funding is for organic food or locally grown, regeneratively grown organic food. You know, it doesn't have to be USDA organic. They just have to stop spraying poisons on it, though. Yeah. They have to stop spraying glyphosate and other toxic chemicals as a drying agent on our food.

That is move number one. And that would eliminate the majority of the toxic chemicals that we are consuming from our food supply. And then they've got to switch the fruits and vegetables over to organic. It just, we've been farming for thousands of years without toxic chemicals. I know. This is not necessary. It doesn't have to be happening. And it needs to happen now because we're headed for not just a health crisis, but a mental health crisis.

And it's a national homeland security issue. There are generals from the U.S. military that have said that our school launches are a national homeland security issue because it's something like only 25% of the kids that apply to get into the military can get in because they have mental health issues or obesity. So we're putting ourselves, like not setting ourselves up to be a superpower just because of the food that we're feeding our children.

And by the way, China does not feed their military GMOs. I have spoken with a Chinese military person when I went to China to speak there about the food supply and he told us we do not feed our military GMOs. Of course, Russia doesn't allow them, right? So what is America doing? How do we expect to be a superpower if we continue to poison our children? Sure.

This has to change. Zen Honeycutt, again, so informative, and it really is a wake-up call. I think all of us go, well, you know, I don't have time, you know, we're busy and how bad can it possibly be? It's obviously pretty bad. It's pretty bad. I didn't know fast food restaurants. We're supplying school lunches. So really amazing.

And for that once in a while, we stop by, you know, you have to think about, you know, how many times you stop and get that fast food and do it yourself, you know? It's really bad. It's not worth it. I want to, I know we're wrapping up here, but I want to thank Children's Health Defense

for donating to the fast food testing, moms across America supporters. There are a lot of moms across America supporters. And also the Centener Academy, our friend. Yeah, Lea Center. Yeah, Leena Center. Yeah, so we, and David, we really want to thank them. And we want to do more testing, though.

We want to test gluten-free food because we think that the ingredients in gluten-free food, the soy and the corn and the beans and all of that might be much higher for glyphosate than we'd like to see. It's sort of like non-GMO. I think people think gluten-free healthy. And, you know, I read the ingredients, and you just start seeing like these huge lists of ingredients.

I was like, you know, it's just can't imagine that that is, the step we're supposed to be taking. We've got to have better answers than that. We do. We do. And I want to point out that we, you know, moms across America, we're testing. And so we would love to have more funding for testing. We want to test military food as well, and children's hospital food. And we have brought this information to Congress. So Kelly Ryerson from glyphosate facts, she's a board member on our board, arranged a meeting with, through Corey Booker's office, Senator's Corey Booker's office. And we had a congressional briefing because the EPA, I've met with them four times, has said, go to

Congress, you know, they got to change the laws regarding all this. So we went to Congress and then they said, go to the USDA. So we went to the USDA and met with them, and they said, well, really, it's the FDA and the dietary guidelines. So we went to the FDA. And that was really upset. The meeting with the FDA was really upsetting because they said, well, the EPA, you know, they pointed us back to EPA. This is all, you know. Just go over there. They just sends you around, like literally just spinning circles. Yeah, it's ridiculous. Yeah. So they said, go back to the EPA and the FDA also said, well, the EPA sets the regulatory levels, you know, for the amounts of pesticides allowed and heavy metals allowed in food. We just enforce. So I said,

so how do you enforce? And they said, well, we test pesticides and we put out a report. It's two years later. You get to see it than when it actually was done. I said, well, actually, as a member of the Organic Products Advisory Board in California when I lived in California, I saw those those lists of what you were testing for. I saw the FDA and, you know, the federal EPA list, and I saw the California Food and Drug, you know, and agriculture list. And I also saw what the EPA says are the top 25 most widely used pesticides. Top 25 most widely used.

And I looked at the list with what the FDA is testing for. I looked at the list of what California Department of Food and Aga is testing for. Guess how many were on these lists? The federal list was two of those chemicals, the most widely chemicals they were testing for. the California list was three. So they weren't even testing for the most important things they should be testing for. Yeah, so I said, I believe that that report that's being put out is misleading to the American public.

It's not, you're not actually testing for the most widely used herbicides and pesticides. And John Fagan was on that call from the lab, and he said, how come you guys aren't testing for Parquot? You know, things like that. Yeah. Like, it's one of the most widely used toxic. And they're like, well, we're always, you know, improving our, our, we're always looking at that. And so anyway, I just want to let you know that they're passing the buck all over the place.

Indeed. And that's why what we're doing as consumers is so important. This show is so important. Please donate to the show. You know, getting the word out. Let's donate to you right now because this is so important. Moms across America, you know, check out this website right now. I want you to do your part.

This is, we need this information. And by the way, it's information like this that, you know, nonprofits like mine, I can can go. ensue over when we have these, you know, proof in our hands. So we're all working together on these issues in order to make a difference in this world. You are just, it's so invaluable right now at this time. No nonprofit could do it at all. I mean, I'm just glad, like, I'm glad you're doing it. I'm glad you're doing what you're doing. We're really busy over here. So keep up the great work and, you know, really, really, really important. And I love that you just are so tenacious. Thank you.

They got their hands full with you. We're going to keep going. All right. You take care. Thanks, coming in. Thanks so much. You know, we have so many different warriors out there for different reasons.

And, you know, sometimes it's because they're doing great work and sometimes it's because they're blowing the whistle and showing things that have happened. And all of those are coming to the high wire. And so many of them are thankful for the work that we get to do that. We get to show you what's happening out there, whether it's, you know, a great. investigation whether it's you know a hard truth or sometimes a celebration all of which we've seen today well Breed Dresson with React 19 has really been on the forefront of trying to bring attention to the COVID vaccine injury we're going to talk to her in just a minute about an action she needs your help with

but first this is just a little background on you know what she's been dealing with and her interaction with us here in the informed consent action that work. Before the pandemic, I was a preschool teacher. I had lived by the Rocky Mountains and always wanting to get out and appreciate nature and live a healthy lifestyle. Early 2020, when the pandemic hit, we took it seriously, did the masking, we did the social distancing. We need volunteers. What they're looking for are 100 volunteers to develop safe and effective vaccines for COVID-19. To be among tens of thousands of people. It's the last stage before results go to the federal government for approval. Please volunteer today. When we started hearing about the COVID vaccine in the clinical trials,

I signed up. I thought that this was my way of, you know, doing my duty to this country. And in November 4th of 2020 is when I got my one and only dose of AstraZeneca. Within an hour, I had tingling down the same arm. Later that night, my vision had become blurred and double. And by the morning, my left leg was slumped and my sensitivity to sound just ramping up. Got so that by the end of the day, I was hold up in the corner with the lights off, just waiting for their parents to come get them. That was the last day that I taught.

Over the next two and a half weeks, I landed in the ER, I want to say it was at least four times. My skin was on fire. The pins and needles had spread all over my body. Couldn't sleep. I couldn't eat. All I could do was just try to focus on breathing. The neurologist proceeded to tell both of us.

I think that you just kind of got really wrapped up and the stress of COVID just kind of had a mental breakdown. My legs weren't working. I was incontinent. I had severe cognitive deficits at that point. My kids couldn't be in the same room as me because my daughter's little voice was just too painful for my ears.

I lost over 20 pounds and you could see every single red in my body. I was positive I was gonna die for months. Nobody ever deserves to live like that and endure like that. Within four months, we were financially ruined. My contract with AstraZeneca says that if there is an issue, they provide for any and all medical expenses.

They sent me a settlement letter for a little over $1,200 to sign away any and all claims. We realized very quickly that we needed to find lawyers and we crossed paths with ICANN. They went after AstraZeneca, made them stop ignoring me. Before that, AstraZeneca wouldn't give us a situation. Zeneca wouldn't give us this time a day. ICANN has been able to recently get the V-Safe data,

see behind the curtain, and see what's been going on with the serious adverse events, why they didn't tell the public about this. We can't sue the government, we can't sue the drug companies, we can't sue anyone. ICANN is challenging the constitutionality of the CACP program that all COVID vaccine injuries are forced to file under. That press conference we did with Senate

Senator Johnson, Erin Siri was able to show just how big the problem has become with COVID vaccine injuries in general. Just knowing that it would stand behind us when we needed it, it meant the world. It really does take a unique set of people to have the guts to help us. If I can hadn't been involved with me, I don't know where I would be. Thank you I can for always having my back and more importantly having the back of of every injured America in the U.S. Well, it's true we definitely have Breed Dresson's back.

And on this, we really want to help her out with a new initiative, a very important one. And it's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Bree. Bree, first of all, it's great to see you. You look fantastic, which is important because you've been through so much. I mean, it's just really been a heck of a road. Yeah, thanks for having me. Yeah.

You know, so you've really been a pioneer in getting these stories of COVID vaccine injury out to the world. But you're working on really doing a study right now. So just tell me about that. What are you up to? Yeah. So as you know, there's a lot of fronts to this battle that we're all fighting, right? There's getting stories out, you know, connecting with people here in the heart, you know, so they can. understand and feel the suffering and know what's going on that way.

But in the legal front, also and equally and if not more important angle for the fight. But the legal teams are medical teams and the government, whether or not they're going to do anything. But they all need a scientific data that they can rely on to go after, you know, whoever they're, you know, representing in court. And to do that, the government is not going to generate the data. The government is not providing any of the research dollars to make proper vaccine injury research happen. In fact, actually, through our advocacy organization, we've learned that they've been doing the opposite. They've been restricting our ability to generate funds for research.

So because of this, we've learned that we need to generate these research papers and these studies on our own. So we've teamed up with the University of Maryland, Baltimore to initiate a study for COVID vaccine injured Americans and actually people all over the world can participate. Okay. We're looking for 2,500 participants. We're going to look at symptoms, treatments, diagnoses, and tests. So we can then cluster these syndromes, understand what is the difference between neurological complications versus cardiovascular complications? What are the treatments that are effective for these different clusters of syndromes? You know, natokinase isn't going to work for everybody, just like IVIG isn't going to work for everybody.

Right. So we really need to be able to gather that information so we can better understand what these syndromes look like and then also how to effectively treat them. And the goal for this is, is we've gone through the appropriate channels to make sure that this is an IRB approved legitimate study. And so what that means is that we will be able to take this information and then get it published into the medical literature, which then will have the credibility needed to withstand the scrutiny that happens in court cases when people file for claims for compensation. So, yes, we're really excited about this study. Very exciting and super important. It's amazing. It's great that you've got a university that's, you know, going to be working with you.

what will this entail for people that get involved? Obviously, we want everyone, I mean, does this require, is it mostly just a questionnaire or is there going to be blood tests? Like what can someone expect that wants to get involved in being a part of this study? Well, we're hoping that this is the first step. And of course, it's a low budget study. So we're making this as convenient and as easy on the patient as possible to participate. So from the comfort of your home, you can log in.

You can create a unique user ID that only you have access to. Your unique information is yours alone. You know, with everything that we do, privacy is of the utmost importance. And because of PIPA laws and just the IRB in general, they really do take health information very, very seriously. The questionnaire takes about 60 minutes, which we understand is very taxing for people that are suffering. with injuries. And so people are able to save their place and come, you know, take a break, come back later and finish the study. So, and you can opt out at any time. And of course, if you have any questions about the study, you can reach out to the University of Maryland.

And it's a pretty transparent and simple, straightforward study, how it's set up. So this is really important for all of you watching now. I know so many of you have started watching the high wire because of things that, you know, the reactions you might have had to the COVID vaccine, but also so many of us know people that are dealing with health complications, this would be a really great opportunity. And I think it's really important, Bree. For people that are going through these things, sometimes it can feel so hopeless. And feeling like you're doing something that matters, I think many times is what helps get people through as they're on this journey to get their health back. So if you've got a friend that's really

suffering, it can be a very, very lonely space and actually giving them the opportunity to feel like they can take what they're going through and help somebody else and make a difference in this world is really actually a gift that you can deliver those people in that time. So let's bring the website up again. It's really simple. Obviously, you know, in all of our notes, you'll get this to react19.org slash study. If you are going through any COVID vaccine injury at all, please take part in this study. We want there to be more than enough to, you know,

people signing up so that we can really get answers to this. And it is a very confusing, even for doctors that we know that have been dealing with vaccine injury for a very long time, this COVID vaccine is a brand new mystery. It brings a whole new set of issues that are very, But when we look at the more we can see more people and what's going on with them and what's working for them, what's not, hopefully you can really start helping people, you know, move out of this pain and injury and back into a productive life, which I know is something you've been working so hard at, Bree. I want to thank you for letting us be a part of helping you with this. What is the deadline? If people want to be involved with this, how soon do they have to sign up? Well, we have 700 participants currently enrolled and we're we're planning on bringing on, you know, a max of 2,500. Okay.

So by the end of this year, because we know that, you know, and I understand it myself personally, you know, I mean, I still deal with my vaccine injury 24 hours a day. There's no relief that's going to come unless we the patients are going to figure it out. Yeah. And this is our first step in doing that. So by the end of 2023, we're hoping to wrap up the data collection portion of this study and then start, you know, fresh right at the beginning of 2024 to start looking for solutions and answers for people. All right. Well, you know what to do. If you're out there, you have a friend that's out there. Let's get involved in this right away so they can get to this important work. Breed. Thank you for, you know, really soldiering on. And I'm always amazed at this movement that I got involved. with vaccine injury. The people that get injured themselves, have children that are injured,

end up being these voices. And, you know, it's just, it's amazing that with all that you're dealing with, the focus you get on trying to help others and protect others from making similar mistakes and finding ways forward where energy is scarce. I know one of the big issues here is just having the energy to get through the day. It's really impressive what you've achieved. React 19 is doing such great work and it's just an honor to be working with you guys. And so we hope to fill this, you know, group of people up. We're going to hit the limit here. So everyone get involved.

Bree, thank you for incredible work. Thank you so much. All right. Keep us posted. We'll talk to you soon. All right. Well, look, there's so many things that we're working on. So many successes.

There are also things we've got to keep our eyes on and one of them is censorship. or how about robbing you of the entire internet? I mean, look at what we're able to, you know, achieve here. Sure, the television is owned by pharma, but thank God we have the internet, even though there has been some censorship, but a really scary thing has just happened with the FCC. One of the things, if you're a member, and you've joined, sort of given us your email list, you would know the FCC just voted to take control of the internet. We have a whole article about this, but basically the FCC now wants to come.

control every part of the internet. This is the government getting involved. And though there are definitely issues with these private companies, whether it's Twitter or Facebook, and they haven't been great, do you really want the government to step in and start regularly? Do you think that they want the internet to be free? This is just, I mean, you can read the whole article, but there were a few dissenting voices from the FCC commissioners that said, this is crazy. They were the dissenting voice because this did get passed, but look at one of the dissenting voices that came forward. The FCC reserves the right under this plan to regulate both actions and omissions, whether recurring or a single instance. In other words, if you take any action, you may be liable,

and if you do nothing, you may be liable. There's no path to comply with the standardless regime. It reads like a planning document drawn up in the faculty lounge of a university's Soviet studies department that commissioner brendan carr is the one that put out that dissenting voice there are others this is alarming this is overreach by government moving in to control the last space of communication which is why i say here yes donating we're going to fight these things but more importantly will you just take this moment where at the end of the show i want you to get on our news letter because we may find ourselves in a moment well who do you think they're looking at honestly when they're looking at the internet saying there are voices we need to stop. How about that voice that every week

is telling you your regulatory agencies are owned by the industries they're supposed to be protecting you from? They're poisoning you. All day long, we just told you here. They're poisoning you. We're giving you proof. Do you think they like the work that we're doing? Do you think they would like to shut us down? Well, here's one thing. If you're on our newsletter, we may have to bob, we may have to weave, we need to jump to another site or another way to get to us. Or God forbid, maybe we're going to send you the show in an email in some dark times that may be ahead. All of that, you will want to know where we're at. Can you imagine what could be in our future? I'm not going to be dark here, but don't we need to be in communication with each other?

All you have to do is sign up for our newsletter. Just go to the highwire.com, scroll down, and put your email right there where it says, subscribe. It's that easy. It's totally confidential. We don't share your information with anybody on this earth. It's just so that we can share all of the data. You get the most amazing part of what the Highwire does, which is a printout of every link, every conversation, every single study that Zen Honeycut just delivered to us, the books she's referencing that maybe you should read in the articles. All of that ends up in your inbox for free. All you have to do is sign up to our newsletter. I think you should do that. I really wish you would so that we can always be in contact with you, no matter how crazy these authoritative government

entities decide to be, we will defeat them as long as we can stay in communication. That's what this is all about. It's about communication. It's about bringing you the truth. I'm never going to tell you how to live. I'm not going to judge how much fast food you're eating or how much fast food your kids are eating, but I will tell you what is in that food that you're eating, what are in those drugs that you are taking and what the results of those seem to be as we watch what's happening to our society. There are great successes taking place in the face of the face of those seem to be as we watch. of seriously dark and depressing demise that is happening worldwide. The news wants to distract us and focus on the negative.

I want to stay focused on the positive. We're winning. We're waking up. We're growing. More and more people are having conversations. The news is starting to report on vaccine injury again. They're telling the truth. We can get there.

We can make the world the better place. Stay positive. We've got Thanksgiving coming up next week. So it's a great time to share all. the new information you have. But remember, don't be depressing. Don't be dark. Be positive. Show them how far we've come. All the things that we're working on and all the things that we can hope for our future for our children. This is one of the most exciting times to be alive. Our generation will be the most important generation I think they'd ever lived on this planet.

Yes, they're trying to take away all of our power, all of our freedoms and control our bodies. But guess what? When we win, that's going to be an awesome chapter in the history books in the future. So I hope you'll join us in being a part of that, and I'll see you next week.