The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 355: UNREDACTED

Episode Date: January 19, 2024

Service members confront Military Leadership with the Declaration of Military Accountability; Jefferey Jaxen shares highlights and lowlights from the World Economic Forum in Davos, US Climate Lead John Kerry steps down, more from the front lines of the German Farmers Protests, and the W.H.O. introduces the next pandemic bug, Disease X; Unredacted data from almost a million death certificates appear to reveal systemic fraud and a horrifying truth.Guests; LTC (ret.) Brad Miller, John Beaudoin Sr.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to Icandecide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Yeah. Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are in this world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Many of you know that I left my job at CBS once I got into this investigation of vaccines and specifically into the safety of vaccines. And one of the things that I've been trying to get across to the world ever since then back in 2016 is that vaccines are just like drugs.

They have all the same types of side effects. And if you actually had a commercial by the manufacturer on television, you would hear that ticker tape at the end of all those side effects you would never want to experience. Well, of course, that was blasphemy. That was misinformation. You should be shut down. We've lost YouTube channels and Facebook channels for daring to say something as outrageous as that. But this week I was watching a little bit of football, try to, you know, get my feet up, have some relaxation. And I don't know if you've noticed how many pharmaceutical commercials there are now.

In fact, I almost don't see anything else. It looks like that $100 billion they made from the COVID vaccine meant they can own all of television. That's what seems to be going on. But I saw this advertisement for a vaccine that is going to put a punctuation mark on the point I've been trying to make for many years. Watch for the side effects. Here they come. During your pregnancy, you'll take about 6 million breaths. Two breaths as you get Pfizer's maternal RSV vaccine, a brisvo.

The only maternal vaccine given between 32 through 36 weeks of pregnancy to protect babies against RSV from birth through six months. Six million breaths to meet your baby. No, you've helped protect them against RSV. A brisvo is not for everyone and may not protect all babies. of vaccinated mothers. Don't get a Brisvo if you've had a severe allergic reaction to its ingredients. People with a weakened immune system may have a decreased response to vaccination. The most common side effects among pregnant women are headache, pain at the injection site, muscle pain

and nausea. In clinical trials with a Brisvo, low birth weight and jaundice were reported more frequently than placebo. Every breath matters. Talk to your OBGYN or other health care provider about Pfizer's maternal RSV vaccine of Brisbane. All right. So, all right. So, you know, So forget the fact that RSV appears to be a problem in the world because of the polio vaccine. In fact, that was a derivative. It came from a monkey virus that in the manufacturing of the polio vaccine, we introduced to the world. You're welcome. But that's for another time.

I don't want to get into that story. What I want to talk about is those side effects that just went whipping right past your television. In one box, they're telling you to be worried a little bit about preterm birth. It also goes on to say that in the trials, there was a high rate of low birth. and jaundice in children that got the vaccine versus the placebo. Now, what we do is say, well, hold on a second. I don't know if you want low birth weight babies. Probably not a good idea.

Jaundice means they're sick. And what about that preterm birth issue? Well, all you have to do is look at the vaccine insert. You never get to see. This has been one of the issues that we want in this country, which is informed consent. You should be able to read this. If you ask for it, your doctor usually ends up yelling at you. But here it is, of Brisbane, the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine.

What does it say about the side effects and specifically preterm birth? This is what it has to say about that. Potential risk of preterm birth. To avoid this potential risk of preterm birth with use of Brisvo before 32 weeks of gestation, Administrative Risvo, as indicated pregnant individuals at 32 through 36 weeks gestational age. Just look at that for a second. Let's just use our common sense. Now, anyone that has had any children like we have, you know, how do you calculate that 32 to 36 weeks?

Some people end up having their baby weeks early go, I guess I miscalculated it. Others, they go very late. Maybe they miscalculated it. And how about the fact is your baby just, you know, growing along the same way every other child does? Is this a perfect science? No, it is not. But they think this vaccine could be perfect if it's not given at the wrong time. except for even when it works, it causes low birth weight and jaundice.

That's where we're up, but how long were these trials? What did we learn for the trials? How were the trials done? And the biggest question of all, what was the placebo? Well, we looked into this because you can look it up online. Available data are insufficient to establish or exclude a causal relationship between preterm birth and a brisville. So it doesn't matter how many weeks, they don't know for sure.

But what they think is to want to avoid it, the potential risk of preterm birth with use of a brisville before 32 weeks of gestation. Administrator of brisville, as indicated, in pregnant individuals in, I mean, at 32 through 36 weeks. It means crazy what they say. If you want to avoid having this side effect before 32 weeks, what you do is give it at 32 weeks. Got it. Pregnant individuals who were at increased risk of preterm birth were generally excluded from clinical studies of Brisvo. Do you think you're going to go through a test?

Do you think they know if you are susceptible to preterm birth? birth when you get it? No, they're going to give it to everybody, even though they didn't give it to everybody in the trials. Now, let's talk about the placebo group. How big was this study? It was about, here it is, in this study with a one-to-one randomization, there was 3,682 participants that received a brisvo and 3,675 that received placebo. What is a placebo? Well, it's supposed to be something that has no effect on the human body, like a saline injection. Is that what they got? No. They did not. Let's read what you actually got. Says right here, a 0.5 milliliter dose was containing the same buffer ingredients in the same quantities as a single dose of a Brisville.

What does this mean? It means all the junk outside of the actual viral components that are in the vaccine. All the things we're worried about. It gives you a list of what those things actually are. Brisville also contains the following buffer ingredients. tromethamine, 1.04 milligrams of tromethamine hydrochloride, 11.3 milligrams of sucrose, 22.5 milligrams of manitol. And we've got polysorbate 80, sodium chloride. And look at the bottom here. Each dose may also contain residual amounts of host cell proteins and DNA from the manufacturing

process. Boy, that sounds like fun. Definitely not saline, but let's just look at polysorbate 80 in the list all of those ingredients. Is that safe? Is that just have no effect on the human body? Here's what it says about the side effects of polysorbate 80. Polysorbate 80 is a surfactant that is commonly used as an emulsifier in food and pharmaceuticals. It has been linked to potential health risks such as increased risk of cancer, endocrine disruption and organ toxicity. It has also been linked to an increased risk of infertility and reproductive issues. Additionally, it has been linked to an increased risk of allergies and sensitivities. So you know there was no long-term trial. We're not going to track all the people that were in both of these groups and they all got this.

Do they end up having higher rates of allergies or infertility or any of those issues? We just don't know because we just don't care. And when they talk about that, you know, DNA and protein that may actually be in this vaccine as though that's safe and it's in your placebo group two, what protein are we talking about? Let's take a look at it. this. The RSV Pref A and RSV Pref B recombinant proteins are expressed in genetically engineered Chinese hamster ovary cell lines grown in suspension culture using chemically defined media without antibiotics or animal derived components. There you have it. That's what they call a placebo, a bunch of chemicals, some of them could be cancer-causing, and some foreign animal

proteins. And guess what happens when you inject foreign animal proteins into a human body? That's right. You could have an allergic reaction. The baby could have an allergic reaction. And how well do we know? Is it working? Is it safe? We didn't compare the product that had all of that junk and the viral load against a saline injection, which would be a true placebo, a true placebo study so that we see that all the injuries that took place are there more of them than the placebo group? Well, that's what we would want to know. Unfortunately, what we get is a ton of junk plus viruses against a ton of junk. And look it, it wasn't that much worse than the pile of junk we injected in the placebo group. This is how the science is done in the United States of America and thus for the world when it comes to vaccines. This would technically be illegal for a drug, which is why we just simply want vaccines tested the same way drugs are against a real inert placebo that has no effect on the human body. But go ahead, inject this vaccine into you while you're pregnant. If your baby ends up being born too early or coming out too small, hey, that's just so as the vaccine is working.

All right, there's a lot to get through today. I've got a big show coming up. And one of the issues we've got to talk about is the military. Did you know that the military has higher rates of all sorts of autoimmune disease in both them and their children? Maybe it's because they get more vaccines than just about anyone else on earth. And what happens if a vaccine comes along and it's got some, you know, experimental products in it, maybe even some things that go against your religious beliefs. If you're in the military and you want to back out of that, you're in trouble. Well, there's a letter that was sent out that got a lot of attention on this issue. Take a look at this. More bad news for Biden's military, which is having a critically difficult time with

recruitment. More than 200 former and current service members demanding President Biden's military leadership be court-martialed and fired for forcing the COVID vaccine on our military. The service members are calling this the Declaration of Military Accountability. It states this. While implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, military leaders broke the law, trampled constitutional rights, denied informed consent, permitted unwilling medical experimentation, and suppressed the free exercise of religion. Service members were families who were significantly harmed. Some service members became part of our ever-growing veteran, homeless population. Some develop debilitating vaccine injuries.

Some even lost their lives. was published on Twitter by veteran Brad Miller who resigned from the army. He said, quote, the email was merely to inform these military leaders that there is a group of troops and vets pledging to the American public that we will do everything lawfully within our power to stop the willful destruction of our military by its own leadership. I love seeing a page full of signatures like that. It always reminds me of our Declaration of Independence standing up for freedom. And when people put their names on the, the line like that. It always says to me, yeah, you know where I live, you know what I stand for,

and I am making my point heard. There's a tweet that went out regarding this very important letter. It said this. At 4 a.m. Eastern Today, a few minutes ago, senior military leaders received an email with a letter attached called the Declaration of Military Accountability. I know because I sent the email. I sent it on behalf of myself and 230 other signatories of the letter. The letter is not addressed to the military leaders, but rather to the American people. The email is merely to inform these military leaders that there is a group of troops and vets pledging to the American public that we will do everything lawfully within our power to stop the willful destruction of our military by its own leadership. Let's take our country back in 2024 and let's

begin by defending our military from its own leadership. You can find the body of the letter below. Soon we'll have it on a website where you can find it as well along with the names of the 231 signatories. Now this tweet has been seen by over four million people, and I am joined now by the author of this letter, Brad Miller. Brad, first of all, it's an honor to have you on the show. Thank you for doing something as simple as writing a letter and demanding some answers.

Well, thanks, Dale. First of all, I appreciate being here. I appreciate everything that you've done. And thanks so much for giving me a little bit of time to explain where this letter came from and what we hope to achieve with it. I do want to make one slight correction. I'm not necessarily the author.

You could call me maybe a co-organizer of the letter. Okay. The principal, the original draft of the letter was written by a good friend of mine, Rob Green, who is currently serving as a commander in the Navy. He's the one who came up with the idea and the original draft, which he then socialized with a group of us. And then we all kind of tweaked it a little bit, put it into the form that everyone has seen now.

And then we kind of decided as a group that I would be the one to roll this out early in the morning of January 1st, which you just alluded to. Is that partly because you had, you've left the military because of this and it probably is going to get you in less trouble. Technically, you don't have to worry about being fired from the military any longer, which are the type of threats that happen when people inside the military try to voice their opinion. Yes. So, you know, within this small group that kind of put this together, yeah, we decided that maybe I'd be the best candidate to, to roll this out. I resigned at 19 years of service because of this issue, which I do consider to be unlawful and harmful. And so because I resigned before making it the 20 years and therefore without a retirement, I also do not have a pension that they could leverage against me either.

So I was perhaps the appropriate candidate to roll this out. But again, as I mentioned in that original tweet, I did it on behalf of myself and the 230 other signatories that bravely put their names on this letter. I love the fact, though, that's got so much attention in the news. I mean, this is a lot of what we try to do here in the high wire is you need visibility. People need to know what is happening. And of course, the informed consent action network, which is our nonprofit, has supported and funded many of the lawsuits trying to protect the military from this forced vaccination, especially protect their ability to opt out on a religious basis. When you looked at this vaccine, what was it that really struck you that took you all the way to the point of walking out on your own pension? I mean, that is an incredible decision to make.

I'm sure it didn't come easily. What was it about this vaccine for you particularly, particularly that sort of led you to that decision? Yeah, you know, as you mentioned earlier in your intro, military service members take a ton of vaccines, and I'm no exception. In fact, I had never, ever refused any sort of injection before this one. So while I do believe that this one is unique,

I will tell you a lot of service members are starting to wake up and kind of question the science behind vaccines in general. And I had kind of started to do that a little bit, maybe about 2017, because I was going to be stationed in Korea. And so since I was going to a new part of the world, where I had never been to previously, I was going to receive a completely different battery of vaccines. And I do remember being a little bit skeptical about that. But I didn't refuse any.

Fast forward a couple of years, you know, 2020 rolls around. Everyone starts to learn about COVID. new word gets introduced into our lexicon that you know nobody'd ever used before and i remember just being skeptical about everything that we heard with the narrative as to uh what covid was or wasn't so as we move through 2020 and we get closer to the end of the year and then into 2021 when people start now talking about this supposed shot uh i knew eventually it was going to be mandated in the military but i just i wasn't going to take it i didn't like anything that i was hearing about it and then um i ended up taking command of a battalion in the summer of 2021.

And I knew on the day that I took command of that battalion that I was eventually going to be fired for not taking the shot. I took command of that battalion in June of 2021. The mandate would not become implemented until the end of August of 2021. So about two and a half months later, but the writing was on the wall. I knew that this was going to at least spell the end of my command. I didn't necessarily know then that it would mean the end of my career as well. But a couple of months after I had been relieved of command when I realized that the military was not going to walk this back.

And then I also realized not only was this ultimately harmful and built on a lot of lies, I also believed at the point that I resigned that it was completely built on fraud, just this entire bait and switch between this ghost product that supposedly the FDA approved called Comerity. And then what they were actually pushing forward, Pfizer Biointech or the other products, which always remained under emergency use authorization. So when I saw the collusion that was going on between DoD and FDA, and I saw, I saw my own leaders go against everything that the military stands on, you know, the military that has a very clear ethos when it comes to the way in which you act or the virtues that you should embody,

particularly as a, as a senior leader, when I saw them act clearly in direct opposition to the military's own moral code, I just realized that as paradoxical as it may seem, I was going to have to take the uniform off to actually make good on the oath that I took to the Constitution. So here we are now. Amazing. You know, we've done a huge dive on this all the way through. We also were the ones that won a lawsuit that got the V-Safe data, which was the data that was collected through an app of those receiving the COVID vaccine.

And what we found instantaneously in that first round of data that was over 7.7% of those that received the vaccine sought medical care because of the vaccine. One of the arguments our lawyers, Aaron, Syrian, Glimstad have been making for the military is the entire point of having, you know, this vaccine program, as you say it, is to have, you know, your military to be action ready. And yet what we're seeing is 7.7% needing medical care immediately after even larger body, up to almost 30% that either couldn't perform daily activities, couldn't go to school, couldn't go to work. So how is that preparing the military to be ready? It seems to be doing the

exact opposite. So my question to you, you've got friends in the military. Is the military ready now? Do you feel like after they've taken these steps and rushed this vaccine, force those that stayed to get this vaccine? What is the state of our military and our ability to protect ourselves now in the United States of America? A lot lower than it was a couple of years ago for a variety of issues, one of which is physical injury. And we've had multiple whistleblowers within the military medical community that have come out and said, hey, we've got this database that we spend millions of taxpayer dollars on maintaining. It's called D-Med, the defense medical epidemiological database.

I myself had never looked into it. You know, I wasn't in the military medical community. But I have close friends of mine who have. And they have said this exists to give early warning in terms of from a health or medical perspective to military leadership that there may be some sort of threat out there that could impact military readiness on a large scale. So this database exists. Now there are signals in there indicating that there are, in some cases, pretty severe spikes in numbers of adverse effects that are certainly coming from something. Yeah. So if they are not coming from the shot, okay, well, let's at least

determine what is causing these because regardless of what it is, it is impacting readiness. Now, I would tell you anyone who is observant, you know, could probably put together a pretty clear case as to what we think it is. But if it's not and DOD keeps saying that it's not, okay, great, we still need to determine what is causing young individuals in the military that we know come from a very healthy demographic compared to the public at large. Why do we have stark increases in 20-year-olds that now have myocarditis that were healthy all their lives, grew up as athletes, you know, we're athletes in high school, healthy enough to join the military, in many cases were some of the most physically fit members of their unit in the military and now have myocarditis. And that's just

one example. There are other indicators also that have spiked with just these precipitous increases that need to be investigated. Well, and that's what's really a crime right now is they are sitting on top of that demed data. And really, it's the best, you know, kept data we have. Later on in the show, I'm going to get to someone that has managed to recover. death certificates is looking at the data from there, but our national data is horrible. One stat we know for sure, and we continue to report on here is that we're over 150,000 extra excess deaths last year here in the United States of America. That's three Vietnam wars worth of the people being killed in one year in the United States of America. And as you point out, if it's not the vaccine,

somebody should be telling us what it is. Certainly it should be being reported on. And so there should be some alarm and we're not, we're just like crickets from anyone inside of our government. And this is a five alarm fire that's going on. All right, to get to the point, though, and obviously I'm sure we could get into the lack of morale in the military when people that used to, you know, join the military now see that I'm going to be put through a battery of vaccines. They saw that they are going to have no option out and in many ways be forced to do things. I'm sure that that's killing morale. And we're hearing that, you know, sort of sign up for the military is at an all time low. But besides all, all.

all of those things. You wrote that, you know, you help craft this letter. You're getting the word out. What is it that you hope to achieve? Yeah, great. So, and if people want to find it, they can find it at military accountability.com. So you go there, you'll find the one page body of the document, military accountability.com. You can also find right behind that the 11 pages of signatures of those 231 brave souls that put their names on the document. And then you can also find a petition associated with the declaration that anybody can sign. You don't have to have any affiliation whatsoever with the military. If this is something you're concerned about, go to military accountability.com and check that out.

And I would encourage everyone to do that. But what are we trying to do? Yeah. So you mentioned in your intro, the Declaration of Independence. So when somebody reads our declaration of military accountability, they are going to understand that there is a particular voice that kind of comes through that document. And that's because it was written with this historical framework in my So Rob Green, who's kind of the original mind behind this, big fan of the founding period.

So he wrote that with the desire for freedoms that our founding fathers had in mind. And there's even a specific reference in the body of the document to the Declaration of Independence. Now, again, we're not looking for separation here, but here's what we are trying to do. We are trying to say, hey, there is kind of a long train of abuses that we're laying out here, which to some degree is akin to those that the founding fathers were referencing vis-a-vis the King. So what we're saying is the the senior leaders have violated their oath to the Constitution. They've broken the law and they are violating the military's own regulations. And some of these are laid out. For example, the deprivation of informed consent, which I know is

near and dear not just to you Dell, but also to your audience or religious freedoms. You know, you don't lose all your freedoms when you join the military. Now there may be a curtailment of some, but you do not lose wholesale your constitutionally protected rights like the free exercise of religion. But what we saw was individuals who in good faith put forward religious accommodation requests were almost, I mean, I think 99% of them were denied, almost as a matter of course. In fact, they probably only approved the 1% or so that they approved just so they could say that they didn't deny them all. But they were not in any way considered on a case-by-case basis. So these are some of the deprivations that we feel like service members were on the receiving end of beyond the fact that the shot itself was also physically harmful.

Absolutely. Well, look, it's really important to get the word out there. You know, the military represents our best and brightest. And we need them ready to support our nation, our nation, defend our nation, so that all of us continue to have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. as I will say, you know, over and over again, if we lose the right to control what is injected into our body or what we can eat, but how our body is treated, if the government can inject us with whatever we want, we do not have freedom, we are now the property of the U.S. government. That makes us, you know, puts us right on line with the same rights as farm animals. We've got to do better than that. And we certainly have to make sure that those that are protecting our rights as citizens with, you know, rights endowed to us by God that they too are protected.

I want to thank you for bringing this to our attention, to the attention in the world. One last time, if people want to sign your petition, what's your website? Yeah, military accountability.com. They will find the declaration itself. They'll find the names of the signatories. And then perhaps most importantly, they will find the petition. Anybody can sign it. You do not have to be, you don't have to have any affiliation with the military whatsoever.

And if people want to figure out how to contact with me, you already mentioned it before. You showed it. But I'm pretty active on Twitter or X. People can find out it just my name at Brad Miller 1.010 at Brad Miller 1,010. Fantastic, Brad. Thank you for, you know, speaking out. Thank you for standing up for your own rights and walking away. I'm sure that was a hard decision.

But it also, you know, shows that courage still exists. And you represent that, that that's a part of every one of us. It's pulsing through our veins. And when we see it, it inspires. Thank you for being an inspiration. Thanks, Dale. All right, take care. All right, I want to mention one thing about the RSV vaccine that I forgot to mention,

which is part of the whole thing. If you're asking yourself, why am I suddenly seeing a vaccine ad that does have side effects? I remember COVID vaccine ads. Why didn't they have side effects? Well, here's the loophole. If the government is the one advertising to you, they're exonerated from having to tell you about the side effects. And that's why this is one of the first ads you're hearing it, from. This is one so that the company can make money and when they put it out themselves,

they've got to warn you. So there's a little hiccup and what's taking place. Keep your eyes on that. But you can use this with all of your friends to say, hey, if you want to say there's no side effects, how about this commercial? Now can we have a realistic conversation? That's what we're trying to do is provide you with the tools in which you can have these very important conversations now because our rights as human beings are hanging in the balance. I'm going to talk about just how precarious that balance is later on in the show. I've got John Bowdwin that is joining me. He has gotten his hands on over a million death certificates from Minnesota and Massachusetts. He went before a board of directors and government officials talking about this.

He's going to be on stage in studio with me to tell me what he found. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey. What do we? we got this week? Well, Del, it's 2024. It's a very important year here in the United States. It's an election year, an important election year, and all around the world as well. And what year wouldn't be complete without an annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland?

And that is what's going on right now as we speak this entire week. And this is something that we're going to weave in through the entire report. We're going to use this as the backbone of the report and branch off and talk about a lot of aspects about this. So this is where global leaders meet under the auspices of the state. of a Klaus Schwab and they really just talk about policy and how they're gonna move forward. These are political leaders.

These are leaders in business and finance and climate change agendas, even medicine and health. And so let's look at some of the clips from this and dissect what was going on. So first of all, we're gonna look at the current president of the European Commission. This is Ursula van der Leyen. Ursula, you may know her as an unelected official

by the people, but you may know her from these headlines. This is out of Reuters during the United States. the COVID response. EU to shortly sign world's largest vaccine deal with Pfizer. That was her. She was responsible for that as 1.8 billion doses in 2021 and committing to, excuse me, committing to 900 million in 2023, even though they didn't need them. So how did she do that? Did she sit down with all the members of the parliament and say, hey, what works best for your country? No, she did it in behind the scenes dealings and via text message with Albert Borla, a Pfizer. And when she got called out on it, they asked where these text messages were because the members of parliament for their own countries didn't even get to see this contract.

So this was the headline here. EU's Vanderlein can't find texts with Pfizer chief on vaccine deal. Oops, can't find them. Sorry everybody. Just go ahead and we're part of this deal, but don't worry about what was talked about. So this is Ursula at Davos. And see if you can pick up some interesting things she has to say. All right.

For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies. These risks are serious because they limit our ability to tackle the big global challenges we are facing. changes in our climate and our geopolitical climate, shifts in our demography and in our technology, spiraling regional conflicts and intensify geopolitical competition and their impacts on supply chains. The sobering reality is that we are once again

competing more intensely across countries than we have in seven, decades. And this makes the theme of this year's Davos meeting even more relevant, rebuilding trust. I love the fact that their theme this year is rebuilding trust. Previous themes where it's time to reset, the great reset, we're going to make the world a better place. Then she lists all the stuff that's now going wrong that the great reset caused and saying, and apparently we've lost trust with the world. And when she talks about misinformation and

misinformation. Jeffrey, I'm looking at you. I think she's saying you are the biggest problem in the world today. So I don't know what you have to say about that. Well, it's interesting because misinformation used to be called conspiracy theories, but they kept coming true. So they put this like academic word misinformation around that so they can get funding for it and open organizations. But what's interesting about that, the entire disinformation, right? The term disinformation, which is true information, but is being used to make you not trust the people that are giving you the actual misinformation. So, I mean, it's an amazing spin on words that they're throwing in there. But you know what? I take pride in that fact. I take pride in the fact

that we have been, you know, busting their, you know what's, since they've been launching this great reset, I think that everyone out there in the audience, you should take a little bit of pride right now that the Great Reset did not come into full being. We are not like walking around with vaccine passports. We're not being blocked from stores, though. It is still. still on the docket and clearly they need to get back to that, but the only way they can get there is by reestablishing the trust they destroyed. Jeffrey, I take it as a personal mission to make sure that they never restore that trust ever again. The entire conference is rebuilding trust. Because remember, when Klaus Schwab said the coronavirus is the greatest

opportunity to switch to the fourth industrial revolution, which is merging with machines, not owning property, all the stuff. And so they jump full speed ahead. You know, most people were in panic mode, we're in fear, we're in a tragedy during this. He says, what a great opportunity. So they jumped, they showed who they were, people now see who they are, and now they have to work on rebuilding trust. This is a big step backwards for them and a victory for the people, in my opinion. So one of the people that was invited there was the newly elected Argentinian president.

His name is Javier Mili. Now, Javier, you remember these headlines. You notice something about these headlines. It says here, Argentine president election, far-right libertarian, Javier Meeley wins after rival concedes. Pretty much anybody these days, when it comes to winning an election, that is not signed on to all of the checkmark points of the WEF. It's going to be called far right.

It's going to be called an anarchist. A lot of smear words to this, but Javier gave a speech. Here's the opening part of his speech. Take a listen. All right. Today I'm here to tell you that the Western world is in danger. And it is endangered because those who are supposed to have to defend the values of the West are co-opted by a vision of the world that inextrably leads to socialism and thereby to poverty.

Unfortunately, in recent decades, motivated by some well-meaning individuals willing to help others and others motivated by the wish to belong to a privileged cost, The main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism. We're here to tell you that collectivist experiments are never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens of the world. Rather, they are the root cause. Do believe me, no one better place than us, Argentines, to testify to these two points. When we adopted the model of freedom back in 1860, in 35 years we became a leaning world power. And when we embraced collectivism over the course of the last 100 years,

we saw how our citizens started to become systematically impoverous. And we dropped to spot number 140 globally. it's like the closest they could get to having Ricky Jervais at the W.E.F. I mean, I love the fact that he's calling out the elitists in their, you know, elitist clubs, basically, and talking about collectivism, something that we discuss a lot. And, you know, we've had probably, you know, the godfather of this warning, Ed Griffin from Red Pill Expo on our show, that for decades now has been warning of this move towards collectivism. But I, I I'm sure they were shocked to have him in the room, calling them all out for not actually caring for the needs of the people, but destroying the worlds we know it. Right, and much of the pillars that the WF is made of are collectivists that could be housed under that.

So he's saying collectivist's experiments are never the answer. So it's interesting because he takes the helm in Argentina at a time when there is really runaway inflation, poverty, labor issues. And so he speaks a good game, but there are people that are questioning him and have an eye on him. One of them is David Ike, long-time researcher. He used to be called a

conspiracy theorist until a lot of stuff he said came true. He went to Twitter and said this. I heard that Meeley's speech at the W.EF. Champions Freedom, so I listened. It doesn't. It seeks to move power and control from governments to corporations. If you listen carefully, and that's happening anyway. So a very interesting observation there, but again, we're looking at there now. point is let's make sure the remedy is not worse than the disease right i mean it's it's a continued issue when we look at these things thanks for showing all sides of that yeah absolutely and so who else was there well we have john carrie and you may remember john carrie from this recent headline he used to be biden's climate change lead but not anymore john carrie bows out as u.s climate envoy this is

new york times and we've shown a lot of his science communication on the climate in in testimony which is not too crisp a lot of the times. Well, I'm sure, like that Thomas Massey interchange that we have exchanged that we've viewed many times to not help him in that position, as he's clearly tongue-tied looking at the reality of what he was talking about. So here's John Kerry at Davos. See if you can pick up a little desperation in what he's saying. All right.

You know, it's absolutely critical that we accelerate. I am convinced beyond any doubt that because of the decisions being made in the marketplace now, because, I mean, you know as well as I do, even if, you know, I don't want this, obviously, but if you wound up with a different president who was opposed to climate crisis, I got news for you. No one politician anywhere in the world can undo what is happening now. The marketplace is doing this. And the only issue for all of us is not whether or not we can get or will get to a low-carbon, no-carbon economy globally. We will.

The only question is, will we get there in time to meet the challenge of the scientists in order to avoid the worst consequences of this crisis? That is what is at stake. Yeah, I mean, he's got sort of coming out both sides of his mouth. I'm all about market forces, wherever the market goes. I think that's the best way to let humanity evolve in the direction it needs to go. But that's not what this is. When you have the President of the United States saying that, you know, 60% of the fleet of cars in America is going to have to be electric vehicles by 2030 or 2032, whatever that number was, you're now inflicting authoritarian rules upon a free market system. And then everything.

It's like chaos theory. It's a butterfly flapping. It's wings. You throw everything out of balance. That has to stop. Right. And I think there's some disagreement with John Kerry because I think the right leader who allows these market forces would help because people drive the marketplace as well. So those two combinations would be really potent. And this is somewhat what you're seeing here minus great leadership in Germany. This is the second week in a row we're reporting on this. This is the German farmer protests. So they're going to be starting to drive the marketplace here. You can see the B-roll of this. These tractors are rolling through. There's massive protests rolling through Berlin.

We have truckers joining them at this point. We have other industries joining them. People are helping them out, giving them food. This is a sustained protest. And if you start to go to the headlines just this week, just the last couple of days, you see a different tone in these headlines. Before it was just kind of saying these protesters, they're just protesting some subsidy cuts to their agricultural fuel

and their farm vehicle tax exemptions. You know, farmers, they have a very tight market. So when the government cuts these things, it can destroy an entire industry in that country. So you go to the headlines here. This is the Guardian. Thousands of tractors block Berlin as farmers protests over fuel subsidy cuts. But it says in here, now, an estimated 30,000 protesters, including farmers, supported by a wide range of representatives from other industries, from fishing to gastronomy, to logistics, block the streets around the government corridor on Monday with their vehicles, including lorries and forklift trucks and even children's toy tractors. So reading between the lines there, this is becoming a people's rebellion to support the farmers.

And why is that? We saw that in Netherlands. We see it in Germany. We can see in France. So this is the Epoch Times from 2022. And they put a really great point on this. This is the article. It's titled UN World Economic Forum behind Global War on Farmers.

And you go into this article, and it really gives a great background. It says one of the earliest meetings defining the sustainability agenda was the UN Conference on Human settlements known as Habitat 1, which adopted the Vancouver Declaration. It goes on to say the agreement stated that land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals, and that private land ownership is a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable. The UN Declaration said a prelude to the World Economic Forum's now infamous prediction that by 2030 you'll own nothing. So there's a lot of people that are really starting to wake up to this and a lot of leaders as well.

Croatian member of the European Parliament, Mislav Kolakusik, he's able to communicate this very concisely and he has a courage to do it and he did so. Take a listen. Today, we're talking about ullozy vas, vast, polyprivrednika, in zelenoy transition. Your role is extremely easy enough enough. You must be no. Why? Because, because, because smetate the new, sulludo, ideology, putpunay of the Union,

for which, in the scorer's in the future, the only food being, um,et-storrened, not-punned-unned-cukcum-cooksia from the east-o-n, normal, bio-hran, mochie, will becupo-y-y-est, and is, unilchively bogat.

The war against the proxious in the insuzevroi. Tamo, farmers, them, them, to use their landiiiii

to give in the government's because, is, the opasna, the

landlishts and the they're not they, they don't, not can't do, Khervatsky and other countries of the European Union.

Thank you. Wow, I mean, it's so powerful and clear and horrifying that we find ourselves in a place where our farmland, which is the food supply for humanity, is under attack by globalists. Why is food now the issue, the problem in the world? Yeah, and so what Mislav Kulakusik really really really said there is they want farmers, they only have one job as it disappear. So, you know, historically when we look back, this isn't like the late 50s in Mao's China where they had the great leap forward. The government took over all the farms and nationalized them and outlawed private ownership of the

farms. They're talking about ending farming and shifting the entire food production industry to synthetic food to insects. And this idea comes from in part a UN report in 2013, title literally edible insects, future prospects for food and feed security. And in this report, it's a long report, but it talks about how they're going to try to get Western nations to switch over to insects because they have a problem. They don't eat insects. We don't eat insects here in America. Other countries do, but we don't. So how are we going to do that? There's literally a heading called communication. How are we going to propagandize people to do that? And it says this, Western societies required tailored media communication strategies and educational programs,

that address a discuss factor, influencing the public at large, as well as policymakers and investors in the food and feed sectors by providing validated information on the potential of insects as food and feed sources can help to push insects higher on political investment and research agendas worldwide. So that is exactly what they've been doing. I wonder if Joe Rogan realizes he's been working for the WEF

in pushing fear factor and making us watch these eat bugs as a part of the television show. I knew it. I knew it was something about the, that guy I couldn't trust. I'm kidding, Joe. He's an early stop. So that brings us to Alex Newman. He's an incredible investigative journalist, author, and he presented on the Agenda 2030

at this year's Freedom Fest in Memphis. Take a listen to this. All right. Agenda 2030 was signed by every national government in the world in 2015. On behalf of the United States, Barack Obama called it an executive agreement. and it's a plan to totally transform every element of our lives. In fact, the head of the UN General Assembly at the time called it the master plan for humanity. And if you read the preface, it says over and over again, no one will be left behind.

And so a big part of this, as you read it, and I tie all the points back to that, is you've got to transform agriculture, you've got to transform the food supply, you've got to transform every element of life. And so in keeping with that UN report on using government propaganda, Here's the World Economic Forum promoting insect farming. As we speak, they're actually building the largest insect protein manufacturing facility in the world in Decatur, Illinois. So the World Economic Forum thinks you need to eat zibugs. And here is the government's funded propaganda outlet known as PPS.

The future of food is being revolutionized by science, as new research helps bring unexpected ingredients to the table. It kind of tastes like shrimp. They have this seafood quality to them. It reminds you of like a Frito or a chip. Frito or a chip, okay? So it's crazy talk. I mean, he goes on that talk. It's a great talk about the health problems with eating insects,

including known issues with lupus and autoimmune diseases that it can create. But, you know, it's interesting. I was having a great discussion over the holidays with someone very close to me, happens to be vegan. And he was arguing with me, you know, that, you know, your meat, is polluting and it's a problem in the world. I said, hey, you know, and he's really talking about industrial farming. I was talking about, look, I want, you know, I want to, you know, have a better farming system. We've had Joel Salatin and people that have better ways to do this. I said,

but look, your industrial agriculture for vegetables is just as dangerous. All of the glyphosate that's being sprayed all over everything is poisoning the earth. And what's ironic here is both of us are going to end up losing what we care about because it's moving in this direction. What are the vegans going to say when they fought off meat and our stuck with bugs. Because obviously you don't need to take up farmland anymore. I'm sure all you need is a bunch of ugly kitchen sinks and cabinets in a giant room and you can grow all the roaches you need without any windows. So I mean, you can see where this food supplies at a lot of benefits. Yeah, and this is a sustained program. This is supposed to replace farming and this is what is happening

or what's being attempted to happen. This is from last year's Davos meeting. Here's the headlines that came out of that just to see the consistent. and messaging. Davos speaker calls for one billion people to stop eating meat for innovation and the environment. So there you go with that. And so we're going to stick with the Davos theme here. And we're going to go into something that's, you know, really up our alley, which is medicine and health. And you had Tedros, he's the head of the WHO. He was at Davos. He was present. And just yesterday he gave He gave his speech and presentation on disease X, something we've seen a lot in the headlines, and this is what it looked like. All right.

So, Dizzy X is a placeholder for unknown disease. I just wanted to start by clarifying that because there is already a lot of attention. If I may, although COVID came immediately, we were preparing. for COVID-like disease. You may even call COVID as the first disease X. And it may happen again. Such a crazy statement. I mean, I don't know if people just like try to peel back, you know,

the shades of your eyes and listen to what he just said. We were planning on COVID. It came really fast. In fact, that was the first disease X. know what this disease X is, but you better be preparing for it. I mean, I would take his word. I've said it before. I think we have to take his word for it. Whatever this disease X is, they're working on it. And it's, it's, you know, coming to a theater near you. And if you'll notice something in the headlines, which he had to correct there right at the beginning,

disease X, the reporting on it is synonymous with maximum fear. Disease X is going to kill everybody. Oh my God. And disease X is nothing. It's basically just a placeholder idea for people to put in their heads and say this thing's coming. And really, it's an idea and a placeholder for industry. So they can, it's kind of like a beachhead so they can really ramp up industrial manufacturing of new vaccinations, get funding. So this idea is not new. The WHO has been pushing this since 2018. So if you go to the WHO's website, this is one of the documents from 2018 when it first kind of entered the conversation. 2018, prioritizing diseases for research and development and emergency context. And you can see the list that they say at present, these are their priority diseases. You see COVID-19, you got

Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever, Marburg virus, you have the NEPA virus in there. Then at the bottom, in quotations, disease X, not real, just a placeholder. We'll just keep it there somewhere. But you go into this journal article here, and it goes even further. And this is from 2021. It says, disease X, a hidden but inevitable creeping danger. There's that fear again. You can't escape it. Some experts, it says, have even commented that COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 met the standards to be considered the first disease X, while some authors have called Zika a disease X. However, one unfortunate possibility is that COVID-19 and other recent pandemics might have been milder versions of what will eventually be the most prominent

disease X. So they're really, you know, they're really gunning for this thing where they're saying it's out there, trust us. We don't know what it is, but trust us. It's out there. And we need to build vaccine capacity. And we need to make bills for this as well. This is in the U.S. This was HR 3832. It's literally called Disease X Act of 2023. What does it do? It says to establish a program at Barta. Remember, Barta is the organization that gave all the U.S. government organization that gave all the money, billions of dollars to vaccine makers just threw them at them when they were developing the COVID vaccine. To establish a program at Barta for developing medical countermeasures for viral threats with pandemic potential. So this is a blank check.

Just that whole list from the WHO, just go ahead and develop countermeasures, put them on a shelf, develop your vaccines, and we're going to need those. And how fast were you going to develop those vaccines? Well, this is SEPI. Remember, SEPI's website literally has a website called 100 Days. Seppi was launched in 2017 at the W.EF in Davos. It was co-founded, co-funded by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Welcome Trust. So it gives you an idea the players behind this. This is a vaccine organization, the top one in the world. And here is their CEO.

He wrote the main blog post on there on that website. And it's titled, Developing Pandemic Busting Vaccines in 100 days. This is crazy talk. It says the world can face down the next disease X with a new vaccine in just 100 days. Here's how. And there's a little image here, a graphic on this website. And it says prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a vaccine could take 10 years or more. to develop. And you see a little graph there on the right, vaccine innovation timeline. And you can

see here, you know, typhoid fever vaccine, you're looking at almost 100 years. Then you get down to like the Hep B. It's about 20, 30 years, HPV, about 20 years. And then SARS-CoV to just a little over 300 days, 326 days. So they're saying, you know what, that's not fast enough. And here we are. We're on We're trying to unpack. You have John coming up on the show. We're trying to still unpack what this vaccine's doing. Is it causing excess deaths? What are the outcomes? What are the severe adverse events and harms? And they're saying, that's fine. We want 100 days. Let's just do this in 100 days. So what do they know? What's out there? What kind of gain of functions going on? Well, here's a scientific article we're going to go through. This is just one of them.

And this is out of China. These are researchers out of China. It's titled Lethal Infection of Human and ACE2 transgenic mice caused by SARS-CoV-related pangling coronavirus, GXP2V. Remember that. So it says in there, two SARS-CoV-2-related pangling coronavuses GD-2019, were identified prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. So they knew about it. And they started to gain a function, basically. It says the respective isolates termed P-COV GD-O-1 and GXP2V were cultured in 2020 and 2017, respectively. We previously reported that the early passage GD-O-1,

GXP2V isolate was actually a cell culture adapted mutant. So they're passaging this cell. They're passinging this GXP2V to make it more virulent, make it more infected to humans, trying to mutate it more and more, make it more virulent. That's what cell passageing is doing in this case. And it goes on to say this, in this study, we clone this mutant, considering the propensity of coronaviruses to undergo rapid adaptive mutations in cell culture and assessed its pathogenicity in H-Ase-2 mice.

Those are humanized mice. It says we found that the GXP2V clone can infects humanized mice with high viral loads detected in both lung and brain tissue. This infection resulted in, ready for this, 100% mortality in the humanized mice. We surmise that the cause of death may be linked to occurrence of late brain infection. So just as just point in this. We did. We made a deadly virus. It can kill everybody.

just in time for disease X. Oh, my God. Gain of function research. The cell passageing that they did resulted in additional changes that may have conferred lethality. That's gain of function. And so we go to another study. So that was a recent overview of studies.

Just last month in December, there's another group looking at that same part, that same mutant. And this study was put on the radar by Dr. Christina Parks. And this is titled Induction of Significant. neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by a highly attenuated Pangolin virus variant. And it says here we report the GX, P2V isolate rapidly adapted to Vero cells by acquiring two genomic mutations. Those Vero cells, those are those monkey kidney cells that are putting it in.

In cultured Vero, BGM, and Cal3 cells, GX, P2V had similar robust replication kinetics and consistently produced minimal cell damage. So it's saying this thing replicated really fast. So, but interesting enough, in their study, they didn't find 100% mortality. In their study, they said, well, we're replicating this thing. We're finding it's minimal cell damage. And that's good news for them, right? Because this is what they write, literally in this study.

They say, this study furthers our understanding of pangling coronavirus pathogenesis and provides novel insights for the design of a live attenuated vaccines against SARS-CoB-2. Oh my God. Now, this is crazy. Live attenuated vaccines are, this is Science 101. they are clearly known to revert back to wild type and more pathogenic once they get out into the wild when you start injecting people with these vaccines. It's exactly the problem we're having with polio.

People don't know this a lot, but the oral polio vaccine, we don't use it here, but we use it in the third world. We now have a polio epidemic spreading across the world and what's it caused by vaccine-strain polio coming from the vaccine. Can you imagine taking a virus that has a 100%? death rate, making a live attenuated vaccine for it, and then giving it to people as though it's going to be prophylactic, and suddenly it reverts back, becomes wild, and starts spreading across the world. It is this level of stupidity that we are trying to stop. I mean, I really, when we do these stories, Jeffrey, I just think, my God, how are we going to survive these fools? And when you think about all the reporting on Tony Fauci's now admitting, you know, basically funding Wuhan Lab,

We know that the, you know, the reason we lost our YouTube channel and Facebook channel was daring to say that this looked like it could have come from the lamp in Wuhan. Now that is the, you know, majority consensus theory. And yet no one really talks about what that means. That means a man-made virus that the United States of America and others funded to create just started a world pandemic that destroyed our economies, costs America trillions of dollars, destroyed our lives, destroyed our education system, and never had to happen had we stayed with a moratorium on gain of function science. And still it goes on, and now they're getting even better at it

with viruses that could kill everybody it touches, and we can't seem to stop them. Man, it is time for new leadership in this country and in the world. This level of stupidity, this, I mean, again, I can't. keep saying this. If we keep, and remember, what they love about disease X is if there's a crisis, as they're saying, the 100-day vaccine, that means you're never, ever going to see a long-term study again. They're just going to ramp up a vaccine, say that you need to be terrified to the virus that we created that just escaped the lab last week in order to protect you. We got to

skip all the safety trials. We got to make trillions of dollars off of the vaccine that is totally experimental, and if you see cancer rates rising, if you see thrombocytopedia and heart attacks, and all the things I'm about to start talking about with my next guest, go ahead and sit on it because we're not going to stop. In fact, we got some drugs to try and take care of the exact problem we just created. This is a really, really horrific time to be alive in this world, and it's just a shocking moment in science. If we live long enough, historians will look back and say what the hell went wrong. And Del, you have to wonder, they have all this machinery, all these factories that are sitting here idle at this point, because no one's taking the COVID

vaccine anymore, ready to produce these MRI vaccines, these new technologies. And so this disease acts as a placeholder to keep those going. And the WHO pandemic treaty even has a clause where it says, go out and find these things and try to get ahead of nature and develop these countermeasures. So they're actually going out and trying to do this in biosafety labs. that are renowned for safety issues, leaks. And just like we saw in Wuhan, it's no longer conspiracy theory. Fauci and Collins are the last people to admit this on Earth.

But this is what's happening right now. This is reality, and we really have to face this. Jeffrey, you're doing an amazing job. It's why I think the High Wire is one of the most important news shows on Earth. You have CNN or MSNBC or Fox or NPR playing the background at your home all the time, and trying to brainwash you with material being handed to them by the very industry that is actually trying to destroy the world, that is actually trying

to gain control over your sovereignty. Please share the show with everyone you know. We need to wake up as many people as we can because these people are on a freight train from hell. Jeffrey, great work, amazing reporting. And continue to keep your eyes on Davos, man. The place just continues to deliver amazing material. All right. Take care.

All right. Well, you know, we've got, of course, if you're brand new to the show, maybe you don't know we are not just a new show. We don't just complain about the problems. We actually set out to do something about it. We have a legal team that fights on our behalf, really on your behalf, as Americans, as world citizens. We are the reason that you're able to understand what happened to the trials with the Pfizer, the V-Safe. Last week, reported not only did we get all the sort of check the box V-safe data, you know, now the lawyers that work for ICANN went out and won the open box text, which means we're about to find out what the people wrote in when they were trying to be silenced, what happened to their heart,

all the questions we really have that weren't in the checked box, that's now available. And last week we also reported that we are releasing all of the data on the different lots of the coronavirus vaccines. Last week, it was Pfizer and it was modern. We got all the different lot numbers. So now we're able to tell, is there really a hot lot? It's hard to say it. We see lots that have a lot more heart attacks, things like that. But how many vaccines were in that lot?

Very important information. We've been fighting tooth and nail with the government in the United States, spending fortunes doing it. This week we can report. Last week was Pfizer-Madernia. This week we got the Johnson & Johnson hot lot data breaking ICANN acquires more lot data this time for the J&J COVID-19 vaccine. Folks, I cannot stress to you enough

how important your donations are to the high wire. Science cannot be done when it is being hidden, when it is being blocked and there's no transparency. We were promised transparency because they knew they were rushing this brand new MRI gene therapy onto the population. They said they'd be transparent about all of the different things that they knew about it, their own trials, and some of the capture systems that they've created like VERS,

and instead they've done the opposite. They have literally been fighting us in court, fighting you in court, trying to make sure that you cannot see this data. No one else is as successful at fighting our government right now to get to the truth about these vaccines, then the informed consent action network, which is the parent company of the high wire. So if you want to avoid being destroyed by some future ridiculous vaccine

that was not properly tested, some live virus vaccines, we need to get ahead of this. We need to beat them everywhere we can in court. And every time we win, we're setting precedence that says you will never be allowed to do this again. We've proved it's illegal. We won in court and we're going to show it to you next time you attempt to do this. We can't continue this work without your help right now. We are fighting on every front.

How do you think that those are just the only three cases that we had going? We just happened to win a week. Each one of these cases is taking like a year to get through. We've got hundreds of them out there. We are spending your money in the best way possible to save the species right now. So please, if you are watching and say, wow, this show is outrageous. I've never really seen anything like this. And the information has been dead on all the way through COVID.

I told all my friends, but the one thing I haven't done yet is decided to be a part of it. Guess what? You're $1. Your $0.50 a month makes a difference. There's millions of you out there that are just watching. and not contributing in trying to make a difference. Why did you change that about your life today? Why do you become a recurring donor?

That's what we're asking for. Just go to the top of the page at thehighwire.com, hit the donate to I can button, and go in there and say, I want to be a recurring donor. Decide what you can afford. Can you afford to skip a cup of coffee once a month to try and protect the future

for our species and your children? Or can you afford $24 a month for 2024? That's our ask in the new year. become a recurring donor, $24 a month. That's like lunch. Maybe you just, you know, compress your eating time with a, you know, a little bit of intermittent fasting and decide, you know what, today's lunch that I would have loved to eat, I'm going to lose a little bit of weight around here, and I'm going to try to save our species.

I'm not over-exaggerating how important this is. If you think I am, just continue to look around you and watch how many pharmaceutical are now trying to program you in the commercial breaks that are happening on television. All right, we're going to make it easy. Just text 7202, right in the word donate. We'll send it right to your phone so you can click on it and become a world changer immediately. All right, some people, you know, donate to ICANN. That's what they can do. Other people like earlier, you know, Brad Miller, who decided to be a part of writing a letter and then obviously help to use social media to get that word out there. You know, it takes citizens sometimes outside of the medical

establishment that really make a difference. Well, recently one of these citizens, a very highly educated individual, use FOIA, Freedom of Information Act requests in order to get all of the death certificate data to see why are people dying. Did anything change when COVID hit and then when the vaccine program started and maybe even remdesivir? There's a lot of information when we look at how people died. This is him in front. Is it in Massachusetts? I think is in Massachusetts.

Okay, this is him in front of the legislator in Massachusetts. Watch this. Here's some real data that I got from Massachusetts. I have one million unredacted death certificates. About 500,000 from Massachusetts, 420,000 from Minnesota and other, the balance comes from Vermont. Well, what happened on a year boundary when the vaccines were introduced? Everything shifted to blood and circulatory. Blood and circulatory deaths all of a sudden started going up.

They didn't go up when COVID was around in 2020. They all of a sudden started going up in 2021. Acute post-hemorrhagic anemia, thrombocytopinia, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism. And I can tell you about the individual cases. Cassidy Barak from Groton, Massachusetts was injected in January, 13. She reacted in five minutes, vomited for eight to ten hours. Cassidy died on January 18, four and a half days later. You know what it says on her death certificate from Massachusetts?

Complications of coronavirus 19 viral infection, with no mention of the vaccine. Those are multiple federal felonies that the medical examiner Stephen Schwartz committed on her death certificate. A couple days ago was referred to the Attorney General of Massachusetts for criminal investigation, Brianne McCarthy. She reacted in hours with a headache. She went to the ER. They said, go home. You have a headache. She was so bad she went to the ER again. They said, here's some time and I'll go home. She didn't recognize her sister. So her family brought her in. She had intracranial pressure. They cut a hole in her head, did a craniotomy. That didn't work because the clots were all through her head. They kept her on life support for a while after she had had a seizure, paralyzed and half a heart.

her body and it's about two and a half weeks before she died and that was in she was injected on March 30 2021 and she died on I think April 15 this the official date of death but she was brain dead in a few days which is fatal post-COVID MRI vaccine associated cerebral ischemia translated to English means the vaccine killed her by stroke every paragraph in that report says the vaccine killed her by stroke two weeks before Brianna was injected Diane Dubois 62 years old, died of acute intracranial pressure in the setting of rhombocytopinia. It says it in a death certificate, but it's not coded by the CDC. Because the CDC, they have a software called transaxin acne. It automatically reads

the death certificate, the English words, and converts it into codes. And the codes, their international cause of death codes, ICD 10 codes. Those codes are the only way that the public knows what's going on because that's how you track data. Nobody's reading all the words that are in the death certificates. Solomon Kisito died at 62 years old in Massachusetts on January 16, 2021, idiopathic bronchal pneumonia in the setting of thromacetopinia in a person vaccinated recently. So it says it and it's coded.

Y59.0 viral vaccines T88.1. The CDC, however, says that nobody died from the vaccine. We don't have any reports. Yeah, because they turned off the soft. where after that. So the others are, let's see, reacted to the vaccine in five minutes, didn't make it out of the clinic, dropped dead, cardiac arrest. That was not coded by the CDC. This is felony federal fraud. We got kids getting injected. I told you about Cassidy. Brianna was 30. Oh, by the way, on Brianna's death certificate, it doesn't say the vaccine killed her. It said COVID killed her. They lied again. It's double fraud. Frauded by omission, fraud of commission.

You know, Ian was in Bellingham, 11 years old. He got a vaccine, got a booster. This was November of last year, not the year before. Anyway, he died on December 3rd. Their family donated his heart. They pulled it out. They couldn't use it. It was full of clots.

To not care about an 11-year-old child and to listen to testimony like that and just not pay attention, it kind of blows my mind that people can do that. At the heart of that amazing testimony was John, Bowdwin and he joins me now. Thanks for happening, sir. Hey man, it's always just an honor to meet a fellow warrior that is just, you know, doing your part. Great video, by the way. You know, lots of people looking online, just amazing, powerful.

Yeah, I have to thank Ann Forty. She's somebody on Twitter. She follows me and she cut it down from 14 minutes to four minutes. Wow. And did a great job. And it's over a third of a million views now. It's over 400,000, I think. And that's just that video.

It's been translated into Japanese, French, Spanish, and German. It's going all around the world. Amazing. That's fantastic. Congratulations. So important. Can I just ask, like when I watch something like that, what was the reaction? I mean, you know, by this panel, I mean, a lot of times you reduce to three minutes.

For some reason, you got 14 minutes, which is always a good sign to me that you had some time to lay this out. But what was the response? I was a little bit emotional giving that testimony because I was looking to my left, the two state senators to my left. There were two to my left, three to my right. And the two to my left wouldn't look at me. Just would not look me in the eyes. And she looked up real fast and really fast looked down. Started typing on the keyboard.

They whispered to each other. She pulled out a binder, started rifling through it. Just refused to listen to anything. So, you know, I was sad. I was angry. But then eventually throughout the testimony, you hear me say, I'm kind of shocked that they can't even listen to the testimony of children dying. They don't want to know it.

But I looked to the right and they were engaged completely. And I didn't know it was down party lines. I could have guessed, but, you know, you can figure it out. So, yeah, it was tough. Normally when I speak to somebody, they look me in the eyes and we have a conversation, right? Yeah. I've had similar experiences when you speak to, you know, these government bodies. And, you know, it is really weird that it has become, you know, a political.

I've seen all sides when I was a liberal. I used to wonder why we, you know, can't talk about pollution in water and error. And now I'm seeing now it's pollution in your bloodstream. And suddenly the tables have turned. I really pray that we get out, we get past this division, these dividing lines that, you know, these are issues that are just human issues. And if we could just listen and get out. I think really turn off the television.

Exactly. There's a huge part of it, right, that's dividing us. I think we'd realize we need to come together. I want to talk about this data. So first of all, what how much, you know, what did you get? What is it you have in your hands right now? So almost a year and a half ago, almost two years ago, I got about 420,000 Massachusetts death certificates. And since then I've had updates.

And now I have over 500. These are unredacted. Yes, I have everything. I'm so used to legally as we're in this process with four. that the complaint is that, you know, there's names that it's not de-identified, then you've got to figure out how to get it de-identified. But in this case, a lot of that was just wide open. Yeah, in this case, I did eight public records requests. It's a state version of a FOIA that you just mentioned moments ago. And in those public requests were a number of, tell me the

vaccination dates of these people, and tell me why Gyrish Navani was on the governor's reopening advisory board when he basically is a false claims act violation, had to pay $150,000. $25 million. Totally separate story. And I asked for the entire state database of death certificates. How long did it take for them to produce that? Days. Really? I was shocked. I was like they gave me none of the others. They only gave me the biggest one that I wanted. What? And wow, okay, I'll take it. That's great. I ran them through. Other people had submitted the requests, eight different names. If they were all from me, they would have seen them all for me. I want to correct too. I had said that there was a

Massachusetts hearing was in New Hampshire. It was a New Hampshire hearing. Okay. I live in Massachusetts. I was invited up to speak for Emily, Emily Phillips bill. It is SB 319, I believe. I'll be speaking next week on Thursday for a bill that I wrote. House Bill 1661, Jason Gerhardt submitted it. Has Yuri Paulosov also, these guys brought me up to speak to the Attorney General. We had a 45-minute meeting, private meeting. They went pretty well. Talk about it some other time. But they're very involved. And so I'll be speaking again in New Hampshire next week.

I'll also be speaking at the Massachusetts legislature on Monday. Jancy Lindsay put it together. Great. And it'll be Christina Parks will be speaking as well. Wonderful. We've had her on the show. I mean, I think what's amazing now is the conversation has definitely changed. I mean, when I was first touring this country with my documentary vaxed,

we weren't really getting any attention from here. the side of the aisle. It was just, this is crazy talk. This is conspiracy theorists, you know. But a lot of moms, I will say, really just stayed in there, started understanding the political system, started bringing bills, and we kept visiting. And, you know, we were already moving the needle. COVID, I think, really opened a lot of people's minds. And I think that's why this data is so important. So let's get down to, you know, you know, just sort of on, you know, in bulleting out, What are the top discoveries you would say, if you were like the elevator pitch, someone that's just like, so what did you find, what do you think is the most important find in

all this, now a million death certificates between three different states? Right. Okay. So there are two things that I'll do. One is people and the other's data. Okay. All right. In my book, I start out with people.

We talk about Cassidy and then three different strokes and three women named. And then I get into the data. And the reason for that is there's a lot of PhDs and MDs and they're all some. smarter than I am. I need to do something different because we need to get the evidence to the legislators, to the courts. I'm looking to get a grand jury investigation. I'm on a team with Dr. Henry Ely, Senators Kim Thatcher, and Dennis Lent, come in Oregon, and they have a lawsuit to petition the court for grand jury investigation of the CDC and FDA. Great. Needs to happen. Trying to do that. Yep. So I have the book coming out and the thesis of the book I'll tell you is

the symptom spectrum profile, that is the causes of death across society, in this case, Massachusetts, changed on a year boundary from 2020 to 2021. Also the age spectrum profile and the seasonality profile. So the profile of deaths, what do they look like? All of a sudden, on a year boundary, it's starkly changed from respiratory in 2020, the year of COVID, to circulatory, if you believe COVID or hospital protocol deaths, whatever. I don't want to upset people that don't believe in COVID. Right. But the age spectrum profile dropped about 10 years, 10 years of the excess deaths. So the, when you see... So we're looking at here, this is the slide. You can sort of take us what we're looking at here. Oh, yes. Yep. Right. So on the top, you have all cause death, COVID, and pneumonia.

Yep. And you see each bar represents a year and the years are 2015 through 2022. Right. And as you get to that big spike in the top left there under all cause deaths, that's the year of 2020. Right. Massachusetts had about 8,800, close to 9,000 excess deaths in only a nine-week period from mid-March to mid-June. That's where that spike is. Okay.

All right. And then you go to 2021. Well, 2021 almost looks like it's in line. It dropped quite substantially. So notice the drop. We won't talk about 22 for now. Let's just look at the transition from 21 to 22. Yep.

Now let's go to COVID in the middle, in the top. Yep. You see it's high, and then the marginal, the difference. is cut in half. And if you go back and look at all cause, that marginal difference, when you take a line and you draw a line from the normal 2015 through 19, you see that that difference, that big 2020 is, the difference is cut in half. The difference is cut in half. That difference is cut in half. The difference is cut in half for those causes of death and all cause. And then you go to the far right and you've got pneumonia. Niemonia correlates with COVID. It goes down. The marginal difference is cut in half. Everything is cut in half for those causes of death and all cause. Now let's look at what happened in the blood and circulatory deaths. Okay? Yep. So when I say blood, what that is, those are decodes. Those are ICD-10 codes from the international, you know, they come from the WHO.

Every ailment on the planet has a code. Exactly. And so if you're dying from it or whatever, it gets that code. Right. That's how they track it, sort of computer systems. That doesn't mean the codes are right, but, you know, Ketrusparibis or Ceteris paribus, as people say, all the other things being equal, looking at a set of data where the same people are there coding, so nothing else has changed.

Right. blood in the bottom left. You'll see that it went up from 2020 to 2021. Okay. Those are D codes, anything starting with D. Then you have cardiac arrest. That's a really big one. I won't get into a discussion of that,

but that's a mistake in the way codes are written by the C, by the WHO, the whole ICD-10 code. They're listed as heart-related issues. All that means is the heart stopped. Right. Nothing wrong with the heart. The heart stopped because it didn't get oxygen because the person had pneumonia and went anoxic and they died.

But they write cardiopulmonary arrest, which goes under an I-4. Now I'm getting into something different we didn't talk about. Let's just stay. Let's keep it on the surface. Yeah, so it goes on. Read your book. They can get your information. We'll make sure that they get that.

So it went up from 2020 to 2020. All right. And then cardiac arrhythmia also went up from 2020 to 2021. Now when all causes went down, COVID went down, pneumonia went down. The blood and circulatory went up. How does that make any sense? Right. because something else came in 21 that was not COVID that killed people.

Right. Okay. All right. So then where does that take us? What's the next step? So what do you look at? Let's bring up the next graph. Let's go ahead and go through these slides that you sent us that we can present. Okay.

Let's go through the individuals and then I'll get back to people. All right. So what you have here is this is acute post-hemorrhagic anemia. You can see that 2020 there was no excess. Right. The third from the right, there's no excess. All of a sudden in 21 and 22, Now, what is acute post-hemorrhagic anemia?

It's sudden blood loss anemia. Okay. You had sudden blood loss. I looked through them. More than 89% said non-traumatic. What that means is... You imagine if I'm in a coraxe and I sever an arm, I die of blood loss. Exactly.

But this is non-traumatic. It's non-traumatic. That did not happen. There wasn't an oops in the operating room. All of a sudden, you started bleeding out in your body somewhere. A lot of them, what I've found is gastrointestinal hemorrhages have been up. Aortic dissections. It eats a hole in your aorta, and you just...

just bleed out through your aura. So those are up substantially, as you can see from that graph. I mean, 21 and 22, but not in 2020. Wow. I mean, it looks like almost 100% gain in 22. And in 23, you know, it's probably still up. Wow. Amazing. Right next, we're looking at, uh, um, okay, we'll go to cancers now. Okay. There's a lot of talk about turbo cancer. Yeah. People say there's no signal. Well, there is. Okay. Because I found that everything that went high was associated with blood and circulatory, where would you expect cancers to start? Well, the blood is made by the white cells, your lymph, and red, white, and platelets made by bone marrow. Right, exactly.

I don't have the bone marrow slide here, we only have so many slides we can put up. But if you looked at the lymph node cancer in Massachusetts, more than 400% of normal in 2023, 258% of normal in 2022, and it's still going up. It's still going up. It's not an acute problem like the sudden blood loss anemia. Right. Or cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism. Those happen pretty soon after. Now they're happening, you know, the more people take boosters. But. Well, what we're talking about now are the reasons why I keep screaming for long-term safety trials.

Exactly. Right? You mean, there's the issues that happen within, you know, a short period of time after vaccination or any drug. But what is like the downstream effects? What, you know, what are the cancer rates and things that take years to develop? Absolutely right. and those cancer rates are extremely high. And they're moving toward other cancers, not just blood-related cancers. The numbers are low. And they have that chart.

Yep, there it is. Oh, there it is. Yeah, look at that. The numbers are low. This is Minnesota. Right. Yep, that's Minnesota. I also have 420,000 death certificates from Minnesota.

And if they do a good job and really look in the autopsy, they do the microscope work, they do the blood analysis, blood labs, tissue samples, then they will find things like this. But if they're lazy, they won't. So each jurisdiction, how good their death certificates are, depends on the culture within the office in that area. Got it. Yeah. So you saw how much that's going up. Right. All right. Next. I mean, this is super fascinating. And, you know, we don't get an opportunity because this data is so hard to get to.

CDC should be printing this out on a daily basis. They have the ability. We're supposed to be one of the most transparent nations in the world. We're supposed to have the highest levels. I always say this, you know. We're the home of Google. We're the home of Apple. We're the home of Microsoft. We have to have. computer learning. We should be able to just show the world exactly everything that's gone on. And we have some of the worst data collection in the world. We're less transparent than in some cases than China. I mean, it's really outrageous how much work it takes to get to this information that you're sharing with our audience right now. We didn't talk about this ahead of time. Let me interject that this is the time to do it. The government has all this data. I'm one guy with a home computer. And I put together a system. Not only can the system show you the

individual causes of death, which I've been doing. I can traverse the hierarchy from all cause, down to causes and ages, down to the individual, and we can go investigate the individuals and what they died from. So when it says on a death certificate that they died with the vaccine hours earlier, okay, or a day or two earlier, and I see that the cause is cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac arrhythmia over and over again, and then I go look at the aggregated data, cardiac arrhythmia is high. Well, I can assume that all those excess, that's it. This is the tragedy, right?

You know, Joe Biden stood in front of us and said, I'm going to spend $10 billion promoting this vaccine, this experimental product in media, basically just spend it on television telling you to get it. You know, clearly we didn't spend $10 billion on tracking it and putting every scientist we know. In fact, no science would be being done if you weren't grabbing the data yourself,

or as I've pointed out, what we do with ICANN is get a whole of the data and then share it with all the scientists in the world so that they can actually. actually see what's going on there because we can't afford to do as much science as it be. All I can do is say, hey, if you're at a university, if you have the ability to calculate this, take it. Here's the data. We need information here. So we're basically open sourcing this data. But this is what our regulatory agencies are paid to do and they don't do it. They're purposely not doing it. Right. And I prove it. In the CDC memorandum, which is the second

publication I have, the real CDC is my book that's coming out. Then the CDC memorandum, There's 172 enumerated paragraphs of factual allegations. And it goes through how they have purposely not looked at it, and they're recklessly endangering the public. And I give them legal notice that now they have the information. But let me get back to the public, the data. The data belongs to the public, and they're hiding it and obfuscating it from us.

Now, I have a bill in New Hampshire, 1661. What that does is it puts a structure around reporting the public health data in the manner in which I already did, but with better access, with somebody going inside, to look at that data, report it back. to the public. And the oversight committee or the budget committee, they have to do an analysis of how that bill might impact the state finances. I just read that less than half an hour ago in the booth up there. It's only like 160 grand a year. Wow. To save people from dying, like a lot of people,

and to show that public health, what I've done is put together a system, which is, it's not AI, but it's intelligent. And it looks at the past history and currently what's going to be What's going on? It can be used as an early warning system as to how people are dying. Before they even know there's any kind of virus, before they know there's something wrong with the water supply in three zip codes somewhere. I'll find it in the data. And they have this data. They should be doing this. That's their purview, but they're not doing it. I mean, it's really amazing. You know, we reported, you know, over the last several weeks, there's this massive rise in excess mortality. You know, last year, 2023, nearly, I think, 150, over 150,000.

excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019, you know, average just skyrocketing. I say it's like three Vietnam's. Oh, yeah. And yet, like, no one at CNN is even really asking a question about it. One report at Fox. I mean, this would be the opening of any, you know, dystopian nightmare future scenario where scientists are screaming, we don't know why, but in every nation in the world, excess mortality is, you know, tenfold. And yet it's just people like, you know, you know, that are doing anything about it or looking into it. Well, that's why it's going to stammer on my words here. Organizations like yours are just that important, okay?

Because the Pfizer commercials and the Moderna commercials and everything going through Fox or CNN, I probably shouldn't name anything here. But the big normal regular media, they're going down in flames. Nobody can trust them anymore. They killed a million Americans. The protocols killed a million Americans, or amdesivir. I don't know if we can bring up this. Let's go, let's continue back to the data for those that are watching.

You're not going to see this really anywhere else on television. So intracranial, okay? Yeah. So I'll say the name. Eden was 17 years old and she's in that number four, which is third from the right. She's only in that number four. She died from a cerebral venous sinus thrombosis type of hemorrhagic stroke. I'll go through the particulars of that in a minute.

Okay. But you see that G-08 is where that gets coded under intracranial and intraspinal phlebitis and thromoflibitis. Right. That's... And what we have to remember, like even when you see 4, 10, 7, I guess you could, if you're crazy, you're like, well, I mean, that's a small number of people to get killed by vaccination. But each one of these is just one code, right? We're talking about you start stacking these all together and you have a massive, And one of the things that's amazing about this vaccine is just, you know, how many different ways it can kill.

Because it's the blood and the blood goes all over your body. It's not, you know. It sounds like there's so many ways, right? Because that's what it ends up being. But what it starts as, it's all about the blood. Right. Your blood's messed up. The blood is dysregulated. Yeah.

The white cells, red cells, platelets, all three of them have problems right now. Wow. But I'm not a doctor. I won't go there. We can just talk about the data. Okay. Let's continue on. All right. Pulmonary embolism. Okay. This alone, more than 500 excess deaths in Massachusetts alone in 21 and 22.

Wow. You could say that it looks like 20 is up, but 20 is only up because there were 8,800 excess deaths in nine weeks, which drove the numbers of other things, and many old people die with a clot in their lungs. Right. Because they weren't taken care of or whatever hospital protocols or you could call it COVID if you want, if you want to do that. Right. But the point is, don't forget that first graph.

COVID went down. All cause went down. Nomania went down. This is skyrocketed. It went up. From 20 to 21, it went up. So 500 excess deaths in Massachusetts alone, pulmonary embolism. It's a big one.

That's a big one. Right next. Acute renal failure. There it is. Wow. Now this is Massachusetts. It's up over 100%. But the numbers, and I'm very conservative with my estimates of

trending. So if it's a positive slope, I use the positive slope, if it's a negative slope, I don't even use the negative slope, I use a flat line average. Okay. People with math will understand that. But I'm very conservative in my estimate of excess deaths. It's actually more than what I'm telling you. What I'm telling you is this 2,000 excess deaths in Massachusetts alone by acute renal failure. This extrapolated across the country is 100,000 people. Excess, more than normal, died from acute renal failure. in 21 and 22 doesn't even count 23. Now this is so big, you would say that, you know, as a single cause of death, it's bigger than

anything since the Spanish flu, 18, 19, 18, and 1919. Why is our government not even talking about it? This is massive and it's not just old people. This goes down into the 16 to 24 year olds. It goes through all the ages. One of the things that you talked about, we decided to skip it because it's complex to look at the grass, but it's this swing in, you know, the average age of death year to year, usually this is something that just barely moves. And I mean, when you look at your

grad, they're like, they're going younger. It's, it's something is just yanking these things in really abnormal directions. As they go younger. Yeah. Okay. You're talking about multiplying the number of life years lost per death. Right. So if somebody dies at two years old that otherwise would have lived 80, they lost 78 years. If an 80 year old dies, they lost one year. Right. So that one child that died is worth 80 old people. Right. Right. Because that's the difference in Life Years Lost is huge, and people are dying younger. I want to look at one of these individuals just to show how you're doing this. So to show like the data, because you don't get all the information there, right?

You sort of, in some of your cross-res. These are just bars. We care about people. Right, right. So let's bring up, pick anyone. Yeah, can we bring it? Here we go. Here's Eden.

You're talking about. So what am I looking at here? This is a VERS record right here, or this is the? This is a VERS record. What I do is I create templates that extract the information. from a spreadsheet. This spreadsheet is from the official government VAERS records. Okay. Okay. All right. It has the VAIR's ID. Anybody can check it. Female, 17 years old. It has her injection date of May 23rd. Yep. And then the report date is important at 610, June 10th.

Okay. What it says there is she had massive brain swelling and infarctions. And you can probably read it better than I. Yeah, massive brain swelling infarction is decompressive craniectomy. Unable to control intracranial pressure, parents agreed to DNR status. Do not resuscitate and patient is not expected to survive. Now, that was, read the orange in the bottom. All right, so then the orange says headaches started around three weeks prior to the event. That delayed dose of the second vaccine. Headache was very severe and she saw PCP for it twice and it lasted a week.

It then resolved and oh my God she got her second vaccine. Now we can go to her death certificate. And then we go to her death certificate. So that's the VERS report that was filed. The VERS report doesn't have a name. Okay. So there's no name on the VERS report. Right, okay.

So what I'm doing here is scouring the VERS records and scouring the death certificates to find matches. Okay. And so your death certificate you received has a name with a little less information in it than the VERS report would have. Correct. So in this, it just says complications. of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis unknown massive stroke and you know the unknown is the time

from beginning to death okay that's it would say like five days or months or years or whatever so they're just how do you do it you get this it has a little bit of information you have dates you have the state you have the name so then you go to the vera system which we just saw and i'm going to assume you look for that date, right? Like, do I line up the dates of where this event took place? Female? 17 years old. Okay. Okay? And I look for stroke symptoms. All right. If you saw the death certificate, that was one day after that VERS report. They said not expected to survive. Right. She got two shots, had headaches, went to the doctor twice. It resolved. She got her second shot. The shot date is 523, May 23. The report date was June 10th. The death certificate

It is June 11th. And when you look for female, 17 years old... There's no others in Massachusetts around that time. There's none in that time. No. This is... That's it. And you put this information...

How many 17 years... I can't even imagine how time consuming that is. And I can't imagine how easy it would be for the CDC or the NIH to do this since they're staring at all the data. Well, they have the immunization information system. Right. So every state has their own immunization information system. And what I proposed to Latipo and DeSantis, more than a year and a half, half ago is that I come down, just give me a week in an office, it won't cost you anything,

I'll do it pro bono, I'll even get somebody to pay for my flight, and I will correlate the certificate database with the immunization records and it'll be over. This whole thing can end. There's no debate. Just let us see the data, but the government is hiding the data from us. They won't let us see it. And it's purposeful that they're not looking at it, because if they looked at it, they know. We'll find tens of thousands. As I said, I think it might have been the last show. When you go to the CD you see, what you see now is just a bunch of butts in the air and every scientist has got their head into the dirt because it would be so easy to be able to figure out what's going on here.

And I say this, when they don't look at it and they refuse to look at it, when, look, you can't say, you know, it's definitively this. There can be several things on the table, but why is this the only thing not on the table? Why is vaccination when you're seeing a rise in excess death? And I always say, you know, when you have food poisoning, what's the first thing you do? You ask yourself, what I eat last night? When you suddenly have people dying at rates that can't be explained by a virus that's circulating, you got to ask yourself, what did we do differently across every single state? And in this case, across every nation that we're all seeing,

we're all seeing something that is unprecedented worldwide, all seeing rates of myocarditis and cancers. and as you've shown out rising, then you've got to look at what did we do differently? We gave you all this experimental product that we didn't know what the side effects would be. We did no long-term studies on it, so it has to be on the table. And if you were going out of your way

to keep it off the table, that tells me you know what's going to happen as soon as you put it on the table. It's not that you don't know, you know exactly what we're all going to find. I can't see it any other way. I'm studying human nature my whole life. If you know for a fact, if I throw this on the table, it's going to be exonerated right away.

It'd be the first thing that you do. The word no that you kept using there. That's the important part. Okay. In order to prove somebody is guilty of a crime, the mens rea needs to be proven. So purposeful, knowing, reckless, negligent needs to be proven somehow. The CDC memorandum has the 172 facts enumerated. And then it goes through a legal analysis of uttering, which is a subset of fraud, if you will.

And it has involuntary men. slaughter, depraved heart murder, and felony murder. I go through the analysis of the facts, and once the document is served to the FDA, CDC NIH directors, 12 of their subordinates, and then I'll copy six state attorneys general in the hopes that they'll impanel grand juries to investigate this. But once those directors are given knowledge, they know, they have a legal duty to act. You and I don't have that legal duty. We didn't take that job.

They took that job. It's like a crossing guard not telling Johnny to not step out in the street. In fact, it's worse. It's like the crossing guard saying, Johnny, look at me. Here comes a bus. Okay, Johnny, you ready? Go. Jump and, you know, don't look for the bus.

Look at me. Right. And go. They have a legal duty to protect the public. Not only are they shirking their legal duty, but they're purposely not doing it so that they protect the vaccine and not the public. That's murder. And I can prove it in a court of law. Some of this data is showing things like, I want to go back to the renal failure because, you know, one, a lot of the, you know, the issues you're showing, whether it's cancer or blood issues, those are, you know, vaccine.

But renal failure, is that, is this what we're seeing, this spike in renal failure? Is that, do you think, caused by the vaccine? The CARES Act is a behavior modification. They modified the behavior of doctors through incentives or through coercion from either medical boards or the hospital administrators who were financially incentivized. The renal failure didn't go up. I have other graphs to show exactly when it goes up. But it didn't go up as much in the April and May EUAs for rmdesivir for older people, older people and then the October 22nd, 2020 EUA. You know when it went up? After the November 2nd

CMS.gov, 20% adder, NCTAP, people can look that up. When that hit, it went sky high. This is the moment they add that extra bonus charge onto every medical bill that tags 20% on any patient that you gave remdesivir. And look what happened, folks. This is absolutely stunning when you see it on a chart like this. You're in 2021. Remember, this is when we're I'm more told the virus isn't really deadly. And just as soon as you make that adjustment, you incentivize every hospital an extra 20% bonus on the charge being given worth tens of thousands of dollars,

you suddenly watch this spike in renal failure that goes through the roof. And it hasn't come down. Hundreds of thousands. Hundreds of thousands. Not to contradict you. No, not appreciated. Sorry, I left the zero out of. Half a million dollar ICU stay.

20% is 100 grand. Half a million dollars. And people are, there are millions. I have files. We can't see the accounting because if we did, you know, I'd have fun with Warner Mendenhall. We'd be going with False Claims Acts all over the place. Right. But they won't let us see the accounting.

But I have the other records as to when they received the remdesivir. That's the hard one. 28-year-old woman, okay? Her mother brings her in because she tested down at 87% on a finger SPO2. So the oxygen level. Yep. By the time she got to the hospital, it was 95. But what did the doctors do?

They gave her remdesivir right away because she tested positive for COVID. She had no fever. She was 97.9. I have the vital statistics, the vital stats on her. I have a 6,000-page medical file her mother shared with me. I think it's going to be okay, but, you know, there was, her name is Danielle Alvarez. I'll just say the name. Yeah. And Rebecca Charles is her mom.

And I'm trying not to cry right now because I flew to Florida and went to a conference and just happened to run into her Rebecca. And, you know, it was tough. She lost her daughter. She lost her only daughter. They killed her. Not only did they do that, they started prepping her for ventilator,

larazepine, medazilam, propofol, dex metatomitone. They gave her the whole thing. So they can't fight back. They give you a muscles paralytic. So you can't fight back when they're shoving the trache tube down.

Oh my God. And it goes over and over. This case after case, after case where they murdered people and it drove the COVID numbers. Yeah. Okay. But that last graph you showed, you don't have to put it up again. But I have a different graph where there's zero correlation in Minnesota between COVID

going up and acute renal failure not going up, zero correlation until they money kicked in. When the money kicked in, the graphs started swimming together like salmon, just swimming together. Just perfect correlation after that. So you go to the hospital with COVID. get put on remdesivir, you have kidney failure with COVID on your death certificate. No correlation in 2020. That's the thing I said.

I have a friend that's a doctor. It's like, are, you know, renal failure's up? He's like, yeah, they are. It's really weird. It's like, does COVID known in any stretch of your imagination in science cause renal failure? He's like, no, not that I've read or anything. I was like, dude, you're killing people. Here's a big thing I want to mention because I don't know if it's from does.

I did say dude, by the way, because when we were kids, really, really. each other's dudes. I don't know if it's rindesvere. I think it might be a combination of vancomycin or amdesivir. Doctors tell me I'm wrong. Vancomycin destroys the kidneys if you give it too much. People are getting these massive infections and they end up septic and they give vancomycin very strong antibiotic.

But here's the problem. It doesn't matter that I don't know. It doesn't matter that doctors might be right or wrong. The problem is what you just said, they're purposely not looking at it. They're purposely not looking at 100,000 extra deaths in 21 and 20,000. I mean, how can you, it's like they're not only not doing their job. They're purposely not doing the job and they're promoting the thing that's killing people because it's incentivized and the people who wrote the bill, and it's probably the lobbyist,

not the legislators. Lobbyists write the bills, they hand them to the legislators, here's a donation, put in my bill, the bill gets put in, the CARES Act. We're going to take care of people. No, you're not. You killed a million people with protocols, vaccines. They killed more than a million people with that legislation. I absolutely agree with it.

That's what we reported here. We could go through a bunch more graphs. I just want to talk about one more personal story. We have a death certificate here that I'd like to bring up because you know, you said this is, you know, sort of an important story to this. So this is Brianna, 30 years old. She passed away in a hospital from a massive stroke and seizure. She recovered easily from COVID-19 back in November of 2020, along with several of her close friends and family members with no lingering effects. On March 30th, she was given a single dose of the Moderna vaccine.

She initially complained of mild nausea and vomiting, but quickly developed the same. severe headache prompting her to visit the local ER where she received treatment for a migraine. She returned the ER at least one more time after no relief from the headache. By April 3rd, Saturday, she no longer recognized her sister. She had dangerously high intracranial pressure. She suffered a stroke with paralysis of a left side and a seizure. Multiple lesions were noted on her brain via MRI. Obviously, I mean, right there had no issue with COVID, but the vaccine all held

breaks, lose vomiting, and within days, she's dead. What was the cause of death that was listed here? On her death certificate, it did list that the stroke killed her, but the underlying, here's the death certificate. You notice what's in pink at the bottom, okay? The last thing listed in part one is the UCOD, underlying cause of death. That should be the root cause of death. It's a backwards time order.

Yeah. They said COVID killed her. COVID killed her. They said COVID killed. Even though in that entire description, the Vera's report says she did fine with COVID, days after the vaccine and this death certificate, if it was used and did not do an investigation attaching it to VERS, you could walk away and say she died of COVID. Let me, okay. I've spoken to the person who filled out the VERS report, a nurse, a cousin

of the father. She knows. She got it right. Okay. This is a fact. I've spoken to the father very recently. It was a really tough call because I lost my son in 2018. And when I talk to these guys, I'm struggling right now. So he's trying to get the state to take off COVID and put on the vaccine. They've been stonewall on him for two years. That date was March 30th, 2021 she got injected to teach at Methuen High School. There's an article. I have the link in my book.

Methuen High School teachers to get the vaccine. Not only that, this is how we know it's her, right? I've talked to the family member who input that VERS record. Why did she put the input the VERS record? because the doctors didn't do it. Wow. They didn't do it. Now, there's a report written in the neurohospitalist magazine

by six doctors from the Beth Israel Deaconas Medical Center in Massachusetts and Harvard Medical College. Those six doctors, the title of the report is fatal post-COVID-MRNA vaccine-associated cerebral ischemia. What that means is the vaccine killed her by stroke. That's what that title means. Every paragraph says the vaccine killed her by stroke. One paragraph says we have several reports,

of COVID vaccines killing people by stroke. Another paragraph says there are a number of reports where CVST is common, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Sound familiar? That's what Eden died from. She was injected five weeks after Brianna 20 miles away and died from a CVST. And it's in the report. And also where thrombocytopinia is frequent, frequent, okay, frequent. Diane Dubois was 62 years old.

Three weeks before Brianna was injected, Diane died from acute intracurine. cranial hemorrhage in the setting of thrombocytopinia. Three women, three strokes, chapter two in my book. You know, and this is part of this whole scam that began in the middle of COVID that we reported on, where doctors were being told basically to misrepresent the death certificate. You talk about that underlying cause of death. They started saying the COVID numbers were through the roof, but really because they were just categorizing everybody that died with COVID is having died from COVID.

I just want to do a flashback here. This is actually the interview I did with Scott Jensen from up in Minnesota. And this is what we were talking about when they changed how doctors are supposed to fill out a death certificate. Imagine now we've got to go back and try and figure out what happened here. And it looks like our own CDC purposely went out of their way to basically just cloud the data and corrupt the data. So we'd never really get to the bottom of it. Take a look at this. We reported several weeks ago that it looks very much like the CDC is asking doctors and coroners or whoever fills out these forms to bloat the numbers.

Go ahead and take it, make it all COVID-19. And this was what went on to say. It is important to emphasize that coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to the death. It goes on. This is a question. If you're not understanding what we're saying, wink, wink, doctor, here's what you need to know. What happens if the terms report on the death certificate indicate uncertainty,

meaning I'm uncertain? What should I do then? If the death certificate reports terms such as probable COVID-19 or likely COVID-19, these terms will be assigned the new ICD code, meaning use the code that they did die of COVID-19. And in case you're worried, we're going to check up on you. Let us just make it clear. It is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases. You're a doctor.

What was your experience when you saw this recommendation by the CDC on the death certificates? That was actually April 3rd, Adele. And I had never seen something like that before. All of a sudden, I read this document from the Department of Health and it said, go ahead and diagnose COVID-19. It didn't say put down probable. It said, go ahead and put it COVID. You just showed it on your screen before.

And so then I went to the CDC document, and that flies completely in the face of the manual that CDC puts out as to how death certificates should be filled up. In the manual, it talks about specificity and precision. And all of a sudden, we're being told, well, if it's reasonable, if it's likely, if it's probable or it's presumptive, go ahead and put that down. That was what caused me to raise this up the flagpole if you'll say, hey, I've never been coached or told before that this is what I need to do. And so I checked with 50 to 75 positions in Minnesota, and none of them could remember it either. We didn't have that happen in 2018 when we had 60 to 80,000 deaths from influenza. If I diagnosed pneumonia and I put that on the death certificate, nobody was telling me to put influenza on it as well if I happened to be in the middle of a flu epidemic.

If I didn't test for it, if I didn't have an interest in testing for it, then I certainly shouldn't be putting it on the death certificate. Typically, death certificates are filled out based on causation. And now we're simply saying, well, you can just correlate it to what happens to be going around. I mean, we never do things like that. So that was Scott Jensen who was not only a doctor who'd won, like, Doctor of the Year multiple times in Minnesota. He was a senator, and he was reporting to us.

They're asking me to manipulate the death certificate in a way I've never been asked in all my years in medicine. And now you're stuck trying to filter through in many ways contaminated evidence. Right. Well, what you saw, that was either alert number two or report number three. both the links are in my book and in the memorandum. What that is is solicitation of fraud. That right there, 18 U.S.C. 1035, false statements in health care matters, 1040, fraud and disaster relief, 1343 fraud by wire. I'll stop now.

But those are multiple federal felonies that they're telling doctors to commit. And why? Because the death certificates are controlled by state law. All right. That's a federal agency. Interesting. telling the state medical examiners to violate state law. And then in doing so, those death certificates then feed up into the CDC of federal agency,

which is why I can then use federal law to say 18 U.S. C. 10, 35, 10, 40, 13, 43, and so on. I have all those analyses in partly the book and partly the memorandum. But what you have here is a RICO criminal organization called the U.S. government in the CDC, FDA, NIH, along with the medical boards, FSMB is. right there, why they exist, I have no idea. And then not only the state licensing boards, but the board certifications, American Board of Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Pediatrics, they all got to go down because they're all working together against the health of the people.

They're killing. They killed a million Americans in the last couple of years. It's a RICO scam, and it's a government against the people, killing the people. Yeah, it's really amazing. No mob boss ever dreamed of something so horrific. Oh, that's cruel. As what happened here, to sort of sum all this up, I think, you know, there's a tragedy. A million people have been killed by the decisions that our government made, things that they forced, you know, illegal acts as you're pointing to. But with COVID, perhaps to me the greatest tragedy is that this is one of the few viruses we've ever seen that actually had no effect on children. Usually children are the, they catch it, they spread it, they have the most serious outcomes when they're young. In this case, this is a virus that basically left them alone.

The death rate, I think, under 19, is 0.000000. zero zero two something percent. So I want to go to this last death certificate in this story because this is a young child that you have in your group. This is Cassidy seven years old. She spiked a 103 fever. Severe stomach ache has not had a bowel movement since the day before vaccination, which makes today three days without one. First vaccine caused severe nausea and vomiting from five minutes post-injection and for the next eight to ten hours. And she's no longer with us.

Yeah. This is what prompted me to get the death certificates. I was driving to the gym, and I heard on the radio, a seven-year-old died from COVID, and I know from all my work didn't happen. Right. They lied. The only thing they wrote on her death certificate under causes of death in part one, which is the causes.

The contributing conditions, there was fungal and bacterial pleuracy, probably from wearing a mask in school, six hours a day, five days a week. Wow. You know, generating all that and rebreathing your own, fungi and stuff. So the only thing in part one, complications of coronavirus 19 viral infection. They blamed COVID. Now, I've asked the state, tell me her vaccination date because I found a seven-year-old,

and I go through the four, there are four different seven-year-olds who died in Massachusetts around that time. I analyze all four in my book, and it's up to the people to decide. But there's only one that matches. Right. And Cassidy is the one that matches. Why don't they tell the truth? We know she was injected on January 13.

She died on January 18, five days later. She reacted in the first vaccine, you just read, five minutes and threw up for eight to ten hours. Then they gave her a second one that the report is about. And then she dies. I believe it's Cassidy. I think any rational person would read that evidence and believe it's Cassidy. Tell us the truth. Because all the parents read that.

She died of COVID, went out and got their kids vaccinated. Oh, my God. For the very thing that killed her. And the other thing is complications, there's no other causes in part. How can you have complications of a death when there's nothing else listed? It's not pneumonia, it's not COPA, ARDS, no asthma. In part one, it said she had asthma in part two. You can't.

And then when I look, because I have the records in every field, 315 different columns per record, I was able to look and see all the death certificates that that particular medical examiner wrote. And what she wrote, and it's complications of, She had the same phraseology. Not a single other medical examiner wrote that in the other 20,000. Occasion from coronavirus, 19 viral infection. That's it. Yeah.

In days. Well, complications. Yeah. All right. So I'm sure people want to be able to look at this data. So what is the best? Do you have a book? Yeah.

So the book has a lot of graphs. You go the realcdcdc.com. The realcdc.com. Yep. T-H-E-R-E-A-L-C-D-C-C-D-com. Okay. That's the book. The book is for everybody.

Anybody can understand, I don't do P-values, statistics, confidence intervals. I do raw data. And anybody can look at a graph and say, oh my God, look at all the people that died of this cause. The other publication is called The CDC Memorandum. That's more difficult for people to read. It's about 130 pages, it's almost done, 130 pages of text, which 100 pages of factual allegations and then legal analyses.

Okay. with 157 pages. Now here's where all the graphs come in. 400 graphs of various causes of death. Wow. Do you have a solution? What's the plan? What's the goal? I mean, you're doing all this work, you're staring at it. What's our way forward? Where's the light at the end of this very dark tunnel? You know, I said in early 21, this won't end until everybody knows somebody. The people I talked to at the hotel desk, the guy who drove me to the hotel, to the hotel, from the airport. Everybody knows somebody now. We have a Rasmussen. I think we have that Rasmussen article or the poll that was done.

So now that we have 20 something, 20, here we go, COVID-19 virus deaths versus vaccine deaths. It gets into the groups that, you know, they believe someone in their family died of COVID-19. These numbers are starting to go through the roof. So they're going to get higher. So they're at up about 25%, 40% are saying that they're pretty sure the vaccine kills people. I mean, so like you're saying. The solution is any state should look at what I've done and either come to me or I talk to Ed Dowd's guys, Carlos and Yuri, we talk, put together a system to show what people are dying

from and make that information public. So we need public transparency of health data. That's number one. What else can we do? There's a lot involved. We don't get into politics here. But you know, criminal, you have to have criminal prosecution. otherwise the behavior will not stop.

I agree. You can't just slap them on the wrist. These people murdered people en masse, and they knew what they were doing. And after they get the CDC memorandum that served to them, anybody who subsequently dies after a reasonable time after receiving it will have done so with knowledge that they should have investigated, they should have stopped this. And have they not, now the mens rea is proven,

and now you just have to prove causality. Right. Well, look, I mean, when we elect our leadership this year, a lot of elections coming up, I would recommend that we not elect people that sit in there and avoid listening to the story of children dying and roll their eyes and try to get out of the room. The people that are paying attention, those are the ones that need to put in the attorney generals state by state and the attorney generals of this nation to actually bring, you know,

I think, criminal indictments against these murderers that, you know. We need grand jury investigations. We need grand jury investigations. Well, your data is going to be a huge problem. part of that. It's really important that people like you are out there. And it's really an honor and a pleasure to gotten to look through some of your data. Same here. Thanks for having me. All right, absolutely. Thank you. All right. Well, look, for those people that, you know, are starting to think, man, you know, I don't know if I want to be involved in this vaccine program. There's a lot of us. My kids have

never received a single vaccine. Truth is, is I never received a single vaccine as a child. I'm doing just fine. There's millions of us out there. But what do you do? you, you know, your child is talking to a friend and it comes out that they may be different. It's like any other difference. We need to develop acceptance. And that's what one of the books by I Can is all about. Take a look at this. I want to officially just make this statement. I'm unvaccinated and that's okay. Tonight we're celebrating Shannon Croner's book. I'm unvaccinated and that's okay. It talks about a little boy and what his journey is like in today's world with all the pressures to being vaccinated, where he's

unvaccinated and has an older sibling who's vaccine injured. We need tools that parents can use to show their kids that it's perfectly acceptable and well within bounds to make a decision for their kids to not be vaccinated. Being able to see it in a cartoon specifically for children, they're able to relate a lot more. They're like, hey, this kid is just like me. I made a decision with my parents and We shouldn't be ashamed of it. This book is one that everybody, regardless of your age, your concept of what you may believe, you've got to read this book.

It is something that we all really, really need. What a wonderful book. What a wonderful message, beautiful illustrations, great content, great information. Target is already sold out online. I can. They sell it on their store online and they're already sold out. They're ordering a thousand new books. This book is touching.

the hearts and minds of so many people. The message is just right on time for a world that's ready to receive it. Well, I'm unvaccinated. It's okay selling like hot cakes. To say it's a hit would be to undermine the explosion that's happening worldwide with this book. And I just want to report that the Spanish language version is now available. You can find it at our store at I Can Decide.com. You can get the book. And I want to point out, if you're looking at that screen last week, one of the most dynamic interviews I've done, a new superhero in our mission, Michael Nels.

His book was out of, like it was out of stock. He'd sold out by the time he came on our show. So many of you were complaining that you couldn't even get near it. So we managed to buy a small group of these books. They're now available. What I Can Decide. Shop. I can't, I mean, I really, I went, you know, over the top last week. You need to buy this book.

It is mind-blowing. As I said, it's like the companion piece to the psychology of totalitarianism by Matthias Desmond. Those two books, I think, will really help you and anyone you know understand what really happened with this COVID pandemic, what's behind it, so that we can prepare. Folks, we need to prepare for what's coming because our leadership and the people that we once trusted in this religion called modern medicine and we're bowing down to those white coats, we no longer have, we've lost all trust. And frankly, I don't know how to get it back when I see headlines like this. This is the recent headline I just saw this week. This is CNN.

Cancer incidents rising among adults under 50 new report says leaving doctors. searching for answers. I believe the thumbnail that was tweeted out was leaving doctors baffled. Your doctor is baffled why there is a rise in cancer. I tweeted out about this and I said it couldn't possibly be caused by that experimental MRNA technology that bragged that by design puts your toll-like receptors to sleep, which are the guardians of your immune system that do what protect you from cancer? Couldn't have anything to do with that product, could it? I mean, everything that we just talked about, these rises, and the only thing that these baffled doctors of people,

you're putting your life in their hands, they're baffled on why there's this anomaly, not just in the state of Minnesota or Massachusetts, all 50 states and every single country in the world seeing the same thing. Never happened before. Never before have we seen something like this worldwide where not a doctor in the world can figure it out.

It's absolutely astounding. And it means we are under threat by powerful, powerful stupidity right now. And you need to do everything you can, like by the indoctrinated brain and the psychology of totalitarianism and share this show with everyone you know. We are running out of time. We are growing. It's like a flow truck. We are growing.

We're growing in numbers. I think we're somewhere probably around 30, maybe 40%. There's elections coming. There's WHO treaties that will take away the sovereignty of every nation in the world if we don't have enough people to stop it. So I get it. Your job's important. You don't do what I do here on the high wire.

But you better make waking up your neighbors, your friends, your family members, your number one priority or everything we know to be true, especially here in the United States of America, everything we know to be true about freedom, about liberty, about sovereignty will come to an end. And yet, they are complaining at the WEF this week that they have to gain our trust back, which means we're winning, winning. W-I-N-N-I-N-G. I want to turn that into we won.

I hope you'll help me get to that finish line. And I'll see you next week.