The Highwire with Del Bigtree - EPISODE 360: THE CLOT THICKENS

Episode Date: February 23, 2024

The V-safe Free-Text Data is Out and Aaron Siri, esq., Has the Details; Jefferey Jaxen reports on the state of vaccine mandates and informed consent in a post-COVID world, and a new vaccine technology beyond injectables that takes it a step too far; The Clot Thickens As A New Study The Severity of The Blood Clot Problem; Funeral director and embalmer’s firsthand account corroborates Haviland’s survey data.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to ICan Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world. Thank you for joining us to step out onto the high wire. Every week we bring you more and more information about the medical situations and issues that are happening around the world that we think really affect your life. life and our ability to move forward. We discuss things that may talk about our future species, whether we will last on this planet or not. And many of those that appear to be or say that they're fighting for our safety may be actually bringing the very dangers that we're the most worried about when you think of gain of function science. In an attempt to protect us, they're

making viruses more and more deadly every day inside of a lab. And we know that labs leak. Well, this week I've been preparing for this show. I will tell you that we're about to present some ideas and some things that are going on that may be the scariest issues of our time. I think I want you to watch this show and think about the ticking clock. How close are these issues? How much danger are we actually in? And how long till enough people wake up to say, stop, this is over. We're not going to take this anymore.

To begin this show, I want to talk about a headline that just came out, I believe it was today or yesterday, about our nonprofit. We are always under attack by the media because we are not working for pharma the way they are. Tax records reveal the lucrative world of COVID misinformation. It goes on to say four major nonprofits that arose to prominence during the coronavirus pandemic by capitalizing on the spread of medical misinformation. Collectively gained more than $118 million between the United States. 2020 and 2022. I'm not going to get any deeper in that if you want to read the article and get into all the details of our finances, what I get paid, what others get paid. What you won't see is what Scott Gottlieb got paid or Tony Fauci got paid or any of the people that are actually

destroying your world, your lives and your bodies. But I want to say this about misinformation. What misinformation? What is it exactly that we peddle for money here on the high wire? We were one of the first ones report to you that it looked like this virus came from a lab in Wuhan. For saying that, we lost our YouTube channel and our Facebook channel. But if you've turned on your television at all in the last year, it is clear that almost every decent scientists in the world, including the FBI, are saying it appears this virus came from a lab. So who got it right? We did. We told you from the very beginning before one single person ever received this vaccine outside of the trials, that the trials had shown that they had no idea whether it would stop transmission or not.

We said that the misinformation is coming from mainstream news that is telling you it's 95% effective at stopping you from getting the virus and therefore you are protecting everyone around you. We called bull crap on that and we were right. Everyone knows it. If you've gotten the vaccine and you're watching the show, you know you caught COVID after getting the vaccine. In fact, we've shown you that there's negative efficacy now. The science shows that after about 14 or 15 weeks, not only does the vaccine not protect you, it makes you more likely to catch COVID over and over and over again.

That was called misinformation. To say that the vaccine didn't stop transmission was misinformation. It's a lie. It's going to stop this pandemic. Now it's called endemic because it's never going away because everyone that got the vaccine is now keeping us from being able to end the rain of the country. COVID virus. We also told you we believed that there were going to be long-term danger, short-term and long-term dangers. We talked about blood clots. We talked about myocarditis. We talked about

strokes and brain swelling and cancers. All of that was said to be misinformation. This is just like every other vaccine. It's perfectly safe, totally effective. It can do no harm whatsoever. I said to you, can you imagine how stupid you would think it would look if you drove down the road and saw a billboard that said drugs are safe and effective? Your brain would immediately go, wait, hold on a second. I mean, all drugs, even drugs that have been approved yet. Are we talking about fen, fen, and biox and oxy cotton and all the drugs that are being discontinued because they do so much harm? Are we saying that, you know, no drug in the future is ever going to be dangerous? I mean, everyone knows. What about all those side effects I hear at the end of every commercial for every drug? We would say it's preposterous to make a statement that drugs are safe and effective.

Yet we've made that claim for vaccines. Well, folks, that claim is crashing down. In fact, I said just a week or two ago we're seeing commercials for vaccines now, and guess what you're hearing may cause injury at the end of the commercial. Because there's no such thing as a perfectly safe product. And now, based on headlines that came out this week, The misinformation that myokyditis, periocarditis, blood clots, and strokes could be increased by vaccines. Well, here's the headline.

Daily May, largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small, increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders, but they're still extremely rare. Remember how, look at how hard they work at that. Small and extremely rare in the same sentence. This is the New York Post. COVID vaccines linked to slight increases in heart brain blood disorders study shows. Slight, small, rare. Well, how rare? How small?

How is the study done? What are we talking about? Well, the Daily Mail puts out a graph, so this is what they consider small. That to have a almost four times 400% increased risk of swelling the brain and spinal cord. that's just from the first dose of Moderna. I guess four times the risk is a small risk. Blood clots from AstraZeneca 3.23 times. Not a 20% risk, a 320% risk increase of blood clots.

Guillaume Barre syndrome, which could lead to paralysis, 2.49 times with the astrazeneca. Myocarditis from Pfizer in the first dose, 2.7 times. Myocarditis from Moderna, 3.48 times. periodocarditis 1.7 times just with one dose of Moderna. Myricarditis from Pfizer in the second dose. 2.8. Oh, here's a really small one. Myrocharditis from the second shot of Moderna, six times the risk of myocarditis in your child that had zero risk from dying of COVID. But a six times risk

of swelling their heart, which will permanently dealms them. Remember, another small one. Look at this. Astrozeneca, only six to almost seven times the amount of a paracarditis if you got that vaccine and the third dose if you didn't, compared to if you didn't get it at all. Myrocarditis, Pfizer, third dose, two times. Periocarditis, Maderna, fourth dose, 2.6 times, myocarditis from the third dose, two times. And they're not even talking about cancer, which we've been reporting on.

But how about this? You're like, well, I mean, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis, What about the blood clots and stroke? And that's, I mean, what happens? They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we like 20 times, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine?

And they're only just starting the list. And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could. Because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say we need to recall a vaccine. Now, I think this paragraph from New York Post says it all. It shows how far we've come here at the work we're doing with ICANN. Possible safety signals when they looked at this for transverse myelitis. That's, by the way, folks, that's polio. Transverse myelitis would have been paralysis in the body, which back in the polio days, if you had transverse myelitis, you were paralyzed with polio.

This is what is happening from this vaccine. A spinal cord inflammation. There you go. Wow. sounds like polio. It is, folks. They've just changed the definitions. We're identified after viral vector vaccines, as was acute, disseminated encephalomyelitis, the inflammation and swelling in the brain and spinal cord. Oh, so all it does is put me at risk for swelling my brain and swelling my spinal cord. Line me up, man. Line starts behind me after both viral veteran MRI vaccines,

the researchers found. Okay. So what's just happened? What's just happened is you've finally been told some truth, though it's small. It's a rare moment of truth from the pharmaceutical industry. And of course, they don't like this study, but there's nothing they can do about it. But what did we just find out? A vaccine we were told is perfectly safe. In fact, on Fox News, Dr. Siegel will tell you, well, still, it's rare. You should go out and get it because it's better to have those issues than to worry about what the virus could do to you.

Well, we have no idea how good that comparative study would be, but what we know is there's this rare risk. It's rare. It's rare that your heart is going to stop, though we see people dying suddenly everywhere we look. We all know somebody now. The recent study shows that 50% of people believe they know somebody that probably died from the COVID vaccine. And so what does the word rare mean? because before COVID, in the middle of COVID, we told you there would be these side effects. It was misinformation.

Now it's not misinformation. So why don't we go back a few decades? Vaccines don't cause autism. Really? Interesting. Because you just admitted that this vaccine can swell the brain. You do realize that all autism is, is a symptom that comes from having a brain swelling event. It's a side effect of your child's brain.

brain swelling too big inside of their skull, and then finally it comes down and they're never quite the same again because they have some form of brain damage. For others, it may be Tourette's is the symptom that they end up with, or maybe schizophrenia, all of these things that can happen once your brain swells in your brain. So we now know the COVID vaccine can swell your brain. They have to admit it. And they've done more studies on this vaccine than any vaccine in history, because finally, there were scientists allowed to ask the right questions. So now that we know that vaccines can and do, sometimes rarely swell brains, can we get back to a conversation about something else that's rare?

I mean, if it's just rare, then it's okay, right? It's okay that some people are going to die from heart attacks from this vaccine. It's rare. It's just a small group. We killed them. We know. But it's just a part of the reality we live in. we had to do it. Well, what about autism? Autism's rare. For a while, it was super rare. It was

one in 10,000. Then eventually after the vaccine program started to increase, maybe it's not vaccines, maybe it's other things. Who knows? We should be looking at it. But it goes to 1 in 250. And then 1 in 150. And then 1 in 125 and 110 and 88 and 68 and 69. One in 50 and 54. Recently one in 44, studies saying it's more like one in 34. Is that rare? Sure, it is. One in 34 kids will never have a normal life really. It's rare, though. So don't worry about it. Odds that your child is going to be one of those one in 44 or one in 35, it's rare. Don't worry about it. We know for a fact, vaccines don't do it, just like we knew for a fact that vaccines don't cause myocarditis or blood clots or brain swelling. You see, we've shown you. We've shown you.

you time and time again. They have no science to make any of those points. And when you actually start doing science that you're allowed to do, you find out that, oh my God, as it turns out, the industry that's making billions of dollars off of their own products that are doing their own safety studies were lying to us. What? You're kidding me. They didn't tell us the truth about their product they planned on making billions of dollars from. The veil has been lifted. The king has no close. And now we are looking at the truth. And now you've got to ask yourself what you're going to do with it.

Because what we're going to talk about for the rest of this show could spell the fate of mankind. Our silence could be our doom. Coming up in this show, I'm going to talk about this. It is right here. These are some form of white blood clot. This came from a young. child. Obviously at this point when it was removed they had already died. I'm going to talk to the embalmer that had to pull this out of that child's body. I'm going to

talk to a man who decided to put out a poll of all the embalmers around the world. What do they say? Is there anything to this 150,000 excess deaths in the United States of America just last year above? COVID's over. Why are people still dying. We're going to get to the truth of the matter. It's going to be heavy. It's going to be serious. And you're going to have to ask yourself, do you really think your government is protecting you or are they putting you in grave danger? All right, buckle up. It's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey. We've been having some intense conversations this week. Yes. I'm going to go ahead and let you take it from here. I think I've made my point.

Okay. All right. Well, you know, as we're all navigating this post-COVID world, conversations that used to be not really mainstream narratives like informed consent and some of the problems surrounding all-out vaccine mandates and legal issues are now top stories. So we're going to go through some of those now that are top stories. And one of them, really one of the top stories is this legal issue, a law that's going through the National Assembly and the Senate in France. This is the reporting from the Brownstone Institute. And they write this. France's Pfizer amendment could turn MRI critics into criminals. There's a lot of people talking about this online. And a lot of reporting on it, some good, some not so good. So let's just go right to the bill. And this is a translated bill.

So some of this stuff may be lost in translation. But we're going to read right from it here and then break it down. Provocation to abandon, Article 4, provocation to abandon or abstain from following therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punitive. by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 15,000 euros. When this abandonment or abstination is presented as beneficial for health of the person's targeted when it is in the state of medical knowledge, clearly likely to result in serious consequences for their physical or psychological health, taking into account the pathology from which they suffer.

Now it goes on and there's one more line here. It says when the provocation provided for in the first two paragraphs has been followed by effects, meaning someone actually had a problem because they followed by. that. The penalties are increased to three years of imprisonment and a fine of 45,000 euros. And then it goes on to talk about when these offenses are committed through the written or audiovisual press. So there's specific provisions that also happen. So they're actually talking about the press in here. They're talking about the media, written media, audiovisual media. So let's break this down a little bit. Let me just get this. Let me make sense of this for a second. We are an audio visual press.

We, for instance, have definitely pointed out the dangers of the COVID vaccine. As I've pointed out, we were right. We were right, small or rare, whatever it is, we were right that there's an increased risk of harm from the vaccine. What this law is saying is that if me or you or people like us put out information saying that we believe this prophylactic product called the COVID-19 vaccine is dangerous or whatever vaccine comes during the next pandemic, that if we make those statements, I would guess that perhaps I could fly into France and be. immediately arrested. And now I'm only going to get one year. I'm going to get one year of arrest and I think a $15,000 fine as long as it didn't affect anybody. But if they can find somebody that wash the high wire and say that they ended up, let's say, dying from COVID or getting really sick or something like that, that is now my fault and that now I should go to jail for

three years and pay a $45,000 fine. Do I have that straight? Is that? And it's not just prophylactics, right? Like remdesivir, a treatment. If someone doesn't take remdesivir and dies of COVID, doesn't matter how many people died of remdesivir. If the medical establishment believes remdesivir works, then I'm going to jail. You might overstating that? There's a lot of ins and outs on this, on this bill. And it's actually double speak because it says from a pathology from which they suffer. So a medical treatment, someone's suffering from medical treatment. So, but they also say prophylactic. So prophylactic is intended to prevent disease. So they give on both ends. But they also, I mean, to your point, SSRI is for depression, chemotherapy for

cancer, statins for high cholesterol. Where does this end? If I'm a pharmaceutical company, I'm loving this bill. Now, let's stop right here. A lot of people are saying, this is law now. It's happening. It's not law. It's passed a National Assembly. It's going to the Senate. There could be rewrites. The Senate may not pass it. They didn't pass it the first time it had to go through a rewrite. And it has to do all that before it becomes law. So this is kind of a preempt of putting it on people's radar and you really want to pay attention to this. I want to bring up, you know, Jeffrey, I think about this because, you know, when I was just on the Dr. Drew show recently, we're having a really intense debate about exactly this.

You know, if medical doctors can't speak out, if laws like this are getting passed, by the way, Macron in France is one of the darlings of the WEF. This is that globalist agenda through WHO treaties and all that this is where they want to go. They want America right behind this. I was just up in Canada where they're having issues just like this, laws that are coming down the pipe. But I want to play this clip from Dr. Drew talking about the moment he woke up to what happens if you don't go along with the medical consensus, even when you know it's wrong.

Take a look at this. At a time where, you know, with all the computers and all the files, we should be able to track people better and deal with them on a personal basis. Instead, everything's becoming more and more of a one-state. size fits all. And I'll be honest, all of these laws that are, you know, taking people's right away. You're also taking away like a second opinion. As far as I can tell, if all doctors, as you're saying, are only employees. And essentially, the dictate sort of seems to be coming from regulatory agencies that are, you know, seem to be taken over by the pharmaceutical industry.

And so it just sort of trickles down. Look no further than the opioid crisis. Right. That was your, that was your model for what happened in COVID. Same thing happened. evangelizing physicians became convinced that pain should never be experienced in America ever again and that anybody who wasn't using as many opioids as possible was quote opiophobic and was guilty of patient abuse not malpractice a criminal act for which the lawyers loved that jumped all over it a criminal action of patient abuse so we started seeing patients doctors go to prison and get gigantic fines for inadequate not giving enough opiates. That's amazing.

It's exactly what we're looking at in this law, isn't it, Jeffrey? Where they're saying if a patient is sick and you don't use the treatment being recommended by the pharmaceutical industry that owns your regulatory agency, doctors are going to jail. It happens. It's already happened in the United States of America, not France, right here in the United States of America this is taking place. And God forbid we get to this place where journalists like you and I point out studies coming from all over the world, if our president says you have to take this vaccine and we believe it's

good for you, then they're now going to say that you are, should be arrested, that you are a terrorist, that you are putting people at risk. It used to be called the scientific method. I guess that's going to be illegal now. The whole opioid story was such a teachable moment from everybody wants to go back. Pharmaceutical companies, it should be clear by now, will do almost anything to get their products protected and put upon a population. So let's move. You mentioned you were in Canada. Let's move to Canada because there's some action going on there too.

So this is from Alberta. This was just last summer, the headline from CBC. So mainstream role of politicians in pandemic restriction decision making breached Alberta Public Health Act. The judge there ruled all of the restrictions. Remember, non-essential businesses, basically prohibited people for making a living. They ruled those ultra-varyes, which means it's beyond the legal authority. They did not have the legal authority to make those decisions, those politicians. So what happened now is this has set up one of potentially the largest class action lawsuits in Alberta history

from a company called Rath & Company. These are legal representatives. And they are putting forth this class action just starting within the last couple of weeks here. You can go into it and read it and it reads this. It says this is a proposed class action on behalf of all individuals who owned and or operated businesses in the province of Alberta and whose business operations were fully or partially restricted as a result of the measures contained in the CMOH, that's a chief medical officer of health orders, and who suffered losses as a result. So this is going to be ongoing. This is going to be stretching out probably for some time now because I don't see Canada

or Alberta really caving to this. I think they're going to fight this. But that is that is a positive thing because people in Alberta and throughout the world, let's be honest, lost businesses, lost livelihoods led to size as well. So there's real consequences here for economies from what has happened that they did not have the authority to do. So some of the other things that happened, obviously we covered this, the vaccine mandates that happened over the last three years really just woke up so many people to this issue because they were so overarching. Well, a study has now looked at that. It was put out in the mid-February here. U.S. state's vaccine mandate did not influence COVID-19 vaccination rates. So we go into this study here and it says this, quote,

results show that COVID-19 vaccine adoption did not significantly change in the weeks before and after states implemented vaccine mandates, suggesting that mandates did not directly impact COVID-19 vaccination. Just stop and think about that. I mean, we know it's common sense, but here's the study now. All of those ads you saw, all those governors doing ridiculous things to get these, the money being given, didn't do anything. But it goes on to say this, they have a bigger problem. It says compared to states that banned vaccine restrictions, however, states with mandates had lower levels of COVID-19 booster adoption, as well as adult and child flu vaccination. So it's going into the rest of the schedule now, especially when residents initially were less likely

to vaccinate for COVID-19. So it's moving, again, it's moving into the rest of the vaccines outside COVID. They did such a large disaster with these vaccine mandates that people are starting to question as we've talked about here. Other vaccines, they're not taking them. In fact, even Anthony Fauci himself, who was behind closed doors testimony in the select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic just last month, this is what that committee has tweeted, says Dr. Fauci admitted that America's vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future. So from From the top to the bottom, everyone knew that was a bad idea. They did it anyway.

And these are the consequences. It's not just, you know, this small group of influencers who are causing people not to get vaccinated. It's actually the policymakers that are causing this at this point. And it actually gives us hope. I mean, there's going to be a lot of scary stuff we're talking about. You're about to get into one of the scariest discussions we've ever had. But the truth is, is when we are forced, when we are pushed, there is something that triggers inside of the human spirit.

I suppose a protective mechanism of sorts that says, I shouldn't have to be forced to do something that's good for me. Something's up. I don't trust it. And so we've all got to weigh into that with our friends right now. We've going to have to start waking up our friends and our family's minds if we're going to stop, you know, some of these really, really scary, you know, things that are about to happen, some of which you're going to get into now. Right. And so there's real consequences to, I guess, whatever lens you're looking at through these policy blunders of these hard, heavy-handed vaccine mandates. And we're seeing that in Canada.

So here's one of the headlines, public health issues suspension orders for 18,000 elementary students in Waterloo region. It goes on to say in this article, region of Waterloo Public Health has issued suspension orders to more than 18,000 elementary school students for having out-of-date vaccination records. The orders were issued on February 1st. and the deadline for elementary school students to comply or apply for an exemption is March 27th. But that's not all. It goes on to say this. It's also a problem among high school students. As 10,000 were behind in Waterloo region as a month ago. So that's Ontario. I looked up Ontario's basically their laws for vaccination requirements for school students. No COVID shot requirement, no flu shot requirement. And they do have a conscious religious belief exemption. So no matter what

the letters that are being sent home to parents say they kill out these religious belief exemptions but the fact is let's spread that word let's not just let that be aside if you're watching the show you're in canada especially if you're ontario and you feel like you were backed up against the wall they're never going to tell you you have an exemption you have the ability to opt out but just know that you do let everyone you know if you have friends and family in ontario just tell them go ahead and get that exemption and go back to school. This is crazy. Yes, absolutely. Very, very key information there. And so if you add up all the people there, these kids, 18,000 in elementary school, 10,000 in high school, that have 28,000 kids that don't have up-to-date vaccination records.

And this is just basic vaccines, MMR, polio, DTP, HPV is for, that's actually required in Ontario. So this is these vaccine mandates that were happening these last three years for the COVID vaccine have officially spilled over into regular vaccination. And the policymakers are to blame for this. So let's let's switch gears here. You've you've kind of been alluding to this this big story. And now here it is. So this is going to be a little deeper dive really to explain this. And let's start the story in 2018. So remember 2018, this is a year before the world ever heard of COVID. COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, we had Johns Hopkins, and they put forth a report.

And this report was titled Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks. So they had all of these great technologies they were assessing to address these risks. And in 2018, this is literally a year, almost a year to the day that Johns Hopkins had Event 201, which was a fictitious coronavirus that swept across the world and caused all kinds of lockdowns and deaths.

So one year before that, they start searching for these great new technologies. One of them, one of the key ones in this report is this. I'll read right from the report. Self-spreading vaccines, also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines, are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases. But rather than causing disease, they confer protection. Now, fast forward, the world has now heard of COVID. We're searching for a vaccine.

It's 2020. The Telegraph puts out this article, could self-spreading vaccines stop a coronavirus pandemic? So understand this idea, this technology was in the mix for a possible chosen technology. We could have all had this technology already in 2020, but it was not chosen then. Didn't mean it went away.

So we go into this article here and it says this. Dr. Amish Adalia, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins University, says the outbreak of the coronavirus may have come too soon for the technology. Dr. Adalia says, says the method of vaccination will throw serious medical ethics questions. His view is endorsed by the Department of Health, which explored the technology in a presentation late last year. In a study from November, the department stated that the self-spreading techniques could eliminate vaccine delay.

So I want everyone to pay attention to this. It's here. Everyone watching this show right now, that's you. You're a problem now. They have a solution. They're going to create a man-made virus that will sweep the earth. they'll call it a vaccine. They're now directly in competition with God himself.

Their virus beats out, you know, the natural virus, and this is how you're going to be protected, and there'll be nothing you can do to stop it. All right, everybody just let this sink in for a moment. Jeffrey, let's just give everyone a moment of silence right now to recognize that this vaccine is so close, they almost thought it was ready two years ago to release during COVID.

But they have a few things just getting in their way that they're working on. Think about it. It's game over. It's game over for anyone that doesn't want this man-made crap inside of your body. All right, take us. You can see there, right. I'm just going to give you some facts. So you can see there that it says vaccine delays right there front and center in the article.

This isn't a side note. This isn't some theoretical thing that may or may not happen. It's saying it right there. Now it goes on to say in this article. The presentation also stated that such facts is that, such vaccines did very little harm. There it is, rare, small. Go ahead.

That's right. In comparison to a pandemic. However, the department highlighted a number of ethical issues that arise with self-spreading vaccines, one of which is that it is less lethal, not non-lethal, meaning it can still kill. Some people will die who otherwise would have lived, even though fewer people die overall, it's stated. There's this greater good conversation and it's front and center behind closed doors, but when you see it spilling out into the public in articles like this and studies, that's when you

really got to start paying attention. Well, that's what I said at the top of the show, right? It's what I said at the top of the show. The whole language is changing, folks. They now know the cat's out of the bag. They had a vaccine that injures. It also didn't work. Didn't stop transmission.

They can't get around it now. So this whole idea, remember the entire theme of vaccines, when you all got them for your kids, I'm not blaming you, you were being told they're safe and effective. They're safe and effective. It doesn't harm anybody. stops disease, just like this says it stops disease, except for those people that we know we're going to kill. We know it's going to kill some people.

It's going to swell some people's brains. It's going to cause swelling in some people's hearts. Others will have cancer. Others will have blood clots. This is how this goes. No one wants to add all those things together. It's rare, and therefore it's acceptable. And what they're saying is, but, you know, it is going to be forced upon you.

So informed consent is going to be an issue. Right. And there's always those issues. Public health officials know that. Medical professionals know that. They just don't want you to know that. And that's why the line has not been, some people will be hurt. It's just safe and effective.

No more conversation around that. That's what it's been for a very long time. And then COVID came along. So we have this window here. Now, in 2014, this is when some of these conversations really started to be supercharged. So there was an opinion paper published in the journal Cell. And it's titled, The Case for Transmissible Antivirals to Control Population-Wide Infectious Disease. So they're kind of just mulling around this idea talking about it.

It says infectious disease control faces significant challenges, including how to therapeutically target the highest risk population, circumvent behavioral barriers, there it is again, and overcome pathogen persistence and resistance mechanisms. And it goes on to say, we review a recently proposed solution to overcome these challenges, antivirals that transmit by piggybacking on viral replication. These proposed antivirals term therapeutic interfering particles or tips are engineered molecular parasites of viruses that are designed to steal replication resources from the wild type virus. Lead author of that paper is a person named Leor Weinberger.

He is of the Gladstone Institute. The Gladstone Institute launched its own virology and immunology safety lab in 1991 to address the AIDS epidemic. So in that 2014 paper, they're talking about using these to address AIDS, but then COVID came along and you kind of understand where this was pointed because that was the big meal ticket there. Now, two years later in 2016, the military starts to get involved in this. We have DARPA once again, something that continually comes up in our reporting when we dig a little deeper. Here's the article from their own website, DARPA's website,

co-evolving antivirals aimed to keep ahead of fast-changing viruses. And it says in there, you can see the messaging is now starting to get a little slick. You can think of these tip-filled envelopes as tiny Trojan horses, but instead of containing warriors, they contain pretenders that ultimately outnumber real disease-causing viruses and interfere with their ability to replicate, Gimlet said. He's the DARPA program manager on this. And because tips are made of genetic material, he added, they will be subject to mutation and diversification over time just as the genome of real viruses are. Once we develop a tip that works for a given virus, we expect it, we expect it to generate a steady stream of variants, so there will always be a population of tips with the right genetic

stuff to disrupt any new strains of the virus that may arise. So now here, we'll pause for a second, and we'll give Leor Weinberger one of the key people in this technology, the floor. This is him in 2016 talking about engineering these viruses. Take a listen. We knew that these long strings of DNA had parasites of themselves that were just a partial string about this long. And so what we're doing, our genetic engineering, so this is the full-length virus that takes over the cell, turns it into a factory to make more of itself. This is now a parasite of this short piece doesn't have the code to make more of its nanomachines. They're all coming from the full-length virus. But what it does have,

have is the little instruction to itself to get inside. So now, when that factory, the cell, is making these viral particles, what comes out is a virus carrying the short parasite piece. And since it's so much shorter, it's made much more efficiently, this small parasite piece. We call these interfering particles or therapeutic interfering particles because they interfere with this long piece. There's much more of this. It competes with this long piece to get into the shell.

And since there's so much more of it, it has a much better job competing. It's a competitive inhibitor. So now the cell, which was a factory to produce virus, has become a factory to produce the therapeutic particle. Yep. So we have Lear Weimberger. Now he goes on to become the co-founder of VX Bioscience. VEXBioscience gets a contract from the U.S. government and DARPA to start doing studies. So this is the actual federal contract here, and you can read in the description of this.

It states this. The key innovations of this approach are that these therapeutic parasites establish co-evolutionary arms races, co-evolving with wild type virus to overcome resistance. Number two, replicate and self-renew, acting as a single administration therapies that circumvent compliance issues. There it is again. And number three, spread via the exact same risk factors and transmission routes at SARS-CoV-2, autonomously utilizing super spreaders to deploy the intervention, thereby circumventing manufacturing at scale and rollout challenges. That's people I don't want to take it. So he gets the contract. And they turn people in the super spreaders. We spread it all to

each other. We are now spreading this man-made form of the virus that can mutate just like the virus, take on attributes of the virus, and then keep spreading inside of our bodies, ready for every mutation and going on to the next person. We're talking about a man-made rewrite of the immune system of every human being on the planet. Okay, I think I got that. And so Lior Weinberger, he does the study with his team, and then he does a TED Talk to sell his product once it's finished, and it look like this. There's no guarantee that the vaccine that we produce 12 months from now, will match the mutated virus.

We're always playing catch-up. And this is the scenario we're in every time there's an outbreak. Our quarantines are porous. Our medical responses are flat-footed. The fundamental problem that we face in controlling these outbreaks is that viruses and other infections do two things really well. They mutate, and they transmit.

Our medical tools do neither of these two things. Twenty years ago, I had a radical idea to use the viruses themselves as therapies, as building blocks for therapies, to build therapies that could mutate and transmit. The reason I'm here today is because for the first time in 20 years, we got it to work. And this is the first time I'm sharing it publicly.

Last two times I did this, I cried. I just, I think, I want people to take that in just for a second, because I've talked about this before, this idea that people are evil or that they're evil that they're evil to try to reduce the population. I think you can see inside of this guy, like he's really heartfelt, he's emotional about this incredible achievement he's just made because, technically,

he's just replaced God. For those that believe in God, this idea that there's something that holds us all together and, you know, knows counts the hairs on our heads and would never really let a virus hasn't so far ever wiped our species out, ever. But this guy's just made his own virus that he thinks everyone in the world should catch

to make them healthier. He's really excited about it. He'll probably take it himself. But I just want to point out that it's this kind of misguided stupidity. This is a man who stares through a microscope all the time and has lost all ability to look at the periphery of all the side effects that could possibly happen here.

And this is the problem with science, especially science, in a world where it becomes illegal to call it out and say, I don't like this idea. I think it's dangerous. And, you know, this is also a factor. When conversations around vaccine safety aren't permitted at the academic level, which they're not, you get this kind of idea that everything's good, it's all a go, safe and effective. Let's just keep building these things. we have in 2021 the paper on that study that he's talking about, identification of a therapeutic interfering particle, a single-dose SARS-CoVe 2,

antiviral intervention with a high barrier to resistance, also it published in cell. And so they use hamsters in this one, they use nasal inoculation of this tip therapy. And it says here in the discussion, together these data demonstrate that a synthetic subgenomic viral deletion mutant can conditionally replicate to durably suppress a virus infection, i.e. SARS-Co2, in vivo, thereby constituting a therapeutic interfering particle tip. So what does the U.S. government have to do with this? Well, they put forward in 2022 the Prevent Pandemics Act, and in that Prevent Pandemics Act,

in Section 506K to be exact, they're looking for platform technologies to prevent the next pandemic. And when they find some platform technologies, they say a drug that demonstrates that the platform technology has the potential to be incorporated in or utilized by more than one drug without an adverse effect on quality manufacturing or safety. When they find that, they're going to fast track this thing and they're going to choose it for the next pandemic. So the U.S. government is already locked and loaded to do this. But now, 2023 comes along and this article is what we're seeing.

So the COVID vaccine's already been out there. It's old news. Warp speed isn't fast enough, the need for variant-proof therapeutics. Well, if you look at who wrote this, it was Ariel Weinberger. And you may recognize that last name as somebody familiar. This is him. He's CEO and founder of Autonomous Therapeutics. In Bloomberg in 2016 wrote an article on he and his brother, and it said this, the headline, to fight a virus, get a virus. Military bets on mutant pathogen. And you look in the article, it says a pair of brothers working in laboratories on opposite coasts of the U.S. are brewing a new approach to fighting viruses,

one that's drawn interest from the military for protection against the threat of infection such as Zika or Ebola. So we have autonomous therapeutics. They get an award as well from DARPA, and you can see it here. Remember, his brothers already has SARS-CoV-2 kind of sewed up. So this is his first inhuman therapeutic interfering particle tip targeting a respiratory virus. So now they're going for respiratory viruses in general. And you can see here some of the, these are the patents, if you want to get into looking at those for the researchers out there. This is one of them, therapeutic interfering particles for coronavirus. This is Lear Weinberger's patent and another individual. But it says on this patent, if you look into it, it says,

this invention was made with government support awarded by the National Institutes of Health and awarded by DOD DARPA. The government has certain rights in the invention. So keep an high on that because the government actually has rights in this. And then there's another patent as well. So then ask yourself, let's just take this for a second as we start to put these building blocks together. If your government is invested in it and your government is the one with the regular agency is supposed to test if it's safe and tell you we don't think this product is safe. Now you not only have a problem where the pharmaceutical industry is doing its own building and building its own safety studies on its own product, now your government is the pharmaceutical

industry. Your government is now the one making these products for you. So who are you going to trust to do a proper safety study? Right. Well said. Well said. So really to wrap this idea up here, to understand this, nature is continually seeking a competitive advantage. So what this technology is doing is it's mutating. It diversifies. It's literally designed to have a competitive advantage, and it continually creates variance. So the question would be, what happens for cross-viral recombination? What if it reverts back?

You're giving it its competitive advantage. So I'm sure everyone out there can think of a million other ways that this can go wrong. But do you think of this one? This one's right from our friends at the World Economic Forum. You can go to their own website and read this. It says, are viruses actually vital for our existence? So it says in this article, the 21 viral types that Rick Havoc with the human body represent an insignificant fraction of the 100 million viral types on Earth.

Most viruses are actually vital to our very existence. It goes on to say this. It breaks it down. Algae implants are primary producers, the foundation of the world's ecosystems. Using sunlight, they turn raw materials like carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and organic matter. In turn, they're eaten by herbivores, which are in turn eaten by other animals and so on. Energy and nutrients are passed on up the food chain until animals die, but what ensures that the primary producers get the raw elements they need to get started? The answer hinges on the

viruses' relationship with bacteria. So now we're getting something in there. What's the one thing that is protecting us from this tech informed consent. And this tech, if you, I was trying to know it. Right. That's what they said at the beginning, right? Is they're saying, you know, the one issue is you are going to kill some people. And once you release this, by the way, let's make it really clear here, Jeffrey, as soon as they do a trial of this product, it's all over. This isn't something where we get to say, oh, we took 20 people and gave them a self-spreading vaccine that as he put, put 12 months down the road will be capable of mutating with that year's virus, meaning this thing is never going to leave your body.

This is a rewrite, a permanent rewrite of your immune system saying that you weren't designed right. This guy is going to redesign your body for every future virus there is. And as you're pointing out here with what the WHO is saying, he's saying this tip because it's shorter. It's going to get in the cell faster than the long DNA strand of a regular virus. It's always going to out-compete. It's always going to get to the cell first.

It's going to make sure that you never get that virus. And what you're saying is there's only about 30 viruses we care about. There's millions keeping us alive. And what happens if this technology suddenly starts out-competing every single virus there is? You know what that is? That is a mass extinction event. That is the end of all life as we know it. And the only thing protecting us right now is we've got this little pesky idea of informed consent,

which means that you should consent to anything that's going to happen to your body. Now, mandates get in the way of that, and we're fighting to make sure that every state, this is why we're trying to free the five. But this bypasses all of that. Even a trial of this, and all informed consent is out the window, and now you are, in sense, a natural cyborg. body is going to be changed forever, potentially impervious to any virus, even the good ones. So go on. What are we saying about the 4%? Go ahead. Yeah. For the few people left out there that think

the FDA or the CDC's ASIP committee will stop this, remember, they said we need to approve the vaccine, the booster vaccine to figure out what it does, to figure out if it's effective, if it's safe. It doesn't work like that with this type of technology. So you have to. literally this tech is designed from its inception with a prime feature to circumvent informed consent people need to really understand that and then what did the FDA just do we reported on this two weeks ago this is it right here FDA eases informed consent requirements for minimal risk trials so can this be put under a minimal risk trial well hey everything in this nasal vaccine is you can find in the body it's all natural so there's really not much of a risk and it's prophylactic

so it's supposed to help people. I mean, I feel like they could talk themselves into any type of idea to make this minimal risk. So this is why this is a very important topic, perhaps one of the most important topics we've talked about, Del, to really get on people's radar.

I think it is. I think it is. I mean, look, you know that the FDA is lining up for exactly this. Take away informed consent now. All we have to do as a government agency, remember the ones invested in this technology, if we determine and tell the world it's safe,

then we now. can circumvent informed consent. You don't need to be informed about something that's safe, and now everyone in the world is going to get it. You know, this reminds me, Jeffrey, as I think of this, when we think of, sure, we're thinking worst case scenario. I am thinking worst case scenario. Maybe it only just stops coronaviruses and every coronavirus into the future, and it just sort of stops there. This little tip floats around and it's focused on COVID. But it says it's designed to mutate. It says it's able to take on, you know, the different attributes of every variation it comes in contact with. And we know that virus, this is bacteria now interacting in ways that we never quite understood before.

The deeper we get in, the less we seem to know. And it really reminds me of that seed in Jurassic Park, which I want to play for everybody. Yes, this is a movie. Yes, this is fiction. But I think Michael Crichton hit it on the head when he tried to make us think about this little warning right here. How do you know they're all female? When somebody go out in the park and pull up the dinosaur skirts? We control their chromosomes.

It's really not that difficult. All vertebrate embryos are inherently female anyway. They just require an extra hormone given at the right developmental stage to make them male. We simply deny them that. Deny them that? John, the kind of control you're attempting is it's not possible. Listen, if there's one thing the history of evolution has taught us, it's that life will not be contained.

Life breaks free, it expands to new territories, and it crashes through barriers painfully, maybe even dangerously. But, you know, there are not. It is. There it is. You're implying that a group composed entirely of female animals will breed? No, I'm simply saying that life finds a way. It's really not a laughing matter, even though that clip.

I mean, we are talking about playing with nature in a way that's never been done before. And I am telling you, folks, take this very seriously. They're taking away your informed consent. And France are going to take away my ability to warn you of anything. to warn you of anything. And then they're going to release a vaccine the next time that they have a pandemic that you can't escape, that everyone will be infected by. And now man-made viruses are supposed to be better than the natural ones, the ones that have never wiped our species out, have never taken us out. There's never been a pandemic that eradicated our species from the planet.

But you have a interfering particle in your body that starts interfering with the nature and the evolution that we've been a part of. That could literally spell the end of our species. Jeffrey, incredible reporting, so brilliant and truly horrifying. Thanks for the great work that you're doing. Hopefully, I'll see you next week. Absolutely. Thanks so much. All right. Take care. I want to bring on our lawyer, Aaron, Siri, that actually sort of really tipped us off to this in the investigations that we've been doing and the FOIA requests we've been bringing this. this is where we sort of really saw this pop up.

It started, Aaron, if I'm correct, we sort of stumbled upon this when we were looking into chem trails and part of our question was, is there anything being atomized? Are they looking at atomized, you know, spraying vaccines in the air? And through that investigation, we stumbled on this little thing

about self-spreading vaccines. Am I right about that? That's sort of how we sort of stumbled in here. Yeah, and the research regarding aeroslides vaccines and there are all kinds of studies about releasing from airplanes of various, what they would call vaccines to inoculate population, so forth. And we came across the information you just covered in that segment. So, I mean, when we when we talk about this sort of threat, I mean, we put out a press release on this. I can uncover the potential next level

threat, inhalable self-spreading vaccines that spread like a virus. This is, I mean, what I think about this, Aaron, one of the things, the challenges we have. I mean, you've been so amazing in the work that you've done for I can. We are bringing lawsuits. We're bringing transparency. We're finding out that they're lying to us about the safety of products that are out there. We're revealing what they know and don't know. you've put on the stand, some of the leading vaccine creators and vaccine program designers

in Dr. Stanley Plotkin, Dr. Catherine Edwards. But in this case, if we're doing a FOIA request to find out if this was safe when it was given to people, even in a trial, it's already over. We've lost. Once this technology goes into trial, it's all over. What the hell do we do about that? Well, we are ICAN legislate, which is the sister, a group to ICANN, the C3. The ICANN legislate is the C4, so it engages in legislative efforts, something that ICANN itself can't do.

But the ICANN legislate actually has an entire initiative around addressing self-spreading vaccines. And the real issue, and I think you hit it on the head, is that when most drugs are released, therefore usually a small segment of the population, already sick segment of the population, current vaccines are for healthy parts of the population, and they're given typically to, or they try to give it to most children for many of the vaccines, which obviously can be an issue. If you get that wrong once, you could decimate or cause issues of the huge portion of the population. But even there, if you have a serious issue, many still refuse. That's what informed consent is about. But with this product, this product, the whole idea is

they release it to basically one person and it spreads to every single person on the globe. So if they mess it up one time, just once, just once, it's it. They can mess up the entire world. And to your point, how do you really test it? Are they going to take 10 people, put them in an isolation cube for a decade, give it to one, the other nine get it, and see what the long-term consequences are? No, they're never going to do that because that's not profitable. Right. What they're going to do is something that's going to be, you know, and as they said, faster than warp speed is what they're counting on. And, you know, as we report today, what we're looking at now,

we just saw in the articles coming out about the largest study now done on the safety of the COVID vaccine. As it turns out, it does swell your heart. It can swell your brain. It can and does cause blood clots. It does cause transverse myelitis and Guillain Barre syndrome. And all of these really, you know, disastrous issues. And then when you look at them describing this self-spreading vaccine, they say, well, it'll stop disease. I mean, there'll be some people that have a reaction, you know, certainly some people will die from this thing.

And it just, it just, what's so mind-blowing, Aaron, as we do this work, is that sort of callous idea that if it can kill some people, what stops it from killing all people? I mean, obviously someone's having a bad reaction to this. Something's not working right. What if that part of it that's not working right doesn't work right for like the majority or all of us? Right. But you know what might even be the biggest victim, even if it doesn't end up having some real physical harm, that's widespread, if they ever release this thing, it's going to be civil individual rights.

Because the more you engage in conduct, the government and they're participating in this, that takes away people's right to inform consent, the more you have to censor them, you have to silence them, you have to suppress their speech. You don't have to suppress people's speech when it comes to most drugs, right? Because the government's not involved, but you do with that. the moment they tell you, no, no, no, you must take it to go to school and go to work. Here they're going to release a product where you're going to have no choice effectively but to take it. That is the ultimate crushing of individual and civil rights.

And always commensurate with that throughout history is the government's need to suppress your ability to dissent, to oppose, to speak out against it. Well, I mean, I know we've got you on the front lines dealing with this. I can legislate working on legislative ideas, just part of all the work that you're doing. You had a huge victory recently. We've been talking about the V-Safe data. And as I read that article, I think about, I mean, we're seeing all the posts from doctors and nurses, one going around just yesterday that I saw where she said, this nurse said, I fill out every VAR's report. I try to teach the incoming students.

That's a vaccine injury. That kid coming in with that fever right now, they said, I ask a question. I say, are they up on their vaccines? There was an interesting post. The nurse saying, I don't ask, did you just get a vaccine? Because that would trigger somebody. Are you up on your vaccines? And then they say, yeah, we just got updated three hours ago.

And they're not putting, that's why this child's having seizures or whatever. This is what this nurse was saying. But she said in the 30 years that she's been in this business in hospitals, she's never watched one doctor or one nurse other than her report to VERS. So when we see these reports, we see these studies like the one that's reported on now saying it's rare, it's small, small effect. That is what is eking through in a totally crushed, non-transparent system where every doctor and nurse is working against the reality that these things are injuring. So one thing I got to say right now, Aaron, is now everybody in the

world that just read that article that's having myocarditis or periocarditis, guess what question they're probably going to ask? Could it have been the vaccines and the doctors like, no, no way. Really? No way? Because I just read an article. I might be a part of that small group. I might be that six times number. And when they start saying that, guess what happens that six times? Ten times, 20 times. It makes me wonder if we're going to see the same thing that we saw with autism. We're at one in 10,000, super rare. But then as people start recognizing more and more starts saying, wait a minute, I think this happened to me too. You have numbers like that. This is VERS, 37,000 deaths now reported from the COVID vaccine. all of this to say that, you know, that's sort of outside surveillance. It's totally contained. Doctors aren't a part of it. But you've been working on a system when we talk about the V-safe data that really isn't contained. This is people that were checking boxes freely. And we talked about this for everyone that might be brand new to this. This was given to 10 million people. It's an app that went on your phone that you would, you know, sort of followed you for at least

six months and every once in a while would ask you a question, you check in and check the boxes. Well, we sued in court. We ended up winning and getting all the check the box details, but it was all the minor effects, things like, you know, a fever or a headache or swelling in the arm, all the things that we knew were injuries or issues, adverse events of special interest that the CDC knew existed. We have documents. We've gone through this. We're not going to do that now, but things like myokaryokitis, all the things being reported. on Bell's Palsy, antepalaxus, these things that New York Post and Daily Mail are talking about now, those things weren't in that check the box. There were these open box for that, meaning

you had to write in, what, 260 characters or something like that in that big box right there. Well, we assume that's where all the major injury is going to be, even though we learned just from that data to check the box that nearly 30% of the people that got the vaccine about, I think was 700,000 out of 10 million. Oh, no, that was just those that got hospitalized. It gets even bigger. hospitalized 700,000. 1.3 million couldn't go to work.

1.2 couldn't function, do daily functions altogether. Roughly about 30% had a serious enough injury from this vaccine. That's 30%, right, that they couldn't perform a daily function or worse. But this open box, now you went the law, you know, you guys are the lawyers for I can. You went on your own and you went after this open box detail and you've just won. Tell me what you achieved there. Sure. The free text data fields, which is where individuals using VSA, like you mentioned, there

were over 10 million Americans that signed up to use VSAFE right when the first COVID vaccine rolled out. And they had some categories of check the box for symptoms that the CDC says is normal, is good to have after the vaccine because it's just. shows the vaccines working. And it tracked those for a week. And they were very high rates of those reports. And the Cs said, great, that's good.

The only other check the box data that they tracked was what you just showed, Dell, of course, which is people who saw medical care couldn't perform a normal day of activities or missed work. And about 32% of people in VCA reported at least one of those categories. I'm about 7.7% saw medical care. So that in and of itself was very, very troubling because that's unfiltered data. That's data that unlike a clinical trial didn't have 30,000 people, had had 10 million people. And unlike a clinical trial where you, you know, you ask the patient, you get the data,

but then it goes through the pharma company, then it goes to the FDA, and then it goes to the public. This data was just direct from asking the individuals in the vaccine, and then boom, we were able to get it directly. No filters. So it's the most reliable data. So the check-the-box data was really troubling. But that left the question of the free text fields. Like you said, those 200-something character boxes where anybody could write whatever they want. And there were over 7 million entries into those free text field.

And the CDC fought and said, no, no, we can never make this available. It'd be impossible to review it. It would take, you know, it's like the last lawsuit with FDA all over again. It would take decades to one person to review all this data. Well, we prevailed in the lawsuit. And about a month ago, a little bit over a month ago, the judge issued an incredible 30-page decision that said, no, no, no, CDC. You got to produce all 7.something million free text field entries.

And it gave them a one-year timeline to do that, starting on February 15th. So starting a few days ago, where they had to produce the first 390,000 free text entries. And despite all their claims of impossibility, guess what? They did it. The good news, in addition to the fact that they produced that first batch, is they did not appeal the decision. Presumably they thought their outcome would be worse if they did. So that's it. This is a binding order of the court.

The CDC has produced about 390,000 entries every month for the first three months, then 650,000 entries for the next three months, and then 780,000 entries every month for the last six months. So 12 months from night now, we'll have all of it. Now, in that first batch that was received, the CDC, according to the judge order, is producing the entries in the order that the CDC received them from the VSAFE app, in the VSAFE app from people.

So what that means is we're getting the very, very first entries that were made from individuals. And also remember, the app asks at day one through seven every day, And then it asks every week, up to six weeks, and then three months, six months, and 12 months. So what we're really getting, those first 390,000 entries,

they're just for the most part, as far as we're aware, the first few days, that's it after the shot. It's not, right, for the most part. It's not likely to be long term or a few weeks later. And a lot of times these issues do take a few weeks. And I can read you through some of those findings. Yeah, we've got it. We had Tracy Beans, one of our journalists that writes for the informant, put out an article, a very interesting article, folks. And obviously, she couldn't read 390,000 entries. But she grabbed just a few that are interesting. One user wrote, endaphylaxis within 10 minutes of being vaccinated, throat, throat, swollen, almost shut. Another, after receiving the shot, within 15 minutes, I had an allergic reaction, tightening of the throat, dizziness, confusion, elevated heart rate, and was taken to the ER, received steroid shot, benedrill shot, and epinephrine.

It was released to go home. The user later wrote, feeling of mild allergic reaction in the throat, elevated heart rate. One user described their experience in the ER, stating three to five days after my shot, experienced a rash around my eye that was painful and burning. I reported the emergency room on Thursday, 1224, diagnosed with shingles, herpes, zoster. which I've never had before, so I'm suspicious if that could have been a result of my first dose of the COVID vaccine. 22 users reported having a miscarriage that coincided with receiving the vaccine. One such user wrote, I had a miscarriage. I should have been eight weeks pregnant, but the baby stopped growing at six weeks,

which would have been very close to when I received my vaccine. Making numerous entries the user wrote, I had some mild tachycardia 10 minutes after injection, Hard to take a deep breath, sweating, and I turned bright red. My work had me take some Benadryl. I lost the use of my right arm and couldn't lift it. I've had COVID twice, and the night I've had, meaning this night, made me long for COVID-19. This was much worse.

I'm not sure I can go through this again for a second shot. I want to do my part, but this was unreal. Anyone around me and it actually told me not to get the second shot, it felt like death had entered my bones as if they were being hammered. I kept waking up crying with a respiration rate in the 60s. I couldn't take deep breaths because my ribs were hurting. I've had a very high tolerance for pain, and this had me in tears. Those are just some of the entries we found right away, and as you're saying, these are just the first few days. I imagine as we go through these, if there is myocarditis, parochydides, you know, issues with blood clots,

many of those things sort of developed further down the road. but 390,000 entries, 7 million to come. I think that this, oh, you can find them on our website. So as they come in, folks, this is what you want to do. You go to www.Ican decide.org. Go to Vidsafe and then read more. And we have a dashboard there. You can access it.

And then you're going to start seeing as this data comes in, the VSA free data text, you can download it. There it is. and you can start reading through these entries yourself. This is part of what ICANN is doing. And, you know, after Aaron won this data, we want all the scientists and all of the investigators around the world to start looking into this.

We have a small team here, but the world is large enough to do some major investigations on this stuff that you are now releasing. It's really incredible. You know, we actually did crunch a few numbers that, you know, since that article came out, we did a quick look.

And, you know, like you said, independent scientists out there, they really should crunch and verify these numbers and look closely at it. But based on a rough review of it, and again, these numbers, it could become a lot higher once we have the full, all the entries for each individual. But based on these entries, it looks like there's about 1 in 1,300 individuals

in at least this first few day period reported Bell's palsy. Wow. About 1 in 906 reported disturbances in their normal menstrual cycle. One in 450 apparently reported shingles. One in 160 reported tinnitus or ringing in the ears, which can be a devastating life condition. One in four, 143 apparently reported heart palpitations after vaccination. And so, you know, and this is just based on the initial few days.

apparently of reports for many of these individuals. Once we have all of the first week and all the six weeks of their reports, these numbers might might go higher. And I think this is reflective of why the CDC fought so hard because this is a this is probably the best reflection of what the true safety profile is because the pharmacompson. We have a control. We know we know it's a control They can't. It's 10 million people. 10 million people got it. How many of them had issues?

We can have real percentages from this. Yeah. Well, Aaron, you're doing incredible work. I want to thank you for all that you've done with ICANN. We've been ahead of the ball. We've been right. And I want to thank you because though these articles, like the one this week, wants to say that we're spreading misinformation,

you'll notice they never quote a damn thing that I say here because all of it is back by science and much of that science is produced by the work that you and your team are doing, much of it coming from the CDC themselves, the NIH, Health and Human Services, FDA. And as I always say, when I'm interviewed by these reporters, I say, I'd like to know how you would say I'm spreading misinformation when I'm using that information to win in court. If you ever tried to use misinformation to beat the government in court, it doesn't work that way. There's a reason we're winning, we're right, and we also have the best lawyer in the world. Aaron, you're incredible. Thank you for all your great work. And congratulations.

Thank you. All right. Thank you. See you soon. Well, folks, as they reported, you know, yes, we raised something like $13 million on that report. That sounds like a big number. I mean, I don't know for some of you out there, we're all, you know, struggling to, you know, make ends meet, but I want to tell you, we're suing the government, we're suing FDA, we're suing Pfizer, we're suing Moderna, we're going after these. What do you think those cases cost? What do you think it cost to do this work. Is it $25 an hour? Is that what you imagine this is? There's over 20 legal professionals on Aaron's series team that we utilize on a daily basis to try and stop literally at this point it may be the end of the world. I think it's that dangerous. I think these people

are that out of control and whether they're doing it on purpose or whether they're just the stupidest ego-filled morons we've ever seen. They're out there and they're trying to change your They're trying to take away your ability to choose. So I really want you to think about right now. I want you to think about all the things that maybe you donate to. I want you to think about how important is that dinner that you're planning on going out this Friday night? Why don't you stay home once a month and say, I'm going to throw that $100 to I can because they literally need millions more than they have right now if they're going to protect my children and our species? We're not playing around here. If you haven't noticed, I'm not playing around in the high wire.

I'm not just some windbag telling you things to worry about and not doing anything about it. This is an experiment that we have going and you're a part of it. Can we bring media that entertains you enough, keeps you engaged enough that you decide to give us some money like you do for every other cable station that's lying to you, but then we take that money and we go infested in suing the government of the United States. We've even brought cases in FOIA requests now, internationally. We're doing this work because we think it matters because everyone here, this little team I have, is so passionate, if not for your children, certainly our own. So if you're not a part of our team right now and you're watching, please ask yourself why.

What would be, would you really think it's a waste of money to give us money to help us do this work so that we can keep reporting to you what no one else has told you? that a year from now could be a self-spreading vaccine that you will never get out of your body as long as you live. God knows what it will do to us. If these things matter, will you please donate today? Go to the top of the page. Thehighwire.com hit donate to I can. And we'd love it if you would become a recurring donor.

Just give a recurring donation that comes automatically out of your bank account, whatever that is. a coffee, a dinner, a sandwich, $24 a month for 2024 is what we're asking for. If you can only give 50 cents, guess what? That makes a difference. And you should pat yourself on the back every time we win another case. Because every single penny counts. Every single penny is going towards our work. And by the way, 90% of the funds that come in go to the work that we do, not the salaries of the people around us, but to actually getting work done. It's a really, really good number for any nonprofit on the planet. And if you have had a really lucrative life where your business is done very well and you want to get involved maybe in one particular lawsuit or one issue that we're covering

and you want to make a large donation, maybe you want to get credit for it, just reach out to info at Icandecide.org and let us know and we'll get back to you. This is important work we're doing We're going to make it easy. Just type 72022 on your phone and hit the word donate. There's so many scientists and so many different walks of life have been looking this COVID vaccine. It is waking up the world. And we've talked aloud about the other vaccines, but this COVID vaccine, they're trying to tell you, well, yeah, it does cause rarely blood clots, things like that. Well, I covered this over a year ago when I visited the pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole.

We got into the blood clots. This is what that looked like. You are a pathologist for decades now. How many years? 26 years. Have you seen anything that resembles these types of claws before? No. Never.

From around the country, from coroners and embalmers, I have received some samples and specimens from unfortunately the patients that have not made it. Now, me personally, I've done about 550 autopsies. And when you do an autopsy, yeah, the blood congeals. But it tends to be red and jelly-like and soft, almost like jello. But these have been coming out of individuals' bodies at the time of embalming, blocking large stretches of vessels in the arm or the leg or in the lungs, or I have some coming from a surgeon in another state who has been removing these huge rubbery crotted plaques.

And so the normal composition of a clot should be fibrin, platelets, some trapped white blood cells and whatnot. These are firm in rubbery. You know, patients do form deep vein clots, but the consistency of those clots is different than this. They're not white like this. They're not firm in rubbery. You know, if we pull these out and put gloves on and squish them, they bounce back.

And obviously coroners do this all the time. They do. I'm just sending this out because something's bothering them. Something's bothering them. That was one giant clot that came out of a vaccinated woman, and it came out in the shape of the inside of the uterus. And I've talked to obese left and right that are seeing this. The sad thing is it just takes that much of a blockage in a medium-sized vessel

to now you can't get red blood cells past that, you can't get oxygen past that. You had a heart attack, you get a stroke, you get infarct your lung, you infarct another organ, you can't perfuse around this. And have I seen clots? 500,000 patients later, you bet I've seen clots. Yeah. Clots like this now. And talking to other colleagues, other pathologists, hey, have you seen these? No.

Coroners, no. This isn't normal folks. There's nothing normal about this. Well, since then, there's been a lot of different reports on this that coroners and embalmas are having issues finding these clots. We've wanted to, you know, find one of these guys or women and see if we could talk to them personally. And recently this video went viral. A lot in here.

Could be wrong? Oh, no, there it is. Pulling it. This is the doubular thing. It broke. Wow. That's good. All right, hold on.

I can I show how stretchy this stuff is? I've already squeezed it. It seems very much like a rubber band. I'm here I put the size of your hand or your finger, so you can see how long it goes. Well, that live video removing that white clot was by an embalmer named Richard Hirschman from Alabama, and he joins me now. Thank you, Del. I want to thank you for speaking out coming forward.

But no one knows more than me how dangerous it can be in these professions and to really speak the truth. And as we're seeing laws attempting to be passed in Canada and France and probably America, making it illegal for anyone to say anything at all. So I just want to recognize right up front that what we're about to talk about takes a lot of courage. A young child, you know, has clots like this in their veins. how often have you seen that? This is one of the people that you worked on. Well, as far as the children, it's not been a ton, but that one was pretty significant. And my fear was, as I was seeing this in the beginning, and as they were, because before

they started putting on some children, I was already seeing these strange cloths. And I was starting to put the pieces together. I was believing that it had something to do with the, with the vaccine. And my fear was eventually this was going to start continuing. And as more and more were getting it, I would start to see these strange things starting to show up in younger people. But in my first 20 years of doing this,

I'd never seen any clots like this at all. At all. I mean, so these sort of, you have some of these, right here, you can hold it. Give me that really white-looking one right there closest to me. So what makes this clot right here when you say, because you've removed clots, right? People die of blood clots.

I mean, it's one of the, like, you know, stroke or heart, these things. Clots are involved with that. So you have to tell me you've seen clots. Oh, absolutely. We've seen clots, I mean, from the beginning. But clots are red. Okay. Blood clots are just congealed blood.

It's red. Usually a clot looks like grape jelly, literally. Like if you're making a grape jelly peanut butter. sandwich and you drop some on the table you try to pick it up it just falls apart it's slippery you rub it in your fingers it kind of dissolves into nothing or like jello okay um and sometimes we would get larger clots maybe in somebody that had like a deep vein thrombosis or something like that and you'd remove them but the but these these are so different that it's it's alarming it's alarming now these that i show you here are

the most difficult to deny. I mean, it's right in front of you. I mean, the video showed exactly, you know, what we're seeing. There are other things in the blood, too, that's abnormal. I mean, just clotting in general has gone from my earlier days of doing maybe, seeing it maybe 10, 15, 20%, some embalmers might say they see it up to 30%. but now when I do embalming, almost all of the bodies have clots in them now.

Not necessarily always like this, but a lot of clodings. There's a lot more clotting going on in people that are dying for, and they're dying for all sorts of different reasons. Yes. So whether or not a clot killed them, what you're saying is, so tell me about the process that, like how involved with you are, you know, embalming is, I mean, we all think about it, you're sort of, I don't know, filling the veins with formaldehyde or cock or like, what is it?

You know, what's the process that has you sort of on the front line of witnessing this? Well, what we do is we're trying to preserve the body for burial. You know, sometimes when people die, their color changes. And we basically are preserving the body, desanitized in the body, in order to have a public viewing or a visitation for the family in a casket prior to burial. The process is we raise typically two vessels, a large artery and a large vein, whether it's in the carotid,

whether it's in the iliac or the groin near the femoral region, and or whether we have to do it in the axillary or brachial up in the arms. We use large artery, large vein. Then we insert a cannula into the artery and it's hooked up to a machine that has our chemicals. And then we use the pump to pump that into the, the body. As that goes in there, it builds up pressure and we open the vein to allow that

blood to drain out and it kind of filters. I look at it kind of like a car engine if you're going to flush your radiator, so to speak. Or it's like bleed my brakes. Like you'll get all the old brake fluid out. So it's the same with the blood. Like you can go in one vein but it'll go through the whole system and just clear it all out eventually and you get every vein or just most of them or? It ends up going through the majority of the body. And when we're doing the process, we know it's getting into the different areas. So a lot of times when people are in dying stages, they get their fingertips get dark

and it kind of has a blue color. When we're doing the embalming process, if we see that the fingernails start getting pink again, we know that the fluid is going all the way down there and circulating back. And so we are having to do a lot of what we call multiple point injections. where we have to, let's say I'm embalming the body, then this arm is still blue. It's not turning and it's dark. Then I have to go and embalm this arm separately,

try to force that fluid down here to clear out that blood so that would preserve the arm and make it look better. Right. So we're having to do a lot of those. More than usual? Oh yeah, more than usual. So you usually used to be able to go into one place, get the whole body. Now you're having to switch all around the body

because I'm assuming these are blocking that was happening. You can't get the embalming fluid through. Right, and that's, I'm glad you bring that up because some people misinterpret things. Okay. So when, if you're trying to push fluid and there's a blockage, it ain't gonna go nowhere.

You have to remove, or you have to build up enough pressure to kind of help that out. Okay. Now, the majority of these, The majority of these clots that I see come out of the venous side, which is on the low-pressure side of the body. The arterial side, I'm also finding these, but the only time I see the arterial clots are when I actually open the artery and I prepare to put my cannula in there, I see the clot

and I have to remove it. If those are in the arteries, these things will be too big. to go through the capillaries in order to get it back to the venous side. So the things that you see here are only what I see. It's only what comes out. I would be willing to bet there's more of this inside the body than what came out. Wow. And so you say prior to 20, like what, mid-2020, you'd never see these types of clots.

Yes. And these are all, I'm assuming from different patients of just yours. Yes. That you've brought in. And have you, did you call anybody? Do you say anything? Do you, what is, what is your interaction with the medical establishment over this issue? Well, I'm not a doctor and I'm not a scientist.

I'm just a mortician. I'm an embalmer, a trade embalmer. Okay. When all, when I was seeing this stuff in the beginning, in early 2021. The first time you see it, you think, well, that's weird. That's strange.

But, you know, sometimes weird things happen. You know, sometimes you see cases that, you know, just are different. Yeah. But then I started seeing it another time. And then again. And then it started to stack on top of each other to where I'm going,

Am I the only one seeing this? So I would talk to other people that I know that are embalmers, talk to other people that are in the funeral home that have many more years of experience than I do. And I would question them, and I'd say, have you seen this? And, you know, they had never seen anything like it. So there's a consensus among embalmers that we've never seen this. Yes.

Something's happened. Whatever it is. I mean, we could argue over, you know, what is causing it, But something started in 2021 that embalmers are now seeing something in veins that they've never seen before. And arteries. And arteries. All right. Well, you were part of a documentary that got a lot of attention, died suddenly.

This is just an excerpt from that documentary. Take a look at this. People were asking me, well, how many people are having these strange clots? And I didn't have a very good answer for it. So starting in November, I started making notations of whether or not the person was clotted or not or vaccinated. My green is people that I've been verified are vaccinated. Yellow typically is somebody that has smaller clots. And the orange is somebody that had more significant clots, the clots that are really kind of concerning to me.

A lot of the substances that I'm seeing are stuff that looks. Pretty much it's this white fibrous stuff. Now instead of calling them blood clots, I try to refer to them as white fibrous clots or white fibrous structures. As I started gathering more and more photographs, I'm able to share it amongst other people that I work with. I talked to other embalmers that have 30, 40, even 50 years of experience. I'm a licensed funeral director, national board funeral director, and certified embalmer. I've been in the death care industry since 1982. I've been embalming, been in the embalming process

with well over a thousand bodies. And I had actually noticed some of the differences in the clots as well, in some of the bodies. I had been embalming, and that had started recently. First time I saw it firsthand, pulled out of a deceased, my end, was about three months ago. Been struggling to embalm people for around about

18 months, my embalmer was complaining that he was having trouble getting fluid through people. And the way they do that is they cut into the carotid artery and they pump it around the body via a pump. He was struggling to get it through. And we kind of thought, well, maybe the pump wouldn't it service in and had to look at it. It doesn't. Pulled this out and he kind of grabbed the end of the tweezers. And this comes out in one piece, one elastic piece. It looks like calamari.

Longest one that I have on video is probably almost three foot long, which is incredible to come out of the, you know, the juggler up here. It's just, it's incredible. That is not normal. I talked to other embalmers that have 30, 40, even 50 years of experience, said, hey, you know, have you guys ever seen this stuff before? And the answer was always, I haven't seen clots like these. these long white fibrous different, not blood clots, but they're clotting the blood, so therefore you have to call it a clot. I have been in this profession actually for approximately 12 years and approximately two to 250 bodies per year. And I have never seen anything like this until the vaccination.

Now I've been in an embalmer for 41 years. 41 years I've been embalmer and I've never seen pots like these. Really, really shocking testimonies by eyewitness accounts. Many of us saw that documentary, but one man decided, well, how many coroners would say this? How many are there? We just saw a handful there, and so he took it upon himself to start sending out a poll to, you know,

embalmers around the world. I am joined now by Air Force Major Thomas Haviland, who has, you know, gone out of the way to ask a very important question. Well, you know, I was retired and I had the time to do it. And also I was curious. You know, I've got family members who've taken the COVID-19 vaccine. And I was wondering, are they in danger? I saw the movie died suddenly.

The day it premiered, it was the week of Thanksgiving of 2022. Yeah. And what was interesting is that the 13-minute and 15-second mark in that movie, an amazing statement was made. There was an embalmer from the state of Indiana, Mr. Wallace Hooker, who was lecturing at Ohio Embalmers Association Conference in Columbus, Ohio, in the 26th of October of 2022, and he was lecturing to a room of about 100 embalmers, and he showed him photographs of these white-fibers clots

that he's been pulling out of his corpses for the last couple of years, and he said, by a show of hands, can you tell me how many of you are seeing these same plots? And he said, Adele, almost the entire room, raised their hands, yes. He then asked him, when did you start seeing them? And they all agreed it was in the middle of 2021, about six months after the vaccines rolled out. So whatever else happened in that movie, I thought that was an amazing statement, right?

Either those embalmers raised their hands or they didn't. Right. So I got up the next morning, Tuesday of that week of Thanksgiving, and I said to myself, you know, I don't think any reporter's going to chase after this story. So I decided myself to call the Ohio Embalmers Association. They're located in Cincinnati, Ohio. I live in Dayton about an hour north.

I talked to their president, their vice president, and their secretary, and I asked all three gentlemen, did you happen to be in the room of the time that those embalmer supposedly raised their hands saying yes? Well, none of the three happened to be in the room at the time. Okay. But the vice president who owns a funeral home about an hour north of where I live, and he does his own embalming, a lot of funeral directors do their own embalming, he says, Tom, I'm seeing the white fibrous clots too. So I said, wow, now we have an official officer of... the Ohio and Balmers Association corroborating with the six or seven embalmers in this

Died Suddenly movie that I just watched said it's happening. So right then and there, I decided that I needed to do a survey, a nationwide survey, which I then later expanded into a worldwide survey by including Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand to see just how big this phenomenon was. And I tell you, the results were shocking. We did the first survey last year, and there were three main results to that survey. of the 179 embalmers that responded, 119 of them, almost exactly two-thirds, said they were indeed seeing the white fibrous clots.

Wow, look at that. So this is it. Have you observed any large white-ish fibrous structures, clots, and the corpses you have embalmed? Right. Yeah. So the next natural question is, okay, and what percentage of your corpses are you seeing them?

Yep. The slide will pop up here, I think. Actually, one of the other questions, main questions we asked in that survey was, what years did you see the clots? Okay. Maybe that's the slide we should look at next. Here we go. What years have you observed the large, white as fiber structures, clots? Please check all years that apply.

Select not observed. If you have not observed any. 60 said they hadn't observed any, but 17 said they saw them in 2018. 20 saw them in 2019. 44, in 2020. and then it really accelerates. 95 of them saw that in 2021 and 109 in 2022. But the obvious question would be then,

2018 and 19, you have these embalmers saying that they saw it then. Obviously, as far as, I mean, mostly, we know there wasn't a vaccine at that point. Right. I put those on there as control years, expecting not to see anybody answer that. So I was a little surprised to see that small number of answers.

I actually went back and checked through the people that responded to those answers. and it seemed like they breeze through the study, through the survey in less than a minute. So I'm not sure how accurate it was. How accurate it was. They may have also, in my instructions, I said, please distinguish these white fibrous clots

to what embalmers have been seen forever, which are these chicken fat clots. They're much smaller, they're yellowish in color, and they're easily to tear, much different than these large white fibrous clots. So I suspect that maybe those ones that answered 2018 and 2019 may have mistaken those for chicken fat clots. I guess we have images of the chicken fat clots.

That's what those look like right there. They don't get this long. They're not super long and pulling out. But those did exist. So, I mean, you imagine it could be anomaly, but whatever the case, it is a minority, there is this majority of saying I never saw this before. What's interesting if you, on that slide, was 44 the embalmers did say that they saw the white fibers clots in the year 2020, which is the year that we had COVID, but no vaccines yet.

Interesting. Yeah. And we know there's a spike protein on the surface of the virus, right? And we believe that the spike protein might be leading to the formation of what's called amyloid proteins, AMY, L-O-I-D, which is basically a fancy term for misshaped or misfolded proteins. Right. We all have an enzyme in our body is called plasmine that's used to break down normal clotting. But if the clot is misshapingly folded, it becomes difficult for that enzyme plasma to attach.

So then the clots tend to persist and grow. But what happened in... I think these are blood cells. We've sort of shown these are blood cells. You can see the healthy round blood cells. Then when they come in contact with the spike protein, they sort of get this webby structure around them. There's been a lot of different images of this. I'll also point out that when I was meeting with Dr. Ryan Cole, I don't know if you guys saw that,

but we took my own blood and put it on a slide and dropped the vaccine just on that slide. We'll show that right here for people. We drew my blood. I think we have that as a clip here. All righty. So, here we go. So here you can see, I'm trying to put the same number of drops in the same part of each slide. And that way we can focus on that one part of the slide.

And it should be, you know, uniformly spread. Look at that. Holy cow. Changed immediately. Didn't it? Yep. Holy cow. Instantly cleared. I've never seen anything do that.

And I don't mean to sound sensational. I just, I haven't. Never seen anything do that? Nope, never seen anything do that. Look at that. Oh. Wow. Pfizer.

That's the Pfizer, right? Ooh, look at that. You saw that. I saw that. Wow. That's unusual. I mean, this is the thing, right? Unusual.

I've never seen it before. Pathologists, I've never seen something dropped on blood do that. You know, we've got embalmers saying I've never seen these and buys the majority. And so what else have you? Well, going back to that question in the survey, you notice, like I said, the bars in 2021 and in 2022 are much longer. Right. What we think happened there, Dell, is that the vaccine was supposed to stay in your deltoid muscle,

right, and produce just enough of the spike protein to elicit an immune response and do that for just a couple of days a week and then it's got you ready for COVID. Right. And we now know that's not what happened at all, right? That vaccine goes all over your body, turning your whole body into a spike protein factory, like doing it for months at a time. So the scientists that I've talked to believe that it's actually exacerbated or supercharged the formation of these white fibers clots and then grow to the side. So COVID itself could have done it, but obviously the immune system in a natural infection is wiping that out pretty quickly.

It's clear from the body within I think seven days, maybe 10 days. We have found that they altered the pseudoridine in the spike protein, the vaccine, that makes it so that it just persists in the body. And so I always, I mean, I argue this with everybody. Every time I see, even in that article at the beginning of our show that talks about, you know, well, I mean, you know, Dr. Siegel at Fox says, well, I mean, still the virus is a bigger risk. We see these same problems with the virus, but it's really simply not true. The virus clears the body faster. The natural infection is a lighter dose. You know, your immune system's attacking immediately.

This vaccine, they bragged, causes more of an antibody response. that it is a higher spike protein load. And now we know it doesn't leave the body. So even if you imagine very quickly, we maybe saw a few clots and be able to just probably had extreme reaction. But if you are having it persist long in the body, just if you took the natural infection, but made it stay there for six months instead of one week, we'd probably see more and more of these things.

Yeah, absolutely correct. The last result of that first study that we did, Dell, was that some of these embalmers, they were seeing these white fibers clots in an average of 30 percent of their corpses, but some of the embalmer seeing that up to 50% or more of their corpses. 50% of the course is coming through. And they're not all coming from heart attacks, right? I mean, it's like everything. Cancers, I imagine, everything, car accidents.

Yeah, this is just one of the side effects we're talking about, the blood clots, right? We're not talking about myrochitis and turbo cancers and all the others. 30%. So if we can bring up the slide for the second survey, I just completed this about a month ago. I ran it from the 8th of December this last year to the 8th of January. So I give embalmers around the world a full month to respond. Okay. Just like last year, what I do is I send it out to 50 national, regional, and state funeral director

associations, each with hundreds of members of funeral directors and embalmers underneath them in a top-down approach. Okay. I also looked up the email addresses for over 1,700 funeral homes around the world and set the email to them directly with the link to our SurveyMonkey survey. This year's survey was 12 questions. Last year's was seven questions. We got a chance to ask some additional questions.

this year. So if we can go to these. Let's see what we got here. So how many years have you been in active in Balmer? Two years, 19 of them, three to five years, 32, six to ten. So a lot of, barely this is a good job because people stay in it, just like you stayed in for some time. 137 embalmers. Next slide. Yeah, yeah. It's a good thing, right? Because they know that what the blood looked like before COVID, during COVID, no vaccines, and then with COVID and the vaccine. Right. Okay. So look at this next. slide. How many corpses do you personally embalm every year? Up to 50, said 75. And then, so this is how many, so this is how many each one of them does. So 75, some said 95. Wait, what am I looking at?

95 of embalmer said between 51 to 100 corpses a year. Got it. I see. For example, 13 embalmers, like Richard, he's a trade embalmer. He does well over 300 corpses a year. Wow. Yeah. But the average is 100 corpses a year, two a week. So these embalmers, they know what they're seeing, right? They deal with bodies on a regular basis. All right, so let's ask the next question. Did you observe any large, widest, fibrous structure clots that seen above in the corpse that you involved in year 2023?

197 embalmers. Out of 269, so that's 73 percent, said they were seeing the white fibrous clots in the year 2023. Wow. Next question? Yeah, yeah. What percentage of the corpses in the year 23 that you have involved and have had the large whiteish fiber structure?

clots. And so take me through the 63 and Balmowers said none. So if you average all the bars together, including the green bar where 63 saw none, you get a weighted average of 20% of the corpses in 2023 contain these white fibers cloths. So 112 said up to somewhere up between 1% of their corpses. So the good news, Dell, is it's down from 30% in our last year's survey. But you might expect that because most Americans took their last jabs way back in 2021 when 80% of Americans took at least the first two jabs. In the fall of 2022, only about 20% of Americans took the bivalent over-cromed booster, and only about 15% have taken the XPB won't find. So we would see if these things are caught. If they're causing it, you might expect the number of white

fibers class to go down. So that's not a vindication of the vaccine. Yeah. Okay. Did you observe any microclouding the corpses that you involved in the year 2023 as evidenced by the appearance of coffee grounds or dirty blood in the drainage? 79% said yes, I believe we got an image of what that actually looks like. Do we? So let me ask you, Richard, this is your footage right here. Correct. So beyond these white clots, you're seeing what looks like,

it's almost like sand or something in the blood. That's rare too? Well, this is not normal. Normally blood is red when mixed with a little bit of water as we run water as we're helping the drainage down the table it will get a little bit lighter more into a pink color But this that's normal blood right there. Okay, so just clear. Yeah, it's just typically it's just blood and and you know if if I don't have as much water there it might be a little bit darker, but it is it's a liquid and again, we've always run into clots in the past Typical grape jelly clots but those images of that dirty blood is totally different and the sandy blood is another strange anomaly that we've been noticing you see though that's that's kind of dirty blood right there it's got a lot of um i look at like coffee grounds there's little specks yeah um and this could be just as dangerous as the large white fibers clause because it's occurring at the capillary level and it's blocking good exchange of oxygen at the lungs and then the carrying that oxygen to all your major or

organs of the body, including your brain and your eyes. Right. So this is just as serious. And if we go to the next slide, we'll see what percentage of corpses we saw it in Del. What percentage of the corpses in year 2023 that you have embalmed have had the microclotting coffee grounds, dirty blood. The average was 25% of them. Yeah.

So one fourth, one in every four now has coffee ground blood. And prior to the years of the pandemic, Ballers would see it very rarely in less than 5% of their corpses. Some would see it in like chemotherapy, cases where they had heavy chemo. But that's at least a quintupling of this phenomenon of microclotting. And like I said, the white fibers clots, it's a brand new event. So this is a serious business going on. Here's the next one.

What percentage of the corpses in the year 20s that you have embalmed have had traditional grape jelly blood clots? 40% of the corpses have that. If you go to the next slide, you'll see that's up. It was 30% before COVID in the vaccines. So that's going up. It's going up as well from 30%. to 40%. And they've gotten a little thicker, too. The embalmers are saying they're now more like grape jam than grape jelly. So not a good thing. Is anyone pushing back? I mean, is that when you,

when you reach out, is anyone that like, how could you dare ask us these questions or do you get like that what's interesting is, you know, we ran this survey very unbiasedly. At no point in either surveys last year or this year do I ever mention the words COVID or COVID vaccine. Okay. I only ask the embalmers, what did you see, when did you see it, and how much are you seeing? Okay. But despite that, we had a optional comment comments box at the end of both of the surveys it wasn't mandatory they could you know respond if they wanted to to see what more about what they were seeing in the embalming room well a lot of the embalmers talked about the vaccines either implicating them as the cause of all this clotting or defending the vaccine staunchly and say there's no way the vaccines are causing this

even though i never mentioned it in the survey so i thought that was very interesting dr doth protest too much yeah embalmers have they have their they have their opinions about what's happening here Wow. But I'll stick with the majority. The majority are saying this is a new phenomenon for most of them that started in main consensus in 2021 after the roll out of the vaccines, and they're seeing it in a high percentage of their corpses. I guess we have a few more questions.

Here we go. Did you embalm an increased number of infant deaths, miscarriage's field demise of stillborns in year 2023 when compared to years 2019 and prior? I guess the good news here, I guess, is no bars longer. That's good. But 20%, 21% did see an increase in infant deaths. compared to the pre-COVID years. That yellow bar, from talking to Richard

and some of the other embalmers, it seems to be a lot more cremations of infants these days. So if there is any evidence. That's what I was going to ask. I mean, I would guess embalming infants is probably not as common. Is it? It's not.

And it's usually because they're so small. It's difficult to embalm an infant. I mean, just imagine we're having to take these instruments and put them in little tiny vessels. I mean, these are tiny arteries. So a lot of times, you know, what I've noticed is the, they're not making it to full term anyway. So that makes them even smaller. And so a lot of times there is no embalming for those, either they're cremated or they're what we call direct berry.

So it is sad. I've noticed it. And some of the people that I work with and around, I mean, they notice it as well. the increase in the numbers. And if it's cremated, obviously, any evidence is being destroyed, right? Also, the hospitals from where I've been told, are now more prone

to ask the parents, hey, would you like us to dispose of the remains of the child as well? So if that's happening more often, then less embalmers are seeing the infants. But we can go to... Do we have a couple more questions? Here we go. What was the percent increase in embalmings of infant deaths?

Stillborn is in year 2023, when compared to years 2019. 25% increase in infant deaths. So if you average all the bars and not including the blue bar, but if you start the yellow bar and move down and do an average of those, you see a 25% increase in infant deaths

in 2023 compared to the pre-COVIDs for just those 20% of the embalmers that saw the increase. All right. One more question. Here it is. Question 12. What age groups, check all that applied. Did you observe an increase in the number of clots in year 2023 when compared to 2019

and prior? Please select none if you have not seen any increase. 22 of them said no, no, 46 said none. But, so there were nine, so increased all. So basically there was increase in all categories. The longest bars, not too surprising, they were in the elderly age groups. You can see the 66 to 80 year old bars, the longer.

But actually, I mean, I would, I actually find that more shocking because I would imagine, if you're imagining people dying of blood clots, it's going to be in that age group. So to see an increase in an age group you're used to seeing this in, is actually even sort of more alarming, right? I would think there's like, no, it didn't go up a lot in the elderly because we deal with that a lot.

But it's even increased in that space. What is, I mean, how does this survey sort of line up with your observations personally? Okay. I think the survey is understated. Okay. And the reason why I say that is because in November, back when I, And before I came public, people were asking me how often I was seeing it. And I didn't have an answer.

I just, I knew it was a lot. And I would say, I don't know, maybe 20, 30%, I mean, maybe 40%, I wasn't 100% sure. And so I wasn't, I didn't have the data. So I started making the notes on my computer just like you saw in that clip. And it wasn't until I started doing that. And in that first month, it was not quite, but it was almost And that number shocked me because, but now I had something. For something that you'd never seen before.

I mean, I want to just keep saying that. Like, wasn't an increase from it used to be this, but something I've never seen before is now happening to half the bodies that are coming through here. Yes. And so I think what happened in the survey is I only know this because I've been writing it down as people are asking me the question, but the average embalmer that's out there than the average person. They're not taking note. It's kind of like asking, well, all right, so how many times you use the restroom in a week? I don't know. Right. You know, and until you

actually document it out, you might find out you're going to the bathroom a lot more than you think. Yeah. So, I mean, that's just kind of why. I also want to point out on the other side, I'm sure there's going to be some pushback on this study. Doesn't really have a control group per se. Those that are answering, we could assume, have a bias that decided, I want to talk about this. There's a lot that didn't answer. I want to put all that out there. But I mean, for me, all we can look for are signals, right? I mean, especially when we do work like this, when you do any type of study, any kind of research, what you're asking is, is there a reason to do a deeper investigation, right?

Is there a reason to look deeper into this? One last point on that slide with the age group. That bar for the 36 to 50-year-old group was actually fairly long. 89 in the abalmers saw an increase in clotting of all types, and grape jelly. white fibers or microclotting in that age group. That's that dovetails very closely with Edward Dowd's data from the insurance industry. He's tracking death and disability data. And he's seen an explosion in that age.

Exactly. Exactly. So that's really mindful. So our information that we got from the embalmers is dovetailing very closely to Edward Dowd's insurance data. So that's corroborating. I'd like to add to that right there. When I was in in 2021 at the end as I'm trying to figure out what's happening, I'm trying to do

research on clotting issues and I'm looking up deep vein thrombosis and and most of what I read was that the people once you get to age in your I want to say it was 65 but it was in their 60s and older the older we get the more clotting issues can become a problem so it made sense that I was seeing more clots in the elderly but that that survey showing that clotting and younger people because they're they're much more healthier they have a healthier blood. I mean, they shouldn't have these clotting issues. Right. So their blood should have been normal. It's amazing. I think about, and we're seeing all sorts of died suddenly on Facebook.

Even I think of Al Roker, you know, I think there was a headline about how, you know, he had clots. Although here it is. Al Roker is recovering from blood clots in his legs and lungs. Medical whackamol, they called it. I mean, I remember them saying they just, he kind of went on the show and said they just kept finding more and more of these things. And yet no one reports on. He bragged, of course, that he'd gotten the vaccine. So we know that if that's on the, you know, if we're looking at the vaccine, which obviously, if this started in 2020, 2021, you know, you had trials going on, 2021, you released the vaccine. Certainly it should be on the table. Are you shocked? Let me just, I mean, because this is where I'm at. You imagine the news, right? We know the news

sensational. It makes its money by scaring the hell out of us and people tune in and, you know, whatever they can get, whatever to just trigger us. It's in there. Did CNN, you were on the documentary yourself, did you get a call? Have you been on CNN? Have you been on Fox? Have you been on MSNBC? Any of the CBS, NBC's? Have you seen them covering the story of coroners across America saying I'm seeing a type of plot I've never seen before, and it could be as many as 50% of my population. The majority of what I saw were immediate hit pieces, trying to discredit.

When I first spoke on the Dr. Jane Ruby show in January of 2022, two days late, I mean, it was like two days. The PolitiFact already had contacted me, didn't even talk to me in person or on the, phone but through a couple of emails went ahead and wrote an article and called me mostly false my claims are mostly false and so the hip pieces were right away i mean immediate and after the documentary died suddenly uh they it's like they went out of their way to try to discredit what i'm saying what i'm seeing and even then i can't i can't tell you because i'm not a dog i just want to say

this is this is this is this is this is real they're real they're right in front of it someone needs to explain this right please well remember now so Thanks to the survey, we now have an army of 200 embalmers standing behind the seven or so that were in the died suddenly film saying they're seeing the phenomenon too. One of the things I did, Dell, when I got the results to both this year's survey, it finished on the 8th of January. I immediately on the 9th of January sent all my results to the FDA, CDC, and NIH, just like I did last year. Last year, they actually had a meeting of their vaccine and related biological products advisory committee on the 26th of January of 2023. They had an hour set aside for oral presentations. I asked to speak of that meeting.

They had a lottery in a student. I wasn't selected as one of the speakers. But I did submit all my information in a written format. And I did get a tracking number from Indel. Okay. Back in January of 2021, 23. Okay, but anyone call you? Throughout the whole year crickets, Dell, nothing from the CDC or the FDA.

You can't go find a problem if you don't go looking for it, like Dr. Cole says. So it's just, it's really discouraging that they're not doing anything with this information. because obviously regardless of how it's happening, how the clots are forming, Houston, we have a problem here. The survey is showing that we absolutely have a problem here. It's really, really shocking. Any last thoughts as you are watching this happen? You've seen my show today. I mean, we're watching the idea of what if a vaccine you can't avoid it.

You can't say, I don't like the science. I know it was rushed. I'm not going near it now. Everyone in the world. What if everyone in the world starts being giving vaccines that do this to people? Well, Del, I was very concerned early on, especially in the summer as we were going into the fall of 2021. Something is very wrong with the blood. And all I saw, I saw a number of people having issues with blood clots.

And when I'm sitting here and I'm looking at these things, and I see those. articles about blood clots I was like y'all don't understand these are not normal clotting issues at that time I believed that there was no way that these things could be post-mortem clots because there's so there's so much protein in there it looks like tissue itself and all I seen was push push push push and anybody that stood up against things like Dr. Ryan Cole spoke out early Dr. Peter McCull and Corey and several others. Many of them were losing their jobs over this stuff

by creating vaccine hesitancy. Yeah. And all I was trying to say was, something's wrong here, and we need to investigate this because if this is linked to the vaccine, you know, none of these here, and I've got over 250 images on my phone.

None of them that I recall was related to a vaccine, is related to a vaccine death. You didn't see it on the paper. No, there's, there's nothing. The vaccine. So all of these, none of this is being attributed to vaccines right now as far as you know. Exactly. And my concern is, and I'm almost 100% sure, when this is linked to the vaccine, I can't

say this killed the individual. All I am saying is without this substance, whether it's antimortem, postmortem, would that person have lived longer? If this is linked to the vaccine, then the number of all the excess deaths that you see, the death rate for the vaccine would be through the roof. I don't think you'd be able to count them all. Because if I'm seeing these in 50% or more of the cases I'm doing,

none of them are being labeled as a vaccine-related injury or a death, but something's changed in the blood. They've had over two years now that I've been slowly, speak being the words been getting out to come up and and show where this is there this is known oh well we're in the medical literature which is nothing but gas light that this has always been there for some reason you're just mistaken you're right they're trying to make me think that two plus two is five right i've been doing this for 20 years and never saw this and all of a sudden now i'm seeing this started slowly and it's continued on and there's some months i see a lot more and there's some months

that I see less, but overall, I would say at least 50%, if not more, have this strange substance now in their blood when I didn't see it in my first 20, the people that I've talked to with more experience than myself, 20, 30, 40, 50 years, they'd never seen it before. Something's changed, and by God, we've got to get to the bottom of it. Amen. You know, Richard's talking about the fear of embalmers to come out and speak out about this, too, because they see what's happening to doctors or licenses. getting pulled or certifications taken away.

I have a little story from this most recent survey. I sent the survey out Dell on the 8th of December to all 1,700 funeral homes around the world and the 50 national regional estate funeral director associations. After about five days, I checked my survey monkey collectors and I only had about 14 responses. I said, what's going on here?

So I need to make some calls. So I had sent the survey to the 30 top US states by population to their state funeral director associations. So I called their offices and I talked to either their president or their secretary or somebody else in their office. I said, hey, could you send out that survey? And I sent you last week, get it down to your embalmer so they could take the survey. Well, God bless the Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Association. They did exactly what I asked.

And I know that because the next day I got up, I checked my survey monkey collectors. There were 93 responses from embalmers. They were all from Pennsylvania. The next day I got up and I had another 32 responses from embalmers, and they were all from Pennsylvania again. So in two days, I got 125 responses from the bombers in just one state. The one where they were actually able to ask the question. It told me, yeah, it told me embalmers want to tell you what they're seeing in the embalming room if they think they have the permission of their boss or their state funeral director association.

But remember, I sent it to 29 other state funeral director associations. What do you think they did with my email? They probably deleted it, right? They probably suppressed it. Their embalmers probably never saw the survey. So I have two reasons why I think that may have happened. First of all, if you're a funeral director, a funeral director or association president, most of them are funeral directors themselves.

They elect one of their own to be the president. Would you want to participate in a survey if you think there is a link between these white fibrous clots and the microclotting and the COVID-19 vaccines, if you mandated that all your employees, including your bomber, take the jabs. Also, 80% of Americans took at least the first two jabs back in 2021. There might be a little personal cognitive dissonance going on. I don't want to know. They don't want to know the answer.

Just a couple of things I'm speculating. I think you're right. I mean, look, those are obviously speculations. We're theorizing what's happening here. I want to thank you both for the work that you're doing. I want to thank you for your courage in speaking out about this. I feel like we're in the middle of a horror movie, and somehow it's not working like we would expect where all the news is warning us or something going on.

We've got to get to the bottom. of this they're totally avoiding it it's like nothing we've ever seen where media literally attacks the people that are warning them that's what you're in the middle of but it's really important that you're speaking out we're gonna keep pounding this drum I think we gotta get to the bottom this especially before they start self-spreading this type of disease upon everyone on the planet I want to thank you for your time thank you appreciate it thank you very today thank you well there's lots of heroes we've had many

on this stage, we need many, many more in politics. And I, you know, this is a nonprofit. I'm not going to get into the political issues of this, but I will say that when you think about self-spreading vaccines, you've got to ask yourself, is there anyone out there running for governor, running for Senate, running for Congress, running for president, that is actually going to stop that,

that would say no way that is not happening. Who have you seen really stand up against this? I know one guy, and his name is Ron Johnson, and he has been having hearings on this issue. And this Monday, I'm going to be in Washington, D.C., with an absolutely star-studded panel of some of the greatest, most outspoken, courageous scientists and writers and psychologists, all gathering for Senator Ron Johnson's roundtable discussion. What are federal health agencies in the COVID cartel hiding? going to be at 9 a.m. Eastern Time. We're going to stream the entire thing live on the highway. You're not going to want to miss this. This is the best and brightest. Most of them been on this table, but you're going to hear them all in one place. I'll be speaking. If you don't know about

Ron Johnson, you don't know about this hero that is literally being attacked by almost every one of his fellow colleagues in government, but he's not stopping. This is one of the brave people on our planet. You've been the biggest voice, you know, for the vaccine injured, for the discussion about VERS, what's going on to the deaths that are going on, the early treatments. My eyes have certainly been open in terms of the capture of the agencies and the corruption of that, the corruption of all the grant money, a guy like Fauci to all these institutions, the medical journals. So, I mean, I just think there is overall corruption throughout our federal health agencies, the medical establishment, the medical journals. They have every bit as vested interest

to not being proven wrong now because again i believe these people do have blood on their hands okay hundreds of thousand people are dead in america that didn't have to die i am 100 percent thoroughly convinced to that because i've laid the foundation for the investigations i'm going to want to do on this subject but is it going to be popular no because again people don't want to be proven wrong it is is definitely me against the media it's all of us against the media it's it's all of us against the covid cartel you know the administration the health agencies big pharma, mainstream legacy media, and big tech social media giants. I mean, that is the COVID cartel. They are the ones I keep telling people that they can't afford to admit they're wrong

with this point. I mean, the body count is so high. I agree. I was thinking of the phrase, you know, it's the victors that write the history. Right. And they intend to be the victors. Yeah, well, so do I. So we. Well, I think you and I both, okay? Margaret Mead, had a pretty good quote, something to the effect of never doubt that a few people can save the world because in reality, that's all that's ever saved it. I know you have on the back of your room or running in your car some form of news, most of us do, CNN, MSNBC, Fox, NBC, CBS, you pay a cable bill, you pay a serious bill, you're paying some way. bill to let those people never talk about this. I want you to think about this for a minute. And if you aren't giving a red scent to the high wire, then seriously, I don't know

what to tell you. Up to 50%. You just saw it in Balmer to say 50%. Randomly selected people that died coming through his office have this happening inside of their veins. And you keep tuning into news agents that are telling you. what they think is so important and you should be alarmed about, none of them are talking about this.

They are propaganda machines. They should have some explanation of this. They should be looking at specialists. If this was a movie, the movie would open with a corner like this, pulling out a clot, and he says to the person next to him, this is the third person this week. What is this? I've never seen this.

It could be invasion of the body snatchers. It could be a million movies we've seen. But what happens is he starts telling people and talking to doctors. And he calls his coroner friend and he says, are you seeing these weird clots that have never been in the human body before? I've done this for 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, never seen this. Have you seen this too? I'm seeing it too. Folks, they're all seeing it.

And no one in the news that you're turning on is saying anything about it. And you trust them? You trust them on everything else that they're talking about. Ron Johnson's right. We are at war with the news. We are at war with our regulatory agencies. We're at war against lies and real misinformation. And those misinforming, lying people are writing laws right now as we speak,

flying to Geneva, Switzerland to figure out how they're all going to write laws so that I can't talk to you ever again, that I cannot show you what no one else will. We're trying to build right now for ICAN systems, players, you know, blockchain technologies that we can run the show on so that you can get to it even when they try to shut us down. Yeah, that's not cheap either. Meanwhile, you are funding billions of dollars into pharma every time you pay your cable bill. You are literally funding the people that are poisoning you and lying you. Will you please this year, if never before, will you please say I'm going to live my life differently, I'm going to start supporting those people that are telling me the truth because they're all alone. I'm going to donate $24 a month to I can because my God, every single week, they bring real science.

Not imagination, not some theory. They bring me science. They bring me evidence in a tube showing me something that never existed before. And if it did, by the way, if you're a doctor and you can bring samples of these from 30 years ago, come right on in. Come here on the high wire. I'd love to see it. I would love to debunk this. Go to Fox.

Go to the embassy. See us how these existed. Explain what these things are. because you're about to start giving us vaccines that every one of us, whether we like it, are not going to have problems like this. And still, if you're sitting at home, wow, sure glad Del Bigtree is like talking about this

because somebody's got to. You know, we're reaching 5 million, maybe 7 million people. It's great. People like, I mean, doubt, it's amazing. Yeah, it's not 100 million. It's not a billion. It's not the 7 billion people that are about to have this in their bodies

or probably most of them already do. How are we going to come up with cures for stuff like this? You got to get engaged. You really need to recognize that this actually is your problem. That even if you've avoided this, if you're in that 30% of America that somehow resisted the greatest propaganda we've ever seen, or if you're waking up to this and, you know,

thank God you're still alive, so maybe your body process this. and got this out of your body. And just saying, I'm never going to do that again. I'm not going to listen to these people anymore. But you realize we're still a minority, at least vocally we are. We will not stop that law that's going to take away informed consent. I guarantee you, that guy that's crying in his TED talks about how he's going to be able to vaccinate

everybody finally and his man-made virus will rule the world. And he gets tears when he thinks about it. You're not going to stop that guy. Okay? And Pfizer and Moderna own your government, and they own your television set. So please, you need to take it upon yourself and say, I know it's an uncomfortable conversation with my friends, with my sister, with my brother, with my dad. But if you stay silent, that majority of people that are just not awake to the truth will very. vote in the people that will allow these bills to be passed, and somewhere, maybe literally the

next outbreak that happens or whatever the WHO says is a pandemic, and they're going to roll out their new technology. And that week, at the trials begin, I'll be reporting on it, and I'll have to do it like this. Is this our future? You want to try helping me avoid this? Donate to ICAN. Help us do this work. They have to figure out how to keep this thing from fogging. Can you imagine what a disaster this is going to be? All right. Let's have a laugh and then let's start calling everyone we know. And I'll see you next week on the high wire.