The Highwire with Del Bigtree - EPISODE 370: LICENSE TO LIVE

Episode Date: May 3, 2024

Christine Anderson, MEP, unceremoniously censored by the European Parliament, Joins Del to finish her Message to Europe and the World; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on The Origins of the Bird Flu Outbreak, Elon Fights Australia’s Move to Censor the World, and another ‘climate scare’ talking point falls flat in legacy media; Del Reunites with The Original Voice of Vaccine Research, Truth, and Education; Finally, The ICAN legal Match has been extended!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Yeah. Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out onto the high wire. Seems like every day now there's more and more headlines about dangerous caused by the COVID vaccine or the fact that we're like on the ninth booster. and here in America, 90% of people are now rejecting going for their next booster, which means 90% of those people that believed in the program at one point are now going against the CDC recommendation.

I think this is a huge wake-up moment for this country, the United States of America, but also the world. And many around the world are starting to ask questions about the investment they got into. We paid a fortune for a product that was supposed to be stopping COVID. it didn't. Now it's endemic. It's here forever. It's here to stay. If you watch the high wire, I think we can blame a lot of that on the fact that we basically turned everybody into a gain of function machine with the vaccine instead of killing it dead like those who were unvaccinated. Their immune systems killed it. Now those that are vaccinated cannot seem to stop the spread of COVID. And God knows where that's going to lead in the future. But at the heart of this, there's so much that

has been going on. So many shenanigans and backroom deals and one of the biggest backroom deals happened in Europe. And it's been the focus of a lot of the attention that we've had. I want to revisit this topic today because we're going to get deeper into it. So take a look at how we talked about this backroom deal in Europe. In December of 2020, when the first vaccines were going into the arms of UK grandmother, we have Ursula von der Leyen's husband, Heiko. And so she's the head she's the one that signed these contracts she's that yeah basically the president or head of the EU head of the European Union European Union and they're asking what did you sign like they're not getting being allowed as members of

that same Parliament they're not being allowed as EU members to see what the heck she signed what was the agreement right that's what they're asking for yeah and allegedly there's text messages where she was texting Albert Burla back and forth during that time what are they talking about they won't be revealed wow so if you look you look into a little bit of of what was happening at that time as well. Her husband, Ursula von der Leyen's husband, takes a position as medical director at a company called Origenesis in New York of all places. So there is the actual page. You can see him there. Medical director, Haiko von der Leyen. There he is. And so in April of 2022, this was well

known by everybody saying, what's going on here? There's an investigative reporting that looked into this. And this is what they had to say. Let's look at that investigative report to see what they wrote. They wrote this, Albert Ursula, Haiko, the dangerous relationship between the president of the European Commission and the CEO of Pfizer. They were on it back in April. And they write this, according to them, basically they're saying Dr. Heiko von der Leyen, husband of the president of the European Commission, who until then had been running a clinic in Hanover. Dell, that's in Germany. Was recruited in December 2020 as medical director of the pharmaceutical company Orgenesis, which is based in New York State, just like Pfizer. Then I have to assume that that was a pretty decent salary hike.

Absolutely, in the tune of over a million out here. So it goes on to say originese is a biotech company developing cell and gene therapies using messenger RNA technology. In May 2020, the company announced the launch of its new vaccine platform targeting the COVID virus. When Dr. Van der Leyen joins the Originesis board, the European Commission had just concluded a series of contracts with pharmaceutical companies between August and November 2020, including two with Pfizer. bio and tech. Wow. So at the same time, Ursula, who's secretly having conversations with Alex Borla, secretly signing documents that the rest that you hasn't seen yet are demanding to see, her husband gets this giant promotion onto a biotech company making an mRNA COVID vaccination. Well, obviously, you know, you've got this conversation going on. Many in the European Union

want to know what the heck was going on with those text exchanges. My understanding is they haven't been turned over or some, I think, have said that they've been erased. And it's important information. It's important for the entire world to see what kind of deals were being made here. Well, I bring this up because just a couple of weeks ago, Christine Anderson, who is the member of the European Parliament, who has been on our show, one of the great outspoken truth tellers in the world today.

She wanted to address this issue at the European Parliament, and in the middle of her address, she was cut off. This is what that looked like. In connection with vaccine negotiations between the European Commission and Pfizer, I give the floor to Ms. Christine Anderson to move the request on behalf of the ID group. In best of von der Leyen man, earlier, nanted it, Fetternworship, handle of the line per SMS with chief CEO Pfizer a contract over 35 million euros out. When she's she's just weigert, all documents off to leaghan and an invitation in the COVID-Autschus to follow,

to them the unfraging the on-vards'rault, and even the ruse of the European Rechnungshofe's with an arrogant shoulder-zooking, then we as Parliament, von der Leyen, and at the state's law-anvardship against you because the red card to find.

Shlimm enough that the commission's president is a parliament but that this corruption decked is it even so

and bereop no more now I put the request to the vote by roll call vote is open vote is closed and it is rejected

therefore the agenda is adopted the order of businesses does establish. Thank you very much. We're seeing so much of this around the world, people being silenced, just trying to get a thought out. What is the big rush? I think you even hear people in the audience yelling, you know, that are there.

Why can't we hear from her? Let's let her finish her statement. Well, I am honored to be joined right now by Christine Anderson. That's exactly what we're going to let you do. Christine, thank you for taking the time today. Oh, thanks for having me. Nice seeing you again. It's good seeing you again, too.

So I would like to know you were in the middle of speaking there. What was the rest of your statement? Let's just start there. What were you going to go on to say and why were you making that statement? Well, we had learned from the media that the European district attorney, the People's Attorney's Office, are investigating Ursula Funderline. They actually launched that investigation last year. And they only made a public statement about, yeah, we have launched investigations.

But they didn't clarify, is it EU Commission or is it Ursula von der Leyen personally? So they were very tight with their words on that. And a few weeks back, they said a little more. Yes, they are actually investigating Ursula von der Leyen personally and her role in negotiating these contracts, which, yeah, as you pointed out, her buddy, CEO of Borla, Albert Borla, he benefited from that and her husband as well. So that kind of makes you think, well, what is going on there? So she has been refusing to show up in the COVID committee. So has Albert Borla, by the way, they declined to show up there twice, and they would be the only ones to shed light on these text messages that apparently have been

exchanged. So like I said, she negotiated a contract for 4.6 billion of those doses. I mean, this is half the planet. And they did so in November of 22. So what did she know that none of us knew? Because, you know, they said it was two shots only. Two shots. Right. Why would they buy 11 shots for every single European citizen? Why would they do that? So anyhow, so they're investigating her and yeah, the news broke. And I thought it was reason enough for her to show up in Parliament and answer some questions. Because we as the elected representatives of the people in the various member states, our job is to answer to the people. But how can we do that if we don't get the answers that we need in order to fulfill our job? So she is actively preventing us from doing

our job, the job we were being elected to do and the job we are being paid for by the taxpayers and no one else. So, and yeah, like I said, I wanted her to show up and I would have thought that the parliament whose primary role is to control government would be on my side on this one. But no, they weren't. And that just goes to show they're just as corrupt as Ursula von der Leyen is, point blank. Which you clearly point out there. You say it's bad enough that she's committing these crimes, but now we are sitting in parliament and we are ignoring it or looking the other way and allowing this continue. Then we're not doing our job looking out for the people. And what was it, what was that vote on? Was that vote just to be allowed to have this conversation?

What exactly did they rush into a vote? What was that vote about? Yes, that was actually, I wanted them to put another point on the agenda for that. plenary sitting to have her come in and answer our question what is this investigation all about what can you tell us what about these these text messages you exchanged with Borla do they even still exist or did you delete them already as you have done in the past already by the way so you know just having this conversation and her coming in and enabling us as elected representatives of the people to do our job but you saw

how it went, right? So when I didn't even realize it. So they interrupted you and then had that vote. Should we even have this conversation? How many people voted on your side? How many people voted on your side? We should have this conversation. Do you remember? I don't have the number right at hand, but it was a minority as always. It might have been 150. I don't even remember. So, but I mean, I didn't even realize that Mike had been killed. It took me, you know, a few seconds to realize that even. And I didn't get to vote on that vote myself because it went all so fast by the time I'd realized, yeah, she had killed my mic. So I was like, why did you kill my mic? And anyway, no explanation, no nothing. The vote, you know, just took place without my participation.

And it was no surprise here when you know how the EU parliament functions. It was declined. Yeah, just having a conversation about this. That. was all. We had this conversation when you were on before and obviously you know you said the you know I keep saying the world is waking up and that you know hopefully we're watching the European Union. You're one of those outspoken voices. We have just a handful that are asking those types of questions in our Congress and our Senate here. And you know as we move forward, I mean now the European Union, this is a huge deficit. I mean, you make a good point. They make this purchase of, you know, billions of vaccines, was it four billion vaccines, really as the pandemic is winding down. So what were those

four? Certainly they must be sitting and we hear all these stories of having to throw out all these vaccines now because we're getting old. So just on a financial level, it seems like someone has some explaining to do on why do we buy a product that is now dying on the shelves that nobody wants and who's going to be responsible for the mismanagement of funds? Yeah, you're exactly right, but that does not seem to be the case, especially in the Western democracies. I mean, you know, I'm not concerned about China or North Korea. They don't have a democracy to begin with. They are totalitarian regimes, point blank.

But they have this problem, as I pointed out before, they have this problem in the Western democracies, because the people do get to elect their representatives. And the means they're implementing, you know, to take away these democracies. processes by shaming people, threatening in with their livelihoods, if you don't do what we tell you to do, you might lose your job, and you know, all of that. I mean, all of this gaslighting that's been going on. It all serves that very same purpose, which is to undermine freedom, democracy and the rule of law and to roll back these democratic processes. Because the people, guess what, they don't want what the globalitarian misanthropists want. there is a conflict and but they seem you know on the on the stronger side and they seem to win time and time and time again so it's it's of other importance that people need to wake up and need what is going and you know so many times especially me as me as a journey people always ask me well how was it even possible back then how could this happen in the third that the nazis came to power and the people just went to along, well, take a look around. It's exactly what we're seeing right now. And by the way,

government enabling big companies, you know, big farmer or whatever, so they could make billions and billions and profits take it from the taxpayers. That is the very definition of fascism, by the way. That's what fascism is, but people don't see it. I agree with you. Well, we're doing everything we can to let our audience know that we need to be aware of this. I agree with you. You have the same problem here in the United States of America. The corruption of government by corporations. We have just far too much money controlling our government.

Now pharmaceutical industry being the number one lobby here in America. I'm sure it's true around the world, but all the other large industries, big industrial agriculture, industrial chemicals, you know, oil and gas, you know, the war machine, all of these things. These are supposed to be democracies for and by the people. You're one of the few people in the world today, actually standing up for the people. Christine, thank you for bringing us up to date on what's taking place in Europe. Thanks for standing your ground and making an attempt to have what it should be a very important conversation.

I hope you won't give up. And I just want you to know how much we really appreciate you. You're truly brave. I think you will go down in history. You may be a lone voice now, but I think when we look back in the history books of time, they're going to remember you. We're all going to remember you for standing up for freedom and justice and the people. So keep up the good work, okay? Well, thank you so much, and I will keep up that work because I wouldn't know any other way to do my work.

Fantastic. Glad you're here. We'll have you on again soon. Take care. All right. Well, we have a huge show coming up today. One of my favorite humans on the planet is right here in the studio. Ready to come on, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. Man, has she been through the ringer? One of the most outspoken doctors always has been, but of course, when COVID came along, that became even more precarious. They threatened psych evaluations, took away her license in the middle of all that. I want to talk to her about what's going on and where she's at now. It's just wrong how we treat doctors that really essentially were more on top of what was really going on with COVID than anyone else. there's a huge, you know, rectifying that needs to be happening in the world as Christine just talked about.

I'm going to talk to Sherry about that. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. Man, you know, you just wish you could clone people like Christine Anderson and, you know, we need them here. We've got just a few, the Ron Johnson's, the Jim Jordans, the, you know, those that are out there fighting and having hearings and trying to get questions answered that everybody should want to answer. obvious, but it just shows you to me how corrupt all of our governments are. These are quite, this is just a financial, like, let's just look at the folks here. Where did all this money go? Who made this deal? Who signed off on it?

Did you? Did you? I don't know anyone here, did? Why can't we have those conversations? It seems like it's now, it's division between team common sense and reality and the other side. Yes, right. Whatever that other is. So whatever you want to call yourselves.

Right. Well, though, there's a lot going on in the news today. So I want to talk about first, just about two weeks ago, there was a bishop in Sydney, Australia, that was stabbed during a live sermon at his church, along with several other churchgoers. And we have part of the video here, obviously, we're not going to show the whole thing. And this has now become a focal point for the global conversation in government-sponsored censorship. And shortly after that happened, because it created quite an uproar, there was protests, and the police described this as a terrorist attack. So we labeled it a terrorist attack.

This was the headline here shortly after that. Sydney Church stabbing was terrorist attack. Police says BBC News. So that puts it in a whole new category as opposed to just some other random act of violence. But you go in here into this article and it says the government, that's Australian government, has told meta the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, as well as X, formerly known as Twitter to remove offensive content relating to the attack from their platforms within 24 hours of face potential fines. Now, it wasn't the Australian government. It was the

E-Safety Commissioner in Australia, and she's in charge of this whole thing. This whole apparatus was put into effect in 2015 from something called the Online Safety for Children Act. So it was originally started to prevent child bullying online. So keep that in mind as we go through this story, because we can see how far this thing has ran and how much government is trying to take the power. And now the woman that runs that is just been reelected from there five years. So that would be 12 years as her tenure there, just as a side note. So what happened from there is X, Meta, all of these organizations, they removed it in Australia. They put geolocators on it and they removed it in Australia. But then we get this

headline here. Australian court orders Elon Musk's X to hide Sydney church stabbing posts from users globally. Now this changes the whole conversation. So it says here because this now has went to court. It says in a hearing late on Monday afternoon, Barrister for e-safety, Christopher Tran, told Justice Jeffrey Kennett that X had geo-blocked the posts containing the video, meaning Australians could not access them. However, the posts were still accessible globally

to the Australians who used a virtual private network VPN connection that made their IP addresses appear outside Australia. So because of that, the e-safety commissioner is saying, I want you to block this globally on the platform So you have one country reaching into a social media platform and directing their global communications and global censorship, really. So right now, as it stands, there's a May 10th court case, federal court case in Australia to really decide the fate of this. So we'll know something next week. But if this, if X and Elon Musk have found to be error on this, then they're talking about over $700,000 a day fine for the days the video was up.

I think he can afford it. I think that's the problem, right. Exactly. Exactly. So one of the interesting things about this story is it was a tragic event. No one died. In fact, the bishop actually went back to giving sermons. And this is one of the headlines here.

Sidney Bishop speaks of losing sight in one eye after alleged church stabbing. This is Bishop Marmarie Emmanuel. And he told his congregation, his eye injury was a sacrifice, and he forgives the alleged offender. But he also said this in this article. He says, I say to our beloved, the Australian government and our beloved prime minister, the honorable Mr. Albanese, every human being has the right to their freedom of speech and freedom of religion, every human being.

For us to say that free speech is dangerous, that free speech cannot be possible in a democratic country, I'm yet to fathom this. So you have a very person at the center of this standing up for free speech, which is quite a quite a stance for someone like that. And so the bigger picture of this whole conversation, though, this isn't happening in a vacuum, this censorship speech. This is going on all over the place. Last summer, the communications minister in Australia put forth a bill,

a draft legislation to give sweeping powers to Australia's media regulatory authority. And it fell flat because at the time, if you remember, there wasn't much, there weren't a lot of bills out there. They were kind of a frontrunner. That's not the case anymore, but at the time we look at this article, this was eight months ago when they tried this. Just check this out. Labor misinformation law, a dangerous proposition for society. This is some really great reporting here. It says the proposal in the bill to clamp down on people whose commentary may disrupt public order or cause economic harm could have a chilling effect on the right to protest, stifling debate and freedoms of assembly.

According to New South Wales Council for Civil liberties President Josh Pallas, Pallas said that, the proposal to exempt government information from being categorized as misinformation carried the implication that governments were by definition truthful at all times. So you've got to look at that and say, gee, I wonder why that failed. But think about that. Governments can never be categorized as misinformation. I mean, the last four years alone during the COVID response should sweep any type of conversation about that amendment out of a bill like that. But now what's happened in Australia is there's been a renewed stance for this bill. So this was the headline eight months ago, Labor to overhaul misinformation bill after objections over freedom of speech. So they went back to,

you know, went back to the drawing board. But now they've come back out in the wake of this, this stabbing, this Sydney church stabbing. And these are what the headlines look like now. Peter Dutton backs law to crack down on above the law social media companies over misinformation. Now he is the opposition leader. That's the lot of the largest political. party in the House of Representatives in Australia. So this is a very big, very big deal in Australia happening right now. It seems like this conversation is turning pretty fast on the back of this. So this May 10th court ruling, if it happens at that point, we'll be really interesting to see what happens. But this isn't just in Australia, obviously, this is all over the developed world at this

point. In Germany, we have Mario Voigt. He's one of the leaders of a major political party in Germany. This was the headline just recently that came out of Germany. Thuringian, you CDU boss calls for social media licenses for every user. And those would be revocable by the government if basically they don't like what you're saying. So think about that. He had to come back out and apologize and said, well, it's a little misunderstanding what I said there. But that should just give you an idea of where governments are looking at this point. You're seeing this echo chamber of censorship coming from the mouths of various government officials in many countries throughout the world.

One of them is Scotland. We've been reporting on Scotland's hate crime law. Hate speech bill where it basically criminalizes certain type of speech and activity, but also life imprisonment, guilty until proven innocent, police have the right to enter your home. Well, the person who signed this bill and who campaigned for it, Hulmsa Yusuf, the first minister of Scotland, was facing at the beginning this week a vote of confidence. And what that is, is a majority of legislators when they disapprove of the government's actions, they can put up a vote and vote no confidence and remove that person in their entire cabinet.

So he was facing that with no hope of passing this. A lot of legislators are not happy with him right now. So what did he do? Here's the headline. He has stepped down. Scotland's leader resigns after conflicts over climate change, gender identity, weakened government. And it says directly in this article, why was that? Support for the Scottish National Party in part declined after the party backed legislation

to make it easier for people to change their gender. and implemented a hate crime law that made transgender identity a protected characteristic, even though the same protections weren't given to all women. Yeah, we've been reporting on that for many weeks now. And again, I love these stories because it still shows the power of the people, even in democracies or republics that are not as strong as they are here

in the United States of America, it does matter. When people step up, when they protest, when they peacefully protest, and go out and say, we are not going to stand for this, It really makes a difference. And frankly, here in America, we need to start getting out in the streets and standing for what we care about, too. And you see this slippery slope. You see this in Australia.

It starts with a little law. Well, we just want to make sure that it's safe for our kids. We've talked about some of those things here, TikTok, things like that. But it is every decision we make, the government never just stops there, right? It always begins a ball, little snowball. And what snowball do you want to start today? which one has a little pet issue that you'd like the government to fix for you, let's get that rolling.

It ends up bulldozing all of us. So we've really got to get smarter about using the government to fix the issues that maybe we need to do on a local level, on a school board level. You know, more and more I just see the power of smaller government, keeping it close to you instead of just, you know, letting big government move in to fix your tiny problems. And this next story exemplifies that because we're talking, information and big government trying to solve a problem we're being told is the biggest problem

in the world. And what we're going to do is something we've done in the show. I heard they've got, they've just released a video that exemplifies the political journey of the Hums of Youseps. Let's take a look at this. Nice knowing you. Good luck with everything else. Stay off the scooters. So we have another story here. We're going to do something that we do quite a bit here since the beginning of the which is fact check legacy media. And this is in the space of the climate change conversation. So the LA Times, the friends at the LA Times, have put out this editorial,

and it's titled, If 10 straight months of record breaking heat isn't a climate emergency, what is? Well, we go into this article, literally the first paragraph, it says, Californians have had weekend after weekend of cool stormy weather and the Sierra Nevada has been blessed with a healthy snowpack. But the reality is that even the last few months

have been more than two degrees hotter than average. Hold on a second. I mean, I know where this is going, but can we all just take that? Like, this is your media. If you ever, like, there's let me a little rule of journalism here. You want to know when your newspaper is a complete and total shill for a non-story. It reads like this.

Although we have record snowplack and it's been really cold here, you'd be shocked to know that it's actually hotter. That's what that paragraph just said. I mean, they'll say absolutely anything you tell them to say. I mean, what an incredible paragraph. Okay, go on. It's really important to stay thinking when you're reading your jury. By the way, it's why I stopped working for CBN.

Like, I mean, I'm just, I'm not doing it. I'm not going to push this story. This is ridiculous. Okay, go ahead. So we go over to NOAA. That's the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. And we look at some of their data. So they said the last two, that article is from April.

So they look at the last two months. We have February, March. So we go to the California maximum temperature for February, and we look at this, and this is over 130 years of data here. And that black line in the middle is the average temperature, which is 55.6 over that entire time. And now we see 2024, February, and the max temperature is 56 degrees. So what does that do? That's about 0.4 degrees over the average of all that time. And we look at this next chart here in the top line there, February 2024, the rank out of 130 February, 130 years is what it's saying.

2024 ranked 62 of the hottest temperatures. Literally right. It's like you couldn't define average better, right? Smack in the middle of 130 years, right? It's 62 years. you know 62 we're ranked this the 62nd hottest February out of 130 wow all right so not two degrees point three degrees but let's let's go so they have one more so they're they're one for one right now so let's go to march because they said it the last couple

months so we go to march at california maximum temperature and look at that average temperature going across the middle in the black line 60 degrees Fahrenheit well unfortunately march was 59.7 degrees. So we actually were negative 0.3 degrees cooler. And you can look at the chart here. And for the March 2024, that's ranked 57 out of 130. So they didn't get that one right either. Now, but they go they go further. So that's the first paragraph, but they go big. This is LA Times for you. So it says the planet is experiencing a horrifying streak of record-breaking heat with March marking the 10th month in a row that the average global temperature has been the highest highest ever recorded. Back to Noah we go. We're going to look at Noah's global land, the average

temperature anomalies. And we have a chart here. And this is a time series again. We're going to look at just the last, since 2005. And you can see here that far right is where we're at. It's not really the highest temperatures ever recorded. And it doesn't look like 10 months in a row. In fact, around 2016 looks like there's a big spike there. I believe that was an El Nino at that time, which makes hotter temperatures. But let's go back to the chart. And we have the last 10 months in a row, which we're supposed to be the 10 hottest ever recorded. And you can see their rank. What do we have? We have 227th. We have 193rd. The lowest we ever got was 156. So it's not close to 1 through 10. That should be 1 through 10 if you're believing the LA Times, but it's not.

So, you know, that's just one article. But let's go to the bigger picture here because all of this information, all this type of reporting is meant to lead to one thing, which is to give power to government to fix what we're told is a problem that is the biggest problem facing the globe right now. And what does that look like? Well, it looks like this. In the news this week, check it out. The White House renewing internal talks on declaring a climate emergency. The White House says President Biden is now considering declaring a national climate emergency. The president says he's looking at ways to use his executive authority. to try and curb carbon emissions, including reportedly declaring a climate emergency.

The Pentagon has noted not just in this administration, but even the previous one, that climate change is a national security issue. This is a contentious decision if it's made. This discussion has come up many times. But if it is made, then the president would have additional powers in the short term, immediately. What that would enable the federal government to do is to direct more resources to renewable energy and shift the country away from fossil fuels more quickly.

It might also enable the administration to block some new oil and gas drilling permits. The Center for Biological Diversity has estimated Joe Biden would get about 130 wartime-like powers by which to bypass democracy and impose the Green New Deal on America without a single vote of Congress. Climate change is literally an existential threat to our nation and to the world. It's just what we need is more emergency powers in the hands of our leadership. Like forget Congress, forget Senate, let's just let these guys dictate emergencies so that they can have all the same rights that they loved so much during COVID. It's unbelievable.

We're at a really interesting situation here and a big point of it could go either way. And we go to the Brennan Center for Justice to go deeper into this state. This is a nonprofit, nonpartisan Law and Policy Institute, and they have a guide to emergency powers and their use. And it says here, the Brennan Center, building on previous research, has identified 135 statutory powers that may become available to the president when he declares a national emergency. An additional 13 statutory powers become available when a national emergency is declared by Congress. So let's pause for a second here because you just heard that news clip about, you know,

shutting down gas and oil. but here's another angle we should really explore here. So there's a thing called climate reductionism, and that's kind of basically just blaming the climate for everything, even though it's not quite obvious that the climate may have caused it. And we've seen the research community, the science community, the medical community, take on this idea of climate reductionism

when it comes to infectious diseases. So we have an article here, a research study here, and it's titled, over half of known human pathogenic diseases can be aggravated by climate. change. Here's another one from UC Davis just this year. Experts warn climate change will fuel spread of infectious diseases. So think about this for a second.

If there is a climate emergency that's declared and these powers are given to the president and pathogenic diseases are part of that climate emergency, this is something that the American people should know really well over the last four years. It activates this U.S. code. This is 21 U.S. Code subsection 36. And it reads, Secretary of Health and Human Services may authorize the use of an unapproved drug device or biological product or an unapproved use of an approved drug device or biological product. And this is during an emergency. So it's not that far off to think that, you know, if another pandemic comes around, which they are, we're told that climate change exacerbates that these vaccines could come out under this climate emergency.

This is kind of like a back door. And so why is that problem? It seems like they're saying that the climate is the pandemic, right? I mean, if you're going to declare the emergency, it's not like, well, we're double emergency and then a pandemic clause. What they're saying is I want all the power to say. And then once you're in the emergency situation, now all of a sudden, and I can imagine why pharma is funding our government to move into an emergency situation because they get to say,

well, hey, now that's an emergency. We've got to rush our products out without the proper safety testing. We're going to need that EUA again to handle this virus that we think is caused by the fact that it's all warmer here. And I'll say, Jeffrey, you know, this is something that we've got an amazing team that we rarely talk about all over the world. But one of the people on our team in England was warning us during COVID. Trust me, when you get through this, this isn't going to stop. They're going to start making pandemics for climate. We all kind of laughed at the moment.

We're like, oh, come on. That will never happen. And yet here we are. We're talking about climate pandemics being declared by the most powerful position in the world. And it also made me think about when I talked about being the shill that the L.A. Times clearly is stating that we've got a higher snowpack and it's colder than we've seen. But don't be fooled. It's actually hotter.

Those types of things I guess people read it don't think. But do you remember Project Beritas? We talked about this. And I just, this is what I love about my team. Can we get that video? Let me just play this video because this is what I think a top news person was saying, you're never going to believe what the next problem we're being told to talk about is. Just take a look at this.

I think there's just like a COVID fatigue. So like whenever a new story comes up, they're going to latch on to it. They've already announced inner office that once the public is, will be open to it, We're going to start focusing mainly on climate. Climate, like, global warming. And that's going to be our next, like, I don't know, like, what's the other book for it? It's our, it's going to be our focus.

Like, our focus was to get Trump out of office, right? Without saying it, that's what it was, right? So our next thing is going to be for climate change awareness. What does that look like? I don't know. I'm not sure. I have a feeling it's just going to be like constantly showing videos of like decline and ice and weather warming up and like the effects is having an economy. And I really don't even ahead of the network like just. Who's that? Is that Zucker?

Zucker, yeah. I imagine that he's got his counsel and they've all like discussed like where they think. So that's like the next pandemic like story like that will yeah that will be to death. But that one's got longevity. You know what I mean? It's not like there's a definitive ending to the pandemic or you know, like it'll taper off to a point that it's not a problem anymore. Probably it's going to take years. So they'll probably be able to promote that for quite a bit, you know. That video is awesome.

Welcome to your news that you are funding. Everyone you're doing it. You're all paying that cable bill so that CNN gets funded to lie to you. And I love it when she's like, what do you think that's going to look like? I mean, he really can't see the future. But if he could, it'd be like, I suppose it'll be like trying to explain why, you know, the Sierra Nevadas are buried their houses or under 15 feet of snow. but still it's because the world is the earth is hotter,

and these are the hottest days we've ever seen. He couldn't even imagine how stupid it's going to get, but he is right. It's a story this can last a really long time, because while there's a sun, and while it doesn't matter if there's 10 feet of snow on the ground to talk about global warming, we can do this forever. True legacy media.

We can scare people for a long time on this story. So why are we talking about this? It's not an outlandish idea, because the WHO pandemic treaty has the term one health approach, which wraps environment into the entire conversation on epidemics, pandemics, infectious disease. So this idea, these blurred lines, it's really written on the wall and written in treaties. So why are we reporting on this? Well, in parallel with this climate emergency story that Biden is considering calling, is this in the news right now. Very important. Check it out.

Bird flu is back making headlines. A lot of consumer concern about avian flu. H5N1, avian influenza, aka bird flu. Federal officials are expanding bird flu testing as outbreaks continue to pop up. The largest supplier of eggs in the U.S. has halted production after some of its chickens at a Texas plant tested positive for bird flu. Six states are reporting outbreaks of avian flu among dairy cows. This week, a Texas dairy worker had pink eye after testing positive for the virus. It's not only affecting birds, it's affecting squirrels, dolphins,

all different types of mammals. The more that we allow this to spread mammals, the more we're tempting fate that this could evolve in ways that it could threaten humans. We are definitely taking this seriously. This is a new development. Cows, mammals, being a reservoir, gives this virus new opportunity to change.

And that's what we're watching for really closely. Could this be the next pandemic? In terms of the animal kingdom, it already is a pandemic. It's in every continent, it's infecting. disinfecting all types of animals. Is this COVID all over again? Is it far worse than COVID?

It's one of the worst we've seen. So, again, without scaring people, it has the capacity to be worse than COVID. What's not reassuring is that we've learned as recently as COVID that we can be surprised. So I think vigilance is appropriate. Why stop at vigilance? Just cut right to hysteria.

Exactly. I can't believe we're here again. And, you know, seeing just coming out of COVID. I just want to say, Jeffrey, one of the funny things here is, like, you know, I work for CBS. I even worked with Jennifer Ashton, who was the last doctor on there. And I just, there's moments like this where I just thank my lecky stars that I found you, that I found this great team, that I'm not being paid to shill these incredibly ridiculous stories and try and incite fear and hysteria around non-existent problems. It's just, it's nice to be able to sit here.

I'm a little giddy today at my fate. Yeah, well, we're glad to have you. Glad to be sitting next to you talking about this. Let's expand this little bit in a way the legacy media will never do. And so it's interesting because in 2023, Reuters, a year ago, Reuters ran this headline. It says vaccine makers prep bird flu shot for humans just in case. Rich nations lock in supplies.

And that's Reuters. And now the current headlines, they're still talking about this. It says U.S. could vaccinate a fifth of Americans and a bird flu emergency. So those headlines are already being prepped. They're already being rolled out there. The FDA, because this has jumped to cows, is testing milk. If you go to their website, they're giving regular updates here. But you have this, one in five samples of pasteurized milk had bird food virus fragments, FDA says. So they're PCR testing milk products on the shelf. And if you go to their actual website, the FDA, it says this. The FDA continues to advise strongly against the

consumption of raw milk and recommends that industry does not manufacture, sell raw milk or raw milk products. FDA has a long history of going to war with raw milk manufacturers, literally, like swat-teaming them. So this is- I love it. Look at what that reporting just was. We found it in pasteurized milk, but we're really concerned about raw milk. I mean, again, if they'd have found in raw milk, you'd be hearing about it, I guarantee you, but they didn't. What they found it is in pasteurized milk. When we put thousands of cows milk all into one barrel, as it turns out, that contamination can get to the grocery store. But stick with that process, and don't you dare go to a healthy farmer that's actually treating their cows well,

not like injecting them with all sorts of antibiotics and chemicals and covering the food they're eating with glyphosate and feeding them corn when they should be eating grass. No, no, forget about all that. That's where that's a healthy cow giving you that raw milk. That's the danger. Haven't found it yet, but it's what we're investigating. Yeah, so the FDA is out there. They're testing cottage cheese. They're testing baby milk formula. Haven't found anything in those yet.

But that's the story there. But with the other part of this conversation is the cases. So there's been two cases in the U.S. This H5N1 is really not very good at when it gets into a person jumping to another person. It does not transmit very well. So we've had two cases. One in 2022. This is the CDC's own report from that time. And you can see it's kind of a milk toast report, a U.S. case of human avian influenza A H5 virus reported. It says person at contact with infected poultry. So they were culling some of the some of their poultry heard basically because of the suspected cases of H5N1. But it says public health risk assessment remains low. And that person had if you go into that report fatigue for a few days and that was their only symptom and they recovered. Not to say this

is a mild disease. But then we have in 2024 this year we have another person who allegedly they've come down with it. CDC report again. And this reports a little strongly worded. It says highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus. And as you saw in that news report, the patient reported eye redness, basically, some pink eye as the only symptoms and is recovering. But the bigger conversation here, as everyone knows, coming out of COVID, we have a little COVID fatigue, but we've also been burned a little bit. So a lot of people are looking, rightfully so, at the bio labs. And we have to be doing that. I mean, just recently, yesterday, Peter Dasick, the head of EcoHealth Alliance, was dragged in front of the Coronavirus Committee and questioned

for a very long time. This is one of the headlines that came out of their. House COVID panel grills EcoHealth Alliance chief demands criminal probe over virus research in Wuhan. They are asking health and human service to initiate a suspension and disbarment proceedings against Dasik and Equal Health Alliance, barring them from ever getting any type of funding from the United States again. So that is, that's what's come out of their new like 30,000 emails. Internal emails have just been released as well about all the stuff that's been going on there. Samples were at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that were being kept there of the coronavirus. So a lot of information is coming out there.

But this is, you know, we're still four years later trying to figure out this thing. and we're now being shown the bird flu. The Organic Consumers Association last year put out a wonderful article, and anybody wants to really do a deeper dive and they have the time. This is the article to do it. Is bird flu being weaponized? And so they go into the history of bird flu. It hasn't been around, at least known, forever.

It's really 1997 was when the world first learned about it in an outbreak. And it says this in the article. The first human H5N1 outbreak occurred in Hong Kong in 1997, the year of what the British called the Hong Kong handover when sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred from the UK to China. It was during this politically sensitive year that Kennedy Shortridge, an Australian scientist, who was the director of the World Health Organization Reference Laboratory at the University of Hong Kong confirmed human cases of highly pathogenic bird flu. The 1997 Hong Kong H5N1 virus was unique in every aspect.

Time magazine reported, quote, on the H gene, at a point called the cleavage site, this is starting to sound like COVID, was found a telltale mutation, the same kind of mutation found in other highly pathogenic avian viruses. The virus had regions that were identical to portions of an avian virus that struck Pennsylvania chickens in 1983. The LA Times reported, quote, the H5 piece came from a virus in a goose. the N1 piece came from a second virus in a quail, the remaining flu genes came from a third virus, also in a quail. Shortridge had been studying how avian influenza viruses spread to humans since

1975. Prior to discovering H5N1, Shortridge eerily predicted its emergence. At the time, the natural leap of a flu directly from poultry to humans was thought to be so unlikely that scientists first suspected contamination from Shortridge's lab was the cause of the highly improbable H5N1. one diagnosis. So at that time, 18 human cases of the disease were recorded. There were six deaths because there is a known high fatality rate of this disease. But media was not like it was back then that it is now, investigative media. So you're literally saying experts thought it may have came from his lab, but there was no further deep investigation, independent investigation of that. So there's a big question mark hanging around that conversation there. So leaving

that there, that brings us to the 2010, 2011, and 2012. And that's where we pick up this story. And there's two researchers, Yoshihiro Kayawoka and Ron Foucher. And these two researchers working separately, not in the same lab, were funded to see if they could make this straight up gain of function, see if they could make this more transmissible. They could make it jump because that was the problem for the virus is it couldn't jump, it couldn't transmit very well. So in people, basically. So they did it in ferrets and they were about to publish a paper and the scientific community said, hold on, hold on, we can't put this out here. So this was the paper. It eventually was published. This is Nature in 2012. It says mutant flu paper published. And it goes on to say in this,

H5N1, commonly known as bird flu, a highly pathogenic and lethal in humans, but it cannot spread efficiently between people and cases seem to be rare. To find out if H5N1 could evolve easy transmissibility between humans, Kiowoka and his team mutated a hemaglutinin H.A. gene, which produces the protein that the virus uses to stick itself to host cells. The first hints of Kyowoka's work emerged last year, along with details of similar experiments led by Ron Fouchet at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. However, the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, NSABB, an independent government advisory board recommended in December 2011 that both papers should be censored before publication,

citing concerns that the strains could be used by bioterrorists or that untrammeled proliferation of the work would raise the risk of an accidental release from a lab, still a problem. But it says after a meeting that included international flu experts and health agency representatives, the NSABB decided in March that revised versions of the two papers, should be published in full. And that is what happened. And you think, who would do this? Why would you do this? Who's funding this? Well, get ready, because we look at the work. We look at the actual studies that led to those two papers being published. And here's the work. This is Kiowaaka's work. You look at this name of the study, pandemic potential of H5N1 influenza viruses. And you look at the

funding, who's funding this? Well, we have NIAID to a tune of over 500,000. thousand dollars that's anthony fouchy's organization anthony fouchy himself is at the basically the root of this and then we have ron fuchet's funding and his study was airborne transmission of influenza a h5n1 virus between ferrets which they were successfully able to do that and his work it says in this article at the end this work was financed through nia id n iH contract and there's a whole bunch of letters there so fouchy and and you know gates too is a part of this they've figured out how to get scientists to basically do biological weapons research with a clear conscience by saying, look, there's pathogens that don't really infect humans too much. So let's use some

genetic engineering to find out how we can make them infect humans a whole bunch. And this is at the heart of this. So I'm sitting here talking to you, hopefully this does not turn into a COVID situation. If it does, we don't wait four years to haul the bird flu Peter Dazek in front of Congress. We do that on day one to really get to the bottom of this. That would be a suggestion just looking at this research here. You know, I want to try to do something right here, Jeffrey, we've never done before. I'm talking to my team. I want to put out a Twitter poll if we can.

Maybe by the end of the show, you can all look at Highwire Talk. But I want the poll to ask this of people. Do you think a future bird flu pandemic will more likely be started by the spread of bird flu amongst chickens, cows, and dolphins or from the gain of function research on bird flu being done in biolabs around the world. Let's see if we can get that out sometime by the end of the show. That'd be awesome.

Jeffrey, understand you're gonna be giving a talk in Connecticut? What's that about? People want to see so many people like, I wanna meet Jeffrey Jackson in person. So how do they do? We're gonna be talking? Yeah, I'll be this Sunday, 1 o'clock, passport to Health and Wellness Expo.

It's in Bristol, Connecticut. I'll be talking for about an hour. And so it'll be fun. So if anybody's around, that would be cool to come out and take a listen. All right. Awesome. Jeffrey, thank you. Great reporting.

Once again, it's amazing to watch how the other networks have to cover their stories. I'm glad we get to tell the truth. Well done. I'll see you next week. All right. Thank you. All right. Great.

Well, we are constantly winning lawsuits. We're constantly launching lawsuits. And because of that, we need your help. One of the things that the high wire does, it's not just this great show. It's also this powerful legal team that's led by Aaron Siri that makes all of this possible. We actually put out basically press release that we're going to continue to go after this sort of emergency court system that's been put together for COVID. This is what it is. Ican's attorneys file a second CICP lawsuit to demand justice for COVID-19 vaccine injured.

This is actually a case in Texas being filed on behalf of four individuals, a minor who was rushed to the emergency room when blood vessels began to burst all over his body shortly after receiving his shot. It was eventually diagnosed with immune thrombocytopinia purpura, a mother of twins who suffered vaccine-induced dysotidonomia and was forced to resign from her job. An orthopedic surgeon who suffered rapid onset of transverse myelitis, a paralytic disease inflammation of the spinal cord that extends horizontally across the vertebrae who can no longer practice. practice medicine. He is on permanent disability yet. He was denied compensation by CICP and a pediatric neurologist and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School who suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration, also known as CERVA. That's that injury to the shoulder. But missed the extremely short one year statute of limitations to file a CICP claim due to her injury. She now has great difficulty practicing medicine the way she used to. Those are our plaintiffs in this case.

And of course, as we have reported, the CICP has gotten tens of thousands. This is the countermeasures injury compensation program under HRSA. To date, there's been 13,000 claims filed. It should be more, but I'm sure no one in this country really even knows about this program. And there's been compensation of 12 total people. We think that this is a disaster. We don't think this program is working, and we want it shut down. We basically want to take away this liability protection.

fighting to say that this deserves to be in a real courtroom. These people deceive real relief, not some fake relief by the very same regulatory agencies that promoted this vaccine, that told the president to take away our jobs if we didn't get the vaccine, that rushed this vaccine on the market, that ended up getting paid through the NIH, their own patents in developing the vaccine. We think that level of corruption removes your ability to protect yourselves from liability, and we want to sue on behalf of these people and all of the injured across the United States of America. You want to help us with that? It's pretty awesome task. We're the ones doing it. Remember, we are more successful at doing this than any other nonprofit in history. And as you know, we had a matching funds offer. We reached out because we did really well last week. We went, we almost doubled our numbers from 100,000 last Thursday to now this week.

We have two, what is it, where we at, we made it to $235,000 raised. All of that's going to be matched. But of course, it was the end of the month. We reached out to the supporter that made this possible. Can we run it one more month and see if we can't grab all of that benefit? They said, of course, it's really about winning these lawsuits. And what do you think a lawsuit like that is going to cost? With four plaintiffs going after, you know, government agency, trying to shut this thing down.

this is how we do it. This is how we make a change. So if you want to take advantage of this matching funds and double your money in making a difference in the world, use the QR code, please. We're asking for $24 a month for 2024, but there's a special QR code. Is there not so that you're, oh, this is it. There it is right there at the bottom. I was blocked by my monitor. Hit that QR code.

Make sure you donate through the ICAN legal match. Hey, can we see what you can do it this week? You think we can double it. We doubled it last week. We went from $100,000 to $2.35. How about we hit the whole $500,000 this month? I know I'm not asking for you, not just you by yourself. Your $5 is all we need.

If you all do that, we make a difference. Text match to 72022. It doesn't get any easier than that. Even forget about the QR code. Pick up your phone right now. Text match to the number 720222 and help us bring the case that will eventually shut down the system that's designed to screw every one of us. All right, this is what we do here at the high wire.

We are no friends of the regulatory agencies. We're no friends of liability protection. We're going after all of it. Speaking of somebody that's been going after all of it, there's been doctors that have told the truth, and I've said throughout COVID, so many great and wonderful, powerful doctors have stepped forward, whether there's Dr. Peter McCullough,

Dr. Robert Malone, and Merrick and Quarver, and all these great doctors and scientists. But there were a few that did it when there was no team. When they were designing the sport of, you know, mono-emonal battle with the medical industry. One of those is none other than Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, who has had one of the loudest, most powerful and educated voices in modern medicine. So many people, everywhere I go say,

I love the work that you're doing, Del. but you know who really got me started? Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. We have someone who has spent two decades bringing the truth about vaccine safety to the people. The person that had the most clout behind them, the most information. Widely regarded as the most knowledgeable and outspoken physician

on the adverse impact that vaccines can have on health. She's probably the most respected and well-known medical doctor out there breaking down exactly what's happening with these vaccines that are being pushed on. In many ways, I consider her a maverick in medicine. You know that I call you times when I'm looking for information. You are a wealth of information. The one and only Dr. Sherry Tenpenny.

Please welcome Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. I'm not really speaking against anything. I'm just pro-information and think that people should have a fully informed decision about vaccinating their children. My mission actually, for the last 23 years, has been to enforce. people about the problems associated with vaccines, but they're not safe, they don't keep you from getting sick, they're not necessary, and they absolutely cause harm, and I'm talking about all of them. I've been a practicing physician in Ohio since 1985. I was board certified in emergency medicine

and director of a level two trauma center in Finley, Ohio for 12 years before moving to Cleveland to start my own private practice. In September of 2000, I went to the National Vaccine Information Center meeting in Washington, D.C., and learned about all kinds of problems with vaccines that I never knew. When I was a board-certified emergency medicine physician working in the ER, I really thought that the only thing in a vaccine was a little dead or attenuated virus and a little bit of normal saline. I'm not exaggerating at all when I say I've spent well beyond 40,000 hours, probably closer to 50 or more through all the time, all the time I spent reading about the stuff during COVID, looking at the problems associated with vaccines and vaccination.

I can unequivocally say vaccines have never been proven to be safe. They do not keep you from getting sick. They definitely cause harm. When COVID came along and the COVID shots came along, it was just a natural extension for me to go, well, what is this all about? What are the ingredients here? What is this going to do to people?

Looking at the EUA and why are we injecting experimental drugs into people and young children and pregnant women? Historically, when you really look at the elimination of small and the elimination of polio, the elimination of pertussis, the elimination of measles. There are innumerable graphs that show that those infections were long gone before the vaccine even came around. I have a collection of more than 17,000, links to abstracts in full-text articles, more than 17,000, only from peer-reviewed published journals that show problems associated with vaccine. We are here today to challenge the premise.

that injecting foreign matter and toxic chemicals is safe. We're here today to challenge the premise that vaccines are necessary for health. They would think it's as necessary as food, water, and oxygen. Because the fact is that they are doing the exact opposite from providing health. They are causing disease. If a person is so crippled by fear over a virus that has a documented death rate of less than 1% globally, and they want to bow to an untested pharmaceutical product out of their fear, well, that needs to be their decision.

They can make that choice. We have got so much information on our side. So when Paul Offett says stuff like, the science is over, we won, exactly, let me tell you something off it. The science is over and we've won. It's true. How can it possibly be that 200 years later, we still have this horrible mistake called vaccination going on

and that people are just bought into that paradigm, hookline and sinker, and without even thinking about it. The most important takeaway I want you to remember is that absolutely health does not come through a needle. Thank you very much. Well, she's a person that no one asks. So what really is your position on vaccines? It's the one, the only Dr. Sherry Ted Piddy. Hey, good day, Bell.

Thank you so much for having me here. It's always a pleasure to have you. You're an icon. You, as I said before, when COVID hit a lot of, a lot more than we've ever seen. It was really, I think, a great moment seeing a lot of doctors waking up. That had probably ridiculed you throughout their careers. I'm sure you've gotten a lot of apologies. But you got, you think?

But I want to talk about like this journey. been on really for about two years. You also did some speaking out about COVID and about the vaccine and like so many doctors had your license under threat. So I'd like to sort of go back because we really didn't get to talk to you about that. When did this all start? Well, in that little clip that you saw where I had on kind of a white jacket that was kind of brown, that was my testimony at the Ohio State Medical Committee, health committee, in June of 2021. Okay. And then by September of 21, I started getting letters from the state medical board that they

wanted, the first one, they wanted me to have a psychiatric evaluation to see whether or not I was fit to practice medicine. Then they wanted to- I actually think we have that. Do we have, by the order, here it is, by the authority best in the state medical board of Ohio by section whatever, Ohio revised code, you are ordered to submit to an examination. and this examination will take place at U.H. Cleveland Medical Center. And what was interesting about that.

Oh, there it is, for a psychiatric evaluation. And what was interesting about that is that I was supposed to show up there for a psych evaluation, and I was supposed to pay, I believe it was $3,000 to my executioner to do an evaluation with me. That's probably the first. Oh, $2,000, yeah. Right, there we go. That's probably the first part of the test. I mean, if you pay that, you must be crazy.

That could be it. That could be very well true. So we responded legally and said, no, we're not doing this. I've never been, I've never, thankfully, thank God, knock on wood. I've never had been in a malpractice suit. I've never really even had any complaints from the state medical board, even though I found out from a state medical board investigator that if somebody called the Ohio State Medical Board and said,

I want to go on record as saying Dr. Tenpenny is the best doctor ever so that if anybody complains, you've got a counter complaint. This investigator told me that if you said I want that put into the record, it would go into the record as a complaint Really? Because their system is so antiquated. So they only have one type of comment that can be made even if it's positive it gets put it filed as a complaint Wow. And so I didn't do that.

Then they wanted me to come down for a hearing in front of the state medical board and they said in the letter that I was not allowed to bring legal counsel which violates obviously all of your rights. Right. And then there was another one that they wanted me to come down and just go through an investigation with them so they can ask me questions. And then the fourth one, they said they wanted to really have a hearing with the full board and had me show up, which was August of last year. So we went to that one. And one of the investigators on the board read into the record at the very beginning. There's this the whole panel of them and two of them read things into the record.

But the second gentleman said, this is not about Dr. Tempenny's position on vaccines. It's not about what she said about magnetism. It's not what she said about 5G. It's the fact that she will not cooperate with us in an investigation. Did you ever figure out why, by the way, like spoons and things are sticking to people's faces? Well, there is a thing that's called magnofection, that they've actually used magnetic little nanobots in medicine for a while. They've been doing a lot of investigations. They've been doing from a lot of different medicine.

Yeah, it's metallic things. And like a lot of things in medicine and in government, it starts out to be kind of a good idea. I mean, if they can inject a little thing that has a little dot of chemotherapy in it, and it delivers it directly to the tumor instead of you getting the whole thing about chemotherapy and it deposits its load there, it's directed externally by a magnet or by a frequency, that would probably be a good thing. But then, like a lot of things, they turn out to be not so good. So at that hearing, they said it wasn't anything to do with the fact that I had failed to investigate,

or failed to cooperate, even though I legally responded by my lawyers. every single thing, and that they said that I would have my license indefinitely suspended until I cooperated with them in the investigation. So they basically said it's not about what you've said. It's not about, you know, even in the hearing that you were at. Or my position on COVID. Or your position on COVID. It's just that you are not cooperating with our investigation.

If those things don't matter, why are you being investigated at all? I think begs the question, but they said you weren't compliant. Were you not compliant? I mean, you didn't show up for the psych evaluation. Well, we legally responded to them. And it's like my lawyer said, you know, he said, just because they didn't like the answer doesn't mean we didn't cooperate with them. And my one lawyer, Eric Jones, who now helps people to resolve their social security issues

if they've been injured by COVID. He also does state medical board things. He said that he went back through 42 years of records with the Ohio State Medical Board. Not one single other physician had ever been suspended for, quote, failure to cooperate, even though I had cooperated. I answered every single one of their responses. So I was to pay a fine and my license would be indefinitely suspended. Now, that's one thing that got all blurred over in the news. They said my license had been taken away and been taken away. Now, there's a difference between suspension and revocation. When they revoke your license,

they take it and you can't get it back. When they suspended, it just means you can't see patients. You can't practice medicine because you've got to slap on the knuckles until you, which time they tell you you can. Right. So my license was suspended. It was never revoked. And so I said, well, okay, whatever. Yeah, here's one of the headlines.

Ohio suspends license position. You said COVID-19 shot magnetizes recipients. And by the way, I've watched that video, and though, you know, I would have probably avoided getting into the magnets as a part of a help. Or you did say there's no, there's just, there are people that have things to leave. There's a lot of things we should be investigating. You're saying, I'm not saying it's causing it, but there are lots of questions around this vaccine. Well, the reason that I answered that like that was because the gal on the state medical board, one of the representatives, the question she posed to me was, have you seen any unusual responses or reactions to the COVID shot?

Right. And I said, well, I'm sure you've all seen on the internet all these pictures of people putting a coin on their head or different things. It seems as though that's kind of interesting. Somebody should investigate it. pretty bland statement if you really think about it. I didn't say anything about causality. I just said something's happening there. Somebody ought to look at.

So again, it was all taken out of context and all blown up. And so by December, so that was in August. And by December, I started having to fill out some forms for various things that said, have you ever been under investigation by your state medical board? Well, yes. And I didn't want that following me around forever. Right, so something you wanted to do. Just get it off my record.

It was like, oh, wait a minute, I'm going to have to start, like, filing myself. It's like a scarlet letter, essentially. Yeah. And it is. It's sort of like if, like, I was named in one malpractice suit when I was in the ER in about 1994. That's how long it was. And I was just named. I was dismissed from the case.

But that follows you around forever. Like, every time you apply for medical malpractice insurance, you have to go through and document all of it and submit a lot. letters and I didn't want to go through that again so I said to Eric my attorney I said what were those questions again because they were pretty self-incriminatory so he sent them to me and now that's three years later that we have all this documented evidence of right of the problems that that the COVID shots have caused and that there is scientific information about the 5G and the frequencies and

we know about the self-assembling nanobots we know about graphene oxide we know all of these things so I said to him I'm just gonna answer these questions and I I said, so I did. And they asked silly questions. Like, since you tell people never to get a vaccine, that you've never, tell people to never get an MMR vaccine, have any patients in your practice gotten measles? Well, first of all, I never say that. I always say, here's the risk of the infection. Here's what you can do about it.

Here's the risks of the vaccine. Here's what's in it. Now, you decide. Let the patients or the parents decide. So I said, well, I don't think so, but I never tell people not to do that. So I just cut and pasted that on every answer because they asked me every thing. You can see it right now. Of the patients to whom you recommend and not receive vaccinations or to whom you did not administer vaccinations,

how many contracted measles? You answered, none that I know of. However, I do not tell parents not to vaccinate. I tell them the ingredients in each vaccine. I tell them the true risk prevalence of the infection the shot should protect against. I tell them the potential side effects from the infection versus the vaccination. And then they can decide if they want the vaccine. and there's like 10 or more questions like that and you kept pasting I never I'd never tell

them not to put it back in their butt and your answer's like not that I know it has anyone gotten polio not that I know of has anyone gotten TB or whatever like they asked me dude did because of my position on vaccines have I lost patients and I wrote to the contrary I think I've gained practice patients because contrary when he suspended my license I finally had a vacation something like that yeah Because I said, you know, people want to go to a doctor's office where they have, they get informed, true informed consent, and they get options. They're not dictated to. And one of the questions was, would I administer a vaccine in my office?

I said, no. Well, what if patients wanted a vaccine? Well, there are lots of other places they can go to get one if they want it. Right. So there were 33 of those questions. So I answered all the questions. We had it notarized. We sent it to the state medical board on January 7th of this year.

right after the holidays and after innumerable contacts with the state medical board by phone calls emails text messages they they were absolutely crickets they did not answer at all so we decided as a legal strategy strategy we were going to file something with the court called a writ of mandamus which is actually asking the court to tell the state medical board to do their job right and um my attorney eric he said i don't know if the court's going to know what to do with this you're asking the court to tell the state medical board to investigate you. Will you investigate me already? Please get this over with.

So on the day before we were going to submit this to the court, Eric called the attorney that represents the Ohio State Medical Board and said, you know, they're going to look really bad because they're going to lose. And I just wanted to let you know that we're going to do this. The very next morning at like 8 a.m., we got an email back from the state medical board. On further investigation, we've decided to release your license. It's no longer revoked and you can reinstate your ability to practice. So we thought that, you know, and they voted unanimously and they actually sent me a letter and an email and all these things.

So it was just a big scam and just a big hoax all along, just a way to kind of shut me up and try to shut me down economically, try to do things that, you know, fortunately I have a pretty good size practice. So I have another doctor and some physician's assistants so patients could still get care. But I can see where, you know, it's the reason why when you say to other physicians, when you say the word state medical board, they just shake in their shoes. And if the state medical board requests a piece of paper, they'll send them a banker box full of stuff and they'll self-incriminate them. So my message to other physicians who may be hearing this is just hold your ground. And you know you're right. Hold your ground.

Don't oversell your position. So can we call us breaking news? Have you told anyone else that you got your license back? Hey, everybody, this is what it means to stay in your ground, right? To actually stand in it. Sherry, you did it. It was just April 24th. Wow.

So it just happened. Just like a week ago. Just a week ago, you got your license. Yeah. Fuller back unanimously. Yeah. And they're really, I mean, they're licking the wounds. And I think you're right.

If you'd answer those questions in the middle of it, it may not have had the same power because they thought they're right. I just similarly got interviewed, you know, was asked some questions by the Wall Street Journal. they always say, you know, you spread conspiracy theories on your show The High Wire, you know, and how do you, I say, you know, there's a lot of things I've covered, true, there's a lot of things I've covered in the high wire that have been described as being conspiracy theories like the lab origin of the COVID virus, the lack of effectiveness by the vaccine and the inability to stop infection, the fact that social distancing wasn't based in science, which now Tony Fauci's

admitted in front of the Congress, all things in fact that we have a better record on than the Wall Street Journal. I'm getting really tired of you guys who got wrong saying that somehow what we do is a conspiracy theory. I mean, I have no problem standing in their face because we're right. I mean, we have the benefit of time, right? I stand by every video I have out there in the world.

You can put these like misinformation or conspiracy theories, but those are just nothing statement. They don't mean anything. What did I say? I point out a single thing I got wrong. That's not now back. signs I'd love to see it yeah really truly you've been in the forefront of in a leader of doing it big and broad and loud which is really really important I mean

if when COVID started between March about the end of March of 2020 and when everything first started through December of 21 so in that period of time was 18 months or so I did over 600 interviews you know just the same thing as broad and as many people that wanted to hear it saying that the vaccines aren't safe. It's there. They don't stop transmission. They do cause harm. If you really think you want this vaccine, the only thing you ask you do is just wait, wait a little bit. You don't have to be the first person standing in line. You can wait a couple weeks, couple months, see what the results are going to be. Take your time. And with doctors who are, you know, facing anything from their

state medical board, stand your ground. You know, physicians somehow, you know, one of the problems that physicians have, where I am a little bit different, is that most physicians are W2 employees. Their employees are a big hospital system, so they got a boss that can fire them. You know, I'm an independent practitioner in my own office, and so I am the boss. So I'm not going to fire me this week. You got to get out of that system. That system's corrupt. I think it kills more people than it saves at this point. So I know that most doctors got into this because they really wanted to save lives. I do believe that.

And I just think they get caught in a system where they become yes men, yes, women. And I think most of them are stifling a real concern that they are doing more harm than good, but are afraid to speak out about it. I think that's really true. I think that when you make the decision you're going to go to medical school, you're 18, 19, 20, and you think it's going to do, you do really good things to help people. And you don't know until you are eight years and $400,000 into your education. that that's really not what's gonna happen.

It's really not the way that it is and it's too late to turn back at that point in time. And I think there are a lot of physicians that have issues with depression and begin to get over that. They just ignore it and just say, I'm just following protocol. I'm just greater good. I mean, I don't fully understand the numbers,

but I'm being told we save more lives doing this way than we lose. Yeah. So I'm really excited to be able to, you know, this is like it's, it's just me, but it's really important to let people know that they have unsuspended my license. I guess reinstated is the proper term. And to encourage people to stand on what you know is right.

Don't back down. You know, whether it's with your job or if you're a physician, you know, somebody comes after you with the state medical board. Don't shake in your shoes. You know, grow some strong feet and stand there and be brave. Well, that's the most important thing you can do. I mean, I think, you know, more than that. than as you said, just protecting yourself.

You've shown the way to other doctors. I did fine. I got through it. I faced it. You're gonna turn out just fine. You said something I hadn't really thought about. You said, you know, in your practice, if you wanna get a vaccine,

there's other places you can go and do that. You did once in your career give vaccines, is that correct? Only when I was in the ER. Okay, only in the ER. And I would only did it on, even back then, what I really didn't know anything about vaccines, just like most

physicians that you know you've interviewed a lot of physicians and said how much did you learn about vaccines in medical school and it's like essentially nothing right and so but it was just i used to give out tetanus shots like they were a special kind of candy you know it was just you just because you knew tetanus was a uniformly in a uniformly fatal disease until i started investigating tetanus and it's not right it's a bad infection you don't want to have it the best way to avoid it is to clean out the wound warm soapy water there's some homeopathics you're Make it bleed a little bit. Make it bleed a lot.

You take an antibiotic. There's different things that you can do. And so people, because when I started reading the backdrop on tetanus, it would say like, you know, so-and-so, this is what happened. This is what they did. They contracted tetanus. And then they fully recovered. And I read case after case after case. And we're like, fully recovered.

It was like, like, what's this happening in my brain? Because we know that tetanus kills people. Well, it didn't. And so that was kind of one of my biggest turning points when I started investing. vaccines 25 years ago now was that and even in the ER like the kids would come in and the nurses would come up to me and say you know they're behind on the vaccine so this is an opportunity to catch them up and that's actually an official medical term called catch up and I would say no don't give them no they got an ear infection they got a fever they got more

important things to deal with than do that right now and the nurses would look at me like I had four heads you know because all the other doctors would say yeah of course give it to them. So they would be vaccinating sick children. And I didn't know anything about vaccines that I did now, but it just didn't seem like the right thing to do. Yeah. It's a really good point. One of my favorite things when people will come up and say, you know, well, you know, measles is deadly. You want people to die from measles. Like I think there's Brandy's Rosne. Like one of the really intense reporters out there outside of the march we did in Washington. You know, well, measles. I mean, measles is deadly. I was like, no, it's not. And she's like, of course. Are you saying it's not deadly? I said, But how are you standing here to ask me this question? Say, what do you mean? I'd like to know how you're standing here.

If measles is deadly, it's one of the most infectious viruses on the planet. Almost everybody caught it. So that means your grandparents survived it. In fact, look at this, at that point, it's like 40,000 people out from the stage. Look at all these people. They're all only here today because their grandparents didn't die from measles. So I don't know what you're talking about. The seven billion people on this planet are here because measles did not kill.

their grandparents when they caught it. So I mean, to your point, they push a narrative that's just simply not true. Now, honestly, I think we've burned them enough with statements like that. I think I recently saw the reasons you get a measles vaccine is not that it's really that dangerous. It's just that you want your kid missing school.

So they're lightning up on it, right? They're lightening up saying, this death line, we're starting to get called out on it. I wanna ask you though, because you do, you're always doing great intensive work. You do online courses that, that are like going to Harvard Medical School. But what are you focused on right now?

What is your muse right now? As you look at the world, what do you sort of focused on as a real problem? Well, two things actually. One is about what's actually getting into our food supply. You know, it's like things that are getting injected into our food supply and they're feeding the animals that gets into our food supply.

We know about it commonly how they've kind of cut back a lot on giving antibiotics. to the animals because it does get into the food supply. But there's a whole lot of other things that I'm investigating that gets injected or fed to our animals and the things that we eat and then some solutions for that. And the other thing that's like probably the biggest thing on my mind is I, you know, I became, you know, I've always been a Christian, but I became a really strong, devoted Christian in January of 2020.

And so my substacks that I write, I write just in the nick of time. Yeah, seriously. That's a whole other long story in it of itself. But it was, you know, I started writing the substack, two substacks a week. One is called, one is called... There's one right now, Walking with God. Yes, which is my book. Can I show you?

Yeah, sure, please. So it became my book. So out of my substacks, I wrote my book. I wrote my book on Walking with God. It's a compilation of my substacks. And I like it because it's like lots of pictures and it's really nice weight and it's got lots of different things. And it's like not a one and done book. It's not like something when people say, oh, I want to read your book. Well, it's not like you get it and you read it to the end and you

put it on the shelf. It's like two or three minutes of daily inspiration. And it's not like a daily thing. By the table of contents, it's divided into be brave, have hope, embrace faith, deep in trust, and practice obedience. So on those days that you need a little inspiration of that, you can just turn to one and just kind of read it. So I spent a lot of time on that. And my other substack is called eye on the evidence, which is very medical related. And right now I'm doing a whole series on the immune system because we're always talking about building up your immune system, but people don't even really know what that means.

What is our immune system all about? And what can we do better to support it? So I think teaching people more about their own bodies is a way to have them be more self-responsible. You know, we get one of these. We get three or four cars. We get a couple houses, get a couple spouses. You get a bunch of things like that, but you get one of these.

And we don't really know how to take care of it very well. So I'm like slowly going through and teaching some people about that. And then the food supply is a really big deal for me. What kind of things like, I mean, when you first brought this up, I thought we were talking behind the scenes just about, it's like vaccinations in the food supply. It's like, oh, you mean how they're going to put vaccines in the lettuce? That's where I thought you were going.

But it's really what's already happening. It's what's already happening. I mean, I started an article. A friend of mine who was staying at my house had brought home some junk food. And I looked at it, I said, what the heck is in this? So I picked up the package and it said, made with B.E. ingredients. And I said, what is a B.E. ingredient? So I looked it up and it's bioengineered, which is different than genetically modified.

Those two things are not synonyms. Genetically modified is when they insert a type of bacterial gene into the cell. bioengineered means they actually slice out pieces of genes and put things together. They're creating a new organism, completely new organism. So when I started looking at that, I found the, I think there's 17 different things that the USDA, in combination with the FDA, allowed to be genetically modified or bioengineered. So what started out to be a 2,000-word substact turned into a 42-page research paper, which was the beginning of where I'm going to.

with this book that I'm writing. And the one, the section that really got me was about the genetically engineered by the genetically modified salmon. And when I was reading and investigating this, I found that they have 20, at the time that I read it, there was 26 vaccines for fish. Fish vaccines.

And then a later date paper now says there's 50. Now put that in perspective. I mean, there's 17 vaccines in the pediatric human schedule And they give our fish 50 vaccines. And the USDA does not require the ingredients to be put on the package label. So if you go get a package insert of your dog getting a shot or your cat or your cow or you don't know what's in it. And when I called the USDA and I made 10 phone calls and the last phone call ended up, I spoke to someone in Ames, Iowa, in the USDA Public Health Service Department. and they took me to a website where it showed what was the package labeling requirements.

They don't have to put the ingredients. I said, well, can I call Zoetis, which is the big, Zouettis and Merck are the two largest vaccine manufacturers for animals and ask them, you know, what are the ingredients in this particular vaccine for fish? And they said, yeah, but they'll probably tell you it's a trade secret and they won't tell you what it is. So researching this and digging deeper to really find what's the ingredients in vaccines that they give to fish and cows and chickens and sheep and what they're doing to genetically engineer all these different things, it's a really big deal. It's a really, really so much bigger, deeper, and darker than what you even know. It's not even about like the lettuce thing where they're

going to make vaccines from lettuce. It's more than that. Wow. And so do they're, I mean, are they taking fish, like injecting them with that that actually happens? There's three ways that they can vaccinate fish. One is they can put the vaccine in the pellets and they feed these pellets, this farm fish with soy and all kinds of things that fish never eat. And then the second thing is they have big vats filled with the vaccine or a percentage of vaccine that the fish swim around in and through their gills, they take it into their bodies. And the third way is they actually anesthetized the fish and they actually inject them.

They have injectors that they can inject up to a thousand fish per hour. Wow. And they actually, they put it into their belly, into their peritoneal area. They actually did a small study of 12 fish, like what happens to the fish after they've been injected. And these fish got sick, and they hung out at the bottom of the pen. And they acted like they were in pain, and the other fish were around protecting them. And then when they harvested the fish, they found that all of their intestines had, like, adhered together almost like a scar tissue. Wow.

So now not only are we contaminating the food we eat, we're really doing harmful things to these people. these, can you imagine this little fish is just swimming around just trying to be a fish. We do the fish for having an issue with viruses. Exactly. Wow. And the only reason that they're having issues with some of those viruses, and they call them sea lice and things like that, is because our water is so contaminated. The oceans are so contaminated with plastics and pollutants and, you know, all these different things.

So a lot of people would say, well, that's fine. I'm going to just buy local. I'm going to buy for my local farmer. Well, the USDA now is trying to pass a law that the farmer has to put up equipment to keep the runoff that goes into local streams of like cow dung and things like that. It may cost small farmers up to $300,000 to buy the equipment and then they have to pay an annual fee, which is going to put our small food farmers out of business. Right. I mean, that's something I'm really getting more and more fascinating about because I do want regulations. do we want to make our food supply safer. But when you realize that sometimes when you are wanting a regulation to make sure that we're

not getting run off in our water, that the big ag companies love those regulations because they're the ones that can afford to put in that equipment. And it knocks out their competition of the organic Amish farmer that's really not having issues, but can't afford to put in all this extra equipment. And so these are spaces, you know, the more I sort of look at the political systems. There's just not easy answers to some of the problems. that are out there. You know, I just attended virtually a conference they had in San Francisco a few weeks ago.

It was a three-part conference. I attended virtually the first and the third part. The first part was called Future Ag of what they're doing to our cows and chickens primarily and how they're replacing that with like cricket flour, cricket protein. The second part was an international one that I didn't listen to, but the third one was called Future Food. And it was really interesting and eye-opening about what they're doing to food.

And all of them are very much, oh, it's all about global warming and it's all about carbon footprint and we have to eliminate the carbon. I didn't know until I attended that that there's actually pellets that they give to cows to cut down on their methane release because it's protecting the planet.

And they made a really big deal. All of them were, yes, we have to, We have to do the synthetically made meat. We have to. It's just absolutely the only way that's going to be sustainable, that we're going to be able to maintain all of this stuff. And so you listen to all these conversations. And there's two things about that.

One, the takeaway was they're going to hide it, I believe, by calling it fermented food. And, you know, we in the natural health industry know that fermented food is very good for us, you know, like fermented cabbage and things like that. Well, they're going to hide it by calling it fermented food because it's coming out of these huge fermenters that making this artificial meat.

The other thing is that the funding has really been cut back on a lot of these things, and they don't know how to scale. So it's going to take a lot. We talked about a lot of investors are bailing out. It's just not growing. It's not growing because they can't scale it because they have issues not only with taste,

but with texture. You know, does it really feel like meat in your mouth? And we talked about this a little before. I mean, if you have a steak for dinner and how that steak taste in your mouth when it's hot and fresh off the grill versus maybe the next morning. You may have a little piece of it. It's cold.

It's still the same steak, but it has a different texture. So they're really dealing with textures and flavors and digestibility. And so the good news is it's not growing as fast as what the media would have you believe. You know, the bad news is there's a lot of players in that space that they're really working for it. They're really working to get it done. Sherry, how do we follow all the work that you're doing and, you know, where's the best place to sort of check out your stuff. Well, the best place, everything sort of buttons up to Dr.10penny.com.

So it's DR10penny.com. Okay. Without the period. So it's just DR10penny.com. And that's where we have, you know, you can find my two substacks that I do. One is DR10penny.substack.com and the other is 10penny walk with God. Dr.substack.com. Those are the two places I hang out the most.

I do seven podcasts a week. And so we're pretty busy. You sure are. You're kind of active, you know, just to get the word out. and have a lot of interesting guests on like what you have. Not merely as big as you, but we're all doing our part, you know. This takes all of us, and really I'll never be as big as you. You have saved millions and millions of lives.

I mean it everywhere I go, that's the people say, I mean, more common than any other name, they say the person that really, that I started seeing these videos by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny on the vaccine issue, and that changed my life forever. You're changing lives. You continue to do it. I'm so psyched. You've got your license back. Can I make one more little comment?

Please. Because I know a lot of people have been praying for me since I had the stroke. And I'm not shy to talk about it. I always just picture you as healthy, right. Well, I'm not shy to talk about it because it's a journey. You know, that was August 29. So this medical board stuff was August 7th. And on August 29th, stress and everything, I had the stroke.

And at first I was completely paralyzed on my left side. I had lots of good care. thousands of great prayers and I'm really doing well. I mean I still have a little bit of weakness in this leg and a little bit of things with balance but compared to where I was in just a short period of time like thank God that it's all better but I just wanted to let your audience know because I know we have a lot of cross people that all your prayers and everything really helped it's a lot of hard physical hard work on my part but a lot of prayer on the other side so thank you to everybody We're so happy you're doing well got your license back getting your health back. Yeah

You look fantastic by the way I have to say like you when you came and say I was coming in for a wise Like see you living there now you look here you look rested. I was just giving a talk Well I hope you continue to give those talks. It's great to see you thank you so much thank you so much all right Oh and by the way let me give you one last plug here here you go. We'll have connected on on the chat right now definitely check out this book It is really a beautiful book. One of those things you can just sit down and have a moment of being blessed, of feeling inspired by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. I just want to make sure we go out and support that book.

Thank you. All right. Well, look, we've got this match going on, and I just, I can't stress to you enough how important the legal work that we are doing is. You make that possible. All we are is a vessel to try and let you know that there's all these things that we can do in courtrooms to make a difference in this one. world, but it's up to you to support it. This is sort of the latest breaking news from our legal team. Take a look at this. We were very proud to represent members of our military who did not want to get a COVID-19 vaccine because it violated their faith, their beliefs, and obtained

a class-wide injunction that prevented the military from kicking out over 10,000 of them who refused the shot. More recently, there was a family where the children of the members of the members of the military were not going to be allowed to attend on-campus daycare unless those parents again violated their beliefs to give their children certain vaccines. ICANN generously supported legal action to basically send a message to the DOD to the Department of Defense. You need to respect the right to these parents make a choice with regards to the childhood vaccines.

Their beliefs are contrary to giving them. They shouldn't have to give them. We're very pleased that the Department of Defense let those children back into school. The goal there, of course, was to not only get those children back in school, but also set a precedent for the Department of Defense to understand they need to respect the religious freedoms of all their service members. After all, service members swear an oath to protect the Constitution, and the first freedom in the Constitution of the Bill of Rights is the freedom of religion.

I want to thank Aaron C. for all the great work. This is one that's really, really always dear to my heart, is anytime we can help kids in this situation. We have done that work with the military, but their kids really need to be able to opt out. So many of them are having issues because their parents are so highly vaccinated as it is and as they're starting to wake up and make changes, but they also don't want to be injecting their kids. So your support made that possible.

I want those of you that are watching right now. Maybe you've already given before or maybe you never have before. You want to save lives? You actually want to say, you know what, I got five bucks in my wallet and I would love to save a life today. you actually can do it. Take advantage of this matching fund right now. We'd really love to utilize all that's being made available here. We're at $235,000. You can go to ICAN legal match or just type match to 72022 on your cell phone right now and help us continue to do the work. And by the way,

we have cases all the time I'm not talking about like this one because we don't, when We're not a nonprofit that goes out and says, hey, give us money. You know, look at what we're about to do. Look at who we're going to sue. That's what some groups do. And then they lose because the courtroom will say, look, this is just, you know, an advocacy group or they're using this to raise money. We don't do that.

Most of our cases, we only tell you after we've won. So there's cases right now that are going on that are very important that we don't talk about because we don't want to influence the courtroom and the work that we're doing. So that's why every time you donate, you really make a difference. I want to thank everybody that's made this incredible show possible. And all of you that are going to donate today, thank you. And to our sponsor out there that's made these matching funds possible, you really truly are helping us make a difference in the world.

And you're all becoming a part of our network, informed consent action network. Well, I have this amazing team. I tried something today. Can I just call a poll out from the desk as I think about it? I guess that happened. And then we've got some results right here. Here it went up.

Do you think a new bird flu pandemic is more likely to originate from birds, cows, and dolphins, or gain of function biolique? Look at that, 99.7% of you've already got 2005 views on that poll. So let your friends know, share that. Share that out with everybody. I mean, this is the part of us like, is there anyone out there? Are we really all alone? Or is there a lot of people thinking like us?

I think more and more does people thinking like us, think about this. You know, when we want to talk about medical freedom, people like, what do you mean, you know, not having vaccine mandates? Remind every friend you have right now that is decided they're not going to get the ninth booster shot, that eight is enough for them. This is an opportunity to say, well, you know, you've said before that you prefer that Joe Biden in our government just mandate these vaccines. What if they made you get that ninth vaccine even though you're? don't think you want it. Do you really not want to live in a free country? Do you really want the CDC to say, hey, that's our recommendation. And it's more than recommendation. It's a law. And we're going to take your job away if you don't take that ninth vaccine for COVID. I bet you have that conversation

right now. There's a lot of people going, you know, that's a good point. I have opted out of the ninth vaccine. And I don't think I need it. And I wouldn't be really psyched about the government made me take another one. So these are those opportunities where maybe we can open up a conversation. Really? You didn't get the last booster. Why? Do you think the government should start mandating that booster? Why or why not? Ask questions. Open up the conversation. Don't beat them with truth. Just ask them questions. Would you support a mandate? Do you want Joe Biden to go out? I think you should force everybody to give the, to force us to get the ninth booster? Those are the types of conversations you have. You want to change hearts and minds. That's what we're doing here

on the high wire, changing hearts and minds, bringing the truth every week. We will never start sentence with though there's 10 feet of snow on the ground right now it's actually hotter than it's ever been I'm glad I don't have to say it I get to bring you the truth bring your friends if they want to hear the truth too and I'll see you next week