The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 371: THE FALL OF ‘SAFE AND EFFECTIVE’

Episode Date: May 11, 2024

Episode 371: THE FALL OF ‘SAFE AND EFFECTIVE’The Fight Against WHO Pandemic Treaty Amendments Faces New Pushback; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on Chris Cuomo’s Unexpected Reversal on the COVID Vaccine and Ivermectin, and Explosive Revelations About Lithium Batteries; Del’s Message to Chris Cuomo and How Del Bigtree “Knew” Before He Did; Unpacking Transhumanism and Preparing For the Age of the Technocrat. Guests: US Senator Ron Johnson, Patrick WoodBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Yeah. Let's do this. Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. I want to tell you that this show is packed today, and I just spent up to the very last second planning what we're going to talk about today. And it's going to be a little bit hard for me to keep my emotions down, which my executive producer said, Dell, just keep it chill. Why? Because you may be looking at someone right now that is recognizing that their life's work is now coming to fruition.

All the people that have worked on ICAN and the high wire are finally seeing our due diligence paying off. And what do I mean? From the very beginning, our non-property, informed consent action network set out really just to prove one point. that vaccine injury is real. People get injured by every single vaccine there is. All vaccines have side effects. That's essentially the entire purpose of our mission. And because of those injuries, no products should ever be mandated on the American people that is known to injure some people because that turns your government into murderers. If a vaccine can kill and it's forced on children and people that will be killed, no matter how small that group is, you've just turned your government into murdering innocent civilians. So at the heart of this conversation is vaccines do injure some people.

Now, all of media, and all of our regulatory agencies have said the exact opposite. There's no such thing as vaccine injury. Anyone that says their child's been injured is crazy. Anyone that says that they've been injured is crazy. Well, this week, all of that is turning around. We've also talked about body sovereignty, that I should have choices on what happens to my body. The essence of all freedom is do I own and control my own body? And at the heart of that is in the United States of America, of all places, I should have that power, I should have that control. But now we are seeing the WHO treaty, some worldwide move to take sovereignty and decisions away from the United States of America and every other nation, saying that some global body gets to decide what we

do with our own bodies during a pandemic, during an emergency that they declare. At the heart of all the work we've done, one of the things we've always wanted to make sure is that politicians understood what was going on, that we're finally getting real representation from people that understood the facts and the reality of the world of vaccines, of the world of viruses, and how they intertwine. It's a huge week all the way around. We're going to get to the bottom of it. But first, the WHO treaty, you've seen a lot of reports. reporting and they're about to sign it potentially in just a few weeks. This is what that looks like.

The World Health Organization is expected to finalize a new pandemic treaty with talks underway until the 10th of May. The pandemic treaty is that controversial blueprint for how the WHO and the international community will deal with future pandemics. It means that the WHO is able to call the shots if there's any health. health emergency or potential health emergency anywhere in the world. These discussions will be crucial for building a more effective health security architecture for the future, grounded in international law, equity, and the fundamental right to health

for all people. While the draft treaty doesn't give the WHO direct authority over the country's domestic pandemic policies, it contains numerous ruinous provisions that would push nations to adopt an authoritarian globalist mindset for handling future disease outbreaks. The accord is a problem because it a circumvents Congress, so there's no approval, and it's legally binding. It gives the WHO authority over the global supply chain, trade, commerce. It also regulates IP.

It affects pricing of goods. I mean, no sovereign nation would want to do that. They will obligate all of the countries who in the world, the 194 countries, who are parts of the World Health Organization to surveil our citizens and then also it would obligate us to censor any misinformation or disinformation. Our rights should be protected by our constitution and our laws, not subcontracted to international bodies,

especially as discredited as the WHO is. For so many people, this seems like insurmountable. You have WHO, a president that's not listening to us, all these issues. We need politicians to step up and make a difference. Well, folks, this week, that has happened. Senator Ron Johnson just tweeted this out recently. Two international agreements are being considered at this month's World Health Assembly that surrendered U.S. sovereignty to the WHO. At POTUS should reject them or at least submit any agreement to the Senate as a treaty. The entire Senate GOP conference has signed on to my letter to Biden demanding just that. It's my

honor and pleasure to bring on the lone wolf, the truth teller in our government right now, Senator Ron Johnson. First of all, the whole GOP, how did you achieve that? First of all, Del, thank you for all your tireless efforts over the years. Again, I think it's a pretty good achievement. The dam is breaking. The ice is thawing here. I appreciate that.

Public pressure. You know, people like you, other groups, the sovereignty coalition, the public understands this, and so the Republican Senator's constituents supported it. I mean, it requires public pressure. So it was actually a pretty easy lift for me to get off 48 of my colleagues, 49 in total, to sign a letter that basically says, reject this agreement, but if you do agree to something, at a minimum, bring it before the Senate for discussion, debate, and non-ratification, let's be honest. And that's why, you know, Biden probably wouldn't do that.

But, you know, I previously offered an amendment on a piece of legislation that would have deemed any agreement a treaty. Every Republican senator, except for the sponsor of the bill, didn't want to, you know, vote for it because there's a poison pill of the bill, apparently. But every Republican senator voted for it, other than the one, every Democrat senator voted against, deeming in a tree. So, why national sovereignty, why health autonomy is a partisan issue is beyond me, just like why a border fence is a partisan issue. but that's the state of our politics today, but this would require public pressure, and it's people like you in the alternate media, people who have been tirelessly working on this issue for years. The public's paying attention, of course, the abuses during the pandemic. You know, people's eyes have been opened, and it's amazing.

It's on a very nonpartisan basis. People's eyes were open across the political spectrum, and that's a good thing. Absolutely, absolutely. brilliant. Let's take just a couple of excerpts from your letters so people know what we're talking about. In it, you say this, the WHO's failure during the COVID-19 pandemic was a total, was as total as it was predictable and did lasting harm to our country. The United States cannot afford to ignore this latest WHO inability to perform. Oh, and this latest, yeah, WHO inability to perform its most basic function and must insist on comprehensive WHO reforms before even considering amendments to

the international health regulations, IHR, or any new pandemic-related treaty that would increase WHO authority. We are deeply concerned that your administration continues to support these initiatives and strongly urge you to change course. Some of the over 300 proposals for amendments made by member states would substantially increase the WHO health emergency powers and constitute intolerable infringements upon U.S. sovereignty. That about says it all.

You know, Ron, when I interviewed you just over a year ago, you were saying that, you know, you were all alone. There was very few people that would look at the pandemic, would look at this issue. And I said to you, there's got to be a change. And just now you said something that really, I think, is important. I've been feeling it. The dam is breaking. Now, this sovereignty is such a major issue.

When you went out, why is it, why is it the Democrats are saying to you? I'm not a political show, but yet you've got to stare at the obvious in the face. why are Democrats saying they're not interested in protecting our sovereignty here? Again, our policies have become so partisan. They're going to be supportive of their guy. And right now, their guy is President Biden. If he enters an agreement, they're going to back them up. It's really that simple.

Now, you know, I don't want to carry this too far. You know, it's still a pretty lonely path when we talk about vaccine injuries. People just want to move on. They don't want to think that there may be something lurking in their body that could cause clots or may have caused some of the problems they're having, they all blame it on long COVID nowadays. I mean, that's the go-to place. But this treaty in particular, this impacts national sovereignty. People realize that the who has been captured by the Chinese communist government,

by associations like the Billing Linda Gates Foundation, there's just a mistrust of the new world order, of singular government, of organizations like the UN and the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum. So certainly in conservative circles, there's just that level of distrust. And that's one of the reasons I was able to get all Republican senators to sign that bill. So I don't want to go too far. I don't want to raise hopes too high.

We've got a long way to go because I still think the vast majority of people just want to forget the pandemic, want to forget the abuse, the harms cause, and just move on. And we can't let them do that because we have to prevent these things happening in the future, defeating the WHO amendments and new agreements. new agreement would be one way to prevent these things from happening in the future. Well, as we know, if we forget our history, we're doomed to repeat it. It is absolutely critical that we understand what happened during the pandemic. Just very quickly, because I know that you're just got a couple of minutes here of time,

another big shift this week. New York Times is now, you know, recognizing the side effects of COVID vaccines. Thousands of Americans have filed vaccine injury claims with the federal government. New York Times of all newspapers is now admitting that vaccine injuries, is real. Astrazenica is in many articles. We're going to talk about this throughout our whole show. Polls its COVID-19 vaccine from the European market, basically admitting that we know it's caused a lot of injuries. You talk about being all alone. You have had those hearings. I've been there when no one else would listen. You know, bringing forward, you know, Bree and those React 19

and all these people coming forward with vaccine injury, COVID vaccine injury. You've been telling their stories. You've been getting these pushback. The newspapers all attacking you this week. is a huge sea chains taking place where, you know, it's not everything, but they're finally admitting vaccine injury is real. This moniker that every vaccine is safe and effective no matter what, no such thing as injury, is crumbling down. That castle is now falling down around us. Do you have any comments on that since you've been at the forefront of representing people like me and those that I represent on this issue of vaccine injury? Sure, again, there's a crack in the damdell. But again, there's a crack in the damdale. But again,

They're going to do everything they can to repair that crack. The COVID cartel, I mean, the body counts way too high. So what we're seeing here is what the intelligence community calls a limited hangout. They simply can't deny the reality of vaccine injuries anymore. So they're starting to admit to them. But again, they'll still say, well, they're very rare. And generally, they're mild. I mean, Deborah Birx is now saying, oh, no, vaccine injuries are rare.

Or vaccine injuries are real. There have probably been thousands of them. No, there have been millions of them on their own VAIR system. to 1.6 million worldwide, 37,000 deaths. And we all know that Veyers dramatically understates the number of adverse events. So again, they're barely, they're barely admitting to vaccine injuries.

And I'm not hearing anybody really talk about the childhood schedule. I'm not hearing them talk about, you know, all the diseases that, you know, all the studies that showed in the book, Vax, unvaxed, that Brian Hooker and, was it Bobby Kennedy? Yes, indeed.

It was. That was just study after study after study. Just science is showing, you know, the unvaxed population is by and large healthier. They're not admitting that yet. So we still have a long way to go. So don't retire. We're still going to need you working as tirelessly and as hard as you've been and as effectively as it have been for years. I'm not going anywhere.

I want to thank you for all the work that you've done. And trust me, now that they have cracked that door, I am going to kick it wide open with your help. You don't go anywhere. are so honored to have you a part of this movement. These are those moments that we hope for. And I know that there's this dark cloud that always sits over Washington, D.C. I feel it when I'm there. It's hard to recognize the sunbeam when it's coming down. But today, that beam is beaming down on you, Senator Ron Johnson. We are so thankful for all the injured, for all the truth tellers. Thank you for standing up for us. Thank you for starting to move this needle.

I'm glad that you've got 50 senators at least talking about body sovereignty and national sovereignty here in this country, keep up the good work, and we will be in touch. It's a good day. As they say in Native American culture, it's a good day to die. Go to sleep well tonight, Senator Johnson, good work. Thank you for all you do. Take care. All right, take care. You know, I also want to add that not only did Senator Johnson get every Republican GOP, Senator, to sign on to this letter, now 22 Attorney Generals across the nation have signed on,

a coalition opposing drastic expansion of WHO authority. This thing is dead in the water. If you don't think you have power, if you want to be a Debbie Downer, oh, they're in control of anything. There's nothing we can do about it. Your voice matters. We're going to talk about this today in all the developments that are shifting all of this country.

And what's really behind all of it? Is it really just about vaccines? Is it really just about, you know, body autonomy or our health or pandemics or being prepared for pandemics? or is there something bigger? Is there something darker? Is there something they're really trying to attempt to do with the entire world? That is a conversation I'm going to come out.

I'll be talking about with our guest that's coming up. Patrick Woods, written six books on transhumanism and the attempt to take over the geopolitical world. I'm looking for that conversation. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, we got a lot to get to. this is one of those gigantic, I told you so, moments. It's sad because of all the pain and carnage that is just now the door is cracking

and we're starting to have to admit, but they're admitting it. That's right. There's a huge shift, as we know, anybody watching out there in the way that vaccine injuries are being reported. And after so many decades, some of the final holdouts are having to admit the most basic facts that vaccines can and do cause harm. And after so many years of the government ignoring and the media neutralizing parents and people coming forward with this, the days of the safe and effective talking point are over. One in a million harms injuries over. Those days are gone now. And we get into real investigation.

So how did this change? Well, like you showed with Senator Ron Johnson, the New York Times kicked this off just about a week ago with this headline. The side effects of COVID vaccines, thousands of Americans have filed vaccine injury claims to the federal. government. It's a very basic article. It says nothing about the countermeasures injury compensation program. This black hole, it's only paid out like 12 cases so far, basic medical bills. But it's broaching the topic. And a floodgate is open. It's kind of weird. And as Senator Johnson said, limited hangout. This is purposely just dripping out some information as a form of damage control. But I don't think this is going to work because they're the last to know. Everyone else kind of knows this by now. And you even have people, it's not just in New York Times, you have former White House COVID

Response Coordinator, Ashish Jha. He came forward in an interview and listened to what he had to say. All right. More than 270 million Americans received the vaccine, 677 million doses. The overwhelming majority of people didn't feel the side effects, but that doesn't mean that we can't have real and honest conversations about the thousands of people who did. So with us now, Dr. Ashish Jha, former white. House COVID-19 response coordinator. Thank you so much for joining us, sir. You know, I spoke with someone

who is experiencing some incredibly severe symptoms today. It was an emotional conversation. I just want to get your reaction, first and foremost, from the New York Times piece. Yeah, so first of all, thanks for having me here. It was a really important piece, and I think the idea that we are not listening to people who feel like they've been suffering from this vaccine is is awful. We absolutely need to be listening to them. And I think you set it up perfectly. Look, these vaccines ended the pandemic. They saved millions of lives. But it doesn't mean that there aren't people who, whether they actually were injured by the vaccines or feel like they were, doesn't mean that we don't take them seriously. And it doesn't mean that we don't understand

what's happening with them. Well, there we go. I mean, as you said, as you said, it's very light, but they're having to, you know, stand in the fact that, yeah, we have been kind of ignoring. And look, I can't go into all the incredible work we've done. But we have people that were in the trial when we think of Maddie deGerry, who, you know, ended up like putting her vaccine injury forward. She's paralyzed. She can no longer eat. And we see that, you know, Pfizer ends up saying, oh, she had a stomachache.

That's how it got reported. When that went forward to the FDA commissioners and everybody saw it and Jaa, they also. They all said, nope, not going to talk about it doesn't exist. Nothing to see here. La, la, la, la, la. That's how they've handled it. Now when he's saying, well, it's true. It's unfortunate.

They feel like they've been ignored. Ignored, you have lied to the public about their existence until now. And so what people should understand is these aren't people acting on their own volitions. She's jaw didn't just wake up one day and go rogue and say, you know what, all that stuff that I ignored, I'm just going to go and do the grand interview. When he says that New York Times article, that was a good thing. article a week ago for the last 10 decades for many decades that would have been misinformation from his mouth they would have called that misinformation and when he said it's really sad that these people

you know that being ignored he was part of the government apparatus that was ignoring them so just keep that in mind as we go through this so you know that's okay so that's someone from the white house that comes out along with the new york times but what about legacy media what about some of the some of the key people one of CNN star reporters Chris Cuomo has come out now as well. And so you heard a she's jaw there say, now, he's a White House response coordinator for COVID, but he's not an investigative journalist. Chris Cuomo's investigative journalist. Did you ever hear Chris Cuomo suggest that this experimental vaccine may have caused any type of harm or when it was being rolled out to maybe have some biased conversation

about, well, this thing may be dangerous. Hopefully there's a mechanism in place to watch these people and make sure they don't get hurt. Well, we, we do. checked and he didn't. Take a look. All right. 11 months to get a COVID vaccine. Amazing. Breathtaking speed. The vaccine advisors agreed that the benefits of getting the vaccine far outweigh the risks and shots could be in arms as early as this weekend. Not a moment too soon because we've shown you how these vaccines can offer some of the most heartwarming reunions, bringing us back to life to the people we live for. Now you have people who don't want to get the

vaccine, right? Some of them are anti-vaxxers. Some of them are just making a political play. They're taking their own risk. But there are a lot of people who need to know that it's worth it for them. It ends with you getting the vaccine so that this virus doesn't keep replicating and creating variants that we need to find ways to combat. The whole reason this is happening is because people won't protect themselves, Tony. I mean, what do you think of it? The other aspect to why you take the vaccine is it also reduces, not completely, nothing is perfect. And certainly this vaccine is not. But it also reduces your ability to communicate the virus and make other people infected. That part matters too. Kids now account for almost 29% of all cases in this country.

We know why, because they're not vaccinated, many of them, and they're going back to school. Choose not to get your kids vaccinated. You don't get to go to public schools or pretty much any school, right? You don't have to take the vaccine. That's not what's being done here. But you don't get to not do what keeps everybody else safe, and then get to live the way that you want to because you are forcing the rest of us not to live the way that we want. Did you know that on social media,

people are referring to the vaccine as the Fauci-Oachie. Did you know that? Did you have anything to do with that? Someone brought... Was that your idea? I did not. I love you.

an actor, but I couldn't respect more what you're doing on the ground to help people motivate the vaccine and testing before that, and I'm sure you'll be a part of whatever comes next. No doubt he was really good at pushing the vaccine as all of the news agencies were not just single him out, but, you know, it was... Yeah, of course. Yeah, no mention of the potential that it would hurt somebody. Right. It really got to look hard for the journalism there. It sounds like I was watching a press conference from the CDC or something, but so let's look at the article that kind of kicked a lot of this off from the New York Times. This was the major lead article and it was titled Thousands Believe COVID Vaccines harmed them as anyone listening. This was by Apurva Mandavili.

And it says in this article right at the top, now she's she's a award-winning journalist, medical journalist, spent more than a year talking to dozens of experts in vaccine science policymakers and people who said they had experienced serious side effects after receiving COVID-19 vaccine. So we're just dipping the toes in here. At the end of the pandemic, it's over we're going to spend about a year del i've spent about 10 years writing specifically on vaccine injuries and harms you left your career at the doctors and dedicated your life to this so it's nice to see some some high level reporters at the new york times start to dip their toes to actually start reporting like it's nice to see them doing their job finally exactly exactly and so let's look at

some of her previous reporting though which is really interesting because i'll take you back to a time this fda was about to vote on a covid vaccine for children Now at that time, a COVID vaccine for children sounded crazy because kids were not getting harmed by COVID. It was for older people, people with comorbidities, immunocompromise. So the public was not really on board with this because it was still experimental vaccine. Well, Mani Velli comes out and writes this article just two weeks before the FDA had voted on their decision. A new vaccine strategy for children, just one dose for now. And you look and you read into that and she actually had to retract.

Remember, award-winning journalists had to make this retraction. Just a couple days later, this article comes out. A New York Times retracts massive exaggeration of children hospitalized by COVID-19. It says in an article published by New York Times reporter, A Porvup Mendevelli on Wednesday Times readers were told that nearly 900,000 children have been hospitalized with COVID-19 since the pandemic began. A correction issued on Thursday notes that the correct number is 63,000 between August 2020 and October 2021, which means Mandevelli exaggerated the number of children hospitalized by 837,000.

cases. Wow. Whoops. But remember, I mean, that's hospitalized with COVID. That means they came in, they scraped their knee, and they tested them on the way in. And oops, you got COVID. So a whole conversation around that we reported on. But the damage was done.

FDA approved that. FDA approved that for kids, the shot, and the rest is history. But now you have people sounding like, she is sounding in her articles. And now you have Chris Cuomo sounding like this. Take a look. We know that vaccines can have unintended consequences, aka side effects. But nobody's really talking about it

because they're too afraid of blame and they just want it to go away. But the problem is people like Sean and me and millions of others who still have weird stuff with their blood work and their lives and their feelings physically are not going away. I'm just a desperate person

that something bad happened to and I'm reaching out and pleading for help. Well, let me tell you something. Sean, I can't help you because I'm no clinician. I'm just, I'm sick myself. But I'm working with people who are working on this. So I'll make sure that we're in touch right after the show.

And I'll help any way I can. You may be ahead of me. I'll hook you up with my clinicians. And maybe you can share different protocols and things that may help. But I will never stop reporting on this. And all I'm doing is just beating the drum of you need to have a 9-11-style commission to figure out what worked and what didn't and what questions need to be answered because it's not over. So not only we're not set up for the next pandemic, and there will be one, but we're not treating people, millions of people who still have problems from the last one.

Wow, a 9-11 commission on the vaccine, and 9-11 commission on the pandemic. I remember when Robert Kennedy Jr. was asked by Donald Trump to head up just such a commission we reported on that years ago when he was running for, you know, president that never, or actually when he'd won the presidency and that never happened. but now we've come full circle. Now are we going to start to see people saying we need an investigation? You're damn right we do. Wow. And talking about like his own, like sharing doctors because of his own injury, it's amazing that this is what it takes.

It takes getting injured yourself to finally decide maybe I should do some reporting on this. Right. And, you know, great for him coming out and having the courage to speak out. But the first statement, no one's really reporting on this. Yeah, we are, Chris. We're right here. We've been here for several, several years.

And it'll be interesting to see. He said he'll never stop reporting on this. Let's hold his feet to the fire on this. The public is watching. He said that publicly. So he was dragged out by Patrick Pat David on Patrick Pat David's podcast. Chris Cuomo sat down with him and was actually questioned about some of the things he's been saying in that interview.

Take a look how this went. The idea that, well, you were a vaccine proponent. Why wouldn't I have been a vaccination? vaccine proponent. Now there are questions, oh, no, but I knew at the time. No, you didn't. What you knew was that there were people telling you to be resistant to what the government was telling you to do. Yeah. No one was saying that. I mean, we did our, a lot of people did their own research. That's what people were doing. And to this point, right, nobody was telling, nobody knew what we were here, you know, we were here, scientists were there, doctors were here, all making that statement. They

coming onto the high wire. Where were you, Chris? The question is, where were you? Because the truth was there. You weren't with the truth. And that's the problem. Right. And so he went further, actually. So it wasn't just vaccines. He didn't just stop there. He talked about early treatment. And when it came to early treatment before this past week, this is what Chris Cuomo sounded like. Take a look. People who are getting, injecting drugs for animals and horse. And people telling them to. Oh, my God. What person? You know, you talk about, like, you know, cancel culture and who to shame?

Ivermectin, a dewormer, really? They are shaming themselves. No, one has to shame them. They're shaming themselves by doing that. They need to be called out and shamed, brother. Wow. Here we go. Now, so Chris Cuomo was actually asked about that, asked about what kind of meds he's

taking right now by Patrick Bet David. And what an interesting transition he has taken. Check this out. Okay. I am taking a, what do they call it? Like a regular dose, you know, whatever. They're trying to build up of ivermectin. Ivermectin was a boogeyman early on in COVID.

You couldn't talk about it. That was wrong. We were given bad information about ivormectin. The real question is why? Everyone's going to say Joe Rogan was right. No, Joe Rogan was saying, yeah, he was right. But that's not what matters. What matters is the entire clinical community knew that Ivermectin couldn't hurt you.

They knew it, Patrick. I know they knew it. How do I know? Because now I'm doing nothing but talking to these clinicians who at the time were overwhelmed by COVID and they weren't saying anything. Not that they were hiding anything. But it's cheap. It's not owned by anybody.

And it's used as an antimicrobial, antiviral in all of these different ways. It has been for a long time. So they were wrong to. play scared on that. Didn't know that at the time. Know it now. Admit it now. Reporting on it now. Wow. All right. I got to take a moment here because Chris, just look in my eyes for a second. All the science existed in Ibermectin when you were shaming people, when you were shaming those doctors that were speaking out and you were helping the media and helping the establishment take their licenses away if they tried to push.

Ivermectin, which you now suddenly recognize works. I want to make this clear. At least a half a million people in America are dead because Ivermectin was taken out of the arsenal of things that they could use while you were waiting for your miracle vaccine. Now, you know, you can decide where you're going to be at with that, Chris, but when the reporters start not doing the work, not investigating science, not saying to the world that this had actually won the Nobel Prize in medicine, not on horses, but on human beings. Here it was. Ivermected in a multi-faceted drug of Nobel Prize honored distinction with indicated efficacy

against a new global scourge COVID-19. That's what we now see. But it won the Nobel Prize when you were reporting everyone should be shamed that even talks about it. Half a million people at least are dead because there was a product that those doctors that you say were afraid to speak. Why were they afraid to speak, Chris? Because everyone like you on the television set was shaving them and celebrating when they were having their licenses taken away. All to have now this vaccine that's injuring people that was supposed to be the savior.

So I'm glad, look, I want to give Chris a shout out here that at least he's coming around. and starting this investigation. I guess it's a little bit better than the rest of the reporters now that are trying to figure out how they're going to handle the truth that's now coming forward. But this one, I've said it from the beginning, Jeffrey. This is bigger. This ivermectin issue is bigger than the vaccine ever would be. We knew the vaccine was an experiment.

We knew it might not work, at least anybody with blood moving through their brains. But ivermectin did work. They knew it worked, and they went out of their way to take it out of pharmacies to take it out of circulation. As Chris now knows, it was the safest drug in the world. All of that was reported here on the high wire. All of it. All of the history of it.

And Pierre Corey, who came forward and stood before our Congress and stated all, calling it a miracle drug, he was shamed. And by the way, you better read this book now. If you haven't purchased the war on Ivermectin, then now's the time to do it because this tells the story of the greatest cover-up and the massive. occur of hundreds of millions of Americans. Not hundreds of millions. Hundreds, you know, a lot, you know, hundreds of thousands, millions potentially around the world. So here we are. The floodgate is now open. I know round Johnson's afraid it's a crack. It will never be a crack. And by the way,

Jeffrey, can you imagine what the tidal wave of injury that must be pouring into the CDC right now that is making them have to admit to injury at all? As you've said, after 50 years of denial, denial, denial, being the approach to any injury to now come around and have to say, look, we've always said vaccines injure some people. Now you haven't. No, you haven't. Absolutely.

And the talking point is, well, you know, we really, she's job. I'm really sad. The government should do a better job. So that's the limited hangout is, well, the government should be a better job. And we're going to let them try to do a better job when they're just going to sit on it unless we continue to push this. And, you know, let's just say for a second that Chris Cuomo is honest. He's scared.

He just received the medical diagnosis of a lifetime that shook his core beliefs. But to go back and say, no one was really talking. No one really knew about Ivermectin. Yeah, they did. Look at these studies. This is the website here looking at the Ivermectin studies. You have 103 studies from 100 or 1,193 scientists. Over 140,000 patients in 29 countries.

He couldn't talk to one of those patients. He couldn't talk to one of those authors of those studies to talk about how this is going. This is all for COVID-19. Yeah. Chris, this is where you start your journalism. He couldn't talk to Dr. Robert Malone. He couldn't talk to Dr. Peter McCullough. All, all who were paraded across this desk right here, Chris.

In the future, Chris, if you're asking some questions or there's any sort of like red flag going and off inside of you say, maybe I have a bias here, maybe I should, just tune in the high wire. You want to know who you should be listening to? To the high water. Because guess what? No one is going to find no one in the world right now because of your great work, Jeffrey, and our great team can run two videos side by side like we just did saying, you should be ashamed for using ivermectin.

Oh, by the way, now I'm using ivermectin. You won't find Del Bigtree caught out like that anywhere because we do our research. We do what reporters we're supposed to have been doing. And it's interesting. We don't ever start to sound like CNN or Chris Cuomo. they all tend to sound like us on a long enough timeline. Yeah. Just keep that in mind. So let's do what we do here the best.

Let's go into some of the deep science. Cleveland Clinic has come out with a new study on the COVID vaccine. Now remember the COVID vaccine, they're doing it like the flu vaccine. Every year, experts get together and they go, hmm, what kind of variant do we think is going to be the most dominant variant? They pick some out of a hat, and then they load the vaccine with those, and that's that year's formulation. And they cross their fingers and they hope it works.

Well, this is the testing of the 2023, 2020, for formulation with Cleveland Clinic employees. And so this is the headline effectiveness or the study of the 20203, 2024 formulation of coronavirus on the JN1 variant. And it says here they conclude conclusions. The 2020, 2020, 24 formula COVID-19 vaccine given to working age adults afforded a low level

of protection against the JN1 lineage SARS-CoV2, but a higher number of prior vaccine doses was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19. It's a failure, doesn't work. And they go on to even go further. they say consistent. Hold on. So worse than does it work? Like if it just didn't work and you had the same rate of, you know, infection as someone that didn't get it, that doesn't work. It actually increases your risk of being infected, which is what we're seeing here. Okay. So. Right.

You've got to laugh at it. And not only increases 2.5 times higher for people that receive three or more doses is what they found. Wow. To higher risk of infection. So they go on to say this, consistent with similar findings in many prior studies, a higher number of prior vaccine doses was associated with a high risk of COVID-19. Pretty simple. The exact reason for this finding is not clear. It is possible that this may be related to the fact that vaccine-induced immunity is weaker and less durable. The natural immunity, well, that's been proven too. And they go, although some individuals are at high risk of complications for COVID-19 and may benefit from receiving a vaccine frequently, the wisdom of vaccinating everyone with a vaccine of low effectiveness every few months to prevent

what is generally a mild or an asymptomatic infection and most healthy persons needs to be questioned. Wow. I mean, it looks like they're reading from our early episode of ours. I mean, this is science now. It's completely rejecting the COVID vaccine. Wow. Cleveland Clinic. I mean, there you are. One of the scions of medical research and science is now admitting the obvious you're at higher risk

of infection by getting these vaccines. And we have talked. We talked about all the mechanisms that this would be happening. happening, original antigenic sin. We've talked about the vaccines where we've seen the history of this. If you've been watching the high wire, you understand the science, and I did it with the football analogy, go back and take a look at that, where we know that once you've vaccinated, we've tricked the body.

So it's only focused on the vaccine, you know, form of the virus and is now blind to all the other mutations that can come in and therefore you're more likely to be infected. This is known science. It didn't just start with COVID. We knew this back with a pertussis vaccine. the problems that that has. I don't want to get two in the weeds, but we could go on a science dissertation that Chris Cuomo would like to think just started this week that we were covering long before COVID ever came along. That's right. So let's switch to some other conversations

around science and technology policy that looked good on paper, but when it hit reality, there was a problem. And this was the headline that just came out. This is PBS. It says coal-fired plants will have to capture emissions or shut down, says strict new EPA rule. So we have legislation here. EPA is making this rule, and it says the EPA rules would not mandate use of equipment to capture and store carbon emissions, a technology that is expensive and still being developed. Instead, the agency would set caps on carbon dioxide pollution that plant operators would have to meet. Still, the regulation is expected to lead to greater use of carbon capture equipment. Only a handful of projects are operating in the country

despite years of research. So coal plants are a major source of energy generation in this country. And in the article, they're saying the technology to capture this is super expensive, it's still being developed, years of research, there's only a handful of projects actually operating. And the EPA is saying, well, hey, coal plants, go figure that out, or we're going to shut you down, even though that's the reality of the case. And at the same time, these headlines are happening. You're seeing this headline from the Washington Post.

Amid explosive demand, America is running out of power. And so you go into this headline. I thought we were switching over to a greater green energy technology, but it says vast swaths of the United States are at risk of running short on power as electricity-hungry data centers and clean technology factories proliferate around the country, leaving utilities and regulators grasping for credible plans to expand the nation's creaking power grid. And it goes on to show what type of energy demand we're looking at here. So see from starting at 2017, you have less than 300,000 gigawatt hours.

And then on 2023, it jumps up to 563.9. And so you're almost doubling what we're looking at here, what we're needing for 2023. And it says in this article, the situation is sparking battles across a nation over who will pay for new power supplies with regulators worrying that residential tax rate payers could be stuck with the bill for costly upgrades. It also threatens to stifle the transition to cleaner energy as utility executives lobby to delay the retirement of fossil fuel plants and bring more online. The power crunch imperils their ability to supply the energy that will be needed to charge the millions of electric cars and household appliances required to meet state and federal climate goals.

Then they talk to this gentleman here. He says, when you look at the numbers, it is staggering, says Jason Shaw, chairman of the Georgia Public Service Commission, which regulates electricity. He says, it makes you scratch your head and wonder how we ended up. in this situation. How are the projections that are far off? This has created a challenge like we have never seen before. This is a disaster reality. Reality of this is an disaster. It's so obvious. I mean, it's so how did this happen? We have morons running the world. That's how it happens. This is basic math. I mean, we've been saying it from the beginning, all right, electric cars. It doesn't mean someone gets an electric car and says, see, I'm not creating any pollution. Yeah, but the coal factory

that is charging that battery is, all you did was take the power plant that was once inside of your car and put more stress on the coal-fired plant that's going to now have to produce your energy when you used to produce it yourself with a gas engine. I mean, it's so obvious that switching everything to electrical, you have no grid that can handle that. And I'm not against moving in that direction. But when you build the vehicles that all use electricity before building the grid that could handle that expansion, you're a bunch of morons. I mean, it's just unbelievable. Yeah, it is shocking. We're here. It's shocking that we've elected this level of dumb, you know what's. And that's what's going on at the policy level, at the higher up level, and that comes down to

the factories and the power generators. But what about what we deal with in our own lives and our own homes? And so this is the electric batteries. We're going to an all-electric economy, and the electric batteries right now are lithium-based. And this is what is in, I mean, you probably could go into your house right now when you're done with this listening to our show. You could probably find 10 to 20 items in your house that are powered by lithium batteries. And so we're finding out that these are a lot more dangerous than we were told or that we knew. So the problem is how do we deal with that? So this is Paris. This is one of their headlines because they have electric buses there.

Paras suspends electric bus fleet after two fires. Another one for electric cars. Electric cars risk becoming uninsurable. It says Jonathan Hewitt, Chief Executive of Thatcham Research, the motor issuers, Automotive Research Center, said, a lack of insight and understanding about the cost of repairing damage electric car batteries

was pushing up premiums and resulting in some providers declining to provide coverage altogether. Mr. Hewitt said, the challenge is that we have no way of understanding whether the battery has been compromised or damaged in any way. The threat of thermal runaway means that a catastrophic fire can take place if the cells of the battery have been damaged in a collision. And then you have this out of Australia. EVS electric vehicle crash victims could be left to die in battery fires without training for responders' inquiry told.

So with these batteries, they don't just start a fire and put themselves out like a normal fire. What they do is they explode very quickly, very rapidly at a very hot temperatures, almost like a bomb. and they create excessive amounts of smoke. So take for instance, for instance, an e-bike. People store their e-bikes in their house. They charge their e-bike. And when these go up, we have a video of this. When these go up from zero to just a complete house fire,

take a look at this video. All right. Wow, that's really terrifying. I mean, that just, it's like a nuclear bomb goes off right inside of your house. You know, and I, you know, when we started looking this video, I thought about my son, you know, has a remote control thing with a lithium battery, and it wasn't working. I was checking it out, and I plugged it in, and in about 10 seconds, it got red hot. Something was malfunctioning, but I just thought, what happens if that's like under his bed, where it stays all the time, and he usually charges it, and we weren't paying attention? Boom, I mean, this is something, and how many of these are going to happen before we finally say, whoa, whoa, whoa, we'll pump the brakes here.

We've got to figure out how to deal with this. And how do you put an electrical fire out? This is the conversation now that a lot of cities are having because these e-bikes are a preferred way to get around in cities for a lot of people. And there's obviously a large population density in the cities. This is Portland. We're going to go through a lot of cities here.

This is the problem that's coming to the surface. Electric scooter explodes, fills apartment building with smoke in Portland, in New York. Congress in rare agreement on e-bike battery bill pushed by New York reps. and also in New York, more New York City fires caused by lithium ion batteries from eBikes in two months than in all of 2019 FDNY Chief. When you go into the article and it's even worse, it says, well, there were only 30 fires related to the batteries in 2019. The number more than tripled by 2021 with 104 fires reported. That year also saw four fatalities.

Well, no one was reported to have died from the blazes in 2019 or 2020. The amount of battery-related fires more than double the following year, with 220 fires reported as well as six deaths. is confirmed. Last year, the FDNY reported 268 fires involving lithium on batteries, 150 injuries, and 18 deaths. Same thing happening in London. Notice, it's all the high concentration cities that are

moving over to this all-electric grid. You get a lot of people with these bikes. They're calling it unexploded bombs is the headline. Call for action after 11 deaths in the UK due to e-bike fires. It says new figures produced by the Office for Product and Safety Standards drawn from data from the UK Fire and Rescue

Service to reveal what is believed to be the highest number of deaths recorded from e-bike fires in the UK last year. MPs and safety groups are calling for third-party certification to ensure e-bikes, e-scooters, and their batteries are approved by an independent body before being available for sale. This is already the case for other high-risk products such as fireworks. And even the London Fire Brigade, their headline, new record high of e-bike and e-scooter fires in London. They talked to the fire chief. He says, we recognize the environmental benefits that bring to travel in our city. But the stark reality is that some of these vehicles are proven to be incredibly dangerous,

particularly if they have been modified with secondhand products or if batteries are used with the wrong chargers. So some of the tips they were giving, I mean, this is almost something we do here, do a public service announcement. They're saying, don't store these. If you're living in apartment, a lot of people charge them in hallways. Do not do that. Do not do that at night because what it does is it blocks exits when it goes up.

It fills everything with smoke. people can't get out of the apartments. Don't charge any of these things at night where you can't see them or you can't monitor them. And don't buy from third parties. You want to buy from reputable dealers, especially online. There's a lot of shady stuff going on online. So you've got to check where you're buying it from and make sure they're certified. You know, this is one of those things that you imagine if you had 18 deaths from raw milk,

we'd be hearing about it. And they're already shutting it down at the idea that something like that. or vitamins, as we're seeing, many laws being passed and Canada stop things that never cause death. Yet when the government has an agenda, when it really cares about something, boy, it's really good at looking the other way, putting out a couple warnings, and letting, you know, tens of people, hundreds of fires started. It really just shows you the hypocrisy of how our government actually works, and really the government around the world. Unfortunately, more and more often, America doesn't really rise above any of it. we seem to be caught up in as much manipulation and corruption as other nations around the world.

Incredible reporting, Jeffrey. And by the way, let me just take this moment to really congratulate you on the incredible reporting that you've done with the high wire since we started in 2017. This certainly, you know, I travel through more airports than I think you do with all the work that I'm doing. So many people come up and thank me for the work we've done. But they also say, and please let Jeffrey Jackson know what is spectacular. job you're doing. I also want to take this moment to thank my team, both that are here in studio,

but also our scientists and contributors from around the world. And then, of course, Aaron Siri, the legal team that has gotten to the bottom that's gotten these facts out when no one else could. You want to talk about great reporting. When you have a legal team like this and you're not getting the information that you know is out there, when you can sue and go after the government and do what real reporting should be doing, which is telling the truth, not just saying, hey, the professional said it was so. I was just trusting the government. Well, we didn't. You're right. We didn't just trust the government. I grew up watching Woodward and Bernstein, who didn't trust that Nixon hadn't, you know, recorded phone calls and all the rest of it. So reporters, this is the fourth

estate. It's the fourth branch of government as stated by, you know, our founding fathers, that if we stop putting pressure on our government, if we take everything, they say, hook, line, and sinker because they're the government, then you just lost the entire purpose of news altogether. And so I think we can erase all those years that you just reported, Chris Cuomo, as having not been the news. I hope you woke up. I hope you're getting to what it means to be a reporter once again. Jeffrey, you're the real deal, and I'm honored to have been working with you all this time. Likewise, Dallas, it's been an honor. And thank you. And we've turned a new page. So we keep pushing, and everybody out there has been doing that research and the parents

We don't sit back and let the government do this. We don't sit back and let Legacy Media take the ball the rest of the way. We finish this. Yes, it's the road less traveled. It's great to be on it with you, Jeffrey. I'll see you next week. All right. All right.

Whoa, I feel a demo. I feel a demo coming on. It's been a long time for those of you. I'm not sure if it's going to work. We haven't even tried it. But first, to get to the bottom of this, I'm going to harp on a Chris Cuomo interview a little bit more. This one is with Deborah Birx. I think what's in it is really important.

So take a look at this. So, Doc, Astrozenica made a headline today pulling the vaccine. They say it's because the demand curve isn't there anymore. There are other products. Other people say it's because the other products are better than their monkey-based one and that has less side effects than AstraZeneca. And it is motivated people's paranoia about vaccines. What is your opening statement about whether or not the COVID vaccines were effective

and whether they are safe compared to most vaccines? They were very effective for what they were supposed to be used for, which was prevent severe disease and hospitalization at deaths. And that's what the vaccines were studied to do in this country, and that's what they did. Now, the question, you're asking a broader question because a lot of people were immunized that weren't in those high-risk groups, and that's why there has to be this transparent panel and discussion.

I do believe, and that's what you're getting at, Were there issues with the vaccines when you've immunized millions, close to billions of people? Tracking that will give us critical information because what I love that you had Sean on, and he made the point. A lot of his symptoms are similar to long COVID symptoms. Well, that makes total sense. That happens often with immunizations, that if the natural disease can cause it, then it also can sometimes be seen in certain profiles of the vaccine.

We should be studying that right now. Tell the people with long COVID and vaccine reactions to come forward. Study their genetics. We're in the 21st century. We know how to solve these issues, but we're not really bringing all the pieces we have to bear. But is the reason because they don't want to know that they being the deep state, big pharma, the government, whatever boogeyman you want to fill in, because the truth is the vaccines didn't really work and there are way more side effects. more people got sick than got better as a result of it. Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. Do I think it's millions? No. Could it be thousands? Yes, but there's millions of people with long COVID. So proportionally, when you look at it in an honest data-driven way, more people have long COVID from having COVID than had vaccine reactions.

All right. There's a lot going on there. She's basically admitting, look, all that when you give a lot of vaccines. There's certainly people that get injured. We know that. And it's really great. We should be tracking them. Should be tracking them. I thought this was an experimental vaccine. I thought that was the entire purpose was tracking. We've gotten deep into that. But now she's finally admitting there's some injuries. If you watch that whole interview, Chris Cuomo will go on to ask, well, I mean, should have been given to everybody. She very clearly says, look, the children, I think there was a question there. The children were at no risk. Where did you hear that here on the high wire. We were screaming from the mountaintops. Please don't give this to kids.

They don't need it all. It's only an increased risk. Now the science shows that. But I really want to explain something to everybody right now. And this comes from an interview I actually did with the New York Times. And I forget the reporter's name, but she actually ended up writing a fairly fair article. And I've mentioned a couple times. It's one of the few times in one of these interviews, I feel like I finally got an aha. And sometimes, as luck would have it, I do achieve those. Here's what I want you all to understand about the statement that Deborah Burks just made. What she is saying is that, look, if the elements of a virus are in a vaccine, it just goes to figure that the side effects of that virus, that there must also

be similar side effects to that vaccine. In this case, she said long COVID, which as Ron Johnson said is where they're going to try and hide all the vaccine injury. Let's call it long COVID, since everybody got the vaccine. Let's just say it was actually the virus that did. And she is starting to start that mantra. And this is where I am going to blow this apart. And so follow me on this. What she's saying is, look, there's long COVID. Certainly the virus itself caused more long COVID than the vaccine.

Whatever does you have of that? You have no evidence of that. In fact, I'm going to use some common sense right now to tell you why I think the exact opposite is true. Okay. So let's talk about a virus. Let's say COVID-19. Let's say this is the virus that escaped the Wuhan lab and is suddenly blowing in the wind across the world.

I have a map of the United States of America. I haven't tried this. We'll see if this works. May it take a couple of attempts. This is really, as I said, we put this show together at the last minute. Okay. But what I want to show you here is that if this is the virus and it's coming to America, it ends up doing this. Okay?

All right. Can I get another camera over here? Hey, Mike, come on over here. I want to show this, all right? Now, really zoom in here. Really zoom in and see if we can see that if you really look, you see that there's some people that got it. You have light specklings of the blue particles here because it's random.

A virus is random, all right? So pull back for a second. Let me just talk to the camera. A virus when it's blowing in the wind is random, okay? Whether you catch it or not, you may or may not. So enough people might get infected before you do to create herd immunity all around. you. This is the reality we know from centuries of science. It's blowing through the wind. You might get such a light dose that you're an asymptomatic. You don't even barely feel it. It doesn't do anything

at all. So let's just say that that is the natural virus. That's how it works. Some get it. Some don't. There's a randomization to it. So now what you're saying is that that randomization is going to cause more of the side effects than the vaccine itself. Okay. Now let's talk about the vaccine. shall we? And this is what I said to the New York Times reporter. Let's say that this is the vaccine. Now, there's a few differences. The vaccine is not the entire virus. The vaccine is only the spike protein. And this is what I said to that reporter. Can we agree that the vaccine, that the most dangerous part of the virus is the spike protein? Would we agree on that? She said, yeah, that's my understanding of it. Okay, mine too. So we took the most dangerous part of the virus, not the weakest part,

the most dangerous part, and we made a vaccine that that's all it is. All it's going to do is get me to produce the most dangerous part of the virus all through my body. So if the spike protein is what causes long COVID naturally, and the spike protein is what causes, you know, myocarditis and periocardites, all the science shows this. They're finding it throughout the systems, and the natural virus can cause that. Well, then, okay, let's just say all things are equal. This is what I said. If the spike protein in this vaccine is the exact same as the one in the virus, then they have the same amount of ability to cause myocoditis or paracoditis. That would be true.

Let me add, though, a couple of things. This is not any usual spike protein. They made a frankin spike protein. They made it last longer because if they used the regular spike protein MR and A, the immune system killed it too fast. It didn't last long enough. So they injected it. and inserted a pseudo-uridine, which meant it could last longer inside of the body. This was the whole article. We've discussed it a million times. This was the genius of the people that made this vaccine. They made this so it won't die.

It's an unkillable. Now it lasts in the body for up to 60 days, three months, six months. We've talked about all the studies instead of dying immediately upon entry into the body. So now it's even stronger. And when it comes to the load you're getting, all of science bragged about the fact that there was more antibody production. SARS-CoB-2 antibody profile of naturally infected, 50-fold higher antibody levels than the naturally infected.

Our vaccine is giving you more of the spike protein than inhaling it. So now you're getting a higher dose of the most dangerous part of the virus, and we've made it a frankin spike protein that cannot die. And then what did we do? Let's just say all things are equal, which they clearly are not. I think this is far more dangerous. Now we took the randomization away. Now it's not whether you catch it or not.

In a vaccine program, everybody gets it. Come on over here with the cameras. So this is what the vaccine program does. It makes sure that there is no random. We want every single person in our country and around the world to be infected with our pseudo-franken spike protein so that nobody's left behind so that everybody comes in contact with it. That's what we did to our country and to the entire world.

And you want to tell me that the people that only caught the natural are having more long COVID or more myocarditis, that's insane. It defies all reason. And you're right, Deborah Birx, you better start having everybody report their injuries. And though you would like to hope it's only thousands and not millions, let's just look at fares because Senator Ron Johnson has already said, we're already at a million here, 1 million, 637,441 reports from people that barely even knew that this reporting system existed by doctors that have been scared to even talk about it by people like Chris Cuomo. They've been said, don't touch it, you'll be ashamed, you'll lose your license. and still 1.6 million reports of injury. And guess what? Every study ever done in the VAIR system,

as Senator Ron Johnson points out, says that at the very best, it captures 10% of those being injured, and most likely in this Harvard study, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are ever reported to VAERS. 1% of 1.6 million. Can you imagine if anything like that is true?

What if it's just 10%? That's 10 million. If it's 1% 100 million people are injured, I don't know, but someone's going to have some spaining to do. And trust me, now that that door is cracked open and we've been right the whole time, telling you the truth the whole time, we're not going to stop here.

But we need your help. Look at what we've achieved here. I have got a mess on my hands, by the way. I'll be covered in sparkles for the rest of this, just for you. But I want to say this. All of this reporting that's possible. The only place that you heard the truth

was here on the high wire. The only reason we could have these lights and these cameras and the legal team and the ability to do the research around the world to get you the data that nobody else could. The only way that was possible was by you that are donated to us. You made it possible.

Every one of you is responsible today for the sea change that is now happening around the world. This is a critical moment. If we never want to have this done to us again, if we want free choice in the future, we have a lot of work to do right now. We do not want to slow down.

As Senator Ron Johnson said, I'm not going to back down. Neither am I, Ron, and neither are our supporters. Please, if you are watching this show right now and are recognizing how important it is to have news that actually reports the facts and the truth and interviews people that are being sidelined instead of as a part of the lie, please help us now.

Our matching funds, we're in a matching funds moment. We've now hit of the 500,000 to be matched. Last week, we're at 200,000, 235,000. This week we are at 395,000. We have 115,000 or 105,000 left to go. So please, let that be you. Double your money this week. Double your money to support the, you know, the fourth,

estate, the fourth branch of government, the last known truth-telling news organization on this planet, the high wire. I'm really glad that Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan all eventually got onto this issue, but we were here first, and I didn't think they would have ever covered it if you hadn't helped us do all the research we did and bring it to the public. $24 a month would be awesome if you're going to do that matching for 2024. for the recurring donation helps us know what we can invest in, how many lawsuits we can do, how many investigations we can do, how many people we can hire great scientists around the

world, you make all that possible. Thank you so much. Now, when the question was, and Chris Cuomo said to Deborah Berks, is it just because why aren't they doing the studies? Why have we always sidelined the injured? You know, are we doing it? And she's like, well, yeah, we should definitely investigate those as though it's always been done. It hasn't been done. One of the most famous interviews and I've played it so many times. I think it's the most important interview of all times. The head of the NIH back in, I believe it was 1995, Bernadine Healy. She was there from 91 to 93. Actually, I think this interview was like somewhere around 2008, sat with Cheryl Adkinson on CBS. Why aren't they doing the studies is the question. That's what Chris Cuomo just asked.

Why don't they study those that are being injured? Why don't they? If we know that all vaccine cause harm, why don't we do that science? This is what she said. This is the time when we do have the opportunity to understand whether or not there are susceptible children, perhaps genetically, perhaps they have a metabolic issue, mitochondrial disorder, immunological issue that makes them more susceptible to vaccines plural or to one particular vaccine or to a component of a vaccine like mercury. The fact that there is concern that you don't want to know that susceptible,

group is a real disappointment to me. If you know that susceptible group, you can save those children. The reason why they didn't want to look for those susceptibility groups was because they're afraid that if they found them, however big or small they were, that that would scare the public away. There you have it. People always ask me, what's the motivation, Dill? Why would the CDC lie to us? Why would doctors lie? Certainly they've looked into this. No, they have not. For exactly the reason Bernardine Healy said. And it makes some sense. What she says is when I looked into it, I couldn't believe it. We have never studied the injured, the people that took the vaccine

and ended up having autism. So everyone out there that will tell you, oh, we've looked at it, we've studied it, not true. That's a lie, Chris. So please stop saying stupid things like that just because Tony Fauci says it's true. Bernardine Healy is telling you the truth. And my investigations both through our legal work and everything shows that this is true. These vaccines are not being studied and the people being injured are not being studied. Why? Because they are so afraid that if they studied a group of people and discovered that there are a small group of people being injured by vaccines, that no matter how small that group is, simply admitting they exist, would kill the vaccine program and put fear in the people. and that's why they don't do the science.

There you have it. We've now turned a corner. Deborah Birx is demanding the science. Chris Cuomo is asking for a 9-11-style commission. We're going to hold them to that. Trust me, it's only just begun. Now, what's really behind all of this? I mean, we're just talking about vaccines.

Why are they so important? Injecting people, okay, it's a problem. pandemic treaty, do they really just want to push vaccines? Do they want to just make us do crazy things like staying six feet apart and put plastic bubbles over our desk stool and tear our masks so we can play our clarinets just so they can laugh at us? What's really behind all of it? Well, there's a guy that's been writing about it. His name is Patrick Wood.

And this is just some of what he's been reporting on. His name is Patrick Wood. Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on. development, green economy, Agenda 21, the 2030 agenda, and historic technocracy. Transhumanism is a reformation of humanity itself. Claude Schwab at the WF would call it Humanity 2.0. They're going to create a fourth industrial revolution to restructure the planet, but they also believe that they must restructure the people who are going to live in that planet.

What the Technotronic era does is it creates a system of control. not controlled necessarily by an individual, but the system is the controller of society. Transhumanism promotes an interdisciplinary approach to understanding and evaluating the opportunities for enhancing the human condition and the human organism, opened up by the advancement of technology. They decided that if it were possible to extend life and achieve immortality, that this would be the way to do it through science. This control over resources is clearly where everything is moving today. This is what sustainable development is all about. Twisting the resources out of the hands of the people and putting it into the hands of the elite.

That's the scam. Getting the resources away from you and me and putting it into the hands of a global trust. They're handing over the operation of this entire thing to the non-governmental private sector entities and international partners like the World Health Organization. Now that the CRISPR technology and other gene editing technologies have advanced to the point where they are today, they are saying we will be the intelligent designers of the future. You have the massive surveillance that's going on today with a total awareness society.

This was an original specification from technocracy in 1930s. You cannot manage what you cannot monitor. They don't believe in God. They don't have any use for God. However, they do believe now that the scientific tools are available to manipulate and take over the genome and to engineer life the way they want to engineer life. It sounds like science fiction. It's not. Once they get control of the economic mechanism, they will have control virtually over life itself. And they'll be able to make the peoples of the world dance like puppets on a string.

His latest book is called The Evil Twinsuit. of technocracy and transhumanism. He's written six books really on subjects just like this. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by Patrick Wood. Patrick, thank you so much for joining us today. Good to be with you, Del. You've done such a great job at being a battering ram to knock this whole thing down.

Congratulations. We have more work to do for sure, but, This is the crack in the dam that we've been waiting for. Yeah, I agree. I agree. You've written six books. We've got, you know, a few minutes here to have a conversation. This could go a million places.

But you said something in that video piece that we just played is kind of where I want to start because, you know, Chris Cuomo is suddenly waking up this week. He's suddenly waking up to mistakes that were made and saying things like nobody knew during COVID what the vaccine would do or any of this. But similarly, we act like the COVID pandemic was brand new, this attack on our sovereignty and this idea of a world health organization trying to rule the world. It's now in our attention. But you said something at peace that this goes back to, I think it's the 1930s or something. and what do you mean by that? I mean, how much was this laid out and how long ago?

Well, if you look at it historically, you'll see all the markers back then that we're dealing with today, not genetics necessarily, but in terms of control over energy, the economy, surveillance issues, et cetera. they were all specified back then. And, you know, when they talked about creating a new economic system back then, it wasn't, they weren't just crackpots. They were engineers and scientists from Columbia University, the cream of the crop, so to speak. And these people thought that they could do better than the world was doing at that point. And we see this pretty much playing out right now. Now, how much of the conversations then, this is where I really get confused.

Because, like, for instance, take Joe Biden. This is not a political show. I'm just looking at him as a political leader. I feel like when I watched him running for president, he was using slogans like Build Back Better. That's not a slogan written by an ad agency here inside the United States of America. What came from the World Economic Forum, which is a globalist group of people outside of our own borders. And so much of what I now see is that this World Economic Forum, their Klaus Schwab brags about the fact that he's trained many of those in cabinets all around the world.

And we see images of Barack Obama there. All of this to say, what shocks me is I feel like if I was president of the United States, I'd be like, I have the most powerful position in the world. America's number one. Let me do what I can, whether I'm a good person. and I want to, you know, put out and be the shining light of freedom and democracy to the world. But more and more, it looks like all of our sovereignty. You know, Joe Biden is behind the World Health Organization and giving up our sovereignty.

At what point did the United States of America, which is where I was born. And so if someone, you know, we have an international audience and maybe saying, boy, you're really full of yourselves. But we are in America. We're full of ourselves. We really think we have the Constitution that should represent to the whole world how you should be governed. At what point did leaders maybe inside this country start thinking the borders of our country don't matter. In fact, this should be more of a global system. When did that start? We see the genesis of this, the crystallizing of this in 1992, I do believe, when the Rio de Janeiro conference took place to produce.

Agenda 21 for one and also the Biodiversity Treaty at that time as well. We see all of these things coming forward from that time, especially genetic engineering. That apparently that period of time in Rio de Janeiro, that was swarmed by the biotech industry, the big pharma industry. They were staking their claim, if you will. to genetic engineering processes that has resulted in all seeds, all animals, all fish, all insects, you know, everything else but humans, and now we see humans being genetically altered as well. This was really the point of inflection, I believe.

It goes back farther than that, but that was really, I think, where it really crystallized. into the initiative of CVA. We have an excerpt of several videos that you wanted us to show. We put them all together talking about, you know, this ability to sort of impact DNA and essentially genetically modify, as you're saying now, human beings. Take a look at this. I'm here today to tell you that we're actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease.

treatment of disease. We are probably one of the last generations of Homo sapiens. Because in the coming generations, we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds. We've reached the point when we can hack not just computers, we can hack human beings and other organisms. We have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale. future entities will be more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals.

You know, the only difference between us and Neanderthals is just a few genetic mutations, which led to changes in brain structure and a hormonal system and so forth. So we now acquire the technology, maybe not in the next 10 years, but in the next 100 years, of making even bigger changes,

intentional to our DNA, to our bodies, to our brains, And in addition, we have the breakthrough in AI, which could lead either to combinations of organic bodies with computers, which are known as cyborgs, or to the creation of completely inorganic entities, completely inorganic beings, that could be far more intelligent and capable than us. By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power,

to re-engineer the future of life itself. Because once you can hack something, you can usually also engineer it. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. Not the intelligent design of some god above the clouds. But our intelligent design and the intelligent design of our clouds, the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud,

these are the new driving forces of evolution. One of the features of this forced industrial revolution is that it doesn't change what we are doing, but it changes us. This forced industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing. It changes you if you take a genetic editing, just as an example. It's you who are changed and of course this has a big impact on your identity. In every cell, there's this thing called messenger RNA, or MRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we're all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do. And so we think of it like an operating system.

And it's not just in every cell of our body, it's actually in every cell of every organism alive. It's the same thing. Humans are now hackable animals. You know, the whole idea that humans have, you know, they have this soul or spirit and they have free will and nobody knows what's happening inside me. So whatever I choose, whether in the election or whether in the supermarket, this is my free will, that's over. If you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, you could introduce

the line of code or change. a line of code. It turns out that has profound implications for everything. That last line is incredibly creepy given that it's one of the heads of Moderna saying that

if we could change basically the written DNA of life, we can change everything and they just as I just said in my demonstration injected a product that is manipulating your MRI,

manipulating your DNA, is designed to last longer than a virus itself, is designed wrapped in a fatty lipid, designed to go to the blood brain barrier, which the virus can't do on its own. What's really happening here? I guess I'm asking a question. What is transhumanism? Well, transhumanism is the philosophy of the dogma that we can transcend our human condition. That's exactly what Klaas Schwab says. It's pretty much the accepted definition.

Taken to extreme, however, it ends up setting you up to be your own God in the end because you will become immortal. Eventually, you will be tied into the Internet, like with NeuroLink or whatever. And you will become omniscient. and perhaps omnipesident, a precedent. If you get in a nose cone of a spaceship and you can go to Mars or whatever as a virtual entity,

these people are so unplugged. It's just not even funny. They really have a God complex that they can do anything they want to do with the rest of humanity, and they're doing it. That's the problem is. all of these new modalities of vaccines,

including MRNA and the ASTRA ejection, these are all classified as GMOs. They, you know, who would have known if they were given the opportunity to get, to understand that the every one of these shots were GMOs, Would they've done it? Right. I don't think so.

That's one reason they couldn't declare that there was anything like a consent agreement. But, you know, this is the, when I say a GMO, this is actually admitted on the application that the UK has, for instance, with the AstraZeneca, yep. And other scientists have said this just recently that all of these things should be considered GMOs. They should have all fallen under the label of a GMO and never approved any other way. But nevertheless, this is this as an assault on humanity at this point. How many people have taken these vaccines around the world? 72%, 73% of the whole population of the world? You've got to be kidding.

This is a wholesale transformation of humanity. Let me just put the exclamation point on that because we just read through a bunch of science. And to your point, when we look at the Cleveland Clinic study, you have genetically altered your body now, where you are more susceptible to every coronavirus in the future than had you not genetically altered your body, had you not change, had you stayed natural, had you had a natural infection, you would be blocking future viruses is what we see.

That is how the system is designed to work. Now you have a genetic alteration that is inhibiting your body's ability to fight off infection from coronaviruses. We've known this. It's true for the protustis vaccine. Studies now show that once you've gotten that vaccine, you are going to catch pertustis over and over. and over again. You may not be symptomatic. The virus blocks your symptoms, but you are now,

you know, perpetually vulnerable to being a carrier, which means you're not the same human being you would have been prior to having that vaccine. You know, we're not even going into, you know, people say, oh, transhumanism is injecting, you know, micro-robots in your body and guaranteed that science is being done, but that's not even necessary, right? We're talking about just changing your DNA code and how your immune system works. Once you manipulate it and you can't undo it, now you are, and we've talked about this a little bit. I'm sure you're aware of this.

We've seen that there's been companies trying to patent DNA. Patent certain, you know, physical attributes. It's illegal. You can't patent nature until you alter it. Once you alter the DNA strand of a plant or, you know, or in this case, maybe a human being, now you can own that being. Now you can be an owner.

Now you can trade it on the stock market because you've claimed ownership by manipulating it. Is that a part of what's going on here? I think it probably is. This is not really talked about too much in circles like people that research this stuff. I think there's something to it because that was part of the negotiations

that I mentioned from Agenda 21 in 1992, there was a lot of talk about patenting everything. Of course, we know that seeds, for instance, have been patented as they get GMO'd. We know that, for instance, Monsanto has patented everything that ever touched, and they license it back to the grovers now. And, you know, they make huge piles of money. We've seen Monsanto sue the farm.

downwind that has the seed that the pollen blow in and they go in and say, though you didn't plant our seeds, those are now our seeds because we've contaminated you and you owe us money. I mean, this is how sick this gets. All right. So at the horn. It really does. Yeah. The question I have then is, you know, we're watching the WHO treaty.

Ron Johnson has just gotten, you know, every Republican senator to sign on to a letter to say to Joe Biden, this thing's dead in the water. Don't even think about it. And we've been really pushing back on that. But this is what I really want to ask you about. Is it just about the WHO? If we stop the WHO, what is it about health that's being used? And how important is the WHO as far as some global, what's really going on here?

Is it just about health? Well, no, it's not just about health. But we need to stop the treaty for sure. we also I mean I would recommend that we just throw the whole United Nations complex into the Atlantic Ocean you know they they don't belong here they're enemies to do the people of our country but yeah aside there is a larger agenda going on here and we see for instance the heartbeat of this treaty concerns this thing called one health that's a new concept sort of historically When you talk about One Health now, this is... All right, let me read this. Article 5, this is from the World Health, I'm going to read it real quick. World Health Organization, Article 5, One Health Approach to Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response.

The parties commit to promote a One Health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response that is coherent, comprehensive, integrated, coordinated, and collaborative among relevant actors and sectors. What is One Health? Wow. that's when they combine all the things of living things and some in Oregon or other things like rocks and whatever they talk about humans animals the ecosystems the plants of the earth and everything else being and wrap into one thing so it's just not it's just not taking a view of human health all these other

things come into play and they talk about either economic issues and supply chain issues and everything else the surrounding all these things gives for instance gives the the latitude to declare an emergency for climate relating to health they're not related but they're they're gearing up for this uh if uh if a herd of cattle for instance gets bird flu they say well that could jump you know and we all get sick and die from it but the answer is now let's just kill all the cattle because a few of them get it get the bird flu right that can't really i don't know how they can determine that but nevertheless this is this is what they're doing. They've they've they've killed hundreds of millions of chickens, hogs, cattle

around the world now and this is just going to be continuing. We see this as an assault on agriculture and our food systems honestly. Right. And then that's where I really, you know, and then you hear from the same people, you know, a constant discussion about population control, that we need to reduce the population. But if you ever bring up, you know, that you or you call them eugenicists or anything that smacks of what ultimately got a bad name because Hitler just made eugenics not look so attractive, but your sideline. But really at the heart of this is eugenics, is it not? Yes, it is. It really is. And they have new tools now, obviously, like things like CRISPR, there's others, but that's a big one. And these tools now can, because they're

they're scientists now. You know, they have a coat and a pocket protector and the pens, whatever, and the stethoscope. They're respected members of society now. But back of the day when Hitler was prosecuting eugenics, it wasn't nearly as pretty, but it's the same philosophy today that predicts, well, at least it wants to reduce the human population of planet Earth, There's no doubt. They've written about this for the last 50 years. It's really coming to now, to fruit, because we see so many people dying from these injections. And honestly, I think it's going to get worse, not better over time.

We can hope that there was only 60 days effect, maybe 90 days effect. But evidence is coming out now that these things may destroy so many people in the future with these new types of things like turbo cancers, et cetera. This is an unknown. It may be able to kill so many millions of people in the world. It's just incredible. It really is incredible. And the fact that, you know, I'm glad Chris Coleman was waking up, but they're psyched about this technology. At the moment where Deborah Birx really isn't sure how many injuries there are,

I'm glad she's calling for some data collection as I have been and many like us for, you know, many, many years now. But this MRNA technology is, talk about turbo. It's a turbo cancer in the medical industry. It's everywhere. I mean, they are, I mean, they're basically going to start trying to manipulate our MRI on, you know, all sorts of different viruses and cancers and things. things like that.

Yeah. You're right. You're right. There's another aspect of this. M RNA is a big thing, obviously, because it causes things to express in your body. Moderna would call that that's the application phase, you know, when something gets expressed like a spike protein. But there's also another process that's going on called reverse transcription of this stuff.

the other stuff that's in the shots that's getting back into your DNA directly. That means your DNA is being changed as these other things are going on. Right. And this is demonstrated now by many scientists. I've seen several studies that document this now. This is not even being talked about. This is the serious part of DNA modification. We don't want our DNA to be modified in any way, shape, or form.

But this is what GMO technology will do to us because it's engineered to do that. That's what the synthetic part of genetic engineering is all about. They want to create this stuff in the laboratory with computer algorithms first to produce an effect in our bodies that is not natural. It's going to change us in expression. It's going to change us fundamentally in our DNA as well. This is where, for instance, all of this talk about this turbo cancers that are just devastating to people. This is how it gets started. When some cells in your body go wacko because they have this new DNA insertive in them, they start to multiply.

The body can't take care of it. They just explode and all of a sudden you die. I mean, that's what's amazing. I've said this for so long. You know, Teresa Deischer is some that I've had on. She's a gene specialist dealing with stem cells and the focus on that. And she once said to me, you know, we've all talked about gene therapy.

For decades now, we've been waiting for a CRISPR technology to come along where we can cure cancer by changing that DNA susceptibility you had by inserting, you know, some fix to your DNA code. She's like, why do you think you haven't seen it? It hasn't come about. It's been a dream for decades in science. I've been at the forefront of it. The reason you never see a, you still don't see a technical gene therapy on the market, because no matter what we do, you can't. can't get it to land exactly right, no matter how good that insert may be, if it could get there, as soon as it missed lands or, you know, it immediately starts causing cancer, that in all of our

studies, we just, we accelerate cancer every time. And as she pointed out, she said, I once said to a, you know, one of these gene therapy specialists that's at the top of their game, you know, we know that if we have small fragments of DNA and we're inserting them into people, they're going to try and insert into the DNA code, correct? He's like, yeah, I mean, that's the heart of our technology. She said, do you know that our vaccines do that? That time she was talking about MMR vaccine, aborted fetal cell lines. Now, MRI technology is taking this to another place.

It's not rocket science. This causes cancer. It has never gotten out of a lab and been used on people till now because it causes cancer. And thank God Donald Trump was able to rush this right onto the market and get it out to us in a few months. When for decades, they've been holding onto it because it only. causes cancer and here we are. So, you know, the question ultimately ends up being. So this one health, and you point out something that has been just mind-boggling to me, which is how is it climate is now being attached to health. They're literally saying, because of, we're going to stop disease

by, you know, by stopping CO2 in the air. And right now, as we speak, I just reported last week, Joe Biden is looking at calling for a climate emergency so that he can have emergency powers as though we are under attack by Russia, but this time it's the sun and CO2, and he's going to do something about it. Where does this brainchild come from? This, I tell you, this is embedded into the treaty first. Article 5, you just saw us.

some of it, but this has been embedded in our country since at least 2002. It's been ramping up in our country, in other words, whereas full blossom at this point, the CDC, other agencies have been infected with the stuff with this ideology. We have mastered, apparently, secretly, nobody talked about it along the way. I didn't hear it 10 years ago. I didn't have any clue. But you see it now, and people can search for it,

one health, and then the government, you'll see all over the place. What? Where this stuff comes from? But the ideology behind it is absolutely insane. You can't wrap everything together in one package and think you can have one health. That's stupid because basically what they're going to say is,

well, over here we have an issue with the ecosystem. It's you humans that caused it, therefore you need to stop eating red meat. Right, right. Yeah, you know, okay, well, how does that play out? Well, they're not related. It's totally not related. And when you kill off the entire.

population. Right. And look at, look at the way, you can see how devious it is. Number one, if we want you to stop eating red meat, which is what Bill Gates and these people have stated publicly they want to do, we coal all of your beef or most of it, saying that there's a terrifying bird flu that could miraculously make a jump that we haven't seen in zoology or anything since the dawn of man, but it might just happen. And so therefore, we're going to kill all your cows. And if not all your cows, what we will certainly do is kill enough cows at the cost of the remaining cows will be so high that only Bill Gates will be able to afford to have that stake. And we're going to see this in so many different ways. This is essentially, it looks like to me,

how they're going to control this entire narrative. So to sort of sum all of this up, you've written six books. Clearly, you've been on this for some time. Is there a they? This is the question I ask of the people that come on this show. Is there a they? Is there this group of zero? Is there this group of you know, superpower families that are, you know, have this diabolical grasp on the world and are looking to just own everything. Do they have a plan? Are they evil? Or is it more, you know, accidental and haphazard? Personally, I think it's evil, for one. I've traced the Trilado Commission, for instance back to 7 in 1973 i've written extensively about it over the years these are this was the modern genesis of globalization i believe when they got together zabigna brazynski and

david rockefeller got together to form this commission they brought people from around the world including from america of course and they're the ones that said they were going to create a new international economic order. That's what they said. It's all over their writings. I've traced this forward over the years to today. They're in the middle of every single horrible thing has happened to us ever since, including genetic modification. So there's one group you can study for sure. Is there anybody outside the Trilada Commission? Is there another body above that? I don't know.

I can't really say for sure. We can see people like the World Economic Forum, certainly toots the horn for the United Nations. Is it Tedros? No, I don't think so. But, you know, we have a lot of operatives that are in this whole thing. but when you look back at the Trilada Commission, what they started back then,

we can see their fingerprint almost everything has happened, including trade treaties, Agenda 21, and the Rio Conference, agenda 2030. All this stuff has their fingerprint. Oh, by the way, immigration policy. That was something that emanated at the Trilada Commission in the first place. We're suffering from this today. I'm in Arizona, as you know.

Yeah. And we see it every day. What part of what do you mean by that? They want to have an open border? I mean, they talk about that. What is the... Oh, absolutely. This was all...

This was spread around Europe several years ago before he died. By a trilada commissioner. who was head of the Goldman Sachs, International, I think was board. And here you have a guy who wanted to promote multicultural society where all of the people from the mid-east will be moving forward into Europe to basically conquer the nation. We know now, but this policy was set in place by this guy as special envoys. His name was Peter Sutherland, by the way. He was a special envoy to the United Nations who set the quotas for these nations in Europe

to receive all these people from the South. And then when it started and they got nervous, he went around again and said, you can't go back on your quota. You said you're going to do it. You can't, you know, you're not going to, you're not going to rid. NIG. This is the same policy that's been prosecuted against us as well. You don't see anybody get into China. You don't see anybody get into Sudan or Uganda. There's no other place on the world except us and Europe who got this treatment. This was an intentional policy and is still being worked out today. Incredible. I mean, we were watching all this. We're reporting all this. for all of your work. If we want to, you know, find your books. Where do we find your latest book?

Certainly on my website, technocracy. News. Also on Amazon.com and other places that books are sold. If you want to get it in a paper, a bag, a brown bag, go to a look, bookstore and order it. They'll get it for you. and hand it to you. Otherwise, you can get it off off of my website, technocracy.news. Well, I mean, look, you're one of those figures that's been on this for a very long time. In many ways, I feel like I'm just waking up to it. I'm a little bit ahead of Chris Cuomo, thank God. But I appreciate the work that you've done and that you're continuing to do.

I think it's really important. This is the conversation of our time, and as you're pointing out, And I think as we're all sensing, at least people watching the high wire, it feels imminent. It feels like the end game for them is near. And I think luckily, maybe it was always inevitable once they'd made a jump like they did during the pandemic. I've always said that they can put all the pieces in place. But when you finally really try to make that final moment where you oppress all of humanity at one time, they're going to react. And we have reacted.

Do you think there's time? Do you think we can stop this? Yeah, well, I have to have hope that they will or that we will. Who knows? But at this point, we have the goods, right? Yep. We have the good. We have to tell everybody in the world what we have and what we have in our hands is defensible.

You can't refute it when you look at it. It's obvious on the surface, under the surface. any way you look at it, we have all the stuff top to got to bottom. These people need to be hung out to dry, period. All right. Well, we're going to work to that end. Patrick Wood, thank you for your time today. I really appreciate it. Thanks. Thanks, Del. Great job. Take care. Well, look, you know, we beat up a little bit on Chris Cuomo, but I do want to say, Chris, thank you for, you know, starting a conversation. Everyone has their moment that they've started. So many of you that I know are probably sitting in judgment today, angry at all that Chris Cuomo

was a part of in the propaganda. So many of you at one point were vaccinating your kids or vaccinating yourself and something happened. Either it happened near you or it happened to you and you realized, oh my God, I was believing the narrative. I was being lied to by people I trusted. I mean, as Chris Cuomo has said, I mean, whoever thought you can't trust your government. This is the question of all I've always had with people that come up to me or when I get in a serious debate. They're like, let me get this straight, hell. I'm supposed to trust you over the best scientists and doctors that work at the CDC, over the government of the United States, over the reporters from the New York Times. I said, I know.

It's a hard pill to swallow. But no, I'm not asking you to trust me. I'm asking you to look at the evidence I'm handing to you. which is what we do on the high wire every week. And by the way, I haven't talked about it for a while every single week. If you're simply signed up to our newsletter, which is right on the website where most of you're watching the show, just scroll down. All you do, right there, type your email right there and your life is about to change. No longer do you have to say to your friends, trust me, I got this right, CDC got it wrong, or Del Bigsree got it right, CDC got it wrong.

No. We're sending you the documents that showed what Chris Quartz. almost said didn't exist. The FDA telling you in the EUA, emergency use authorization, this thing doesn't stop transmission. We weren't able to prove that. The evidence was always there and the evidence was in everyone's hands that simply was a part of that newsletter that we send out for free. You don't even have to donate to have it. But I want to say this. As you reporters out there that are watching, I'm glad you're finally waking up. Everybody has their moment. You're not going to find some video right now. As I've said, we are very proud of the track record we have. I say it all

the time in every interview I do. They will say, well, you've spread conspiracy theories. Really? Point them out. Which one? Which one? Lab origin? Was that? Oh, wait, big problem there. Wall Street Journal, who said this to be last week. I said, oh, didn't you say that it was natural origin and it was a conspiracy for us to say lab origin? Ooh, you got that one wrong. What about of efficacy and the ability to stop transmission, the infection that the vaccine is supposed to do. Oh my God, you got that one wrong too, but we were conspiracy theories. Oh, wait a minute, wait a minute. What about social distancing, that six foot distance, which was literally why we locked down the entire nation of the United States of America destroyed jobs? Wait a minute.

We said that was never scientific. We said that it looks like that was a junior high student science project. You said that was a conspiracy theory. Who got it right? We did. You got it wrong. We can keep reading your newspapers where you try to say that what we're spreading is misinformation, but it's not. There are scientists. There always are telling the truth. And Chris, they were out there. They were speaking. They weren't speaking to you because you were ridiculing them and attacking them and praising those who are having their licenses taken away.

Here on the high wire was their retreat. Here is what people saw that we're watching our show, all of the people. that were brave enough to tell the truth. This is what the high wire is. When the whole pandemic stopped, this was really where I got my knowledge from. I saw all the scientists, all the doctors. Religiously, every Thursday,

we need that encouragement from each other. You allowed a lot of us to take that dive into the science and really get immersed in it. So thank you. This is why I love watching your show. This is why I love watching you. It's a comprehensive overview, but it's also built and supported with detail

and with evidence. CNN and Anderson Cooper has been reaching out to us and all the other mainstream guys. But I need to share my side of the story and I know that there's only one person who's going to do it right and that's Del Big Tree. You guys are the mainstream media now. They're done. And that's over. The media like the Highwire and Del Big Tree not only reporting the truth every week, but also

fighting in court for justice. I think what we have in common is the passion for the truth, right? I see you as somebody who's investigating, you know, what are the real facts and data. You are one of the beacons for all of us. When things get really dark, I turn on the eyewear. It lifts me back up every time. Del, your confidence is so inspiring. Thank you for doing all that you do, fighting the good fight.

Dale, I really appreciate your hard work and your team. Thank you for giving us a voice. I appreciate you so much. It's an honor to be here. Thank you. What can we create when we connect together? Good to be with you, Del. You too, bro.

Thank you for your continued supporting. your friendship that way. We're just grateful for the chance to talk to you and for your support and interest in our latest declaration. It's great to be on your show and thank you for everything you've been doing in terms of providing the truth to people regarding COVID and the vaccines. You've been in a war zone of your own. It's a really lethal war zone, right? When you get into the realm of big farmer and all that money that is at stake there, all the power players. This is a war for survival, survival of the soul of humanity. Ultimately, it's going to have to take people who, ready to sacrifice everything in order to bring the truth to the world.

I've been one of the silent people with injured children who have hidden behind you, rooting you on for years, and it's time that I stand beside you. We're standing up and we're fighting for you. We're fighting for those who cannot fight for themselves. That is what the truth is all about. That is what being alive is all about. And that's what the high wire is about. I'll see you next week.

This is a very important day for us here, the informed consent action network and the high wire. It's a very important day for all of you who we work for. You're the boss. You're our sponsors. Not Exxon, not Pfizer. Pfizer is not telling our executive what to do, what we can report on, like unfortunately did for Chris Cuomo and the company that he used to work for. And maybe Newsmax or any of these others are, you know, lightening up their grip a little bit.

here, this is what news looks like when you have no corporate influence whatsoever. This is what our government is supposed to look like. This is what the United States of America. In fact, the model of this is based on what America is supposed to be. A nation of four by the people. Is it? Do you feel like it is? I mean, let's be really honest right now.

We're coming into some elections coming up here and around the world. And as Patrick Wood just pointed out, boy, they would love to have all the control. They would love to be tracking us on our cell phones everywhere we go. They would love to track our cars. They'd love to control our power, our food, our food supply, how many steaks we eat, how far we drive. That's what they all want. They're making it really clear. They want emergency powers.

And who's giving them all of their science that they're working with? Who's helping them put together these plans? Is it you? Is it me? Is it the people? Is it our vote? No. No, that has nothing to do with it right now.

It's all about corporate interest. The W.E.F. has the same billionaires all getting together to have a party about controlling the world that are then going home and funding the biggest lobbies that control every part of the United States government and every other shill of a government around the world. Am I wrong? seriously. Am I wrong? Are we going to do this? Are we just going to keep electing people that do the same thing and say, hey, there it goes. Same as it ever was. Talk ahead. Same as it ever was.

Same as it ever was. I'm dating myself for that point, but those of you that know what I'm talking about, here we are. We are showing we can make a difference. Just with one show like this, one internet talk show was able to light a fire. And I'm not saying we were all alone. A shout out to all those doctors that came before me, the shoulders we've stood upon, and all of those warrior moms out there that started talking to politicians long before I ever did. But today, we all get to pat ourselves on the shoulder. Today, we have just turned a corner. Now they can never turn back.

They cracked a door. But what came crumbling down when they did that was safe and effective. Don't question it. it's over. That lie is now over. And behind it, what I've always said, once the biggest lie ever told that affected all of us,

this vaccine program has been in all of us. We're all been forced to do it to our kids year upon year upon year. Sure, we can talk about Central Reserve banking and all the other issues. And sure, climate and all of those things are important. But I've said from the beginning, this vaccine is what will take this system down.

This is how we'll let the world know what a lie it has all been, how little control we've had, and how much corporate disgusting influence there has been. Once we prove that this vaccine program's been lying to us, everyone will have to wake up. Those of you who have watched me from the beginning, from the moment I made vaxed, and I left CBS and said,

I'm only going to tell the truth, the people's truth from here on out. You've watched this journey. This is the next chapter. Perhaps this is Act 3 opening up. Now we look at the runway ahead to how the story ends. Are you ready? Do you have enough wind behind you now to finally speak your truth? Do you have enough strength and confidence and saying, wow, man, I've been watching. I've been watching Dell and geez, that track record, he and Jeffrey and that team, it's amazing how, you know, bold they've been, how against the grain they've been, and yet all of it they got right. Are you finally going to tell your friends? Because right now, you know, we have five, seven million people, something that any influencer in the world be really proud of. But this has

never been about that for me. No one here. I don't care about how big the numbers are that you're watching everybody needs to know this truth. We need everybody. Can you imagine if the world had been watching the high wire instead of Chris Cuomo on CNN or MSNBC and Rachel Maddo? Can you imagine if everyone had been watching this show? Why don't you help us make sure the next time these global monsters try to do this again and believe me, they still have all the money and they don't plan on giving it back and they know we're coming for it, what do you think they're going to do? Please make sure everyone you know is going to the place where the truth is all we talk about. This is the high wire. It's a day of celebration, a day of morning for all of those we wished we'd have gotten to on time.

But a recognition that this is not over. In fact, the fight has really just begun. Let's win this. And I'll see you next week.