The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 375: WEAPONIZING HEALTH

Episode Date: June 7, 2024

Del Reports on the Road To Geneva Protest and his inside Look at the World Powers at Work There; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on Fauci on Capitol Hill, and new twist in the emergence of AI; Firebrand Journalist exposes destructive policies threatening our health and freedom.Guest: Savanah HernandezBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now.

All right, everyone, we ready? Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, I had an awesome week last week. In fact, I did get to step out there into the world. I took a trip to Geneva, Switzerland, to protest the W. The WHO treaty, the rally in March, we are the change that took place there. It was just an incredible experience, amazing people from all over the world,

sharing the same, I guess, frustrations, concerns about what's going on with the World Health Organization, the treaty, the international health regulations, all of it. Well, this is what that experience was like. Take a look at this. It's fantastic to stand here with my friends on stage and see you all, your brave, courageous people. It's great to be with you here in the lion's den, in the heart of globalism. This is incredible to see thousands of you here standing for freedom and from sovereignty from all over the world. Hello world!

And hello the high wire. They're watching this right now. And now the one and only who had this crazy idea. She had done a great rally manifestation in Vienna. And then she said to me, Philip, let's do it again. Here and now in Geneva. So Maria Hoopmer Mock, welcome. So empowering.

If you could see what I see, it's just beautiful to see you out there. Thank you. I just want to start by giving a shout out please to all of those freedom lovers who, over the last two days have trapped. traveled across Europe and many continents to be here on the road to Geneva. Yesterday we brought in leaders, a hundred different leaders in the freedom movement from all around the world. We teamed up with the Japanese rallies that are happening the same weekend,

because we are all... We stand in front of the global headquarters of one of the most evil organizations ever to curse this planet, and I'm here to condemn it. They aim to dictate what we are allowed to do, to say, and to think, to control where and when we may travel, what drugs and injections we must take, what doubts we are allowed to harbor. The supranational agencies that are claiming power over our lives only have it if we give it to them.

So do not give it to them. We are the eight billion and we are not afraid. The WHO are trying to implement the international health relations, regulations and the amendments about surveillance, imposition, restrictions and knee-jerk suffocation to all of us, not just around so-called pandemics, but also of course around the latest thing, the environment emergency, keeping us safe. That is terrifying. The weaponization of fear of infectious disease to control human behavior is ethically evil.

And that those who deploy these unethical practices to advance their objectives of political power, profit and control should be shamed and condemned. I think you'll agree that they've done a great job in using division and polarity to divide us, to disconnect us from each other and from nature. They've used fear, they've used anger. And they have enslaved this world for far too long. There is a massive conflict of interest in the United Nations, contrary to member states' representativity of people.

The UN and WHO are directed by interest, financial interests. They made loads of money for the last three years. You realize this. The world's leading health authority, the WHO, sponsored the gross mismanagement of COVID-era health policy. which will have generational consequences. We must not allow them to make the same mistakes for future health contingencies.

Coercion and mandates of the most horrific pharmaceutical product in the history of medicine responsible for serious harm and death to millions around the globe. And they have still not said sorry. deserves an apology from the World Health Organization. In the last four years, the evil on this planet has shown its teeth. Many of you know people who've been injured and who've lost their lives due to the web of lies, deceptions and propaganda.

During the pandemic, a war was waged by all the governments of the world against the people. And this is what they've done. They've brought us together as brothers, as sisters, as family members on this world to stand for freedom. I'm not an anti-vaxxer. I'm a doctor. I'm a doctor who didn't forget the Hippocratic oath. First of all, do no harm. When I meet colleagues who talk about the vaccine without looking into the side effects, I'm very worried. It is so important to think about all those people that took the so-called vaccine out of solidarity

and now the government organizations, none of them feels responsible for those who got injured. What we learned in the last four years is that we have no protection, not from our doctors, not from our teachers. So what we have to do, we have to take the responsibility in our own hands. Today we have won. Today they've sailed their ships away from our shores that they've been attacking, but they are not leaving forever. We are here with a small victory this week over the petty bureaucrats, but their game isn't over,

and so what we must do is always remain vigilant. Stay awake. I implore governments and heads of states to heed to our calling, to listen to our voices, and recognize that sovereignty as nations, as individuals, and as patience is not negotiable. We are the people, we are the power, we are many, and we are taking our freedom. We need to stand together and we need to get our world back. We need to fight for freedom. No one controls our destiny but us.

We, the informed citizens of the world, do not consent and we will not comply. This all ends when each and every one of us understands the strength and the power that we have to say no. We have to decide if we and our children will live a free life or they're going to be slaves of the globalist system. But I know from the deepest of my heart that we will win and the globalist agenda will fail. Freedom, freedom, freedom, freedom. Well, it was just an incredible experience. I wish all of you could have been there.

but as many of you were there in spirit watching live as the high wire was streaming it across our platform. It was an amazing day. The march was fantastic. They had these big cowbells that, there they are, wearing these yokes. I don't even know how, it was like a three mile hike and those people were carrying those.

And the ringing and the, just the power and the joy and the drumming, it was just really such a spectacular experience. And as we claimed victory that day, you know, I would say that in some ways the victory was not that long lived. Remember last week when I was saying, you know, a lot of people called me and say, Del, look, they're not going to pass it while you're still going out there, the WHO treaty and, you know, the IHR rules agreements. And I said, I don't trust these people. I think that sometimes they put out those press conferences, you know, those press releases to try and get us to not show up. So luckily we did, but what was amazing is, you know, it was all supposed to be over that day. We were at dinner about 9 o'clock that night just celebrating the incredible day we'd all had

when we heard that they'd had an emergency meeting and brought everybody back in and managed to pass the IHR rules. There is World Health Assembly Agreement reached on wide-ranging, decisive package of amendments to improve the international health regulations. Of course, they weren't able in this trip to pass the World Health Treaty, the pandemic treaty, which has its own teeth. But I just want to say that, you know, I watch these videos. I think if you're tuning in for the first time and maybe like, wow, they really take this vaccine issue very seriously. I just really can't stress to you enough that this is the biggest issue of our time, of this moment. and it all hinges around this WHO. They are using health as a weapon against the world.

And there's so many great reporters and lawyers. There was a press conference in the morning with a bunch of fantastic lawyers that are fighting on our behalf, some from America, Germany, Switzerland, from all over the world. And while we were watching them lay out, we all recognized just the power of what this was,

but in the same hotel, next door was the Gates Foundation meeting and people were running into Tadros in their hotel and we were hearing from some people that were visiting that were actually you know part of the member states there to vote they said that their governments had only given them a one-way ticket that they did not have a ticket to leave until they had signed something come to some agreement and of course nearly in the dead of night they pulled that off I'm Jeffrey Jackson's going to get into the background on those rules but I just want to just

tell you about my personal experience because it was eye-opening. I mean, I've sat here on this show since the beginning of 2017, explaining to you how the vaccine program is being weaponized against people, the lack of science, all those issues. We spoke out against the pandemic. We saw it coming. We knew it was happening. The warp speed was going on, locking down our businesses.

All of this, we were now watching congressional hearings. We're going to talk about. They're admitting that, you know, social distancing had no basis in science. Mass probably really didn't work. And the vaccine, of course, overstated what it could do. But when you think of where it was coming from, this part we're going to talk about, it wasn't coming from inside the United States. This was something coming from around the world.

Something made every government act exactly the same way. And I will tell you, when I was in Geneva, it all became very clear. a great investigative reporter that spent many years in Afghanistan, asked me if I'd like to drive around and see the different complexes being built. I didn't get out of the car. I shot the cell phone just sort of out of the window at things like this is the W.EF compound that's being built there. It goes down the side of the hill. Every one of these facilities is armed guards and surveillance cameras. This is the new WHO building that they're building this complex. There's skyscrapers going up, cranes.

And right here, there's a tunnel that drives right into this driveway from the airport. They can literally move people in and out of the airport from all over the world. You can land on the Swiss side or the French side. No one will know you came and went. IOM, you know, the Institute of Immigration, UNESCO. They're building an empire there, folks. And as Jimmy, who I travel with, my manager, said, This is like a super villain's paradise.

I can't stress to you enough how chilling it actually was to see what's being built there. They have every, it's like a world takeover is being staged and these massive complexes designed to run the world from Geneva are going up. And so it's no doubt that the IHR rules pass. I guarantee you the World Health Organization's treaty will eventually pass. they don't plan on stopping folks. This thing is real. This is how they take over the world. They can't stand the United States of America. They hate our constitution. We were really a hiccup in the entire, you know, plan to take over the world. Really because we stood our ground and 30% of us didn't get the vaccine is probably one of the few reasons this thing didn't sweep that we're not

all, you know, carrying vaccine trackers in our cell phones. But I want to tell you, it is real. It's happening. And in many ways, it's like, you know, I went over the hill. We're all celebrating a victory on the beach that we just won D-Day today. It's really on my mind. And it's like you climb over the, you know, to the back of the island and the mountain. And you just see all these ships that are landing on the beaches. Folks, they're coming. I mean, I, you know, you know me, I'm positive. I know we can win this. You and I, if we tell everyone we know, but do not look away. Do not think that that COVID pandemic is in your rearview mirror and this idea that they will use disease and fear and some idea of international health regulations as a way to lock us down again.

And next time, they're coming for all of it. It's really happening. And it became very real there. So I have mixed emotions. It was beautiful. See all the people out there to see how far we've come to see that we can stall them for a moment. But we have work to do, folks. There's some really big fish that need to be fried. We're going to be talking about that with Jeffrey Jackson's just a moment. I have a great show coming up. I've got one of the most dynamic new reporters, Savannah Hernandez, that is just taking the world by storm and getting in people's faces on issues that everyone else is afraid of.

I think this may be one of my favorite reporters I've seen out there in a really long time. We're going to sit down with her and talk about how she has the guts to get up and talk about issues that everyone else is running from. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey. I mean, you know, I'm coming back and being out there in Geneva, you know, it just really became clear what we, why we have been on this train, right? Why we have been so fiercely warning people that this is not just about your childhood vaccines. This is not just about trying to get into school. This is about something much, much bigger.

It became really clear that this is the tip of the speech. And we've been reporting on it from the beginning. Yeah, great work out there to you and everybody raising awareness at really ground zero of the WHO's headquarters there. But let's look at the WHO's opening ceremony for this year's health conference that they held there. This was Tadros. Here's a video of Tadros and pay attention to what he says because it's really telling. Check it out. Okay. The serious challenge that's posed by anti-boxers and I think it's,

we need to strategize to really push back because vaccines work, vaccines affect adults, and we have signs, evidence on our side. I think it's time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers. I think they use COVID as an opportunity and, you know, all the havoc they're creating. It's really kind of scary to think that it's time to push back on anti-vaxxas as though all of the censorship of our social media, the attacks from mainstream press, calling us misinformation, trying to label us as domestic terrorists. That didn't quite do it. It's time to really, you know, put the screws to them. You can't even imagine what is going through his mind when he makes that statement. And these are old talking points.

I mean, the COVID response that he and the WHO really pushed and supercharged and stood behind proves to the world that it's not as simple as vaccine, anti-vax, and the safe and effective talking points, or just these are old unsupportable talking points. We're going to get into some of the science he talks about that supports these vaccines in a second, but let's get into these international health regulations. So as you said, in the basically still of the night,

they met and passed these amendments to these international health regulations. And these are legally binding amendment, legally binding agreement of 100, 96 countries. So the CDC goes by them. These are recommendations. So the WHO is not commanding, but everyone is following these recommendations. These countries are following these recommendations when it comes to pandemic emergencies. So let's look at that moment when they passed it. This was right at the end of the yearly WHO meeting. And here's Tedros in ecstasy. Check it out. All right. You have made history here today in approving a strong

package of amendments to the international health regulations. You have strengthened the cornerstone of international health law. In doing so, you have made the world safer. I have always believed that both the IHR amendments and the pandemic agreement could be finalized for this Health Assembly. IHR. tick. And the pandemic agreement is not done yet, but I have no doubt it will be. I mean, listen to his voice. He either has COVID or he's been screaming at somebody all day long. But, you know, one of the things I thought about, really, is as we were sitting there, I wanted to walk into the, you know, the Gates Foundation meeting. I did peek over there. They were taking a recess, but I wanted to say, you know, you know everyone in the world actually. hates you, that no one, I mean, think about this, no one is rallying to pass the IHR regulations

or the, you know, world health organizations pandemic treaty. Like nobody's like, hey, let's get thousands of people together and really just, you know, support this and put energy by it. No one in the world is doing that, right? Can you imagine being a part of these organizations that just somehow accept that we're hated by the world, but as long as we have the world's leaders, that's all that matters to us and they're showing up here and they're, you know, signing these documents, we're good to go. I mean, I can't imagine what it's like to be those people. Yeah, and it must be easy for those people just to throw all of their failures and all of that hatred onto, well, it's just this group of anti-vaxxers, everyone else loves us.

Right. So let's look at these amendments that are now in here. One of the biggest things, this is right at the beginning of the document. This is a document the W.HO. released on June 1st of this year, obviously, just a couple days ago. And right at the beginning there, they defunders. what's called a pandemic emergency. And you can see here it says pandemic emergency meets a public health emergency of international concern that is caused by a communicable disease. And it gives three stipulations, has or is at high risk

of having geographical spread within multiple states. Next one, high risk of exceeding the capacity of health systems. And the final one, high risk of causing substantial social or economic disruption, including disruption of international traffic and trade. I love that last one. I mean, as though the virus does that. You're the people that destroyed our social world.

You're the ones that destroyed our international trade and our business. The virus didn't do it. It had never done that before. But WHO is literally like, if it can do that, it's like, isn't that what the IHR rules are so that we could do that to you? Amazing. Exactly. Exactly. And so it defines a pandemic emergency.

So who gets to call this? Who gets to determine, hey, this is high risk. And we're going to call this for 196 calls. countries, we're going to declare a pandemic emergency. Well, it says it right here in the document. You go down to the next article, determination of a public health emergency. It's as if the Director General, that's Tadros or anybody else that

fills this position, determines that an event constitutes public health emergency of international concern. The Director General shall further determine, having considered the matter is containing the paragraph whether the public health emergency of international concern also constitutes a pandemic emergency. So really, unilateral power of that position of the WHO Director General to call it for the world.

So there's a big problem right there because the track record of the WHO isn't the best over the last four years when calling for lockdowns and things like that and really leading this pandemic response. So now they're in the driver's seat. But let's look at some other things here. Article 31 talks about what happens measures relating to entry of travelers. So we saw this during COVID. People that were traveling to other countries. They were detained. So this is in here as well. It says if there's evidence, evidence, just evidence of an imminent public health risk.

the state party made accordance with its national law and to the extent necessary to control such risk, compel the traveler to undergo or advise the traveler. And it says here, the least invasive or intrusive medical examination that would achieve the public health objective, vaccination or other prophylaxis. And then finally, it says health measures that prevent or control the spread of disease, including isolation, quarantine, or placing the traveler under public health observation. So remember those hotels that people. I think that's going to be the new definition of jail. Yeah, we remember those hotels people were stuck in during COVID for weeks and weeks and they couldn't get out even though they're testing positive or they weren't testing positive, the false PCR tests. This is what this is in this law.

But one of the biggest things it does here is it sets up a financial funding mechanism. It's kind of its own Federal Reserve Bank, if you will, to keep the party going. And this is in Article 44, it's kind of a subsection of it, but it's called a coordinating financial mechanism. And what is it for? it's to promote the sustainable financing to basically implement these regulations, to develop strength and maintain the core capacities in these regulations. So that's developed vaccines, just create testing, all of this stuff that's in these regulations now has financial backing by these member states. So that's a huge part of it. But the good news is that there's a way out of it.

It's very simple. And it's in these international health regulations. This article 61, as a matter of fact, And if you go to this, it says if a state notifies the Director General of its rejection of these regulations or of an amendment there too within the period provided in paragraph one of Article 59, these regulations or the amendment shall concern shall not enter into force with respect to that state. So this is where people can actually have some actions to find the delegates that are representing the United States all the way up to Congress and president, pressure them to not adopt this, this IHR within this time frame. really really easy piece to do hopefully people can activate around this one of the people that's been reporting on this is james rugoski and he has a substack he actually wrote on this it's a very thorough article it's called the amendments to the iHR have been adopted and you can really go read more about that in there but that that's this is the reporting that's now coming out of this they kind of backdoor this it's now implemented but anybody any of these countries that are now

legally binding to this agreement can withdraw from them. They have a time frame. I also want to state that I mean there's a lot of discussion amongst the lawyers out there that this is a completely illegal document right now that they're the rules state that all of the member states are supposed to have four months to read the the language before then ultimately voting on it. Of course this these changes were made during that you know during the last week as we had predicted trying to rewrite it but signing it and then saying it's now you know basically the law or the new rules is totally against their own rules, which is supposed to be four months.

So I know that there's going to be lawsuits around that whole thing. I want to thank James Rugasky, who has been just doing, I think, some of the best reporting on this. Definitely check out his substack. He's been advising us, keeping us abreast of what's going on. But, you know, it's real, right? And I would say that one of the scary things is if they'll just change rules, if they'll just throw out the four months of, you know, giving you time to read it, I would guess that that little paragraph for reading was what they put in there to sort of get over all the other member states that were just not down with it saying, well, if we just say you can opt out at any time, would that work? Yeah, sign your name here. How long do you think that's going to exist? I'm sure that there's some way that they just kick it out without a vote or, you know, it's like anything else. They have just set the ball rolling now, and now it just snowballs. Your freedom slowly gets wrapped up and taken away. But, you know, look, we're here.

People are standing up. We're aware of it. We're watching, you know, as we've reported states across the United States of America, Attorney General's, you know, standing up against it. So it's all part of waking up and boy, we better get on it quickly. And, you know, people could say, well, what's the big deal? We just lived through what we were told was the once in a century pandemic, so we're good for another century, right? Well, these are the headlines we're seeing right now, as these IHR amendments are in full

We see three human cases of bird flu detected in Michigan farm worker, says the CDC. This is H5N1. But then interestingly, yesterday I saw this. This was a press release from the WHO itself. Remember, they have their shiny new international health regulations that are going to report things right away. And this is the first case of H5N2. So these are all influenza, basically influenza A.

There's just subtypes of them. So this is the first fatal case in Mexico that's ever been reported now. in the world. And it says here from the WHO itself on 23 May 2024, the Mexico IHR NFP, this is the national focal point, responded to WHO PAAHO, a confirmed case of human infection with avian influenza AH5N2 virus detected. Now, from everyone watching over the last four years, see if you can pick out some of the interesting points in this. Detected it a 59-year-old resident of the state of Mexico who was hospitalized in Mexico City and had no history of exposure. to poultry or other animals.

The case, the person, had multiple underlying medical conditions. The case's relatives reported that the case had already been bedridden for three weeks, for other reasons prior to the onset of acute symptoms. It goes on to say whenever avian influenza viruses are circulating poultry, there's a risk of infection and small clusters of human cases due to exposure and infected poultry or contaminated environments. Therefore, sporadic human cases are not unexpected. And they have a hard time, too, just as a side note to that, really transmitting

person to person. So when we see this, you know, the fear-mongering, it's really false flat because this is something that we're not seeing really, even in the H5N1, which has what we're told pandemic potential. It's only been about 900 plus cases since 1996. So these are very low cases despite what we're seeing right now. But this WHO, this press release, just picking it apart, they PCR tested their 29 other contacts around this person. They all tested negative. This person and obviously it was bedridden for weeks with several other issues. They waited weeks after they received the report of the fatality. They waited weeks to report this, which is very interesting.

No exposure to poultry. And again, the PCR tests, they're known for false positives. Right. And what cycle are they using in those tests? If people want to go back, we've covered this issue of a PCR test, just keeps magnifying and magnifying with each cycle until ultimately what we've seen. saw out of the leader of Africa who's now no longer with us mysteriously, but basically tested like pineapples and mangoes and they tested positive for COVID. And I'm sure this is similar.

Clearly everyone his family says, dude, this guy was like dying in the hospital like weeks ago and suddenly just saying it has like something to do with an avian flu. I mean, so and why are they testing it? Like they're so desperate, so desperate to find this. And then so desperate to report it all the back of being so desperate to control the world. So keep your eyes open, folks. I mean, whether or not they get away with it with this bird flu, they are looking for disease X. They want it badly.

Now, remember from the COVID response, died with COVID or because of COVID? There's a huge gap between those two conversations. So let's go to one of the biggest conversations here in the United States when it comes to the health. We had Anthony Fauci come out of retirement to testify in front of the House Select Subcommittee on the coronavirus to talk about really the just bombshell explosive email scandal from his right-hand man, Dr. David Morins,

at the NIH there, who, I mean, clear evidence of just destroying any type of evidence of the origins of COVID, hiding and personal emails, even waiting until they cite each other in person to exchange information so they couldn't be FOIA. This is Dr. Fauci being questioned about that. So does he stick up for Dr. Morins? Well, you be the judge. Take a look. All right. There's a troubling pattern of behavior from your inner circle, not just Dr. Moran's, but also your chief of staff, Mr. Fulker's. Do you agree that it violates NAID policy to use personal email for official purposes? The, the Dr. Morin's issue that was discussed by this committee violates NIH policy, yes. But does using official email, using a personal email for official business, does that violate

policy? Using a personal email for official business violates NIH policy. Does it violate N-A-I-D policy to delete records to intentionally avoid FOIA? Yes. Okay. On April 28, 20-20, Dr. Moran's edited an eco-health press release regarding the grant termination. Does that violate policy? That was inappropriate for him to be doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest among other things. So on March 29th, 2021, Dr. Moran's edited a letter that

Dr. Dasick was sending to NIH. Does that violate policy? Yes, it does. On October 25th, 2021, Dr. Moran's provided Dr. Dasik with advice regarding how to mislead NIH on EcoHealth's late progress report. Does that violate policy? That was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. On December 7th, 2021, Dr. Moran's wrote to the chair of EcoHealth's board of directors to, quote, put in a word, end quote, for Dr. Dasick. Does that violate policy? Should not have done that. That was wrong. And that violates policy. Well, I'm not sure of a specific policy, but I imagine it does violate policy. He should not have been doing that. I mean, it's, you know, it's wild watching this. It is like watching the Godfather, right?

Like, where, I mean, obviously, like, I have no idea. I had no idea he was cooking the books. I don't even know. I barely met that guy. I mean, I know what we're talking about. Yeah, of course. It's disgusting. I can't believe he did it. I mean, clearly this Morin's is going to be the fall guy they think. Honestly, I hope somebody has this guy under suicide watch right now. Right. And so you're seeing Fauci is basically throwing these people under the bus. Morins, he's getting called out. Even Dazic, Fauci was asked about Peter Dazik and Fauci said it was right to cut his funding to bar him, to bar equal health alliance.

So these people one by one are going under. So you gotta wonder if they're looking at this whole situation saying, wait a minute. And if the Justice Department wants to move on these people, I feel like there could be a real good case to have these people come in and really side with trying to get Anthony Fauci and get some justice there. But I think the American people, just seeing these exchanges are very helpful. Obviously, no one has been indicted with this yet, which is frustrating for many people. But it's seeing these exchanges, seeing the emails, being able to read them for yourselves and seeing how they're destroying this evidence in the background is really, I think, a healthy thing for this conversation. People can no longer be called conspiracy theorist.

And then there's representative congressman from Georgia, Rich McCormick. He's also a doctor. He's treating patients during COVID. So he had a unique position here. And he questioned Tony Fauci about the COVID vaccines. Take a listen. All right. You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audio book written by Michael Specter,

that you believed an institutional should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Can we run the audio clip on that, please? You think can be done about it. I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory vaccination. I know federal officials don't like to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you were going to have schools, universities, and colleges. They're going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy?

You're going to get vaccinated. Lady, you're going to get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are going to say, you want to work for us, you get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it different, for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated. Thank you. Are all objections to COVID vaccinations, ideological bullshit? Dr. Pouchy? No, they're not. And that's not what I was referring to.

Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context. And I take great offense to this. Alison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, which came from recommendation from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician, on how to get pregnant and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, wanted to get pregnant, and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes. But she was fired because you made it hard, just like you said in your statement, because you didn't want to make it. sure that the ideological bull's the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her health care professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting

a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self-determine as we're all given God-given rights. Shame on you. They're amazing hearings. I mean, I'm thankful they're happening, but I do ask myself, where were these people while it was going on? As our representatives, why weren't you shouting from the rooftops that this was unconstitutional, that we were being forced into something to take an experimental product? I mean, you didn't see this on the floor.

You didn't really see this happening. Letting both these presidents, frankly, that took us through this, just destroy our civil liberties, destroy our businesses, our jobs, giving us no due process, can't go to a quarter. courtroom and fight for rights because no one's allowed into a courtroom. Couldn't even get into a courtroom. Courts were shut down. I mean, we cannot forget how quickly this happened, right? And as Tony Fauci says, you know, if you, you know, basically protect people, they'll do whatever we want.

I mean, he said, as soon as we protect, we get a protection in place, which they did with the PEP Act, then, you know, schools, they'll take your kids' education away, they'll shut your businesses down. They'll act like the Nazis we want them to act like. So I'm pretty good. Let's talk about that vaccine that Fauci and NIH funded, helped developed, marketed through the media and then whose mandates they supported to get those in arms of Americans. There's been a lot of great studies coming out with just the past couple weeks showing some things that we previously did not know about these shots.

But also there's been a change in the reporting when it comes to, we'll call it mainstream media and the increase in heart attacks. So this is the morning show, today's morning show. Take a look at this clip. We are back with our ongoing heart health series with a new way of thinking about heart attacks. Yeah, doctors say they're seeing an alarming number of seemingly healthy patients having heart attacks and those patients are getting younger and younger.

This story is going to blow you away because research shows that more than 10% of heart attack patients had no known risk factors such as obesity or smoking. Now there's a group of doctors at Mount Sinai here in New York City tracking patients to see if they can uncover the new risk factors behind this trend. Trying to unravel the mystery of young heart attacks, Dr. Deepak Bot, director of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital in New York City. He's looking into patients presenting with no known risk factors like diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. I think there are a lot of reasons for that. One probably has to do with the obesity epidemic, but it could also be other things. Another potential clue, long smoldering,

inflammation. And I'm talking about inflammation in the arteries, supplying blood to the heart. It might lead to the plaque in that artery to act up, in fact, to rupture a blood clot to form, if that blocks the blood flow in that artery, that's what causes a heart attack or heart muscle damage. The cause of inflammation in seemingly healthy people like Matthias, who are not obese and don't smoke, is not yet clear. When I watch reports like this, Jeffrey, I can't tell you how happy I am that I'm no longer working for mainstream media at CBS the way I did. Can you imagine having to just on the face of a COVID lockdown that forced an untested product that we know causes myocarditis and paracyditis to have to say, wow, this just in a shocking

rise in young people dying of heart attacks. And, you know, we've talked to specialists all over the country and around the world and everyone is mystified why this is actually happening. It's an alarming trend it's affecting 10% of all people getting heart attacks show no signs of it. I mean, it's absolutely mind-blowing that they can keep a straight face while they're doing this stuff. Right. And so they're saying, well, I just don't know why this heart muscle damage is happening, this inflammation in these younger kids. And at the same time, literally at the same time, this study comes out in the BMJ. And it's titled, so these researchers are looking at the effectiveness, of the COVID-19 vaccination and children and adolescents. And they say this. Among both,

and hundreds of thousands of kids are looking at here, among both adolescents and children, myocarditis and paracarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups with rates of 27 and 100 cases per million after first and second doses respectively. That seems like a little bit of signal. We looked at all these kids and it's just, it's just coincidence that only the kids that got the vaccines were having these myocarditis issues that have been reported for the last two years, in several medical journals in the Bears reports. And, you know, the Today Show doesn't mention that. We don't expect hardcore journalism from them,

but these are the studies that are coming out. And we've known this, and the signals were there, even when they were voting to approve these vaccines for the use in children. Yeah, and, I mean, the death rate was so low in children. I think 0.002%, something like that. So to be putting them at risk, it's just, it's really an atrocity. Yeah, I mean, we're basically talking about all risk

going to almost no reward here. So let's go on though. So JAMA, Journal of American Medical Association, Pediatrics, were, this is a FDA study. They were looking at the safety of the Pfizer shot and the Moderna shot in kids aged six months to 17 years. And what did they find? They said this.

In the primary analysis, seizure met the statistical threshold for a signal on children aged two to four years after Pfizer shot in all three databases. And in children, two to five years after Moderna's vaccination, in two of the three databases. They went on to say the statistical signal for seizure in children age two to four or five years has not previously reported

for this age group in active surveillance studies of MRNA COVID-19 vaccines. So you know what that means? That means when your child received this shot in a doctor's office and had a seizure on the spot or went home and had a seizure and you said, hey doc, something happened after this shot, doctor said there's no evidence of this.

The FDA would have told us it would have been in the literature. Now years later, they're saying, hey, guess what? we found a new signal and this is the problem with emergency use authorization of these vaccinations is they're just going to keep finding oh there's this is a problem too this was look like another signal we found right here and this well hold on i just want to make it really clear for people watching you would find the same thing if you ever went back and looked at the childhood vaccine program i mean what we are seeing right now is not that the COVID vaccine is any different than all the other vaccines we've given our kids that never went through safety trials never went through safety tests was rushed on the

market exactly like COVID vaccine was. But with all the work we've done with the high wire and Aaron Siri, our legal team, we've never been able to get them to go back retrospectively like they are right now looking at databases saying let's look at kids that got the vaccines and look at kids that didn't get the vaccines, which is what we're seeing now and what they're finding, geez, everybody, you know, in the group that got the vaccine, rise in heart issues, rise in seizures, the group that didn't get the vaccine, nothing. So clearly there's a signal. They've never done these studies. They have never done these studies on all the childhood vaccines, which is one of the things we've talked a lot about this that we discovered when we went to when Robert Kennedy Jr. invited me to the media at the NIH that Donald Trump set up back in the beginning of Trump's presidency. And we spoke with the NIH. We said, why won't you just do a comparative study of those that received the vaccines and those that have not? And just ask simple questions. Who has more seizures? Who has more diabetes and autoimmune disease and lupus and, you know,

Tourette's and autism and all these things. And as I've stated before, they said, essentially, we can't figure out how to do that study. Well, they figure it out right now because the entire world is doing it. It's all of these independent agencies around the world that are finally at least looking at this one vaccine. But folks, don't just think it's just this one vaccine. If they did this with all the other vaccines, you'd be seeing the same outcomes. And speaking of that, so we have a headline here, shocking for some, not too shocking for others. This is the telegraph.

COVID vaccines may have helped. fuel rise in excess deaths. That's a big headline because this is the first time really that that's been reported in such a big publication and not just talked about by a podcast or something. And this is a study now. So this study is titled excess mortality across countries in the Western world since COVID-19 pandemic. They're looking at autopsy reports.

They're looking at data from the registries for vaccine injuries in all countries. And they are saying the vaccine is definitely up there as a culprit. And it says during the pandemic, it was. emphasized by politicians in the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death matter and every life deserve protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply. Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin, transparency towards potential lethal drivers is warranted. And they are suggesting so those lethal drivers are possibly the

COVID vaccine. So what does this do? A lot of people are saying, well, yeah, but this puts it in the the medical journals. This puts it in the literature. Other people can cite this. And so doctors, the remaining doctors that are really just still hook line and sinker thinking this vaccine is amazing, can look at this and say, all right, there's the problem here. We can start looking at this now. There's a green light for this. There's cover and hopefully they start doing this because the studies continue. I'm going to go through one more here about blood transfusions. There's a lot of questions about, well, is it safe to get blood transfusions for people who had several of these MRNA shots.

And researchers out of Japan looked at the safety concerns, and they found six of them. And I'll list them right here. Spike protein contamination is a concern, contamination with amyloid aggregates and microthrombi formed by spike proteins, events attributable to decrease donor immune system, and immune abnormalities due to immune imprinting or class switch, we've talked about this, to IGG4 resulting from the multiple doses of these vaccines, presence of lipid nanoparticles, pseudo-urinated MRNA, contamination with aggregated red blood cells or platelets, and then the memory B cells producing IGG-4 as well as the IGG4 produced from them. All issues, not simple.

These are complex medical issues that are just now seeing, you know, getting into the conversation for blood transfusions, a major change. And you got to wonder what the Red Cross and what hospitals are doing. Will this, will this change anything? Are they going to just look the other way on this? It's really interesting how this could be societally changing. And every time someone takes a booster shoving, luckily over 90% of America is now denying taking the latest booster, which is number nine. But one of the scientists out in Geneva

really put it clearly for me. He said, Del, it's not the spike protein in the vaccine is the problem. It's this platform, the MRNA technology platform. Essentially, we wrapped a spike protein in this fatty lipid and then sent it into the body, but it was supposed to stay in the shoulder. It did not.

As we've shown in multiple studies, the second it moves past there, we're finding it in the heart, in the liver, in the brain. Well, what happens when it delivers a foreign protein? Your immune system is designed to attack any cell that has a foreign protein. It has to get rid of it. It's under attack. It realizes you're not supposed to be here. Well, that's what vaccines do, especially with this technology. You're putting a foreign protein in, and you're lodging it in the heart.

And so the immune system attacks the heart. If it lodges in the brain, it attacks the brain. This is made so clear, it's not the spike protein that is giving you the swelling of the heart. It's your own immune system attacking your heart because the vaccine put a foreign protein there. So it won't matter if they put chicken pox inside of this thing or, you know, whatever, you know, RSV. This technology is delivering foreign proteins to your organs and that is going to get you killed. This technology is an abomination, and it's shocking that anyone is sitting going, we have no idea why there's a rise in heart attacks among children.

You have to be an absolute imbecile to make that statement right now. Del, one of the more polarizing conversations I want to go into here, we'll hold off on the vaccine just for a moment, is artificial intelligence. So depending on what camp you come from, if you're in Geneva, the WEF, you're being told that the fourth industrial revolution is the greatest, greatest thing ever to come. Humanity will merge with AI and we'll all live happy at life after. Or if you're from like an Elon Musk camp,

AI could be one of the greatest threats to humanity. Well, right down the middle, this thing is just developing. It's still going and it's moving forward. And this is one of the crazier headlines I've ever seen in reporting. It says, world's first bioprocessor uses 16 human brain organoids for a million times less power consumption than a digital chip. There's a lot going on there. Wow.

I'm going to break this down a little bit because it's pretty shocking. And we'll go to this paper. What they're quoting is this paper, this article here in research. And the research disclaimer is done by the company that is basically marketing this. So all the conflicts of interest there are from the authors that belong to this company. They wrote this paper. Open and remotely accessible neural platform for research in wetware computing. They're calling it wetware.

It's this merge between biology and artificial intelligence. And what do they do? Well, let's take a picture from this. They grow this, they call it this organoid, this brain organoid. They grow it. And that's the step process there. And you can see it there in the, I guess that's like a little petri dish thing. This is this white, you know, this shiny organoid ball.

And it's hooked up to a bunch of sensors. And it can be kept alive for about a year. And it's a living thing. And they hook up these sensors to it. And they use it as a processor. Because why? Well, they're saying it uses so much less power. So it's so much more efficient.

But this is not a shift. shock because in 2015, almost a decade ago now, the Obama White House put forward a grand nanotechnology challenge to the world. And in that challenge, they asked the world, they challenged the world to create a new type of computer, they say, that can proactively interpret and learn from data, solve unfamiliar problems using what it has learned, and operate with the energy efficiency of the human brain. Well, I guess they just took a shortcut and said, let's just use the brain. Forget about the energy efficiency. We can't design that. Let's just use it. And at that time, in 2015 you had a lot of the luminaries that were coming out and making these predictions.

These are the people that were really steeped in this in this technology. And they weren't coming forward saying at some point in the next 10 years, we're going to have technology where when you're on Zoom, it'll AI will transcribe your Zoom call. No, they're saying they're saying things like this. This is Wired Magazine from 2015, the future of personal computers. And it says this. This is Andy Adminski. He says personal computing will become intrapersonal and intracellular. Each human neuron will be hijacked by a self-growing, self-reparing molecular network. Computers will be networks of polymer filaments growing inside and together with a human. Seeds of the network will be injected into embryos in the first month of their development. They will form a

gigantic network inside the brain. Computers will be inside us. They will span all living creatures into a united computing network. And that is what this is the part of this we're seeing. So they're obviously looking at this thing to get very into the human body. But one of the big takeaways there is this united computing network they're hooking up brains together they want brains according to him of all people together so they can really have this this super powerful network but in 2015 as well they were doing that with rat studies already so they were they were building this is one of the studies here building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains so and again this is crazy stuff but it says in here in a they call it a brain net in our brain net all four rats

were chronically implanted with multi-electrodot arrays. That sounds fun, placed bilaterally in the primary somatosensory cortex. Once animals recovered from the implementation surgery, the resulting four brain nets were tested in a variety of ways. They're talking about basically computational tasks, but they were able to do this with mice. And you can see the picture here. You have all those rats and they're all connected in this brain net, and there they go, and they're doing all types of neural activity and asking to do tasks. But you can see now after that after 2015, you can see the research starting to come out and going, wait a minute, this brain thing, this brain idea is a really good idea for artificial intelligence. And so this is where the divorce happens

between humanity and artificial intelligence, if it was ever even combined. And this study right here it says brain organoid computing for artificial intelligence. So here we go. A breakthrough and AI hardware may be inspired by the structural and function of a human brain, which has a remarkable efficient ability known as natural intelligence to process and learn from spatial temporal information. Their high efficiency renders a human brain to be ideal hardware for AI. So that's what, there's the divorce. So AI is just looking at humanity as bits and parts as hardware to help synthesize and grow AI.

That's what we're here for according to popular science. I wonder how many people watching right now are looking up like land in the middle of effing nowhere where we can take a tent our family and just go hide. Wow. Amazing and scary and clearly you see science and doctors and medicine playing God in a way that is truly terrifying and all I just keep thinking is what could possibly go wrong. Jeffrey, great reporting. So important. And thank you for all the great work you're doing. We're laying out some heavy reality right now. But the truth is we're still here. We are spreading the truth. People are listening. More and more people are waking up every day. So it's really just a game of chicken. Like who's going to have a big enough for us first? Humanity or the globalists? All right. Stay at it. I'll talk to you soon. See you next. All right. Thanks.

There's so much to what we do here at the high wire. We are, you know, first of all, bringing you the news like nobody else is. I would say, I think in all honesty, we have the most accurate track record throughout the COVID pandemic and everything that happened there of any network in the entire world. And I would also bet that we've stated most of the statements we made, like the vaccine is not going to stop transmission. There's no basis in science around social distancing. All of those things that are now proven to be true. I think we said them first.

But beyond that, and you know, it's just the reporting that we're doing, the international group of scientists that we work with as a part of our team, there's also the legal side, which gives us information nobody else has. We're able to go in and sue government agencies because they're hiding information from me. I know it's a shocker. I know you're really shocked that your government's lying to you, but look at all those lawsuits we've won against the government. I want to ask you, what other news station do you watch?

Do you watch CNN? Do you watch MSNBC, Fox? Have you ever seen them suing the government agencies on a topic that they're like making you all alarmed about saying, can you believe it? And on to like sell you more pharmaceutical products. Stay tuned. We'll be right back. That's what you're funding all the time. Meanwhile, we are not just taking your donations and trying to bring you the news.

We're actually fighting to change it, to change the world so that we don't have to report on this insanity any longer. Every week we've been giving you sort of a legal update. This is a big one. Do you ever want the ability to have a free market when it comes to vaccines? You want to be able to sue the manufacturer. Or do you want, as they said, would Tony Fauci very clearly say, if we can protect them, they'll do anything. They'll kick kids out of school. They'll shut down businesses.

As long as they know they can't be sued, they'll act just like Nazis. That's what we're fighting against. And that's what's our legal update. Take a look at this. The federal government paid Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars to help them develop license, manufacture their COVID-19 vaccines. And then paid them billions more to purchase these products. It then gave them immunity from being sued from injuries for these products.

All of this was done on the backs of citizens and taxpayers. It was taxpayer money that flowed to these companies to make these products and to then buy it from them. And it literally is the skin and bodies of the citizens of this country that bear the brunt and pain and hurt when these products hurt them. It is truly incredible that the government then set up to compensate those injured by COVID-19 vaccines, literally was given a budget of only a few million dollars,

has rules that make it virtually impossible to get compensation, and has a process that is worse than than the most ridiculous kangaroo court that you could even imagine. Who is deciding your claim? You don't know. Can you confront the experts they supposedly rely upon?

No. Do you know who they are? No. Can you get a hearing? No. Can you have literally any of the due process that we all come to expect from any court proceeding? None.

There's literally none of that. As most of you probably know, the National Childhood Vaccine injury Act of 1986 gave vaccine manufacturers immunity for the injuries caused by most of their vaccine products all the way back in 1986. And so you might say, why does COVID-19 vaccine need another layer of immunity?

Well, if you're injured by any of those other vaccines, you can bring a claim in the vaccine injury compensation program, which has serious issues, and that's for another time. But apparently that even wasn't good enough for COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The government really wanted to make sure that nobody was gonna get any relief from those injuries. So it added another layer of protection called the Prep Act immunity.

It sends those who are injured by a co-vaccine into something called the counter-injury compensation program, the CICP, which is effectively the equivalent of fill out a piece of paper, go to your backyard, buried in the ground, and wait for it to actually grow money to compensate you for your injury. We are proud that ICANN is supporting a lawsuit to not only show, strike down the immunity given to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers under the PREPAC, but also this ridiculous program that supposedly is pretending to compensate those injured by COVID-19 vaccines, but in reality only is adding insult to injury by creating a show as if to pretend it's going to compensate them.

Well, first of all, I just want to thank Aaron Siri and his incredible team of, you know, I think it's nearly 20 legal professionals, you know, that are working to protect us from, you know, pandemics in the future, from being forcibly vaccinated like we were during COVID, from having our job shutdown. We fought for the military. And going after the PEP Act, this is massive. We've got to be able to take down these things because, as Tony Fauci just told you, as long as we can protect people, we can unleash them upon you and they will take away all of your rights.

You know, many of you, when you run into me, you know, out in the real world, whether we're in a restaurant, sit down with you and you say, wow, you're just like you are on the show. And that's because I'm really not putting on a show. I'm just being deadly honest with you. So I'm going to be really honest with you today. You know, there's a lot that we've accomplished. There's a lot that I want to thank you all for. Everyone that's donated makes the show possible. All the legal wins.

I still am so proud of winning back the religious exemption in Mississippi. We're trying to do that. We're trying to free the five, all the other states. We've got amazing approaches. Some of them are Trojan horse approaches. We're, you know, I can't legislate is out there doing its thing. But, you know, and in many ways we are seeing the same, we're, you know, seeing the same level of donations. We're strong as we've ever been.

But Erin is really trying to win before we lose our turf. to win while we've got the wind at our backs. And I'll be honest, he called me last week. And he says, Della, I think I may have overextended. I think I may have taken on too many legal cases. And so we're going to have to pick and choose and start pulling back. I'm just being honest with you. I'm really happy with all the work we're doing.

We're doing a ton. And maybe we have done too much. I mean, maybe we'll just wait and hope that all this works out. Clearly, there's no other nonprofit that I think is having the success that we are in courtrooms that is actually winning for you. But this is that moment. And I want to speak to, you know, so many of you will go and you're already donating and you'll put a couple more dollars in. I want you to just hold back for a second. I know this is crazy, but I want to talk to the rest of you. You know that less than one percent of the people that are actually watching this show actually donate

to the work that we're doing here. I know that you're paying your cable bill. If you're forced to pay a bill, you'll pay it and you'll let them lie to you on the news and that news channel isn't doing anything to actually protect you. And I love that you're coming here and you're sharing this show. And I also get that these are difficult times. No doubt about it, the economy sucks. I get it. But we're running out of time. Okay. So maybe is it possible that this week when you go into Starbucks, you just say, you know what? Instead of parking, instead of walking in and getting that cup of coffee, I'm going to take this $5 and I'm going to donate one cup of coffee every single week. Do you realize less than 1% of you are doing that? Can you imagine if just 20% of you did?

Look at what we are doing with those of you that are donating. And for the rest of you, I just can impart upon you how good it feels to say, even if it's a dollar a month, to say, I was a part of that. It really does matter. Voting with your dollars decides your future. Do you want to look back and say, man, there were so many opportunities I had to help that group, those winning lawsuits, But then an election came in and the censorship came in and the WHO took over and now we live in some sort of authoritarian state. I don't even know what my future is for my kids and I suppose I probably should have done a little bit more.

This is that moment. This is real time. I know I'm being dramatic this week and I promise I'll crack more jokes next week, but Geneva scared the hell out of me. And I know we can win. I know we can do this. But we can't just let the billions of dollars, let the liars have billions of dollars of our tax money and not then go out of our way to say, you know what, I can throw a couple of dollars

to those people that are actually making a difference in my world. So I'd rather not, you know, call Aaron on Monday and say, all right, give me the list. Let's see what state will let have mandatory vaccines another couple of years or whatever the case may be. I would rather just say, Aaron, your instincts were right. Our audience is behind us. They really want to see you continue to win these lawsuits. So please, please today, if you're watching this show and you're thinking, you know, I'm thinking about it, just go to the top of the screen.

Just grab that mouse right now, roll up to the top of the screen and hit donate to ICANN. This is going to be one of the most important things you ever do in your life and we will celebrate on the other side of the finish line when we win. We're asking for $24 a month. But honestly, $1, $1, $2, a cup of coffee, $5. Isn't it crazy that a cup of coffee is $5 now? But anyway, you get the idea. Help us continue to do this great work and expand it. I don't want to just tread water here and see how much we could get done.

There's so much more we can do. Let's do it together. Thank you for all of you that support. Just type in 72022 in your text message, write in the word, donate. And we'll send you a link right away so you can. can start funding the lawsuits that will protect your future, especially the United States of America, so it can be a beacon of light, liberty, and freedom for the rest of the world. We're America's public health watchdog, and I Can is the informed consent action network.

That network is you. All right. You know, everyone, remember where you're a little kid and you go to a movie theater? I don't know, maybe I'm just the only one. You see like a Superman, you know, action film. and I would just pine like, why can't I fly? I just want to be Superman. I just want to be someone that goes out and fights, you know, the bad guys and wins.

I kind of had a little bit of that feeling watching a brand new reporter that is so fierce and so awesome that, you know, you just think, man, what does it like to have that type of courage to charge into the story right in people's faces and ask the questions everyone else? is afraid to ask. Well, Savannah Hernandez is definitely not afraid of anything. Take a look at this. Savannah Hernandez. Savannah Hernandez. Savannah Hernandez. In a very short time frame, she has made a name for herself as a fearless independent journalist, uncovering the truth of what's going on in the streets of America as well as abroad. This is Savannah Hernandez on the ground in Davos, Switzerland, to report on the 2023 meeting of the World Economic Forum. Our next guest has been on the ground talking to migrants, border agents, and reporting on all of this chaos.

To anyone who advocates for open borders, I would tell them, come with me to the border for a week and I'll show you the realities of open borders. What I want to speak about today is an active National Guardsman talking to me about mutilated bodies that the cartel is leaving on the U.S. side of the border as an intimidation tactic. Let me go ahead and give you a quick pan of the hundreds of illegal immigrants that have currently made their way across the border. This is Savannah Hernandez in New York City, specifically in front of city.

hall where as you guys can see we have hundreds of illegal immigrants specifically from Africa convened behind me excuse me sir as a city employee you said that you don't like people using the word illegal immigrant and can I just ask why you don't like that word these are the employees of the city of New York who don't want the people to know what's going on there's so many different aspects to political issues that the mainstream media doesn't even show us they're trying to push a specific narrative so it takes a very strong person in this industry to be able to push back and say, you know what, let's look at this from a different angle.

Do you see any other reporters on the streets of Portland documenting what truly is shocking the most American walking sign? No, I feel to be the only one, Laura. It's absolute chaos out here. I would immediately attack. Security officer right here who has stolen my property for this to give it back. Would you like to give me my property back? So you have the people on the streets that flu, allowed to physically attack you.

This is what happens when you come to Philadelphia and you try to report on the drug crisis here. Whoa, whoa. Hey, hey, hey, hey. I have to be off the exact Your first amendment line. I couldn't be more grateful to be a brown woman in America. If it was not for this country,

I would not be able to do what I am doing today. I have freedom to achieve every single dream that I've ever wanted. Like the more racial nonsense that I see Bush, the more I realize that they're trying to distract us from the fact that the government is corrupt, that they're printing trillions and trillions of of dollars and destroying our economy. Hundreds of thousands of people are dying from this experimental vaccine,

but they want everyone focused in on racism because it's the easiest way to keep people divided. We're tired of straight white men having the power and everything, you know, and it's like we don't have the same privileges that are offered to straight white men. Talk to me about what some of those privileges are that, you know, straight white men have that you don't have. Talk to me about that. Um, I think I mean, I don't really know. I don't know, but I also need to go.

I know. I do. You need to go. I'm sorry. My experiences are going to be different from yours. How come? I think, you know, there's a thing of like white privilege. What privileges do you have that I don't have? Oh, see, that's a question I keep asking myself personally. It's like, not that I think I'm more privileged than anyone else,

because I had to work to get where I was. Why do you have that mentality immediately where you, you know, kind of apologize to me? Like, let's talk about privilege. Let's talk about I'm a white man in America, so we could have grown up differently. I got you. Why is that your first initial reaction to me as a brownie? to me as a brown woman. Wow, you're getting me good.

Would you support your mother's right to abort you? My mom aborted me, I wouldn't really care. If I were to ruin her life, I would not forgive myself. Are you today proud to be an American? Not one bit. Not one bit. I've never been more embarrassed to be an American. The younger generation doesn't care because we all hate the military. We hate America.

If you could choose citizenship in a different country, revoke your U.S. citizenship today, which country would you choose? I'd love to maybe go to like Algeria, or like Egypt, South Africa. Anywhere but the United States? Yeah, you can name all other like 267 countries and I would go there. Iraq? Maybe.

For this younger generation who hates America, I mean, what would you say to them? If you don't love the country that you're from, I suggest you leave. There's plane tickets available. I'll help you. What would you say to the parents of the girls that were swimming today who felt like Leah

has an unfair biological advantage? She has been transitioning for the past three years and at this point there isn't that big of a biological difference. What do you think about kids being targeted for Pride Month? Do you think it's an issue? Do you think it's a good thing? I think more kids should be given puberty blockers. Women can have penises. Can men get period? Men can get periods. And can men get pregnant. Men can get pregnant. My message to any American who is genuinely looking for the truth. about what's going on is to do your own research.

Think for yourself. Stop allowing the mainstream to think for you. Stop allowing the government or your friends or, you know, your political meaning to decide for you how you should think and feel. When are Americans finally going to get tired of being lied to? It's time for people to get angry and actually stand up for their freedoms and for their freedom of thought. She's my new personal hero and it's my honor to have her here in studio, Savannah Hernandez.

Thanks for having me, Del. I'm so excited to be here. You were a big inspiration to me during 2020. Everything that happened with COVID, especially the lockdowns you speaking out against all of that. And I know you've been at the forefront of this as well. So thank you for having me. Well, it's really great to be here. And I'll be honest with you. Like the type of journalism you're doing where you just get in there and get in people's faces. Like it's something I rarely do. Every once in a while when the opportunity comes and people don't know. I mean, it's really nerve-wracking to just sort of really confront people. I mean, I can sit here at a desk and talk about it, and I can get on stages, but really getting down on the ground, I mean, how do you, how do you, I mean, just even those moments where people are getting violent around you, how do you stay so calm? Well, I think it's because I'm doing this for my country and I'm doing this for the truth and to be quite honest with you. It really breaks my heart that we have been lied to as American people. And when I met with the vitriol, when I met with the violence, I know that that, that is a direct result of the propaganda

that every single American has been hit with, right? Whether it has to do with our health, our economy, why America is the way that it is. You know, in that real that we just watched, we talked a lot about distractions for the American people. And again, I don't like when people are lied to. I don't like when we're distracted.

So if I met with, you know, some pushback, that's okay because maybe somebody will start to think, and I've seen it so many times, where when you do push back on people, especially those going to these protests, and you wake them up to the fact that they don't even know why they're really angry, something happens, and I think that's how you change hearts and minds.

So, I mean, when you go into those situations, it sounds like you don't really see the people that have a different perspective of you as your enemy. You just see them as misinformed. Absolutely, and again, we see the, what, billions of dollars of propaganda that the American people are faced with. We see the mainstream media, continue to lie to us every single day and we are force-fed this narrative since we're kids,

right, to obey authority, to not think for ourselves, that the government loves us and cares about us and is protecting our health and wellness and they have our best interest at heart. But everything that I've seen on the ground over the past five, six years is completely counter to that. So yeah, it just really baffles me that we're lied to so much and it makes me really sad. And again, it's hard for the average person to even understand the war that they're being faced with. Yeah, well, because they turn on their TV and it's just this monstrum over and over again of what they were. I mean, I think one of the big problems is, you know, I talk to people from Russia or from China. They know that their media is lying to them.

Yeah. Right. And so we think we're better off in the United States of America, but in many ways, in some ways. I mean, not to be like the guy that wants to move to Iraq, but in the same. But in some ways what makes America so scary right now is we think we have better media than that. We think that our media is telling us the truth that we're abreast of what's actually happening in the world and all the problems and we trust the news. I think that that's really dangerous. And I wonder when those nations, like Russia, when people live there, started realizing at what point, I don't think they're telling us to truth.

But let me ask you about journalism. How did you get into it? Why? Why do you do what you do? So again, this all stems truly from a love of country. I worked for Alex Jones for a couple of years, and I really wasn't politically active. I worked on productions for his show, and it was basically like getting thrown into the deep end because he talks a lot, too, about government misinformation, propaganda, just our entire history

about how we relied into wars, how Americans died because of the government lying to us. And then I would go out to protest, I would talk to people. because, you know, if you were out protesting in the hot Texas sun at noon on a Thursday afternoon, you would think that said protester would understand why they're angry or have a couple of points to say, well, this is why I'm here. But I realize that the average person didn't. And I think that woke me up to the fact that, again, we are being hit with this propaganda campaign, that a lot of Americans don't even understand why they're mad.

And I really just wanted to unveil that. And then, you know, it was kind of unmasking all of these problems in the United States because, again, 2020 was the time in which I was doing a lot of on-the-ground reporting. And that was during the George Floyd riots. And I watched CNN standing in front of a burning trash can, one of their reporters, saying that this is fiery but mostly peaceful. I think a lot of Americans remember that line. And I remember Austin, Texas. There was rioting. There was looting. the city streets were not safe for American children. I was baffled by this and it broke my heart

that police officers were being targeted. Bricks were being thrown at their head. I went and held up a sign here in Austin as well that said police Lives Matter in honor of David Dorn, who was killed by Black Lives Matter rioters and I was beat up for it. And at that point too, I realized that our own country was so far gone in terms of our own First Amendment and being able to utilize our speech on our own streets and that really scared me. Did you go to journalism school? Was journalism something at a young age or did it sort of happen all of a sudden like I think I'm going to do this? I did go to school for journalism but I didn't learn anything. Are they teaching, you know, to have an objective, you know, to be unbiased? Absolutely not. Absolutely not. I was in school during the beginnings of

Trump getting into office, right? So like 2015 through 2017 era. So I did see from a lot of my own journalism professors, just the already anti-Trump slant that we were supposed to adopt. And that was just a given. And again, that was something that I kind of question, like, well, why do we hate this man? Why is it that this is a given? Why are we not allowed to question things or ask questions? Why is it that the narrative is kind of given to us and we're supposed to run with it? Again, too, going to a lot of these protests, which were anti-Trump. At that time, I really was just like a clean political slate. And I told people, you know, you have a chance to inform me as to why Donald Trump is so bad.

So can you do that? Because, you know, I don't really know. And no one could explain to me. It's just start screaming at you. How could you not know? Exactly. Exactly. And then the response was, well, it just gave me like three points.

Three of the worst things he's done. And it was the same exact response every time. But no one could give me anything concrete. So again, I just realized that there. There's really no freedom of thought as well because people are force-fed points from the media and they just run with them. That's something that we consistently see. You've done, you've been, you know, you do a lot of documentary work.

You've done some great documentary work up in New York City looking at the migrant crisis. This is a shocking story and watching this video absolutely blew my mind. Everybody, I know you've heard this story, but I don't think you've seen the whole story take a look at this. This issue will destroy New York City. Another 12 billion to address the migrant crisis. Our criminal justice system is upside down. And it's causing not only safety concerns. They are nonetheless putting on New Yorkers and making our city less safe.

They brutally attacked a New York City police officer. Two migrant sex crime arrests. Tonight a migrant has been charged with raping a 15-year-old disabled girl. It's just a lot of them. They're just all over the place. How were the migrants affecting you as in New York? Mommy, you have no idea. You're not happy with... They murder people that I love the ones.

Good morning, New Yorker. Would you go another few of the city here in the city? The city of New York was once a beacon of cultural diversity, but now the melting pot is overflowing into a disaster, as over 175,000 illegal immigrants have made this lawless city their new home. The city, which has redefined in the land of the free, is spending billions on handouts for illegal immigrants who are now being given prepaid debit cards, hotel rooms, and plane tickets.

However, this still isn't enough. Now, hundreds of illegals gathered outside of City Hall today ahead of a New York City Council hearing. There is an issue with the food where culturally my kids refuse to eat it because they don't know it. There are unique dialects that are also coming that I've never heard of. A significant amount of people who are illiterate. We need people that speak the native language to teach to those people.

That's what we're asking the city and the city refuse. Or we don't have the finding or if we can translate. That's disgusting. It's totally racist and xenophobia. This is Savannah Hernandez in New York City, specifically in front of City Hall, where as you guys can see, we have hundreds of illegal immigrants,

specifically from Africa, convened behind me. Now, we're here in New York to discuss how bad this crisis has gotten, as over 175,000 illegal immigrants have made their way to New York City. As we were on the ground filming the crisis that had overtaken City Hall, a New York employee approached us to ask what was going on. As a city employee, you said that you don't like people using the word illegal immigrant. And can I just ask why you don't like that word?

He was extremely upset because he came up to us and asked, hey, what's going on? We said, the illegal immigrants are here. And he said, that's not a nice word. He's walking through this area. It's a boy talking to me. These are the employees of the city of New York who don't want the people to know what's going on. I just wanted to put into numbers how much this crisis. is costing the city of New York $12 billion through 2025

to make sure that these people are housed, fed, given medical care, given free daycare for their children. Most of the people that are in charge of this stuff couldn't find their own asses with both hands in a flashlight. They shouldn't be spending that amount of money on the migrants. There's a lot of resources that you spit in the city. It comes down to the fact that there's no secure border. If you have a federal government that's no rules or lacks rules,

I mean, they're just going to stream across the border. Joining me now, Savannah Hernandez, Frontlines reporter for Turning Point USA. Savannah, some of the illegals did not appreciate you one bit. Watch. Miss, miss, miss. I'm sorry, but this is the United States. We have the First Amendment here. We are allowed to actually film. Okay, well, you don't get to tell me what I can and cannot film. Welcome to the United States of America here. St. Bridges in East Village, New York is often surrounded by hundreds of illegal immigrants.

After the city began using this location as a reticketing center for. for migrants back in November of last year. Previously, the city would shelter illegals for an indefinite amount of time. But as New York began to become overwhelmed, Mayor Eric Adams announced a 60, then 30-day limit on how long migrants could be in a shelter. Single-male migrants now find themselves

outside of St. Bridges every 30 days in hopes of being reticketed into a new hotel room. There was a huge line of migrants standing outside of this NGO and as soon as they saw it starting to talk to them, starting to film, they brought them all inside As you guys can see, these are all single men sitting out here, and there's a park right there. And the crisis has gotten so out of hand

that the city has even resorted to offering free plane tickets to illegals anywhere in the world that they would like to go. They give me a ticket for free to Chicago. I fly tomorrow. For free? For free? Why are you going to Chicago? Because I want to see new city.

I want to feel new wife. Who gave you the ticket to go to Chicago? to Chicago. Chicago, no, this special government service company, you know, they try to help new people, new immigrants who come. I want to highlight these signs as well. They say, did you know we can book your ticket to travel anywhere outside New York City? No need to wait in line.

Just tell the front door staff you'd like to get a travel ticket. Now this is in one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight different languages up there. Not only are these tickets being paid for in the taxpayer's dime, but we sent our informant inside St. Bridges to see how easy it would be for a New York resident to obtain one of these free tickets. Just to me just because I'm getting a apartment, and they said that here could have a bullet to go to here in this avion. This is a residentian permanent here in the States of the United. This is only for the people who are using asylum.

Okay. People who are undocumented, For undocumented not only received free plane tickets, but due to New York's relaxed immigration laws, many migrants have access to programs like the ID NYC program, in which they can get a state-issued form of identification and access to city resources. Back in 2019, the state of New York also passed the Greenlight Law, allowing illegal immigrants to obtain a state driver's license. And all we're doing with saying,

what are so in the ID, why is that if, if, if, if you get to get that the people, we're that we're having a refund to, that's a document that we're putting up to you

with the access to resources and relaxed laws surrounding illegal immigrants in the state of New York, many have wondered, but these migrants with state-issued IDs potentially vote in our upcoming 2024 elections. If we're going to vote,

I would be with the vote of my, with the other of her, with the other of her, that me grant, that know that it's a benefit. It's more with President Biden. Yes. So, would vote for President Biden. Okay. But for John, and Marra? And you, you have you?

I was to put my account. I have to the idea of the city, the license. But you're not here, legally, right? I'm not I'm still not I'm still the decision of my process. In an effort to understand, just how easy it could be for an election,

to obtain different forms of identification, we spoke to a source familiar with the black market. Wow, it's like to be able to say or something like to work or something. What do you? What we do? Wow, it's like watching some sort of fictional cartoon or as I think somebody was referred to idocracy, right?

Yeah, unfortunately, but it's just the United States of America America in 2024. The whole thing about flying migrants all over the country, and this guy's like, I mean, he's literally like on a sightseeing tour, right? I want to just get a different vibe, did New York, I want to go check out Chicago, here you go, here's a plane ticket, go check out Chicago. It's like the new homesteading, right? You're just like, just, we'll travel you all over, just look for where you want to plant your roots and hang out. Exactly. And that's actually a shortened clip. He was telling me how he wanted to go to Los Angeles. He wants to go to Chicago. He was in New York.

Why not? Yeah, exactly. It's like, well, the taxpayers are going to be paying for it anyway. And then, you know, we highlighted how New York is spending 12 billion on this crisis. Now, if we go back to 2022, which was a short two years ago, they were like, oh, we're slated to spend about a billion dollars on this. Yeah. Now, 12 billion through 2025. So these migrants are being treated. I mean, they're rolling out the red carpet, Del. It's absolutely insane. I actually did another piece with another whistleblower in which he exposed just how much is going on in these hotels in regards to what migrants have access to. The Roe Hotel, which is a block away from Times Square, is one of the biggest migrant hotels in New York. We're talking about three to five thousand migrants staying in this hotel room. Previously, rooms were sold for upwards of $500 a night.

Now it is filled with migrants. They go there, they get a free room, they get room service, laundry service. If they are pregnant, they can go to the hospital, give birth, and then they are given a stroller for their children. They are given free metro cards to ride on the subway, three meals a day. So it's insane what's going on there. And also, alongside all of the free things that they are being given on the taxpayers' dime, There is a lot of drug and alcohol use.

My whistleblower saying that children as young as 12 years old were getting drunk in this hotel because their parents checked out for the weekend. They went to a different state. Left the kids. Hopped on a plane, went to visit some other states. Yeah, why not? Because New York's handing it out for free. It's crazy.

And again, it's like we send in our source and they're like, oh, well, if you are a U.S. citizen, we can't give you a free plane ticket because this is only for illegal immigrants who broke the law breaking into the country. It's really amazing. I did have done some, you know, traveling down to the border as so of you. And what was shocking to me is it just wasn't the story I had expected, at least not the night we were there. We were there at like 2 in the morning, really watched the, you know, the coming across.

And, you know, they're broad, you know, drug cartels running the whole thing. They're bringing bus loads up. They just walk right in. It's insane. Police are totally overwhelmed. There's nothing they can do except just hop on a bus. And then there you can go into a place and, get a plane ticket. But what was shocking was it wasn't like, it wasn't at least that night,

it wasn't Guatemalans or Latin Americans. I think there's like two people that were from Latin America. The rest was like Congleys, like many of the images you're showing, you know, African, Middle Eastern. But to your point, like not families, not families seeking refuge, and really not a whole lot of women, like a lot of like military age men. Single men, exactly. And again, going into that report too, right? I really wanted to highlight that this reticketing center in New York is next to not one but two children's parks. And I forgot to put this B-roll into this documentary, but you can go to the entryway because the parks are kind of gated off. And in again, those eight different languages, it says you are not allowed to come into this park unless you are accompanying a child. Because there are so many single unvetted males there. And, you're keep in mind too, anybody can go on Google right now and look up crime, New York City, and you have these same migrants stabbing American citizens, shooting NYPD officers, raping small children and other females in the United States, other migrants.

It's absolutely atrocious, and, you know, I hate to even use this type of language, but it's heartbreaking to me that the American citizens, not only are we paying for these people to be brought into our country, to live off of our taxpayer dime, but then on top of our taxpayer. top of all of that, the final slap in the face is that they are making our city streets unsafe. And then, you know, more of our money gets sent abroad for other wars. It's heartbreaking. What, I mean, and you cover so many issues, you know, we're going to have to have you on again. Because, I mean, you're getting, you know, a lot of things we cover here, the transgender issues, which, you know, you're standing there. But on this migration, immigration, whatever you want to call,

I was just in Geneva, as you've been there too. And, I mean, I'm sure. sure you've seen these complexes that they're building there it's just like these fortresses for migration and we're hearing about like IOM I'm reported on Darien Gap where these camps are being built to just move people into our country I mean it really looks like it's all happening on purpose when I was just in Geneva so many people were in Europe but like it's finally happening to you they've been doing this to us for years infiltrating our neighborhoods with illegal immigrants just saying we're all supposed to accept it now they're being handed IDs. Why? What do you think is really going on?

Do you have you come to some sort of you know thesis on the the plan? Why do we need all these people being let in here without knowing who they are or adjudicating anything? Well I think it goes back to a topic that I'm sure is very popular with your audience and that's the great reset or globalism right? Yeah. I mean we have seen how the W.E.F, the W.E.F., the W. show have worked in tandem to take away our rights and our freedoms and this mass migration is a great way to replace the population that does care about a nation that does care about the rights and freedoms that that nation was founded on so for example the United States of America we were a very strong Western country

would be very difficult to bring us down from the outside so they import people and they destroy us from within and that's what we're seeing right now we have heard so many times that you'll own nothing and be happy. And that's what we're seeing right now too with this mass migration. I mean, import people that have this mentality and think that socialism is a good thing or that governmental control is a good thing because this same government allowed you to break into the nation and then they're taking care of you. And then the people who are screaming loudest about this are getting censored, are getting

silenced, and the nation is being destroyed before our very eyes. So I think it does go back to the one world government. globalism issue that we are consistently seeing, again, across Europe, so many of these once beautiful countries have been absolutely demolished by mass migration, and it's happening now in the United States and has been for a long time. You talked about censorship. Are you, have you dealt at all in your work with being censored? Absolutely.

I was censored off of Twitter for two years, and this was a direct result of pushing back against the mainstream narrative on multiple issues. 2020, I went to the Million Maga March in Washington, D.C. And this was at the height of the media trying to tell the entire nation that if you were right-wing, right, if you just basically had common sense and you maybe liked the Constitution a little bit, that you were a domestic extremist, that you were a terrorist. And so I showed a clip of thousands of Americans singing the national anthem. It was a beautiful moment. Then President Trump retweeted it. I was immediately banned, all of my work was deleted and keep in mind I was covering the BLM 2020 riots at that point.

So all of the footage that went along with headlines saying, hey, these riots are not fiery but mostly peaceful. They're very dangerous, in fact. All of the footage that went along with those headlines was gone. And then we all watched how censorship allowed the people in charge to rewrite history. I made another account and I went viral because I spoke to an athlete who, was competing in the same championship as Leah Thomas during the 2022 NCAA Women's Swimming Championship.

She was the first woman to speak out against Leah Thomas saying this is a dude, he has a biological advantage, and she was upset because her teammate got kicked out of the finals, it was her senior year, last opportunity to go for gold. Leah Thomas took that opportunity away, and then Twitter not only censored my voice, but her voice, more importantly, because she was brave enough to counter the entire

nation who was trying to push this narrative, or the media per se, that was trying to push this narrative that trans women are women when we all clearly saw that they were not. The third time I was censored because I made another account because I was like, you know what, I don't like Americans being lied to. I'm going to continue to talk to people on the ground that are living through the nonsense that the media keeps pushing on us as a normalcy. And the third reason I got banned was because I went to pride. And I spoke to two young girls who said, I'm by, I'm I'm queer. I really don't know. It's very confusing, but I'm hit with all these sexualities, and now I'm a queer, Omni. I don't even remember all the labels, but it basically highlighted

how the LGBTQ community is targeting and confusing children. That went so viral that I again got banned for my third time. And again, too, all three of these stories made national news, and Twitter decided to ban them because they were a full. and showed real American voices. It's amazing the work that you're doing. Thank you. And, you know, there's also, I think, hope for young people, your generation. Do you have hope, especially for young people?

Do you think there is a passion there? Do they love America? I mean, as you, you know, went through school, as you travel around doing this work, where are the people that are getting out of college right now? Where are their minds? Do they feel like they have hope? I think that a lot of them have been brainwashed as well into hating the United States of America,

hating the white man that created this country. A lot of them have been hit with this racial propaganda. However, I think via independent media, via social media, where we do have a voice, we can change hearts and minds, and we are doing that. I mean, again, look at where we are now versus where we were in 2020 in terms of the vaccine, right? Yeah.

We were in a completely different ballgame. People who previously were calling anti-vaxxers, you know, super spreaders and saying that we were killing people are now saying, you know what, you guys were right, we were wrong. This vaccine is ineffective and dangerous. So I think even with that alone, we can see how effective. Being able to talk on social media has been, especially to those younger generations. What's your dream? Where do you want to be? Where are you going?

My dream is honestly just to have a country in which I can use my free speech and my voice to continue talking to other Americans. I love talking to people. I love being on the ground. And I love the United States because this is truly the last free country. And we're losing a lot of those rights and freedoms, which is why we need to keep fighting for them. But, you know, where are we going to go if the United States falls? New Zealand, Australia, Canada. Look how that.

Yeah, look how that went. There's a lot that got struck off the list over the last couple of years. Like I was like, oh, Katie was pretty, oh, no, no, no, no, no. Not that one. Exactly. So it's like there's nowhere else to go. And so my hopes and dreams are just to live in a free country to be able to pass on a free country to my children, you know, have my grandchildren grow up with the same rights and freedoms that I had. And continue to fight for, you know what past men and women died for?

What makes this country great? Because the United States is absolutely an incredible country. Yeah, it really is. Your passion is infectious. Thank you. And I'm really, anything we can do to help on your mission. It's really, really great. Keep up the good work.

It's very inspiring. Thank you, Del. Thank you for joining us today. Thanks. All right. Well, you know, what happens, as Savannah was just pointing out, look how far we've come. But what were the voices in the middle of the pandemic?

There are some really big names in people that are suddenly telling us I was trying to tell the world the truth. They weren't letting me. Can you imagine hearing that from like, I don't know, the head of the CDC? Take a look at this. I was upset with CDC when I left because they stopped tracking people that were infected that were previously vaccinated. So if you didn't track it, well, because then you couldn't report that there were people vaccinated

that got infected. But no. Why did they stop tracking it? Because I think there was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine sound like it didn't work. You know, I've always tried to be honest that I think there was some major mistakes in the vaccines. They should have never been mandated. I also felt that people should have been more honest about the fact that there were side effects

to those vaccines and some people were actually harmed. The other thing I thought there should be, you know, more honest. honesty about the fact that the vaccines don't protect against infection. I remember Biden saying, you know, this is an epidemic of the unvaccinated. When I was Hogan's chief public health advisor in Maryland after I left CDC, I was saying, wait a minute, two-thirds of the people that I'm seeing infected in Maryland are have been vaccinated. I mean, the President of the United States said it. Biden said this was an epidemic of the unvaccinated. Tony wasn't aggressive in putting this in perspective. the CDC didn't put it in perspective.

The reality is this vaccine, listen, it's a short duration in which this vaccine provides some efficacy, maybe four to six months, max. If you came down and visited me and interviewed my patients, you know, you'd interview patient after patient after patient that did not have COVID, but are very sick, you would say very sick long COVID. patients, and it's all from the vaccine. Now, what is it, Chris? Well, it's the spike protein is immunotoxic. All right? You get infected, it's immunotoxic. But when you give the vaccine, we make the spike protein. Now, this is my opinion, okay? When I give you an MRI vaccine, which I help develop,

and I've given to a lot of patients, and I've taken it myself multiple times, I don't, know how much spike protein you make. Right. Because I give you MRNA and then your body goes, makes it. Right. So you make a little, you may make a lot. You may make it for a week. You may make it for a month. I just let that sink in for just one second, shall we? That was the former head of the CDC that was there as this pandemic started. I knew the vaccine wasn't going to be effective. He's saying, I knew it had side effects. We're injecting a spike protein, like, you know, injecting and making your body make the spike protein. We don't, we don't know how much it's going to make.

I mean, maybe, I mean, granted, maybe if he'd been just maybe a touch more dynamic, maybe his voice would have been heard. And those that have been with us all the way through COVID, we called it, didn't we? You know that we were actually, I said, I have a feeling that Redfield is on our side and he's not being listened to. I even told Aaron Siri, can we FOIA? every email between Robert Redfield and Tony Fauci. And I just want the ones where everything's written in all caps. Because I'm sure those two hated each other.

It was clear there was a battle going on there. But I just really, I want to take a moment here. You have the former head of the CDC, a top health official that didn't believe in this vaccine. Knew it was problematic, thought it was being rushed, knew that the president was lying when he said, this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated. We have shown how all of that was lies. But this isn't just a doctor. This isn't just someone's on stage.

This guy was right there in the meetings, running the CDC, and his voice didn't matter. Is he an anti-baxer for saying, you know what? I wouldn't have mandated the vaccine. Do you know the definition of anti-vaxxer is just someone that doesn't believe in vaccine mandates? Doesn't want it forced on people, wants it to be choice? That's the definition. So technically, he's an anti-vaxer. But his voice, the top doctor scientists, one of them in America, couldn't do anything to help us.

Because the one we were all listening to, let me remind you, you've seen this earlier in the show, while our head of the CDC wanted to say that, this is the opinion that ran all over this country. The serious challenge that's posed by anti-boxers, and I think we need to strategize. to really push back because vaccines work, vaccines affect adults, and we have signs, evidence on our side. I think it's time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers. I think they use COVID as an opportunity and, you know, all the havoc they're creating. For those of us, we're an international show,

but for those of you that live in the United States of America right now, now, we have gotten complacent. We have grown up in a country where we think we just rule the world, and it's all going to work out. We're in charge. We weren't in charge. It's already gone. We've already ceded our power.

We did it during the pandemic under both of the presidents that were in. The WHO called the shots, and our own scientists didn't have a voice, and forget about the Great Barrington Declaration and those great scientists saying that we shouldn't have locked down. Forget about Dr. Robert Malone who invented the COVID, the MRNA technology that was being used that came out against the vaccine. Our own head of the CDC did not matter. His opinion did not matter. The WHO already had its sights on our Constitution. WHO called the pandemic, said everyone, millions are going to die. In the end, it had a death rate of 0.35%. And that was just because if you were over the age of 80, had other serious health conditions that drove the numbers up. Everybody else was 0.00 something.

Here it is. 0 to 19. Your risk of death was 0.027%. 2029. 0.014.0.013. I mean, you don't even get up above 1% until you're above the age of 70. And when you're looking at these IHR rules, they're saying the next time there's a serious crisis. That wasn't a crisis. They haven't set the bar. I demanded it in the middle of COVID and said,

at what number do we say? Is it at 1% that then we, you know, lock the nation down? Is it at 2% to 3%? It certainly couldn't have been at 0.3%, which is what every flu season has been. You know, bad flu seasons are 0.5%. It was less than a bad flu season. And they locked the world down. And now Tadros is telling you, we're going to do it all over again next time we predict that there's a virus that may be out of control. You got to see what's happening here, folks. Please, you all giggle and laugh when your three-year-old child. You're like, where are you? They're like, you can't see me. You can't see me as though covering your eyes somehow hides you from the people or the monster. Are you sticking your head in the sand? Do you really think

think this is going to blow by? Do you really think that they don't mean business? Do you really think that that's the last pandemic you're going to see that the last time they're coming after your job, the last time they're coming after your constitution? Is there anything in you that is allowing you to believe that right now? This has been a serious show. But let me just say one of my favorite things that you say to me when I meet you in an airport is you always give me a sense of hope. So here is my sense of hope. Here it comes. Are you ready? Here. Here. Here is the bright shining light of this week's show that I'm here to report you. We still have time.

That's it. Not a lot of time, but we still have time. We are not, you know, being tracked by our cell phones, at least not legally, and they can't arrest us yet. They aren't stopping us in airports right now they did before and we've pushed back and won back a little bit of those liberties. But let me make this perfectly clear. Every nation in the world involved in the WHO does not have the United States of America's Constitution.

And every one of these member states that we're all supposed to be in this together have one thing that's getting in their way. The Constitution of the United States of America. They've got their sights set on it. So if you live here, recognize this on D-Day. They have already landed our beaches. They took our cities. They took our towns.

We beat them back. And now they've gone and got even stronger troops. Stronger sign up by member states around the world to continue to attack America. To continue to attack, frankly, every citizen of the world, as I said in the speech. This was a world war. It is a world war. They're coming after every citizen so that you have no rights. All they have to do is declare an emergency and they are in charge.

This is serious, serious business. And lastly, as we see these brilliant investigations going on, the right questions finally being asked of Tony Fauci and others. And we've got assistants saying, hey, Fauci knew about it, Collins knew about it. This guy can lie all he wants. But as long as he keeps talking, he's going to talk himself into a hole because now we know he lied about gain of function. We know he's lying right now about the fact that these emails, you shouldn't have been using private email, even though his assistant, Moranz is saying, Fauci knows we're supposed to be using Gmail. He's the one that basically told me.

And the FOIA ladies are all in. They're all in on it. It's a pattern of corruption. I want to say this, we have worked so hard here at I can to get to this point. And for all of you freedom fighters out there that have been in this movement, even before I was, you were fighting for this moment, for them to finally mess up at a moment like COVID, where we have before and after video. We know what the people said when they were lying to us.

We have proof now that they're admitting that they had lied and that they got it wrong. We have those that were healthy adults running and jogging. and running marathons and dropping dead now. We have the best and greatest, most important investigation in the history of the world around a product that has been alive from the beginning. But MRIs take it to a whole other level and they want to give it to everybody.

Tadro still believes it's great, even though the head of the CDC is telling you, it ain't great at all. So when you ask yourself, what are we going to do? One of the things I want to ask you is, who are you going to elect? I mean, who do you think is really down to investigate this? Who wants to get to the bottom of it?

Whose name do they want to say, we're not, you know, we want to make sure that this investigation happens. Is you thinking about it? Joe Biden want to really uncover this and say, hey, I made a big mistake. Is Donald Trump really down to keep these investigations going, get to the bottom of it, figure it out what happened when we rush that vaccine out, figure out what's going on? I don't know. I don't know who we're going to trust, but I'm telling you the only people I trust are the ones that have regular jobs every day. They go out and work, that teach their children to tell the truth, that stand for what they believe in.

The free citizens of the world are hanging in the balance right now. You're one of them. I'm one of them. So what do we do? We're not all going to be, you know, Savannah Hernandez. I get it. But are you going to tell everyone you know that we shouldn't be celebrating the greatness of America when we're watching its buildings being torn down, when we're watching them landing our beaches and coming after everything we knew to be freedom, while they're killing our chickens and our cows and our food supply because they have the flu and it doesn't seem to be bothering them, while they're celebrating every little disease and screaming, this may be disease X. And by the way, we just signed agreements.

If we can find disease X, we can shut you down again. I promise I will make us laugh more next week. But this week, please do everything you can. Donate to ICAN so we can continue to be right all along the way that we can continue to pay the scientists that we're using all around the world to bring you the truth. Donate $24 a month if you can, but donate $1.50. Be a part of change.

be a part of doing something, be in action, because over there in Geneva, they're counting on you to stick your head in the sand and do nothing. And many of the leaders right here in America and our leadership around the world knows they can lock its down, they'll try to do it again, if we don't stand for who we are. This is our moment. I've said it before. May you live in interesting times. May you live a life that meant something, that you were needed. Every one of you is needed. Trust me right now. You're dynamic. You're awesome. You're free. And we outnumber them. Now let's go out and do something about it. I'll see you next week.