The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 383: HIDDEN GAMES

Episode Date: August 2, 2024

Paul Offit Fails To Explain Why Childhood Vaccine Safety Science Hasn’t Been Done; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on the Illegal Immigration Crisis and the Legacy Media’s Attempts to rewrite History, HHS Director Sets the Table for a Bird Flu ‘Emergency,’ and the controversy over the Olympics Opening Ceremony; Del does a deep dive on the origins of Occult Practices hidden, and in plain sight, at the Olympics Opening Ceremony.Guest: Matthew EhretBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the informed consent action network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Now, those of you that know me should know that I'm not really big on gloating. I don't like to gloat. But there are moments where the victory is just so great you've got to do. You got to tell the people that supported you and got here, and you also have to remember that God is great and truth prevails, and it doesn't matter how big your foe, never believe that it is insurmountable.

We are now in a time where the high wire and I can and all of you that have supported us are watching this temple of lies and bull crap come crashing down to the ground. And let me explain what I mean. This is the Bible on vaccines. This is the most important book that has ever been made when it comes to vaccines. If you look at who it's written by, it's called Plotkin's vaccines, meaning Stanley A. Plotkin. There are only four authors on the biggest book ever written for vaccines, Walter A. Ornstein, Stanley Plotkin. Paul Offit and Catherine Edwards.

These are the people that we were up against when the world told me you are never going to get them to admit that their product stinks or that it causes injury or that it doesn't stop transmission. Dell, you can't sue them. There's nothing you can do. I'd made vaxed. I was looking for a lawyer. Everyone's, you'll never beat them.

The entire government is owned by this. The pharmaceutical industry is the most powerful industry in all the world. Give it up. I mean, it's great that you're trying to do something. They'll never admit that vaccines cause autism. They'll never admit that vaccines injure people. It's the basis. It's literally the foundational principle of modern medicine.

In many ways, if this was a religion, if this was Christianity, this is their Jesus. Vaccines is their Jesus. Okay? So I told you, just a few weeks ago, when we were at Freedom Fest, that Plotkin, Stanley Plotkin himself has finally given in and admitted that I can, the informed consent, the high wire, Del Batesry, Aaron, Siri, Robert Kennedy Jr., Sherry Tenpenny, Judy Mikovitz, and the rest of them were all exactly right. We never did the safety trials on any of the vaccines.

How do I know that? Because he put it in a paper. Why did he do it? Because we've won so many lawsuits. We've been parading all over this country giving speech. every week we talk about it. We win lawsuits against government agencies. And now Aaron, Syria, our lawyer,

is appearing before congressional hearings and saying, you've never done a proper safety trial. And the health departments are all saying themselves, this can't possibly be true. They're going to the CDC. They're going to the FDA. They're bowing down to their priests and saying, please give us our tablets of truth that we told exists.

They're not there. They don't exist. And we've known this from the beginning. And Stanley Plotkin says it in one of the first paragraphs of this article, funding post-authorization vaccine safety science. What does he say? However, the widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the public, all of you, is no longer satisfied with the traditional, the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a. vaccine has been authorized for use. Let me read that again. The only way we get you safety is we try to meet a couple of simple safety goals simply detecting and quantifying the associated

risks after a vaccine has been authorized, not before. He didn't say we've done some safety trials before that we thought were adequate. He says after is the only time we look at safety. This is what we've been saying the whole time. All of the studies they say are being done are efficacy studies. Does it create antibodies? They have never done a safety trial on any of the childhood vaccines before they started injecting them to all of you, before they started taking away your education if you didn't get them. So now that that column of this temple has come crashing down and Stanley Plotkin, the author of the Bible on vaccines is now admitted we never did a proper safety trial prior to licensure, the next big question is coming into play. Well, if you never did a safety

trial. And in the article, you end up saying that you never really could afford to do post-licensure safety. How is it that you've determined that vaccines don't cause autism? Well, guess what? Stanley Blockens jumped to the ring to try and defend something. He's gone down. Another author has just stepped forward. I'm talking about none other than Paul Offit. So this is the second author of the four leading humans on the planet with vaccines. This is a second author. This is the second author of the This is how he's trying to defend the lack of science around autism and vaccines. This just came out this week. Look at this.

Then you get to the sort of untestable hypothesis, which is too many vaccines given too soon cause autism. And we should do a trial of vaccinated children and unvaccinated children. Well, you certainly can't prospectively do that trial because if you have a group of unvaccinated children, they're at high risk for getting vaccine preventable diseases. And so people say, well, just do it retrospectively. But you can't do that either because those two groups are unlikely. to be the same in terms of their healthcare-seeking behavior.

Wow. I know it's hard to wrap around. Like, well, what do you just say there? What he just said was this. You certainly could never do a prospective study, which would mean watching children that are getting all the vaccines, and then those that are in a placebo group that didn't, to make sure that those vaccines aren't all causing autism collectively.

You can't do that study. Therefore, it has never, ever been done. Then he says, and you can't, then all the, you know, the anti-vaccin say, well, do a retrospective study where you go back and look at the database, which is what we've been calling for, go back to the VSD, the vaccine safety data link has 10 million people in it with all of their health records. They're anonymous because their names have been wiped out. It's where we do all of our studies from the CDC. Just go back and look at it and say, here's the vaccinated group, here's the unvaccinated group. Compare the two. I've said this before.

We're the home of Apple. We're the home of IBM. We are the heads of AI technologies and computer learning. We can easily tell a computer, compare these two groups, vaccinated and unvaccinated, and ask certain questions like, who has more autism? Who has more lupus? Who has more ADD, ADHD? Who has more autism?

and all of the other things that end up being that chronic disease epidemic that is going like this from about 12% of American children in the 1980s, there it is, 12.8% chronic illness in the 1980s, to now 54% in 2011. It's believed to at least be 60% of our children are chronically, permanently, forever sick their entire lives because of this vaccine program. And he's telling you, well, you know, here. Here's the deal. We can't do that retrospective study because there's no way to isolate all of the health impacts of not vaccinating. Let me explain what he's telling you. What he's saying is we have already done that study. Let's be honest. Can we be honest? You're reasonable people. You're still thinking clearly.

Do you really think the CDC, the NIH, the HHS, the FDA, NHS in England, and every other major health agency in the world that forces you to take vaccines, never thought to take their database and say, let's compare the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated, and show the world that the vaccinated live longer have lower rates of autism, the vaccinated have lower rates of asthma and ADD, ADHD, all of those. things, don't you think they know that if they could show you that study, that Dell Bigtree show the highway would have five viewers, this thing would be over.

Robert Kennedy Jr. would never say it again. Sherry Tenpenny is a liar. All of it, they've been misleading you from the beginning. Do you really think they haven't done that study? No, of course they have. And what often is telling you, no matter how we slice that study, no matter the millions of ways we try to manipulate it, kick that kid out, put this one in, as long as it's comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated, the unvaccinated are healthier and they know it.

But what he's saying is, in order to do a proper study, we would have to be able to isolate the fact that it's only the fact that you're unvaccinated, it makes you so healthy. And what they recognize is that if you're not vaccinating your kids, you're probably also not drinking tap water. You probably take vitamins. You probably don't eat. glyphosate covered vegetables, you eat organic food. You're probably not going through the giant radiation scanner at the airport and a whole host of other decisions that you're making because you care about the health of your children. You're reading the ingredients. And therefore, one of those other things could also be the reason your children don't have autism. So let's be clear. They know

that the unvaccinated have lower rates of autism. They just want to say that because of all all of the great things you're doing with your kids, that we can't isolate it, that it's only not vaccinating. So therefore, here's what we want to do. We want to poison your healthy, unvaccinated kids that are healthier than ours to make sure they're just as sick as ours. That's their answer.

And that's the reality we live in. And this is the fight that we are having right now. If you don't believe me, if you think they've actually well dealt, they do say they have mountains of evidence. you know, that show that vaccines don't cause autism. Really? Well, this is what Stanley Plotkin goes on to say, since they never tested pre-Licinger. Paul Offit just admitted they didn't test pre-Licinger. So what are they doing post-Licinger? This is what Stanley Plotkin goes on to say. It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization, AEFIs, that have not been detected in clinical trials, the ones that never looked at the safety, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally.

incidentally related to vaccination. Makes perfect sense. Yes, you would have to do that if you never did a proper safety trial before. Progress in vaccine safety science has understandably been slow, often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete, which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance, meaning we know you're getting sick, we don't do the studies, they're not big enough or strong enough or empowered in. enough to actually come to any conclusions. So we just keep sticking our heads in the sand. And if you believe that we're funded correctly, he goes on to say currently, in 2024 in the United States of America, more than 40 years at the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program that took all liability away, when the advisory committee on immunization practices recommends a new routine vaccine, the only automatic statutory

resource allocations that follow are for vaccine procurement, meaning buying them for you. Government funds paying the pharmaceutical industry to buy these for kids. And then the rest of our money goes to the vaccine injury compensation program in case you get injured that has no judge, no jury, and no, you know, right to precedence and has nobody from the media allowed in. Although the ACIP acknowledges the need, there are currently no resources earmarked for post-authorization safety studies beyond annual appropriations, which I just told you is $0, which must be approved by Congress each year. Huh. So you're just admitting you don't do pre-licensure safety.

Paul Offis telling you, we know we could do a comparative study, but we can't figure out of a way to make it look, make vaccines look good. And then Stanley Plotkin is saying, we've never spent a red cent on post-licensure safety reviews. We've never looked at it. It's often said, does the accumulation of vaccines cause out? It's weird. Because I thought you did do that study, Paul. I thought that's what you've been saying all along.

I thought it was because the four greatest scientists in the world were telling all the media, we have done those studies. And if I'm wrong, then who told the? to say this. We're not sure of the scientific community what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. We know that vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. I do not deny in any way that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. Let me be clear, vaccines do not cause autism. Vaccines don't cause autism.

Absolutely sure. Absolutely sure. This really is the one thing we have studied. I mean, yes, Plotkin's right. We never did a proper pre-licensure safety trial. Paul Oppens, it's right that we never did a post-licensure safety trial or looking at vaccines and autism, but somehow this is the one thing. We have mountains of evidence proving that vaccines don't cause autism.

Sanjay Gupta, I mean, we know, you know, we don't know what causes autism, but we know what does not. Travis Stork, who I worked with on the doctors. This is the one thing we really have studied. Huh? That's interesting. Well, luckily for you and the world, you know, God granted us many beautiful opportunities here at I Can in the High Wire. We got to depose Stanley Plot in the writer of this book,

which you've seen many of those videos, which is why he's now recanting and saying we never did proper trials. We just heard Paul Offit trying to defend the fact that they've never done the opera studies, so I don't know how they have mountains of evidence when he's saying, we can't figure out how to do that study. And now the fourth author, Catherine Edwards, I'm talking about the third of four. We got her on the stand. She showed up for an autism case, and her job was one job to prove that it is unequivocal that vaccines do not cause autism. So if all of those reporters are right, and we have really a mountain of evidence that shows that vaccines do not cause autism,

you would imagine that one of the authors of the Bible on vaccines, when they step in a courtroom, are showing up with their suitcases full of this mountains of evidence against the connection between vaccines autism. Is that reasonable to accept when your only reason to be there is to prove vaccines don't call? autism? Well, when they put their hand on a real Bible and they had to be deposed and Catherine Edwards showed up for this job, did she have suitcases of evidence? Is there mountains of evidence that vaccines don't cause autism? Because Paul often says, we don't do that study, but she apparently thought we had. But what happened when her hand was on a Bible? Watch this. profile, you have done most of the period of the trials relied upon to license many of the vaccines, correct, on the market?

Yes, sir. Okay. So you're highly experienced conducting clinical trials, correct? I'm highly experienced conducting clinical trials. And you're familiar with many of the clinical trials that relied upon to license, many of the vaccines currently on the market, correct? I am. In your opinion, did the clinical trial, did the clinical trial,

relied upon to license the vaccines that Yates received, many of which are still on the market today. Were they designed to rule out that the vaccine causes autism? No. You've badgered me into answering the question the way you want me to, but I think that that's probably the answer. Is that your accurate and truthful testimony? Yes. In the expert disclosures for this case, it asserts that, among other things, you will testify that, quote, the issue of whether vaccines cause autism has been thoroughly researched and rejected, end quote. It's your testimony that MMR vaccine cannot cause autism.

That's correct. It's your testimony that HIPB vaccine cannot cause autism? That's correct. It's your testimony that iPod cannot cause autism? Yes. It's your testimony that HIP vaccine cannot cause autism? Yes. Your testimony that Varysela vaccine cannot cause autism?

Yes. It's your testimony that Prevnar vaccine cannot cause autism? Yes. It's your testimony that D-TAP vaccine cannot cause autism? Yes. And do you have a study that supports a D-TAP doesn't cause autism? I have. I do not have a study that D-TAP causes autism, so I don't have either.

Do you have any study one way or another of whether iPol causes autism? No, I do not. Do you have any study one way or another of whether Endrix B causes autism? I do not have any evidence that it causes autism nor that it does not. And what about Hidtiders vaccine? Any evidence one way or another whether it causes autism? And what about Prevnar vaccine? Any evidence one way or another?

No, sir. And how about various cellal vaccine? Let me just finish. Are there any studies one way or another test for whether it, does or doesn't cause autism? Part of MMR, but not as Baricella by itself. No, sir. No studies that say it does or no studies that say it doesn't.

Right. There have been studies that have found an association between hepatitis B vaccine and autism, correct? Not studies that I feel are credible. Okay. which study are you referring to when you say that? Well, why don't you show me this study and then I'll see whether I agree with it. We arrest our case.

If the top leading experts in the world are admitting to you, they never did pre-licensure trials, they don't do pre-licensure, post-licensure trials, and then under oath when they're asked to show whatever evidence they have and they come up with zero evidence, zero evidence to back up what they have had every news reporter in the world saying ad nauseum, this is the one thing we know for sure, but under oath you have zero evidence, not mountains, not piles, not hills, not mohills, zero, nada, nothing. This is what your funding of our work has allowed us to do, to wipe out three of the leading authors of the most important vaccine book in the world. And by the way, the other one, Walter Ornstein,

I took him out with Vax, the movie I made that got me into this. So that's it. Four for four, you're down. So let me honestly say, here's where we're at in the United States of America and the world. This book is not worth the paper it's written on. End of story. I Can wins. The High Wire wins.

And everybody that's been fighting for this truth, we are now the victors. But here's the reality. We need them to admit it. We need the Supreme Court to admit it. We need to wipe out every regulatory agency that ever lied and poisoned our children. And by the way, now they know who we are. We got here through our little guerrilla tactics, bringing a little foyer request and slowly undermining them and, you know, pressing into the cracks of their foundation

until this castle is crumbling down. But now they are funding an army to try and stop us. They are reaching every way. They want to sue us. They want to censor us. They want to stop us. And I need you now. If this matters to you, if you want this to be the reality for your children and your grandchildren and the future and you want to end the systematic poisoning of every citizen in this world, we have some work to do.

I have Aaron Siri who's made all of this possible standing by with the most brilliant lawsuits you've ever seen. We are going to close the chapter on this. We're going to burn this book forever. but I can't do it if you don't get involved right now. And I'm not talking to all of you that have funded and made this possible. I'm talking to all of you that watch us every week. That's it they're going, wow, it's amazing. I know it.

I know we're in the middle of the election season. I know you're trying to fund, you know, the next president. But what president has ever achieved what we have done here? Who do you think is actually going to stop you from being poisoned no matter who's in office? I'm serious right now. I can't even tell you. I can't tell you. what the cases are because I'm not going to give away what little secrets we have to take them out.

But you've watched us win over and over and over again and achieve what everyone said was the impossible. The real impossibility when we end this forever. When you are never mandated again, when every doctor, when you walk through says, it's a choice. There are real side effects to this. And there are some questions. Let me show you all the data on the actual real. risk to the disease to your very healthy child that doesn't seem to have any autoimmune diseases yet. You may want to ask yourself whether you want to take a product that has been clearly shown to raise your risks of

autoimmune diseases and things as damaging as autism, which, by the way, the current rate now has gone up 350% since 2000. It's now 1 in 36 children. If you just look at the boys, 1 in 22 boys. That is the pandemic of our lifetime. That is the end of the world as we know it. If you want something different, please become a recurring donor today. I'm asking you just go to the top of the corner of the highwire.com. Hit donate to ICANCE.

My God, I've never seen anyone so successful. God is truly working through this people. They need my support. We need to win this before they turn the table and they take all the billions that Donald Trump just gave them to make the next vaccines that is now poisoning us. Just give $24 a month for 2024. And no, I'm not just calling out Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and every Republican or Democrat has

ever lied to you on this issue. We the people need to stand together now. We the people are the ones that are changing the world and no one else. So join we, the people of the informed consent action network today and make a difference in the world that you can actually count on. I have a huge show coming up. So many of you are really up in arms. over what happened in the ceremonies of the Olympics.

Was this all a part of a bigger, more diabolical plan? Well, I'm bringing in one of the greatest experts I've ever met on the issues when it comes to being a historian and geopolitical analyst. Matthew Erritt is joining me. I guarantee you the depth of which he's looked into this issue is about to blow your mind. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, I'll let you take a breather.

Well, Del, we were actually just talking today about how fast and vicious these news cycles are in society today. I mean, it's people have to develop discernment to just move through these media narratives because they are coming so rapidly. Yes, it's really, it's amazing. We live in the most amazing time in media history for sure. Yeah, and for Americans, you know, some of the top concerns are still there, though, despite this news cycle.

We have a national debt that's hit a record 35 trillion. Americans are struggling to pay their grocer bills. And one of the other top concerns are the number of migrants that have surged the border over the last three years. And put smack dab in the middle of this controversy has been presidential hopeful Kamala Harris. And she was named the border czar to really look after the southern border by Biden. But speaking of media narratives, that's not what we're being told. Take a listen. All right.

Quote unquote, borders are. Kamala Harris, who was appointed as the border czar. And this will be her first visit to the U.S.-Mexico border regents and she was appointed as the border czar by President Biden. President Kamala Harris, Vice President Kamala Harris, to be the border czar. They were very critical of Kamala Harris, especially in her role as border czar. In meantime, vice president and borders are, Kamala Harris, facing some backlash. There has been so much criticism against Kamala Harris.

You know, she was the border czar. So the border, if they weren't planning to address it in a major way, do not make her your border czar. She met with some of the Northern Triangle countries, but nothing has effectively changed. Vice President Harris was not a border czar. The Biden team didn't declare her the borders are. They wanted her to work on kind of the root causes of immigration. What he said about Harris and immigration was not true. She was never appointed borders czar.

People got to have to counter the misinformation. You already hear folks talking about the borders czar. She wasn't the borders are. Now what she's up against is folks lying about her border record, calling her a border czar. Calling her sort of the border czar. calling her sort of the border czar, which wasn't necessarily the case. She wasn't the border czar. That's what Republicans labeled her.

Jeffrey, I can't. I can't. I can't do this anymore. I mean, what is wrong with reporters? What kind of shills have they become? I mean, it's absolutely, my God, this is called a camera. If you're a reporter, this is recording you when you're talking to it. You do realize that this is how this works.

That we'll always be able to rewind and show what you said here. When I say it in here, it's there forever. What is wrong with you? How do you call yourselves reporters? And what's even more shocking, Jeffrey, what's more shocking is that apparently this works, that somehow they've mastered some mind control, repetition, hypnosis where half this country is now walking around going, they never called her the borders are. They never called her the borders are. They never said that the COVID vaccine would stop transmission. You know, what do we do? What do we do? People may be saying, well, you know, that was a couple people in the media. Some of a couple of new shows that may have got their facts wrong.

Here's 2021 AP Biden gets into the presidency. And one of the first things he does, Biden taps VP Harris to lead response to border challenges. Associated Press. Then the BBC, Biden tasked Harris with tackling migrant influx on the U.S. Mexican border. It says in this article, announcing Ms. Harris' appointment as his immigrations are, Mr. Biden told reporters and officials of the White House, quote, she's the most qualified person to do it to lead our efforts with Mexico in the Northern Triangle, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks stemming the migration to our southern border. And then we have this. Now the media, obviously, you see there is backtracking Kamala Harris

with never Biden's borders are. Here's what she really did. World Time magazine. Yeah. I mean. Here's a quick fact check, though. Here's another one. Harris's border work was on root causes. That's the talking point now of migration.

She wasn't in charge. She wasn't the boss. Don't worry. She was just looking at root causes. Not the boss. Definitely not the boss. So why is this such a hot button topic? Why does anybody care about this?

Well, coming into 2024 in January, we saw these headlines. I believe this is out as CNN. Authorities encountering record number of migrants at the border each day amid unprecedented surge. Another headline here at Pew Research, migrant encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border hit a record high at the end of 2023. And it says in April in 2020, the Border Patrol recorded around 16,000 encounters among the lowest monthly totals in decades. Since then, the monthly number of migrants' encounters at the U.S. border, Mexico border,

has surpassed 200,000 on 10 separate occasions. Now, this is where politically it becomes a problem because that same organization, Pew Research, did a poll at that time and looking at how Americans viewed the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border. And it said this. Just 18 percent say the U.S. government is doing a good job dealing with the large numbers of migrants at the border. Well, 80 percent say it is doing a bad job, including 45 percent who say it is doing a very bad job. But now it gets even more granular. I'll tell you one thing, too. I've been down there, and if those 80% went down there, they would all be saying it's a very bad job.

When you watch it on your television, it's hard to wrap your head around it. Go there in the middle of the night and watch hundreds and hundreds of Middle Eastern military-aged men and African men, almost no women, a few children that don't look like they're with their own parents, and you've got to wonder how they're being used, and what their future is. This is one of the most horrific situations I've ever seen in my life and how anyone can call this humanitarian in the United States of America. We are letting drug cartels run our border security. It's insane. And, you know, moving past this either or political division that the media continually tries to put upon people, looking at this article, it says also on top of that, 73% of Democrats also give the government negative ratings, the highest share recorded during Biden.

Biden's presidency. So we're being told that this mass migration is just a coincidence. These are people looking to our country for a better life, which is probably the case for a lot of them. But since the corporate media is deflecting to Kamala Harris explaining her work is on the root causes, let's look at those root causes in some of the things that really play into this. First and foremost, George Soros. Who is he? He's the billionaire philanthropist. He is a founder of the Open Society Foundations. And in 2015, he wrote this op-ed, rebuilding the asylum system. So remember, a lot of times they're rebranding asylum seekers as migrants and vice versa.

So rebuilding the asylum system, he writes this. First, the EU, European Union, because this isn't just an American phenomenon, has to accept at least a million asylum seekers annually for the foreseeable future. It says, next, adequate financing is critical. The EU should provide $16,800 per asylum seeker for each of the first two years to help cover housing, health care, and education costs, and to make accepting refugees more appealing to member states, it can raise these funds by issuing long-term bonds using its largely untapped triple A borrowing capacity, which will have an added benefit of providing a justified fiscal stimulus to the European economy.

So we're going to float bonds to do this. Go in bed on, you know, migration. Great idea. Exactly. It seems like a questionable. I wonder if everyone was able to vote on that. So he says this, finally, to absorb and integrate more than a million asylum seekers and migrants a year, the EU needs to mobilize the private sector, NGOs, church groups and businesses to act as sponsors. This were required not only sufficient funding, but also the human and IT capacity to match migrants and sponsors. So George Soros famously, really he commands with his connection. these NGOs, these non-governmental organizations,

they wield extremely great power outside of government to get these social issues implemented and done. And they're in all sectors of society. So here he is kind of putting out the flare saying, OK, activate, we're going to fund this. This is how you fund it. Activate the NGOs. And this was not lost on people in the EU,

specifically Victor Orban. He is the Prime Minister of Hungary. And he looked at this plan, read it in a congressional congressional hearing, and he had this to say about it. Take a listen. So don't forget that what we are speaking about is not an accidental stories, not a bark of 10 years of accidental stories. It's a plan which is going on. It was greater. It was published. It's known. So we are fighting again an organized gang called Empire of George Soros, and NGOs, who are just supporting everybody who is transmitting our legal system and our regulation.

and financing illegal activity against our nation. So this is why the story is not just about migration, but it's about how this European Union is working and how George Soros was able to captive the main positions inside many institutions of European Union, buying out MPs and other leaders, and in order to execute the plan which is written and it's against all the Christian and nation-based political.

forces. It's against us. It's about how to change Europe and how to eliminate and push aside all the Christian, conservative, national-based political leaders and borders from the European Union decision-making parties. This is exactly when I was in Switzerland. A lot of people, the international reporters were coming up to me and saying, your border situation is finally happening. We've been having this for 10 years in Europe. It's destroying our economy. It's destroying our families. It's destroying our livelihood. It's destroying our safety in our countries.

And now they're doing it to you in America. We actually thought they were like, we thought you would stand up against it. We thought your ideas of liberty and freedom would stop this. You had a strong border. What happened? You know, it's really amazing. It is an attack.

This is an attack on the sovereignty of the United States of America. And everyone that supports it should really be, I think, considered in some way an enemy. to the sovereignty of this nation. And in the European Union, the entryways for this migration were through the water routes up into Italy, up into Spain, and Greece. And then from there, the transfer went

from everywhere from Ireland, UK, Germany, Sweden, Austria. I mean, throughout the entire European Union, you see reports of these small towns just being swamped by people that are not from that town, and the resources just can't handle it. And these AAA bonds that George Soros, talking about it is not doing it not doing it but here in the united states we have our version of that's a land it's the land gap the darian gap and we had michael yon he's the journalist combat

photographer has done great work there bringing several people down there to really see what's going on here and this these NGOs are ramped down there really helping and we can see i mean it's it's no secret either in the media this is an mpr a record 400 000 migrants have crossed the treacherous dairy and gap to reach the u.s and that's in panama and that's in then another one here in the Dary and refugees receive help all along the way. But let's go back. So George Soros, it wasn't his brainchild. As early as 2000, if we want to go back that far, in just recent history, we have the UN, United Nations Population Division, and they produced a white paper and the literal title of this

white paper was called replacement migration. And so what is it saying there? It says the number of migrants needed to offset declines in the working age populations are significantly larger then those need to offset total population decline. So they're admitting there's population decline. Whether those large numbers of migrants are within the realm of options open to governments depends to a great extent on the social, economic, and political circumstances of the particular country or region. So if the appetite socially is there, if the financing is there, if the politics is there, green light it. And that's where George Soros comes in and he says, this is how we make those things palatable. This is how we change the society, open the society,

if you will. This is how we finance it. This is how we use politics to do this. And the report, the UN report centered around one of several critical issues. And this was one of them. Policies and programs are relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants. So that is the critical issue of how are we going to do this according to the UN. And so that brings us to present day. So that's just some recent history. You can go back a lot further in this history. I'm sure Matt could do this on another show with our guests coming up. But we have currently, we have a lot of people in this country. What are we going to do with them? Well, this was an interview on CNN with Elizabeth Warren

talking to Jake Tapper. And I just want to say really quickly, breaking news. CNN is permanently shutting down its entire opinion section. This was in the Hill. This broke last night. Breaking news. perhaps they realized that their high-paid news pundits were just giving opinion and bias the whole time, so they didn't need their opinion writers. It's perfect timing, right? Right at the moment where your opinion that you're calling news is that Kamala Harris was not the borders are. We're just going to go ahead and get rid of our opinion section. Folks, there is no news.

None of these people are practicing in what we used to call news. They are not reporters. they are advertisers, CNN. If you, honestly, if you're turning on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, even Fox or MSNBC, and not doing it as a joke where you actually think you're getting reporting, then, I mean, I don't, you got to wake up. They are advertising agents. It is propaganda for their team.

That's it. They're telling the world they want you to believe you live in, not the one you actually do. They are, and I want to say this. I know everyone's like, God, I can't believe those Democrats are getting brainwashed by this Kamala story. You have to know what's happening on our side, too. We're being brainwashed on things, too. They don't, you know, they haven't, like, lost out on the psychology of how you do it, how you manipulate, how you make you hate the other side so much that you'll do anything to stop them, even if it's your brother, your sister, you know, or your neighbor. I mean, this is, it's really out of control.

So, yeah, get rid of the opinion section because it's all. only opinion now. And so here's CNN's Jake Tapper talking to the Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren about really the big secret of what happens if you can get to this country. Take a listen. All right. President Biden charged Vice President Harris with addressing the root causes of mass migration at the border by going to those Central American countries. She's consistently defended his handling of the border crisis. I don't know. I don't need to tell you voters overwhelmingly disapprove of how the Biden-Harris administration has handled. the border by giving the nomination to one of the leaders of the border effort.

Aren't Democrats doubling down on one of your party's biggest vulnerabilities? Well, let's remember to start with the facts, and that is that border crossings now are lower than they were in the last year of the Trump administration. But recognize, and I know that Kamal Harris knows this, this is a problem that ultimately has to be solved by Congress. We need the tools in order to have more resources at the border, to have more resources in the states and cities that are supporting migrants. And I believe we need to create a pathway to citizenship. All of that is a part of what we need to do for comprehensive immigration reform. It seems so obvious to me now. I've never wanted to admit it.

You know, it's probably still my, you know, lifelong, you know, commitment to the Democratic Party, which has been obliterated. but it is clear. They want to give them a path to citizenship. It's not a problem. It's not a problem for the Democratic Party as long as we just take those 10 million people and make them citizens and they can vote. I'm pretty sure that's all the vote you need to win

the election now in this country. And obviously, and she's not the only one. I've heard it from so many different leaders across this country. Let's just give them citizens. They're already here. They need to work. It's not fair to not let them work.

They need to be able to drive. They need a driver's license. They need to be part of our society. They need to be able to contribute to our society while undercutting your salary by half because they'll do it for less. And the millions and millions more will keep watering down our working class and destroying our way of life so that it used to be that you could own a home if you, you know, fixed cars or, you know, built houses. Now you're struggling to pay your bills. You've got to decide whether or not you can afford your groceries or whether you're going to, you know, have gas. And God forbid, you know, you start having car issues or.

anything else or your kid gets sick or someone goes in the hospital you break a leg all of these things are driving people to be homeless and by the way harder to get money from this government once you're homeless than if you just immigrate and come in and have no money we've seen you know videos of them being flown all over the country with plane tickets whenever they want them and i want to switch to another story here in america this is obviously front and center as well there's so many there's so many stories that we can be covering but this one feels like a of 2020 for the COVID response. Health and Human Services just released an update

to the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act. And this is it right here, amended determination of a significant potential for a public health emergency pursuant to Section 564B. So you look in here and it says they're amending this federal food, drug, and cosmetic act. I'm not going to read that whole thing, but if you look to the bottom here, we've highlighted,

what are they amending it for? Well, Avian Influenza A, A, H, C, and 9, but also involving anything involving biological agents, namely pandemic influenza viruses and influenza viruses with pandemic potential. So all influenza A viruses that may have pandemic potential, that is a huge umbrella. So we're being told that, well, there's this one strain of bird flu, but HHS just said, you know what, just lump them all in there. And if anyone kicks off, we'll be able to, we'll be able to call this a pandemic.

And why is that important? Well, this is the first step before something like this happens. Let's bring everyone back to 2020 when the public health emergency for COVID was declared. This is what HHS published in the Federal Registry. And they have to do this by law. Determination of a public health emergency. It says on February 4th, 2020, the Secretary determined pursuant to his authority under Section 564. There it is again, of the FDNC, that's the Federal Drug and Cosmetics Act, that there is a public health emergency. and go on, you know, how that history played out there for the new novel coronavirus. So what they just did with bird flu and influenza viruses is they are preempting.

This is the step before a public emergency. So they're making sure that they can call this thing in a heartbeat if they need to do that. And so looking at that, you know, seeing that data point, people can say, and you know, I looked at that and said, well, maybe this is just something they need to do. Maybe this is just a step along, the continuum to make sure. But then you start connecting more dots here. At the end of June, this year, just last month, we have Asper. This is the administration for strategic preparedness and response along with BARDA. They released what they called a pandemic influenza preparedness and response strategy. And remember, Barta, Operation Warpspeed used Barta as the financial interface with the U.S. government, the biomedical industry, to fund the

COVID vaccine development to a tune of about $18 billion. So when Barta gets involved and this strategic response gets involved, you really have to pay attention. This was just last month. So what is this strategic response strategy? Well, let's look into it. Objective number one, strategic implementation and deployment of the U.S. national pre-pandemic influenza vaccine stockpile. Objective two, enhanced protection through novel, that's new, vaccines against pandemic influenza. So now they are really cooking. They're searching for them. They're looking for them. They're developing them. They want new vaccines for this bird flu. And so people can say, well, that's probably enough. piqued my interest, but it gets even crazier. The American Medical Association has just updated

it announced it's CPT codes for avian influenza virus vaccines. So CPT codes are what your medical practitioner, your doctor, your nurse, your person at CVS, they put in your medical chart when they give you a vaccine. So what they're doing is they're priming the medical system now to start recording people that are taking bird flu shots for tracking, for compliance. So let's look in here, give an example number a CPT code 9695 influenza virus vaccine H5 and a derived from cell cultures adjuvented for intramuscular use and you go down for children through 18 years of age we have 90 460 so these codes are now being put into these systems so professional medical professionals can use those if

these vaccines roll out and just two days ago we have the WHO throwing their hat in the ring, new initiative launched by WHO to develop MRNA bird flu vaccines, and then over here to the United States. Another headline, a bird flu vaccine from Moderna is in the early stages of development. The federal government awarded Moderna 176 million. They're anticipating starting phase three trials by 2025, but they said in this article that that timeline could change, you know, we're basically depending on what happens with the bird flu, but where are we at? So we go to the CDC, and the CDC's own reporting gives us kind of weekly updates of what's happening, of what's happening in bird flu news.

And it says here, 13 human cases. So since this virus has been circulating, I believe 2022 is when it started, 13 human cases. That's it. Of avian influenza A, H5 infection have been reported. And you can see here most of them for these cases were associated with exposure to sick dairy cows and nine were associated exposure to avian influenza AH5N1 infected poultry. And then just recently, there's three new additional cases in Colorado.

But these are impultery workers who are working directly with infected poultry at a commercial egg layer operation, not a backyard operation. And you can see here at the bottom line, similar to previous cases, all the people have mild cases. So this thing is notoriously hard to jump to people. It's notoriously hard due to the point where it becomes lethal. So that's where we're at right now. But you can see the regulatory machinery is putting itself in place to really just pull the trigger on this thing.

People get ready. There's a pandemic coming. Seriously, folks, I've said it before. Take them for their word. There's a pandemic coming. And though this virus can't really spread amongst humans very well right now, don't worry. They're fixing that in a laboratory somewhere near you. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. We've got to now start recognizing our history, what's happened here. And it's not my opinion. It happens to be the former head of the CDC. When he's talking about it. there is definitely a pandemic coming. It's not if, it's when. And what does he think will be the most likely reason for it affecting human beings and being devastating? This is what he said.

I'm less concerned, though, that this will happen through spillover and evolution in animals. I'm much more concerned that this will happen in the laboratory through gain of function research. What president is equipped to handle that? when these goons are out there around the world in these laboratories, working on gain of function, creating the most deadly virus they can, and then walking out of their laboratories, and somehow, like it happens every year all around the world,

they catch that cold, they walk out, and suddenly it's sweeping around the world. I mean, I just, no one's prepared for that. And we're still under this assumption that that happens accidentally. I'm not convinced. I'm not convinced. I'm still willing. You can call me whatever you want, call me,

conspiracy theorist, but I'd like to actually investigate Wuhan and ask the question, was that accidental or did you guys do that on purpose? Or did we do that on purpose? Or who did it on purpose? What were the advantages to spreading around the world? And what are the advantages to buying a bunch of vaccines, developing vaccines right now? Stage three, folks, they're in the, third stage, that is the final stage of developing a bird flu vaccine. No one develops things, especially not our governments, that they don't plan on using. Take that to the bank. And let's move to the story that has really grabbed the news cycle for the entire week, which is hard to do in this fast, rapid, crazy news cycle.

But what am I talking about? This is the Olympics and the opening ceremony. So on Monday, people had a lot to say about what happened over this past weekend. And if you didn't have an internet connection or you live in a cabin in the woods, this is what it looked like. All right. Backlash to this year's Olympic opening ceremony. Backlash after Olympic ceremony, drag queens parody last. There was instant controversy over an opening number that some people said was

lastphemous. The highly anticipated Paris Olympic Games has been overshadowed by a controversial depiction of the Last Supper that sent billions across the world into a rage. At one point during the ceremony, there was a long table that included a woman with a halo-like crown at the center. Soon after, a nearly naked man painted in blue who depicted the Greek god Dionysus laid on the center of the table. The god was surrounded by drag queens.

The far right here in France called it a provocation, whilst many Catholics all over the globe were united and they distaste for it. You took something religious, which two billion people in the world hold sacred, and you mocked it,

with something that many of those two billion people are struggling to accept and understand. Why offend such a huge population? of the Olympic village, the athletes themselves, and the people at home watching for what purpose? The director told Parisian news outlet BFM that, quote, the idea was to do a big pagan party

linked to the gods of Olympus. Now, in response to the internet drama, the Olympic Games tweeted, quote, the interpretation of the Greek god Dionysus makes us aware of the absurdity of violence between human beings. If people have taken any offense, we are of course really sorry.

So a lot of headlines were made from that, obviously. One of them here. US leaders denounced drag queen last supper parody at Olympics opening ceremony, but it wasn't just US leaders. Here's Matteo Salvini. He's the deputy prime minister of Italy. He took to X with this message.

Opening the Olympics by insulting billions of Christians around the world was really a bad start. Dear French, Citi, Paris 2024. But then we have the apology. you, Paris organizer, Olympics organizers say, sorry for offense, but insist opening ceremony did not depict Last Supper. And we have to pause here because really think about how long it took to plan and choreograph all of that.

This isn't a week. This isn't a month. It's probably more close to a year, I'm guessing. And so it's the first. And by the way, you're storyboarding this light, right? It's literally drawn. I come from media. I happen when you're going to put this many, we're going to do a lot.

event like this, which we have done here at the High Wire and other places, you have written this out, you know exactly what it's going to look like. There are hundreds of millions of dollars on the line that has to go exactly perfect. Choreographers have drawn this. So nobody looked at it and said, hmm, I don't know, that reminds me this. I'm trying to think. What does this image remind me of? Come on. So it's important to, it's important to realize here, it's the first instinct that people get, which was outrage. That's what they wanted. It's like the media. When the media prints a lie, it's the first instinct they want you to remember is that lie. No one ever goes back in like page four of the classifieds to go, oh, there was the retraction

a month later. They didn't mean it. It's that first instinct. Vaccines are safe and effective. They stop transmission. The virus stops with you. How many people still remember that to this day, even though we've been through so much. It's the first instinct. So during while this was happening, what is the corporate media doing? Well, here's Savannah Guthrie, co-host of today's morning show. And this is the headline. Today hosts Guthrie, Savannah Guthrie left hot and bothered after 2024 Paris Olympics opening ceremony three-some moments.

So here we go. Not a discerning bone in the corporate media body to stay unbiased and professional in the face of what could be. What is this happen to do with sports? I mean, come on. Somewhat inflammatory at this point, and you have a person just going, hookline and sinker, you know, wiping their mouth with drool saying, oh, I'm hot and bothered. I mean, CNN opinion section out, maybe today's show out. So what was interesting about this is come the beginning of this week,

a lot of people, because social media is a robust marketplace of ideas, are posting videos, are talking about this, are giving their breakdowns of this. And they were beginning to be hit with what we're called DMCA takedown orders. That's the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. DMCA takedown notices hit Olympic Ceremony Last Supper videos. So anybody that was talking about these videos using clips from them on X, on Facebook, on YouTube, they were starting to get takedown orders and getting hit with this.

So, which by the way, which by the way is an absolute attack on free speech, freedom of the press. This is something I know very well. I've been in television for, you know, well over a decade now. It's called fair use. And in fair use, when something happens in the media, you're allowed to play it as long as what you're doing is either making a parody of it, making fun of it, or having commentary about it. So for everyone that played it and wanted to talk about what they thought it meant, your freedom of speech says that's exactly that they have no right to claim, you know, some sort of copyright infringement. that is how the, certainly in the United States of America,

and the fact that that was taken down, there should be a lawsuit that we're going to look into that because that is an absolute violation of your freedom of speech. If we cannot point out what our leaders are doing and play the videos, imagine, you're just this far away from not being able to play the video that shows everyone calling Kamala Harris the borders are. Like, this is what this is,

saying, no, it's a copyright infringement, CNN owns that footage, and you're not allowed to talk about it. Folks, it is so dangerously close to living in, you know, 1984 or brave new world. We are right there where freedom of speech is illegal, where referencing anything that's actually happening in your world is censored and illegal. It's so scary, you know, and over something is sort of ridiculous as this pageantry was. Yeah, and that pageantry and that drag queen theme pageantry of the opening ceremonies has given way to lopsided physical combat of boxing. And what am I talking about? Well, the woman's boxing

category, this is something that's all across the news right now, has just ended and it looked like this. Take a look. All right. Cliff taking the win. Cleve taking the win. It's really abandoned about. Respons for her knees. It is very upset. I don't know if he's

is my father. I have done the last because a day I'm a little bit more than I'm tired. I said, Babbo, I'm tired of my training are intense, but I don't mullo. He said, Angelina, Babbo, a champion is a bit like,

when combat, it's a bit like the cyclism. The champion is when you see the last kilometer, So you can't even, then you, arrive at that last kilometer and pedala, you go in the front, because I'm always with you. And so I've done. I've combatted with the same in the eyes because I want to all of this victory.

So if you're watching the corporate news reporting on that, this headline may have came and went without any fanfare. And if you're reading Reuters, you would read this. Algerian Kleeff advances as Italy's Karini abandons fight, He abandoned fight after 46 seconds. But there's a little more of the story than what Reuters is reporting. And here we go to Daily Mail, and it gives a little more of a, their headlines are always something special.

Female boxer yells, this is unjust and falls her knees in tears as she quit fight against biologically male opponent, Olympic opponent, Amin Khalif after just 45 seconds following two powerful punches. So what happened here is the International Olympic Committee, the IOS, see allowed Khalif to compete. And the boxing commission, the international boxing association, used to be over kind of the boxing, I guess you want to call them like, okaying these athletes. Did they test? What did they test? They testing for drugs? Are, you know, what gender are they? Well, the Olympic Committee took that over because the boxing association, apparently there was

some problems. There was not some, there was some issues with transparency. So, So the Olympic Committee didn't really have, they're basically saying, just look at the passports and we're good to go. And the passport of Khalif says that Khalif is a female. One of the problems is the Boxing Commission actually has a robust system for this. They test the testosterone, they do genetic tests. And Khalif has failed those genetic tests showing, revealed the presence of an XY chromosome, which is a male chromosome, had higher testosterone.

One of the conversations is that Khalis suffers from a genetic disorder, was born female, but has this chromosome, and has this higher testosterone. But the problem was that wasn't picked up by the Olympic Committee, and it was played out on a world stage. And you can see just by looking at this, just with your own eyes, you have one athlete that's bigger than the other. And getting into the ring at this point, you're talking, I mean, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, It's a CTE.

This is a real thing. So it's one thing when somebody with an advantage or a biological male or whatever the case is here plays in a soccer game or a baseball game or a track game. But when you talk about taking blows to the head, I mean, the NFL hid this point, but this is widespread. These are real issues and people can really get hurt here. And that's not even to talk about the violence against women

that was just a woman that was just on display for the world to see. It's really beyond. imagination you know I've had some as a kid growing up I did a lot of sports gym gymnastics springboard diving things like that but I've been watching the Olympics and sports for my whole life and they always tested whether it's a biological issue there it's just known that there's an unfair advantage if you have an X Y chromosome if you've got higher levels of testosterone I remember

there was a the name was Castro Semenia or something like that a runner that they just they kicked out I believe of the Olympics just because there's such an unfair advantage. And when it comes to sport like this, you're right, a full contact impact sport. It's different. It's different than any other sport that we're looking at. And it's just, it's really a shocking story. And it just, I mean, all of these things, we are, we are really living in just the most amazing time of news cycles we've ever been in. And so many people are scratching their heads. They feel like throwing the towel. I keep talking about it. Don't throw in the towel, everybody. Just stay tuned with us. We're going to keep bringing the truth. We're going to try and be

absolutely as objective as we can report on what we're seeing out there just now. We're not saying that that's a man, but we are saying that the chromosomes are there. We're going to do a deeper research. But just as, I mean, just so you know, we were reading the headlines and it was saying this is a man that is, you know, claiming to be a woman. But just before we're going live, Jeffrey's reaching out saying, hold on a second. There's a little bit different part of this story. So we You're bringing you as it actually is reporting in real time. If something story changes, we'll bring it to you next week. We're not trying to be sensational.

We're trying to discuss that there are real ways that this is supposed to be being handled. There's the right ways to do this to make sure that sports are fair for everyone involved. And especially in all the work that women have done to be recognized for their incredible talent as athletes to, you know, get the same pay, to get the same respect, to get the same advertising benefits. and things. And this woman whose father died in her life mission, I assure you, she's never dropped out of everything. She's got her own father in her mind and took those hits and said, I'm sorry, Dad, I'm not going to die for this. Just an incredible moment. All right, Jeffrey, great reporting. Really, really amazing. Thank you. Thank you so much. Well, you know, I said, you know, just, you know, in that story that, you know, people are being censored that are trying to

share the Olympic story, censorship should not be happening. I mean, I'm a journalist. That is why I'm here. I worked at CBS. So did some of the people on my staff, you know, we take what we do very seriously, and we will not be able to bring you the truth if we're being censored.

So many of you have been with me from the beginning when we started this show in a tiny little closet in California back in the beginning of 2017. And you know, we started with a couple hundred people, then a couple of thousands, then tens of thousands, then hundreds of thousands, now millions of people watching around the world. It's been an incredible moment.

It's been incredible to be with you here. But there's always the risk that this could end like that with the wrong leader, the wrong rules, or allowing them to get away with it. You know, some of the time, if you allow something to take away your rights and you don't say anything about it, and then somewhere down the road you come back for your rights and say, hey, you already let them go, why didn't you fight this before?

Why did it take so long? It ends up weakening your argument. your argument. We're jumping right on top of a story right now. The CDC is now censoring citizens in America. This is the story. This is the headline breaking news. I can's attorney filed suit against CDC to end its illegal blocking of users on X. We're talking about a great truth teller, Texas Lindsay, who is always commenting on all the insanity in the world. One of my favorite people to follow on Twitter. She said, I need a lawyer opening my DMs now. There she is.

She's trying to just look at what CDC go at CDC gov has. She can't look at their Twitter feed. She is blocked because she comments too much that she has her opinions and therefore they're blocking her. Folks, she's their boss. They work for her. Texas Lindsay, they work for you. I know you know that.

The government is not, they don't own us. We're on the leash. They're on the leash. There are employees. You don't get to block me from looking at the things that you're saying publicly, you don't get to block us from the emails. So we've joined Texas Lindsay. The ICANN is supporting the lawsuit against the CDC, not just because I think Texas

Lindsay is awesome, but because every person out there in the United States of America, we must protect this right right now. We cannot allow the government to keep some of us from seeing what they're doing. Or it's over. It's game over. This whole dream of the United States of America. and whatever our founding fathers thought for us and freedom of the press and freedom of the speech,

our First Amendment rights, they're literally under attack, and they think they're going to get away with it, not on our watch. So this is just one. I've shown you all the lawsuits we've won on the vaccine issue, where we're going, how much we're doing. But this is another, just imagine all of these different channels

by which we are bringing lawsuits. Have you ever been in a lawsuit, honestly? Do you know what lawyers got, you know what it costs to do this? against the government that's never going to pay us. There's no money at the end of this road. One of the things that makes this possible for us to fight like this is you.

Up until the high wire and I can, no one thought you could bring a lawsuit because who's going to pay for it? Who's going to spend literally millions of dollars fighting the government that even when you win, all they say is, yeah, you're right, we didn't actually do that science. Yeah, you're right.

We were lying to you. No one had that money. No one ever knew how to do it. But no one had a lawyer as good as Aaron Siri, but we do. And you've been supporting us and making this happen. This is just another one of those avenues. So please, I'm going to really hit it today. I can't stress enough how important this moment is right now.

This is just one of many lawsuits that we are using to hold back the authoritarian takeover of our country. There are government officials who you have elected, some of you have elected, that are working for, you know, whoever, right now, they're not working for us that literally don't believe in our First Amendment rights anymore. They don't believe in your body autonomy. They're owned by the pharmaceutical lobby that's walking through their office every day. And they know that the media is no longer free, that it's being funded by the same oligarchs of power and corporate corruption that own them. So the story will be the same. I don't have to worry about CNN speaking out against my censorship because they believe in censorship. They're owned by the same dark lords that are running our country.

These issues are important and we need you now. So become a recurring donor. I'm asking you one more time, go to the top of the page. If you're watching on the high wire or if you're on the informed consent action networks website, donate to ICANN, click on whatever you can, honestly. I mean, a dollar really does make a difference. But if you have it $24. And for those of you that are doing better than that,

I mean, what are you going to save the Bonart Butterfly this year? I mean, when you think of that tax deduction that you want at the end of the year, is there really a better thing to invest in? I mean, it's almost like cheating. It's almost like cheating. You literally get to invest in something that is fighting for you. You win. You win.

This is for you. In the end, you win your freedom. You want to talk about a custody battle. you get control of your child back instead of the government. So make this the day you do it. I want to ask you something. I'm going to be really honest. I mean, because I sit here every week and we're doing great.

We've accomplished amazing things. But so many of you are commenting. If you're not commenting right now, you're like, how do I comment, then be a part of the community. Jump on to that high-wire community and get to the place where you can comment. But for everyone commenting right here, I'm going to have my staff watch what you say right now. Tell me how I can do this better. How can I impart upon you? Because this is what we're seeing. We're seeing thousands and thousands and thousands of you watching every single week. Frankly, millions, but let's just, I'm going to be modest here. And there is a really small percentage of you that donate, you know, usually on average, it's somewhere around $20 the average comes out at, but some at $1 and some is $100 or some of you give in large chunks. That's fine. But the majority of you are just watching. So if you're watching right now,

You're one of those people, then tell me, am I being too hard? Am I inflicting too much guilt when I'm asking for money? Or am I not hitting it hard enough? I mean, I really want to know. Because if we could live in a world where those people that appreciate the work that we're doing here and say, you know, Del gets a little bombastic, but it's kind of funny. And Jeffrey really holds down the news. And Aaron, Siri is literally like the greatest crusader that ever lived.

This whole package is so amazing. what would it take to live in a world where all of you give something? You know, sort of like when you sign up, if you've ever been a private school or a church, you know, looking for 100% participation. Do you think it's possible? Do you think it's possible? Obviously, so many of you're watching because you're awake, you're aware of what's going on in the world,

and you're recognizing that this is the only place telling you the truth. And I get at their hard times, but not even 25 cents a month, not even 50 cents a dollar, really? So write to me now, give me your comments. I'm going to have my whole team watch it. Tell me how I might be able to do this differently so that maybe we can all be a part of this because I can't tell you what we could achieve. I mean, we did this for pennies on the dollar.

We are up against a system that gets billions, billions and billions, tens of billions of dollars every year at the NIH and CDC and FDA and Health and Human Services, and they never thought to take a single red cent of those billions and spend it on a safety trial to protect your kids. And you would have never known that if it weren't for us. So you want to know more and you want to stop it. You want to kick out all of those money changers and those evil, dark lords that are working for pharma and not for you.

100% participation. What would it take? Let me know. I'm going to read it all. We're going to look at it this week. Maybe you'll see me have a different tone next week. I'm trying everything because I see it. what is possible. We're going to make it easy. Just type in text 72022 and write in the word donate because today is the day you said, all right, Dell, I dug that tone. That works for me. I'm going to make it happen. Thank you. And thank you for everybody that has gotten us this

far. I mean, what a victory lap we're getting every single week. It's truly awesome and I know you can feel that. All right. Well, let's stop. Why don't we dive into the topic really of the week? Jeffrey touched on it, but it's more than just, you know, I think a sacrilege or putting up what looks like, you know, the last supper image. Is there more to it? That is really the question online. And as we do here at the Highwire, we could just touch on it. We could give it five minutes like everybody else did and maybe be, you know, somewhat sensational. But we get in the weeds here. We geek out on this stuff. And I've got someone coming up that has got a knowledge base in this space that is about to blow your mind. But first, let's revisit those images

that maybe we should take a deeper look at. I know for some of you, it's somewhat disgusting, repulsive, all of that. I don't want to be alarmist. I'm not alarmist. But let's face it, because there may be something more going on here. And we're about to find out what that could be. Here is the excerpts from the Olympic ceremony. We were told there would be a little bit of French cliche. They won't shy away from that. We have have the Cancamp. And we had to have Le Miers.

Of course we did. Is it a catwalk? Is it a banquet table? Who can say? Olympic Stadium in the world for an opening ceremony, the six kilometers between the Honduras and where we are now by the Trochidero by the Eiffel Tower. And Diana.

Is there there would be if we're resty all new no? No.

Or to have a revolver when we're all new or I know

where you think but it's not a good idea yeah

more more of more of poor when we get all new I mean, it's the thing, that we're all

going to simply all new. I mean, it's the thing we're all talking about the opening about the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. Lots of people have lots of issues. And the very surface, just watching those elements together. Obviously, sexual innuendo in sports just goes so well together. It's very odd.

but getting deeper into what is the meaning behind some of this. I'm really happy to be joined right now by Matthew Erritt. He's the author of The Clash of the Two Americans, the Anglo-Vinician Roots of the Deep State. We're going to get deep into maybe some of the symbology and imagery that's there. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Matthew Erritt. Matthew, first of all, you know, you've been sort of deep into, the investigation of what's really behind the history of, I suppose, occultism,

Satanism. Just give me a little sense of, you know, your back, it's vast. I can tell by the books behind you reading through this book, which, you know, is dense, I will say, super informative. But give me a sense of just what your area of specialty is. Well, thank you, Del, for coming on. It's a great place. pleasure and honor from my end as well. To answer the question quickly, I am not a specialist in the occult per se or symbology. In fact, I would say, if anything,

it was a topic I shied away from for many, many years. And it's just, you know, you kind of know that there's something weird under the surface of historical research, but it's so difficult to wrap the mind around. It's so absurd in so many ways that the logical mind resist is repulsed from going there. And it was really honestly, in just in the last couple of years, that it became more and more apparent, that the events in our world are so clearly being shaped with considerations that have to do with matters of the occult and especially things that tie into the type of architecture and structure of political and cultural controls that shaped so much of the pre-Christian world that didn't disappear, but rather many of these mystery cults with their initiation ceremonies, continued, though in many ways under new.

branding over the next two millennia. And I think many of the big events, the wars, the assassinations throughout the last centuries can't be properly understood. I've come to this conclusion now pretty firmly without an appreciation for the occult proclivities of an oligarchy, which has been trying to nudge society into a certain very, very dystopic direction. So unfortunately, we're not used to seeing such a high density of occultism all at once, and it's jarring. even for me who's been thinking about this now for a couple of years in a dense way, just to see that at the opening ceremonies in such a dense way. It is, it's a bit much.

It's a bit much for a lot of people. I think in America, there's just been a few glimpses into this space. I think of, you know, the video when Alex Jones went into the Bohemian Grove and captured this really bizarre ceremony, you know, and recognizing that there's like sort of hundreds of. I guess, or maybe over a thousand of the richest people in the world and our politicians all celebrating, you know, this very strange occult ritual. And it just, I watched a recent video. I think there's somebody else has gotten in there.

And it just, the words, it just seems so dorky, right? It's so, I mean, I don't know what, like just the grown men are sitting around listening to this ridiculous sort of play with, you know, animal, you know, beings and babies, wooden babies being sacrificed and things. And it just seems nonsensical. But is there something more sinister about it or dangerous about these rituals? Well, there certainly is. And if you'd like, I prepared a few slides that showcases a little bit of the backstory

behind what I think people need to have in their minds. When they look at such absurdities as what just occurred, in front of all of our faces at the Paris Olympics. Okay. So, yeah, let's showcase a few of these things. Let's start with the first slide. Yeah, and I chose to give this little presentation, the tentative title,

the precursor to the Great Reset as the French Revolution. There was a lot of amages to the French Revolution, Mary Antoinette having her head cut off being a big one. But there was a lot more to the French Revolution that a lot of people don't realize that had more to do with a reset of humanity as an ideal and a real. a reconstruction of an ancient order of managing society, the human zoo, that is overlooked by most history books.

All right. The first sign that we had was that it was already announced a while ago that the mascot of the Olympics was going to be the Fris, the Frisian hat, which people don't really think too much about. Another image that I referenced Mariantoinette singing at you in a weird way with her head cut off, a giant building with a lot of other apparently decapitated aristocrat. women. So when people think of the French Revolution, they tend to think of, you know, some attempted at American Revolution in many ways it was. You know, the American Revolution itself

would not have been a success, were it not for Marquis de Lafayette, the support of Louis XVI, Mary Antoinette as well, with many, many leading statesman scientists like Jean-Slevaibé-Bay. You had Antoine LaVoisier, the discoverer of so many major breakthroughs in chemistry, discovered many elements. He was also a politically very effective statesman, and he had his head cut off. Many of these key figures who were allied with Ben Franklin all were the qualified leadership of France when that revolution in 1789 was launched. And within a couple of years, the paradox is that as the outcome of the American Revolution, there was a viable republic. It had problems. It had a fifth column that was still loyal to the city of London that remained behind. But

it was still a viable republic, if you could keep it, as Benjamin Franklin had warned. It's the responsibility thus of everybody to come afterwards to perfect and to that ideal expressed so beautifully when it was expressed in the declaration. In 1789, there was a different effect. The outcome of the French Revolution involved not a republic, but an anarcho-jackabin bloodbath, an anti-Christian reset. Christianity itself was banned completely for a number of years from France, a new calendar system, starting with the storming of the Bastille as day one, the new day of the new sacred calendar with a 10-day decimal system. It was a weird thing. As I mentioned, the French Republicans were decapitated very shortly. Marquis de Lafayette found himself rotting in a dungeon.

You had Forever Wars launched, 20 years of just Forever Wars. And you had essentially a civil war of Jacobins cutting off the Jacobins cutting off the Jacobins. Just because, I mean, what is it Jacobin? My memory of the French Revolution, all that, is going way back, many. many years now. So what is a Jacobin? A Jacobin was the revolutionary political movement that was calling for the decapitation of the king and pretty much everybody. It had the banner, the revolution

that was by the business, the revolution doesn't need scientists. Okay. The idea was the masses, the poor, it's a peasants revolution and everybody who appears to be in the upper, like the upper classes, they're all evil. They all must be destroyed. So it was the weaponization

of the masses in order, I would say I would call it even a proto-color revolution. So the people were induced to kill the people. So the masses were induced to kill the people who actually had their own best interest at heart, as well as some bad people. So that created such a vacuum of leadership

that you had the Girondins enter the scene who were the logical cult of reason. You know, all of them were essentially anti-Christian, but the cult of reason said, no, when you allow the emotions of the mob to run amok, then you get anarchy, we need to impose order. And so you had a lopsided taking of turns, cutting off each other's heads.

And this is the origins of today's political right and political left. So in the Assembler, one group on the left was sitting on the left side of the Assembles, the Girondin faction was sitting on the right side. So the idea of political right and left actually finds its origins in this messy civil war effectively, which was thus only resolved with a strongman

sort of proto-fascist type of a Napoleon to enter the scene who didn't waste too much time before he declared himself Emperor of the Universe. And there was more to it than that, though. So the Fritzian hat was the sort of symbol that united the mobs. So to make them, bring them into righteous indignation and a violent orientation, they were rallying around this symbol of freedom of liberty that somehow became this red cap, which is, again, the symbol of the... That's interesting. So the red cap, basically. And the red cap, basically. I mean, and what's interesting about this is it was both, so you say it was both sort of anti-science and anti-Christian. So they sort of put the two together.

So intelligentsia and religious were, you know, the masses were against all of that. And that's, if you wore this red cap, it meant that's what you sort of stood for. Take out all the leadership. That tended to be where you would be pulled into, yes. So despite the fact that most people didn't even have a clue. I mean, just that alone, knowing that that level of like decapitation, attack everyone on top, is the mascot, if you will, of the French Olympics. That's the image that they want to go.

Is what you're saying is that little cap that talks and is now a cartoon represents rebellion against science and religion? And I guess, is it aristocracy of the time? or? I think it's more a, the idea of reviving a, a reactionary vibe in the population. The idea that you can, I think it's a bit of a joke for those social engineers who've been manufacturing this type of symbolism to manipulate the masses so that they would get reactionary and without thinking through what they were walking into,

but they were willing to kill without understanding what this evil enemy was that they wanted to kill. So by getting to that mind, and we can very much see this being invoked yet again today with a variety of efforts to showcase the worst aspects of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and there's a lot of effort to get us to think of channeling our anger and rage at Islam, at Iran, at other countries, at other nations or at Chinese or at Jews, whatever. So there's an effort to just really shake these up. Can we simplify it to divide and conquer, which is really what it just feels like is happening to humanity? Okay, yeah. A couple of key points, right? We all just watched that montage video.

You have Bacchus, Dionysus, same thing. It's the god of ecstasy of ancient Greek and Greece and Rome. On the one side, being dished out as like a dish. You had some other weird stuff regarding Snoop Dog of all people being brought in to carry the torch for a certain point. people have made the point that there's a lot of similarities to the Last Supper. Now, that may be true. I think it likely is true. And for sure when you go to the next slide.

Well, they seem to apologize for it. And as soon as you apologize, I mean, unfortunately, you know, but an apology tends to mean, we recognize that this is the imagery and we're sorry versus you're all off base and, you know, you're really taking this out of context. It seemed like we got an official apology and the fact that you now can't find any of these videos anywhere on YouTube or any in the social media space is being totally shut down. I think it's still available if you're a peacock or NBC member here or something like that. But clearly there's been like a whitewashing of these videos online, which tells me, I mean, if you're proud of it, you felt good about it and we were all off base, you leave it out there. Once you start seeing a total cleanup going on, someone feels like they've overstepped.

And though they were obviously trying to be racy, it seems have gone further, or the backlash seems to be bigger than they expected. Yeah, that. And I think possibly they also got the, they've reved the engine that they sought to rev. I think they did this with the intention to inflame the passions of a lot of, especially Christian-oriented people of the world. and they were very effective at revving those engines. It was very provocative and intentionally so.

Yeah. It was a slap in the face. And so they say, oh, it was not really the last supper. But then, you know, it was clearly a meal. Like when we have here, the Dionysus is being trotted out. He's the guy of ecstasy, you know, and he's the dish in front of everybody there. So, yeah, there's a lot of that. There's a lot of inderogyn.

There's just an observation. There's no judgment. That's a theme. Children also placed into that environment, which is a bit weird as well while they're talking about everybody getting naked. The little kid is being trotted around dancing with these adults. You have the image. I think we had to blur it, though, of the guys' genitals in some form hanging out of his pants right near a young child, which was very disturbing for a lot of people. Rightfully so, yeah.

So what people have been saying who have been defending this ritual, they've been saying, Well, it's actually not Jesus. It's a reference to the painting by Yan Ben Bilart of the Feast of Apollo and Dionysius, the Feast of the Gods. And that's Apollo, the solar deity of ancient Greece with Dionysius, eating the god eating the grapes. He's the god again of wine, of the orgy, of the ecstasy, the transformed of altered states. Okay.

In the evening, one of the one you worship in the daytime, the other at night. you know um the other and then you have pan a prototype of a lot of the the the devil imagery that has been part of the christian iconography that that derives from pan uh with the goats feet they're dancing i mean this is really interesting because it all flies by so fast so all right so tell me what's this big bull's head i mean which is an odd image again like what's that doing next to the olympic symbol i know well people have been saying it's the And it's the golden calf is what they've been saying. It's a representation of a celebration of the golden calf and of the Old Testament.

I would say that's not really true because it's a fully grown bull that's been decapitated. So it's not the golden calf. I don't think that's what it is. I think that there's something else being represented there. And so this is where it's going to get really interesting, albeit a little, well, we're already in weird mode. So it's not a big deal. We'll just keep going into that orientation. Something that most people have not encountered in general in our education system, but it's a fact that when early Christianity was just being brought online, Jesus had just recently been murdered. There were

three dominant mystery cults that were at war with the early Christian church. And of those mystery cults, they were all under the cult of the emperor. So as soon as Rome stopped being a Republic, it became an empire, first under Julius Caesar and then every other emperor after that. It became essentially a society ruled by a godman with his own cult that you worship. Now that godman would also sanction with the, you know, there was a committee that would have things like the sibling books, the writings of oracles from Greece, from Delphi, that would then advise the Senate and advise the emperor. But the empire would then sanction other subcults that anybody could worship and they weren't

exclusive. You could be a member of all of the cults if you wanted to. They were all pagan. They all believed in multiple deities. Many of them and the ones that I'm going to mention here that were the primary rivals of Christianity were the cults of Mithra, the cults of Sibel Attis and the cult of Isis Serapis as it was known in Rome. Those are the three dominant cults. The cult of ISIS for Paris's sake is going to be extremely important towards the end of this presentation. I'm just going to run through the essentials and why the bowl, the decapitated bull and the Phrygian cap are two extremely important symbols that have multiple layers of meaning, but I think the deepest one is located in exactly what I'm about to say

here is a consideration. So the first one that I'm going to showcase, and this is just from a website just talking about these three dominant mystery cults. A mystery cult is essentially a cult organized around rights of initiation into secret mysteries known only to some initiated elite priest class that then takes the initiate through various rituals, often proto, various drugs, opium, hashish, ergot, which is, which is what LSD today was derived from that was developed by the CIA in our modern era. It was derived from erigut, a blight that came from wheat that was used in these ancient ceremonies to basically de-pattern and deconstruct the minds of an initiate in order to

then be reconstructed under a new identity that was more befitting to the type of society which an empire would like to have run. So that was the types of activities that these cults were operating under, but they had different symbology, different sort of sacred stories that made each one kind of unique. First one here, which is the cult of Sibel and Atis.

So Sibel is a, she had various incarnations in various cultures of the ancient times, one of which was Gaia. She was an earth mother, a magna mater deity. The Gaia cult is obviously very big as far as a revival of it today, the worship of this idea of the pristine

beauty, divinity of nature, which may not be untrue, but at the expense of the idea that human beings are the pollution that destroy nature. So that is sort of one of the belief structures of the ancient Gaia and also Sibel structures that having babies abiding by family dynamics, Things like that are unnatural. They're the imposition of cultural matrices that prohibit us from being our true divine selves. And by the time you would get through the rights of initiation, the idea was that you would discover that you are in fact God. And the God of the Bible is in fact an evil demiurge that made the world in six days. It's evil Demiourge image, but now you're free to discover your true own God's self.

So it's really a way to make people egotistical a sin. Interesting. Yeah. there's a few other aspects to the cult of Sybil. She had a counterpart, a male demasculated counterpart, that wore the Phrygian cap. It was imported from Anatolian earlier from a few other. It was active in Iran, but it came through Turkey into Rome during the end of the second Punic War, which I would say was an imperial war.

The Punic Wars against Carthage was kind of like the Vietnam War of America, as Rome really started becoming an empire and sabotaging its former allies and extending its influence onto the weak. And that second war was really where I think Rome started losing its soul, even before it became a full empire. And that's when the cult was brought in of Sebel. The Atta's figure was somebody who cut off his family jewel. So in the sacred story, he's the brother, husband, who's driven kind of mad and ashamed by Sebel. and in his shame he cuts off his family jewel. Yeah.

Yeah. And then, you know, so there's two aspects of this. One of the ways of this cult celebrating or conducting its ceremonies was through the Toroborium. That's from two of the Sibelian temples that have been excavated of two followers bringing in the bull and the sacrifice, the head cutting off of the bull as its blood is drenched onto the high priest, standing under receiving the blood of the bull. I think it's probably likely, though there's no visual evidence of it, but I think it's not a bad hypothesis that these also, in higher, esoteric ceremonies involved probably human sacrifice to. I don't think it was just animals, but they definitely did the bull.

If you want it to be a male member of the priesthood, what's called a hierophant, then there are certain things you had to do. Number one, you had to also follow Atis, and in a ecstatic revelry under Bacchus there's sort of what it knows the Apollo Dionysian ceremonies the Bacchanalian night revelries under the moon

you had to basically get drunk and wasted enough that you in your religious fervor would cut off your own family jewels walking in his footsteps. Start speaking with false voice. You'd have to the higher fonts were known for wearing women's clothing. They would

also, as it's pointed out here, they would whip They'd have a whip of knuckle bones for self-flagellation. So they innovated self-flagellation. So it's this weird, unnatural thing where every time you have a bad thought, you have to flagellate yourself. This was taken up by the Benedictines in the 6th century after this cult was banned from the Roman Empire. I mean, what's just so interesting about this is we've been talking so much now about all of the, you know, especially in young children, whether it's, you know, puberty. blocking drugs, but then transgender surgeries for children.

And, you know, what we've been saying is it's castration of children, essentially. But just this imagery that, you know, you need to remove that, you know, castrate yourself for some sense of balance or understanding of yourself. I mean, you know, it almost feels like it derives from, you know, that sort of occultism that goes all the way back to what you're showing is 204 BC. Yeah, and the Roman families at the time were so disgusted by so many of their young men getting their schlongs cut off in the ceremonies that they actually organized to kick out the cult and the cult went underground in Rome for about two centuries.

And it was only with Caligula that it was fully revived and given full sanction and brought out into the streets of Rome. But it took a while. Like the Romans had some moral repulsion naturally to this. It wasn't an easy sell. So, yeah, there's that. There's that. Now let's quickly dig a gander at the other cult I mentioned, Mithra.

Okay. So Mithra was a male exclusively male-only cult, unlike Sibel, which was very much open more to women. Both of them carried out, it seems, sacred orgies. But this one was specifically, you had to be a male to enter it. It was very much dominant amongst the legionnaires of the Roman Empire, as well as the Praetorian Guard, the elite guard, sort of the SS of Rome, were pretty much all members. That was a precondition to do. It's kind of like, you know, if you want to become a high-level person in the FBI, you kind of have to be in a Scottish right. Kind of similar, right, or maybe a Mormon, or both.

This is part of the thing is what they were also doing. It was imported into Roman 55 BC. it took them a little bit longer, there was eight degrees of initiation. And you always have Mithra wearing, or the god Mithra, is wearing the Phrygian cap yet again. It was imported again from Anatolia, which itself, earlier it was from Iran and before that from India. It took on different incarnations. When it was brought into Rome, it took on the murdering of the bull, the Torboreum. Typically, there's thousands of these sculptures that have been found in underground Mithraim.

I'm going to show some examples of what these things look like. keeping in mind the Apollo Dionysian ceremony of that painting with Penn, the sun god, lunar deity, day, night, you know, you're stoic in the daytime, and then you do debauchery, you get in touch to your inner beast at night. Kind of like what people do when, in too much of our Western society, where they hate their jobs, but they do them in the daytime, and then on Friday, Saturday night, they get wasted, and then they do it all over again.

It really creates a discombobulation of the development of a natural, integrated identity. It's very useful for an empire to have a culture that has these practices. So he's looking always over to the Helios, Helios being the sun god, the Sol Invectis. And on the left, there's always the imagery of the lunar goddess in Egypt that was Isis. But there's various incarnations of the lunar goddess. So most of these sculptures have the lunar god and the solar god. Okay. Standing above.

Interesting. So I mentioned the Mithraim. So far there's been about 400. of these mithram, just the ones that have been discovered recently in over the years, in Europe and North Africa and the Holy Land. That's a few samples of what some of them look like. Again, there were thousands in the ancient world. Many have not been uncovered yet.

They were always underground representing the womb of the earth. You're inside Gaia. So that's the idea of the symbolic nature of the cave. We don't know fully there's no surviving or at least no known texts of what this cult practiced as far as details. So it's been inferred by scholars, and I've read a bunch of their books. But there's a general idea. A lot of them what's observed is that they coexist up below temples to Sibelinatus.

So there's a disproportionately large conjunction of these two temples being built together across the world, all across Hungary, but big time in France, in England, all over the place. Okay. So these two are coexisting. I think usually the men of a family would be in Mithra. as well as in Sibyl, the women would just go into Sibyl and they would have a family gathering like Sunday service together that way. After they were banned. So all of these cults were banned in around 380 by Theodosius, who also burned the sibling oracles, the sibling books that were shaping the Roman Empire. All of that was burned.

These cults were wiped out Christianity with a lot of compromises, I would say. Maybe some were unwise compromises. But Christianity did survive and became the dominant chosen vehicle for the Roman Empire. with a lot of the good within Christianity that came with that. And these mystery sects were wiped out. And they went underground. They did not disappear. Mithra didn't disappear.

None of these disappeared. And in fact, you could trace their rebranding over the centuries. As Mithro, as I mentioned, was a warrior cult. Right. So that was what the cult of Mithro was. It became the Templars. Just to say it quickly, I've written a book on this. Okay.

But the Templar order itself, was seated by a Benedictine grand strategist who put two popes on the papacy named Bernard de Clairvaux, who seated the Templars with another Benedictine that had an esoteric and an exoteric, a secret and an outward set of practices, one for the majority of people who were members and had no idea, I think kind of like the Freemasons, you know, you're generally first few degrees, you're a good person, you're perfectly fine, and something happens in the higher degrees regarding a secret teaching that all of a sudden only a high initiate can know about. That seems to be the sort of activity that was utilized then when they ceded the Templars.

And what I had there was a picture of the Templars, an illustration done in the 19th century worshipping Baphmet on the one side, getting burned at the stake in the middle. And a picture of Baphimitt there, that's Jacques de Malé, and they were burned at the stake in around 1314 in France. That's a picture made by Elefos Levy, a French. occultist who drew out this character of bathmet who may not have looked exactly like that but it's definitely not i don't think untruthful entirely and uh that's an image of a goat's head again one hand pointed towards an eclipsed sun one to the eclipsed moon um there's a variety of

of different animals that are integrated into this this entity that the templars were induced to admit to or they were discovered to having worshipped under the temple of solomon that's actually their headquarters. They worshipped in many cases the basis you have Christianity comes in

but once you become an initiate in that and you're in the higher order it leaves Christianity and goats back to this sort of

occultism for the elites in there which is super and so it's a combining of the two two worlds

yeah and the gateway through that the sort of secret sauce was the the Gnostic

mystery cults that were the followers of Simon Magi Simon the sorcerer who was an enemy of Peter and was somebody who was a favorite of Nero in Rome who was trying to pass him off himself off as the representative of Christianity and Christ's

successor and even superior as the incarnation of the Christ's spirit and he was literally a sorcerer from Samaria who was trying to who was a conduit who they were carrying out sacred orgies acting like they're a Christian but introducing a lot of new concepts that were foreign to the Christian moral worldview. Wow.

Of which sacred orgies were part of that, other things too, but also a repackaging of the sacred stories of of Mithra, of Isis, of Sibel. A lot of these ancient pagan stories were repackaged into the sort of Christian wineskin and get followers like Marseus and Valentinian and Balcities and. and others who were producing in the second, third century's Gnostic scriptures, the secret teachings of Jesus, you know? So Jesus had his outward teaching for the stupid plebs, and then he had his secret teaching for Mary Magdalene and his favorites, you know?

And that would be passed on orally in the same way that you had a lot of the worst Kabbalists who were also passing on the secret teachings of Moses, you know. So Moses had the teachings given to him by God for the stupid people, as they say. and then he had the oral teaching where he passed on vocally only to his trusted click. And that becomes whatever, because it's like the game of telephone at a certain point. You're just making stuff up. So that was kind of what these creatures like the Knights of Solomon's Temple, the Templars were passing on as part of their heritage.

All that to say, the Templars initiated the Crusades. As I mentioned, there's a lot of inflammation of clash of civilizations and motions right now between Christians, Jews, Muslims, especially Chinese out at. And this is really what took over and destroyed the world for centuries at that period, which the Templars were created to oversee this forever war with the idea of creating this restored kingdom in Solomon's Temple. That's just one Templar underground Mithraim that was excavated. That was the temple of Jerusalem, the Templar managed kingdom of Jerusalem, I should say.

One of the key figures to carry the torch in these ceremonies was the strange figure from that people recognized from Assassin's Creed a video game, but the actual person himself represented the order of the Hashashins. The Hashashins was a Sufi order from Iran that worked very closely in many ways with the Templars that were Gnostic themselves, that had a pagan origin that were trying to revive the pagan roots of Islam, and had a certain synergy with the Templars,

another Gnostic Mithraic sect, as they were excavating Solomon's temple. Now, why would you pick this guy to run with the... The Olympic torch. Right. So you have something strange there. They were cracked down upon by the Muslim world after they spent centuries carrying out assassinations of high-level Muslim targets, who are generally statesmen, many of whom were actually trying to create peace and reconciliation with their neighbors and with their Christians.

And many of them were killed by this order of Hashashins, who the name comes from hash. Part of their rituals was to get into an altered state utilizing sacred drugs, just like the Gnostics and the the other mystery cults. But where were the Templars represented in the ceremonies? So again, we saw Snoop Dog with the, what the heck is Snoop Dog? That was weird. If we noticed here, Snoop Dog at the Olympic ceremonies in Garb has a very interesting necklace.

Now, the necklace, if you get in close to it, recognize that thing? Yeah. Baphemet. So he's got an actual necklace to Baphomet, which is, he's got many of these necklaces that he wears quite a bit, but he shows to wear this to the Olympic ceremonies. I would say this is a little representation to the Templars in my mind. Because the word Paris itself comes from a Roman term given by Julian the Apostate to the headquarters of the Temple of ISIS in what is today known as Paris.

And Julian the Apostate in 360 tried to rebuild Solomon's temple for the third time. Didn't work out for him. But he also called himself the Helios godman. And he was the last real effort from the Roman Empire to wipe out Christianity and reinstall the Sun King. worship of godman. So that's Paris and her counterpart, Saraphas. Seraphis is brought in from,

they're basically brought in from Egypt. Serapis is the counterpart to, or the Roman rendition of Osiris. Isis and Osiris gave birth to Horus, Horace being the god that the all seeing eye derived its power from, or it's, you know, whatever from. Very much snake-oriented, the Pythian priestesses were very active in the cult of ISIS.

It was imported into Roman 200 around the same time as Cibel and Attis. Why is this important? I've got a one-minute trailer to a French documentary about the origins of Paris. Yeah, we do. We'll play it right here. Let's play it. He was a once Paris.

His history, its rues, these passages insolite, His inhabitants, these boutiques, ceres of coffee, these cartier-chew, these transport, his soiree, his beauty,

his team of foot, are green, are gold. That's, it's Paris, as we know us. But it exists a other paris,

more secret, more cached, a paris etotelic, guarded at the abrid of the regard of the profan. At the film,

that we propose to discover like the batticeur of cathedral who don't let's not their signature

in the content of this film is the heritage of authors inconnu which the discoveries

bring an light new to those who are ready to be bursed by this history.

Here Paris like you have never seen. Paris itself like I was mentioning

was the head quarters of the Temple of Isis. And in fact, this is an artist's rendition of another temple of ISIS. It says here in 1793, while people were cutting off each other's heads, over the ruins of the Bastille, which was the building that was stormed, that initiated the bloodbath, that turned the viable Republican revolution into a Jacobin terror of bloodbath. On the ruins, you had the construction of the of the of the statue worshipping isis um which would spurred out a water as a fountain from her boob flanked by a couple of of wildcats and people would drink this thing it was a weird but

that was a thing it was taken down a few decades later but that was a big part of what was brought online 1790 the paris coat of arms is changed keep in mind and and it what's done is that on the coat of arms, now you have the goddess Isis, the goddess of navigation, who's brought in and placed on the coat of arms itself. What's interesting here is that the Olympics involved for the first time ever athletes not being brought in or walking into a stadium, but brought in on barges on the seine. And that was, I think, also a relevant little tip of the hat to that aspect. The Notre Dame Basilica was built in the 12th century on the site of the biggest temple of ISIS. And when it burnt down, or it was rehabilitated, but it burned big time in 2019.

And people said, oh, it was in an accident? Did somebody knock over a candle? Or what I would say that probably not. There was probably a deeper symbolic meaning to it being lit on fire at that moment that people haven't properly considered yet. And the Jacobins also placed as they were arresting people for protecting a priest or whatever. And don't get me wrong, the priesthood of France had a lot of corruption to it. Okay.

They gave people a lot of reasons to be angry with them. However, it's all about getting reactionary here. People who were imprisoned were tortured in a headquarters. The prison of the Jacobins was the former headquarters of the Templars when the Templars got kicked out. Or they left the Holy Land. They got kicked out of the Islamic world. And they set up shop back in Paris again. And that building became the prison chambers as well as torture chambers for the population that was getting their heads cut off.

before they would get their inquisition, they would get tortured to admit all sorts of things. So that was, again, the Templar headquarters. So another interesting thing that still is fetishized by the French even today that I think has broader meaning. After people were split between this radicalized left, radicalized right, civil war thing, both in ancient Rome as well, before Rome became an empire, right? After Julius Caesar was killed, it went into civil war for centuries before the empire was totally consolidated under Octavia. the same thing happened in France. You had a lot of potential for good,

but everybody got stupid. They acted first, felt first thought little, and they became tools of the empire's social engineers to fall into civil wars of eye-for-and-eye revanchism, resulting in a vacuum of leadership that could only be filled by a new godman in the form of Napoleon who tried to be the emperor of the East and the West and the revival of the Roman Empire.

And, you know, he was also reviving the Scottish rights, the Grand Orient and these things were already being reorganized in France through Scotland, which itself had become the base of where the Templars went underground after they were burned and they basically had to go underground. They went to Scotland first, reorganized themselves, and through their, this is the origin of the Scottish right, the Rosie Cross right as well, the Knights of the Rosie Cross came out of that, and then reconverged back into France and re-s sort of like a virus sort of re-penetrating for slowly over time and rebuilding a lot of their their assets and capabilities. There's a lot more to say, but I felt like I've already gone through

so much material. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, difficult material that I'll just withhold and just let that sit there. Well, I mean, what, I mean, for certain what, I mean, obviously your knowledge on this is vast, and I look forward to getting into sort of deeper meaning. and I know you're writing about this type of stuff happening in the United States of America. It's not just France. It's worldwide. Also, you've looked at a lot of things like the World Economic Forum and all of these, you know, sort of rites of passage that are happening that seem to be affecting a global dynamic.

But at the very least, what I find fascinating here is, yeah, I think most of us thought, well, I mean, that one image was very anti-Christian because it looked like the last, supper and what you're showing is that this entire thing appears to be a celebration that could be on the surface called anti-Christian. You have a hat that is the mascot that represents the beheadings of Christians and leadership. You have this definitely bowing down to occultism and all these different occults that have happened both in Rome and in France. Then the boat, coming in and ISIS. I mean, it really is a spectacular breakdown. And, you know, I think we all just keep thinking, you know, Sodom and Gomorrah or this idea of just debauchery and a celebration of the ego

and humanity versus some sort of more reverent concept of Jesus and God and that, you know, And I do think at the heart of this, and where I get conflicted is, you know, I've said it on my show. I grew up. I considered myself an environmentalist. But I do see there's a difference between wanting to take care of nature, you know, as it's given to us to take care of in the Old Testament and the creation of the earth, you know, dominion over the earth. and this, you know, sort of worship of nature as though we're a part of it. And it's, you know, and it's sort of our goal is to let go of God or let go of something and become more animalistic if we're to sort of be a part of nature.

And you definitely get a sense of, you know, this struggle happening in the world of all the many things that are dividing us. And then you watch France at the, you know, Macron, President of France is the WF, Klaus Schwab, bragging that Macron is one of his, you know, initiates and the many different leaders that are in cabinets all over the world. But taking this out of the Olympics, this wasn't just like a video or a presentation that was made to the United States of America or just for, France, what does it mean that this was a pageantry in one of the only things that the entire world sits down to watch and especially with their families?

When you sort of tie this all together, what do you think this message is attempting to achieve to a worldwide audience? Whenever you get into this realm of analysis, there's never just one motive. There's usually multiple motives layered together at the same time. But I think the, as I mentioned earlier, the idea of provoking a righteous hate and anger against these devilish creatures was something that they wanted to do. They achieved, I think, their desire to do that. But at the same time, it was an arrogant display of tuberous as well. It certainly was that. And I think that, you know,

as whom the gods would destroy they first make mad, these oligarchs do see themselves as gods. They don't believe in God per se, although maybe they do in a weird idea of a more affametic kind of God. Yeah. They actually do see this period now as the consummation of a period that they have been waiting for and trying to slowly build towards.

Yeah. Having to kill a lot of American presidents along the way, JFK, Lincoln. I mean, there's a lot of disruptive elements over the years that have put a block on their attempt to essentially reset society so that our ability to discern the difference between a human being and a wolf is gone. So that if we can't discern the qualitative difference, it doesn't mean wolves or other animals of the biosphere are bad because they're not as good. Because we're superior to animals, it doesn't mean that animals are bad. it just means that we are animated by something else, something more divine that the animals don't have access to as far as an ability to think through the consequence of our actions with conscience, with a power of reason that can allow for the discovery of God's creation, the hidden laws that we can all discover, even if we're not born of a high family or anything, we can discover and then willfully act in accordance with the discovered laws of God's creation to make life better for ourselves and for our posterity that doesn't even exist yet. that that's something no rabbit species can do right like so when at when rabbits become overpopulated they just go into cannibalizing mode the mommy's eat the babies the populations regulate they adapt to the environment of nature the oligarchy would like us to also be like the rabbits that when the oligarchy can create scarcity usually it's artificially created um they get us into a a psychological pattern where we fight or fly you know we we act like the animals we can only kill or be killed or be killed

and that fear state is bad for creativity. We don't make discoveries when we're in that state of mind. We don't think like mature beings, which is needed if you're going to be able to overcome the types of mind field that the oligarchy sets and overcome the limits to growth that they try to impose onto us, which is where I would say that in opposition to the modern Gaia revival, the people like Benjamin Franklin,

or they don't hate nature. They just recognize that the human mind is a part of it. nature. It's all part of God's creation. So to make the human mind work means we should be thinking about, you know, discovering and then mastering when we discover an act to a law of nature, we're no longer bounded by that law as our master. It becomes something that serves us. So wind can become our servant when we discover the sale. You discover electricity like Ben Franklin did. You discover its nature. It could serve you. You can transmit messages. All sorts of things are given to you. You can light your houses at night, which without fire.

So, you know, the universe resonates to humans which the oligarchy wants to disrupt and keep us all in a state where we're just parting at night, feeling shame because we did things on Friday night. We don't want to think about. And then, you know, whip ourselves and then do our drudging thing as Apollonian dutiful beings in the grind and then do it over again. So that's a type of society they like. can if we can also get rid of Christianity and every monotheistic religion that has an impetus towards morality and instead have a new set of gods run by a priesthood that might have maybe a new technocratic AI version or maybe a new alien sort of flavoring to it that can be controlled by by the shadow masters then they're all for it that that's fine it's really fascinating as you

say all those things i mean i just i want to just spend the rest of the afternoon talking to you but so many things come in line because I keep saying things. One of the issues that we're very focused on the high wire is, you know, it's forced vaccination. If you want to vaccinate it's a free country, I'm down with that. I've shown that the science just doesn't exist. Now we've proven, our nonprofit has been more successful at proving the lack of science behind that than anyone. It's now coming clear. But I've always said, if the government can forcibly inject you, then your rights have been reduced to the same is a farm animal. And it's interesting how you're making this connection to, you know, making us more animalistic, making a shame. But also, if we have no sense of something greater

than ourselves, then we're just animals. And then it's kill or be killed. It's division. It's constant war. It's unrest. And as long as we're in that place fighting each other, the aristocracy, the oligarchs can do whatever they want. You talk about scarcity, which is true. entire language now of environmentalism, which is why I struggle with that word now is scarcity. We, you know, the climate change is wiping out of food supply. It's, you know, when clearly what's wiping out of food supply is the end of farming, the end of ranching. They're killing off our cattle saying there's a bird flu that's never infected human beings.

And Jeffrey Jackson just reported on the border issues that now in America, we have these wide open borders with people coming in that are creating crime waves that are also, you know, destabilizing our workforce. I was just in Geneva and they said this has been going on for years. Now it's finally happened to you. The destabilization of societies through, you know, people running from wars and open borders into Europe. All of this does seem to be playing into this. And really, what we have is leadership that clearly seems to want, mass chaos. Chaos where, and we look at just the last few weeks of the news here in America, you've got assassination attempts, president stepping down, not running, all sorts of insanity,

you know, internet shutting down, oh, it's back up to the point where we are just, we're giving up on trying to figure out what's going on. And ultimately, once we recognize, if we just recognize that we're incapable of understanding it, that ultimately is where an animal is at then. Now I'm just surviving and I'm just going to leave it to the leadership to figure it out because it's too big for me. It's too big for my mind. And that really is what all of these images that you just shared, what the Olympics just said to the world is this is bigger than you're ever going to understand. And I think that that was my concern about even doing the story today was that it's exactly what they want. They didn't not, they didn't want us to just accept it.

they want us alarmed, they want us screaming and yelling and in a panic and because then they rule. And so how do we just to finish this up? And you're looking at all of this. What would be your advice to a society that is under siege now by, I think, occultism, but also division where we're being so divided. And how do you fight something that that's exactly what they want is they want you fighting? What is our way, what is our path forward? That's a really great exposition you just did as a summary. And for the point of advice I would give to people is to, on the one hand, just be aware that the oligarchy wants you to believe that they are the gods that they want them, they want to believe they are.

So to the degree that we accept the narratives that allow for the portrayal of this shadowy force, that's sort of been there, right? for all of human history. So the degree that we allow for that force to be identified as something that has it all planned out, all sides have been controlled. The American Revolution, that was an occult fraud, because look,

free Masonic lodges were involved or, you know, everything was controlled. So it really decapitates, it castrates our minds completely from the reality that this oligarchy is not. They've screwed up many, many times. This is not the first time they have tried, to lay down the hammer. It's been attempted before. And any like cogent study of history will

showcase several moments. I could identify three major moments just in the 20th century alone. And I could identify another two in the 19th century where the oligarchy culminated all of their efforts to launch down their hammer to reset humanity the way they tried to do during the French Revolution. It didn't work out. They had to ultimately flush their Napoleon creature. But it could have worked, or they could have kept pushing for it if you didn't have more reasonable, moral, insightful people rallying and organizing for something that fell outside of that wasn't one of these controlled choices of left, right, that we were being told we have to adopt. So you had patriots within America, especially within the Republic, which is why the oligarchy is never forgiven the Republic for what was brought into the world in 1776. and what Lincoln revived in opposition to anarchist terrorists within the abolitionist groupings, as well as terrorists within the Confederacy, both of which were funded by the exact same Freemasonic Scottish Right Lodges in the north and in the south,

tied to the city of London and the United Grand Lodge and all of their banking networks inside of America. They were all trying to create a breaking up of the United States running terrorist operations like John Brown as provocation towards the Confederates to get the Confederates to then provoke back and forth. Lincoln didn't fall into that trap. He stayed above it and he wasn't alone. He had a whole network of allies who understood how this game was played and they were able to keep the nation together. They had the help and they sought the alliance of Russia, which sent the whole Russian Navy Navy fleet to the coast of New York and San Francisco, Alexander II, who had liberated the serfs and the same year. These are inspiring stories and this is what kept

England and France from joining into the Confederacy against Lincoln back then was that they knew that it was going to be war with the U.S. and with Russia. And coming out of that, you had a huge alliance of Russian and American friendship that was making strategic flanks all over the place that was revived again by FDR, who I would say derailed the New World Order eugenics-run dictatorship twice in the 1930s and 40s, which has been completely wiped from our history books. And a new narrative has been created for us to look at what the assassination attempts against FDR we're all about that has nothing to do with reality or we don't even know about that. So there's this inspiring history that if we learn from it, we could see in our

current context where the chinks and the armor are of this empire, where are the weak spots and what are the capabilities we have as people of true Republican spirit, not the Republican party per se, but like Republican in the ideal sense. What are the capabilities and powers we have policy-wise to act accordingly to apply. certain constitutional policy measures to prevent what certain sociopaths want to bring about as far as a mass culling of the world population. So there's things we could do. There's things that some nations of the world have done a better job, I would say, at dealing with as far as the deep state complex within Eurasian nations. There's a battle within every country with this own

fifth, with fifth colonists that are tied to this oligarchy that's supernational. And again, And when you look at Russia, I think when I observe the battles within China and the Chinese elites, they've done a better job overall than what we've done in the West, I would say, at extracting these world economic foreign agents that have been pushing for this agenda that we could be working with instead of pushing to go to war with, which unfortunately many people have been induced to raw, raw, the, you know, whether it's the military invasion of Mexico and then, you know, support the coupetat, underway in Venezuela or support the U.S. military buildup around China's borders and using Taiwan

as a new Ukraine. Like people are just being driven nuts. NATO and the Ukraine, pressure Russia, all of it. I mean, we are sort of at the center of creating unrest now around the world. At this moment, we sit on the precipice of a war in the Middle East that is really horrifying. And Putin saying, I will use nuclear weapons if you continue to push NATO into the Ukraine. These are very, very dramatic times. But I think to sort of sum it all up, let's keep our heads cool. Let's recognize that there is, I think in some times I just sit here and think, just remember that throughout time, as you've said, God wins.

You know, get back to recognizing your divinity, the beauty in the soul of humanity, and recognize it in everybody. There's a lot of distracted people, but there's always beauty. and we can't let this sort of unearth our composure and our generosity and and our reverence. Amen, brother. All right. Matthew, thank you for taking the time today. Super, super fascinating.

We're definitely going to get you back on to talk about some of the other issues in the world. I love to get into some of your knowledge on the WEF and what's going on there. but thank you for taking the time. I think there's a great entry point here with this Olympic ceremony, and I haven't heard anyone break it down the way you just did. So thank you so much for taking the time. Thank you, Del. All right.

Well, look, here's just one of the many books, The Clash of the Two Americas. Matthew Erritt, if you found this conversation as interesting as I just did, there is so much knowledge there and understanding of what's been happening in societies around the world. So definitely check out his work. You know, I was just giving a talk on Monday in Orlando, and someone came up to me, and she said, you know, I've got this bumper sticker that says I can, and one that says the high wire.

And people come up to in parking lots and start conversations about it saying, oh, my God, you watch that show. Well, just think about this. If you are wearing a T-shirt in an airport, you can say, oh, my God, did you see that conversation on the Olympics? It's a conversation starter, which is why we love to, you know, inspire all. of you to figure out how you highwire. And we're living free. Here at the High Wire, we believe in celebrating freedom every day. From tank tops to T-shirts, soak up the sun and let your patriotic spirit shine bright.

Our most popular tumblers are perfect for those hot summer days, and as a special gift, you'll receive a free commemorative I-Can golf ball set with every order. So embrace the spirit of freedom and make it a hole in one this summer season at thehighwire. dot shock. Well, I want to thank all of you for going on this really deep dive for us. And by the way, you know, don't write it in the show and say, are you going to do something on the Olympic ceremony and then be shocked that we really get into depth the way that no one else does?

I think it's an important conversation today. And I want to say, look, I know you watch me stop around the stage and, you know, get outrageous and seem very reactionary at times. And perhaps I should watch that. I didn't really get my time to pray and meditate this morning the way I always do. And maybe I would have been a little bit calmer. But I do want to say this about this story today. They do want us reacting.

They want us thinking that we're under siege, that we're under attack, that the debauchy is going to take over the world and there's nothing we're going to do about it. And what Matthew said is true, they want you to believe that they are gods. They want you to see them as gods as all-powerful billionaires of corruption, and control. We got to make sure, and I think it's perfectly okay to be outraged. And it is good to state, you know, what you feel. But we must not forget that they certainly are not gods. And we've got to really watch how we use that they. I run into so many of you. They just seem to be outsmarting is they. And I do it too. We're talking about a pandemic. These things are really in play. But if we

open up our eyes, part of opening up our eyes is not from a place of fear. fear or as an animal that feels like it's under attack, but open up our eyes that's connected to our divinity, our connection to God. I think it's important after you have a moment of, you know, ranting and raving and trouncing around on your stage or perhaps in your living room, remind yourself to sit down and remember that this too is God. God is not out of control. God's got this through us. We're needed right now. This is such an important time. And I'll say it, you know, over and over and over again, we must not be afraid to live in this time. We must not complain that this is our time. I mean, there's never been a time more interesting. And you have to

ask yourself, you know, if you believe in God, if you believe that you are a part of something beautiful and that life is beautiful, then you must also recognize you've been chosen to be here right now. You're designed for this. You've been given what you can handle and act accordingly. Take a moment, take a breath after the outrage and say, what can I do today to make a difference in this world? How do I bring beauty back to this world? How do I teach my children to love themselves, to love their body, to love their neighbors? And by the way, you really want to, you know, disarm and dismantle the attack that's upon you. Let's look at what Jesus. Jesus said, for those of us that are Christians, see that person.

Love your enemy as yourself. That's something I think that is very hard for us to do. But if you love them, if you see the beauty in them, you absolutely disarm any power that they think you have over them. Fear is how they rule power. If you say, hey, George Soros, buddy, you're misguided, but you probably need a hug, man. You just need a hug. Come over here. You little tutty.

bear let me hug you can imagine what that would do to him he wouldn't know how to handle it they won't know how to handle it stay in your god center know that we are winning and we are achieving amazing things and thank you for everyone that is making all that we're achieving here at the high wire possible stay in love stay in beauty and recognize that we're a part of something really special we're going to keep talking about it in all the details and I'll see you you next week on the high wire.