The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 401: BOVINE BLOWBACK

Episode Date: December 7, 2024

Congressional Report Exonerates Del; Peter Hotez’ Strange Prediction; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on DEI’s demise, Aussies Defeat Censorship Bill, and UK Pushes Back on Cow Feed Additive Linked to Sterilization in the Name of Climate Change; U.S. Cattleman’s Association Founder Exposes the Agenda to Inject Cows with mRNA ProductsGuest: Brooke Miller, M.D.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready? Action.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world. How about we all step out onto the high wire? Well, you know, we've had some amazing shows recently. I've talked a lot about how blessed I feel like I am. In some ways, my life feels surreal at times, all the amazing things that are happening. happening around us. I think we feel a huge change and surge happening in America, a return to sanity, if you will. But amongst all these experiences, I every once in a while have a really weird day. One of my days started when I walked past the TV and did, what? It looked like this.

Who have you spoken with in the Trump administration at this point or in the incoming administration? You are somebody again who served in a Trump administration. What have you had to say to them about Well, look, they know my views. I've been clear about them. I've had certain conversations. I talk to President Trump about vaccines in my first term. I don't think that these policy efforts reflect his views as well. I don't think the president wants to see a resurgence of measles, wants to see a resurgence of whooping cough in this country. God forbid we have cases of polio in this country. He does not want to see that. I think he understood the importance of the child immunization schedule. I'm not so sure that people really understand how Kennedy's

intention is going to translate into politics. and how serious he is. There was an article recently where one of his confidants, Del Bigtree, who's going to be probably brought into HHS, said, you know, he didn't get inside the castle to forego his long-held beliefs. They're going to follow through on these. So I was, I guess, in that moment, I realized, hey, Scott, I didn't know we were buddies. They didn't know we were paying attention to each other's work. I certainly know who Scott Gottlieb is. And I think what he's probably most worried about is one thing we know for sure is going to happen with Kennedy is you're never going to be allowed to have that revolving door ever again, Scott.

You're not going to be able to leave pharma, work for the government, then get paid even more by pharma as soon as you walk out. That revolving door, all the corruption in government. We want people that actually do the science because they care about people, not their next gigantic payout. Anyway, Scott, as much as I would love to have everybody stressed out out there in pharma, is Delibatry going to be at Health and Human Services, trust me, I could never leave this desk. I can't leave you guys. I'm having way too much fun here. I'm no intention of getting involved directly in government, but boy, are we going to talk about it. But I was on a plane. I've been flying like crazy lately, and I was sitting on a plane right after that and just thinking, you know,

I wonder where Scott gets his information about me. Like what happens? Honestly, I haven't done this in a really long time. I Google myself. And of course, like the first thing pops up is your Wikipedia. I was like, oh, let me see where that's at. So I pulled up my own Wikipedia. And just imagine just for a second. Just try and put yourself in my shoes, you know. There's actually, you type in my name, this is what you see. Well, this is the opening paragraph of Wikipedia right now. Del Matthew Beatrice is an American television film producer, who's the CEO of the Anti-Vacconciliation Group informed consent action network.

He produced the film Vax from cover up to catastrophe based on the discredited opinions of Andrew Wakefield and alleges an unsubstantiated connection between vaccines and autism. Not the most flattering paragraph. to lead out with. It's actually not what my resume says. But just to be clear, we don't consider the informed consent action network and anti-vaccination group. I've said it many times. We're dedicated to eradicating man-made disease, and we believe in medical freedom. The truth is, is if you want to vaccinate you or your family members, it's a free country. You can do whatever you want. What we're fighting for is to make sure that you can't ever force any of your stupid ideas

unto everybody else. It's up to you what you do. It's a free country. It's your body. They're your children. Now, I know there's people that watch this show that have a more extreme view than I do, but that's where I'm at. Honestly, if you came over and begged me to slam a vaccine and you, I'd say, bend over. Let's do this. If this is what you care about, I'm not going to stop you. But, you know, when you look at all this, I think, well, how would I ever change that paragraph? If you remember the whole idea of Wikipedia, it was supposed to be sort of open to the public, It was like open source and anyone can fill in data or information. Well, that worked for a while, but I have like millions of followers out there.

You guys that kept going in and fixing this and making it make sense using what you know to be my perspective. Well, Wikipedia couldn't handle that. And so I have one of these pages that has this little thing up in the corner. It's a little lock. You actually cannot change a word of it. Now, it doesn't mean it doesn't change because it has new things about the work that I'm doing with Maha or that I've done. with Kennedy and those things. So some little elves inside of Wikipedia are updating it, but what's crazy is how dated their information actually is. Here's just one of the paragraphs

where you're looking at it. Now think about these under the context. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Big Tree propagated conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus and COVID vaccines and urged his audience to ignore the advice of health authorities. It's a huge paragraph. Well, what they're talking about is the fact that if you've been watching the highway, you know we were one of the first to bring on scientists and talk about the fact that it looked like there was an insert in this virus that can only be done in a lab. Therefore, since this whole thing starts right around a lab, the Wuhan lab, we said there's a really likely probability that this was escaped from the lab. Well, as I got off the plane, shockingly, and thinking about how incredibly out-of-date Wikipedia is and

How long are they going to be the ones that are wrong attacking me for what I've been proven right? I got even more proven right by the fact that the Congress just released their COVID-19 panel information. About 500, I think is it, 520 pages, something like that. There was a summary that came out. Let's just look at some of the things that they now know to be true. The final report, COVID-Select concludes COVID-19 origin. Here we go. The big conspiracy theory, COVID-19 most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.

What? Somebody better call Wikipedia. They obviously don't know that. They don't know that we were right. COVID-19 vaccine. Contrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread of transmission of the virus. So they're saying I was undermining the vaccine and saying bad things about it. You're right. I told everyone on day one before a single person took this that it was a lie that it was 95% effective, that the FDA in the emergency's authorization admitted, they hadn't really even tested to see if it stopped transmission. You knew that here. Everyone else that believed the news, I'm sorry, you got lied to. Now they're admitting to it. What about the rest of the issues like lockdowns and masks, the mask mandates? There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flip-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans' scientific data,

causing a massive uptick in public distrust. There we had it. We showed you studies. studies from around the world. The majority of studies showed that the virus would go right through the mask, right around the edges. It was absolutely useless. Even Fauci admitted that before he ever decided to promote the mask. By 2023, Bigtree is calling for the imprisonment of public health officials and executives of pharmaceutical companies for favoring vaccination against COVID-19 over the use of ineffective drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. That's been totally

disproven, alleging people have been murdered in order to further the agenda of sinister, globalist interests. I do still hold that position. Actually, I think that if you lock people down illegally, one of the things the commission came out with was the six-foot distance rule, was the entire reason we locked ourselves down, was just made up, had no basis in science. How many people died because they couldn't get to an emergency room? The hospitals were shut down because of social distancing. How many people died when ivermectin hydroxychloroquine was working in the hands of doctors that were having far higher success rates in their practice than others that weren't using those products.

Either way, it's a free country. Why did the government ever get involved in blocking drugs that are already proven safe that doctors felt comfortable using? We've never seen that egregious overreach of government. But ultimately, Tony Fauci staged one of the greatest cover-ups of all time in taking five or six scientists who were writing emails to him saying they believe that. that this must be a lab leak. He made them change their tune.

We've shown you all of this throughout our shows. We're going to do a big show breaking down all the discoveries inside of this hearing coming up. But if you watch this show, you know, he made them put out an entire paper saying it was only natural origin. And anyone that said it came from a lab should be discredited and call it misinformation. That was the misinformation. That was a lie. And then when we finally had access to the Wuhan lab, the, you know, literally ground zero, where this entire pandemic started.

Tony Fauci sent a bunch of shills from EcoHealth and those scientists he controlled to do a whitewash instead of an actual investigation. To me, that's treason, working with a foreign government. Yes, I believe people need to go to jail for what they're doing. But as it turns out, I would imagine Joe Biden is probably going to go ahead and give everyone a pardon ahead of time so that no one ever gets prosecuted for all the crimes that were done.

So let me state it perfectly clearly. I actually do believe, and this is just my theory, definitely, that about a half a million people easily were killed by misinformation saying that ibupton and hydroxychloric when was dangerous, barring it from being able to be sold at pharmaceutical, at pharmacies to doctors that wanted to prescribe it and use it. I believe putting them on ventilators, which we now know was a mistake. nine out of ten people died on those ventilators and all the people that ended up dying of kidney failure from remdesivir when coronavirus doesn't cause kidney failure. I think those people that made those decisions and forced so many people to their death, I think that they should at least be on trial. And I am in a free country and you are innocent until proven guilty. These are my suspicions. I think you should go to court and if proven guilty, yes, jail time. But that's

perspective. We'll see if that's even possible moving forward. But lastly, when you're being talked about in the news and you realize your Wikipedia page is totally antiquated and showing you how out of touch everybody that just lost power in our country and around the world, we are seeing a resurgence of the truth. We are seeing a resurgence of skepticism, the ability to ask questions and have conversations. It's so refreshing, except that that light that is now beaming down on us, is missing one little tiny cave where one of the world's most moronic little gnomes lives. This is what he still believes about the world that we live in. Take a look at this.

Here's the reason why we need to care about this stuff. Nicole is that we have some big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st. Mr. Bloomberg mentioned H5N1. That I'm really worried about. It's all over wild birds on the western part of the United States and going up in the north. It's getting into the poultry. We're seeing sporadic human cases. No human-to-human transmission yet, but that could happen.

It's in the cattle. It's in the milk. And that's just the beginning. We have another major coronavirus likely brewing in Asia. We've had SARS in 2002, SARS-2 COVID-19 in 2019. And we know these viruses are jumping from bats to people thousands of times a year. But there's still more. We know that we have a big problem with mosquito transmitted viruses all along the Gulf Coast, where I am here in Texas, or expecting dengi and possibly Zika virus coming back, or a poochie virus, maybe even yellow fever.

And there's more. Then we have all this sharp rise in vaccine preventable diseases going up because of, in part, the anti-vaccine activism. That's so prominent right now. We have a five-fold rise in protostas cases, whooping cough over the last year, 15 measles outbreaks this year. We've got polio that's been in the wastewater in New York State. All that's going to come crashing down on January 21st on the Trump administration. We need a really, really good team to be able to handle this.

What exactly is going to be crashing down on January 21st? He listed like 20 hypochondriac, you know, disorder fears about what we breathe in the air. is probably why he retreated into cave. I don't believe he's left it since the COVID pandemic, but will someone please get the guy a mirror and a brush? I mean, come on, man. You're checking in with the world. We're out here. We're breathing. We're having fun. We're celebrating. This poor guy is just living in absolute horrid terror. Maybe because he's been doing these studies on vaccines inside of his own labs, maybe what he's saying is I have all these viruses teeming in me. I caught them from some infected mice, and I am going to walk out in the public on the 21st, and look out

what's about to happen to you. I am patient zero. I don't know. I don't know what's going on with that guy, but it's great checking in with you, Peter. I pray for you, man. It must be terrifying, being afraid of the same viruses that mankind has been walking amongst since the dawn of our existence. We've all been evolving together beautifully.

And frankly, I don't think we've ever seen so many pandemics or issues since we started vaccinating the living crap out of our children. I think we should ask questions there, but think about it, everybody. Did a hole just open up in the earth? Did a meteor recovery where the viruses just suddenly hit this earth? How is it? We made it all the way to hear without Peter Hottes for hundreds and thousands of years. It's astonishing. We were able to survive without him.

Anyway, two different worlds are existing right now. Those of us that are free, happy, and believe that God's beautiful air and water is something we need to cherish and joy and run around in with our kids. And then there's others that want to hide in a cave and inject themselves with every living, bacteria and virus that they can find in MRI technologies. We're going to get deep into that because it's coming towards you. It's coming in your food. It's really about to start coming in the meats that you eat, which is why I'm looking forward to speaking with our guests later on in the show. Dr. Brooke Miller, he's a doctor. He's a rancher.

He's been looking at this from all sides. What is really going on here? What's happening with vaccines? What's with the MRNA technology? And what about farting cows? We're going to get into all of that today. So this is going to be a good one. And now it's time for the Jackson Report.

Hey, Jeffrey. I'm doing pretty good. It's interesting now that the rest of the world can see the true Peter Hottes for what he really is. And it's nice to see everyone else kind of making comments on social media about that clip as well. I mean, just just thinking about it. Like the guy's preparing to be on live news. What is it? What do we say about a person that just doesn't even put a comb through their hair? I'm not, I'm just not quite sure. I mean, I'm not really into appearances. I don't need makeup or things like that. But honestly, man, like, do you need to look like you got shout out of a. Canon. That's a signature look. Anyway, all right. All right. All right.

Well, throughout corporate America, Dell, there is a trend that is sweeping through. And the Fortune 1,000 companies in the United States looks like they got the memo. What am I talking about? Well, take a look at this. All right. Walmart, which employs more than one and a half million Americans, says it's rolling back some of its diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. Moulson Cores, the

iconic American brewer that makes Coors beer walking back some of their diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. Home improvement chain lows reportedly announcing major changes to its programs meant to boost racial and ethnic representation. Wisconsin-based company Harley Davidson says it's dumping its diversity policies and initiatives. Toyota says that it will refocus its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and halt sponsorships of LGBT events. board is now joining several other companies on pulling back those DEI policies.

John Deere, the iconic American farm equipment maker, announcing it will end all, quote, social or cultural awareness events and audit all training materials to, quote, ensure the absence of socially motivated messages. The company will stop participating in the human rights campaign, equality index, which measures workplace inclusion for LGBTQ employees. It will drop socially motivated training for employees and would make other changes to back away from diversity programs. The company said starting next year it will no longer set specific supplier diversity goals and executive bonuses will solely be tied to business performance. It's no longer taking part in yearly surveys from the nation's largest gay rights group. The company also pausing

sponsorship and participation in pride parades. It will stop selling LGBTQ themed items online that are marketed to children, including chess binders for youth going. through a gender change. I think we're going to look back at this and kind of laugh and marvel that this fever took such a powerful grip over the country and it took so long for people to recognize. It's wild to go through that and, you know, we talk about the pendulum swinging. I want to say, in all honesty, I hope that the pendulum finds its way to middle. We live in a free country. You're allowed to, you know, live and treat your body the way you are and live. And, love who you want to love. Our issue has always only been when you start pushing an agenda on

children whose ideas about sexuality, their own life, their own bodies is just forming. I don't believe they're in a position to decide to castrate themselves. And so I think that that push that got so far out of balance is what we are actually seeing here. But I want to make it clear that, you know, here on the high wire, we love everybody. I want, you know, everybody, every, every, every, race, color, creed, sexual orientation is what makes America great. But we are seeing that we got really out of balance here. Right. And the ideas of diversity, equity, inclusion, these are ideals that every human being should be standing up for. And what happened over the last four years, really in the wake of the George Floyd protests, was all these corporations just slap things together and

check boxes and said, see, we're playing along with the new thing. And it's, it's, got out of hand. I mean, you heard there in the news montage, funding pride parades, selling apparel to children, LGBT apparel to children at Target. We covered that at one point. But we saw, over the past year, you saw this coming. In the Harvard Business Review, you had a headline that says the failure of the DEI industrial complex. So you saw in academia that's happening. And then Fast Company wrote, I've worked in DEI for a decade. This is an op-ed. It won't survive beyond 2025. So the people that were in this knew that what was happening, what these corporations were slapping together, they weren't really working. And in fact, some of the evidence shows

that it was actually having the opposite effect. And even Forbes here, what companies are getting wrong about DEI. And again, diversity, equity, inclusion. This is something that our country has had a rich history in. In the 60s, you had John F. Kennedy, signed an executive order shortly after he got in an office, having equal treatment for federal contractors. discrimination and the Civil Rights Act by Lyndon Johnson in 1964. This was, these were all major landmark of things that the government and the presidents were doing. What these corporations have been doing in the last four years aren't exactly that at that level.

And a lot of people could say, well, they were striving for that. Sure, they were. And maybe some great things came out of that. But let's look at the New York Times here because they really put a fine point on this. And this was not even a new article. This is over the past year. New York Times says this is the actual danger posed by. DEI and it says first it is a moral necessity for colleges to be concerned about hateful discourse

including hateful language directed at members of historically marginalized groups. Yet, that is no justification for hundreds of universities to pass and maintain draconian speech codes on campus, creating a system of unconstitutional censorship that has been struck down again and again and again in federal court, nor is it a justification for discriminating against faculty members for their political views or for compelling them to speak in support of DEI. I mean, just take a breath on that one because it's not just the corporations, it's the universities. But now it goes on to say this. Again, they're saying it's great that they wanted this, but this is what was actually happening. They say it is urgently necessary to address racial

disparities in campus admissions and faculty hiring, but again, not at the expense of the Constitution. It is difficult to ignore the overwhelming evidence that Harvard attempted to achieve greater diversity in part by systematically downranking Asian applicants on subjective grounds, judging them deficient in traits such as positive personality, likeability, courage, kindness, and being widely respected. That's not inclusion, it's discrimination. And so what you're seeing there, I mean, what is really saying is we have, in this DEI, when it really fully manifested here over the last four years, you have a country that's trying to, in corporations, and trying to correct this country's past constitutional violations by basically putting a new set of

violations on certain American communities and America in general and college students in a new American era that we're in right now. And it just doesn't work that way. But for our audience, it's the freedom of speech part. And the National Science Foundation is an organization you think DEI at the National Science Foundation? Absolutely. Here's a Senate Committee and Commerce Science Transportation report. And they have a graph here looking at starting in 2021, the Biden-Harris administration, funding of DEI. And this is what it said in 2021. You have 0.29% of annual funding. By 2024, it was up to 27.21%. And this is the science, this is a science arm of our government. The taxpayers are paying for this. And what are they paying for? Well, the U.S. House Committee

and the Judiciary put out a report called the weaponization of the National Science Foundation. What did they find? They found that the National Science Foundation was funding, censorship campaigns. They were putting out these awards. You can see here by this graph, you have the National Science Foundation, and they were putting out awards, giving money to universities and nonprofits to create AI instruments, artificial intelligence to censor federally funded censorship to censor big tech. So they were using the National Science Foundation under DEI to create these censorship tools to reach into big tech. And that was all happening. And really, that's still going on to a certain degree right now. That couldn't be ended by just a stroke of a pen.

This is what this DEI has really morphed into. We want free speech, but all of a sudden we get full censorship and AI censorship because someone may say something hateful. So we're going to just delete people's accounts and shadow ban them. And it gets into really dark places. And that's kind of what that New York Times article. And a lot of these corporations are really starting to see is, you know, this has gotten off course a little bit.

I think we need to re-correct, reassess. We're going to ditch what we have right now, but we're going to keep working on this, which I think is a really great at point. Wow. Well, I mean, like I said at the top of the show, we're feeling a return to sanity, like a return to balance. And it's obviously, you know, it's a free market. And the market was answering.

The market was saying, we are not, we're buying less of your products as you're getting involved in issues that have nothing to do with driving a tractor, have nothing to do with making a car, have nothing to do with, you know, brewing beer. Can we get back to being focused on what you do well and let the rest of us deal with how we're going to raise our families? Very important. And this battle for free speech, it keeps getting roped in.

So no matter what the cause is, all right, to DEI, well, we're going to find a way, the government's going to find a way through National Science Foundation to push a censorship regime. Well, there is a battle for the heart of free speech, especially during COVID. And right now, it's a wide open field. In Australia really seems to be one of the ground zeros, if not ground zero, for the, this. And we take it to Australia right now. And there is a, they talk that was being done on misinformation, actually. And this is Kim Williams. He's a chairperson of the Australian broadcasting company. He holds a very senior position. He was asked a question by an audience

member. And this is how it went. Take a listen. I have a question about Joe Rogan. And you've sort of touched on elements of this in the US. He's obviously the world's most popular podcast host. He has three billion listeners. He's sort of managed to successfully capture that bro market in America. And his influences such that in the wake of the US election, the Democrats have said that one of Carmel Harris's mistakes was that she didn't appear on his program. So I'm just wondering if you had any observations about what's behind the Joe Rogan effect, how you believe he's managed to so successfully capture this huge market. And then for us here in Australia, you know, how would or should the ABC be going about capturing that kind of audience?

Look, I'm not sure that I'm the right person to respond to that question. I am not a consumer or enthusiast about Mr. Rogan and his work. Shocking. I am not one of the three billion, and I'm unlikely to be three billion and one any time soon. I think people like Mr. Rogan pray on people's vulnerability. They prey on fear, they pray on anxiety, they pray on all of the elements that contribute to uncertainty in society, and they entrepreneur fantasy outcomes and conspiracy outcomes as being a normal part of social narrative. I personally find it deeply repulsive.

And to think that someone has such remarkable power in the United States is something that I look at in disbelief. I'm also absolutely in dismay that this can be a source of public entertainment when it's really treating the public as plunder for purposes that are really quite malevolent. It's amazing. I mean, and we're watching really the death, as we've said, of legacy media there at the National Press Club in Australia. What's amazing is he meets right up front. I've never watched the show, basically. He doesn't even know who he is, but then starts saying he's disgusting, he's malevolent, he's awful, this shouldn't happen. And that's literally, you couldn't have a better example, honestly, of what was wrong with legacy media. You're not speaking the truth. You don't know what the truth is. You're pushing your own problem. propaganda in perspective without any evidence science or backing.

It's really quite astounding. But you know what's great, Jeffrey, is if you think about the fact that Joe Rogan and the podcasters and new media, as we've said before, won this election in the United States of America, I don't think that's lost on anybody. Legacy media has died. All the people that were against the COVID pandemic and said that this is a bunch of lies are now taking positions in our health departments. So what's amazing is now when we watch these national press clubs, we can now look at them because they are the fringe.

They are now the minority in this country and rightfully so. So again, what a great moment to be alive and to see this shift where the liars still lie, are still antiquated in their perspective, have no backing, and less and less people are listening to them. And that was such a teachable moment because there's still, still to this day, and he echoes a lot of what other means. I'm watching, see, is zero self-reflection. They could have answered. They could have said, well, maybe they like longer-form podcasts getting to the truth where it's not really scripted too much and people are just genuine people.

And the fact that Joe Rogan, the fact that presidential candidates had to reach out to independent media and go on their terms without scripts, without time limits, to win an election, I would think that's what you want. Because the other side of it we've lived through for our lifetimes, and it doesn't seem to work out too well. And the woman at the beginning saying, how do we capture that audience that Joe Rogan captured?

I don't know if he captured it. People just tuned in. So, well, in it. I wish I was just thinking about, like putting it all together in this show. Can you imagine? Just love to take that guy and show the Peter Hotez diatribe on the 20 viruses that are going to kill you starting January 21st. And then cut over to Joe Rogan smoking a fat blunt

and contemplating the existence of UFOs and say, which one of these groups is actually, praying on people's fear as you're, you know, so worried about. I mean, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's astounding sort of the projection that we get from mainstream anyway. Right. And Australia is now, it's, it's, it's kind of also ground zero of the new fight for free speech when it comes to censorship bills. So in 2024, Australia government pushed a misinformation disinformation bill. And a couple of years ago, that bill probably would have went through, but nowadays, not so much. And even reporting from corporate media looks a little bit more accurate with the headlines.

Australia withdraws a misinformation bill after critics compare it to censorship. So what they were defining as misinformation was something that was reasonably verifiable as false and could contribute to serious harm. So if that bill was an effective, I don't know, at the beginning of COVID, and we said, we don't think the vaccine is 95% effective. We don't think the virus stops when you get the vaccine. That would be contributing to reasonable harm. And the social media platforms that harbored us would be fined millions of dollars into this

bill. Wow. It's not happening. So right and they also would treat corporate media differently. They would have a wider birth with corporate media. They can say more. So this bill is gone. Reuters Australia dumps the plan for fines for social media giants. But unheard, the outlet did a really great piece on this to kind of show this inflection point rat. And it says Australia has shown the way on free speech. Has it thrown off its penchant for tech technocracy. And it says the bill, which would have created a two-tier system. of speech rights was comprehensively rejected. And the story of its defeat reveals much about the evolving dynamics of political discourse

in the post-pandemic world. What makes this defeat truly remarkable is the broad coalition that emerged to block the bill. In the Senate, an uncanny alliance form, conservative opposition, the Greens and left-wing independent senators all united in rejecting the proposed legislation. This cross-political alignment suggests a growing recognition of the dangers inherent in state-controlled information management. And that's where we're at right now. So as soon as that bill was defeated and withdrawn, Australia, they put another bill forward. And this bill passed. Australia withdraws one bad online speech bill

and advances another. What is that? Well, Reuters Australia passes social media ban for children under 16. Now, this is something that a lot of other countries, including at the federal level here in the United States, are trying. The UK Online Safeties Act has a version of this. Some states are working with this in the United States. So this is going to come into effect next year in Australia. If you're 16 or younger, you're banned unless you do something that can verify your age. And right now, they're working on, well, how that would be done. But there's tons of white papers out there from Australia's e-safety commissioner and a lot of other people and think tanks that say digital ID. So it looks like it's probably going to be a digital ID. And the danger with that is a lot of

people said in Australia as this bill was advancing rapidly, said, this is just a hop-skip and a jump away from full internet identification through digital IDs for adults. So there's no more anonymity online. There's no more posting anything you would like. Now it's verified to your credit, to your banking, to your actual social security number, all of that. And that was one of the issues with the privacy of this because all of your information is online. And the government can take action with that. And Australia, we know is pushing through. also central bank digital currency. There's a talk on that. So everything will be linked up. You can see the danger there. And so that's the conversation that's happening in Australia right now.

Will this bill really get, I'm sorry, will this social media act really green light to the point? Or can it be withdrawn at this point? It's still a push poll. But right now it's passed. And I guess the government now is working on how they're going to implement this next year. I mean, these are these are touch these subjects. We've talked about it before. I have two, you know, well, a teenager and a 10-year-old. And, you know, it is hard to, you know, they're out of your site a lot. You give them a phone so that you can communicate wherever they are. We're all busy and traveling.

And then, you know, you find out they're on social media all the time. What are they actually seeing? What are they looking at? I understand why we want to make these knee-jerk reactions to somehow ban things for our kids or let someone else control that. But you're right. As soon as you do that, it brings up this good point. How do you know they're too young?

Well, you had to show an ID. That means we're all showing an ID and we're all now being, you know, scanned and watched and tracked and sold because data is the gold of the moment that we live in and all of this is data collection. So these are scary, scary times precarious and needs thoughtful leadership for sure. And now that COVID's over and a lot of the misinformation is found out to be true from that house report that you just read at the beginning of the show here, lab leak has turned out to be true and so on and so forth. Another big hurdle here is something people used to be called misinfo and disinfo agents for questioning the net zero push, questioning the settled science around climate change. And why were people questioned that? Well, maybe they were watching Bill Nye in the late 90s and they were believing him. Remember the science guy?

Check this out. All right. This is a model of a carbon atom. And you say, what's a big deal? What's the big deal? It's carbon. Okay, carbon is everywhere. Carbon is in every living.

The trees? Carbon's in the trees. Carbon's in the grass. Carbon is in you and me. Carbon's in the cows. Carbon's in that bowl over there. Carbon is in the horses. Carbon is all over the place. Carbon's even in the air. Carbon is what makes life go. Go, go, go. Carbon makes the chemicals of living things. Carbon is so important. Are you listening to me? We've named a whole branch of chemistry after carbon. Organic chemistry. Organism? Organic. Are you You with me? Organism, organic, okay? It's vital. It's important. That's why, I mean, don't say what's the big deal about carbon? Carbon is the key to life. You have got, got to respect that. Maybe that is why I'm having such a hard time believing all this anti-carbon net zero stuff. I mean, he's pretty convincing there, told all those kids. Yeah, carbon sounds pretty great. And, well, when you turn the TV on nowadays, Bill Nye's message kind of fell to the wayside and there's another dominant message and it looks like this. All right.

Climate change is real and it is a challenge. Virtually every nation in the world, almost 200 countries, agreed to phase out carbon emissions, net bases totally in the second half of this century and to set their ambitions to do it quicker and to do it more forcefully. One thing you said you were particularly surprised by was how great a problem bovine flatulence is. Can you explain what that is and why it's a problem? Yeah, so the animals that can eat grass have very unusual stomachs that have these

bacteria that are methanogenic in there and so they leak natural gas both out the front end, the back. I asked the top scientists in there several times, do we really have to get down to near zero? Can't we just cut it in half or a quarter? And the answer is that until we get near to zero, the temperature will continue to rise. We've got to start. Human activities, by the way,

are the primary cause of carbon emissions, we're told. So to take Al Gore there, we need to stamp out human activities. And not a doctor, Bill Gates, just found out that there's these animals walking around that have gas coming out of both sides, he says, very scientific terms. It's a problem for him. But you have, you know, the government's taking this very seriously because you have the Biden administration. This was a headline just a couple of years ago. Biden signed order for government to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. So that means no more carbon, everybody. And in the UK, they're trying to, we've been reporting on this now over the last couple of weeks.

There's an inheritance tax on farms. So the UK has been having basically a full frontal assault on their farmers. In 2022, they tried to just give them lump sums to get out of farming. but now they're doing an inheritance tax to try to get those when the farmers pass away so they can't really, you know, it's a hardship to pass it on. But you see some of the headlines here out of the Guardian. This is how the reporting looks. Farmers have hoarded land for too long. Inheritance tax will bring new life to rural Britain. Okay. Well, I maybe believe that if the C40 cities, which is an initiative that is trying to get net zero by 2030 and all the governors and mayors of a lot of cities and even here in the United States have signed onto this pledge, The C40 cities talking about the future of urban consumption. When they tell me in their chart that an ambitious target for 2030 looks like this, zero kilograms of meat consumption and zero kilograms of dairy consumption, you know something's brewing.

They don't want livestock. They don't want cows, and they don't want you eating dairy or meat. So that brings us to the question of livestock and cows. Bill Gates has invested almost $27 million in a startup for, as he said, a vaccine now to stop cow farts and burps. And that's through his investment fund. Now, Jeff Bezos, also following line with that because it looks like there's big money to be made here. Jeff Bezos backs development of fart vaccines for cows to help save planet. Well, we get into, so those are maybe someday maybe. Imagine when those start guys start competing with each other like the fart vaccine wars.

No, my product's better. Less farce, definitely. Well, it's already happening. now. So in the UK, there is a product called Beauvais and it's a feed additive. And it's supposed to reduce the methane emissions of livestock's dairy cows that are eating this. When you put it into their feed, they're supposed to have less methane that they expel out of both ends from from Bill Gates. So the supermarkets out there, like Arla, they're partnering to test this methane busting feed additive. So the headline says for dairy cows. So Arla is doing that in their dairy fields for the cows, and then it puts that in their milk,

it gets on their shelves in the supermarket. Well, the similar thing, I should say, is happening over here in the United States. The FDA has approved the same feed supplement in May of this year. So this is the approval headline here. It proves first feed supplement to reduce methane and dairy cows.

How did this all happen? Because I mean, we have to, even if you believe this is true, why dairy cows? It seems like there's a lot other things you can tackle before, for wanting to stop what's coming out of the front and back of livestock that have probably been on this planet to the degree that they've always have. Well, a 2006 United Nations report

is where this all started. It's called Live Stock's Long Shadow. And it says this in this report. Here to Livestock's contribution is enormous. It currently amounts to about 18% of the global warming effect, an even larger contribution than the transportation sector worldwide. 18% larger than the transportation sector. So a bunch of cows and livestock are out there, and all of the cars and transportation in the entire world can't compete with what's coming out of their front and their back. Well, a lot of people are scratching their heads.

There was a UC Davis researcher Frank Mittlerner, and he actually did a paper. He said, I'm going to do a paper with some co-authors on that because I'm not sure I believe that. Sounds kind of crazy. So livestock's contribution to climate change. He writes, the impact of livestock on climate change in the United States in California have arrived at much different greenhouse gas emissions estimates associated with

direct livestock emissions, enteric fermentation and manure, totaling at less than 3% of total anthropogenic global warming and much smaller indirect emissions compared to the global assessment that was by the UN. And so he puts this out here. And one of the main authors of that 2006 UN report in the BBC had to say this. He said, one of the authors of this livestock long stagull says, I must say, honestly, that he has a point. We factored in everything for meat emissions and we didn't do the same thing with transport. We just used the figure from the IPCC, he said. That's bombshell. So basically what this author saying is, we factored in everything for livestock, transportation to the field, from the field, to the processing plant, all the fertilizer, all the

manure, the cost of clearing all the land of the trees to make the grass they graze on every single thing. And for transportation, it's like, well, it's just maybe a little bit that comes out of the tailpipe. Let's check that out. So totally unfair calculation that was thrown on the backs of livestock. And this is the equation, basically, that created these methane-busting feed additives and cow fart vaccines. That's the whole rationale behind this is to cut that out. So let's look. Let's go into the science here. In 2024, the FDA approved this. That's in May. And we have their actual letter here. And let's see what they say in their letter. It says, based on the information provided in your letter, Bovar 10 is an article other than food intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of an animal. And therefore, it is a drug. That's interesting because it's not considered a drug in the European Union in the UK. But it is by the FDA here. It goes on to say, based on a review of your data and the characteristics, of your product, FDA has no questions at this time regarding whether Beauver 10 will achieve

as a tentative effect and is expected to pose low risk to humans. So what they did here is the company did some tests, gave the FDA their probably sanitized results and said, here, look, it's great, I promise. And the FDA says, that looks good to me. We don't expect that to cause any problems with humans. Stamp green light approval. That's how it worked.

And so, and this actual letter, if you start scrolling down a little bit, you see a warning sign. What are they warning about? Not for human use. Caution should be exercised when handling this product. Three nitrooxypropyl all may damage male fertility and reproductive organs.

Then it goes on to say it's harmful, inhaled, and skin irritant. But we have a study here. It was done in 2021 in Europe, and this was by the regulators. They wanted this data. And you can see here as the safety and efficacy of this feed. And you go in here, and it's from rats.

They looked at the rat model. And it said in tissues, the highest concentration were found in the liver, kidney, adrenal glands. Concentrations were found in the fat, muscles, and brain. So, I mean, for our audience, think lipid nanoparticles. Remember, this is just like any other thing. It's just like a food additive, but it finds bioaccumulates in all your organs. This is kind of what's going on here. And again, the muscle.

This is what people are eating if they're eating the meat. And this is saying there's high concentrations in the muscle. We don't know what it does the humans. And so we go into this study. This is a gigantic study, but let me just pull out a couple quotes in here. It says, based on the above, the feed app panel concludes that the genotoxicity potential for three NOP cannot be ruled out. So they don't know what genotoxic effects it has. But let's go into fertility. It says all females at 500 milligrams per kilogram of body weight showed evidence of mating, but none of the females became pregnant.

And no corporate lutea or implantation sites were found in. any of these females. That seems like a problem. What about the men? A slight to severe decrease in spermatogenesis, that's the creation of sperm. That might be a problem, was observed in the testes of most males of the 300 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day. Spermortility was reduced in most of the males at that same number, accompanied by decreased total sperm counts in testes and epididymides. No evidence of recovery was observed after 13 weeks. Now, they're feeding them a little more, than the cows would be fed, the livestock would be fed, but we don't know long-term bioaccumulation.

We don't know these effects. So what's happening now in the UK? Predictably, you have a boycott. These are the people of the UK are boycotting the milk from the cows that were given this feed additive now. Here's the headlines, Tesco, Aldi, and Morrison's face boycott over a controversial ingredient and major dairy brand. And you can see these pictures here.

People just, the shelves are just empty on, One side is the good milk, if you will, the milk that hasn't been treated with anything that was controversial. And the other side is one that has been treated with this ingredient. So I want to say this. We have an example of this in the United States. In the early 2000s, Monsanto had an artificial growth hormone for cows, and that was found to be getting into the milk.

And there was a lot of protests about this. And it was at that time, Walmart, the largest employer in the United States, had took, said there's no more artificial growth hormone in our milk. That was a Reuters headline. And that was the death blow. At that point, Monsanto divested ownership in the company of this growth hormone. They were out of the business. So the people voted with their dollars. And I want to say this boycott in the UK has all the ingredients to really move forward fast because on the shelves of every supermarket and every town is a vote, vote against or for this top down climate push in the form of milk. And every citizen now in the UK has a voice to make this choice heard at the companies

and force them to listen because it affects their bottom line. And this is what's happening right now. And what's interesting is the Walmart boycott was for an artificial growth hormone. So arguably you could say there was actually a reason to have that because they would make the cows bigger. They would have more milk production and so on and so forth. It's good for business. It's questionable about this methane busting. What benefit does that? that have to people? What benefit does it have to farmers? Farmers, there's really no positive benefit here if you don't believe in this climate model. If you don't believe in the science, that 18% UN model that started this whole conversation. I mean, it's really amazing when you look at it.

We just keep seeing, you know, it's really the Scott Gottlie method. Go ahead and just put it out to the public. We'll trust whatever the company says is safe, and then I'll go on and work for the company you make millions of dollars down the road. That's what really needs to change our regulatory agencies. We've talked about Bonnie Hari bringing real attention to the fruit loops and the dyes in our fruit loops that are illegal in other countries, as we know, are endocrine disruptors, causing cancer. In this case, the way we keep seeing them just put new chemicals into our food, you know, things that, you know, could be reducing fertility. And even if it's just the animals, and once again, you know, we see Bill Gates funding this. We also see.

see Bill Gates talking about reducing CO2, but one of his biggest issues is reducing the population. Also, as you pointed out, saying getting down to zero meat. So it's fascinating that the same people that are investing in a product to get cows to stop farting, that one of the side effects appears that it would be a reduction in fertility. And you have to imagine they saw that and said, hey, win-win. I mean, that's not a side effect for us. We don't want any beef anyway. So if they stop giving birth to other cows, then great, they're not farting and there's fewer of them. Is this sort of mentality that needs to be kept in check as we move forward because we're messing with our food supply? And to talk about farmers as hoarding land, this is where our food comes from

unless they have some other plan like coming from a factory. And I say no thanks to that. And this tax, it's something that the Biden administration was looking at. You're doing it all over Europe to tax a farmer when, you know, to a family basically, when that farm gets handed down to the kids, I mean, how many, you know how hard it must be to get your children to want to stay and work on a farm these days? They probably want to go off and play in computers and do all sorts of other things, become lawyers. So even if you get them inspired to keep feeding the world, now you're going to hit them with a tax for the value of that property, which I can't imagine, you know, what is a farm if it's 5 million, 10 million, how long does it take you to net that much profit to pay that back?

I mean, you're just burying them in debt for no reason for serving humanity, the food that we eat. It's really evil. It's got to be stopped. And I'm just happy that a reporting is showing how many people are waking up to this, standing up against it, and we're really seeing movements in the political system. So great reporting, Jeffrey, as always. Thank you. All right. Thank you, Doug. next week. I'm really, really excited about, you know, we win a lot of lawsuits, obviously. If you're just watching for the first time because you saw the Scott Gottlieb news piece and said, Who's Del Big Street? Welcome. This is called the High Wire. This is where we tell you the truth,

not a bunch of lies based without any facts. We show you the evidence. So by the way, why I'm saying that, if you're brand new, one of the greatest tools we give you for free is our evidence. Is our evidence? I was actually just meeting with a CNN reporter. I had coffee yesterday. I won't say who they were. But I said, you know, we had a really nice conversation. I said, how is it that you feel comfortable continue to say that the experts say when the experts have been so wrong? Why is it that you allow yourself as a journalist to never say to the expert, will you give me the evidence of that? I mean, look at this paper that's just come out from the congressional hearings on COVID. 520 pages.

is all to find out that we relied to, that there was no science that mass didn't work, that social distancing had no basis in science, that the vaccine didn't stop transmission. I said to this reporter, I mean, how does that make you feel? And why did you never ask, hey, can you show me? I mean, if you're in there, she's like, well, have you ever been the press? I was like, no, I haven't, but I know what question I'd be asking. Could you please give me some evidence for why standing six feet apart? I said, or better yet, could you show me the science behind?

walking in, standing six feet tall, wear a mask, sit down in the booth that comes off. I said that. Honestly, how did we all put up with that? How did you put up with that as a reporter? And why did nobody ask for some evidence? I said, that's my problem with legacy media. And I hope that you'll join us in the future actually asking for evidence because we now live in a time where it's been proven. The experts lie. And they did in this country. And so, you know, around all of that, you know, the work that we do, we have brought lawsuits. since the beginning of 2017 that has been showing everyone that watches this show as we won against the FDA, the NIH, Health and Human Services, CDC. You don't even have to have a COVID pandemic, you know, lying to you. We showed you they were lying to you about your childhood vaccine program.

We just found out they've been lying about the safety of fluoride. We know that they were lying about the safety of talcum powder, which is, you know, now proven to cause cancer and how many women and children for over 50 years. years. These are the things that we do here. We bring lawsuits to end the lies. Now, one of the biggest lies there ever was told was rushing this vaccine onto the market during COVID. We'll be totally transparent with the science. Well, as it turned out, they never, ever planned on being transparent. And you know this. So someone had to sue to get the trial information from Pfizer and Minerna. No one did it. You know who did it? We did. The informed consent action network.

No one else in the world. That evidence, that Pfizer data only exists in the world today because of this institution right here and your donations. That's it. No science, no university, no government system. No one was planning on letting you see that evidence. In fact, they wanted to hold it for 75 years. Your FDA, your own government tried to block it for 75 years, but then I can came along sent

in Aaron Siri. And we said, Aaron, do not stop this lawsuit. I don't care how long they wait. I don't care how much they try to wait us out. We are getting that data and we're going to give it to every scientist in the world. Well, in about one week, seven days from now, I think maybe the most damning perhaps and most important revealing data in the history of the COVID pandemic is coming to you because of I can. I'm talking about the V-Safe open field data. First, the judge ordered the CDC to release all V-Safe, free text entries, and a huge win for vaccine safety transparency.

That was our second win. You know that we won the Check the Box data, which is how the app was actually designed, you know, and call you, I mean, would text you every day, and then it would ask you these questions, did you have pain, red, and swelling, itching. You can check those boxes over in the really, you know, the moderate area. chills, headache, joint pains, muscle or body aches, fatigue, or tiredness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, rash. But when you look at all of those, where's the myocarditis? Where's the my heart swelled and I went to the hospital like so many children that dropped on their baseball fields and basketball courts and soccer fields across the world? Where was that? It wasn't in the app. How about questions about blood clots, which we know

are happening? How about the thrombocytopinia, the loss of blood platelets that we know. was happening with AstraZeneca and other vaccines. Well, guess what? We did FOIA request. You've seen if you watch this show. They had all those listed issues they wanted to track with their B-Safe app. But when they finally got to their B-Safe app, none of those questions got asked. Instead, all of the stiffness, soreness, headaches, nausea, all things that they would say to if you check that box, good. It just shows you the vaccines working. Not all the things that were destroying your life. For that, they left the free text field. That open box up there that said, hey, if we didn't cover it with any of the things that we'll just write off as being natural to a vaccine,

if you had any of the other anomalies that happened to every rat study and mouse study and macaque study that we did prior to rushing this into the public, you'll have to write that into this box. We had to spend, I think, at least another year in court. As they said, oh, we can't give that as D. That's personal information. why it's de-identified, who cares, we don't know who said it, we need to see what they said. And they said, well, we'll give you a category and say that the free text field, you know, was in this category.

So we don't want the category. You said transparency. We want to know what they wrote in those boxes. Well, they are now turning it over because of I can. The federal judge orders, there it is again, CDC to release all B-safe free text entries in a huge win for vaccine safety and transparency. Well, there is, folks, brace yourselves. There was only 10 million people that took part in the V-Safe data. So how many people do you think weren't covered by this section? This is the app that we built to show you all of that check-the-box data. And we learned tons, like 30% of people were either hospitalized or missed work or couldn't perform daily activities, which made that vaccine horrific.

We already built you this dashboard, but now we're going to get into what that didn't cover. All of the serious injuries that had to be written in. Out of 10 million people, so far, it's still coming. We're still getting more and more of it. But right now, 2.6 million people out of 10 million people had issues not covered in that checked the box that went and put in entries. And we have nearly 6 million entries, which meant that first box, box that they filled in obviously didn't get the job done. They came back for more. Are you dying? Are

curious to know what were they writing in their box? Well, we're building an app right now that we want to launch by next Thursday. I want to celebrate with you that we have taken the 2.6 million people's information. There's 6 million entries, which adds up to 52 million lines of data. We have a power team right now building a dashboard so that anyone in the world can search this data and type in things like chest pain. Who complained of chest pain? Blood clots. How about death? Yes, they're in there.

Get ready, world. This thing is coming. The truth is coming like a freight trade. People get ready. But I need your help. I need your help to deliver it right now. This is costing a lot of money. These lawsuits cost millions of dollars to get this data that's only possible because of you. This app, as you can imagine, so that it's flawless. So when everyone around the world and CNN starts going, what's going on here?

I thought we said it was safe. We want it to work right, so I need your help. I need your donations now like never before. This is a giving season. How about we give the greatest evidence of the issues around the COVID vaccine and others for Christmas, to the world. Help me do that. This is a great time to do it because we have a matching donation going on right now, the $2 million match. Let's go over to the wall, shall we? Now, first of all you have to do is click on this QR code, or you can type in Icandecide.org slash legal match to donate and get any dollar that you donated matched here. So last week, we were right here at about Right, is that where we were at 300,000? All right, here we go.

Here we go. Boom! Wow! All right, we're at half a million dollars, which means that turns into 1.3 million dollars automatically. That would almost get us through a half of year of one of these cases of outing our regulatory agencies, hiding data that they wanted to share for 75 years. But I want to see this go all the way up to here. We've got to do it by the end of the year. And if you help me do that this week, right?

now, I'm going to deliver the most amazing app the world has ever seen. And why is this important? Well, yeah, we're celebrating with the congressional hearing said, you know, that masks don't work, and that the social distancing was a lie, and lockdowns did more harm than the virus itself. But it still says this in the app. Operation Warp Speed was a tremendous success and a model to build upon in the future. The vaccines, which are now probably better characterized as therapeutics, undoubtedly saved millions of lives by diminishing likelihood of severe disease and death. All right, it's a little bit like Peter McCullough when he first came on this show and said, COVID vaccine, bad, childhood vaccine's good, then he finally did his investigations.

Same thing with most of the sciences came on here. These guys were all trying to keep a cheery face on this whole thing saying, well, there was some good that came from the vaccine. Wait till they see the open text fields. Are you ready for this? Are you ready to bring the whole thing? crashing down in reality. Help me do that this week. I need you.

We can match $2 million and blow everybody's mind and finally be able to say, I have the evidence. You don't get to say anymore out of all the 10 million people that got this vaccine, here's how many died, here's how many had heart attacks,

here's how many at blood clots, here's what they didn't want anyone to know. Be a part of making history. That's what this is about right now. This is where ICAN goes where no CNN, No, you know, no MSNBC or Fox ever goes. They complain about the world. We, meaning you and me, we change it.

Join us now. Type and donate to 72022, and we will send you a link to make it easy to make a tax-deductible donation. All right. Let's lighten it up. It's the holiday season coming, you know. And one of the best ways to let everyone know what you're following, and what information you're getting is to grab some of the Highwire holiday merch. Take a look.

Tis the time to celebrate the holidays and an amazing year of winning. Give the gift of the Highwire this holiday season with gear that not only entertains but enlightens. From cozy hoodies perfect for the winter chill to mugs that start the day with a good morning. The Highwire collection has something for everyone on your list. And remember when you shop at thehighwire.com, you're not just buying a gift. You're supporting our fight for transparency and informed consent. So visit our store at the highwire.com and get your loved one something special. From our family to yours, happy holidays from the Highwire where health freedom rings.

You know, we all have those people like, what do I get you for Christmas? And I think we have the perfect gift. I told you about this last year. It's a Faraday bag, right? Did you see the headline that I think China has, like, cracked AT&T and Verizon and all those? US officials are now urging Americans to use encrypted apps amid unprecedented cyber attack, like signal and things like that. You know what?

You may actually want to have some privacy when you're having, you know, conversations. You just slip your little phone right in here, close it up, and suddenly no one can hack it, no one can listen. I think this is a great high wire gift that everyone could use and guaranteed not many people already have it. Everyone in my family does. This is important for those, what they call, the cone of silence, family meetings. It's perfect for that.

All right, look, we've got to stop having our regulatory agencies allowing, you know, drugs to be put in our animals that are changing the gut system of our cows so that their bodies, which digest brilliantly, probably the most efficient animals at turning that great sunlight energy that's in the grass into meat that then sustains you and transfers that sunlight energy power, which is all life into your body. They're messing with that. And then this MRNA technology, which we have covered extensively, doesn't matter if it's COVID or the spike protein, as, you know, Brett Weinstein put it so perfectly. This vaccine is putting foreign, is delivering foreign proteins into the hearts and lungs and livers of us and other animals.

animals and then your immune system attacks those organs. What happens to the future? What happens to fertility? What happens when we start eating these things that have been contaminated and their DNAs contaminated? No one's asking those questions. I think you're about to have a regulatory agency under Robert Kennedy that finally will ask those questions. And boy, are they terrified of those questions being asked. But until we get there, there's people that have been on the front lines. One of them, he's a doctor. He's also a rancher and he's been looking at a lot of these issues and being very outspoken about it. It's Brooke Miller. This is what the world's been

looking like in the news as he sees it. We turn now to the growing concerns over the spread of bird flu. While officials say the risk to the general public remains low, work on vaccines is already underway. A new MRNA vaccine is being tested on calves and dairy workers because of the global bird flu outbreak. Scientists are ramping up vaccine testing to prevent bird flu transmission between cows and people. Next generation MRNA vaccines are now in development to protect cows against the virus. Ultimately, if we reduce the virus amounts in livestock, it's going to reduce the chance that this virus has for jumping into humans. We have to make sure that if H5N1 did come across to humans with human human transmission,

that we were in a position to immediately respond with access, equity, to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. What are the regulatory and approval processes that these MRNA vaccines have to go through? As far as what research has been done, we really don't know. It's been pretty opaque, sort of like the human MRNA vaccines. This very much needs to be transparent and open for review for independent scientists who have no conflict of interest. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by Dr. Brooks. Miller. Brooke, thank you for taking the time today. I appreciate it.

Thank you for having me on and thank you for all the work that you do, Del. You bet. I mean, look, as they say, it takes a village and this village has grown to as I think, in very many ways, I think we're becoming the majority of the thinking people in this country, which is important because we are the beacon of light for the world, but there's so many things still going on that seem like they're in the dark ages, you know, things that aren't being tested. You've been pretty vocal about, you know, at least this MRNA technology as you're being asked there in cattle. Where are we at with that in the United States of America? Well, currently there are no MRNA vaccines approved for use in cattle at this point in time.

We know they're working on them. We know that they have been completely opaque in their studies. They have not, there's basically a lack of transparency. And we're supposed to take their word for it that these are safe and effective. And history tells us that we can no longer, no longer trust the drug companies and no longer trust the regulatory agencies to have our best interests in mind. Are they vaccinating pigs and things like that or is it right now on hold for all animals? No, there is a, there is a platform called Sequevity that is produced by Merck that is for swine. We're told that in order for producers to give this vaccine to their swine, that they must sign a non-disclosure agreement. So that brings up a lot of red flags right there.

Yeah. Yeah, so basically don't talk about it. Don't talk about what it's doing. Is it in a trial space then? or are they considering it open to the free market, they just you're not allowed to talk about it? Oh, I think it's, I think it's been approved. It has definitely been approved by the FDA and the USDA.

Have we noticed, is anyone, you know, since you're in that space, is anyone complaining about seeing any issues around the use of that vaccine and their animals or does it seem safe at the moment? I don't know any swine producers per se that have used it. I have heard through the grapevine that it's wrought with a lot of problems and a high death loss. When we think about cattle, I mean, we obviously have watched the vaccine program explode amongst children especially.

You know, I'm very focused on this issue. A fully vaccinated child in the 1980s got about, you know, nine or ten vaccines. A fully vaccinated child currently is somewhere in the 50. 53, 54, 55 vaccines. Those are multi-dose vials. So we're getting up around 75 to 80 total vaccines in a child by the time you're 18. Have we seen that same sort of massive growth in vaccination use amongst cattle or has it been a little bit more tempered? It's been a lot more tempered as far as there's still a lot of vaccination of cattle, probably over vaccination of cattle. There's a lot of propaganda out there that's put off as scientific evidence.

But there's a lot of vaccines that are needed in cattle, but we're probably over vaccinating our cattle if you want to know the truth about it, but not to the extent that we're doing our children, not even close. Have you, I mean, obviously you're a rancher, you vaccinate your cattle. what has been your personal experience with that in working with vaccines and cattle? Well, it's interesting that you bring that up because like a lot of people, a lot of lights went off in my head when they put the pediatric vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccine on the pediatric vaccine schedule.

And I just thought it was madness. and we saw all the harms that the COVID-19 vaccine has done to our population in multiple ways, harming the immune system and more. And so I started questioning my vaccine practices. We mainly vaccinate for four viral respiratory diseases in our livestock. We vaccinate the calves. It's called shipping fever. It's four different viruses that cause pneumonia and viral respiratory diseases. but these same viral respiratory diseases can cause reproductive problems in the cowherd. So it's pretty standard practice for a lot of producers to vaccinate their cow herd about a month to six weeks or more before breeding every year with these viral respiratory vaccines.

And last fall, I decided not to. I decided, you know, I'm worried that these vaccines are actually causing problems that they should be preventing. And lo and behold, when we checked our cattle for pregnancy rates in the spring, we had basically zero open cows, whereas normally we'll have four, five or six cows, you know, four or five percent of the herd suffer miscarriages or abortions or abortions or and then get bread laid or come in open or not pregnant. And last year after using no vaccines, we were pretty much 100% bread in the entire herd, with the exception of one old cow that was just pretty much worn out.

I mean, that's incredible because you said you're being told the vaccine is to protect illnesses that will affect fertility. And you're saying once you just gave it a shot, let me try not giving them, you had a more successful fertility rate in your herd. Yeah, that's just one year. We'll do that again this year. We just started breeding in the last month, but we'll do that again this year and see where things lie.

But I think if it's two years in a row, it's pretty much got it set in stone that these vaccines do have an adverse effect on the animals that we're giving them to. Very interesting. Now, there's a huge conversation about bird flu. Obviously, this is the buzzword. They gave up on monkey pox, and I don't think they can really go after ranchers and cows with monkeypox. So bird flu seems to have more resonance.

And, you know, we're seeing reports. We found bird flu in the milk of a cow. And in that one of the reports that we just ran in in the news pieces that you were in saying things like we're going to vaccinate the cows for COVID and the, and the world. I mean, for bird flu and the workers, they're working on those vaccines. What are your thoughts on that? Do ranchers talk about that? I mean, I know you're different. You're a doctor, so you're probably looking at this in a different way.

But are ranchers just down to like, yeah, hey, just give me a vaccine because you've got some abstract fear that a bird virus that has never infected human beings really or turned into a pandemic suddenly will? Is there a conversation about that or are you all alone there? Now, ranchers are pretty savvy, Del. By and large, a lot of ranchers didn't take the MRNA vaccine themselves. They realized that this bird flu thing is being blown way out of proportion. It's just more fear and propaganda to try to sell product and control and money, basically. you know, by and large, there have been very few workers that have allegedly contracted bird flu in

dairies, and they've all been very minor illnesses. And, you know, while the cows, if they do get H5N1, the dairy cows, it does decrease milk production for a short period of time, but they, by and large, are recovering unless the federal government comes in and euthanizes them. And that's my concern. I have to say when I watch this story, when I see the Bill Gates's of the world, we just reported, you know, the World Economic Forum and even some of the documents by Biden administration show this desire to get to zero meat uptake, that that's the future they dream of. They're investing in lab grown meats and cricket meal and all these things. You know, so there's this desire to get rid of meat eating. One of the things. One of the things. One of the ones. One of the ones. ways you would do that is just make the product so incredibly expensive that people just have to choose a different option. And that leads to, I mean, I know like I'm stacking things together, but, you know,

I'm concerned about the sort of supply and demand side of this. We have watched them coal, I think, over a hundred million chickens now in America. I'm not, check me if that maybe it's less, but millions and millions of chickens have been cold here in America due to this bird flu. If they do that with chickens, what stops them doing that with cows? And boy, that sure would help that agenda along by reducing the meat supply altogether. Am I out in left field or do you think that there's a concern that there's an agenda behind this? There is definitely an agenda behind this. There's, there are definite globalists like Bill Gates and the whatnot and the extreme left that they feel like they should control everything and they want to be a

extremely wealthy. And by and large, the American people are very independent. And the only way you can control them is through fear. And they did the fear of the pandemic and controlled a lot of people by propagating a bunch of non-truths during the pandemic. You control energy. You can control the people and you control economics, money. But the big thing is if you can control the food, you can control anybody because hungry people are very compliant people and they're systematically trying to destroy our ability to produce our own food here in this country we currently have fewer livestock or fewer cattle in this country than any time since 1948 really we have four yes we have four global

monopolies that control the protein industry in the United States and they have made it so unprofitable for farmers and ranchers over the last several decades that kids are not coming back to the ranch and farm and they're not taking over the farm and ranch because they see the hard work and they see the very low to no profits and people are just going out of business. And we basically don't have a free market in the protein market. There's a bottleneck right there at the monopolies, the meat packing monopoly, there are four oven that control 85% of the market.

They try to destroy the free market and they destroy our ability to sell our product for a fair value, what it's really worth. And consumers are finally starting to wake up and they're going and doing more direct marketing or buying directly from ranchers now as opposed to through the big monopolies. And they get a better product, they get a safer product. And they also help ensure a future, you know, a future sustainable food source. Do you think that, I mean, that's, I'm doing some of that behind the scenes. And I mean, that's, I buy my meat now directly from local farms. I get raw milk from local farms. You develop now a relationship with your local rancher. You can find out some of them have sections that they're, you know, trying new things going all organic and things like that. Like you, I'm not vaccinating a group of cows. You can be involved in that. Say I'd like to buy meat from there. Is that, are we perhaps? Are we perhaps? because of this authoritarian experience through COVID.

In some ways, it was such a great awakening for this nation, especially. Is there a future in taking these things back from government? When we look to the government for so many answers, it's obviously created so much more harm than good. Do you think, you know, as we sit and watch programs like this, Is the message to the audience, get involved with your local farmers. Let's start getting back to a direct-to-consumer marketplace. Is there an answer there?

Yeah, well, we have to have the right administration in, and hopefully we have the right administration in now with President Trump and Bobby Kennedy. He understands Bobby Kennedy, from what I've heard him talk about, understands the globalist and the monopolist. but we need to develop a decentralized food system where it's more regionalized. We're not shipping product all the way across the country. That's very inefficient.

We need to develop a series of packing plants all across the country and not have them concentrated in any one area. And in my mind, we need to divest and break up the big four packers. I mean, that's the only way we'll have a free and fair market and have a bunch of smaller and moderate-sized packers all over the country. Our food supply will be much more resilient. You know, we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic where we had a couple of workers became ill,

and that closed down several large packing plants. And for the first time and a long while, we saw shortages of meat at the meat counter. And the packers then just dropped the prices. I mean, they basically price gouged on both ends. They price gouged the consumption. consumer and they price scouts the producer. They dropped the producer's prices and their profits went through the roof. I mean, absolutely obscene. How much foreign interference is happening when you

say you said globalists, you know, four global companies who are there? I mean, I know a huge, huge part of the pig industry has just been purchased by China and now essentially, you know, I mean, I think the larger percentage of our pigs in America are, uh, a Chinese company, and it just begs the question, you know, should our borders be that open to business, or do we need to sort of buy America, make America? I mean, if it's grown here, shouldn't it be Americans raising it? And so what is the affiliation in these meatpacking plants? Are the American companies? No, they're multinational. Two of them are Brazilian-owned, JBS and Marfrig, and then

Tyson is heavily invested in by China. And then there's one American company. They just laid off 10% of their workforce, or announced 10% layoff cargo. So they are an American company, but they're one of the monopolies. And they use the same monopolistic practices that the other companies do.

You know, the, these, a lot of these, there's a lot of criminal activity in some of these companies. The founder and owner of JBS was placed in jail for bribing the Brazilian president. I mean, that's fact. And if he's willing to bribe the Brazilian president, who else are they willing to bribe? Yeah.

They use anti-competracies practices, and they hide behind confidentiality agreements. And then they also control, basically, they control the beef checkoff, which is an $80 million a year, checkoff that beef producers pay into, and it's administered by National Cattleman's Beef Association, which is a mouthpiece for the big packers and the big multinationals.

And they basically lobby against the American rancher. And that's one of the hardest things to get across to our legislators and President Trump is that just because they have a name of an agricultural group doesn't mean they have agriculture, the American ranchers, and the American consumers best interests at heart. In England, we just reported that they basically are going to bring an inheritance tax. upon farms with headlines saying that farmers are hoarding the land throughout time. You know, when I think of America, you know, the American cowboy and the open plains of the Wild West and the ranchers and the farmers, it's truly, you know, the rolling green hills.

You know, this attack seems real. I know, you know, there's a lot of politicians that are looking at this, but an inheritance tax would really destroy farming altogether if that happened here, would it not? I mean, if your kids have to pay a huge tax to take on the farm, that'll probably get rid of the last few that are planning on doing it. No, you're exactly right. And it gets back to control. It's a war on the American farmer and rancher, which is really a war on the American people. It's, you know, we're not making that much money in production agriculture as it is. And if you make it tougher, more and more regulations, more and more taxes, it's just going to run more and more people out of business. And that's, that's really what they, what they desire. Bill Gates wants to make all your food in a lab. He wants to control everything. He wants to give everybody these harmful vaccines and reduce the world's population. You know, it's, it's pretty sad. And they use climate change, net zero, to get what they want when really they are really anti-environmentalism.

Because a lot of the practices they're doing are harmful to the environment. They're losing sight of all of that. We have a saying in ranching, the American rancher is the original environmentalist, and I truly believe it. Wow. We were born on this land. We love the land. and we're definitely not going to do anything to harm it. Yeah.

You know, we have a really active audience. I know you're doing some work to try and turn this around. Tell me a little bit about that. Well, I was exactly what are you talking about because I'm very involved in the medical freedom. The Catalan's Association was what I was talking, the Catalan's Association. Yeah.

Yeah, I'm a founding member of the United States Cattlemen's Association, which is a nationwide, Association of Grassroots Producers, the immediate past president. My term termed out two years ago. And now I'm still on the executive committee and still very active in the United States Cattlemen's Association. We're active in trying to make profitability or make ranching profitable for future generations. But we've also come out very strong against the MRNA vaccine and livestock. We've developed a stating that it should be banned and if it is ever approved in livestock then all of the safety and this all the studies show efficacy and safety must be an open book and they must be

completely transparent and reviewed by independent scientists who have no conflict of interest and then even even at that to that end it's considered it we considered a drug and And labeling, it must be completely transparent, both to the rancher who's giving the vaccine, exactly what he's giving the vaccine, and to the consumer when they purchase meat or other livestock or food products that have been treated with modified MRNA or self-replicating MRNA. Wow. Is there anything we can do? Is there a petition that you're working on, or is that just something you guys do internally?

How do we support the work that you're doing from a consumer's perspective? Well, you know, we could certainly use all the monetary donations. We're producer funded. We don't get money from the beef checkoff or anything like that, so we're producer funded. And we certainly would appreciate any donations that you could have. But also, we want you to raise awareness of all these issues with Congress and the regulatory agencies. because, you know, Congressmen want to get reelected. And as a group, farming and ranching is a very small group in this country,

but it's so very important to the American people and the health of the American people. So, you know, everybody needs to be as informed as possible, and we really appreciate you amplifying this message for us today, but we need more and more and more of this. So everybody pitch in because, we're all in it together if we go out of business you're not going to have a supply of healthy safe natural food you know as a physician I've seen the harm that the dietary guidelines and processed food have done and my day is spent every day

re-educating people and I have had great success in reversing chronic disease hypertension diabetes anxiety depression autoimmune disorders with a carnivore diet and I'm a big proponent of that and that's going to go away if Bill Gates has his way. I absolutely agree. It's a very, very important fight. Whole foods is the answer. It's what Bobby Kennedy and make America healthy again, the whole Maha movement is getting back to that whole foods space, you know, real vegetables, real meat, let's be serious, eating things that are, you know, made in a laboratory or overly processed or insects we have never really eaten throughout our evolution is just not the answer.

The American farmer, the American rancher is the answer. Highway, we're going to do everything we can to support you. Obviously, I know your message is being heard, and I'll make sure you're in touch with Bobby Kennedy, keep that conversation opening. You're doing great work with FLCCC, which is just a brilliant organization that we've partnered with so many times. Brooke, I just, you know, I feel your heart, I feel your soul on this. We're in this together. These are great times. This is the moment. This is the time where we really look over this next few years where I think we have an opening. We have a listening ear inside of our government. It's not going to be easy. There's plenty of, you know, die hard bureaucrats in there that don't move. But I've been, you know, had my ear to the ground, if you will. There's real change upon us. And so, let's make sure we get your voice inside there, but certainly I'm going to spread your message

that all of us need to use our voice right now. So thank you for taking the time to enlighten us on what's happening in the beef industry and pig industry here in America. Well, thank you, Del. I appreciate you having me on. And again, I want to thank you for all your good hard work. And hopefully we've educated some more consumers and more with American public about the plight of the American rancher and how that goes hand in hand. hand with the American consumer in our country. I agree. All right, take care, Brooke. I'll see you soon. Thank you. Thank you. All right. All right. Well, I mean, you know, just the salt of the earth, right? Don't you want to get back to that America of just the beautiful green farms and healthy animals?

The whole thing seems crazy to me that somehow, you know, keeping cows from farting. I mean, I just think when human beings weren't here, can you imagine how many animals must have been teeming on this earth before humans are even here prehistoric. I mean, did they not fart? I mean, the whole thing just seems so ridiculous. You know, it's, it's nature. I don't know. I mean, I have friends that still buy into it, but I'm telling you, I don't think they're ever going to get away with this global warming thing because I used to be 100% in and I'm about 99% out. And so I don't know where you're going to go. I know people are never into it, especially with all the harm that's being done. So many important issues that we're covering here.

here on the high wire. You make that possible. I really hope you'll take this holiday season to donate and to help us continue to do this important work to spread these important messages to bring you these heartfelt truth sayers like Dr. Brooke Miller there. One of the things we're doing, we started Highwire Plus. We're giving those of you that do donate a bonus content. We've got Jeffrey Jackson's got a documentary series. I think we're going to be launching right at the beginning of the new year. We're really excited. about that. He's been working hard that. You're only going to give it, get it. If you're a member, you're only a member simply by just becoming a recurring donor. This week, one of the things we're dropping is another Freedom Files for all of you that support the work that we do. You make this possible. This is a way to give back. This is this week's Freedom File dropping on Tuesday. I'm here with Eric Brackie, Executive Director of the Free State Projects, the U.S. dollar. There's obviously been inherent flaws with that for a very long time. What do you see as an answer to that? I think the answer is to build parallel systems, and I think that the collapse

of the U.S. dollar is inevitable. Our federal government has inflated the currency so much, so quickly, to the point where I think a lot of other countries are getting very nervous about being dependent on the dollar and are looking for alternatives. I personally hope that what we see is a transition away from anything that's manipulated or controlled by a central bank, and that we see a return to either precious metals as the backing of currency or something like Bitcoin. I think the worst possible scenario is the movement towards a central bank digital currency, which I imagine probably many in Washington, D.C. are trying to plan the big switcheroo where the dollar fails and suddenly we're on in an even worse monetary system where everything we do

is monitored and controlled by central authorities. That would be the worst case scenario. Freedom Files Las Vegas, our newest series on Highwire Plus exclusively for monthly donors. I once again, I think I'm doing this almost every week. I just want to thank all of you for making this incredible experiment the high wire possible. When I look at how we've affected the world, we're not alone. There's other great organizations out there, but as I've said, I think we're the only news organization that turns around and sues the government or the military if we think they're doing harm. I want to do more of that.

I want to get into farming. I want to protect farmers, organic farmers, Amish farmers. You know, we've got to make sure that our food supply is being protected. We've been really dynamic in the vaccine space. We managed to bring back the religious exemption from Mississippi. We're getting close in California. I can feel it. So so many, you know, great things are happening. But there's more to do. And, you know, Aaron's series building a bigger and bigger legal team to do as much as we can get you involved with.

So please think about, you know, if you aren't already, become a part of this. Not just because, you know, it's great to make change, but it's great to be able to say you're a part of change. It's great to be able to, you know, go home to your kids and say, hey, you know what? We want a lawsuit. You know, we donate every month to ICA. and they just won another lawsuit. And now the open text fields are going to be available to the whole world. Books like the Pfizer papers by Naomi Wolf are only possible because of the work I can did. Those Pfizer papers don't exist. There is no book. There's no one doing research

if we don't keep doing what we're doing. We're really dedicated to it. I am so thankful that I get to work with this brilliant network, you, the audience. Thank you for everyone that shares this show of it is spread the word and made this a bigger and bigger success. I want to do more. You should want to do more. These are the next, these next couple of years should be transformative. We need to make sure they are so transformative that we can never go back. We can't go back to the insanity. We are so far away from it. We're back to eating whole foods, growing good food, supporting our farmers, supporting a free market idea, getting rid of rules and regulations to push some government agenda. And what I am telling you is, like I've seen a closer look at it now and

some of the work that I've done, we have a overly bloated government. Bobby Kennedy has 80,000 employees when he gets confirmed. 80,000 people that work for health. And somehow, we're the sickest nation in the world. Somebody needs to start saying, you're fired. We're going to help out in that process. We're going to continue to bring the truth. And we're going to continue to stand up against the powers that be, no matter how ugly our Wikipedia page gets. It's not going to stop me. It shouldn't stop you. Thank you for being a part of the high wire. And I'll see you next week.