The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 422: MAKING A KILLING

Episode Date: May 3, 2025

Del breaks down breaking news as U.S. health officials call for placebo-controlled trials before licensing new vaccines—a major shift after years of pressure from ICAN. Jefferey Jaxen reports on the fall of Davos and growing backlash against net-zero climate policies. Plus, Del sits down in-studio with Angelina Ireland to unpack the dark expansion of Canada’s controversial MAID law.Guests: Angelina IrelandBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out into the high wire. You know, the world just keeps changing around me and sometimes I get giddyed about it. Just last night I was, you know, working away. I was actually in a meeting and all of a sudden it popped up that a major newspaper one asking about the breaking story that the FDA was suddenly going to do placebo trials. And I just thought, what a different world I'm living in.

It used to be like, oh no, what do they want now? Now it's I can't wait to get on the phone. Of course, there's a great interview with Marty Macri that just shows us how far along we've come. Take a look at this. I want to talk to you about Novavax, if I could. It's protein-based COVID vaccine you were an enthusiast for back in COVID. Its target date for permanent approvals, I understand it was April 1. That's now been delayed.

Why was it delayed? And if you'd be so kind, what role did your special assistant, Tracy Beth Hogue, play in that process? Well, first of all, Major, good to be with you. And yes, you're right. I have been enthusiastic about non-MRNA COVID vaccines. To help with people who have a tough time with taking mRNA vaccines, I felt. that it could increase vaccination rates. The last study that we have showing that it has a clinical benefit was from 2020 and 2021,

and it excluded people with prior COVID infection. Now essentially everyone has natural immunity. So it's my general feeling, not with this particular product, which I can't discuss in depth, but with drugs in general that we need to know if they work today in order to be able to recommend them. So we are asking some companies in general to do clinical studies, a basic clinical study, so we can educate the population and have information to work with. Should a 12-year-old thin, healthy girl get a seventh COVID shot this year? I don't know the answer to that because we don't have good clinical data.

We can get that data. And what about Tracy Beth Hoag? What role did she play in this evaluation process? Dr. Hogue is an amazing MD PhD who has joined my staff. as a special assistant to the commissioner. And she is involved in reviewing data sets at the agency. And I'm really excited to have her in the process. And she'll be involved in other approval procedures, I gather.

She's an amazing, talented MD PhD, and we're lucky to have her. And that is our job at the FDA to review data. I'm a science guy. I come from Johns Hopkins. I've published 300 scientific peer review studies in my career. And so you're going to see gold standard science and common sense as two themes in this new FDA. And for COVID shots for next winter generally, is the FDA still planning to approve updates to those? We're taking a look. I can't comment on any particular application. As you know, we have a bunch of applications for those booster shots.

Remember, major, 85% of American health care workers said no to the last COVID booster. So we have a bit of a public trust problem. I think there's a lot. void of data. And I think rather than allow that void to be filled with opinions, I'd like to see some good data. I love this clip. I mean, obviously, Marty is doing a beautiful job to weave and stay away from bias, but just say, hey, these products that people are taking, we're no longer just going to blanket say that they're okay. We want to reevaluation. Should a child be getting another COVID shot, you know, after, you know, all the years that have gone by. What happens about, And if we all have hurt immunity, we've already caught this thing.

Does no one ever test the vaccine amongst those that really already had infections? So you can see that they're forcing all of the industry to go back to the drawing boards. And of course, there's been lots of pushback on the idea of placebos now entering this. I know Jeffrey Jackson is going to talk about this coming up. But folks, I just want to point out here because we do a lot of talking about Robert Kennedy Jr. But Dr. Marty McRey is the one that drove the removing the petroleum-based chemical dyes. Robert Kennedy Jr. overseeing this. But I say this to say, this isn't just one man in there now with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He really has surrounded himself with guys that are bold enough

to actually start speaking about doing science or saying, you know what, we're not rushing that vaccine on the market. No matter what, you know, the MSNBC hosts want to do, no matter how much science they want to avoid, we have logic now. We have reason. We have a discussion. We are talking about efficacy. Is it efficacious? Is it safe? All things. that here at I can, we have been fighting for this to just be a reasonable mainstream conversation from the beginning. Now, I know some of you would like to see vaccines eradicated from the planet, and you can keep working on that. From my perspective, it's always been about choice. It's always been about science, do the science, and then show us how the science is turning out, and no matter

what, we always have choice. So so many of these things are now starting to fall in order. we truly have just come a long way. Obviously, tons of great work to do. But I'm just so ecstatic that I, that, you know, newspapers are having to face the fact that, you know, the world is changing and that the things that Del Beechie said and that Robert Kennedy Jr. said in the past was called misinformation. That's now mainstream information. They're having to admit that we were right. So super exciting time. Now, there's a huge event coming up next week around the, um, uh, around the, Peter Mark's secret tapes. Of course, we have the secret recordings. I think it's about seven recordings, six videos or so. We have a timeline, random, what he was saying to the people while

he was, you know, saying something completely different behind closed doors on these Zoom calls with vaccine injured people. Remember, he could say, I don't know, we just don't see a signal. Well, now we know all he was seeing was signals behind closed doors in the trials themselves and the people that were being injured and lying to the public. What does that mean for his future? Well, we'll let the press decide, but we're going to have a press conference with me and Aaron Siri and Brienne Dresson in the National Press Club next week right in the heart of Washington, D.C. on Tuesday. Here's the promo for that. You won't want to miss it. Hey, everybody, Del Beatry here. This is a very important week here at ICANN.

We are holding an online press conference on Tuesday, May 6th at 10 a.m. Eastern Time. It's one that you do not want to miss. Through months of extensive legal work, ICANN is obtained never before seen internal recordings that Peter Marks knowingly misled the public about the COVID-19 vaccine during his time at the FDA. We know this because we have obtained over seven hours of secretly recorded video calls between Peter Marks and Breanne Dresson, along with other vaccine injured victims, describing to him in detail the serious injuries they suffered from the COVID vaccine during the clinical trials. They were previously healthy, they got vaccinated, and they became ill. She bled and bled and bled. We've got thousands of people that are having issues with the neurological side effects to the COVID vaccine.

It started within an hour of getting the vaccine. We're both young, and we were totally healthy before getting the vaccine. Unfortunately, now this is happening to teenagers. I will never forget when Riley cried out to me, where's my mommy? She couldn't see that I was right there. Immediately following our press conference, we're launching a detailed, interactive timeline with all of this information for you, the internal documents, the secretly recorded calls, all showing that Peter Marks was being told firsthand by vaccine-injured victims what

he knew, what he was learning, and what he was hiding from the public while simultaneously misleading the American people. Getting a booster will give you peace of mind. Please don't delay. You cannot afford to miss this press conference in the release of this shocking timeline. Be sure to tune in at 7 a.m. Pacific, 10 a.m. East. at the highwire.com. Followed by the release of secret recordings, The Real Peter Marks, an immersive timeline. For more information, go to the real petermarks.com now.

Well, that's going to be streaming live here on the Highwire next Tuesday at 10 a.m. Eastern time. You can check on the High Wire. We're going to have all the major press there, already getting people that are reaching out. I think this is a huge story. There's a lot of, you know, you can do hidden videos on someone you've never heard of,

of and we see those those are great at a bar or something like this this is secret videos of the guy that decided this product was safe this is the man that technically did rush it onto the market that you know thought up the idea of warp speed because he was a trekkie this is the guy that's the heart of it that promised us it was safe said he was seeing no signals of course when you look at the verres reports now we're well over 35 000 people have been reported killed by the COVID vaccine Here's the actual numbers. 38,541 reported deaths just from the COVID vaccine. 220,000 hospitalizations.

Almost 30,000 cases of swelling of hearts and patients. 156,000 people have gone to urgent care, nearly 20,000 Bels palsy, antephylaxis that can kill you in up to 11,000, and doctors' office visits from the vaccine itself in nearly 250,000. Can you imagine if you had a company, just call it a carlachis, crib or a stroller that had those kind of stats. Anything that we use, have you ever seen anything to stay on the market? It is only on the market because of Dr. Peter Marks, and we believe we're going to bring that crashing down when mainstream media finally finds out what a liar this man is, and why did anyone ever give him that much power? It's a huge press release happening next Tuesday.

I hope you don't miss it. We're hitting from all sides. I can has always been on this. This is our beat and we're not going to lay off of it. We're Americans public health watchdog. So now it's time for one of our strongest watchdogs out there, the Jackson Report. Kind of feels like we got them on the ropes this week, Jeffrey. It sure does. And it seems like that's every week now. So much has changed in even just one year. I mean, we've been reporting the last four years, it seems like a stranglehold around our necks with trying to get information out and trying to get any movement on key issues. And I want to remind people just last year, in fact, you were in Geneva, Switzerland, and you were at a conference and a rally with Ryan Cole, so many other activists in our

movement were there. And you came back with a report, kind of an ominous tone from there. Remember, this was a year ago, so as the pandemic was still going on, our governments were not listened to us, were being censored. We remind people what that looked like. Take a look. When I was in Geneva, it all became very clear, a great investigation. reporter that spent many years in Afghanistan asked me if I'd like to drive around and see the different complexes being built. I, you know, I didn't get out of the car. I shot the cell phone just sort of out of the window at things like this is the WEF compound that's being built there. It goes down the side of the hill. Every one of these facilities is armed guards and surveillance

cameras. This is the new WHO building that they're building this complex. There's skyscrapers going up, cranes and right here there's a tunnel that drives right into this driveway from the airport. They can literally move people in and out of the airport from all over the world. You can land on the Swiss side or the French side. No one will know you came and went. IOM, you know, the Institute of Immigration, UNESCO. They're building an empire there, folks. It was.

I remember coming back from that. Of course, we were out there. You were really protesting the WHO treaty and this idea. that they could just overtake the sovereignty of any nation via treaty by, you know, declaring a pandemic. But it was shocking still. Just watch that footage again. And it doesn't, the little video camera just does not capture it where you see the cranes all over Geneva and these giant complexes that go for it appears to be miles as though.

I mean, and it does seem like they're making the headquarters for all things world dominance is going to be coming out of Geneva. So very, very shocking stuff. and, you know, watching that again, just gives me chills again. Yeah, you know, I don't know, Del, you're usually a pretty positive guy. So when you came back and said, look, they're preparing, this is like a cultural battle they're preparing for. It was kind of like a deep breath of like, wow, this is a cultural war. We're going to buy where we're in and we're going through.

Well, that's, that's changing. That's changing in a big way. And some of these key players are really stepping down, taking the exit, taking the buyout. One of those people that's stepping down, as we reported, is Klaus Schwab, the head, the former head now, the World Economic Forum that's based right down the road from Geneva, Switzerland, but it's based in Switzerland there with the World Trade Organization. So he steps down, and then the W.EF. puts this up. World Economic Forum announces governance transitions. They're trying to transition out. They're trying to maybe rebrand themselves. And so a new gentleman has now entered that

space of Klaus Schwab's chairman, but he's kind of the interim chairman right now. And this is the former CEO head, Peter Brabeck-Latmith. And for people that don't, know about him, he can, unfortunately a lot of the public probably knows him just for this comment. Take a look. So, water is, obviously, the most of the raw material that we're today on the world have. It's about, whether it's normal water-versorgation of the people, privatize, or not.

And there are two different, The one of the one of the one of an one of I would I say,

will I say, would I'm from the NGOs who are who are that they about

that water to an public right is, as as a man,

should they have just to have to have. That is the one extreme

solution. And the other that says, water is a life-mittle, so as every other leavensummitle, should that have a market have.

That may be one of the most chilling things that I've ever seen, that the extreme point of view, the extreme, this radical extreme idea that water is a right is now going to be the head of the WEF. So meaning you don't naturally have a right to have water.

And if someone owns it and wants to keep it from you, that's their right. I mean, the only thing left is you don't have a right to error. We decide whether you get air or not. I mean, we just replaced, I mean, this is the problem. Do you want to scream ding-dong, the witch is dead and jump up and down as you watch, you know, Klaus Schwab walk out the door and say, you know, don't let the door hit you in the ass. And then you see, oh, my God, they found an even bigger lunatic to run this thing. So now, you know, no one will own anything.

everyone will rent, and those that we don't like don't get any water. Fabulous. And this idea of, because every year WF has its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, and this idea of Davos Man, it's basically these people that stand outside the nation state, and they dictate policy within their countries. Remember, Klaus Schwab once said, we penetrate the cabinets of governments, and we basically make them do our bidding. And that whole idea, these private billionaires giving their private jets, flying their private jets into Davos to lecture us about our climate and carbon consumption, trying to switch over our industry to net zero.

This idea is really kind of falling by the wayside in the public's mind. And here's one of the headlines now. It's interesting. You never would have seen headlines like this years ago. The Devo Circus is now mired in scandal. Its days are numbered. It says its founder of Klashwob has already begun the process of. stepping down after whistleblowers reportedly accused him and manipulating research of a toxic workplace

culture at the organization, of demanding that staff promote the founder for the Nobel Peace Prize and of mixing up personal and corporate expenses. This thing is just going down in flames, this idea. But the two points, the really two big moving parts that the W.EF really represent and pushed are this artificial intelligence merging man with machine would no longer be a, no longer be a 100% biological human in the near future and this move to just complete net zero. It's shutting down all industry in the name of climate change. Well, that second part is really also, along with W.EF is also falling, it seems like. At least it's getting a pause and a breath of fashion air for people to really reanalyze this.

Throughout the European Union right now, this is the headline. They're proposing looser rules for automakers CO2 emissions targets. This is in Reuters. So they said automakers have to have these emissions targets. You have to switch over to electric vehicles. They're saying, no, let's back that off a little bit. We didn't really mean that. We'll give you about three more years for that.

And so we can talk about it. Even in the UK, they're relaxing their electric car rules. There's a mandate there to switch over like California had to switch over the electric cars, all electric. That's not happening. Even down to the individual house level, how you heat your house in the UK, they were going to ban wood stoves for new homes. They stopped that.

Major U-turn on wood-burning stove. This is stunning homeowners and campaigners, obviously just the campaigners who wanted to ban those stoves. But this bigger idea, this climate change idea that is people's fault is really being questioned now. And you're seeing a lot of the media starting to push back, the corporate media pushing back. Here's headline out of the Guardian, activate climate's silent majority to supercharge action experts. Say you go into this article and it's saying there's this silent majority that no one can hear but trust us, they're there and they need to activate and supercharge this action and really push us over the line so the planet doesn't heat by two degrees. Maybe we want to breathe as much and that will

happen. But what's really dangerous here is, Del you and I have reported on all these kind of overlay ideas, these masks that are used to sponsor censorship, whether it be hate speech or online safety or just plain old information, public health, any of these ideas, this mask comes in and said, because of this, we need to censor your speech. We need to tell you what you can say and what you can't say. Well, now that mask has changed and it's a climate mask. So we have this idea, this basically a trust. It's outside of a government trust called Impress in the UK.

And they're reporting that the climate news, the news you and I are talking about right now in reporting, it needs to be boosted by independent regulation. And what does that mean? Well, we go to this article literally says the headline, the climate crisis being is being misreported and there is no legal way to stop it yet. Goes into this article. It says UK press regulator, Impress calls for regulation akin to defamation and liable where individuals can lodge complaints against news publishers for climate

mis and disinformation. And it goes on even further, Impress plans to launch an ethical content training program to a credit journalist. Remember, you can't report unless we tell you you're accredited to accountable industry standards and invites climate-related news publishers to join as regulated. members. It invites them to join. Soon it'll be mandated if they get their way. And how does the crack team at impress vet their articles, this arbiter of truth? Well, you can go into this headline here and it says, we use a generative AI tool, Claude AI, to assist with summarizing parts of

the research before was edited by a human. So apparently that type of reporting is okay. But I don't know, regular reporting like we're doing needs to be accredited and labeled. And you have to go through a re-education class in order to speak the truth want you to speak. Sounds like the earth is getting a lawyer and now it's going to claim defamation if you try to say that, you know, if you try to go against this narrative that global warming is manmade or, you know, have any issues around that. Again, it's really shocking. I mean, I'd hate to be living in the EU and England. Folks, if you live in America right now, just be thanking your lucky stars and keep praying that we hold on to the power of our First Amendment

rights and right to free speech. And for all of you living in the UK and Europe that are watching, there's millions of you right now. All, you know, I think we can do right here is just continue to make the U.S. a beacon of light and hope around freedom so that you can point to it and say, why don't we have, why is our nation not like that? Why can't we have that again? So it's just, it's so important that we hold the focus here. But gee, whiz, it's getting crazy all around the rest of the world. And this climate conversation has so many offshoots. And one of them is what we reported on last week,

the geoengineering aspect of it. And so in the UK, the UK government, it made headlines last week, really just viral all over the place with this headline. Experiments to dim the sun will be approved within weeks. And this was approved by the Advanced Research and Invention Agency. That was determined by Parliament. It was created by Parliament.

It's kind of a research and development agency within the UK government. It's interesting because it sounds quite a bit like the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Defense, DARPA out of the United States. It's very interesting. The acronym goes along with that. So that's happening in the UK, but here in the US, we have Harvard. Harvard was kind of the main hub to really run some of these programs or at least research these programs. One of the key players there is a professor out of Harvard, David Keith. He caught the New York Times eye with a handful of articles. One of them was this, the scientist, David Keith, has a risky plan to cool the earth, there's growing interest. That was in 2024. Bill Gates funded this

venture, and it was called Scopex. Basically, it's like stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment. It's a big handful of words there, but launched by Harvard, funded by Bill Gates. And you can see here, we have over 10 years ago, we have David Keith talking, kind of just pontificating at a public event about geoengineering and the risks. Take a listen. Okay. Can I leap in? This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program and you put, say, the kind of program I think makes more sense we put about a million tons a year, but let's say you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year.

It's a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences. I don't sweep another rug. So it's a case where I take this much differently from Allen and think it's a much more serious issue. Now, it's true that as part of doing that, you would hope that the, you would hope that the, overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you would save more people than you killed doesn't mean there's no moral impact of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty

to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it. I don't, maybe that's more chilling than the new head of the W.E.F. I'm not sure. Jeffrey, you're really, you're making this a tough coin toss today. So this guy, You know, I'm being really honest with you, we may have to kill tens of thousands of people every year in order to do the proper climate science that we need to do. You know, I think we have to think about that. Of course, we'll move on. And we can definitely show through our own shady science that we've used throughout COVID and every other debacle we've ever created that, we're actually saving lives. Just like the COVID vaccine has saved lives.

Forget about all the children dropping with heart attacks on the football field. Forget about the people that dropping because the air and whatever the hell is in these lines in the sky that were sucking. down our, you know, into our lungs, you know, forget about all that. Just look at the beauty. Look at the fact that we're finally blocking the sun, God's light, that we're finally, you know, getting somewhere in cooling the earth. These people are absolutely nuts, and it'd be hysterical if it was a South Park episode, but it happens to be the world we live in.

And it's wonderful, Keith is being transparent there and speaking about that publicly. It's also wonderful he's talking about the moral aspect of this and putting that on the map. But what, like you said, what if there's parts of climate science that can't be modeled with our current modeling right now? What if we don't understand how the sun works? What if there's a lot of what ifs here when he's talking about do the benefits outright the risk? And the risk starts killing people. And if we greenlight that, off they go. That's a big conversation there.

And so that venture was shut down in 2024. So David Keith, Harvard's venture completely dead. David Keith's Scopex engineering program is dead. That was March 2024. But this is a learning experience here because just like Klaus Schwab, he's out, Nestle Guy in, and then we have the Harvard, Bill Gates venture shuts down. A year later, it pops up in the UK. This stuff is always going on.

It's more about the idea and the actions that are taking place. There are always be new heads that we have to focus on. But it's not about the head. It's about what these actions are moving forward. And so here in the U.S., this is a big week. We have our government now speaking like this. My name is Emily, and my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day. Bromium, aluminum, strontium, it's sprayed in our skies all day long.

That is not happening in my agency. We don't do that. It's done, we think, by DARPA, and a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. So, you know, those materials are put in jet fuel. We, I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it. We're bringing on somebody who's going to think only about that. Find out who's doing it and holding them accountable. Wow. Fantastic.

I mean, fantastic to be seeing government officials finally taking this seriously. Yeah, and it goes beyond government officials, because arguably the way the United States is set up, the states have even more power than the federal government. We have Florida just this week. Florida makes history becoming the first state to criminalize geoengineering and weather modification. So the law, the new law that is going to be signed is going to make it a felony crime to engage in this geoengineering. Five years in prison, up to five years in prison, $100,000 fine.

It passed the house in Florida by an 82 to 28 vote. So this wasn't bipartisan right down the middle just by an inch. This was overwhelming essentially. There's 34 other states exploring this type of legislation. And this in Florida was mainly a grassroots push. The people spoke up. You know, that's always a big conversation is how do we get them to change that up there? Well, the people are starting to do that.

They've spoken from the earth to change the sky, essentially. So that's an important move and a grassroots move that's happening in Florida. And one, we've really been directly involved in ICAM. We've done several shows on geoengineering, on chem trails, on, you know, injecting. sulfur dioxides and things into the stratosphere. We see the balloon company that's doing that private company now being investigated by Lee Zeldon. We've covered that. But I just really want to say, because I don't think a lot of times we sit here, we look up in the sky, and we just think there's nothing that can be done. There's no way, you know, the government is just so powerful.

I also want people to know that there are sponsors out there of this show and people that have cared that really do make a difference in this world. I think a lot of times we think that government is the only way. This is why I'm getting away from some socialist idea that the government needs to protect us. You're being protected by angels out there that sponsor, you know, groups like I can to do investigations into what's going on the sky. But they don't just stop with us. They're hitting so many different groups that I know. There's documentaries being made. Who do you think is funding that? You know, I wish sometimes we could celebrate these people, these unsung heroes that are a huge push behind this, that have got us to the point where 80 to 20 are

in a statewide vote saying, stop these lines and this thigh. Get this poison out of our air. We shouldn't be breathing this. There's no need for this. This is insanity. And so just a shout out, you know, to all of those, you know, those great entrepreneurs and people that have done very well that take that, those blessings that they have, and they bless us with a commitment and a desire to make the world a better place.

Truly, it's things like that and people like that that make I can't possible. and all the other great groups that are fighting for this. These are grassroots issues now that are changing the government. As we know, Robert Kennedy Jr. Wouldn't be there if it wasn't for groups like this. And to finally have a government that's listening, mentioning that DARPA, you know, we know now that it's happening, and we are going to put a special person into HHS to do investigations on specifically this.

Hallelujah, is what I've got to say right now. Amazing, amazing. Now, let's jump to still one of the biggest health headlines, in the world, whether you're in the UK or the United States, it's the COVID shots. And over the years, when we reported on this, it was more about looking at, you know, the corporate media was looking at who was taking the COVID shots and who wasn't. Now we've changed that lens and we're focused on the companies, the safety of their products. This is a good place to be.

In the UK, Moderna is under the microscope. This is the headline here, Moderna faces suspension over COVID jab breaches. It goes into this article. It says, if found to be lacking adequate compliance systems, Modern could ultimately be suspended or expelled from the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. It follows several code breaches, including representatives of the company offering children 1,500 pounds and teddy bears to take part in COVID vaccine trials. Treturous stuff. It goes on and says Molly Kingsley, the founder of us for them, said many of the previous

judgments against Moderna have revealed how readily it put profit ahead of the health and safety of children. Now it has also laid bare just how little regard it has had for the regular. system that was supposed to keep it honest. So let's talk about the regulatory systems that are supposed to keep them honest because a lot's happening in the United States this week. And we go to the FDA here, Dr. Marty Macquarie has made some bold statements regarding vaccine development, also vaccine approval. And I want to go through a quick media literacy exercise for our viewers here.

I want to show you three articles on this reporting on the same story. We go from low, mild temperature, Wall Street Journal, just the facts. the headline FDA asked vaccine maker to complete new clinical trial for delayed COVID shot. So basically just go back to the drawing board. We need some extra data. Then we go to stat news. We're going to turn up the heat a little bit. Statenews says U.S. health officials inject new uncertainty into approval process for COVID boosters. Stat News writes in the process, McRee and they have to be safety tested? What? Uncertainty? Go ahead, go ahead. Macaree and the spokesman of the Department of Health Immun Services appears to raise the spectrum.

that going forward, manufacturers of COVID vaccines might have to generate new effectiveness data before the release of annual updates of their vaccines. A hurdle that would be unlikely to clear to vaccinate people in time to protect them from COVID transmission, when COVID transmission is occurring. That's interesting. So I remember reporting that these shots don't stop transmission, but okay, let's just keep talking about that. Then we go to CNN, one of our favorite organizations, and you can count on them for this type of headline. Anti-vaccine sentiments may derail vaccines already awaiting FDA approval experts fear. So what happened here? Well, Nova vaccine. Sounds like a game of telephone where it just keeps getting ugly and worse with each person

answers the call. And so just to paint this picture more accurately, NovaVax, a vaccine company had a COVID vaccine in the pipeline. It was going through development. It was supposed to be greenlit. And Marty Macri did this. He took the X and said this. To be clear, this is a new product that NovaVax is trying to introduce to the market with a study of a different product from 2021. New products require new clinical clinical studies. Under this administration, we are prioritizing the gold standard of science, not what saves pharma companies tens of millions of dollars because they were complaining Nova vaccines was going to cost us so much more money to go back to the drawing board.

And what happened was they were putting forward a study that excluded. It was from 2021 that excluded people with natural immunity to COVID. They said, we don't want those people. We just want these naive COVID people that have never been exposed to this to test a product on. Now, everyone has natural. I mean, like, seriously, where are you going to find those people? Crazy. Everyone has natural immunity.

So Macri is basically saying, I want this tested with the real population that will be taking this if they take it. And it's interesting because so I remember people, 2020, Mother Jones, the publication, this was the headline in 2020. Look how far we've come. Anti-vaxxers have a dangerous theory called natural immunity. Now it's going mainstream. Went so far mainstream that everyone has it now. So that's where we're at. And, okay, moving from the COVID shots that are coming down the development pipeline,

to the COVID shots that are already approved, a lot of the public has concerns about these shots that are still being given to children, to babies, and on the CD schedule. Well, RFK Jr. was speaking with Dr. Phil at a town hall meeting, and he said this. Take a listen. Marty McCarrie, you're recently appointed. director of the FDA recently said that he was looking at removing the COVID-19 shot from the

CDC vaccine schedule for infants. I believe he said that last week and I'm interested in your opinion and if any other changes should be made in the CDC schedule. I think that is a, you know, that's something that we're talking about and I think the justification for giving Giving this shot to children is very, very weak, and particularly since there was the safety testing is utterly inadequate. And children are at almost a zero risk for COVID. And we're seeing a lot of adverse events from the vaccine, particularly in children, myocarditis, paracotitis, even strokes.

And people are trusting us to American. people are trusting us to make a good risk-benefit judgment when we recommend these products. And we need to go back and look at that recommendation. We're doing that right now. We're waiting for the Senate to confirm my CDC head, my general counsel, my deputy secretary who's a critical position, and many, many other positions. And we kind of got our hands tied with these agencies to do the kind of fast action that I would like to see. And we're way behind on the science. And I don't want to do action until I have solid science behind me.

And that's, you know, one of the things that's going to slow this down. But we're going to do it quicker than anybody imagine. That's really, I think, very important. First of all, you know, to see, again, an HHS secretary that is fielding questions about the potential of pulling back a recommendation on a vaccine. I want to say here that, you know, obviously this is a top issue for ICA. can. It's been the focus of the work that we've done. And I'm as frustrated as I know you are, Jeffrey, and many out there that it's taking so long to get this COVID vaccine away from our

kids, get it off the recommended schedule. But I think that second clip, which must have come from another commercial, I mean, from another question, I think he's laying out what we have to understand. And I've said it too. We don't want this to just be a sand painting that blows away as soon as Robert Kennedy moves on or the Trump administration is done. And we go back to business as usual because just some crazy person came in and started wiping vaccines off the schedule. What he's saying is so important. And I think you have to recognize for the most part, our government doesn't just trust

science around the world and say, hey, because of some study out in Switzerland, we're going to change our vaccine schedule. What they see is they call that a signal. Once they see a signal, they're supposed to bring it internally and do that science themselves, unbiased, see how it's all structured, oversee that stuff. in trial and then presented to the world as they, if they're going to make a new mandate or change in that mandate. And so obviously you've got the government right now, certainly Democrats are stonewalling Robert Kennedy Jr., not just getting him confirmed, not getting

all the people around him, which is terrible. We've reported on it looks like they've destroyed the VSD, the vaccine safety data link, was the database of 10 million people that we could have, we could have had answers to autism by right now. By now we would have had it, but they're just obfuscating, they're cheating, they're lying. I think they're breaking the law. Robert Kennedy Jr. is in the middle of it. But I think at that point, you know, as he's saying, he needs to get the studies going, he's going to get them going.

We're all chomping the bit every single day another child's injured. Every, you know, people are dying still. And it's going to, you know, it sucks that it's going to take time. But I think it's important, you know, acknowledge that that's a part of the process, you know. And, Del, there's two moving parts to that you just illustrated. Because what we saw with Peter Marks is the injured, the people that were injured by the COVID vaccine, there is a critical mass of people. We don't know that number. Then there's the people still being, the children, still being injected with this vaccine, those are two moving parts.

If the recommendation down the road is removed in June, like they're saying that maybe for children, that does nothing to the liability or the compensation ability for people to get compensation for their injuries or deaths from the vaccine. The vaccine is, the co-vaccine is protected by the PEP Act, which Biden renewed until 2029. So that is not going to put this vaccine and put people injured by this vaccine into the vaccine injury compensation program. It's still all going to the countermeasures injury compensation program. Black hole, very few people get compensated. So still, there's a big question with that conversation, too, of where do the injured go? How do they get compensation? Recommendation or not is not going to make a difference here.

Now, I'll tell people right now, we have Aaron, Siri, digging deep right now on lawsuits we can bring to end the PEP Act to get rid of so there's not a secondary protection once Marty McRey finally does the right thing. And Robert Kennedy Jr. polling that. COVID vaccine. I am sure that's in the cars for the future, but if it's still protected liability by the PEP Act, we're going after it. We are not stopping, folks. I can is not stopping. I also want to just, again, I open up the show showing look how mainstream media is now having to deal with this issue. But Dr. Phil, Dr. Phil is in on this now. You know, it's amazing, what, an amazing roundtable. It was wild when he started getting in and interviewing Robert

Kennedy Jr. when nobody else will, millions and millions of views going viral. And I'll tell you, Jeffrey, you know what I've said it on this show. My whole start in media actually starts with Dr. Phil. I started as a freelance investigative reporter and producer for Dr. Phil flying all over the country. I eventually worked on staff. And of course, then they went on to create the doctor's television show where I won an Emmy Award. There's a huge part of my life that's wrapped up in just sort of a little bit, you know, I guess off the record in a way. I just had one of those amazing moments with your life coming full circle.

and I had an opportunity to interview Dr. Phil just over the weekend in Dallas, Texas, the first time ever. My boss, there he is, and now I get to ask the questions of him. It's in a stunning. So many people came up and were shocked at his perspective on the COVID, you know, pandemic and vaccines. And what he finds so interesting about Robert Kennedy, Jr. That's going to air on the Maha podcast coming out next week. So the whole world, though, just so many different entities that are stepping. up to the truth and here to make a difference. We're seeing laws all across this country,

starting to change states changing the laws around health. Jeffrey, we're in a heyday moment, man. Pedal to the medal, take no prisoners. Keep up the great work and I'll see you next week. All right. Thank you. All right. Take care. Well, speaking of, you know, one of the greatest attorneys of all times, Airman Siri, there's so much work he's doing all the time with his amazing team that you don't even hear about. Most of the time, we only only talk about the victories. But as I said, we are deep looking at the Prep Act. Aaron is digging through every piece of information. How do we take away this liability protection? Do we have to wait for Congress or is there another way in? Can we get there through lawsuits? Can we undermine

the system? It's why he's in the middle of the Peter Marks tapes. He's helping us get that out there. He's getting, you know, stopping his busy schedule just up here with us in Washington, D.C. coming up for this incredible moment. We're going to release to the world, not just these incredible videos, but a very detailed timeline of exactly what was happening in government, exactly what was happening with the vaccines, what we're being told at the same time that he knows a completely different story. It's really this timeline that makes this thing so powerful and dynamic. And we're about to put it in the hands of the people, which is what our job is to be completely transparent and put in the hands of press. Mainstream press is having

more and more difficulty trying to avoid our narrative because our narrative makes sense and now we're becoming the majority thought system in this country as more and more people are waking up. And speaking of waking up, we hit from all sides. Sometimes it's as simple as just getting someone into the country. What am I talking about? I'm talking about today's legal report. Take a look at this. Jared McNeil is a pro-mortar cross ratio from Australia that was denied a green card to come to the United States, even though he has an American wife and child because he refused the COVID-19 vaccine. To set an example,

ICANN supported challenging the immigration authorities denial of his ability to get a green card. And Christina Xenidis, who runs the immigration practice here and handles these matters routinely, thankfully, was able to get him a green card over the objections of the immigration authorities and he was able to come to the United States with his wife and child.

Well, that's good news for Jared. And then more recently, even more good news, which is that the current administration has rescinded the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for immigrating to the United States. I have a damn green card. That is sick. That's a big day. You know, this is one of the things that makes Aaron Siri so brilliant. And, you know, we get flooded with a lot of requests. So many of you out there dealing with, you know, problems around vaccines wanting legal help. And we send you on to Syria and Glimstad. But Aaron's always looking for the perfect case. We can't do every.

case, but what case can actually set precedence and move the needle? Actually, you know, by winning one case, can we open up protections for a vast group of people? This was one of those cases. It was perfectly designed. It had all of the right elements to it. And so we know by supporting a case like that, when we win, we actually open the floodgates and that's exactly what happened. We won so resoundingly that the government has to decide we don't want to be in that case. We can't win that again. And so you start seeing changes and now people can come in, immigrate into America and not have to worry about that, you know, mandatory forced vaccines. It may not be affecting those of you that already live here, but we are looking at every single

walk of life. We don't want vaccines forced into anybody, anywhere at any time, certainly not here in the United States of America where we actually, you know, have something to say about it. when you donate to ICANN and the high wire, you're not just being, you know, updated on everything that's breaking right now in the world, the things that are going our way, the things that aren't going our way, you're actually making a difference. You're actually a part of changing the world. We're giving you an opportunity in this experiment called the highwire that as far as I know has never happened. I don't know of any other news agency that both reports on issues and then funds lawsuits to fight on behalf of people on those issues. I think we've spent probably,

you know, over $30 million since we started with a high wire and I can, mostly suing the government of the United States of America, demanding transparency. We've won against the NIH, the CDC, the FDA, Health and Human Services. Go ahead and write in if you found another organization that has been that successful. That is also a part of reporting to you. You make this possible. The only reason we can win these lawsuits, because remember, winning against the government, they don't pay you anything. They don't give you any money. They just say, okay, you win, and maybe we'll change a law if you're going to be really

testy about it. But what they do is try to wait us out. They make these moments. A FOIA request should take a month. They make it take a year. Then we bring pressure and we bring a lawsuit. They make it take another year, just like they did with the Pfizer data. When FDA said, we want 75 years to hold back on this Pfizer data, we made them cranking

it out in a year. We did the same thing with the Moderna data, and we did it with the V-Safe data. There's no one else that is getting more transparency in your world right now. Today, as we speak, we have a law firm right now bringing lawsuits, and I need your help. If you're not involved, if you're not helping right now, if you're enjoying this show and saying, wow, this is amazing and amazing I can do something about it, well, don't leave it to everybody else to do it. Why don't you take your turn? Why don't you step up and become a part of our team? Go to the highwire.com, hit the top of the page there, donate to ICANN. You'll have the opportunities to choose how much you'd like to donate once a month.

We really love that recurring donation. We're asking for $25 for 2025, but honestly, whatever feels comfortable to you, whatever fits, you know, the income that you're bringing in it. If you are doing really well, maybe you can even go bigger to make a large tax deductible gift. Go to info at Icandecide.org, and we'll have someone contact you on how you may want to do that. sure there's anonymity around this. No one knows. This is these all non-profit donations. So you're totally anonymous. You can do it by mail, by stock, international transfer, crypto, vehicles, gift cards, points, legacy giving, make something up. Tell us, I got a way to get you some funding.

And we'll listen. I want to thank everyone that's making this incredible moment in our world possible through I can and the high wire, honestly and truly. When you watch that television and you see these changes, I want to tell you it never would have happened without you. All right. You can follow us on so many different platforms for the Highwire. We're on X at Highwire Talk. We're on Instagram. Highwire Plus, Jeffrey Jackson, Real Jeffrey Jackson, the underscore Highwire underscore official. You can follow I can at I can decide. And you can follow me at Del Batry on X and Instagram. Yeah, we're really cranking out.

We had a million views last month on the official highwire social media. So, you know, we've got a brand new team that's really seeing how that's a new space where we can push in and reach out. And for those of you that, you know, know that your friends maybe can't sit through an hour and a half for a two hour highwire show, we've got these little clips that are going out. So check out. Be following us on all of these platforms so that you can say to your friends, hey, just check this out. or throw it out and be a part of spreading the word because, hey, you know, it's going to take a village. It is taking a village. And I don't know if you've noticed we're in a war, a war that we're winning at the moment.

I want to be, you know, all the way at the top when we're all done. Of course, you can also watch the high wire on our own website on rubble.com. And we're available on Roku and Apple TV now. So you can watch it on your television and see why we're actually have these 4K cameras that you really don't get any, you know, quality out of when you're watching it on your phone. and so check it out on television. There's a story. Now, we're bordered by Canada. And so many of us, you know, throughout COVID, we watched, you know, how horrific it was to see a socialist nation.

Something that we all thought was, oh, wow, and it's great. I mean, what's wrong with socialism? At least I used to think that. In fact, I even went to film school up in Vancouver, Canada, and just thought, wow, these are sweet people. They don't have to worry about paying for the medical bills. Maybe that makes people happier. And then COVID hit. And I mean, my person was like, oh, my God.

Socialism's terrifying. Well, it may have been terrifying during COVID. It may be terrifying to be forcing you to take a vaccine. It may be terrifying that they shut down your bank accounts if you decide to protest the government. I mean, that's some terrifying stuff. But nothing would be more terrifying if they start promoting the idea of assisted murder, killing you, your friends. Someone's depressed. maybe even your child.

Take a look at this. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduced legislation to legalize physician-assisted suicide. It's a deeply personal issue that affects all of us in our families. Unbelieve, it is their only option. One should be faced with such an impossible choice. Canada first introduced medical assistance in dying or made, where medics can help people end their life in 2016.

At the time, it was only open to those whose natural death was reasonably foreseeable. Last year, Maid accounted for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada, or 10,064 people. That's a 32.4% increase over the year before. Opponents have made argue it's being used as an alternative to social or medical support. Ramona Coelho, a family doctor, says it's far quicker to get aid in dying than specialist care. Mother of three Rose Finley is applying for a medically assisted death. She filled out the forms and is counting down to the day she can access maid. But what Finley says she really wants is access to services.

It's always been a challenge to find adequate personal care support. The fact that people are feeling compelled to apply for maid or to even ask about maid because they can't get the basic fundamentals to live a life is it's shameful. In March, it's first. further expanding eligibility to include people with mental disorders. It's expected made will be about 4% of all deaths in this country. When people have suicidal ideations, we used to meet them with counseling and care. And yet now we are seeing that as an appropriate request to die and ending their lives very quickly.

It sends a culturally and socially acceptable message that suicide is one option to end one suffering. that is contrary to our message that we're sending to our youth. It seems to me that offering death to people in the moments of greatest vulnerability, fragility, is profoundly unethical. I have a patient. I'm in the middle of treatment, the middle of medication trials, and the family doctor came along and kindly, you know, from her perspective, offered made, the patient said, yeah, why don't I just die? This is honestly one of the craziest stories.

We've lightly covered it, but I was just up in Canada just over a month ago, testifying in front of a tribunal on many of the stuff that, many things that I understand around vaccines. And I ran into the executive director of Delta Hospice Society, Angelina Ireland, and she started telling me what's really going on up there. And it was so shocking. And I am just so happy to be able to say she's right here in studio to tell you what she was telling me. Hi, Angelina. Thank you so much for having me. Thank you for coming.

I said to you the moment we were talking, you're like, I'd love to have this to get this issue out there, and I said, we're on it. And so just a couple weeks later, here you are. When I watched that montage of news coming from Canada, and obviously just some pushback from different people, it almost feels like your government is giddy about rushing in, anyone might have a weak moment and think about committing suicide, they want to be there to get it done before you think twice,

before you have a moment to back out. Is that, am I overstating that? No, no, you're not. This is the Canadian cull. That's what this is. Culling. Yes, culling. You know, listen, Maid is actually an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada

that says that doctors and nurse practitioners can non-culpably homicide their patients, period. They can homicide their patient. Non-culpably homicide. Wow, so not being trouble for it. Wow. That's right. And they push it down onto the provinces. And because health care in Canada is a provincial jurisdiction, according to our constitution, they said now the provinces can, you know, get this whole thing going. And that's what we've seen. So the province where I live, British Columbia, they just attack this with an alacrity, with an enthusiasm. And, you know, I now, look, I'm not a doctor or a nurse. I'm a patient. All right. I'm a patient. I'm a cancer survivor. Okay. Thanks be to God. Yeah. And, you know, so I was a patient at the Delta

Hospice Society going through my cancer journey. And when I got to good health, I joined the board of directors just at the time when they were pushing made down onto everybody who gets public money. Okay. So any company that gets public money? Any work? Well, it's a public health care system. Everybody gets public money. So every, so every, so every, so every, so Everyone's on it. Everybody's getting public money. Wow. So it's everybody.

It's everybody. Wow. So we did have a public partnership, public-private partnership with the Fraser Health Authority. Okay. And we were told in our hospice. So I became the president of the Delta Hospice Society. And we were told because we had a hospice that we operated, a facility that we actually built. We fund-raised $8 million.

We built it. We got a land lease for 35 years. We built those buildings on it. We were told that if we want money, we're going to have to start killing our patients. And we said, well, we're not killing our patient. We're palliative care. We don't do that. Right. The whole point is to just ease the suffering as they go through this experience. Live well? Yeah. Until your natural end, which we can help you with. Yeah. Right. And so they said, well, you're not getting any more money. We said, that's fine. We don't want your money and we don't need your money. Wow, okay. Right? So we had, we're sitting on this land with our buildings, so we had 25 years left on that land lease.

So as soon as we started to resist and be defiant, not get into lockstep, they canceled that lease with 25 years left. Wow. Right? They evicted us from our buildings, took our money away, and basically took our facility from us, kicked us off the land, and expropriated those buildings, $8.5 million worth to the government. So the government walked in, started to operate our hospice with us gone, and provide euthanasia there. That is absolutely outrageous, and it does fit into this model we're seeing

where they will shut down a bank account. They go against the lease that's been signed. What good is the lease if it doesn't protect the property and you've invested that funding and money into knowing you're going to be there for a period of time? all just because you're like, we're not going to offer death as one of the options in our hospice. That's right. So you are now compelled. You see, and this kind of made, right, is conquest and then compel. That's the dance. That's the modus operandi that they're using, and that's going to be facilitated by the court system, by the judiciary.

Yeah. Right? And all of our courts and our judges are appointed in Canada, appointed by the government. government. Yeah. And so the government is controlling the whole thing. And what's so, where does the media come into this? Why is the media not pushing back? I mean, because, I mean, here, I mean, I know here we have pharmaceutical control of our media,

so we'd be kind of screwed here, but you don't have that in Canada. No, we have government control of our media. The government gives the media billions of dollars. So basically it's, you know, I joke kind of not really. That is like Soviet-style Pravda. Yeah. That's our media. So none of the television stations, they all go.

get government funding? They'll get money. But particularly the CBC, that's the state media outlet, and they get money, right? And of course, you know, we have never been able to get our message onto the legacy media, into the mainstream media. It's all very pro-made. So people don't really even know how bad it is out there. Well, what if an institution, say, is like a Catholic institution, or has a religious belief around, it just doesn't believe in suicide? Do you not have a right to exercise a religious belief? Well, we do. Yes, in the moment, but again, right, so they're compelling everybody to kill patients, and the last bastion that we have, truly in Canada, to protect authentic palliative care is through the faith-based organizations, Catholic health care, for

example. Yeah. But now we see there's court cases against, in British Columbia, against Catholic health care to force them to provide euthanasia to their, right? So in a sense, it's going to destroy religious liberty in Canada. But, you know, like everybody's equal, but, you know, some people are more equal than others. Yeah. So now it becomes a constitutional argument that that's going to supersede, you know, the right for the state to kill its citizens will supersede religious liberty in Canada. It's so crazy. I mean, like the fervor around it, like just, who cares, all right? If you're, if you're nuts enough to want to be, you know, allowing people to kill their patients, okay, you've gotten away with that. But why go out of your way when there's

just a group that says, hey, leave us alone? We're just not going to do it over here. Like the fact they're like, no, everybody must be able to do this. Everybody must be able to kill. In fact, you know, is there any sort of mandate that forces that that offer? Like, how do they, I mean, how do they make you offer it? Well, because, you know, they've stolen the moral high ground on this, right? And we're told that if you're a good citizen, then the only way that you can be compassionate is to kill people. They use words like dignity, dying with dignity. Well, actually, we were providing dignity, right? Yes.

Youth and I someone by a bureaucrat, basically, mercenary of the state, that is not dignity. Right, but no. So dignity, autonomy, oh, you want to have control. Really, the only one who's having any kind of control is the state. Yeah. Not the person. And in one of the videos in that montauze, what's shocking, is the one woman, she only needs care. She's just waiting so long to get that care that she said, screw it.

I think I'm going to get a faster. I mean, I'll just go ahead and get made. Go ahead and kill me because that's going to happen faster than getting me the care that I need. And this is one of those things where we know people come to America because it's taking too long, getting to surgery somewhere or taking it long. But this may, they'll rush it right through your front door within minutes. It seems like. your house. They'll come to your house. They'll send a maid team to your house. When this is the last

time any of us ever got a doctor come to our house? No, we sit, we don't even have doctors. Many of us have no family doctor. We, on wait list to get even the simplest of procedure, but they'll send a maid team to your house. So some people in, you know, depending on where they fall in the track, they can want maid and they can get it that day. That's track one. Fast track the maid. Kill the people. Amazing. You've got a headline here. Take a look at this. The number, of assisted deaths jumped more than 30% in 2022. The report says, what percentage of deaths in Canada are now euthanasia or, you know?

Well, I mean, this is kind of a contentious topic because the government is releasing certain data. They're admitting to certain numbers. I don't believe those numbers for a minute. Yeah, here we go. Look at that rise. We're now up to 62,000 in 2023 assisted deaths. No, I think they forgot a zero, actually.

Yeah, you do? Yes, I do. Yes, and I've said that publicly many times. Why is that? What does you think they're hiding? Well, first of all, the first reason is that they're not putting Maid as the cause of death on the death certificate. Okay. They're putting the reason why the person wanted made or the underlying condition, cancer, cardiovascular.

Bad day. Okay. Dietary. Bledness. Right? That's why. Number one, that's happening across many provinces. And number two, the provincial governments are not transparent when it comes to releasing their made data.

In fact, they hide it. The only way we know and see those kind of numbers is because they give it to the federal government and the federal government releases numbers. So there is a complete cover-up as far as I'm concerned. Because I speak about this across my country. And every single talk that I give, I ask, show of hands, how many people know somebody who's been maided or know someone who's. who has no someone who's been made it.

Every hand goes up. Every hand. At the most, where two degrees of separation, a population of 40 million, there's no way it's 60,000 people. That's incredible. And it starts out, and I remember Jack Kovorkian, I grew up with that whole story.

And frankly, in my family, he's kind of like, you know, all right, I mean, I guess if a person's really feeling awful, they shouldn't be forced, you know, to be in pain. But watching you guys, I'm like, you know, obviously there's a lot of things have changed my opinion since I was a kid, but now I'm like, oh my God, this is insanity. I mean, and from the very mouths of people that keep screaming at their visits, when you think of

Trudeau at W.E.F, all talking about overpopulation. We've got to do something about it. I mean, nothing better than a 24-hour team that will rush to your house as faster than you can deliver a pizza and kill you if you want. But what's shocking is it seems like it's, they want to act like it's for pain and suffering. We have an interview that we're looking at of a girl. I mean, this doesn't seem like the right reason to kill yourself. Everybody, take a look at this. Last week on Tuesday, I called my doctor to tell her if you do not, and I feel bad about

this, but I told her, if you do not feed up this made process with me, I'm just going to do it like that. No, no, no, no, no, no. Why? Why? Why, why, why, why, why? Why are you calling for Maid? I mean, I do have a physical disability that so what. So what? Brit, how old are you? I'm 26. 26. All right, for people listening, Maid is a government supported and in many as a government encouraged program of assisted suicide in Canada, claiming the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands of Canadians. What got you here, sweetheart? There's this guy.

He promised to be my boyfriend and date me. And he then asked me if I could do some work for his show. He's a podcast. And I did hundreds of hours. of work for him all summer. We eventually, late August came, we were going to have this big exciting meeting.

This was going to be my first date, first handhold, first kiss, first everything. It was going to be super exciting. And he found a reason to end things with me because I asked him in September if we could have a phone call. And he was telling me,

you are the most nagging person, your quarrelsome, and he threw Proverbs 2119 in my face. And then I was doing a lot to just get him back because he's been live on the air saying he finds it super hot when a woman is super obsessed. So I was telling him things like, $10,000 to be my boyfriend. I'll do anything because I wasted my whole summer.

Hold on, hold on. Britt, Britt, Britt, Brett. I know. So you get taken advantage of by a complete and absolute scumbag. Yeah. And let's forget the money and the hours part. He robbed you and took advantage of you. But beneath that, he promised you something you've wanted for a long time, which is connection, right?

Yeah. Which is physical intimacy, right? And he absolutely sucks. Yeah. So how in the world do you go from this absolute clown of a human determining the value of your life? I mean, she's on a list, right? She's sort of, you know, at least her practitioners on a list. What are the rules of this?

I mean, are there any parameters? Can someone that had a bad date or broke up or even going through a divorce? And, you know, we all have really bad. My son, who's 60, has been going through a real. really difficult, you know, week or so. There's things at school and friends and all of it. It's kind of piling. It's going through one of those moments. I'm saying I'm glad you're here in the house. I'm glad we're, you know, going through this together because, you know, life has its moments. It's going to have its moments where you're going to have to just grin and bear it,

tough head out and recognize that on the other side of this is, you know, is happiness and joy. but in Canada, I mean, it almost feels like, you know, your school counselor might go, hey, you ever thought of just killing yourself? I mean, where does it stop? Well, that's a very good question. Where does it stop, you know? Apparently there are eligibility requirements that we, but we have seen over and over again where those eligibility requirements have been violated and people have been mated and there's

no justice. Nobody goes after the doctors who are doing it. There is no justice for the families. It seems to me that the law around maid has no authority, honestly. The eligibility requirements are just ignored. And we see that truly it is just coming after the vulnerable. If you're old, sick, disabled, mentally ill, homeless, poor, like I said, it's a cull. They're getting, you know, it's very much about eugenics, and they have the ability.

The maid assessors and providers, we have examples of having a five-minute Zoom meeting for a maid assessor, and they basically just rubber stamp, the person who wants it. Anybody in my country who wants to be killed by the state can be killed by the state. That is it, it's amazing. And then, as a part of, you know, where is it going to stop? This is a recording of someone talking about how far they think this should go. And should we be allowed to euthanize infants? I mean, we're taking, I mean, here, of course, we have huge arguments around the idea of abortion.

When is something to become a life? In Canada, it apparently doesn't matter if you already have a life at whatever level. I mean, they're just admitting, oh no, outside the womb, inside the womb, it doesn't matter. If you think I'm crazy, take a look at this. minors from 14 to 7 years of age, nearly 18. The committee recommends, and the board of directors supports as well, that these minors could, with their tutors or parental health, parent, parent, could make a request for maids based

on the level of persistent and intolerable suffering that they may experience and become unmanageable and senseless. The same for babies from zero to one years of age who are born with severe deformations, very grave and severe syndromes, medical syndromes, whose life expectancy and level of suffering are such that it would make sense to ensure that they do not suffer, given that that the possibility of surviving is basically nil. And this is something that has been used in the Netherlands as an argument, and we could explore that option.

Finally, the committee addressed the issue of elders who are feeling, you know, tired of being alive. Sometimes what we in geriatric care call, you know, sliding into existential suffering or who are very fragile, whose physical abilities are so debilitated that the very fact that they're still alive becomes a real strain on them. That seemed to just about almost cover the gamut. You have a handicapped child. Maybe you're, you know, saying, I think they're suffering, you know, what quality of life, let's just kill them. If you're depressed, later on, what's this, you know, mature minor?

I guess if you're mature enough to know that suicide is an option, then you can get it. And elderly that are suffering from, you know, loneliness, emptiness. I mean, so, like, just like you're saying, just about anybody and this idea of children. I mean, I just think of, you know, one of the issues that we cover, one of the conversations right now, like autism, you know, these beautiful individuals that some of them are doing really well and in college and at varying degrees of the spectrum, you know, there's a, it's like if they've planted, we've done a lot of work on the fact that they're planning the idea that transgender is your issue. And so in the autism community, we're seeing a huge rise in wanting to get gender transition because that'll answer my problems. I can't even imagine if you went into this group and just said, hey, there's maids available to you. Are you having difficulty? Are you depressed?

You feel like, you know, the world's out to get you or something. Have you thought of medically assisted, you know, death? Yeah. I mean, I guess it answers all your problems in a country that just doesn't want to spend money on anybody. If you want to die, we'll let you die because, frankly, we can use that money back. Well, and we know we're a country that has had public health care for a number of decades. and we're also a country that has had mass immigration thrown on to us in the last five years, maybe five, six million people have come into our country. Right, just like here.

You can expect the, you know, the strain on the infrastructure. So our health care system is damaged. It is broke, right? And so what, you know, so for me, it's a mix of ideology and economics. Right. So there's panacea. Well, it just kill them, particularly the old people. They now have spent their whole lives working, funding this system, funding the medical system, now they need it.

Wow. And now it would easy, no pension, don't have to pay them any, don't have any medical bills, don't have to pay any, right? My own mother, 91 years old, was offered maid. Wow. Didn't come from her. She told them to get out of the room. Yeah. You know, they're running around soliciting, recruiting for, made among the elderly population.

Do they state at all like what numbers they'd like to get to? If they're somewhere in the 5% committing a suicide right now in the country of the deaths, is there a goal that they're mentioning or is there just sort of, we're just putting this out there? And are there special clinics designed for this now? I mean, is it becoming, you know. Maid is offered everywhere, including they'll come to your own house. So we're looking at hospitals, long-term care facilities, hospices, funeral homes. you can get made in a national park.

Right? They'll come to your home to me. Every place. There is no place. My last camping trip and then that's it. There is no place that they won't. The concern is now there's no place where you can hide. My organization is looking to create sanctuary.

Sanctuary for the dying. We're not allowed to. We could open up a sanctuary tomorrow. We have the money. We have the constituency that just wants health care and not made. And we are not allowed to. It's amazing. So if they start allowing children, we have issues here where they keep trying to push laws, you know, in states that a child can vaccinate themselves without parental consent. In California, there's states that you can go through gender issues. You can change your name without parental consent. All of these things. Do you see a future where this will be potentially offered in schools where a child that's having difficulty, maybe, you know, issues with depression that they're, you know, they could just say you're allowed to make this decision without parental consent?

Absolutely. Parenthoodal rights have been destroyed in Canada. And that came through the Trojan horse of the gender transition and the gender ideology. In Canada, parents have gone to jail when they have dared to speak out about the transitioning of their children. Yeah. Right? You know, this gender ideology taught to the children in the school and transitioned in the school socially. Parents find out they say that's it.

the child wants to go and have testosterone or wants to transition medically and the parents say no, well, the 12-year-old can go do it on their own because as a mature minor, they can make their own medical decisions. So once you destroy parental rights, then there is no one to protect the child when the child decides, I'd like to get euthanized. I've had a bad day, a bad week. I don't like the, I don't, whatever, whatever. Yeah. So the law is not going to protect the children. The law, The parents can't protect their own children, and certainly the medical establishment is not going to protect our children. Are they offering it in prisons also? Absolutely.

Wow. I mean, it's just the whole thing is it is absolutely dystopian. I feel like Canada is sliding into a dystopian nightmare. For people watching right now, we're right on the border. I think there's a lot of people in America that are like, oh, that'll never happen here. what is your word of advice for America right now? It's your neighbor. Yeah.

You have to watch what's going on in Canada. Of course it can happen here. You know how we started, right? We started with just the assisted suicide. In the United States, I believe, 11 jurisdiction allow assisted suicide. That's where the doctor gives you some prescription for some pills. You go home and you take the pills. So here in America?

Yes. So we're already moving this direction. 11 jurisdictions, okay? Right. So in Canada, we have, so California, right, about the same population as Canada, about the same kind of wokeness as Canada, except probably Canada's worse. Look, 2023, 800 people took assisted suicide. In Canada, in the same year, 15,000, according to the government numbers, right? Because we don't, the vast majority of maid is euthanasia in Canada. Okay. As soon as you cross that line of euthanasia. Asia. It will explode. It will explode. I promise you. So the thing to do the United States is to take

our example. Listen to us when we say what has happened, you know, with these examples. You have to stop the horse from leaving the barn if you want to stop what's happening in Canada, what's happened to happen here in the United States. Really, really incredible. Is there a website that we can follow or where we follow your work and what you're doing and what you're doing to try and push back? Sure, yeah. We spent most of our time now trying to protect our people. We're a national organization, delta hospicesociety.org. Okay, there you are folks, delta hospice society.org, all of you in Canada, obviously, that are watching this very important, but if you're in America, let's see if we can pitch in and help out before this thing turns into,

what's this right here? That's our DNA defense kit. Oh, it's your D&E defense kit. What, Tell me all about this. What is this D&E defense kit? This is something someone can download. Yeah, absolutely. So what happened to us was in any sort of private people trying to help in the health care system, we all got pushed out to the margins. So the only people inside of the health care system in Canada now is government and unions, right?

So on the periphery, the only thing that we can do is try to protect people inside the system. So we give them legal forms that basically say, don't talk to me about maid. It's called Do Not Euthanize Advanced Directives. And we literally put a card in people's hands that say, I require health care and not made. Wow. They carry around in their wallet just in case. And it actually speaks for their lives. We have had example after example where particularly the elderly are sitting in the emergency wards

and they have people approaching them, asking them they'd like to be mated, right along with witnesses that they bring. All they have to just sign here, sign here, Mr. B. right, Mr. B, which is an actual person that the story will be released very soon, who was basically attacked in an emergency ward, 92 years old, twice, you know, trying to tell him to made himself, he pulled out our card and it spoke for his life. Wow. And they just backed off. They don't want to tangle with the Delta Hospice Society.

They might tangle with the 92-year-old man with pneumonia, but they're not going to tangle with us. And so we say, get one of these into your hands. This will save your life. I can't believe there's a country that calls itself free where you have to carry a card to keep them from killing you when you go in the hospital for any reason whatsoever. This is really, really shocking. The fact that they're looking at children now, there's no balance to this level of insanity. It's obviously control of society.

I think that I keep saying, if they're saying they believe in, you know, reducing population, take them for their word and actually. accordingly. I'm gonna I actually would love to get into your the politics right now. You've gone through a huge election, but let's do that after the show on off the record. So I want thank you. Thank you so much for coming in and sharing this very important issue with us. Okay, well as I just said, off the record is our way to just get a little bit deeper, maybe the personal, maybe a little bit political, you know, where does Angelina stand on some of those things? Well, you'll only find out if you are a recurring donor and that's one of our gifts back to a recurring donors off the record. So check it out right after the show. If you want to know what's

like, well, here's what's all about. It's time to go off the record. The show exclusively for our donors. All right, we're rolling. Here we go. I want to thank you for just sticking around a little bit. We call this off the record. This is what we couldn't talk about on the high wire. I actually want to dive into a very sensitive topic. You have no obligation to be honest with these people. Is anyone telling me the truth? No doctor wants to say that they're killing people. Yeah, but doesn't every doctor want to stop killing people? You have no freedom. You have no liberty. You're a slave. Journalism massively failed the United States.

It's silly to call people anti-vaccine. It's nonsense. All the vultures come out. You're married? Yeah. All of that's BS. This whole system's rigged, and they don't care about our health. We will have full discovery power. Watch what happens. When we go off the record, you are not going to miss this. Good hanging out. Indeed.

Well, you know, here on the highway, we cover such that, you know, if it has to do with your health, your future, your safety, you know, really in many ways, you know, a government that is trying to kill you. It's a scary idea and how many places they can come in. Can you imagine knowing your guidance counselors or even suggesting that your child, you know, there's another option out there. I just can't even imagine living in that world. But, you know, I want to bring this to your attention because as we said already you have you know 11 different districts or Around America that are looking into this and I have already heard murmurings Perhaps you know somewhere in Oregon Washington looking at you know these mature children this idea that you know an adult child whose parents don't realize how much they're suffering Maybe they should be able to make this choice for themselves folks we have got work to do But just to show what that work is I want to sort of just reflect on this incredible moment we find our ourselves in. One of the biggest things, I mean, probably in every talk that I give, at least 90% of them, and I give a lot of talks. I am broadly right now, you know, giving live, you know,

discussions at least once a week, if not twice a week, state to state. I'm going to be, I think, in three states over the next three days. But at the heart of it's always been, there's never been placebo testing. There's never been placebo trials. These products cannot be called safe. They've never gone through a safety trial. The gold standard is a double-blind placebo trial. It's not being done. The media screamed. It's a lie. Don't listen to them. Don't listen to them. This is misinformation. Paul Oppen, it's misinformation. Of course we're testing them. Of course we're doing safety studies. Well, now we live in a whole new world. Here's a couple of the articles I was talking about. The Boston Globe, RFGA Jr. will order placebo testing for new vaccines.

Alarming health experts. Can you imagine being alarmed? All new vaccines will undergo safety testing and placebo-controlled trials prior to Leicinger, a radical departure from past practices. I will just take that sentence in. A radical departure from past practices is to actually do safety trials. And HHS spokesperson told the Washington Post in response to questions about Kennedy's comments on the measles vaccines and general vaccine policy.

It's another article, very important. When I say we are the ones doing the work, we're put in the middle of it. This is the epoch times. HHS to require placebo-controlled. trials for new vaccines. It goes on to say, except for the COVID vaccine, none of the vaccines on the CDC's childhood recommended schedule was tested against an inert placebo, meaning we know very little about the actual risk profiles of these products. The HHS spokesperson said, and it goes

on to say, many vaccines licensed in the United States were tested against other vaccines rather than against a placebo. HHS acknowledged in a 2018 letter to the informed consent action. network. Want to know why you're donating to us? Because we changed the world. We change at least our government. And now I think we better take a good look next door at Canada. Maybe we can do something there. One of the big questions is, well, where's Donald Trump? I get this everywhere. Where is Donald Trump at? I mean, he's the one that warps-speeded this vaccine. He was just giving a talk in front of a group of people. And I think it's a good thing to show. Where is this perspective? Because it's something I've talked about a lot. Just take a look at this.

We reinstated service members thrown out of the military over religious objections to Biden's vaccine mandate. We did a vaccine, but we didn't do a mandate. He did a mandate threw them out if they didn't take it. So, I mean, there you have it. I think this is really important. And it's something that I, you know, over the years, there's been a lot of big think tanks of different autism groups and health freedom groups. And we sit down every once in a while and try to come to you like, what is our narrative? What is the central theme?

And some people are, you know, ex-vaxxers because their child was injured by a vaccine or they were injured by a vaccine. Sometimes it's someone like my family that never got a vaccine at all or my children are not vaccinated. We're coming from very different energies and perspectives. But what we really come down to is that in the end, what we want is freedom. What we want is choice. I can't stop you from eating a bag of Doritos or drinking Coca-Cola or even six Coca-Cola's a day and eating nine meat lovers pizza if that's what you want to do. I don't want to be telling you what you can and

cannot do with your life. So if you want to inject yourself with viruses and bacteria and aluminum and polysorbate 80 and mRNA that maybe inserts itself in your DNA and starts recreating, well, you know what, maybe there. Maybe there if that stuff can spread and get to me, maybe I do want to step in there. But I think my point being is that it's about choice. And that's what Donald Trump is saying there, and I believe this in him. People say, well, he had Operation WarpSpeed. One of the things we should point out is that Warp Speed also included, you know, a warp speed investigation to the repurposing of drugs, and what do we find? Hydroxychloroquine Ivermectin. Unfortunately for Donald Trump that time around, he didn't have Robert Kennedy Jr. He had a Sith in there named Tony Fauci,

who then made it almost illegal to get near any of the drugs that they found. So that part of warp speed fell apart. And there was also warp speed on maybe vitamin D. in natural ways that could have happened, all that got shot down. So Warp Speed just became about one product. But even if that had happened, if that was all there was, really don't we want a president that just sort of says to everybody, it's your choice no matter what? You should see all of the benefits, all the side effects. Well, we don't have that information on vaccines. We don't know if there's benefits or side effects. We don't know because they're not doing the proper safety trials. Well, now they are. Now we live in a new world. I can't tell you how many millions of

I can spend in courtrooms against the government demanding that they do placebo trials and that they admit to the world of vaccines they are now taking right now, have never been tested against a placebo. If you go to our website, you'll always see this placebo pyramid scheme. It basically shows you licensure, not based on any placebo controlled trial. Every single vaccine in our childhood schedule meets that description. This is what we do here at the high wire. We report, we analyze, we investigate, we study, and then we sue when it's time to make a difference

and we can't be heard. They're not listening. This is what we have to do. So you're a huge part of what's happening here. Please can we bring sanity back? I mean, we have a lot of work to do. I mean, we've got to start demanding. I mean, call all your representatives, especially if you're a Democrat and say, will you get Robert

Kennedy Jr.'s team completely approved? This is insane. Our government's supposed to be working for us. I am paying taxpayer money not to have employees waiting to come into the establishment and do the job. Get involved. Stay involved right now. Call your representatives. Start ringing their phone every single, every single day. Just bother them. Say, why is it Robert Kennedy Jr. can't get his deputy secretary approved? Will you please get on that? Hi, it's me again. Why is Robert Kennedy Jr. still waiting for me? Hi, it's me again. Trust me. If you do that, you're going to see change. We have power. right now. It's in our hands. This is our moment, our time revel in it. I hope you're

having as much fun with as I am. I'm taking it to the man every day. Join me. The water's warm. Come on in and I'll see you next week on the high wire.