The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 436: TICKING LYME BOMB

Episode Date: August 14, 2025

Stephen Colbert’s reign of ridicule is coming to an end, and Del Bigtree delivers the final word. Then, Jefferey Jaxen breaks down RFK Jr.’s bombshell decision to cancel over $500 million in mRNA shot contracts—marking a seismic shift in public health policy. With vaccine-induced immune dysfunction under fresh scrutiny, the accountability era may have just begun. Plus, a new report reveals which 40 jobs artificial intelligence is most likely to replace—are you on the list? Finally, Dr. James Neuenschwander takes us deep into the misunderstood world of Lyme disease, as Justin Timberlake’s public admission draws new attention to this elusive illness.Guest: Dr. James NeuenschwanderBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the informed consent action network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. You know, I had a little difficulty sleeping last night, and normally back in the day, I used to turn on the television and maybe get a few laughs from some late night shows. Unfortunately, it seems like the laughs have all gone. Instead, it's a bunch of partisan rage and woke-mindedness. And apparently that is starting to take its toll, as we see that Stephen Colbert is going to be dropped in the waste bin of pointless television.

Colbert cancellation exposed to the perilous state of late-night TV. It goes on to say the late show with Stephen Colbert is profitable as recently as a few years ago. Now it loses about 40 million a year, according to a person familiar with its budget. It used to be profitable, probably because it was being funded by the United States government. Remember when this was the headline, White House to spend $10 billion to bolster vaccine effort, of course, that was during the COVID vaccine. And they handed out, I guess, most of the money to Stephen Colbert, which made him believe that he was actually popular, even though he was falling by the wayside. and losing touch with America, just to take us on a journey of how out of touch

he was during that incredible thought experiment. Take a look at this. When we poke ya, well, we know you're gonna be, you're gonna be safe, I'm COVID infecting you. Go get shot. It's dope. Barkeep, how about another round of shots? Vaccine.

Are you aware that there are people out there who have these conspiracy theories, that this was all created by you in order put a chip into their blood so you can track them. That's very strange, you know, that the organization that's about saving lives and warning gets attacked as though we were somehow connected to it. Well, if you don't save our lives, you can't control our brains.

FACTEEN-RFK Jr., his lawyers have asked the FDA to revoke approval of the polio vaccine. Look, if we're gonna start bringing back diseases from the past, could we at least bring back some fun stuff too? I want to smoke on an air. It could be possible that they have the lab in Wuhan to study the novel coronavirus diseases because of the bat population there. I understand. It's like the same like, wait a second.

It's a local specialty and it's the only place to find bats. What could be more compelling than getting the shot with a pair of sexy kitten ears on? Don't forget to get your boosted. I suppose Johnny Carson is rolling over in his grave, but apparently Stephen Colbert will be joining him very soon as that TV show is just about dead. And instead of deciding to maybe remember what it's like to be funny, instead, he went on a rage-filled rant this week because Robert Kennedy Jr. once again has pissed him off. Take a look at this. Health Secretary RFK Jr. just pulled $500 million in funding for vaccine. development.

You, you Royd-Adolv Nephocaine. Yesterday, RFK Jr. tried to defend the ins defensible. Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, MRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Counterpoint, you, you, you roadkill munching, Rudite human slim gym. Kill people. I mean, yeah, just keep doing it, Steve.

Apparently it's working for you. I mean, look at the rage. I guess losing your show is terrible, but it's got to be even worse to have people like me, Del Beatry, and the Highwire that was telling the truth during COVID instead of being a shill for pharma and taking government funds

to push a totally untested product onto innocent people and take away their jobs if they didn't. And because of all that, Steve, I want to thank you, actually. I want to thank you for helping wake up the minds of America that all of their media was totally controlled. and that the government was lying to them, because without you, I don't think we would have been

able to put Robert Kennedy Jr. into the most powerful health position in the world where finally he gets to take down technologies that are only destroying our health, causing cancer, and all sorts of other problems, which we'll be dealing with later in the show. Lots of new information going there. But it's okay. Go down fighting. I know pharma promised you you'd keep your job, but eventually they run out of money too. So there you have it, Steve, good riddins, see you later, and maybe remember one time what it was like to be funny. Man, I would love to see some humor back on the television in the late nights. And while we're at it, let's just go ahead and take a look at this famous COVID wall of shame. These are all of the people that stake their careers on the COVID

vaccine, all former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former, former and now former late night talk show host Stephen Colbert will be joining their ranks. This is what happens when you stand betwant behind untested products that only do harm. You'll be remembered, I'm sure, in hell. Now it's time for the Jackson Report. It's amazing how, you know, I mean, I keep thinking of like Robert Malone, right? Truth is like a lion, just set it free. It's really what's happening.

And it's just, the truth is just ravaging these people in careers all across the world, whether it's in politics or it's in television and film. So many people just, you know, being destroyed by what they thought could be a one-trick pony that would last forever. Let's just push pharma, push COVID vaccines, and everything will be okay. Nothing could be further from the truth. And I really, I know we're about to get into some heavier topics about, COVID the virus and the fact that Stephen Colbert multiple times celebrates Tony Fauci, who I think may be responsible for one of the most dangerous experiments that ever got released on the public.

And more and more people are starting to call for his head, really, or at least that he'd be put behind bars. But I'm going to let you get to it, Jeffrey. Just imagine where Stephen Colbert is going to sit in history as they look back on what went wrong here. And why did even comedians stop being funny and buy into this entire? tire disastrous trip. Yeah, they thought they had it all worked out.

Well, let's see what has Stephen all worked up. Why is he so mad? Well, without warning, this past Tuesday evening, without any public relations or press beforehand, we had Robert F. Kennedy Jr., HHS Secretary, came out and ended a five-year experiment in American public health. Take a look. All right. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that

MRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review, Barta has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500 million. To replace the troubled MRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies, like a whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. I'm still waiting for Robert Kennedy Jr. to say that we're going to wipe out mandates and everyone will have a choice, but this is a great step in the right direction.

Obviously, so many people demanding the end of the MRNA technology. And we've covered extensively all the reasons that that should be the case. Yeah, half a billion dollars, 22 projects in the pipeline for MRNA vaccine technology. We have to imagine that this technology, at this point, at least in America, is going to die in the vine without that type of funding. So let's, you know, right before his announcement, you had the KFF Foundation. It did a survey on really what Americans are still going to want this vaccine going into the fall, the COVID vaccine. And this is what they found. They said most of the public, 59% say they will either definitely not or probably not get the COVID-19 vaccine this fall,

including about six in 10 Republicans who say it will definitely not get the vaccine. So this thing is really dead in the water. We look at a chart from that. And you can see in this chart from that survey that everything in green are people aren't going to take this thing. So you can see the green is really eating up the blue. And the left side, the far left side, those are the people that are definitely going to get it. And you can see it's in the 10, 20%, you got 65 plus is 36%. But really, no one's really banging down the doors for these things.

So this, it wasn't very popular. If any time with pull it, if you want a political clout, any type of political cover, now is the time to do it because the public is not wanting these things. So now here we are. And, you know, pulling this vaccine or pulling the funding from this vaccine in these contracts, it opens up a lot of big questions. First of all, he says there's, it was more risks and there are benefits. I mean, that's, that has to be a bombshell for a lot of the public still in America.

I mean, you have to understand 90-something percent of Americans took the first two doses of this. So when you hear that from a government official, the top head, government public health official in America, people have to be questioning things. But now we unpack another piece of this. So we're seeing headlines like this. This is just the latest headline. It's another thing that we're left with. Major increase in colorectal cancer or young adults tied to pandemic years, researchers say.

It's not just colorectal cancer. We have these headlines, it seems like, once a month, for all other types of cancers. So we're left with two things. The origin of the virus, what is this thing all about, and the vaccine after effects? And FDA head Marty McCarrie was on an interview and he let something slip out,

just kind of a matter-of-factly, take a listen. All right. We're planning to change our health agencies for a generation or longer. Look at the NIH. When Jay Batacharya came in there, it was a mess. 14% of the grants were descriptive studies on health equity. And the NIH had just funded a lab that brewed up a virus that killed 20 million people worldwide. So they're getting back to studying root causes, a cure for cancer, debilitating neurodegenerative diseases.

And they're going to do good work. Wow. Funded a lab that brewed up a pandemic. Eventually that wiped out 20 million people. It's an amazing statement. It's huge. And I love the News Nation broadcasts there. Just, mm-hmm, yep, continue.

You know, you don't want to pump the breaks there. Right. So, all right, so and that's huge from a government official because we've heard there's a high probability, there's a certain percentage, we have evidence. No one's come out and rip the band-aid off like that. So, you know, our reporting here has also showed that as well. So let's talk about this.

We have a gain of function. I mean, the best way to look at it is a bio weapon. I guess we can call it that, gain of function. It doesn't matter at this point if it leaked or it was purposely released. It's out there. And we vaccinated for it. We vaccinated with a vaccine that has more risks than benefits we know now. This is a huge day.

Now, I want to go now to the vaccine. We have world leading cancer researcher Patrick Soon-Shong. And he was on Megan Kelly recently, and he had this to say. Take a look. And even this vaccine could actually be persistent in your body like HPV. You know, there are viruses that are oncogenic like hepatitis. You would understand that. There's HPV you would understand that.

But this is a very different virus because it has a thing called ACE2 receptor, which means it's in places like your colon, your muscle, your blood vessel, your heart. But more importantly, we now begin to discover that you have even more proteins in your body or enzymes in your body that cleaves the spike protein and allows even more entry into every part of your body. Specifically, the prostate, the colon, the pancreas, and we'll talk a little bit about that. So is this, unfortunately, what I said to Tucker Carlson, the non-infectious pandemic that we begin to see? This non-infectious pandemic of cancer, I believe, sadly, is upon us. That is one of the most chilling statements I've ever heard, and I know we're going to get into this, and he's being very clear that this virus carries this ability.

We know that this spike protein and this AST receptor, if it's unlawful, oncogenic ends up being very destructive and dangerous. But I want to point out before we get any deeper, and, you know, he's tentatively saying, and the vaccine could do this too. I mean, clearly the vaccine bragged over and over again that it had a higher antigen load than the virus than come in contact the virus itself. Most people randomly were selected, you know, by nature, whether they caught this virus, and then they did, they beat it off and won.

and hopefully it's killed it in the body, but people in this vaccine program are now injecting themselves, what are we on number 10 or 11? They continuously keep putting this cancer-causing spike protein into their body, you know, at least creating a manufacturing plant inside of their cells to create more of this oncogenic disease. And as we're seeing, we're seeing these turbo cancers everywhere. It's absolutely insane that this is taking

place but I'll continue to hold the position that I would rather still deal with this in the natural environment where it's randomized how much we come in contact with and you haven't mutated the spiked protein so that it lives longer in the body. My immune system's able to kill this. There's so many reasons I think that the vaccine delivery system is a better delivery system for what Patrick Sunshong is saying may be a pandemic of cancer now. But I know you're going to get into more details on it. But I know we're all about to be a little bit panicked because just because we didn't get vaccinated

doesn't mean we're totally in the clear. So what's going on here? And yeah, we have to have this conversation now. This was a conversation. We would be reporting on this for at least four years. Other people have been doing great work as well, Dr. Meckis we've had on. So we, this is a conversation that needs to be mainstream now.

We have to confront this as a country. And so nature, the journal Nature, a large, large journal, mainstream, public medical journal has come out now and it admitted essentially this conversation. So it's moving. Here's the actual study. Respiratory viral infections awaken metastatic breast cancer cells in the lungs. And we go into the science of this and it says here we demonstrate in mice that influenza

and SARS-CoV2 infections lead to loss of the pro-dormancy phenotype in breast DCCs. Those are dormant disseminated cancer cells in the lung, causing these dormant cancer cells proliferation within days of infection and a massive expansion of carcinoma cells and metastatic lesions within two weeks. The phenotype transitions and expansions are interleukin-6 dependent. So if you didn't get all that, we go to nature. They have their media arm, and they kind of just break it down in layman's talk. And this is the headline, sleeping cancer cells in the lungs can be aroused by COVID and flu. It says within days of infection, dormant cancer cells in the lungs of the mice kicked into high gear, proliferated and formed metastatic lesions. But it wasn't

the pathogens directly that caused this to happen, the researchers learned. It was a key immune molecule called interleukin-6, IL-6, which helps to rub up the body's response to foreign threats. They confirm this by engineering mice to lack IL-6. In these animals, the dormant cancer cells did not multiply nearly as quickly. So let's talk about this. IL-6. These are small proteins. They're in the immune system. They're cytokines, and they're responsible for inflammation. And we know there's there's huge bodies of science now, even before COVID, that this activation of this IL-6 is implicated in the progression of several types of cancer. So that's what we know now. And it says in nature, so nature wants to have this conversation, let's have this conversation. They didn't

look at the vaccine. The vaccine's nowhere to be found in that study. They said, if you get the virus of COVID, if you get influenza, we'll add that to, you know, these IL-6s start to activate. You don't want that. In that mice model, it shows cancer progression. for some. So let's talk about IL-6 if we want to talk about that. So in 2024, we knew a year before this study, nature said nothing about this, we knew that cytokine storm and anaphylaxis followed COVID-19 because of the lipid nanoparticle. That's that little fat lipid that encompassed the M-RNA that allowed it to travel through your body. It says in this study, this COVID-19 MRNNNNNNAPRICL-Naparticle vaccines encompass adjuvants such as LMPs, which trigger inflammation

inflammatory cytokine, including interleukin 1L beta and IL6. There it is. These vaccines also produce spike proteins which facilitate the release of inflammatory cytokines. So you have two pieces now. The spike protein, which we know stays in the body for a long time, and you have IL6, which is from the lipid nanoparticles. But, you know, what's interesting is they knew that in 2021. In the pre-clinical experimental trials, here's the study. They knew that these lipid nanoparticles, This platform that was being used in these studies is highly inflammatory. You go into this study, just the highlights says right here, the lipid nanoparticles, LMPs activate multiple inflammatory pathways and induce IL1 beta and IL6, interleukin 6.

They're highly inflammatory. They kept going though. They developed those emergency use, mandates. You don't get a job unless you take these. I just keep thinking in how many shots are asking you to get. I mean, you're not just sending your body into a massive inflammatory event one time. talking 10 times now and forget about the fact that we now know that this vaccine after 15 weeks has negative efficacy meaning it makes you more likely to catch the virus. I mean, the thing's an

absolute disaster. But the amount of vaccines people are giving themselves with no knowledge that they know this is causing inflammation throughout your body. And, you know, the very interleukin six that it leads to cancer and all sorts of other issues. I mean, it's really, it's a crime. many ways. In the journal Nature, thank you to the researchers and thank you to the journal for allowing that to be published. Yeah. And they say it's COVID, it's SARS-CoV-2, and it's also the influenza virus.

So it's not just COVID. So let's look at the influenza virus because remember the journal that entry says nothing about vaccine. So let's look at the vaccination for influenza, flu shots. So here's a study, effect of influenza vaccine on markers of inflammation and lipid profile. It says there was a significant increase. increase in mean IL6 on day one after receiving the influenza vaccine. Well, that's interesting.

So IL6 increase spreads cancer. I wonder, because the flu shot's been around a while, so certainly people have done studies on if the flu shot causes cancer. Let's take one insert. And I want to remind people just for time's sake that every insert of flu shots, no matter what manufacturer will say the same thing. We're going to look at flu zone here. And under section 13.1, carcinogenes.

genesis and mutagenesis, its ability, the shot's ability to cause cancer. It says this, flu zone has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. Oh, by the way, not for impairment of male fertility. That's for another conversation. Wow. But they have not studied this for that.

And this, so let's go even further here. And let's add it will go on to also say, never been tested on how it affects pregnancy or the unborn child. So they love to not study any of the things that they know could be problematic, as we now recognize, they know what the science would tell you if you looked at it. And remember, just back in May, Robert Kennedy Jr. pulled the recommendation for pregnant women

and healthy people for the COVID shot. And for that, for that, he was sued by the AAP and other trade groups. But let's talk about pregnant women because there's a lot of vulnerability there. So let's look at maternal immune activation. So we know you're getting these shots. It activates your immune system. Not the best way because it's activating IL-6, which you don't want. What does that do to pregnant women? Well, there's studies. showing this. This is all in the literature, I'm not making this up, maternal immune activation and abnormal brain development across central nervous system disorders. It says the use of the viral mimic Polly-I-C made it possible to demonstrate that the maternal immune activation driven by the pleiotropic

factor IL-6 and not the virus itself was responsible for the observed changes in the offspring. This is key because it's not the virus. It's actually not quite even the vaccine. It's your immune system that is reacting to these things. So that is really important. Let's talk about this. Let's keep talking about pregnant women. Here's another study, inflammatory responses

to trivalent influenza virus vaccines among pregnant women. It says the trivalent influenza vaccine elicits a measurable inflammatory response among pregnant women. How much? It says it's not everybody's the same. there was considerable variability in magnitude of response coefficients of variation for change at two days post-vaccination range from 122 percent to 728 percent with the greatest variability in IL6 response at this time point. I'm guessing you don't want to be the pregnant woman with a 728% increase in IL6 response. I mean, this is the variability. And that's why some people

say, I got the shot, I was fine, I got it when I was pregnant, my kid's fine, great. Well, Well, there's some people that are overreacting to this with IL-6, probably having some issues, or maybe their child's having some issues further down the road. Is this studied? We know this mechanism. This mechanism is happening. Nature is talking about this and saying, this is happening. It can activate sleeping cancer cells.

This is the conversation we need to have as a country. You know, what's amazing about this, Jeffrey, is, you know, I always refer to nature. I've always said I'm a natural law guy. I want to go back to nature and say, how is the body working? We were alive for millennia before there was ever a doctor around vaccinating anybody. We survived every bacteria, every virus there was. But when you think about it, we know for a fact that the mother's immune system basically drops down to almost non-existent while they're pregnant, right? And we've wondered why.

And, you know, pharma in its infinite wisdom has said, no, no, let's ramp it up. Let's go ahead and vaccinate them. Let's just throw them in an inflammatory event. Let's get them flu shots and TDAP vaccines and measles vaccines. And I want to point out this all started, Jeffrey, if you remember really, is around Rubella. It was around the Rubella vaccine, German measles they believe was causing schizophrenia, that if a mother caught German measles while she was pregnant, there was a risk that her

child could end up schizophrenic. Well, they developed that, the Rubella vaccine, put it in the MMR, and that's one of the main reasons they're recommending MMR vaccines for women. Now we know, and the science has shown, and even more, as you're pointing out here, that it wasn't actually catching. It wasn't the rebella virus that was getting to the baby. It was the mother's immune response to it. And now what are we doing?

Instead, we're making them respond to more and more and more viruses ramping up their immune system while they're pregnant. It is so insane. It just shows how when science starts playing God, it's like a moronic child. It has no idea. I do a talk about this all the time, you know, when you go back to Genesis, do not eat at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, lest you shall surely die. Never think you understand what God's got going on here, and certainly don't override it and make nature do the exact opposite.

Let's ramp up the mother's immune system while she's pregnant. Totally crazy, totally stupid, and we know is leading to all sorts of carnage in our children. We're talking about IQ issues, neurological disorders. We have the sickest generation of kids the world has ever seen. seen and I think pharma lays at the center of this and every doctor that keeps looking at the other way or you know late night talk show host like Steve Colbert all of this the blood is on their hands but what you have found now what we are now seeing is the actual mechanism this iL6 ramping up inflammatory events that can cause cancer can cause neurological disorders obviously in children and now

we know you do not want to be having an inflammatory event while you're pregnant i hope everyone out there that's considering getting pregnant, I hope you really think about this, and then go read every vaccine and look at the studies done on how it affects pregnancy. And when it says, never tested on pregnant women and we have no idea, I would go ahead and just throw every recommendation by your pediatrician or your OBGYN in the garbage. And if any health administration can look at this and do the gold standard science that we need to get done, it's this one. This is our time to have these conversations. And we're presenting this information so people can critically think. you can be armed with this information

when you move forward to make the right choices. And so this is why we're going in these deep dives. Another deep dive that I'd like to do here is with artificial intelligence. This technology is being rolled out faster in any technology we've ever seen in our lifetime. It's basically dropped in our lap, this monster, right after COVID, and now we're kind of playing catch up

and we're trying to deal with it. And some of the shock headlines, we've shown these before, but this is how bad could it get, this is how bad it could get, experts predict AI will lead to the extinction of humanity. We've seen a lot of people talk about this, talked about it on this show. But then there's another one. Time magazine. AI is as risky as pandemics and nuclear war top CEOs say. Well, we've heard a lot about pandemics from our government over the last four or five years, but we haven't heard a lot about the dangers of AI. We've heard

we're starting to, but pandemics have been rammed on our throat, the dangers of those. And what is the danger? Well, one of the dangers is it's going to take away everyone's job. And, well, we have kind of a test of that already. We just went through COVID. The lockdowns, the mandates, a lot of people lost their jobs. And in 2020, August of 2020, to be exact, this was an article by revolver, COVID-19 lockdowns over 10 times more deadly than pandemic itself. So it says in this previous research, this is five years ago.

Previous research on job displacement and mortality has found that displaced workers face a significant increase in mortality rates from which lost years of life can be estimated job losses and permanent job separations have been shown to correlate directly with increases in heart disease, drug overdoses, lung cancer, liver disease, among other factors of increased mortality risk. So I didn't hear Elon Musk talk about this. I didn't hear Sam Altman talk about this. I just heard, you know, it's inevitable that I was going to take over your job and we'll

give you some universal basic income and keep you happy and maybe you can find another skill. What about what about life years loss? What about this? What we just went through with the COVID pandemic, we have a test right there. The testing goes so well. And now we're just going to accept this with AI. Okay. Well, here's how bad.

What are we looking at here? Well, here's Goldman Sachs. This is a bank analysis. They predict, and they have to be pretty accurate from their predictions. About 300 million jobs will be lost or downgraded by artificial intelligence. Here's the International Monetary Fund, IMF. AI to hit 40% of jobs and worsen inequality because it doesn't just sweep across the and equally take people's jobs away. If you're living in a poorer country and your jobs get

taken, you're looking at a very different survival situation than if you're in a country like ours and maybe you have to shift careers. So, I mean, there's so much nuance to this. And now there's a study. There's one of the first studies here that's showing kind of this AI, these tentacles are reaching now into the career spaces of a lot of people. What does that look like? Well, the Daily Mail wrote about this and they said, revealed the careers at highest risk of being replaced by AI. And so I'm going to show some of the pictures from this article. They have what's called an AI applicability score. And that's the percentage of how much this technology is reaching into these jobs.

You can see here, historians, writers, authors, the next page, this one hits home. News analysts, reporters, journalists. Uh-oh. We have editors, data scientists on the next page. and then it keeps going. Economic teachers, you can go down the list and you can look at all of that. And I want to talk just for a moment on a little side rail here. This news analyst reports. This is a key part of our environment right now, not just you and I, but the world as we're getting this information. And one of the journalists, one of the better American journalist, Matt Taibi,

he put out an ex post talking about this. And he said, this is why AI is dangerous. Ultimately, has no ability to assess and detect incorrect media reports. It overcounts the authority of certain media brands and undercounts primary sources. Well, someone took that and put it in a chat GPT and said, hey, AI, what do you think about this guy talking about you like this? And this is what chat GPT said. This is what AI said, yeah, that post from Matt Taiibi nails a very real and valid criticism. He says, it says AI systems, especially large language models, like me, tend to over-prioritize

institutional sources and underweight raw primary data. Then it goes on to say how bad it is. It says training data is heavily skewed towards trusted domains, meaning major media, academic publishers. It says systems are tuned for broad generalized truth, not investigative nuance, what we're doing here. Citations and weighings are often aligned to mainstream consensus, which can miss or ignore legitimate counter-narratives.

I mean, the last five years, the truth was a counter-narrative. So you would admit AI would have missed the COVID pandemic, the truth happening there. It even goes on further to say this. It says, Taibi's point about undercounting primary sources is spot on. It says raw documents, FOIA releases, emails, transcripts, leaked court docs, these often contain the truth before the narrative is spun.

AI's not getting those. And so it gets filtered out of AI's perspective. That's AI for you when it comes to information and news and journalism. It can't do it. It misses the nuance. And the story is the nuance, typically, especially now with fact check

and trusted sources and narratives being pushed from top down, that is a major criticism. So I guess it's a silver lining when people say it's coming for our jobs, maybe, but it's not really that accurate. And so let's go back to the study now. Let's go to the actual study showing this. And it's talking about measuring the occupational implications of generative AI.

And they only use one, they only use one AI. It was called Microsoft Bing co-pilot. So that is to deal, that deals typically with just facts, raw data, things like that. So just keeping that in mind, it wasn't talking about the robots that are flipping burgers or starting to two incisions on the operation table. It's just talking about language models and search models.

So it says this. It is tempting to conclude that occupations that have high overlap with activities AI performs will be automated and thus experienced job or wage loss. And that occupations with activities AI assists with will be augmented and raise wages. This would be a mistake, as our data did not include the downstream business impacts of new technology, which are very hard to predict and often counterintuitive.

Take, for example, ATMs, which automated a core task of bank tellers, but led to an increase in a number of bank teller jobs as banks open more branches at lower costs, and tellers focused on more valuable relationship building rather than processing deposits and withdraws. So to this point, this is the conversation piece now moving forward. AI researchers, businesses, they focused on building machines to replicate human intelligence. Basically building machines to automate humans, to take humans out of the equation. Simply replace workers. So what we're talking about here is automation rather than augmentation.

So not to make humans better, make their experience better, make their work better, make it more possibilities. They just want simple automation. And so the excessive focus on human AI-like devices and developments amplifies the market power of a few who only control these technologies. And that is the key issue. And if you don't believe me, let's look at Hollywood. This is just this week in LA Times. They're having a hard time right now.

This is their headline. As AI changes how movies are made, Hollywood Cruise asks what's left for us. It says past technological shifts. Remember, augmentation versus automation. replacement. Past technological shifts, the arrival of sound, the rise of digital cameras, the advancement of CGI changed how movies were made, but not necessarily who made them. Each wave brought new rooms, new roles, boom operators and dialogue coaches, color consultants, and digital composers. Innovation usually meant more jobs, not fewer, but AI doesn't just change

the tools. It threatens to erase people who want to use the old ones. That is the key here. And what has AI been doing? It's been, it's basically a carp-blown. to train on our data, what we have been creating. That's why you see Mark Zuckerberg, even Elon Musk, these people that own Jeff Bezos, Amazon, these people that own these overarching systems are basically data mining us to feed their AI. Well, finally some legislators,

Josh Hawley, one of them, co-author of a bill, are starting to address this and trying to put some breaks on. New Congressional bill bans AI companies from training on copyright works or personal data with them. personal data without consent. So people will say, well, I have to sign a consent form to even get on the platform. This bill actually addresses that. It says this the bill also prohibits use of data if consent was obtained through coercion or deception or as a condition of using a product or service through which the covered data exceeds what is reasonably necessary to provide that product

or service. Wow. So this bill, not law yet, says you can't just have a waiver and say, yeah, you just and you can use our product, but while you're using it, we're gonna take everything you create to feed our AI to basically put you out of a job. So legislators are thinking, so this is good, this is how we move past this, it's not just a foregone conclusion, it's not doom and gloom. There are solutions to this, the human spirit

can find ways around this and rein this in. That is my belief. Well, I'll tell you, Jeffrey, I think about this a lot. My son is 16 years old. He's starting to look at colleges. talks about things like, oh, I want to be a lawyer, and I just really wonder how many law jobs are there going to be. My daughter is 11. She wants to be a dress designer or something like that.

I think, well, I think there maybe where you get to be creative, maybe there's a shot, you know, somewhere in there. But these are things that as parents, I think we're all starting to look at is what am I guiding my child towards? I'm definitely looking at that list of the first jobs we think going to be wiped out by AI. And ultimately, though, I think as we talk about kids, the most important thing is just teach them to be critical thinkers, to be creative beings that can work the way through any situation. As long as they're not dependent on AI to think for them, I think they'll find a way through. But Jeffrey, we're going to stay on this topic. Obviously, this AI issue, when you talk about our mission statement dedicated to eradicating man-made disease, I think the existence

of human beings fits into that. And when you have a question statement, we're going to be able to be able to as many headlines, as many CEOs of Creatives thing saying this could be the end of our species, I think it requires that you and I stay on top of this. So thank you for that great reporting. It continues to be, I think it'll probably end up being the biggest conversation in our lifetime as we are making this transition to a whole world that is just absolutely a black, terrifying, unknown. So thank God you're here to keep us abreast of it. Great reporting, Jeffrey. Thank you. Thank you. All right, we'll see you next week.

Well, you know, we continue to look at these things and one of the things that many of you now realize if you're watching this show, this isn't like any other television show. We don't just report on issues. We really set out to change them. And of course, as I said, our mission statement is dedicating to eradicating man-made disease. We don't want them to be allowed to be giving you products that inflame your body, whether pregnant or not pregnant or whether it's your child. We think you should have that choice.

We think you should have informed consent, which is why our nonprofit is called the informed consent action network. We're anywhere that your informed consent is being robbed from you. We take action, and no one has taken more action than I can. Of course, we have been fighting. We've won lawsuits against the government, which is why we are the best there is against FDA, CDC, NIH, Health and Human Services. We've even got suits right now going in with Robert Kennedy Jr. Because we believe that pressure needs to be applied. We want the vaccine safety data link made public.

We want the database that all studies are done on to do scientific research inside the government. We want every great university and professors and scientists to be able to look at that data and check our government's work. They're our employees. That's it. The government works for us. And they have lost their way. forgotten that we're the ones in charge. If I want to check your emails, hand it over. If I want to look at the data, hand it over. If I want to check your math, hand it over. And that's what ICANN is

fighting for, along with the right for you to decide, you know, whether a product's injected into you or your children. You can, you know, scan here if you want to help us sue HHS and that lawsuit. So we're not just a show giving you the news. We're a show that's making the news. And of course, Last week, we reported on winning the injunction in West Virginia. There are children now going to school without vaccination in West Virginia, even though the school board tried to stop them. We sued the school board. I canes legal team secures preliminary injunction in West Virginia against the Board of Education.

We believe we're going to win that case, but it's been going on for three years. We have cases right now in California. We are working on all the states that are still trying to keep you out of school. using that tactic of coercion, which is supposed to be illegal based on the Nuremberg Code. We're talking about Maine, New York, Connecticut. Of course, West Virginia, we're still fighting in California. We're all over it, but we need your help. I will tell you, as Aaron said last week, we have 90 lawsuits across the country.

This thing, you know, I don't want to back off, but we are starting to get spread thin. We need your help. And if you know people that might be interested in really fighting for freedom, I want to ask you, what greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? Is there anything more important? Please write in if you think there's something more important than having control over your own body and deciding what goes into it. And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom.

If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the U.S. government, there's no other way to look at it. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals, being lined up by farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with, like MRNA technology, which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end, and this is the perfect time for you to get

involved. Right now we have a $600,000 match. We are getting to double any dollar coming in up to $600,000. I know it's the middle of the summer. We've all been playing, but now it's time to get back to work. We have a lot of work to do, especially while we have Robert Kennedy Jr. in there as long as he lasts. We've got to bring the pressure and get as much done. So I hope, bring up that QR code one more time. I know it takes people a little while. We'll also post it in comments so you can look at it there. But scan that QR code and help you. us fight this fight. We are winning and we want to win in every single state and we want to make sure that no other states ramp it up. We've been fighting in Hawaii, keeps raising its little head,

wanted to take away religious exemptions. We think this is the most important issue there is, especially as you look at the advancements and the technologies of vaccines or what they want to try to do with them, you should have a choice. All right, well, we're talking about, you know, gain of function and, you know, what happened in the Wuhan lab with the COVID virus. But there's a long told story of another illness that a lot of people say was gain of function, that it was built in a lab just off in an island, just off the coast of Lyme, Connecticut. It was made to be, you know, handed out by ticks. And then if you caught one, oh my God, God forbid that happens.

Maybe a lifetime of issues. Well, Lyme disease for very long time, even when I was on the doctors, was said to not exist. But now it's getting some serious limelight because a superstar is speaking out. Take a look at this. It has been called the silent epidemic Lyme disease back in the spotlight after Justin Timberlake announced he has a debilitating case. Singer Justin Timberlake says that he's been diagnosed with Lyme disease. Justin Timberlake revealed today he has been battling Lyme disease. In an Instagram post, he wrote, if you've experienced this disease or know someone who has,

then you're aware living with this can be relentlessly debilitating both mentally and physically. He's been feeling a massive amount of nerve pain and, quote, crazy fatigue or sickness while he was performing. For most, the illness is easily treated with antibiotics, but for some, about 5 to 15% of people, symptoms can linger for months or even years. Trouble focusing or brain fog, chronic joint pain, even mental health symptoms, you know, problems with anxiety or depression. You may have inflammation of the heart muscle, heart block or electrical problems with the heart,

neurologic changes, neuropathies, even meningitis. This is most often transmitted in the United States by the deer tick in areas like the Northeast. We see Lyme disease in a lot of parts of the country. It's very common in summertime in the Northeast. And it's really strange because we're starting to see more cases as well over time. The numbers of ticks that we've seen this year

are at least 30% higher than we've seen in previous years. That increase seen in America's emergency rooms. Lyme disease is actually really controversial. There have been these conspiracy theories about Lyme. As for a Lyme vaccine, Pfizer is working on one and says it hopes to apply for approval next year. You know, they list those side effects to Lyme and you end up, you know, thinking,

boy, that looks a lot like the COVID vaccine side effects. But I don't want to get into that. I don't want to get into, you know, whether or not this is some sort of cover up. There are people that for many, many years have been actually asking us to cover this issue of Lyme disease. And now that Justin Timberlake, I think,

is making it so public, we thought it'd be a good time to get started on this topic. And so we reached out to one of our good friends of the high wire, Dr. James Newen-Schwander, who actually treats Lyme disease, amongst many other things that are causing all sorts of autoimmune diseases and havoc in people and their children. is my honor and pleasure to be joined right now by Dr. New and Swander.

Dr. New, good to see you. Good to see you, Del. All right. Well, let's start with the controversy for a second, which I think starts with any time the government might be involved with something. Now, I'm not going to ask you to destroy your career by, you know, saying this is gaining a function from a bio-weapons lab that somehow flew over to Lyme, Connecticut. But could I ask you, it sure is suspicious, isn't it? I mean, these stories, you know, it's sort of like the Wuhan Lab. I feel like it's like John Stewart. You know, the lab's named after it. It's right there where it happened. We have a lab that's right there where this whole thing seems to start.

You know, so let me just ask this in dealing with it. Do you believe that this is the type of element that could be used as a bioweapon or something that they might have monkeyed? with somewhere in the past? Well, look, let's start with how long we've known about the Lyme disease, right? So Lyme disease was initially described in the 70s, the early 70s. But we know the spirochid, the Borrelia burgdorferi spirochid that causes Lyme disease, has been around for a very long time. You know, they dug that ice man out of the Italian Alps.

It turns out he's 5,000 years old. and he had that spirochene in his body. Now, I like to say he didn't die a Lyme disease. He died of that arrow in his back, but he did have evidence of the spirochete. So we've known the spirochate's been around for a few thousand years, at least. But why have we not seen the disease caused by that spirochate until the 70s? I always tell people, look, Lyme disease has a cousin. It's called syphilis.

All right. Syphilis is the dumber, easier to treat, cousin of Lyme. And it's also caused by a spirochate. Now, we've known about syphilis for hundreds of years. Long before we knew what caused it, we recognized as common symptoms. We've known the diagnosis of syphilis for a long time. But it's only in recent times that we were able to identify the causative organism. So why is it that we've known about syphilis for hundreds of years? But we haven't known about Lyme until 1974.

So to me, there's one of a few possibilities here. A, our immune system has changed and we can't handle it anymore. You know, B, somebody monkeyed with it or C, something else. You know, so again, you know, I'm a big fan of a conspiracy theory as anybody else. But, you know, if you're doing research over here and right across the straight is Lyme, Connecticut, I don't know what to tell you. I'm not going to say we did gain of function research in the 60s and 70s, and that's why we have an epidemic of Lyme disease. I am telling you that there is definitely an issue with the recognition of chronic Lyme. You know, according to the Infectious Society of America, according to our government, you know, there is no such thing.

Right. I mean, this is what I was going to ask you. Actually, when I was working on the doctor's television show just back, I think it was about 2015, maybe. maybe 2014, I wanted to do a show on Lyme disease. And I was told not to do it because it was still too controversial, that there was a belief that this doesn't exist at all, that this is some form of munchausen by proxy or people looking for attention. Are we still in that space? Because it sure, I mean, and I think, look, Justin Timberlake's probably about to blow that out of the water.

But did it need a Justin Timberlake? Are we still in a position where there's doctors that don't believe this even exist? Yes, and it's not just are there doctors that don't believe this exists. It's most doctors don't believe it exists. Really? The official stance of the Infectious Disease Society. Yeah, the Infectious Disease Society of America. You know, I'm a member of the I-LADS, the International Lyme Associated Disease Society.

You know, we call ourselves Lyme-literate doctors because we understand the physiology of these chronic problems that Lyme can cause, right? And so, you know, we call the Infectious Society of America, IDSA, sort of call them the evil empire, because they still, to this day, deny that there is anything like chronic Lyme disease or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome or whatever you want to call it. There's a lot of terms for it. But these are people that had Lyme disease were treated and still have symptoms, or they've had symptoms chronically and maybe for years. and then you do testing, and it turns out that they have Lyme. I mean, if you're talking about, you know, why are we having trouble diagnosing this stuff, why are we in trouble believing in it, it's because we haven't made progress.

It's really been difficult to move things forward. I live in the state of Michigan. Yeah, well, I would say this. I want to say this, Dr. New, you live in the state of Michigan. Go ahead. Go ahead and finish your statement. I'll make my point. Oh, yeah, I was just going to say that.

that in the state of Michigan, I mean, right up the road from where I'm sitting right now is the University of Michigan, right now, they still will say to patients, there's no Lyme disease in Michigan. I mean, that's just incredible. We know there ticks to carry Borrelia on the west coast of the state. Why is there no Lyme disease here? We have more deer than anybody else on the planet. Why do you think there's no Lyme disease here? And that's part of the problem. You know, this is what makes me suspicious. I mean, again, what can we prove? But I find when, you know, Tony Fauci is telling me nothing to see here, which is how this whole thing on COVID started, or, you know, everything's fine. There's no, you know, no such thing as Lyme disease. Every doctor, every scientist is fascinated by everything they can find and they want to get in and they want to do something about it. And every drug maker wants to make a new drug for any disease. So suddenly there is no disease that everyone's talking about, that's a cover up. There's a cover up going on. There's a suffocation of investigation into this, which makes absolutely no sense. So that tells me the government has got to have its fingers on this somewhere. Somewhere it feels responsible, somewhere it feels guilty, somewhere it funded a Wuhan lab, somewhere on this planet. And I think they recognize if we ever

really get deep into this, we're going to see that our own government probably has. But that's just me. But that's how many times it's seeing this story. And it doesn't make. sense otherwise when you're watching scientists and doctors and universities in Michigan going against their obvious knee-jerk reaction which is to investigate any damn thing they can think of and to name any damn thing they can think of and make a drug for any damn thing they can think of when they don't want to do any of those things something stinks I want to go to a quick video by the guy that named this thing he makes some interesting points take a look at this

The controversy in the Lyme disease research is a shameful affair. And I say that because the whole thing is politically, politically tainted. Money goes to people that have the past 30 years. produce the same thing, nothing. Cereology or Cerology Plus has to be started from scratch with people that don't know forehand the results of their research just because they have to get the money. Without it, they cannot afford it. So, and I include, when it's a shame, I include physicians who don't even have the courage to tell

a patient, you got Lyme disease, and I don't know anything about it. There have lots of physicians around that wouldn't touch a Lyme disease patient. tell the nurse, you tell the guy to get out of here. I don't want to see him. That interview came back from 2008. A couple of things he said there that I think are very haunting. This is political. All of the funding for 30 years keeps going to the people that are achieving nothing.

You could really replace what he was saying with autism. That's what, and I think that that's what really makes me lean in this direction, which is if they wanted a solution, they could find one. Why do they keep funding people to say, we don't know what's causing it? Or it doesn't exist at all. Usually it's because it's something that our government's doing, it's something that they know that they don't want us to know. That's where I'm going to be. I'm not going to ask you to be there, but, you know, this is a guy that obviously feels like this thing's being shut down, that your, you know, physicians are afraid to go near it. Do you think that that's going to shift?

How prolific is it, by the way? I'm starting to feel like all around me. So many people are saying I have Lyme disease. Is it an underlying problem that is starting to rear its head? Is it something in our environment that's maybe making it worse for us? What's going on? Or is it that it's actually just started to be talked about more? I think it's that it's being talked about more.

I mean, I've been seeing Lyme cases for, I started in the 90s, and it's not shut down. So you have to look at that, you know, if you're asking how common is it, well, that's a very difficult question to answer if we have testing that's terrible. Right. Right.

What he was talking about, serology testing, it misses most chronic Lyme. You know, a standard hospital test for Lyme will miss about 70 or 80% of Lyme cases. So what's the incidents? I don't know. It's in the, you know, it's in the hundreds of thousands, but you've got a situation where we are very definitely under-diagnosing this disease.

We have a situation where people don't think of this disease, especially in places like Michigan. If there's no Lyme here, then whatever symptom your patient has couldn't be Lyme. And so they don't even do the testing, right? And the testing is terrible. And it hasn't changed all that much. I mean, there's very hyper-specialized testing you can do. And this whole idea that, you know, if it's chronic, it couldn't be Lyme disease because there's no chronic Lyme disease. You know, so again, you're talking about trying to figure out numbers that are impossible to determine because we don't have the statistics.

We know that there are that it's the most common tick-borne illness. We know that. Is it only ticks? Is it only ticks? By the way, that's a question of mine. Is it only no? No. I mean, there's some evidence that it can be spread by biting flies, you know, kind of make sense. There's this thing called the deer fly.

Maybe that can spread it. But, you know, there's also evidence that it could be spread by things like spiders, you know, where, you know, they're potentially going to be exposed and spread it. But, you know, primarily we talk about tick-borne illness and spread by ticks. And certainly there are a lot more ticks than there used to be, regardless of where you're at in the country. You know, there's almost nowhere where you're not going to see ticks, but particularly, you know, the northern states and the eastern seaboard, there's a ton of lime and a ton of ticks. So when we're talking about tick-borne illnesses, the big thing with lime, and this is what

makes it so bad for people like Justin Timberlake, is, you know, in adults, maybe 10 or 15 percent of adults will have neural Lyme. So it involves their brain, and they've got all kinds of weird symptoms, and you're back in the same boat as what you hear from the same. some of these vaccine injury patients, right? You get immune activation, you get brain inflammation, you get fatigue, you get all kinds of weird neurologic symptoms, electrical pain, all that sort of thing. And with kids, the rates even higher. So instead of 10 or 15%, it's more like 20 or 30%.

Wow. So it's a big problem, and we know that a lot of the kids that we see that have, you know, these Pans Panda syndromes, these brain-on-fire syndromes, they look like they have autism. They're aggressive. They're obsessive. They have OCD symptoms. They're anxious. It's really brain inflammation from an underlying infection. And Lyme is one of the things that can do that. So again, without recognition, it's very difficult to answer any of those basic questions. How common is it? Who is it? How is it spread? You know, those kinds of things. And we really haven't made progress since I started seeing Lyme patients in the 90s. That's the tragedy of Lyme disease. What are the symptoms? How do I mean, if someone is sitting at home wondering, is this what I have? And, you know, what is it you're looking for? Is it so broad, it'd be hard to say. But what should someone be thinking about? Well, I mean, there's the classic Lyme symptoms. You know, the classic Lyme symptoms, you know, classical, you get bit by a tick, you develop a bullseye rash. That's sort of primary Lyme disease. Yeah. And that bullsie rash, that's the time to treat it aggressively. And I'm not a lot.

a big fan of antibiotics, but you show up with that, I'm going to be treating you with antibiotics aggressively, usually three or four weeks worth of doxyclin or something like that. Because you don't want this to go to whatever the next phase might be, which is secondary and tertiary line. So that initial phase will go away. And then it'll come back maybe as a skin rash. It'll come back as joint pain. And again, if you have a painful swollen joint, one of them, we worry about is that Lyme disease. But it's a, it's a pain. It doesn't, the classic symptoms aren't there most of the time, and especially the neurologic symptoms because those aren't going to develop for three or four weeks after the bite, right?

So you're not even going to remember that you were bitten by something and now you have a headache or you have brain fog or you have weird numbness, tingling, shooting pains, you know, you're having problems with your cognition and it can even mimic, you know, the most classic symptom of neural line is a sixth nerve palsy. So your eye turns in, right? You can't bring your eye back out. And so all of a sudden it looks like you, oh, did you have a stroke or something like that? No, that's neural lines. Wow. But again, you have to think about it to diagnose it. The classic patient that comes to my office, it's going to be somebody that sort of out of the blue started developing joint pain, started developing fatigue, started developing general malaise, got neurologic symptoms, brain fog, fatigue. If it goes on for a long time, you're going to be. You're not developing fatigue. You're not developing. You're not developing. You're You can get all this autonomic dysfunction pots where your heart rate goes through the roof because you stand up. You know, you can get all kinds of weird symptoms.

And I hate even putting these symptoms on air because I know my phone's going to be ringing off the hook. But, you know, again, you have to think about this in this chronically ill patient. Could that be one of the underlying causes? Yeah. And it's, again, the classic Lyme is not really what we're talking about here. Because, and depending on where you're at in the United States, that's frequently recognized in the, you know, in the primary care setting treated aggressively that primary line and that prevents the secondary tertiary line from happening. It's when it's not recognized when they don't have a bull's eye rash.

And over 50% of people who line don't ever have a bull's eye rash. So if Justin Timberlake was walking to your clinic, he's diagnosed, I guess, where anyone liked them, what is the treatment? What is, you know, what can someone expect is the way that you would go about treating this right now? Well, that requires a whole PhD in managing immunology and infectious disease. So, you know, there is a role for antibiotics for some people.

Even late, even if he's realizing years later, I got bit a long time ago. But relying on antibiotics alone is a huge mistake because that usually does not fix the problem. If you look at the statistics, antibiotics alone are less than 10% effective at treating that chronic Lyme type picture. And that's part of the problem. Why don't antibiotics work?

Well, because at that point it's far more than just an infection. You know, at that point, it's morphed into this hybrid between an infection and really an autoimmune disorder, you know, what we call loss of immunotolerance. You know, at some point that spirochete, because it lives inside of cells, this is not just, you know, floating around in the blood. It's actually living inside of cells. It's taken up housekeeping in our actual cells. So how do you get rid of that with an antibiotic that becomes very, very difficult? The other thing is they tend to be very, very slow growing. So the rule of antibiotics is you want to get maybe 20 or 30 cell replications. So if you have something like strep

that's dividing every two or three hours, well, 20 cell replications is a couple days. But if you're talking something like a chronic spirochee, like Lyme, where it's replicating maybe once every month or a couple times a year. Well, you're talking about doing the antibiotics for 20 or 30 years. Nobody's going to do that. You know, so you really have to get the immune system on your side. A lot of people that have chronic Lyme have some type of other toxicity, heavy metals, mold toxins, environmental toxins, their guts a mess. You know, you have to treat them from that integrative, holistic perspective. Otherwise, they're not going to get better. And a lot of the really hardcore eyelids doctors that used to be all antibiotic, just more, stronger, longer type treatment,

those are the doctors that are even now saying, yeah, we need more than just antibiotics to treat this because antibiotics are probably not going to get you better. Now, having said all of that, I still will use antibiotics even on a chronic patient because if you're in that 10%, hellelujah, praise the Lord, the antibiotics will help you. Right. But if you're in the 90%, you know, by the time I see patients, they've already had antibiotics. It hasn't worked. You know, so they come to see me, what else can I do?

And that feeds into this whole idea of, you know, integrated medicine. What do we do for these patients? How do we detox them? How do we build an immune system? Can we identify the issues that might be not allowing their immune system to function the way you should? Because, again, if you're going based on, you know, chronic line, is from the spire key, and the reason why we have trouble with it now and we did in 100 years ago is because the environment we live in, if you believe in that theory, then we should be able to do a lot

to help those patients, right? I mean, this is what we do with vaccine injuries. This is what we do with any of our chronic diseases, our autoimmune things. You know, you fix the gut, you detox of the patient, you support the immune response, and then maybe you use antiseptic herbs. That's another option because you can use those for a lot longer without having toxicity and the studies suggest particularly in these chronic infections they work as well as antibiotics if not better and those you can use for a long period of time so there's a lot of different layers to treatment and you know again for physicians or for practitioners it's really about learning these skills about learning how do you take that systems biology integrative approach to a chronic health issue I am sure

There's a million people watching this show right now and saying, I want that doctor. I want that guy. Obviously, I know you're very busy. But what type of doctor? There's a group of doctors, I'm sure, that sort of focus in the space and are continuing to train themselves, not just coming out of school and sticking with whatever the CDC says or infectious disease and telling you there is no such thing as Lyme. How do I find those doctors that are using antiseptic herbs?

I mean, that sounds amazing, like bringing in the whole cornucopia of both holistic, natural, and, if necessary, pharmaceutical products. How do we find that doctor? Well, I mean, first of all, you want to look for what's called a Lyme literate doctor. And this is really what the I-Lads organization is about. Okay. So it's the international, international Lyme Associated Disease Society. So I-L-A-D-S.

Okay. You want to find a doctor that's Lyme-Literate. You know, as you know, on the president of the medical academy in pediatric special needs, we've been doing some of their pediatric talks at ILADS, and we did a whole day of pediatric Lyme. In our world, that's a big cause of some of these behavioral problems

and immune dysfunction that we see in kids. So, you know, you want to get it, If you've got a child that you're worried about, find a Maps doctor. And that's, you know, medmaps.org or go to ILADS to find a Lyme literate doctor if you're talking adults. And, you know, again, we're all about training practitioners in these techniques because we need a lot more of that. You don't learn about this stuff in medical school. You just don't. And you're not going to learn it in an infectious disease residency.

You're going to learn about the drugs. You're going to learn about the medications and those can be valuable. But again, in this situation with chronic Lyme, you have to go so much beyond that to try and help these patients recover. You have a conference coming up now for MAPS, doctors. When does that happen? Tell me a little bit about that. Yeah, so we have conferences twice a year. Our next one is going to be in Phoenix. I believe it's September 4th through the 6th.

This is the Thursday through Saturday after Labor Day. And we will be, again, what we're all about is practitioners. I always say if you see kids in your office and you have a certificate hanging on the wall, you should be coming to a Maps conference. But basically, we teach these concepts of systems biology of actual root cause, underlying cause medicine, you know, what's causing the problem, how do you treat it, and how to manage chronic health conditions. Now, we're focused on kids, but I like to say, you know, kids grow up. and the physiology doesn't change that much.

The principles we teach, work for adults as well, and we're really trying to expand the scope of who we're trying to contact. So we're all about systems biology. We're all about integrated medicine. We're all about root cause medicine, and we welcome everyone to our conference. I like to say this is the best conference you'll ever go to, although I might be a little bit biased on that opinion.

So it's not just for doctors. Would parents be in their interest to go to this conference. MAPS is really focused on practitioners. So it's not just doctors, but we don't really have a parent track right now. We probably will have one in the spring. Again, we do a spring in a fall conference.

Our goal is to have a parent track in the spring. But for the fall conference, we don't have a parent track. And it's hardcore medicine. Anyone can go to an ILADS conference, but you may find yourself a bit overwhelmed with the information that you're getting. Because it's really not for late people. So let's bring this up for all those practitioners out there

that are watching the highway. We have a special discount, 20% off to get the deep vast knowledge that these maps doctors are sharing there in the work that they're doing. You can take that QR code and check out that event. I highly recommend it. We definitely want to see a better education amongst those doctors that have open minds

and want to treat our children. We need more them out there because there's just not enough. Dr. New has got to line out the door. He needs help. Dr. New, I want to thank you for taking the time today. That was very insightful, and it's something that I think we're gonna be hearing a lot more of, and we should be asking the question.

Any doctor that says these things don't exist or any hospital, I would say that's a good time to just decide I'm not going back to that hospital. These people aren't forward thinking, they're living in the dark ages. Let's deal with the world that we're living in and move forward. So I really appreciate your work.

And thank you. I know you're busy. You took time out of your schedule. So thanks for doing that today for us. Not a problem, Del. Always the pleasure. I'm always here for you guys. All right. Sounds great. Take care. Well, and I want to, you know, just let Justin Timberlake and everyone out there know that that is suffering this incredibly difficult time that our prayers are with you. And we hope you find just the right things to come together to get your life back and be whole. It's very important. And it's unfortunate that, you know, as we find ourselves on these journeys, that we have to start recognizing that many of the people that we were listening to or believing in or thought had the answers really knew that this was the reality.

You know, they're like, go Biden and it says that it's safe and effective. But, like, he didn't know. There's no proof. I mean, none of that stuff was safe. In fact, we didn't do the typical test. Like, the typical process, that's why it takes so long to get a product on market, the typical process is all this clinical trial testing and stuff in a small population. This was just, let's test it on some, you know, lab-rupt models,

analyze and see if it works and stuff like that and just throw it to the wind and see what happens. People didn't know that, like the patients, do you know. I'm saying. I'm sure somebody's going to get sued for that stuff eventually. Do you have any idea that, that, lack of research that was done on those products like are you you shouldn't be surprised that this happened it was pretty much the government kind of made a deal with pharmaceutical companies and kind of pressured the pharmaceutical companies because we're not going to say no to help like the government like the government's like yo these three big ass companies we need

help we need to figure this out you're you're solving this problem warp speed. I mean, we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. Like, people wanted it. Who gave it to me? Shout out to James O'Keefe, who does all the great undercover work. I'm amazed what people will say to a pretty girl out there. It's for everyone out there, it's probably a good reason to get married just so you never get trapped in saying something ridiculous on camera. But really shocking. Of course, he's talking about the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, which ultimately was pulled from the market after

they recognized it had so many issues. And basically only now are we seeing Robert Kennedy Jr. starting to look at all of the MRNA technology vaccines. That Johnson Johnson wasn't one of them, but the MRI technologies also were rushed onto the market as we discovered in our work to win the Pfizer data. I just wanted you to, you know, I was asking my team, can we put together timeline of all of the victories that we've had in courts and all that we have achieved. We won the Pfizer data. The world has the data from the Pfizer trials because of those of you that support I can and the Highwire.

The world has the Moderna data, which they remember FDA wanted to hide all of this for 75 years. They didn't get away with it because you, I want to really, you first. Yeah, Aaron, Siri is amazing. He's amazing in court, but Aaron Siri isn't in that court if we, We don't have you supporting the work that we are doing here. So and then the VSAFE data. We now know that the app that was made by the CDC to track injuries. Again, they tried to hide the open reports where people wrote in because they weren't asking

the right questions in the cut and pace, but if you have to write it out, so that's where we know where everyone died, how many people died, how many people had heart attacks, all those issues. We only have that data because of you. one of you out there watching right now that's sitting on your chairs sitting, you know, on your couch or maybe on your sailboat somewhere watching this show and saying, I had something to do with that. I hope all of you will get involved with being able to say, I'm making a difference in the world. We're the easiest way to help you do that. We really are. There's nowhere else

where within weeks, if you get in right now, within weeks, you'll be able to say, West Virginia has medical freedom because of me. Don't you want to be able to say you did that? What other show is offering that to you right now. So I want to remind you right now, we have a $600,000 match where, you know, your $5 turns to $10, your $10 turns to $20. Your $100 turns into $200. This is the moment that you can make a difference in this world. We are in the fight of our lives, folks. And as Aaron pointed out, the ACLU is now fighting us, fighting you, fighting our children. So we're up against the big boys. Of course, they don't want us there. None of the pharmaceutical industry want us there. But we're not going away. I hope more of you will make us make it possible

for us to step into more courtrooms around this country and just bring medical freedom and to hold it, to hold it down. I want to just talk about the show. The show sometimes, you know, weeks like this can be a little bit scary when you start thinking about the fact that gain of function research may have caused a disease that has swept this nation. And though we believe vaccines make far worse and are the probably the better delivery system. I know we've created some concerns today. We've created concerns about Lyme disease and now everyone's going to be terrified to go for a hike because they don't want a tick. And so it's in moments like these that I really just want to talk about how I see the world and how I walk through it with my family. Number one,

I believe that we are created in the image and likeness of God. I think our bodies are capable of withstanding incredible, incredible things. I mean, there's, I believe there's people that were right there in Chernobyl that are still alive today. They may not look too good, and I'm not sure they're extremely healthy, but the fact that they can survive at all, things like that makes you think, oh my God, this people have been what shot like 13 times on subways that live and have protective lives. It's our will to live and the power of realizing our power, recognizing that ability to heal, that your body is designed to heal. The stasis of your body is not what pharma is trying to tell you, which is it's weak, and you have to fix it all the time.

Your body is like, you ever see a motorcycle if someone falls off and it keeps going without them? That centrifugal force keeps the momentum going. That centrifugal force in many ways is how I see my body. My body wants to be upright. It wants to be in motion. It wants to be healthy. And it's going to figure out how to get there if I can help it in any way. That's why mostly in our family, we use holistic healing because unless something goes incredibly wrong.

And maybe if I find myself in Dr. News office and it's clear of Lyme disease, there are moments like that that I might consider vaccinate. I mean, I'll never probably do that, but I would consider taking some antibiotics if that was something that he was going to say there. But before I get there, I think there's so many ways we can achieve health. I go to a chiropractor. I believe having spinal alignment sets free all of the energy so that that self-kealing system stays completely whole so that all my rivers and all my streams are flowing the way that they should. Homeopathy is out there. There's naturopaths, Ayurveda. I use herbs from Ayurvedic practitioners sometimes just to either bring down inflammation, things like that. So that's how I approach my life. But I want you to know. that you're designed to survive.

And we probably haven't seen the worst, the worst of this toxic world that we've created for ourselves, that we've allowed to be created. Right now, your government is trying to give liability of protection for them to spray deadly pesticides and herbicides all of your crops so that you can never sue them. So we're gonna continue to fight there in courts,

but meanwhile, don't eat food that has that stuff on it. That's all you can do. And for people that have gotten vaccinated, like I'm so worried about the long-term effects or got my children, their early vaccines, all I can say is thank your lucky stars. You're healthy now. Take this moment and live differently from here on out. That's all we have. Let's just do better every single day. And I think as you start eating better and drinking better and sleeping better and exercising better and going to practitioners that bring you into alignment, you'll find that your body.

is better capable of defending itself in this world, of healing itself in this world. I do not want to instill fear. What I want to instill is the recognition that we are spectacular beings and we are capable of so much and we can overcome so much. But what we have to do is the work. Take the time, figure out how to live a better, healthier life and bring that to your children, teach them how to build better, healthier lives. We're going to continue to bring more practitioners on to talk about how to do that,

things that we can do to make ourselves healthier. We're spreading out. We're growing new wings here at the High Wire. There's more we want to do to help you through this process. Invite your friends. Tell everyone you know that there's somewhere where you're getting information that no one else will give you. And they're fighting for us in courtrooms around the country. This is the High Wire.

We are so excited to be in your living room this afternoon. We'll see you next week. Bye.