The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 442: HIDDEN FREQUENCIES

Episode Date: September 20, 2025

Del covers the fallout from Sen. Ron Johnson’s hearing on the hidden Henry Ford Study and teases a twist in ‘An Inconvenient Study’ Film—LIVE Oct 3. Amy Bohn exposes CA’s rushed AB 144 law, which doubles down on the state’s medical tyranny. Jefferey Jaxen reports on the turbulent free speech debate after Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the historic ACIP meeting. Plus, new science shakes climate change—and Dr. Carlos Loredo Ritter reveals how to protect your family from dangerous EMFs.Guests: Amy Bohn, Dr. Carlos Loredo RitterBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Yes. Action. Good morning. Good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Well, the pushback has begun, the result of the Senator Ron Johnson hearing last week, all about our study. We're calling the documentary about that study. an inconvenient study. But this is the study by Henry Ford Medical System done by Dr. Marcus

Zervos, who was the head of infectious disease there. It was the center point of the entire Tuesday hearing last week. And now Ford has reached out and said that we peer-reviewed this. It wasn't good enough standards and are making all of their arguments and excuses that they can absolutely everything that we were expecting, but just so that you can see exactly the attacks that are coming in. This is from Washington Post journalist Lauren Weaver. Lauren, first of all, I want to thank her for being at the hearing. I love it when people show up. It's great. I'm going to keep working on it, Lauren. I know I'm going to win you over eventually, but this is what she had to say. On Tuesday on the Hill, Senator Ron Johnson touted results from an unpublished study

commissioned by an anti-vaccine group as showing the risk of childhood vaccines. First of all, I don't know what that word commissioned means in terms of this. I just challenged Dr. Zervos to do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. We had several meetings on this. He said he believed in vaccines. I said, then prove me wrong. Prove me wrong. Do a vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated study and prove me wrong. I don't think that's commissioning. I didn't give him any money. I didn't have any involvement. So I don't understand. understand what that word commission means, I think that's stretching the truth. Let's look at the rest of this, though. She goes on to say, I asked why the study hadn't been published of Henry Ford Health,

where the author who did not testify worked. A spokesperson told me that initial peer review of the draft revealed immediate and significant concerns due to serious data flaws. First of all, I want to say, I know for a fact there was no peer review on this study. I can't tell you how I know you're going to have to see the documentary to know why I know that, and eventually you'll know that too. But let's go on. And that the institution was unaware, this long rejected and unvalidated draft was being talked about or had somehow been shared. And then she gets into details and the arguments and excuses that they're making against the vaccine. I've seen a lot of this online.

The unvaccinated patient sample was vastly different than the vaccinated sample with more meals, more white children, less prematurity and less respiratory distress at birth. The unvaccinated sample is very small in comparison to the vaccinated sample. This is going to be true, by the way. That's going to be true of any Vax versus Unvax study. Obviously, there's more vaccinated children in the world. There's more vaccinated children inside of any medical system. But that doesn't matter in science.

The thousands and tens of thousands of studies we've gone through on this show, the question is, is it statistically significant? Is there a large enough comparative group that you can, you know, make a comparison? In this case, out of like 18 or 19,000, roughly 2,000 of them were unvaccinated, that is what you need. That was enough to be able to compare these two groups. Now, you're not saying that the numbers is 500 this group and 200 in this group. Therefore, what you're saying is out of this many, the percentage of that group that had issues versus the percentage of this group. We all know how math works.

That makes sense. We're not saying there's more in the group that obviously had more. kids, that would be stupid. That's not what's happening here. All right, moving on. The amount of time, this is a big one, the amount of time measuring occurrence of disease, which is much shorter for the unvaccinated children. One quarter were absorbed only through six months of age. It's 75% we'll only observe up till three years of age, which is before doctors can confidently diagnose chronic pediatric disease. What's amazing about this point is it's clear that Dr. Zervos and his team did see serious problems in this.

vaccinated, right? They were worried about it. And so they did what's called a sensitivity test because it was true. A lot of the unvaccinated just don't go to the doctor as often. They had to look at things like that. Why? We know why they're not sick, but okay. But then the idea like what if they were getting out early. And so they did a sensitivity test. They looked at one year. If we just limited everyone in the study that only in the first year, what did we see? What we saw was the vaccinated were sicker? Just in the first year. In one year, the vaccine were already sicker. Then they looked at three years. Let's limit everybody to all three years. And then they found that the vaccinated were even more sick. Like they were, the numbers were

getting worse and worse. And then they said, let's just limit the whole study to the entire five year investigation so that everybody that was unvaccinated had to be in the program for five years. And you know what they saw? Catastrophic. In fact, I think the numbers almost doubled in the vaccinated group with all the issues they had. So honestly, and it was statistically significant, they could have just stuck with all the kids that were there for the entire five years, but it made the vaccinated look even worse. So what did they do? They went to the entire group, which was some of the unvaccinated were there for a year or two or months, and it made the vaccinated look healthier, which is still horrific. And that's the point. They were trying to see, was there any way to make

these numbers look better? And so lastly, I think there's one more point here. The draft compared multiple vaccines versus no vaccines instead of a specific vaccine versus no vaccines. Vaccine guidance has changed over time, but that was not taken into consideration. This was not to try and determine if MMR is a problem or hepatitis B is a problem. That would be a different type of study. This is what we've been asking for for decades, just vaccines in general. Does vaccinating make you healthier? And whether you got one or more, you were 2.5 times.

more likely to then develop chronic disease as a child. I mean, just want to make this clear that this study design that was used was exactly the study design created by the CDC. We've talked about this. And instead of doing that study, they did a study on how to do the study, right? Genius, okay? But that how to do it, like where they figured out it would have to be done this way, you'd have to compare these groups this way.

Guess what? That's what Ford used. That's what Dr. Mark has used as his template. So if you have a problem with how this study was designed, then you have a problem with how the CDC spent taxpayer money saying how this study should be designed. But lastly, I want to say this. Do we look stupid? We knew there'd be pushback. There are things I'm not showing you or telling you.

We wanted all of the arguments to be made so that we can show you how they do this. How we know they're doing these studies at the CDC, at, you know, different large government groups across. the world and the reason we never see one. This is the whole point. We never see a vaccinated versus unvaccated comparative study. We've never seen one because obviously if they could show you one that showed the vaccinated were healthier, this argument is over forever. It's over.

There's no moving forward. But they can't show you one. They've never not in any institution in the world been able to compare vaccinated to unvaccinated and prove to you that the vaccinated are healthier. And this time we've got them. This time we know they did this study. They never put it in peer review. They shut it down immediately because Lauren, I want to ask you this. Why didn't you ask? Well, then if you saw problems with the study, why didn't you fix those problems and address those issues in the only way that you could with the amount of kids you had in your database? Why did you not still publish this study? Why didn't

you bring in a team? If your head of infectious disease was not talented enough to do this study, why didn't you bring in people that were, then then really deliver and put it out? Because that's what peer review is supposed to do. Well, why don't you do this? Why don't you do that? That didn't happen. We don't see an interaction with Zurbos and some team at Henry Ford medical. Instead, you just buried the thing. And I think that's where we're going to have a problem. And wait to you see this documentary, folks. An inconvenient study. Man is it, and we got the receipts now.

They just played right in our hand. Lauren, I want to thank you for getting that information. You were a part of this process. We need to have happen. Wait till you see this movie. Children struggling every day with ADHD. Scott's allergies made it hard to keep up with his friends. Allergic reactions from accidental food exposures.

Moderate to severe eczema. Lach syriasis. Rumatoid arthritis. is food allergies. The health of American children is in crisis. More than 40% of American children now have at least one chronic health condition. Automium disease like rheumatoid arthritis, human al-diabetes, lupus, Crohn's disease, all this is IBS. Just a few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism.

Today it's one in 31. ADD, ADHD, speech, a light language like ticks, her ed syndrome, narcolepsy, sleep disorders. There's no way in the world these kind of rapid increases in the incidence of disease could be genetic. Genetic change takes generation centuries to play out. What the heck is happening? What is happening? Chronic disease has gone from 12.8% in our children in the 1980s to over 54% of our kids now. That's the greatest decline in human health that's ever been recorded.

And people will say, how do you know it's not the pesticide sprayed all over our cross? or the hormones in our beef or plastics or forever chemicals. But when we're talking about an autoimmune disease crisis, which is what's happening in America, shouldn't we look closest at the one product that's designed to alter our immune system for life? And we don't just inject it one time or two times, or 10 times, or 15 times, or 20 times or 50 times,

72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program. There'd be one easy study to rule of our children it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children. But we don't know because they've never done the study. The CDC's responsibility to do those studies and they've been ordered again and again and again to do them and they have refused. This is information that vaccine safety advocates want, and I'm not sure why it hasn't been done. What we would need is a scientist that the CDC could trust. They would have to be a passionately pro-vaccine, highly accredited group of scientists,

willing to do a super-robust, retrospective, vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparative study. As fate would have it, Delmet, the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health System, Marcus Servos. Dr. Zervos is the perfect epidemiologist for the study. He's incredibly pro-vaccine, and he's also used to being in high-profile cases because he was the center of the Flint, Michigan water investigation. Dr. Zerbis only agreed to do this study to prove us wrong. Della and I thought that was an excellent opportunity. We only had one request.

Whatever the outcome, you publish it. He said, whatever the results, they get published. Would he stick to that promise if the results show that unvaccinated kids are healthier? Did it know? Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long-term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. I've never seen this study before. 18,468 subjects. Henry Ford, like other institutions, has a bias towards the goodness of vaccines.

If the results came back demonstrating that the battery of vaccines was associated with chronic diseases, such a result would be particularly convincing. This could be essentially one of the most valuable studies in the field. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. 600% more acute and chronic ear infections. 4.47 times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. 616% increase.

Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated, in a group. There were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities. None.

It's a big difference. It's very important that this study sees a light of day. This is devastating. This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis. We are systematically making kids sick, and not just a little bit. sick, very sick. This may be the most important study that has ever been done, and it needs to be

published. He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over. I mean, I'm obviously, like, really emotional. Zervos probably going to lose his job over this. This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda. Oh, I can't wait for this moment. It's going to be so, so good, but make sure you're signed up. Go to an inconvenience study.com and register in there so that we can keep your breast of all the moves, where we're screening. Lots of people reaching out to do screenings. We're looking at how we're going to do all of that right now as we speak. If you want to be on top of it and certainly sign up at the website there. And follow our socials. An Inconvenant Study. Here it is an inconvenient study at Facebook, Instagram, you name it. It's all

right there, except for X. I think they had to shorten the words a little bit just so it fits in there. Make a note of that. But just be tracking everything we're doing here. We would love you. to start sharing the trailer, let everyone know this film is coming. We've got them dead to rights this time. This is going to be, we're going to make it so inconvenient for the entire medical establishment. You just want to be a part of this. All right. Well, while we're having amazing successes on the national front,

and while Robert Kennedy Jr. is making huge strides now, we're going to talk about incredible ASIP meetings that are going on and all the changes that are happening. It sounds like we have breaking news now that California has decided to go even deeper into the dark ages. I'm being joined by Amy Bond. All right, Amy Bond, live from California. What is happening? All right.

So there's never a dull moment in California. And honestly, I cannot believe this truthfully. So just a couple of days ago, what happened is there was a budget bill that was introduced in January of this year. It was just a placeholder bill. There was nothing to it. But on September 12th, the last day of the legislative session, they gutted and amended this entire placeholder bill and filled it with everything that we would not want

related to immunizations, health, health freedom, parental rights. It's atrocious. And they've already passed the bill. So they passed it without any due process, no public comment, no committee, hearings, no stakeholders to oppose. And this bill is, it's awful. I'm almost speechless. I'm not speechless, but I am almost speechless because it's so, so bad. So what it's done is it's going to be

changing so many things related to immunizations in California. Do you want me to start to go into what the bill does? I mean, because, I mean, it's really unfortunate because there's been so much progress there getting people to re-litigate SB277, SB276. You're even starting to get Democrats that are questioning it. I know there's those that were even signed on to SB 277 that are questioning it. But you're saying this thing just got backdoored right in and through under like, you know, in a bill that had nothing to do, I'm assuming with vaccines or education or any of it. They just sort of gutted that out, kept like the number basically built an entire thing.

and said, I mean, is this how this works? They basically said it was already approved. It's already made it through all committees, even though it was about a completely different subject. Now we're going to pack it in under that number and make it all about vaccines. And now we don't have to go through hearings. It's just going to go through what, a committee vote or something and get forwarded? Yeah.

So basically they bypassed all of the legislative process. So typically if a bill is introduced, you have to, you know, it has to go through different committees to be heard. and allow the public to oppose or support, as well as those committees to evaluate if the bill is good or not or bad policy. But in this scenario, none of that happened. They literally just crammed all of the worst stuff possible

into this bill last minute, last day, and created, and the original bill is just about the budget. It's a budget bill. So if anybody remembers back to SB 276, this is exactly what they did. They pushed through a tree. bill at the very end, last day of the session. There's no committee votes, no public review of it,

no opposition, no ability for public to actually have comments on it. And so it was originally a budget bill. So it was supposed to be just about the budget, a budget act, but lo and behold, on September 12th, that's not what it was. It was amended. It was filled with a whole bunch of terrible things. Well, let's get into those terrible things.

Let me hear about what do we talk about how bad is it we've got everybody terrified now living in California so what are we talking about all right so what we're talking about is that first of all the bill and this is already passed just so to make sure that that's clear so what's happening is in the bill it says that all immunization recommendations from January 1st in 2025 and prior to that will be the baseline for all recommendations it's basically cutting out anything related to ASIP or the CDC, it no longer will allow for those recommendations to hold as it used to in legislative

law and in California. So it's moved all power to the California Department of Public Health, no legislative process anymore to add any kind of invasations onto the schedule for children. So any basically, I mean, this is a preemptive strike. Any changes Robert Kennedy Jr. And the new ASIP might make like we know right now this week they're looking, hepatitis B and day one old babies. They're going to look at the COVID vaccine should be recommended in any way. California is basically saying we're going to stay in the dark ages. We want to be pre-Rober Kennedy Jr., pre-CDC, where it's at now. And we are not going to adhere to advisory committee recommendations at all.

That's what they're saying. We're separating from any federal government or health department. Yes, and additionally, the CDC. So specifically this bill goes through all of the existing health codes. and statutes and literally strikes out. You can see it just line, align through it. No longer will it be following the recommendations from ASIP or the CDC. And in addition to that, it will be following.

So this is what they're doing. They're moving all the power to the California Department of Public Health. And then they've also said they will follow the recommendations of the AAP, American Academy, Pediatrics. Obviously, you know what's happening with that. So it will follow that recommendation. but most importantly, it's moved all the power to the health department. So there's no longer going to be a legislative process to add any kind of recommendations or vaccines to the schedule.

But I wish that was all that this bill is doing. But in addition to that, all the work that we all work together on, you know, you and I, your organization, our organization in 2023 to push back against that HPV vaccine mandate bill. They're pushing for it in this bill. So what they've done is as of July 1st, 2006, so just next year, it will fully be implementing into law that the HPV vaccine will be recommended for eighth graders. So middle school and high schoolers. And they added it also to college students' recommendations. So anybody 26 years old or younger, they're going to recommend the HPV vaccine for those age groups. I can see it as clear as day in the new writings and the amended version that was just passed.

So they brought that back. All that hard work brought it back into this piece of legislation. Because truth because they're cowards. They know that the public would oppose so vehemently every single one of these things. And there's still more to share it through that's in this law. But the public would not have stand for it because all the, you know, the tide is turning. All of the people, you know, everybody knows. Well, that's why you do something like this when you do not have the will of the people. I can't believe that Gavin Newsom is so short-sighted that he would sign this. First of all, you're now admitting I don't believe in process.

I don't believe in the will of the people. I believe in cheating. I believe in backdoor, you know, making backroom deals. This is everything he's accused of. This is why America can't stand this guy and why I don't think he has a chance in heck of. up as president of the United States. He may win what remains of the Democratic Party, but there is no way the nation is moving this direction. It's really an abomination at a time where he should be reading the writing on the walls. You've got such a shift happening in California

right now. I don't know. I mean, are you surprised he signed it? I'm not surprised. I think that Governor Newsom has shown that he's a coward, honestly. From the time that 276 passed, he signed it, I think out of pressure and now we see this law being signed. You know, Governor Newsom could have done the right thing right now and vetoed it, but instead to allow it to pass, there's no transparency. He has no courage, in my opinion, no principles.

And this is an indication of that and no respect for the people, no respect for people being able to voice their opinion. But what else is in there? Tell me about it. Also in the category of the flu shot, it mentions that and removes any recommendations, again, from A,

or from the CDC related to the flu vaccine. So this is like directly targeting that vaccine as well. The recommendations are shifted for that to the health department as well. I think one of, I think there's two more things that are atrocious and it's related to liability. So as you know and as people know that anyone who's been injured by a vaccine cannot, they don't have any recourse. They cannot sue the manufacturer. there's no recourse for injuries except for in 1986,

as you know, the childhood vaccine injury compensation program. So with that, what this bill does is instead of protecting the people, instead of making sure that a product that's brought to consumers is safe or effective or making sure that there's no harm being done or people at least have recourse to sue the manufacturer if they hurt people, instead this bill goes further. and expands on the liability-free component of this. So it says that anybody who prescribes, dispenses, orders, furnishes, or administers a vaccine shall not be held liable for any injury caused by that administration.

So it expands this liability-free part of it. And then, unfortunately, it talks about minors, too. And this is really suspect for me. I know we don't want to, we don't know what this means yet. But what it says is that the expansion of liability removal also applies to minors. So if a person gives and administers a vaccine, they will not be held liable for any injury caused by that if they administer it to a minor. So it specifically talks about minors and says that this part of this new law would go into effect on January 1st, 2030. So my question is, why is there anything in this piece of new legislation that would be five years removed from right now related to minors and any injuries that would happen to that or liability to be removed from anybody who administers vaccines?

It mentions that any outreach programs are not liable for any harm or any injuries. It's also, again, specifically related to minors. I don't know the answer to why that's in there yet, but I can tell you that this is very, very, very scary, I think, for all Californians. And the fact that Governor Newsom has said he's created an alliance or a pact with all of the West Coast states, you know, Oregon, Washington, I think Hawaii may be part of it as well. It's specifically to counter what we're seeing with Secretary Kennedy at the federal level. So this alliance, you know, they're shifting it to the health department. I would not be surprised if there's going to be other states who do this as well,

aligned with what Governor Newsom just did. Again, you know, the People's Republic of California strikes. I mean, I just, it's really shocking. And it's funny because they always talk about, you know, Texas seceding in many ways. This is like California is seceding from the nation on where everyone else is at. We're all waking up to freedom, body sovereignty,

freedom of speech, and it seems like California is moving into the dark ages. So sad, really scary for so many people. Yeah. And why would California do this or any of these states? Because in reality, if the CDC and ASIP are bringing in the best science, the best scientists, re-evaluating what was just, passed often with conflicts of interest and really looking at this for the first time,

you know, how does multiple vaccines given to a child on the same day and two different limbs of their body impact that child? They've never had the answer for that. So for us to have the opportunity for the first time under Secretary Kennedy's leadership for these things to be evaluated at the deepest level to protect children and to make sure we're not just pushing a product that's going to just, you know, continue to harm them. You know, the governor knew some of these legislators, they're so out of touch. The people want the truth. And that transparency has been coming forward, I think, in magnificent ways from Secretary Kennedy, HHS and all the leadership and the things they're implementing there. This is a step backward. This is something where,

honestly, I don't think the people are going to stand for it. I don't know what that means, but I can say, you know, for us here in California, for myself, my family, the people that we serve, people are not going to stand for this. If that means we open up new schools and find a way around this. We are going to figure that out because this puts children in danger in a different way. Yes, it removes parental rights. There's so many issues with what they've just done, but I just, I don't know what the future looks like here. Honestly, this is really, really nerve-wracking. It is, and it's something that, you know, I talk to people, I talk to donors this week, they're asking, you know, what about Washington, what about California? Yeah, we're winning in other places.

I mean, look, you're getting a response. This is sort of that natural response to the success that we've been having in medical freedom. California is doubling down. And by the way, unless they decide to be like England and Europe and start censoring people's social media accounts, they're going to be watching the changes that are happening around the rest of the country. California is going to start feeling incredibly disenfranchised. And I hate to say it, maybe this is just the kind of mistake that's needed to wake up the politicians. to wake up the voters in California to say, I'm voting all these people out.

It's time for change. Maybe this is what's necessary. But I also want to say to parents that are out there, you know, follow the work that Perk is doing, Amy Bond. You're on top of all of these things. But if you are coming down to the deadline and it looks like they're going to force vaccinate your kid, please don't say I didn't have a choice. You do have a choice.

There are no, you know, giant walls around California yet. and there are many great states out there that are moving in a completely different direction. So I know, Amy, you're in there fighting. We always joke. You know, I left California, went from Texas. You went from Texas to California. I love that you're in this fight. But for everyone out there, you know, the writing's on the wall.

You have some real morons that are running California right now. They keep making bigger and bigger mistakes. And the overall outcome could be great, but if you're in the firing line, start thinking about it. start thinking about what your next moves are. Amy, I want to thank you for bringing this to our attention. Thank you for this breaking news. You know we'll stand beside you. Anything that you decide to do, let us know where Perk is going

and all the other great nonprofits that are out there in California that are really, truly on the front lines of insanity. I was there. I know what it's like. You got Hollywood, these people. I think we just start watching all cars mortality in California compared to the rest of the country. But for anyone that,

wants to follow the work that you're doing, where do they go? They can go to our website, perk-group.com. They can also follow us on social media because that's where we put a lot of our calls to action and information, try to help people know what's going on. That's Perk underscore group. And I think what's also really sad, Del, I just want to say this too,

that in light of the passing of Charlie Kirk and the assassination that happened, this all happened two days after that. So while everybody was in Greece, and mourning over the loss of such a great leader and how and what happened and the symbol that he is, they did this during that time. You know, and I just think that that is so shameful and should be brought to light that that's the timing of them pushing through this atrocious, atrocious, atrocious belt for Californians.

And here we are. They pulled the stunt that they do. They went right in behind everybody because they couldn't have gotten it past. Mark my words, they could not have gotten any of this past if the people knew this was happening and they had to go through the proper process through the committees. They wouldn't have been able to pass this. Amy Bond, thank you for this report. Thank you for being on top of it. And keep us posted, okay?

Thank you, Del. Thank you so much. Okay. All right. Well, you know, there's always news happening. And when there is, it means it's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey. So much going on.

the world, it just feels like everything's been turned up to 11. So where are we at? Yeah, it sure has. Well, Del, last week we were talking about the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and although the investigation is still ongoing, we do have the other conversation that's happening across the United States, and that is the speech, the speech that's happening, whether it be from universities or employees of companies and hospitals or just the general public. And we have our Attorney General Pam Bondi has come out recently in an interview to talk about some of that speech. Take a look. There's free speech and then there's hate speech.

And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society. Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people? So we show them that some action is better than no action. We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything. And that's across the aisle. I don't, I mean, I just had to say this pushes it to the edge for me. It's been something I've been really thinking. I'm glad you're bringing this up.

And just right there, I think that is the line. I, first of all, I've never liked this term hate speech. I've always thought we have plenty of laws to handle when someone gets killed or brutally beaten by a group of bad meaning people, I think our laws handle that. Bringing hate speech in, which this happened back when I was like a teenager. I remember the stories that really started pushing his hate speech agenda. It doesn't make sense to me. I think it is the slippery slope that we find ourselves in the middle in.

It's where it can be used against either side on this. And frankly, I don't like the government getting involved over what, you know, what people say, no, you're about to get in this. I'm just saying right up front, unless you're going to convince you. be otherwise right now, Jeffrey. There's a line. People are allowed to say the ugliest things in the world here in America, and that's what we fight for is your right to be as disgusting as you want to be. Now, do you keep your job? That's another story, but I don't like the government getting involved in here. But go ahead. Right. And thankfully, lots of people on the internet

were up in arms about this immediately. No one was kind of mulling this over back and forth. Look, this is not right. And going back to the 1960s, there is legal precedent after legal precedent showing that speech, no matter how bad it is, is protected. And there are laws in the books already that just really need to be enforced for violence, for calling for violence for people, for directed threats and attacks on people. Conspiracy to commit violent, whatever it is. It's all covered. We got it there. Yeah.

Yep. Yep. And so let's go to 2017. That was the most recent Supreme Court decision. This is the Washington Post. Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment and this is actually the judge's ruling this is their opinion they said this the idea that the government may restrict speech expressing ideas that offend strikes at the heart of the First Amendment speech that demeans on the basis of race of ethnicity gender religion age disability or any other similar ground is hateful but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom of it to express the thought that that we hate and that is where it's at and AG Bondi is saying in light of what happened to Charlie we should really look at hate speech well here's Charlie Kirk from

2004 here's an actual ex post that he made about speech he said this hate speech does not exist legally in America there's ugly speech there's gross speech there's evil speech and all of it is protected by the First Amendment keep America free so like you said employers have the right to fire employees based on their behavior in their speech in public if it looks bad for the company and people have the rights boycott companies for what the companies and their employees are saying we have those rights as americans but not not this government overreach this especially from the federal government this is how we get to what's happening in the uk people arrested over memes and facebook posts or in canada these hate speech laws you're seeing

going across that that's how these things happen the slippery slope is slick and it's being slipped upon by a lot of governments but let's look let's move this into the medical conversation. We just saw attacks on Kennedy in the Senate Health Committee, and they're trying to float this idea that prioritizing an end of chronic health disease in children is somehow a bad thing. And you saw a lot of people testifying. You saw a lot of the senators kind of trying to make these points that this is a threat to public health. But the center of gravity of the public health discussion has really been taken out of the corporate media. for the most part, the governments that are attacking as well,

and the pharma lobbyists. And it's been distributed among the peoples. And it seems like everyone has a voice now. And the talking points that you, myself, Aaron, have been talking about for almost a decade. It seems to be everybody's talking about them now. Take a look. All right.

I would definitely not have mandates for vaccinations. This is a decision that a physician and a patient should be making together. The parents love their kids more than anybody else. I could love that kid, so why not let the parents play an active role in this? There are some states now where you're seeing an increase in homeschooling because parents are running from the health care system. This is the problem with vaccines, okay? You don't get informed consent, even with any vaccine. You go in and talk to your doctor about the DPT vaccine, or you go in and talk to them about the Hep B vaccine.

But now, by the way, I talked to you about before Hep B vaccine, okay, was given to me when I was, you know, 20 years old or, sorry, 24 years old when I started medical school. You're an at-risk person because you were dealing with. dealing with body fluids as a physician. Correct. Right. And you can be infected. But why? But now in the 35 years since, it's required for every child born in the United States.

Yes, they get one on day, one at birth. They get another one a month later and they get another one six months later. And that's because it's a captive audience. There's a lot of problems because they don't test vaccines in a double-blind placebo-controlled setting. They test them against other vaccines. The problem is that the pharmaceutical drug companies have an exemption. because of what they did in the 1980s with Reagan, where they allowed them to never worry about being sued.

And that's when they ramped up the schedule. You know, Jeffrey, just earlier this week, I had a great meeting with some donors of ICANN on the high wire and said, you know, are you working in any way to, you know, teach other people how to do what you do, like clone yourself as Aaron and I. And I think that's evidence right there, Jeffrey, that we've done that work. It used to be only us with these talking points.

We're all alone. We were the first one censored for talking about medical freedom on Facebook, on YouTube. But now, you know, you could probably point out 50 to 100 major podcasters that all put this issue of vaccines. And ICANs literally are talking points are in the top five discussion points that they're making all the time. So the message is out there. It's so exciting. That was our dream that we would mainstream this conversation. So it's incredible to see it happening.

And this topic, important as it is, is surging right now, everywhere in America. And this is probably the most important week since Kennedy took the helmet HHS, only because of these conversations that are happening. It's all coming to a culmination point right now. And one of the main topics of chronic disease in children is autism. Kennedy had just a couple months ago made a press conference on autism and the latest numbers, which were 22. And one in 12 children, boys have autism in California that was quoted as,

kind of the best reporting system. So a lot of people, including us, have been talking for decades about we have to find a cause of autism. This is an epidemic. And we've been met with, obviously, censorship being called anti-vaxxers, but then being called, well, it's just genetics. It's always been here. And there's been studies that are coming out and have come out that say this will bankrupt the country if we do not figure this out. And we were ignored. The people bringing this up were ignored. Well, now here are the headlines. and it looks like we may be here, at least in the UK. We can't afford so many people with autism and ADHD on benefits is the title.

And you go to this article, it says, spending on taxis for children with special needs has also doubled in less than a decade to a record high of 2.3 billion pounds in 2023, 2024. These costs are threatening to bankrupt more than half of local councils that support children with special needs. It goes on to say claims for behavioral disorders alone are now fourfold greater than in 2018. Psychiatrists say we have always had the same share of people with these conditions, but there is simply greater awareness.

I mean, let's just look at that paragraph. Bring it up. Look at what we're saying. What we're saying is they're making more claims that all of a sudden, just in the last seven years, people, what they realize, they can make money off of this, claims from behavioral disorders alone, four times greater, fourfold greater than in 2018. But it's always been here.

It's always just been the same. But, you know, I mean, it's four times greater the amount of people that are involved. Where were they? They didn't want the money back then. They didn't want help. They weren't seeking help. It's absurd that statement. And I love that it's all that they have.

I love that that's what they're backed in the corner on because it's the world's dumbest argument. And we know. So where have we been here? Where is the science? We know ICANN has used FOIA requests, has suiting court to get all of this science that shows that vaccines don't cause autism. we found out that there's really not a lot. But the science that is being pointed to as the gold standard of science. It was done in the early 2000s.

And this is a couple of them right here. Here's 2002. This is a population-based study of measles, multisrabella vaccination of autism. They didn't find a connection. Here's 2003. Here's the thymarisol study. Looking at the occurrence of autism. Look at the Danish population.

Well, one of the main authors on these studies that have been used to debunk this was Paul Thorson. And even in 2003, the New York Times runs with this. Study cast doubt on the theory of vaccines linked to autism. Well, let's look at Paul Thorson. Dr. Paul Thorsen, well, he's wanted by HHS. He's a fugitive on the run. He fled to Germany with almost a million dollars.

Well, he has just been apparently arrested. Autism and vaccine scientists arrested for allegedly stealing $1 million from CDC. The U.S. is now working on extraditing him from Germany to the United States. so he can stand trial for this. This is your gold standard science. This is your scientific integrity coming from the people that have been paid by the CDC to the tune of almost a million dollars. And you can read all about his crimes.

They've been going on for some time now. The Department of Justice has sent out this in 2011. They've been looking for him. That's when he fled. So that's a conversation around vaccines. The science around vaccines, obviously vaccines and autism is up in the air, but you have even the authors are questionable here. They're literally criminal.

juveniles, fugitives on the run from justice. But it's like the worst, like the guy who study they point to every time they're like, no, that's been debunked by this important study done by a man who stole money from the CDC, has been on the run and has now finally been arrested. That's the best you have. Actually, second best to the guy you put on the stand in front of Senator Ron Johnson, who brought up 600-something baloney studies to try and disprove that they've never had a placebo trial on any of the childhood vaccines and got absolutely torn apart by Aaron Siri. So, I mean,

we're knocking them down like bowling pins here, Jeffrey. It's amazing mainstream media even goes near this topic right now because everyone they quote ends up going down. And minus, you know, some of those clips we're seeing from the Senate help committee going around that they're saying Kennedy is a threat and public health is in shambles right now. There's this idea that is permeated again over this past week. It's just culminated, which is why do we have mandates on vaccines? And this is in the Daily Mail over in the UK, and they're throwing this idea out as well. This is one of the first headlines I've seen from a mainstream publication to really suggest

this, is this the end of vaccine mandates, they say, they say, these European nations don't demand jobs, and they're doing just fine. So remember, we're told, if you don't have mandates, there's going to be disease and pestilence in the street. We're going to go back to the smallpox of the 1800s. Well, it goes on in this article to say, in debt, where health authorities do not mandate a vaccine, 93% of children have received two MMR doses in 2024, and 90 to 95% were up to date on their polio vaccinations. In Sweden, same thing, no mandates.

93.7% of children had got two doses of MMR in 2024, and 94.5% have received three doses of the polio vaccine. So that's kind of on its face, there's some real world data, but there's a study done by asset. This was a nonprofit, and there's analysis. They did the efficacy of mandatory vaccinations. They actually studied this in several countries. They looked at, well, does it actually work?

And they said this. From 2007 to 2013, the enforcement of mandatory vaccinations does not appear to be relevant in determining childhood immunization rates in the analyzed countries. Those where a vaccination is mandatory do not usually reach better coverage than neighbor or similar countries where there is no legal obligation.

So here we are. The idea of states rights, no mandates. You're seeing that in Florida, and it's probably going to spread to other states, well and at the same time this pre-positioning from the corporate media this is the hill and this is this is actually a really disgusting headline it says all an infectious disease has invaded america's public health agencies there's a picture of Kennedy secretary Kennedy right there so that basically if you look at this at a glance they're basically calling Kennedy an infectious disease so

dehumanizing a government employee okay that's what the hill wants to use run for their op-ed great but the real the real conversation here is what's happening at asip this is the reason they're running these headlines. ASIP, the Advisory Committee of Minimization Practices, is happening right now. As we speak, they're talking about a lot of things. One of them is the COVID shots, and this is one of the headlines coming out of Washington Post. Trump officials to link COVID shots to child deaths, alarming career scientists. They're saying their initial analysis, 25 deaths could be related to the COVID vaccine. Dell, you and I both know looking at open VERS. This number is probably much higher, not only children, but also adults.

that conversation is happening right now. We have the other surgeon general, not Joe Lodipo, but Dr. Ralph Abraham in Louisiana, he's come out on X to talk about this. He says the COVID vaccines are dangerous. He says, I see the fallout in my clinic every day. Senator Cassidy should remember that the PEP Act gave manufacturers immunity from liability for harms caused by these products, so they have little incentive to make them better. Amen.

And so right. Absolutely. It's great to hear these talking points. And they're accurate. They're factual. And they shut down a lot of these conversations. right away. So right now, the ASIP committee is talking, their meeting, they're talking about the hepatitis B vaccine, which is on the CDC schedule given a day one old babies, talking about the

MMRV vaccine. And at 5 o'clock today, 5 o'clock Eastern, right after our show, the committee is going to vote on recommendations for these vaccines. So what that means, we don't know, could this mean the Hepby is taken off the CDC's recommended vaccine schedule? A lot of people are saying that could be It makes, I mean, you know, I say this all the time. That is the best argument to make to newcomers. Just walk them right through the hepatitis B vaccine. We've done it a thousand times on this show. FDA licensed vaccines just typed in right now.

Go to Rekamba Vaccine, HB. And then show your friends 6.1 where it lays out, you know, five days, safety trials, how long it was, 147 kids. It's just horrendous for a sexually transmitted disease. If this thing doesn't get, you know, canceled from the CDC scheduled, I don't know what's going on. And we just heard from Amy Bond talking about how California and other states, I mean, they're already bracing for it. They're removing themselves from ASIP recommendations, going with the pharma-funded American Academy of Pediatrics.

Well, you know, let's see how California fair is under those circumstances. But, I mean, that is, there's a divide happening in this country, right? Those that are waking up to the truth. Those that are to open the truth. Those that believe that ASIP has every right to reevaluate vaccines. I just don't get it, Jeffrey. It's amazing, right? Bernie Sanders and all these people, they'll rail against the pharmaceutical industry.

Oh, you know, they'll rail about, you know, they're over-medicating our kids. But they'll talk about drugs, drugs, drugs, drugs. Drugs are terrible. We're taking more drugs, everyone else. But, boy, you call it a vaccine. No, this product's made by angels. Couldn't have anything wrong with it. We should never test it.

We should never ask any questions. You know, it's unbelievable, the dream world that is wrapped around vaccines. It's just a pharmaceutical product. Was it good? Was it not? Did COVID work? Does it still work? Does it still matter? Is it needed? Hepatitis B, all of it's on the chopping block. Thank God. Thank God. Finally, these questions are being asked for the first time in decades. And I just want to point out, I mean, I know we're getting this hit squad. Let's not forget, Jeffrey, that just last week, they basically destroyed direct-to-consumer marketing, right? The pharmaceutical industry knows its days are numbered. It only owns the television for a few more seconds. It's going to try and squeeze every. red scent. It paid those news anchors to try and get Bobby out because if they don't and suddenly you don't own the television set anymore and your commercials are gone because you don't want to have five minutes of side effects being, you know, spoken out in the commercials, which is what that new executive order says. So we're seeing it, right? This is their last ditch attack. It is a full on

attack one on this week. And tomorrow will be interesting because tomorrow is when they discuss the safety of the COVID vaccine. They're probably going to bring up as discussed those 25 children in this reanalysis the FDA did, but they're also going to discuss the safety and the further recommendations. What is that going to look like moving forward? And we know that President Trump put out the tweet. It wasn't a tweet actually, it was on truth social and he was questioning, is this the right thing? Was Operation Warf speed great? I need to know. We need to know these for Pfizer. So ASIP may actually answer that question. The CDC may answer that question. So it's not going to be Kennedy or Trump answering that.

It's going to be ASIP with the information. So all eyes on that vote as well, I believe that's tomorrow at 2 p.m. Eastern. They're going to vote on the further guidance for the COVID vaccine. Yeah, it's heating up. It's heating up on this issue. This is what we all wanted. We wanted this in the public lie. Well, now we're watching.

And by the way, you should be, you know, if you have issues, you know what to do. Everyone has representatives, you know, get involved. Get out there, you know. Make your voice known however you want that known. It matters when we go and talk. talk to those that represent us. It matters when we call them. This is that time. This is time to push these things over in whatever direction you feel like they should go. And this idea of settled science has been really just shoved down our throats for so many decades

when it comes to certain products, certain topics, when agendas are at play or profit margins are at play that are trying to be protected doesn't just stop the vaccines. We reported here for several years now that the climate science conversation. That settled science, It's settled, let's reorganize society very quickly around net zero. We reduced the energy systems in a lot of countries. Well, where did that come from? That came from the Club of Rome, and that came from a lot of people also that were trying to push this narrative with their own voice.

One of them is Al Gore. Now, if you remember in 2006, Al Gore made a blockbuster documentary, and part of that documentary talked about sea level rise. Take a look. In 1992, they measured this amount of melting in Greenland. Ten years later, this is what happened. And here's the melting from 2005. Tony Blair's scientific advisor has said that because of what's happening in Greenland right now,

the maps of the world will have to be redrawn. If Greenland broke up and melted, or if half of Greenland and half of West Antarctica broke up in Mexico broke up and melted. This is what would happen to the sea level in Florida. This is what would happen to San Francisco Bay. A lot of people live in these areas.

The Netherlands, one of the low countries, absolutely devastating. The area around Beijing that's home to tens of millions of people, even worse, in the area around Shanghai, there are 40 million people. Worse still, Calcutta, and to the East Bangladesh, the area covered includes 60 million people.

It's a trip watching that again, because the first time I saw it, you know, I was a rabid environmentalist, huge Al Gore fan. I thought this was the most important movie ever made. Yeah, I was one of those guys. And there's a little problem here, right? The oceans aren't right. I know you're about to get into this, but, you know, here's a little factoid Al Gore should probably think about.

When you put something into a documentary and you shoot it with cameras and you put it out to the world, you have just made a time capsule you will have to answer to the rest of your life. And where are you now? I mean, what's so incredible is that they're just pushing forward even though none of these predictions are coming true. It's unbelievable. And I just want to say that as a guy that knows full well what I put into documentaries. When I made Vaxed, I know what we said. There's going to be an alarming increase in autism, even beyond where it was at.

And at the moment Vax came out in 2016, you could argue we're somewhere around 1 in 40. And, you know, in that Stephanie Sennep, says, you know, we could be at 1 in 2 boys. I said that seems extreme in that documentary. I hope you're wrong. I pray that you're wrong. But now we're at 1 in 12.5 boys in California, you know. And so the numbers are going. I mean, that's what we make a document.

I'd be saying, hey, everybody, no need for alarm. The numbers stopped. It stopped back. They started reversing themselves. I would do that. I would do that with human decency. Unfortunately, the predictions that we've made on this show have been right. We told people the COVID vaccine will not stop transmission.

They are lying to you about the 95%. We were right. We haven't had to retract that. We told you that the mask was not based on any science whatsoever. Even though Tony Fauci said, question me. And you were questioning science itself. We had no problem doing it. And I knew the cameras were rolling.

And I stand by everything we're doing in every documentary we made, including an inconvenient study. And there's a reason we named it that because this is how an inconvenient truth is put out. With actual facts that we will stand by that stand the test of time. Where are you, Al? Why the hell are we still moving forward when all of this ends up being a complete and total fiction? Well, I think for Al Gore and the settled science crew, It's going to be facts, the new scientific community that's stepping up here and also just our own eyes, because here are the new headlines with the sea level rise.

This is New York Post. Blockbuster's sea level study may turn climate change orthodoxy on its head. We go to the study, a global perspective on sea level changes, and their team says this. Researchers write, statistical tests will run on all selected datasets, taking acceleration of sea level rise as a hypothesis. In both datasets, approximately 95% of the suitable location show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise. They go on to say the investigation suggests that local non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations. So they're saying basically it's tectonic shifts.

It has nothing to do really with climate for those other 5%. So you're talking about 100% essentially. It's not due to climate change or human breathing. So in doing this, again, you're seeing this divorce of the settled science crew, and you're coming out with scientists that actually have bravery, that actually can do and speak what they want to say and show the facts. And you're seeing this also. Remember, we have Bill Gates talking about blocking off the sun because, well, humans are breathing too much,

the planet's getting warmer. So we have to block out the sun because of climate change. Well, we have scientists now at the Scripps Institute. They're coming out and saying, no, no, we're not going to do that. the headline experts warn against five polar geoengineering ideas. One of them is the five most discussed. One of them is stratospheric aerosol injections and they say they're unlikely to help, but they also could harm the ecosystem. So this is huge. And so throughout all this, people are saying, I don't think I trust this anymore. And there's actually numbers to show that too.

This is the UK. We have a study of survey where global warming is exaggerated, say soaring numbers of Britons. So it says here the number of Britons who think the Danes, with global warming have been exaggerated, has jumped by more than 50% in the past four years. New research for The Times reveals today. One in four voters now believes that concerns over climate change are not as real as scientists have said, amid growing public concern at the cost of the government's net zero policies.

Remember, they're involved in the later stages now of a rapid shift to society to shut down their energy systems. And the new energy systems of wind and solar, they're just not cutting it. And a lot of the public in America thinks, We're safe here. Trump's in. They're not going to look at this. Well, the states are also moving on this, too. This is Ohio. Ohio has a bill right now floating through the legislator. Proposed Ohio bill would give utility companies control of customer thermostats in some cases.

What? What could go wrong there? This is what's happening in Ohio. I mean, imagine how dangerous that is. I mean, like, Ohio, you have a below zero night. someone could just cut off like power to grandma's house and you know by morning she's not here and I mean it just it's dystopian to think about that but why would you ever put your safety which is your thermostat in the modern world determines that why would that ever be in someone

else's hands that is absolute insanity and it's your point though we're seeing this masked slip of maybe the real reasons why there's been such a hard push to shift society over to net zero. And I want to end here with the co-president of the Club of Rome. We've done a lot of shows in the Club of Rome. This is kind of where this idea that humans are bad where the environment started. It's literally written into their books. And this is the co-president from 2018 to 2024 speaking. It was about two years ago, but it's really relevant because you can see between the lines.

Take a look. All right. The second scenario is the giant leap. We wanted to identify a small set of actions, a minimum viable product, to reach as many sustainable development goals in Europe's vision of a social and green region. We wanted to take a system's approach to explore if we can achieve an acceptable level of well-being for the global majority on a finite planet. We conclude that nothing less than the following five extraordinary turnarounds are needed to have

well-being for all while respecting planetary boundaries, ending the world. poverty, addressing gross inequality, achieving full gender equity, transforming the food system and the way we eat, transitioning to clean energy and efficient energy. We argue that these five extraordinary turnarounds in the set of economic reforms that will drive them form the basis of a well-being economy. It is not a blueprint, but more of a guide for systemic transformation. In this scenario, poverty ends a generation earlier than too little too late. We see gender empowerment in one generation, not 10. We see a switch to healthier plant-based diets. There

is still meat consumption, but at sustainable levels. And we have carbon dioxide emissions every decade to reach net zero by 2050. The economic model everywhere is circular, regenerative, and efficient. Material consumption of unsustainable resources is rained in, fossil energy phased out, and we see a significant redistribution of wealth. In this scenario, we interpretive, we introduce a universal basic dividend operating like a universal basic income, with dividends coming to all people, sharing the wealth of the global commons and public goods. Who's taking the wealth now? It is not properly redistributed.

This is not utopic. This is what is fair and just, and what a society in transformation is all about. Why do we think this is important? We know the giant leap will be disruptive. talking about a complete shakeup. This is everything, everywhere all at once. It will create shocks. But if it is to succeed, then we must bring the majority of people along the journey. Didn't they, didn't Chairman Mao call his giant jump with communism the Great Leap? Am I mixing that up? Is that? The Great Leap forward. It wasn't so much a Great Leap. And here they're

naming it the Giant Leap. I mean, this is an educated person. They're saying it right, too. I mean, folks gee whiz that is you want to know how communism happens that was a communism speech what do they call it the well-being economy we're all going to be equal we're all going to be happy we're not getting get rid of meat some people eat it me and my friends some people have jet fuel me and my friends but the rest of you you well-being mother whatever's is how they see us wow man i've read this book before it's called animal farms i know absolutely It's so chilling. And that's, you know, you see it the UN now.

You see the WF. You see all of this coming. And, you know, we are sitting on an island right now trying to hold back the attack at our door. Incredible. Jeffrey, great reporting, as always. So enlightening. And, you know, and we realize, right, we're winning, but we're having an equal and opposite reaction now. These threats to Robert Kennedy Jr., all these hearings.

FARA is spending all of its money right now. It does not want to lose its grasp of humanity. And if it can take America, it takes the world. So we're going to stay on top of it. Great. Thank you. I'll see you next week. Thank you. Well, I mean, look, you tune in every week.

You see what you're not really seeing in any detail on any network. I mean, I know there's networks. You're like, oh, this one's pretty good, but where do you get detail like that? Where do you see what's really happening behind the scenes? This push to really come after our rights. The use of global warming is a way. a way to bring in authoritarian regimes and, you know, all of this. And then this vaccine issue,

which this was, no one wanted to touch this issue, right? Nobody. When I got involved, when Vax came out, no one could talk about it. You could not talk about this in a single mommy group. You couldn't talk about it in a blog, anything. You would be censored, to be shut out, you'd be kicked out of your social group, out of your Facebook group. Everything has changed. Now, this is the hottest topic in the world. That was by design, designed by me and others in this movement, but using media, using everything we do, then using Aaron Siri and his brilliant mind, winning lawsuits against the government of the United States, then getting in the hearings, you know, enrolling people like Senator Johnson. I mean, all of this, it's just this

multi-pronged approach that is now, we are that little snowball that is just rolling down the mountain now. Can you feel it? Can you feel it? But man, the momentum means we're bigger than ever, we're moving faster than ever, which means we need more help. help than ever. So if you want to get involved, this is a perfect opportunity to do it. Not only can you donate and become a sponsor for ICANN, the Highwire, you can actually say I was here, I was present in accounting for. I'm telling you, we are the generation that will be remembered for this battle that we're in, a true battle for freedom, a battle for free speech, a battle for body sovereignty. You want to say, hey, kids, go check out the I can campus,

or leave a time capsule to your grandkids, your great grandkids, go check out the stone that we put in the terrace there at the High Road at I Can. This is about making your moment and making your presence known, whether it's just a statement or a quote or something that moves anyone that sees it. This is your opportunity to get involved. Take a look at this. A couple of years ago, we asked you to help us build the high road. And you did.

Brick by brick, message by message. You helped pave the road that led us to historic legal victories. Let me introduce you to phase two, the terrorists, a peaceful, powerful space, nestled at the very heart of the high road, a sanctuary where reflection meets purpose. Whether you already have a brick, or this is your first time, this is your moment, to renew your commitment. So go to Ican Decide.org and click buy a brick. Choose your message, leave your mark, and become part of the very heart.

of this campus at the center of the high road. It's such an amazing thing to walk this walkway and be inspired to do the show. By the way, I love doing this show. I love the high wire. I love Jeffrey. I love this reporting. I love all of you out there when I get to come out and meet you. And now you have an opportunity to be a part of my life as I walk the walkway every single week. This is my favorite brick this week. My favorite brick is one that actually has passed a lot because as you know, I'm pretty wired up and I'm kind of always on 11. So every once in a while it's good to remember, Dell, you got to breathe. And this one catches me every once a while. Breathe free America. God save for free speech and a free press. Mr. R. New Jersey. Mr. R. Thank you for all the times

you reminded me to breathe. And now that I've done that, let's go do this show. All right. Well, it's true. Breathe free America. I know there's some scary, bad, dark people out there saying really ugly things, but they're saying those things because they see that they're losing the world that they wanted to control, that they wanted to live in their little dark place. Instead, the light is shining. I mean, just think about, I don't know if you went to church this week, but people just poured in. It was a line like I've never seen before.

That's what happens when you decide to sort of take out one of our people. We don't start burning down buildings or smashing in windows or throwing bricks. We come together. We have vigils. We love each other. We pour in a church and we say, I want to be a better person. This is making me want to be a better person. It's such a testament to the power of this movement. And it's a worldwide movement, as we saw also happening in England this week. So for all of you that make I can the high wire and this work possible, I want to thank you. You truly are changing the world, changing the dialogue, changing the government. And for just $25 a month, you can do that.

So if you've already got a bench or a brick or you wanna also become a recurring donor, make sure that you make that happen to, just becoming a recurring donor to the top of the screen on the website where you're watching right now. Just click there on Donate to ICAN and become a recurring donor. It really makes a difference.

All of it. Thank you. Thank you, thank you, thank you. It's just amazing to see how change is possible. Now, speaking of change, it's amazing watching someone that gets into a career, that they think that they know what they want to be studying, and then somehow they see something. Something grabs their attention, and it changes their life forever. And suddenly they get into an expertise or a specialty. I mean, the amount of brilliant people that have sat at this desk because they saw something nobody else saw, my next guess is like this.

And talk about something nobody else saw, it's invisible. What about this issue? For 10 years, I practiced pediatric neurology in Mexico City. The greater majority of the patients that I have, it was epileptic and autistic patients. I was doing electroencephalograms where you put a lot of electrodes in the head of the patient in order to understand the electric activity of that brain. There was sometimes activity that it belonged to those patients. It was coming from the outside.

All my patients, they were telling me, my kid gets worse every time they play video games. I started digging in the literature. It turns out it was an electric activity coming from the console and being absorbed by the human brain of my patients. What we learned in med school is that it was an electric activity coming from the console. said, you need to see everything from the biochemical point of view. We didn't actually understand this electric activity of the human body, so I have to relearn absolutely everything.

I told my wife, I'm going to take a six-month break. I need nobody to talk to me because I need to study a lot. Well, six months turned into 18 years. That's how long it took me to understand EMFs. In 1957, the US government brought Dr. Schwann from Europe in order to understand why soldiers were getting sick when they were exposed to this new radar to detect airplanes. And he described most of the things that are now the basics for EMFs. Men made electromagnetic fields interact with the human body because our bodies are or

organic and in nature, we will absorb EMFs. Trees, in the other hand, they're grounded. So they absorb and they send it to the ground whatever a human cannot do. The human body can protect themselves if we have a low exposure. When men made electromagnetic fields start being part of everyday life, then is when problems started.

Late 19th, 1990s is whenever they start erecting those cell phone towers. With telecommunications, everything has to be wireless, that the density that we're exposed today is higher than five years ago, way higher than 20 years ago. So when we're inside of a room with electromagnetic fields, printers, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, all sorts of antennas, a human will absorb in an extremely high-relixtrously. high ratio, EMF destroys first of the restoration areas. That is why we have so much an epidemic of sleeping disorders, insomnia, because we sleep with those highly contaminated environments. The brain, the heart and the immune system are the most important electric systems of the

human body. The problem is that those nerves that really really, reaches those vessels are extremely small and they are very susceptible to absorb EMFs and misfire as well. So high below pressure, it could be that EMFs are actually interfering with that. The immune system is patrolling inside of the human body. Whenever it feels the need to trigger a reaction, it will do that starting with electric systems and then follow by chemical systems. So if we have one misfire,

then you're gonna have a cascade of misinformation on that area. I will say today that biochemical and electrical go together. One electric field is always, by law, going to interact with another electric field. It's imagine that it's a microscopic bullet. And it goes through things breaking them. It deteriorates the inside of the cell,

and then it goes all the way to the main structure of the organ. That is why we have an increase in immunological problems. EMS break DNA, destroy proteins. People don't realize that we're inviting the enemies out of a house. We're getting sicker and sicker. Well, I know this is playing into your greatest fear. If you're thinking about your health, I know every time you pick up that cell phone, it would be like me. Like, oh, I don't know about this thing.

We're all the EMFs in our car, in our homes now. So to get to the bottom of this, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined by Dr. Carlos Ritter. Thank you for joining us today. Thank you so much. Thank you for having me here. You know, like anything else, in some ways, it seems like a no-brainer, you know. But why is this so controversial? Oh, there's so many factors in there.

One of the factors is that we ignore it. Yeah. We ignore it when we go to med school. We only learn biochemical things. We don't really learn anything that rules the electric fields. Which is crazy because we are truly just electrons, alleged. I mean, I think about this one. I think if you're going to start a heart, you know what I mean?

You got those paddles. It's electricity, right? Exactly. We are, you know, just a series of electrons moving around, yet we do. We ignore this part in every other part of our health. It took me forever to understand I'm a neurologist. I'm a pediatric neurologist. That's my main thing.

And I didn't know that I was working with the electric system of the central nervous system. Yeah. Until I have a lot of patients in the private practice, then I start realizing. So what you're doing, you were doing these EKGs, right? And you're seeing, wait a minute, EEG, sorry. And you're like, there's signals, there's frequencies in here that shouldn't, is that what's happening? You're seeing things you shouldn't see. So normally, whatever we should see is the electric activity that belongs to the brain.

Yeah. And that's what they teach you. And that's what you're looking in the air. One eventually, I saw, hey, that actually didn't belong to the brain. It belonged to something else. It turns out that it came from the environment that we're exposed to. Wow. So is this, I mean, is this like one of those issues like, you know, we kind of.

cover it all the time, covered it from the time I worked on the doctor's television show on CBS now like a decade ago, but where, you know, the sugar companies and the, you know, end funding science, so the cholesterol ends up being the heart, you know, causing heart, like we just see this manipulation of science. Is there any of that going on, or global warming, for instance, I mean, where you just see all the funding going to one perspective and avoiding others? Are we seeing some of that here? Is there a reason why we're not getting science is telling us there's an issue. Exactly.

Let me tell you really fast the story, how I got here. I was born in Mexico City, I practiced in Mexico City, and I met people around the world. I met nice, amazing people here in the States, and they invite me to be the president of the society, to be involved in the area. So part of my job, it was read. We need to read every single paper that is in that realm.

We find out a few papers, around like 130 papers, that they said, yeah, EMFs is a thing, but everything goes well to the paper until we get to the last point. It's okay. You can be exposed. So my team and I... They do the same thing on all the vaccines. You'll see really ugly stuff throughout the body. Exactly.

But the conclusion is, but it's one of the greatest inventions we've ever seen and everything's going to be okay. so that you see issues in there, but in the end they conclude it's fine. It turns out that my team and I, we were like, impossible because nobody knew about this, right? In the medical field. Who's this guy? Who's writing these things? Yeah. Well, that's when we start finding out, oh, that guy actually works for Motorola.

Really? And that guy actually owns patents of cell phone antennas. So how's possible that the one is telling you, what should? be the dosification that we are, we should be exposed to, is the same guy that is actually putting it in the air. So I learned that not everything is amazing in this world, so we have to fight those things. That is one of the reasons. Another reason is it's invisible.

So we don't think of anything that we cannot see. And it's convenient. So at the end of the day, those are the factors, this is multifactorial thing. And the other thing is we, medical doctors, if I ever get the chance to be the dean of a school of medicine, I'm going to force them to study physics. Yeah, we need to study all in biology, but we should be learning about physics because the environment that we live in, my patients, everybody, it's... It's developing in an environment that it could be poisonous.

In this case, electrical poisoning. I love that term electrical poisoning. I think it's better because we think Tywell, I mean, it's way, you know, but when you think you're poisoning yourself, when you look at what, when I think of if I'm looking for, if I'm having health effects, what are the things that you see it's affecting the most? The very first one is going to be sleeping. Okay. So that's why my third specialty is sleep medicine.

Okay. I need to learn why do we sleep? It's really easy to answer right now. We sleep because we need to restore. Imagine really quick inside of each one of the cells. We have trillions of cells. Yes. And each one of the cells know how, what is the damage that they have?

Well, sleeping is amazing, it's the superpower that we have. Because each cell is going to tell you, hey, this is my damage, this is what I have to restore. It's a very complex thing. It turns out that electrical signals are the ones that tell the cells how to restore. And electrical signals are being disrupted by EMS when we're in the most vulnerable time of day

when we're asleep. When we're trying to fix ourselves. Exactly. That's where we're just getting bombarded. Well, I mean, what happens if you think, well, sleeping, what room am I in? How many EMFs are in that? in that room. I know you've thought about this. Well, it's exactly what happened with our executive

producer. I don't know if you remember some time back when their house burned down, unfortunately, when they were rebuilding and she said, well, I want to do this right. There it is, a real tragedy. You know, thank you for all those that supported Jen through that. But as she was rebuilding, it's like, I want to do this right. What does it take to make sure I don't have too many EMFs? Well, Dr. Ritter went to her home, and let's take a look at what happened there. Hi, Dr. Miller. Nice to meet you. Nice to meet you too.

We're talking about something invisible and a lot of people second guess if EMFs are bad for us, if they exist, all the things and I'm just hoping that you can shed some light on all of that and help me with my home. I will try. We're going to do a diagnosis. Imagine I'm going to put my hat as a medical doctor, but now my patient is your house. I'm going to touch you in the arm. Okay.

And whatever this is gonna show me is if you're absorbing only electric fields from the wires, it says that it's low. I want us to walk all the way to that wall. It's going up. The numbers starting going up. And if you touch the wall, please. Oh, wow.

Just the wall. Just the wall. That's how much you absorb by being next to a wall. Let's see what is broadcasting from that self-on antenna there is close to the house and it's mixing out the meter. Let's try to pinpoint a source of EMFs. If I get in between the antenna and the source, I'm going to absorb that radiation. If I move, radiation keeps going and it's really intense.

But if I get in between, the antenna picks less because I'm a filter, I'm absorbing. And that's really important to understand that cause. This is what's right on the other side of that, those windows. Yeah, this is the source. Wow. I would have never guessed in a million years that pool equipment would be giving off a ton of the EMF. Now step two is we're going to analyze that. So we have the results.

Whatever we have in here is reference values for sleeping locations. And then we start increasing slight concern, severe concern, and then extreme concern. We're above the concern. Extreme concern. Yeah. Wow. The most important sources are from outside of the house. We have one cell phone tower.

We want to have some barriers in between. Trees are amazing to minimize it. Okay. So like master bedroom. So we can see that the number with electricity was 250. I wouldn't want anybody to sleep for a long period time in the way it is right now. Okay.

If we shield the house, we can actually bring them down to five. Whatever we want is to make the walls extremely absorbent. Yeah. And keep radiation in the walls, send them to the ground. You have to bring now a wire from that grounding system into the wall, we're going to try to get all resources that we can so we can minimize. We're going to start with the very first part of the project. The medical grade grounding system is the core of the hole shielding. We have to bring him inside of the house, so we have to drill

some holes. We're going to pull it through. This is a mixture of graphite, particles, carbon particles, and cobalt. Now that we have to be able to, we have to drill some holes. We're going to pull it through. This is a mixture of graphite, Now that we have this line, we're actually going to do the second layer. It looks exactly the same, but it's just carbon and graphite. It's going to cover the whole entire wall. We have to connect now the grounding system. Even if we're connected only to one wall, the whole room is now a system. At the end of the day, they're going to put paint on top of this,

like any other rooms and any other houses. Now we're going to set the grounding system. It is a set of coils in a set of rods, 100% copper. We're going to place it like that, one foot apart. These wires are going to be connected now to the grounding system. It's a two-part drainage system.

We know that this room is huge. This room is shielded. I mean, it's incredibly incredible how in depth you're getting there. So am I to understand that you sort of left being a doctor for patients and now you're a doctor on people's homes? Exactly. So I learned that one of the main stress or toxins that my patients have is electromagnetic fields. It was devastating for me to understand, hey, that's a lot of the things.

hey, that is a problem. Nobody knows. And nobody even know how to measure what to do. If you don't have a solution for something, it's very discouraging. Yeah. So I had to study to learn. What could be the solution? Actually, I started traveling not around the world, but Europe mostly. Because those guys, they knew how to do things.

This is around like 15 years ago. Okay. So I went over there. I learned how they do things. And I find out that if we shield the room where somebody's sleeping, then you're going to be doing the restoration over time with less toxins, with this electric toxin. And then your body can just start restoring, defending itself from all the different foreign stressors that we can have. How do you go about doing this work? Yeah, I mean, I do need help.

because we need to manufacture things in here. Everything I bring up from Europe so far. Okay. And there's a few companies. There's low quality. It's black. I don't like to call it paint. It's particles, electrical particles.

There's low quality and there's good quality. Well, we need to bring the good quality because if we're going to invest, we have to make sure that we absorb all the medical grade grounding system. It's the core of the system. is whatever sends EMFs into the ground, which should be. I don't want EMFs next to my kids. I don't want EMFs next to my, et cetera.

I want it in the ground. I have a thing on my bed that's like sort of a grounding mat that I plug into an outlet. Like, what do you think about things like that? Let's unplug it. I'm going to tell you why. Let's unplug it right now. Okay.

The reason is because you plug it in into the electric system of the house. Even if they, say, plug it into the grounding. Yeah. That's a grounding. That's not a medical grade grounding system. Okay. That's just one rod that is still carbon steel and is attached to the electric system of the house.

They made him because I did a, I published a paper mentioning all those things. They did it because the house can get on fire. So with that, they prevent. or they stop. If we shield a house kind of like the way that we sit it, that house will never catch on fire because of an electric problem. Okay.

But the thing is that you're bringing now into your body through the mat that the EMFs that are in the wires of your house. Now, if you have that mat and you plug it in into a medical grade grounding system that is meant to absorb EMFs, you'll be fine. You'll be grounding yourself. That could be one of the solutions. What should I be more worried about?

Because I see these different things. One, obviously, cell phones, ear pods. None of my kids, no one in my family use ear pods. In my house, when we went in there, I took out all the Wi-Fi. But I still have, like, how bad are the electrical outlets and things like that? So the main thing that I see is cell phone antennas, Wi-Fi from the neighbors. Imagine all the things that we have five miles around the house. If I pop it up, you're right,

I can see all my neighbor's computer. Exactly. Whenever I measure, I need to make sure that I know what is five miles around of the house because it will leak in the house. Those ones are the strongest because they emit around like over a thousand watts. Okay.

Of course, the Wi-Fi is whatever you have inside of your house. So it can get trapped. It emits around like two watts. around like 2 watts. So 1,000 watts versus 2 watts, well, but this one is extremely close. So whatever we have to do is we have to relearn how to live in this modern era.

In my house, I don't have Wi-Fi. I do have internet and I have a faster internet because I have hard wire, everything. If I need Wi-Fi, then we should be able to switch it off at night. Do we need it at night? If the answer is yes, well, we need to shield the house. I mean, we should shield houses.

But if not, let's turn it off. So give me the top five things I can do, aside from painting my walls with metal particles, which I know is... I'm going to say that that one would be the very first one. So I want to do that. Do you have a website I can go to, I can find those things, okay? EMFHOMTesting.com.

All right, here you go, folks. I know you're curious. is EMFHOMTesting.com. Okay, very good. Exactly. Yep. Then, whatever you have to do is switch off as much as possible, even though I think that taking care of whatever we have to take care at night is the most important.

Let me read through this. They just pop this up. Smartphones of seven different antennas turn off what you don't really need. What is it? Seven different antennas. I don't know what that means. I don't, I'm sitting on or off or airplane mode? Yeah, we have Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, we have just the normal cell service.

Cell phones, they have more antennas that are not, you're not even having the control of them. Okay. Somebody else has the control. Yeah. But at least, let's turn off the ones that we don't need it because the cell phone emit in a high way. Okay. In a high density. So whenever you don't need them, let's.

Let's make sure that we don't have it. Let's try not to put the phone close to our body. Of course, it's really convenient. I'm going to say, I've never put my phone close to my body. I will have it in the table. How do you carry it? I have a little pouch, and I doesn't grab it. Togs.

You know, but the thing is that we need to start changing. It's a good way. Let me plug it. Faraday bag, the high wire, Faraday bag. You want a Faraday bag, go to the store. shop at howard.com is one of our favorite items. There we go. Exactly.

Shemless plug. The thing is we need to learn how to protect ourselves little by little. Don't touch the phone if it's possible. Not all the time. Don't put them close to your body. Testicular cancer, oh my goodness, I mean, so many things we put them right here.

Or if you're a woman, please don't put them in the breast. So learn how to turn out the Wi-Fi. Stop buying things that transmit Wi-Fi for your home or don't connect to that feature. I mean, everything's Wi-Fi now. Refrigerators. I think my iron just probably got Wi-Fi. Probably it is. But you know what?

When I started doing this, I felt that it was one guy against the whole entire world. Time has passed. And now I've been talking about this. There's more awareness. I mean, not just me. Yeah. There's a lot of amazing people. I know what that feels like.

But the thing is that now we're more. If we tell companies, hey, sell me something that actually I have the opportunity to plug it in into the Internet, they will sell it. The things that we don't ask for that. So now, hopefully all the people that are watching this show, they start having that. Hey, if I'm going to buy that TV, I want that TV to be either Wi-Fi, some people want it. But have the option, not Wi-Fi. I can plug it in.

Okay. All right, let's look at number three. Turn off your Wi-Fi at night when you were sleeping. Put your router on a timer. Oh, that's a great idea. This is something that keeps saying I want to do. You know, I've got to figure out how to... I don't have Wi-Fi, but I do have Ethernet and things like that.

And, you know, and do you, like, turn your power off even? I shield my house. I have three different layers of shielding, a little bit more than whatever. I'm kind of crazy about it. Jen, he shorted you. But I still, because I didn't buy my house when it was, well, I bought it already. It wasn't built at that time. I don't have the way to shield the wires.

If we build a house from scratch, we will shield those wires. We don't have to turn off the power. I do. I do it in my house. Every night, my kids already know. Everybody who visit us, they know. oh, there's some rules in this house. My kids are kind of like the famous guys in the area.

And everybody, they're friends. And are you getting involved in home development, like, in groups now? Yeah. So right now, we have this project that we're going to build. 24 houses having EMFs in mind. That's going to be the sales point. The rooms are going to be shielded. And we're going to be shielded in all the steps that

All right, let's look at the rest of this list right here. Number four, don't keep your phone on your body. We went through that, of course, and earbuds, hey, everybody, I see you letting your kids use them. I wouldn't. Keep electrical devices out of your room while you sleep even on airplane mode. You did actually, you did some sleep studies, right? I did.

What did you find from that? So whatever I did is, I did electroencephalograms and sleep studies. Okay. I have two groups. Houses that they allowed me to shield the houses. in houses that I didn't ask for shielding. Okay. Whatever I did is I follow,

prior to the start of the study, I follow EEGs and sleep studies. Every three months, I did electrons holograms. Whatever I was measuring is just the homeostasis, electrical homostasis area of the central nervous system. Really quick. The left side of the brain and the right side of the brain, they have to communicate instantly.

So whatever I see in one area, in one side, I have to see it on the other area. That was one of the parts that I measure. Whatever I find out at the beginning is that everybody was wrong. Everybody was under the homeostasis line. Wow. And whatever I did at the first three months of the study,

it actually was worse for me. Because whatever I find out is that they were getting worse. Wow. the clients, the patients that I shield the houses, they actually weren't more this face than before, which it was really discouraging for me. I imagine that I've been doing this for so many years. I've been doing better, I shielded their house.

So what was happening? The thing I wait for the next, to the EEGs for the six months, and they start getting better. I think that whatever they were having is kind of like a this detox. Interesting. Time.

And by the year, the 12 month, they got the homestasis back. So the thing is that if we sleep over time, one year I can prove in there, without EMFs, at least at night, you can regain the homeostasis that we should have already. Amazing. Well, I'm inspired. I've talked about it too much. That's why I love doing this show. I'm going to go home.

We're going to take a look at our house, see what we can do. I do think this is a huge issue. I think we're all being lazy with the cell phones. We don't need it all the time. So I don't need Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, then just use the one thing I'm using and turn the rest of it off if I can. Exactly.

It's great information. Thanks for taking care of Jen. Oh, thank you. Thank you so much. And thank you for inviting. Absolutely, it's great having you. Thank you. All right, well, look, I was in Washington, D.C.

last week. It was an amazing week, as we said. I even got to stop by the White House and do a little press conference there. And you would have known that if you're following us on socials. I really want to push this right now. You can follow me personally at Del Big Tree, Instagram, Facebook, and X. And then also all of the work that I can, high wire, all of it. Our handles were all there.

And we've got the new one, an inconvenience study, you know, at an inconvenient study. So be following us there. And then you can see when I break out and do something a little bit, different and do an interview like this one. Take a look at this. Here at the White House in the briefing room with Del Begatory, who was nice to be here. Yeah, nice enough to come and stop by for an interview. What happened yesterday is this was massive seismic events are taking place. Many of us have been asking for the end of direct consumer marketing for

pharmaceutical products. This is what is putting the pharmaceutical industry in control of the television. So the stats say between 50 and 70 percent of advertising is coming from the coming from the pharmaceutical industry. So we've been asking to say, get rid of that pharmaceutical ads so that we can have real media. So we can really talk about the safety of vaccines. We can really talk about drugs and all the overprescribing that's going on in this country.

Ron Johnson, who's a great senator, and he really wants to bring transparency. And it seemed like a lot of the evidence coming out at that hearing was about this new study. Back in 2016, I met the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center, Dr. Marcus Zervos. and he sat down with me, totally pro-vaccine. I said, well, why don't you do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparative study?

Compare those children that have had vaccines to those that have never had any, and let's see who has better health outcomes. It took me years to talk him into it, but by 2020, he did that study, and what's amazing about it, we've never seen anything like this, is we've never seen a study done this by people that are totally pro-vaccine. They did this study to prove the antibacterious wrong, to prove people like me or Robert Kennedy Jr. wrong on the dangers of the side effects of vaccines. But instead, that study ends up being one of the most damning indictments of the vaccine program we've ever seen.

There's not another mammal on the planet that is suddenly unable to walk the planet without having its own immune system turn on itself. We have more people that are going through that in America than any other nation in the world. And we are the most vaccinated nation in the world. I think that this study shows unequivocally that we have got to take a look at the vaccine program. maybe reduce the amount, maybe take a look at how they're done, how they're delivered, and it's a long time coming. All right, I want to thank Lindell TV. First of all, for just having a spot the White House all the way there all the time,

reporting on things that actually matter, not the mainstream news. And Kara Kassanoova, a great friend of this movement that did the reporting there. Great work. And it was great to actually just be there at the White House, the Pless Club, the whole thing. was very exciting, super cool, and it just shows how far we have come, man. We've got the White House. We got Bobby in there. I just want all of you, you know, prayers for Bobby right now.

He's under massive, massive attack and pressure by, you know, dark forces that want the pharmaceutical industry to remain in control of everything, our lives. They wanted just to give over our sovereignty to the WHO and the WEF. And, you know, we've got an administration right now that's fighting. And by the way, reach out. If you know President Trump telling him, hey, I love the job Bobby's doing. I mean, we got to, you know, we got to talk about the things that we care about. We got to stay involved. We've all still been, you know, through, you know, a couple of weeks, you know, at least a full week of, you know,

dealing with the tragedy of Charlie Kirk. And, you know, what Jeffrey was talking about is so important. You know, I see the same thing that you're seeing online. They want us to be enraged. They want us filled with rage. If we are enraged, then we are controllable. We're manipulated. They can move us around.

We're not thinking clearly. You know, just as, you know, I said it last week, Charlie was such a great example. He affected so many of our lives. He stood for free speech, though. He truly believed in it. So we cannot just to get through this moment in our own pain, try to use the government or want the government to step in here

and take away someone else's rights. It's ugly. It's awful. But remember, they are also brothers and sisters that are completely misguided at the moment. And I don't care. If you want to tell your boss, you know, hey, do you see what some employee did? They put themselves out there into the free market. They decided to put themselves on social media.

That was their decision. So at that point, you made a bad choice. It may affect the business. The restaurant may lose customers because you work there. All of that is fine. In fact, I think that that's what this is about. is I've been on kind of on all sides of this debate. We've been talking about it all week,

but we're supposed to be a nation of foreign by the people, meaning we take care of our own problems ourselves, right? We deal with these things ourselves. We just don't go to establishments where people use ugly thoughts and language. We can vote with our dollars. We don't need to bring in daddy or the mommy government to take care of this for us.

That is not what it's there for. It should have his little power, has absolutely needed so that we can walk down the street and not actually physically hurt each other. Outside of that, our founding fathers believed in our own governance, our own ethics, our own moral standing. And I think what was beautiful this week was how many people checked in on that and said, you know what? Probably could take the kids and go to church a little more often, probably should start connecting on how much I'm a part of my community. I want to be a better person. I want to, you know, live like as many have said, like Charlie. That's the right response.

That is what is really, you know, will make his legacy powerful not just this week or next week, but the years and millennia to come. Should we all, you know, have that effect? But check in with yourself. Make sure that you're at peace, that you can, you know, that you can look at these things and say, the world, it's happening, but I have. peace. I know that there is goodness. I know how to find goodness. I know where I put my energy, that that is where my focus and my world is. We really do create our reality. We decide the world that we want to live in. And if sitting there on social media is really bumming you out or bringing you down, turn it off. You don't need that information. You don't need those

visuals. You don't need to be enraged. And look, we just found out you don't even need the EMFs. So give yourself a break. Give your family a break. Just let's get back to what's important. We're winning here. There's so much great work going on by so many different organizations that are really making a difference right now. We've got to stand up for what we believe.

We've got to go out and get the job done. We've got to make sure that we have freedom forever and ever and ever and that the world continues to watch the United States of America and say, boy, is that a great nation? Wow, are they incredible? It's amazing how they can have intense dialogue and debate and yet still find a way to love each other. That is what this is all about.

So try not to trigger your own rage. You have control over what you're doing and what you're seeing. And I hope that you'll tune in next week because we're going to keep covering this stuff. We're going to keep talking about the wins and boy, we're going to be talking about an inconvenient study because that film is right around the corner. And I think next week we might leak a little bit more information. There's a gotcha coming. We got them.

Get nervous, Ford. Get nervous all of you mainstream newspapers out there to think, oh, we got them beat. Oh, the studies, like no one imagined that was going to happen. They're making excuses, and we got them this time. I'll see you next week. I'm the Highwire.