The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 474: INDICTMENTS, SURVEILLANCE & POISON

Episode Date: May 14, 2026

Breaking developments in the COVID accountability story. Former senior NIAID adviser David Morens has been indicted on federal charges tied to the destruction and concealment of pandemic-era records. Senator Ron Johnson joins Del to discuss what this case could reveal about how key COVID decisions were made.In the Jaxen Report, we revisit the emails that first raised alarms about efforts to avoid FOIA requests and shield officials during the pandemic. We also examine breaking developments on Capitol Hill, where Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s amendment to the Farm Bill passed, striking language that would have provided pesticide manufacturers with liability protections.Next, who controls your car? A little-known provision buried in federal infrastructure legislation could require new vehicles to monitor driver behavior and even limit operation if “impairment” is detected.Then, Del reports back from The People vs. Poison rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court, where many are demanding accountability over glyphosate liability protections. Food Babe founder Vani Hari joins the conversation.Finally, functional medicine physician Dr. Ann Shippy discusses the fertility crisis and her new book, ‘The Preconception Revolution,’ exploring how environmental exposures and health before conception may shape the next generation.Watch LIVE today — 11am PT / 2pm ETGuests: Sen. Ron Johnson, Vani Hari, Ann Shippy, M.D.Airdate: April 30, 2026Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Yeah. Let's do this. Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world. It's time to step out on the high wire and things are getting wild in America, especially in Washington, D.C. Of course, I was just up there on Monday for, I think, you know, one of the most powerful rallies I've ever been a part of. Fani Hardy is going to come up a little while later. We're going to talk about why I think that was just a tectonic plate shifting moment in the United States of America.

But I just want to say this right now. If you watch the high wife, you're signed up, you know, to receive our texts. It's really super easy. You can just text ICAN to 72022. You would have known we streamed a lot of the events that we're going to be talking about today. You could have seen the whole thing in real time. I'm talking about the people versus poison rally streamed at the high wire. The IAC committee, the Interagency on Autism Committee met on Tuesday.

We streamed that entire event. And then yesterday we streamed the Senator Ron Johnson hearing on COVID-19 vaccine safety signals. All huge, super important moments. in American politics, especially when it comes to medical freedom, especially when it comes to body sovereignty. And, you know, so let's start out now by just talking about the Senator Ron Johnson hearing where explosive new details and an arrest finally were a part of discussion. Take a look at this.

I am releasing an interim report titled, Unmasked How Biden Health Officials Purposely turned a blind eye toward COVID-19. vaccine, or I call them injection, injury safety signals. I urge everyone tuning into today's hearing to read the full report to determine for yourself how the title is as accurate as it is incriminating. To set the stage for what follows, let me remind everyone that Dr. David Morins now indicted for this under conspiracy and destruction of records charges. He was an advisor to Anthony Fauci emailed to colleagues on how to evade freedom of information requests.

Quote, I learned from our FOIA lady here how to make emails disappear and how we wanted, quote, correspondence on sensitive issues to be sent to me at my Gmail address, unquote. Included this report is additional evidence of how federal health officials avoided creating a paper trail to prevent transparency and public disclosure. In discussing how they've been warned of a major limitation of FDA's data mining system, one senior FDA official wrote, quote, we should meet internally. Many considerations not suited to email, unquote. Other federal officials appear to have openly acknowledged that they were actively attempting to avoid transparency.

A CDC official discussing the sharing of vaccine safety data stated, quote, I think because of the foias, we may have asked FDA to stop sending these weekly data mining, mining outputs, unquote. In spite of their concerted effort to concede what they knew and when they knew it, documents we've retained, thanks to Secretary Kennedy's responsiveness to my subpoena and his commitment to radical transparency, paint a clear picture of an obvious cover-up by federal health officials. All right, well, Senator Johnson had another brilliant and important and historic hearing yesterday, and it's my honor and pleasure to have him joining me now. Senator Johnson, thank you for taking the time today.

Appreciate it. Thanks for having me on, Dale. You've had several of these hearings now about COVID, the COVID vaccine, vaccine injuries. What was it about yesterday's hearing that set it apart? What was this hearing and if you're going to sort of break it down, what was the focus of this hearing? Well, we're finally getting documents. And that's because of, you know, Secretary Kennedy's, commitment to radical transparency, quite honestly against a great deal of resistance inside

the agencies. We had subpoenas issued, we had all kinds of oversight letters, never got squat of the agencies, and they weren't producing much more when he became secretary either. He finally got fed up with it and said, no, give them documents. We got about 11 million documents. And the first thing we saw were, you know, they saw, you know, they had seen a safety signal myocarditis, covered it up, downplayed it. You know, then we, then we, We saw the tail into 2022 through 2023. They were consistently seeing a signal of asheemic stroke with people over 65. Same thing.

Didn't do a health alert network warning, downplayed it, called it from moderate to slight. But the bombshell, which is what this hearing was about, was on March 1st, the woman inside the FDA who was working with the inventor of their mathematical algorithm that analyzed Veer's data. They were touting in October 2020 as you could really, you know, very sensitive system to, you know, pick out anything that might be going wrong with these COVID injections. The inventor of the algorithm was warning that that algorithm was not going to work with COVID, with two pretty similar injections. Moderna and Pfizer is going to mask the signals. And so they provided a multi-page presentation to Peter Marks, head of Sieber. He thanked him for it, but basically ignored it.

26 days later, they came to him with an updated, a state-of-the-art system that unmasked these things, showing 49 extreme cases of masking 25 safety signals on very serious adverse events, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, bells palsies, different types of strokes, different types of arrhythes. These weren't rare and mild. These were life-threatening kind of industries. And rather than put a pin a medal on her chest, thank her for her good work and seriously take a look at this

and start warning the American public so that the American public could be informed that there were some serious side effects to these COVID injections. So think twice if you're part of the vulnerable population. They hit it. They shunted her off to the side. They ordered her to cease and desist.

They considered a pest, persona non-gradas. That's how they treated this person who was trying to warn the public, warn FDA, that there's a real problem with these injections. And of course, Dale, I mean, you know, we were watching this in real time. We didn't need a sophisticated mathematical model when you saw the 20-some-year history of Vayers going back to 1990. Averaging deaths is about 200 a year, which are troubling enough. All of a sudden, in 2021, 21,000 deaths. And then, and this is what is really sick. March 2021, they started treating redressin and about 22 other severely COVID injection injured individuals.

Okay. They were giving them treatment. They were studying them. They were having some success, not full cures, but these patients were improving. But they told those 23, don't tell anybody. Stay silent. Let us announce the results of our study so that, you know, other people can receive. the treatment. Don't say a word. But we will release the study. We will acknowledge your illness.

They never did. To this day, they have never released the study on those vaccine injured that they treated in many cases successfully. And they've never admitted to these vaccine injuries. Again, they diagnosed them as COVID injection injuries. And they have, again, so this corruption, It's just sick. We had played a video of Peter Marks that Bredresson recorded those Zoom conversations and time and time again

through December 22nd. We're just not seeing a safety signal. We're not denying that there can be some vaccine injuries, but they're generally rare and mild because we're just not seeing safety signals. Total BS.

There is incredible BS out there about like thousands of people dying, et cetera. That just ain't true. No one's denying that adverse events can occur. That doesn't mean that any given individual might not have had something related to the vaccine. I'm not denying anything. The issue is that the number of cases have not risen to a number that leads to a clear differentiation,

that it's a signal. There's not a clear signal that says that we don't have a signal. continue to query the various databases, the large databases, still have not seen a signal. You couldn't really tell, you just couldn't tell whether there was a signal or not. And something that's been reported, but not as something that is clearly vaccine-related. You guys know we exist. We know that you know that we exist. But the public doesn't think that you guys know that we exist. So let me get this straight, though, Senator Johnson.

And they've got some sort of AI or computer algorithm to go through the VERS system and spit out data so that Peter Marks can see it. And one of the creators that says it's not going to work for this. The way it's designed, it's actually going to hide your injuries, your safety problems. It's not going to work good. Peter said, don't worry about it. It's stuck with the system. While they're telling us, we recognize we're rushing this onto the market. we're going to have robust, you know, vaccine surveillance because let's be honest, the entire

population of America and, frankly, the world, we're becoming test subjects in a study because we jumped out of the original trials with the emergency use authorization. So now we're no man's land. We have no idea what the actual safety profile is. It's going to be the most critical moment to have really clear, concise, you know, post-marketing surveillance. and the system they're looking at, they're told, isn't going to work for this. It's not working.

And then that group comes back and says, we've made a new one. This one will do it and we'll show you how. We'll show you how when you run it. All of a sudden we see, what is it? You said 29 new very serious, 25 serious injuries now appear through our new system. And he basically said, get the hell out of here. We don't need you. You're being a nuisance.

Yeah, and of course, I'm sure in his mind he was going good. Our current system's working exactly as we want it to work because we don't want to create vaccine hesitancy. You know, we want to be able to hide behind a complex mathematical model so we can, thinking, you know, with integrity, we can say, we're not seeing safety signals. Yeah, I know. You're not seeing safety signals because you're using a system that will mask them, that will prevent you from seeing them. So, no, they knew exactly what they're doing. I mean, it's evil what they did. I mean, it was evil the way they led these vaccine-injured people down a primrose path, told them to stay silent, told them they would publish these studies,

that they would acknowledge the injuries. And that's all the vaccine community wanted, the vaccine-injured community. They wanted to be seen, they wanted to be heard, they wanted to be believed, so they could get treatment. So FDA did see them. They did hear them. They did believe them, but they kept silent. They didn't warn the American public. They never published a... I mean, how sick is that? Now,

are there crimes committee here? I don't know. I don't know. I hope there are. I hope, you know, what David Morins, you know, again, my staff... Let's get into that, Senator Johnson, because we do know somebody has finally been arrested. And all is, everyone's like, when are we going to start seeing arrest? Just this week, Dr. David

Morins, you tweeted this out. has been arrested. We've seen some of that video where he's admitting to talk. I mean, the guy is an absolute idiot telling everyone in the emails that you can FOIA, we should take this outside of this email system so they can't FOIA us. And the expert on FOIA is telling us how to hide it. But anyway, we finally have an arrest. Tell me about David Moritz. Do you think this is sort of, is it significant? Is this going to matter? Can we make it matter? Are we going to pressure this guy? Are we going to get this guy? get him to explain what the other people he's obviously emailing with were hiding from us.

First of all, big shout to my staff because we didn't get this information from NIH, HHS. We got this from one of the universities they were granting. And again, we were doing this investigation on Ralph Barrett and getting in. So this is a 115,000-page document dump. And, of course, we didn't know a search for David Morins. This is a needle that my staff pulled out of the haystack. that where David Morden is saying, we've got this FOIA lady has shown us how to make these emails disappear. And if it's sensitive, sent it to my Gmail.

So again, that's destruction of federal records. That's conspiracy to hide what information is for the public. In our current report, we have similar types of statements made. So, well, this is pretty sensitive. So let's talk about this offline. This isn't something we should put in emails. Because your FOIA request, my FOIA requests. Yeah.

They stop sending their VAIR's data analysis between the two agencies, between CDC and FDA. So it couldn't be FOIA. So, you know, we've got a statement there, so we'll probably stop doing that because, you know, because of the FOIAs. So, again, is it criminating enough to rise to a prosecution? I don't know. But I'll just ask your listeners, just think. And you probably have listeners whose family member might have been harmed by the injection. Now you know that Peter Marks, the person who was in charge of making sure that that safety system was surveilled,

that if they saw safety signals, they would alert the American public, did the exact opposite. So your loved one who might have been injured or might have died because of the COVID injection, they were not fully informed. The CDC, FDA, they knew these serious side effects were occurring with the COVID injection, and they said nothing. and they lied to the vaccine and the injection injured. This is sick. I mean, what penalty should be paid for not informing somebody

who then took an injection didn't need and then died? How about a child? What does Peter Marks have to say to those people? Now, what I'll probably say is I'd take the fifth. Yeah, I think you're right. It is evil, and we're not even talking about it. It would be evil if it was a product that was just available by choice. This is a product that the president of the United States,

States went on television and says, this is not about your freedom. This is not about your rights. This is about going out and getting that damn shot. This is not about freedom or personal choice. It's about protecting yourself and those around you. The people you work with, the people you care about, the people you love. And so I'm going to force everyone with 100 employees to get it in their business. We're going to help, you know, everyone that works for the health departments, you're going to have to get it. I mean, they literally were forcing people to take a product that has all the issues you've laid out here. I know you're really busy, Senator Johnson, we've just got you for a minute. You know, there's been investigations throughout the history of the Senate and the Congress

and being a part of government, you know. We know this happens, but I'll tell you, you have been at the forefront of what I think is unfolding to be one of the first of the one of the the greatest cover-ups and lies and disasters in American history. It'll prove to be world history, but we only have control here. I know you told me I'm only running again to deal with this issue. There's nothing else. Otherwise, I'd be retiring. Thank God you did get reelected. You know, are you feeling full? I mean, this is what you're here for. You must have some sense of a fulfillment that you've got a team around you capable enough to find these things, that you really are starting to pin the tail on the donkey, if you will.

And I have to imagine Peter Marks is not sleeping well, knowing people are now being arrested, knowing this data is coming out, knowing Robert Kennedy Jr. is in there releasing, you know, information to you. And I also want to say, to everyone said, Bobby's not getting anything done. I think he's the most effective HHS Secretary we've had in my lifetime. But this is huge. getting all this data to you

seems to be a really, really big moment. Any last thoughts on what you're finding here? Well, again, we're exposing the truth and unfortunately we still, the vaccine injury deniers, I mean, take a look at my ranking members, Senator Blumenthal. I just say, no, this is, the cherry-picked

quotes out of this, totally destroying the record. You know, these, we know these vaccines are safe and effect. I mean, he's saying that. I mean, Peter Marx is saying that. I don't know how Peter Marks could live with himself. in terms of he knew what he covered up. He knew he was lying to all these people.

And again, his lies resulted in the deaths, the unnecessary deaths, the unnecessary permanent disabilities of thousands, tens of thousands of people. I don't know how he can live with himself. If people want to know more about the Peter Marks statements, we have them all at the real petermarks.com. You can check that out. We worked with Breed Dresden on putting that together.

Senator Johnson, I'll say it. I say it every time. You're a hero. You're what we dream. I wish we could clone you, get more of you inside of that cesspool in Washington, D.C. Good on you for putting up with it. No one knows what a sacrifice that is. I've only touched it in some of my work with Bobby.

Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We'll keep supporting you and this incredible work. I just, I just, I hope it leads to more. And I hope that we start being on a pressure and get more to happen. The feeling is mutual. Thank you for everything.

you've done. God bless you. God bless you. So, you know, coming up, I've got a great show coming up. I'm going to talk to Dr. Ann Shippey. Have you been hearing about the fertility crisis? It's a crisis. People, both men and women. Well, Anne Shippy has got some tools. She knows how to work with these people. She's getting people to have babies that have tried everything else, even after IVF. It's a fascinating conversation coming up. And then I'm also going to talk to Vani Harri, you know, the voice behind that incredible rally we were all at in front of the Supreme Court. We're going to talk about why I think, at least, that that was a tectonic plate shifting moment in this conversation. But first it's time for the Jackson Report. You know, this is one of those days where we really feel like the news, Jeffrey.

And I turn on Fox and NBC and ABC and C.B. And no one is covering what I think are some of the biggest stories that have happened in this country in a long time. But I'm going to let you get to it because there's a lot to get through. Oh my gosh. This is a big, big news week. Just when we thought the news would have ended with Ron Johnson's explosive hearing and everything he just went through. Breaking this morning, we have the Farm Food and National Security Act of 2026, better known as the Farm Bill, massive movement on that going directly into the wee hours of the night last night, into the morning of this morning, Thursday morning. And we have some movement here. So let's just go over that. So the bill itself has.

passed out of the House representatives. That was passed. However, the controversial amendments that we've been tracking for quite some time, this was the pesticide immunity. It would give chemical manufacturers of things like glyphosate, the herbicides, of pesticides, foreign companies from China and Germany, legal immunity, just like vaccine makers. That was, there was an amendment that was put forward last night by Representative, Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna. And this is what it look like. You can see it here, and it struck three of those amendments. So obviously the vaccine, I'm sorry, the pesticide liability, but also there was a big issue for states' rights. In that original Farm Bill text, there was language that would have limited states' rights from regulating

the use of pesticides, and it would have given that oversight to the EPA. So it would have stopped states' rights. Her amendment actually took that away. That amendment was passed. You can see the headline here just now coming out of the Hill. House strips controversial pro-pesticide policies from the Farm Bill. But something interesting happened last night into the morning because this debate was going back and forth as it sometimes does in Congress in the House of Representatives. And one of the things the Speaker did was he called for a verbal roll call to pass this amendment. Take a look what happened the first time it was tried. I take zero money from pesticide liability in manufacturers and my colleague takes 124,000 from them.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I yield my time. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Florida. Those in favor say aye. Opposed no. The opinion of the chair of the nose have it. I request yeas and ayes. The gentleman requests a recorded vote.

Pursuant to clause 6 of Rule 18 for the proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida will be postponed. Just for people that went by pretty quickly, he calls for a vote. You hear all these voices in the audience say, I, meaning we want to have this pesticide protection removed from the farm bill. We're voting for Luna's amendment. Eyes throughout the room, nays, zero crickets. And then he says, in the opinion of the chair, the nays have it.

I don't, Jeffrey, do we have any idea? Is that illegal? How do the rules work? Can he just, like, not get it? Before we do that, apparently we got the source. We want to make sure that wasn't edited. So let's play with more volume. Let's see if we can, everyone, listen, see if you can hear a single yay or nay.

Is it where we're going, nay, eyes and nays. Can we hear a single nay in there? Take a listen. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Florida. Those in favor say aye. Opposed no. The opinion of the chair of the noes have it. I request yeas and aes.

The gentleman requests a recorded vote. That's, it seems criminal to me. In a democracy where majority votes, you know, decide these things. He totally overrides the only people in the room apparently voting and then goes with zero. That is an incredible moment. It is. And from my understanding, the chair has the ability on a verbal roll call to call eyes and yeas and nays. And others can request, as Luna did, can request a recorded roll call vote, which is a different scenario altogether, which happened.

And we do have that recorded roll call. He refused to do it right then. I mean, I think she's saying, let's do it right now. Let's do that all over again. And instead of doing it, he says, we're going to do it. delay that vote, knowing full well, he has no one in the room that is going to deliver a nay. I mean, again, we rarely get to catch these shenanigans at that level. It's incredible.

As you pointed out, they did come back. What was the final vote? Yeah, we can check it out here. Actually, we have tape of it right here. This is the actual vote on the amendment that happened this morning. Take a listen. Okay. On this vote, the azer 280, the nayser 142.

adopted. Boy, it sounds like he really made himself a bad name for no reason. It's you know unbelievable. Now this farm bill now goes to the Senate and one of the you know this is how the bills go. Things are added things are removed one of the things that was added to this farm bill is Thomas Massey's Prime Act. This was this was a standalone bill and now it's been incorporated into the Farm Bill. The Prime Act allows farmers to sell local without the hand of the federal government overseeing them. They can sell locally to restaurants,

to households of people in their communities without federal oversight. So basically just the health departments of the localities can come in inspect just to make sure things are okay, just like you do with restaurants. That's now in there, so it takes the federal government out. This is huge. This is a big conversation I've had with Abby Rockefeller,

the organic farmer, yes, a Rockefeller, but one of the rogue kids that has been trying to make the earth a healthy or better place. She has an event I speak at all the time, but this right to slaughter for small farms and ranchers is such a big deal because even when you go to a farmer's market, you don't realize if you're seeing stakes there, that farmer has to go pay a giant vendor like Cargill or something like that, usually Brazilian-owned, to a plant where they then will cut up the beef, making it very expensive. That's why you pay a fortune at the farmer's market in this is that right to, you know, in some limited number, slaughter some of your own animals right there and deliver

direct to the consumer, which is something, you know, farmmatch.com. A lot of people are looking at. Good friend of mine works with Abby if you want to find a farm near you. And I'm sure we're going to see more and more of the ability to get these products. This is huge. This is back to, I think, what America is all about, meeting your local farmer. getting some raw milk, grabbing a couple of stakes, and not having USDA and, you know, all this, you know, corporate oversight. So a huge victory. Massey's been at this for years. So getting it into this farm bill, I know is a really big deal for him. He's worked hard to, and to see it moving forward. I think it's very exciting. Absolutely. And now it moves on to the Senate, like we said,

and there's obviously still controversy around this farm bill. There's still amendments in there sections in there that allow the extension of the EPA's oversight on glyphosate to do their safety assessment. It's giving them more time to do that. A lot of things in there, people still have issues within the maha-minded crowd, let's call it. But I want to go to the other big news of this week so it doesn't get lost. And Senator Ron Johnson really hit on it there. And that's Dr. David Morrens. He's basically the second in charge. He's the advisor for Fauci at NIAID when they were both there. He has been indicted. And just to go over that really quick, you see this headline here out of New York Post. That's the indictment. But I want to go over, we reported this in 2024 from

the FOIA emails that Ron Johnson, Senator Ron Johnson and his team did receive and made public. Just to remind people what's going on here that this is not a rogue government going after a health official. Let's look at Morin's actual emails. So you can see them for yourself. Look at this one right here. This is 2021. Remember where we were at in 2021. with the pandemic. He says, I learned from our FOIA lady here how to make emails disappear after I'm foiled before the search starts. So I think we are all safe. And then he goes on to say this. This is to Peter Dazick, member of Equal Health Alliance, who has his fingerprints all over the origins of this coronavirus. He says to Peter, Peter Dazek. He says, I can either send stuff

to Tony on his private Gmail or hand it to him at work or at his house. He's too smart to let colleagues and him send the stuff that could cause trouble. So obviously, Marenz isn't too smart because he's now indicted. So you can see that indictment here. This is the Department of Justice actual press release. And we go into the press release. What does that mean? What does the indictment mean?

Well, the Department of Justice says this, when you go into this press release. It says, Dave Merenz of Chester, Maryland, and it goes on to say, what's he indicted for? indicted for, destruction, alteration, falsification of records in federal investigations, concealment, removal, or mutilation of records, aiding and abetting. And then it goes into this. What's the conviction? What's the penalties? Well, if convicted, faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison for conspiracy against the United States, a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for each count of destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in the federal investigation. And remember in 24, who really called for this? Who championed this? Everyone was really silent in government,

except for Rand Paul. Rand Paul put this out, this press release out. He was going to all the media in saying this. He says, get this out there. I write to urge the U.S. Department of Justice to open an investigation into alleged improper concealment and intentional destruction records by Dr. David Morens. And remember, at that time, all of the evidence, that is in this indictment was public. It had been public for two years. So now the big story is the public and even politicians here, they smell legal blood in the water. They want more indictments. And Ram Paul again leading the charge. He says this on X. I've said it from the beginning, lying to Congress as a felony, destroying federal records is a felony, advising others to destroy

federal records as a felony. Fauci did all three. His advisor was, his advisor was just indicted. Fauci is next. The deadline of prosecutors. Fauci is May 11th. The DOJ must act now. This is where we're at. We have a timeline. People want justice. There's a lot of other people besides Fauci that have all of the public records out there. The indictments are right there waiting. The Department of Justice must act. Wow. I mean, that is massive. And what a timeline. We are days away from that. I mean, are we talking about, you know, within just over a week, we could see Fauci get to just walk Scott, free from all of this.

You know, and it's the department, like, how do we, there's nowhere to call. We can't call the Department of Justice, right, and say we want this. I mean, you just hope, you know, people like Rand Paul are being demanding enough. Because as you said, I mean, look, if aiding and abetting is what the second under Fauci is being indicted for, who was he aiding and abetting? This guy. This guy. Wow. Okay. Well, I guess call your representatives and just tell them to bother Department of Justice or whatever you can do and say, we want this, we need this.

America has to get to the bottom. Look, and by the way, let's have a fair trial. Let's get an investigation in this. Let's see, you know, what we find out. I didn't realize that the window is that short. That's incredible. Yeah, it's closing in. And remember, Fauci has a pardon, auto pen pardon by Biden. So there's that layer on top. of this. So it'll be interesting to see how this plays out. A lot of people watching, a lot of the American public is watching right now. And I want to move to something that is a little closer to us, perhaps even intimate in our own vehicles, our own cars. There's a video that's been going around TikToks. It's been viral. Yeah, take a look at this, Del. Check out. All right. Come on. No, no, no, no. Now imagine there was an emergency outside the truck, an accident, something terrible on the ranch with a chainsaw. And I jump in this truck, but the truck, it won't

shift into drive. Why? Because the cameras and sensors inside this cab won't let it shift. Because it detects my eyes are big. There's a lot of emotion. There's some panic. And it doesn't feel that I'm fit to drive. Now that's not science fiction. That is happening because Ford just filed the patents. Ford actually has a series of patents down at the US Patent and Trade Office that deal with the sensors and cameras inside the cab of their truck. And if the sensors in that truck determine that you're not fit to drive, that truck will not actually shift from park to drive. Now, they already have a system called telematics,

and that's where they can actually pull up cameras in real time inside the cab of their fleet vehicles. Now, they actually market this to insurance companies, because the truth is, this is really about who owns the data and who owns the liability. Now, your name might actually be on the title of this truck, and you may have paid for it, but you don't own it.

Wow, that's... That is some pretty scary stuff. Wow. I guess really probably hear that hail that is coming down on top of the studio and I'm wondering how good my truck, my Ford truck, by the way, is going to handle this hail at the moment. Anyway, moving on. If you could hear that out there.

And it really does come down to who owns the data. I mean, we learned this through all the social media that was data mining people's information. But now it's your car. And I mean, this is the mainstream conversation. It's in the headlines. This isn't a conspiracy theory. Here's one of the headlines right now that's everyone's debating.

Every new car could become a surveillance machine by 2027, and it may decide if you can drive. Where's this all coming from? Well, it's coming from a bill, HR 3684. It's titled the Infrastructure Investment in Jobs Act. And you go into this, and this is basically government mandated. And it says this in the section. They call it advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention. Well, what does that mean?

In this quote, it says passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether the driver may be impaired. It's a big umbrella, the word impaired. Impaired could mean anything. And it goes on to say, prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if impairment is detected. And what's interesting about this is it goes on to the next quote on this. And it says that the government's requiring passenger motor vehicles manufactured after the effective date of that standard to be equipped with what they're calling advanced,

drunken impaired driving prevention technology. And again, this gentleman's name comes up. Thomas Massey, Thomas Massey's been out there, really one of the few vocal politicians trying to get this out of here, trying to protect people and the public from this. Take a listen to this speech on the House floor. He filed an amendment.

I regret that we have to offer this amendment. What I'm going to describe will probably sound like a bad science fiction movie, but that's what's written into law. right now in law that's going to be implemented for the it says for 2026 and beyond now the reality is the technology doesn't exist but that doesn't keep legislators from imagining things that they would like to do to infringe on civil liberties but there is a law that states that every vehicle manufactured is going to have to have a kill switch in it the car itself will monitor

your driving and if the car thinks that you're not doing a good job driving it will disable it So the car dashboard becomes your judge, your jury, and your executioner. My question is, how do you appeal your sentence? Once your car, the technology in your car, has judged you to be incapable of driving. Once it's disabled you and your children at the side of the road, how do you appeal that? Do you press a button on the dashboard? Do you start talking to an AI? What if it really was somebody who was drunk?

Are you really going to send a police? a police car after this, disabled vehicle? Do we have the resources to do that? There's going to be so many false positives. The technology is unworkable. That's why the DOT is still in the rulemaking process, asking for feedback on how this thing could even exist. You know, I predict one of the major changes

we're going to see from this is horror movies. Every time, you know, the Texas chainsaw mask is coming at you in the car. It's like, rearing, it won't start. Now it's just like, what's happening? What's happening? I can't get into the start because I'm too pan. Okay, I got to calm down. I got to calm down.

I got to act normal. I'm okay. Oh, my God. I can't imagine. This is just, this is so far beyond a step too far. It's absolutely unbelievable. I have a hard time believing that this is going to be a good sales point for Ford moving forward. Yeah.

And it's not just Ford Auto. And you can see a pocket. year by auto companies we already seen it check check this out this is a Subaru Subaru is this 2021 they're already pushing forward this idea like it's a good thing and they're marketing promotional marketing this is on Twitter at the time says they all new but conventionally powered Subaru Outback it comes equipped with a system which detect signs of fatigue or impairment directly from the driver's eye movements and combines this with steering behavior then

Volvo will put out its own press release they were so proud of this and it talks about in-car cameras in interventions against intoxication and distraction. Again, they're being paired. Those two terms are being paired. And it goes on to say in this, the car can intervene if the driver's clearly intoxicated or distracted, driver does not respond to warning signals and is risking an accident involving serious injury or death. But let's go into the patents because that video talked about Ford patents. Here's one that goes beyond just impaired driving. This gets extremely dystopian when it comes to surveillance. This is this biometric identification in a vehicle environment. Goes on to say in this patent by Ford that they're going to use the biometric data. That's you.

That's your information the car is picking up from you. Using it and we're going to run it through a security events database. That's basically a police database. It says examples of the cohort include a missing persons, persons with warrants, criminal persons, persons with criminal history, persons with an all points bulletin or persons associated with security events. So your car is your snitch now. If what is second you sit in there. But then it goes on to say that you should not even know that it's doing that because the patent says this indications of a security event may only be presented to the administrators and not the participant. Well, you're the participant in your driving of your own car. So you're not going to know this is happening. You're just going to get

in there. And what's a what's a security event? That's a pretty broad topic. Is it someone that has an infection during a quarantine? Is it somebody, I mean, there's a big. Think about it. We know during COVID, there were sensors on buildings that were sensing people that were warm, fevering inside of buildings. So imagine if your car says, oh, wait a minute, you have an infection, all of a sudden, you know, and then I think about like Tesla, right? And these companies have like self-driving cars. I think of it. They're just going to drive you to jail, you know, or I guess even worse, a quarantine center. Yeah, quarantine camp.

You're going to say it. Where are we going? Oh, man. Right. Okay. Scary. And you're seeing this overarching idea. I mean, we're talking about this.

We cover a lot of health issues, but this is surveillance. And you can see during the COVID pandemic, here are the headlines during the COVID. Remember the vaccine passports, the digital passports? Here's the headline vaccine passport. can be used for surveillance under the guise of public health measures. Well, what else could be used as surveillance under the guise of safe driving? Well, your car. So these are issues that cut through ideologies, that cut through topics. There seems to be this wrap back into how can we fully surveil the public autonomously with biometric data. Now we have all this AI and artificial

intelligence. These are really, really big topics we should watch out for and be supporting the politicians who are standing up for the rights of America. to really use their own vehicles, drive their own cars, where they want to drive them. That's a big part of freedom. And let's go to the state level now because we talked about the federal level with the farm bill and we had Senator Ron Johnson's hearing just this past a couple days ago. But there's battles now every day at the state level. Anybody out there just walk outside your front door and there's a battle raging.

You can check it out. And this is, I'm going to couch it with this. It says another poll, another survey. And look at what this is finding. Now, the title of this headline, A New Global Health Misinformation Survey reveals deep divisions. I thought we retired that term, but anyway, it says, the survey found that divisive beliefs about health are extremely common.

Seven in ten people globally had at least one view contrary to medical science. But it goes further. About a quarter of people worldwide say they believe that raw milk is healthier than pasteurized milk, that the use of acetaminopin during pregnancy causes autism, and that vaccines are used for population control All right, now we're getting somewhere. So with that idea, now I want to bring up some bills. So in New York, we have Bill A914. And you can go into this language. And remember when people say, we don't know when the vaccine researchers and public health researchers say, we don't know why

people are vaccine hesitant. They're spending millions of dollars to wonder why people just don't want to take vaccines. Well, as we heard with Ron Johnson, your system for monitoring the harm, after people are getting injected is broken. There's no way to monitor that. The compensation system is broken. There's no safety net, essentially. So New York thought it was a good idea to reproduce the vaccine liability at the state level. And this is what this says in this bill. It says no home care service agency license or other health care providers shall be liable for any injury caused by the administration of a vaccine. But then it goes further and it says, again, no person shall be liable for an injury from a vaccine when it's being given to a minor. So they're covering the whole

gamut there. Minor consent laws, everything. You can give these vaccines. So this law, obviously keep an eye on this if you're in New York. But in Arizona, we have another big law here. And this is kind of the other end of the spectrum. Arizona bill seeks protections for unvaccinated. And what it's doing there, and this is the actual, basically mainstream reporting of this. It says, calling in a matter of individual rights, Arizona lawmakers are moving to protect those who refuse to get vaccinated from being denied services or employment. They're also allowing people to go to restaurants, entertainment venues, concerts, no more of this pandemic era shunning of people. That's past both the House and the Senate. It's on the desk of the governor waiting to be signed. So that's a really

high watermark there in Arizona. It's now following the lead of Idaho and another state I'm about to mention. Wow, huge. Florida. Yeah. Oh, it's gigantic. In Florida, we have let the headlines tell the story here. Remember, we had the medical freedom bill in Florida. It stalled a little bit.

Governor Ron DeSantis called a special session to convene and talk about the medical freedom and the AI because these are such big topics for the people of Florida. And here are the headlines here. Florida's vaccine exemption bill for kids get second chance as lawmakers kick off special session. That's CBS Miami. And then Florida House, the update just yesterday again rejects Governor DeSantis' AI and vaccine measures. So DeSantis went to X and said this. Voters elected Republicans to protect freedom against both the

big tech cartel and the medical industrial complex. Yet when given the chance to deliver for their constituents, not a single Republican House member could even be bothered to file a bill, typical political shenanigans. He goes on to say, we'll be interesting to see these guys campaign as big tech enthusiasts and guardians of the medical industrial complex. He's obviously talking about the midterms here coming up to see all of these people. people who maybe looked like they were going to do the will of the people and pass medical freedom bills now say, you know, we're going to actually push through the gentas of the medical industrial complex.

It's interesting he uses those terms. And then the surgeon general, Dr. Joe Laotapoui says this, on X, in this job, I've come to realize that power is most honorable when used for the benefit of others. The governor's agenda to defend freedom, whether for medical tyranny or tech oligarchs is something Floridians and Americans everywhere want in value. Members of the Florida House should be leading that effort not standing in the way. So some strong words there by the top leadership in Florida after this medical freedom conversation is stalled. But I'll end on a high note here in Louisiana. There's the Medical Freedom Act that's going through and you can look

into this act just like Arizona. It says the purpose of this part is to protect the rights of individuals to make autonomous decisions regarding medical interventions without discriminating. nation coercion or exclusion by public entities. Just basically want to get on with their lives without having mandates, without being shunned or coerced into a medical procedure with known harms. So that's Louisiana, like Idaho, like Arizona. There's some high watermarks there. But again, walk out your front door, get involved, everyone at the state level. These fights are going on right now. Don't wait for the federal government to do it. You can affect change, however you want to see it right now in your own state.

Absolutely, Jeffrey. Wow. That was just, you know, really a tidal wave this week of things going on. A lot of it positive. But you definitely see this tug of war. I'm going to say it again. It looks to me like Ron DeSantis is setting his sights on running probably in the next presidential election as the anti-AI, anti-medical, you know, medical, industrial complex. So it'll be interesting. could actually set them apart of what people will think of that, but I keep seeing that language. Certainly, you know, we're looking at all those issues, very concerned, obviously, about the medical issue, but we're starting to look at AI. Amazing reporting, Jeffrey. Thank you for being on top. But that was a lot to unpack this week. Amazing job.

All right, I'll see you next week. Yeah, busy one. All right, thank you so much. All right. Well, look, your voice does matter. That is what makes news happen. That's what makes politicians move. That's what changes amendments.

When you see, I think, the success of the Luna amendment, that doesn't happen in a vacuum that does not happen on its own. And frankly, we've watched so many things like this just go by. Maybe they get away with erasing the I vote and making up a nay vote, but not this time. And I think a really big part of that is that we made our voices heard. We've been talking about it on the high wire for weeks. People versus Poison went down. This is what that looked like. In Washington, D.C. to march to the Supreme Court, we've had enough.

It's people versus poison. Corporations like Monsanto do not get immunity for causing cancer. People versus poison. People versus poison. People versus poison. Inside that building, Monsanto Bear will be arguing for the right to poison us and not be held accountable. They want to give us cancer and get away with it. We're here to make sure that does not happen. Over 100,000 lawsuits have won against glyphosate, paying out over $11 billion. Hundreds of thousands of more cases are lined up being poison, cancer,

non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, all sorts of issues with gut dysbiosis. This product is destroying the health of our children. Was the EPA established to protect the environment and the people? which is established to protect foreign corporations when they harm the environment and the people. This is regulatory capture. It is corrupt. I have been an organic farmer in Maine since the 1970s. And no one can tell me or the other farmers here today that we can't grow food without all of these toxic chemicals. No corporations should be able to poison people and then run for protection of the Supreme Court.

and Congress. And we know that's exactly what Bayer is trying to do. It is unacceptable that this administration uses the power of the Defense Production Act to increase flight to safe production, appoints chemical lobbyists to run the EPA and completely gut our health. For decades, they have gaslit us into believing that spraying poison on our food is not only safe, it is necessary. It is neither.

We can no longer have Aramontso have any kind of immunity or liability protection as they're poisoning us. If you eat this, you're going to be poison. And so you have to eat organic, but it's more expensive. So choose your health or you choose paying your bills. It's not fair.

Right now, the U.S. uses millions of pounds of pesticides every year, and it is poisoning our air, our soil, our water, and our bodies. Pesticide companies are raking in billions while the rest of us suffer. 98% of all pesticides marketed in the United States that require a cancer warning, there is no public warning at all.

That is grotesque. That is terrible. A recent study done in the United States showed that 82% of Americans, six years and older, have positive glyphosate in their urine. The glyphosate exposure is not just sometimes. It's daily.

In our children's baby food, in their snacks, in their school lunches. I lost my dear friend James this year to colorectal cancer. My father lost his life to mantle cell lymphoma. I survived a golf bowl-sized tumor in my lymphatic system. My grandfather used to use the pesticide paraquot, and later in his life he developed Parkinson's.

A roundup killed my husband. Jack was one of the healthiest people I knew. He served, ate clean, never smoked. He didn't want to use him harmful cancer. chemicals on our farm. So he chose only Randa because he was told it was safe. Then one morning he said, Terry, I have lumps in my neck. By the time they started chemotherapy, it was already too late. And I kissed my husband and told him that I loved him and that he was the best thing that it ever happened to me. Glyphosate took my love away from me. It took my

children's dad away from them. I know that many of you are here because you have similar stories. You or your loved ones have gotten sick or living with a chronic illness right now. We know that this cannot go on. A family member that he lived near a horse farm that they sprayed pesticides. He died at 59. I was diagnosed with cancer 16 years ago and glycifate is something that I should never be exposed to. So we need to get rid of this stuff. These children cannot get away from these pesticides at their parks, at their schools, in the cereal that they're given in the morning, even if it's fruits and vegetables, they are non-dated with it and they are sick. I think that it's good to get rid of it and to not have bad chemicals in our food.

You know the saying that a worried mom does better research than the FBI? Well, I think we should change it to moms do a better job than the FBI, the FDA, the FDA, the EPA, the EPA, the CDC, and the FCC. Today, if the court rules in favor of Monsanto, then all of those labels, that our missing warnings will become a liability shield for every pesticide company. We're talking about chemicals used in the homes, like disinfectants, bug sprays, and your pets flee and tick collars. Imagine going over to a friend's house for dinner. They serve you a salad. And just as you pick up your fork, the host says, wait, wait, I need to sprinkle a little bit of rat poison on it.

Liposate is not necessary for national security. It's merely one among many modern inventions pushing us toward insecurity. I came from my farm in northwest Ohio today because Liberty is on the line. Farmers have been under the thumb of corporate power and government complicity for too long. My father and I were proud chemical farmers. We really believe that we were feeding the world. But fast forward to today, we've contaminated our drinking water, our lakes, all of it. It's all a lie. My son wants to be a future regenerative farmer.

farmer. They would like to tell all the kids out there that they should also join their parents and join in the fight because it's for their future. For future generations, we can have healthy food and stuff. There's like better farming practices. If your product is safe, then you don't need immunity. And if your business depends on immunity, the problem is not the losses. The problem is the product. If your product is harmless, you don't spend billion settling cancer lawsuits. If your business model depends on sick kids and silenced farmers, you don't deserve a liability shield, you deserve prison. In 2018, when we brought Monsanto into that courtroom, and we showed 12 jurors, the science,

the Monsanto papers, when we showed them the truth, they brought this company to its knees. And today, this court is deciding whether or not those doors are shut. We need to make sure that we stop this federal overreach. Our movement is bigger and broader than ever. We are together as human being. To the nine justices in the building behind me, deciding whether the poisoned can still seek justice, the law you serve is not the highest law. The verdict you write will be read by your children and your grandchildren. Everyone should have clean water and clean air. Everyone should have. Everyone, should have clean, wholesome foods for their family.

That we should have the power over one of the most sacred things that we do, what we consume, what we eat. That is not what this country represents. That is not what our government is supposed to stand for. We need to stand up and say, this is not making America healthy again. And I am so glad that all of us are here to tell the Supreme Court,

you should not poison the people of our country, You should not poison the judicial process. You should not poison the Tenth Amendment. And you should not poison the Constitution of the United States of America. Every home in America now knows what glyphosate is, and every single mother just turned into Aaron Brockovich. Thank you for showing up. Thank you for refusing to be silent.

Thank you for standing up for our next generation and our children together, we are truly unstoppable. Well, it's my honor and pleasure to be able to say, you did it, girl. Voniehari joins me now. Well done. What an experience. I have tears in my eyes, Del, watching that.

I mean, wow. What just was an idea that we were on the phone together two months ago. What we created was something I couldn't even imagine, honestly, how everybody came together. that day, every walk of life, citizens from across the country, environmental activists, health advocates, nonprofits, elected officials from both sides of the aisle, everybody putting everything aside to say we have to work together to make our voice heard for this. It was the most beautiful moment I think of my career standing there, giving a speech flanked by members of Congress on both

sides of me on totally different sides of the aisle. People like you, Del Big Tree, that are, you know, I think of as a hero and so many other amazing women and activists there like my friends, like Alex Clark and Kelly Ryerson and toxicologist Alexander Nunes. I mean, it was just, you know, Zen Honeycut for moms across America, you know, one of one of the OG food activists I used to work with who really taught me how to become a food activist, Zuri, Alan Starr, who was the And see, I mean, it was just this beautiful movement that I never thought would even be possible to be able to pull that off on the steps of the Supreme Court without a permit, using the public sidewalk, inviting the public to come. We were so worried that we would have too many people when we'd get kicked out. So we didn't like, you know, really spread the news as big as we could have. You know, we just kind of like held back. You know, we're like, let's just keep this small so we could use the, you know, the right area in front of the Supreme Court. But it wasn't. It wasn't small.

It was huge and much bigger than I ever imagined. And hundreds of people were there to join us. And it was something that I think is a turning point. We came together in such a loud, unified way that the world now sees us that we're not going away. That pesticide companies are not going to get away with any kind of liability shield, that corporations are not going to be shielded by the. politicians who they pay and we are going to call out the madness. We're going to call out the

corruption. We're going to call out the captured nature of what's happening in Washington, how our politicians are captured. After that rally, we marched to the Capitol and we sat in a rules committee meeting and demanded that these amendments get added to the farm bill that were passed, that eventually, you know, removed the pesticide liability shield. We sat there and watched G.T. Thompson, the sponsor of the bill, sit there and drink his mountain dew, bright. I mean, it was just, it was kind of just, I don't know why that visceral reaction got me, but seeing him drink that bright yellow product that I think of as poison. And then, you know, promoting a poison bill to Congress, it was just, it was like, I'm glad I got to see it with my own eyes and be able to see it and see the arguments that are going back and forth and seeing how. wrong they were. You know, one of the things that I think was the most beautiful part is that

the timing worked out so beautifully. The Farm Bill went to the floor this week and we were able to talk to our congressional representatives and members. We were able to call. We were able to visit their offices. We were able to go and make our voice heard. And there's so many groups that came together that normally would be on different sides of the aisle, but we all did this together. And it was the entire food movement that made this happen. And I think that's what's so beautiful about this. And this is something that is a spirit that we talked about on that call two months ago, Dell, was that we wanted to re-energize this spirit of all working together in the grassroots movement, which ended up bringing Maha to Washington. And it was that spirit, that spirit,

that was there this week when, you know, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. decided to leave his presidential campaign and go to the President Trump campaign and say that and say out loud, you know, I mean, the fact that he was a Democrat for all of his life and to leave that behind and join the Republicans

because he wanted to see a better future for our children and our next generation. I thought that was beautiful because it was something that we need to see more of in Washington. And it's what Shelley Pingree and Thomas Massey did with their amendment that they submitted to the Farm Bill, which eventually got copied by the Luna Amendment and implemented, which was beautiful.

And so everybody was working together to make this happen. And they weren't upset that their name got stripped off of the amendment. They were ready to support it. And it's reminded me of this moment where Secretary Kennedy joined with President Trump because he saw that President Trump was going to win the election. There was no way the Democrats were going to win. There was no real vote to have. candidate on the Democrat side.

And so we had to do something if you wanted to make an impact. And it's like if we're going to change the world, if we're going to actually stand up to these corporations, stand up to bear and these special interests who outspend us every single time, this is what we have to do. We all have to come together and be very loud and show up and show our faces and say enough's enough.

And now these politicians can't hide. The people who voted no today, today on the Luna Amendment to keep pesticide liability language in the farm bill are going to be called out in a resounding way, especially those that are running for re-election. We've already started to do that on X, and you're going to be hearing a lot more about that because these politicians are traitors to the Maha movement. They're traitors to the American people, and they need to defend themselves of why they would even allow something like that to happen. You know, this is, this is, again, the power of grassroots coming forward and it's it's such a beautiful thing and i hope we get to see more of this also

del i think you were there when we talked on stage at the national products expo where we were we were talking to a large democrat audience i remember and i was like you know pleading with them like this is our moment this is our moment where our issues are in washington getting talked about come with us come work with us let's all do this together let's try to see who out mahas each other right? And I think we're seeing that finally take place, which is so excited because the Democrats, if you look at the votes of this Luna amendment, the Democrats won this for the Farm Bill. Wow. That is very, really, really eye-opening here. Okay? That is a signal that the Trump administration, the Republicans have a situation on their hands. They need to start looking at what

Maha brings the table. We are a large vote. We are a large movement and we really care about these issues. We care about these issues more than anything in our lives and it's what makes us come to the voting booth and support candidates. Absolutely. I second all of that. I would just add, you know, your hope is that the media turns out and they turned out in droves. And I'll say, Vani, I'm used to the media sort of asking questions in a way to try and corner me like I'm playing chess, you know, you know, in this situation, they didn't know. They were genuinely asking questions.

They couldn't believe what they were seeing because I can't remember. Honestly, in the last 10 years, when was the last time we ever saw Republicans, Democrats, you know, literally standing side by side, holding hands together over an issue, not calling either side out, but standing together on an issue. That's when I've been saying this was a tectonic plate shift. moment in politics. It felt like we returned to things that used to happen when I was a kid, when something was just so obviously a problem, both sides recognized it, and that is what happened. And that's what I was saying to the press. You know, the question, you know,

what does this mean for maha? I said, what it means is maha is not a political movement, is a movement of the people and is growing every single day. And every representative better start understanding what it is we're asking for because we are going to. going to be moving the political spectrum here. And I hope you're right. I said Donald Trump has done a lot of great things for Maha. This was not a great day. Fighting for liability protection.

In my speech, I talked about, here's some of the headlines that were coming. Republicans faced their first big Maha test with a pesticide policy. There's over, I think, 35 different articles came out. Supreme Court, here's arguments in landmark weed killer case. Maha Moms say it could be a midterm issue. It just went on and on with Barrett U.S. Supreme Court. Maha rallies against pesticides, the odd bell fellows protesting the Roundup weed killer case. See, I mean, they don't, when was the last time you saw media not just making a bad guy? They couldn't. Everyone was there.

They couldn't. They couldn't. Even NBC News interviewed me. It was amazing. They haven't talked to me in 10 years. It was incredible. I mean, it was everybody. The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, CNN, NPR.

It was just insane. And they were there to witness it with their own eyes. They brought their reporters. And I was excited to see such, you know, the amount of reporters that came because normally they ignore things like this, right? They don't believe in the grassroots. They don't see the things that we're about to do. But I think they understood the assignment and they came and they showed up and they reported

on it, which is absolutely incredible. They understand the uprising that's happening on this issue. And I think it was just such a bad, bad week. for Bear Monsanto to have that kind of negative press, talking about how glyphosate is a carcinogen, and it causes cancer, and having all of those speeches reverberate across social media, seeing hundreds of millions of views

of all of the different speeches, just taking over X, taking over Instagram. I can't open my phone without seeing somebody's speech. It's absolutely incredible. And that's what we need is the truth going out to the American people directly so they can hear it, they can join our movement, and they can get on board, and we can make a better future for our children.

Fantastic. Bonnie, you're a rock star. Call me any time you want to do this again. It was a blast. It was, I think, a success beyond any of our wildest dreams, and we're going to see the repercussions of it. Obviously, some huge strides. Farm Bill, we got that liability protection yanked out.

We still have to wait and see what happens with the Supreme Court. But even that seemed pretty hotly contested in there if we're to, to, to, to, you know, to, to, you're to to listen to what's going on. So baited breath and the Supreme Court's on notice that the majority inside of the, you know, Congress just, you know, said we want liability protection out of there. They have to be watching this. So good on you, Bonnie. It's just another big step in the work that you're doing. And I'm just really happy to be a part of it. So grateful for you, Dell, and your whole team and everybody that came together to put this together. It took an extraordinary amount of effort and I just think this is a beautiful time and we're going to keep going and lots more to

come. Awesome. Well, I'll see you then. Take care, Bonnie. Bye, I don't. Okay. All right. Well, look, if you missed it, if you didn't see the rally, you can watch it on the website itself, the People versus Poison. Also, look, I wouldn't miss out on getting yourself a People versus Poison t-shirt. This is going to, I'm telling you, this is a historic moment. They're going to talk about what a ship this was whether you call it medical freedom, food, freedom, maha, whatever you want to call it, grab, you know, grab a little bit of that merch that also helps us pay for getting all of the equipment out there so that we could live stream it for you. You know, when you think about this issue of glaupe, so we think about a lot of the things that we're covering right now, well,

what's the big deal? Poison all over our food. We hear about the cancers, but the thing that is really maybe the most terrifying of all of the toxic, you know, disease issues we're thinking about, I'd say it's fertility, which means the future of our species. And this is what that looks like in the news. Infertility seems to be more common these days. Fertility rates are plummeting across the globe and in the United States. According to the CDC, 20% of couples will experience infertility problems. One out of every eight women struggling to become pregnant. Doctors say one in six couples worldwide struggle with fertility. In the U.S., it's about 51% of couples who struggle with it.

Research shows about 30% of infertility among couples is due to low sperm count. By definition, if you're under the age of 35 and you've been trying for one year, that's called infertility. If you're over the age of 35 and you've been trying for six months or more, by definition, that is infertility. According to the Mayo Clinic, there are environmental factors men need to be aware of, like exposure to heat, certain medications, or toxic chemicals. There's no question that environmental factors affect reproductive function. We're in a crisis, a really, really serious situation. Well, obviously, we're seeing the conversation everywhere on fertility.

Young women come up to me when I'm speaking all around the country, you know, asking me questions about fertility. Do I think that they should do some sort of a cleanse, things like that? And I always say the same thing I say here. I'm not a doctor, but Anne Shippey is, and she's written an incredible book on exactly that, The Preconception Revolution, A Science Back Path to Your Fertility and Generational Health.

And it's just my pleasure and honor to be joined now by Anne Shippey. Thanks so much for having me. Absolutely, thank you for being here. This is probably the biggest conversation happening, not just amongst young people, but also the fact that I think we're well aware, especially in America, there's been a delay to the age at which many people are having

kids. My wife and I, we didn't start having kids to write about 40 years old. And so, you know, why this book? And who's the target audience? It's expanded. The target audience has expanded. I wrote this book because I just started seeing amazing things with my patients. My patient's experiences have taught me over the last 20 years how important this preconception period is. And it's really what I wish I had known before I had my children. I had mine at 34 and 38 in the midst of med school and residency. So gosh, I really wish I had known this. So I started seeing my first patient that actually taught me about preconception

was one of my early patients. And she had heard about my work and functional medicine, being an internist, well and she asked me to just check her out. She was in her early 40s and she wanted to have her first child and felt like there were some things that were off before she got started. And we found some things. She had really high mercury levels, her microbiome, you know, the organisms in her cut were off and she had some nutrient deficiencies. So we got her all tuned up in about six months and she went on to have a very healthy baby no problem. And then a couple of years later I had a patient who had been turned away from IVF. She had failed IVF three or four

times and they were like, okay, we're not going to do this again with you. We can see the writing on the wall. You need to go to adoption. But she still had it. She had a sense that something was off on her body and she could actually fix it. So she came and she had a couple of autoimmune disorders that hadn't been detected as well as some other environmental topics. in her body. Another six, nine months, we got her tuned up. She also had an undiagnosed gluten sensitivity. So we changed her diet. And lo and behold, six, nine months later, she got pregnant with her first baby. Wow. She was thinking she wasn't that fertile, was still nursing that first baby, and she got pregnant with twins. And then she didn't learn her lesson. But she was still

nursing the twins got pregnant with the four. So that taught me so much. Like she was over 35 when she got started. So to go and have four children so quickly, I just started getting really inspired. Well, how can this be? But what was really dramatic is in eight years, this field of epigenetics has really, really come to the forefront. So it's how we can influence how our genes behave by our environment that we're bathing our genes in. And this work around epigenetics and fertility just is so inspiring now for me to share with men and women what they can be doing in this preconception period to give their baby the best start. But then also to look deeper into why we're having this children's health crisis where I think

there's work that we can do preconception to reduce the chance of the baby having autism. other neurological issues, reduce the risk for getting diabetes and obesity, as well as autoimmunity and so many other things. So we're kind of converging at this really exciting time between what's available in the research on this preconception area, what I've seen for 20 years with my patients, and then we are in this fertility and health crisis. So I'm excited to share with people that there are things that they can do not only to improve their fertility, but to have healthier babies.

You know, I see stories where young women are now like freezing eggs in their 20s and storing them for when they want to have children in the future. Again, I'm a natural law person that just seems outside of nature that we're not acting like we would in nature. Is that something you recommend? Because there's almost a concern that I won't be able to do this. when I want to be able to, when I decide to do it. Two things, right?

There's the fertility preservation conversation that's happening. It's shocking. 28, 30-year-old women are so scared by what they're seeing happen with their friends and family, but then also this narrative that's being shared with them, that they're probably not going to be able to get pregnant naturally. Right. And so they need to start freezing their eggs, which is shocking to me. Yeah.

And then there's also where people, are with the infertility or automatically turning to IVF rather than thinking about the fertility being a check engine light. So when you're not fertile, there's something going on in your body and we need to help you figure out what's going on. Do you have some toxicity? Is your microbiome off? Do you have some inflammation? Do you have some undiagnosed autoimmunity and more and help you get your body into balance? Because what I've seen with my patients is that you could, become super fertile even in your mid-40s. My oldest patient is 47 right now. Wow. She's, I know, that's so fun. It's teaching me that even in your mid-40s, if your body's

really tuned up, you can be very fertile. This particular couple had met later in life and wanted to have a child together. So she had heard about my work and just wanted to know, is it safe? Is it a good idea at 46 to get pregnant. So fortunately she came because we found that she did have some high environmental toxins in her body and she had a low-grade chronic fungal infection that was driving inflammation in our body. So we worked together for about three months. She's supposed to come back and re-check. She'd turn 47 by then. But they had one night. They were just thinking they weren't that fertile, so had fun. Yeah.

And voila. Wow. Baby. So she'll actually be 48 when she delivers in about a month. And she's feeling amazing. And everything looks great with the baby. So it's like, oh, okay, super healthy body and balance, full of nutrients. Of course, your body's ready to procreate.

So you even recommend in this book because I think you take it so seriously that someone that's considering getting pregnant should use some form of contraception to protect against getting pregnant to get their body prepared for that process. Again, let me make the same argument that doesn't seem natural. We used to just have babies. We're just, you know, this is something that should come easily to us. But are you saying our environment is such now that odds are you have toxins we need, we're going to have to address if you want this to really have the greatest success. So even my patients that come in, both the men and the women,

that they think they're doing everything right. You know, they've cleaned up their skin care, they're using air filters, water filters, eating mostly organic. We find some environmental toxins in their bodies. So what I like people to do is to do a science-based detox, which I describe in the book for three, six, 12 months. And then back to the couples that are wanting to protect the fertility, be doing a lot of this in advance of even wanting to try to conceive.

So keep the toxins down in your body by supporting your detox pathways. But especially that three to six months before conception, be very, very careful about it. What's the most common issues you're seeing now? Since we're seeing this dramatic increase in infertility, and on both sides, right, men and women. And so it's 50-50, right? The male fertility has dropped, that sperm count has dropped 50% in 50 years.

And so that's, you know, on average 1% a year, but it's accelerating now. The last count was dropped by 2.6%. Wow. Yeah. And this is a global issue. I mean, we're definitely seeing it everywhere. So I think that the data really points to them. environment. So we're getting food that's less nutrient dense that really runs over at chemistry

and physiology, but we're seeing so much more toxicity, and we know that these toxins affect sperm health. And what are heavy metals? What are the most common things that you find? So heavy metals are definitely up there. It's really challenging to have healthy food. It doesn't have some heavy metals in it, but the biggest thing that I think is hard to avoid are the pesticides, as well as the plastics and the phthalates. It's so ubiquitous in our environment. And then the other thing that's really picking up research is the P-FAS, the non-stick items, that are almost impossible to avoid. There's forever chemicals.

There's forever chemicals. They have a huge impact on epigenetics as well as sperm health and the health of the baby. Wow. I remember my mom was ahead of the game. She never let us eat off of non-stick pans all the way back when. I don't know how she was on that. Is that a thing too, these kids that grow up in households that use those products? Mom was cooking on that. They have to do work to try and get all those things out of their system. That's exactly right. And it's probably even eating out at restaurants and doing takeout, like a lot of those things, the microwave popcorn, a lot of those things, the non-stick, chemicals have leached into the... Wow. And, you know, this is really a conversation for everybody. It's not just for people that are wanting to conceive or the grandparents, the grandparents

really care to me, really care about these issues. This is really for all of us. You know, these same chemicals that affect fertility and affect the epigenetics and the health of the baby are increasing the risk for cancer, autoimmunity, all these things. around longevity, we have to start thinking about all of us really need to be becoming aware of this and I think voting with our dollars, right? If we're putting our dollars towards the organic food and we're not buying the things that have the PFS in them, then that's going to drive the industries to do things differently. The

mattresses, the furniture, all of these things out gas and you know come through our skin and through the air that we're breathing. So we're Really, we need to start to be smart consumers and be aware of what's in the thing, everything that we buy. I imagine you have miraculous stories, but there must be people to think I'm too far gone. That would never work for me. Would you recommend that everyone give it a shot that there's? Absolutely. Like, I see amazing things happen with my patients all the time.

Pertility is just a piece of this. And I love the first story that I shared, you know, going from being. being told you have to adopt, there's no other option for you for healthy, beautiful children. Coming too fast. The floodgates open. I have patients, so many patients too where that story kind of happens. I have to remember to tell people that even if they've had problems with fertility and they've come to see me for, you know, they've developed some autoimmunity or some neurological

issues, early dementia, all the things that if they're under 50, they need to use, have some type of contraception because as the body gets healthy, we're just built to procreate. And it's just really inspiring to see even couples that have had issues with fertility or they've had children that have had issues, right, been on the spectrum or had autoimmunity. Like there's one family that's coming to mind right now where they had issues with fertility. They finally got pregnant. Their first child was, you know, fairly severely on the spectrum. The second child had pans pandas, you know, pretty seriously at a year and a half.

They brought the children to me to help with those things, got those reversed. The parents also started to become patients as well. And then, surprise, they got number three when she was 42. Wow. Because again, they just got, and this child is so healthy. Like, none of the issues that her siblings had to overcome. Is it, do you find, I mean, I would think that men are not as open to thinking there's anything wrong with them over women. Do you find that there's an issue with getting both people in a relationship to say, no, you really both should do this work?

So what I really want men to understand is this three-month period before they start trying to conceive, is that. the greatest gift that they can give. I could get hurried about it actually. Their health is those markers on the epigenetics get passed on to that baby. So if they're super stressed, if they have trauma that they haven't dealt with, if their blood sugar is irregular, if their body's full of toxins, that gets captured as information with the DNA of the sperm and already sets up the baby for future health. So some of the biggest studies around this are, with the Indian populations who went through big famines. So what happens after going through famine,

and it's just the opposite with the obesity, but with the famine, the thrifty genes get dialed up and then can make the future generations gain weight much more easily. Same kind of thing when there's plastics, P-FAS, pesticides that are impacting that the epigenetics of the, sperm, it increases the risk for diabetes, obesity, autoimmunity, cancer, all of these things.

So what I want men to understand is that by them really, really taking care of their bodies, those months before conception, doing this tune-up period, they will impact the health of their future child as well as multiple generations. So really putting that time in and prioritizing their health and even exercise. we know from an epigenetic standpoint. Getting sleep, eating high-quality nutrients will impact their fertility and the health of the baby. There's a study that came out actually after the book

was already at the printer, so I didn't get to include it. But it was so inspiring for me, for men. It was on highly processed foods, so it's all packaged foods. They took men, and just for three weeks, they fed them, they fed one group the highly processed food, and then the other group, the whole foods. Like, just hardly processed and hardly packaged.

The group that was highly processed had poorer sperm quality and count and lower hormones. The group that ate the healthy food, better hormones, better sperm count, and health. Then they did a little washout period, and then they switched them over. replicated it. So even in three weeks, you can dramatically change your sperm's quality in health and have better hormones. So we should probably all, you know, all men should probably know that so that they can, because I think sperm quality is an indication of total body health. So just to know that even committing to healthy food for three weeks can start to change what's going on your body enough that we can measure.

Like if I had seen the study plan, I would have been like, oh, no, three weeks isn't long enough to really see a statistical difference, but it was. So I think, isn't that inspiring to you? Very inspiring. It's very inspiring that, you know, that everyone can make a change at all sides. I would say, you know, you want the star athlete kid, you want the smart child in school to, I don't think we really think about, it all starts once the baby's here,

how we feed them, how we raise them, but to think I might have a huge part in their IQ and their agility ahead of time. I think it's a great message. It doesn't seem to be a mainstream message at the moment. Do you feel like this is a priority that maybe Bobby Kennedy and those in Maha should be focusing on?

Absolutely, I would love to help with that. I, that's why I called the book, The Preconception Revolution, because to me, that information in this book and what I see with my patients could dramatically solve a lot of these issues, the fertility crisis, as well as really put a dent in this children's health crisis that we're in. I was having a baby now, I'd be so concerned by the statistics on the 1 in 31 for autism and the mental health and the diabetes. And I really do think that by putting the effort into this period,

preconception can dramatically help us with this crisis that we're facing. Is this a book that someone that's maybe like, I don't really plan on having kids or we're done with that? Is there valuable information about men taking testosterone we're getting older? Or bioidentical hormones is a huge conversation right now. now with women.

That's a little bit in the book. And I just want to say, if you haven't had your children yet, do not take hormones. If you want to increase your family because those feedback mechanisms on how our bodies make hormones need to be intact and you really start to confuse them, I'm definitely for bioidentical hormones done safely after you've had your kids, but if your testosterone is, you're low we need to look at why there's something going on in your body and we need to figure it out are you not absorbing some of the nutrients that are needed to produce do you have too many toxins you're in your body or is your body fighting a low-grade

infection are you too stressed and actually this thought process is in the book for everybody so it is kind of funny because I've had quite a few of my patients read the book even if they're not in that preconception or pre-grandparent phase because it really does describe a lot of my thinking on how we can be resilient. I'm so grateful for my own health journeys. It's part of why I went from chemical engineering and changed careers at 32 because I couldn't get the help that I needed from the traditional medical field. Yeah. And when my body healed, you know, when I put the puzzle pieces together on what was going on, it was so bad at the time I found out later that the word on the street and at IBM was that I had cancer.

But I just got so inspired at how the body could heal. And then I've had a couple more run-ins, had some ALS-like symptoms from toxic mold. Wow, yourself. And totally recovered from that. but I got to learn about mold toxicity and then developed adult onset asthma a few years later. So these experiences that I've had with things in my own body that aren't supposed to be solvable help me to hold a space for people to know that their bodies can heal, even when it doesn't seem like there's an obvious answer by doing some of the

blocking and tackling, you know, getting the toxins down, building up the microbiome, making sure all the nutrients are there. Our bodies are so wise and so resourceful that I think even the really hard things can heal. Fantastic. Well, the book is the preconception revolution. How do people track the work that you're doing? What's the best place to find you? AntsapemD.com.

And then we're on Instagram. at ANCHIP EMD. We're putting lots of good information on all kinds of different topics. This one's my favorite one right now. But for anybody that's dealing with autoimmunity or mystery illnesses, we've got all kinds of information there. Fantastic. If you'll stick around for off the record,

I want to talk about that transition from being, what did you say? You were a chemical engineer. Yes. Then moving into health and wellness, your personal story with that. We'll talk about that off the record. How's that sound? I'd love that. All right. Great. Well, once again, if you are even considering, maybe you haven't even found the right partner yet, but it's something you know is out there in your future,

you want to get started early. This book has got all that's a really great how-to book. It's so easy to understand the different tests and studies you can do and the things you can do to make changes in your life so that when that child comes, it ends up being the greatest experience both for you and that child. So I highly recommend it. Get this book anywhere you can find a book. Really great. And, you know, speaking of, you know, when we're out there and you want to start a conversation, one of the best conversation starters are to have people recognize that you're one of us. And the best way to do that is to be wearing Highwire merch wherever you go. So take a look at our merch store. We asked and you delivered, showing us how you highwire. This is how we

We Highwire. This is how we highwire. Team Highwire is being rep from all over the world. Sporting our new Highwire gear in the free state of Florida. When I wear this cap, it makes me feel proud. I am a doula and a childbirth educator, and I love wearing my get vaccinated t-shirt. Sometimes it's not just what you wear, it's who you meet while wearing it. When I was wearing this shirt yesterday, a tourist came up to me and said, love that shirt.

Since 2020, when I woke up from The Matrix, I've been talking to neighbors. talking to neighbors, connecting with local groups. There are a lot of people that are a little bit hesitant about approaching the topic of vaccination, and this wearing this shirt allows them to approach me, and I know exactly where to send them. Whether you're dropping the kids at school or marching in rallies across the globe,

we see your dedication, we feel your support. We want to see millions of truth tellers show in the world how they highwire. Head to the highwire.shop to support our mission and stock up on gear for the whole. family. Thank you so much. Keep it up. Thank you for spreading truth. We love you guys. Thanks for what you do. I have to say one of the things I had a lot of pride in was at that rally thinking that every politician from every side had to look out of this audience that was wearing so much highwire

gear. They were everywhere. I want to thank every one of the highwire participants that made it to the rally representing in such a powerful way. It was super cool. And so definitely get yourself some high warmers. I have walked up to people in airports when they're wearing it said, hey, and then they, you know, it's always a fun moment anyway. Look, one last piece of brilliant information to get through is if we haven't already had enough. We're drinking from a fire hose this week for sure.

But the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee had its first meeting, which we live streamed, and you could have been watching, I believe those on Tuesday. Of course, this is, we've celebrated this. Robert Kennedy Jr. put together a great group of autism parents have been dealing with this issue, their whole lives. Some of the great activists in the medical freedom space are on that committee. But one of our favorite activists, I think, made the most dramatic statement. and he wasn't even on the committee.

He was speaking as a public comment. Here's Aaron Siri, weighing in on the interagency autism coordinating committee just the other day. Take a look. This committee has existed for 26 years and under its leadership, autism has risen precipitously.

So I'm hoping for longstanding members of this committee in particular can hear what I'm about to say. National Childhood Acton Act in 1986 it's explicitly provided, quote, the Secretary of HHS will complete a review of all relevant medical and scientific information and the nature of circumstances

and extent of the relationship as any between vaccines containing pertusses and the following illnesses of the conditions. And they listed only 11 of them, one of them, being autism. In 1991, the IOM conducted that review, and it said it couldn't find any studies with regards to pertussis and that testes and autism.

Fast forward to 2009, the CDC and HRSA again commissioned the Ireland to again review all the medical literature with regards to the excessive vaccines and autism. And the IOM again came back and said it could now find a single study that supported that vaccine did not cause autism. They found one study that did find an association between the touch of vaccine and autism, but it threw it out because, quote, it lacked an unvaccinated comparison population. I can't quote. In 2014, A.HRQ, again conducted the same reviews, considered the most comprehensive review as of that time on vaccine safety, according to the HHS.

It again cannot find a single study whether DAP does not cause autism. It also looked at HAPVAS and autism. Again, it could only find one study. And that study found a three-time risk of autism amongst those that got happy in the first month of life. Those those in it did it outside of the University of Cunningbro. In 2017, I interacted with Joshua Gordon, the former head of this committee for a long time, again asked him, could you provide the studies that show that the vaccine is given the first year of life,

six months of life, five of them, denouacal's autism. He never provided me a single study. In 2019, we sued the CDC on behalf of a nonprofit ICANN for the studies that support that the vaccine is given in the first six months of life. Detap, HEP, IPV, and PCV, three times each of non-goal autism. they were not able to provide a single study you can redisticulated order to yourself on ICAN website. That is why today, finally, the CDC website correctly states, quote, pursuant to the Data Quality Act, which requires federal agencies to ensure the quality of activity, utility,

and integrity information is disseminated to the public. This webpage has been updated because the statement, vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim. Scientific studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines contribute to development of autism. However, this statement is historically mean disseminated by the CDC and other federal health agencies within HHS prevent vaccine hesitancy. Approximately one in two survey parents of autistic children believe vaccines played a role

in their child's autism, often pointing to the vaccines with the children's seen in the first time to provide the five that just mentioned earlier. That reality stands. Mr. Sir, I need to ask you to wrap up your comment. Okay. We shouldn't ignore the parents, complaints, we shouldn't ignore the epist studies, and we shouldn't ignore the biological basis for the connection. Thank you. There was a study done out of Henry Ford in Michigan, and it was a Vax versus unvax, but it was unpublished. But it did show a significant entry rate in regards to allergies, asthma, cancer, ADD, ADHD, autism, and many other conditions that were. way more profound if the child was vaccinated and this was taken over a 10-year period of time.

And I do feel that this is a subject that deserves to be addressed. An actual study deserves to be done for these families, for these children, for the health and welfare of them, and to stop this epidemic. Thank you. Obviously, you know, brilliant comments by Erin Sire. I want to give a shout out to Tracy Slepsivik for giving a shout out to really the work that we've doing in an Inconvenient Study, the Henry Ford

study. If you have not watched this movie, go to an Inconvenient Study.com. It's mind-blowing. It's, I think, one of the most powerful tools we've ever made addressing this issue of vaccine risk. This is a once-in-a-lifetime moment to see really a scientist

self-proclaimed pro-vaccine, trying to prove it's wrong, and does the exact opposite by accident. It's an incredible film. Pick up some business cards on an Inconvenant study.com. where you can hand them out and help us spread the word on this movie. This is really what it's going to come down to them. That's what I have to say.

Look, all of these wins are not happening, as I've said, in a vacuum. They're not happening just because we finally have Robert Kennedy Jr. up there in HHS Secretary. In fact, in some ways, he may be working against some of these things. But it's the will of the people that drives the politics of the United States of America. And, you know, when you watch a politician like we saw when that, you know, chair ends up, you know, with zero nays being said, says they won it. You see what we're up against, the level of corruption that's there. And this choice around glyphosate, and I want to announce we just heard as we're coming into this show that the Trump administration has pulled the nomination of Casey.

Dr. Casey Means. As Surgeon General, here's the headline. Trump polls Dr. Casey Means nomination for Surgeon General announces a replacement. I just want to say I saw a lot of debates about Casey Means, but I've had the opportunity to spend a little time with her. We lost a good one there, you guys. We had someone that actually has just given birth. It's spectacular on understanding the importance of informed consent

and stood her ground on that. in the hearings. Obviously, I think that we have, we still have political officials that want pharma shills in there to make it more difficult around Robert Kennedy Jr. You know, the walls are closing in a little bit on Bobby Kennedy. This is going to be a serious blow in there. But look, I, you know, we're lucky every day we have Bobby there is a win. As long as he lasts, that's a win. But none of it is going to change the world without you. none of like you know there is still so much work that needs to be done one administration would never get it done we're always going to get pushed back once we have momentum like we're having but the real momentum the real change happens as we keep enrolling more and more people as we keep reporting to you that now 25% of those pulled worldwide believe that vaccines you know are being used for population control and things like that or could be

I know they're doing it on animals. Why wouldn't they do it on human beings? When we see more than, I think it's 60% of people that are currently pregnant right now in America are saying they are not going to adhere directly to the vaccine schedule, maybe skip some, all, but they're taking back their power. These numbers are astronomical when you would think we were in the 3% and 5% range when the high virus started this back in 2000. That's not because the high wire is amazing.

It is, but it's because you're amazing. Because you keep sharing these stories. You keep sharing these videos and you share the other great voices like Vani Hari and 20 or 30 of the speakers that were in Washington, D.C. We have an amazing match going on right now if you want to donate to the work that we do. We're still fighting in all these cases. We are going to take that West Virginia case. I think it's on its way to the Supreme Court. We're, you know, they've forced our hand, so we're going to take it all the way to the top.

Right now, up to $1.5 million, you can match up to that. So every dollar you give right now gets doubled. So now through June 30th, we're really hoping we can double your impact by supporting our legal efforts for medical freedom. consent and government transparency. There's the Bitley, I can two times impact. I want to thank, there's actually a couple of sponsors that have come together and said, we're going to join hands on this and offer up a match to your folks out there. It's just that type of support that makes us able to just throw Erin Siri right into the fire like you just saw.

you just saw. I mean, not only, you know, is he always fighting for us in court, but look what the guy's been doing in Senate hearings and, you know, an IAC hearing like that. I mean, the best of the best, I can, we're really cooking on all burners right now, and every dollar right now counts. The heat is on. We want to achieve as much as we can. I do not take for granted the fact that we have Robert Kennedy Jr.' as HHS Secretary. I was asked by the press, well, what happens? You know, we've submitted 300 new injuries to the injury table. What happens if he doesn't do it? I said, then I'm going to sue him.

Do you think it'll, you know, that'll be a good thing? He says, it doesn't matter. I'm still going to bring that law to it. We're still going to do this work. But yeah, it matters. Yeah, it matters that the HHS secretary right now is aware of these issues. And we need to bring pressures for him to be able to do things. He's going to have to say, look, I'm being sued.

What do you want from me? So help us bring that pressure. Help us get as much done right now as we can. And so many of you already are. I want to thank those of you that are sponsoring. But if you're listening right now to a podcast version of this, just text 72022. Just type in that number on your phone and write in the word donate.

And I will send you a text back to make it easy for you to double that donation right now. $20 is $40, $100 is $200. $1,000 turns in $2,000. $100,000. If you're out there is going to turn into $200,000 today, this is how we do it. This is how we fight 90 lawsuits across the country. This is how we go and even quietly sponsor a rally without putting our branding all over it. We really wanted this to feel bipartisan, and there was some concerns on that.

You've made that possible for Republicans and Democrats to stand together on an issue you care about by supporting us. So to all that support out there, thank you for those that showed up the rally. Thank you for everyone that watched the rally in our live stream. Thank you for everyone that watched Senator Ron Johnson hearing. Thank you for everyone watched the IAC committee. Thank you. Thank you for being engaged. You give me hope.

You make me realize we are winning. Let's keep that going. And I'll see you next week on the Highwire.