The Highwire with Del Bigtree - Episode 489: mRNA’S NEW TARGET, FARM BILL FIGHT & SEARCHING FOR “THEY” IN FRANCE

Episode Date: August 13, 2026

A new mRNA vaccine is entering the spotlight, and Del is asking whether the lessons we learned during COVID about altering our DNA have been learned or ignored.Then, the battle over glyphosate heats up in Washington as lawmakers from all sides of the table clash over liability protections tied to the Farm Bill.Finally, Del takes his search for “they” to France. What began as a tour for “An Inconvenient Study” quickly became something much bigger, as Del sat down with doctors, scientists, and insiders who were closer to the pandemic response than almost anyone he has interviewed before. Who was really shaping the decisions that changed the world?Guests: Louis Fouché MD, Christian Perronne MD, Vincent Pavan PhD, Xavier Azalbert, Guillemette Crépeaux PhD, Me Diane Protat, and Corinne Lalo.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Have you noticed that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want any corporate sponsors telling me what I can investigate or what I can say. Instead, you are our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. So if you want more investigations, if you want landmark legal wins, If you want hard-hitting news, if you want the truth, go to I Can Decide.org and donate now. All right, everyone, we ready?

Action. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out into the high wire. Speaking of the world, as many of you know, I've been on a bit of a world tour over this summer. And just over two months ago, I took a trip to friends. France where we screened an inconvenient study, the medical freedom groups there did an amazing organizational job where we're actually screening at times to like 30 or 40 different theaters all at the same time. Then the Q&A from the theater I was doing was being broadcast throughout

those theaters. So over two days, you know, we reached thousands and thousands of people with the message of an inconvenience study. It was fantastic. I also did, I think, some of the the most important interviews I've done yet in what I'm calling my In Search of They Tour. Here's a taste of what that was like. We've just arrived in Paris, France. We're going to get to the theater where an inconvenient study is playing. This is Louis Foucher, who is responsible for putting this whole event together, but you were telling me this isn't the only theater it's screaming tonight. Yes, for sure. We have like 50 different series screening the movie at the same time.

And we're warming up for the next viewing. We hope to be 100 and maybe 200. Wow, how amazing is that? He's exposed to the collared of all of his profession. We're having some technical difficulties. Not sure if it's, do you have like a CIA? We're about to start the Q&A and all of a sudden there's a fire alarm going off. In your film, you can see victims who are suffering already dead. Yes, I think this is the important conversation.

We know for a fact some children are killed every year by vaccines. And the victims are considered just as numbers, 10 or 12 years that I was selling vaccination to the people without knowing what I was doing. I have bitterness about that because I have been conducted to do things that now I consider it to be criminal. We are in the Republic Plaza in Paris. This is the majority of the demonstration in France. Anger in the streets across France. As protesters gathered to voice their opposition to what many are calling a health dictatorship. And so a lot of people are gathering there and then going through Paris to demonstrate and say,

we don't agree, we don't agree. Demonstrations in Paris and towns and cities across the nation. We are not agree. here to say to our politics, stop it. We have this reputation to be against the system. 204,000 people took to the streets. But for all the noise, that very same day, more than double the number of people

were quietly getting an injection. France has one of the highest vaccination programs, not just in Europe, but anywhere in the world. With the health pass, which shows whether you've been vaccinated or have had a PCR test within 72 hours, suddenly needed to enter restaurants, museums, cafes and bars, and now extended to employees of any business that serves the public.

How do you have a movement if you're already doing something you don't want to do it? Does it make you give up on it or does it make you fight harder? In 2020, I refused to have a face mask in front of my student. I was suspended for three years. 60% say it's high time that the government stopped believing their own lives. This is like day four or five on three. three to five hours of sleep. Thank God.

I love what I do. Fauci? Tony Fauci got him as number one. He's number one. What's wild about this is this is mastermind. They're on a global scale. You're the highest ranking vaccine official that I have ever interviewed. I saw your new film.

I was shocked. I'm heading to Leon. Beyond that, I have no idea what time it is. Hello, We'll be happy, Enchanté, I know. I know.

In a Ensemble of the If we have We will not have more freedom than we have right now. America cannot fight this alone.

I can't I believe that there's something much bigger than all of us that's going on. It's the last night in Paris it's been an amazing trip. We were just on.

a barge right around the corner having some wine, cheese, and conversations with some freedom fighters here in France. They're all saying the same thing. We need to be encouraged. We need to be empowered. This is an international issue. I just said to them, if you don't stand up now, then we will lose. I'm going to share some of the most important interviews I did and sections of discussion that we had, some, some of it repetitive, some of it seeing what the saying the same, but what's new? I ended up interviewing who I think is now the highest ranking vaccine official I have ever spoken. We're talking about running the vaccine department for France. What did they know? We're going to get to that in just a few minutes. But first,

it's time for the Jackson Report. I'm about to talk about all the problems with France, but what's happening here in America? Well, Delo, I want to talk about the COVID shot. Oh, great. Actually, the COVID shot technology, which is MRNA technology. It's a whole new novel technology that was forced through because, you know, there was an emergency. Well, the emergency is over and that technology is over, right? Well, not so much. Check this out.

Your flu shot could soon look a little different. Moderna has been given the green light for the first ever MRNA flu vaccine. The Food and Drug Administration yesterday approved the country's first flu shot. that uses MRNA technology. With MRNA vaccines, you can produce them much more quickly, means you can also update the vaccine more efficiently. The traditional way to make a flu vaccine is through chicken eggs. That takes six months.

This process you can do in theoretically 100 days. So that allows a shorter turnaround time. There did not seem to be any safety signals or concerning risks other than the traditional side effects that we see from flu vaccine. There were two serious side effects that they saw in the trials, somebody with low blood pressure and somebody with myocarditis. But the vaccine effectiveness was higher than for the standard flu vaccines. We have tens of thousands of people every year who die from flu. You're much less likely to be hospitalized and die.

If you've gotten this vaccine, it clearly works. It's clearly safe. And I think it's an important addition to the armamentarium in our fight against flu. What we have here, obviously, is a new flu shot. Here's the New York Times. This is the headline breaking this news. FDA approves Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine. You can see here they reverse course the FDA because of public outcry.

I don't know what kind of public outcry there was. We've got a MRNNA vaccine. Sure, okay. Yeah, that happened. I don't know. Okay. So you go in there and you read this article and the excerpt says, Dr. Persad, remember Vinay Prasad?

He was the biologics director. He took over Peter Mark's position at the FDA. Dr. Persad's chief criticism of Moderna's flu vaccine application was that it compared the company's vaccine with one made by GSK that is not considered the best in class. Such a tactic in Dr. Prasad's view was meant to skew the results in Moderna's favor. So here we go. No placebo control. Right. That's the point, right? I mean, we're still comparing to another product. There's no other MRN like it. This is not, this should be a saline. And honestly, I've been talking to reporters, by the way, been calling me on this, Jeffrey. And the point I'm making

is you all seem confused about the difference between an efficacy study and a safety study. You can study efficacy. Is it better than the other ones on the market? Fine. But you can't get safety, especially when those other ones on the market, we're never in a placebo study against a placebo. Everyone just seems mystified by this thought, but you and I and everyone watching this show. But go ahead. Let's see what else is ridiculous about this new vaccine. Yeah, so no true placebo. In fact, they chose a comparator. that was an inferior comparator. If you're going to choose a comparator, they chose one of the worst ones. So obviously that hides these side effects, these profiles. So this, it was in May of this year.

This was posted in England Journal of Medicine. This is their safety and efficacy of this seasonal flu vaccine. But here's the thing. The InformConsent Action Network actually sent a letter to the FDA's independent Verpac committee before they voted on this. They warned them. We actually went through and showed them the science. They had a chance. Here is the ICANN better. Verpack Green Lights, Modern is MRNA flu shot despite risks. And you can go in here and you can see this list that we broke down for them. It was all right there. Unfavorable benefit to risk ratio. It reduced absolute influenza risk by only 0.8 percent while it had a 6.4 percent adverse reaction profile. You can see concerning patient deaths. They had more deaths in part A of the trial than they did with the standard flu shot that they were using.

Obviously no placebo. they only use the single season's data. So many issues with this study, but off it goes. How did this happen? I thought Maha was in here. And let's look at how this happened. There's a forensic breakdown of how this happened. So you can see just five months ago, this was the headline. In fact, we reported on this headline. FDA refuses to review Moderna's flu-MRNA flu vaccine. Why did it do that? Well, like they said earlier in the New York Times, It was Dr. Veney Prasad, and he put out this letter, and in this letter, he says this. This is actually the denial letter that Moderna received.

It says, we are refusing. This is the FDA. We are refusing to file this application under 21 CFR, 601, a bunch of numbers. And why are they doing this? It does not, Seabird does not consider the application to contain a trial adequate and well-controlled, and the application is therefore on its face inadequate for review. So go back. Do not do not get out jail free. Do not pass go. You're gone. You're done. And remember a leaked memo from Veney Prasad when he was in there people within the agency leaked it to the Washington Post and it says this we will require this Vinay Prasad to staff members at the FDA

He's trying to set a culture there. He said we will revise the annual flu vaccine framework which is an evidence-based catastrophe of low-quality evidence poor surrogate assays and uncertain vaccine effectiveness measured in case control studies with poor methods. We will reappraise safety and be honest in vaccine labels. Well, that sounds like a wish. No, no. And in fact, because he pushed back on that, presumably, he received this treatment here. This is 12 former FDA chiefs blast preside's move to tightened vaccine standards.

They posted this in the New England Journal of Medicine as well. They just kind of whip this up. And of course, he stepped down, or there was a little cloudiness referring to how he left the agency, but he stepped down just recently. So here we go, just a couple months ago. Here we go. We're back to this. Now, this MRNA technology, the flu shot was kind of the lowest hanging fruit here.

So the question is, are we going to see MRNA technology now start to displace traditional vaccines on the recommended schedule? And this will be, I've spoken to some experts in this field. will be obviously the first shot now, MRNA technology that will be in the injury compensation program. So what does the safety profile look like? What does the injury table look like? This changes everything.

This is a very, very big move. And it's exactly what we were afraid of. They skipped the very first attempt of warp speeding this MRNA technology under the market. We watched them skip out of the proper safety trial with an emergency use authorization that essentially was determined after, I think, 100 and, what was it 40 or 80, 100, I forget the exact numbers, but less than 200 of the 40,000

in the study got infected. And from those, that handful of people, they made an assertion that it was 95% effective and they put it on the market. And then, because it was then available, they said it was unethical to keep it unavailable to the placebo group since the rest of the world can get it. And they vaccinated the entire placebo group. And our concern, Jeffrey, was they were going to say now, well, every MRI, in the future, we've already proven its safety with the COVID vaccine when they did nothing but they skipped out of it. We're not in an emergency now, but they're now essentially just running on the safety of MRNA, which you and I both know, as we've reported turbo cancers, myocarditis,

pericarditis, anaphylaxis, blood clots, you know, you name it. This thing is an absolute disaster technology. And as I said, and I want to quote Brett Weinstein as best as I can, paraphrase, I thought he put it best. It's like, it doesn't matter that this MRI was of the spike protein, the worst part of the COVID vaccine. This delivery system, this fatty lipid that was designed to bring cancer drugs to your brain does not stay where it's supposed to. Instead, we know it's designed to go to your liver, to go to your ovaries, and essentially go to your heart and place a foreign protein inside of heart cells, and that is making your immune system now attack those cells. Your heart does not regrow those cells. And any attack, any form

protein, no matter how benign that protein, it's the foreign nature of it that's going to cause scarring on the heart. This technology, he said, is doomed from the very beginning. I think that this is the best way to explain at least the problem that they're going to have to prove that they remedied, and they clearly have not proved that they've remedied that. So now everyone lining up for their flu shots are now putting themselves at risk once again for all sorts of harms. I miss Vinay Prasad. I don't understand what happened there. It feels like, you know, the cabinet that Bobby was putting around him to try and push him to Jen. I've all been removed, and he's this lone man on an island all alone attempting to achieve miracles. Obviously, for some

reason, he couldn't stop this. The river's flowing. This is bad news. And all we can do now is what we do, Jeffrey, warn the public. Tell your loved ones, especially. This is like 50 or 60 years older, right? It's for elderly right now? Yeah, yeah, 50 and older and then fast track for 65 plus. All right, well, let all of your loved ones that are in that age bracket know if they have to get a flu shot, maybe go with one of the other ones. Obviously, the flu shot, as we've reported extensively, causes more, about four or five times the amount of upper respiratory issues other than flu once you've taken that vaccine.

So it's only weakening your immune system. But there we are. It just keeps on pushing. Pharma won't stop until we finally shut it all down. And I want to say, Adel, the difference when we were reporting on this technology in near real time during the COVID rollout of this vaccine was there were less people watching. There's a lot more people awake, aware, staring at these moves right now. There's a lot of people who aren't agreeing with how this is going down. So industry is on notice, and they continue to be now, it's not just a vaccine conversation here. It's also the conversation now this is moving into crop chemicals and pesticides. We just had last week the Farm Bill markup.

A lot of eyes on this Farm Bill. They have till September to agree on kind of the aspects of the Farm Bill and push this through. So the markup is when they all get together, they sit in this long table in a room and they go line by line and say, do we agree on this line or do we not agree on this line? Let's debate it. Well, here's Corey Booker bringing up the conversation that a lot of people watching this show are really concerned about. Take a look. All right. Mr. Chairman, I ask to be recognized to call up on Amendment Booker number one and have it considered for a vote.

Thank you, sir. On April 27th, I was at the Supreme Court to rally with farmers, farm workers, doctors, working parents, cancer survivors, and, frankly, Republicans and Democrats to raise concern about a case that would give giant chemical corporations a free pass when their toxic products make people sick. The name given to the rally was the people versus poison. The purpose of the rally was to draw attention to the fact that the Supreme Court was considering a case that day, Monsanto versus Dernel, in which Bear was asking the court for a liability shield so that people who developed cancer after using that toxic pesticide glyphosate would not be able to have their day in court to hold Bear accountable. In June, the Supreme Court,

gave bare their liability shield. Holding the EPA approval of a label gives giant pestified manufacturers permanent immunity from lawsuits about their failure to warn people about the known health risks of their products. My amendment does two things. It states our federal pesticide law known as FIFRA does not block people's legal right to bring failure to warn claims in state court. And second, it explicitly authorizes pesticide companies to add warnings about cancer and other serious health risks to their pesticide labels. It restores the fundamental right of cancer victims to have their day in court. It restores the freedom of states to require stronger public health warnings when lives are on the lines. To my colleagues,

claim to support public health and the Maha movement. This is the chance to stand with us. You cannot claim to want to make America healthy again while voting to protect corporate profits over cancer victims. I urge a yes vote on this amendment to reverse this misguided Supreme Court ruling. Mr. Chair, with that, I move to that Booker number one be voted on and request a roll call vote. by the clerk, the amendment fails. Wow.

So there we go. So it fails there. There's other opportunities that still needs once they vote on this, which they did not, once it passes out of the markup, I should say, because they did not do that. Here's Politico Bozeman. He's the head of that committee

to reconvene Farm Bill Markup after vote failed. He says, he's the Agricultural Committee chair. He says it's going to be a miracle if this thing gets passed before midterm. So there's a lot of tension there. there's a lot of static in trying to pass this bill. Well, one of the conversations here is glyphosate. It's a whole farm bill, right?

It's not just this glyphosate issue, but is it this glyphosate issue that is holding the whole thing up, or are there other problems going on with it? Oh, there's several other problems as well. This is just one of them. There's a lot of farm industry that, pushing and pulling a lot of industry that are trying to get their pieces in there of the bill. It's not just one thing, like most large bills. So there's a lot of contentious aspects of this bill.

It would take a whole hour to go through all of them. But the glyphosate issue really is the gift that keeps on giving of indemnity protection from lawsuits to these foreign companies like Barron-Singenta. And for our audience, this is probably not new news. And I would imagine a lot of people listening, they know glyphosate's bad, but just the sheer amount of studies that are coming out, just two in the last couple months. Massive ones. This is one of them right here. Glyphosate, common pesticide damage human DNA at low levels. Why is this a big deal? Well, it says this in an article. For the weakly glyphosate, the researchers saw cell damage at the lowest levels tested, suggesting that there is almost no safe level of human exposure. It was the first time

several of the pesticides were tested for impacts on DNA, and the first study to confirm certain mixtures of the pesticide were toxic to cells as well. And then another one, this is in the New York Post, So these are going mainstream like almost every week. Herbicide hated by Maha, that's glyphosate, maybe causing pregnant women to give birth prematurely. It says the study showed that women who had evidence of glyphosate in their bodies at 10 to 25 weeks of pregnancy about midway through were more likely to have their babies

at least three weeks early. Preterm birth is the leading cause of villainous and death in children under five. So you definitely don't want that. And people out there watching this may say, I'm done, I'm not using pesticide, they're literally not even selling it. Are you living next to a golf course?

Are you living next to a municipal park? Are you living next to a municipal building or an office building that has like greens or grounds there? You got to check this out because the drift is real. It gets into the water supply. The stuff is toxic. The studies have shown it. This is not going out on a limb here. It's not fringe science.

This is, you know, I hate to say it, but somewhat settled science that this chemical is toxic to living things. It kills insects and it hurts people. These are the studies that show this. I actually had a conversation recently with a mom at an event, and she was like, we didn't vaccinate our child, but they have massive autoimmune issues, all sorts of breathing and asthma conditions. We have cleaned up the food supply. We eat only organic. We drink bottled water. And I was like, yeah, I mean, it's hard to so many different toxic impacts. And she says, I mean, my husband is a golfer and we live on a golf course, which is something I've been questioning. I was like, I mean, well, there you go. Can we have him drive a little bit?

Get away from the golf course. That could very, is fully potentially living right on it. Can you imagine what is spraying into those houses? Anyway, Jeffrey, great reporting as always. Look forward to seeing you on the download on Monday. Rocking it out there. It's great to be getting the week started with you and some of the news that's affecting our lives when we're planning on the high wires. So keep up the great work, Jeffrey.

I'll see you next week. All right, thank you. You know, when you think about being a donor for ICANN and the High Wire, I just want you to watch. We can't always talk about the strategy, but we are hitting from every direction we can. We are playing on multiple fronts. When you watch Cory Booker there,

I think a lot of people would say, you know, the High Wire is a conservative newsnet. What truth is is is we're not political. I've said it. I'm politically marooned. I care about the issues. I don't care who says it. I want both Democrats and Republicans to believe in

I want both Democrats and Republicans to say everybody has a right to choose my body, my choice. I decide what goes into it. I want both Democrats and Republicans to stand for parental rights. This should not be partisan. These issues should not be partisan. Both parties should be holding Anthony Fauci in contempt right now. I'm going to keep working towards that dream. I mean, a guy has to dream, right?

Anyway, as we had that dream, there are moments where we actually do have that win. When you sponsor I can, we were the funding body behind all the money that we could raise through t-shirts and stuff. We were the ones that paid for the licenses for people versus poison. We put together that event, whereas Cory Booker described it right there, Republicans stood next to Democrats, farmers stood next to doctors, regenerative farmers stood with mainstream farmers. This is how we make change. And look, it's still working. It's still a voice. It might have just failed a vote there, but the voice is alive and well because we,

lit that fuse. We lit that fuse and it continues to burn. That is where these victories are coming from. If we weren't here, who would be lighting the fuse? Where would it start? Who would people put people in front of the Supreme Court? So if you can donate today, become a recurring donor, $26 a month during 2026 is what we're asking for, but any amount. If you want to do one large sum, you don't like to do the monthly thing, then do that. Whatever you can give will also help you feel a little piece of victory when you hear Corey Booker using our words. That's what this is all about. So speaking of words, there's been a lot of words around the COVID pandemic. The most frequent ones are we should forget it. We should put it in our rearview mirror. Obviously,

it's not in our rearview mirror. It's frontline news right now with what's going on with Anthony Fauci. And I have been touring the world. I'd sort of thought I understood COVID almost completely until I started meeting all of these experts in other countries. You watched our breakdown of my interviews with Italy, where I was finally, I think, forced to face enough evidence to say, clearly this was some form of a pandemic. There were plans ahead of time that cannot explain the way Italy, you know, was in lockstep, how immediately they were told not to use hydroxychloroquine and other things,

how immediately they said put them on ventilators and remdesivir, How immediately they said, we're going to pay you more for COVID. Well, now we're in France. And now I'm talking to the experts there. Remember, I am not just talking to some doctor. These literally, some of them are the best of the best. In fact, one of the highest ranked vaccine experts I have ever spoken to is coming up. But first, let me start with the man that made this tour possible.

It also was the leading voice in building the medical freedom resistance. He was a doctor on the front lines saving people's lives until they tried to destroy everything he was doing. This is Louis Foucher. Dr. Louis Foucher, that's my name. And the first thing that we have to say when we go in any media is that I don't have any conflict of interest with any pharmaceutical back sort of industry, anything that earns money in any way. Actually, I lost nearly everything during this period. And I'm specialized in intensive care and critical care medicine.

You could compare me to Pierre Corrie, that maybe the audience would know, meaning that most of our patient have critical condition. And just like we are plumbers of the body. Breathing, circulating, neurologic function, renal and metabolic function, epithic and digestive function, and ematologic function. I used to work in the public hospital of Marseille, and it's a big hospital, it's a university hospital, and so second most important institution in France. Within the very heart of COVID, we were told this it's going to be awful, and we will be in what we call masca, mass casualties plan. You will be overwhelmed with the patient. And so we were just like, oh wow, what's going to happen? We were afraid.

And from that moment, Han, we receive webinars, information, protocols coming from Paris and coming from the WHO and coming from China, telling you should do that. You should do remdesivir. You should intubate very early. You should not use this and this. Everything that we knew were wrong, randesivir was bullshit. We knew it from before, from Ebola and from before. Intubate early, we know it's not good because when you intubate and put mechanically. ventilation that means you put sedation and if you put sedation that means the patient is not moving

anymore if it is not moving anymore is losing all these muscles it makes some erosion of the of the skin it will you will need to feed them and it will overwhelm the nurses with a workload which is overwhelming them and our rate of letality for the first waves of COVID was zero percent wow the one who were respecting the protocols they are they had between 30 to 40 percent of letality which is considerable. Was it hard to treat? No. That was nearly one of the easiest

disease that we have. As I told you, most of the patient we must intubate with no adrenaline and renal replacement. I'm used to doing a bunch of them. You didn't have to do any of those things. Just oxygen and wait and watch. And it's hard for the patient

for like two or three days. It will be like, and that's all right. But, you know, one of the most difficult things for the patient was to, be insulated because they saw they were they had like ebola and their disease was so hard so psychologically seeing all the healthcare provider with big mask and all the equipment is what's just like oh wow wow what's happening to me and there was has mad stress like you die for the patient you know so you're having a 100%

success rate in your ward you are doing things differently than another local hospital they're having a 30 or 40% lethality do you get celebrated Did they celebrate and did the WHO sent specialists and say, brilliant job, what are you doing? You're doing better than everyone else. Sure. I received the medal, no. When we told our chief in Paris and things like that, that we could do otherwise, they said, you're a murderer.

You're a murderer. You shouldn't dare that. But we had zero percent of letality. This is just crazy. And the media we're telling, it's so harsh, we're all going to die. This is so severe, you know, that we have to train. transfer by TGV, by the train, we have to transfer the patient to another one because we have jammed all the wards. But the intensive care units in France, they are already naturally jammed because we have an administrative, compulsory thing.

We must be filled more than 90%. Otherwise, we lose our funding. They say, oh, you don't have your bed, you have bed empty. Your nurses are not useful. We're going to put away your funding. and you're going to lose. So we're already all the time. We try and stay packed and fall. And this organization make that we were never jammed and everything was going all right.

But, you know, in the end, we had a report in France about the activity of the hospital named ATIH, Langeance Technique for Information Hospitalia, the technical agency for hospital information. And they said that during 2020, there was only 2% of the hospitalization

that concerned the COVID. And in the intensive care unit, there was only 5% of hospitalization that concerned the COVID. I mean, this jamming thing of the intensive care unit is just a lie. It was so strange for me that I had to cry for help,

sending a message in my whole hospital saying, can we discuss of what's going on? And I received like 10 answer really harsh saying that I was a conspirationalist, that I shouldn't say that. But I received a hundred other answer of people privately, not publicly with everybody in the loop, and privately they said, you're right. Myself, I'm asking the question, what's happening?

Thank you for opening this object. They wouldn't do it in a group, but I'll put it to stop. I mean, it's amazing how few doctors felt empowered. When you look at how this thing was planned and put together, they knew what doctors were made of. They knew all they had to do was attack the Louis Foucher. shut down the Louis Fiches of the world. And this is what I've discovered.

Our best and brightest were the ones that were taken out during COVID. We are left with the drones now of medicine around the world. Those that will just do what they're told. Those that will just say to Louis Fichet on the side, thank you so much for what you're doing. I really appreciate it. I can't speak up. I'm not going to support you, but I know you're telling the truth.

And boy, I hope you win on that all by yourself. those heroes that stood on their own are still the most amazing. And maybe the only hope we have is we look to the future for a pandemic they keep saying is not if, but when. I had the opportunity to sit down with Dr. Christian Perone, who is the highest ranking official. This man was responsible for the vaccine program in France for, I think, 15 years, responsible for a vaccine program all over the world, in fact. So what did he know?

What did he recognize? And what happened? How did this guy suddenly get flagged in the middle of COVID? I mean, wasn't he on board? Wasn't he in those original meetings? Was he not at Event 201? Why wasn't he there? Watch this.

I was a chairman of one of the major public health institution to counsel the governments about public health issues, epidemics, vaccination. And I was the president of the official vaccination committee to counsel and manage the vaccination policy in France. They get safe to say that you're the highest ranking vaccine official that I have ever interviewed. What was it that first happened with COVID that just stood out? So when the COVID crisis arrived, immediately I saw that it was. a great manipulation. And I was very popular in the mainstream media during years. I was sometimes sent by the Ministry of Health and I was many times at the prime time on

the main TVs to speak about vaccination, infectious disease crisis and so on. So I had many friends among the journalists and at the beginning of the COVID crisis, I was invited several times a week from March 2020 to the end of August. Every week I was on the TVs, but Macro and his team and the Minister of Head were very upset. What were you saying? I was demolishing all their narrative every week. I spoke about the mask, about the hydroxychloroquine, which was censored about the PCR tests, which were designed to diagnose false cases in the people in the perfect condition.

And after that, on vaccines and so on. So specifically, did you believe COVID was truly an epidemic? Was it dangerous to everybody? No, it was not so dangerous. After August 2020, the government was so upset that they made a press release to all the media, to all the TVs. Now you are not allowed anymore to invite Professor Perron because he's a charlatan. They published it to the word.

No one is allowed to. interview you and no longer. Some, a few TVs continued to invite me, but at the end they had a huge fines. They find them. They find them. The director general of this group, of the hospitals, I knew him very well because sometimes we had some friendly relationship before. One day at 7 o'clock in the morning, I had to come to his office in Paris, and And he gave me a letter where I was a charlatan that I was responsible for death trade for young colleagues because he invented a whole story. And that I was fired from my position of head of my department.

I was head of the department for, I don't remember exactly, maybe 25 years. And after that, the National Order of Physicians, which control all the physicians in France, trial me at the disciplinary commission one day. The National Order wanted me to be fired. They would like to withdraw my license to practice. Wow, it's quite a judgment, it was amazing when I went outside from the order of physician, the verdict was not yet available.

It was a few weeks later. A few weeks later, there were 3,000 people in the street to support me. For me, it was a fantastic warm for my heart, you know, because of this popular support, it was fantastic. But it was a difficult period for me. Do you believe there was an agenda from the beginning behind it? Yes, because... And I remember there was a group of German lawyers who sent me a list of all the citations of the future coronavirus pandemic.

Even Bill Gates had been the event 2-01 in Baltimore. He made a special repetitions just a few weeks before the start of the pandemic. And if you look at what was said, it was not about how to manage the patients, the death, they didn't care about that. Their only speech was, oh, when the pandemic will occur, there will be some misinformation, fake news among journalists, the population, how to control the people, how to control the this fake news. It was their only...

Communication was all they cared about not. After that, I think that what they want always maintain the populations in fear. If you remember the Nuremberg trial for the Nazi officials. One guy asked to, I think it was Gehring, the Nazi general, how did you do to control like that? It's very easy to control the population. The only thing you have to control the population,

to do is to threaten them. Every day on the TV, they said you are all at risk of death tomorrow, and people were really frightened, and they asked for the vaccination to save them. It was terrible. I mean, he's right. All you have to have is fear, fear and people will do whatever you want, and fear doctors will do what they want, obviously. I mean, this guy, look how he describes himself, where he was at. He's running the vaccine program. He's the vaccine program. He's the the guy you call to be on television. He's almost like they're Anthony Fauci, but God forbid you reasonably say, wait, something doesn't make sense here. This isn't adding up. Your numbers are wrong. This is wrong. And suddenly now, like, you're the bad guy. It's amazing that they were

able to achieve this all around the world. I've got some more incredible insights that Perona gives us. But first, I want to talk about outside of the science, what happens in academia? You know, we know that the doctors are controlling the people, but what about the universities? This is a mathematician that was working in a university, and like many of the others we've spoken to, could crunch data. That's what he does. Statistics, you name it. This is his talent. What happens to a guy who lives in a world of math, where there is no guessing. There is only fact. This is Vincent Pavon. My name is Vincent Pavon. I am a mathematician. I work at university. And one day in 2020, I refused to have a face mask in front of my student. And then I was suspended for three years by my university. At that time, I became an activist in order to defend the freedom, of course, and to fight against false.

science, especially in the fields of mathematics and prediction. Because since the beginning of the decision during COVID were made upon modeling, especially, for instance, by Neil Ferguson in Imperial College. All these models, all these predictions are completely false. Were you shocked that you could not make a reasonable argument with the university? Yes, yes, I was really because normally university, you know, it is the land of freedom, of, you know, controversy, of being critical of yourself and of the other, and it is a space of discussion. It was not possible for me to imagine such a situation where rational arguments could not be heard by my colleagues. So especially in the domain of mathematics, because we have a very

high level of proof and I wrote about 100 pages of proof and mathematical computation to tell my colleagues, okay, look at this, look at it. I can be wrong or if I am wrong, please tell me, please look at what I have written, but nobody did it. How do you explain that? Because now you're talking about a university. This isn't even the health care system. Why is the head of your university? Who's talking to them? Who's telling them fire anyone that asks the question? In France, face masks were mandatory at school, at university, even for very small children. And, you know, normally at university you are free to do your teaching the way you want. The only condition is tolerance and objectivity.

So my point of view was objectivity is that face masks are useless. So tolerance is not to make them mandatory. That's very simple. And it was for me an argument so that teachers in elementary school or secondary school could use in order to prevent their pupils to have masks, which were really, you know, harmful to the children. And the state, probably, the administration and the presidents didn't want me to have this argument in the university so that no teacher at elementary school could use it. We can't have the disease of critical thinking spreading throughout this university. There will be a problem. Yeah, a very big problem.

When I was suspended, I began writing books and thinking about politics and philosophical politics. And my question was, how, you know, a totalitarian system, use science to rule people? For me, it was very strange because science is not met for politics. politics is a free debate and science when you have the truth of science nothing can be debate so if you tell that science is the basis

for politics then you cannot decide for anything and this is you know interesting thought I hadn't thought about that something because if you think of science like math you can't fake math math has one result it's not there's no opinion

about it politics there's no proof that one way of politics is better than another just an opinion. So it's interesting. Science, math should never get involved with something that can't be decided.

Yeah, exactly. If life is put in mathematics, you can decide to anything. And this is the reason why, you know, the government in France told us you can doubt about everything except

figures. Right. So if everything is infidious, you have nothing to say. And this is the danger of mathematics, because if everything is mathematics, so people can't decide. As you told. They have no free will, really. Exactly. Interesting. It's a very interesting point.

Of course, obviously, he saw the same red flag we did in the Neil Ferguson Imperial College modeling, which said that millions and millions of people were going to die. This guy, I mean, obviously, what we talk about, Neil Ferguson, is the definition of failing forward. He was wrong. He's had cattle slaughtered all over England for no reason. Oops was wrong about bird flus and hoof and mouth the disease. I mean, this guy is Bill Gates' destruction master. And here you had a mathematician saying, none of this adds up. This is what I do for a living.

These numbers are wrong. We're not allowed to recalculate them. What do you mean we're not allowed to recalculate them? I mean, all the way down to the university level, heads of universities, are being told stop the math, stop the science, none of that is allowed, and they went along with it. But I thought Vincent made a very, very interesting point that I was reflecting on some of the things that happened last week when he's talking about how he believes what was dangerous is that when math and politics comes together. And it made me think about why our country is supposed, in the United

States America, we're supposed to have separation of church and state. Part of it's because if your minister, your religious leader says, God told me to tell you to vote Democrat or God told me told you to vote for so-and-so, how do you refute that? If God is speaking through, you know, the person I'm listening to, then I can't argue that. It's an unfair advantage or space where it's totally subjective. Every politician, we have the right to choose. There's no perfect solution there. Odds are, we probably know they're all lying a little bit. But he talks about it with math as being the same thing that if politics attaches itself and says, this is the math, this is the science.

Math and science aren't supposed to be debatable. There's supposed to be facts. And when they state this is the fact, you no longer can vote. You are no longer, now you have an authoritarian ideas set by science because it's supposed to be irrefutable. There's no argument here. And it made me think, if you've been watching the show when I was questioning, why are the Democrats so in lockstep with Fauci? What is it they're standing behind? They believe in they want to keep gain of function going.

They want to be able to lock us down again. They don't want to stop that. But it made me think maybe it's just this. Because they keep saying, right, the Democrats like to say, we're the party of science. And by doing that, what they're saying is, we're the party with irrefutable evidence. We can't be questions. You're not allowed to question us, which is perfect for an authoritarian outlook, which is you can't question us because we have the science. I mean, unfortunately for them, the science just pled the fifth on their behalf, but you see how they want to use it.

You're not allowed to question me. The experts have spoken. We do not look at the doctrine. You must believe because there is no question here. Super fascinating. I thought talking about math and politics together. Now, if there was one real smoking gun in this argument that this was all planned, you know, on top of the things I found in Italy or in even Japan, but listen to what happened in France right before. Imagine you had a product that would have been great for just a scenario like this, but suddenly it's made almost impossible to get to.

Watch this. Hydroxychloroquine in France was, you can buy it without any prescription in any pharmacy. You can buy them like sweets or gums or throat. Right, and buy it like candy. Yes, over the counter without any condition. Complications were very rare. Millions of people took chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in France, in the former French colonies in Africa, Asia, during decades. without any problem.

And before the pandemic arrived in France, I think it was in February, the Minister of Health at that time, Agnes Buzin, passed a text to put hydroxychloroquine to put it with a mandatory prescription, just a few weeks before it arrived. No way. Weeks before there's any COVID understanding,

the Minister of Health in France, decides to pass the law that hydroxychloroquine, which is being sold like candy, you can just get it without a prescription. Now it must require a prescription just before. And after that, when the pandemic arrived in France, Did you have treated many patients. I followed him, I treated many patients in my hospital. And in Marseille and in my hospital,

we had the lowest rates of death in all France. And we published our experience. It was in a preprint. At that time, all my assistants as a team in my hospital were fully with me. It was a bit excited. Like you're like we've got an answer. But when the preprint was published on Internet, it was terrible. The leaders of the hospital groups called them, my colleagues, and they said,

If you continue to follow your stupid and foolish boss, who is now a charlatan, your career will be finished, you know. But, I mean, they're working for you. They see the success. No one stood up for you. No one said you're wrong. They were not courageous, and they withdraw the article from the preprint site. I was upset about that, but I couldn't fight with all my colleagues within my department. It was so difficult. I was alone. And when the false paper in the Lancet from Merah... You're talking about the surgesphere.

Yes. Saying that it was published just the time of the first wave, saying that a huge number of people in the world died because of hydroxychloroquine. The day the Lancet was published, our Minister of Health Olivier Veron has forbidden the prescription of hydroxychloroquine for liberal physicians. I wrote three books about the COVID crisis. The first one,

is there any mistake that they didn't commit? It was the title of my book, published in June 2020. Is there any mistake they didn't commit? Like, meaning everything they did was wrong. It was the bestseller in France. It was a fantastic success. They were very upset.

I want to revisit some of what he just covered there because we may have forgotten it. I know, like I live and breathe. this stuff. I'm so fascinated by these interviews because I'm, you know, the pieces, these little tiny pieces are all starting to fit together. But if you remember hydroxychloroquine, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, says, look, it sounds like we have a product that might work. I want the FDA to make it readily available. And then Henry Ford Health, run by what? Dr. Marcus Zervos, the center of our film and inconvenient study. This was his study. Hydroxion

chloroquine lowers COVID-19 death rate. Henry Ford's study finds it found that there was a 50% reduction in deaths amongst those that were treated with hydroxychloroquine versus those that did not receive it. That had to be undone. As we've discussed this so much, remember, Tony Fauci, the world, needed this vaccine rushed onto the market. They couldn't get the emergency use authorization unless there was no other product that could protect people or save people or help people. And all of a sudden, this is the part Christian Peroni brings up the Lancet study, which was the surgesphere study, and this changed everyone. Everyone said, oh, see, look, hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. Surgesphere governments in W. Cho changed COVID-19 policy based on suspect data from a tiny U.S.

company. In fact, doctors all over the world says, where's your data come from? And listen to this, a guardian investigation you can reveal the U.S.-based company Surgesphere, whose handful of employees appear to include a science fiction writer and an adult content model. That was Surge's fear. It ended up being complete and total fraud, but nobody corrected it. They used that study to say hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. People have died. It was pure baloney made by fiction writers and porn stars, but even in France it affected them.

That's how they shut it down. But that's all we'd covered up until this moment. Now think about this. hydroxychloroquine. Didier Raute, it comes from France, this idea, right? He's one of the masters of hydroxychloroquine. He's the one that says this is easy to treat. How do you know that?

Because it was the drug they found during the original SARS outbreak. Nearly a decade earlier, Tony Fauci did a study his name was on, saying hydroxychloroquine is not only good at treating, it's good at protecting from SARS. So they knew what drug was going to be used, and suddenly, randomly, a couple of weeks before the next coronavirus comes into France, they take a drug that is used for everything from river blindness to lupus. Everyone's taking it.

It's literally over the counter. People pop this stuff like candy worldwide. Suddenly they move it to prescription. You need a prescription now. And lo and behold, the most important moment you would ever need it comes a couple of weeks later. But now you're going to need a prescription and we're blocking it. it from you. I mean, that timing. Sure, it's, it's, uh, correlation is not causation, but boy, oh boy, when you start putting this together all around the world, it's amazing. So we block a

product that worked. We stopped Louis Foucher from saving the people in his hospital. And then everybody starts getting the vaccines and they're getting injured like we've seen all over the world. Well, guess what? You need a lawyer. You need a lawyer to do something about it. And as As it turns out, there's a lawyer they call the Erin Siri of France. Watch this. When I came here, they said, oh, you know, Diane is the Erin Siri of France. You're an injury attorney. How did you get into vaccine injury?

In July 2021, the French government make it compulsory for people to get vaccinated. Not exactly compulsory, but we have the COVID safe pass. So you need to show your pass to enter a restaurant, to enter, school, et cetera. So suddenly in France, there were lots of lots of vaccinated people and the state organized places, public places, you know, to get boosted. And then I received lots of phone call of people telling me, well, my son lost his sight four years after vaccination. My son got a hot attack after the vaccination. And so usually we have two or three phone calls by months and it's enough, but suddenly we had so many phone calls that even with me, it broke my heart.

And we're saying something is happening. From my perspective, I'm no doctor, I'm just a lawyer, and I see that something is coming. And then when I started to take these cases, the problem was that usually I could make a trial against the vaccine manufacturer, at least in Europe, because we have regulation for that that are superior to our national law. there is an EU provision saying that the manufacturer is liable for his product in any case. And so I was surprised when suddenly the state said to us, oh, no, there is a contract between the European Union, Pfizer and other manufacturers and the national state,

like French, Germany, etc. And this contract that nobody has seen at the beginning has closes and provision, which says that Pfizer and other are not like. It's totally opposite to what was in our law before the COVID. And I said, okay, but if I'm asking the state to compensate any injury, well, first of all, the state give less money than, of course, Pfizer or other company. Usually it's 30% less for the people because if the state pays with your income, with your taxes.

So can you imagine? Suddenly this product is given to everyone and we are paying with the money. our own taxes, the damages that can be caused by this. You've had an opportunity to work with Aaron Series law firm in some joint work. Tell me about that. How'd you come together? Well, we come together because of the help of the non-profit ICANN, and the nonprofit Dons, which is a French nonprofit I represented, we presented a case to this, to ICAN,

explaining it was about the contract that the contract that has been signed by the European Union, Pfizer and the member of state of Europe contain this provision preventing everyone to be a real victim of Pfizer vaccine in Europe. And all these contracts that are, in our opinion, unlawful contract were negotiated by text message between Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union and Mr. Broula. And it was New York Times who talked about it and said they exchange lots of messages, hundred matches between a woman and a man.

And she refuses to say what that contract is, right? What did you get paid or husband seems to be involved on some level? And also simple question. How come when you have public procurement, the more you buy, the less expensive is supposed to be. Not the more expensive. In the end, the more we bought in the European Union, the more expensive it was. More you paid?

Yes. And this text message, Mrs. von der Leyen, in the European Union, said that she lost them, you cannot lose. And so the citizen of the European Union should be able to see what's inside of this message. In a way, the European Union sell the rights of the European citizen to be a victim of Pfizer. They said, no, we sign this contract. You will never be able to go after Pfizer. So this is something we are keeping on fighting. So there may almost be a loophole here in France that we don't have in America. We may be able to get a direct hit on the manufacturers through the court systems here, whereas we have a massive liability protection wall we can't get

through in America. This is exactly that. Maybe there is a loophole in Europe. Well, if there's an air in Syria of France, maybe there's a Del Baitrean, I can, of France. And certainly, that did prove to be the case. There's a nonprofit called Bon Samp that's run by Xavier Azalbert. And he runs a newspaper. He understands media.

He started doing FOIA requests like we did. He brought in Diana Protot as an attorney to fight these cases. An amazing individual that is like a dog with a bone in France. I know the feeling. This guy and I hit it off. Take a look at this. This decision and an economist. Today, after being an entrepreneur, I run a newspaper, an online media called France Soar.

We have developed also a legal arm, and we try to bring force some lawsuits. For example, we brought a lawsuit against Bill Gates, for example. We also brought a lawsuit against Pfizer in order to seek the SMS, the discovery of the SMS between Arbebula and Ursula von der Leyen, for one of the largest contract that we've seen in Europe for several billion doses. As another example, whenever a study, a scientific study was coming about, whether it's on hydroxychloroquine or the vaccine or other subjects, We read those studies, we try and understand those studies, we try to identify whether there are any biases,

and whenever we feel is needed, we write a letter of concerns. We have done this many a time. We've done this for the Lancet Gate study. We've done this for recovery. We've done this for the recent study that was published by JAMA on vaccinese versus non-vaccinease that gave superiority to the vaccine because... This is the study where they, though, wouldn't look at anyone until, like, what was it six, was it six weeks or six months after? Two weeks.

Basically, you have a time window of two weeks where the person, in fact, is injected, but it's not considered. And then afterwards, you have another period of six months where they exclude this. This is bad science. Terrible. Obvious. I mean, obvious manipulation. Why wouldn't you just show everyone that got the vaccines the moment they get them? But, Dale, it's worth in this.

It's worse than bad science. Because imagine, it's a French organization called Epiore, controlled by the state, who goes into the U.S. and publish into U.S. paper a study. It's a study that could influence American individuals by an agency that's controlled by a foreign state. That could yield massive consequences. Because if an American person reads this study or hear from this study, from the media, and it was portrayed in the media, it was used by the media, and the data, the underlying data of this study is not available. JAMA did not have access to this data.

It's amazing. The scientist who peer-reviewed this did not have access to this data. I consider this could be a breach of trust of foreign interference. And with a group of scientists, including Professor Perron and Professor Martin Zizi, we wrote a letter of concern. Then we got a response from the authors. We wrote a second letter of concerns.

And in the second legal letter, we copied J. Batesharia, we copied Robert Kennedy on this, we copied Senator Johnson. Because we believe that this foreign interference will yield some impact on American people. And we believe that a American publication that publish a foreign study, especially when you know that Marco Rubio is negotiating for some peace and we're all looking for interference, foreign interference. We have evidence here that this will yield some consequences. And therefore, that's why we engage.

At this point in time, Jama has our latest letter. They haven't actually come back to us on that one. So you're doing the same thing we're doing. You're after many lawsuits, trying to fire a way and to find a loophole, a weakness. The message we have been talking about, we try to actually build the informed consent back into people by first of all, telling him you can ask question.

You may ask question. And if you don't ask question, it's your own responsibility. Because the issue is also the responsibility of the people. We've seen vaccine adhesion go down significantly. From a 90% high of vaccine adhesion back five years ago, today you only have 70% to adhere to vaccines. So you have people who question the vaccine.

And when it comes down to, so that's vaccine adhesion as a whole. When it comes down to specific vaccination, 55% of people are saying we don't adhere to vaccination in certain instances, flu, COVID. So we can see that there is a drop in the curve. It's currently a drop in confidence. However, the next question we've asked the people is why have you lost confidence? Because I keep on hearing from the mainstream media

that it's because of somebody like you or myself. That is because of alternative media, it's because of conspiracy series, it's because of anti-vaxxas. And in fact, 60% of people are telling us no, The social networks and the anti-vaxxers, so-called anti-vaxxers, it's not because of them that we've lost us. 60% are telling us it's because of the repeated lies of the government.

And by the way, they go even further than this. It's high time, 60% say it's high time that the government stopped believing their own lies. And what gives me hope is going back from 2020 or 2021, where you had 85% of the French population who got vaccinated. Today, when there's a new vaccination campaign, only 10% will go and get vaccinated. 90% will not. So that is a first victory. That is for me a signal of hope.

Public opinion is being curbed. In 2021, we were looked at as being the odd ones. Today, we are probably considered as being the good ones. Yes. We're making truth sexy. again. Yes. Terrice is sexy again. What a great guy. We actually borrowed his house for some of the interviews, beautiful home. And he sees the world the way I do. Things are changing. And in France, not only are they opening up to this concept, not only there are more people now waking up

and questioning vaccines. Some of the best research in the world is being done in France. It actually goes back prior to COVID during the time where we're really focusing on aluminum and all the work. One of the great scientists there was Roman Gerardi and he has an institute and scientists that had been looking at aluminum. And we got to sit down one of the newest superstars of that aluminum research. This is Guillermo Crepeau. I hope I said her name right or somewhere close, but she had some mind-blowing new discoveries in their investigation of aluminum. Take a look at this. I'm working on aluminum-adjuvant toxicity for now 13 years.

Specifically in vaccines, any other products or just vaccines? Vaccines, only vaccines. What is the latest discoveries that you've had on aluminum? When we studied the cellular responses of immune cells from macrophagic-myophagythesis patients, And we observe that they respond differently when they are exposed to aluminum adjuvants. They have troubles to produce enough mitochondrial energy to deal with that kind of environmental factor. This term myophagic, what was it again? Macrophagic myofacetis.

It is characterized by a muscular lesion in the deltoid, where you received aluminum misdivants from vaccines. And this muscular lesion is full of. of aluminum and it is associated with cognitive impairment and chronic fatigue. The macrophase, so the immune cells, they go and try to protect us by gobbling up this aluminum that's in the vaccine. And then what happens to the cell once it has the aluminum? My team has observed a biopersistent for 29 years. Inside the macrophages, it will activate a autophagy or inflammatory processes.

In the case of this study, we have observed that a specific way of autophagy was involved in these patients and another kind of autophagic pathway was involved in controlled. The reaction of the cells are quite different. So changing how they react. Yes, and probably this explains why they cannot eliminate aluminum maldrivance. And if you have a particle that can biopersists inside a cell, it's a protection for the particle, finally. In animals, we have observed translocation of aluminum adjuvant in spleen, in draining lymph nodes,

in brain. And so the cell is essentially holding it. It biopersists. And in essence, the cell is protecting the aluminum so that it can stay, instead of getting rid of it. Yes. and can just transport them through the lymphatic circulation and go inside the brain. And now you're saying also that it affects the mitochondria. We have observed that mitochondria from cells from patients have troubles to increase the production of energy

when they are submitted to a very hard challenge for them. Okay. If the cells cannot produce enough energy, they won't clear out, they won't digest the particle, so particles will persist more and more. So it's a cascading effect. It increases the weaker your mitochondria gets, the more it allows more aluminum to persist. The repetition of the injection of aluminum adjuvants is a very important point to consider, and we have to remember that the first exposure is during pregnancy.

So it's just even before birth. And if you induce a pro-inflammatory challenge to a baby, repeatedly is the exact way to induce a very large increase of microglial activity. If you want to increase microglial cells activity, which are the immune cells of the brain, you have to activate once, twice. So if they are busy with inflammation, they will have troubles to do their own function, which may be autophagic pathway in order to work on the synaptic density and to induce synaptic pruning and all that kind of well-regulated and very sophisticated mechanisms during

brain development. So if you induce inflammation, they are just trying to resolve that and they can't do that On almost every vaccine insert, the warning label, one of the side effects is encephalitis, which is inherently brain swelling. And you're saying aluminum is increasing microglia production leading to brain swelling. Do you think this is one of the causes of the encephalopathy we see in the warning label? Yeah, it must be one of the cause. If you induce a peripheral, peripheral inflammation, you will induce very persistent change

in microbial cells. So you just don't even need to have aluminum into the brain to induce things. Yes. Yes. It causes an inflammatory event in the body of a child can also inflame the brain. Yes, and this change can last for a long time. Well, it's a brain damage, is it not? Yeah. Yeah, for sure. That's really, I think, one of the most disturbing interviews I've done. We've done a lot of discussions on aluminum. and, you know, they've taken it to a whole other level. So look what she's saying. Anything that caused an inflammatory event in the body can go to the brain. But what they love about aluminum is it's the best it can, you know, causing an inflammatory event.

It sends the immune system into hyperdrive because it's under such a panic. That's why they use it. And so it's not necessarily just the aluminum qualities, except that it's lighting your body up, causing an inflation. causing the microglia in your brain, which will never act the same way again, as she put it, permanently altered. Similarly, she says we're seeing it affect the mitochondria, shutting down the energy of your cells. Can you imagine doing these two things? Not just to a day one old baby with a hepatitis B shot, but while you're pregnant, you're getting this stuff in shots and vaccines that is going to your developing brain. It stops neural like pruning, synaptic pruning.

It interferes with that. I mean, oh, yeah, by all means, let's stick this into a day one old baby, not just in the Hep B vaccine, but also in the vitamin K shot. And when she was talking about how it shuts down the power of the mitochondria, I couldn't help but remember really the most proven case because it's the one that paid out in vaccine court, Hannah Polling. Let's revisit what her father said, John Poling, after they pulled his case out of vaccine court. Remember, this case was in the omnibus proceeding. They looked at six cases. This one should have triggered that every autism case now gets paid out. Instead, they hate it from the public.

Why? Watch this one more time. We are here with Dr. John Poling. He is, first of all, he's a neurologist. He's also the father of Hannah Poling. As you just mentioned, her autism, her case of autism diagnosis was conceded by the federal government as having been contributed to by vaccines. That was a pretty startling thing, I think, for a lot of people to hear. We talked to a lot of experts about this. They say, look, vaccines in no way

cause autism. You're a neurologist. You're also the father of Hannah. What do you say? Well, I think you bring up a really important point is that the government, actually, the Department of Health and Human Services conceded that my daughter's medical problems, which are autism, encephalopathy, seizures, were brought on by vaccination. That's startling, I think, for a lot of people to hear that. Because we've been taught for so long. You're a doctor, I'm a doctor. We go to medical school.

We hear those vaccines, obviously. There's so many good things about vaccines. They prevent, you know, life-threatening illnesses that we've heard about. But in your daughter's case, it turned out to be a problem. I wouldn't have believed it until it happened to me. To be honest with you, as a doctor, until it happened to me, until I saw the regression, until I saw a normal, 18-month-old toddler descend into autism, I wouldn't have believed it was possible.

So what you believe is that, that Hannah have some sort of predisposition, and then the vaccines tipped her over the edge into developing autism? What is your belief now? Well, I don't think that vaccines are the only way that you can tip over a child like Hannah to regress and have an encephalopathy and have regress into autism. There are probably multiple triggers. And my daughter, clearly, it was the vaccinations. That was our. experience. As far as other families' experiences, it may be different. The other cases that were at Johns Hopkins, there were, you know, only a few like Hannah and then others regressed for other reasons. It's not really a known entity.

So there you have John Pulling talking about his daughter had an underlying mitochondrial disorder that made her have a bad reaction to vaccines. And I always thought, well, what caused it mitochondrial disorder? And what we just heard? from Guillairenet in France is aluminum, that's what it does. It shuts down your mitochondria so it underperforms and it's never the same again. Imagine every baby in America within the first 24 hours of life of being injected with loads of aluminum. What if we're destroying their mitochondria right out of the gate? And then every subsequent vaccine after that, it's just how how good are your mitochondria still holding up? If they're not, that's it. That's it for you,

massive brain swelling event, your mitochondria didn't have the ability to fight and take the inflammation away, and now you have brain injury that I think the results can be many different things, speech delays, autism, Tourette's, probably even ADD, ADHD in light brain injury issues. But all of that should be being studied. We shouldn't be speculating, but it's obvious where we need to look, especially now with this work being done in France. I want to get to, in sort of finishing up this show, I'm trying to figure out who they is. Well, I actually got some intel on Bill Gates. I had never heard before because Dr. Christian Perron works with Bill Gates.

He works with WHO. He actually helped bring vaccine programs to the entire world. He was really good at talking Africa into getting vaccinated. But look what he discovered. along the way. Watch this. I was approached by WHO. They asked me to chair a big workshop with many countries from Eastern Europe, including Russia and several Russian-speaking republics about the missile vaccines. You were sort of in charge of getting all the nations to come together to a WHO agreement

on vaccination. Was that to, was that agreement to say, all of these nations will, what, mandate vaccines? Except it was, yes, about to push the Missons vaccination. Diesel's vaccination specifically. And they finally, at 12, at the end of the morning, 100% of the countries signed that I had to manage sometimes meetings with 1,000 representatives of different countries for vaccination. I discovered by Bill Gates on the Gavi Foundation was colonizing

show year after year and I could see that from my eyes and I was I was upset colonizing yeah because he there's a gavis foundation they had representatives at the beginning they were they were not present in the European group they were present in the global group meeting in Geneva the European group we were meeting in Copenhagen in Denmark okay but we were inviting frequently in the global group. At the beginning, there were two or three Gavi representatives. After years, they were ten.

I discovered afterwards that Bill Gates was, now he's the main sponsor of WHO. And I remember I had a friend of a French guy, a very nice physician who was working for WHO. He told me something is a little bit bizarre because he showed me his paper. pay a paper with his salary and he was paid directly from the gavi foundation the bill and malinda gates foundation so here's this guy working for w h a but funded by gaii

and i discovered how the bill gates organized whole all his organization and uh put pressure on all the countries to vaccine more and more and and i discovered the council the council of Gavi eligible country. Bavi eligible country. You have some poor countries with not many resources for health. They have, for example, six or seven vaccines that are recommended in their official recommendations. And Gavi comes, go to see the Minister of Health, the President or the King, or I don't know, and say, oh, you're a poor country, Bill Gates is very...

a nice guy, philanthropic. The vaccine costs, for example, $50, but the bill is very nice, and he will give you the vaccine for $5. So the minister is very happy. So they add this new vaccine within the national recommendations. But after two years, Gavi comes back, oh, Mr. President, Mr. Minister, So Bill is a very nice guy, but now you have also to pay for these new vaccines.

And now it would be, you should do like other countries, now $5 really, it's not a good price. You should put it to $20, for example. And the minister said, oh, no, but after that there is a big pressure. And once the vaccine is inside the National Recombeckoning, it's very difficult for a minister to withdraw it. So by this means, they put the pressure everywhere. So if you look on the internet, you can see the list of countries that are Gavi eligible and some from one day to another become a Gavi non-eligible and they have to pay much more.

Look, it's a fantastic finance. So they start as Gavi eligible. They get a discounted price to begin a vaccine program. a vaccine program promoted by Gavi. They start that program and a couple of years later they come back and say now that you're in our program here's the next vaccine but you're no longer a Gavi eligible you have to pay more. I remember one day I was in the plane I was returning to France from this gavi event and I was seated in the plane beside one of the collaborators of Bill Gates and this guy I was discussing with him and I said oh

So you are doing a lot of earning a lot of money from the rich countries when you start to market a new vaccine. And as the price is very high in the huge difference between the real cost of fabrication and the cost to the states, you make your return on investment in one year or two years. And after that, when you propose the vaccine at a much lower price to many so-called poor countries, you win much more money than from the rich countries. And I remember he was smiling and he looked at me. He said, oh, I see that you're wise and that you understood our way of functioning. And he told me, yes, it's win-win.

I remember very well this conversation and I realized how, all this worked in the world. Wow. That's really amazing, if you think about it. It made me reflect on Bill Gates in the antitrust lawsuits with the government of the United States he had when it was clear he was creating a monopoly. It's what he's good at, right?

He sees the world as how can I control things? How can I kill my competition? How can I steal an idea, make it my own, and then destroy all of my competition around me? But he got caught, got caught red-handed. And so what do you do? okay, okay, I'm going to move into NGOs. I'm going to be altruistic now. I'm going to be a philanthropist. But look at this business model, right? As a philanthropist, he invests in Gavi and

WHO, Bill and Melinda Gates, starts taking control of its health systems all over the world, then invest in vaccines. He gets first world countries like America to pay all the cost so that ultimately it's already paid for. Now he's in money-making phase, and he goes to third world country said, I'm going to offer you a little deal. Suckers him in at $5. It's like a free bag of heroin to a user once you're hooked. Sorry, now I'm charging you a full price. Now what can they do about it? They can't take it off the list. It reminded me of confessions of an economic hitman. Have you ever seen that story where we go in and destroy third world nations by building them infrastructure? He's building health systems and now they can't get out of it.

Now they're paying full price and he's raking in the money into his nonprofit. Bies Jets, buys houses, buy his boats, goes all over, just because it's called a nonprofit. He's still the richest man in the world. And what I keep, the big question is this, is people keep telling me there's someone above Bill Gates. He's just who we see. Maybe that's the case. I'm, I'm going to continue my investigation. But I will say this, did he need someone above him? Let's just say he was smart enough to invest in all world health, which is where his name is. He's got his name in Gavi. He's got his name in Bill and Lynn Gates. and his guy's name is WHO.

And as we just heard, if you're working for WHO, you could be getting a check from Bill and Melinda Gates or Gavi. So WHO is his baby. That is his control place. Why does he need someone above him? Did he need someone to give him that idea? Because whoever had that idea, that was the future of world domination. It wasn't banking.

Banking will never be able to do. This is outside of banking. This is your body. This is the biggest fear center there is in the world, and he owns it. He's got the masking. He's got the testing. He's got the vaccines. We now just found out that he is in touch with Tony Fauci,

and they're writing books together. Well, speaking of Fauci, there was a journalist in France. She thinks it's Fauci. She thinks Fauci is the top guy. She is drawn out one of the most comprehensive book of maps and just linking everybody together you ever seen. Sometime, I'll have to show this entire interview. But this is a touch of an incredible life.

work investigation she's done on exactly my question. Who is they? I was on the first channel of the French television, which is TF1, the first one, and I was working as a journalist, reporter, and I made a lot of thousands of reporting on the news of the night, the main news. I was always in the ground. Are you still a mainstream news journalist? No, I left mainstream news in 2018. Okay. You've been a journalist, you watch this, you've been reporting. Is there a bigger question than who is they and how do they do it? Yes, this was exactly the question I had. What we can say is that if we take the chronology during the Second World War, the Merck Laboratory, they made bio weapons for the army,

and they founded, the first one, Fort Dittrick, was founded by Merck Labortons. So Merck founded the first laboratory. And with the government, they were working on the bioweapons program, because they thought that Germans were doing the same, and they were, they were, and even Japanese were doing the same. And they were. And at the end of the war, MacArthur went to Japan, and he took the scientists who made the programs and who had killed a lot of Chinese.

And he said, now, you don't go to prison. But I take you with me back to the States. And you work. You give me all your archives. And that's what he did. So we brought the experts to pursue germ warfare. Yeah. There has been a lot of. of attempts documented by the CIA during the Cold War by the Soviet Union. And the Soviet scientists were working on bacteria and on anthrax, all the toxins of the bacteria, which are deadly. Yeah.

Deadly. So they went to the States and they worked for the United States. This was the Cold War. And then after, they went. went on working on bio-weapons. And then it was secret. Of course, it's a secret. And so after what happened in 1986, you know, the law about the vaccines.

Liability protection, you know. Yes. And after that, you have a law. And then in Twin Towers and the hand tracks, you know the anthrax? It was something arranged to pass a law, which was a Patriot Act. And it's always a threat. And then you have a law. To take more and more of our rights away.

Exactly. Your freedom. And then there was H1N1, 209, 2010. And this was the real first pandemic trial, which was a failure for them. Because the people didn't go to vaccinate. They didn't get the job. The job, they said, no, we didn't. We don't see the dead. And there was no test.

So now they made some perfect scenario now. They took the lessons from the H1N1. They saw that you have to have a threat. And if the disease is not terrible, you have to have another lure, a kind of lure, to say this is terrible. And the lue is the false test. Because you can say, I'm positive, but positive to what?

The trick is to make people believe that they are ill because they are positive. So what's wild about this is this is mastermind and not just, it's not like these things are happening in America. They're on a global scale, which means there has to be interconnected. I mean, essentially with our. enemies, right? Exactly. Here you see China. Yeah.

United States. Here you have Peter Dazak. He got what is sort of the NGOs. You got Tedros, Géblis, Bill Gates, Rockefeller. The Rockefellers, which are sort of the beginning of modern medicine as we know it. And here you have the Chinese part. Okay.

George Gau, the Batwoman, Madame Xi, and another scientist, Mr. Zong, Professor Zong. And what... When does this relationship start in your mind? Where do they start working together? We have the proof that Peter Dazak worked with Madam Xi in 2003, with the first SARS-Kov. You know, there was a first Saskoff threat in 2003.

And this was a pretext. to ask for grants to the Congress and then launch the whole things. And here you have Fauci. Tony Fauci, you've got him as number one. He's number one because he's working with the army, is the head of the army for everything which is by a weapon, and he's jeweled so he can have civil work and military work. And he can ask the money,

the taxpayer money, he asked with the White House and with the Congress, and they say, oh, there is a big threat now, give us money. So they give the money, and he distributes the money. And he's very, very powerful because he controlled everything since the age period, for instance, you know. And what did he do? He gave a lot of money to an NGO which is called he coerles a line. So he gave the money to here, Peter Dazak, which is British at the origin, and Peter Dazak gave the money to the Chinese and to Ralph Barrett from North Carolina

and the number one scientist, the number one of gain of function is Ralph Barrett, you know. And Ralph Barrett, at the beginning of 2019, so before the pandemic, in January, he went to China and it made a conference to these people, to the Chinese. What was the title of the conference? How to make a pathogen which is able to create a pandemic? And when the pandemics appear, he says, oh, I don't know. And he didn't say he went to China to teach them how to make the false artificial viruses, which, by the way, is exactly the twin coronavirus of the one that emerged before. But Fauci is number one. He just doesn't strike me as, he's like a general.

he's still working for somebody something. Is this the super elite money, Bilderberger, Rockefellers or Rothschilds? Do you think all that plays in? Of course, yes. Of course, yes. But the names still remain in the dark. But the structures, they are there.

And all here, the investment banks, they own everything. So it's always the same triad. I think she makes a very important point. It's sort of where I am, do the Ross Seils, the Bilderbergs, whatever you want to call this invisible they, are they out there? She's like, yeah, of course they're out there. But it really only meant the structure's in place.

We see the structure. It doesn't matter if there's someone out there. We've got to face this structure. to destroy this structure that is not bringing any good to this world. And the lead players, we know who they are. They are destroying our future. They are a part of an authoritarian globalist regime that is using health to take over the world.

I know that sounds crazy, but we were there. You watched it. We've never watched anything move that swiftly, that quickly, and destroy our sovereignty. And of course, at the top of her list there is Tony Fauci. It's why I think what Rand Paul is doing is so critically important. Is it enough? Is contempt going to lead to something? I mean, look, he's polling at the only thread he still can have his fingertips on.

You had the former representatives of this country and Joe Biden completely pardoned the man that's at the top of the structure that sucked the life out of the earth. And Rand Paul is making everything out of that one thread. maybe. Can he get to Ralph Barrett? Can we figure out what Barrett was doing? Eco Health Alliance. What were they really? How much money really moved? All is, we need answers to all of this stuff. And I am. I'm upset that a party in this country is trying to hide all of those answers. This is bigger than the Kennedy assassination. One person's life was destroyed with that lie. We are talking about millions of people's lives being destroyed. And when we talk about lies being destroyed. We must think about our best and brightest. Those heroes that stood up for us

stood in the truth, the ER doctors that came out in New York with tears running down their face saying, we are killing people in here. This is not what we're supposed to be doing. Louis Foucher is one of those heroes. This man is dedicated his life, risked it all, put it on the line and had everything taken away. And yet he smiles and he marches on. I'm going to let him have the closing remarks from these interviews in France. Listen to what happened to this guy's life when he simply told the truth. We created a group and this group was with nurses, doctors, administrative person at the hospital.

And it was just like a and something going on. And then we created Reinfucovied, which was a group in charge. And so I became the spokesman of this movement and kind of helping in coordination, because it's one of my talent. As intensive care practitioner, I'm always gathering people, just like an orchestra. Progressively, we built a group in charge to provide science. Another one was with the artist, because we said, we're not going to understand this crisis with the head. It's not in the head. And maybe we could try and understand with the heart. And so the artists in France, they were said by our president to be non-essential.

Right. Yeah, you remember that? Yeah? Yeah. And so I said, no, art is essential in this very moment. We need people to tell story. We need people to write plays. We need people to make movies about what was all going on. And we also realized at the same time that on YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, everything was censored. Each time, even with humor, we were trying to deal with what happening. censor, censor, censor. There were a YouTube channel, which had, in one month, it's like 150,000 people following, you know, really fast. So we started gathering the people everywhere, small groups everywhere in France, all around France, 250 groups in France, but also in Australia, in Israel, in Germany, in Spain, in England, in Canada. We became a multinational company with no... bank account with no administrative structure we were even an NGO yeah we understood that we shouldn't be alone because one head you can cut it but when you have hundred heads more difficult we had a lot of doctors everywhere in

France and so we said but we can care for the people at home where we had a nurse a doctor a oxygen provider and we gave protocols with C vitamin D vitamin ivermectin, anti-clotting medication, oxygen at home. You're building an underground network saying we're not following the protocol, I'm going to go save lives whether you like it or not. And it was working well. We cared for like 25,000 persons and none of them went dying. So you save 25,000 people.

Yeah. And I think that was maybe one of the most of the most. beautiful thing that we've done, I called my wife and said, okay, maybe I'm going to lose my job. You had that sense, or you thought this is... And I felt. The gut feeling was, the fear was there. And I went there, and there was 200 person in front of the building saying, go on, Lewis, go on. There were guards.

But those guards, they were the guards of the hospital, and I know all of them. And so they smiled to me and clinched with the eyes and said, we're with you, Lewis, go on. And there was the TV, the national TV there, you know, with the microphone saying, Are you going to be fired? Dr. Foucher, are you going to be fired? Wow. And they said, we've been quite surprised because we saw you. We were a crazy, insulated person, but we received more than 10,000 emails on our email boxes. And it jammed our boxes, each one email, saying, take care of Dr. Foucher.

is important, speech is needed. And after they had deleted the first 10,000 emails, other 10,000 coming. And it never stopped. And so they were surprised. I started to understand it was not my force. It was the force of the community, force of the people. I was the knight entering the Dragon's Cave, but the night was armed by the community and the people of the village. And after that, nothing happened. So this happened like that the first time. But in France, the Haska provided, would refuse vaccination they were supposed to to be suspended so that's where it all went down when you refused to vaccinate yeah yeah straw so they weren't firing you no they're just suspending it's a pervert thing you know it's a perverted

thing and if you quit you don't get paid no and and you couldn't get them to fire if you would vaccinate you could have your job yeah yeah so you're just suspended until you vaccinate intimidation pressure coercition coercion. But we decided with my wife to say, no. It was not an easy decision. I mean, I don't judge. You have children at this time? Yeah, had three children. Three children. A house to pay. A house to pay. Yeah. And so. No pay coming in. No, nothing. And then you have kind of a choice there where a face choice. It's just like Moses going through the Red Sea. You know, it has to open. But you don't know if it's going to happen. So you need to have the water till there. And, and wait for the miracle.

Yeah. But the miracle happened. I mean, when the decision has been made, everything contributed to help me keeping on. I had time to organize resistance and network resistance because I didn't work anymore. The suspension lasted 606 days. Wow.

This is a long time. I think most people would say I couldn't survive that. We wouldn't survive. Another person, she was coming every week. He is a friend to have lunch with me. And each time he broke meat, but each time we brought too much. And I told them the first time, oh, this is really too much for us. Well, get that back to your home and say, no, no, no, keep on, put it in a fridge.

I don't care. Do you get bringing too much food to the lunch? It was giving me food for my kids. Yeah, it was nourishing us. In my street, you know, it's a neighborhood of doctors. And so all the other doctors in the street, we know each other. And they knew what I thought about the COVID. And they disagreed because they were in the propaganda.

Yeah. but each week there was a small basket with croissant there hung on my door for my children and I know who he is who does that every week he never never put his name, never said who he was but I know I'm sure who he is and it disagreed with me about COVID but he thought that suspension was such a bad thing he couldn't agree that and he wanted to help the way he could when I made that choice to lose everything

Actually, I had Lux. I had more than what I've made it. There's something deeply rotten in the kingdom of France and medicine, and it's a long time. And I only saw that. I saw that during the COVID, but it was there. And some people saw that 10 years ago, some other 20 years ago. The industrial way of things is about replacing the artisanal work by industry.

is about trying to have a perfection instead of having something artisanal. If we want perfection, what's the mistake? The mistake is always the human being. And we should maybe get rid of the human being. It doesn't fit in the algorithm. It happened during Nazism. It happened all the time. Nazism.

And transhumanism is about getting rid of the human mistake. And it's just the same in our medicine now. If we want to get rid of the virus, if we want to get rid, each time you hear this eradicate, fight against. All those words are related to war and to destruction. But this is not about life. How can we shift in that system collapsing? We can get back our sovereignty and autonomy.

And that's really inspiring because you can see that all the breaches that are opened by this collapsing system, the people are doing things. We have a guy named La Fontaine and he wrote a story about the dog and the wolf. And the dog is very big, you know, he is eating well and everything's fine, yeah, it's comfortable. And the wolf is like that, you know, he has no hair anymore, he's running all the time, and never know what tomorrow is going to bring. And the wolf gets to the dog and the dog says, you know, you just have to come with me.

Come, and the master is going to give you something to eat. You're going to be well. Come with me. And the wolf says, well, that should be good. Maybe I should go. But in a moment, he sees that there's something on the neck of the dog. What's there that you wear on your neck? And so the dog said, oh, that's my collar.

That's how my master keep the hand on me. And then the wolf disappear. And it's still running. That's the hand of the story. It's still running. So now I think I'm the wolf. Not comfortable, but freedom has no price. And I must say that I don't regret anything.

In French, we have two different words for hope. One word for hope is espoise. And espoor means you're waiting for something to happen, which is not in your hand. There's going to be a savior. There's going to be a messia. There's going to be somebody coming and free you. This one I don't trust.

You're not waiting for a messiah. I'm not waiting for anything. Nobody's going to come. We are the one. When you're not alone, you can change the world. The only thing is you give the energy, you put the first flame. Spark? Yeah, the first spark.

Yeah, you light the spark. And the barrel was, you changed the world. Well, this one thing I'm realizing is I two weeks. the world, it's that we really are all in this together. And when you're supporting the work at Ha'I-Can, I've said we are all about strategy. And part of my strategy is to make sure that we are not the last front standing, that we're not the only battleground here in the United States of America. We can't win if the entire world is against us, especially when we know all it takes his one presidential election.

Really, that's all that's left. There is this very thin little veil that we have. And I'm not saying Trump's the greatest president of all times. I'm not saying you have to vote Republican. But I will say watch. Imagine if we get anyone in office that tried to bury the Fauci story, that doesn't believe it's important to investigate what happened during the pandemic.

And what really, why did we get lied to? What were lies? What were the truth? What did we invest in? Did we fund gain a function? Anyone that is telling you that has no relevance, it's to me it's the most relevant story in human history. Not just in my lifetime, which a lot of us say,

oh, this is the craziest thing that's happened in my lifetime. This is the craziest thing that ever happened in the world. Name one other thing where every nation of the world use the same exact set of life. lies and infrastructure, as Corinne put it, all against the citizens of the world. And now we know whether accidental, whether knowingly they were dead wrong. As Christian Peroni put it, what didn't they get wrong? Was there anything they got right?

Of course, every government wants to bury this. Of course, every doctor involved in it wants to bury it. Of course, every news agency that were propagandists for it wanted to go away and never be seen again. And if we allow that to happen, guess what? It won't take much of a memory because we'll only have to remember it when we're back in it. There's a reason I'm traveling the world. We are lighting the fires of truth everywhere they can be lit. We are trying to support Bonsant in France.

We have Aaron Ciri working with their attorneys. I was just sitting in England. Can we raise funds in England? Wherever you are in the world, we need to all work together now. We are the informed consent action network, and this network is worldwide. And together, we are going to fight an authoritarian takeover that is trying to be established through this word health. Your health is in your hands. and if it's in anyone else's, you better be very afraid.

We're in this together. We are a family worldwide. We're all waking up to the same realizations. And we are winning. I'll see you next week on the Highwire.