The Highwire with Del Bigtree - EXPOSING MODERNA’S VAST SPY NETWORK

Episode Date: December 6, 2023

In what could amount to the vaccine industry’s ‘Big Tobacco’ moment, internal communications from COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer Moderna, shows that their marketing department has been aggressively targeting online speech, dictating policy and working to censor debate. Learn how the Public Goods Project, an NGO, played a role in the surveillance of the public.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

You have this populist movements all over the place that are concerned about what's happening in their country and not the world and not trying to lock down the entire world or get everyone to buy vaccines. These vaccine companies, though, are pushing back. So one of them is Pfizer. So remember, the European Union was basically sold. They negotiated a contract with Pfizer for all the member states. How was that done? It was done by the EU Commissioner Ursula van der Leyen. And what she did, she didn't sit down with Albert Berla.

Pfizer, the CEO, she did it over text messages, just some text messages. And when asked what we're in those text messages, this is what Reuters said. EU's von der Leyen can't find texts with Pfizer chief on vaccine deal. Oops, can't find. I'm sorry, but the vaccine deal is going through anyway. Well, Poland said, we're done. I don't think no one wants these vaccines anymore. COVID's over. And we didn't really fully agree to this. So we went out of it. Well, this is what Pfizer's doing now. This is a political headline. Pfizer is suing Poland over vaccines. And this is kind of a breakdown. It says this is how we got here. But when you look into this article, it says this in April 2022, then Polish health minister,

Adam Niyyeltsky announced the country had stopped taking vaccine deliveries. However, it didn't take long for a group of nine other countries, all in Eastern and Central Europe to follow Poland's lead. While they didn't go so far as halting deliveries, they did complain that they had been trapped into spending money on doses they didn't need at a time of economic turbulence, indeed. At one point, capitals even began asking for greater transparency on the original negotiations between Pfizer and the commission. What was promised? We would really like to know, said Belgium ambassador Pierre Cardinals in December 2022. So think about that. Your country is signed on to a vaccine deal with Pfizer and they're saying, can we at least see what the deal is? Because we don't need these anymore. And we're going to probably back out on this.

and saying, I can't find the text messages, can't find the deal, just, you know, go ahead. Pfizer is going to sue you, though, if you back out of this. Well, here's another kind of page to this. So this is an investigative piece by American journalist Lee Fang and Jack Polson. This is called Moderna is spying on you. New documents reveal its attempts to control the vaccine debate. Listen to this. So it says in here, quote,

Djokovic crown anti-vaccine hero after U.S. Open win, how will the title of an internal report. It continued the optics of Djokovic, whose vaccine opposition barred him from competing in the 2022 U.S. Open, returning to and winning the Moderna-sponsored competition, bolsters anti-vaccine claims that vaccines and mandates are unnecessary. The report-rated news surrounding Jokovic is high risk, noting that vaccine opponents are celebrating the tennis champion and that some on social media mockingly point out that Moderna is a U.S. Open. sponsor. Well, mockingly point out, who's mocking them? Oh, yeah, it was us. Check this out. Try to contemplate what are the odds that the one human being on the earth in all of sports

and maybe got more attention than anybody during a mandated vaccine program stood his ground, took headlines worldwide, and his name is Novax. Well, it's Novak, but seriously, pretty dang closed, really strange. Is someone in there programming this whole thing going, come on, people, wake up. But to add irony to the whole thing at the U.S. Open, of course, they're sponsors, and they have a shot of the day. Well, he didn't just have the shot of the day, the shot of the match. He had the shot of the tournament and the shot of the year.

And this is who was sponsoring that shot. Well, we'll take you to the dirtish shot of the day, and here's the final one. Relief and release there. So the shot of the day brought to you by Moderna. The shot of the day brought to you by the guy that beat everybody else that got that stupid vaccine. Well done, Novap. We're really proud of you. Seriously a hero in this world today.

That is just never going to get old. I try to imagine how much money they spent for that ad placement spot for shot of the day, only to go to the guy that defied them. the whole way. Really, truly a hero. I hope someday, maybe when he's done playing tennis, we're able to get him onto this show and talk about it. Just amazing. Regardless, it's fun to know that Moderna's public relations department is wringing their fists at our show when they're watching us every week, I'm sure. So let's go into this, because this is actually like a big tobacco moment for the vaccine industry. So we've heard about their PR firms, their departments, but this kind of really pulls back the curtain. So let's go back to this article.

It says, behind the scenes, the marketing arm of the company, this Moderna, has been working with former law enforcement officials and public health officials to monitor and influence vaccine policy. Key to this is the drug industry-funded NGO called Public Good Projects. According to documents, we have seen, PGP works closely with social media platforms, government agencies, and news websites to confront the root cause of vaccine hesitancy by rapidly identifying and shutting down misinformation, a network of 45,000 health care professionals, are given talking points and advice on how to respond when vaccine misinformation goes mainstream, according to an email from Moderna. As the pandemic abates, Moderna is, if anything, ratcheting up

its surveillance operation with a keen interest in anything relating to policies designed to coerce vaccination. In particular, the company is closely tracking elected officials and recently passed laws in Arkansas and Texas, which restricted vaccine mandates. It says, quote, politicians attempting to ban COVID-19 mandates or at least claiming to signals growing resistance to COVID-19 mitigations reads one of Moderna's alerts given the company avoided publicly commenting on the mandate debate this is revelatory and remember they talk about bills in Texas we just had last week jackie schlegel from texans for medical freedom who was an integral part in helping pass texas's sb7 which

bans private businesses from mandating the COVID shot like modernas on their employees and contractors to the tune of a $50,000 fine if they break that. I love it. Modern is very interested in that bill and other bills like that. So can I just take this moment to say that Moderna's little like private police force here is failing at their job? I mean, it's really scary, but man, do they suck what they do? All that money, all that effort to control, and they still can't do it.

I'm sorry. So we're learning about the reach. So people think, you know, it's just some, a group of people sitting around a table with, with, you know, marketing minds thinking, how are we going to do an ad for our vaccine, our product here? No, they're proactively, aggressively, reaching out into the public, into the community, putting their hand over people's mouth, censoring debate. And so it gets interesting here. So we have the Public Goods Project. Let's go to the PGP website, the About page. It says the Public Good Projects is a public health

nonprofit specializing in large-scale media monitoring programs. Jesus. Creepy. Social and behavior change interventions. Oh, my God. That's psychological operations, if you will, and cross-sector initiatives. So one of those initiatives is this. It's called the stronger campaign. This is on their website. And the stronger campaign is they worked with, well, actually, let's just go to Lee Fang's Twitter page because he uncovered this. And this is actually, we'll stop right there for a second. So we have the Public Goods project and one of the articles leafing wrote for the intercept this was titled drug lobby asked biden to punish foreign countries pushing for low-cost vaccines as some you know corporation doesn't

want low-cost vaccines but in there it talks about two of the largest drug lobby groups in the world bio and pharma are the acronyms bio and pharma represent the largest drug firms in the world including Pfizer-gillied sciences and johnson and johnson the two groups collectively spent more than $38 million lobbying federal officials last year and member companies maintain extensive ties to promote think tanks, lawmakers, and academics active in shaping the policy response to the pandemic. So we go to Lee Fang's Twitter page and he talks about this. We have bio, this juggernaut of lobbying. He said in a separate push, Pfizer-Moderners lobbying group, Bio, fully funded a special content moderation campaign designed by a contractor called Public Goods Projects, which worked with

Twitter to set content moderation rules around COVID misinformation. So their, Moderna is essentially working using these sock puppets to work with Twitter to set content moderation to set it at the global level. Not just, hey, could you take down this person, you could take down this person, no, to set it from the start of for vaccine misinformation. Think about that around. And calling it an NGO like the, and it's called the public good, like literally monitoring you, brainwashing you for the public good. And, you for the public good funded by pharma but tax deductible because it's an NGO i mean it's it there's a huge i mean we used to call this propaganda you used to call this the advertising arm of the pharmaceutical

industry now they call it an NGO that's out for the public good it's really unbelievable sinister but it's a non-profit so i'm sure it's okay so let's go back to these twitter so bio it says bio provided 1.275 million dollars to the campaign part of which is revealed through tax forms the PGP campaign called Stronger, helped Twitter create content moderation bots, select which public health accounts got verified, helped crowdsource content takedowns. Boy, it sounds a lot like what just happened to the Highwire page.

But you can see here, you can actually look at the tax document. If you're not, don't believe me, look at the tax document. So there's bio, there's the biotechnology innovation organization at the bottom there. And you can see the public goods projects, Mount Vernon, Alexander, Virginia, that's right there, consulting. So there's the money that's being spent on there. But what's interesting is this stronger campaign ended in 2022. From what it looks like, it ended right around the same time that Missouri versus Biden in that court case started, which is the attorneys generals that were forcing the government not to be able to talk to big tech

anymore to do this content moderation. It's really outrageous. And it shows you what, what a carry a situation we find ourselves here in the United States of America, that we have a government that is basically, Moderna, by the way, holds co-patents with our own NIH, which we have always thought was a conflict of interest. When Moderna makes money, so do government agents. That is crazy, especially when they're the ones doing the same safety testing of this product and promoting it to everyone in America only to make money themselves. Do you really think they're doing a proper safety test? If it's of a product, they're going to make money off of? I mean, this is the type of like this really is the swamp. And when you think about the greatest attack on American sovereignty

and freedom and liberty, it was this COVID pandemic, the lockdowns. Both Donald Trump, I fault, and President Biden were a part of locking us down, destroying our economies. So it crosses, I mean, it shows you it crosses political lines, this type of incestuous, disgusting relationship that corporations now have with our government and allowing, them to call it an NGO when all it's really doing is surveilling us and trying to brainwash us through their control of television.