The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FATAL FLAWS

Episode Date: January 22, 2022

Five Times August performs In-Studio!; BOJO Ends UK Mandates; Against Omicron, Natural Immunity Wins; The Truth about 5G; New ICAN FOIA Deepens Fauci Fraud; Geraldo Eats Humble PieGuests: Brad Skistimas, Dafna Tachover, Esq.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world.

It's time to step out onto the high wire. Now, we've talked a lot about communication. We are, in fact, a communications outfit right here. But when we think about what we're up against when it comes to this discussion of vaccines and the pandemic, we think about the $4 billion by President Biden allocated to controlling the narrative on the issue of the pandemic. and of course the rollout of the vaccine. To remove vaccine hesitancy is really the goal. Now, this is taking place all around the world.

It's hard to really contemplate the billions and billions of dollars in advertising and television time and radio ads and newspaper ads and magazines all dedicated to trying to convince us all that we should be vaccinated. And in some situations, I mean, this is happening all around the world. They're trying to get to every nook and cranny. that exists. Now in a really unique video, I think we get to see in some ways how far they will go. And in this case, it's perhaps almost comes across his desperation

as this minister from Australia, this is Mark McGowan, state premier of Western Australia. I want you to watch this video as he attempts to bring in a translator to translate the very rare and linguistically complicated language of Creole, which is just one of the languages in the Aboriginal tribes. If this doesn't smack of desperation, I don't know what does. Take a look at this. This is an important message to keep Aboriginal people safe. And this message is a proper important one to keep everybody safe one.

You can die from the corona or get really sick. You can pass away. pass away from this corona or you can get really sick one. It's time to get the corona needle to keep people and country strong. Again, it's time to get them this needle, to keep them but other people and country proper strong one. The corona needle will protect kids, old people, men and women. men and women.

Well, the young crown a needle, gotta keep them a male safe one for all the kids and for all the men and women. Many people around the world have already had the needle. Big more people all around the world then already get them about their needle. It is free and it's safe.

The young that needle black grown needle block corona he free one and he's safe one if you're worried talk to your clinic or medical center or go to roll up for WA on the internet even a worrying but talk like yours one clinic or go long a hospital place or go to get himself roll up on the internet so get your needle now and stay strong. Thank you. So you've been going to get him that needle and stay proper strong one and thank you. I'm so sorry. I'm sorry. It's still, it just keeps getting better

better. Now, there's a couple of things that are happening here. First of all, I think that's one of the most condescending videos that could ever be made. I can't imagine how you continue through. I don't know who talked this guy into doing this video, but you would think at a certain point would say, this is ridiculous. I think she's speaking my language. That doesn't happen. And I don't know.

Maybe she's the greatest con artist that ever lived and said, you need to translate it from my people. I don't know what's happening here, but it's completely absurd and it shows how ridiculous this entire thing has become. And it gives you a sense of what we're actually up against. If you keep saying they, as though they have some incredible, you know,

mind-bending power to overcome us, clearly, you know, our opponents are not that intelligent. And by the way, this really was a test for the audience. If you took that video seriously or did not find any sense of humor in it or like, you know, a giggle coming up, I think it's a sign that you really need to turn off your television. You need to shut the cell phone down for a few days. Go to the mountains, get some fresh air, and come back to reality. All right.

So, moving on. When we talk about, you know, language and getting the message across, obviously that's something that we're very proud of here at the Highwire. I think we've achieved a lot. We have seen this entire conversation change. And when I look back at what got us here, you know, there's certainly always milestones in a movement. You know, I think about our lawsuit wins, you know, through Aaron, Siri and Associates, you know, the wins against the CDC, the FDA, health and human services, all of this breaking, literally just destroying the foundation of this lie as we know it. And then there's the big moments where we march.

In fact, maybe like the Battle of Trenton was a huge, huge experience because this was the belly of the beast. This was Trenton, New Jersey, one of the most pharma-driven states in the country, home to many of the pharmaceutical companies. We had a turnout of somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 people. They said we chanted outside of that state capital, and they were trying to remove the religious exemption. And in the end, they failed. We had won. The people won. and we staved off that final vote that they needed.

And then Sweetie, who had led that entire charge just this year, was deselected. He lost the election bid. Everyone thought he was untouchable. Those are certainly big moments. But for me, I think the moment where I started recognizing that this thing was shifting was when artists started getting involved, when musicians started getting involved. Once you start hearing songs and the musicians and the comedians, Maybe I'm prone to that because I did.

I was an artist. You know, I started out in theater. My wife and I were actually in a band together years ago, the Lee Nestor band, my wife's band. We even opened for the Googie Dolls. It was a great time and fun memory for us. But when I think about it, when I think about the soundtrack of the time, I think about the 1960s, which were the stories I grew up with. My parents marched in the 1960s.

It's that soundtrack of the 1960s to me that leaves that indelible mark that feels like, Once the artists were behind it, that is when that movement really took hold. And it's what we remember. When we think of the 1960, it's the music and the soundtrack of that time. So when artists started singing about medical freedom and songs parodying, you know, the issues around Tony Fauci and, you know, artists, you know, we started seeing comedians crack jokes about the pandemic. That's when I started thinking, it's happening. This is real. From here on out, it's only a matter of time when we actually win this. And so it's really a pleasure and an honor when I think about as I've been on these stages

and starting to hear music being played that are our songs, the songs of this movement, of this revolution, if you will, it's been very exciting. And one of those artists that I've stood on stages before and has got some amazing songs. We played his music videos. Sad Little Man, which is one of my favorites about Tony Fauci. Of course, I'm talking about Brad Schistamist and five times August who joins me now. Brad, awesome. Good to see it.

Thanks for coming in studio today. Yeah. So this is a weird topic to sing about. And let's be honest. I mean, the 1960s, you know, it's anti-war. It's all these things. But, you know, medical freedom, health freedom, vaccinations. When did you decide, you know what?

I, as an artist, I need to say something about this. Yeah, I think towards the end of 2020, you know, my wife has actually been involved in the medical freedom movement since our first son was born. Okay. And, you know, we, as new parents, you just go along and you just listen to whatever you're supposed to do. And, you know, he got his early vaccines and had some adverse reactions to it that he's still dealing with today. And so the information has been floating in my ether and the more it encroached upon my doorstep, it was sort of like I was looking around, looking for my peers to speak up. Musically, I'm going like, like, where is everybody?

And I kind of felt like I don't want to look back on this time. I feel like I didn't say anything. So I started speaking out through my music. And, you know, I just felt like it had to be set because nobody else was really saying anything. Right. Now your career doesn't start here. You've been in music for how long now? Two decades now.

Two decades now. And is there something about how that career went? Have you always sort of been singing music about, you know, rebelling against the system or the man? I mean, what is it that leads you here? Or was this a sort of step out? This was definitely a step out. I mean, I liked pleasing people.

I like being in the middle and just having a big dynamic audience that, you know, we all get along like music is supposed to bring people together you go to a concert it's not a divisive experience you can be you know standing next to somebody who believes in completely different things than you do but you're singing the same song you're looking at each other you're smiling i like that about music um but it reached a point where you know i i started speaking out uh like i said at the beginning of or at the end of 2020 yeah the beginning of 2021 and um it just sort of you know i was dipping my toe in the water, so to speak, going like, well, I'm going to say something that I know I'm going to lose fans from saying this. And sure enough, that happened. But what also happened

was I started getting more feedback from people going, oh my gosh, thank you so much for speaking out. And the more I got that feedback, the more encouraging it was. And I would release the next song after that and the next song after that. And each time I'd think, like, oh, I'm going to get in trouble for this. But what the feedback was really was from people going like, thank you for speaking up. Yeah. Because that message is not being portrayed anywhere in entertainment. There's a handful of guys out there right now that are in music and entertainment and comedy. And, you know, it's really starting to usher in the message in a new way that hasn't really been been approached yet, I don't think. So, no, my career was always a safe path. You know, I was singing love songs for. you know, 20 years. And that's kind of where I was, that was my domain. And every now and then I would

release a song that had like a bigger picture, a more come-together message. But like this was definitely crossing a line. So when you, when you put out that first song, were you sort of careful about your message or do you feel like you let it rip? Were you trying to test your audience and how your audience respond? Yeah. The first song I released was called God Help Us All. And it was a toe dip into, okay, I like I said, I know this is going to turn some people off. I don't know how much. We'll see what the tolerance level is. And I was, I thought I was being pretty careful.

But then you would get these messages from people that are like, oh my gosh, like I've been listening to you forever. How could you say that? I'm deleting your music. And like I said, but then for every one of those messages, you get five or six or seven more messages from people that are like, wow. You know, I needed to hear that. So it was just very encouraging to put. out that kind of message and get that kind of feedback because you I felt like it was it was just me venting through my music music is supposed to be a reflection of the times and how the artist

portrays the world and you don't really see that in art so much right now yeah there's no real clear message and these are confusing times so for me to pick that path and be like well i'm going to say what i truly believe in for the first time ever we'll see how this goes you know i felt for a long for for the first couple songs i was like i'm either burning down everything i've ever worked for or i'm i'm building something new up here and um you know it's been very rewarding for sure you know when i think about when we think about rock and roll you know i mean it's sex drugs rock and roll live in the moment live or die like this whole attitude yet all of the rockers we grew up with or i mean it feels like like where are they right i mean the only guy i think that i

can really think of, you know, that I grew listening to those Eric Clapton, you know, but everybody else used to just be like, oh, yeah, compliance. Like, these guys are more afraid of death than they at least portrayed in their youth. Right. You know, so I guess it's time. It's time for a new generation. There is a new generation. I wrote down some of the guys we've been featuring here, Jimmy Levy, R.C. the rapper,

Bryson Gray, high-res, blind Joe, writing great music. Do you feel like there's a new genre, you know, here? You know, is this? Are we at a place where can call this a genre yet? I think so. I don't know what you would call conspiracy rock, what they call it or something like that. No, I, it's an exciting time for sure. It does feel like something new.

It feels like a rekindling of, that's a lot of the feedback that I get on YouTube is people going, you know, an older generation going like, wow, I thought this was dead and gone. The spirit of the 60s. Right. It's just weird because it's a 180 in and of itself. All those rebellious rockers have grown up and now it seems like they're part of the system. They sort of bailed on us. You're like, you know, you're hoping that they show up. I mean, even with Eric Clapton, he spoke up.

He got the vaccine. He told us about his experience. And he's still slandered and labeled anti-vaxxer and conspiracy. And what happened to Eric Clapton. And Rolling Stone releases all these like smear articles. And, you know, he's just telling. That's why so many people, I think, are afraid to speak. Right.

Because their whole careers on the line. I think these independent guys like me and everybody just listed out, we have an opportunity as independent artists that don't have a team of people. We don't have lawyers in A&R agents and record labels telling us what to think and what we're going to say through our next single. We're actually speaking, you know, we're saying things that we actually mean and want to say to the world. And that hasn't been done, I don't think, in a really long time with music. Yeah, I think you're right.

I mean, where it actually is speaking to the times, it has more power to it. This isn't just a love story. It's not, you know, about, you know, your problem with someone across the street. This is a global moment. And what better time? I mean, again, I do reflect on my parents' involvement in the 60s. I mean, I don't know if I grew up as a singer, as an artist, you know, filmmaker. I even worked in New York.

I did musical theater. So I ended up touring with Hair, the musical. I got the Broadway touring company all over Europe. I played George Berger, which was a rock and roll musical. It was a great time. And I think about how that contributed to my life now. Like that was a very rebellious character I was playing, but representing that sort of moment of, you know, again,

I think George Berger and Harris, like my body, my choice. Like, I'm going to burn this draft card. You don't own me. You don't get to tell me what to do. And there's so much of that that does feel like it's palpable right now. The tension is growing, the oppression on people all over the world. And so when you watch, you know, these images of Australia, you know what I mean like and and police been like beating innocent people unarmed people in the streets and hearing about lockdowns

when you write a song now is there some part of it that is you know i suppose as we think about how music works it never leaves you it's really the emotion right it's the emotion of the people of the time do you feel like you're putting it in a time capsule of sorts yeah i think that uh it feels like i'm sort of investing into the few Like what I'm writing right now isn't, you know, it might not connect with everybody. Right. It's going to make some people mad. And my hope is, you know, ideally, down the road, they come back around and they go, oh, I get it now.

Right. You know, I get what they were doing. Everything I've released over the span of my career has come from a real place. And so I'm coming from a place now as a father and somebody who cares about what's happening in the world. I don't want to leave this place behind for my kids and their kids the way it is now. Yeah. Do you feel like that?

feel like that I mean as we said there's other musicians when you stepped out like you were one of the only ones there as you start do you start are you feeling momentum like there are others that are really going to start do you think this is growing and I hope so yeah I hope so you hope to see it I would like to see bigger artists with the larger platform to speak out you know everybody has sort of a machine behind them so guys like me you know I think we're starting to really see that like this is our time to speak up if you know if you don't have a machine behind you if you don't have a record label kind of telling you what to say, what to think, what to do, this is your chance to really speak up if this is what you believe in.

So it's an important time for sure. Well, it's an important time. You're right in the middle of it. It's really awesome. You're bringing that energy. I mean, it's so great because it can get so heavy, all the speaking, all the shouting at these stages to have you standing on these platforms, on these stages in front of capitals, playing music. I think it's really, it's opening people's hearts up, which I think is what music does so well. I mean, how much can you penetrate if it's just, you know, a bunch of intense energy, music takes us to another place.

It opens us up so we can really let it sink in. I think it's so important that you're hearing and you're doing it. So I understand we're going to, I think we're going to attempt to have a live performance. What song is going to sing? I'm going to do, I will not be leaving quietly. All right. And if people want to check out your music in the future, where do we go? Five Times August.com.

Okay. And you can follow me on all the socials just at five times August. All right. on the social. Five times August, live here in studio. Take a listen. Here we go. You can hate me, try to break me, talk me down and denigrate me. You can try to silence every word, but I will not be leaving quietly. I won't leave. I won't leave. I won't leave I will not be leaving

quietly talk me try to outsmart me you can shame me try to blame me best to shut me up and scold me censor and try to kick me out

you've seen the last of me try to break me talk me talk me down silence everywhere. Music, see, this is what is going to just derail the lizard brains of the world. I'm telling you, nothing scares them more than making people feel.

It's such a fantastic moment. Great show coming up. We're going to get into the entire, really one of the first dives into 5G. This time, really it's all the news about the airlines, maybe grounding planes, Verizon, AT&T, launching some of these towers,

others not being launched. We're going to get into, what is this all about? Why is 5G effect airplanes. What does it do with our health? So stick around for that. But first, we've had comedy, we've had a little of music. Now it's time to get serious with The Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, wish you were here to get a little piece of the concert, but hopefully you enjoyed it on that end. Oh, it was wonderful. That's really, it's really great to see that stuff. You know, it goes really great with these headlines to preparing this segment. I had to wonder, are we looking at the final closing ceremonies of COVID-19? Take a listen.

to Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister in the UK, just came out and said this this week. All right. We can return to Plan A in England and allow Plan B regulations to expire. As a result, from the start of Thursday next week, mandatory certification will end. Organizations can of course choose to use the NHS COVID pass voluntarily, but we will end the compulsory use of COVID status certification in England. From now on, the Government is no longer asking people to work from home. And people should now speak to their employers about arrangements for returning to the office.

And having looked at the data carefully, the Cabinet concluded that once regulations lapse, the Government will no longer mandate the wearing a face mask anyway. Mr. Speaker, from tomorrow, we will no longer require face masks in classrooms. And the Department for Education will shortly remove national guidance on their use in communal areas. In the country at large, we will continue to suggest the use of face coverings in enclosed or crowded spaces, basis, particularly when you come into contact with people you don't normally meet, but we will trust the judgment of the British people and no longer criminalize anyone who chooses not to wear one. Incredible, powerful statements. I have to tell you, Jeffrey, have some mixed emotions on this.

Like, I mean, this is a guy that has driven this. He is supported the home of the Imperial College, which is the debacle. And university has put out these, you know, um, stats and models that have just driven everybody in these businesses out of our nations, but he's come around. Now, is this, is this real? Is it not? I'll tell you, I wouldn't trust this guy further than I can throw him, but it does, it does feel like over the last little bit of time that, you know, and I've been saying it, these guys are committing political suicide by pushing this agenda on the people. Maybe he's thrown in the towel, maybe he's had it. It certainly feels like he is, you know, really, you know, giving some gestures to those that

tend to control politics. My concern would be, and I think one of the things will watch is, do they replace him? Do we suddenly see, you know, Boris Johnson being replaced and putting some other puppet in place to get back to the agenda? But, I mean, it is certainly a sign that the tides have shifted. Well, whatever they do with him, it's going beyond Boris Johnson, too. So let's look at some of the headlines, though, in the UK really surrounding this. Now, this was right before he made it his announcement. They were ditching the self-isolation. This was the rumor. So self-isolation law set to be scrapped. It is scrapped now in favor of move towards learning to live with COVID. Remember, we did a whole show on that last week. We really saw the drumbeat

the drumbeat there. But now let's look at some of these other headlines here. This is a big one and it has implications for the United States. NHS, health department warning over vaccine mandate for NHS staff in England, exclusive. Leaked document says data on jabs, effectiveness against Amacron weakens case for compulsory vaccination. So the guardian there had a leak doc drawn up by the Department of Health and Social Care. And they were warning the ministers that they really should rethink going along with firing almost 5% of the NHS staff who remains unvaccinated at this point. And those firings, those letters to fire these people are going to be going out February 3rd. So all eyes on what they're going to do with NHF staff there,

because that has implications here in the U.S. But speaking of the NHS staff, here's maybe some of the reasons why Boris was forced to make this waiting lists at the hospitals in England. This is the headline hit six million. This is an all-time record. Absolutely crazy number there. And then we even have another internal, I guess you want to call this guy a whistleblower, but he was part of this thing called a Nudge Unit. So this is the headline. Ministers have used propagatistic tactics to scare public into complying with COVID rules, founder of number 10's Nudge Unit claims. Now number 10 is like their White House, and this was a co-founder and he said, you know, initially fear was used to boost the

compliances for the first lockdown, but then it became the driving force for all the restrictions. And he was worried about basically what is done to the population. And we reported on that in the past. They were using their secret of SIOPs military as well alongside of this. So there's a lot of things to answer to here, but it goes beyond the UK's borders. So let's go to wider Europe. Sweden, Sweden scraps demand for negative COVID tests to enter country. Now I might just today the WHO came out and called for an end to international travel bans completely saying that they caused partly economic and social unrest they have the ability to cause those so they want to end those

completely Scotland taking UK's lead really and saying they're going to end so Scotland amicomacan restrictions to end on Monday that's their leader says nicholas sturgeon now let's go to Israel, their finance minister is calling for a cancellation of the COVID vaccine green pass. This is really good news here because they had one of the strictest green passes. It says here in the article, there is no medical or epidemiological logic in the green pass. Many experts agree, says Lieberman. There is, however, direct harm to the economy, to daily operations and a not insignificant contribution to daily panic among the public. All things we already knew, but it's really great to hear these people parroting this. Now, looking at the restrictions,

Let's take those and let's jump because we really know now that Amacron ended this thing if it is if it is the final stages here So now let's look at the vaccine. What's happening with the vaccine is still being pushed? Is it being trashed? Well, first of all, Belgium is axing Moderna's vaccine for people 31 years old and under because of myocarditis risk. So that is out in that country and then we have Norway doing a turn as well for kids and it says here Norway is going a completely different direction than Denmark would not recommend corona vaccine to the youngest, this is translated. Norwegian authorities believe the five to 11 year old children may be better protected against future coronavirus if they are in fact infected naturally rather than vaccinated. And even here in the U.S., the Wall Street Journal is writing something like this. They're admitting this, which is just blowing my socks off. Prior COVID-19 infection offered better protection than vaccination during the delta wave.

Now, this was the CDC staying this, that during the delta wave of the summer. fall of 2021 that the natural immunity protected had greater protection than the shot. So there's a lot of people out there who's just jaws are on the floor reading these headlines. Well, there's still people suffering from some form of mandate with the university. Fauci has been saying, you know, refuses to sort of promote the idea that natural infection, you know, is obviously better than the vaccination, which every study we've shared here has shown. What's really, I think, I know there's a lot of us, you know, we're gun shy, right? We're questioning where this is going.

But one thing is for sure. I think the one thing we can take away from this, whether this is a part of a bigger game or a bigger play, and obviously we are here to keep our eyes on it, what this is showing us is that they clearly feel like they have lost the support of the world, the support of the citizens of the world. They clearly now recognize we have lost this battle. We are losing it.

Now, maybe this is a game and a trick to try and get it back, and then those surprises with something else. I see all of this on Twitter and Facebook, all the conversations. But let's be clear, so far right now, everyone watching the Ohio wire, all of you out there, those of us that do this work, that are sharing this information, pat yourself on the back right now and recognize that you have scared the powers of the world. They now recognize they're outnumbered, that they can't get reelected, that we may not have a vaccine program that works. We may be losing faith in all of the health ministries of the world, all of the, you know, the CDCs and the FDAs and the WHOs.

And so now they are trying to win us back by giving us what they think they want. Now, is that going to last? Should we be fooled by that? You know, this is like, you know, a witch handing out candy. But in the end, what we do know is what this signals to us is they know we're here, and now they're afraid of us. You bet. Well said.

And now we're into the booster shots. We're obviously past the two doses. We're into three and four doses. And even the boosters are getting some bad press. By some, I mean a lot. So check this out. The WHO has turned down the booster. says there's no evidence healthy children and adolescents need COVID boosters.

Now that's in direct contradicting the CDC's recommendation. So it's going to be interesting to see what the CDC does coming out over this next week to try to align with the WHO or they keep plunging ahead because the European Medicine Agency, EMA regulator, is aligning with WHO. Europe's drug regulator warns excessive COVID boosters could lead to problems with immune response joining WHO pushback. We reported on that quite a bit. And again, this is like if you grew up playing sports, when you start seeing the other teams starting to argue with each other, you know and screaming each other on their sidelines, you know you are clearly winning the game.

And this is obviously what's happening. You have divides amongst the ranks going at each other's throats. It's fantastic. It is clear divide. And in Israel, Israel's up to the fourth booster shot. And they're even showing, they're throwing in the towel what looks like here. This is the Times of Israel. Front page headline, Israel trial, World's First, finds fourth dose not to be. good enough against Amacron. It says in the article, we see an increase in antibodies. After the third dose, Rajab Yashi said, however, we see many infected with Ammocrine who received the fourth dose, granted a bit less than in the control group, but still a lot of infection she added. And this, this is in line with all the studies we're seeing, including this one. This is a world's first

study out of South Africa looking at German tourists who traveled to Cape Town South Africa. They had their shots and their boosters. This was in the Lancet. And it says, here. A group of German visitors who have received three doses of SARS-CoB two vaccines, including at least two doses of the MRNA vaccine, experienced breakthrough infections with Amacron between late November and early December 2021 while in Cape Town, South Africa. And I bet it goes even further than just those six German travelers. Now, last week we covered the big breaking news. We had Aaron Sirean, a lawyer at ICAN, Biden's mandate a strikedown. So Supreme Court blocks Biden's vaccine or test mandate for large private companies.

That's with 100 more employees. So the fallout here in the United States is starting to happen. We're seeing Starbucks. Just last week, Starbucks was trying to force their employees get the shot. They've backed off. Starbucks drops worker vaccine or test requirement after SCOTUS ruling. Then we have GE, General Electric, huge company here, suspends COVID vaccine and testing rules after Supreme Court blocks Biden mandate.

So we're seeing the drum start to happen here in the U.S. The U.S. is not really following the U.K.'s head forward charge in this. But as we pull back from this, there's a wider picture that has to be described and has to really be looked at at this point. So we have unexplained medical events that are happening in healthy people, extremely healthy people in some cases, and they just keep happening. And there's really no explanation from the medical community. And here's another one. This one just happened recently. Take a look.

Hashim Ali and Saude Barak Rodriguez 5 Rodriguez goal but it's Vahatheal Merttnery Rha'am! He's a ladd Riyadh Kulaharai

Kulis, Kulipalal. All of Kulah Inshallah, Inshallah, Al-Klibali Sabae Sabea Nade al-Wakra and it will

it's... Oh, oh, oh, oh Oh, oh. Seneyma, inshaw. Seneyma, Another one. Another one is just I mean I think we're probably over a hundred or so now, right? Around the world with these athletes dropping. Of course we have the video that we put out and to let people know out there. As we've said before, there's no proof that these athletes are having a reaction to their vaccinations.

We are going to continue removing the videos from that montage that you'll always found at our website as we discover more information. We're looking for more information if they were not vaccinated or if there's some other reasoning or credible reason that is given. But we are here right Jeffrey asking the question when do you ever remember seeing or hearing about a story like this? I mean, maybe one in a year, but hundreds. I mean, this is really, it's really sad and shows how incredibly easy it is to make people put on windfolds. Right. And you know, just last week, we had the stories about Joakovic, Novak Djokovic. And at the time he was facing a trial, we know now that he has been deported.

And, you know, these are the headlines here out of Newsweek. Fear Novak Djokovic would stoke anti-vaccination sentiment led to deportation. This is the judge. So. Uh-oh. Looks like we just lost Jeffrey. And I'll just say it. So we try to get Jeffrey back here. Oh, here we are.

When you look at that, Jeffrey, you know, that the fact that he is being removed for fear that he stokes some idea. I mean, what does that have to do with tennis? That isn't even a statement about health. I mean, they're not saying we're concerned about him putting other athletes at risk. We're concerned that, like, so what difference is that than saying, you know, he's Catholic and we think that he would be offensive to Muslims or Jewish people. So because of his religion, we're sending him home. his statements might, you know, bolster the idea and belief in Catholicism. I mean, there is no difference here. And it's really shocking. I think a huge mistake because he's, there's thoughts he

might sue over this issue, right? Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And, you know, it goes, it goes beyond him. So we're seeing other sports, too. We have an Olympic runner from Switzerland. This is Fabian Schumph. She's a triple vaccinated Olympic athlete, develops mild carditis, possibly end of her career. She's diagnosed with mild carditis shortly after being vaccinated with her booster shot. So these are some questions that really need to be answered. But you know, what's interesting is these athletes are performing in front of large, large audiences. They have medical teams and ambulances standing by.

But what does it look like when someone has an issue with their heart or perhaps a vaccine issue when they're at home with their family or when they're by themselves? Does it look like this? Bob Sagat had hand on his chest at the time of death. Hotel Security called his wife from the scene. Now, we don't have confirmation that the vaccine, the cause of death is still being ruled at this point. It's still unknown. But we have to ask these questions.

And he was, whatever. He went on, he went out to his followers and bragged about getting that third booster and recommended that other people get it. And so as far as I'm concerned, I know we get attacked every time we put these stories out there. We're not supposed to speculate. But here's the point. If you are an artist or an actor or an athlete and you are putting yourself on video, giving a recommendation to the world, which is none of your business on their health decisions,

but you say, I'm doing it. Look at me. I'm the poster child. You just invited the high wire into speculating when you die a couple of weeks later, all by yourself with no known history of some sort of heart disease or brain problem. You put yourself on the chopping block. So for all of you actors out there thinking you're going to do a PSA for this vaccine, go ahead. Go ahead and get that shot right on camera.

And when you die, just please know, we're not going to forget that that happened. We're going to remember you told us to look at you as the example. And that example will be followed all the way to your end. And listen, if it was just a couple people, we wouldn't be reporting on this. But now it's expanding across the whole country. Remember reported last week out of Indiana. This is an insurance CEO. Indiana Life Insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18 to 64.

Now that was last week. It's moving beyond Indiana and beyond the CEO. So this is a headline out at Epoch Times. They did some great investigation here. States investigating surge in mortality rate among 18 to 49 year olds, majority unrelated to COVID. It says deaths among people aged 18 to 49 increased more than 40% in the 12 months ending October 2021 compared to the same period. in 2018 and 2019 before the pandemic, according to analysis by the Epaq Times of death certificate data from the CDC.

Now let's look at some of the states here. For people that are seeing this for the first time, I didn't see our coverage of this last week. The statement made by the CEO of this insurance company that he saw a rise in deaths in Indiana, a 40% rise in deaths in this age group. What he said was to put that in perspective, we look at a once in a 200 year catastrophe.

One of those, once every two century catastrophes, the big one, when we look at that, we plan for that, we expect about a 10% rise in deaths during an event like this. This is a 40% rise. Just to give perspective to these numbers that we're looking at right now as we've been reporting, what will be the effects of these vaccines? What do we see? 40% is an astronomical number. Right. Thank you for that perspective. So important. And here's some of the states individually broken down from this article. Texas saw the 18 to 49 age mortality jump 61 percent, the second highest increase in the country of that. Less than 58 percent was attributed to COVID-19.

Florida, which saw an increase of 51 percent, 48 percent of that was attributed to COVID-19. Nevada saw the highest increase, 65 percent. They only had 36. That was attributed COVID-19. And then the District of Columbia experienced an increase of 72 percent. None of it was attributed to COVID. Now, let's look at a moment. Now, let's look at a moment. map here. Now this is the surge of 40% and up are highlighted. So you have 40%, 50%, 60% and 70%. You're looking at almost half the country there is seeing this surge. So there's a problem here. This is a flashing red light. It's a major, major signal. And people are going to have to really come to terms with what the heck is going on here because there are some major mortalities among

this age group that shouldn't be having it. Man, it's really shocking. And, you know, of course, as we're reporting this, we don't have the columns, right? Because our data collection is so slow in the United States of America. It doesn't matter we're the home of Microsoft. Apparently doesn't matter where the home of Apple is some of the greatest technological minds that ever lived. We are incapable of getting you accurate death information like what they died from probably for a year or two or three years out.

It's deplorable that we live in a modern society that is moving slower with its data production than almost every nation in the world. But at some point, we're going to start looking at heart attacks. We're going to start seeing the strokes. I'm really curious about those categories. I'm curious about autoimmune disease, anaphylactic reactions. You know, pneumonia's.

Remember, we know how many of them had COVID, but what if they had flu? What if they had something that wouldn't be COVID? Are they having that antibody-dependent enhancement reactions and enhancing other upper respiratory conditions and causing deaths that way? All of this is super fascinating. But here's what we know. deaths are through the roof in a way that we haven't seen, I don't think, in our lifetime. Right. You bet. You bet. And, you know, people are pointing fingers. Who's to blame? Who caused this? Why are these deaths up?

You know, we're still asking where this thing came from, where this virus came from. And we can count on Rand Paul to ask those questions over and over and over again. Anytime that he gets a seat in front of Anthony Fauci. And this was his latest. Take a listen. All right. Your desire to take down those who disagree with you didn't stop with Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford. You conspired with Peter Dezac, who you communicated with privately, and other members of the scientific community that wrote opinion pieces for nature. Five of them signed a paper for nature, an opinion piece. 17 signed a paper that called it conspiracy theory, the idea that the virus could have originated in the lab. Do you think words like conspiracy theory should be in a scientific paper?

Senator, I never used that word when I was referring to it. You're distorting virtually everything. Did you communicate with the five scientists who wrote the opinion piece in nature where they were describing, oh, there's no way this could have come from the lab? That was not me. What I did. Did you talk with any of those scientists privately? But you keep the story of the truth. It is stunning how you do that.

Did you talk to any of the scientists privately? Yes. Who wrote the opinion? You did. What were they telling you privately? Well, let me explain. You know you're going back to that original discussion when I brought together a group of people to look at every possibility with an open mind. So not only you're distorting it, you were completely turning it around as you usually do. Were most of the scientists that came to you privately? Do they come to you privately and say, no way this came from the lab? Or was their initial impression, Dr. Gary and others that were involved, was their initial impression actually that it looked very suspicious for a virus that came from a lab? Senator, we are here at a committee to look at a virus now that has killed almost 900,000 people.

And the purpose of the committee was to try and get things out how we can help to get the American public. And you keep coming back to personal attacks on me that have absolutely no relevance to reality. Do you think anybody has had more influence over our response to this than you have? Do you think that's a great success? Do you think it's a great success what's happened so far? Do you think the lockdowns are good for our kids? Do you think we slowed down the death rate? More people have died now under President Biden than did under President Trump.

You are the one responsible. You are the architect. You are the lead architect for the response from the government. And now 800,000 people have died. So you think it's a winning success, what you've advocated for government? Exactly the right question, the one I've been asking the whole time. How do you still have your job with one of the highest death rates in the world? with the greatest hospitals and medical facilities and doctors at your fingertips.

It's an abomination. And Rand Paul is all over them and naming a lot of people there too on top of just Anthony Fauci. Yeah, he's throwing a lot of names out there. We have Peter Dazek, EcoHealth Alliance. These are becoming common household names now of directions of where this thing might have started. We have Francis Collins, the former head of NIH, is in there as well. He's been popping up on his emails quite a bit. And then, you know, it reminds me of like those Scooby-Doo episodes,

do episodes when they catch one person, which would be Anthony Fauci, everyone's focused on him and they pull the mask off. But in the background, you see some guys and some people run in the shadows and they went and grab them too. And one of those people here who really needs to be looked at is Jeremy Ferrar. This is the head of what's called the Welcome Trust. It's a charity in the UK. And it's one of the world's top funders of health research. And if you really want to understand the Welcome Trust, check out this BMJ write-up of them. It really gives an idea of their inner intertwining of pharmaceutical relationships, conflicts of interest. It's called COVID-19, trust and welcome, how charities,

pharma investments overlap with its research efforts. It says in here, this was written in March 2021, that they're one of the top organizations that gain from this pandemic with all of their conflicts of interest. So there has to be something on that. But looking at this in Jeremy Farrar, he was recently written up in The Guardian, and this is what it looked like. He was a top stage advisor in the UK. Top stage advisor admitted lab leak theory was most likely origin of COVID in February 2020, but debate was shut down because it could cause harm to China bombshell emails reveal. It says in this article, the British scientist, that's Farrar, was shut down by his counterparts in the US who warned further debate about the origins of the virus could damage

international harmony. Now this article frames Farrar like someone who thought this thing was lab created and really tried to warn the world but it was shut down by his U.S. counterparts Fauci Collins but that's not what the evidence says and as Fauci pointed out there in the clip we just listened to there's absolutely not one shred of evidence for Paul's accusations but we're going to show you that there actually is so let's look at this now just recently Congress uh congressional committee unredacted emails that were public and had those big that you know the redacted emails those big blackouts on there yeah well they found out what was behind those And it's just adding.

So what I want to do here really at this point is let me take you through a timeline. I'll put together using the informed consent action networks emails that were obtained through the FOIA requests that showed Fauci and Dezac and all of these other people along with these new congressional unredacted emails. So these are the ones that we were here. I was talking to Aaron Siri last week. We put it out. And by the way, for all of you right now, they're maybe watching the high wire for the first time. If you want to be the first one to see the document dumps that we're getting from our FOIA request, you're about to see some of those emails.

Aaron Siri was doing that work, he puts out these requests. That document dump, the new emails coming from Fauci, we're in your hands first if you are on our newsletter. We want to make sure that you get the breaking news first because we want that commitment from you. So just go to the highwire.com. This doesn't cost you any money. Just put in your email. It's all we don't send you advertisements. We're not selling you anything.

We just want to make sure that you get the information. All of the data, the articles about Farrar right there. We went right very quickly through that Daily Mail article, but that will be in your inbox on Monday if you want to, you know, really get into the details. It's a hyperlink, super easy. I want to read that whole article. We want you to be able to say to your friends,

here's what the article said, or here's the exact study, or here are the emails that came out. And I have to say, here's what Del Bigtree said. I want to change the culture of news. We want transparency. Facts is what matters, not people's opinions, not expert opinions, and not talk show host opinions. You need to be looking at the facts. We're doing something that nobody else in news is doing for you.

We're providing you with all of the data that appears on this show. Every video, every single article is in your hand so that you continue that research. Sure, we have to grab a couple of quotes to keep this moving and not making a 10-hour show. But that doesn't mean, you want to say, well, then you're cherry-picking. Who else would say, fine. Here, look at the entire document. If you're not a part of this newsletter right now, you're not getting the body of work that international scientists are helping us put together for you. So please, just sign up to that newsletter right now so that you can also get these document dumps.

So here, Jeffrey, to get back to it, we now are going to go through emails that the Congress has had unredacted and the email dump that came to us at the Inform Consent Action Network through our lawyer, Aaron Siri. And so this tells a story then, I guess, is what you're telling me. Yeah, it sure does. It sure does. And a bombshell one at that too. So let's go, it's going to be like a rough timeline here. Let's start with February 1st, 2020. There's a conference call. Now, Jeremy Ferrar is on this conference call. And he's kind of playing secretary at this point. He's taking notes. This conference call was a bunch of world leaders, world leaders in genome research and genetic engineering, things like that. And he's taking notes. And he writes an email of those notes. He says, here's my notes. He says, here's my notes. He says, sends that email to Collins, Fauci, and a gentleman called Lawrence Tabick. He was the second in command at NIH. He is now the acting director. So all three of those people get this email. This is what Ferrar writes. He says from Michael Frazen, now Michael Frazen was discoverer of the SARS receptor. So this guy has been around the block on this. He says he is bothered by the fear on site and has a hard time explained that as

an event outside the lab, though there are possible ways in nature, but highly unlikely, goes on to say acquisition of the firon site would likely to stabilize the virus but would make it disseminate to new tissue so given above a likely explanation could be something as simple as past as passage SARS live co v in tissue culture on human cell lines under bsl 2 that's biosafety lab two for an extended period of time accidentally creating a virus that would be primed for rapid transmission between humans via gain of furon site from tissue culture and adaption to human as2 receptors via repeated passage. Basically he's saying it looks like it might have been a biosafety lab accidental release. So Farrar says in his own words, he finishes this email to Fauci and Collins

and everybody. He says, so I think it becomes a question of how do you put it all together, whether you believe in this series of coincidences, what you do, what you know of the lab in Wuhan, how much could be in nature, accidental release or natural event, question mark. I am 7030 or 6040. That's saying he's 70, 30, 60, 40 on an accidental release. Now, at that same, now those are big, that's a big prediction at that point. Now, that's a huge statement. Now, at that same time, there's a gentleman named Christian Anderson. He sends an email to Anthony Fauci, copied Jeremy Ferrar on this as well.

And he says here, I should mention that after discussion earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself. Now, this is a separate group that has gotten together, and they're all talking. These are all experts. Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. So point number two, right out the gate, you have pretty much almost all of the experts that are taking these calls out the gate saying this really, it looks like it may be something that was created in a lab. Yeah, absolutely.

So now we have one of the ICANN emails. And this one has to do with Eddie Holmes. This was an ICAN email and it says, here's Farrar, sending to Fauci at the top there. Farrar says, I'm pushing WHO again today. And then he shares a rough draft of what we now know as a nature article. We're going to cover really shortly. But Eddie Holmes says to Jeremy Farrar, who's one of, Jeremy Farrar, he says, it's fundamental science and completely neutral is written,

did not mention other anomalies as this would make us look like loons. As it stands, it's an excellent basic science, I think, which is a service in itself. Of course, they're talking about which will eventually be a nature article on the origins of this saying it's a natural origin. So that's on February 4th. So now we go back to another I can email Fauci. This is a day later. Fauci is already being allowed to pick a group. So this is Jeremy Farrar to Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins.

And he says this. Ferrar says, I spoke again with WHO this morning. I believe they have listened and acted. Let me know if you agree. at the WHO meeting next week, they will set up the group who will, quote, look at the origins and evolution of 2019 NCOV. They didn't name it at that point. He also says they have asked for names to sit on that group.

Please do send names. So now here we have Ferrar pressuring the WHO to form a group and telling Fauci to stack this group with people that he wants in it. So let's go forward to that WHO, that WHO meeting. And here it is right here. This is that one Farrar was talking about a week later, global research and innovation forum towards a research roadmap. The whole point of this from the words of this forum was to form a consensus on strategic directions to discuss research priorities and to address a framework of natural history of COVID-19 of 2019 novel coronavirus. So they weren't even saying anything about a lab.

They just said, we want to find the natural history. That's the tracks we're going to lay and that's what we're going to look. People all focused. We're going to stay in this hall. way of natural evolution, even though all the scientists a week ago are saying it most likely does not have a natural origin. But let's just keep the conversation there because we don't want to look like loons. Wink, wink, wink. Right. And so lo and behold, who's presenting at this conference? None other than Jeremy Farrar himself right from the conference blueprint sheet right

here. And that's at 1600 hours. And he is talking about main knowledge gaps and research priorities for for this reason for the research activities laid out by the w h o with a group that fouchy picked so now we fast forward to about seven days later february 13th and we have fouchy talking to then cdc had nancy messinier and what he's saying to her is really the handing of the baton so fouchy collins implicated in this but here we have he says nancy the official us g g-gg group will be convened by NAS National Academy of Sciences. Bob Cadillick is the person with direct knowledge of that. In addition, there is an ad hoc group informally led by Jeremy Farr of Welcome Trust. This group has about 15 people, all of whom are highly respected scientists,

mostly evolutionary biologists who are convening by email and conference calls. I have been on two of these calls since Jeremy invited me to look at all the bat, pangolin, and human coronavirus sequences to try to determine the evolutionary origin. This is not my area of expertise so I have backed off and I'm leaving it all to Jeremy. Best Tony. That's on February 13th. That's what we're going to focus this thing. He has totally erased all the people reaching out and saying it looks like lab origin. Right. And just a couple days later, the hammer comes down. This is in the Lancet. This was published. This is now the infamous Lancet conspiracy article. Statement in support of scientists, public health professionals and medical professionals of China,

at combating COVID-19. We now know that Peter Dazek was one of the brains behind this. And it says, we, yep, Jeremy Ferrar's on there. You have even Christian Drozden. He was the PCR test guy. It says here, we stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin. So we're talking, Del, two weeks out from the initial February 1st emails where everyone's saying this really does look like it. I'm 70-30, I'm 60-40. Two weeks later, we got to crush this crazy idea, this conspiracy theory of lab origin. What a bunch of sellouts. It's absolutely disgusting and despicable.

And every fact checker in the world took that, ran with it, and used it as the impetus to ban people off the internet en masse. Twitter, Facebook, everywhere. So now we're going to March 5th. This is another ICAN email talking the media talking points. Fauci has his hand. in this as well. So lo and behold, he picked Clifford Lane as one of the leads. Now, Clifford Lane was the second in command at NIH. So he was one of the leads in the WHO mission to China to find the natural origins. So this email from ICAN is talking about the main talking points. So these are what the media is to be

told. So this is what the media can ask, what it can write about. This is what it's told. So here we have NIAID crafting the media narrative. And it says here that key questions related to natural history. So the joint mission is focused on key questions related to natural history. We're always worrying about this natural history. The same words coming out of the WHO, less than a month before that. So now it gets really interesting because then a couple days after that, we have the nature article that comes out, the origins, the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. There we have Christian Anderson we have Eddie Holmes we have Robert Gary he was on one of the initial emails about talking about this thing so we have them there's putting this out

there and then this is an interesting email here this is a bio safety Fauci starts getting questioned about Wuhan Institute of virology and the biosafety this was in April there is April 2020 and this was for Secretary Pompeo it said down a little bit it said I would appreciate that you and your office could help us with the following observation exchanges and agreements with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on the issues of biosafety, biosafety and enforcement and inspection mechanisms at Wuhan Institute of Virology or any other Chinese high biosafety labs your institutes have interacted with

and the extent to which the U.S. has been involved in building the Chinese labs and helping enforce the safety standards and inspections. So right there, Fauci is probably starting to feel some real heat. Now that email says it's not, this is an investigation. We just want some answers. We want it's the preliminary questioning. But here's let's really bring this home here because we we talked about and so did Rampal. The great Barrington declaration we now know from emails was was kind of put down and crushed in the media thanks to the work of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins. We know through those emails. For those people watching for the first time, the Great Barrington Declaration, which was put together

by world renowned scientist, Dr. Martin Koldorf, Dr. Sinaitra Gupta, Dr. J. Bata Chariya, It essentially was into sort of a focused protection. Let's protect those in a high-risk categories while letting the rest of the people that are healthy. Let's not lock them down. Let's go ahead and just let those that are healthy enough catch this virus naturally so that we get to herd immunity and protect those in the high-risk category where the body of all of our deaths ended up occurring. None of that happened. In fact, most of the people that were terrified of this pandemic and this disease ended up making laws where they forced the,

nursing homes to take on patients that were sick and then basically lit a dry grass fire that killed untold amount of elderly. Shockingly, all probably people that were getting pensions and things like that. When you start to look at this, it's really hard to not sort of jump to some sort of diabolical concerns. But it was weird that instead of focusing on protecting those that were vulnerable over 80 in nursing homes, other comorbidities, those, you know, many people like Cuomo forced the disease into those nursing homes. So really shocking. The opposite with the Great Barrington Declaration, but we now know as of last week that the head of NIH, Francis Collins, said we need to squash this idea that we should let this run its course, let people live their lives and just

protect the elderly. Clearly not open to that science. They had a different agenda in mind. Correct. And he was asking for a devastating takedown of three fringe epidemiologists that wrote the Great Bering to Declaration. So he was coordinating that. And now we see here that he's coordinating another takedown. So listen to this. So Collins writes to Fauci, Lawrence Tabick, and Clifford Lane. Those are three names that we just covered. He writes this, wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy with what seems to be growing momentum. And there's an article link there. What he's talking about is the nature article that just was released. He says, I hope the nature medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this, but probably didn't get much visibility.

Anything more we can do? Ask the National Academy to weigh in. Now, to this, Fauci responds just directly to Collins. So it's a one-on-one email we have. This is unredacted. Take a look at this. Fauci says, I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in time. Well, we know now that it hasn't.

gone away. It's grown. It's become shinier. And a lot of people are focusing on it. To bring me back to my memory, the Lancet article, has it been pulled? I know that they broke apart the group that wrote this. They sort of sent this team of scientists to Wuhan. All

of them have been connected to the Wuhan lab work or most of them. And so them making these statements, had those papers been pulled or they just been looked at and said, we no longer trust this and we're disbanding the people involved? Like, we're technically is this conversation at around these people that that authored these articles but did it from

what we now know to be a completely biased position they had to go back because peter dazick had obviously extreme conflicts of interest and he signed that so they had to go back and put these conflicts of interest on there it was a it was a huge egg on their face and also other people that had those conflicts of interest with the welcome trust and so on and so forth that were on that article Peter Dasak was removed from the Lancet's. The Lancet had its own investigatory committee that was looking into these origins. Peter Dasak was removed from that after his ties with the Equal Health Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But all was done after public pressure.

So none of this was done on the front end as the Lancet did zero due diligence. As they did, just like they did with hydroxychloroquine, had to be pulled on the back end. But, you know, totally discredited on those two points. And frankly, it frankly treasonous, treasonous, you know, I think actions, because all while you are, you know, building this lie, shall we say, you're giving China and all the people in that lab time to erase any ability to investigate in the future. So instead of doing a proper job, you know, how you would with anybody, any other criminal would just kick in the door and surprise them, you told them that you were coming, you sent all the best friends of the lab that. have been funding the lab. They whitewashed this whole thing. And now we may never get to the truth of what will be, you know, this dark blot and, you know, leaking through the pages of our history books. Right, right. And the winds seem to be changing, at least in the public, you know,

the people that used to be hard supporters of Fauci, hard supporters of the lockdowns and the things that Fauci was kind of putting his weight behind, are now turning on him. Everyone recognizes this guy. Take a look at Dr. O'Hawks. odds. The challenge is a debate. I'm challenging him, doctor to doctor, to actually argue about the merits of vaccine mandates, about ignoring naturally acquired immunity. So if you've actually had the illness, why would that count as protecting you? Like it has for all of known human history? And what about these inexcusable delays with therapeutics? And I'm not just talking about right now, although it is a catastrophe now that we don't have monoclonal antibodies and any of the pills that we

think might work. But some of these pills have been around since before COVID started. So what gives. How is it possible that in America, which is 4% of the world population, we have 15% of the world deaths. I think Dr. Fauci is basically the J. Edgar Hoover of public health. He's a petty tyrant. He got COVID wrong. He continues to get it wrong. I keep hearing from people inside the public health space and outside, regular doctors like me, that he's not managing this correctly. So let's get to the root cause of why this is occurring. And I want to specifically go over the issues that they've been so confident about that they've gotten diametrically wrong. Thames fighting words.

I mean, you know, it makes me wonder. I know that there's issues. He has talked about vaccinations before saying, I don't get into that. My wife handles that. It makes me wonder if he's winning some family or losing some family arguments at home. And he's a little pissed off about it because he followed Fauci's lead. I know some of us are thinking of all the people to debate Anthony Fauci,

how about not one of his number one fans that's been promoting him throughout this, you know, COVID epidemic? Why don't we have Dr. Peter McCola or Dr. Robert Malone get in there to debate him? But either way, the sentiment is there. And clearly, as we start to see, you know, I think you're going to see these guys turning on each other. This is just like a mob bust. And once, you know, what do you think Fauci is thinking about Farrar? These guys cannot trust each other. They know someone is going to spill the beans.

Someone's going to throw him under the bus. That's shifting public opinion. Television promoters. I mean, this is an amazing, amazing. time, Jeffrey. Yeah, it is. And every time they appear in public now, they're saying the exact opposite thing that they were saying literally two weeks ago and throughout the entire pandemic response.

So watching them basically sound like us now, it's really something to see. And like you said at the opening of this, we're going to have to really watch where this goes. I think there's going to be some really important broadcast here as far as strategy and next directions about where we can see this going. All right. Well, I know you're deeply watching every move. You know, you've got your finger on the pulse, as they say. And so we'll see you next week. Thank you for the great work, Jeffrey.

All right. Thanks, Del. All right. If you like that, definitely check out the Jackson Report, which is at our website, thehighwire.com. He is writing more in-depth. He gets more in-depth in the topics that we covered here. It's an amazing resource for you.

I just want to take this moment very quickly to say that I know when you watch this show, you were saying nobody else is doing it like this. I can't trust the information anyone else has given me like the high- Highwire is they're transparent. You're showing us your data. All of that is true. But look at this. We have FOIA requests. We have a legal team that is bringing Fauci's emails to light. And by the way, I want you to know, even though I'm not in direct communication with Rand Paul, I wouldn't claim that, we do send our information out to these senators and Congress people that are starting to raise the right questions just as we send it to other newsleaders, even if it's to bother them to say, hey, look what we found today.

Look what we found today. This might, you know, help with, you know, the narrative or changing your story, as it were, all of that is made possible and is happening here because of you. And this is 22. Let's not get relaxed here, right? It is clear we're winning. It is clear that we've done an incredible job and we've got them running over the hill. But once they get over that side of the hill, what do you think is going to happen over there? You think they're giving up? You think they'll give up on the billions and trillions of dollars they planned on making off of our backs, turning us into human pin cushions and tracking systems that track us everywhere we go? What are you to do? Throw all that technology to the garbage and say, well, that's it. We lost. We lost.

Del Bigtree in the Highwire one. It's over. No way. There's no way. We cannot stop now. In fact, this is the most important time to keep hitting hard, which is what we plan to do. We're all over them. There we retreat, but this is where they make the mistakes. This is where they start attacking each other. This is where they start trying to hide the evidence. And who do you think is going to be there looking for it? It's us. And we cannot afford to do that. This is an international journey right now. I need you to go to thehighwire.com. Please donate. Become a reoccurring donor. asking for $22 for $22. If you are, you've done very well in life, then make it larger than that.

But please, if it's a cup of coffee once a month, give us $5 a month, you know, throw the Starbucks and maybe hit the gym instead. But whatever it is, we need your help. We want to win this. I don't want to say hashtag winning. I want to say hashtag one. That's all dependent on you. So please help us with this effort this year.

It's super important. I think literally the fate of the human race and certainly of the United States of America hangs in the balance. Okay, well, one of the biggest stories I think I've seen in some time and shocking, I was actually out to dinner with Mickey Willis and we were talking about how quickly the news changes. I mean, there's not a headline that seems to last more than two or three days. And just as the Supreme Court rules to stop the mandate for all employers, you would think that would be big news. But it certainly got trumped by the idea that we might have to ground all of our planes because of the rollout of 5G? What? This is what that look like.

Major Airlines warning of a possible catastrophic aviation crisis beginning in less than 24 hours when AT&T and Verizon are set to launch new, stronger 5G technology. 5G wireless internet service. 5G cell service, high speed 5G service, 5G wireless technology, ultra-fast, 5G wireless. The FAA has warned that 5G antennas near airports could disrupt altitude sensors on board flights. Its critical technology pilots rely on while landing in bad weather or low visibility. The altimeter bounces radio signals off the ground to tell pilots their distance to the ground. Just an altimeter, no big deal. This is unsafe.

Let us be clear. This is unsafe. The manufacturers have said so. Our airlines are saying so. The FAA is saying so. And so our pilot wounds. Airlines wrote the Biden administration, urging immediate action on the rollout of the 5G network. The CEO's adding that certain larger planes can't be used and could potentially strand tens of thousands of Americans overseas.

Now we hear there are late negotiations underway. trying to ensure that the airlines do in fact have a buffer zone, a two-mile buffer zone around those cell sites near airports. That would give them, they believe, the protection so the planes can land safely. And that would therefore, hopefully, avert any kind of a massive meltdown that the airlines have been worried about. So all of that news came over the last week, you know, sort of all over the airwaves. And then just yesterday, the rollout began Verizon AT&T rolling out the 5.J. They didn't stop it altogether. There seems to be a limited rollout.

Here's what the headlines now look like. Verizon, AT&T, delay 5G rollout around some airports after stark warnings from U.S. Airlines. Just put those words together for a second. Let's just, let me just show you what I do for a living. I have a red flag here. I'm a journalist. I see AT&T delay the 5G rollout around some of the airports after a stark warning. Is this supposed to make me feel better?

It certainly does not. And, you know, one of the things that I love about my job is I get to reach out to the best in the world. When I think about, all right, I want to talk about 5G. And I thought, who would be the best person to talk to? And I thought, why don't we go to the leading attorney that is winning lawsuits against, you know, the companies that are using 5G, a huge win with the FCC forcing or demanding that we have a change in the way that we're looking at the health guidelines. This was CHD versus the FCC 5G and wireless radiation guidelines lawsuit case summary challenging FCC's wireless radiation guidelines. So I'm talking about Daphne Tackover, the leading attorney that won that case and is in many cases with 5G. I called her and said, could you give me some thoughts on what's happening here?

And boy, could she have her. So I am honored to have her joining me now. Daphne, thank you for taking the time today to help us through this. really bizarre story. Thank you, Jill. But you know, those of us who have been following, you know, the 5G and the telecom industry are not surprised from what you're just seeing with the airlines. It's just ridiculous. Okay. So to start out with, can you just help me understand what it is we're talking about. I mean, you know, a lot of times people talk about 5G and health, but right now I just want to understand how is it that 5G rollout affects airplanes?

So, 5G is a very confusing concept. I mean, we've been told that 5G has been already launched. So why is it not being launched? So 5G is really different than 4G, 3G, 2G, 2G and 1G, 3G and 4G were technologies, actually technology. 1G was calls, 2G was calls and text, 3G was called text and a little bit more data, 4G was called text and a lot of data. 5G is not a technology, 5G is a concept, is an infrastructure,

structure that's supposed to allow the internet of things, driverless cars and anything and everything that would come moving forward. So it's not just very clearly it's not you're saying that those other 4G 3g 2g 1g were actual technologies 5G was just a concept because I thought I was hearing about like any technology. Okay the concept and a technology. It's a person for most of a concept that we're supposed to now connect things not only people. So it's not one language. 4G user language is called LTE. That's how 4G devices communicate. 5G is a concept that's supposed to enable Internet of Things networks, which means that we're going to interconnect tens of billions of devices. So anything and everything in our house,

environment is going to have an antenna and they're going to communicate and intercommunicate. So your laptop will talk to your refrigerator, your laundry machine, to our tea kettle. They now have diapers that have an antenna, so they text the mother every time the baby poops. So all of these billions and billions of devices want to be interconnected. And for that, we need a much more intense infrastructure of antennas because you have many more devices that you need to interconnect. So we need to create a big infrastructure. And that is what 5G. Now you have to create solutions and how to create this massive networks that interconnect anything and everything. And the way you do it, there were different ways

about how to do it. So in the beginning, they saw that they would put what we all heard about 5G millimeter wave networks. Yeah. Millimetre waves. So let's maybe I should explain a few words what it is all these frequencies and help the confusion. So frequencies that transfer all these data are electromagnetic frequencies. We have an electromagnetic spectrum.

And we have a lot of different frequency. Another word for frequency is a wave. Okay. The higher the frequency, the higher the more waves it have per second. So we measure frequencies in hertz. So a frequency of 1 hertz means that it has a relation per second. A frequency of 60 hertz, which is for example our home electricity, will be 60 oscillation per second.

For one technology, we use much higher frequencies. Frequency is between 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz. So that would be 3,000 hertz. And it's basically those groups of frequency we're using for us, while technology, it's called radio frequency between 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz, which means 3,000 hertz to 300 billion oscillations per second. Okay. Right now, most of the wireless technology we've been using for cell phones, Wi-Fi,

has been between 600 megahertz to actually 5 gigahertz. So from 600 million oscillations per second to seven, to seven, two, two, two, two, two, to five to five billion oscillations per second. Okay. Millimetre waves, again, there are still radio frequencies. They're just higher frequencies on the same group of frequencies. They're mostly between 30 gigahertz to 300 gigahertz. So 30 billion hertz to 300 billion hertz.

Okay. So the higher frequencies are the one we've been using. The problem is the higher the frequency, the most easily is obstructed by things in the environment. Okay. So you need to put many. many more antennas in closer proximity so they don't lose connection in order to have this network working. That was not a very smart idea to begin with. Well, this kind of frequency can deliver much more data.

They have much bigger bandwidth of data like bigger roads. Again, they're easily obstructed by things in the environment, and so they're not very practical. Verizon, AT&T, Timoaba bought these frequencies already three or four years ago. But those networks they were offered, they were only. offered they were only in very limited spaces because they literally could not create that big network so after that didn't work too well and even though let me just get this cleared I want to make sure I understand so all the the talk I heard 5G or these millimeter waves super high frequency they don't penetrate through

trees and environments and walls very well so we need more of these closer to you all these health experts were telling me that's this millimeter frequency is going to basically rip our cells apart, all of this. And you're saying that they basically scrapped the millimeter waves that we've all been talking about 5G. They did not scrap. They're using it in different ways than they planned to do. Okay.

But now, that's the story that goes behind the problem with the airplane. But it wasn't good for the cell networks. It was not good. It was not effective. Ones were getting hit it because they didn't have enough family. So they were like moving to the 4G. So it was not very practical. Okay.

Eventually, in 2021, the FCC did another auction and decided to sell. So after the industry was working, how to make it work, this 5G that they promise anyone, they decided they probably need to work on lower frequencies. So they decided, so they basically bought from the FCC, the frequencies which are called the C-BAN frequencies, which are between 3.5 gigahertz to 4.2 gigahertz. That auction took place a year ago, And they paid $81 billion for these frequencies. So these frequencies do travel much better than the millimeter wave frequencies. And they're a little bit fast, like they can carry more information than the, let's say,

7,800 megahertz frequencies, 1.9 gigahertz frequency that we're using until now for cell phones. Okay. So they can get more data a little bit faster, but not as fast as the millimeter wave. So basically, they can change their plan. And some of it does have millimeter waves. Usually you have millimeter waves in central cities or in stadiums or in airports. Okay. But not really so much all over because you need to make sure that these waves go farther and they cannot do it with the millimeter waves.

Okay. So here we go they got a C band. So now so we scrapped, in many ways they said we're not going to use the millimeter waves to drive the cell phone service. So they went and purchased this midband wave group or C band and said, let's grab that. paid $81 billion to buy that midband now and get rid of this thought we all had that we're going to the super high frequency. We'll use it in some places, but mostly the new network is going to be building midband. Okay, I'm with you.

And the problem on that band of frequency was actually mostly used by the military. So they actually, the FCC had to work with the military to get them to move to other frequencies. And again, that was exactly the problem that happened with the airlines because they were doing more doing first and then figure out the mistakes. So nobody I guess figured the planes use those frequency for their safety features. And now it's happening. So the military all got off of it. They said let's get out of the way of those midbans being sold. No one talked to the airlines and just let the airlines go ahead. This is what they were putting in their airplanes. Correct. So now we have on January force, both AT&T and T Verizon supposed to launch those new C-Bans.

mid-band technology and network. So for Verizon, it's called ultra wide-band 5G network. And then the airplane, the airline company figured that there is a problem and asked to delay the launch of this technology so they can figure out what to do with the planes. So the airplanes, as your promo explained, they have an altimeter technology that helps measure altitude, especially in bad weather. And if you are going to have those cell towers, and they meet those frequencies,

they're going to interfere with the airplane system. Because if you put two antennas that use the same frequency, they're going to be interference. So that is clearly a huge risk. And the FAA interfere, and they agreed that they would not put those antennas in a distance of two miles away from the airport of only 50 airports. But what about all the other?

50 airports. So 50 airports are going to remove it. It's not even the main airport. Yes. Now, what about, let me just ask you just very quickly. So you surround the airports and say those are okay. But isn't the plane like sending and getting information along all along the way? I mean, is it going to be interfering? It gets, but you don't have, but you don't have, if you're somewhere in the middle of the ocean, you don't have those frequencies interfering with your systems. And those systems of altitude that measure the distance from the grounders, especially important in those close, when you get closer to the airport, where every second matters when you actually want to do the landing. I'm not a pilot, but you know, this is, this is really, you know, quite basic. So their system is going to interfere, critical system from the plane.

And what I read from the from the letter that the CEO sent to the FCC and to the White House is that apparently it's not going to be only this altimeter system. Apparently, there are other systems, you know, airplanes have more systems that communicate, with other systems in the plane. So apparently those systems also communicate with other critical systems in the plane. And according to that letter, they said that at least three, it might be the three type of airplanes,

the 777, 787, 787, might have to be grounded for that reason. And it's not, again, it's not only the antimeter. And that's the ridiculous, it seems like the telecom industry has so much power that they allow them even to endanger planes, endanger traffic, you know, it's cargo, its people, its economy, and all of it, in order to reduce your

download sprites from your movie from 10 seconds to two seconds, how can that be more important than the safety of airplane, enabling flights and communication? It's outrageous and it's not the first time. Let me ask you a question. Let me ask you this question as a lawyer. Should unfortunately this cause an airplane to crash, do you think there would be lawsuits both against the airline, but also would it be possible to sue the cell phone carriers or maybe even the FCC that didn't interfere here? Where are the liabilities should this cause a catastrophic accident? It's complex. I think, first of all, you know, I assume that the product can be some kind of a loss of injunction against the telecom industry and this system.

In terms of the FCC, it will be more complex. There's very specific rules on when and how you can sue a government agency. Yes, but I do think that lawsuits are probably possible. I hope it would not get to that. I guess we didn't hear anything in the past couple of days since that letters. I guess there's some negotiation going on. I mean, I've been following and nothing happened since. I don't know even that it is possible that they not really launched those systems.

system someone told them to put a halt on it so I guess there are negotiation but I have to say I'm not very optimistic you know we saw we had a bad experience with this 5G technology already before about a year ago NASA warned that those 5G millimeter wave networks are interfering with their weather systems and you know weather systems are critical in order to warn us of of catastrophes and as we've seen in the past few years we have numerous catastrophes related to weather and because of this 24 gigahertz millimeter wave frequency that they use for 5G, they're interfering with those radar systems. There was a big conference in injured and actually the word lost. 5G

and Telecom 1 got the backing of the FCC. They did some kind of changes to the system, but overall the rest still exist. And 5G Telecom 1, just in order to get you faster downloads between your game, you know, sacrificing lives of millions of people. It's going to cost a lot, It's unbelievable, and it just shows you just how sort of stupid this whole system is. Our government agencies being commandeered by industry, just captured. As so well put, they're supposed to be protecting us, and now they're making calculated risk with thousands of people that are traveling right now. I'll bet you anything.

There's a lot of fingers crossed in control towers and amongst airlines. I don't know, probably AT&T and Verizon are probably crossed into fingers, hoping that somehow everything goes smoothly, but there are people in the air, I will assume landing at airports that could be at risk. So one of the things that comes up as you're talking to me, because this is a conversation, and you're not a doctor or a scientist, but you have been suing, you know, one of the issues when you won against the FCC, just very quickly, that was really a case looking at how had you approved 5G and what type of proper studies had been done looking to safety,

and then what type of public, you know, hearings did you have to allow you. the public to weigh in on this conversation as giant decisions the public should be involved we should have a vote at least with our voices you got the FCC I mean you got the judge that basically said the FCC had moved too quickly and didn't use proper science is that the basic just of it yes so I I was I mean I'm not a scientist but you know when you're an attorney and you run those cases which are based on science you have to learn the science even now and I assume I probably know more than most scientists on this issue as a result. But we do have a lot of scientists

that work with us. We actually have scientists, one of the biggest scientists on this issue in the United States being one of our petitioner, Professor David Carpenter, who is the co-editor of the BIA initiative report, which is the most comprehensive review of the science on wireless arms. And this case, essentially, the FCC adopted what's called health guidelines regarding radio frequency or wireless technology in 1996. Since 19906, the FCC did not update its guidelines despite thousand more studies show clear evidence of harms

of this technology including government studies. And in 2013, it's a long story, the FCC was forced to open a docket, basically, an inquiry asking the public whether or not the FCC should review its guidelines. That docket was open for six years. Thousands of comments were filed, thousands of studies showing harms were filed. In December 2019, the FCC published a decision to that inquiry. There's no evidence showing harm. There's no need to review the guidelines.

Wow. That's it. Eight simple pages. It was thousands of studies. There were like hundreds of comments by doctors, scientists, people who've been injured, no answer, no respond, nothing. Exactly. So we basically the whole thing was a fraud.

And the FCC claims that they're not a health guideline and they rely on other agencies to decide whether or no the evidence is there to show that their harm and basically mostly on the FDA. The FDA also did not conduct any review for the science. And the only thing that the FCC quoted was the FDA website and a couple of letters from the head of the relevant department in the FDA saying that there's no evidence of harm. No analysis, no respond to the evidence in the record, nothing. So we sued the FCC. We had 60 days to sue the FCC.

We filed a lawsuit claiming that FCC decisions, capricious, arbitrary, not evidence-based, and abuse of discretion. And we won. It was, it's in a Pellate Court. It's a federal court. It's a three-judge decision to two to one decision. And I recommend people to listen to the hearing. It's, it was really, the judges were literally in shock

by what the absentee has done. So the court ruled that essentially the absentee did not conduct what's called a reason decision making, which is required from every agency when they're getting, into a decision. Part of it was that the court ruled that the FCC did not properly review the evidence that was filed with the FCC and did not give a reason decision making why that evidence that we provided does not require a change of the guidelines. In its decision, the court specifically, I mean, we provided all of evidence about the negligence in which the

FCC approached a 5G issue and the court ruled that indeed the FCC did not properly review the evidence when it comes to new technologies. 5G Wi-Fi. They never reviewed the evidence on Wi-Fi. Never reviewed anybody. And there's many, many studies, clear studies of evidence including DNA damage, ADHD, cancer, I mean, damage to sperm. I mean, 50% there's a 50% reduction in quality of sperm in mail. You know, there's about, I think 15% of the correlation cannot have children. Nobody's asking why when the clearest reason is those cell phone and Wi-Fi that people put in their pocket and the Wi-Fi and the laptop they put on their needs.

And there's clear evidence. It's destroying your sperm. There's no maybe evidence. It's clear evidence. You know, there was comments in the doctor from the pediatric association. There was comments from them, and they just ignored the whole thing. And so the court ruled the GFCC did not review evidence of science on new technologies. They did not review clear, critical elements of the harm of this technology, something called

POSational and modulation. Let's talk about the harms then. harms then okay so when we you know now we're out you know one of the things that I'm questioning is has 5G rolled out I'm getting a mixed message in that I have people tell me that it's 5G everywhere we launched 5G is where we're seeing COVID you know people wanted me to cover this topic I'm not going to ask you to get into a lot of detail but that COVID is really just the symptoms of the 5G rollout but on the other hand I people that tell me your phone's not capable of

5G. It's still 4G. We're not on 5G. And then you told me we jumped off of this millimeter waves for the most part. So what has rolled out? Has 5G rolled out? That's what I found shocking about these headlines was, wait a minute, I thought 5G was already rolled out. So what is and is not rolled out right now? So as I said, there's some millimeter wave antennas that were rolled out, especially in major cities. Otherwise, there's a lot of other antennas. Basically, a lot of them are four. 4G or what for example Verizon called 4G plus. There's T-Mobile, they actually bought the lower frequency, 600 megahertz frequency that reaches very far distances.

But again, it's not the millimeter rate 5G. Some of it is, some of it is not. It's basically, and they did not even provide the promise that they promise us faster downloads with. There's numerous articles that all of this 5G faster, it's alive that actually many places, in most places, 4G is faster. There was a lot of fraud, and those companies

constantly misdeered the public. For example, 18G came up telling people with a cell phone that have 5G on it, 5G evolve. It's actually there was no 5G and actually they were ordered to remove that because it's a lie. So there is some system of 5G, but depends again, what it is that you define is 5G and whether or not those networks that they told you

are 5G and faster there, whether or not they're faster and actually most of them were not faster than a 4G and a lot of phones actually moved automatically to the 4G because the 5G was not really there or was not really better or actually were hitting the funds. So it's not a real thing. It is a thing that 5G midband network that has been deployed will provide those faster, somewhat faster networks.

Again, it would not be everywhere. I do want to make a comment about the health effects that you mentioned before. So wireless technology is harmful, whether it's 5G, 4G, 3G, 3D, 3D, 1G. Those radio frequencies, the transmissions, transmit information, especially in dense information, like the movies that you don't know, those carrier waves that carry this information, carry the movie, your talk, that information is

being put over those carrier waves. And they have high, they use numerous frequencies, constantly changing. And that is something that adversely affect our body, our nervous system, and numerous systems in our body. So 4G is very harmful, 3G is harmful, Wi-Fi is harmful. 5G is also harmful. And there's no doubt even though there's no specific studies on 5G modulations or what we call language. And there are a lot of studies on millimeter waves that shows that it's helpful. There are studies and not just that because the infrastructure is so much more intent until 5G was deployed there about 300,000 cell towers, which is a lot. But 5G was supposed to add 800,000 cell towers. Large percentage of those towers has been added as a result of this massive deployment for the 5G infrastructure. So you're saying it doesn't matter if it's millimeter waves or not. We're getting pounded from closer distances, this mid-band frequency. And tell me just very

quickly, so I understand it, you know, this carrier wave. Now, the carrier wave might have been the millimeter. We got rid of that. And we think, well, it's a 2G or 4G or even lower when it comes to T-Mobile, but that carrier wave isn't really the only problem, right? I mean, that's where the science is done is on the carrier wave, but what are they doing to the carrier wave? So one of the major claims we brought to the court was the radiation. You know, we all talk about radiation, but talking about radiation is helpful to industry. Radiation levels are important, but it seems that the more bioactive element of this

technology is the pulsation and modulation of these frequencies. So it means, so you have a carrier way. For example, for Wi-Fi, it's 2.45-hundred. So it's 2.4 billion hertz. So that frequency only carry the information. It carry that movie. It carries that email. You actually have to put the actual movie, the actual text you're writing, the actual email you're writing on that way.

So you can imagine the wave is like something thick. And in it, there's a lot of small waves, which is the actual data that you're transferring. Okay. And how you do that, it's called modulation. You modulate that signal, that signal to have a lot of other small signal, which is the data. And that is something which is bioactive. And an easy way to explain it, it's like fluorescent slide. You know, a lot of people can get seizures from fluorescent light.

And the reason is the fluorescent light is flickering. And something that is flicker is more complicated to our nervous system and that can cause serious bio effects. And that seems to be the problem with exposure to re-impulsed and modulated radio frequencies. They interfere with our body system. And what seems to be the problem with the 5G modulation? They are pretty intense modulation because they want to transfer more data faster. So they have to jump very quickly between frequencies.

And it seems to although there is no study so far that was done on the actual. actual modulation of the 5G technologies, because we know that those technologies much more intense and variable, it's very likely that they're going to be even more harmful the previous modulation. All right. And this is one of the things that the... Well, I... And this is one of the things that the court addressed, you know...

Sorry? Yeah, well, now I'm going to jump into, so now I get it, we have a carrier wave, but on top of it are these tiny waves and that modulation is what can really start doing cell damage and things like that. Now what about Bluetooth? Is Bluetooth the same as Wi-Fi? Because Bluetooth, you know, I'm using my phone. It seems to only work in close distances. Is that mean it's got a weaker frequency? Is that safer for me? Or, you know, where are we at with Bluetooth? No. Oh my God. Bluetooth essentially it's Wi-Fi for close distances. So it's from your phone to your airports, from the phone to your car. So there are Wi-Fi networks for close proximity and therefore very intense.

And I do recommend people, this technology, these waves that you go in the air and go through our body, we don't see them, we don't smell them, some of us feel them, those who get sick from it. But it's like invisible harm. And I do recommend people to go and buy meters. They call radio frequency meters. And you can buy in a lot of places online. And they make the invisible visible. And you will see that actually those Bluetooth networks are very intense networks.

You show the airport. There's very intense network. that those airports that you put in here, transmit non-scope levels of radiation, which are literally billions of times higher than those your body was evolved to tolerate. And you have to remember, humans are electric beings. Your heart is electric. Your nervous is electric. Your brain is electric. Your cells communicate electricity. Now you introduce this massive amount of radiation, numerous frequencies that your body identifies and feel some of these frequencies are the same frequencies in which your body works. For example, Wi-Fi router uses a 10-hertz frequency, which is called

a beacon frequency. So when you open your cell phone and you tell you, oh, there's like 18 Wi-Fi networks, how does your phone know that there's 18 Wi-Fi networks? It's because the Wi-Fi router stands a constant beacon frequency, just like Airworks, telling your phone, I'm here, do you need me? And that 10 hertz frequency is the same frequency used by your brain. Alpha brainwave work on frequencies between 8 to 13 hertz. And just as we know from those airplanes problem now with the airports, when you have two antennas transmitting on the same frequency, they're going to be interruption. Wow. And that studies showing a lot of EEG studies showing that those frequencies interrupt

and interfere with the brain waves. And it's not surprising that people cannot sleep, that people have cognitive problem from this technology, and they don't even know that that is the What about people that are wearing, like, say, Apple watches? I mean, that's got a frequency. It's been monitoring their heart. It's right on their wrist. Does that have an effect? I mean, I'd see the earpods and the ears that freaks me out.

But what about these watches? I can talk on the phone right of my wrist. Those are the first thing. Just get it off your hand, ASAP. In one of our cases, we had in other cases that I have against the FCC, one of the petitioners, the woman, she got, she had sleep problems. She didn't know they were caused by the wilds devices in the house. So her husband got to her as a gift and eyewatch to monitor her sleep.

But then she started noticing that whenever she wears that watch, her hand becomes paralyzed, literally. So she started suspected that it's the eyewatch. So she moved it to the hand, their hand and the same thing can happen in. So she called Apple and she said, listen, my hands become paralyzed when I'm using those eyewatches. And after a long conversation, eventually one of the agents told her, we know that some people are reacting to these eyewatches. we have no solution for you except don't wear it. She removed that eye watch and she felt nothing.

The thing is the most two most common symptom we've seen people from those eye watch as that pains in the head, even paralysis from the hand or heart reputation. So it's really ridiculous. Those eyewatches were developed to allegedly help you keep feet and measure your heart, but by measuring the heart, they mess up the heart. There's like, as I said, like numerous frequencies coming out from the eye watches, the Bluetooth, the Wi-Fi, and those are billions of pulsations. a second sitting on your wrist where you have a major nervous system going to your

heart and messing up your heart the worst thing it can do to your fitness and life is put those I words on your hands wow and I can tell it's my sport I cannot we could do this all day and go on is one last thing as we think about the internet of things and you know getting we're gonna have 30 50 devices in our house and the diapers on my baby all trying to get in and carry this information I mean I mean, we know on the show, like one of the things when we do this show, when we're talking to a guest like this, we say, turn off your cell phone, get all the other things off of your Wi-Fi right now so that we can get the cleanest signal we can, because carrying all that weight, even another phone on affects it.

So can you imagine the power with which these things are going to have to deliver to carry, you know, information between my toaster, my telephone, my refrigerator, you know, all of this, the vacuum cleaner and my baby's diapers. That's still, I'm never going to forget that. I mean, it's like the craziest waste of technology, I can imagine. But there's also, you know, we're starting to see, I know like I have a router in the house, but they're even changing that, aren't they? Aren't they bringing in systems inside of the house to sort of help power all of that? These essential devices? So, yeah, about six months ago they started to intensely promote what's called Internet of Thanks

networks. So they actually, it's routers that, A, to connect all of these smart devices. Okay. And this is for example the one that was promoted by a company called Little Antenna. People were getting flyers put in their drawers saying, hey, we pay you $600 to help create this big world, this interconnected world. And essentially these are looked like router, but literally they're like cell towers.

There's like a cell tower in your house. There's like a cell tower in your house. Go ahead. Sorry? Go ahead. And it's not just in your house. They put it in your house, but it's connect the whole neighborhood devices for a distance about half a mile.

So you basically, the antenna for all of this. Then for example, Amazon announced on June 8, all of their devices are going to be now connected. So if you have devices, Amazon devices like Echo, like Alexa, now they're all connected, talking to each other. So your devices talk to the neighbor device and connect them. and create a network of their own. And so now we get much more higher radiation from these devices, connecting.

It's also a problem for your security systems, much easier to hack. And you don't even know, your neighbor can have one of these antennas that you showed before in the house, it transmit to half a mile of distances, which means that they're pretty high levels of radiation. And it's from your house, and you don't have that meter to measure.

You're just going to get sick and cannot sleep and your child will have cognitive problems, and heart reputation and anxiety attacks, and you would not know that this small thing in your house. It's really the cause of it. And your neighbor would not even know why. What do you recommend that we do in this world of these waves beaming through our houses,

around our houses, through our devices? What's the, what's the first steps in trying to protect ourselves? I think first thing, I mean, most of the population is really addicted to this technology. And it's very nice that I say those things, but I think that people are getting convinced, that would not change the ways.

So I think person for most people need to get informed. And there's massive evidence. I do recommend reading those documents that we filed in our lawsuit. We filed 11,000 pages of evidence, which was like, you know, it costs us $50,000 to do those 11,000 pages, just evidence. And then evidence out there is massive. There's numerous good studies with website and evidence, with evidence. just educate yourself. And then look around, you see, what change in your life?

I mean, all the various adverse health effects, your family experiences. I mean, so many children have autism, it's been connected to autism. We have like literally doctors saying that after families remove their Wi-Fi and wireless from their home, children literally, children who never spoke a word. And I know those families personally, after a few days of removing wilds, the rise is autistic children started to speak. And I'm not exaggerating. I know those families, and others doctors. So just and see what happened. Remove those devices.

Turn off the Wi-Fi router and cell phone at night and see what happened. You're still going to have quite a lot because again, we're surrounded by this from our neighbors. All the time the router transmit further distances or the radiation from your neighbors are coming into your house. But the bottom-in-life proximity is critical. When it comes to radiation, radiation drops in a square of the distance. So distance is critical. So probably the worst devices for you are the devices in your home. Turn off the cell phone. Don't sleep with them. If you need an alarm clock either, disable

all the wireless in your phone or get a one dollar phone from a watch from IKEA, turn off the Wi-Fi router and see how you sleep, see what happens to you in your family. And again, the only environment we can control right now, it's our home environment. And I mean, I see the sickness every day. It's overwhelming. People need to start and reduce exposure. Is there just the last question? When I put my phone in AirPolm, Is that the same as turning it off? Does that stop the radiation from my phone? No. So if you go to the settings on your phone, you're going to have airplane mode,

you're going to have Wi-Fi, you're going to have Bluetooth. Each of this, each of the features on your phone has its own antenna because it's working on different frequencies. So when you disable, if you put your phone on airplane mode, it's essentially only disable the frequencies that work for the calls. It does not disable the Wi-Fi antennas. It does not disable the Bluetooth antennas. The older phone it did, but in the new phones, it's not. So if you really want to turn off the radiation in your phone, you need to put it on airplane mode, you need to disable the Wi-Fi

and you need to disable the Bluetooth, also disable location because I have another antenna. So that only then your phone is really off. And what I recommend people, I mean, essentially to reduce constant exposure. If you go around and you need to keep your phone on because you want to get calls or you have to get calls. You can, for those times, turn off the Bluetooth,

turn off the Wi-Fi. And then when you stop and you want to check your email or how many likes you got on Facebook, enable that antenna. It takes exactly one second. Get all the data you want, send whatever emails, and then again, disable the Wi-Fi, disable the Bluetooth when you don't use them.

And so you have less radiation. You still have a lot of radiation, especially from close proximity. But it's much less radiation. But so there's a lot of small things. things you can do to reduce your exposure and they are really meaningful. But one of the claims of industry when they try to tell people why Wi-Fi is not harmful or cell towers are not harmful, they said, you know, your cell phone emit more radiation.

But again, that's falsity. To my opinion, the worst radiation you can get is that chronic exposure and there is explanation from cell towers and especially Wi-Fi in your house. The Wi-Fi is intense. It's constantly, have a lot of modulation, a lot of pulses. Now the routers have 2.45 gigahertz frequency, 5 gigahertz frequency, and the new system that Vranson launch right now for the 5G home also have a 6 gigahertz frequency. So another frequency. And they also have another antenna in them and transmit a signal to the street.

So they use your router in your house to give hot spots to people on the street and you don't even know that. Wow. And they don't tell you. And so a lot is going on. It's technical, but it's It's not complicated. There's a lot of good website, good YouTube videos, reduce exposure, and, you know, start, you know, deal with your addiction to these devices. It's not a good one. Daphne, you're so passionate about this and I feel lucky to know that you're out there fighting for all of us when you're bringing these lawsuits.

I want to just say it right now. If you ever need help, the Inform Consent Action Network is dedicated to eradicating man-made disease. That's what we say. man-made diseases. So certainly we'll talk after this, but any help you need to forward your work. Is there a website or something we can go to the track the information you're doing or, you know, anything that we can. Well, until recently I worked for the Children's Health Defense. I left the Children's Health Defense in October this year. So I kind of like went back to my previous

organization, which is we already evidence. Okay. But at this point, you know, I kind of like in between thinking about the lawsuit, next lawsuit. So I'm less intense in terms of the information. But there's a lot of really great information out there for a lot of websites. I recommend physician for safe technology, which is a group of physician and scientists which have amazing information out there on the website and keep up to date with everything. The Bio Initiative report, which is another website, which is the biggest review of the science on this issues, it's incredible. There is, so there's a lot of website and information and we'll see what next for me.

All right, Debti, keep up the great work. You know, we'll keep in our prayers. Thank you so much. Thank you for enlightening us today and taking the time. So much information here. I appreciate it. You take care. Thank you for all your work and congratulations on your recent win.

Thank you. Thank you. All right. Well, I mean, it's incredible, right? It just feels like if it isn't dawning on you that your regulatory agencies no longer have your back, that they are not looking out for you, then maybe this is a little bit more like the Wild West than you realized and you're all on your own.

There's no sheriff in town protecting you. I think we've got to come to that conclusion. And I keep thinking about how many guests we've had on that talk about community. It's time to get back to our communities. Find those that you're like-minded with. Maybe even start building neighborhoods and networks with people that want to start having some effect on our environment and the things that are infecting us.

Now, she rattled off a bunch of sites that you can see, and I know we didn't have time to put them up. But this is why it's a perfect opportunity to sign up to our newsletter. If you're like, wow, that was a lot of information. I wanted to see those graphs. I want to take a little more time with it. That's exactly what you get for free. All you have to go is go to the highwire.com and just put your email into our newsletter. I can't stress this enough. I don't know what keeps all of you. I mean, we know there's millions of you out there. We can tell you're not all signed up. It makes no sense to me why you don't

just take the seven seconds it takes to do that. So I get it. You don't want to read it every week, but every once in a while there's got to be something you see to say, I don't know. know where to find that and boom there is going to be in your email at the end uh on monday right after our show all right um we're going to keep bringing you all of these information these are an amazing times it is so clear that there's a giant shift right near here now the the vaccine is a complete and total disaster i called it right up front didn't i tell you i said honestly this is going to be the greatest gift that's ever happened nobody ever watched how the sausage was made in this case how a vaccine was made. Nobody ever watched the rushed science and the lack of safety studies and the

lack of placebo studies. I was talking about it. You know, we worked hard. We put out the vaccine safety product. We went to the NIH and said, you better fix this or you're going to have trouble. We're all on this now. We're all over it. We started going to the CDC meetings. We started really being, you know, a thorn in the side of this bad science. But what happened? This COVID comes along and they decide, let's race out a vaccine in front of everybody. And I said, this is going to be the biggest they've ever had. They're promising us the COVID-19 vaccine unicorn. Instead, we got some hybrid disaster monster-looking thing like this. That's it. Brought to its knees, we predicted that. I told you this is where we would be. And so now we get to have that moment. I don't know how long

it will last, but we'll get to have this moment where many of those that attacked us, many of those that said we were crazy and wanted to walk away and we're watching them. We're watching. We're Watching the Joe Rogan shift out of having Peter Hotez and saying, wow, this sounds like a good idea to now waking up. There's a huge wake up going on. And it's a fantastic moment. And I think we should embrace it. And I want to honor those people. I truly want to honor anybody that, you know, I get it.

You were an a-hole at one moment. You attacked us. You came at us. But at least have the dignity and the honor to admit you were wrong. In this case, one of my favorite videos that happened last week came from Geraldo Rivera. Now, Geraldo Rivera, if any of you watch Fox News, he has been vicious and disgusting when it comes to people who are not vaccinated. I think we have a little chunk of sort of how he talked about the anti-vaxias. Take a look at this.

No shirt, no shoes, no vaccine, no service. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. I think the vaccine is absolutely bulletproof against this damn. disease. I despise vaccinated people who are smug in their protection, who urge unvaccinated people to exercise their freedom. We had a lightning storm in Cleveland last night. It was as likely to get hit by one of those lightning bolts as to get this terrible disease if you are vaccinated. This is a disease of the unvaccinated. I think that you cannot have a right of privacy that I'm in your room with my grandchildren who are not vaccinated because they're too young and you

lied about your vaccine status and you sneeze on my grandchildren, you know, that that is, that could be a crime. That is absolutely so self-involved. If you're unvaccinated, then you should at least get tested every week on your own or be, understand why you are banned from the VA, why you are banned from restaurants, while you are banned from other businesses and colleges increasingly. And they should be because it's selfish. I mean, amazing, as he said all these things, I said, you know, just like you spent all that time getting into Al Capone's grave, which proved to be a nothing burger, it'd be really awesome if you actually dug into a scientific study or some research around this. Or how about just read the emergency use authorization? But all that being said, he didn't. So he had that other way of learning. That way that comes when you decide to not do any investigation of your own, only trust the experts. Eventually, you're going to have to fall. You've got to get burned by that stove like you're a three-year-old. child, which is what happened here, but at least this three-year-old is finally admitting he was

wrong. Why? Because he caught COVID. He did get struck by that bolt of lightning like everybody that got the vaccine. And here's what he's saying now. I am vaccinated to Moderna shots, then boosted with the Pfizer booster. You know, I thought for sure that I was immune. I've been very hard on the unvaccinated, as Dana suggests, I eat some. humble pie in that regard because I went to Key West Florida with my family on vacation, and guess what? I came back with a scratchy throat. I insisted I didn't need a test because I was vaccinated and boosted. Then Erica, my wife, insisted, so a couple of days by the time we finally got the appointment, I take the test. Erica is negative, and I am positive. It was

shocking to me. It was in some ways embarrassing. I didn't quite know how to respond to it. You know, I was just having a conversation. My own son, you know, was, uh, he had that moment where he had made a mistake and done something wrong. And, you know, at his school, decided I'm going to stand up. And he told me, you know, I stood up and said, yeah, it's me. You know, I was the one that got in trouble here and it won't happen again. I said, you know, I'm proud of you for, you know, being honorable that way. Everyone makes mistakes.

But what we want in a society and what makes a great society is not that people don't make mistakes, but that when they do, they will voice it and stand up and, you know, face the consequences. So in this case, I want to honor Geraldo Rivera for, even though, you know, you had made a lot of statements that were not factually based, I am glad that at least you can say you're eating some humble pie. And I want us all to really get used to this because there's a lot of people that are going to want to reembrace you to come back. And we're going to have to put away all the slander and all the disgusting things that have been said because the ultimate goal of this entire thing was to tear us apart, to tear the fabric of our families apart, to tear our society apart, to make us feel like we're so distant in our, you know,

philosophical and political differences that will never be able to come together. So it's going to be up to us to create an environment allows those, those prodigal sons, if you will, to come back to the truth that actually their natural immune system was the only way out of this thing. And now they recognize that since that's the only thing that kicked in. when they finally got a symptomatic disease or version of SARS-CoV-2, even after two, three, or maybe even four vaccinations. It's going to be hard for us.

But I would say forgive and forget, and then let's embrace these people and move into a space where we never let this ridiculous thing happen again. One of the things that's taking place to try and end vaccine mandates and really to sort of end this mandate and end this insanity and make sure we never do this again, it may be, it may be, And I'm hoping that it proves to be one of the most important events I've ever spoken at. I'm talking about this weekend, this Sunday in Washington, D.C., United We Stand, and Peace We March, January 23rd, Defeat the Mandates, an American Homecoming.

This is the website. Go to defeat the mandates, dc.com. I will be one of the keynote speakers there, Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Robert Rillan, Dr. Peter McCullough, and a whole host of other brilliant outsides. spoken freedom fighters will be in Washington. We really need to make our presence known. And I don't want to let you know. I see the reports. I see that they, you know, they're going to try and scare us. They're going to try and say that, you know, you have to have a vaccine passport or proof of vaccinations. You don't have to have a vaccine or proof of vaccines to stand outside. I will say you're going to need hotels outside of D.C. because they won't let you into the ones in D.C. bring a pack lunch because

I'm understanding they won't even let us near the food trucks. But this is how insane it's gotten. The entire little town built around that White House and this capital where the decisions are being made are passing laws where you can't eat out of a food truck. Folks, if we do not nip this in the bud, God help us all. If you can get there, if you can take the weekend off, this is the one to be at. Let's all go stand in solidarity. D.S.W.W.S.W.R.W. It's Washington, D.C. It's winter. But this is an important, important event. I'm going to be there so many people.

We want there to be thousands and thousands of people standing for this truth. This is our moment to represent the United States of America. Let's not leave it all on the backs of those marching in London, marching in France or in Australia where they're being dragged and beaten by police. Let's not let it get to this point. Let's show them why 40% of Americans said, oh, hell no, to this vaccine. Let's show them what's inside of us, what pumps through our veins, the reason that we do stand up, that we do believe in liberty.

And we will not live on our knees, but will stand in our freedom. This is our moment. So please join me in Washington, D.C. this Sunday. This will be an event to remember. It's very, very important. We are making a difference. We have changed this conversation. Those that were wrong are having to admit they were wrong.

Fauci is under attack. The gangsters around him are starting to squeal on each other. It is all going to come crumbling down. This is our time. We need to shine the light on these rats. We need to make sure that we don't let them just scurry over the hill and hide and regroup. It is so important. This is it. We're in this together. This is 2022. This is going to be the year of victory. I can feel it. We need your help. I'll see you next week. And as we're stinging out of this show, we have one more opportunity to have the power of music open our hearts and our minds. Go ahead and share. five times August with everyone you know. Here we go. Somebody sailing alive. Somebody sailing a life.

Somebody wants all this strife into it's driving us out of our mind. To trust their own. They're telling the people they're wrong. Keeping the truth for their power and gain Taking whatever we've got Eat all the lives you've been fed

Some of you just go Training acceptance inside of your head To give them whatever loves behind You told it's the best thing you should Because you're told that's what's right Now they win because all of us lose It's so sad watching these times as they change And it's so inviolent

And has they lock us indoors In a prison of this silent war is trying to sell me I'll try to convince you and make you feel sure but hey there ain't no guarantee all the damage that's done they won't ask until the master permanent watching these times as they change it's so bad All shout behind doors in a prison of this silent war.

Watching these times as they change and thence yours, do not let this silence.