The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FAUCI FEELS THE HEAT ON CAPITOL HILL

Episode Date: June 16, 2024

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

One of the biggest conversations here in the United States when it comes to the health. We had Anthony Fauci come out of retirement to testify in front of the House Select Subcommittee on the coronavirus to talk about really the just bombshell explosive email scandal from his right-hand man, Dr. David Morins at the NIH there, who, I mean, clear evidence of just destroying any type of evidence of the origins of COVID, hiding and personal emails, even waiting until they cite each other in person to exchange information. so they couldn't be FOIA. This is Dr. Fauci being questioned about that. So does he stick up for Dr. Morins? Well, you be the judge. Take a look. All right. There's a troubling pattern of behavior from your inner circle, not just Dr. Moran's, but also your chief of staff, Mr. Fulker's. Do you agree that it violates NAID policy to use personal email for official purposes? The the doctor morin's issue that was discussed by this committee violates NIH policy yes but does using official email using a personal email for official business that violate policy using a personal email for official business violates NIH policy does it violate NIAID policy to delete records to intentionally avoid for you. Yes. Okay. On April 28,

20, 2020, Dr. Moran's edited an eco-health press release regarding the grant termination. Does that violate policy? That was inappropriate for him to be doing that for a grantee as a conflict of interest among other things. So on March 29, 2021, Dr. Moranz edited a letter that Dr. Dasick was sending to NIH. Does that violate policy? Yes, it does. On a October 25th, 2021, Dr. Moran's provided Dr. Dasick with advice regarding how to mislead

NIH on EcoHealth's late progress report. Does that violate policy? That was wrong and inappropriate and violated policy. On December 7th, 2021, Dr. Moranz wrote to the chair of EcoHealth's Board of Directors to, quote, put in a word, end quote, for Dr. Dasick. Does that violate policy? should not have done that that was wrong and that violates policy well i'm not sure of a specific policy but i imagine it does violate policy he should not have been doing that i mean it's you know it's wild watching this it is like watching the godfather right like where i mean obviously like i have no idea i had no idea he was cooking the books i don't even know i barely met that guy i mean i i know what we're talking about i'm going yeah of course it's disgusting can't believe

he did it i mean clearly this morin's is going to be the fall guy they think Honestly, I hope somebody has this guy under suicide watch right now. Right. And so you're seeing Fauci is basically throwing these people under the bus. Morin's, he's getting called out. Even DaZic Fauci was asked about Peter Dasik and Fauci said it was right to cut his funding to bar him, to bar equal health alliance. So these people one by one are going under.

So you've got to wonder if they're looking at this whole situation saying, wait a minute. And if the Justice Department wants to move on these people, I feel like there could be a real, good case to have these have these people come in and really side with trying to get anthony fouchy and get some justice there but i think the american people just seeing these exchanges are very helpful obviously no one has been indicted with this yet which is frustrating for many people but it's seeing these exchanges seeing the emails being able to read them for yourselves and seeing how they're destroying this evidence in the background is is really is really i think a healthy thing for this conversation people can no longer be called conspiracy there's and then there's

Congressman from Georgia, Rich McCormick. He's also a doctor. He's treating patients during COVID. So he had a unique position here. And he questioned Tony Fauci about the COVID vaccines. Take a listen. All right. You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audio book written by Michael Specter,

that you believed an institutional should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Can we read, run the audio clip on that, please? think can be done about it. I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory vaccination. I know federal officials don't like to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you were going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get vaccinated. Lady, you're going to get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all. of those others are going to say, you want to work for us, you get vaccinated. And it's been proven

that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated. Thank you. Are all objections to COVID vaccinations, ideological bullshit, Dr. Pouchi? No, they're not. And that's not what I was referring to. Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context. And I take great offense to this. Ms. Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, which came from recommendation from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician, on how to get pregnant,

and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, to get pregnant and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes. But she was fired because you made it hard, just like you said in your statement, because you didn't want to make sure that the ideological bull's the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her health care professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American side, to self-determine as we're all given God-given rights.

Shame on you. They're amazing hearings. I mean, I'm thankful they're happening, but I do ask myself, where were these people while it was going on? You know, as our representatives, why weren't you shouting from the rooftops that this was unconstitutional, that we were being forced into something to take an experimental? product. I mean, they just, you didn't see this on the floor. You didn't really see this happening. Letting both these presidents, frankly, that took us through this, just destroy our civil liberties, destroy our businesses, our jobs, giving us no due process, can't go to a courtroom and fight for rights because no one's allowed into a courtroom. Couldn't even get into a courtroom.

Courts were shut down. I mean, we cannot forget how quickly this happened, right? And as, as Tony Fauci says, you know, if you, you know, basically protect people, they'll do whatever we want. He said, as soon as we get a protection in place, which they did with the PEP Act, then schools, they'll take your kids' education away. They'll shut your businesses down. They'll act like the Nazis we want them to act like. So I'm pretty cool.

Let's talk about that vaccine that Fauci and NIH funded, helped develop, marketed through the media, and then whose mandates they supported to get those in arms of Americans. There's been a lot of great studies coming out just the past couple weeks showing some things that we previously did. did not know about these shots.

But also, there's been a change in the reporting when it comes to, we'll call it mainstream media and the increase in heart attacks. So this is the morning show, today's morning show. Take a look at this clip. We are back with our ongoing heart health series with a new way of thinking about heart attacks. Yeah, doctors say they're seeing an alarming number

of seemingly healthy patients having heart attacks and those patients are getting younger and younger. This story's gonna blow you away because research shows that more than 10% of heart attack patients had no known risk factors such as obesity or smoking. Now there's a group of doctors at Mount Sinai here in New York City tracking patients to see if they can uncover the new risk factors behind this trend. Trying to unravel the mystery of young heart attacks, Dr. Deepak Bot, director of Mount Sinai

Fuster Heart Hospital in New York City. He's looking into patients presenting with no known risk factors like diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol. I think there are a lot of reasons for that. One probably has to do with the obesity epidemic, but it could also be other things. Another potential clue, long smoldering inflammation. And I'm talking about inflammation in the arteries, supplying blood to the heart that might lead to the plaque in that artery to act up, in fact, to rupture a blood clot to form. If that blocks the blood flow in that artery, that's what causes a heart attack or heart muscle damage. The cause of inflammation in seemingly healthy people like Matthias,

who are not obese and don't smoke, is not yet clear. When I watch reports like this, Jeffrey, I can't tell you how happy I am that I'm no longer working for mainstream media at CBS the way I did. Can you imagine having to just on the face of a COVID lockdown that forced an untested product that we know causes myocarditis and paracyditis to have to say, wow, this just in a shocking rise in young people dying of heart attacks. And, you know, we've talked a specialist all over the country and around the world, and everyone is mystified why this is actually happening. It's an alarming trend. It's affecting 10% of all people getting heart

attacks show no signs of it. I mean, it's absolutely mind-blowing that they can keep a straight face while they're doing this stuff. Right. And so they're saying, well, I just, Don't know why this heart muscle damage is happening, this inflammation in these younger kids. And at the same time, literally at the same time, this study comes out in the BMJ. And it's titled, so these researchers are looking at the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccination

in children and adolescents. And they say this, among both, and hundreds of thousands of kids are looking at here. Among both adolescents and children, myocarditis and paracarditis were documented only in the vaccinated groups with rates of 27 and 100 cases. per million after first and second doses respectively. That seems like a little bit of signal.

We looked at all these kids, and it's just, it's just coincidence that only the kids that got the vaccines were having these myocarditis issues that have been reported for the last two years in several medical journals in the VERS reports. And, you know, the Today Show doesn't mention that. We don't expect hardcore journalism from them, but these are the studies that are coming out. And we've known this, and the signals were there, even when they're voting to approve these vaccines for the use in children.

Yeah, and the death rate was so low in children, I think 0.002%, something like that. So to be putting them at risk, it's just, it's really an atrocity. Yeah, I mean, we're basically talking about all risk and almost no reward here. So let's go on though. So JAMA, Journal of American Medical Association,

Pediatrics were, this is a FDA study. They were looking at the safety of the Pfizer shot and the Moderna shot in kids age six months 17 years. And what did they find? They said this. In the primary analysis, seizure met the statistical threshold for a signal on children aged two to four years after Pfizer shot in all three databases, and in children two to five years after Moderna's vaccination in two of the three databases. They went on to say the statistical signal for seizure in children age two to four or five years has not previously, have not been previously reported for this age group in active surveillance

studies of MRI COVID-19 vaccines. So you know what that means? That means when your child, received this shot in a doctor's office and had a seizure on the spot or went home and had a seizure and you said, hey, doc, something happened after this shot. Doctor said, there's no evidence of this. The FDA would have told us it would have been in the literature. Now years later, they're saying, hey, guess what? We found a new signal. And this is the problem with emergency use authorization of these vaccinations is they're just going to keep finding, oh, this is this problem too. This was look like another signal we found right here. And this study. I just want to make it really clear for people watching. You would find the same thing. ever went back and looked at the childhood vaccine program. I mean, what we are seeing right now is not that the COVID vaccine is any different than

all the other vaccines we've given our kids that never went through safety trials, never went through safety tests, was rushed on the market exactly like COVID vaccine was. But with all the work we've done with the high wire and Aaron Siri, our legal team, we've never been able to get them to go back retrospectively like they are right now looking at databases saying, let's look at kids that got the vaccines and look at kids that didn't get the vaccines, which is what we're seeing now. And what are they finding? Geez, everybody, you know, in the group that got the vaccine, rise in heart issues,

rise in seizures, the group that didn't get the vaccine, nothing. So clearly there's a signal. They've never done these studies. They have never done these studies on all the childhood vaccine, which is one of the things we've talked a lot about this that we discovered when we went to, when Robert Kennedy Jr. invited me to the media at the NIH that Donald Trump set up back in the beginning of, you know, Trump's presidency. And we spoke with the NIH.

We said, why won't you just do a comparative study of those that received the vaccines and those that have not? And just ask simple questions. Who has more seizures? Who has more diabetes and autoimmune disease and lupus and, you know, Tourette's and autism and all these things? And as I've stated before, they said, essentially, we can't figure out how to do that study. Well, they figure it out right now because the entire world is doing it. It's all of these independent agencies around the world that are finally at least looking at this one vaccine. But folks, don't just think it's just this one vaccine. If they did this with all the other vaccines, you'd be seeing the same outcomes. And speaking of that, so we have a headline here,

shocking for some, not too shocking for others. This is the Telegraph. COVID vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths. That's a big headline because this is the first time, really, that that's been reported in such a big publication and not just talked about by a podcast or something. And this is a study now. So this study is titled Excess More

across countries in the Western world since COVID-19 pandemic. They're looking at autopsy reports. They're looking at data from the registries for vaccine injuries in all countries. And they are saying the vaccine is definitely up there as a culprit. And it says during the pandemic, it was emphasized by politicians in the media on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply.

Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin, transparency towards potential lethal drivers is warranted. And they are suggesting so those lethal drivers are possibly the COVID vaccine. So what does this do? A lot of people are saying, well, yeah. But this puts it in the medical journals. This puts it in the literature, other people can cite this. And so doctors, the remaining doctors that are really just still hookline and sinker thinking,

this vaccine is amazing, can look at this and say, all right, there's the problem here. We can start looking at this now. There's a green light for this. There's cover. And hopefully they start doing this because the studies continue. I'm going to go through one more here about blood transfusions. There's a lot of questions about, well, is it safe to get blood transfusions for people who had several of these MRI shots?

And researchers out of Japan looked at the safety concerns. And they found six of them. And I'll list them right here. Spike protein contamination is a concern contamination with amyloid aggregates and microthrombi formed by spike proteins, events attributable to decrease donor immune system. and immune abnormalities due to the immune imprinting or class switch, we've talked about this, to IGG4 resulting from the multiple doses of these vaccines, presence of lipid nanoparticles and pseudo-urinated mRNA, contamination with aggregated red blood cells or platelets,

and then the memory B cells producing IGG4 as well as the IGG4 produced from them. All issues, not simple. These are complex medical issues that are just now getting into the conversation. for blood transfusion, a major change. And you got to wonder what the Red Cross and what hospitals are doing. Will this change anything? Are they going to just look the other way on this? It's really interesting how this could be societally changing.

And every time someone takes a booster shopping, luckily over 90% of America is now denying taking the latest booster, which is number nine. But one of the scientists out in Geneva really put it clearly for me. He said, Del, it's not the spike protein in the vaccine. It's the problem. It's this platform, the MRNA technology platform. Essentially, we wrapped a spike protein in this fatty lipid and then sent it into the body, but it was supposed to stay in the shoulder.

It did not. As we've shown in multiple studies, the second it moves past there, we're finding it in the heart, in the liver, in the brain. Well, what happens when it delivers a foreign protein? Your immune system is designed to attack any cell that has a foreign protein. It has to get rid of it. it's under attack, it realizes you're not supposed to be here. Well, that's what vaccines do, especially with this technology. You're putting a foreign protein in, and you're lodging it in the heart.

And so the immune system attacks the heart. If it lodges in the brain, it attacks the brain. It is not, and this was made so clear, it's not the spike protein that is giving you the swelling of the heart. It's your own immune system attacking your heart because the vaccine put a foreign protein there. So it won't matter if they put chicken pox inside of this thing or, you know, you know, whatever, you know, RSV, this technology is delivering foreign proteins to your organs, and that is going to get you killed.

This technology is an abomination, and it's shocking that anyone is sitting going, we have no idea why there's a rise in heart attacks among children. You have to be an absolute imbecile to make that statement right now.