The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FAUCI THROWN UNDER THE BUS ON WUHAN

Episode Date: December 24, 2023

FAUCI THROWN UNDER THE BUS ON WUHANBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We have a very interesting trend that's happening in the United States right now. We have former officials, head officials for departments under both the Trump and the Biden administration are coming forward now and saying some really interesting things about the lab leak. Before they were kind of just completely mute on this topic, no one really threw their hat in the ring, had an opinion on it. But as soon as they leave their administration, they start talking. This is Robert Cadillic. Robert Cadillic is responsible for Operation Warp Speed. He was at the time Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services in the preparedness and response. So he went on Australian news television, not United States, not American news, Australian news, and said this.

Dr. Robert Cadlick was a high-ranking official in the U.S. government's preparedness and response department. He reported directly to the president, and he was also technically Fauci's superior. Here, for the first time, he opens up on camera. The key is not to let the story die because there are people who would like it to kind of go away. It's really important to kind of keep people focused on it, and I think there has to be accountability across the board. What discussions did you have with Anthony Fauci and others behind the scenes about deliberately deciding, to turn down the temperature on a lab leak? Well, it was early on in the event

when I did have the conversation with Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci. It was the intent then to get the White House involved. What we were trying to do was trying to make sure that politically, that you would not get into a situation where people would make accusations or allegations, but quite honestly what happened was the exact opposite. You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turn the rhetoric down, is that?

Correct. That was it. Cadillac says Fauci was worried about protecting his own reputation, and that could be why he diverted attention away from the lab leak. That would be a natural reaction of him or anybody, you know, particularly, you know, I think for him, to saying, you know, what could this do to me and to our institute as a consequence if we were found to have some culpability or some involvement in this. And I think it would probably make that even more acute was the fact that they didn't have good visibility

into what they were doing and what they were supporting through the grants, through EcoHealth Alliance, that went to the Wuhan Institute of Irology. I think that just probably magnified that concern. It's pretty extraordinary to reveal the conversations that you had with Fauci Collins, it's pretty extraordinary to publicly say that you did try to downplay the rhetoric around

a bioweapon and a lab leak. Are you doing this interview in part because you feel guilty about that? I just feel like it's an obligation that I have to kind of say what happened. And I think to factually try to portray this, not to get sympathy or forgiveness, but more to, saying factually, here's what happened. This is what we tried to do. Did it work? No. Something tells me he's not doing this out of the goodness of his heart. He's jumping ship because the congressional hearings are on.

The investigations are on. And nations around the world are looking into this, doing investigations. People's heads are going to roll. And this is the beauty of having a free, you know, sort of government and judicial system. Once these investigations begin and you start putting pressure on people, they jump ship and sort of stop their, you know, holding hands with each other. And clearly people are running from Tony Fauci just moments before he's going to be on the stand in just about a week. I'd hate to be Fauci right now.

I think the water's getting warm in there. Yeah, moral obligation. Come on, man. So like three years afterwards, he's like one of the last people on Earth that comes to these conclusions. Well, so just to recap, we censored people, we hid evidence because of politics, those were his words, and because NIH has hands all over funding on this and because of Fauci's reputation. That's why we did this. So okay, cool. Yeah, as you said, as you said, here's Fauci. This was just breaking congressional hearing,

Dr. Anthony Fauci to appear for transcribe interview and public hearing. This is January 8th and January 9th. So look for that, look for the information come out from that because that's going to be talking about what he did to hide all of this information on this lab leak. And then we have a former Biden official. This is Rajab Panaji. So this is a former NSC. So National Security Council think Deborah Birx. He was running the National Security Council. This is the headline that he is creating now. He went to a talk recently. Biden's ex-COVID advisor admits pandemic may have been caused by a Wuhan lab leak and warns there's a 50% chance of another pandemic by 2050. This is a big deal because nobody from the Biden administration really at the higher ups have come forward and

put their name on ink when it comes to this Wuhan. Either way. with this Wuhan lab leak. So him coming forward once he steps out away from that administration, this is a really big deal. So what does everyone know here? Obviously Fauci is going to be up on a congressional hearing, but there seems to be some type of flashpoint happening. And this is a report by the global biolabs.org. This is her 2023 report.

And in there, they said this. In 2021, we identified 59 BSL4 labs. That's biosafety level for us. The highest level lab you can possibly have. These are dealing with the nasty pathogens that were in operation under construction or planned in 23 countries. By the beginning of 2023, that number had increased by 10 to 69 labs. This is a huge deal. It says the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered another building boom for BSL4 labs.

Since the start of the pandemic, nine countries have announced plans to build 12 new biosafety level four labs. And so we're seeing all of this proliferation of these labs dealing with these really, really path, pandemic pathogens. And yet the public, the takeaway from the public when it comes to this conversation is this from the hill. Climate change could spark next pandemic study fine. So we're being told it's your fault. It's cows farting. It's your breathing. It's your car.

It's your gas lawmower. That's going to start the pandemic. Not this. Or the idiot that just walked out of the lab with a virus on their sleeve. I mean, one or the other. Global warming might get to us faster than that. Or the lack of safety, the fears around these. labs, the really just the lack of oversight whatsoever. And this is something that's also happening.

This is the push poll in this conversation. Here's the BMJ. This is one of the original investigations. US quietly shuts down controversial wildlife virus hunting program amid safety fears. The BMJ can reveal that a flagship project for hunting viruses among wildlife in Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America, and prevent human outbreaks and pandemics is being quietly dropped by the United States agency for international development, that's USAID, after private and bipartisan criticism over the safety of such research. So it sounds like a lot of people are starting to really say, hey, stop pulling these things out of the bowels of nature, bringing them to these biosafety labs, and then making them pathogenic to people so they can spread. Stop doing this. And then handing it, by the way,

when we bring in this technology, it's not just like we keep it in our awesome labs in America, we hand it all over the world to labs that we aren't in control of that aren't running as well as we Wuhan's laboratories were already being busted for, you know, releasing other things prior to any of this happening. This is the problem is it doesn't even just stay with the scientists. I don't agree with it at all, but it's the way that they internationally deal with these things that makes it even more dangerous. Is in the Ukraine, do they have the same safety standards we do or China? You know they don't. And we're on the precipice, Dell, of forcing that into an international treaty for people to do that literally by international law.

And that's the WHO's pandemic treaty, something we've been covering here a lot. But this is Article 12 of that pandemic treaty. And it specifically says of this. Now, this is a legally binding treaty. And it's called the WHO pathogen access and benefit sharing system, PABS. And it's, you go into this and it says the parties. Now, the parties are all the countries that are going to be signed on in this. Parties shall implement the WHOPABS system in a manner to strength and expedite and not impede

research and at all times, both during and between pandemics. And it calls for uploading the genetic sequences to publicly accessible databases. So when they go out into the wilderness and they find these things, they're supposed to upload these genetic sequences into this public database. I mean, these are select agents you're talking about here. These are pandemic pathogens, potential. This is a really not a good idea. And this is just one of the many reasons people are opposing this WHO pandemic treaty because

it's forcing these countries to go out. and find these and report them so everyone can share this all at once. And you'll say, well, this is, you know, during pandemics is a good thing. But it says in between pandemics at all times. Do it all the time. And so you're sharing again, just like you said, with labs that don't have this biosafety, with countries that don't have an infrastructure or any type of legislation on the books to really look after this or have the safety protocols.

So big red flags here. Yeah, big time. And, you know, something that I think we, need to really, all the things that need to be investigated. I mean, it is time to spend a lot of money, you know, like you've spent a lot of money trying to force us all to take an untested product, to fund labs like Wuhan.

Now we've got to start funding investigations into who was in charge of this debacle.