The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FAUCI’S FOLLIES

Episode Date: January 27, 2022

As a day of legal reckoning approaches for Fauci, his international counterparts are coming into focus more than ever. Peter Daszak, Jeremy Farrar, Francis Collins and others are facing increased scrutiny for a potential lab-leak cover-up and suppression of a scientific debate early into the Covid outbreak.#FireFauci #EcoHealthAlliance #ICANemailsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

People are pointing fingers. Who's to blame? Who caused this? Why are these deaths up? You know, we're still asking where this thing came from, where this virus came from. And we can count on Rand Paul to ask those questions over and over and over again. Anytime that he gets a seat in front of Anthony Fauci. And this was his latest.

Take a listen. All right. Your desire to take down those who disagree with you didn't stop with Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford. You conspired with Peter Dezac, who you committed. communicated with privately, and other members of the scientific community that wrote opinion pieces for nature. Five of them signed a paper for nature, an opinion piece. 17 signed a paper that called it conspiracy theory, the idea that the virus could have originated in the lab. Do you think words like conspiracy theory should be in a scientific paper?

Senator, I never used that word when I was referring to it. You're distorting virtually everything. Did you communicate with the five scientists who wrote the opinion piece in nature where they were describing, oh, there's no way this could have come from the lab? What I did. Did you talk with any of those scientists privately? But you keep the story of the truth. It is stunning. Did you talk to any of the scientists privately who wrote the opinion?

You did. What were they telling you privately? Well, let me explain. You know you're going back to that original discussion when I brought together a group of people to look at every. possibility with an open mind. So not only you're distorting it, you're completely turning it around as you usually do. For most of the scientists that came to you privately? Do they come to you privately and say, no way this came from the lab? Or was their initial impression, Dr. Gary and others that were involved, was their initial impression actually that it looked very suspicious

for a virus that came from a lab? Senator, we are here at a committee to look at a virus now that has killed almost 900,000 people. And the purpose of the committee was to try and get things out how we can help to get the American public. And you keep coming back to personal attacks on me that have absolutely no relevance to reality. Do you think anybody has had more influence over our response to this than you have? Do you think it's a great success?

Do you think it's a great success what's happened so far? Do you think the lockdowns are good for our kids? Do you think we slowed down the death rate? More people have died now under President Biden than did under President Trump. You are the one responsible. You are the architect. You are the lead architect for the response from the government. And now 800,000 people have died.

So you think it's a winning success, what you've advocated for government? Exactly the right question. The one I've been asking the whole time. How do you still have your job with one of the highest death rates in the world with the greatest hospitals and medical facilities and doctors at your fingertips? It's an abomination. and Rand Pauls all over them and naming a lot of people there too on top of just Anthony Fauci. Yeah, he's throwing a lot of names out there.

We have Peter Dazick, EcoHealth Alliance. These are becoming common household names now of directions of where this thing might have started. We have Francis Collins, the former head of NIH, is in there as well. He's been popping up on his emails quite a bit. And then, you know, it reminds me of like those Scooby-Doo episodes when they catch one person, which would be Anthony Fauci, everyone's focused on him and they pull the mask off. in the background, you see some guys and some people running in the shadows and they went and grab them too. And one of those people here who really needs to be looked at is Jeremy Ferrar.

This is the head of what's called the Welcome Trust. It's a charity in the UK. And it's one of the world's top funders of health research. And if you really want to understand the Welcome Trust, check out this BMJ write-up of them. It really gives an idea of their intertwining of pharmaceutical relationships, conflicts of interest, It's called COVID-19 Trust and Welcome, how charities, pharma investments overlap with its research efforts. It says in here, this was written in March 2021, that they're one of the top organizations that gain from this pandemic

with all of their conflicts of interest. So there has to be something on that. But looking at this in Jeremy Farrar, he was recently written up in The Guardian, and this is what it looked like. He was a top sage advisor in the UK. Top sage advisor admitted lab leak theory was most likely origin of COVID in February 2020, but debate was shut down because it could cause harm to China bombshell emails reveal.

It says in this article, the British scientist, that's Farrar, was shut down by his counterparts in the U.S., who warned further debate about the origins of the virus could damage international harmony. Now, this article frames Farrar like someone who thought this thing was lab created and really tried to warn the world, but it was shut down by his U.S. counterparts, Fauci, Collins. But that's not what the evidence says. And as Fauci pointed out there in the clip we just listened to, there's absolutely not one shred of evidence for Paul's accusations. But we're going to show you that there actually is.

So let's look at this. Now, just recently, Congress, congressional committee, unredacted emails that were public and had those big that, you know, the redacted emails, those big blackouts on there. Well, they found out what was behind those. And it's just adding. So what I want to do here really at this point is let me take you through a timeline. I'll put together using the informed consent action networks emails that were obtained through the FOIA requests that showed Fauci and Dezac and all of these other people, along with these new congressional unredacted emails. So these are the ones that we were here. I was talking to Aaron Siri last week.

We put it out. And by the way, for all of you right now, they're maybe watching the high wire for the first time. If you want to be the first one to see the document dumps that we're getting from our FOIA request, you're about to see some of those emails. Aaron Siri was doing that work. He puts out these requests. That document dumped, the new emails coming from Fauci, we're in your hands first if you are on our newsletter. We want to make sure that you get the breaking news first because we want that commitment from you. So just go to the highwire.com.

This doesn't cost you any money. Just put in your email. It's all we don't send you advertisements. We're not selling you anything. We just want to make sure that you get the information. All of the data, the articles about Farrar right there. We rent right very quickly through that Daily Mail article. but that will be in your inbox on Monday

if you want to really get into the details. It's a hyperlink, super easy. I want to read that whole article. We want you to be able to say to your friends, here's what the article said, or here's the exact study, or here are the emails that came out. And I have to say, here's what Del Baitry said.

I want to change the culture of news. We want transparency. Facts is what matters, not people's opinions, not expert opinions, and not talk show host opinions. You need to be looking at the facts. We're doing something that nobody else news is doing for you. We're providing you with all of the data that appears on this show. Every

video, every single article is in your hand so that you continue that research. Sure, we have to grab a couple of quotes to keep this moving and not making a 10-hour show. But that doesn't mean, you know, if you want to say, well, then you're cherry-picking. Who else would say, fine. Here, look at the entire document. If you're not a part of this newsletter right now, you're not getting the body of work that international scientists are helping us put together for you. So please, just sign up to that newsletter right now. so that you can also get these document dumps. So here, Jeffrey, to get back to it,

we now are going to go through emails that the Congress has had unredacted and the email dump that came to us at the informed consent action network through our lawyer, Aaron Siri. And so this tells the story then, I guess, is what you're telling me. Yeah, it sure does. It sure does.

And a bombshell one at that too. So let's go, it's going to be like a rough timeline here. Let's start with February 1, 2020. There's a conference call. Now, Jeremy Ferrar is on this conference call, and he's kind of playing secretary at this point. He's taking notes. This conference call was a bunch of world leaders, world leaders in genome research and genetic engineering, things like that. And he's taking notes.

And he writes an email of those notes. He says, here's my notes. He sends that email to Collins, Fauci and a gentleman called Lawrence Tabick. He was the second in command at NIH. He is now the acting director. So all three of those people get this email. This is what Farrar writes. He says from Michael Frazen,

Michael Frazen was discoverer of the SARS receptor. So this guy has been around the block on this. He says he is bothered by the Fioron site and has a hard time explained that as an event outside the lab, though there are possible ways in nature, but highly unlikely goes on to say, acquisition of the Feroon site would likely to stabilize the virus but would make it disseminate to new tissue.

So given above, a likely explanation could be something as simple as passage SARS-live COVID in tissue culture on human cell lines under BSL2, that's biosafety lab 2, for an extended period of time, accidentally creating a virus that would be primed for rapid transmission between humans via gain of furon site from tissue culture and adaption to human ACE2 receptors via repeated passage. Basically he's saying it looks like it might have been a biosafety lab accidental release. So Farrar says in his own words, he finishes this email. to Fauci and Collins and everybody says so I think it becomes a question of how do you put it all together whether you believe in this series of coincidences what you do what you know of the

lab in Wuhan how much could be in nature accidental release or natural event question mark I am 70 30 or 60 40 that's saying he's 70 30 60 40 on an accidental release now at that same now those are big it's a big prediction at that point now that's huge statement. Now, at that same time, there's a gentleman named Christian Anderson. He sends an email to Anthony Fauci, copied Jeremy Ferrar on this as well. And he says here, I should mention that after discussion earlier today, Eddie Bob, Mike, and myself, now this is a separate group that has gotten together and they're all talking. These are all experts. Eddie Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. So point number

Number two, right out the gate, you have pretty much almost all of the experts that are taking these calls out the gate saying this really, it looks like it may be something that was create in a lab. Yeah, absolutely. So now we have one of the ICANN emails. And this one, this one has to do with Eddie Holmes. This was the ICAN email. And it says, here's Farrar sending to Fauci at the top there. Farrar says, I'm pushing WHO again today. And then he shares a rough draft of what we what we now know is as a nature article. We're going to cover really shortly. But Eddie Holmes says to Jeremy Farrar, who's one of, Jeremy Farrar, he says, it's fundamental science and completely neutral is written, did not mention other anomalies as this would make us look like loons. As it stands, it's an excellent basic science, I think, which is a service in itself. Now, of course, they're talking about which will eventually be a nature article on the origins of this saying it's a natural origin. So that's on February 4th. So now we go back to another I can email Fauci. This is a day later. later, Fauci is already being allowed to pick a group. So this is Jeremy Farrar to Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins. And he says this. Ferrar says, I spoke again with WHO this morning. I believe they have listened and acted. Let me know if you agree. At the WHO meeting next week, they will set up the group who will, quote, look at the origins and evolution of 2019 NCOV. They didn't name it at that point. He also says they have asked for names to sit on that group. Please do send up. send names. So now here we have Farrar pressuring the WHO to form a group and telling Fouchy to stack this group with people that he wants in it. So let's go forward to that WHO, that WHO meeting. And here it is right here. This is that one Farrar was talking about a week later, global research and innovation forum towards a research roadmap. The whole point of this from the words of this forum was to form a consensus on strategic directions to discuss research priorities and to address

a framework of natural history of COVID-19 of 2019 novel coronavirus. So they weren't even saying anything about a lab. They just said, we want to find the natural history. That's the tracks we're going to lay and that's what we're going to look. People all focused. We're going to stay in this hallway of natural evolution, even though all the scientists a week ago are saying it most likely does not have a natural origin, but let's just keep the conversation there because we don't want to look like loons, wink, wink. Right. And so, lo and behold, who's presenting at this conference? None other than Jeremy Farrar himself, right from the conference blueprint sheet right here. And that's at 1600 hours.

And he is talking about main knowledge gaps and research priorities for the research activities laid out by the WHO with a group that Fauci picked. So now, Now, we fast forward to about seven days later, February 13th, and we have Fauci talking to then CDC head Nancy Messingier. And what he's saying to her is really the handing of the baton. So Fauci, Collins, implicated in this, but here we have, he says, Nancy, the official USG group will be convened by NAS, National Academy of Sciences. Bob Cadillac is the person with direct knowledge of that. In addition, there is an ad hoc group informally led by Germany. Ferrari Farah of Welcome Trust. This group has about 15 people, all of whom are highly respected scientists, mostly evolutionary biologists who are convening by email and conference calls. I have been on two of these calls since Jeremy invited me to look at all the bat pangolin and human coronavirus sequences to try to determine the evolutionary origin. This is not my area of expertise. So I have backed off and I'm leaving it all to Jeremy. Best Tony. That's on February 13th.

That's what we're going to focus this thing. He has totally erased all the people reaching out and saying it looks like lab origin. Right. And just a couple days later, the hammer comes down. This is in the Lancet. This was published. This is now the infamous Lancet conspiracy article statement in support of scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combating COVID-19. We now know that Peter Dasick was one of the brains behind this.

And it says, we- Yep. Jeremy Ferrar's on there. You have even Christian Drozden. He was the PCR test guy. It says here, we stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin. So we're talking, Del, two weeks out from the initial February 1st emails where everyone's saying this really does look like it. I'm 70-30. I'm 60-40. Two weeks later, we got to crush this crazy idea, this conspiracy theory of lab origin. And as you know, what a bunch of sellouts. It's absolutely disgusting and despicable.

And every fact checker in the world took that, ran with it, and used it as the impetus to ban people off the internet en masse, Twitter, Facebook, everywhere. So now we go to March 5th. This is another I can email talking the media talking points. Fauci has his hand in this as well. So lo and behold, he picked Clifford Lane as one of the leads. Now, Clifford Lane was the second in command at NIH. So he was one of the leads in the WHO mission to China to find the natural origins. So this email from ICAN is talking about the main talking points.

So these are what the media is to be told. So this is what the media can ask, what it can write about. This is what it's told. So here we have NIH crafting the media narrative. And it says here that key questions related to natural history. So the joint mission is focused on key questions related to natural history. We're always worrying about this natural history. The same words coming out of the WHO less than a month before that.

So now it gets really interesting because then a couple days after that, we have the Nature article that comes out, the origins, the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. There we have Christian Anderson. We have Eddie Holmes. We have Robert Gary. He was on one of the initial emails about talking about this thing. So we have them. There's putting this out there. And then this is an interesting email here. This is a bio safety. Fauci starts getting questioned about Wuhan Institute of Virology and biosafety. This was in April. There is April 2020. And this was for Secretary Pompeo. It said down a little bit, it said, I would appreciate that you and your office could help us with the following. Observations, exchanges and agreements with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on the issues of biosafety, biosafety and enforcement and inspection. mechanisms at Wuhan Institute of Virology or any other Chinese high biosafety labs your institutes

have interacted with and the extent to which the U.S. has been involved in building the Chinese labs and helping enforce the safety standards and inspections. So right there, Fauci is probably starting to feel some real heat now that email says it's not, this is an investigation. We just want some answers. It's the preliminary questioning. But here's, let's really bring this home here because we talked about and so did Ram Paul. The Great Barrington Declaration, we now know from emails, was kind of put down and crushed in the media thanks to the work of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins.

We know through those emails. And to be clear for those people watching for the first time, the Great Barrington Declaration, which was put together by world-renowned scientist, Dr. Martin Koldorf, Dr. Sinaitra Gupta, Dr. J. Badacharya. It essentially was into sort of a focused protection. Let's protect those in a high. risk categories while letting the rest of the people that are healthy. Let's not lock them down.

Let's go ahead and just let those that are healthy enough catch this virus naturally so that we get to herd immunity and protect those in the high risk category where the body of all of our deaths ended up occurring. None of that happened. In fact, most of the people that were terrified of this pandemic and this disease ended up making laws where they forced the nursing homes to take on patients that were sick and then basically lit a dry gas. grassfire that killed untold amount of elderly. Shockingly, all probably people that were getting pensions and things like that. When you start to look at this, it's really hard to not sort of jump to some sort of diabolical concerns. But it was weird that instead of focusing on protecting those

that were vulnerable over 80 in nursing homes, other comorbidities, those, you know, many people like Cuomo forced the disease into those nursing homes. So really shocking. The opposite of the great Barrington Declaration, but we now know as of last week that the head of NIH, Francis Collins, said we need to squash this idea that we should let this run its course, let people live their lives and just protect the elderly. Clearly not open to that science. They had a different agenda in mind. Correct. And he was asking for a devastating takedown of three fringe epidemiologists that wrote the Great Berington Declaration. So he was coordinating that. And now we see here that he's coordinating another take down. So listen to this. So Collins writes to Fauci, Lawrence, Tabick,

and Clifford Lane. Those are three names that we just covered. He writes this, wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy with what seems to be growing momentum. And there's an article link there. What he's talking about is the nature article that just was released. He says, I hope the nature medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this but probably didn't get much visibility. Anything more we can do? Ask the National Academy to weigh in. Now, to this, Fauci responds just directly to Collins. So it's a one-on-one email we have. This is unredacted. Take a look at this. Fauci says, I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away

in times. Well, we know now that it hasn't gone away. It's grown. It's become shinier. And a lot of people are focusing on it. To bring me back to my memory, the Lancet article, has it been pulled? I know that they broke apart the group that wrote this. They sort of sent this team of scientists to Wuhan. All of them have been connected to the Wuhan lab work or most of them. And so them making these statements, had those papers been pulled or they just been looked at and said, we no longer trust this and we're disbanding the people involved?

Like, where technically is this conversation at around these? people that authored these articles but did it from what we now know to be a completely biased position they had to go back because peter dazick had obviously extreme conflicts of interest and he signed that so they had to go back and put these conflicts of interest on there it was a it was a huge egg on their face and also other people that had those conflicts of interest with the welcome trust and so on and so forth that were on that article peter dazick was removed from the lancets uh the lancet had its own investigatory committee that was looking into these origins. Peter Dasak was removed from that after his ties with the Equal Health Alliance and the Wuhan

Institute of Virology. But all was done after public pressure. So none of this was done on the front end, as Alance had to do due diligence, as they did, just like they did with hydroxychloroquine, had to be pulled on the back end. But, you know, totally discredited on those two points. And at this point, frankly, treasonous. treasonous, you know, I think actions, because all while you are, you know, building this lie, shall we say, you're giving China and all the people in that lab time to erase any ability to

investigate in the future. So instead of doing a proper job, you know, how you would with anybody, any other criminal, which is kicking the door and surprise them, you told them that you were coming, you sent all the best friends of the lab that had been funding the lab. They whitewashed this whole thing. And now we may never get to the truth of what will be, you know, this dark blot in, you know, leaking through the pages of our history books. Right, right. And the winds seem to be changing, at least in the public, you know, the people that used to be hard supporters of Fauci, hard supporters of the lockdowns and the things that Fauci was kind of putting his weight behind are now turning on him. Everyone recognizes this guy. Take a look at Dr. Oz.

The challenge is a debate. I'm challenging him, doctor to doctor, to actually argue about the merits of vaccine mandates, about ignoring naturally acquired immunity. So if you've actually had the illness, why would that count as protecting you? It has for all of known human history. And what about these inexcusable delays with therapeutics?

And I'm not just talking about right now, although it is a catastrophe now that we don't have monoclonal antibodies and any of the pills that we think might work. But some of these pills have been around since before COVID started. So what gives? How is it possible that in America, which is 4% of the world population, we have 15% of the world deaths. I think Dr. Fauci is basically the J. Edgar Hoover of public health. He's a petty tyrant.

He got COVID wrong. He continues to get it wrong. I keep hearing from people inside the public health space and outside, regular doctors like me, that he's not managing this correctly. So let's get to the root cause of why this is occurring. And I want to specifically go over the issues that they've been so confident about that they've gotten diametrically wrong. Them's fighting words. I mean, you know, it makes me wonder. I know that there's issues.

He has talked about vaccinations before saying, I don't get into that. My wife handles that. It makes me wonder if he's winning some family or losing some family arguments at home. And he's a little pissed off about it because he followed Fauci's lead. I know some of us are thinking of all the people to debate Anthony Fauci. How about not one of his number one fans that's been promoting him throughout this, you know, COVID epidemic? Why don't we have Dr. Peter McCola or Dr. Robert Malone get in there to debate him?

But either way, the sentiment is there. And clearly, as we start to see, you know, I think you're going to see these guys turning on each other. This is just like a mob bust. And once, you know, what do you think Fauci is thinking about Farrar? These guys cannot trust each other. They know someone is going to spill the beans. Someone's going to throw him under the bus. That's shifting public opinion.

Television promoters. I mean, this is an amazing, amazing thing. time, Jeffrey. Yeah, it is. And every time they appear in public now, they're saying the exact opposite thing that they were saying literally two weeks ago and throughout the entire pandemic response. So watching them basically sound like us now. It's really something to see. And like you said at the opening of this, we're going to have to really watch where this goes. I think there's going to be some really important broadcast here as far as strategy and next directions about where we can see this going.