The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FIGHT OF THE FATHERS

Episode Date: April 15, 2023

Last week’s interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson went viral, with cuts of the interview garnering millions of views on social media, and even making it onto America’s most-watched Mainstream News Network; Award-winning Musician Dedicates Music Proceeds to the COVID Vaccine-injured; Jefferey Jaxen Reports on the gender transition pipeline in Schools and hospitals, the failing Green Agenda, and Mouse Study Emerges Suggesting Spike Protein distributes Throughout the Body; The Father and Brother of Julian Assange, a journalist jailed for 4 years in ‘UK’s Guantanamo Bay,’ are fighting for his freedom; Finally, new science reaffirms early treatments and will save millions of lives, if it isn’t suppressed. Guests: Brad Skistimas/Five Times August, Ernesto Ramirez, John Shipton, Gabriel Shipton, Dr. Pierre KoryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire.

The high wire had an amazing week, and for many of you are probably joining us for the very first time. Welcome to a very unique news program where we actually just tell you the truth. And we provide all of the evidence behind that truth. Why are you joining for the first time? Probably because our interview with Neil DeGrasse Tyson last week went absolutely viral. Millions and millions of people viewed clips that were being made by organizations outside of ours by us. It was an amazing windfall for the high wire and it made it all the way to prime time. This is world-renowned astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, a scientist explaining why you and

everybody out there shouldn't ask questions. Watch. There's a list of top-ranking Medical professionals, just take a look. I'm talking about it. Excuse me. Dr. Peter McCullough. No, no, I want to go through what happened here. This is the problem with the consensus. Okay, I just want, medical professional.

I want you to not know. Because the medical is so huge, I can find you an astrophysicist who is sure we've been visited by aliens. That's not the consensus. The problem was, the scientific method died here, and this is the point I want to make. It died a death here, and I need you to help me save it. Because Dr. Peter McCullough is the leading cardiologist. I don't care.

I don't care. But what should matter. What matters is the consensus. I'm not interested in medical pedigree. I'm interested in medical consensus, in scientific consensus. Scientists that were on the ground that were dealing with patients were being censor, were being shut down, their YouTube channels are being shut down, their LinkedIn's are being shut down. Because the individual scientist does not matter.

So let me get this straight. The scientist doesn't want you to follow the scientific method because it goes against the scientific. consensus, even if the consensus was wrong. And it's not just the vaccines. The consensus did the same thing with COVID. Remember when Fauci and companies said COVID came from a wet market? That lab leak theory went against the fake consensus. If you mentioned it, you got censored and smeared as a crazy person. Hey, Kuk, the coronavirus came from a bat. Definitely not the coronavirus lab around the corner. I definitely want to give a shout out to chief nerd. That's the Twitter handle that did some great job cutting clips and putting it out for the entire world

to see. It is hard to get it all done from our side. As you can see, what is it, four million views on that clip alone, which was amazing and great to get that assist. So thank you, Chief Nerd. And people, if you want to watch, Chief Nerd puts out a lot of great information follows us, but other, you know, great news organizations and breaking news that's out there around the world. And Mike Sertovich and others like him that made posts like this. Great Point. from Del Bigtree. This is why no one will debate him. And to that point, I want to say it's true. We've really had difficulty people, getting people from the ProVax side to ever sit and debate me or to sit in this chair, if you will, next to me. There has always been an open invitation out to Tony Fauci and

all the other illustrious pro-Vaxers that are out there. But I want to really thank Neil deGrasse Tyson for having the courage and standing by his word, he put out the challenge that he was open to a scientific debate and anyone that would be willing to have it, discuss our differences, and then share a beer afterwards, which we did. So Neil, really, I want to thank you for being a man of your word in that space. And I know it's probably not been the best week ever for Neil deGrasse Tyson. Of course, really, when you watch the comments on this conversation,

what everybody was struck by was this religious belief in consensus. if you will, the power of consensus. And I've actually, you know, there's something unique about when you talk about vaccines as much as I do in this issue, sometimes we miss the simplest argument. And what's unique about a live debate, I didn't know where it was going to go. Obviously, we were well prepared for anywhere it could go, but we ended up landing in a space I never planned on. I never expected that the entire argument by Neil deGrasse Tyson speaking for the scientific community was that consensus. is all that mattered. It left me in, you know, having to recalculate what I want to say, and it turned out to be this. If there's a consensus, okay, but the consensus has never taken care of the minority. It never cares about the smaller group. Consensus is about as long as the majority is okay, then it's okay. But what about the minority? I mean, the United States of America is not just focused on consensus. In fact, I think this is a misconception of what, you know, what this nation is.

We're actually not a democracy, which is mob rule, and the majority gets the say over everybody. It's actually a republic, which means we have a constitution that protects every single citizen in this country. It's what makes America unique across all of the other democracies, if you will, across the world, is that we don't just let the majority decide what's right. because the consensus and the majority has never, ever cared about those that it injures, those that it harms, those that it oppresses.

If we were to go with consensus, then look at all of the medical mistakes that we'd still be living with. We'd still have thalidomide babies, birth defects, you know, that were caused that ended up, you know, looking like this. It was only because we investigated those that were being injured against those that were doing just fine with thalidomide. Or how about all the other products like Merck, you know, had to pay out. billions for Vioxx, which caused heart attacks, or Fenn Fenn Fenn. The consensus believed that was safe. The consensus also believed that Monsanto's glyphosate was safe, as now it's being pulled off of shells across America.

Countries are rejecting all the products using it. Johnson and Johnson's baby powder had a consensus, and now we know it's caused cancer for millions of people around the world. And the consensus said that OxyContin was safe in non-habit forming, and they're paying out billions. The consensus is all we ever cared about would never allow for women's rights and would have said it was okay to segregate African Americans. Who cares that they can't go to school? It doesn't affect the majority.

The rest of us are just fine. Who cares if they have their own water fountain or can't go into a building? I mean, in all honesty, it is one of the most terrifying arguments ever made inside of the United States of America, but it shows what the problem with science is. that if science only cares about the consensus, and Neil DeKrasse Tyson pointed it out, he says the problem is there's no money to invest in challenging studies. We talked about how peer-reviewed science,

maybe up to 50% of it is inaccurate. And he said, well, the problem is who's going to fund the studies looking at challenging those studies? Exactly right. Who's going to go up against farmer that owns our government, owns our television sets to say this product isn't working, especially when every time someone does state, step forward to stand for the truth, to stand for the truth for the smaller group of people,

the minority, the oppressed, the injured. When they're attacked by mainstream media that is being funded by pharma, how do we move forward? When they're being censored, when the great scientists, as I was trying to point out, and doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, inventor of the MRA vaccine, Dr. Robert Malone, look at this list I showed him. Dr. Paul Merrick, the second most published ICU doctor in the world that had a 50% reduction in the world. death in his ICU compared to those in the rest of the hospital and around the world. Dr. Gert van der Boch, a pro-vaxxer that believes in vaccine but spoke out against this one. Dr. John Eonidis, one of the top epidemiologists in the world.

We have the Great Barrington Declaration, you know, written and designed by Dr. J. Badacharya from Stanford, Sinatra Gupta from Oxford, and Dr. Martin Koldorf, I believe, is it Harvard. I mean, these are legendary people that all were trying to speak out, but we're still. So here's what I want to point. I want to point to what before Neil deGrasse Tyson knew what he was getting into. This is what he said about the importance of the scientific method and his simple way of describing how it should work. The scientific method is do whatever it takes to not be fooled that something is true that is not, or that something is not true that is. Did I say that right? I get what you say. Do whatever it takes. Does it mean get a chart recorder?

Get a friend to verify. Unearth it in any way possible. Any way possible. Yes. Okay? I don't care what it is. Yep. You don't want to be fooled into thinking something is true that isn't or something is not true

that is. Period. Right. And that sequence is the unpacking of that sentence I just uttered to you to try to systematize that process. Completely totally agree. Here's my problem. I cannot trust science, and my audience will not trust science, that continues to say we will not let top officials at the table that have now proven to be right.

When we see emails that said, just keep them out of the room, and they are the ones that ended up being right about this virus. I will not trust the head task force when they come forward and say, I always knew it wouldn't stop transmission. Even though I and you and Neil deGrasse Tyson were telling you get it to protect each other, I always knew it never could do that. So we're going to have a hard time getting back to a place of trust. What we need now is a regulatory agency and people in charge that get back to actually listening to, as you said, those people that are challenging this from all sides. The challenge has to be allowed into the room, and it's not. Science is dead in my mind. The scientific method is dead, and I think the coronavirus experiment proves that we are in a terrifying moment of science. And I reach out to you to think about what we've said here today and say, is he right?

Did the scientific method take place? Is it taking place now, retrospectively? Even if you want to argue in an emergency, we've made decisions and we rush things, why is Peter McCullough and why is Robert Malone and the people that were right? Why are they not at the table now? I cannot answer that. Okay. I mean, there you have it. And obviously, you know, the world has spoken as they've watched these videos of this interview.

But I want to really sort of drill this down for those that really maybe haven't thought about the scientific. method. The scientific method does not demand that the most powerful richest industry in the world, that's the most powerful lobby in Washington buying more politicians than anyone else, is the number one investor in all of television, the number one sponsor, that it then goes and uses government power and television power to force social media contracts to pull down Twitter accounts and LinkedIn accounts of people that are well credentialed trying to bring the scientific method. As Neil deGrasse Tyson said, attack it from all sides. The scientific method does not say, keep all of them out and don't let them anywhere near our hypothesis

on this brand new product that's never been injected to human beings. The scientific method did die here. Let me tell you how this has to work. We have VERS right now. We have the VERS system. And what we are seeing is that there are reports, reported deaths, people that believe that people died, many of these written into VERS by doctors, the vaccine adverse events reporting system, 35,048 reports of death from the COVID vaccine.

Almost every, you know, when we look at those other products have been pulled, we pull baby seats after a few babies are strangled, not 35,000, but this is how this works. And you can say, well, that's not accurate. Okay, but here's how the scientific method works. I want that entire panel of doctors that I showed. And this is something that Robert Kennedy Jr. was talking about when we went before the NIH. When Donald Trump sent us as a consortium to discuss vaccine issues, what we said is there needs to be an independent vaccine safety commission designed not by people who believe in the product because, as Neil deGrasse, admit, there's bias involved. Let's bring the opposite bias.

You should attack from every side and after the product or after the theory is attacked, And you cannot prove it is wrong or you cannot prove it's not safe. Then it is safe. So here's what I want to happen. Here's what a forward-thinking nation like the United States of America should be doing. And Neil DeGrasse Tyson should be standing right next to me right now. All of those scientists that are well credentialed, whether Neil DeGrasse Tyson likes it or not, the Martin Coldhors and the J. Bottacharias and Peter McCullough, I want them to be the Vaccine Safety Commission.

And I want them to take all 35,000 of those death reports. I want them to get all of them, and I want them to do a deep investigation and try to prove and see how many they can prove look like they're directly related, correlated to this vaccination. And if they can't prove that any of the 35,000 were caused by the vaccine, there it is. Now you're allowed to say it's safe. But there is not a single scientist in this world that has any credibility, not a doctor in this world can sit here and tell you no one died from the COVID vaccine. And we need to know how many actually did. And that bear's system is only a tiny percentage of what's there.

But let's be clear, the scientific method does not say that the NIH that received $400 million in payouts for the sale of the COVID vaccine gets to be the one to investigate the bear system and prove that the vaccine is not causing the deaths. No, the scientific method demands that someone that believes it is causing deaths does that research. And if they can prove it, if they can prove that any group of those, 10 of them, a hundred of them, a thousand of them, all of them, probably even more than is listed there is directly related to the COVID vaccine, we have a national problem. We have an international problem that deserves attention. Thalidomide. The fact that we wash our hands between surgeries was all pushed back on by the consensus. change is only made by those brave enough to actually do the investigation where it's inconvenient. The inconvenient truth of vaccinations is, matter-of-factly, as clear as I can state it, vaccines do kill some people. Vaccines do injure some people. That is a fact, and I don't care

who wants to push back. Anyone pushing it back against that thought is an absolute moron or a liar. They are definitely not a scientist. All right, that is my point. I am passionate about this because I am tired of watching those that stand up for the minority, being attacked and vilified for caring about the individual. In the United States of America, no man, no woman gets left behind. Every COVID death counts, as they said in the news all the time, so should every death by a COVID vaccine.

An investigation needs to be done here. The high wire is a part of that and other great groups out there are investigating it. We shouldn't be attacked. We should be celebrated. We should realize that there are real true stories, real pain that is out there. Like that suffered by Ernesto Ramirez,

a father that just tried to do what was right. I'm the father of Ernesto Ramirez Jr. He was a wonderful kid. Since day one, I was a single parent and I raised him, fed them, diapers. I did everything for him. It was my job to protect my son. My son received a vaccine and he died a few days later. The only explanation that was given to me was in large heart.

My government lied to me. They said it was safe. Will be keeping the truth for their power and gain. I sent his autopsy, which took me three weeks to get to a specialist. And he said my son's heart was over double the normal size. And they had chemicals from the vaccine. surrounding it which causes death. They need all the lives you've been fed.

Some of you just go along. They need to quit pushing this on their children. I lost mine. I need to protect yours. I hold this rules in remembrance of my baby boy and the many others who have lost their lives, including those who have taken their lives. I love the hell out of my country, but I don't trust my government anymore.

We need to take our country back. We need to fight for our freedom again. We shouldn't be forced into doing what they want us to do, knowing the outcome. This thing is not safe, it's not effective. And they say it's worth the risk. It wasn't worth the risk to me. My son was a world, he meant the world to me. They could never give them back to me.

back to me. That's all I want with my son back. The battle's been violent and strange. Has they lock us indoors in a prison of this silent world? No longer just justice for my son. This is justice for the whole world. I'm joined now by Ernest Ramirez and Brad Schistimist five times August. You guys have been, you know, touring together a lot. trying to bring attention to this issue.

This group of people, maybe it's a small group. We really don't know how big it is of people that are finding themselves on the wrong side of the safety of this vaccine. So it's a pleasure you joined by you. Thank you, Brad. Ernest, to begin with, you know, what's been amazing about your stories, you don't strike me as someone that has, you know, is comfortable being a public figure. Is it, you know, yet you're really speaking out and getting out of your comfort zone because of this story. What, you know, why?

The thing is, to be honest, I always taught my son how to love God, love country, love family. And always stand up for those who cannot protect themselves. And I feel like if I don't stand up and do something to honor my son, He'd be telling me, Dad, you need to practice what you preach. Because I honestly believed I was put in this situation because the good Lord needed people to fight back. I mean, so many people tell me, you need to pray for these people.

You need to do whatever. I said, no, not all God's warriors sing and pray. Some of us are called into fight. We're called into battle for him because we are here to take care of one another. We put ourselves in this position. I believe their lives and I thought I was doing something to protect my child. I didn't think I was giving him a death sentence.

So I figured along the way, all the people I met, all they injured like with Maddie DeGarry, Briann, I mean, so many thousands of other people I met, no one's standing up for them. And I figured I need to stand up and fight for these people. like I said to honor my son to make my son proud of me so I'm not going to stop I mean I can easily stay at home and grieve but who else can stand up you know I've always said we all need to bond together that's why we've been to so many different events together I love this gentleman he doesn't have to do it what he's doing either but we feel it inside a heart that we we need to try to stop this.

We need to do something positive, but we need to help have actually injured. Because, you know, like I said, our government's not helping them. You know, they tested it on us as like if we were animals. And now that we're either injured or deceased, they just sweep us under the carpet and keep going forward, and they keep pushing it.

So I need to continue doing this, you know. Nobody's going to stop me, you know, and no one's going to try to scare me to keep it quiet. You know, I welcome it. You know, I don't mind. I mean, if this is my job, so be it. Until the day the good Lord takes me home.

Brad, you know, as a musician, you know, you've been one of the great voices. And there's something so powerful that art can do that I don't think anything else can do. But you put yourself in a firing line. You know, as you watched Neil de Grasthicest and I talked about, he's got a documentary attacking me and those like me, and I know that you've been attacked for taking your music and supporting this group of people. Why are you doing it? I mean, what is the motivating factor for someone like you that isn't injured? My understanding, none of your children got injured by the COVID vaccine, is that right? Not by the COVID vaccine. My oldest son was injured by his early childhood

shots. So a lot of this was already in our ether before the COVID era. But Ernest was actually at the first rally that I played at when I started speaking out through my music. And I heard his story, and it just punched me in the gut. And over the course of the last couple of years at other rallies, I've met the injured. I've talked to them and heard their stories and seen what they're going through. And simultaneously, I'm watching nobody in music or art in general speak up or, you know, help these individuals. In fact, I saw the Pfizer campaign recently,

the No Plan Go one recently with Pink and Questlove and whoever else it was, John Legend. And they're collecting a check on the backs of the injured, pushing Big Pharma propaganda. I thought, I'm going to do the opposite of that. I'm going to use my music as a tool to help bring the conversation forward. Because there's a layer of a culture war here where we're oftentimes, We can argue about data and statistics, which doctors said what. But through art and music, I think that there's an emotional level when you introduce these stories to people, and you're seeing individuals who are running marathons who are now having to relearn how to walk because of this situation.

These stories need to be at the forefront of the last three years, of the conversation, and they're continually suppressed, even mocked at. So I just sort of felt like I have this tool, this album. If we can, you know, get some support behind it, have it go up the charts even. And people on the outside are looking in going, why is this little indie album beating out all these major players? The answer is, well, he's raising money for the people who've been injured

by the COVID shot and it becomes more real. You have a campaign going right now. This is the new full-length album, Silent War, five times August. Hashtag Fight for You is your campaign. I understand if we go to five times august.com and flash fight for you. Tell me how this works.

How does this benefit work? How does the funding going? Where is it going? Yeah, so this is benefiting React 19. Who's been there helping out these individuals And like I said, I've met a lot of these folks over the last year and a half or so. And basically, I'm just, I'm donating 100% through the digital album sales from Silent War to React 19 to help out these individuals. I wanted to make sure it was going to help out the individuals themselves.

So all you have to do is just download the album from Apple or Amazon, wherever you can actually buy it. And I'm just going to take all that and hand it over to help them out. I mean, I'm often seeing these campaigns, these give send go campaigns, and these individual campaigns that are happening. And, you know, it's just so heartbreaking that, as Ernest said, you're trying to do the right thing and then you do it. And severe damage has been done and you're left behind for doing that. So that's the point of the campaign, is to just sort of thrust the conversation forward. Ernest, when we think about the propaganda that was around this product, what was it, if you don't mind my asking, was there a singular ad that inspired you? Or how did this sort of idea that this vaccine would be good for your son?

What got you to do it? The thing is, excuse me, when all this started up, down there in the real Grand Valley where I live, all they were showing were people getting COVID, catching COVID, talking, it was killing people. They were ending up in the hospital. They were put on ventilators, and no one was coming out of their life. And being a single parent, me and my son were locked up. When we did what they told us, at first, I started using sanitizer, face masks. We didn't go out unless we really had to. And I went and took the Moderna, so I wouldn't, because I was the only one in and out.

And so I thought I wouldn't bring COVID home to my son. Then Pfizer came out. And I mean, like I said, on a regular basis, they were constantly showing these where people were just dying on the respirators, the ventilators. And I said, well, Pfizer said it's safe for teenagers. And I asked them, I said, you want to go get the vaccine? They're saying it's safe. He goes, sure, Dad, you know, like I said, we're best friends.

He was my best. So, you know, that's the only reason I did that. I thought it was, I was protecting my son. You know, I thought, you know, there's no way in the world. I wanted to see him in the hospital. And they weren't allowing people to be with their families. And I would have, actually, I would have fought my way in there because I wouldn't have left them in the hospital alone.

So just being that scare tactic they used on a, I took him to get the vaccine and he didn't show any side effects or anything. You know, like I said, every day was a normal day. I would wake up, wake him up, get ready for school. I'd give him a hug and a kiss and tell him to call me if you need anything. And then same thing in the afternoon, I gave my son a hug and a kiss and just can start on their day. And that's why I said, I've reached out, I've reached out e-mailed.

called and tried to get in contact with Biden all this time. How long after the vaccine? Five days. Five days later. Five days. He was my neighbor. She's a real good people. They've been there for me and my son.

You know, they would always check on me and junior all the time. You know, are you okay? And they would want to send us food. You know, but we're, like I said, we live paycheck to paycheck. We're doing good. My son didn't like anything. Her son was the junior's best friend. They were like brothers.

So she asked me if she could. take him out to eat and I wouldn't let him out. That was the first time I let him out because he took that first dose and I thought my son was protected. So I met him at the front door. I came with some money and I gave him a hug and a kiss. I didn't realize that was the last time I was going to talk to my son. She said they went to eat and they were playing games.

Then she took them to the park. She told me they got off the truck and they started running. across the parking lot and that's where he collapsed he just collapsed no signs of anything and she called me hysterical and I couldn't believe it I wouldn't believe it because neither that's my son nothing could happen to him so I raced over there man they wouldn't let me on the ambulance they wouldn't let me ride with my son so I chased the ambulance all the way to the hospital and like I said these people they like nothing they worked on them for a while in the house

hospital and they just gave them on and said your son dead you can go home now and I didn't I didn't want to go home I didn't want to leave without my son so like I said I did get upset I cursed God out loud I cursed anyone that called me and mentioned anything about God and I got suicidal too and then something in the back of my mind told me I couldn't do that because that's a sin and my plan is to go to heaven and see my son again. And so I figured I'm going to have to change this around. I'm going to have to make something positive in my son's honor.

So that's why I started this fight. And then I made plans on driving to D.C. We sent it around Johnson contacted me. He heard what I was planning to do. I told him out, I'm going to ride my motorcycle to D.C. and try to get some attention, get some answers. And he asked me to meet him there. Because he wanted to know what I was going to do I said I have no plans

I'm gonna knock on the gate I'm gonna see if Biden comes out I need some answers So that's when he had the round table and well I did start a go fund me And people were donated to help me financially to get there and they canceled it because they said everything Yeah, they said because everything I was doing the reason I was doing it went against all the rules and regulations So after my first interview with Ibre Hecker, she helped me start up another one, Life Thunder. And she called me the following day, Ernest, can I interview again?

And I said, yes, ma'am. We raised over $10,000 in less than 24 hours. So that's when I went up there to meet Senator Ron Johnson, and that's when the battle started. I met Briand Dreshing, co-founder of React 19, Dr. Joe Walscog, little Maddie to Gary, you're a sweet little girl i mean like i said unfortunately i have met thousands of injured and grieving families along this way and the only good thing out of it is i have another family now

and they actually give me the energy to continue if i stay at home i do get you know in my feelings and i don't want to do anything or go anywhere but seeing these people you know just their smiley faces even though they're suffering they give me energy to fight harder for them because you know like I said nobody's worried about them nobody's trying to help them financially you know we need they need thousands millions of dollars to get them all back to hopefully a normal lifestyle again yeah well it's you mean you're truly a hero so many people could really just stay in their home you know really it's it's obvious I don't think it's lost

anyone what that experience would be like when I think about my own kids. Brad, I know that's what drives you. We think about our kids as fathers. We're there to protect them. And we think of a story where you were trying to do that. The work that both of you're doing is really, really important. And of course, the Highwire is in complete support of that.

And I know you've been, you know, you've got a great motorcycle that you're touring around in, you know, that has sort of got images all over it. You have a trailer that you've made to sort of bring attention to this. Yes, it's with a vaccine injury. I have photos of a lot of vaccine injured people I've met along the way. It's not just about me and my son. It's about everyone. It's a world issue.

That's what we're dealing with. It is. So, I mean, if it has to be a rolling billboard, they can't stop me from doing what I do with my own personal property. So I'll take it everywhere. I'm asked you take it. Fantastic. Thank you for joining us. Thank you for sharing your story here and every.

everywhere you're sharing it. I know you are saving lives and that is truly for Ernesto Jr. That's the best that you can do is to remember him by all the children that are saved. And so I know that that's happening. I want to thank you for that everyone. Thank you for coming in here today. Thank you so. I appreciate that.

Brad, thank you for supporting this group and I understand, don't want to have you can play us a little song to sort of wrap up this conversation. Do what you do best in this arena. That would be great. All right. Great. Cool. We got a guitar for this guy and a microphone.

Thank you. Day I try. I am here. There's a light that shines the proof. It'll soon reveal the crime so I won't stop this flat. You'll give up. So to am. Stand up all your sons and back down.

This award to win as I tell them. I will always fight for I will stand guard at the gate I beat shot they take I will always fight for you Ernesto Five times August Catch the album

Go buy it now And support those that are being injured Because we don't just care about the consensus here at the high wire Or anywhere in this group As fathers, as mothers Here's Ernesto's website If you want to follow all the work that he's doing

Junior's Guardian Voice.com. Just amazing work you guys are doing. It's an honor to know you and be a part of this journey with you. Thank you. We have more great, powerful fathers coming up later on in the show. I sit down with Julian Assange's father,

John Shippton and his brother, Gabriel, to discuss the documentary they've made and they're incredible attempts. If you don't know, this is the four-year anniversary this week, of Julianne Assange's arrest as he's been in a prison in England, and held by America, the United States of America, on this really horrific story.

And Pierre Corey, another father that has been fighting for the truth and products to not only protect those against getting sick, but now dealing with the spike protein diseases, whether injected or inhaled, great work that he's doing. I'm going to talk to him about that. But first, five times August we'll be back in a little bit for a song, and now it's time for. the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, you know, I'm not sure I'm the world's best news anchor in that, like, I just don't have that stone cold ability to handle emotional conversations like that. But so powerful, so important, this work that we do and those that join us in this fight

to bring truth to those individuals that most of, clearly our government doesn't want to talk about. Yeah, well, that's what makes us different here at the Highwire. And that and telling the truth, I guess, from the mainstream media that separates us in a big way as well. So that's great interview. Thank you for doing that. So one of the big things we're seeing, you know, before the COVID vaccine came in in 2015, there was a really critical mass of parents in California that were fighting against the legislators coming in there and trying to remove the barriers to get these vaccines into kids through the school systems, through conscientious. objections and things like that. And so, you know, I'm seeing a similar three-pronged pattern approach of the politicians, the school systems, and the pharmaceutical companies kind of

coalescing for another topic. And it's happening in California and the rest of the country right now. Take a look. All right. For an elementary school allegedly helped her fifth grader change their identity and never got her permission to do it. The district is now instructing teachers to educate children starting in kindergarten to experiment with non-binary pronouns. Today, the Sacramento City Unified School District is standing with the trans staff and students, raising the trans pride flag through the end of March. This was the biggest crowd I have ever seen trying to get into a local school board meeting. We're told what really got this crowd of more than a thousand people out here was a recent storybook

hour featuring drag queens. They told me that if I were to ever find out about a student, gender or pronoun preference that I was to withhold that from parents. AB 1266 passed in 2014. Schools can't tell parents about their children's gender identity without first asking the student. School districts like Los Angeles have adopted an explicit policy that teachers can facilitate your child's gender or sexual transition and the default policy is that they keep it secret from parents so they know that they're doing something that parents would object to. Last

Last year, my 11-year-old daughter was in elementary school here at Chico Unified, and her elementary school transitioned her from female to male behind my back. During one of those one-on-one meetings, my daughter told the counselor she wanted to tell me about her new identity. The counselor ignored her request and did nothing to support her and letting me know what was going on at school. Parents should absolutely be involved in all the decisions that their kids make. Right now, kids are influenced by the media, by their friends, by just a lot of mixed

messages. It's about love and empathy and communication, not secrets and hiding and having government in our family's home. So it's a big topic here. Yeah. We're really starting to dive into this year at the Highwire because now it's starting to bump against a lot of the stuff we have talked about with the vaccine. And really one of the biggest developments in this story recently was in Chico, California. This is the headline coming out of there. We saw some testimony there from the school board meeting. Chico unified board votes to keep current. parental secrecy policy. So that's this secrecy policy that forced this mother here to sue. Here was the headline. She was in there testifying at that school board meeting as Regina was her name.

California mom sue school district that allegedly counseled daughter to transition gender. And we're seeing this across, you know, unlike the vaccine conversation, which kind of stayed localized in California. And then with the measles outbreak, you saw it really spread out and just hundreds of bills started to come out of nowhere in 2019. We see this, this conversation has spread very quickly to other school boards and the schools are where a lot of this is happening so you saw missouri in 2022 this is epoch times article you saw the parents have no right to be informed about children's conversations with teachers missouri school policy nearly 70 schools in the state of missouri enacted these policies at that time and then in virginia headline out of here

at washington times democrats kill virginia bill banning schools from hiding kids gender transition from parents and we see the parents taking it to these schools. So just like the California mother, in Maine, we have a mother there suing as well. Mother sues the Darmatica School alleging counselor helping helped her child transition gender. Iowa, same thing. Iowa school district sued over gender transition policy that leaves parents in the dark. And you can see, I mean, really a match. Yeah, I mean, and it's just a snapshot. And when we look at this, the idea that teacher has more rights and their ability to communicate with your child than you do as a parent is pure insanity and I you know I want to state it unequivocally here certainly

there are you know a very small strange group of bad parents out there but that doesn't mean we take the right of the rights of parents across the country with there's got to be better ways to handle these things and truly I think at the high wire we stand for parental rights in making decisions of how to move our children through difficult times, different decisions. I don't think any of us are saying that there isn't a, you know, a problem. I think our heart goes out and we support those that are dealing with gender dysphoria. I mean, this is a group that I would stand up to protect also as, but what we cannot do is take away the ability for the parents to be a part of this conversation. Clearly, a government institution,

and private individuals that do not spend every day and haven't watched the growth of their child cannot be better equipped than the parents themselves to handle these conversations. This is a very, very slippery and dangerous slope. And one that's been executed before by other authoritarian governments. Separating the children from their parents is usually how you really start to try and take over a society. Very, very disturbing. Right. And, you know, we're looking across these headlines.

It's just a smattering of headlines from really the recently, or, over the past year or so. But how are these schools doing? Is it just a couple of schools, a couple bad apples? What's the conversation like behind his closed doors? Well, we have some emails that were discovered, and this was from a FOIA request. Here's the headline showing this. Elementary schools, private emails show secret plans to defy parents' wishes on transitioning

their child. These are FOIA emails by a mom simply named Aaron for parental rights on Twitter, not a large following, and she received these from a Colorado elementary school. And this is what it says. This is the assistant principal at Laurel Elementary School. And they allegedly right here in the email, I'm wondering about what to do when an elementary school student has expressed their pronouns and chosen name,

but their parents directly tell school staff not to call the student by those pronouns. Well, this went through the machinery at the elementary school to the higher-ups, and they came back with this email. Darcy and I met to discuss this and both agree that the school should use the students' affirming name and pronouns at school and use their legal name and corresponding pronouns.

when talking with the family. So, I mean, completely, completely kind of two realities there, kind of two-face from the school. And look, at the heart of this is this problem. I don't know what the agenda of these teachers are. I don't know what the agenda. I don't know what their own sexual background is. I don't know what their interest in having sex conversations with my child are.

And now they're being empowered by, you know, school boards and potentially ultimately government. agencies to be indoctrinating my child into a thought system, don't tell me that that's not possible. Don't tell me that that can't happen. I mean, this is really, it's incredibly dangerous when you think about this and how vulnerable children are in this time of life, elementary school especially. And the reporting on this goes to a bias as well. And let's check out ABC News here. We have the headline here where gender affirming care is being targeted in the United States. So again, targeted, you already, you already kind of have an aggressive

headline there. Right. Targeting these people. But we have this map now. We can show what's going on. And we can see that quite a few, about 12 states have passed laws or policies that are restricting gender affirming care for people under the age of legal minority. Another about 19 states and local legislatures are considering or have introduced bills that would restrict the medical community from being involved in transitioning minors. But then you go into this argument. a little more. And you see this, this quote, critics, critics say gender affirming care restrictions are an infringement on the rights of families to make their own health decisions. The rights of the family. Whoa. We just saw the rights of the family completely sidestepped purposely

by school boards all across America. So again, when you see purposeful hypocrisy on these talking points on a charged topic, you really have to start taking note and wonder what the heck is going on here. That's not a slippage. I mean, it's ABC News. And that's just. very deliberate. So now we get into the topic that is very familiar to the high wire here. And that's medicine that hasn't been properly tested. So this goes into this conversation. A recent article by the Federalist breaks this down beautifully. Pumping gender bending drugs into kids is even more dangerous than we thought. It says last month, a stunning report by the British Medical Journal, written by a former editor of Ms. Magazine, argue that only a contrive medical consensus,

Niel deGrasse Tyson, census, not scientific evidence, props up wrongly named gender-affirming care for minors. That's the protocol that starts with social transition. That's what everyone's suing for, these mothers, moves on to puberty blockers, then wrong sex hormones and finally surgery. Now, one of the puberty blockers they use is a puberty blocker named Lupron. It's actually a prostate drug for people with cancer, and they found off-label that it can be used successfully as a puberty blocker.

So that's a very successful once. We go back to the article and it says this about Lupron. Lupron side effects are so severe that doctors tend not to prescribe it for even mild non-metastatic cases of prostate cancer. Many doctors found that Lupron decreased minors bone density so much that they could no longer recommend it. And so now it goes on to say this. Some gender activist doctors will admit their guidance is not based on long-term studies.

Rather, they claim it's based on expert consensus. There's that word again. But that consensus is highly staged, managed because of the known dangers and lack of long-term data. The Finnish French and Swedish governments have either banned or limited Leupron's use for minors. Similarly, the British National Health Service now urges caution. So again, we have this consensus, this highly stage-managed situation. And where have we seen that before? Much like you just discussed, opioids, not habit forming, vaccines, safe and effective, injures one in a million. So we have this massaging of the

words even here with this. We, we have the word gender dysphoria medication. Well, you can call those also puberty blockers or you can call them chemical castration. It all depends. I mean, all that is true. It depends on how you want to discuss this conversation. Which is really, you know, and I know that, you know, and for our audience out there, we are, if you can't tell, going to start putting this on our agenda to be looking at a lot of this conversation. We have a much bigger show coming up. You can always write into our show at info at the highwire.com about your comments about us covering us. But this is the thing that I just, we're talking about, you know, castrating children when we talk about these drugs that can be used, meaning I don't even

understand this idea. You're going to take away all sexuality. If they don't go through puberty, what is their experience no matter what they choose as adults? It seems like there's such a danger of robbing them of any sensation and experience. There's so much of this that doesn't make sense yet it is really being rammed down our throats from every direction right now. And in the space of these drugs are not tested for long-term safety, a Reuters investigation, they did a deep dive into this. And if you may want us to read this, it's a pretty in-depth article. It says, as more transgender children seek medical care, families confront many unknowns.

Where have we seen this before? And in the article, it says the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. government agency responsible for medical and public health research, told Reuters that, quote, the evidence is limited on whether these treatments post short or long-term health risks for transgender or other gender diverse adolescents. The NIH has funded a comprehensive study to examine mental health and other outcomes for about 400 transgender youths treated at four U.S. children's hospitals. However, long-term results are years away and may not address concerns such as fertility and

cognitive development. So again, we have this huge campaign across the entire United States is now being resting upon 400 transgender youths and a study that someday maybe might be done but didn't look at fertility, kind of important for kids growing up. Yeah. And cognitive development, another kind of important topic. There's good old NIH really on the ball there, I guess. But that's a confusing thing for me looking at this is where are the studies?

Yeah. I mean, it's really, I mean, this is it. And this is the continued push by science. Pharma doesn't want the studies. They don't need the studies as long as they keep funding government to just do their bidding and get them into school boards. meetings and get them into changing laws and rules all around us. And this is, you know, this is why I think this reporting and this story, though it's controversial and we're going to be very careful with it is

one that I think we have to be focused on because it truly is going to come down to our health, our safety, and our rights. Absolutely. And since we're talking about transitioning, let's talk about the transition the United States is currently in, transitioning from our current energy power sources to electric, wind, solar, and also the entire automobile fleet. This is the headline that just happened recently out of Reuters. Biden, U.S. proposes 56% vehicle emissions cut by 2032 requiring big EV jump. Biden saying 67% of vehicles sold by 2032 should be electric or they want to be electric now. 67% of cars in America within the next 10 years will all be electric.

I mean, what is that? What do we have something like 280 million cars out there on the road? 67%? I'm going to just get with that. Probably 190 million cars are going to be taken off the road that are burning gas right now. We'll call it Mount Car Everest. We're going to build this giant rusty heap of dead cars that weren't obsolete, but made obsolete by an authoritarian policy, it appears. Right, exactly. And so we can look over to the European Union, to the UK, who's already into this, push a little further than we are. And we can see some of the headlines coming out of there. Let's look how that's doing. The backlash has begun against Net Zero's relentless war on driving.

It says a fanatical obsession with congestion charges, low traffic zones and electric cars is ignoring the needs of the majority of ordinary people. Again, you're going to hear that. Ignoring the needs of ordinary people is a big part of this. And so charging stations, let's talk about that. We have a lot of cars to transition here, 278 million in the United States. Let's look how that's going in the UK.

headline ban on petrol and diesel cars by 2030. Unrealistic electric charger network won't be ready. It says in the article, estimate suggests that around 280,000 to 480,000 chargers will need needed across the country by 2030 to fulfill demand from drivers. Currently, they're around 28,000. And if you look at this graph here, you can see this is basically the cars that have been registered from 2016 to 2022. You can see almost about 800,000 cars and they have 28,000, 28,000.

charger stations. I don't know where the planning's going there, but the clock's ticking. You got about seven good years left to get that done. I don't know if that's going to happen. But some countries are actually looking at this and pushing back. So a European Union was going to vote on this car ban, banning petrol and diesel cars. And Germany and Italy blocked Brussels from banning this. That is the headline. Now, Germany has been in talks, try to find some type of workaround around this. But not all countries are hookline and sinker on this, because they possibly are looking and seeing that this may not be able to be done. I mean, here's what I find so shocking about it.

And by the way, I have to make this caveat because I want to be understood by my audience. I have always been for a clean environment. I still am. I consider myself an environmentalist, though I'm looking for a new word. Maybe I'm a conservationist now. But here's the truth. I think we should be across party lines, Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, whatever it is. we should agree that our air can be cleaner, that there are cleaner ways to burn fuels,

there are better technologies that are out there, and we should utilize those because our children have asthma and all sorts of health issues that cost hundreds of millions of dollars in medical problems every year in America that could be alleviated by cleaner air. I think we should all be able to agree that just like Huckleberry Finn used to be able to go down and fish out of a river and eat it, that those of us that like to fish with our kids should be able to go to any river, in America, pull a fish out, go home and grill it, not be told you just poison your children and your family. While that is the case, we have work that we can do together. I believe in the immediate that there's an issue that we can all start working together to say, how do we clean all this

up? How do we use technology? How do we use the free market space to make things better and cleaner? Great, I'm for all that. What I'm not into is enslavement by some idea that the ocean is going to be a foot deeper a hundred years from now, like that somehow has an effect or that you have any proof that we're going to get there. The immediate is where this conversation needs to be. And also, we need to be reasonable. This idea, I mean, when I think about this right now, that 67% of our cars are going to be electric within the next 10 years, I challenge anyone in my family and my friends that still, you know, that are part of that clean earth that we've all dreamed about our whole lives. How the hell is this going to happen without destroying countless lives? First of all,

what you are going to do is you're going to take all of these needed resources like cobalt and lithium and, you know, all the others, you know, things that we're going to, I mean, it's amazing. Shut down coal money, but it's okay to mine copper and lithium and, you know, cobalt with child labor. Look at these fields, these lithium fields. How the heck is that considered environmental? This is what we want, oh, this is okay. Toxic sludge spewed across large, vast, you know, spaces of the earth. I don't understand it. Solar panels covering our mountains. This is the future. This is, this is environmentally sound. Look, I'm open to conversations, but we're talking about child labor. You were about to, you want to talk about warlords in Africa. What infrastructure

is going to be built for this demand? We are going to turn these rare minerals into blood diamonds. If you don't think that's the case, then you clearly are just lined yourself. This is an interesting video that was just recently out where these people, like, I don't know how regulated this is, are trying to save each other from collapsing minds while they're trying to get these earth-friendly, you know, cars built that Biden has got rushing onto the market. This is absolutely pure and total insanity right now. We should be reasonable. We should be moving forward. I'm going to say this too.

I have solar panels on my house. I like them. I bought the house that way, and I put solar panels on other houses. It reduced my cost. The market made it interesting and affordable. And I would also say I've thought about if I have an electric car that I can charge during the days, sometimes off my own solar panels, maybe I am going to be able to reduce some of the pollution out there. But it's a personal choice, and the market is allowing me to make that choice.

I don't need an authoritarian government coming in and destroying the economy around me. And by the way, an administration that claims to care about those underserved. or those that are, you know, living paycheck to paycheck like Ernesto that we just talked about. What's he going to do? You can't tell me he's out going to buy a Tesla next year and the next 10 years? I mean, come on. This makes absolutely no sense at all. And one of the issues that I'm finding is scratching underneath the surface of this climate situation

and the climate push, whether it's taking of the farms in the Netherlands, whether it's, you know, trying to throttle the American car fleet, is this obsession by government industry to control and restructing. you know, down to the very smallest aspects of our lives. And it's beautifully encapsulated in this headline here. This is just a recent headline. One of many, sees property and build wind and solar farms, says J.P. Morgan Chief. That's Jamie Diamond.

That sounds like, it's eminent domain. That sounds like a great idea to get this done. I guess they have to rush to do it. So they're going to take your property to do it. Well, I guess if it's a good idea, we're supposed to do anything for the environment, as long as the science is there, right? Well, we have some science. a new white paper by Michael Kelly.

He's a professor of engineering at the University of Cambridge. And he just wrote a new paper titled the feasibility of a net zero economy for the USA by 2050, not agenda 2030, 2050. And this is what he says in there. This is a pretty well-research document. He says the scale of this project suggests that a war footing and a command economy will be essential as major cuts to other favored forms of expenditure, such as health, education, and defense will be needed. He said the fourth, a fourth project is to secure the buying of the public. Did you get asked for this? For what will be 30 years of social disruption, diminished living standards, and living under a

command economy. Now, Del, let's get to your point about the batteries. He says, if the U.S. were to convert overnight to an electric fleet, that's of cars, the materials requirements for the batteries alone compared with annual production today are estimated by scaling UK estimates by population ratio as this. 1 million tons of cobalt, almost 20 times the annual global production, 1.3 million tons of lithium carbide, over 7 times the annual global production, at least 36,000 tons of neodymium and dysprosium, nearly five times the annual production of neodymium, 10 million tons of

copper, nearly the global production in 2018. But God forbid we mine for coal. I mean, I'm sorry. The amount of mining, I'm looking at there. Please, all my friends, I'm ready for this debate. We will do it offline. Call me. We need to have this conversation. And so Michael here even gives a price tag.

And you get ready for this one. He says this, with extra costs comfortably in excess of $35 trillion with a T, a dedicated and skilled workforce comparable to that of the education sector and key strategic materials demanded at many times the supply rates that prevail today. and all for no measurable attributable change in the global climate. The mitigation of climate change via a net zero emissions U.S. economy by 2050 is an extremely difficult ask. Without a command economy, the target will certainly not be met. And then he speaks to those people, the climate change community,

says, my analysis requires the climate change community to go back in all humility and ask themselves, really, how bad will, as opposed to might the world's climate become? The proposed solution seems far worse for society than the world. problem. So really some hard words there, you know, stuff we haven't seen before by academic professors too much. And it's not stopping there. We have another professor, Wade Allison, professor of physics from the University of Oxford. And he now takes a stab at the wind power, the wind generation through windmills in a paper titled the inadequacy of wind power. And he says in there, the generation of electricity by wind tells a disappointing story. The political enthusiasm and the investor hype are

not supported by the evidence. Here we go again. Not supported by the evidence. He goes into some of the numbers. If the wind speed is 10 meters per second, about 20 miles an hour, the power is 600 watts per square meter at 100% efficiency. That means to deliver the same power as Hinkley Point C, that's a nuclear power plant in England. 3,200 million watts by wind would require 5.5 million square meters of turbine swept area. That should be quite unacceptable to those who care about birds. he says and to other environmentalists. But then he says this, if the wind drops to half speed, the power available drops by a factor of eight, almost worse. If the wind speed doubles, the power delivered goes up eight times. And as a result, the turbine has to be turned off for its own

production. So he finally concludes by saying this, with general electricity shortages, the war in Europe, high prices and the likelihood of failures in electricity supply, many popular scientific presumptions underlying energy policy should be questioned, absolutely. But he says this, wind power fails on every count. Again, Dell, this is just like lockdowns. No cost benefit analysis should be rejected out of hand because there was no cost benefit analysis on these things. The science, where is the science on this?

I mean, what's going on? And in the same place. I mean, look, I look at this all the same. These are, we are looking, obviously, I'm going to assume that a lot of these scientists, because I know how this works, are probably getting funding from coal companies and oil companies. and we can look in the background, there's bias on all sides of this. But sciences should be demanding at this point.

Before you're allowed to pass laws that are clearly going to rock our economy in ways we cannot even imagine, are going to drive countless children to have their arms chopped off in Africa if they don't dig up enough coal ball. Before all of that happens, can we get an independent body of both sides, ten from the pro-environmentalist side, if they think this is an environmental action, and ten from the other side, to really start putting it. stolen table. And by the way, let's broadcast it. Let's have the whole world watch these conversations

and weigh in on what's going on here. I'm really tired of these decisions being made for us and not by us as citizens. And moving back here to the United States, announcement just by President Biden. He says this. This is the headline after his announcement. Biden backs tearing down Columbia Snake River dams contrary to comprehensive scientific assessment. Now, these are four hydropower dams that provide clean, renewable energy to homes and businesses in Washington, in central Washington. So they want to breach these dams, which would obviously have a dramatic impact on that energy production. But also the science... The dam is not clean energy. I mean, like, again, and maybe we're finding out it's not clean.

I don't know. Water flowing through the turbine seems like the best. Now Biden, while, you know, screaming green energy is about to tear down one of the best forms of clean energy we have. And even if they're side of it, look, again, the reason why you don't dive in, if you're starting to find scientifically there's a problem with this type of energy, this is why you don't pass laws to shift everybody over. But continue, continue on. Right. And so it was against a comprehensive scientific assessment as well. So that's what has a lot of people stretch in their head, because the cover story, if you will, I guess, is they're doing it to bring the salmon runs back to the central river system in that area. But Army Corps of Engineers and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, they did a comprehensive scientific assessment. of this and they said, they basically concluded the dam can stay and the salmon, the salmon runs can be built back up. But I can also say this from personal experience. When I got out of school, I went and worked in a fish hatchery in Alaska. It is very easy to put a man-made hatchery, the mouth of almost every river and raise a hundred times the amount of fish that need to flow up. You know, there are modern things that we now have that we can do

here. I've been a part of that process. This is, this is ridiculous. And so, So the headlines are showing that that type of frustration now. I mean, just full throttle here. This is before, you know, maybe 10 years ago, you could never see a headline like this. Now we are. Net zero is a Trojan horse for the total destruction of Western society. Strong words there, backed by some pretty good points in that article. But let's move on now to some conversation about the vaccine.

Okay. Now we're moving to a space, you know, over the last couple of weeks, we've been talking about the reporting of injuries, how it's been severely underreported, not only here in the United States, but we reported last week in Western Australia. Their reporting system was just inundated when they started putting shots in arms, the COVID shots in arms, you know, several 10, 20 times that they've seen ever before with other vaccines. Now let's talk about mechanisms because we're at a space now where we're continuing to identify the injured.

We want to know the mechanisms so maybe some therapies can help. And one of the things that is really becoming commonplace talk now are headlines like this. This is out of the epoch times. Brain injuries after COVID vaccination. And so a lot of good science now starting to support that. But remember, these vaccines were rolled out just to remind people without much or any regulatory oversight.

And this is the WHO's consultation on the considerations, the regulatory considerations for this evaluation. This was in April 2021. And it says here, the FDA's Center for Biologics, evaluation of research, sorry, has determined that this is in flux and has not required that biodistribution studies, that's where it goes in the body, be performed on a new vaccine if studies with another vaccine using the same manufacturing process and same and lipid nanoparticle have already been done. So basically they're saying we don't need to test this because that, you know, those vaccines

over there. Because that study we bailed out on the COVID vaccine, remember when we got emergency use authorization and kicked everybody off the study, erased our placebo group by giving them all the vaccine, That was the only study that ever needed to be done, the one we did not follow through on. We're going to say it established safety for every future MRNA vaccine, you know, probably thousands now in the pipeline that won't have to do safety studies because we already did a fake safety study. There's a list of all that are in production right now and the different vaccines are on the way. And so I want to make this clear because I know we harp on it and we all want to like put COVID

in our rear view mirror, but the high wire's not going to walk away because it ain't over folks. If you think the COVID vaccine and the destruction is done to your family members and people around you, and by the way, one in four Americans now believes they know someone that was injured by a vaccine. Reuters has reported that to us. It's not over. There is a tidal wave of these mRNA vaccines coming, which is why we keep harping in this space. You need to understand how big this fraud was because there is so much more fraud coming. Yeah.

And so remember we're bringing people back to the lipid nanoparticle studies. We first saw that out of Japan, the regulatory agencies showed the internal documents there, but then our attorney Aaron Siri on the behalf of public health and medical professionals for transparency. They sued. The FDA released these documents, Pfizer documents, and we look at this. In November 2020, Pfizer was looking, they basically hired outsourced a therapeutics company to do this testing in rats. They would inject these vaccines, these lipid nanoparticles, and they'd see where it would look. And let's look at a table from that.

Now, Pfizer had this data. And you can see here, bone marrow, liver, ovaries. This is, and you notice at the top there, it's as early as 25 minutes after injection. This thing is spreading through the body. And by 24 hours, by 48 hours, it's skyrocketing in a lot of those organs and systems. And you can see also in the injection site there, kind of right in the middle, it kind of goes up to about four hours, and then it starts going down the concentration. So as it's draining out of the injection site, it's going to all of these other organs and places.

So now that brings us into the study here. So recently over the past several years, I did not know this. I had to look it up, but pretty interesting, scientists make transparent mice to study cellular connections. So they take the hemoglobin out of these mice and so they can study these connections that are happening. They can use dyes and fluorescent dyes in them and see really just how things work in the body. I mean, obviously, it's really, really helpful for science. Well, researchers in Germany have utilized this to look at the spike protein, the distribution in the spike protein around the body in a mouse model.

And this is the study here. This just came out. It's kind of going all over the internet. SARS-CoB2 spike protein accumulation in the skull manangi's brain access, potential implications for long-term neurological complications in post-COVID-19. And they say the researchers write the lack of evidence for the viral presence and especially viral replication in the brain led to the hypothesis that virus shed proteins circulating in the bloodstream may promote an inflammatory response independent of direct viral infection of the

affected organs, including the brain. Notably, the highly immunogenic spike protein also used in COVID-19 vaccines might be a candidate for triggering infection independent effects. So really quickly, what they did, these researchers, they took three mice, these transparent mice, and they gave them an IV injection of either a cell. spike protein that was mutated, it was altered to mimic SARS-CoV-2. And in that, it seeks to attach to the ACE receptors. That's those docking stations that the spike protein goes to into the cells so it can enter the cells. And then they use two controls, a wild type spike protein that didn't have an affinity for those ACE2 receptors in the cells, and then a protein from an influenza virus.

And here's what the researchers wrote after that, after this IV injection. At 30 minutes, post-intervenous injection, the mice were transcarly perfused, and their whole bodies were subjected to optical transparency and clearing and image using light sheet microscopy. We detected spike S-1, that's the one that mimics SARS-CoV-2. We detected spike S-1 binding in most organs, including the heart, lung, liver, kidney, intestines, thymus, spleen, and pancreas. And Del, here's the image. This is what it looks like. The middle one, if you guessed it by now, the Christmas tree lit up like a Christmas tree is the spike protein. And that is the distribution at 30 minutes after IV injection of this spike protein.

You can see the lighting up of a lot of the organs compared to the wild type spike protein on the left and the influenza protein on the right, not really rapidly speeding through and transporting through the body and ending up in the organs like the other ones. And now if you go to the second image here from that, they bring it to the individual organ and you can see each one of those organs and underneath them there's little arrows and those are the spike proteins they're finding these spike proteins in all of these so before again we had lipid nanoparticles and they were saying well these are going around the body so what's happening in the spike protein are those accumulating the organs we didn't really know we had some autopsies where we showed

people that had the spike protein in their brain and there was a lot of hypotheses around that but now we're getting a mouse model with this you know there's it's not an exact science and not an exact model but we're getting some looks at this. So the research is right this. Spike S1 was also detected in the brain prefrontal cortex. Further examining the mouse heads, we found substantial spike S1 accumulation in the skull marrow niches. Notably, we detected the spike protein in the channels connecting the skull marrow to the meninges. And we can see a picture of that here. So this is the, if you're, if you will, you're looking down on the mouse and that little box at the top that with the dotted lines, That's the area that's magnified to the right.

And that's the head, that's the brain. And you can see in the middle there on that middle picture on the right, the spike S1, there's a red fluorescent dye there highlighted. This is not good. This is not good. You do not want this in the brain. Wow. And the researchers write this simply.