The Highwire with Del Bigtree - FORCE OF NATURE

Episode Date: April 22, 2022

Tyrannical Bills Pulled in CA; The Travel Mask Mandate Melee; New Dismal Covid Vaccine Data; MIT Scientist Finds Possible mRNA Vaccine-Brain Disease ConnectionGuest: Dr. Stephanie SeneffBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in this beautiful world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. You know, as a kid, I remember thinking when I watched, you know, videos of Babe Ruth and other great baseball players, when they would step up to that plate and then just lift their bat and point it to the stands, you know, what that must feel like? Is there any nervousness in there? Like, what if I don't hit it out of the park?

Or do they just know they're going to hit it out of the park? Is that what being a winner is, really about you just have that sense. Well, I went through a lot of those emotions when I think I raised that bad and pointed it out of the stands saying we were going to have the biggest party, we were going to make a difference and we're going to go to L.A. for the defeat the mandates rally and we would win if we did it. We all gathered together. We didn't know if the people would show up. We didn't know what would happen. But it has absolutely transcended our wildest For those of you that missed it, somehow, here's just a taste of the defeat the mandates rally.

California is making history right now. Do you want to know how? They have set up the 10 most extreme bills in the entire country. Bill number one, Senate Bill 871, mandates COVID vaccines for all public and private schools. They're trying to mandate COVID vaccines that are experimental from daycare up to college. They know for a fact that it swells the hearts of your baby. And still, today, Senator Richard Pan wants to mandate that vaccine on all of your children. He wants to force law enforcement to enforce that law. Senate Bill 1464, there was some brave law enforcement here in LA

that said, we're not going to enforce these absurd mask mandates. The brilliant sheriffs here in California said, stick it up yours. I'm not doing it. We're not doing it. We stand for the people. We stand for the Constitution. for the Constitution of the United States of America. Now they want to rob that from our law enforcement. AB1993 saying that every person working in any form has to have a COVID shot.

Senate Bill 920 authorizes the medical board to search my doctor's office and these doctors offices and access your medical records without patients or doctors consent. They're trying to make us say, show your papers please, like a damned Warsaw. get out if we want to work. We are the tip of the spear. What happens here is going to roll out across the country. This is why we need to put our stake in the ground now. Keep pushing hard.

Keep doing what you're doing. Don't stop. Don't stop calling. Don't stop emailing. Don't stop coming to these events and standing with us. Because you want to know what's on the line? Everything is on the line. We cannot pass on this problem.

this problem to our children. To all those politicians that are supposed to represent us, when you look at this audience, I hope they're all looking at you out here now because this is your voting body. Make our day. Go ahead and try to pass this law. You will vote this crop down or redraft those bills or all of us are coming to Sacramento to hold you accountable for crimes against your men. Well, obviously last week I talked a lot about that incredible rally, and most of it was about the incredible success. Over 20,000 people all appeared in downtown Los Angeles for one of the biggest events we've ever had in the United States of America when it comes to medical freedom. But just moments, moments after our show last week, we missed it by that much.

Moments after my tech started blowing up, phones started blowing up because the bills started falling. crashing down all in California. I could hear the cheers and the cries over my phone. What a success. There was one thing to have a successful rally to have, you know, amazing musicians and that setup and the, you know, the stadium like sound, the 20,000 people or more that showed up, but nothing would be more important and prove the success if we could actually defeat the mandates and that's exactly what took place. So remember there was 10 bills, horrific bills in California that were really going to determine the sort of the future of American what was dreamed by the great reset. Of those 10 bills, we have managed to attack and really

essentially destroy the worst ones. Here's what this now looks like. 871, which required all children zero to 17 to get the COVID-19 vaccine to attend any daycare or public private school with no exemptions, has been pulled. In fact, Senator Richard Panis team pulled that personally, meaning they knew it was they just weren't going to get the votes. Well, how are you going to get the votes when all the people that would have to vote saw this rally and said, I'm not going against the constituents. I'll never be elected again. 920. This is the one that would totally destroy your HIPAA rights. It would authorize the medical board to inspect the doctor's office and records without patients consent violating HIPAA laws. That was pulled.

This bill 1464, which I just got to call a couple of days ago, forces law enforcement officials to enforce public health orders, even if they oppose or adopt a policy to oppose a public health order. Remember, this is where the sheriff stood up and said, we're not enforcing the mask here in Texas. They're saying, we're not enforcing the curfew. We're standing for the Constitution. I called it out when I was standing on the stage. We went, part of this rally was standing for the power of law enforcement. That bill was pulled two days ago. Think about how sick that one was. This is where the health department is showing their cards. They're literally want to use our law enforcement.

as their, you know, pit bulls to go after us, well, that has been polled. The law that was going to essentially circumvent parental consent when changes to the California Medical Privacy Act authorize a health care provider or service plan to disclose your child's medical information to a school linked services coordinator. It was going to go around parental consent. We, you know, they've now amended it so that parental consent is added back in. So parents will still be in charge of those decisions. Amazing.

And then 1993, which was going to require all employees, including independent contractors, to show proof of COVID-19 vaccines to work in California. That has been shelved, which is a good word for it's on its way out the door. Man, I mean, hold on a second. Hashtag winning. I haven't done that for a long time. It's an amazing moment in California. We are talking about, you know, the home of the propaganda.

for this entire push for vaccine control, vaccine mandates, all of it. And by standing together, I told you it would work. I said if we can all show up, if we fly from all over, we stand in California and let them know we mean business, that they're going to have to look us in the eyes and say, do you really think you'll be reelected if you go against this many people? Remember, when they look out and see 20,000 people, they know how hard it is to give up a Sunday, especially Palm Sunday, to give that time up with your family to go out and go to event, they know we represented millions that day. And the headlines said exactly that. Even though many

of the headlines were attacking us, calling us neo-Nazis and, you know, all sorts of, I guess, QAnon and truckers and things like that, all complete and total lives. I've never seen a more diverse group of people coming together, children, mothers, fathers, all walks of life, every race, every religion, every socioeconomic position was represented. I thought this article, though, really covered it best. Here's the headline. Richard Pan and the growing movement to stop him. Mentions of his names brought about booze.

It's standard operated procedure for politicians to ignore their critics. And if this is not possible to dismiss them as extremist fringe dirt bags, not welcome in polite society or any society. A closer look at the attendees at the day-long rally might have produced a more nuanced view. They included Biden voters, Trump voters, old school Democrat liberals, disenchanted with the party's newfound Stalinist impulses, Jews, Muslims, evangelicals, mama bears, and lots of them too, truckers who had been to D.C. in fact, union tradespeople, cops, nurses, esteemed physicians, ex-employees who had lost their jobs simply because they chose not to get

the jab, inspired Latino activists, immigrants of all races, families, retirees, the unvaccinated, and in a new twist, vaccinated Californians who are simply saying that enough is enough. These people are not fringe. They represent an emerging new movement that is building across the land. If you watch the rally in Washington, D.C., exactly that same sentiment, even NBC covering in MSNBC talking about the rally. We have underestimated this group of people. They am saying, you know, this is no longer fringe. this is what we've achieved.

And so many people, and I've said it before, we're concerned that when it mattered, we were never bringing all the different sects and different groups and different nonprofits all across this nation. We've got to figure out a way to come together. And I said, when the moment matters, we will come together and we did.

So for all of you out there, I want you to celebrate what has been achieved. We went into the belly of the beast, and we broke that animal and dropped it to its knees For those who have you been fighting in California, Senator Richard Pan, you know, got away with AB2109, and then SB 277, which is really what got me involved that started me on the track to make the film vaxed, where they were going to force vaccinate any child going into public or private school. And then you had SB 276, which then attacked the doctors that were taking care of the immune suppress and those that, you know, couldn't get vaccinated, were getting exemptions. all of these things were happening. Senator Richard Pan had gotten away with it.

And slowly but surely, like a train, we were building a movement to stop him. And that train has made it to the station. We are there. Now, I say all of this because this was a journey, both for I can, but many nonprofits that came together to make this happen. And so today, I need to reach out to you.

For those of you that both showed up and those that the millions of you that watched around the world this incredible event and are now seeing the results of what has happened. This was a very, very expensive event. It was over a million dollars. When you look at that stage and the lights, that Drumbotron, I'm saying all this to just point out that I can, our nonprofit that makes the high wire possible, was the largest donor to that event. So all of you that are recurring donors and help support the work that we do, you can really feel a part of what took place there. But these other nonprofits also chipped in sizable amounts of money, but there is still

a deficit. And I want to point this out because FLCCC is the nonprofit that bravely took on the risk of putting up. And that's, of course, the frontline doctors that are all working together, Pierre Corey and Dr. Robert Malone, amongst many others that have not only put their licenses on the line to speak the truth. They're getting ivermectin and new protocols out to people. They've been going on the news. But then they decided to be a part of throwing this rally Pierre, Corey being a huge part of it. And they took on the responsibility of all the finances coming in. They put up the give send go campaign knowing that if we came up short, they'd be the ones holding the bag. And so that's where we sit today. This is the give send go site. Now, as I said, well over a million dollars.

There's 300,000 that we're looking to the people to provide, and we're short by, you know, about $200,000 right now. We want to do this again, right? Don't we? And we're getting calls from New York. Dell, it's hell here. We've got to bring defeat the mayonnaise to New York and other states like that. Colorado wants to have a defeat the man that's Florida. This is something that I think could really revolutionize this conversation in the political movements all around this country.

but we, I can, will never be able to do this alone. These are big, big, heavy-lift events. And so I want to make sure that our partners are taking care of. I want us today to really dig down and say, you know what, let's not let FLCCC stay in there holding the bag. They've already put in a lot, but right now, we need to step up. We believe in what we're doing here. We believe in this mission, and we're putting everything we have into it.

And just to add one more little piece, insider information, there were meetings at times where we were clearly going over budget, where many of the people at the table saying, this is going, we're going, you know, we can't afford to do this. And I said, please keep moving forward. We will find a way. If we build it, they will come. I've always carried that. That is what has moved through me in creating the high wire. Well, here we are. We did build it. Not only did they come, but we achieve the goal stated on every poster and we took out billboard ads and radio ads defeat the mandates we want to keep doing this which means everybody that was involved all these nonprofits have to see that the people

come together so today do me a favor I want you just take a moment and think how incredible it is that we were able to defeat mandates in the home the king of mandate senator richard pan I'm not chasing him any longer I don't have to he is run off to hide. We achieve that. What does that mean to you? If you're in California, what does that value that? Is that only $100? Would you have paid $100 to make sure that your kid does not, is not at risk of being forced to get a COVID vaccine to go to school? Well, did you give someone that $100 or more? What does it matter to you? How about anywhere else in the country? Does it matter that we won the battle where it's starting right on their home turf so that they've got no soldiers to march into our

States or how about around the world as we stand as a beacon of light and truth here in the United States of America? How important is it that we win here, that we continue to mount this type of attack on the insanity that was brought upon us? I want you to think about all those things as you think today, I'm going to make a difference. I want you to realize you can make a difference. Maybe it's $1. Maybe it's $5.

Maybe it's $20 or $100. Or if you'll have to realize. one of those individuals out there that we've never contacted before that is really well off and said, you know what? I want to help make a difference in this world and maybe you don't want to go to the give, send go. You can certainly reach out to us at info at I can decide.org. But let's go ahead and show them that not only do we show up in person, that we also vote with our dollars. We stand behind what we're doing. Today, I'm not going to raise any funds for the informed consent action network or the high wire, we do that every week, and I am so thankful for your support.

But today I want to support our partners so that we can stand together and know we have confidence to march forward and do events like this again. You want to scare the heck out of our opposition more than just showing up. When we show up and we take care of our own, they'll know we are unstoppable. It's huge. I'm going to hit it several times today. Please help me help our partners so that we can continue to press forward into other battlegrounds. All right, I have a huge show coming up today. Lots of other great breaking news that Jeffrey Jackson is going to be sharing. And then I have a very interesting conversation with Dr. Stephanie Seneff, one of my favorite scientists in the world. I worked with her, of course, when we made the film Vaxed. She has

some information that has truly brought light on the issues with this vaccine and specifically the vaccine version of the spike protein in a way I haven't looked at or understood it before. That's coming up. But first, it's time for the Jackson Report. Wow, huge victories. Jeffrey, you were there in California. I mean, it was a victory just to all stand together, even if we didn't have results. But to have those results, I mean, to point to the Raptors and then hit it, you know, out of the stadium.

It just, it really feels like we are in a different place now, that the entire. conversation, at least here in the United States of America, is going through a massive metamorphosis. Yeah, I've never seen this much unity in this whole time I've been in this movement and covering these stories. I've never seen all of these organizations come together as one with a focused mission. And if this is the future, oh my gosh, for these politician pushing these bills, I can't, I can't wait to see what it's going to be. Yeah, it's amazing. It's amazing. Well, let's get down to business. So one of the biggest,

stories in the United States this week. We have one of the major pillars of the lockdown restrictions. It has been vacated. It has been ended by a federal district court in Florida. What am I talking about? I'm talking about the mask mandate for travelers. This is how the news reported on it. Take a look. Out of Florida, where a federal judge has just overturned the CDC's national mask mandate for planes and other forms of public transportation. Yeah, U.S. District judge said the court accepts the CDC's argument that masks will limit COVID-19 transmission, but that alone was not sufficient to exceed the agency's authority. That means the TSA will not enforce the rule at airports and other transportation hubs. The CDC, for the record, still recommends wearing one if you're on a train

or on a bus or at the airport or on a plane. This is obviously a disappointing decision. The CDC continues recommending wearing a mask in public transit. Basically, get out of jail, free card for people who want to get off the masks. I have actually passed. a lot of passengers I'm hearing from this morning who are begging us even go on strike to stop this. People are really upset about it. You should wear the best filtration mask you can, an N95 or KN95 mask.

So in my case, I'll still do that. I'm gonna get on a plane in about an hour. Thankfully, I'm vaccinated and boosted and have a good quality mask, so she'll feel reasonably good. I think when it comes to mask mandates, they're there because people just aren't. because people just aren't great people.

And that's just the bottom line. Americans just aren't aren't great to each other. We just aren't. And so when it comes to things like flying, I don't want to get on a plane with super spreaders. I don't want to get on a plane with 214 other people that are going to be breathing on me with their COVID breath. I don't want it.

Yeah. I don't want it. I want the mask. Well, you can keep wearing it because then we'll know you're a hypochondriac. I mean, that's really what it comes down to, right? I guess she's going to keep wearing it on the planes. I mean, that's what's so amazing about this, right? I mean, I almost, Jeffrey, almost booked the ticket, you know, to get on a plane the day that this all broke just because I fly so much.

I thought, what's one more trip to Denver and back really quick just so I can hear them have to announce it? But it was, you know, it's just amazing how the news makes it like it's like the end of the world. You better keep wearing it, though. I mean, you're not going to trust this, are you? I mean, this is a dangerous decision. I mean, it's crazy. Right. They try to float a narrative there, but let's take a look.

We have tons of video here of what that historic moment looked like when it broke in air cabins across America for airlines. Take a look. April 18, the Biden administration announced that the Transportation Security Administration will no longer enforce the federal mandate requiring mass in all U.S. airports and on board aircraft. Your math are now on you. Oh, yeah. The most celebrated's ever happened on planes at the same time all around the country. Amazing. And you don't see a lot of people standing up and screaming and certainly doesn't look like the majority are against that,

which gives us a sense of really where we're at in this country, I think. Anyone that thinks that we are not the majority, look at those planes. Everybody's excited about it, meaning all those people were just going along with it because they were being forced to. They didn't believe in it. They weren't afraid of this disease. And with the CDC still recommending it, Sanjay Gupta, still recommending it. It looks like people know who they're going to listen to. They're going to listen to their own intuition.

We're in a whole new world now, baby. Absolutely. And this is what the headline looked like over at the highwire.com news page when it broke. U.S. federal judge declared CDC's mask travel mandate for planes and trains unlawful. Now, looking at this court decision is fascinating. what the CDC decided to rest their case upon was a public health code 42 USC subsection 264 paragraph a and basically the CDC's claim of authority under this article here does not take into account its limited language found in that subsection and this is what it has to say for purposes of carrying out and enforcing such regulations the surgeon general may provide for such inspection fumigation disinfection sanitation pest extermination destruction destruction of animals or articles found to be so infected or contaminated as to be sources of dangerous infection. The CDC relied on one word there, sanitation above all. And

if you notice in that section, it's basically doing something to an object, doing something to something else. It's not talking about what we can do to humans, not talking about detaining humans, anything like that. And so they focused on sanitation. And interestingly enough, ICAN's excellent attorneys on March 8th, we covered this on the show. We put a lot of suit or I should say you put a lawsuit to Rochelle. I sued through, yep, Aaron Siri, we put a lawsuit out because I told you I was over this airplane mask mandate. And guess what? I think as you're about to point out, that was our

argument too, is all based on the fact that that just does not hold water. We are not sanitation. We're human beings. You might be able to euthanize an animal. And for those of you that work for PETA, I guess that's really upsetting. But it was only about what you could do to animals or objects, not what you can do to human beings. And so what did the judge rule on that? Yeah, absolutely the same ground. So looking at this latest call in Florida, this was against Joe Biden. This was Health Freedom Defense Fund versus Joseph R. Biden. And they found this, among other things in this ruling, since the mask mandate regulates an individual's behavior wearing a mask, it imposes directly on liberty interests, not the property interest contemplated in subsection A. Therefore, it was vacated

by this judge. So after that happened, directly after that happened, the everyone was kind of wide-eyed because the airlines themselves, individual companies, can still impose these mandates. So people were looking around at the airlines wondering, are they going to all work in concert here and slam this thing back shut? So just to remind people back in March, when this mask order was re-upped, 10 major airlines and the CEOs for them sent this, this was the headline, CEOs of 10 major airlines and cargo operators, including American Southwest, JetBlue, and FedEx tell Biden a drop outdated mass mandate and test for travelers. And this letter was sent through what's called the Airlines for America. This is a trade union for all of those airlines and more. And their letter

had some interesting language in there, some harsh language, some strong language. It looked like this. It makes no sense that people are still required to wear masks on airplanes yet are allowed to congregate in crowded restaurants, schools, and at sporting events without mass, despite none of these venues having the protective air filtration system that aircrafts do. Then it goes on. It ends with this. It is critical to recognize that the burden of enforcing both the mask and pre-departure testing requirements has fallen on our employees for two years now. This is not a function. They are trained to perform and subjects them to daily challenges by frustrated customers. This in turn takes a toll on their own well-being. And so what happened right after this mandate was vacated by

that federal judge in Florida, all the airlines sent up their kind of their bat signal to let the public know, we are not going to do this. So let's run through these real fast here, American Airlines. Update on federal mass mandate. This is what they had to say, face masks will no longer be required for our customers and team members at U.S. airports and on domestic flights. Alaska Air, same thing. FaceBass are now optional. Southwest. Federal face mask mandate lifted. And then United, This was through the Association of Flight Attendants, United Informs, Employees, our airlines no longer enforcing these mass mandate. So that angle was done.

Now, the next angle I saw the media attacking was, well, this is a Trump-appointed judge. So clearly this person has no expertise, but just a reminder, putting the politics aside for a second, there was some unity on this issue during a Senate vote in March. This was the headline out of Reuters, U.S. Senate votes to overturn. transit mass mandate Biden vows veto. This was a 57 to 40 vote to overturn this mass mandate. Eight Democrats in the Senate voted for this resolution. So we saw this bipartisan unity here on this mass mandate to just kill this thing. Of course, it was kind of vestigial. It was just symbolic because it would have been vetoed by Biden and the House would have given it a run for

its money too. But let's look at this disconnect between the agencies. Here is HHS Secretary, the leader of the Health and Human Services, Javier Becerra. He was caught. during an interview someone asked him about it and this is what he had to say take a look we are right now in the process of deciding and we likely will appeal that ruling uh but stay tuned it just goes to show you have the cdc looking at it department of justice doesn't know he thinks they're appealing then look at president biden this is what he had to say in two separate time frames basically an hour apart right before basera made that comment take a look Do you people continue to wear masks on planes?

That's up to them. Did your administration go to kill the gas in that they ruling? I've not gotten any grief from the CDC. I don't know. What will you talk about? I mean, it's like, you know, you have freedom of choice. It's your choice. And then hours later, oh, no, sorry, I think we might take that choice away from you.

I mean, if they did take that choice, let's political suicide. Is it not? Yeah, and just yesterday, the breaking news was it looks like they decided to pull that trigger. This is the New York Post. CDC asked DOJ to appeal ruling to bring back mask mandates on planes and trains. I can't believe I'm reading this. The CDC is saying that this order is necessary for public health. They're also saying in a statement that they believe that they're well within their legal bounds to make this order, even though the judge didn't think that way.

So the appeal is now, they've tapped the DOJ to push this appeal. And these are some of the headlines coming out. And what's interesting is you see the shift now from the talking point was everyone was kind of attacking the Trump appointed judge. It'll be interesting to see who pushes back against the CDC on this. If you think about it too, I mean, I think there's a lot of things at play here as I think about it just on the fly is that there's two things. Right. Number one, if they don't appeal it, then did their health ruling actually matter? You know, are they just walking away from the health issue? But I think the bigger issue is sort of what they stated there, right?

If they allow this to slide, that sets precedent. That means we've allowed and accepted the fact that this judge says we don't have the authority. And by God, the WHO is, you know, everyone wants this authority. They want to give us this authority so we can't let it glow. And you're right. I mean, I think there's, I mean, not to be political about it, but I think this really all backfires on them. Because as they try to make it the bad guy in the news, right, well, is a Trump appointed judge that made this decision? I'm sorry, that Trump appointed judge, if that's what decided this, it looks like 95% of every airplane out there that heard the news is siding with a Trump appointed judge.

Does this make these people think I must be more aligned with Trump and their appointed and his appointed judges than I certainly am with an administration that wants to take this joy, this celebration. away from me? This is crazy. And they're really splitting hairs here because it was only two weeks they extended this thing for. So they could have let it just go out with not a lot of fanfare. This puts them in a seat that puts a ton of focus on them. Now they're going to have to come up with some really some real science. Hopefully they will. I don't know where they're going to find it, but it's a real science to back this up. And a lot of people are going to be watching them trying to find that. Well, just remember everybody, your health department, the CDC wants to have control over us. That's what this is about. They can't let the precedents be set that they don't

have that control. We didn't elect them. We don't elect them. We have no control of them, but they want to control us. This is why we have so much work to do. That's just outrageous that they're heading in that direction. Absolutely. Another piece of information went through with not much fanfare on this topic. This was, again, Javier Becerra. He extended the public health emergency for COVID-19. just about it says April 13th so almost just about a week ago now HHS extends public health emergency for another 90 days so let's look at his letter really quick it's very short very sweet the renewal of a determination so they made a determination that the public health emergency exists why does it exist really right in the first sentence here as a result of the continued

consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic so they're not saying hospitals are overflowing cases are spiking, people can't get treatment. They're saying the consequences. So make of that what you will. But I did some research on this. And it's some of the things that are underpinning this public health emergency, they're benefiting from this, I should say, is that people without insurance can get free vaccines, free COVID tests. Okay, that's one data point. So also what's interesting is patients. They pull the emergency. They now have to pay for those things. Is that what you're saying? Correct. Correct. Got it? Yep. And so treatment of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, for those patients, hospitals are receiving under this public health emergency,

another 20% increase in Medicare payment rate. So that would be gone. There's an incentive to keep this thing going. But perhaps the biggest incentive that tends to get you thrown on a ventilator, the remdesivir incentive. I would guess, you know, all of these things that are killing people in hospitals, we definitely got to keep that going. Yeah. And the biggest one here for our audience, which is important, is the emergency use authorization. It is under this public health emergency that these EUAs can exist and can, can form, really. And right now, there are a handful of vaccines under emergency use authorization still. We have the two dose series. I mean, just Pfizer alone, the two dose series for 12 and older,

the boosters for 12 and 18 and over, the second boosters for 50 and older and immunocompromise. We have this long list. That's just Pfizer. Moderna has their own. Those are all the long. Those don't have full approval. Those are still under emergency use authorization. So if they remove the emergency, no emergency, no need for emergency use authorization.

Wow. Correct. That is, I wonder if they even saw that coming. I didn't see that coming. That's amazing. And so there's also something else that just snuck through on an emergency. emergency use authorization. And that's a COVID breathalyzer test. This is a fascinating development here. This is what the headline looked like. This was out of New York Times. The FDA authorizes

the first coronavirus breath test. This is an EUA. It gives results in three minutes. It's about the size of a briefcase. So it's very portable. It can be, you know, in a tent just put up on a street anywhere. I would imagine, you know, it could be used, you know, if a police officer wanted to use this and stop you and do this. Imagine driving while under the influence of a cold. Boy, I mean. Do you see like the round off backhand street back flip on a line on the side of the road in order to to get out of that one?

Right. Let's look at some of the quotes in this article because they are telling perhaps of a potential future here. It says if a test comes back positive on the breathalyzer, it should be confirmed with a molecular test such as a PCR lab test. So it's, you know, as viewers of this show have seen, you know, this is like fraud upon a fraud with the PCR test thrown up so many false positives. But then it goes on to say this. This is almost like an ad placement for this thing.

It says the device should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions, including infection control decisions, you know, such as lockdowns. And that's exactly what they said for the PCR test, but they use it for that anyway. So we can't, you know, if this thing comes to market and there's another. surge of COVID-22 or something like that. We really can't expect them not to use this in the way they did the PCR tests. But there's another thing that's coming to the market too. And there's a theme going on here. And it's speed. It's a rapid, more of a rapid thing. Because the PCR test was like a 48-hour turnaround, sometimes a week turnaround. This is getting faster and faster. So now we're looking at a nasal spray shot for a vaccine. And this is an interesting article because they're kind of

admitting what we all know right now is these vaccines are failures. COVID nasal spray could replace vaccine jabs as scientists rethink fight against virus. They're going to give it a little rethink. And let's look what it says here. The Omicron variant triggered a sudden humbling shift in perspective on vaccines. The glass looked at least half full for most of 2021, then suddenly looked half empty. It's amazing they're admitting this now. The hyper transmissible transmissible Omicron variant rampaged even through highly vaccinated

countries and turned scientific satisfaction into discontent. Nasal vaccines are not a new idea. but they are far less tried and true and have stumbled over the years. It's funny, that's what we heard about MRI shots about three years ago. Now, it finally says this, because we do have some experiments on this.

The flu mist. Fluis is used to prevent influenza, but is not approved for old adults or for the youngest children. It has times underperformed the regular flu shot, leading to recommendations not to use it in some seasons. A nasal flu vaccine using Switzerland was linked to an increased risk of Bell's palsy,

episodes of facial paralysis. Well, it's certainly, you know, head down that road. sounds like a great place to go. You know, it's funny, this flu-miss discussion, I was at the advisory committee on immunization practices meetings. That's the CDC advisory body that we're talking about, should we recommend flu-miss? Because flu-miss was about to be just removed and timed out. It had, you know, been a failure during H-1N-1. And so the whole conversation was, should we bring it back? And all they did for hours was talk about all the failures, different scientists getting up,

saying if there's ever an H-1-N-1 outbreak, what if it fails again? again and we recommend it. And then this hilarious conversation where they started asking, is there any way to approve it but not recommend it? You know, can we just say it will allow it to exist, but we don't actually recommend it? And so, and then the heads of the CDC were like, look, you only have recommend or not recommend. And there's all these discussions on trying to create a new category all around flu mist because it's a total failure and has been. And by the way, those nasal mist, they, the one thing they do is you shed those things. like crazy. So shedding flu and whatever COVID would be a real problem. But again, I mean, all of this,

it should be alarming that we're not moving out of the emergency, even when they tell us the emergency is over. It's like they don't want to let go of this grip. We've talked about it before. I keep wondering, you know, if Klaus Schwab is on the phone saying, you must keep the mass mandate on the airplanes, you know, and they're like Biden going, yeah, but I mean, that's going to be really bad for us in the election's coming up. I do not care, you know, whatever, you know, the Bond villain there. I mean, who's driving these things? And why do we need them? It's crazy. It may not be Klaus Schwab, but it may be Tadros Gabriasis. He's the WHO director general, the head of the WHO. He took to Twitter with this tweet, which is interesting in this segment because we're talking about speed.

Thank you, at Bill Gates, for sending a copy of your new book. I fully agree that we must act on COVID-19 lessons and innovate so that we can deliver swift. equitable health solutions to prevent the next pandemic. And the book, how to prevent the next pandemic. Very interesting. And the WHO is trying to ram through a treaty. This is a off guardian. This is the reporting by them. W.H.O. planning new pandemic treaty. We reported on this before for 2024. So they're planning on signing this treaty in 2024. People are obsessed with pandemic. I looked it up before the show. We were sitting with a team and said, how often do pandemics happen. And when we looked it up, it's like maybe three times in a century or other

if you look it up, we'll say between 10 and 50 years apart each pandemic. And yet these people, it's like we know another pandemic coming this fall. Got to be ready for the next one. Well, this fall is going to be a pandemic. Then the year after, we know this definitely. It's like they know there's a pandemic coming. And I just want to put this out there to people because I get a lot of different intel from different sources. Some of it we bring out. Some of it we don't. But one of the things I'm getting a lot of warnings right now is there's a real concern that the next pandemic might be something that we have a vaccine for. There's people that are reaching out and talking to us about that. And also, that is more alarming, right?

When we think about like this fast, like there's a lot of considerations about being able to move really fast. Well, you have, and I believe that this would be true. If these are man-made pandemics and we're still working on investigate, we still would love to see someone actually investigate, the Wuhan Laboratory, but the concern really is there's a lot of writing on this right now on hemorrhagic fevers and things like that. Hemorrhagic diseases where we see bleeding, imagine if you saw someone bleeding from the eyes and from their mouth, you know, in the middle of New York City, then we'd really be able to sell vaccines. So I'm just saying, and I'm putting it out there, if we see some sort of Marburg disease attack or an Ebola outbreak, you know,

I'm going to be skeptical. And, you know, when you tune in the high wire, we're always, we're always, no matter what is out there, if these people are so concerned about pandemics that shouldn't happen for another 50 years, I think we should be skeptical of what's in our future. So you know, no matter what's happening, the highway, we're going to deliver it to you straight. We're going to call it like we see it. And hopefully, I'm wrong. Hopefully these people that are informing us are wrong about these things. But keep your eyes peeled about some strange actions and there's real concerns when the election

year coming up. I mean, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm just putting it out there that we should keep our eyes open and let any sicko. Maybe it's just someone in a basement somewhere. Just let them know our eyes are open. You know, they're open wide. We're watching. And this WHO pandemic treaty is really important because it's a one-stop shop.

It's just like a lock and key. State sovereignty is over. Country sovereignty is over. Top-down biosurveillance, vaccine passports, key everything for your for your country essentially and there are some organizations already besides us reporting on this there are some organizations pushing back and fighting on this the world health council has put their first open letter on the w hO pandemic treaty you can read it here but in it it says the proposed w h o agreement is unnecessary and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights

it increases w hos suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics impose dehumanizing lockdowns and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people. So this is something we're going to continue to report on. We need some big global pushback here. Let's do something here. And my team is not ready for this. I want to put two thoughts together, folks, because when you ask yourself, is there really an agenda going on? The World Health Organization, obviously is not an American organization. It's really, I think, wants to be the World Health Order. That is what it is turning into. And it wants to dictate, it wants to supersede your president.

your senators, your congresspeople. It wants to be the governing authority if there just happens to be another pandemic, 365 days after the last one, which would be, you know, a hundred times faster than any natural form of a pandemic before. All of these things make me nervous. But when we look at that bill,

can we bring up the 10 bills that we knocked down? When we look at what was happening in California, remember California represents the sort of propaganda home for all of this. Look at 1464. So imagine, WHO supersedes your government. Well, then who is going to enforce it on the ground? This is what Senator Pan was working on. He is a part of this plan.

It forces law enforcement officials to enforce public health orders, even if they oppose them or adopts a policy to oppose a public health order. And it gives the health department the ability to pull the funds away from that law enforcement agency and give it to themselves. Now, these two things. in the state of California and the other a worldwide dictate, you must recognize that these satellites, when we talk about, you know, nipping this thing in the butt in California, you must know that every health department, every state in the United States of America right now

is bowing down to their God over there at the WHO and looking and dreaming about having that power like Fauci had to overcome and supersede the president of the United States, take away our rights, take away our businesses, mask us, lock us down. want more of this, not less. These are unelected. We talked about this before. These are unelected officials. We cannot touch them. They're untouchable and they want unstoppable power and the right to use law enforcement against you. These are scary, scary agendas and they're outing themselves and we're winning. But this is why we need to stand together right now like we never have before. Yeah, we have such an important window right now before if and when this thing comes

down like a hammer, run for office, get involved, contact your politicians, and make them do the right thing. Peacefully, of course. But let's take a look at some really important information now that's come out of, well, America's premier data collection association, Walgreens. This is Walgreens. This is Walgreens, COVID-19 index. This is their tracker. And what they did was they looked at the information that they've received at their stores, and they created their own tracker, because I guess they didn't want to wait for the CDC anymore. Which the CDC has obviously already been reprimanded by almost every decent health critic in this country and around the world. Their data is not fast enough. It's not sufficient. It's not clear. All of that, oh, we're going to fix it.

We're going to fix our system, even though they don't want to fix it because when we see it, I'm guessing the results are not very pleasing. Of course, absolutely. And so this is what they've had to show on that and this Walgreens index. I guess you want to call it. Now, first off, notice at the top that dark blue, we got light blue and dark blue. The light blue is Delta. Dark blue is Omicron. So we're, we're in Amacron territory now at the end of basically January. That's been over. So this new variant popped up real fast, Amacron style. So now at the bottom there, there's a bunch of bars going up. That first bar is the not vaccinated category. So, what we're looking at is the positive case rates by vaccination status. Yeah. And we have 8.6% not vaccinated. So this is all the positivity rate of the people that were tested. So 8.6% of people not vaccinated that came in to get tested, tested positive.

But what's interesting here is if you go across, you're seeing the one dose, 13.0% tested positive and then two dose greater than five months ago 15.8% and so on and so forth. And then even at three doses greater than five months ago, you have 19.9%. So we're seeing the booster shot is actually the highest positivity rate, COVID positivity rate of everybody in this Walgreens accounting for that people that have come in for these tests. And if you go to the next slide, it explains these percentages really well. So this is just for the unvaccinated. So they did 18,123 total tests.

And of those total tests, they found 1,559 people were positive in the not vaccinated group. So that's how we're arriving at these percentages. So now that was all ages. Now let's go into, because one of the concerns of this, well, you know, maybe there's some age groups that are confounding this or something. So let's look at the most vulnerable age group that we're being told, 65 and over. Well, we're seeing kind of the same thing. Not vaccinated, only 8.7% of them are having a positive case, COVID case. But again, third doses, we're seeing 18.1%. So we're seeing a really high

positivity rate in these booster shots in the 65 and olders. Now, this information was broken down even further by an author on Substack. There's so many amazing writers and investigators on substack right now that I mean this is why the mainstream media is is tanking this is why corporate media can't keep it can't keep up because data analysts epidemiologists health scientists are on substack and they are they are destroying the media and they're uncensored is this one of the places where they're actually allowed to show you the science and not that's right amazing and so we have a writer that was looking at this Walgreens data and did some more a deeper dive into it Here's the article here if you want to take a look at it for yourself.

US COVID test positivity rates by vaccination status. And this author did what was called a risk ratio versus the unvaccinated by vaccine status. So the risk ratio, just as a reminder, is anything under 1.0 risk ratio is what you want, because that is lowering your risk. Anything above 1.0 is giving you a greater risk. Okay. Correct. Yeah.

So let's look at that over 60. category again from this author's data analysis. So we have this chart here and you can see the first dose, the first blue column, dose 1 is 0.95. So it's just under 1. So, okay, we have a positive risk ratio versus the unvaccinated for a vaccinated person with one dose. Second dose looking pretty good, but all of a sudden after five months, five months and beyond that second dose, we're going now to 1.21, that's that middle bar. Third dose, we're at 1.13. Uh-oh. Third dose after five months, 1.83. So we're almost double this now. So we've been focusing on over 65s. Let's look at some other age groups here, these risk ratios. This is the risk of infection after the shot. Here is

45 to 64. Problem on this one, that 1.0 on the left side there is real low. All of these are over 1.0. So all of these, every shot is, according to Walgreens data increasing your risk of a COVID positive test and again third third dose is is the home run dose there it's it's almost at 3.0 so we're looking at a major increase now let's look at the 18 to 44 year old group same thing we have this like sawtooth step up pattern it's almost as if every shot you get you're getting more COVID positive rates the third dose again it's right there now let's look at some other information here so that was COVID positive rates okay PCR tests just in Walgreens let's look at an entire country and let's look at something that

everyone has been looking at is all cause mortality we have edward dowd the former black rock portfolio manager that we had on the show we had jessica rose talking about this we have some information out of public health england's office of national statistics and they were looking at uh basically age standardized mortality rates by vaccination status so we're looking at all deaths whether it's deaths involving COVID or not involving COVID everything we throw it all in the bag we shake it up and when you go to that site this is what the spreadsheets look like it's just it's just data and more data and more data so we had our team of of scientists around the world kind of collate this data and put it into a bar graph form so we could talk about this and here's what it looks like so there's a lot

going on here so anything that goes upwards is a good thing because that is we're talking about all-cause mortality not being a problem anything that goes downwards is increasing all-cause mortality and this is all broken up by vaccine first dose second dose third-dose timing intervals so we see around may 2021 and this graph is from january 2021 to january 2020 so one year may 2021 you see this orange plummeting bar graph there that is the first dose so zero to 20 to 202 so zero to 21 days, people getting that first dose, all of a sudden, all cause mortality is up almost, you know, over 200%. Yeah. Then in June is going higher, 300, a little over 300%. And then you see it kind of stepping down a little bit. But then on October 21st, 2021, we see the first hints of the

second dose recipients trending downward. And from there, we get trending downwards first dose, second dose, third dose, all the way to January 2022. And this is what we want to focus on here. January 2020, we have almost every vaccine at every time interval that's measured here from Public Health, Inklund, showing an increase in all-cause mortality. Clearly, it's not telling why or what, but this is what the data is showing. And we can blow that January 2020 segment up a little further here and we can see first dose at least 21 days ago that's the the first red bar that's going down we have about 200% increase and then it keeps going and it keeps going in second dose at least six months ago that's the furthest one down and you know i talked to the data analysis team and this first one here

where it's going up and it shows almost a 300% increase so you're protected 300% from all cause mortality that first dose less than 21 days. We're talking January 2020, 2020, and most of the population has had their first dose of the vaccine now. So this is such a small number that may be skewing the results in that category. So what's really important to look at is where this pushes now. So we're getting people with second doses, third doses, and that's what's happening right now. So this is obviously up to a lot of interpretation, but we're showing some of this data here that may not be shown, obviously, in the corporate media, that may not be shown by public health,

public health Scotland has polled long ago any of their public health information, so people can't even look at it. And I know public health England is trending towards that direction too. Well, thank God for Walgreens then putting out data where everyone else is trying to hide the data because what we are clearly seeing here is that this statement that it's at all a pandemic

of the unvaccinated is clearly not true. It's the lowest percentage, even amongst themselves, 8.6%, the lowest number in all of those that were coming in, And then you see this all-caused mortality, which, I mean, there's so many questions. And I have Stephanie Seneff coming up here in just a minute. We're going to ask her about that because, I mean, that would be that, and what you see, what's really interesting is over time, right, looks like the vaccine seemed to have a protective effect for some while. And then all of a sudden, one after the next, over time, whether it's waning, or is that the adverse events that were never tested,

that went beyond the couple of weeks they looked at in the trials, is that where people start dying? and you know the all cause mortality having issues, heart attacks or, you know, brain aneurysms, or you name it, whatever it is, maybe cancers, things like that, that's what that would appear. Now, we don't know what it is, but what we can tell is compared to being unvaccinated, you're doing much worse over time if you got the vaccine in almost all forms of the doses. So it's really something we'll keep tracking for sure. Absolutely. And this is vital information.

It really needs to get out. And I know people are sharing it. Just keep doing that. These are the conversations. This is the data that will underpin some of the conversations as people talk to their legislators, talk to people that are trying to get these bills across in the state houses to maybe block some of the vaccine mandates for their kids and mask mandates and everything that's being protected against here. All of those things that are working. We have great people out there. Amy Baum that's been on so much with Perk using this type information to go out there and talk to politicians. Also a big reason why they're having so much

success in California. So this stuff is important. It's important, even though some of it seems, you know, maybe a little bit highbrow or too scientific, folks. This is what the high wire is. We're giving you the real data. And I want to remind you all out there, if you're brand new to this show, all of these charts, all of this data will be in your inbox on Monday. If you just sign up to our newsletter at thehighwire.com, we call it the highwire protocol. We're demanding every news agency be as transparent as we are. We're going to show you our work. just like we all learned to do in algebra class, we show you where our information is coming from,

and not just a little cherry-picked paragraphs and things we're pointing to. You can have the whole thing. And it's a great party trick when you go and say, hey, look what the CDC just said, or look at this peer-reviewed study. They can't really refute it, and that's how we like to do the news. Jeffrey Jackson, you're the best there is.

So awesome to have you on our team. Great reporting today. Thank you. Thanks, Del. All right, I'll see you next week. Look, if you like the Jackson Report, definitely go to our website just as he broke it this week. For the first people to find out that masks had been lifted were those that were on our website and saw the Jackson report. He reported that before any news agency there is in the country. So we're on top of these things. So it's definitely a website that you want to keep tracking.

All right, look, when you look at what Jeffrey just laid on us, we see this cabal being built. The WHO wanted to supersede government agencies. And then you see their little. little cronies in the health departments like in California want to use law enforcement. Folks, this is why we need to be present and accounted for. So I'm going to hit it again. Please help me make sure that we fully fund the rally that took place. All you have to do is go to give, send go, defeat the mandates U.S. today. I would really love to see this deficit taken care of this week. We can do this if we all come together. And by the way, when you involve yourself in this. I know it's great to sit there and be a pessimist. We all feel like the

world isn't going the way we want and, you know, and let me see how it all goes. But your action creates action. You know, when we move, we create a momentum and an energy. It's almost like that 100th monkey thing we talked about. Please do it today. Watch when you give, others will give and be a part of making change and setting us up so that we can do more of these rallies. Remember, this is not event that we charge tickets. There's some great big events going around that are doing a great job bringing speakers, but you have to pay a fee to get inside of the auditorium. We want to continue to make these free because it's standing as many people out there coming together and especially everybody, those that can afford it. This is that moment for those of us that have done well enough

to really support free events that are massive and get in their face because believe me, we are going to need more of this as we go in the future. I can wants to sort of drive. that but again I want to take care of our partners on this so that they are confident next time i say if we build it they will come that they said you know what you were right last time del and imagine what we will do is we keep that philosophy going so please help me out donate today for those of you that maybe have never donated before or just want to do a one-time donation this is a perfect opportunity to go to that website make sure FLCCC is not left holding the bag now we need these guys I want piercori happy I want dr. roberer

Robert Malone, these guys that are working so hard for us, putting it all on the line, and then also standing with us and helping, you know, raise the funds for these rallies. It's just so huge. So help me with that today. It's one of the things that I want to just show our power in every direction, not just our ability to come together, not just the numbers we're seeing on the high wire, not just standing together, but actually putting our money where our mouth is. So help me out with that today.

Okay. So a lot to celebrate huge victories all around this country. But at the end there, Jeffrey Jackson started talking about this data coming in from Walgreens, higher infection rates amongst those that have been vaccinated. Also, these alarming numbers, and we've been showing them to you for months now out of the UK, showing all-cause mortality being increased, especially starting in January of 2022 from those that are vaccinated. What are those deaths? What are they dying from?

We've also talked about that 40% rise. the insurance adjuster here in America. Many insurance companies talking about the 40% increase in all-cause mortality from ages 18 to 64. It's all seemed like a mystery. Until I read a great paper, innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2M RNA vaccinations, the role of G quadruplexes, exosomes, and microRNAs. I want you to pay attention to the great writers on this. We've got Stephanie Senev, Greg Nye,

Anthony M. Kiriakopoulos and Peter McCullough, one of another, just great mind that is supporting us here. But before I get into this paper, let me just introduce you to Stephanie Seneff. I met Stephanie back when I was making the documentary Vax, which thrust me into the middle of this conversation. She's a true hero. She's a light in science, a genius with more letters behind her name from MIT. but this should just give you a taste of who she is. Now is Dr. Stephanie Sennapp, senior research scientists at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab. Dr. Stephanie Sennaf, who is a major resource in an area that many of us are not very knowledge from.

She has a BS degree from MIT in biology and MS, EE, and Ph.D. degrees from MIT in electrical engineering and computer science. She recently gave a presentation warning of the possible long-term side effects of the COVID. vaccines. My topic is COVID-19 vaccines and neurodegenerative disease. And I have to say that I thought glyphazate was the worst chemical I would ever encounter in my lifetime. And now I've met my match with the messenger RNA vaccines. They are extremely dangerous, in my opinion. And the technology is novel and untested and has many unknowns. And there were personal reasons why I was upset with the way the medical establishment is treating things. And I didn't believe the current dogma.

This is absolutely terrifying. When you look at the potential harm from these vaccines, it just doesn't make any sense. Any parent who's been pressured into giving a child this vaccination, what do you say to them tonight? They should do everything they can to avoid it, absolutely everything they can.

Well, it's my honor and pleasure to welcome Stephanie Seneff to the High Wire. Stephanie, it's great to see you again. How are you doing? Great to be back. Thank you. That's really great. Let's just tell me right up front.

I mean, it's like two of my favorite people in the world have collided on this paper, Dr. Peter McCullough and you. And it's one of those moments where I was like, I should have introduced them. I mean, how did that happen? Just out of Curia. There's other great writers, but we've had Peter McCullough on a lot. How did you two come together with the other writers on this paper? Yeah, I mean, we sort of knew each other because we were in the same fight together. And he sent me a paper, actually, that he was working on together with Anthony Curiacopolis.

They had a paper they were collaborating on and they wondered if I would just read it and comment. And I did and then I commented enough that they said, hey, you want to be an author. But that was a different paper from this one and that one is still not published. We're still working on it. So we're hoping to get that one out as well. But then we, so Greg Nye and I had written that earlier paper from May. Yeah, published in May. Okay. So we joined up with them, those two, the four of us, I think we make a great team. I'm loving it. The research is fantastic. It's so interesting.

interesting and all these brilliant people putting their heads together to figure these things out. That's amazing. I mean, every time I've ever sat and had an opportunity to talk with you, you blow my mind. I always sort of joke. It's like being around a human computer. There's just some way that the way your mind is able to put these thoughts together. I can't imagine you and McCullough and all these people in one room. That room, the whole building must just float when that happens. All right, well, let's get to this paper. A couple of the paragraphs that jumped out at us. What may be a particular concern is the fact that GC enrichment content in vaccine mRNAs results in an enhanced ability for potential G quadruplexes formations in these structures,

and this could cause onset of neurological disease. Remarkably, the human prion protein, PRP genetic sequence, contains multiple G4 these quadruplexes forming motifs, and their presence may form the missing link in the initial conversation, conversion. I mean of PRP to the misfolded form PRPSC. PRP binding to its own MRNA may be the seed that causes the protein to misfold. This observation is particularly concerning the light of the fact that the spike protein is prion-like characteristics. In your conclusion, it is imperative that worldwide administration and the MRNA vaccinations

be stopped immediately until further studies are conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. end we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake we call on the public health institutions to demonstrate with evidence why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly now this is a very long paper and so there's a lot discussed so just to break it down right up front what are and you mentioned you know prion disease which i know we're going to get into but what would you list now of the things as you've looked at this MRNA technology and we look at the long-term

down-the-road potential consequences what are the diseases that you believe may be caused by these vaccines sort of what is that list right now for you and it's sometimes just making it worse you have Parkinson's disease and it gets a lot worse after the vaccine a lot of it is just making everything you have worse and certainly cancer is right up there i think it really accelerates the rate of cancer progression. And then all these neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson's disease, ALS, Lou Gehrig's, that's Lou Gehrig's disease, CJD, Cutsfeld-Eachl Dioclis, probably multiple sclerosis. And then, of course, all kinds of blood problems, sombosis and hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, which is a consequence of thrombosis, a blood clot getting loose, heart problems, all kinds of

different heart problems, especially myocarditis, but even heart failure, heart attack. And it attacks the liver as well, so the liver, the heart, the blood and the brain. Yeah, I think those are the main ones. And, of course, cancer. And then also increased risk of infection with anything. And you see the herpes, shingles, you know, lots of people getting shingles after the vaccine. And palsy, which is probably from an infection, a latent infection that becomes active. So basically, we've talked a little bit about this, like maybe dormant viruses or things or potentially just vulnerabilities.

to not fight off a virus because your immune system is just beat up by this vaccine and it's not defending you. All right. That's a huge list. Now, one of the things you did in the paper that I think is greatest for you, you went through VERS. So I want to just bring up a couple of these various charts that's in there so that you can just help us understand why that list is there. Tell me about this. What are we looking at? Right. Now, so first of all, the numbers are small. All the numbers are small here. And that's because when people, people don't connect cancer with vaccines. And these are all different kinds of cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, etc. And for each one, we looked at the year 2021 in the VERS database, and we looked at the symptom field. And every case that mentioned

breast cancer got to count. So 245 cases in 2021 where they mentioned breast cancer as a symptom as after getting a vaccine, a COVID vaccine. And it's 245. And then when you look at all the vaccine reports from 2021 for all the other vaccines, all the children's vaccines, the flu shot, the shingle shot, the things the adults get, 254. So there were nine more cases for all the other vaccines. Almost all the cases were breast cancer, 96.8% of the cases where breast cancer was mentioned in any report in 2021 was a COVID vaccine report. Just saying that almost all the COVID vaccine is dominating theirs is what you're saying. This is the vaccine adverse events reporting system. This is a system where doctors and anybody can, but usually it's doctors report

incidences that happen after vaccination. It is our main reporting system. Everyone's supposed to be using it. Studies have shown that it's a fraction of the amount of actual cases. But just to be clear, what you're showing here, and this is a study by Harvard showed that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are actually reported. And I think you're right. When it comes to cancer, it's probably even less than that because nobody really associates ever has associated cancer with the vaccine. So it's unlikely that if a vaccine, if a vaccine, caused cancer that the doctors say, oh, that must have been the vaccine. It's just so outside of our frame of reference. But what you're saying is when you listed all these things and just

ask bears in total, the total number of all of that category being mentioned, 96.8% were just for the COVID vaccine's prostate cancer. 96.2% of the 2021 compared to all the other vaccination. And you can see 100% of pancreatic. Right. All right, here's the other chart. Let's take a look at this. All right, what are we looking at here? So this is cardiac symptoms. And so this is actually much larger numbers. You can see 8,000 total of different kinds of cardiac events. So we collected up cases of myocarditis, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest, erysmias, and that includes tachycardia and heart failure. So these are all various severe cases, you know, symptoms in the heart. And the numbers for COVID-19 next, and then for all vaccines. So the same thing again, just as before, 2021. And you can see altogether there were 8,000 different reports of these conditions for the heart under COVID, over 8,000. And that was 97.7% of all the reports for any vaccine in 2021. When you look at this, what I think is in you're pointing out, and it's something that I haven't

really thought about, is if you want a red flag and science, you sort of compare things to each other, right? This is at least 16 vaccines, and I'm imagining we can include all of those that aren't mandated by the CDC that we see advertisements for. So what, 20, 25, maybe even 30 vaccines on the market of all of them in the last year, 2021, look how many injuries are being listed for the COVID-19 vaccine compared to all the rest. 98%, 96%, 98% to the 97%. There clearly is a problem with this vaccine compared to the other vaccines combined. All the other vaccines combined.

that's right. Or not even in the stratosphere of injury that this vaccine appears to be, you know, creating. And so you would think there would be like some hesitancy by our health departments to say, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, Houston, we may have a problem here. But there's none, right? Are you shocked by that? I'm amazed. I can't see how they can say there isn't a signal here because it's incredibly obvious.

And we did another thing. We looked at flu shots, we figured out the number of flu shots, total number that would be given to the population and the total number of COVID shots taking into count the boosts. and whatnot in 2021. And we said if COVID was comparable to flu, so you would have about the same number per shot of events, how many events would you have? And it turns out that COVID-19 has 27 times as many events

as it would have if it were comparable to flip, 27 times. Wow. Wow. And yet just crickets on these issues, which is why it's so important you're doing these investigations. All right, let's jump into, I think, think one of the, we've touched on this topic a little bit. You mentioned it in your original paper last year, which is prion disease. Can you explain to me, first of all, like, you know,

prions. What does that mean? What is a prion? Yeah, very fascinating. And I've been fascinated by prions for a long time, so I know quite a bit about them. Even before COVID, I was well informed. It's a fascinating protein-based infection model. Prusner won the Nobel Prize for figuring it out, that these proteins alone could cause disease, cause essentially an infectious disease. And the infection is propagated by virtue of the fact that the prion protein misfolds,

and then it causes other proteins to buddy up with it. So it triggers a misfolding of other proteins in that cell, including proteins that are not prion proteins, proteins like amyloid beta, which causes Alzheimer's. disease. Okay, I think I heard we have a little animation that maybe you can walk us through here that just sort of simplifies this. So let's take a look and just tell me what we're looking at as we go through it. So Cruz-Belt-Yacob disease is one of these prion diseases, correct?

Yeah, that is the prion disease, the one that's caused by the prion protein. And you can have other proteins that come in that are prion-like and they can cause the same problem. So it's coming into the blood vessels and it's going past the blood barrier into the, it's reaching the neurons. And so you can see the little things that are sweeping through the little dots. Those are the prions coming in and they're going to infect a cell. At some point, they're going to get into a cell.

They're going to infect it. And then they're going to start making this plaque. That red bob thing is the formation of these plaques. Now here you have the membrane of the cell and these little red things that are coming up or getting in. And they're gradually building this plaque that's going to come out on the other side,

getting into the cell. And you can see this red stuff growing. That's the plaque that's forming from the collection of these prions and they're going to propagate. So when one comes in, more join up and it builds this plaque, in these beta sheet formations, it builds these plaques. And then it'll gather other proteins into its mix to make itself bigger.

So it'll grow and then accumulate. And then eventually you get these fibrils, like these are the amyloid beta fibrils that those little strings. This kind of is hard to follow, but the, the fibrels, you see those red strings are those are going to build up outside the cells and eventually they're going to join hands and buddy up and make a big plaque regions. And so the brain becomes filled up with these amyloid beta plaque that's characteristic feature of Alzheimer's disease. And that's what the circle thing, amyloid plaque. And this takes a long time, I would imagine, to develop usually, right? I mean, these are things that happen over years. Right. Yes. And in fact, I'm an expert on Parkinson's disease

because my mother died from it. So I've been very interested in that disease. And it's, they've shown in papers that it often starts in the gut with a foreign protein, a pathogen that produces a protein that's prion-like, it resembles the prion protein. And that means it can misfold in the same way and cause that kind of trouble. And the immune cells take up that prion-like protein and carry it into the spleen. And then they're trying to get antibodies to be produced against it for protection. But if there's too much of it, then it gets released in exosomes. And it travels along the nerve fibers, particularly the vagus nerve up to the brain. And eventually it reaches the brain, the neurons get infected.

They start to have accumulation also of prion-like misfolding. So it's a process of it starts to the sling. Basically this butts up against a healthy cell and then that cell folds in properly and now it just sort of becomes this domino of folding, misfolding cells. Is that right? Not cells, not cells, proteins. Proteins inside the cell. Yes, other proteins.

There's a whole. class of this whole group of proteins that have this problem. Often they normally would form alpha helix, it's called an alpha helix shape, or they'd be unstructured. And then when they misfold, they turn into a beta sheet structure. And it's the beta sheet structure that's the misfolded version of it that causes disease. So the protein is perfectly fine in its normal shape.

But when it encounters these trigger proteins, which are these misfolded prion proteins, it also misfold. It joins the club, basically, and it grows. the thing grows. It's like a monster. And it happens over decades. So they've seen with Parkinson's disease that people have evidence of misfolded proteins accumulating in the spleen long before they show up in the brain. They gradually move up to the brain. The number grows in the brain and eventually you start to have symptoms. So long before symptoms, you can have lots of these

proteins misfolded in your body unable to be cleared. And it's basically once this starts happening, it's essentially a death sentence. Like you are, this will eventually just take you out. It looks that way. I mean, it seems like they've really tried hard to treat Alzheimer's, and they haven't found anything that can reverse it. And most of the drugs that they found don't actually help either. They're pretty useless.

You know, they haven't found a way. They've been spending a lot of money trying to find drugs that can reverse Alzheimer's and they have not succeeded. And again, in that list of prion diseases, the one I think that is famous is sort of that mad cow disease, or, you know, where they just stand it, like the animal starts shaking. That's sort of the animal version of it, right? And so...

Right, that's the prion protein. That's the cow version of the prion protein. The human prion protein causes C.JD. Khrushfeld-D. Which is a very serious neurodigenature of disease. Okay. Now, when we talk about... When we're talking about these prions,

now what does that have to do with these COVID-19 vaccine? Like, why are we talking prions and COVID-19 vaccine? Very fascinating. And in fact, it was a Geert Banden. Geert Banden Bosch? Yeah. Yes, I think he's the one who was talking about the possibility of it being a prion-like protein. And since I know prions well, and I know that they have this characteristic motif, GXXXG motif,

which is a sequence of five amino acids in the protein. The G stands for glycine. So it's glycine and then the X stands for wildcard. So it could be any amino acid. You have some, I think you have some visuals that will help us walk through this. Maybe so. This stuff is complicated. I find it really fascinating. I find it fascinating too and I want to help our audience find it fascinating. So let's get some visuals in here. So this is out of this paper.

Yeah, the GXXXXG is a protein. See down here in the box there, G G GWG. That is a sequence that shows up multiple times in the prion protein itself, the human prion protein. And the G is glycine. The W is triptophan. And up here is the actual amino acid code. This is the three letter code in the famous D DNA code. This is in the RNA molecule. These Gs up here stand for guanine. So it's very confusing. This is a G guanin and this is a G-Glycine. G-glin is the amino acid in the protein and guanine is a nucleotide in the RNA. This is the message RNA. Okay. So you see the GXXXXG is the motif like this. And in the prion protein, it has lots of

these. It has like 14 of these GXXXG patterns in the human prion protein. Okay. So this one is bad. You don't want this G XXG thing. You don't. And most proteins have none. Most proteins have none of this GXXXG motif. Amyloid beta has four. The prion protein has 14 and the spike protein has seven.

So it's sort of, you know, approaching twice as bad as amyloid beta with respect to its prion-like ability. Yeah. But not nearly as bad as the prion protein itself, which has 14. Okay. And it's important to look at this GGX, this thing up here because you see all these Gs are gwanine, not glycine, but guanin. That's the nucleotide in the um.

RNA. When you have lots of guanines, a crowding of guanines, that's when you get those G quadroplexers. Those are forming in the RNA. Folks, hang in here. We will simplify this, but this is super, super interesting. This is what the scientists are looking at, and we want them looking at this. Now, let me understand this, this GXXG, there's, that G can be two different things. It doesn't matter. It's where it's grabbing the G.

So it is guine, but it could also be glycine, right? It's supposed to be... Well, when it's talking about G as a symbol and it's an RNA, it's talking about guanin. If it says G and its protein, it's glycine. And the code for glycine, GigiG, which is guan, guan, guan, in the RNA codes for glycine. So when you have glycine, you have G rich RNA. They go together. They're hooked.

Okay. Because the code for GGG is GGG, so the code for W is tryptophan and its code is UGG. So you have a lot of guanines when you have glycine and tryptophan. This W is UGGG. So this is the actual sequence in the RNA. And you can see GG, G, G, G, G, there's lots of Gs here. Those are the guanines that form this structure. It's so fascinating.

They form these little squares. And then they stack up the squares to form this kind of building. It's like a building. Okay. A square structure. So this is a quadruplex right here that we're looking at. That's the quadruplex, yeah. And you see there's a pattern up here that describes it.

talking about how many guanis in a row and then how many other things in a row. This little thing describes the actual pattern that they look for to try to find these things. Okay, so why are quadruplexes bad? Like, why is this something that we need to be concerned about? Yeah, they're very, very complicated. And we have paragraphs in our paper that are completely unintelligible because it's so hard. I have a hard time understanding it myself. I've read a lot of papers on them and I'm still struggling. And actually, people who wrote the papers don't understand either, Because they're- So this is new. Like this is something we're really just, again, we've created a problem and we barely

even understand what that problem is. Is that the essence of this? That's right. Yes. And I can tell you two things at least that I know about them that worries me. And one is that the prion protein, the human prion protein, as you might imagine, has the potential to make all these G quadruplexes because it has all these glycings. It has a lot of glycines.

So it makes the G-quadroplexes. And they have found in research that the protein itself binds to the G quadriplex is in its own RNA. So the RNA makes the protein, the protein binds to the G quadruplex in the protein. And when those two bind together, they mess each other up. The protein misfolds into its prion shape, its dangerous shape. And the G quadruplex falls apart. It's really, really wild. They interact with each other.

It's so interesting. So that's number one. So the spike protein could do the same thing by binding to its own RNA at the G quadruplexes, causing it to misfold and then causing it to cause trouble. So now when we're talking about the spike protein, are we talking about the spike protein in nature has this issue with prion domains and G quadruplexes? Yes. The one in the virus has seven and the one in the vaccine has seven, seven of these GXXXXG things. However, the vaccine has modified its RNA. This is where it gets really serious, in my opinion. Because they have done something called codon optimization. And what that means is that they've replaced the codons.

The original virus had a certain RNA sequence. They know what it is. And they said, let's make something different. Let's make something better, because we want to make sure it makes lots of protein in a hurry. And we know how to make that happen. And one thing they did was they replaced all of the uridines with methyl pseudouridine.

They figured, out that that's going to cause the protein to be very sturdy, very hard to break it down. The RNA should be very sturdy. We've covered this before. This I have a little bit of sense. I just want to go through a paper we've talked about before. This is a great paper out of the UK, the UK column stabilizing the code. Basically in 2005, Dr. Weissman and Carrico discovered a way to protect foreign

mRNA from the body's immune system. That scientific milestone would be key to the advancement of the mRNA vaccines in 2020. Their discovery that by modifying the RNA, code modifying the nucleoside uridine, as Stephanie just said, resulted in ablating the innate immune response involved toll-like receptors. Basically, everywhere where you see that little sigh symbol, there, there should have been a U for uridine. This is the pseudo-uridine, sort of a man-made uridine that has been put in there. And all of that, the goal, ironically, was to get it past the tolake receptors. Like, that's part I know. Get it past the to like receptors, which are

basically your centurions of your immune system looking out for what is self and what is not self and attacking any foreign matter and by shifting it they're able to sneak it by the immune system now what is it what is it how does it sneak by like what is it they've done that that that confuses the body like why does it work well the methyl pseudo uridines work because they they mess up these the enzymes that would normally break it down so they can't break down the RNA, this sticks around for a long time because of those methyl pseudo-uridines. It turns out they also make it very efficient to make protein quickly. But that's not the only thing that makes it efficient because they've done a design.

Well, the G-quadreplexes also make it efficient. They did the codon optimization, which is to replace the codon that the virus chose with a different one. Like you say glycine is GGX. That means it could be GGA, GGU, GGC, or GGGGGG. like the wild card. A wild card. Okay, got it. So supposing the virus said, let's make a GGA, right?

The researchers said, no, no, no, we want GGG because we know GG is more efficient. It's going to make more protein. It's going to be better because of codon optimization. They want to optimize it to be able to make lots of protein to make it fast and to keep making it, you know, to not stop. And so they ended up replacing a lot of the nucleotides with quantified. guanning. And they didn't change the code. I mean, it's still codes for the same amino acid, but it's a different code because there's a redundancy in the codes. So they change the code in the

RNA such that it has a lot more guanins. And what that means is it has a lot more G quadruplexes. It has a lot more potential to form G4s, which can then bind to the prion protein and cause it to disfold into a prion like structure. Wow. So essentially breaking this down, it's a lot of G's and it can be very confusing, but by adding, by changing the actual spike protein, and it sounds to me like making it a super spiked protein. They said, let's take the most deadly part of this virus, the spike protein, which is causing the blood clots and all the issues we're seeing, you know, of those that are having a bad reaction of COVID, and let's make it a super spike protein that gets around the immune system, puts the toll like receptors asleep, and then adds all of these

extra Gs that can break into these, these, these, these boxes, these, these, these boxes, these G quadruplexes, which then feed and work with the prions to release more of that. So all of this is being produced at a higher rate in your body when you're vaccinated versus if you came in contact with the wild viruses. That simply put that my body's producing more of these problematic quadruplexes and prions from the vaccine than if I had gotten the natural virus because of the super abilities science gave it. Is that clear? Much more.

I would say much more. And in fact, the immune cells take up these message RNA particles that the vaccine delivers. They actually take it up. They don't take up the virus because they don't have the H2 receptor. So they're being infected with the vaccine. And they can't stop themselves from making spike protein. They basically go into a panic. They rush into the lymph system.

They go to the lymph nodes into the spleen. This stuff is spreading off to the body. And they say, hey, help me out. I got to get rid of this stuff. Make some antibodies. Make some antibodies. And then they are overloaded with spike protein. so they release it in the form of these exosomes.

And you can see this is a sore cell releasing exosomes. These are the exosomes here. They can have all kinds of stuff in them. So like exosomes is basically like calling one of those companies that has a storage unit that comes and picks the stuff up and take this away. I got so much garbage in my house, go hide it for me. But it's not really hiding.

Where is it hiding is taking it up potentially to your brain and to these other places where it's getting stored all through your body, which is the major problem then. Right, absolutely. So I think the spleen is loaded. up with immune cells that are massively making spike protein, packaging it up into exosomes releasing them. And they're going to travel along the nerve fibers. They are very good at traveling along nerve fibers. They go from the spleen. They get into the vagus nerve. They travel up to the brain,

to the heart, to the liver, to the gut, and they cause trouble because they deliver the spike protein. And even potentially the messenger RNA that makes the spike protein could be inside those exosomes. And they deliver it to all of those critical organs. And then once the spike protein arrives, it causes damage. And that's how you see the heart problems, the brain problems and the liver problems. So do you believe we're going to see an increase in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's and these, you know, these prion-like diseases? I mean, is that the concern here? Absolutely. I almost have no doubt. And you know, when we wrote our first paper, Greg and I, we predicted that it would happen, but we predicted it would take the years or decades. So we thought younger, people are going to

start getting Alzheimer's younger and younger and more and more cases are going to show up over time. But by the time we figure it out, by the time it happens, we won't connect it to the vaccine because it was a long time ago. But I think it's happening much faster than that from what I'm seeing. I'm getting email from lots of people who have shared their own personal story with me. And it's been amazing people who talk about Parkinson's, ALS, CJD, which is the prion disease. they're sharing with me personal stories about themselves or their close relatives that are, you know, getting very sick after the vaccine. And, you know, Luke Montagnier was an author on a preprint paper. It hasn't been reviewed. They had 16 cases of CJD showing up in

people consistently about a month after their second vaccine. That's shocking. This is a disease that is supposed to take a very long time to develop and it is happening as I was days in the late Luke Montaigne who obviously won the Nobel Prize for being able to isolate the HIV virus just a great scientist and a great loss this year but this is where he was focused also really really shocked he was very upset about the vaccines and he was right I really believe he was concerned about neurodegenerative disease and he was right. We're also by the way we are getting stories of people that are suffering from like you know advanced immediate onset Parkinson's and even dying within just weeks after vaccination.

So an accelerated problem there. Now you're talking about the spleen takes this up. It's making so much of it because they made this super spike protein that hit its way through. The body, I'm sure, is having trouble attacking it because now does it still look like a virus? The spike protein is technically a virus, right? or it's the part of a virus. You know, what is it, does the body still see it as a virus? No, no, and that's another big thing,

and that was a big breakthrough for them, because they had found that because if it kept the same RNA that was in the virus and configured it as the original virus RNA, the cells that took it up figured out right away, oh my God, I'm being infected by a virus, and they would send out alarm bells and they would draw on the immune system, they would get right on it to break it down. So they were worried their RNA would get broken down

before it ever had a chance to make protein, in which case you wouldn't get antibodies. So that was a big concern. How do we keep this from happening? And it was a breakthrough when they figured out we can humanize it. And they actually attached to it controls on the left and the right, the three prime untranslated region and the five prime untransulated region. They took those from human cells, a model from human protein. And in fact, they picked a human protein, which is interesting, the hemoglobin, the protein that makes the hemoglobin in the red blood cells, red blood cells don't have a nucleus. So they have to keep their RNA going for a long time. So they have put the hemoglobin making protein has very special things on the ends of it to keep it from

getting broken down. They said, well, let's use that. We can keep this protein from getting broken down. And furthermore, we can make it look human so that the immune system will be fooled. They won't notice that this is a viral infection. And it worked beautifully. So there's no- I mean, it worked beautifully if you're trying to kill somebody. I mean, like the entire, I mean, it's really, honestly, on this show, I have always said that I think it's a step too far to say that this thing is designed, eugenics, reducing population. But boy, sheer dumb luck, this thing feels like the perfect storm. I mean, I don't even understand how they thought it would be smart to take a virus and then make it look like human RNA so that it can get past your immune system and then get into the cells so that it can create more of it without the immune system knowing it's supposed to attack. Like literally, like you're taking the worst part of this virus and making it this, like I said, put a cape on it and the ability to fly and have laser beams out of its eyes.

And now we're shocked that there may be long-term effects. And then you're saying because it is producing it so fast, because it's so hardy, heartier and stronger than the virus would have been had you gotten naturally. Your immune system's losing this fight, is loading up exosomes, calling in, you know, the storage systems that are then driving it and storing it in your brain all over the place, which wouldn't have happened. Had it been the wild virus, your body would have fought it off, killed it dead, we'd be through this. And then I think about in all of that, these poor bodies are trying to fight off this insane production. of this pseudo-spike protein man-made in the vaccine. It finally gets over it. And then Anthony Fauci says,

time for your booster shot, and then people come and do it all over again to themselves. It's really amazing. I can't understand how people keep on lining up and getting these shots. And they're so thrilled as soon as they are loud, as soon as they make the cut, and it's approved for them.

They're right age. You know, over 50. They can do it over 50. Get down there, get that shot right away. I just am so shocked that people are. so willing to subject themselves to this. So, I mean, you know, again, I pray that you're wrong. I mean, when I have these conversations, I pray that you're wrong.

I pray that Peter McCullough is wrong, that Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the MRNA vaccine technology, is wrong, that the late Luke Montanier spent his last days focused on this prion disease and these things that are killing people very quickly after the vaccine. but this is the thing. I'm having to pray that too many world-renowned scientists are wrong. And what I get from the other side is we just don't know how it works, but we're at, we're recommending another booster. Really shocked that the vaccine failed to stop the virus, but get that other booster.

I mean, on the other side of the tennis court right now, there's just no competition, Stephanie. I mean, you're out there, you know, really nailing this down. So lastly, because, I mean, obviously, there's so much this paper, and I want people to read it and they'll have in their inbox that they do. There's also something that is your wheelhouse, which is glyphosate. Now, I want to just remind people that when you appeared in Vax, this is what you said when I had interviewed you for Vax. I got interested in studying autism eight years ago when I saw the numbers go up

and I was quite alarmed because I could see that the trend was exponential growth. And exponential growth is extremely scary. Every couple of years, the CDC provides a number of what percentage of the kids are diagnosed with autism. And you've got the dots going all the way back to 1975. You draw the line. It is a perfect exponential curve. If we assume that things are going to continue as they have for the past 30 years into

the future, we can predict that by 2032, 80% of the boys born will end up on the autism spectrum. I mean, this is going to be a complete catastrophe if we just let it happen. The reason I bring it up is really about the personal. I've told this story many times. I was sitting in your office at MIT when we did that interview. And I, actually, Andy Wakefield, had asked a bunch of the questions. But then I said, I have a couple of questions.

I sat down. And I said to you, now, you're tracking the math on, you know, what we're seeing is the increase in autism. By the way, your numbers are standing up. We're seeing incredible increases that are not stopping. But what I said to you, and I'll never forget it, I said, now, Stephanie, we are not increasing the vaccine program. every single year. So though your graph looks like we are doing that,

that was what it would take to keep increasing. Certainly this has to plateau or slow down at some point before we get to one and two. And I'll never forget, you said, no, actually, on the contrary, I think it's about to accelerate. Those numbers, you said, I can't prove that, but we are waiting to see the first data ever on the generations that have grown up eating foods

covered in glyphosate. And so glyphosate being your wheel House. You've been on this for several years. Incredible book you have out now. It's a bestseller toxic legacy. Everybody, you've got to check this book out, how the weed killer glyphosate is destroying our health and the environment. And so you thought that that was going to increase the problem with autism. Do you feel like it had an effect? Because glyphosate is sprayed and we've covered this on our show many times. And if you haven't seen that in our show, definitely go back and watch our episodes on glyphosate, the Monsanto product. Also knows Roundup. If you're using

round up on your yard or your garden stop immediately. This stuff is supposed to be banned. Hopefully you can't get to it, but I don't know what's happening with that. But the point being, this is sprayed on 80 to 90 percent of the crops in America. Do you believe that that is having an effect when you're looking at all these other issues with the mRNA vaccines? But COVID itself, do you think Life the State has played a role in COVID in this pandemic also? Absolutely. Absolutely. I feel like the evidence is very strong. And you can look at it epidemiologically too because you see the countries that are having tremendous difficulty controlling COVID all of Europe, United States, Brazil, those are all countries that are heavily

involved with glyphosate usage and on their crops and they've got lots of exposure to their population. And the other thing I worry about is glyphosate in biofuels. I really think that could be contributing to COVID in a big way because I think now that glyphosate is in the air in a city where they're using biofuels like for example ethanol. United States has 10% ethanol in our gasoline and the president just announced that we want to increase it to 15% in order to reduce our use of consumption of oil. Oh my God. And I really worry about that because I think that there is glyphosate in the ethanol.

It's getting into the air. People are breathing it in. And I have a whole chapter in my book on how glyphosate disrupts the immune system. The innate immune system gets clobbered, I believe, by glyphosate. And it's because the innate immune system is weak that the lungs are unable to fight off the vaccine. The virus. The virus. And so, and as you pointed out, where we use glyphosate, we had that map come up.

You could almost point out that those are the worst hit by COVID, having the worst upper respiratory issues. And a lot of this happens to do with the gut biome, right? I've had Zach Bush, Sean, we talk about the importance of intestinal health. Glyposate destroys the bacteria's designed to kill bacteria and things. And so it just wastes your stomach so that any ability to mount defenses against. illness and disease is being affected by the glyphosate then. Absolutely. And I think it has a very serious effect on the mitochondria. The mitochondria produce the energy for the cell.

And when the immune cells don't have enough energy, they can't fight off the virus. Do you think that glyposate is interacting with the vaccine in any particular way? I suspect so. I think it probably has the same problem. Those people who are more likely to be seriously injured by COVID are probably also more likely to be seriously injured by the vaccine. And I think in both cases, it could be because of excess glyphazate exposure. So, all right, lots of very, very alarming work, but I'm glad you're out there doing it. What is our takeaway? What are solutions? I mean, obviously, stop, stop the vaccines, stop the boosters, wherever you are, quit while you're ahead,

don't do this again. What else can we do to strengthen our body? bodies for, you know, these issues. I think number one is to switch to a 100% certified organic diet. When you shop at the grocery store, look for the certified organic label. Non-GMO is not good enough. Some of the highest glyphosate contamination is in non-GMO foods like chickpeas and garbanzo beans and oats and wheat. I think about that. I always think that that's a trick.

I want to point out to people. You see the non-GMO on your bread like, oh, awesome. It's non-GMO. Wheat isn't GMO. I mean, non-GMO, we usually think, means glyphosate resistant. That's the crops that have been, you know, again, man-made crops in a way where they've made them so you can pour this deadly poison all over them. They don't die.

And then you eat them covered in that stuff that your body will die. It's going to really affect the bacteria. It's an antibiotic by nature. So it's killing off your bacteria. But what people don't, you realize is wheat has never been non-GMO. They use glyphosate to kill it. That is what they used as a desicant at the end of the season to avoid the snow coming too soon. They end the wheat harvest early by covering it in glyphosate.

So it's not GMO because then they want it to die. And so the last step of wheat production and garbonsovese things is to cover it in this deadly toxin that is now winning multi-billion dollar lawsuits for causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. And it's all over. And then you get bread and say, oh, good. GMO when the opposite, in fact, you'd be better off, I think if it said GMO, you know, it's like, under those circumstances. The other thing is you then take that wheat that, the stalks, once you harvest and you

take it down to a city and turn it into biofuel. So you're getting glyphysate into biofuel as well. We're getting it from, so how do we, so we protect ourselves, organic diet. Yes, so organic diet. I love sunshine. I think get out in the sunlight without sunscreen and without sunglasses. The sun shines shine is very healing. Yes, and it's not just vitamin D, but vitamin D is super important.

And they've shown in studies, you know, 90% something like 90% of the people who die from severe COVID are vitamin D deficient. So I think it's a very important thing to make sure you keep your vitamin D levels high, but also sunlight for other reasons. So not just taking a vitamin D supplement, but getting out in the sun, I think is much better. And then I like soaking inept in salt baths because that's going to get you sulfates, sulfate through the skin. A lot of people have sulfur sensitivity problems, and that's because glyphosate messes up the sulfur system. And so sulfur becomes toxic and they can't handle it. So they don't eat sulfur-containing foods, and they get a systemic sulfate deficiency problem. I think that is a basis of many of the diseases that we're facing today in our society, insufficient sulfate.

And that's also connected to an inability to clear cellular debris, which is where the prion problem comes in, because you can't clear those prion proteins once they misfold if your lysosomes, lysosomes aren't working. And that can be because of insufficient sulfate. So how do I get solar reserve food? What foods? What do we think of sulfur rich foods? Cruciferous vegetables like cauliflower and broccoli and cabbage and cabbage and Brussels sprouts and then garlic and onions. Those are fantastic. Garlic and onions and then lots of animal based foods. Certainly seafood eggs, organic eggs. Cheese is good. Cheese has sulfur and

meat, you know, grass-fed beef, fish, and I mentioned seafood already, but seafood and fish and eggs and meat. Yeah, those are all good sources of sulfur. All right, fantastic, Stephanie. It's always a journey with you to, you know, get inside of that mind of yours. It is so incredible what you're looking at. I know these are exciting times. You're working with amazing people, And I would imagine there's these times where you just see how incredibly complex and when you start unraveling what's happening here, there must just be a dual emotion, the excitement of her discovering it and figuring it out, and then realizing you're talking about our species. And our species, you know, how concerned are you about the billions of people? I mean, you said in your conclusion, this is literally these are issues that could affect billions of people on the planet. I absolutely and I do worry about reproduction.

We didn't talk much about reproduction in our book, but I think that's in our article, but I think it is likely that these vaccines are going to mess up the reproductive system and cause infertility in the children, especially that are getting vaccinated. I think it's a really, really dangerous thing that we're doing. So I expect that we're going to have a significant job in our population. If your goal is, you know, trying to get rid of people, it's going to work well, unfortunately, to reduce the population. All right.

Well, Stephanie, thank you. Keep up the good work and we'll look for your future papers and every one of your paper, those papers will be on our website and check out Stephanie's book, Toxic Legacy. You're doing such incredibly important work. It's just great to be able to reach out to you and give this information. So thank you for taking the time today.

Thank you so much. My pleasure. All right, we'll talk to you soon. Well, I mean, look, there's so much information And again, this isn't CNN. Obviously, it's not MSNBC. It's not Fox. I'm not going to try and put this on a bumper sticker for you.

Frankly, you know what's happening is I'm being contacted by scientists all over the world that are tuning in to watch the highwire because it's the only place they can hear what their peers are discovering and seeing as they're looking at anomalies they can't understand. So right now, as you're watching the high wire, you are involved in a process. This is what social media was supposed to be. This was supposed to be the open forum where Stephanie Seneff and Peter McCullough and Dider Raute over in France, you know, all these people could come together and brainstorm and share their studies and all this. And instead, instead what happened in the middle of this crisis as they're making a super spike protein, the geniuses, so it'll survive in your body and make billions of, you know, issues with quadroplexes and prions and. all of these other issues when someone could have been covering the other side of the science instead social media censored them shut them down didn't allow those scientists to go against the the

scientific evidence which even now the CDC's admitting hey it was gray you thought we meant black and white when we said we're following the science well if you were following the high wire you were following the science people like stepney centiff these are world changes this is going to affect our future folks we are only now beginning to see these issues and how are we going to share them if the internet is shut down on all of us. That's why this week, I think one of the most interesting conversations actually been over the last couple weeks had to do with Elon Musk attempting to buy Twitter. I want to play for you many of the statements made by the news.

I don't really care about Elon. I don't know what his plan is or who he really is or if he's a dark lord or a benevolent angel Gabriel from heaven. himself. But I want to talk about the response to his desire to buy Twitter. This is what it looked like in the news. The wealthiest person in the world, Elon Musk, threatening a hostile takeover of Twitter. Elon Musk is attempting a hostile takeover of Twitter. Last night, Musk offered to buy Twitter for $43 billion in cash. Having a public platform that is broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization.

kind of funny, oh, Elon Musk wants to buy it, but there are massive life and globe altering consequences for just letting people run wild on the thing. A lot of folks out there that say, you know, it's troubling enough that private companies control these key communication platforms around the world. Maybe it's even worse to have the world's richest person trying to buy one of them and take it private. Are there any guard rails around something like this? Because this could be a very dangerous president.

Elon Musk's vision for the internet is dangerous nonsense. In Musk's vision of Twitter and the internet, he'd be the wizard behind the curtain. Projecting on the world screen a fake image of a brave new world empowering everyone. That's Musk's dream and Trump's and Putin's and the dream of every dictator, strongman demagogue, modern-day robber baron on earth. For the rest of us, it would be a brave new nightmare. Musk has accused Twitter of censoring its users. Are you concerned that what Musk is trying to do is to open up the platform

for more misinformation about topics such as COVID-19 and the 2020 election. I mean, I'm going to be honest. Elon Musk is a danger to Twitter and to freedom of speech. Elon Musk has never been an advocate for free speech. He's an advocate for speech without consequences. And what he wants is for the platform to be more hospitable to him and to people like him. Under a new world order of Elon Musk owning Twitter, suddenly you see people back on that platform who have been banned.

He was asked if there's a plan B, and he laughed and said, there is. We'll find out what that is. That's what a super villain hero would say, right? He thinks he's Tony Stark. Musk has the right to buy whatever he likes and run his company however he likes. But we do not have to buy his nonsense story about saving free speech. I mean, it was really amazing.

Here's what amaze me about it. I didn't hear a lot of people say this. But if you're watching the news, I mean, super villain. This is going to be incredibly dangerous if this is allowed. I mean, one man buying a company like Twitter. I mean, that's the end of the world if we allow that to happen. I mean, meanwhile, Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post, and nobody seemed to care that he bought an entire newspaper

and, you know, would attempt to take over the world with it. But it was just this idea. And as I was watching this rhetoric taking place, and by the way, I don't know if Elon Musk is a good guy. I'm not even going to get in that debate or where this all leads, but it was a reaction to it. Most of the liberal news agencies saw this as the end of the world and just dire consequences should this be allowed to happen.

And I thought to myself, I would understand this screaming terror that was taking place if, you know, Elon Musk was saying, I am going to censor all of those liberal lies. will never be allowed to speak. I mean, then if someone said that, I'd be like, they're going to attack, you know, life as we know it. But that's not what he said. The only thing this guy said in his reason for buying it, Elon Musk makes an offer to buy Twitter,

having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization. I don't care about the economics at all. He basically said, I just want to stop censoring everybody. We allow people an open public discourse. And so as I started thinking that through, why is it that liberal media would see that as the end of the world? And by the way, politically, I'll still say this.

I grew up a Democrat, I mean, an environmentalist from Boulder, Colorado, all of that, to be said, I'm politically marooned right now. But the statement I am making is that the powers that be, right now the media, and whoever's funding the media and our current administration, they see free. speech as a horror, as a danger. And that says to me, they must truly believe then at this point that they're outnumbered. That's the only reason you'd have a problem with it. Who cares if it's an open discord, 50-50, half-consertive, half-not, crazy Democrats, crazy Republicans. But no, we've got to stop one side of this conversation because should it be allowed? As the woman said, some of those voices in this new world order under Musk are going to be allowed back on Twitter, that means then you don't feel like your value system will stand up against it. It won't hold on, which

says to me, folks, they truly believe they're outnumbered by whatever ideology is opposed to them. I think we are at a point now, and I think we've shown it throughout this show that they believe they are now outnumbered. And the entire cry from me, media is don't allow anyone to get a hold of a social media platform that allows everyone to speak or that will be the end of our value system. I want to take this one step further. If that's true, if what I'm saying is true and the elite, you know, Democrats, progressive liberals, whatever you want to call them, see themselves as a minority but need to stay in power to save the world, there's only one way to achieve that. And that's through authoritarian.

which is something that's been shocking for me to watch as a Democrat. What has happened to this party? Why is it my parents marched in the 60s for freedom to decide whether or not you go to a war or not? What you're going to get from your education system? The freedom to choose. The freedom to hear all sides of the story. And now that's the end of the world based on one political party that now believes should that freedom exist? they will not exist?

I think we should be afraid of their fear. People in fear do very, very dangerous and scary things. Luckily for us, no matter how much they censor us here on the internet, you have managed to come over to the high wire. We are covering these issues anyway. And as I've said, our numbers are skyrocketing past most of the major news agencies, certainly the ones like that are on cable news. But one of those great propaganda machines made an attempt to launch their own Hindenburg this last week.

Of course, I'm talking about the CNN Plus, a total disaster and their numbers were abysmal. CNN Plus reportedly draws fewer than 10,000 daily viewers. So there it is, the propagandists that are afraid that they're now the minority, that you're not going to pay attention if you hear any other voices. it appears what they are fearing, they're drawing upon them. I don't know what they're afraid of. Free thought should not be a fearful experience. Freedom of expression.

We're all brothers and sisters. We're all human beings. We all care about our children. I say that on both sides. I get it. You think you're trying to save children. So are we. It's time to all come back to the table.

It's time to start having the difficult conversations with each other. time to end censorship because you've proven it's a disaster. You have killed people with this virus. You made a vaccine that at the very best doesn't work at all to stop Omicron. And at the worst, maybe causing one of the highest rates of death we've ever seen in humanity because you did not let people speak. You did not let them converse. And we must not allow our country to run our media to drive any fear of the people. We, the people of the United States of America, every single one of us, every race, every creed, every religion, every age demographic, every socioeconomic position has a right to a voice in this country and anybody that thinks

otherwise, we're going to bring a rally to your town to make sure you are marched out. This is the high wire. Do me a favor. Donate to the give, send, go. Let's get even with defeat the mandates so we can do more of them. You make a difference this week by doing that. We're going to keep making a difference every way we can. Tons of science coming your way.

We're going to be diving into some new territory. When we look at the Great Reset, all of that is happening. I've never been happier to be alive. I never knew humanity was needed the way it's needed now. I hope you feel the same, and I'll see you next week. Oh, God is always there when you got faith, it'll answer all your prayers, so go and tell all the people that the Lord will lead the way. I put faith over fear every day.

Cheers, heavenly. I got God in my corner to end. I ain't a man that could stop me. I already gave my soul to him not the Illuminati. Now I got an army of people that's right beside me. Heaven over Hollywood, evil can never stop me. The media want you nervous. They want to make you feel worthless.

The government isn't circus. Had to fight off the surface just to get back to the surface. My soul is not for purchase. God's the only one I service. I'm his servant. Going through hardships and my heart is, I know we gonna take my hand. When I get harm,

I can promise that you gotta trust this plane. Even if you don't understand, Doesn't happen right all your prayers ain't gonna be Have no fear when e-n-need-neill take the will to need still got it two weeks and slow to spread that's turning into five years I ain't scared of the devil glad to know a lot of here Hey Faith over fear Make some noise LA

Oh God is always there when you glinter all your prayers So go in that the Lord feels God we all make mistakes and we all have flaws Wasn't following this laws that's when I was so lost I never sell my soul for When I thought I'd be better off then I heard a voice in my head all the tears that I shed All the blood that I bled I kept my faith strong people laid off just for not complying everything I pray for it came for it God showed me the life hey I never question the vision I'm giving in I never question the journey I never question the lessons of less of these sentences so I never worry this is bigger than a song This is my testimony till my family is gone into all my won't forget what I cavil is a lie

Only trust the most high I got love for both sides matter fact that There's no size Jimmy. Say children.