The Highwire with Del Bigtree - HHS EXTENDS COVID EMERGENCY

Episode Date: April 30, 2022

HHS EXTENDS COVID EMERGENCYBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Another piece of information went through with not much fanfare on this topic. This was, again, Javier Bacera. He extended the public health emergency for COVID-19. This was just about, it says April 13th. So almost just about a week ago now, HHS extends public health emergency for another 90 days. So let's look at his letter really quick. It's very short, very sweet. The renewal of a determination.

So they made a determination that the public health emergency exists. Why does it exist? really right in the first sentence here as a result of the continued consequence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic so they're not saying hospitals are overflowing cases are spiking people can't get treatment they're saying the consequences so make of that what you will but i did some research on this and it's some of the things that are underpinning this public health emergency they're benefiting from this i should say is that people without insurance can can get free vaccines, free COVID tests.

Okay, that's one data point. So also, what's interesting is patients- So they pull the emergency, they now have to pay for those things. Is that what you're saying? Correct, correct. Got it. Yep.

And so treatment of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, for those patients, hospitals are receiving under this public health emergency, another 20% increase in Medicare payment rate. So that would be gone. There's an incentive to keep this thing going. But perhaps the biggest- The incentive that tends to get you thrown on a ventilator, the remdesivir incentive, I would guess, you know, all of these things that are killing people in hospitals.

We definitely got to keep that going. Yeah. And the biggest one here for our audience, which is important, is the emergency use authorization. It is under this public health emergency that these EUAs can exist and can form, really. And right now, there are a handful of vaccines under emergency use authorization still. We have the two-dose series, I mean, just Pfizer alone, the two-dose series for 12 and older, the boosters for 12 and 18 and over, the second boosters for 50 and older and immunocompromise. We have this long list.

That's just Pfizer. Moderna has their own. Those are all be long. Those don't have full approval. Those are still under emergency use authorization. So if they remove the emergency, no emergency, no need for emergency use authorization. Wow. Correct.

That is, I wonder if they even saw that coming. see that coming. That's amazing. Yeah. And so there's also something else that just snuck through on an emergency use authorization. And that's a COVID breathalyzer test. This is a fascinating development here. This is what the headline looked like. This was out of New York Times. The FDA authorizes the first coronavirus breath test. This is an EUA. It gives results in three minutes. It's about the size of a briefcase. So it's very portable. It can be, you know, in a tent just put up on a street anywhere. I would imagine, you know, could be used, you know, if a police officer wanted to use this and stop you and do this.

Imagine driving while under the influence of a cold. Boy, I mean. Do you see? I wonder you have to do like the round off back Hed Street back flip on a line on the side of the road in order to get out of that one. Right. Let's look at some of the quotes in this article because they are telling perhaps of a potential future here. It says if a test comes back positive on the breathalyzer, it should be. confirmed with a molecular test such as a PCR lab test. So it's, you know, as viewers of this show have seen, you know, this is like fraud upon a fraud with the PCR test thrown up so many false positives. But then it goes on to say this. This is almost like an ad placement for this thing. It says the device should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions,

including infection control decisions, you know, such as lockdowns. And that's exactly what they said for the PCR test, but they use it for that anyway. So we can't, you know, if this thing comes to market and there's another surge of COVID-22 or something like that, we really can't expect them not to use this in the way they did the PCR tests. Right. But there's another thing that's coming to the market, too. And there's a theme going on here. And it's, it's speed. It's a rapid, more of a rapid thing. Because, you know, the PCR test was like a 48-hour turnaround, sometimes a week turnaround. This is getting faster and faster. So now we're looking at a nasal spray shot for a vaccine. And this is an interesting article because they're kind of admitting what we all know right now is these vaccines

are failures. COVID nasal spray could replace vaccine jabs as scientists rethink fight against virus. They're going to give it a little rethink. And let's look what it says here. The Omicron variant triggered a sudden humbling shift in perspective on vaccines. The glass looked at least half full for most of 2021. Then suddenly looked half empty. It's amazing they're admitting this now. The hyper transmissible transmissible Omicron variant rampaged even through. highly vaccinated countries and turn scientific satisfaction into discontent nasal vaccines are not a new idea but they are far less tried and true and have stumbled over the years it's funny that's what we heard about m rna shots about three years ago now it finally says this because we do have some some

experiments on this the flumus flumists is used to prevent influenza but is not approved for old adults or for the youngest children it has times underperformed the regular flu shot leading to recommendations not to use it in some seasons a nasal flu vaccine using switzerland was linked to an increased risk of Bell's Palsy, episodes of facial paralysis. Well, let's certainly, you know, head down that road. That sounds like a great place to go. You know, it's funny, this Flumis discussion, I was at the advisory committee on immunization practices meetings.

That's the CDC advisory body that we're talking about, should we recommend Flumis? Because Flumis was about to be just removed and timed out. It had, you know, been a failure during H1N1. And so the whole conversation was, should we bring it back? And all they did for hours was talk about all the failures, different scientists getting up saying if there's ever an H1N1 outbreak, what if it fails again and we recommend it? And then this hilarious conversation where they started asking, is there any way to approve it but not recommend it?

You know, can we just say it will allow it to exist, but we don't actually recommend it? And so, and then the heads of the CDC were like, look, you only have recommend or not recommend. And there's all these discussions on trying to create a new category all around flumice because it's, it's a total failure and has been. And by the way, those nasal mist, the one thing they do is you shed those things like crazy. So shedding flu and whatever COVID would be a real problem. But again, I mean, all of this, it should be alarming that we're not moving out of the emergency, even when they tell us the emergency is over.

It's like they don't want to let go of this grip. We've talked about it before. I keep wondering, you know, if Klaus Schwab is on the phone saying, you must keep the mass mandate on the airplanes, you know, and they're like Biden going, yeah, but I mean, that's going really bad for us in the election coming up. I said, do not care, you know, whatever, you know, the Bond villain there. I mean, who's driving these things? And why do we need them? It's crazy. It may not be Klaus Schwab, but it may be Tadros Gabriasis. He's the WHO director general, the head of the WHO. He took to Twitter with this tweet, which is interesting in this segment because we're talking

about speed. Thank you at Bill Gates for sending a copy of your new book. I fully agree that we must act on COVID-19 lessons and innovate so that we can deliver swift, equitable health solutions to prevent the next pandemic. And the book, How to Prevent the Next Pandemic. Very interesting. And the WHO is trying to ram through a treaty. This is an off-guardian. This is the reporting by them. WHO planning new pandemic treaty. We reported on this before for 2024. So they're planning on signing this treaty in 2024. People are obsessed with pandemic. I looked it up before the show.

We were sitting with a team and said, how often do pandemics happen? And when we looked it up, it's like maybe three times in a century or other, if you look it up, we'll say between 10 and 50 years apart each pandemic. And yet these people, it's like we know another pandemic is coming this fall. Got to be ready for the next one. This fall is going to be a pandemic. Then the year after, we know this definitely.

It's like they know there's a pandemic coming. And I just want to put this. out there to people because I get a lot of different intel from different sources. Some of it we bring out. Some of it we don't. But one of the things I'm getting a lot of warnings right now is there's a real concern that the next pandemic might be something that we have a vaccine for. There's people that are reaching out and talking to us about that. And also, that is more alarming, right? When we think about like this fast, like there's a lot of considerations about being able to move really fast. Well, you have, and I believe that this would be true. If these are man

made pandemics and we're still working on investigate. We still would love to see someone actually investigate the Wuhan laboratory. But the concern really is, there's a lot of writing on this right now on hemorrhagic fevers and things like that. Hemorrhagic diseases where we see bleeding. Imagine if you saw someone bleeding from the eyes and from their mouth in the middle of New York City, then we'd really be able to sell vaccines. So I'm just saying, and I'm putting it out there, if we see some sort of Marburg disease attack or an Ebola out of the United States, I'm going to be skeptical. And you know, when you tune in the high wire, we are always, no matter what is out there,

if these people are so concerned about pandemics that shouldn't happen for another 50 years, I think we should be skeptical of what's in our future. So you know, no matter what's happening, the high wire, we're going to deliver to you straight. We're going to call it like we see it. And hopefully, I'm wrong. Hopefully these people that are informing us are wrong about these things. But keep your eyes peeled about some sort of something. strange actions and there's real concerns when election year coming up. I mean, I'm not a conspiracy

theorist. I'm just putting it out there that we should keep our eyes open and let any sicko. Maybe it's just someone in a basement somewhere. Just let them know our eyes are open. You know, they're open wide. We're watching. And this WHO pandemic treaty is really important because it's a one-stop shop. It's just like a lock and key. state sovereignty is over, country sovereignty is over, top-down biosurveillance, vaccine passports, turnkey, everything for your country, essentially. And there are some organizations already, besides us reporting on this, there are some organizations pushing back and fighting on this.

The World Health Council has put their first open letter on the WHO pandemic treaty. You can read it here, but in it it says the proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary and is a threat to sovereignty and inelible rights. It increases WHO's suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe and ineffective treatments against the will of the people. So this is something we're going to continue to report on. We need some big global pushback here. Let's do something here. And my team is not ready for this.

I want to put two thoughts together, folks, because when you ask yourself, is there really an agenda going on? The World Health Organization, obviously, is not an American organization. it's really, I think, wants to be the World Health Order. That is what it is turning into. And it wants to dictate, it wants to supersede your president, your senators, your Congress people. It wants to be the governing authority if there just happens to be another pandemic, 365 days after the last one, which would be, you know, a hundred times faster than any natural form of a pandemic before. All of these things make me nervous.

But when we look at that bill, we look, can we? bring up the 10 bills that we knocked down where we look at what was happening in California. Remember, California represents the sort of propaganda home for all of this. Look at 1464. So imagine WHO supersedes your government. Well then who's going to enforce it on the ground? This is what Senator Pan was working on. He is a part of this plan.

It forces law enforcement officials to enforce public health orders even if they oppose them or adopts a policy to oppose a public health order. And it gives the health department the ability to pull the funds, funds away from that law enforcement agency and give it to themselves. Now, these two things, one in the state of California and the other a worldwide dictate, you must recognize that these satellites, when we talk about, you know, nipping this thing in the butt in California, you must know that every health department, every state in the United States of America right now is bowing down to their God over there at the WHO

and looking and dreaming about having that power like Fauci had to overcome and supersede the President of the United States, take away our rights, take away our businesses, mask us, lock us down. They want more of this, not less. These are unelected. We talked about this before. These are unelected officials. We cannot touch them.

They're untouchable and they want unstoppable power and the right to use law enforcement against you. These are scary, scary agendas and they're outing them. themselves and we're winning. But this is why we need to stand together right now like we never have before. Yeah, we have such an important window right now before if and when this thing comes down like a hammer. Run for office, get involved, contact your politicians and make them do the right thing. Peacefully, of course.