The Highwire with Del Bigtree - IN PLAIN SIGHT HOW THE HIGHWIRE GOT IT RIGHT

Episode Date: November 2, 2022

Jefferey Jaxen joins Del in studio to discuss the groundbreaking European Parliament Hearing that appears to have triggered a global awakening to the worldwide political injustices in the name of Covid-19 safety. Watch as we look back at The HighWire’s reporting, since the onset of the Coronavirus outbreak, exposing incredible subterfuge from the highest levels of government, media, and industry.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

To really fully frame what is going on today, right now, in the world, an explosion, a nuclear bomb has gone off in Europe. I'm going to talk to Jeffrey Jackson about it. But first, let's remember what we were told in the news when they first brought this vaccine upon us. This is what that sounded like. Major news in the race for a COVID-19 vaccine. The drug giant Pfizer said yesterday that its vaccine candidate was more than. 90% effective. 95% effective. 95% effective. Close to 95% efficacy.

95% effective against COVID-19. 94.5% effective at preventing COVID-19. 95% effective at preventing cases of COVID-19. 95% effective. So I think this is a really strong step forward to where we want to be about getting control of this outbreak. Now, for those who've been watching the high, for the last two years, refrain from giving away the punchline. We are going to deliver the greatest I told you so of all times based on everything that has been stated right there. But we all know.

I mean, I think most people now watching this, doesn't matter if you've gotten the vaccine or not, you're saying to yourself, well, I know that's not true. That proved to not be true because everyone that got this vaccine has now caught COVID. To get to that conversation and what's really happening around the world and it's it's astronomical. I'm joined now. Once again, Jeffrey, welcome to the interview set here at the High Wire. I'm looking forward to this conversation. It may be. I think this may be, I've said it before the most important show we've ever done in light of this vote that we just discussed by ASIP, but there's been a change in the languaging and the support of this idea of the 95% effective vaccine.

Yeah, and one of the places you're seeing this change in a big way is in the media reporting, the actual individuals reporting on this. And one of the biggest people of influence was Pierce Morgan. Let's take a look just last summer at how he looked at this, this conversation, this topic. We'll go to his Twitter page. And he had some tweets that he put out. This was in the summer of 2021. He says, love, he loves the idea of COVID vaccine path.

for everywhere, flights, restaurants, clubs, football, gyms, shops, etc. It's time COVID-denying anti-vaxxer lunis had had their expletive bluff called and bar themselves from going anywhere that responsible citizens go. Now he didn't stop there. Wow, I mean, that's outrageous.

Loonies, I want to lock everybody down. You should be basically prisoners in your house. If you don't have a vaccine passport, I mean, and look, and, and, and, not only what he wasn't standing out he was being inspired by government and health agencies to talk to those that disagreed with him in exactly that manner he felt perfectly comfortable it's okay to talk down to these people they're second-class citizens they're dirty they're putting me at risk reminds me of some of the

things that might have been said in early Nazi Germany right and as you say he loves the idea I mean this is like the biggest medical if you will authoritarian push on the people and he loves this idea it's not, hey, maybe we should try this out. Just full in, I love it. Let's go to it. Let's go to months later. He's still singing the same tune on Twitter. This is what he had to tweet. It says, those who refused to be vaccinated with no medical reason not to should be refused NHS care if they then catch COVID. I'm hearing of anti-vaxxers using up ICU beds in London at vast expense to the taxpayer. Let them pay for their own stupidity and selfishness. Boy, I mean, that's nothing short of wishing people death.

Like I want you to die, die if you didn't get this vaccine. I don't know what he would think. What about all the people that had gotten the vaccine? It was failing and they found themselves in the hospital. Or how about those that are having myocarditis that is being reported as connected this? Having heart issues, what should they do? I mean, outrageous. I mean, this is the level of sickness and rage that was being pointed at those of us that were saying,

look, the science doesn't add up. I'm not doing this. We're not loonies. We were following science, which is what we're going to talk about. But, I mean, literally to say, I hope you die, you should be barred from entering a hospital. It's a poorly thought out point. It's, say, the least. It's not researched, and it's inhumane. Let's just say, it's inhumane.

And it's coming from someone that holds a position of influence and power in the media to sway. He wasn't the architect of what was happening, but he's becoming one of the biggest cheerleaders of it. After putting out those texts, this is what Pierce Morgan is now. saying and shifting his two. It seemed to me, Neil, that I, when this was all happening in the pandemic, I took quite firm views throughout it, like a lot of people, I guess. One of which was when it was believed when the vaccines first came along, that they would stop transmission, it seemed to me if you refuse to be vaccinated, you shouldn't be entitled to the

same rights to, you know, to go to nightclubs and stuff as those who'd taken the vaccine and were therefore not able to transmit it. However, when it was established that, vaccines actually didn't stop transmission. They just stopped a lot of people getting very sick and dying. The argument to then suppress any liberties or freedoms of the unvaccinated, to me, it went away. Because in that instance, if the ability to pass it on is pretty well the same, whether you've been jabbed or not, then really it's down to the individual if they want to protect themselves from this virus. So I changed my mind. I got pilloried when I said my original statement. I got when I changed my mind.

I got pilloried like everybody in this pandemic about all of it. And yet to me, it seemed perfectly logical, honestly, to just change my mind because facts changed. You know, behind the scenes with our team as we were like watching this video, we have some mixed, I would say, perspectives. On the one hand, you know, I've been saying I appreciate it when people are able to admit that they're wrong. Especially people that are, you know, public presences. Heraldo Rivera had a big, a culpa in the middle of this. Similarly, when he finally got COVID saying, I'm sorry, I said

some very harsh things. We're seeing that from peers here. Now, I guess it's not for us to decide. I don't think it's for me to decide how Pierce Morgan should be judged. He did wish death on people, and now he's retracting that because he saw that as he is saying, the science changed. And Neil deGrasse Tyson, that was what the conversation was. Well, the science changed on us. And we all have to get used to the fact that we can't hold the CDC accountable because the science has always changed, which is a huge part of this conversation. So I'm glad that he has shifted his perspective there, but he said some nasty things. And, you know, I think history will have to decide. It's sort of like, hey, I thought having slaves was a good idea.

Then I grew out of it. I realized maybe that wasn't such a good idea. I thought wishing death on people that hadn't gotten this untested product was loony and should, you know, they deserve. whatever they got, now I'm kind of changing that perspective. But I want to say this, his argument is the one that should have been against mandating this vaccine onto the childhood schedule. It doesn't stop transmission. Therefore, the entire argument that you're going to protect, you know, that immune-suppressed

child of school is gone. It's gone. The entire purpose of a mandated vaccine to create herd immunity does not exist in this vaccine. And so I hope people like him and that language gets to be the cacophony that it should be, because that is the argument against why anyone would mandate this crappy vaccine on anyone. And to the fundamental of it, he says, to restrict someone's fundamental liberties and freedoms, there should be no conversation that we have that anyone can put forward that will do that for an individual. So he's saying, well, because it stopped transmission, I thought it was okay to do this to people.

So that's something that should be taken away and really looked at. But, you know, what we're talking about here is as these people kind of rotated out, we had the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Borla. He stepped in to be the main mouthpiece of the public health response. I mean, he's literally the last guy you want giving public health advice because he has literally the most to gain on this planet from you taking his shots. Billions of dollars off of this vaccine. Absolutely. And what we saw from Albert Burla was a very narrowly focused narrative. So instead of talking about vaccine, passports, and all of these other things, he focused on the efficacy of the vaccine and the transmission.

Take a look at what he had to say. All right. There are a lot of indications right now that are telling us that there is a protection against transmission of the disease. With all the data have collected so far, there is no variant that we have identified that escapes the protection of our vaccine. This vaccine, and that was the first vaccine administer against. COVID to come now with a treatment of 90% effectiveness, you know, personally makes me a lot very proud about the scientists that we have and the people at Pfizer that were able to make that happen.

You know, as I watched that, you can study body language on when someone's lying. It's like a tell, right? And he's like, you know, 90%, you know, like just short of going 90% effective. Like he knows that there's something in. But so obviously we're taking it back now. We're taking it back from this moment we're in where everyone in the world seems to recognize that that didn't prove to be true, but he had no problem stating that as the CEO of Pfizer. Evidence shows that this is going to, you know, protect you stop transmission. Right. So we're ratcheting this story up if people are paying attention. So it's not just Pierce Morgan, it's not just these other people. Now with the CEO of Pfizer jumping and saying

these things, big statements. He even took to Twitter. He had some tweets. This is when they were trying to get the EUA for kids. And this is what he had to say about this. This was in the summer of 2021. He said, although data shows that severe COVID-19 is rare in children. Widespread vaccination is a critical tool to help stop transmission. Even back then it was rare in children. That's why I'm excited we have begun dosing participants age 5 to 11 in a global phase 2-3 study of the Pfizer Biointech COVID-19 vaccine. And he went on further to even double down on that on Twitter with another tweet and he said this, excited to share that update analysis from our phase three study with Bioentech also shows that our COVID-19 vaccine was

100% effective. Imagine that and preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa. 100%, he says. He's a very excited man about this. Wow. The first time we've ever heard of any pharmaceutical product being 100% successful. I mean, it really is unbelievable

how far away that ended up being from the truth and where we now find ourselves. So now we're here. Now we're here. That was in the past, but now Pfizer finds itself in the middle of a conversation he does

to tell them what's happening. And so let's fast forward to present day here. And this is some big things happening out of Europe. So in March of 2022, the European Parliament basically unanimously voted to create an investigative panel to look into the COVID-19 response. And what this was going to do is look at, you know, can we learn some lessons about this? Where was our money going? How was it spent? Was it spent wisely?

And who did they ask to come testify at this panel? Albert Borla himself. The person that has no problem going all over the media, showing up at any immediate interview to talk about his product. Well, there was a problem. He couldn't make it. He pulled out. He did not want to show up there.

This was the headline out of Politico. Pfizer CEO pulls out of testifying to EU Parliament COVID-19 panel. He sent a woman named Janine Small. She's another president in Pfizer to take his place. And she was up there and she was grilled by a member of the European parliament named Robert Rose and this is how it went. Take a look. Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really

want straight answer. Yes or no and I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before it's entered the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. The speed of science, you know, we are going to name this show the speed of science. It's one of the most ridiculous terms I've ever heard, especially one of what she's talking about is rushing. science, which is the dumbest thing you can ever do. But this just blew up. This was just over a

week ago. You pretty much have to have your head buried in the sand and pour cement around your shoulders to not have heard that this is going on. It's being shared by millions around the world. It's a shocking realization for everybody that hasn't been watching the high wire. Let's be clear about that. And we're going to talk in more detail about this. But at first I thought, what is the big deal? Right. I mean, everyone already knew as, as Pierce Morgan is saying he knows that it doesn't stop transmission. Therefore, I shouldn't be attacking the anti-divactions any longer. But it occurs to me now, as I've watched this a few times,

what's different here is Pierce Morgan and Tony Fauci and all these people that are in the media have been trying to spin the story that the science changed on us, that it went through this natural mutation itself where we were just trying to figure out what's going on, trying to catch up with it, and therefore you have to accept that, yeah, we got it wrong in some of the places, and Tony Fauci's on a giant apology tour now, but what this tells us is that's a lie. What this statement now says is, you always knew you couldn't say it stopped transmission.

You always knew you weren't there. You didn't think it did and then get surprised. It wasn't the mutation of Amacron or something that got around it. She's saying, we never tested for that. Literally the definition of a vaccination being it creates immunity so I can't pass it on. You never achieved this product could do this when you mandate it in the world. I mean, it really is quite shocking. It certainly is shocking to the folks in Europe and Robert Ruse.

Right. And so that admission and that testimony, although it was not legally binding, has hit the zeitgeist. It's gone all over the world. It's even come over the pond, as they say, to our media and Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Robert Rose right after that. This is what it looked like. Okay. It really was a special moment. For the first time, Pfizer admitted that the vaccine was not tested on stopping the transmission of the virus when it entered the market.

And this has massive implications. Governments pushed millions of people worldwide to get vaccinated by telling them, by telling you to do it for your grandmother. And they tricked perfectly healthy young people into taking. making this jab using false arguments. And they used big words such as antisocial to solve an immense hatred against people who refused to comply with the government's wishes. And even worse, many governments, including mine, actually introduced so-called COVID passports.

These passports made access to parts of society conditional. Those who did not wish to get vaccinated lost that access, not being able to visit a restaurant or a gym, all in the name of public health. Our governments love to talk about institutional discrimination, but this was real institutional discrimination. In many countries, like the US and Italy, vaccine mandates were introduced for certain professions. Many people lost their job, their livelihood, their business, because they stood by their principles.

Austria even had a lockdown for the unvaccinated because of the unvaccinated because of the people. of this reason. The government literally imprisoned people within their own homes. All of this was based on the idea that vaccination helps prevent the spread of the virus. Otherwise, why should people out of society? But this has now proven to be a big lie. Even the president for international development market of Pfizer now admits that there was no scientific basis to say vaccination would stop the transmission of the transmission of the the virus and I find this one of the biggest scandals of our time. I think he's absolutely right.

I think this and I have said exactly that over the last couple years. This will prove to be one of the greatest scandals of all times. It will go down as one of the greatest scientific blunders in history as Gert Van Bostas described it, a colossal blunder. Institutional, you know, segregation and this idea that it was okay as he said to to assault people, to put them down, to segregate them out of society based on this premise that this product was protecting grandma, protecting those outside of ourselves, being promised that it stopped transmission.

I want to take this moment very quickly, because I know there are brand new people watching this show, Jeffrey, and what I've been mind blown by is the amount of people that got this vaccine because they were told it's 95% effective at keeping you from getting the virus, Therefore, you can't spread it, which was the definition we all thought exist around vaccinations. But now they're saying to me, oh no, I always knew. They never said that it stopped transmission. They said that it stopped symptomatic disease. It's like it's literally you see how the, that mass formation, that brainwashing happens by media,

that they erase your memory of what was said. Luckily for us. And I'm, this is true for me too. The cameras have been rolling on me this whole time. I have been speaking my mind this whole time. You can go back and see everything that I said, just as I can go back and see everything that they said. So just for all of you, I know you have friends out there that have literally changed this tune and you're like mind blown and they believe it. It's like it's like a, it's a group pathological lie that no, I always knew that it was just 95% effective at reducing symptoms, not at stopping transmission.

I have proof that that is not what they sold you on and here it is. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. We can kind of almost see the end. We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you and your family and friends from getting seriously ill. and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is 80%? Personally, I think it's 100%.

I think that there's a reduction in transmission. Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission.

You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Failure to get vaccinated doesn't just put you at risk. I think this is what is important. In a way, if it's not you who suffers, if you don't, simply, it's also other people. If you've done the right thing and gotten vaccinated, you deserve the freedom to be safe from COVID-19, to have your kids safe from COVID, to get back to the things you love.

going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. If enough people get vaccinated, it actually halts transmission. The people who are not getting vaccines, you don't have to listen to a minority of people who are being harmful to the greater good and who are not acting on logic, reason, and science. I want everyone to be vaccinated so that they're safe and so that their families are safe and so that life can feel a little more normal again. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough, that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus.

The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. You could not be more graphically or articulately articulately wrong. Right? I mean, when you listen to what they're saying, Tony Fauci telling you, it stops with you. This will stop the virus. Rachel Maddow saying, we now know that it, you know, you get vaccinated, you cannot catch this, you cannot give it to anyone else, all of them saying,

you're going to protect your family, not just yourself, this is your duty, all of that now, all of that in light of what we have seen, whether it was a changing tide, which it wasn't Peter HOTES who worked on a COVID vaccine and came out against this one early on saying, I'm worried about antibody dependent enhancement, which is a totally different conversation. All of these people shilling for this product and dead wrong when they said, we know that it stops transmission because we've now just heard from one of the president's advisor. Yeah, we never tested for that. Right. And so the members of this European Parliament committee, the EU Union, they took it further.

So what they actually asked for was, we want the documents we want to see how you what was in the contracts that you signed our people onto we want your phone text messages to see who you were talking to when these contracts were happening that's to the EU president ursula van de the lion and so this this committee didn't just stop that was icing on the cake when janey smalls from Pfizer admitted what she admitted that was just icing on the cake so this this group took a step further they formed a small committee they called a public press conference and they had this to say this was Francisco Donata. She's an Italian member of the European Parliament.

Listen to this, Del. All right. The contact of Pfizer Biotech, the biggest pharmaceutical company involved in the COVID-19 vaccine's production is deplorable and unacceptable in a democratic framework as the European Union One. Yesterday in the official parliament, European Parliament Special Committee for COVID pandemic management, the Pfizer's CEO, CEO Albert Burla refused to appear to answer our legitimate questions about his private text messages with the President of EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen that have already been considered to be irregular according to the transparency e-regulation by the EU Ombudsman and the EU Court of Auditors. He has sent Mrs. Small in his place who has not answered the most important questions

that our special committee has addressed to her regarding the company's price policy, the release of clinical trials reports, adverse effects and other issues concerning the safety and efficacy of Pfizer-Biotech vaccines. The continuous non-fulfillment of the duties of transparency by Pfizer's executives clearly violates the EU citizens' rights

to know in detail how and for which purpose the taxpayers' money is spent. We're discussing about billions of public money that has been managed by the EU Commissioned by secret agreements directly conducted with the company's CEO, away from democratic control of people by their elected representatives in the EU Parliament. The refusal by President von der Leyen to disclose the content of their tax messages first, and The denial by Mr. Burlett to appear in front of the Parliament then, followed by the reticent behaviour of Mrs. Small yesterday, casts concerning shadows on the legitimacy of the entire

contract award process, leaving suspicion of corruption to emerge. I think that companies who behave this way should be banned by the lobbies allowed to enter the Parliament and the Commission, and that further investigation in the Parliament. is needed by competent authorities to let the truth come to light and to secure the full right of the EU citizens to transparency and public-interested-oriented EU policies. Thank you very much. I just want to drive home right now as you're watching this. This is literally happening at the same time.

This is just a week ago, nine days ago. This is a statement being made at the European Parliament. This is a person, one of many now, calling for an investigation. saying that Pfizer should not even be allowed to be a part of a lobby allowed into the parliament. That's how strongly she feels about what's happened. And if Alex Borla feel like he got around, you know, dodging a bullet here by sending in his underling, it did nothing but light a fuse. This is outrageous.

I mean, these are high up individuals, representatives in parliament that are demanding answers. and you and I have a sense of what those answers are, and it does not look good. Right, and she's saying questions like we, we're looking at corruption, conflicts of interest, we want transparency. You know, you do a little bit of research. You don't have to scratch the surface that far to see things like this. In December of 2020, when the first vaccines were going into the arms of a UK grandmother, we have Ursula von der Leyen's husband, Heiko.

So she's the head, she's the one that signed these contracts. She's basically the president or head of the EU. The head of the European Union, yes. European Union, and they're asking, what did you sign? Like, they're not being allowed as members of that same parliament. They're not being allowed as EU members to see what the heck she signed. What was the agreement, right? That's what they're asking for.

And allegedly, there's text messages where she was texting Albert Burla back and forth during that time. What are they talking about? They won't be revealed. Wow. So if you look into a little bit of what was happening at that time as well, her husband, Ursula von der Levin, His husband takes a position as medical director at a company called Origenesis in New York, of all places. So there is the actual page. You can see him there.

Medical director, Heiko von der Leyen. There he is. And so in April of 2022, this was well known by everybody saying, what's going on here? There's an investigative reporting that looked into this. And this is what they had to say. Let's look at that investigative report to see what they wrote. They wrote this. Albert Ursula Haiko, the dangerous relationship between the president of the European Commission and the CEO of Pfizer.

They were on it back in April. They write this, according to them, basically they're saying Dr. Haiko von der Leyen, husband of the president of the European Commission, who until then had been running a clinic in Hanover. Dell, that's in Germany, was recruited in December 2020 as medical director of the pharmaceutical company Orgenesis, which is based in New York State, just like Pfizer. Then I have to assume that that was a pretty decent salary hike. Absolutely, in the tune of over a million I hear. So it goes on to say Originesis is a biotech company developing cell and gene therapies using messenger RNA technology.

In May 2020, the company announced the launch of its new vaccine platform targeting the COVID virus. When Dr. Van der Leyen joins the Origenesis board, the European Commission had just concluded a series of contracts with pharmaceutical companies between August and November 2020, including two with Pfizer, Bio, and Tech. Wow. So at the same time, Ursula, who's secretly having conversations with Alex Borla, secretly signing documents that the rest of the EU hasn't seen yet or demanding to see, her husband gets this giant promotion onto a biotech company making an mRNA COVID vaccination. In New York, right down the road. Now, just to be clear, they haven't yet connected that directly to Pfizer or one of the many companies supposed to deliver vaccines, right? Yeah, correct. Correct. Well, this was, we're looking at this in the spirit of, these are questions that need to be answered, along with many other questions that some transparency may help shed some light on.

So now we go back to this press conference. It didn't just stop with Francesca. We have another gentleman's name's Christian Teres. He is a Romanian member of the European Parliament, and he has a blistering admonishment. Take a look at this. Right. When we found out that the CEO of Pfizer, decided not to come and answer questions. This is not an inquiry committee. So he was not bound by law to come and, you know, he was not on record, you know, he was not facing any criminal punishments in case he's lying in front of this committee. But even in that case, he refused to come and answer some concrete and specific questions. Questions that I think all of us and all of you have.

And the first question is, what exactly in these contracts? What are they hiding exactly? I mean, in the previous press conferences, I showed you some of the pages from these contracts, this is how they were disclosed to us and to the public and to the press. Obviously, after some of us and some of the brave journalists asked, what are the contract signed between the European Commission and these pharmaceutical companies. So this is how they disclosed the contracts. Over 100 pages, every contract with Pfizer with Moderna, tens of pages of those contracts were blacked out.

So yesterday when we asked, I was the one asking, and some of my colleagues asked, when are they going to fully release these contracts? The representative of Pfizer, who was sent to replace the CEO of Pfizer, said that they can't fully disclose these contracts because they have some commercial secrets over there, and they have to protect their interests. now I'm asking you, what about the interests of our people? What about the interests of the Europeans whose money was spent or wasted, I would say now? To buy these medical products that are not providing what they were marketed for.

Because what we found out yesterday, when one of my colleagues asked if they tested, in this case Pfizer, If Pfizer tested, if their medical product, it's stopping the spread of the virus, we were shocked to find out yesterday. That they haven't tested their vaccine to see if it's stopping the spread of the virus. So we are now more than a year after the green certificate, the digital green certificate, was imposed in the European Union. and people were forced to be vaccinated with the medical product in order to exercise their basic fundamental rights. And they were told, and we were told. We were voted against the green certificate,

but many of our colleagues voted in favor of it because they believe what these companies have said that if you get vaccinated, you will not be infected, and you will not spread the virus. They even ran campaign and said, get vaccinated in order to keep your grandparents. mother and your parents healthy. And we find out now after more than a year that when they requested the special marketing authorization, they haven't tested the vaccine to see if it's stopping

the spread of the virus. So I'm asking again, and we are asking again, where are they going to hide? What do they hide exactly? Why aren't they transparent with their medical product? We We heard yesterday, I mean, I was shot. Because Pfizer uses opportunity just to do a PR campaign. And even lecture asked, why are we asking this? I'm not asking that. Who are they to question us? What kind of questions do we ask?

We are elected by the people for the people, not they. And they are supposed to answer all these questions, which they had not. Folks, I just want to say, I know that as we're sitting here today, it's a dark day in the United States of America. Our own CDC is turned on the people against our will. Obviously, by the low vaccination rate of our children, it shows where this country is at with their faith in this vaccine. The CDC doesn't care, now mandated upon us. But this right here, what we're watching right now is the beginning of the end for this vaccine program right now, and especially this Pfizer vaccine. these, I mean, Jeffrey, these are dogs with a bone now.

I mean, they are asking all the right questions, and they're pissed off. And rightfully so. Where is our money gone? What did we pay for? Why did we all have to be the face on television of this program that took civil liberties away, locked people away, destroyed their jobs, all telling them, we're doing this to you because this product is going to stop transmission, and now he's saying, we now know that you always knew that it didn't and couldn't?

Yeah. Yeah, it's hitting breakaway speeds, Dell, and it's a social movement. It's obviously becoming a political movement now to have these questions being answered, but it couldn't come at a worse time in Europe, all across Europe right now. Inflation is hitting. People are having to decide whether to pay money to heat themselves or pay money to feed themselves. And so, rightfully so asking, their representatives are asking, where did our money go? We have $71 billion that we just threw into a vaccine that's not stopping transmission.

Badell, what if the vaccine didn't just fail to stop transmission? What if it increased all-cause mortality? Now we're getting into the territory of the Highwire's investigations over the past year. Take a look at literally one of the most historic moments we're probably seeing out of Europe when it comes to this conversation. Look at this. There's another issue right now raised all across Europe. The excess mortality rate in the month of July 2020, according to Eurostat, in the month of July, the excess mortality rate all across European Union went up 16% more than the average of 2016 and 2019. Now, if you look on the map here, this is released by the Eurostat. It's not from us.

If you look on this map, you will see that the countries with the highest vaccination rate have right now the highest mortality rate. So obviously we ask, is there a connection between being vaccinated and having a higher mortality rate? Everybody's avoiding answering this, I would say, logical question. Wow. I mean, all I can say is wow. Obviously, We have been sharing your Amomo data, Eurostat data all the way along, showing things like this. But that just seeing him hold that, we haven't looked in a while. That's horrifying. I mean, I'm seeing a lot of red in there.

What is he pointing to? Yeah, well, let's bring that map up and let's take a look at that together here. So as he said, rightfully so, the places in the European Union with the highest vaccination rates are also showing the highest excess mortality. And that's July 22. So you see Portugal, you see Italy, you see France. Germany, Ireland's up there, even Spain. And, you know, those are some of the countries that had the most restrictive authoritarian lockdowns and measures in place to get people vaccinated.

So this is a conversation that we're really talking about here. And it's, I mean, almost nobody, take it, just take it back for a second. We'll look at that in a second. We'll look at this middle of the excess mortality hits plus 16% highest 2022 values so far. But let's go back to this map because folks, if you look at that little, you know, Dakota ring there on the side, that deep dark red, which looks like these countries are bleeding, that's where you're at a plus 15, above 15 percent excess mortality. But the orange, that's 10 to 15. The gold, you know, 8 to 10, really, you know, if you think that light yellow is like zero,

they're in trouble. And this is, and as you're pointing out, the countries like Portugal that were in, headlines bragging with the highest vaccine rigs, blood red bleeding in those countries. Right, right. And Del, we saw this from the studies. We saw this from the scientific papers being written. We saw this from the Office of National Statistics until they stopped publishing their data in the UK. This was something that you called out in March of this year. We knew that all-cause mortality would be the conversation. Let's take a look back at that moment. All right. People say, Dell, they're going to try and hide it. Hide what? You might be able to hide COVID deaths.

You might be able to sort of manipulate the COVID deaths and take people that are having heart attacks and put them in the COVID category. You might be able to hide the actual COVID vaccine rates and who was truly vaccinated. Were they fully vaccinated? Were they boosted? Did they only have one shot? Was there only 14 days after the second shot? They're manipulating all of that. But one thing you cannot manipulate is the all-cause mortality, just meaning if there's a rise in just death across the board in every nation, that is going to be really hard.

to hide. I mean, this is sort of the beginning of the I told you so, but it was so clear. We were watching, we've watched the manipulation of the data. They have been doing things like saying, well, if you got one vaccine, you're still unvaccinated. If you got two vaccines, you're considered unvaccinated until 14 days after the second shot. How many people do that vaccine injure that that went on to a death in the unvaccinated column? I mean, all of this, these manipulations, all the people that were testing positive with COVID, in hospitals was listed as a COVID death when really they died in a car accident.

I mean, all of these things were manipulations. But what we knew is, and I said it right there, and now we're seeing it on the stage in the European Union. What you cannot argue with is why the hell when this vaccine was supposed to have dropped death rates in the middle of whatever a pandemic, we are still seeing a rise in death rates. A rise when this virus is at the weakest point it's ever been in. Why are our death rates exceeding 16% higher than they were before COVID? What is it?

What are we dying from? And as you said, insurance actuaries showing us, and it isn't the elderly, 18 to 64, 40% rise in payouts to death by insurance companies and age group. This is going to be the story of our time. And I'm amazed. Every time I think about the CDC signing the names on, these people are signing their names to a document that will live in infamy as I started to show out with in the face of a growing death rate that really appears to only have one source as we know it, the only change in humanity that everyone was involved in that could explain and across the board excess death

rate appears to be this vaccine and yet that's not stopping the CDC. Right, right. And, you know, the final conversation here is brought to you by Mislov Kolo Kusik. He is a Croatian lawyer, another member of... of the European Parliament. And I say a Croatian lawyer because the way he attacks this, he hits Pfizer in the place that's going to make them pay attention, which is their pocketbook. Take a look at what he had to say.

All right. Stotin million of the world, in the last two days, is, puttem of the other than of the director of Pfizer on the question, colleague Rob Ross, Is it provident testing of ceptiv on spritiae, and the pre-enosa, dobiot, is a very answer.

It is not provided. So, in-op-need-en no, not yet, not yet, testin of the non-dally, with other other of the other-dustup-pidacta,

– – – – which, who will do statistics of hospitalized and umrily,

prema, the so-z-n't-n-sat-nop-status first, two, three-and-chet-a-chep-eft-doze and necepeplied. Ned-dvoebeno proizlase, that no-posts

a difference in the zar-a-ovulvian and umirangu from COVID-19 from the, such-z-cyeplened and ne-cieplened and the people.

Slendom to the other need to again doves of the because they're

they're not and they to start to set up in the in the of two and

$2-milard Eurra and the pern't the progon proter and other and in

suprotan and we we're we're in the casen of the law's loggenovirang of law's newstead of the European Union in the vicinity of 7.1 million euros, if, and for how much, Uruz, U.S. Fulten Lain, obvezzal, in the name of all us, to pay pharmacete them? My question is, when you'll re-shin-tutti-waglia. Thank you. It's amazing how he describes it as we must not participate any longer in this crime of promoting. fake vaccines.

Right, right. I mean, that sentence, the crime of promoting fake vaccines and a stop to any future payments, he wants reimbursement for the $2.5 billion that's already gone out. Criminal charges, these are fighting words. Yeah, and what he's talking about here, the European Union is made up with 27 member states. The European Union is its own entity. It's a political economic entity, if you will, a federal. So they fronted 2.5 billion euros to up front to get this ball rolling.

But they committed to future contracts, this is what Ursula committed to, 71 billion euros for all vaccinations, not just Pfizer's. So what Colacusik is saying here is we want our upfront money back of 2.5 billion euros. We're canceling the contracts of all 71 billion and we're charging you, we may charge you with crimes of damaging our budget and selling fake medicines. medicines. It's a big, it's a really big story there. And what's interesting when you look into that, that 71 billion is supposed to provide 4.6 billion doses. There's only about 447 million people in the European Union. So you do a quick math equation. That's about 10 shots per person is what they committed to. So it's almost as if they weren't just investing in a COVID vaccine. They're investing in MRI technologies for future vaccines, which is what we've been warning everybody. This is the

beginning. They have a vaccine they can make overnight. They can start charging you for the millions of viruses and bacteria that are coursing through your veins right now that have never affected you, but they think are dangerous and start mandating those too without any need to show that they stop transmission. I mean, in that light, it appears it's a transfer of wealth to build out this MRI infrastructure to bring on the next phase here. Well, I'll tell you, I, and as I said, in this dark day in America, I feel a lot of light coming from this. I don't see how this goes away. I mean, as he points out, and as many of these, you know, have stated, to the millions that have watched this statement

by the Pfizer executive on social media, we're standing for you, to all of those we've been forced to lie to, these people aren't walking away. I mean, I don't know. Maybe you can disappear one politician that may be speaking out of line. You have a whole panel of them now, and how many around them are starting to reel. It's really outrageous. So let's shift gears a little bit here. Because I've been saying this is all about really in some ways, and I told you so from the high wire, there's many degrees and levels to this. But I want to be really clear because we hear Pierce Morgan saying, oh, the science changed. We know that that isn't what happened. There never was the science there to change. We discover that from this Pfizer executive. But old

Ultimately, they're saying, you know, there's this idea that it's brand new. 10 days ago, the European Union just discovered that the vaccine doesn't, you know, was never tested to stop transmission as though it's the first time it's ever been hurt. And I'm glad they're waking up to it. I really am. But anyone watching the high wire would have known you knew this way back. We're not talking a year ago. We didn't miss this a year ago.

You brought this to our attention before there is even an emergency use to authorization. before anyone had gotten this shot outside of the trials, I believe the date's November 5th, 2020, November 5th, you made the statement on the highway right here that it did not appear this vaccine was going to stop transmission. This is a, I think, a profound moment. It's in a moment I'm very proud of now. I was proud of it then, but, you know, we didn't, you know, were we going to be right? It was a strong statement. Here's what you said. The only reason we're even having these conversations about therapeutics is because these are these are placeholders until we get the vaccine so the vaccine is supposed to stop the transmission the vaccine is supposed to interrupt this thing get us back to our

normal lives but that's not even going to happen now because what we're seeing out of the bmj this is an article out of the bmj it's saying will covid 19 save lives that's the question asked by peter dosi current trials aren't designed to tell us so amazing work here by peter dosi i have to say so he writes in in the article, none of the trials currently underway are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcomes such as hospital emissions, use of intensive care, or deaths, nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus. He goes on to say, but that's not right. In all the ongoing phase three trials for which details have been released, laboratory confirm infections even with only mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint

definition. So for instance, in Pfizer modernist trials, basically a cough and a positive PCR test is enough to bring the trial towards completion, not stopping transmission, not keeping people from dying, not keeping people out of intensive care, just mild symptoms. That's, it's unbelievable to think that's November 5th, 2020. That's about a month before this vaccine even gets approval to be injected into people based on emergency use authorization. The EU is saying the shock to find that the trials didn't test for transmission, but anyone watching the high wire knew on November 5th, 2020 that they had not tested because Peter Doshi at BMJ had pointed that out. Now remind me because now looking back at that, he talked about how

they changed, there's a whole discussion on changing the endpoints. This vaccine was saying was going to reduce hospitalization, reduced death, but it didn't even, they didn't even attempt to show that in the trial. They didn't attempt to show that. that it stopped transmission. They didn't attempt to show death because honestly, I think, and people need to wrap their head around this. We're told this was a study of 40,000 people, that in watching 40,000 people,

half of whom got the vaccine, half of whom did not, that we saw that there was less people going in the hospital in the vaccinated group than the unvaccinated group, but that was never what they sought to prove. In fact, they lowered it to what? Was it a cough essentially? Something as low as a cough.

Yeah, a cough and a positive PCR test, a mild symptom in a positive PCR test. tests, but what they weren't doing as well, in order to see if this stops transmission, you need to do continual PCR tests over a very long timeline, you know, up to sometimes twice a week with those symptoms. They weren't testing the asymptomatic. There was no words about that in there. So those people were just lost in the study.

But Peter Doshi goes... All right, well, hold on a second. Let me just make sure, because this is going to be mind-blowing to a lot of brand new people out there. They didn't. In doing... Now, I could have set my elementary school child. to the task of how are we going to see if this vaccine works?

And there's a chance that they would have come up with the idea, well, why don't we just have the group that got the vaccine, those that didn't, and if the vaccine is going to stop transmission, like how would you see it? I know how you see it. Just give everybody a PCR test the same test, whatever test you're using, give everybody that test once a week and let's just see how many people get infected. Because remember, we aren't locked down because of hospitalizations, we're locked down because of asymptomatic carriers, right?

It was the idea that what was dangerous was the amount of people that were catching this and didn't know what were spreading it. So the vaccine doesn't stop that. What good is it? We can't get out of lockdown because I'm wearing a mask even though I feel perfectly healthy

because you're telling me there's a potential I could still be sick. So they're not testing for that in this trial. They're not testing to see if they can remove the asymptomatic. I mean, it is absolutely astounding. They're not testing to see whether or not I'm going to the hospital.

They're just testing. So let me get this straight. about, and this happened all like two or three weeks after the second shot was when the big 95% came, they essentially just said, we tracked people in the first, what was it, 170 people or so, that got vaccinated, that, the first 150 people, 160 people, 70, whatever was that got a cough. We're going to then go to them, give them a PCR test and see where they vaccinated or unvaccinated. And that's where we got the 95%. It was like nine in the vaccinated group had this cough and a PCR test.

And 160 or 70 in the unvaccinated had a cough and a PCR test. But I remember there was more to this story. A few weeks later, Peter Doshi got back on this and he said, wait a minute. There was more than 160 symptomatic people. Yet that's all we heard about. Remind me what that was about. So as you're saying, as Pfizer is moving at the speed of science here, we have Peter Doshi who comes out just to all.

less than a month later after this article and it says, look, in the fine print here, I'm seeing something. I'm seeing that there's over 3,000 people that you kind of just discarded and focused on this 170. So this is what he had to say. He wrote this article. It's titled, Pfizer and Moderna's 95% effective vaccines. We need more details and the raw data. So we're still not seeing the raw data. So this is what he says here. He says, quote, all attention has focused on the dramatic efficacy results. Pfizer reported 170 PCR confirmed COVID-19 cases split 8 to 162, there you go, between vaccine and placebo groups. But these numbers were dwarfed by a category of disease called suspected COVID-19. Those with symptomatic COVID-19 that were not PCR confirmed, according to the

FDA's report on Pfizer's vaccine, there were 3,400 and 10 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population. 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group versus 1,816 in the placebo group. Oh my God, I mean, that would have changed. That's like a 50-50 split. I mean, you almost would say, and so now, I mean, so literally,

we were told this was about this hundred and and 70 people, but right in the waiting room next door, you have 3,000 sick people and you refuse to test them and tell us, we figured out everything we need here. By the way, everyone that's watching right now, Erin Siri sued for these Pfizer data, and we are still waiting to get this tranche. They wanted to hold back for 75 years, the FDA,

not Pfizer, the FDA, try to hold this data from us for 75 years. Dr. Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, many scientists all came together to be the front for this request. And Aaron Siri, who is the basis of all our legal cases, has one, we are looking to see what are we gonna learn from that data. We need to know what was going on with those 3,000 people

and how did you cherry pick? I mean, you wanna talk about cherry picking. Why did you cherry pick the 170 that you did and leave 3,000, you couldn't afford, could you not afford PCR tests? When Joe Biden's saying, I'm giving $10 billion of taxpayer money to get this vaccine rolling, nobody could put any money into PCR testing,

not even the 40,000, which I think we would all think, was happening, you didn't even PZR test everyone that was symptomatic. What a disaster. And I think that this brought, I mean, again, CDC, where are they going to be at when this comes breaking out and we really realize why this type of cover-up was taking place?

Right. And to bring the viewers here, so here we are, you and I and our team, we're sitting here in December, in November and saying, oh my God, looking into these trials, this thing's not even tested to stop transmission. So we start thinking, how are they going to sell this? How are they going to sell it and tell us it stops transmission? And you were on that on December 3rd, 2020. Take a look at what you had to say then,

just to remind people. All right. I want to explain something that I was even somewhat confused about it. First of all, have you been asking yourself, why is it sometimes they say COVID-19 and other times they say SARS-CoV-2? Well, there's actually, here's the difference. SARS-CoV-2 is the infection that we spread to each other, that we're asymptomatic careers or whatever's going on, we sneeze,

we spread to each other, SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 is just the symptoms that come from SARS-CoV-2, otherwise known as the disease, right? The part that makes you ill at ease. This is really important for me to explain what's going on here. So when you were watching that news, and they do this on purpose, you were under the impression when they say 95% effective at stopping COVID-19, you think, well, that's it. we can reach herd immunity because it stops the infection. And I can't spread it to anybody else. And you keep hearing all the scientists and pundits saying,

we got to get as many people to get this vaccine as fast as we can in order to achieve herd immunity and stop the infection around the world. But here's the problem. They are not telling you that it stops the infection. It is stopping the illness or the symptoms known as COVID-19. You are still, as far as they know, infected. with SARS-CoV-2. You can still spread SARS-CoV-2 to anybody you meet on the street. Thereby, when they're rushing you to get a vaccine to begin with, saying we can reach hurt immunity,

there is nothing in science that proves that that's true. In fact, they are only going to turn you into an asymptomatic carrier. It's outrageous that we're in this moment where, as I said, we get to roll our cameras and Fauci can go back to his. We were all on tape for what we said. in the middle of this, we were the ones losing our YouTube channel, using our Facebook channel, being banned along with Dr. Robert Malone and Peter McCullough, the scientists that knew that this was all a lie. And not only were we doubling down and knowing that it wasn't going to stop transmission, we were showing you how they were using a word salad to confuse everybody, saying SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 as though it was interchangeable, but basically admitting in some ways that it wasn't

going to stop transmission. It was really outrageous. And to think now how affirmative we were. That's what that's a December 3rd. I'm saying that still no one in America outside of the trials has received this vaccine. Can you imagine had we had the prime time spot that is owned by pharma, whether it's CNN or Fox or MSNBC, nobody. I challenge everyone out there. You show me the news station that is affirmatively said to you this vaccine will not stop transmission. The studies showed it wouldn't stop transmission and here's how they're going to voice this lie upon you with a word salad between SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 nobody else had that we were there we were being honest we're doubling and tripling down but I think and this is the greatest I told you so

because in a way it goes against what we're hearing out of the European Union and what they keep saying first of all that we just discovered we've showed you that we didn't just discover it maybe they just discovered it but no one on the highway that was watching all the way back before this vaccine was even released, they didn't just discover it. They've known for, you know, two years now. But here's the point. They keep saying Pfizer lied to us. Pfizer lied to us. And, you know, it's true. Pfizer's a part of this lie, but that has never been the problem in my mind. It's never been. I have said from the beginning that why I do what I do as a journalist, is I just have this instinct, if you will, or maybe a pessimism that when there's billions of

dollars to be made, I don't tend to trust the industry that's making the product tell me it's safe. I think they're going to lie. I think BP by nature tries to hide the oil when they spill it. They don't alarm everybody and say, come out and help me clean it up. That's just not how we work. We're always like a bunch of little kids with a kid in the hand in the cooking jar. You know, wasn't me. Can't prove anything. I wasn't there. You know, Bart Simpsoning our way out of it. That's what industries do. But regulatory agencies, that is what they're there for. The FDA, the CDC, Health and Human Services, the NHS. They are there to make sure that these lying industries

that are trying to make billions of dollars and slide anything under the carpet they can, that they are being held accountable. And in this case, what we proved long ago was that it wasn't just Pfizer that was lying to you. It was the FDA. It was literally the leading health authority in the world on this subject

during the emergency use authorization that was written, by the FDA in ink, you told us back on December 17th, just days now after the very first vaccine, I think is going out. No, no, actually, I think this is a day before the EUA. We had just been released what they were gonna talk about on the EUA, you show the FDA in their own document

admits we don't have proof it stops transmission. Folks, this is it. This is the I told you so of all time. Don't let anyone tell you the signs change on this. Don't let anyone tell you it was just Pfizer lying to you, This is the FDA, purposefully lying to the world when they allowed anyone on the news to say, it's going to stop transmission and protect grandma.

They always knew it wasn't, and here's Jeffrey Jackson delivering that proof. We did check the source. We did take the primary source, which was Pfizer's experimental vaccine data that was submitted to the FDA for their emergency use authorization. And what did it say under Section 8.4,

unknown risks, data safety gaps in certain subpopulation, there are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine and subpopulations, such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals. Vaccine effectiveness against transmission of SARS-COVID2. I thought we're talking about end of the pandemic with this. Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-COVID two from individuals who are infected despite vaccination. We don't have the data.

They said it right there. They're limited. We didn't do a trial. We didn't look at it. It's supposed to be a big shocking discovery. I'm glad it's lit this fire in Europe a few days ago. But the truth was that fire should have been lit and could have been lit had we not been censored.

For those that were telling the truth, had we not been censored, can you imagine where we'd be in this world right now? Yeah. And as you noticed, that was from the FDA's own website. That was a link from the FDA's own website. That was what our regulatory agency, which in a perfect world, we're funding to protect us from predatory industries, from industries that have been caught lying like Pfizer to the tune of billions of dollars in criminal fines in the past. This is the stopgap measure that we're supposed to give our power away to and say,

you do the vetting. And they took that document. They put it on their website. They're saying, this is the information we're discussing. Trust us. We'll protect you. EUA off to the races in 2020. And we were there. And we were censored. We were there. It's incredible. And, you know, for anyone, and by the way, I know we're nailing this to the wall, we're doing that on purpose. This is that time capsule. I want you to share with all of your friends. We're being reasonable. This is the science. This is what the high wire has done the whole time, which is present you with the science. But let's step outside the science just for a second for any one of your friends out there that may be saying, well, I mean, yeah, maybe FDA was writing it. But that doesn't necessarily mean, you know, that the officials knew that, which I don't know why you would give them a pass. I don't know why you would accept that your own officials can't read the doctor. that a couple of journalists are reading when they're supposed to be leading us towards scientific integrity and through scientific integrity, why they wouldn't know. But here's proof they did know. In fact, they're bragging about it. This is what Deborah Burke said just recently about her knowledge about that transmission and whether this vaccine was going to stop transmission. You can't get away from this, folks. This is the court of public opinion. This is the high wire court right now. Watch this. I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection, and I think we overplayed the vaccines, and it made people then worry that it's not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization. It will, but let's be very clear. 50% of the people who died from the Amacron surge were older, vaccinated. What's going on? I think we can rest our case right there, a case that we've been making for two years. Everyone out there that's been watching the highway, that's been supporting the high, that's been supporting the high.

and sharing the great work that you've been doing, our international investigative team that has made a lot of this possible, some of the things we wouldn't have found without people inside of Europe giving us that European data and all of it is real, all of it we've been sharing to come to this point. So let's just wrap this up, Jeffrey. I think what's somewhat depressing for me at the moment, and I think for people, there's a pride in America that we're the beacon of light and hope and freedom. transparency for the people, by the people. It is so clear right now as of today that we at least have a government that doesn't believe that it's for the people. They're not listening to our desires or needs. No one is asking for them to mandate this COVID vaccine on the childhood schedule when it's clearly

under a massive investigation as it should be in Europe. And I find myself just again, I was asking, we're sitting there sitting, why isn't America? Why aren't our politicians having, having this exact investigation that's going on in Europe. I mean, it's inevitable. But why are we going to be the last to the table instead of the first, as we've always been leaders? And as we were talking, we all remembered what Senator Ron Johnson had said when I interviewed him over a month ago.

And also, I think when we look at right now, we're in election season, this is a third rail for a lot of people, not Ron Johnson necessarily, but this is what he had to say of, Why aren't, you know, are we going to see our, you know, politicians investigating this vaccine? This is what they had to say. People are opening up their eyes. Yeah. But, I mean, the powers to be, they're certainly not admitting it. I was just going to sat at lunch and they were, they were, you know, saying the praise about the vaccines again, saying it saved 20 million lies. There's a study out there that the vaccine saved 20 million lies.

So how convenient. I love to see that study. So, no, they will continue, you know, people voted for this stuff. spent billions on it. They were recommending it, whether it's doctors, whether it's members of Congress. They don't want to admit to something they recommended their constituents or the patients might have harmed them or kill them. So the state of denial is going to be almost impossible to break. Okay, if you've been involved in this and if you've been pushing this, you are not going to want to see evidence. You're not going to want to admit it. It's really unfortunate

that this is how government works, right? It's all just about getting reelected. Try, and everyone, and we know it. Everyone we've said is going to try and shuffle this under the rug. That's why I brought up all-cause mortality, staring us right in the face now, across the world. We have, it's important right now. I still believe in our right to vote. I still believe, I know there's questions about voting systems.

We cannot let that stop us right now. I think everybody that's going to be voting, and I'm not going to tell anyone who to vote for. What I will say is you better be voting for someone, that is asking the right questions when it comes to this. You better be voting for people like we're seeing in the European Union right now asking the right questions. Why was this lie forced upon us?

Who signed onto this lie? Who knew what? Deborah Birx is saying, I knew it wasn't gonna stop transmission, but you wouldn't have been able to force this through mandate if you had let Biden, President, I don't think, let him know, did he know that it didn't stop transmission?

He sure seemed like somebody was telling him that's what it was doing. We need an investigation. And I think we are the best equipped to really do an investigation, we saw some glimmer of this. And when we think about, you know, I think about Elon Musk, you know, hopefully Twitter ends up opening up and not censoring voices. There may be a shift.

There is some light at the end of the tunnel. But I think Jim Jordan in one of these hearings talking to Deborah Burks asked the right kind of questions, who really was spreading the misinformation? Because that's what this is all about. Was it Pfizer? Was it the high wire? Was it the FDA? Was it Deborah Birx? Right.

Here's what Jim Jordan comes to in his conclusion. You're an expert. You were on the task force. You were part of this effort when you were in the previous administration. And you're saying in this administration that you can't rule out the fact that our government was lying to us when they told us the vaccinated could not get the virus. I don't know about their discussions that they had in the task force. So I can't tell you that. I can tell you as a family member who had individuals that were susceptible. Of course we got everybody vaccinated.

But we still use layered protection during surges because I knew potentially the vaccine immunity would wane like natural immunity wan. And there was evidence that every four months, reinfection was occurring in South Africa. Wow. When the government told us that the vaccine it couldn't transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess? Or is it the same answer? I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way. And that's why I think scientists and public health leaders, always have to be at the table being very clear what we know and what we don't know. This is important for the country to know. So when I asked the question, when the government

told us that the vaccinated couldn't get it, and I ask you if it was a guess or a lie, you said you don't know, you said you think it was hope. So what we do know is it wasn't the truth. So they were either guessing, lying, or hoping, and communicating that information to the to the citizens of this country. I think they were hoping, but you should know in those original phase three trials that were done in this country, that we only measured for symptomatic disease. So we weren't proactively testing everybody in those trials to see if they got infected with mild or asymptomatic disease. And so people had to present within the clinical trial. So we never had the data that it was going to protect against asymptomatic infection.

I'm just struck with the irony. We got government agencies guessing, or lying with the information they're presenting to the American people. And this is the same administration that wants to set up the Disinformation Governance Board. I want to talk about misinformation, and they're the biggest purveyors of misinformation, false information, hopeful information, but not accurate and true information, which is, again, the frustration I think so many of the folks I get the privilege of representing have shared with me. Well, look, I hope that people, as they go out to vote here in the United States of America, think about this conversation. Did the politicians you supported in your state support lockdowns?

Did they push this vaccine agenda telling you would stop transmission? Did they support stopping free speech and, you know, supporting censoring and basically book burning? Because that's what has taken place. We are in a very, very scary time right now when it comes to freedom of speech, especially when you're, when it is clear, the ones being censored were the ones that got this right. Right. And as you said, there is hope. There is hope in Europe, in the European Union. There is hope in this country. We're afforded tools, avenues of influence that are Jim Jordan, that are Ron Johnson. These are people we elect, and there's avenues of influence in the legal system.

Aaron Siri has shown us that, and ICANN has shown us that. We have avenues of influence everywhere. Are there battles for the livers of power in these avenues? Absolutely, and there always has been. This is the animating contest of liberty that we talk about. Amen. And so what we're trying to do here, it seems like we have momentum right now. When I say we, this is people that want individual liberty, individual sovereignty, the right to decide what they put into their children's bodies and their bodies.

There's a momentum right now. It's hitting Europe and seeing the United States. And this can influence those power centers. And they are power centers. The media are power centers. People are listening to us instead of tuning into Pierce Morgan. or Rachel Maddow, choose your tools wisely, because this is what is going to decide our future. Yeah, and let's be clear, I've tweeted out yesterday that, and I said it looks like the CDC is going to vote for adding the COVID vaccine to the schedule.

And I said, mark my words, this will go down in history as the moment the majority of Americans turned against the CDC. I do believe they just turned us into the majority. Whether there was any question now, there's no question. When we look at the amount of people that had vaccinated their children, especially with boosters that, there is no confidence in this product. Therefore, there's waning confidence in the CDC. And now you just brought all the parents that maybe were on the fence, not wanting to be called an anti-vaxxer. Guess what? We have just grown. We are now the majority. I am sure of it in this country. It is going to get really easy to start getting the type of support needed because we're all, and it's unfortunate that it takes this level of oppression.

and bad policy and arrogance to wake people up. But I think this is going to be a part of, again, we've been saying this pandemic has been a great awakening. But I just want to just finish up because when I hear Deborah Brooks, who clearly, she says it just as clearly as the Pfizer representative. So I don't know. I've heard some rumors that Borla might be saying, oh, the person I sent got it wrong.

No, Deborah Brooks clearly said to Jim, Jordan, we never in a phase three trial, she looks right to the care, looks right of the camera, right to you and says in the phase three trials, we didn't test whether or not you were testing positive asymptomatic. We only looked at symptomatic disease, which is what we said. We only looked for people who were coughing, forget about the 3,000 that they didn't look at. We don't know why we're going to have to find out about that. But why? Why didn't you look at? Why weren't you testing everybody to see? I mean, that's an entire. definition as we knew it of a vaccine was stopping myself from getting it as they all said

they were doing and bragged about which they didn't achieve so I couldn't give it to you why didn't they could they not afford it because I remember Joe Biden you know saying I've got 10 billion dollars to spend on on you know promoting this vaccine well forget the promotion for a second about the R&D how about the safety trial yeah how many billions did you have going there because they're they're telling us now what they couldn't afford some PCR tests in the middle of the troughs. Come on. Exactly. Where did their money go? Yeah. So putting this in perspective, as people are waking up, you know, family members, really waking up this, it's important to be gentle to them because they were hit with one of the

biggest propaganda campaigns in the history of the United States. And that was at the tune of $10 million. $10 billion. I'm sorry. Thank you. 10 billion dollars. Sometimes I want to minimize it. So this is it right here in CBS News. Biden administration commits $10 billion to fight COVID vaccine inequities. Well, that sounds pretty reasonable, but just days later, you go to HHS's website, and they have this banner waiting for you to look at. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services launches a nationwide network of trusted voices to encourage vaccination in next phase of COVID-19 public education campaigns. So now, you have this apparatus that is being built on the idea that stops transmission. Ten billion dollar apparatus. Can't put any money into proving

that it does or making a product that actually does that, but boy, we're going to spend money telling you that it does. Right. Off to the rate. So we have Judicial Watch. This was an organization that now had has gotten their hands on internal documents from this trusted messenger vaccination program. And let's just see how they talked about it in there. Let's see what they were speaking about. What type of influence were they looking at with this with this money? So here are the documents, but we can go into it. So digital media requests. So this is Joe Biden's like wish list that he's going to spend money on. Is that we're looking at a little internal like scratch it on some toilet paper? Here's what we're. we should do. Yes, yes. This is within HHS and this is where they're going to go with it. Hey, here's an idea. Let's request that Tom Brady create a video with his parents encouraging vaccination. His parents had COVID last year and he has talked about their tough recovery. Create custom partnerships with social media platforms with algorithms to hit this audience. Remember, we're getting kicked off social media because of the algorithms. They're saying,

create better ones to promote the vaccine. Completely opposite of what's going on. Launch Hollywood comedy writers video content. Kind of creepy. is seeping in there. It goes further. Request a vaccination special on Christian Broadcast Network featuring evangelical leaders. They're really interested

in the religious communities you can see in here. Request that major live TV entertainment shows feature hosts being vaccinated on air, the host of the voice. And people, as you're hearing this, remember what you saw over the last couple of years. This is the script for what it was.

Request that the TV morning and daytime talk shows feature special vaccination reunion moments with everyday Americans talking about what this means to that. example hugging grandma for the first time even though you're not stopping the transmissions you're probably giving grandma COVID convene an editorial meeting with the publishers of catholic newspapers and and newsletters across the country american magazine florida catholic the catholic spirit the tablet here's one of the creepier ones del place a trusted messenger on from the government on the joe rogan show and barstool sports to promote vaccination work with an outside expert to identify who will be most effective i think about like peter hote's appearing on Joe Rogan and Sanjay Gupta. I wonder if Joe realizes he was just a part of a whole, you know, propaganda campaign.

And by the way, I think Joe in many ways did actually handle some of those conversations very well, and who cares if he knows what was behind it. But boy, it's really disgusting. Right. It's really disgusting in the face of what we are now seeing today, what we now know all around the world, what is coming to light.

you spent more money pushing this product than you did making sure you had a product. Right. And were they transparent? Did they come to Joe? Did they come to the people from the voice and say, we have money, we're the government, we want to influence this. There's actually a further, there's one final document from Judicial Watch that we'll look at here to just go through this blueprint. Work with NFL, remember the NFL, you're doing this. NASCAR, MLB, CMA to request they create content with their talent and release. So your talent is now beholden to government. Think about the athletes that stood out against this vaccine. Aaron Rogers.

You know what I mean? Like these guys, Kyrie Irving, you know, people that we've talked to on this show. I mean, so not only were they influencers with these, you know, these programs, those that went against it were like outed and shamed. Yeah. And what we're looking at is they stood up against $10 billion of U.S. government money and their own league. You got this last one, work with the Hollywood Guild to work. vaccination messaging and descriptive reality TV shows. Folks, if you didn't think this was happening,

if you thought, well, I'm not watching the news, I'm just watching my sitcom, they were brainwashing people there too. Exactly. It's just incredible. It's an interesting time. And you know, that used to be called subliminal messaging or even product placement, but when the government funds it from a budget like that, you gotta really watch out.

That's really incredible. Jeffrey, your reporting has been incredible and impeccable from the beginning. I'm so proud to have worked with you through this entire time. This isn't a day. We're not gloating today. It's actually really quite unfortunate that we were the lone voice for a long time. And luckily, some other networks have started picking up the story about a year ago, but two years ago, we were right. We've proven to be right the whole time.

Part of that is because I have such faith in you and the work you're doing. A shout out to our team of international scientists and doctors that also help us through this process. our legal team, Aaron, Siri. But when you look at that propaganda piece that we just saw that's just been brought in through FOIA requests from Jewish Watch, just know that it was that level of propaganda that took place. And for every one of you out there that didn't end up getting the COVID vaccine, what you were reading there is the most highest funded propaganda machine that it was ever built.

It was 24 hours a day on your news, on your sitcoms, in your movies, in your NFL teams, in your sports. Everywhere you turned, our government here in America, and I think very similarly, governments around the world, funded all the places your eyeballs would land to make you feel horrible if you didn't go along with it and deserve to be a second-class citizen emboldened those who took this experimental product to hate those that didn't. All of that, and yet here in America, somewhere around 30% of you, I'm sure most who watched this show, did not get this vaccine. That is an amazing testament to, and you are, you defy what they knew about psychology. You defy what they thought would happen. And it truly is astounding that we stand.

And for all of you that are new to this, I don't blame you for having followed CNN and M. MSNBC and Rachel Maddo and Sanjay Gupta, I used to believe those people were telling me the truth. We all have the moment where something happens where that glitch goes and we go, whoa, whoa, hold on a second. For you, it's happening now. So welcome to the high wire where we seek to be able to look back at the things we've said and be proud of it as we are today. And as we look forward, we guarantee you that we will be bringing you the evidence. And for those of you that don't know that we have this tool, we call it the High Wire Protocol. Every single week after the show, this Thursday, today, on Monday, if you've signed up to our newsletter, we will send you all of the evidence, all of the slides, all of the things that we reference, so that you have it in your hand, so that you can actually show your friends and your family the actual evidence.

All you have to do is give us your email right there. Just sign up the newsletter. We won't share it with anybody. Everything we're doing is encrypted because we obviously know that there's people trying to get through. to our information so you're protected. But take use of this tool. I don't want you to run out there and say, hey, Dell Bigtree said, or Jeffrey Jackson said

on the show the Highwire, I want to be able to put that evidence in your hands. For everyone watching the Highwire back on November 5th, 2020 and December 3rd and December 17th, you were all holding the emergency use authorization that showed you, the FDA admitted, they never tested for transmission. It had no idea if the vaccine would stop transmission.

I'm glad it's a big story. in Europe. It's going to be a giant story in America in the days to come. We'll make sure of that. But it should have been the story two years ago, and you were only seeing it here. So as we close this out, I want to make sure that those individuals that lied to us, knowingly lied to us, their faces should live in infamy. So one more time. For those that will try to change this story, here is, this vaccine will stop the chain of transmission. Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.

We can kind of almost see the end. We're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggest that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you and your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is 80%? Personally, I think it's 100%. I think that there's a reduction in transmission. Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus.

We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. Failure to get vaccinated doesn't just put you at risk. I think this is what is important in a way if this is not you who suffers if you don't simply. It's also other people. If you've done the right thing and gotten vaccinated, you deserve the freedom to be safe from COVID-19, to have your kids safe from COVID, to get back to the things you're going to you love. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. If enough people get vaccinated,

it actually halts transmission. The people who are not getting vaccines, you don't have to listen to a minority of people who are being harmful to the greater good and who are not acting on logic, reason and science. I want everyone to be vaccinated so that they're safe and so that their families are safe and so that life can feel a little more normal again. Now we know that the vaccines work well enough, that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this.

It will go down in history is the greatest fraud in the history of mankind. foisted upon us by virtually every government in the world. The people need to rise up now. This is what brings us together. When you watch the European Union coming together, it makes me think, and I've said it for years before this, that this issue will transcend race, religion, and creed. This truly is that issue that can bring us all together as we recognize our power as human beings, as humanity, as brothers and sisters.

But before we close out here, there are a few more faces that I think believed to also need to be remembered and live in infamy. And those are the faces of those that have just destroyed the CDC, I think, forever and their credibility. Those members that voted yes, 15 to 0, Grace Lee, Lynn Bata, Oliver Brooks, Beth Bell, Wilbur Chen, Sybil Sienis, Matthew Daley, Camille Cotton, Jamie Lauer, Sarah Long, Veronica McKee. Nally, Catherine Poling, Pablo Sanchez, Nirov Shah, Helen Kip, Talbot. We will not forget you. We will not forget that in the face of a virus that had no effect on our children, you voted for a product that clearly does have an effect on our children. Myocarditis issues all around this vaccine.

No ability to stop transmission. Therefore, what good is this vaccine at all? While it is under threat, while it is under investigation, indictments happening in Europe, You in America at our regulatory agency forwarded the lie. You will be the last of the idiots that ever did this. You will not be forgotten. I said earlier that there is a great fundraising opportunity for us and a donation that will be matched today

if you help us continue to do this work that as we've shown you has been just almost, and I want to overstate it, but immaculate in many ways when it came to delivering you the truth before anyone else did. You are paying, I know you are, to have Fox on your television, to have MSNBC and all those cable news networks, whether you're watching them or not. They're getting a far bigger check from the world than we are, but we're the only ones that got it right. Does that seem right? Does that seem fair? Let me just tell you what you are donating to when you are helping us. We are not some gigantic media empire that the New York Times likes to

about a Washington Post. And look, I take credit and some honor to the fact that they describe us as an empire. But the truth is today, just to do this show, you should see what it took. We were actually planning on maybe doing a pre-tape today because two of my major partners, Catherine Layton, who's my C-O and Patrick Layton, who was our creative director, they are in this fight because they had vaccine injuries to their children, and specifically their young son Brennan, who is on the autism spectrum. And they can't travel. Why can they not travel?

Because when they went to an airport recently, because of the issues with being on the spectrum, Brennan cannot go down that tunnel. He's terrified, grabs the floor, screams and yells, makes a big scene because it's just his sensory issues that deal with that, make him unable to sort of go down onto that plane. And so today, they had an appointment to go to Arizona. Luckily, there is a group at an airport, and American Airlines donates their planes so that you can bring your child. Here they are on their trip, heading, driving to Arizona in hopes that they can teach Brennan to feel comfortable and safe walking onto an airplane. This is the great group, ARC, that makes this possible.

I want to really give a thanks there. You can donate to them. This is such a huge gift to those people that deal with this. For all of us with neurotypical children, we have no idea what this daily experience is like, what it is like to not be able to travel to, in many ways, be imprisoned in your home. At the top of my staff are Kat and Patrick who deal with this all the time and make sure that we never forget what's going on here. They are pulled over on the side of a road today on this trip so that Catherine,

who fires all the slides you just saw, All of those clips that you're reading so that she's really the best at it. They grabbed a hotel in the middle of their drive just so that she could fire remotely so that we were able to make this show happen live because we knew it was that important. So go ahead. Keep funding the billions of dollars that are going to Fox and the people that are lying to you while we don't even have a backup for Catherine to fire slides. It would be really great if we could do that.

Today is an opportunity for you to make that happen. your donation will be matched, your donation that actually does help the truth get out, does help make changes, does help us bring lawsuits, and will help protect those that try to bring these ridiculous mandates upon us. This is it. You can donate. You can use that QR code or just donate on our website.