The Highwire with Del Bigtree - IS CLIMATE CHANGE THE NEW COVID

Episode Date: February 28, 2022

IS CLIMATE CHANGE THE NEW COVID?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

As this COVID pandemic and the pandemic response, you know, really starts to come to a close here. We're reporting on this, like slow trickle for the last couple weeks here. We're seeing a lot of people trying to make their moves for the next big thing off the back of this momentum. And with this misinformation, we have California Governor Newsom. He's going to do his own state unit, his personal state unit, run out of his capital office, basically. This is the headline Newsom rips into Fox News O-A-N-N-N-N-news. Max calling them propaganda networks announces new state unit to combat misinformation. So you notice all those news agencies are people that really have reported more balanced on people like Newsom,

people like Cuomo during the pandemic, talking about some of their issues that they had there. So it looks like they're going to have kind of a state-sponsored media group. Newsom's, for example, is going to collaborate with 250 media outlets. So you can expect basically just about True propaganda machine. I mean, that's really what. I have a group to stop propaganda. No, let's go ahead and say what that is.

Put the mirror on this. You are starting a propaganda machine. You have the funding from the government. You have Homeland Security now behind you. I mean, these are scary, scary developments that really do make us reflect upon, you know, historical moments when other leaders didn't like what was being said about them. What do they do?

They start controlling the media narrative. Right. And, you know, for anybody new to this, I see a lot of doctors and scientists and thank God for them stepping up over the past couple years. But anybody new to this discussion, in 2015, we have SB 277 in California. This started this kind of nationwide push to mandate all types of vaccines and to remove a lot of the barriers between these pharmaceutical companies and, you know, the children for schools. But we're getting this push out of California again now as this pandemic's winding down. And here's some of the headlines coming out. There's a slew of bills. California bill would allow kids 12 and up to get vaccines without

parents. So here we go. We're trying to eliminate parental consent to get kids vaccinated. By the way, just for everyone out there, we first saw this in Washington, D.C. ICAN has a case in court right now. We're waiting for a decision at any moment. We have been fighting that new law there that, again, allows young children to make a decision to be injected with a totally experimental product that could potentially manipulate their DNA if we are going to at least trust in the words of the inventor of MRNA vaccines, Dr. Robert Malone, leading to all sorts of unknown health benefits. You know, we're talking about myocarditis over and over again, the detriment to these kids,

and now they get to make that choice without the parent even being involved. And I want to point out how incredibly terrifying this is. Imagine, let's just say, you know, it is rare. We have a rare incident where you've been injured by the vaccine. If your kid got that vaccine and these bills always carry one part, which is the insurance company that's paying for it is hiding it from the parents. The doctor's going to hide it from the parents. Now you're the enemy and your child has done something you know nothing about. So let's say they had that anaphylactic moment at home.

It didn't happen in front of the doctor. They're seizing in your house. You rush them to the hospital. You don't know what's going on. And maybe they say, oh, it looks like a blood clot and they fire a heparin into their body. Well, we already know that they could also be, you know, suffering from thrombocytes. opinion, which would be a lack of blood clots, and now you have a whole problem, and nobody knows what's going on because you've been taken out of the equation of the medical decisions to be able

to say, what did they just eat? What just happened? I don't know. I mean, you know, they had some carrots, you know, for lunch today. And forget about reporting on myocarditis at that point, you know, now that you're talking about this. Right. Because a lot of, I think all of the cases that CDC and ASIP were following were people or kids that were presented to the hospital emergency rooms. Who do you think's taking them there? The 12-year-old kid driving himself there or herself? It's the parents, and they're not going to know to do that. So other things coming out of California as well. This is our friend Richard Pan, California lawmakers, targeting kids and working classes for mandatory COVID vaccines. So here we go. We have a COVID vaccine that's, you know,

Children in the Poor. Let's go after the Children of the Poor. It's a great idea, said to Richard Pan. What a beautiful human being he's turning out to be. Right. Never met a vaccine he didn't like, including one that's really not that effective against stopping transmission or infection, but we're going to mandate it anyway. And then here, one following bill, this is the final one here. California bill targets doctors' websites. Here we go, pushing vaccine misinformation. So that's going to be, if this bill passed, that's going to be law in California.

And this bill doesn't just target the doctors. If a doctor treats a patient outside of standard operating care, which is ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, budescine, they're going to be put up in front of the medical board and have their license reviewed. And this is going to be in... So there you go. You save someone's life in California that you could lose your license.

You're not supposed to treat them with anything. Let them almost die. Then bring them in, give them, you know, remdesivir, shut down their kidneys, throw them on a vent. If you do that, we'll celebrate you and give you awards. But God forbid, you use a drug that's working all around the world.

We're going to pull your license. For those of you in California, I just want to say my heart goes out to you. We're all, you know, we all left California to come to Texas. We're refugees. come on down. The water's warm here, folks. I don't know what you're going to be able to do there. I mean, I'm glad you're there. Obviously, we're going to be rallying there very soon.

Announcement coming just around the corner, working out final details. But my God, what has happened to California? Such a beautiful state, such beautiful people. It's like what we're watching in Canada. Of all the places in the world, you've got to destroy California. Yeah, and Deli, here's a quick summary of how media manipulation works in one headline. So check this next headline out. COVID won't end up like the flu. It will be like smoking. So as this talking point of COVID is just a bad flu was a conspiracy theory for so long,

now that's being accepted in the mainstream. That's what the data shows. And so they take this talking point and spin it. So the need for the vaccine here is kind of waning with its effectiveness. The boosters are not effective. You know, we can't boost forever. So they're going to say, let's try to let's try the one last effort here to make this thing lasts as long as we can. So they're going to say it's more like smoking. And what does smoking do?

Well, we have to look at insurance premiums, things like that we can tack it on to. So it says here in the article, long-term actions for COVID might include charging the unvaccinated a premium on their health insurance, just as we do for smokers or distributing frightening health warnings about the perils of remaining unvaccinated. So right there, they're setting up kind of an agenda. They're drumming up some support to maybe get this thing. We've seen headlines like this before, trying again to get this thing looped into insurance premiums again to... You know, I have an idea, and I've been floated this and talking to several people that could afford to start a new insurance program. Here's what I like to say. Can you imagine

an insurance program that lowers your rates if you haven't had any interaction with a pharmaceutical product actually starts investing in the unvaccinated? I see a future where that's going to happen. This is all a part of the discussions we're having behind the scenes with other medical entities. It's time to build a new paradigm. By the way, I think that insurance company will make so much more money than those insurance companies that are going to, you know, charge you more for not being vaccinated. What happens when they start watching an insurance company that their premiums are so cheap and they never have to pay out? Because as it turns out, the unvaccinated individuals never go to hospitals, aren't dying, aren't getting sick, and they don't have to pay out. I mean, I think it's a perfect.

If you're out there and you want to get a part of it, definitely reach into info at Icandecide.org. I'd love to see enough people to come together to start a new insurance program. I think that is a great way that we can start changing this system. Let's show the world. And of course, they'd be attacked, right? You'd be attacked if you had an insurance program like that, but say, hey, it's our problem, isn't it? We're the ones betting on the unvaccinated.

We're going to bet and say they're the healthier people. It's going to be cheaper and insure them. Go ahead and keep ensuring those. They keep pumping them with fourth and fifth and sixth and seventh boosters and see how that works out for you. Right, exactly. And, Del, our team of researchers, veteran researchers, doctors, they've been talking to us. behind the scenes about this next headline. It's super important. If anybody remembers one thing from

this segment here, remember this. Coming soon, climate lockdowns. This is in the hill. So a lot of people are saying, you know, they're going to shift the COVID restriction policies and the apparatus that have been built. They're going to just change lanes on that and bring it to the climate change agenda, climate change narrative. And so this appears to be, again, we're seeing these talking points all of a sudden enter the media. Check this out. This is even. in nature. This is personal carbon allowances revisited. So if anybody doesn't know what that is, personal carbon allowances was this idea to get in people's every aspect of their life and tax them, surveil them and restrict them for the amount of carbon they're using, whether it's, you know,

heating their house or driving their car, tax them by the mile and so on and so forth. Listen to what this article says here in nature about this. And this was after COVID. During the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on individuals for the sake of public health in forms of individual accountability and responsibility that were unthinkable only a year ago or a year before have been adopted by millions of people. People may be more prepared to accept the tracking and limitations related to personal carbon allowances to achieve a safer climate. It goes on to say other lessons that could be drawn relate to the public acceptance in some countries of additional surveillance and control in exchange for greater safety.

Oh, man, hold on in a second. I'm going to have to, like a little truth moment here. I'm going to tell the audience right now, this is one of the conversations that's been going on for the last several months. As I've told you before, we have an international body of scientists and lawyers and specialists that we meet with every week to put this show together for you

to make sure that we've vetted it no matter where it is in the world, we want to get it right. But there are a couple of people out there on our team that have been saying, Dell, this entire tracking system, the vaccine tracking system, is just paving the way for what will ultimately be a global warming tracking system. This is where it's going to go. It's going to go into climate change. Mark our words, right after this COVID pandemic, you're going to watch them start to want to track you over your footprint in the environment. Now, I say this as someone,

I'm still an environmentalist. I grew up in Boulder, Colorado. I want clean rivers. I want clean air, but I'm not down with tracking human beings to achieve that. And so I just got to put it out there for those of you on my team that have been trying to get me to talk about this. And I've been saying that's crazy talk. How would they ever move a vaccine passport into a climate passport? You win, I lose. I owe you a dollar. And you know exactly who you are. Right. And a lot of headlines, too, are saying that climate change is a greater public health emergency than COVID ever was and things like that. So how would they get here? Well, there's a lot of ways that they could possibly get there. And obviously that vaccine passport was a big deal that's

still really going forward behind the scenes. But check this out. The WHO announced in 2021 that they were working on something. And this is what the headline looked like. World Health Assembly agrees to launch process to develop historic global cord on pandemic prevention preparedness response. Well, that has now come to fruition and it's moving forward. And this is what it looks like. It's called international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness. And I pulled a couple of the slides, some of the infographics from this. And the WHO is leading this. Why is the WHO the right organization to lead this development of this treaty? Because they did so well in the pandemic. It's 194 countries and they're going to be having delegates from those countries that were

WHO member countries. Remember, the WHO is funded primarily by the Gates, Bill and Millinda Gates Foundation and China. So essentially they're saying the future of pandemic, preparedness is going to be shaped by those two. Well, the nature of any illness or disease by which we just locked down the world. Now, we're going to be controlled. I mean, this is really scary, you know, world order type of stuff we're talking about. So what is their plan? How does this work?

Yeah, so here's another infographic. There's a handful of pieces to this. And so one of these here is they're talking about a global inclusivity via a new legally binding agreement rooted in the WHO constitution. They also, God. I mean, that's got to be interesting and scary for some people to read that coming from the WHO. And then at the bottom here, it says a one health approach. So here we are wrapping that climate agenda in here.

It says a one health approach that connects the health of humans, animals, and the planet. So now the health of the planet is integrated into the pandemic response. So this is really concerning. Now it's supposed to meet on March 1st, is their first committee meeting. to talk about this. By 2024, they're hoping to move forward on this. So this is just the start. We'll be reporting on this every step of the way. Absolutely. And it just goes into the theme of our show today, which is what is behind all of this? Is this really, you know, are we against each other different nations or is there something bigger going on? And by the way, I personally want to make a

shift today from now on. I do not believe we should be referring to this as the World Health Organization any longer. It has clearly become the World Health Organization. health order. So go ahead and make note. I think this is what we're dealing with and we should be very wary of our interactions with the world health order from now on.