The Highwire with Del Bigtree - IS THE COVID-19 VACCINATION MORE HARMFUL THAN NATURAL INFECTION?

Episode Date: May 8, 2023

UK cardiologist, Aseem Malhotra, MD, details findings in a new peer reviewed study based on raw data from the original Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccine trials.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

The highest quality level of evidence came very recently, published in the journal vaccine, peer-reviewed, carried out by very eminent scientists in their fields. These are people who are not getting funded by pharma. These people who are independent of vested interests, right? Robert Kaplan from Stanford, Joseph Freeman, Peter Doshi, associated with the BMJ. What they were able to do, Dell, was to go back to the very original trials done by Moderna and Pfizer, with those MRNA technologies, to look at the raw data, to look at the raw data, to some degree to see what were the absolute harms

from the trials that led to the approval by the FDA of the vaccine and then subsequently and coercion and mandates. Yeah. They found that in those trials, when everything's corrected for age groups and risk factors, one was more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from taking the vaccine, disability, life-changing event,

hospitalization, than one was to be hospitalized with COVID. And remember, that's during the ancestral Wuhan train when it was more lethal. It was still going to cause more harm than good. And that rate was at least one in 800, right? And that's over the first couple of months. We know now, certainly in my dad's case, and many other patients, by the way, I've managed many patients now with vaccine injuries. Okay. We know now that the events rates are probably much, much higher for two reasons. One is the original trials were designed in people that were generally healthier. If you're healthy, or less like to get a side effect, okay? That's how the drug companies conduct their business. Let's be

We looked at this trial. I mean, they didn't want smokers, no drinkers, nobody with diabetes, nobody overweight. Literally, you know, go ahead and cut out 75% of the population that's going to get this and then just stick with I call like the superheroes all got selected. And look, that's the nature that they're allowed to do that. It's not breaking the law, but it's really scary when you use these super healthy people and they end up having negative outcomes to the point where you're saying where the, and we're talking about the, and we're talking but the population risk, not of the healthy people, of everybody, the risk was greater to be, you know,

basically hospitalized as a healthy person getting this vaccine than being a regular person getting COVID anywhere in the world. Absolutely.