The Highwire with Del Bigtree - JAXEN AND SIRI TESTIFY IN MASSACHUSETTS

Episode Date: August 3, 2023

Massachusetts has become the latest hot bed of vaccine-related legislation as its residents have been activated to testify at the State House. While the pandemic fades into people’s memories, lawmakers are picking up where they left off, removing all barriers to liability-free injectable pharmaceutical products.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Jeffrey, I want to thank you because you do, you go beyond, you know, sometimes just doing the investigations. You were just giving testimony in Massachusetts where they're trying to, you know, this archaic idea of removing the religious exemption from vaccinations, right after we won it back in Mississippi, having lost it since 1979, there's still states that want to move back into the dark ages and take away people's rights to opt out or to have a religious perspective. Maybe they don't want to be injecting aborted fetal DNA into their children. But you gave a great testimony, so I want to play that right now. Let's take a look at this. Okay. I sit here as a medical health journalist for nearly a decade telling the story of parents that you've heard here. This is a common story telling the story of parents who had vaccine injuries.

Their children have had vaccine injuries after mandated vaccines. We hear a lot about the immunocompromised child, excuse me, a meal compromised child in these bills trying to protect them. But there's another side of the story. There's vaccine injury. It is real. And it's been paid out to a tune, as you heard of over $4 billion by the vaccine injury compensation program. This is a liability-free product that market forces do not apply to it as it applies to the rest of the products out there. Unfortunately, these parents have been discriminated against and essentially neutralized by the media, trying to tell their story, and also by public.

health agencies, and as you've heard by the medical profession, when they try to get their children help they need. One of the things that we're left to do is to use legal actions and journalists that are outside the corporate media, if you will, that are influenced by Big Pharma as they take their money. And the legal actions that have been pushed towards the public agencies like the CDC have found things like this. CDC and NIH unable to provide a single study to support the safety of injecting aluminum adjuvants, which are widespread in childhood vaccines. CDC concedes it's never conducted a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. These are things that we need answers to.

These are inconvenient facts that should have been debated publicly in the public space. And unfortunately, they haven't been. We've just finished a COVID response where the CDC has admitted it did a lot of wrong things at her public trust. Unfortunately, I was expecting to see bills that would enshrine more. public trust and these civil liberties in these bills. And I'm unfortunately not seeing that. Amazing job, Jeffrey. And just to point out to everybody, I mean, it's not easy to get in those microphones. I find that to be some of the most stressful things I've ever done is sort of speaking

to, you know, in those political spaces. But no teleprompter, no script, Jeffrey. That was awesome. And, you know, I also want to point out that the video glitching was theirs. That's how the feed came out. It's not us, you know, having a mistake. with the video that was the best that it came out. But, and also, you know, Aaron Siri weighed in. So let's go ahead and listen to that and I'm gonna ask you a few questions. This is Aaron's theory that I think came in on via Zoom

or something like that to this same hearing. Take a look of this. Good afternoon. My name is Aaron Seer. I'm an attorney. My firm has over 30 professionals that engage purely in vaccine-related work. We do not represent pharmaceutical companies. So we, we are injured by vaccines.

We do vaccine policy work. We brought, for example, a lawsuit Washington, D.C. challenging a law that had permitted doctors of vaccinate majors without parental consent that got struck down. We also recently brought a lawsuit in Mississippi, which challenged a lack of religious exemption there in a federal court held that it violated the First Amendment right to free exercise not to have a religious exemption. And the state of Mississippi has now reinstitute a religious exemption in that state. You've heard a lot of testimony today from parents. Some of the very motive. I really do want to stress these are real,

real hardships. These families are going to suffer greatly if you remove the religious exemption. Folks don't always listen to what parents have to say, but when they're telling you, this is their convictions. You should trust them. You should believe, and that's what this country was founded upon, was letting people live out their convictions. And if I can't appeal to your emotion, make an appeal to some of your logic. Let me read you some quotes. Here's a quote from the CDC about an activated polio vaccine, the only vaccine for polio using that stage for last 20 years. Quote, IPV, inactivated poliolid vaccine does not contain live virus and cannot cause disease. It protects people from polo disease, but does not stop transmission of the virus, end quote.

That's the CDC, because it creates a systemic community in the blood. It doesn't create any mucosal. immunity with poliopuliphyrates. The same is true of at least four of the six vaccines that you are talking about. They do not prevent transmission. Not my words. That's the government words. There is what you're told about vaccines. And there's a reality. When you litigate it, you have to actually look at the facts and proof. And I can tell you what you're often told is not accord with what the fact show. Thank you. Wow. Amazing. I mean, you know, I can't zone Aaron Siri there. And he points out such a great point. You know, you're talking about the injuries. These are real. These people are real. They need a recourse. They need to be a way to opt out.

We need to be able to have people that can avoid being injured. But as he pointed out, four of the six of these products, we've talked about a lot, don't stop transmission. Just like COVID had the same issue. And at the heart of these laws is always, we've got to protect the immune suppressed child. How do you protect the immune suppressed child if all you're doing is creating asymptomatic carriers? In fact, most of the heart, you're, these vaccines, what we find is that they're more likely to be carriers after they get the vaccine because their body never mounts a totally, you know, virus-killing defense. It leaves it linger around in their bodies. So they keep carrying it around the immune-suppressed child. This is where

we've been attacking this and having a lot of effect around the nation. But what all's going on in Massachusetts? Is this the only law? I mean, it just seems like, you know, they're really out of step with America right now and where people are at. Yeah, that's, that's a a great analysis and massachusetts is one of the big pushes right now and it's interesting because obviously we've we've been covering these legislative push since california like 2014 2015 and that was before the pandemic response as i said in my testimony everything changed the public trust is not a given right now we have people questioning you know asking questions and then we have r fk junior going on and trying to push this debate people now in their minds are like wait

minute we should have a big open debate about all vaccines so this legislation is is interesting because it's a little myopic in that it's picking up at the same pace it did before the as if the coronavirus response never happened as if people are still in that same thing so massachusetts right now we have a bill it's uh h 21 51 the companion bill is s 1458 but what this is doing is it's lowering the age of consent for vaccination so remember in washington dc we had this idea of the minor, they passed this bill of the minor consent. And they brought that down. It was covering it at the time to the age of 11. They said, we think that's reasonable. And they're using these words, we're going to try to remove the parent barrier. Because 11 year old has a full

understanding of all of their, you know, previous issues, health issues that their parents have been watching. And they know all about their own, you know, health history. Right. And the question would be, do they know about vaccine injury moving forward? Do they know about the signs and symptoms of that if their parents are kept in the dark of the vaccination. The parents, do they, are they able to watch out for this child after the vaccine to see if they develop anything? So they, Massachusetts is pushing forth this bill to lower the age of consent to whatever. No, no, any age. And they're also, that same bill also allow schools, daycare, colleges to establish their own vaccine policies. And they can actually add more vaccines

that are on the schedule. And remember, Dell, the COVID-19 vaccine, it has been pushed to the the recommendation. We covered this about six months ago when I was in studio. We really have to watch for the beginning of this school year because Rochelle Wollinsky, the ex-CDC director said, the only reason we put this on the schedule was so we can get paid for for lower income children had nothing to do with science. So if these schools now add this COVID-19 vaccine as a requirement for school entry, it's going to be very interesting because there's really no science. And the only the CDC director said that. So another bill is H-604 and its companion bill is S1391. This one's, among other things, it's going to try to remove the religious exemption.

So Massachusetts, if this goes through, will be amongst a minority of states that have no religious exemption. Maine. And one of the one of the focuses, it will become one of the focus of the high wire to go in and bring a lawsuit to stop these bills. That's what they're going to do because that's where we can actually make a difference. You know, obviously they're there trying to preempt that, bring some truth to power. But if they decide to push forward with this, we're going to do something about it. Right, right. And the final bill here is H582. And it brings, it actually gives doctors and medical professionals a kind of a wider breath for medical exemptions. It protects them against any retributions, kind of like we saw in California.

Doctors were losing their license left and right. And they were actually losing those for just speaking out during the COVID-19 response. So this is kind of something. that's attempting to protect those movements against those doctors. So however you feel about these bills, it's important you can sign up for online testimony. You can show up in person as these things move forward. It's just important to keep an eye out for these things in your states. And again, it seems like Massachusetts is kind of a frontrunner right now in pushing this legislation. But I know other states are starting to gear up to in time for the school year to start. All right, everybody. Well, look, you can sit back and just watch and see how your world gets taken away

from you. Or can step up and do something about. It's about it. Jeffrey Jackson, thanks for stepping up. I mean, that was amazing. Great testimony.