The Highwire with Del Bigtree - JEFFERY JAXEN BREAKS DOWN THE LATEST MEETING IN DAVOS

Episode Date: June 4, 2022

Switzerland was the location for both the World Economic Forum and the WHO’s World Health Assembly. Watch as the worlds ‘elite’ brag and boast about their perceived control. Not everyone was flying high as Modera’s CEO whined about having to toss 300M Covid shots in the trash.#WEF #DavosBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

One of the biggest stories, two biggest shows in town recently happening still right now is the World Economic Forum and then the World Health Assembly. That's the WHO's yearly assembly that they gather is the 75th version of it, I think. And before last week, no one was really talking about this, but a lot of attention was given to these amendments that the Biden administration sent in to the World Health Organization for this assembly to amend the international health regulations according to the United States. And although these international health regulations already give really big sweeping powers to the world health organization to only to recommend they can only recommend they can't force anything they can't take away sovereignty but as we've seen over the last two years their recommendations hold a lot of weight and a lot of public health organizations and a lot of states and countries follow them verbatim so the the amendments by the Biden administration were kind of just giving them a little more a little more leeway there they can they can declare an emergency of international concern without this 48-hour waiting period from a member state. They can do it on a potential, it doesn't even have to be actual. It can be a potential

concern. They can do this. These are the amendments. But really, one of the big things was the WHO's pandemic treaty. This is the big Kahuna. This thing is supposedly being pushed through in 2024. And these international health regulations that are being talked about right now are kind of part of this and it's getting out in the media here's the good news no one really heard about it no one really reported on it too much over the last two weeks and then all of a sudden it pops in the news here's again governor florida ron desantis talking about this listening what he had to say all right there is no way we will ever support uh this w h o thing to send our stuff that's not going to happen no way every every day i love that guy just a little bit more i mean you know you just really really

you could clone a few of our representatives here in America, Rand Paul, Ron DeSantis, among those. Just spectacular. Yeah. Well, it's interesting because once this is forced, the media, the corporate media has to cover it. Our politicians have to weigh in on it. So here's Washington Post. Here's what they decided to run with. There's the headline.

Global health talks clouded by conspiracy theories about pandemic treaty. It goes on in there to say, well, it's conspiracy theory. It doesn't really give over sovereignty. but they are going to work on this pandemic treaty, and it's going to be this sweeping, overarching one-world treaty that's going to deal with these pandemics. So it's almost like this double speak. They're trying to really soften it a little bit.

But apparently CNN didn't get the memo. CNN went right for the sciop fear headline. Opinion, we need a global pandemic treaty before it's too late. You know, you're not supposed to admit it. Right. Right. Are we supposed to be in denial or are we supposed to be demanding it? Wait, wait, wait, I forgot the memo.

Did you get the memo? I know it was a D. Oh, my God. One of them got it wrong. They got the memo, but they got it wrong. But obviously, we know this is the conversation that's happening. Anytime you read a headline that tells you, oh, it's a conspiracy theory that they're really trying to gain, you know,

power and controls over government agency across the world. I mean, we just watched it happen before our eyes. That's what just happened. I didn't vote for Tony Fauci. Who the hell is he to decide whether my kids can go to school or whether I can open the doors to my business? I mean, it's crazy. And a lot of the time the opinion pieces are really driving the conversation in the media because those are allowed to be put in there.

This was from the telegraph. Here's the headline here. A WHO pandemic pact would leave the world at China's mercy. And the byline says lessons have still not been learned. So why should we trust the WHO in a future pandemic? It goes on to say, which is interesting. I thought an interesting point about that article that nowhere in the treaty or the international health regulations does it say lab safety or transparency of research in this agenda, being able to look at the labs and make sure. everything's okay. In fact, the WHO formed a team to go look at this. They didn't really even give

an update at this World Health Assembly. So it kind of feels like that fell by the wayside. I wonder why. But we do we do have great organizations on this now. The Health Freedom Defense Fund, they have put together a declaration. It has about 65,000 signatures at this point. It's called the World Freedom Declaration. This is opposing the proposed amendments to the international health regulations that the Biden administration was giving. But as far as as the overall pandemic treaty this was the one you really got to watch out for there is a written and public testimony the w ho is going to have an intergovernmental negotiating body this is on june 16th and 17th of this year 2022 and the words you got to look for is called the world together that's what

they're calling this pandemic treaty they're not going to call it the pandemic treaty verbatim like that's the world together and that's what you got look for now moving over to i guess just the other side of the country because that was in geneva we go over to davos now We have the World Economic Forum. And this was, this was Klaus Schwab's, you know, World Economic Forum. This is the guy who wrote COVID-19, The Great Reset. This is the guy who, remember, talks about you will own nothing and be happy. This guy talks about COVID-19 being a great opportunity.

You would think he would maybe take a second to step back and think about that. Also the guy who was a star in a couple of the James Bond movies back in the 1980s, if I remember correctly. Absolutely, absolutely, and played and parodied by Michael Myers in Austin Powers. So this is what he had to say at the opening of the ceremony at the World Economic Forum, 2022. Take a look. Let's also be clear. The future is not just happening. The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room.

We have the means to improve the system. States of the world. But two conditions are necessary. The first one is that we act all as stakeholders of larger communities, that we serve not our only self-interests, but we serve the community. That's what we call stakeholder responsibility. And second, that we collaborate. And this is the reason why you find many opportunities here during the meeting to engage into very action and impact-oriented initiatives to make progress related to specific issues on the global agenda. You know, it's interesting because when you say us and he says, we are here and, you know,

it's in our hands and we're the ones that, you know, are going to, you know, affect the world's, you know, When he's saying to us, I think we think he's talking to us as, you know, the people or when this idea of stakeholders, it's really interesting. That was sort of his brainchild, this idea of stakeholders. Prior to that, you know, our entire system or where we were going was more like the Milton Friedman economics point, which was, you know, the shareholders, everything. Make the shareholder happy and all the world will move smoothly. It's all about making money. Well, that led to gutting businesses and all these things to lower the bottom line, make it seem like you're making more money than the shareholders made more money.

And so, Klaus Schwab comes along, and that's why I think he's a saint. I mean, I know some of this from, you know, growing up a progressive liberal. I'm now for everyone that's, you know, new to the show. I'm politically marooned. I don't trust anybody on any side. But being a liberal, what sounded so good was, you know, Klaus Schwab was saying, it's about the stakeholders. It's about those human beings whose lives were affected.

And remember when he's saying these things, saying them to his a room full of billionaires they're all the richest people that flew in on private jets to really do business deals and then talk about how they're going to save you know us minions in the world but i just want to point out that since we've been having the world economic forum there and those have been taking place the poor have gotten poorer and poorer and poorer the rich are getting the billioners are just getting richer and richer and richer and nothing was a bigger boom than COVID for these billionaires i mean they're there all but just giggling themselves stupid right in front of our face. Many of them doubling their

profits like Bezos and Amazon and Walmart, all of the big China-driven entities that kept us alive while all the mom and pop stores were destroyed. That's the brainchild of these world-saving billionaires. It's really disgusting and it's hard to watch it. That's my little summary of what's actually happening there. But it is hard to watch. Yeah. I don't know whether that was his accent or if he was just so excited that he couldn't contain himself when he was talking he was kind of slurring but you know there was three things that really three big pillars that came out of this was you know control information and misinformation disinformation then that that net carbon zero emissions signing everybody on to that and obviously you know preventing these pandemics in the future

but as you mentioned these billionaires talking about climate change they all flew in on private jets for the most part and it actually made some mainstream headlines which is really refreshing to see the hypocrisy at Davos, are leaders, private jets and limos actually hurting climate change efforts? Yeah, maybe. But now that we're talking about this carbon footprint that they've brought about and they're kind of forcing it upon us, you know, this. A lot of people are saying the Biden administration is doing this forced austerity with the gasoline prices. But we have a group president at Alibaba. You know, he was talking at the Davos forum and understand when they get together with their buddies here in Davos, this is kind of like when people get together and have some drinks, they let some stuff slip that. You probably shouldn't let slip. And this is on camera.

So this is a group president at Alibaba. Listen to what he had to say about a carbon tracker. Okay. We're developing through technology and ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. What does that mean? That's where are they traveling?

How are they traveling? What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? So individual carbon footprint tracker. Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on. Oh my God, they must have been so thrilled to hear about that there.

I mean, I can't wait, a carbon footprint tracker that, you know, decides, like, the meal I'm eating. How many carbon footprints am I leaving behind doing this? Imagine getting, you know, mid-stake and suddenly you're arrested. Like, I've gone over my carbon crests, you know, how much, you know, ozone you've eaten up, you know, with that cow that was out there in the world. I mean, this is crazy. And we've talked about this. We've talked about this on this show. This is why the vaccine program was so important.

All of this stuff, all these technologies, these billionaires want to make billions more on, really depended on the vaccine passport getting passed. So anyone that tries to argue with me that, oh, they got exactly what they needed. All this went displayed. I totally disagree. That vaccine passport was everything because that passport ultimately is going to be your carbon footprint passport, and your body monitor to know what your emotions are, what you're thinking, where you're doing, where you are, what you think of the president when he's talking.

That one wouldn't go for me very well right now. I'm thinking, I think he needs to be retired. I think he needs to be handed some pudding and rolled in a stroller off to the window to look out over the beautiful sunset. But, you know, that could give me a lot of trouble if I got a tracker sitting in my back pocket. And these Davos clips over the past years has even said that that's where their ultimate goal is. But we don't have to wait for him to someday possibly develop it for like a green lockdown. This is the headline just this month in May, Google Back startup launches free carbon emissions tracker.

This is for small and media-sized businesses. For free? For small and medium-sized businesses. As if they have not had enough government regulations over the last few years, they can now get their free carbon emissions tracker. And it's interesting to note that Google has not signed up for this carbon emissions tracker, although it backed this startup. But another interesting thing that came out of it from the Americans perspective, it came out of this Davos meeting. another sound clip. Just to give us a quick background here. Basically last year to the month, the Biden administration signed the American

rescues plan that gave $1.9 trillion to the COVID rescue effort. They've burned through mostly all of that. So you have Dr. Ashish Jha. He's the White House COVID coordinator. He's out trying to be basically a salesman right now saying, we need more money. We need to pass this $22.5 billion package to create new vaccines and therapeutics and all of this stuff. And here is the headline.

what he's saying. He's saying coronavirus, US faces dire risk of vaccine rationing without more funds. Vaccine rationing. Well, let's listen to the head of Moderna, Stefan Benzel, a newly minted billionaire, multi-billioner. This is what he had to say at Davos about his vaccines. As Seth knows, we are now throwing those into the garbage. It's sad to say. I'm in the process of throwing 30 million doses into the garbage because nobody wants them. We have a big demand problem. We right now have governments. We try to contact not only he's doing great work with his team trying to get demand into the countries,

but also we contacted through the Washington, the embassies in Washington, every country, and nobody wants to take them. And so the change we have now is a very different situation than we had two years ago. The problem we had two years ago is there has no amount of capacity in the world, zero. The situation is very different today.

Modern has three billion doses of annual capacity. Pfizer has four billion doses, at seven billion doses. and the Chinese don't want the vaccines of a money. So if you just take the Chinese population out, you have more than a dose per person. And as we just discussed, the issue in many countries is people don't want vaccines.

In the U.S., people don't want vaccines. Around the world, we have a lot of people who don't want the vaccine. That's a problem, Seth, and his team are working against. So we don't have a capacity issue around the planet. It is not true. It was true two years ago. It's not true today.

Can I just say hashtag winning? Sorry about that. Sorry you've got to trash the 30 million vaccines. nobody wants i like to think we have a little bit to do with that are they vaccine rationing because they have to trash the vaccines it seems like kind of a circular problem here right and then we have this story out of maryland this was a plant that's being investigated we've reported on it in 2021 it had problems now it says here 400 million covid 19 vaccine doses dumped by baltimore plant congressional report finds they had to do a

congressional report to find this out it was not public knowledge this was a plant that produced astrozenica and now the johnson and johnson and johnson vaccine which the FDA has limited. So not only have, do you have these blood kind of issues, but you have a plant that's producing subparred vaccines that are to throw 400 away, 400 million away. So just, just point that out when we're talking about vaccine rationing, they're throwing away vaccines like hotcakes out there, apparently.

Now, the final clip here really is something that's become, unfortunately, a recurring situation on this show is the policing of speech. And if we remember last week, the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board was pulled. paused, Nina Jinkowitz stepped down as its leader, director, coordinator. Such bad press for that. But then in the European Union, it didn't happen that way. The European Union did pass the Digital Services Act.

This was the headline from just a couple of weeks ago, a new EU power to find big tech billions in crackdown on hate speech, disinformation, and harmful content. Now, at Davos, we have the leader of e-safety. This is Australia's online safety coordinator. Australia passed an online safety act in June. of 2021, you know, as they were visiting people that were posting about going to a rally on Facebook, the cops were visiting them, they passed this act. And this is what the head of this

new e-safety commission had to say at Davos. Take a listen. We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere. And everything feels binary when it doesn't need to be. So I think we're going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to, you know, to be free from online violence or the right of data protection to the right to child dignity. I mean, it's just this is your life in the hands of billionaires. And when I think about this, I think back to sort of that, you know, the definition of, you know, fascism. I mean, originally Mussolini talked about, you know, the corporate control of government and the

corporate control of humanity. And I feel like that's what, let's be honest, that's what's really happening here. It's the richest people in the world saying, I pretty much own my government, you own your government, while we all come together and own the world and make the decisions for the world. And by the way, these pesky little issues around, you know, that they've got these constitutions about free speech and all that, I think we've got to recalibrate that. I mean, It's really these people are disgusting. The fact that anyone represents this is some beneficial meeting for the world. The fact that our world leaders, Obama, the Clintons, hugely invested in this thing.

Of course, Joe Biden's been there. And then they come out and tell us, hey, we've got a great new idea. You're all going to be renters. Give us your houses. You rent. We'll own everything. And you'll be happy. And, you know, she mentions the online discourse feels binary.

No, it doesn't. I don't know what you're watching. but that Alan Dershowitz conversation you had was not binary. Binary is just two sides. There were several sides being discussed, debated, open debate. The conversation you just had in the UK with Gert, open debate, not binary. Maybe what she's watching is binary. We both experienced binary.

Well, they're causing it to be, right? There's vaccine un-baxed, and that's just it. There can't be any nuance. It doesn't matter that you have a scientist that invented the MRNA technology that, you know, is saying, I just don't like this vaccine. There's other things. I mean, there's no nuance and all that's being taken away by these people. You're the ones making it binary.

You drive it into a binary hallway. We're not allowed to have any real, you know, and the really, truly nuanced discussion, which has to happen. We're getting to get to any answers. And then you're going to decide, well, you know what? We tried with you. We gave you your position. We put up the straw man.

You didn't follow it. Now, we're giving our argument. That's not working. So we're just taking control of the whole damn thing. That's right. And, hey, this is why we call it the high wire, because unfortunately, normal conversation in the past now is death-difying and scary for a lot of people, but I'm glad to be here with you, Del, having these scary conversations that should maybe be censored.

But we started this, and I think about a lot of people don't know that. Like our original slogan was the high wire, death-difying news without a safety net. Sometimes it feels like that. I mean, I know we're certainly under attack for saying what we think and bringing in many, many different perspectives.