The Highwire with Del Bigtree - MAKING HISTORY

Episode Date: January 29, 2022

Medical Freedom Movement Makes History; Freedom Convoy Exploding in Canada; Catastrophic New Covid Vaccine Data; Del’s Message to a Manic Mainstream Media; Experts Second Opinion on The PandemicGuest: Dr. Richard UrsoBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire. Now, I think I represent, you know, remember when you were in, you know, in elementary school, maybe junior high, you'd go off to church camp or maybe summer camp. You spent the whole week with your friends and sang songs and you had that amazing feeling like you were all going to be close together would never end. And then you got home and that sort of feeling sets in like, oh man, camp is over. I think that's what about 40,000 people feel like today that we're all at the march in Washington, D.C. Why do we feel that way? Because it was freaking awesome. Take a look. What are you doing today? I am awesome. Yeah, it's a great day. Bus load of freedom lovers on the way to the Capitol. We're going to make sure that those they're trying to rob and steal the Constitution don't get away with it.

We're broadcasting live at the biggest medical freedom of I've ever been to in my life. Certainly the biggest one we've seen, the United States of America. Tens of thousands of people right now. We've got the monument behind us. We're walking to the Lincoln Memorial. It's incredible.

This is a beautiful day in the United States of America. Hey, hey, ho, vaccine mandates have to go. Hey, hey, ho, vaccine mandates have to go. Look at this. This is it. It's happening, everybody. We're waking up. A little noise if you let freedom. Super spreaders of truth.

It is beautiful to be with people today that are awake and not woe. They really didn't expect all of this. Give yourselves another round of applause. Come on, come on, come on, come on. This is a cool view. Not just the monument and the memorial, but the people. Thank you for coming out. We are all different political orientations, from different political parties, from different assumptions and backgrounds from different races and creeds in color.

They've got a Muslim, a Jew, and a Christian. You all know that Congress and the United States Senate must be in some real trouble. We stand before you today, and we are not one doctor. We are 17,000 doctors. That's more than the NIH, more than the CDC, and more than the FDA. We are fighting a war.

It's a war on our health. It's a war that's been going on for decades, and it's waged by the pharmaceutical industry. They have always put profits before our patients. The doctors who stand in front of you early on in the pandemic, used all their clinical skills and knowledge and compassionately treated each and every high-risk patient to the best of their ability. I was told I could no longer use these safe, effective drugs to treat COVID-19. So I stood helplessly watching my patients die because I was not allowed to treat them.

Medical freedom has been hijacked by hospitals, by insurance companies, by the government, and by big pharma. We've been fired, censored, erased from Wikipedia, but we're standing strong because we are with you. It is WHO FDA to acknowledge what nature has known for eons. Natural immunity is superior. They lied to you to tell you that vaccine immunity was better than natural immunity. That was a fraud. Vaccine immunity can never ever supersede your natural immunity, period. If the vaccines are so safe and effective, then why do the manufacturers need liability protection?

And if they're so safe, then why are the organizations that mandate that we take these vaccines not accepting the liability for any risk? If there is risk, there must... be choice. This is the fundamental bedrock truth of modern bioethics. These genetic vaccines, they are not completely safe and the full nature of the risks remain unknown. You alone have the autonomy over your body. You have the freedom to determine what happens to your body. That is your sole possession. In many ways, it's the only thing you really have.

I'm a Marine Corps veteran. I'm a wife to a first responder. I'm a firefighter with 22 years of experience. And the issue that we face today is one of division and medical segregation. We're the firefighters that rush into your house when your house is on fire and your danger, and you need us there. We're here for you, and we need you to fight for us. This is America and it's unconstitutional.

to make us take a vaccine against our choice. We don't want their vaccines! On December 30th of 2020, I received my first Moderna shot. Approximately one week later, my feet were numb. Within days, my legs became weak. I began to stumble, and ultimately, I collapsed at work. Shortly after my collapse, I was diagnosed with transverse myelitis.

a severe and potentially permanent injury to my spinal cord. I was seriously injured by my second dose of Pfizer. The last seven months have been a revolving door of doctors, hospital, and cardiology visits. I've been unable to work and have spent tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket in hopes of getting my old life back. This is real. People are being harmed. People are losing their livelihoods

and in some cases their lives. While the government is, and companies like Pfizer sit by and watch. We have witnessed over the past 20 months a coup d'etat against democracy and the demolition, the controlled demolition of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And starting with the censorship. There are people with cameras on this stand that went to journalism school, and now they are shilling for Big Pharma.

They are censoring. It's up to you to look into your hearts and say, I've been wrong, I will be humble. I will do my job as a journalist and learn the truth. Here is an Emmy Award-winning journalist. I want to talk to the television cameras at NBC, at MSNBC, at Fox, at CBS. And I want to say, shame on you.

And mark my words, we will hold Tony Fauci accountable. We will hold Deborah Brooks accountable. We will hold John Biden accountable. But unlike the Nuremberg trials that only tried those doctors that destroyed the lives of human beings, we are going to come after the press that lied to the world that worked as a propaganda machine to push this. Are you prepared to fight back over there? Are you prepared to fight back over there? Are you prepared to fight back back there?

This is a scientific reawakening. The writing is on the wall, and the determination to preserve medical freedom is in your hands. We are the leaders of the free world, and we are standing with our brothers and sisters who are marching like this all over the world. The world has been waiting for us because we are the beacon of freedom and a beacon of hope.

Live, free, or die has never made. has never meant more to me than it does now. The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself. We are on the right side of history. ...day there in Washington, D.C.

I want to say that the organizers that put it together found out just as the event was beginning that the state park would shut off the power exactly at 3.30. And so I was scheduled to go on at the end of the program, but when they realized they were running out of time, there was still probably an hour worth of incredible speakers to go. I was grabbed and rushed to the stage and said, Del, we really want you to close this up. So get up there.

And I managed to get out there right after the firefighters gave probably the first under five-minute speech I've ever given in my life. And just as I finished it, the power came crashing down. but I want to say on behalf of the organizers to those people that had traveled long distances to be a part of this and get to speak to this audience. I know that we're all upset that we didn't get to hear you. And however that's decided, I know now we're trying to figure out whether it'll be an event or an online event. We will certainly broadcast that through the high wire, make sure that those voices are heard also. I can't explain to you what it was like for me to be there.

when I walked from the monument all the way to the Lincoln Memorial. It's about, I think it's just under a mile, but that walk, we walked up the stairs and I remember looking back and as you saw in some of those images, it was like rivers or a highway. Each one of the sidewalks that run along the water and that run through the trees was packed as far as you could see all the way to the monument. You could still see the audience on the other side and it just kept flowing like a river into the audience. And for someone like me, that has certainly, you know, been at this for, I guess, five years of 2016 when Vax released, I've been traveling all over the country, speaking to capitals. And certainly I've stood on the shoulders of giants that come before me.

And Robert Kennedy Jr., I would imagine had the same feeling. But as I stood there and watched the people pouring like a river onto the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, I just thought we are finally here. the work that we've done is now paying off and all of you, all the work that you've done, to share the videos, to get out and do these marches. Every warrior mother that has ever charged your capital and worked on writing a bill, you must recognize now as we look at those images and certainly with, I think, over a hundred articles written in mainstream media, in Twitter and Facebook and all over the internet, all over the world, referencing the, I think, the estimated 40,000 people that,

were gathered there, clearly this is a moment in history. We have turned a corner with this movement, and now we will spend the rest of the show talking about the impact that this has, the impact that's having on the news, the concern they now have over the size of this movement and the power this movement has to actually decide the fates of elected officials in the future. So for those of you that didn't make it to that incredible event, I want to let you know that we are speaking right now with the organizers at staging another event. I believe it will be twice as big now that you all know we can do this. And as soon as we know where that's going

to be and when that's going to be, the Highwire will let you know. And this is perfectly good reason why you should always be signed up to our newsletter because if you want to be the first to know things like this, you should have gone to thehighwire.com and signed up to our email list where those are the types of things you'll find out before everyone else, along with receiving information all of the evidence that arrives that we provide in this show every Monday you receive that in your inbox with hyperlinks so that you can not only say this is what I heard on the high wire you can hold up the studies and the proof of what we are discussing here so please join our newsletter so

that we continue to grow this movement and communicate with each other as now honestly in many ways this is the beginning of the end of this incredible work that we've all been involved with. Okay, we have a huge show coming up. I'm going to get into the other dynamic event that took place in Washington, D.C., the very next day on Monday. It was a Senate hearing by Ron Johnson. It was the second opinion hearing,

which was all the scientists and doctors that appeared on the stage sitting in a five-hour deposition essentially in the Senate. And so we will have excerpts from that, and I'm going to be joined by one of the first. the great speakers and doctors there, Dr. Richard Orso is going. He's right now. He's flying in here. He's, I think I've heard just landed. He's racing over here from the airport so they can help me co-host as we move through those incredible statements made by those doctors. So just outrageous,

unbelievable. As you can tell, I have blown out my voice. I was yelling and screaming and really so enjoying being a part of that audience and that crowd and the music and the, I mean, the whole thing. We could go on and on. All I can say is you should have been there. So make sure you don't miss the next one. All right. It's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, you got to say, I probably had a hundred people ask me, you know, if you were out there in D.C., so you better get to the next one. Apparently, I'm just not a good replacement. You have a better voice than I do, that's for sure. Well, it's good to see you, Del. And great job there in D.C. I was glued to the screen the whole time. taking notes and posting on the Highwire's website there. You can check out our news section.

You always have some updates. But, you know, let's look to the north. We have a lot of stuff going on here in America. But in Canada, they have some stuff going on as well. And their prime minister, Justin Trudeau, appears to be fighting a losing battle against what is shaping up to be one of the largest protests in Canadian history as he tries to convince people that it's a fringe event. Take a look.

Right. the small fringe minority. Wow, this is a huge, look, and they go forever. Of people who are on their way to Ottawa, who are holding unacceptable views that they're expressing. Do not represent the views of Canadians who have been there for each other, who know that following the science,

And stepping up to protect each other is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country. You guys are honestly true heroes. What you're doing is just incredible. I think you'd have to be absolutely in a coma to not be aware of what's happening up there in Canada's everywhere, all over my social media. it's so inspiring to see what's happening, especially after all the reporting we've had over the last two years of just feeling like Canada really just did in some ways, as Trudeau said,

just seemed to just keep complying as was their nature. But it is obvious now that they've hit the breaking point, and Canada has had enough. And you can look at any social media account here, and there are people are really telling the story here with the live streams. It reminds me a lot of what happened with faxed. When that happened a lot, the media is blacking it out for the most part.

or telling an untrue narrative. And you have people posting or embedded in the convoys going to Ottawa. But let's bring people up to speed here about what exactly was happening. So even at the beginning of this month, there was a rumor that the Canadian government would be implementing vaccine passports for cross-border truckers. Their supply chain had already been hampered by the restrictions and lockdowns, the really strict ones at that over the last couple of years. So loads needed to be delivered.

truckers were told that, you know, if this thing does come down in the middle of the month in January, that the truckers that were going out because the supply chain is always going, they would be exempt when they come back in. So what that led to, the messaging changed last minute, led to some mass confusion here. And this is what the headlines look like as this thing started to come in. Mass confusion amid changing messaging on trucker vaccine mandate. So what happened is the truckers were then told they were forced to quarantine. So they went back kind of on that promise on these truckers. So this is that headline here at the middle of the month.

Unvaccinated Canadian truckers will have to quarantine under new mandate fed say. And here's the headline on January 15th, Canada's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, now in effect for cross-border truck drivers. So this is kind of really where it started. And, you know, here in the U.S., we saw the police, we saw the firefighters, we saw the airline unions. All of these unions at one point or another stuck up for their members when these vaccine mandates came down. They fought for them. They tried to negotiate. Here we have in Canada,

the Canadian Trucking Alliance, and they put out a statement regarding these protests. The truckers are doing currently, and it says this, the government of Canada in the United States have now made being vaccinated a requirement to cross the border. This regulation is not changing. So as an industry, we must adapt to comply with this mandate, said CTA President Steven Leskowski. The only way to cross the border in a commercial truck or any other vehicles to get vaccinated. So basically, resistance is futile. You might as well just, you might as well just go along with it and kind of just shut up. And that's not what's happening. And you also have premieres. We have the premiere of Alberta. This is Jason Kenney. He took to Twitter to show some pictures. It looks a lot like what's

happening in the U.S. here too. I'm getting pictures, he says, like this, from grocery stores across Alberta this morning. This is turning into a crisis that requires immediate action by the Canadian and the U.S. governments. He goes on to say, I'm on the phone with the U.S. governors this morning who share my concerns. We're working on a joint letter to the president and the prime minister, urging them to use common sense and the policy that has taken thousands of trucks off the road. In Canada, kind of much like the U.S., the media still is a blockade for some information. So you get the op-eds, the opinion articles, where you get some of the real voices that come through, like this one right here. This was Trudeau uses trucker protest as political weapon. So Trudeau is basically saying,

at these people, these truckers who are protesting because they're keeping us locked down. They're the ones that are causing the food shortages. But as it says in this article, it reads, even before the Trudeau government brought in the mandate on January 15th, that requires truckers crossed the border to be vaccinated. Canada was short 23,000 truck drivers. The lack of drivers brought about by tough working conditions and at times, onerous regulations may have existed before the mandate, but this mandate is making things worse. It goes on to say the Canadian Trucking Alliance, as the people who just read that quote from, has stated that about 85 percent of its drivers are vaccinated while around 15 percent of the 120,000 Canadian drivers

across the border regularly are not. This means roughly 18,000 drivers can't deliver or pick up loads in the United States, which means fewer drivers at a time when demand is high for shipments. And Dell, we're going to do some basic math here. One plus one equals two. And here we go. This is the headline just yesterday. Bank of Canada says food price increase to outpace inflation. And you don't say, well, I wonder why that could be. And speaking of the media in Canada, if you're looking to the, you know, what do we want to call it? Corporate media, this is the headlines you're getting. Hundreds of truckers headed to Ottawa in Freedom Rally.

Convoy against vaccine mandate. Hundreds. Okay. Well, I contacted some of these truckers. I contacted some of the point people that I was told, you know, there's not really a single head organizer. This is kind of a distributed. event. There's leaders in every province and so on and so forth. And they weren't, no one was really interested in jumping at a media conversation. They said, look, we're kind of, we're insulating from

the media because, you know, they are being attacked. But they did put out a press release. And I'd like to read that here. Some points on that. This was just yesterday night says here, this was on their Facebook account. You can go see this on Truckers Convoy. It says on January 15th, a small team of Alberta Truckers, their family members and friends, came to the decision that the government of Canada the line with implementing COVID-19 vaccine passport and vaccine mandates. As of today, we have the support of millions of Canadians from across the country. In one week, we have managed to raise $4.4 million in donations, although our initial convoy estimated to be 1,600 trucks. That number significantly increased to 36,000 trucks in just a few days. It is now estimated that the number

of heavy trucks heading to Ottawa is closer to 50,000. Now, the question remains, what are they going to do when they get there? Well, here's their list of demands in this press release. Number one, the federal and provincial governments terminate the vaccine passports in all other obligatory vaccine contract tracing programs or inter-Canada passport systems. Number two, terminate COVID vaccine mandates and respect the rights of those who wish to remain unvaccinated. Number three, cease the device of rhetoric attacking Canadians who disagree with government mandates and finally cease to limit debate through coercive measures with the goal of censoring those who have very or incorrect opinions. Sounds a lot like some of the messaging we have here. Now, this weekend,

weather permitting, road closure is permitting, they're expected to kind of converge in Ottawa. That is the capital city of Canada. That's also the office of the Prime Minister Trudeau is also in Ottawa. And there's allegedly a press conference that's going to be held at that point, perhaps a rally there with everybody. But the world's watching to see what happens at this point. Yeah, it's absolutely incredible. You know, it's, you know, when you read like those lists of demands, they're perfect. I mean, they're really perfect. It's exactly what should be being requested all the way down to an open discussion on this,

which is what, you know, now, and we're talking about truckers. We're talking about guys and women that, you know, are really entrepreneurs. I think when I look at it, then one of the beauties of the sort of trucking is a lot of these people, they don't work for, they sort of own their own truck. They're invested in that experience. So, you know, when they're making these decisions, you said there's like no head of this thing. Well, it really makes sense. are, you know, independent businesses, individuals, 50,000 of them now, lined up on a highway

stacked end-to-end as far as can be seen for mile upon mile upon mile. It's inspiring, and it just shows what this has all come to. And the underpinning of this, Jeffrey, it just can't be lost. It's certainly not lost on any high wire viewer. But the underpinning that I think is now in the awareness of everyone on this planet is the vaccine doesn't stop infection. It doesn't stop transmission. Those that made it are telling us, yeah, basically you're going to catch Omicron, and you're going to have to learn to live with it. So why in God's name are we still forcing this failed product on anybody

and then destroying the jobs and the food supply? And for us, our health care workers and the ability for people to take care of us and to fill our shelves with food, it's an outrage. And I think slowly but surely this is what is truly. growing our movement and we must continue to remember and I want to I want to really recognize because we're going to talk in a minute about all of the news that sort of came at me and attacked me over this March so I know that there are people watching today that may be watching the high wire for the first time maybe you got one of the vaccines and just didn't have a reaction that you liked or maybe you got

two and thought you'd done your job but then when they started saying a third was what you needed to get you said wait a minute hold on that's not what I was promised maybe you've gotten a third and you hear the you know, the writing on the wall, watching Israel go towards the fourth, it doesn't matter where you are coming from. Every one of us that is, you know, part of this conversation at one point has had a wake up moment. Many had injuries to their children years ago or from this vaccine right now. What we want you to know is all we care about is the truth. We believe we're all brothers and sisters here in this conversation that the science, just as was stated by the demands of those truckers, must be a debate. We cannot allow it to be seized. It cannot be monopolized, certainly not by someone

like Tony Fauci, who has never treated a single person in his life for any ailment. He is not a doctor. He is a bureaucrat. The doctor should be making these decisions, which is why the upcoming discussion around the Senate hearing will be so impactful. But for those of you joining us, for the first time, welcome home and welcome to this conversation. Yes, and you mentioned the science, though. The science, if you look at it, it's certainly not settled, and the data is telling a different story. So let's stay in Canada, Alberta, Canada, for that matter, and let's look at their public health authority. They put out some data that looked like this.

This is from the Alberta Public Health COVID-19 statistics. And they have specifically from this page. Now, this is a web archive page. Why is this web archived? Because these three graph, I'm about to show you, are no longer there. they were taking down by the government. This first one is Alberta's public health cases. Now, these are the number of days between the first immunization and the date of a COVID-19 diagnosis.

There's the cases. Now, notice as we go through these graphs, there's something that sticks out. Now, the next one we're going to look at is hospitalizations. Again, these are no longer online. Hospitalizations, same kind of shape. So the bottom line, so the total hospitalizations is that line going up, the vertical line on the left, and below is the amount of days since being vaccinated that were, either seeing infection rates or things like that. So here I can see inside, if I'm reading this

correctly, just while everyone's looking at this, when I see that 20, it looks like the body of issues that's happening. In this case, total hospitalizations, really, it's just, it's gigantic for that first 20 days and then seems to drop off. Is that how we're supposed to read that? Correct, yes. Okay. That's exactly what it's showing. These were interactive maps. So you could, when they were available, you can hover over those and they would give you the exact numbers of every little data point on there. And now we go to deaths. Finally, the deaths shaping up looks like the same thing. Zero to 20 days is really where that big spike is there. So it's even like I would guess that spike if you rolled over, it would be right around 14 days it looks like, right?

Just, it's just more than halfway to the 20 there for that super big spike. Just as, you know, just pointing that out. Okay. Just shy of 20. Absolutely. So what, what someone did, this gentleman's name is Joe Smalley. He's a, he's a data analyst, quantitative analytics is a specialty, 25 years in the capital markets for risk management and trading. That was a specialty. He took this data before it was taken down, broke it down, he has a substack, and he published this article at substack. Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling with the COVID vaccine vaccination stats. Now let's look at some of his charts that he created from those charts that are no longer there from the data it's no longer there in

Alberta and this is the first chart we're going to look at is hospitalizations now if you look here at the bottom we have a percentage of hospitalizations on the left column and across the bottom we have the number of days we have one through 14 that line is shaded dark is one day through 14 days 47.6 percent now del remember zero to 14 days after your first vaccination you are still considered unvaccinated. You were unvaccinated in the trials, labeled unvaccinated in the Pfizer trials. You're also labeled unvaccinated in the U.S. data and in Canadian data and Alberta. So what he's showing here is bombshell. He's saying that 47.6% of hospitalizations after people receive their first vaccination were chucked into the unvaccinated category. Now, to be clear, let me just say

the people can get confused with this. What you're saying is we are looking at all of the vaccinated that end up in the hospital. This isn't a vaccinated versus unvaccinated draft. It's showing that all of the vaccinated that end up in the hospital, 50% of them were hot, or what is that, 47.6% of those vaccine that ended up in hospital, you know, were in there hospitalized before or by the 14 days in.

So inside of that first 14 days is where that really climbs up. Okay, is that correct? Correct. Diagnosed with COVID-19. That's the other aspect of this. Okay, great. Yes. So now we go into the next one.

And this one should really be the most shocking one. These are the ones, the deaths. So we have here over 50%, over 50%, 55.6% of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 after the first vaccination. And the 14 days were put in the unfvaccinated category. That should be across every headline. So more than half of their deaths that should have been reported as vaccinated, having died after, you know, from COVID, ends up in the unvaccinated category.

So let's remember that. That not only is that a shift where it comes out of their column, it's added to the column of unvaccinated so that 55% incense doubles in its power when it's taken away from one and then added to the other. It doesn't just go across. It doesn't just get subtracted. It's added. And so there you can see how they obviously, and what we're talking about, right, is this

pandemic of the unvaccinated languaging that, that, that, that was being pushed on us here in Canada and all around the world. Right. And we're continuing to deconstruct this. Now, let's finally look at cases. Joe Smalley looked at the cases as well. And this one was 39.4% of cases were put in the unvaccinated category. Again, inflating the numbers, allowing them to say this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

And what does this all mean? Well, let's look at this headline because this tells the whole story. This is anti-vax Olympic gold medalist, Sylvester Solani, dies of COVID. COVID age 51. He was a Hungarian gymnast won the gold in 2000. And it says here, Budapest newspaper, Blick, has reported that Slani fell ill in December and was put on a vetter layer in the hospital before passing away on 24th of January. While Slani had, according to the publication, expressed anti-vaccination views on social media, the six-time world championship medalist had been vaccinated to allow him to continue to work as a gymnast coach. However, he contracted the virus soon after he received the jab.

what that means he would have been thrown into the unvaccinated category for cases, unvaccinated category for hospitalizations, and then perhaps even the unvaccinated category for deaths. And this is how this plays out. And they couldn't even give him, they called him anti-vax in the headline, even though he had the shocks he wanted to continue to be a coach. This is, it's not only sad to see this and to report this, but the, the breathtaking amount of data manipulation here has to be continually pointed out. And it's something. something that is amazing that we're seeing this data come out now because we've been showing, we've been like sort of tracking in our own way looking at data where we were sort of starting

to really hone in on this idea. We've talked about it several weeks now that this, the vaccinated that are dying and are getting sick are, you know, being thrown into the unvaccinated category, which throws the entire thing out of whack. And now this is really, really powerful evidence of that. Right. Now let's head over. Let's stay with the same theme. Let's head over to Germany. Now, if you remember in November, of this year, Germany had some of the tightest restrictions they implemented on unvaccinated citizens. If you, just a reminder, this is the headline out here. Germany set to tighten rules for unvaccinated as COVID cases rise. This is right at the beginning of the Amacron variant.

Now that false narrative is unraveling. So we have a headline like this. This was translated. This is Chencher. He's the Peter Chencher, the mayor of Hamburg, regrets, quote, uncertainties caused by incorrect vaccination statistics. So they've been caught and now they're trying to really unravel this thing and make it look like it wasn't a big deal. It says here, Corona infections with unclear vaccination status were attributed to the unvaccinated in Hamburg for weeks. Hamburg's mayor is now announcing clarifications and speaking of a quote, use of different IT systems. Chencher had stated at the time in question that up to 95% of new infections were due to unvaccinated people. Those numbers were used to lock down unvaccinated people in

Hamburg, the second largest city in Germany, almost two million people. Now, they were saying they're using different IT systems, but there was also perhaps flying blind the whole time. This is another article. This was translated from a German publication. Incidents in Hamburg vaccination status of those infected is often unclear. It says, this is shocking. In most cases, the Hamburg social authorities actually do not know whether someone is vaccinated or not. At the end of November, that's when those restrictions went in.

In the 47th calendar year, it was not clear in almost 70% of the corona cases whether the infected person, was vaccinated or not. Nevertheless, they were counted in the group of the unvaccinated. Even with the hospitals, the information is incomplete. The vaccination status of at least one third of all hospital patients cannot be specified. And here we have the health minister coming out and he's having to kind of even, he's kind of called the Tony Fauci of Germany. Health minister, oppressive COVID measures for the unvaccinated were based on a software error claimed German minister. Who is?

These are bombshell. I mean, and what we must always remember, because a lot of what we do here on the high wires look at data internationally, mostly because our data in America, unfortunately, even though we're the home of Microsoft and we're the home of Apple, we have the most corrupted data, we have the most difficulty getting to the data that moves out slower than everyone else's data. And so as we continue to see these headlines, I still see news anchors saying 95% of the cases are unvaccinated, even though we watched, what was it? I forget, was it Maryland or one of those states up around Connecticut that had this huge spike in vaccinate people in the hospital? But no matter the case, we know that if Canada is doing this and we're seeing this issue in Germany, that the vaccine and is having these issues and people are getting sick, they're being hospitalized. We're all the same people. We may live in different places. but we all have two arms, two legs.

You know, it's the same vaccine we're using everywhere in all these populations, whether it's Pfizer or Moderna, everyone's using the same. You know, I guess it's still four vaccines. So it's impossible to wrap your head around the fact that the data in Germany would be completely different than the data in America, or that the data just across our border,

a line you don't actually see out there on the land makes a difference, but, you know, is different than the data that we're getting here in America. So it really makes you have to take pause that in what is supposed to be the greatest nation in the world, transparent with his people, still appears to be, you know, involved in the same lie that these other nations are now starting to have to admit to. You're hoping there's an outlier here somewhere, but as we dig and dig, it's the same story over and over. Over the last couple of weeks, we reported about what's called

negative vaccine efficacy out of the UK's public health data, meaning basically that if you get a vaccine, you have a greater chance of having a COVID case, negative vaccine efficacy. Well, we have new numbers out of Scotland. This is, again, this is directly from their public health authorities, the government numbers. Scotland is showing that in spades. So let's check this out. Let's look at the numbers. It's pretty cut and dry.

Scotland, Omicrom restrictions to end on Monday, says Nicola Sturgeon. So they ended, this is the headline here, sorry, they ended their restrictions just about a week ago. out of nowhere. And they've been very strict. I mean, Scotland was like one of the strictest enforcers of, I mean, the vaccine passports were coming. They were locking people down. I mean, they really went kind of hog wild on the whole lockdown thing and pandemic.

Yeah. And right after the UK announced they were going to kind of open back up or ease some of the restrictions, Scotland jumped in there, did the same thing. And you got to wonder, those are the two countries that were really showing this negative vaccine efficacy. So let's go back to that Scotland data. This is Public Health Scotland COVID-19, Winter Statistical Report. Now, what this is showing, we're going to show a couple tables here,

but this is showing age standardized. So it's age-standardized, meaning you're not going to have outliers. You can't argue and say, well, this was just old people driving up the numbers, or this is just young people making the numbers lower. This is a standardized across all the ages. So we're about to show this is the case rate per 100,000 individuals by week in vaccination status. So the first chart here, we have some cert.

circles on it. On the top of the first chart, these are the unvaccinated. So we have some numbers starting at the top says 540.82.858.528.9.2. So the dates are off the left, everybody, 18th of December through the 24th and the 25th and third verse. So this is, you see the dates. And then in this column, the middle column, eight standardized cases. So it's per 100,000. So 540 per 100,000 around December 18th. That rose to 958 cases per 100,000 in December. November, 923 per 100,000 in January. And at the end of January, it sort of dropped down to 412 per 100,000. Right. And if you take that first line now, so you look at the beginning of the December, the first really column there, it's 540.82.

You follow that across to the second circle number. This is after the first dose. We went from unvaccinated to one dose. That rose to 780.3.1. Wow. So we went from 540 per 100,000 to roughly 780 per 100,000. Now we go around Christmas, we have unvaccinated 958.52. The first dose, that rose to 1,409.709.70. And it's like this across the board. January 1st,

2022, we have 923.27. That goes to almost 1,400, but 13903.46. And then the most recent update here, 412.77 on the unvaccinated goes to 543.98. So every one of the, It's so important to point out here, Jeffrey, because when we look at numbers, you know, we're not used to it. You know, we hear this mantra, well, it's because more people are vaccinated, that more people are getting, you know, having breakthrough cases or getting sick or whatever the case may be. But this is per 100,000. This gets rid of this argument. Even if there's a smaller group of unvaccinated, it's in that group, it's per 100,000, 400 per 100,000. And this larger group of the vaccine, if it is larger, it's still per 100,000 that the rates are going up.

clearly this shows us unequivocally that the vaccinated are getting infected more, that somehow it's helping them get infected compared to those that didn't receive that first dose of the vaccine. It's out. And again, when we talked about this before, we've been pulling the data ourselves, right, and trying to, you have to kind of break it down or articles are doing that. This isn't an article. This isn't a journalist. This isn't some mathematician that's pulled this data. They're literally just printing from the health department. Here's the fact. Jack, vaccinated people are getting sick at higher rates. And another way to frame that, perhaps, is because this is still unsettled science,

is the vaccine is driving these cases to a greater degree than the unvaccinated. Now, that was only dose one. Let's look at dose two versus the unvaccinated. So this is the second chart here. Same kind of format, same timeline, same dates. We have that 540.82 on that first line. after the second dose, we're jumping up to 13128.29. And then around Christmas, we have 958.52 in the unvaccinated.

Now we're jumping up to 2,551.91. First of January this year. So we're more than doubled now. The one shot was like, it was like, you know, it was like another maybe third is, you know, on top of it. But this is literally more than doubling the amount of infected now once you've had two shots. Unbelievable. And you can see it all the way down.

It's larger by at least a doubling. And it's all the way up to January 14th, 2022. And this is what their information is saying. So this is still on the website as of this broadcast. I don't know if they're going to take this down. We have the screenshots. We have the information. You can sign up to our newsletter and get this information sent to you directly

into your inbox on Monday. But it's interesting because we're sitting back looking at this. I know you and I have talked Dell on the team. Why, what are they doing here? Why are they doing this? Is this maybe why Scotland just pulled the restrictions out of nowhere in the UK? Well, we have their prime minister, Sturgeon, saying, well, these restrictions were worth it. So she's trying to frame the narrative now.

So they stop the restrictions. But COVID in Scotland, restrictions impact worth it, says Sturgeon. So she's saying like all of these lockdowns, all of these issues that it's caused, it was really worth it. And we're going to back off it now. But we really did a good job. It almost sounds like she's trying to save her job. to me. That's just, that's just a thought. We're going to see a lot of that. Here's my thought, you know, as the, you know,

that when we started seeing Boris Johnson saying, it's over, I'm shutting all the lockdowns, all the masking, it's all over. You know, we were saying he's running for the hills and people saying, oh, it's a setup. You know, he really, and look, maybe it is, we're still investing. We'll keep our eyes on it. But here's what I think, you know, possibly. Here's a theory. I mean, I want to be clear with my audience. We just showed you a bunch of facts. Now we're going to get into a little theory here, which means it's just an idea. It can't be proven. maybe it rings true for you. It seems to me that if you are a world leader,

that you get convinced by your health department that we should lock down because people would die. And there's going to be this great vaccine coming. And frankly, even if you didn't really like, do we really need to, I mean, lock down? I mean, it looks like it has a pretty low death rate. Maybe they say to those people that are a little bit smarter than your average bear, look, yeah, we're pushing it a little bit harder than we should.

But the truth is, is we really need everybody vaccinated in order to make them healthier people. It's for the greater good. So just get behind us and push this pandemic with us, really push against any other drugs that could possibly end this nightmare for anyone because, you know, that will get in the way of our getting this vaccine out as an emergency authorization, as we pointed out, can't be authorized as an emergency. And there's already products that work. So let's push those aside. And you can see the useful idiots. I mean, I don't believe these are evil people.

They're looking at the agenda of, well, it'll be for the greater good. We'll have a product. We'll get it funded. And then we'll be able to save the world. What happens when you played this game? You've absolutely, you know, compromised your own value system, but you did it because the end game will be a great vaccine that you were promised. And now all of a sudden, the data's coming in and you're sitting there as Boris Johnson say, what did you just tell me? Wait a minute, did you just tell me that the vaccine that I locked everybody down to wait for, the vaccine unicorn you promised me was going to come and save the day, that it's actually making people get infected?

It's actually driving the pandemic, not stopping it, not protecting it, but actually. driving the pandemic? Is that what you're telling me? It appears that that's the case. All right, that's it. I don't care who funds me. I don't care about pharma. I don't care about the health department. I am going to go down. There's a political suicide if I stand behind this now. Hopefully if I just open this up, get people back to their lives,

they'll forget what I did to them for the last two years because you promised me we were going to have a working vaccine. I mean, to me, that's like the Occam's Razor perspective right here. That's the simplest way I can describe why Boris Johnson, and why Scotland and other nations are just dropping everything. And immediately out of nowhere, pandemic craziness one week and the next week, it's all over, moving on, got to learn to live with it. Right, right.

And it makes you wonder, what about the countries that are pushing the boosters in the face of this? What's going on there? Where is their head? In the United States here, we have our hands full with some court battles along with what's happening kind of with the protests. But if we remember from about a week or so ago, we reported the breaking. news on the Supreme Court. This was the Biden mandate that was struck down there. Supreme Court blocks Biden vaccine or test mandate for large private companies. This was through OSHA. Well, just

recently, we got a call from our lawyer, Aaron Siri, that helps us out at the informed consent action network. And he asked if he'd like us to withdraw that. Why is that? Because of this headline, OSHA withdraws its workplace vaccine rule. So the Supreme Court struck that down, and OSHA just withdrew it. So that does not mean we're talking about. We're talking about. all of them. So this, there's, there's a lot of them happening here. So that doesn't affect the military. It doesn't affect the CMS, centers for Medicare services, healthcare workers, or the federal contractors. The federal contractors are on pause at this point from an injunction from a Texas judge. But this is just the OSHA mandate. But let me just jump in here really quick.

For the audience is brand new. You may not know this, but not only we a news network, we have a legal team and we sue to get to the truth. We also sue for people's rights. the sort of like the activist side, I guess, if you will, of what we do. We had one of the cases that was up before the Supreme Court. We had a car dealership that was complaining that because they had 100 employees and had to vaccinate them, that they were going to lose employees to smaller car dealerships that didn't have that mandate, and therefore it was unfair. That was sort of the case that Aaron Siri was running for us.

It was still piled in, even though they only chose a couple of cases not ours to rule upon. The ruling affected our case. But for everyone, you're thinking, well, it feels like it was already over. Remember that that first case in front of the Supreme Court was simply for the stay to say, we want you to just uphold, like, stop, stop the mandate from beginning while this case is figured out in court. And the Supreme Court then upheld that stay and said, we will not let this go forward until we've decided in court, which meant there was still a court case to be had on all these cases. But President Biden, the administration, just then, as we're now reporting,

said we're pulling the entire case for OSHA. The OSHA mandate is over. There's nothing left to decide. They've decided that that stay signal that the Supreme Court was never going to rule in their favor. So this is over. This part of it's done. Will they bring it through some other, you know, avenue

or what perhaps? But what we know is this is a complete and total victory now in the Supreme Court on the issue of the mandate of vaccines for every employer with at least 100 employees. So it's certainly a celebration for all those people that work at large companies. Absolutely. And it's happy to report this because a lot of people have been working on this behind the scenes.

And speaking of Aaron Siri, he has his hands full now. If you'll remember, he was working on behalf of an organization called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. And they were behind this headline out of Reuters about a judge, Paramount Importance, said the judge. Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs. They brought a lawsuit with Aaron seeking all the documents that the FDA relied upon to license Pfizer's COVID shot. The FDA came back, and this is just a quick background.

The FDA came back and said, we can only produce 500 pages a month, hundreds of thousands of pages existed. So that would put the timeline basically to about 2076 for the full release. The judge ruled against that here and said you were to give 55,000 pages a month starting March 1st. Well, here is the update in that case. Okay. Yeah, sorry. Go ahead. Go ahead. Yeah, this is directly out of Reuters again. Pfizer intervenes. Pfizer pushes to intervene in lawsuit seeking COVID vaccine information from FDA. Aaron himself wrote at his substack here. Similar, he wrote kind of a behind the scenes. If you really want to read about this, FDA asked the court to delay first 55,000 page production until May, and Pfizer moves to intervene in the lawsuit. So Pfizer's asking to come in as a third party. It assured the court. that it's only here to help. It's only here to expedite the process. But this is a pretty incredible situation. I mean, we're told that these regulatory agencies are separate from these pharmaceutical companies. And here, when the chips are really down and transparency is about to come

out, you see Pfizer swooping in. So their lawyers are moving in basically saying to the Department of Justice, hold my beer, get out of my way. We are the parent company. I think proving overall, who's zooming who. Clearly, Pfizer's in control of our government. not our government and shoulder Pfizer. They're literally just pushing the Department of Justice lawyers aside and saying, we're bringing our own lawyers to fight this now. This is a case with the FDA. What in the hell is the Pfizer bringing their lawyers to deal with a case with our government?

I mean, this is, if ever there was proof of what we've been arguing that this is a captured agency, it would be that that capturer brings in their lawyers to protect them. Right. And understand, one of the main arguments from, the FDA meaning that they couldn't or the reasoning that they gave that they couldn't produce these documents fast enough it's because they didn't have the staff well Pfizer's lawyers are going to cost so much money that they could hire the extra staff to bring these to bring these documents out so it really doesn't make sense and you add to that the US government is mandating Pfizer's products as

Aaron writes it's giving immunity to the safety of the product and so on and so forth it's marketing it And so now they're representing it in court against basically just transparency. This is how hard it is to get transparency in the American regulatory system on vaccinated products here. Amazing. My understanding is Aaron is going to court on this tomorrow. Boy, that's to be a fly on the wall of that court. Amazing. Amazing circumstances. And I look, we've got the, I feel confident. I think we've got the best lawyer in the world, the best constitutional lawyer. I think he'll pick his teeth with the Pfizer lawyers. But we'll see how it turns out. And, of course, if you want to hear about it first, what do you have to do?

Sign up to our newsletter at thehighwire.com. I mean, this is it. Don't you want to know what's going on? You hang at the edge of your seat. Aaron will post it here first, whatever the results are, before you'll even see it on the high wire. We'll make sure those of you that are committed enough to receive the data and information that we share here, we'll make sure you get that breaking news as soon as it happens.

All right. All right, Jeffrey. Amazing. Amazing work. You continue to astound me with how much you can crunch together in a couple of days. And we're so thankful to have you. Really got to make sure you get out to the next rally. I wish you all could have been there.

I wish my whole staff could have been there. But instead, they were here making sure, and you were making sure that the updates kept going to the website and the broadcast was going out. So to my team, sacrificing being a part of one of the greatest parties like Woodstock out there. I want to thank my team for providing the live stream that has been, you know, congratulated by, by the way, the senators and the people that were involved in that hearing. So thankful of the quality of the stream that's coming out through the highwire. We'll continue to do that at these rallies. If you want the best visuals, if you want the best link in the streaming and know that it's always going to be there, make sure that you go to the highwire.com.

Jeffrey, thank you so much for your work. I'll see you next week. Okay, thanks, Del. All right. Well, we're just moments away from, I think, Dr. Richard Urso coming through the door there. But before we get into that, let me go ahead and just sort of talk about what it's like to be attacked by the media, to get up and speak in an event that you know. We knew.

Look, with numbers like that, you have 40,000 people outside of the capital of the United States of America. We have been reporting to you that every news agency gets most of its funding from pharma. We were in the belly of the beast. We had to stand up there. We could see it, NBC, ABC, everyone was there. In that black box up there, the news cameras showed up. This was something, obviously, as their ratings are falling, and we're seeing in the headlines all the time,

they can't not tell this story, but you know they're going to spin this story. And I want to tell my team right now, I actually want to play the video of what I said to the press first instead of what we're going to do here. All right. So just, you know, so, you know, when you think about, like, what is Dell Bigtree thinking before he goes out on a stage? A lot of times it really, you know, it depends on the moment.

Depends on the audience. I like to feel it out. But there's sometimes, especially when I know that there's cameras that are going to be rolling. Remember, I won an Emmy Award. Those are my friends and family over there. I know how they work. I've been there. But I always think to myself that famous moment in Braveheart, the film runs through my head

where, you know, Braveheart shows up to the first real battle, and the lords are all gathered around, and everyone in the Scots are waiting, like, when are we going to fight here? When are he going to fight? And he rides out, like, what's happening here, boys? And they're like, well, we're talking about, you know, how we should, like, friend.

And he just starts, you know, racing off on his horse towards the British army. Like, where are you going? And he says, I'm going to pick a fight. Well, that's kind of what I felt like. I thought it was time to pick a fight with the media that has been lying to the world. I believe that they are responsible for propaganda.

And I held them accountable. And this is what I had to say to their face. Here as a journalist, an Emmy Award-winning journalist, I want to talk to the television cameras at NBC, at MSNBC, at Fox, at CBS. And I want to say, shame on you. You had a right to tell the truth. We have an oath that we've made, just like scientists and doctors made, to tell the truth. And instead, you force a lie upon the United States of America and the world. my words, we will hold Tony Fauci accountable. We will hold Deborah Brooks accountable. We will

hold John Biden accountable. But unlike the Nuremberg trials that only tried those doctors that destroyed the lives of human beings, we are going to come after the press that lied to the world that worked as a propaganda machine to push this. These people here today represent the majority of the United States of America. Your lives could not win. You only got to 60% of this nation to take the vaccine and most of them were under duress. That means more than 50% of the nation are not listening to you. And for those of you, for those of you that say, well, I did what I had to to protect my job, just know that was the same argument made by the Nazis that were tried.

And for those of you that are standing here today quietly, I know who you are. I know you work for the New York Times. I know you work for the Washington Post. And you are here trying to support us quietly. You should have written about us. You should have told the truth. And I have news for you. That job that you are protecting and these liars that you worked for that I once worked for,

I wasn't afraid to walk out. Instead I came out to tell the truth. And I have news for you. The show that I created and that I speak on every day where I share the truth to over 6 million people per episode. That's right. Six million, which means my audience is now bigger than yours and it's growing every day. That's how you pick a fight with the press, I think. And just to let you in, this is something

we haven't really been talking about. It's true. We have now reached six million viewers are tuning in. Of course, that's over the week. We do one show a week, but look at where we stack up. The high wires at 6.7 million. That shows you. Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, gets 2.59 million for her show one episode. Lawrence O'Donnell gets 1.7 million per episode. All in with Chris Hayes gets 1.5. Your World with Neil Cavuto at 1.4. Anderson Cooper at 1.26 at the failing and crumbling CNN. And at the bottom of the list that we chose, Don Lemon gets 873,000 views per episode. I like where we're sitting here, folks, and that is because of you. That is because you have shared the show and you've made it possible, you've gotten it out there. Now, I'm not one to

really brag. It's not actually my style. I like to sort of take the high road. But every once in a while, when you want to stick it to somebody and you want to see if they can really stand in it. And frankly, I was trying to challenge them to say, you really think you can avoid this story? Can you avoid talking about me? Maybe I'll piss you off enough that you'll decide to attack me. It was the strategy I used on Vaxed. And guess how it worked when it came to the high wire. This is Chris Hayes on MSNBC. The general gestalt of the of the rhetoric as I watch this and read reports, Brandy, it's really hyperbolic stuff about essentially Nazism, essentially the second coming of the Holocaust, essentially the second coming of the Third Reich. Here's Del Bigtree calling for Nuremberg trials of Fauci and the press. Take a listen. Mark my words, we will hold Tony Fauci accountable.

We will hold Deborah Brooks accountable. We will hold Joe Biden accountable. But unlike the Nuremberg trials that only tried those doctors that destroyed the lives of human beings, we are going to come after the press. How common is this kind of language and rhetoric in this movement you've been reporting on for a while, Brandy? Yeah, Dal Bigtree has a show. It comes on Thursdays online, and he bragged yesterday that millions of people. people watch it. And it's just that over and over again every single week. So, and it's on Facebook and it's on Instagram. You know, this is just the internet sort of come to life. And it really was,

like Kara was saying, it's like you had the weirdest bunch of people all sort of slammed together. It was really a conspiracy fest yesterday. And, you know, I think it's really important to talk about how extreme these folks are. So like, I was asked yesterday, were there any extremists there? And I said, yes, everywhere. They were on the stage. And, you know, you can frame it. I just don't agree with mandates. That doesn't really feel right to me. But then when you share a stage with, you know, a man who says that vaccines are going to kill your kids and that proof of vaccination is an elaborate plan to enslave you and track you with Bill Gates

satellites, which is what R.F. Kennedy said yesterday. And when he said that being vaccinated is worse than the face of Holocaust victims, if you share a stage with those people, or if you are at a rally and you're like, I'm just against mandates, but you listen to this and clap and say yes and, you know, jail all of the reporters. That is a quick, quick march to extremism. Yeah, and I think, I mean, the Dell Bigtree is such a great example. The group that he runs is called the Informed Consent Action Network, which is kind of a kind of microcosm of the bait and switch here, which is like, well, who's against informed

consent? We want informed consent. What are you going to put in my body to? Like, the Nuremberg trials 2.0 are coming, and you're going to be up there, like, facing the gallows reporters and Dr. Anthony Fauci and that kind of carra engine of radicalization because again I saw some of your reporting which was excellent in Brandeis and like I know people who say this kind of stuff like this is I don't want this to be seen like there's some awful alien group of people that you know

have these questions or concerns or skepticism like we they're friends loved ones might be people you've dated or people whose Christmas you went to but like the slide from that to Nuremberg trials is what's so unnerving. Yeah, and it's all, I mean, this is all a grift. It's such a griff, you know, these like new doctors organizations that came up and want to sell you ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, which is what, you know, the people in white coats that looked so formal. That's what they were hawking. RFK is hawking a book. His group brought in $6.8 million in 2020. They doubled during a pandemic. They doubled the money that they brought in. I can is that's Dell Big Trey's org.

It is every year it doubles its profit and every year he gets paid more. I mean, it's just so obvious that this is a, it's a show, right? Like, Del gets up there and he had to get up there before they cut the end of the program off and just yelled and, you know, yelled and, you know, yelled about freedom and about, you know, jailing everybody. And it was just, and he was walked out. It was just such a moment because he was walked out by all of his security guards and just like feeling good. And people were treating him like a rock star. And unfortunately, he does not care a wit about the real harm that comes from vaccine hesitancy. There's a lot of people who are part of this.

I saw lots of people who said, you know, proud Democrat against medical mandates. That was one sign I heard, if I remember it correctly. And people who have just found their way in this, you know, in any particular way, which to me means there's a powerful coalition coming together right now. People who otherwise don't have anything to do with each other are banded together on the single issue. And if the, you know, Republicans decide to really plug into this, they could have a lot of success

in the coming election. Oh, man, we hooked that fish, did we not? All right, look it. Obviously, we made them nervous. I mean, Chris Hayes is like, and it's like, he's like making accusations, like he wants to put us on trial. He's coming for us. You know, this was

a lot of the languishing that happened in the articles, whether it was in the, York Post. I think we have some of these headlines. Anti-vaccine, this is Washington Post, anti-vaccine activists, March in D.C., a city that mandates coronavirus vaccination to protest mandates. A thousand protesters from across the country, including some of the biggest names of the anti-vaccination movement, descended on the nation's capital Sunday for a rally against vaccine mandates. The marcher's speakers include movement veterans such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Dell Bigtree, founder of the Anti-Baccine Group and Formal Consent Action Network. The events was

being live streamed on Bigtree's website, the highway, which includes a prominent link that allows viewers to donate to ICAN. Obviously, your donations are really pissing these people off. Remember that. If you're not donating, but you want to piss them off, that's how you do it. Rolling Stone. I'm a full anti-vaccion now, how the conspiracy theorists are winning over fresh converts. Delvatriate, prominent anti-vaccine podcasters spoke to the rally in Vogue. The Nuremberg trials to threaten Dr. Anthony Fauci in the press, a sentiment also made clear on many of the signs in the crowd. The anti-vaccine movement has migrated from the fringes to the mainstream to the many who joined its ranks since the pandemic began. And now by drilling down a vaccine mandates, the longstanding movement is recruiting new allies, as they said in that piece.

They're really worried since for some reason this has all become political why Republicans would, you know, believe in body autonomy and my body, my choice, when that was originally a slogan of Democrats. I've told you all I'm politically maroon, grew up a progressive liberal now. I'm not sure that I trust anybody. But it's true. Whatever party decides to lock on to the size of the audience they were seeing in D.C., there could be some shifts in the voting, and that has them scared. And so what are they going to do about it?

They have to make us sound dangerous. And that's what's dangerous about these writers and these articles. This is a completely peaceful event. We had everyone speaking on the stage, I mean, literally, from the nation of Islam to, you know, a Hasidic rabbi speaking, standing together, firefighters, police officers. I loved how when Brandy Zorazni is trying to say that, you know, they were radicalized. And when they asked me, you know, how many extremists and they're all extremes, meanwhile, and this is where you know that there's people on the inside,

the videos that are going up is like pictures of firefighters, pictures of the doctors behind her. I mean, that was how the piece was playing, which says to me, someone inside the control room there is on our side, and they're really giving it to Brandy Zerazni instead of showing the pig. You were supposed to show images of like the crazy homeless guy that was near this event or whatever it was instead. We're looking at firefighters. We're looking at like American citizens of every nationality, every creed, every religion,

all standing together peacefully, not an incident. All of the concerns, January 6th, there's going to be another one of those. All of these issues, all of us that showed up, 40,000 of us stood together, sang together, danced together, and it was beautiful. And so what do they do? We've got to figure out a way to make you hate these people. And so by doing that, they started bringing up the fact that we may be. some comparisons in my case to the Nuremberg trials. Well, why do I talk about the Nuremberg trials?

Well, to begin with, my nonprofit is called the informed consent action network. Informed consent is the first rule of the Nuremberg Code. What is the Nuremberg Code? That is the code of 10 rules written by that tribunal that tried those Nazi doctors and put them in jail and some of them were executed. That document, those 10 rules, changed our entire perspective of medical ethics forever. It brought in the new age of medical ethics after World War II, and they have stood the test of time. And so that document comes from the Nuremberg trial that comes from the trial of the Nazis, which references the Holocaust. And so when, you know, Chris Hayes says, well, he calls himself informed consent, but then he moves into discussions about Nuremberg trials as a bait-and-switch, it's not a bait-and-switch. and switch, Chris, it's literally the entire purpose of my nonprofit is to make sure that we have

informed consent from the Nuremberg Code. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential is that rule. And it goes on to say no use of any force or coercion can be accepted when it comes to medical decisions, whether it's an injection or an experiment or a surgery, nothing. And so I have to ask this, since the entire, you know, assault upon us supposedly we're bastardizing the concept of the Holocaust. We're not taking it seriously. In fact, Whoopi Goldberg on the view said about Robert Kennedy Jr.'s statements and those of us at the March that we were Holocaust deniers for what we had said.

Really? Really? Because it seems to me the entire purpose of remembering the Holocaust is to make sure that it never happens again. And when I referenced the Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg trials, what I'm saying is there is a document that was written in the blood and tears of those that were lost in the Holocaust called the Nuremberg Code, designed to make sure that we never let this happen again. If that document is not the essential trip wire designed to wake us up the moment one of these rules is broken is saying, you are on a dangerous slope towards what we are. know is one of the greatest atrocities of mankind. If that document is not that tripwire and running across it does not set off that remembrance and those discussions, then what on this earth would? We are told, or Winston Churchill said, that if we do not remember our past, we are doomed to repeat it. Well, certainly remembering our past doesn't simply mean we

hold it and sit it on a shelf somewhere and let it grow dust, and then when the next atrocity is over, we go, oh, look, we can compare them. They were similar. You know, Joey Bayhard, you know, made the statement, do we have this quote from the view? This is what she said about to defeat the mandate protesters. They're a mass movement of crazies telling us that putting a mask on your face is equivalent to being trapped in an attic for two or three years while the Nazis are running after you. No, Joy, that's not true. Nobody has ever compared wearing a mask to be locked in an attic for three years or put on a train car

to a concentration camp. But neither have I ever heard a survivor of the concentration camps and the Holocaust say that the Holocaust started the day the first person was put on a train car and taken to a concentration camp. That is not when we determine

the beginning of the Holocaust. It's determined long before that. Some say at the election of Hitler, Others will say it was really when the press and the government started making it okay for the mass group of people, the majority, to start using derogatory language towards this specific group of people, isolating them. And no matter what the debate, what we know is if the end is not what represents the Holocaust, but the totality of those milestones that went along that get us there, then certainly referencing similarities in those early milestones, like the whole thing. the breaking of the document that was born out of the trials for the Nazi doctors. Certainly, if those milestones are there, are we not supposed to make the comparison? How is it?

We are going to learn from our history well enough to avoid it happen again, to keep it from repeating if we do not nip it in the bud, if we do not root out those dangerous moments of evil as they're appearing, just as that cancer is forming, of Isisoran, of hatred. We must nip it in the bud there. That is what the reference to the Holocaust is. The Holocaust stands as a tool, a diagnostic tool to make sure that we capture that cancer before it spreads into the body of humanity. That is where I'm coming from. And I understand that there may be people that have misunderstood why we are making this comparison. But there are so many milestones that have been crossed that are incredibly dangerous. But honestly, you know,

I'm just a reporter. I have an opinion. And it does not carry the same value as someone that has been through the Holocaust. I admit that holy. But know this, that I am not a Holocaust denier. I believe more than anybody that this is one of the greatest atrocities of all times in humanity. And I believe we are all capable of it. If we do not wake ourselves, up at the moment that we start isolating people. But if we were to hear from someone from the Holocaust, what if they said the same things? What if they believed there was a comparison to be made?

Certainly they have the right to make that comparison. Look at this. People are being pushed around, denied normal interaction, and they're just feeling. following it like sheep. That's what happened in Germany, essentially. All Germans were not evil.

But most of them, the vast majority, simply went along. 88 years ago, the German people elected a tyrant who took away their freedom and controlled their lives. But the German people were obedient. their failure to resist the tyranny resulted in the genocide of millions of people. It begins in the public health arena. Public health is government. And that was what happened in Nazi Germany.

All of medicine wound up being public health. Once you have medicine in partnership, with government, there is no individual care. There's the Hippocratic oath goes out the window. Since you have government behind you, the doctor's not responsible for their actions. They're working together with the state. That's when medicine becomes weaponized.

Under the Nazis, medicine was perverted and turned into a weapon of mass destruction. You know, the Holocaust didn't begin with Auschwitz. The Holocaust came in stages, escalating stages, stages of humiliation, persecution, deportation, incarceration in concentration camps, as I myself experienced, and the final destination which was to be extermination.

This is a eugenics way of looking at the world. world. Eugenics was exported from the United States to Nazi Germany. It never, never was abandoned. It just got its name changed. So population control, there's the population council. There are all kinds of institutions that essentially continue to push the eugenics agenda with policies that they easily set because of the money. As a survivor of a concentration camp, I guess I can smell a rat when I sit there. Today, the unvaccinated are being demonized

as spreaders of disease the way the Jews were at that time. It was a lie then and it's a lie today. It's a horror. It's the kind of horror that really there should be, there should be a counter. There should be a real investigation. How this happened. It's very hard for me to bear witness again

to the demolition of a civilized society. It happened, therefore it can happen again. This is about saving humanity. Is it too explosive or whatever to compare Nazism? I'm sorry, this is what Nazis was about. This is how they did things. If we don't want to wind up as ashes, we have to resist. It was Virish Rav with very poignant and powerful words and images and thoughts that we must never forget what took place here.

And we must recognize the similarities when they occur so that it never happens again. Today actually is International Holocaust Remembrance Day. It's the 77th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. And for my part, my family will remember this. Make sure that we sit down and never forget what took place here. It can never happen again. I am so dedicated to the cause of making sure that it never happens again, as so many of us are across this nation and across the world,

is what brings us together so that we make sure that we do not isolate a group. We do not use pejoratives like crazy, massive crazy people, anti-vaxians, which is a pejority. We do not call people names. We don't make it acceptable by the media to make fun of people. Or say that they're radicalized because they want to have control over their own bodies. These are the warning signs. We must adhere to them, hear them, and rise up. Look at this window.

Translation, unvaccinated, unwanted. That's in Germany. right now as we speak written on a window and it's now acceptable. Look at this one. Translation, gas, the unvaccinated, written on a wall that isn't being cleaned up. And I think this headline, a patient who refused COVID-19 vaccine was denied a heart transplant simply because he doesn't want to receive a vaccine where the known side effects are adverse events of the heart, myocarditis, periocarditis, blood clots. Really? This is a guy that needs to get this vaccine. The vaccine is proven to not stop a single infection or transmission is useless against

Omicron. This guy is going to be let to die and accepted by the newspapers and everyone will walk by this man and his headline saying that it's okay because he deserves it. Really? He deserves to die because he doesn't want to get vaccinated. Remember, we're all told that the reason we should be vaccinated is to create a cocoon around those who are too sick to receive a vaccine. If being on your deathbed needing a heart does not warrant you too sick to receive a vaccine, then what does?

We are losing ourselves. We are losing our humanity. These are the red flags. These are the trip wires. They are everywhere. This cannot be accepted. We must stop this now. We must root it out now.

which is what made that second day, Monday, after the March, so incredibly powerful. It was a gathering of all the greatest scientists in the world, and we're not talking about radical guys on a stage. We're talking about some of the most decorated scientists in the world. Dr. Peter McCullough, I think, is the most published scientist or heart specialist in the world. Dr. Merrick, I think, is the second most published ICU doctor in the world. These guys were speaking out, amongst many others, inside a Senate hearing held by Ron Johnson. And as I sat through, I thought, this is a Nuremberg trial. The purpose of today's forum is to discuss the global pandemic response.

What we did right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term. I sit here with an esteemed team of bipartisan colleagues from all white, of medicine and politics and life, we're physicians and scientists. And we understand virology. We understand how disease works. Mandating these vaccines makes no sense and is completely inconsistent with the core principles of Western bioethics developed since the Nuremberg trials and codified in federal law as the federal common rule. Thousands like me have lost our jobs for declining a novel injection whose safety

and efficacy data still remains hidden. We had treatment early on from the very first day in March. There was treatment for inflammation. There was treatment for blood clotting. There was even treatment that we could try for the virus. There's treatment for respiratory demise. It's been a fraud from the beginning. The media studiously avoided covering the 10 proper trials of hydroxychloricent outpatient use

that showed significant benefit for hospitalization and mortality. So the question is, why? Why have cheap, safe, and effective drugs being ignored for the treatment of COVID-19, which could have saved maybe 500,000 lives? These are crimes against humanity. We have patients who are falling ill with a treatable disease and they can't get treatment. Let's face it, nobody, nobody can tell you the long-term safety profile of these vaccines. Nobody. It's unknowable because we haven't taken the time.

We are seeing unprecedented numbers of athletes dying on the field in Europe. Unprecedented. Of these cardiac arrests, half of them don't come back. I am seeing an uptick in cancers. I'm seeing these odd, stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines. We should have tested these for cancer-causing potential before we started giving them to our kids. The CDC is not the nation's super doctor.

And I'm going to scandalize a lot of people by saying, The CDC is not a medical organization. It's a public health organization focused on infectious disease spread. This false construct from our federal agencies that this is a pandemic and the unvaccinated are spreading is a pathophysiologic lie. It's time to come together and move forward using fact-based reasoning rather than outdated and politicized policies, which are not consistent with current scientific data. We have so many tools in the toolbox. It's the message I want everybody to hear. We can beat this disease.

That's called the practice of medicine. All right. Well, it was an incredible event. I want to thank Senator Ron Johnson, who has been spectacular with this conversation, bringing in first the injured, some of which were injured in the trials of the vaccine and letting them be heard

and going down on the Senate record there. And then on Monday, what you just saw was a five-hour discussion amongst some of the best doctors and scientists in the world on the topic of the pandemic, on masks, on lockdowns, on the vaccine, the development of the vaccine. And as he said, we have only scratched the surface by the end of that. We are only scratching the surface, and we're certainly going to even make a lighter scratch today. But I want to take you through some of the highlights. And so many great things said. But for those of you that have a short attention span or a family that will never watch that, We're going to sort of isolate these highlights, and I'm so honored to be joined right now by one of the great doctors that was at that hearing, Dr. Richard or so.

It's really a pleasure. Thanks, Adele. Thanks for all you do. Absolutely. So, first of all, you know, how did this come about? Like, I mean, how did this event get set up? I mean, because it was like the best of the best. I love you saying that because I was driving here today.

I was thinking to myself and I was talking to one of the other organizers and I said, we're really America's team. Yeah. And I said, so it's not the Cowboys anymore. We're the America's team. Yeah. We're stand up for all Americans right now and we're really able to join together for several reasons.

We all were picked off. You know, I've been fighting the fight since March and got tagged pretty hard in March 2020. Okay. Many others did. And then one by one, we all came on the seam, Harvey, Peter. and all the others. And then when Malone came on board this year, you know, it was fantastic.

Here's the creator. Here's the creator of what's now Frankenstein. I mean, what greater vindication than the creator of the technology you've been arguing and fighting about saying this isn't working? When the creator himself comes and says, yes, I'm one of the guys invented this and it is a Frankenstein. It's not doing what it's supposed to do. We must stop.

That's pretty incredible. Yeah, yeah, I like that. I like, that's a good thought in my mind. We've created Frankenstein now lipid nanoparticles carrying a Mestr RNA toxin is absolutely scientifically not a smart thing so but basically we all came together one by one and eventually we started going online together and then we formed a group in late August in September last year and basically called Global COVID Summit or the International Alliance of Physician

Scientists it was a core of mostly the people you saw there yeah and we formed that core and then with our Deccatessen which I don't mind just saying we said let's doctor be let doctors be doctors. Yep. Let us treat patients. Let us heal patients. Let us do our job. Patients understand that we know and can give them advice to inform consent. Let us do our job for inflammation, scarring and wound healing. That's all it is. It's not that hard. Number two, vaccination of children is absolutely should not be mandated. And this is a very dangerous thing that we're seeing. This is not a disease of children. This is. This is not a disease of children. This is. is not a problem for children. This should not be happening. The 5 to 11 year olds, for instance, it's 0.1 per 100,000 infection fatality rate. And the third part of our message was natural immunity denial needs to stop. There's no such thing as super immunity. There's no superman. Right. It's natural immunity. Right. Natural immunity denial is ridiculous. We have 146 studies versus the CDC's

one study. Right. 46 to 1. Right. Fantastic. Well, you're a very passionate guy. You shared some of that passion. So here's just a taste of Dr. Erso on the panel at the Senate hearing. Early on, there was so much we didn't know. And we were all, well, Dr. Erso was shaking his hand. No, that's not true, Senator. We knew early on. We had treatment early on from the very first day in March. Yes. That's a fabricated light. It's scientific fraud to say. that. My first patient, I treated with hydroxychloroquine,

azurethromycin, vitamin D, aspirin, and steroids. And I literally was shocked when I went and talked about it that people were really coming at me about the steroids. Because anybody who treats respiratory syncytrial virus and other viruses, the inflammatory phase is typically one of the most important phases. The NIH, the CDC, and the FDA are not involved in medical education. We went through a residency of medical school, a residency program. I've seen 300,000 patients I've never called the FDA, the NIH, or the CDC one time. For advice. It's not who we call. So to have them dictate our medical practices has to stop. We've got to reinvent the wheel,

basically, because our current system is the corporate practice of medicine telling doctors what to do when we already know. I mean, it's really such a powerful point. You know, one of the things that kept coming up at this was the discussion about the doctor-patient relationship. What is, you know, when you came through school, define what the doctor-patient relationship is supposed to be. My mentors were guys like Red Duke, Kooley, DeBakey. There were people who looked up to you. I remember coming to the medical center, the Texas Medical Center, and wondering what city.

this was and they said it's the Texas Medical Center and I was like wow I couldn't wait and I and these people lived in the hospital they lived for their patients they cared so much about their patients the passion and the and the intensity that they brought was something that

right now as I talk about I have chills this is what I grew up with and this is what I wanted to embody as I went forward and it was a wonderful thing and it kept going through the early part of the 90s Adele we were still the doctors were still pretty much in charge The hospitals were our partners.

It felt like the insurers were kind of on the outside. And then the hospitals banded together. And I thought, well, that's good because we'll be able to fight the insurers a little better. Some of my good friends were actually the head of two major hospitals. By sort of incorporating making bigger hospitals, we'll be able to deal with some of the pressure coming from insurers and telling us what to do. The hospital will protect us. Yes, exactly. Because we felt like we were kind of weak against the insurers at the time.

And so I was all excited about it. I went in a private practice in 2005, and I went to a place where we had two offices, and I thought, you know, there's a couple of us there thought, hey, let's do what the hospitals were doing. We banded together, and we ended up bringing 27 hospitals, 27 offices together. We had the biggest practice in the nation, and now we're the second biggest practice in the nation. So I think the growth always seems good at the time. But what's happened is it's taken away the power from the physicians who are now almost all employed by either medical schools, hospitals, or some other corporate entity.

And I suspect now we'll probably get Walgreens and these others that are going to take over. They've taken over. It's going to be the corporate practice of medicine. That's what we're seeing. That's why they won't stand up. That's why they don't speak out. It's not because they're not critical thinkers. They're just afraid.

So the doctor essentially now is being dictated to a policy. It used to be whatever I feel like my patient needs. It's my personal respond. doctor to me is the only one personally responsible for my treatment as a patient. Hospital's not responsible. They don't care. Certainly Tony Fauci over there in Washington, D.C. Doesn't affect him at all if my patient dies.

But if my patient dies, it affects me, it affects me emotionally, it affects my record and what's going on. So if you're making decisions for that patient, certainly with your butt on the line, it should be your decision. But that's not what happened here, right? Well said. When it comes to this COVID and how we're going to handle it, the hospitals started dictating you know, how you're going to handle it. Where are those dictates coming from? Tony Fauci, maybe they're pharmaceutical sponsors, how much money.

And the incentive is incentivizing, right, that happened whether it was getting incentivized to call the COVID patient. Well, let's just shut down and only take COVID patients. We'll be in the money, you know, and incentivized to use remdesivir or failed drug. And then incentivized, and all of that flies in the face of if you were as a doctor, didn't want to do it. Did you have a choice? You covered so much ground there.

Yeah. So, you know, part of what I wanted to people to hear is that we, we basically were stuck in the system where if you did something against the system, you're going to lose your job. Wow. And, you know, you heard Paul Merrick say it. Yeah. You know, he sat and watched. You heard the tears. I've seen him do it.

Yeah, we're going to play his video several times. He basically sat and watched seven people die why he gave remdesivir. And for people who don't know, the virus is replication incompetent. It can't replicate after about five or six days, which means it can't. can't, remdesivir can't work because it needs the virus to replicate in order for it to work. So I always say people don't die of the virus. They die of the viral particles in day 8, 9, 10, and so on, causing inflammation and blood colliding and respiratory stress.

So that's one of the things I think people don't understand is that there's actually very good treatment for respiratory stress and there's very good treatment for inflammation and blood clotting. And we're ignoring that. We're all thinking about Fauci and the virus. There's no, he doesn't, no virologists need to apply after the fifth day. We don't need a virologist. We need pulmonologists.

We need cardiologists. We need hematologists. That's, you know, that's who we need. It's going right. Because once you're past the infection point, and we have a, I mean, what I've said on this show, for the first time ever, as far as I've ever seen, I can't think of a single disease or a single issue where the montrum in all modern medicine is early treatment as best. Early detection and cancer, breast cancer, whatever.

Early detection, early treatment is the best way in every scenario. here we hear in every hospital there's really here's our treatment it does appear you have COVID so go home let this thing proliferate through your body we're not going to do nothing to stop you know the expansion of the virus throughout your body and the proliferation and then if your lips turn blue come back to us then then we'll put you in a respirator and give you a drug that is now at this point and capable of doing anything as you said we're moving into all sorts of respiratory and brain issues you know when it comes to you mentioned

hydroxychloroquine was what you started working on. Dr. Harvey Rice talks a little bit about that, so let's take a look at this video. We heard at the beginning of the pandemic that one of the medications that has been used in early treatment, hydroxychloroquine or HCQ, was a game changer and would be effective in the treatment of COVID outpatient starting during the first few days of the illness. And then we heard study after study and media report after media report, saying that HCQ doesn't work. However, this was a sham. The media reports never covered how the negative studies were actually fake studies.

And the media studiously avoided covering the 10 proper trials of hydroxychloricine outpatient use that showed significant benefit for hospitalization and mortality. That was Dr. Harvey Rish talking about the fake studies. Now, when you hear that, you think, what does he mean by fake studies? What does he mean by fake studies?

Well, I think everyone needs to hear this if they haven't heard it. If I told you that Harvard was in on the game and our major journal, The Lancet was in on the game, if I said this two years ago, I said, that's crazy, three years ago, it said, no way, that didn't happen. So one of the major studies was done in England, okay, and they used hydroxychloroquine, and they had something called the recovery trial. But the one that I'm talking about, the one that was the backbreaker for hydroxychloroquine, was the fake fabricated Lancet study done by

Harvard CV-Dox, not just any, the head of Harvard cardiovascular. Who hadn't seen a single patient? 693 hospitals, 93,000 patients, six continents. I knew it was fabrication right at the beginning.

So the depth of the fraud is so deep. It goes to our highest levels of institutions. Harvard, our highest levels of journal, journals like the Lancet and they actually put a fabricated study and we all uncovered it in literally like two weeks because most of us who do scientific research knew that you couldn't compile all that data that quickly and get all the ethics reviews that you need it it's it's a nightmare to go to each individual institution to do that remind me the numbers again how many institutions they said it was uh 671 hospitals now remind you they don't they're not on Windows XP okay

they're all on their own separate thing they don't this was from around the world or around the world around the world so they were saying we have China, Australia, Africa. And somebody said, wait a minute. They collected it off for the amount of time that you said you're doing is impossible. I would sometimes say, Soros had to get like 20,000 people to work on this and donate about $50 million that might have gotten done.

But obviously I knew it was a fraud, right, from the get-go. And so it got called out and guys like you started saying, show us the data. Show us exactly where your data comes from so that we can start looking at. Surgeosphere was the one collecting that data. And as it turned out, they refused to provide it. They didn't have it. The entire thing was fraud. It was made up.

And the Lancet had to retract that paper. And that was being quoted by Tony Fauci, being quoted by the health agency in the United States of America saying it came from Harvard. And now we know hydroxychloroquine doesn't work. And the entire thing was based on a fraud. There's complete corruption in fraud at the highest levels. But let me say this. I know people at the CDC, the NIH, and the FDA. It doesn't trickle all the way down the line.

Some fantastic scientists. But the problem is at the top levels, they're basically very closely aligned with Farmageddon. And basically at this point, we really have no control over what's going on there. We can't even get them to show the data. Pfizer's not going to show us the data. So we literally are stuck not being able to review the vaccine data, for instance. And this is a novel vaccine.

Everyone wants to review the raw data. That'd be fantastic. That's called transparency. That's how we're supposed to do science. All right. Well, this is Harvey Rish talking about the immune system. system. People who've had COVID and then get vaccinated have lower levels of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. And this means, and since the vaccines don't address the nucleocapsid antigens,

they only address the spike. It means that they're doing something that's damaging the immune response in a more general way than just what they do with the spike. And this is empirical data that Public Health UK has published. So we know that this is happening. It's not a theoretical issue about all of the niceties of laboratory biology and virology of things that could happen. It's a real thing that's been really observed by their testing. I mean, a lot of us know Dr. Harvey Rich because he is, you know, one of the go-toes on Fox News, but I just want to show his CV. I mean, just when you look at this, folks, this thing is 73 pages long. We could spend the rest of the day showing you how much, you know, Dr. Harvey Rich has achieved in his career.

And so when you hear the pejoratives thrown at you guys, you know, that, oh, they're just extremists or fringe doctors. You guys are some of the most mainstream doctors in the world as we know it. So when he was saying, when he's talking about the immune system and nuclear capsid, for layman, what does that mean? So what's being thrown at us is, and again, the Superman. superimmunity so if you get the the virus and then you get the vaccine you'll have super immunity no you don't and he points that out and there's a couple scary things not only do you not get super immunity but you get attacks on P53 and Broca genes these are your mutation suppressor genes are called tumor

suppressor genes these have being attacked by the spike protein the paper was cited I cited it on after Harvey finished talking yeah the other thing that's happening is to like receptor seven and eight are getting attacked. That is important for T-cell surveillance in your immune system. That's not a good thing for the spike protein is doing that after the vaccinations. So what he's addressing is not only is natural immunity denial ridiculous, but to say we have super immunity, it's actually in some cases the antibody production is going also in a way towards the spike rather than the nucleocapset, which is this more superior immunity. So in every

which way we have a counter argument that is much more detailed, much more well done. And like I said with the natural immunity, did not, 146 to 1. This is, we have almost indisputable evidence that everything we're saying is completely true. And that's the scary part for them. Because we've done our homework. We have world-class people. That's why I say we're America's doctors, we're the world's doctors. That's what we're trying to do is lift up the others so that they can come forward and feel free to speak.

It's a scientific fraud. Next we have Dr. Paul Alexander who was brought in by the Trump administration to oversee. He worked for the WHO. He had been asked by the WHO as soon as the pandemic started to start really looking the data. He is, you know, his ability to crunch numbers and look at it and figure out what was happening all over the world is bar none. So from his vantage point, from inside of the firestorm that was taking place with the pandemic, from the perspective of having worked with health and human services. This is what he had to say about natural immunity.

We put together about 150 pieces of evidence, and we found conclusively that natural immunity is not just equal to, but far superior in vaccinal immunity. And I think there was this misperception from around the fall of 2020 to the beginning of 2021, when the vaccines were beginning to get to the completion phase and be rolled out. There were some studies put out there, some small studies saying that, look, your blood antibodies are waning, so therefore you're losing your immunity.

But these public health officials at CDC and NIH, they knew better than that. They knew that they were misleading the public and they were misleading the government and the population. They knew better than that, that your serum antibodies, can win. But they knew that we had another compartment, your cellular immunity, your long-lived, B-cell immunity, T-cell immunity, that was robust, potent, lifelong, durable.

We had a study done around 2008, 2009, published in CIDRAP, that looked at the persons who, there were some persons still alive at about 95 years old from the Spanish flu. And they were infected. And what do we are infected? research showed us that those persons who were still alive, their blood still produced a cellular response, T-cell immune to Spanish flu 90 years prior. That evidence to us the robustness of the

immunity. I mean, bringing evidence and frankly what he's saying there in the indictment there is they knew, meaning the guys I was working with Tony Fauci, Robert Redfield, Deborah Burks, they knew national immunity was superior to this vaccine from the very beginning, yet all to this day, all we hear is, well, I'm not sure about natural immunity. We are locking down. We treat naturally immune people as though they are completely unvaccinated or a leper, really, when we know that they have the strongest immune system there is. What are your thoughts on this?

A couple of thoughts. One, we have the SARS-CoV-1 patients from 2003, and they, a really good study, were done at the Karolinkka Institute, and they showed that the requisite immunity, the T-cell immunity, the robust T-cell immunity was still there. Remember, though, that there's also memory B cells that make antibodies. So we have requisite immunity in many levels to deal with past invaders. That's what our system isn't designed to do.

So, you know, to deny that is, again, scientific fraud, everyone knows this is this goes to immunology 101 so to say the highest level politicians I'm going to call him politicians are saying

in our political fields Fauci I'm going to add him to that list unfortunately because he's obviously a bad scientist so to say these things are not true means either he doesn't know which makes him a very bad scientist or it's fraud and I know it's fraud

So now let me ask you this question. Has there ever been a vaccine that is said to be equal to in its in the duration and robustness of the of the protection? I mean as far as I know and correct me if I'm wrong, natural immunity is superior and every vaccine that's ever attempted to mirror it may come close attempts to but has there ever been one that reaches it or bypasses it? So natural immunity, the purpose of vaccines is to provide immunity in places where there's a high rate of death. So if you think about it that way, there is a reason for vaccination. That's why we believe in vaccination. That's why my six kids have had 300 vaccines.

But at the end of the day, this is to say that natural immunity is not superior. If you could survive smallpox, you have an incredible immunity at that point. So to go and say natural immunity is not superior would be the first time ever. Okay. Now, I kind of, when I was sitting there, all you guys waited on natural immunity, right? And it's something that we've talked about on this show years before. There was even the pandemic. And, you know, I myself grew up. I wasn't vaccinated as a child. I have natural immunity to everything that I did catch that was available to catch, handled it fine. I think I'm doing pretty good. But I was a little frustrated. And I want to, I'm going to chip at you a little bit. because I feel like mainstream medicine have not uttered the words about natural immunity.

You all seem to know about it, said it's, you know, it's immunology 101, yet I can't remember the last time I heard a mainstream doctor mentioned natural immunity. I think you guys have always known, geez, if we talk about that, then my belief in vaccines will be undermined, and maybe my patients won't think about, you know, getting the vaccine. Am I wrong? I mean, I'm glad it's happening now, but I'm a little frustrated that it took, you know, a lie this big and a dangerous vaccine to actually get doctors to start telling the truth about

natural immunity? I think you hit the nail on the head with what you just said. There's a couple things here. One, most docs aren't exposed to vaccine injuries. So in general, if somebody says, how many people have died of the flu vaccine? Not that many. You know, there's a lot. So this is the first vaccine we've been exposed to in history where, you know, it's, as you know, this number of vaccine over this last year has trumped the amount of deaths that's occurred over the last 30 years. Correct. So the numbers game comes in and makes it really apparent that vaccines aren't always safe. But historically, you're sort of trained like, oh yeah, you know, we stopped smallpox. We did, you know, we did all these things, wonderful things with vaccines. What people don't know,

all right, for the public is the real reason we have a burst in population is basically clean water. Right. And I'm not taking anything away from vaccines. They help some things. But They, the clean water has led to a major rise in population that is, dwarfs everything else. It's probably 95% of the reason that we have a rise in population. So you need to put it in its perspective. So all these people saying vaccines are fantastic and now you're just going to kill all these people. No, it's clean water. That's the main thing that's basically done the job.

And to go to your point, yes, I think most of it, including me, really never thought that much about it. And now that I look back on it, I see that was probably a, mistake. We were letting it creep. I remember, you know, I don't know, Del, if you remember this, but back in the early 80s, they were saying, they cried wolf. Like, if we can't get, you know, the lawyers off us, we're not going to make these vaccines. And a lot of us were like, well, that seems kind of unfair, you know, like we don't, we want them to make good vaccines. And so that story stuck here into most of the people in my generation, like, oh gosh, we don't want the lawyers. The question of preference in the 1986 vaccines.

injury compensation program, which took all liability away. The industry is saying we're losing money from death and injury. Lawsuits against us on vaccines. They said to Ronald Reagan, if you don't protect us from liability, we're going to stop making vaccines. And of course, the medical industry said, whoa, don't let that happen. Give them the liability so we can keep this great life-saving measure on the shelves. And you remember, it's sort of paired with the smoking thing, with the smoking injury.

Like, well, we'll build a, we'll be fun like we did for smokers and asbestos. And it's like, well, okay, that's catching some of these people. It seemed reasonable at the time. Okay. All right. Well, I'm glad you're, you know, I'm glad we're able to have this conversation because it's what this is about. And I know I'm challenging a little bit.

Well, so when we start thinking about, you know, and a lot of the conversation at this hearing really started getting into the ethics. And one of the questions that I'm having, and I'm sure those of you that are, you know, fighting the good fight, shall we say, is how is it that so many doctors are going along with protocols and programs and decisions that seem completely unethical. So speaking of ethics, a guest that we've had on the high wire, this is Aaron Keriati talking about the ethics around this situation. I want to talk about medical ethics because I'm concerned that many of our pandemic policies have ignored foundational principles of medical ethics. During the initial lockdowns in 2020, hospitals, hospitals

sat empty. For weeks, hospital staff, including doctors, were even sent home as we had canceled surgeries and other procedures and were waiting for an influx of COVID patients that did not arrive until months later. We effectively abandoned patients that were suffering from other conditions and had other medical needs. Another thing that patients in the hospitals and their families were denied was the basic human good of bearing the dead. I don't know if folks are aware of this, but in the early days of the pandemic, a theoretical risk that maybe a corpse maybe might somehow, even though it contradicted all known science on respiratory viruses,

somehow still spread COVID. This is a very weird paranoid thought, caused many health departments with the support of the CDC to refuse to give the body back to the family, the bodies were, the bodies were incinerated, basically, and they would give you the ashes, whether or not you, whether you wanted a burial or not. One of the, one of the most painful conversations I had in the hospital. As the head of the ethics committee, I had a lot of conversations with families whose loved ones were dying of COVID. And this was a case of a patient

irretrievably, at that point, dying of COVID. The family had finally come to accept that difficult reality that the patient wasn't going to survive the hospitalization. And then they asked about help for funeral arrangements. And the social worker told them, no, I'm sorry. You know, we can't give your loved one back to you. We can't give the remains back to you, because the health department won't allow it.

So this theoretical, nonsensical risk that obviously turned out to be false anyway, was placed. above that basic human good of bearing the dead. No sane society in the history of humankind since the days of Antigone has ever done this to people. I mean, that testimony is so shocking. Of course, you really should see that the breadth of what was said there were cutting these into smaller pieces. But the idea we've seen that people that can't be with their loved ones when they are dying.

And then to add insult to the great, to the greatest injury and horror. Now you can't even get the body back. You can't, you know, doesn't matter what your religious belief is around how the body should be handled. We kept people from getting the bodies, all, none of it, based in any sort of science. You know, it reminds me, you know,

when we played a video sometime back of nurse Nicole Seratek who took a moment in the middle of an ER break that she was at, in tears saying how inhuman they were being, well, she appeared at the Senate hearing, and this is, again, her expressing just the incredible horror that is taking place inside of the hospitals. In May of 2020, I was one of the original nurses that went to NYC to help with the COVID pandemic. Because the pandemic and the hysteria that was created from poor public health measures and poor execution of appropriate early intervention strategies and the handicapping of medical professionals doing their job has led to, to where we are right now and into the crisis situation

that we are in. What we saw in these front lines, we knew what was happening. And when we asked for the IV-profen, they said, no, it was contraindicated. When we asked, like, why aren't we giving them steroids? Oh, well, it's not. We're just following orders. Following orders has led to the sheer number of death

that has occurred in these hospitals. I didn't see a single patient died of COVID. I've seen a substantial number of patients die of negligence and medical malfeasance. Now, while I was there and I saw that the pharmaceutical companies were rolling out remdissevere onto the patients, I tried to get a hold of the IRBs, I tried to get a hold of my appropriate chain of command, I tried CMS, I tried the Department of Health. And they rolled out remdissevere onto a substantial number of patients, for which we all saw it was killing the patients.

And now it's the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. Our level of health care has been deteriorated to substandard third world nation health care, whereas I tell people you are better off in South America in a field hospital than you are in level one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. I've had patients that haven't been bathed, haven't been fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned. And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital, this is a concentration camp. I mean, that's a very serious indictment. at so many, you can see the doctors and nurses in the background all nodding their heads.

Like, this is true. I mean, hospitals have been reduced to, you know, you'd be better off in a third world. She called it a concentration camp. So, you know, I went through this experience myself with my dad, and I found the nurse called me, said, the doctors don't go in the room. So what do you mean the doctors don't go in the room? Well, you know, it's COVID. We don't go in the room.

So doctors are not going into the room. If you think they are, they're not. You sit outside the room, they look at the numbers, and they walk, and then they go away. That's what's happening to people in the hospital. And, you know, if you can't go in and see them because you're going to maybe get COVID, they don't recognize it's a replication incompetent virus after about five or six days. And that's why you see the CDC change from 10 days down to five days, because it really is replication incompetent at that point. So there's no way to catch something.

If you went in and you got particles on you, that's like getting a vaccine on you. pieces of the vaccine basically pieces of the virus dead body parts so we have so many things that are just basically don't follow science and then you have what's happened in the hospitals where i could never get to see my dad he basically died without a scene we had to do it on zoom you know this is what is that moment like for a doctor i mean i mean a regular we we're reading about all these articles all these moments all these papers everything people saying i can't get to my family but we don't know the hospital system we don't know how it works we just know this glass don't I'm being held out. I can imagine that's frustrating. But for someone that moves in and out of hospitals

can say to someone, I'm a doctor myself, I want to see my father, and even you can't get in there? It was very frustrating. You know, the words, I knew I could. Okay, so I tried to think my dad's words are ringing in my ears. I'll be okay. Like, he's, he feels comfortable with his passing. He feels he has strong faith and, and he's like, I'll be okay. Like I could see him saying, don't get in trouble for me. And that was ringing in my ears. He didn't say that to me, but I knew that's what he would have said. And so in some sense, I was literally wanting to go, knowing that if I did go,

I'd probably have severe repercussions from it because no one else could go, like what makes me special that I can go. So I didn't go. It was very frustrating because I already knew that there's no way I can catch the virus because it's replication incompetent at that point. So I want to say that over and over again. When they're holding you out of the hospital, there's no reason. it the virus now you might get something else mycoplasma or some other thing in the hospital just like we always do when we go to the hospital it's full of germs and people don't know the hospital's full of germs

good to know it's true right it is truly one like it when i was working the doctor's television show they would say and it's sort of a new philosophy this soon as you can get out of hospital get out like it used to be hang out now like get up walk around you just had a heart surgery as soon as we can get get out of here we got mercer crawling on the walls CREs and everywhere. We don't want you to get infected. You got to get out of here. Doesn't matter how much Lysol we sprayed all over this place. We just can't seem to get ahead of it. Now, Nicole mentioned something, and I remember you really, and we don't have the clip, but you really got intense about the use of steroids, that, you know, there are treatments, is, might understand this, that we would use almost in any other respiratory condition or situation where someone comes in, especially an unknown one, it starts with steroids, yet that is not allowed. Or, right? What was that? She said we weren't using steroids when we know we could.

So back in March 2020, I knew right away that when you got into the later phase after the first week, steroids would make a lot of sense because many conditions, the inflammation from the viruses will cause us a lot of the problems. And we use steroids over and over and over again. And steroids reduce inflammation. They reduce swelling. They reduce inflammation. And they're a really important part of that process. They're probably the best drug for we have tons of drugs for inflammation. steroids are historically been the best drug.

And what they ended up using was really small doses of something called dexamethosone. So they're under treating. It's a disease of no treatment early and under treatment in the hospital where literally they give puny six milligrams of dexymethosone. Solumetrol is better. We can go much higher. I typically at the end of a surgery, a small surgery, like if I did a small resection of something on the face here, I usually give eight milligrams. And I do this about 4 to 500 a year where I always use 8 milligrams of dexamethone. For a small resection on the face, I do that for the last 30 years, at the end of the case, to reduce the swelling a little bit.

Here they are people, this is mass systemic disease, and they're giving six milligrams. So I just, I leave it out. What would be the proper dosage? Well, first of all, I probably wouldn't use that, but I'd probably use like 20 Q12 or 30 Q12, depending on the size of the person. So we sometimes go by sizes of the person. Sure. So basically, rather than... six a day, I do three times twice, three times a dose twice a day at least. So in a sense,

they're way under-treating with this. And that is the reason why you don't see people coming out of the hospital. Because the drugs are not only, are they not sequentially, you know, if you hear Peter McCullough talk, sequential multi-drug cocktail. What that means is viruses and cancer cells are very similar. You need to attack them from multiple places. So early in that first week we attack the virus. But in the second and third and fourth week, we're attacking the inflammation. We're attacking the blood clotting. We're attacking the respiratory distress. So there's a sequence of things we do as the disease progresses. And each individual patient may have something a little different that we might want to tweak the formula. Hello, that's how we practice.

And you heard me say it on there. It's called the practice of medicine for a reason, because there's always something new. If you have somebody who's 220 pounds diabetic, you know, five foot six, we might do it a little differently than someone who's, you know, five foot six and 110 pounds in 22 years old. Right. So every person is unique. And we know this. And they try to pass this over that this disease affects everybody.

Everybody's going to die. So many people haven't even come out of their house yet. So it's a scientific fraud in our job. And what you've done so well is bring that message to people. And thank you so much for all you have done. You are a true scientist. When I listen to you sometimes, I'm like, oh my God, Dell, did he go to medical school? I'm like, it's amazing.

We're pretty deep. I'm going to thank you for that. I know you are. I thank you for that compliment. So we had Dr. Christina Parks on our show a month or two ago that we taped it. She came up to me before this hearing and said, I just want to let you know that my father was with me. He got to see me on the high wire. And really, I lost him just a few days ago. She lost him just before having to do this hearing. And she said, I just want to thank you because that memory that I have of him seeing me on the high wire is an important memory. And it's one of the last memories I have. This is her talking about how her own father was handled in the hospital.

My dad just died. Right? He died Friday. Couldn't get a test. Couldn't get monoclonal antibodies. We treated him at home. Unfortunately, we had an oxygen machine that didn't work. So his blood saturation went down to the point where he was incoherent.

We called EMS. They said, your problem is your oxygen doesn't work. They put oxygen on him. He went to 98% saturation. We moved him to the hospital. He recovered all his cognitive functions. He was doing quite well. But he was no longer getting medications that reduces inflammation.

He was no longer getting medications that blocked the histamine response. He was no longer getting the medications that he needed. and he was no longer getting, you know, lung steroids. And he just declined and declined and declined until he passed away on Friday. And I say he passed away from lack of appropriate care. It's an incredible story she lays out there. Obviously, she's a doctor. She has the background.

She can treat her father at home, but they had an oxygen machine that didn't realize wasn't working. So once they get them in the hospital, oxygen comes up. and you would think, can you just continue all the drugs they had were working? Obviously, the oxygen was the only thing that went wrong, and they're like, no way, no how. I want to talk about that. So what happens is they get in the hospital, they put them on oxygen, then they think, well, let's get them something for anxiety. They give them some medazolam. They give them precedex.

It suppresses the respiratory depression. Before you know it, it's like knocking dominoes over. And I'm going to tell you, if anybody looks and you have people in your family that have passed away in the hospital, I can tell you what happened. They got Madaslam, they got Presidex, then they got Remdesivir, and it was basically knocking over dominoes all the way down. So this is give them psych drugs. Yeah, to get rid of the anxiety. This is very, very, very common, almost every patient that I encounter. Absolutely unbelievable. Remdesivir, obviously you mentioned this is a failed Ebola drug.

It was so toxic. They pulled it early from the Ebola trial saying this is a complete failure. I sort of read that as you're better off deal with. with Ebola than mess with this drug and yet it gets repurposed for this situation. We'll talk about it in a second, but this is Paul Merrick, who is, as I said, an ICU doctor for decades. His CV goes on and on and on. I believe he's credited with being the second most published ICU doctor in the world who was having a complete success treating his patients until the doctors told him he had to change his approach.

Listen to this story. If you look at the four independent studies, including the large study by the WHO, it shows remdesivir increases the risk of death. Let me say that again. Remdesivir increases the risk of death by 3%. It increases your chances of renal failure by 20%. This is a toxic drug. But just to make the situation even more preposterous,

the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe remdesivir to Medicare patients. The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication, which is toxic. It should be noted that remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%. It costs the WHO two cents. Two cents. So as regards dexamethasone, this is the wrong drug in the wrong dose for the wrong duration of time. Yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use this homeopathic dose of dexamethosone. Why?

Because the NIH tells them to do this. The NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA-approved drugs. These are FDA-approved drugs. These are not experimental drugs, which are cost-effective and safe, and have unequivocally, unequivocally been shown to reduce the death of patients in the ICU and in hospital. You are more likely to die from taking Tylenol than ivermectin, yet the FDA calls this a dangerous horse deworming medicine. Hospitals have become dangerous places for sick people. Patients must do whatever they can to avoid the hospital.

When they imprisoned in a hospital, they denied their rights. They are not allowed a patient advocate. Their family are denied access to the patient. They are prisoners in the system. They have no rights, and they get the treatment dictated by the hospital. There are dangerous places for sick people. And that's, for me, as a physician practicing, Hospital medicine for 40 years saddens me to the call.

I can tell you what happened to me. So I was using our protocol to treat critically ill patients in the ICU with a whole host of repurposed drugs. I then, this is a memo, this is a memo sent to the entire healthcare system, but they targeted me personally. And what did this memo say? These medications will not be verified or dispense for the prevention or treatment of COVID. This list includes either mectin, becalutamide, etopsycide, fluvoxamine, dutesteroid, and finesteroid.

And then just to stick it to me, they added acorbic acid. What was I to do? My hands were tied. As a clinician for the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I could not treat patients the way I had to be to treat patients. I had seven COVID patients, including a 31-year-old woman. I was not allowed to treat these people. I had to stand by idly.

I had to stand by idly watching these people die. I then tried to sue the system. And you know what they did? They did something called peer sham review. It is a disgusting and evil concept. They then accused me of seven most outrageous crimes that I had committed and that I was such a severe threat to the safety of patients. They immediately suspended my hospital privileges because I possessed, I posed such an outright threat. to these patients. Ignoring the fact that under my care, the mortality was 50% those of my colleagues.

So here I was standing up for patients' rights, and this hospital, this evil hospital, ended my medical career. So that's what they do. It's an outright, outrage, it's evil to the core. When people question why I use terms like Nuremberg trials, and I look at the, you know, smar me Chris Hayes and these people referencing doctors like this. One of the most decorated doctors in the history of the world losing his job because he was having a success rate 50% better than everyone else around him. No one asked, what are you doing? They took his tools away and forced him to watch his patients die. I'm sure there was some heated conversations in those hospitals that led to his losing his job.

You know, this is, it's so powerful. I mean, to feel, you could feel his care for his patients. I'm still a little choked up about it. You know, we all went through this. I remember back in even March 2020, when I was like, how can, I was talking to people on the medical board. And I was like, we can't let people die without treatment. I was just, I was completely appalled. And that's how I ended up on social media.

I literally talked to my wife and I said, look, I know how to do drug design. I know how to do this stuff. And I go, if I don't speak up, I don't know who is. And so. Of all the people in there, you have an understanding of the inner works in the FDA, how a drug gets approved. Why is that you have that sort of special? So I did nine years in a lab and I invented an FDA approved wound healing drug. that basically, you know, it's not that easy to do it.

And at the end of the day, the pharmaceutical companies end up, the pharmaceutical companies end up doing a lot of the work. But the original patent design, all the intellectual side of it was all done by me. At the end of the day, I do that over and over and over again as we go through practice. And a lot of other doctors are always problem solving. You're a critical thinker. And the critical thinking comes in when you go into medicine, like, okay, this is inflammatory. this is cardiac, this is pulmonary, and you start grouping things into categories,

and then you come up with solutions for each and every one of those things. That's medicine. And we weren't doing that. We were just like novel virus. I was like novel. There's 63, you know, I work with, I'll tell you this, like when I looked at it, I was like, okay, how many, how many things could affect coronavirus? In about two hours, I found like eight things that might affect it. This is back in early March. And so within a very short period of time, I said, here's some tools for the toolbox. I didn't know if they're going to work, but it was clear that they had worked against SARS and MERS. And so these are other coronaviruses with 78% similarity. And I thought, well, it's worth a try, at least give these drugs a try. But at the very least,

we've got to treat the inflammation. We've got to treat the blood clotting. We've got to treat the respiratory demise. That's not hard at all. We already have all those drugs. We don't have to invent anything new. So that's why I said, and it shook me up kind of hearing him because he knows how to be a doctor in the ICU. You address each and every problem. And in a unique way. Sometimes you don't, but you have tools in the toolbox and you pull them out when you need them. And that is how we've always practiced medicine. And this current, this current corporate practice, this current, I don't even know what to say about it, this current system we now have is so corrupt that, just shocking some of those older guys. We just can't believe we're sitting here having to let patients languish and die at home or languish and die in the hospital with puny doses of dexamethone. antibiotic and a drug that's a Molnapyrivar and Remdesvere, old nucleoside analogs.

These drugs are from the 1950s. They put a little bo-a-tie on it. This is not creativity, Dell. These are not creative thoughts. This is old nucleoside analogs from the 1950s. They're mutation drugs. They mutate your mitochondria. They mutate every single cell in your body if it's replicating, including like cancer cells.

That's why they're old cancer drugs. And they use them for viruses. So it's killing viruses, killing cancer cells, killing your normal. cells, your mitochondria especially. So this is what we're left with. It's a shame and I just can't believe it. But we're going to reinvent and that's what you're leading the world too. That's what we're doing now, our doctor group. We're going to go through messaging. We're going to form our own medscape. I can't wait to have that press release. It's going to happen real soon. We're going to reinvent telehealth. We're going to reinvent urgent and ambulatory care and we're going to form

hospitals and surgery centers. This has to stop and we're going to work hard to make it stop. I agree with you in the high wire, and I know other groups like ours will do everything we can to help make that dream and reality. We need to do it for ourselves. This isn't about helping you or helping. This is about our future. When you have one of the greatest ICU doctors that ever lived saying hospitals are dangerous places for sick people, you know, Houston, we have a problem. I want to step into the vaccine discussion now. There's a lot of conversations about the vaccine, but one of the questions would be, what is in this thing?

I mean, for doctors that are trying to figure out what am I dealing with. If I have an injury, I need to know how to treat it, I need to know what it is. This is a brand new technology that has never been injected in my understanding into any animal other than human beings. Never went through animal trials. It's sort of raised to gene therapy that's been, you know, turned into a vaccine and whatever it is. This is Dr. David Weissman, complaining about exactly this. Why can't we find out what is in it?

In every single drug package insert, you see a chemical chemical, structure. Don't do you not. There is a chemical structure. We need to know the exact chemical structure, the exact sequence of the RNAs and the DNAs in these vaccines. They are being withheld from us. FDA needs to show us what those structures are. I mean, you can imagine the frustration of that. Well, who might know what's in it? Perhaps, you know, one of the guys that's really sort of leading this. We're trying to figure it out himself, but has some understanding of the background. Why? Because he invented it. This is Dr. Robert Malone talking about one of the issues he's very concerned about fertility.

These lipid nanoparticles go all over the body, just as Richard is saying. And oddly, they seem to differentially go to ovaries and bone marrow, but ovaries relative to testes. And it's important everybody kind of latches onto this and they say, oh, there's spike protein in the ovaries. No, that's not what they measured. They didn't ever measure spike protein. What they measured was the lipid component, these synthetic lipids, which is the other thing you didn't mention in this cocktail. in this cocktail, these synthetic lipids go to ovaries. Now who cares?

Well, when your child is born, when your daughter is born, she has all the eggs she's ever going to have in her ovaries. And we do know that, and the CDC now finally acknowledges after women all over the world complaining about their altered menses and getting, I mean, it was, I felt like I was in the mid, mid-20th century, it was attributed to hysteria, much as you're on the story.

These alterations and menstruation were believed to represent hysterical women. The CDC is now acknowledging it. The thing is that the ovary drives menstruation, as Ryan will, I'm sure, attest. Hormonally, the ovary drives menstruation. When we're seeing altered, altered menstrual cycles, we're seeing the phenomena of postmenopausal women starting to bleed.

That's a hallmark that something's going on in the ovaries. And we know that these lipids are going to the ovaries. We know that these are synthetic abnormal fats that insert into membranes and change the charge of cell surfaces. That's all true. And unfortunately, apparently, the FDA, The FDA made a determination that they would treat these products using their standard checklist approach for a standard vaccine. And they did not use the checklist that they would use for gene therapy.

And furthermore, they didn't make any special accommodation for the novel nature of this technology, which has not been previously characterized. And so what we end up with is the FDA making a decision to move forward with a data package that's grossly inadequate, we have a clear trail of breadcrumbs about reproductive toxicity that's not being followed up. And I am concerned about our children. I'm concerned about all of those effects. Brain, heart, blood coagulation, reproductive system, immunologic system, and furthermore, they're not at risk for this virus. Why are we doing? doing this and mandating these vaccines for children just breaks my heart.

It's impossible for me to wrap my head around the fact that this guy is not on every news channel in the country and in the world. This is a man who knows what he's talking about. He's so clearly understands he works somewhat like you do. He's worked with the FDA. He's worked in the Department of Defense. He knows what it takes to he works on repurposing drugs. He knows he was part of designing this drug, this vaccine, this gene therapy, as he calls him. And we get attacked for calling a gene therapy. It's a vaccine. I mean, here you have the inventor himself.

How do you explain? I mean, I know you're not in media, but it doesn't boggle your mind that when the inventor comes out and says, I think we have a problem here. These lipid particles are showing up in the ovaries, and that means the baby, these little girl, you're going to give this to a little girl, a child, whatever it's doing in her It's permanently, it could permanently be causing damage that will affect her ability and fertility, perhaps, in her future or generations to come. And yet, all they do is sit there and giggle and smirk on these news agencies that some, you know, out there, you know, guy that doesn't know what he's talking about. It's so inappropriate.

No, it's so inappropriate. Lip and nanoparticles have been used for other things. And Robert is absolutely, Robert Malone is, as you said, he, if he, if he, he, he, he, he, can't speak about this, who can't. Right. He's invented this technology. He knows it intimately. And it's just, we have the Pfizer

biodistribution data, which you know about, which shows it goes to the bone marrow, it's going to the ovaries. It's going to the brain. It's not in that. It's not in that. He mentioned it in a backwards way. When you're doing a drug design, you have to look at brain accumulation.

With the vaccine, you don't. Because guess what? Vaccines don't usually go to the brain. All right? I tell people like a normal vaccine can't get out of the room unless you open the door. But a lipid nanoparticle in case vaccine could slip under the door cracks. They're like garlic. Isn't it technically designed to do that?

It's technically designed that way. So for the audience, if you haven't heard it, lipid nanoparticles, one of the things we were trying to do is get lipid nanoparticle particles to carry chemotherapy to the brain. It's one of the things that was good about them was like maybe we could direct chemo to the brain without having to do intrithel therapy, spinal tap to the brain. brain okay so that's what they were used for but guess what happened with lip and nanoparticles they ended up with the ovaries they ended up in the bone marrow they ended up in places we really didn't want them to go we don't want to carry chemo to the to the ovaries or or the bone got it all right so this is when they first were designed I knew right away they were going to go to the brain and the

bone marrow in the ovaries because that's what lip and nanoparticles do and guess what how many ACE2 receptors are in the ovaries a lot is it going to create inflammation yes Yes, it is. So we need to be cautious, very cautious, and giving this to young women. Women are born with the amount of eggs that they have from the time of birth. So any age that you give it is going to potentially create massive inflammation in the ovaries, potentially. I'm thankful to say that I hope that that doesn't happen.

I'm going to be cautiously optimistic and say that I pray that it doesn't happen. But to not look at this scientifically, it's the worst thing I've ever seen. I can't even believe that obese are actually recommended it's to pregnant women. We never recommend it. That's another area. So you have young women of childbearing age getting a product that causes inflammation in their ovaries taking this drug. And you have women who are pregnant taking this. I've never seen this in medicine.

Never, never. Because of the thalidomide scare, we've always been very careful with. Thalidomide being the drug that was given for morning sickness, I understand. And then the babies ended up being born, missus. limbs and things like that. We never give this to pregnant women because of that. Right. The Lidomite scare where they had massive amounts of women having babies that were significantly had loss of limbs and that way that's still if you just look at the pictures if you haven't seen them go look on there you'll see the pictures you'll see why this came about

we don't give pregnant women new products. How many pregnant women were in the Pfizer and Moderna trials? It was a really small number I don't remember because sometimes it's less than a hundred And the one thing that wasn't in the trials, they never allowed a person who already had COVID into the trials. None of the trials had a patient in there with somebody who already had COVID. So if you had COVID, you're not in there. So they went out of their way to kind of exclude pregnant women. But of course, some people found out they were pregnant while they were in the trial and exclude people who had COVID recovered. And they did that for a reason.

They didn't want the bad outcomes that would likely come from giving a new product to those. groups. Next, we have an issue that we've spoken about on the show with Ryan Cole, who is a pathologist, has looked at, you know, hundreds, if not thousands, I guess, cases of cancer and everything else. And this is what he has to say about vaccines and cancer. I do about 40,000 biopsies here. I'm a busy pathologist, and I thought, gosh, I'm seeing more of this type of cancer and this type of cancer and this type of cancer. And so I've tried to talk to other laboratories to aggregate a bigger data set, which obviously these federal data sets are a very easy way to see that signal. Obviously, I've been canceled, I've been ridiculed, I've been maligned, etc.

for saying so, but I've been observing it. And I can't deny observation. That's how science happens initially through observation. So we have genes in our body. We have mechanisms in our body. We have bad cells in our body every day. Our body says, oh, I can kill that, knock it off, you know, shake his hands. with every cell, you're gone, you're gone, you're a bad cell. There are genes, there are

suppressor genes, P53, it's the guardian of our genome. There's another breast cancer gene, broca gene. We know that the spike protein binds to the receptors for these genes and can activate them. That is a mechanism of the spike protein. So putting this spike protein in the human body via a gene shot that is completely investigated, These are not approved and to mandate something that's investigational that can bind to cancer and now when we travel with these groups and summits I have oncologists I have radiation oncologists I am seeing an uptick in cancers I'm seeing these odd stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines it is happening we need federal funding the NIH isn't looking at this getting a grant to look at anything related to the vaccines is next to impossible as I was sort of listening to these, you listen to these specialists, they got a cancer

specialty, have a heart doctoring, all these specialists. You know, the vaccine makers are biologists, right, and immunologists. They make a back, they understand one part of it. But if the thing starts causing cancer, they don't know what the hell that means. That, Brock a gene, what is that, what is that to a vaccine maker? So you have like this totally uneducated group on what, all the issues that are now being created by the vaccine they made. And yet the specialist, they're now saying now this vaccine has just jumped into my area of expertise and I need to speak about what I'm seeing and the news is saying, well, we side with the immunologists or the ones that made the vaccine on this and this is just a crazy person. It's not a crazy person. This is a specialist that knows

exactly what he's talking about. He's saying we're seeing a rise in cancer. And I mean, I'm hearing this all over the country that people are seeing this rise in strange cancers and return of cancers of those that were in remission. So my background is that one of the best cancer hospitals in the world for for for as chief there so you know I have a big background there too and this is a very scary thing it's blocking the guardian of the genome p53 the spike is going into the nucleus and binding up something that whenever your DNA is made it basically sometimes breaks apart and makes rearrangements and sometimes those rearranges make mutations and the p53 make sure that those mutations are fixed and and it's a repair it's a tumor it's a mutation repair

gene basically and Brocka also so that's what these are doing and the interfering with those is going to make a lot of mutations potentially make a lot of cancer cells and so as he said we literally need to see the data from big databases like the VA and other federal databases in in my own clinic where we have huge number of patients over 300,000 a year basically we see we've seen a big uptick in Bell's palsy and in shingles so we're seeing the tumor the the immune system, which takes care of cancer and viruses, is definitely being affected by this virus. I mentioned it earlier, P53 and BRCA, the two tumor suppressor genes, and then the tolek receptors,

which involve immune surveillance of these viruses running around the body. These are things that we all have to deal with, and they should be being looked at. And instead, the CDC stopped tracking data May of last year. There's no reason for that. They're spending $27 billion given it to Pfizer. We need some data for the research. We need autopsies. We need the ability to track this so we can help people.

And we're going to do it. We're going to do without it. We're doing it now. We get together. Ryan and I were talking the last two nights about how we can start collecting more data on the cancer side. If we see just a dramatic rise in cancer, let's be extreme about it. Let's say cancer doubles, you know, in 22, 23. Do you think that that will be detected?

and is it possible for them to cover that up? And how will they cover that up if it happened? So great thing. I mean, you look at what just happened, that insurance company, the actuaries came up with the data. I don't know if you talked about it on the show. But basically. Yeah, so it came by accident. We ended up finding out that in this one insurance company, 40% more deaths.

A 10% rise would be a one in 200 year phenomenon. A 40% rise is, you know, one in a minute. million or so. I believe that's the age group 18 to 64, if I remember correctly, 40% rise in the group. The productive people working people of the world, 18 to 64. So you're looking at the most driving the economy. These people are dying. These are highly insured people, most of them. So what you're finding is that data is being collected and it accidentally got slipped out. So that's how we're going to have to get this data. They're not going to voluntarily look for it. They're not looking. So it's going to be hidden. I don't know if you're listening.

yesterday you were there on Monday when they said that the data was changed. I don't know if you talked about that on the show, but they actually took the data from the federal database, and actually when they went back to look, they found it had been altered from, you know, just the look they had from two months ago. So instead of being like 784, it was down to a smaller number. Oh, yeah.

Just cases being removed, things being removed from the data. Yeah, things were being removed. So, you know, we're going to find out because eventually, you know, people die, enough people die, you're going to know. But it's going to be a, it's already a tragedy, and we have to prevent it from being a bigger tragedy. That's why the positive message is we're not going to stop. We're going to keep going.

We've got a group of doctors, 17,000 now, and we're going to get more on board. Hopefully it'll be 30 and 40 and 50, and we'll grow the movement and we'll prevent it. They're using physicians like they did in Nazi Germany to say, those people are eugenics. They're not good people. Let's get rid of them.

And they're using us to do the same thing again to turn us into the vaccine unvaxed, the bad versus the good. They're using our profession and we're going to stand up against it. And we need more doctors. If you're a doctor out there, a nurse, we need to stand up against it. We need to do this together. This is Peter McCullough talking about the academic fraud that's taking place. The CDC in the last few days said there's five more papers showing the vaccines even with Omicron are associated with the reduction in hospitalization.

But it's only in U.S. hospitals, not in South Africa, not in Germany, not in Denmark, not in the U.K., and not in Israel. Americans should be asking the question, why are the vaccines only working against hospitalization, but they don't work against binary occurrence of the respiratory illness or reduce spread, and they don't reduce mortality? But why do they only reduce hospitalization? And by the way, they reduce hospitalization. in most studies in the United States by 85%. How does that happen?

That is basically academic fraud. And this is something we're talking about today. We're looking at data that's coming in. We're now seeing in Scotland, increased risk of infection amongst those receiving the vaccines. And it sort of gets worse. One dose, you know, it's about a third is, you know, more. And then by two dose of the vaccine, twice the amount of infection,

twice the amount of these conditions. So clearly yet here in America, America are being told, oh, no, the vaccine is working great. We see studies all over seeing a rise and death. We're seeing in multiple cases where the people dying that were vaccinated from COVID are being put in the unvaccinated category. Yet here in the United States of America, we're still hearing pandemic of the unvaccinated, even though they're backing that away in Canada because they know the data is now showing that that's not true. They're backing away, I believe, it was in Germany admitting health ministers saying, sorry, clerical error or computer error,

as it turns out, we overblue this unvaccinated problem. But here in America, where we're supposed to have the greatest hospital system in the world, the home of Microsoft and Apple, and here is the place where our data seems more corrupted than everywhere else. And what he's saying here, it's not possible. We can't look at data coming from all over the world. Same people, two arms, two legs, same vaccines being used, breathing the same air circulating in the planet.

They can't be having totally different results than we're having here. Is that what he's getting to? It is so true, and I don't even know what to say to it, other than to say, to point out, thankfully, Scotland and England are actually given us real data where we see that the vaccinated are dying in higher numbers right now. And if you look at the per 100,000, I mean, this is what we're seeing. And, of course, we have to look at that to see why. Why, we want to help people.

We want to help the vaccinated people. We want to help the unvaccinated. We want to help everybody. And the only way we could do that is to have honest information and transparency. So as we go forward, if we don't get that, we should all be upset, not just the vaccinated people, unvaccinated people. All of us ought to be, why can't we get real information? And thankfully, we have some so that we can at least draw attention to it and say, look, this is really happening. And I just can't believe how arrogant they are.

I mean, I'm still in shock about it almost every day when I literally come in and I literally come in and I, see them go on TV and say 99% of the people in the hospital are unvaccinated. And to bring to your point, Pierre Corey talked about this. What we're seeing is if you're vaccinated, a lot of those people in the ICU are said vaccination status unknown. Unknown. And let me say, I had one nurse and she wanted to do Project Veritas. I said, don't do it. You're just going to get destroyed.

But 16 of 17 people were vaccinated, listed as vaccination status unknown. in the hospital in Houston, Texas. Yeah. Wow. 16 to 17. So Dr. Peter McCullough, who is a heart specialist, that's what he has written more articles on it and been published on this more than anyone in the world. So when he starts describing the issue of myocarditis

and what is happening here, I would listen. There are great unknowns with respect to the vaccines, their mechanism of action and disease categories like cancer, but there is a disease category upon which the FDA, the CDC, and all stakeholders agree that the vaccines cause, and that's myocarditis or heart inflammation. Now, I will tell you, as a cardiologist, it is crystal clear that these vaccines cause myocarditis. We now have over 200 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on myocarditis.

Sadly showing the rates of myocarditis are far in excess of what the CDC ever imagined. It is clear the risks of the vaccines are far greater than the risks of COVID-19. I'm telling you as a specialist, myocarditis is not mild. There are papers by shower and now by Trong, the University of Utah at Salt Lake. When they do MRI on these individuals with suspected myocarditis, 100% are having heart damage. There is the father of a boy here in this room who's died of myocarditis.

One death is too many. One. One. We have 21,000 cases of myocarditis and climbing in the United States that the CDC is verified. One was too many. Under no circumstances, under any circumstances, should a young person ever, receive one of these vaccines, let alone ever be pressured to receive a vaccine, let alone ever be mandated to take a vaccine.

Every time I see a Facebook post with someone saying, look at my young five-year-old, just did what was right, got her vaccine, or he got his vaccines, doing his part for America. Like, I just, something, some part of me inside, like dies. I feel the same. As I think about the greatest heart doctor in the world, what he's saying here. Nobody should be getting this thing. How did the CDC approve this thing? I mean, this to me, this is what starts stacking up as crimes against humanity.

You are, you know, the studies show that myocarditis, he says there's no, there's no mild case of myocarditis. Many of the studies show that within 10 years, 50% of those that suffer myocarditis will be dead. I mean, is that, I mean, think of that future for these children that had zero risk from this disease. What you're seeing over and over from the doctors, we've seen patients gasping for breath. We're there with them, treating them. And you feel that when you're with the person. You're trying to save their life.

And I mean, this is why Peter's emotional. He's seen it happen. And this is why Merrick sat and watched seven people die. This, with your hands tied behind your back, it literally should not be happening. No one is rising up for these children. No one's rising up for these people. And that is the heart of why we're here.

And that's the heart of why we want to keep going forward. Because we are letting people down. We are letting people be fed to slaughter. We are feeding people to slaughter with this vaccine. This vaccine is not safe for children. And what Peter said, you know, mechanistically, a lipid nanoparticle goes through tight junctions. We talked about it with the brain just a few minutes ago. The heart basically has pretty tight junctions too.

It slips. The lipid nanoparticles slips through and gets to the periscites on the outside of the cell walls, which have a lot of ACE2 receptors. The virus doesn't do that. The virus, remember I told you, the virus has to have the door open. So the lipid nanoparticle does not. That's why the virus is not as bad on myocarditis as the lipid nanoparticle, because the lipid nanoparticle gets through to where all the ACE2 receptor.

receptors are on the periscites. And that is the reason why we're seeing such a high rise in myocarditis in these children, because the tight junctions get a little bit loosened up with exercise. And so at the end of the day, there's mechanisms and there's data. And the data is one in about least one in 2700 of these kids are getting mildocarditis. It is not mild. The tissue repair, wound healing, scarring with my background, it doesn't come back. They don't come back. It's scar tissue. You know, Chris Hayes talks with somebody mentions the athletes, the over 100 athletes that have plunged face first into the pitch. There's a quote in an article. We have a video that keeps going.

We take out those ones to find out whether they're vaccinated or not. But I can't remember a time in history. I cannot. And it's been our question here. We're not saying the vaccine's causing these people to grab their hearts, these soccer players, many of them tennis players, football players, plunge face forward onto the grass. But what we are saying is when do you ever remember seeing videos like this, seeing stories like this, in the numbers that we're seeing them all at the same time that, you know, what Peter McCullochol is saying is true. They have admitted these vaccines cause, you know, blood clots, rhombocytopin, myocarditis, paracarditis. Is it really that hard to think that this forced vaccination program and athletes all around the world could be having a detrimental effect, especially to those that are maybe, you know,

highly strenuous athletes. So think about what we're talking about here. We have you and Senator Johnson arranging groups of doctors, not the FDA and the CDC and the NIH. How does that make sense? How are they not doing autopsies? Right. How is they don't care? It's crazy. All these people are dying. Where are the groups of doctors trying to figure out the scientists saying let's find out, let's do the autopsies. Let's find out what happened. Let us try really hard. Let's all group together. We can beat this together. That's how we do things. We're human beings. We're social constructed groups. We go in groups. That's why we form groups and that's why you're bringing us together Because you know together we're going to be stronger and at the end of the day

This makes no sense and we've got to come up with a way to fight back and the only way we fight back is by grouping ourselves together and and saying we're gonna do the autopsies We're gonna find the data. We're gonna do our own studies. We're gonna collect our own information and then we're gonna publish and we're gonna quickly think and we're gonna make a we're going to make changes as we go. Oh, this virus right now is changed enough. We're not going to use de-tastoride anymore because it's not binding TMPRSS as too. We're going to make changes as we go because, again, the practice of science

is not just cut in stone. It changes constantly. And as the virus is changing constantly, as the entire disease representation constantly changing, so obvious. Well, it wouldn't be right to not give a moment for Senator Ron Johnson, who is really

put his neck out on the line of this. I mean, I didn't see any senators in the room. It's shocking. He's not surrounded by a body of senators that are all saying, hey, man, I'm here. I've loved to hear what he got. Hopefully, they're watching on a feed somewhere else. But he's out there all alone,

and this is a little bit of what he had to say. These are real world experiences from people that are on the front lines that are treating patients. And it's different from probably anything you've heard unless you've been following these people, in the media, trying to break through, trying to convey the American public and provide the information that I think we all need, that we all deserve.

Now, you know, my antenna is always up because I'm getting cues of spreading misinformation all the time. So I can imagine how the news media is going to treat so much of this. They're going to pick little phrases out, and they're going to pick it apart. And they're going to try and marginalize this entire event. This shouldn't have been necessary as our information grew, as we became better and better educated, less ignorant about the coronavirus, COVID, the COVID vaccines, this should have been made public every step along the way. But it wasn't. So again, I'm just asking the viewing public to have an open mind. respect these individuals who have paid a significant price professionally, reputational.

These are highly qualified individuals. They speak from experience. We've got to fix this problem. We can't let this continue. We can't let it happen in the future. I mean, we were just saying it. And one of the things that I say to people is that, you know, I might be jaded. I'm a journalist. You know, I've always investigated stories where

malfeasance is taking place. I tend to say people, especially large corporations that make billions of dollars, they lie, they cheat, they're there to make money, they're there to pay off their stockholders, and pharma is no different. You know, just like when, you know, shell oil spills, you know, unbelievable amounts of oil, they don't just call up and say, hey, come and help us, let's work on this, let's fix us. They try to hide it. Like a kid with their hand in the cookie jar from the moment, you know, You know, there's something about human beings or nature is to just lie about it. Okay, I can accept that.

That's what a corporation does. What is so shocking right now is that we know that that's what corporations do. We know these pharmaceutical industries pay out billions of dollars for having lied about the safety of their products. Then they get caught. We're able to sue them and get to the bottom of it. We can't sue this product. We cannot sue. It's being protected.

We cannot get to this information. And the one group that is supposed to be monitoring and watchdogging this, the FDA, the C, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services, they're supposed to be protecting us. And in every situation here, as you said, they're not doing autopsies. They could care less.

They're not looking at 22,000 deaths now on bears and saying, well, that's our system, but we don't trust it because we never decided to make one that we actually trust it. It works. Even though when they say it's, you know, it's inefficient at capturing data, it's never been to the positive side.

No one has ever done a study and said bears is overreporting the issues. every single investigation of Bear says it's underreporting between 10% to 100% underreporting. 22,000 deaths by most estimates means there's got to be at least 200,000 people have died and it could be as high as 2 million if Harvard Medical School's investigation was correct.

When you think about this as a doctor, you've been in the FDA situation. You had to get through that FDA gauntlet. Has the FDA changed or has it always been this totally corrupt and captured? The capturing's gotten more and more over the last two decades. And I would say that there was a lot of barriers to entry,

and it's very hard. If you want to get a drug through back in the 1990s, you would spend $600, $700 million to get it through. It's a lot of barriers to entry. So it's always been a big money game. So I'm not shocked and surprised. Part of me would say, gosh, Dell, if Remdesivir was amazing and saved everybody's lives for $3,000,

I would have looked the other way, honestly. I wouldn't be here fighting, because they were saving lives. Right. At the end of the day, I wouldn't be here. I'm here because we have data now. What I love is the truth comes out. Data from the insurance company,

40% more deaths from 18 to 64. Hello, we know. We know there's something there. It's a smoking gun. The VERS data. It's blowing away every other year. You know, it's blowing it away. So there's plenty of crumbs sitting around to tell us,

you know, the fact that Harvard, the head of Harvard's CV, still has his job after putting out a complete lie is, can you imagine that? Yeah. Head of Harvard's TV. Lancet, you know, putting out fake papers. These are things that we've, they, there's, nobody's afraid. They're just out and out lying to the public and controlling a complete media the whole time.

So here we are because we're a small force. But you can see, and I know you know, 30, 40% of the people are woke up to the point they're listening. And those are the ones we're going to talk to. And we're going to go for the other 60%, 70%. We're going to bring everybody in, but we've got to start with hot

coals. We've got to start with the people who are on fire to learn the truth. And at the end of the day, you know, we've got to go against this complete corruption because it's real and it's big. And I'm sure that we're targets in some way. You for sure. Me, I'm pretty small. But I mean, at the end of the day,

you're bringing truth. And so thankful for what you're doing. Like, I can't thank you enough. I can't. Well, speaking of hot fire and corruption, I think the person probably encapsulated the sort of internal rage and frustration you're probably feeling at home, and certainly these doctors that are finding themselves in the middle

of it are feeling. I'm going to give the last word from this event to Pierre Corrie. I'm sorry to have to do this. I feel like a broken record. But I'm listening to my colleagues. Call out all of the inanities, the insanityes, the absurdities. these departures of our policies from what we know are to be scientific truths. These things like denial of natural immunity.

We have to understand why. To sit here and point fingers and they're doing this wrong and that wrong, why are they doing this? There could be multiple reasons. The simplest and most easily understandable and provable is every vaccine, every these, you know, these novel patented high-cost drugs is profits. They are putting profits ahead of people. You know, we can call attention to all of these policies. They are non-scientific.

They're failing at having scientific support, yet they're being carrying out and they're being distributed across the country. And doctors and states and health departments are willingly accepting this without question, without critical thinking. And that's what I want us to be clear that we're calling attention to today. This is corruption. Plain and simple. It's corruption. Sorry. Hi. They love him. Yeah, I love Dr. Pierre Corey, his passion, you know, as we sort of close this up, you guys, what is, first of all, what is the best way to track all the work that frontline doctors are, like, is there a website?

So our current group, this International Alliance of Physician Scientists, we're putting out stuff on Global COVID Summit. Of course, Pierre was doing the FLCCC, but he's a core founding member of the group. And so we are trying to coordinate ourselves to do more, which is like I was just saying, we're going to go into information. That's important. We have to have a place where people can go, and it's not run by a pharmaceutical company. Medscape is run by a pharmaceutical company. WebMD is run by pharmaceutical company.

We're going to have a messaging. We're going to come out. The press release will be here. Then we're going to go and do telehealth where you can come and you have trusted doctors. They're not going to care if you're vaxed or standing upside down or whatever you are. They're going to take care of you. And then move into more of the ambulatory care and then move into hospitals. And then we're going to get into supply chain side.

We're going to keep growing the system because like you said, we have to reinvent. We're going to do it. We can do it and we're going to do it. We have a great team to start with. Well, this is how it happens, right? This is what change takes. It's a birth. You sort of have to have the old die and the new begins.

And so, you know, I really appreciate being around. You guys, it feels so blessed and honored to get to spend this time with you, the time that we all, you know, had in D.C. And I look forward to future events to come. And I am hopeful. I am hopeful. It is great to see guys like yourself finally talking about natural immunity again. I think that there's a place.

There's a, you know, a coming together of different thoughts, of different modalities, and a future to medicine and science that is so exciting if we can get past, I call these Neanderthals of medicine that are clinging to their relevance in a dying perspective. And we've got to get it. We've got to pry medicine back out of the hands of bureaucrats. These are not people that we vote for. We cannot have health departments deciding whether we get to work our jobs or whether we can breathe the air. And as you pointed out so well, I have never gone to the CDC or the FDA or the NAH for any question. I want to thank you for answering our questions today. It's really been spectacular, all right?

Thanks, though. Appreciate you. All right, thank you. Yes, sir. All right. Look, if you're watching the show, I know many of you, you know, and it's beautiful. When we get attacked in all these articles, one of the great side effects is that new voices and new eyes and new hearts come to us and say, I want to check out what was being attacked. What is it they're so afraid of?

Well, maybe you've been injured by a vaccine. Maybe you took those vaccines. Okay. one has their moment, as I said at the beginning of the show, that wakes them up. But if you need help and you're trying to deal with that injury, we'd like to help. And so we've decided a program to get involved. If you or a loved one has been injured after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, including if you are a participant in a clinical trial, go to injured by COVID-vaccine.com. Submissions are confidential. We are here to help provide support, including connecting with medical specialists

and potentially securing legal representation. To assure the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for everyone, it is imperative that every person injured by this product report their injury. We can provide assistance completing a report to the CDC's vaccine adverse events reporting system. So if you or a loved one has suffered an injury from a COVID-19 vaccine, go to Injured by COVID-vaccine.com now. Well, it's been an incredibly powerful and deep and scientific show today. Once again, it'll probably be one of our longest.

I want to remind you that we do this show every Thursday. We could probably break these shows up into multiple days across the week, but that would take a team 100 times as big as what we have in order to vet and make sure we're getting the stories right, which is why we've decided to cover everything we have to cover on Thursday. But immediately, as soon as we're finished with the show today, an amazing team, a very small team, but dedicated and passionate team of individuals, will start cutting these pieces out so that if you just want to watch the breakdown of the

Senate hearing, you just want to get that piece to your friends by this evening, you'll be able to start delivering those pieces. Or if you only want to watch the show a little bit at a time, all of that's available to you. And I know I don't have to say this because now six million of you have figured out how you want to get through this show and experience this with us. I want to thank you. I'm telling you. I guess just people that could brag about six million. I'm not happy with that. I, you know, someone said to me six million. Well, that's amazing. No, you know what would be amazing? A hundred million. You know it would be more amazing than that than a billion. Because this isn't about how big this show is. This show represents the truth and the more people that watch it and the more I hear that watch and the more that walk up to be in airports and say, hey, I'm watching the high wire. the more I know we are getting closer and closer to that divine future that Dr. Richard Urso was just describing,

a place with new hospitals and systems that get back to the doctor-patient relationship, where we embrace new technology, where we embrace natural health and natural immunity. All of that is on the horizon. It's a light that shines on the edge of these very dark clouds we find ourselves in the middle of. Those clouds are lifting, and if anything showed us that, it was that this weekend that the people are rising up. I know that the next rally that we're going to put together will be even bigger than that and they know it and that's what's so powerful.

They are scared. They are afraid because their news agencies are crumbling. Their hospitals aren't trusted. Their doctors aren't trusted and now the confidence in the CDC and the FDA and the National Institute of Health and Fauci himself is coming down and boy

are they afraid that you might start voting for politicians that decide to say I'm going to question the science of vaccines and I'm going to have an investigation of Tony Fauci. You better get involved in your politics that way. I don't care if it's a Democrat. I don't care if it's a Republican, but they better answer to your concerns over what happened in this pandemic and what happened with this vaccine. Because an investigation is needed. A half a million people at least, if we are correct about the dangers of remdesivir and the success of hydroxychloroquine

and ivermectin that we've seen around the world. If we're right, then 500,000 people were murdered by medical malpractice here in the United States of America, led by Tony Fauci. I'm sorry. Those are Holocaust level numbers. And if this vaccine proves to have issues of antibody dependent enhancement, which was in the hearing, but we didn't cover it today, but myocarditis and infertility, if we lead to destroying the fertility of the world, if we end up seeing this vaccine continue to make those more sick, to have antibody dependent enhancement where the next time someone comes across a flu virus or a coronavirus that the vaccine helps that virus kill them and raises the death toll. If we keep seeing the 40% rise, what happens if it goes to 50% or 60% rise?

What if the death rates in America start doubling because of this vaccine program or even worse? We could be looking at millions of deaths in our future, even billions. And so for anyone that says, you're not allowed to make the comparison to the Holocaust because that was an atrocity. If these numbers bear out, if these issues end up proving true, then they are comparable. And all I have ever asked for, no one is calling for violence. In fact, I will be the first to say we are a peaceful and loving movement.

I don't need to be violent. I have the greatest lawyer in the world. Aaron Siri is winning against the government. We have beat the CDC. We've won against the FDA. We've won against the National Institute of Health. We've won against Health and Human Services. There it is. There's the list of the cases that we've won right there. We're winning. I use the

courtrooms and so I guess if you're threatened by my statement that I'm going to have trials that come after you should only really be a threat if you're worried about going to jail. But don't try to turn that into some threat of violence. We're not threatening violence. We don't need violence. We have the truth. We have the courtrooms and we're winning. And I know you know that. So for all of you out there, your support is making this possible. These lawsuits have got them on the run. And believe me, now is the time.

Now is the time we want to come at them hard because this is when they made mistakes. This is when they start trying to cover up their tracks. And in covering up their tracks too soon, they reveal what they've done here. We need to stay hard on them. We need to stay strong. So please continue your support.

If you haven't already got involved with donated, I can and the Highwire, please do it now at the highwire.com. It's where you're watching this. Donate to Ican. We're asking you for 20, 22. Why don't you give us $22 a month? That's certainly a lot less than you're paying for CNN, which is falling apart in Fox, which is, at least many of the people there are aligned to you in MSNBC and others, less than your cable bill? Why don't you get involved? Why don't you be able to say, hey, when I saw Brandy Zorazni, you know, really quivering and upset and saying, tell it looked like a rock star.

Do you realize that, you know, they're making more money and then they did last year? And by the way, they're bringing more lawsuits than they did last year too. You can say, I did that. I'm the one that's helping make this all possible. I'm the one that's helping build that new future that the high wire and the informed consent action network is involved in. In the end, it's all about us. in the end on this day as we look at you know 77 years ago we were able to shut down Auschwitz

we're celebrating the holocaust today what greater celebration is there than the recognition that it took place that it is possible to happen again and that even if we're being overly sensitive by nipping at every little possible milestone that looks similar to the Holocaust. If we are being oversensitive, let that be our issue. Certainly being overly sensitive versus not sensitive enough is the greatest tragedy that could ever happen. This is the high wire. We do not forget our past. We are here to protect our future. I'll see you next week. Uncover the face that the Lord created so it can be seen.

Tired of the fake training all over the place we just want to be free. There's no fear of faith is present till we're hiding underneath. All the pets of dreads and trauma that came from this tyranny. Not just trouble and disappear without a fight and a struggle. Watch you depressing and addicted, the pills that they're giving, that trust and decisions.