The Highwire with Del Bigtree - MISCARRIAGE OF SCIENCE

Episode Date: November 11, 2022

Medical Freedom Midterm Wins; TSA Extends Covid Vax Requirement; New Wave of Excess Death; Whistleblower Exposes Potential Misscarriage of ScienceGuests: Senator Ron Johnson, James Thorp, MD, Michelle Gershman, RN#Midterms2022 #vote #JamesThorpMD #FetalDeathWhistleblowerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning.

Good afternoon, good evening. Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time for us all to step out onto the high wire. Well, we are an international show, but we are stationed here in Texas in the middle of the United States of America, and this has been a crazy week in America. I think it's one of the most dynamic midterm elections that I've ever seen. All sides taking their positions, promises of red waves and issues, big, huge issues that have been talked about for death. decades seem to be on the voters' minds. This is what that looked like in the news. After a contentious election season, election day is finally here. Polls are open. The stakes could not be higher. I think investors are anticipating a big change. Should we get this red wave that so many people have been talking about? Governor DeSantis is expecting a big victory tonight in his bid for another term of four years.

In the Senate, we're watching four critical races. There are still two close. to call Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. We talk about just how close these races are because any single one of them could determine control of the Senate. Democrats have scored a major victory. Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman is projected to win the Senate contest

against TV's Dr. Oz. And in the rematch between Brian Kemp and Stacey Abrams, Brian Kemp won again. Here in the battleground state of Arizona, there are two pivotal races with national implications. Republican Kerry Lake, who is running for governor, with her election denialism becoming really a central part of her campaign. Looks like Kathy Hogan will make history

as the first female elected to the state's highest office. Senator Rand Paul re-elected to his third term in the U.S. Senate. During his victory speech, he called out Dr. Anthony Fauci several times, promising to investigate him fully in his next term. Thanks for coming out to Dr. Fauci's retirement party. NBC News now declaring that Ron Johnson, two-term Republican, has been re-elected to a third term representing Wisconsin, the United States Senate, narrowly defeating his Democratic challenger, Mandela Barnes.

This is not going to be a red wave in Florida. It is going to be a tsunami. Governor Ron DeSantis solidifying his second term here. The room absolutely electric as the race was officially called. We chose facts over fear. We chose education over indoctrination. Florida was a refuge of sanity when the world went mad. We stood as a citadel of freedom for people across this country and indeed across the world.

Well, a lot of polls were showing that nearly 75% of America did not like the direction that this country was heading in. Yet it almost seemed like we were divided perfectly upon party lines. There are still counting going on as we speak. Apparently it's really difficult to count ballots more than I remember as a child. I think during the Pony Express when things were delivered by horseback, we were faster at counting ballots. But for whatever reason, we're still waiting to know some of the results and whether or not the Senate will be controlled by the Republicans or the Democrats.

And there was a promise of a red wave by some that doesn't seem to have come together, really in any place except Florida. In Florida, there truly was a red wave across that state that was quite shocking. Now, those of you that watch this show know that I've stated, I used to be a progressive liberal. I am now. Actually, let me take progressive out of it. I think I was always a liberal, which leads me more towards, you know, libertarian now.

That progressive part is probably what messed the entire thing up. But I'm now politically marooned. I really don't care if you're red or blue. What I care about are the issues. I'm a critical thinking voter, and I vote based on the issues and what I care about parental rights. And really, I guess you could say I'm a one-issue voter, and that issue is freedom. In the United States of America, I vote for freedom. All right.

So, but all of that being said, I want to look at this election just a little bit differently, just some of the things that we do know now. I know people want to make it red, blue, was it about Trump, you know, all these issues. But here's what I think is really interesting about the candidates that we've been following. for many years now, really in our discussion through COVID and from the high wire. First of all, let's talk about Ron DeSantis. Governor Ron DeSantis in Florida had absolutely the biggest night of everybody in the country, winning by 20 points, moving blue people around him and districts into the red. It really was an astounding performance.

Everybody, the nation, agrees. Nobody won more handily than Governor Ron DeSantis. And I want to point out, and you know, whether it was about politics or not, we've been talking about Ronda Santis this whole time. He was the guy that came out against the mass. He came out against the lockdowns. He came out against school closures.

And he really forcibly came out against the childhood COVID vaccine, especially being assisted by his surgeon general, who I have interviewed Dr. Joe Lattapole. But just to give a sense of where Ronda Santos was, and the types of, you know, things that he was focused on right before his election. Remember, the things you're talking about one month out from your election, I think it means things that you feel like are important to you and important to your constituents. So look what he was saying in October.

Take a look at this. There's been a lot of questions to our office about the CDC potentially adding COVID vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule. And I know a lot of parents are concerned about that because if that's on the immunization schedule, the fear is that schools could potentially mandate your child to get a COVID shot, even if that's not something that you want to do. So I just want to let everyone be clear. You know, as long as I'm around and as long as I'm kicking and screaming, there will be no COVID shot mandates for your kids.

I mean, really nobody has been stronger against the COVID shot for children than Florida and Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General Joe Ladipo. They had put out a study right at that time showing that they saw an increase an 84% increased relative risk of myocarditis and pariocarditis in young adults

receiving that vaccine. Therefore, they stated publicly, we are against giving this to kids in direct defiance to the CDC. And obviously, Ron DeSantis felt very comfortable indeed being in defiance as he was one of the first states to open up, never locked down his schools. Even President Biden, you know, chastised him and said, you're going to get people killed. We're going to watch Florida. Well, we all have watched Florida.

We've watched them thrive. We watched their economy thrive. We watch people move from all of the other blue states into Florida, which is maybe a question what happened in New York, maybe too many conservatives and people that believed in freedom had moved to Florida. So I want to say this, the biggest winner, the biggest winner of this week in the United States of America is one of the most outspoken critics of the COVID vaccine, the lockdowns and the mask. I think that says something. And while all the pundits sit around trying to figure out what happened, I think we should look at the guy that did it right throughout COVID. Another one of those figures that we have talked a lot about on this show, obviously comes out of Kentucky.

And this is the statement that was made by Senator Rand Paul, as he finished his campaign and won in Flying Colors. This is the statement that he made to his constitution. Thank you for coming out to Dr. Fauci's retirement party. No bureaucrat, are you listening, Dr. Fauci? No bureaucrat should be above the law. No bureaucrat should be allowed to deny information to Congress and no bureaucrat should be allowed to lie to Congress. When I return to the Senate, as chairman, promise you this.

promise you this, the COVID cover-up will end. And I promise you this, I will subpoena every last scrap of paper from our friend, Dr. Fauci. At least six million people died worldwide from COVID, and Congress has not had one hearing into the origins of the virus. As chairman, I will not only hold Dr. Fauci accountable, we will finally investigate why you will, your tax dollars were sent to fund dangerous research in Wuhan, and we will make sure it never happens again. You get a sense that this COVID pandemic and the lies and coverups are on Rand Paul's mind. Obviously they are. He made no bones about it as he discussed that throughout his campaign, and he has been victorious here in the United States of America. I think again that that means

something. People can talk about what they think is going on, but this is again one of our representatives that has been very critical of Tony Fauci and the approach towards the pandemic, including the fact that he himself talked about not getting the vaccine since he had already caught COVID, therefore standing for natural immunity from the beginning. But I will say this, that though they've been bold, Ron DeSantis has not been on the high wire yet. Rand Paul has not come on to the high wire yet. We're looking forward to that in the future. But there is one politician, one representative here in America that has taken everything to a level like no, nobody. else has. Not only appearing here on the high wire and having a great conversation with me,

but hosting some of the most important conferences in front of the Senate in the United States of America, of course, bringing in the injured, not only talking about problems with the vaccine, but talking about the people that he saw and met with, talking about their injuries, an incredible hearing that he held, and then the doctor's second opinion conference where he brought in world-renowned doctors all putting their careers on the line to speak to our government. Of course, I'm talking about Senator Ron Johnson, who has boldly gone where no man in America has gone before. This is the statement he made just going into the elections himself in the interview that I did with him in Washington, D.C. Take a look at this.

Is there any sense in the Republican Party right now coming into an election coming up here, that there may be a real, you know, power to running on the fact that we're going to invest, we're going to investigate Foucher. We're going to look into gain of function. We're going to look into this vaccine that never delivered what you were promised. Is there any sense that there's some power there? I have no doubt that, you know, Rand will come and he'll focus on gain a function and, and the origin of COVID. The only reason I'm not grilling Fouch is he never comes before my committees.

If he came before my committees, I would be asking him some tough questions. I'll be just be honest with you. If I do survive and we take over the majority, I'd be the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigations. I've laid the foundation for the investigations I'm going to want to do on this subject. And why I'm running again, it's got to be exposed. And there aren't a whole lot of people like myself who've been dedicated to exposing the corruption. You know, when you spend some time with Senator Ron Johnson, you realize, you know, what an investment it is to put

your life into service all the time away from your family, your loved ones. Senator Ron Johnson's had a brilliant life. He's been successful. He could walk off into retirement. But that statement to me that the reason I'm coming back, even though he had sort of promised his wife we're going to go two terms and be out, he decided to run a third term because of these issues we've been discussing right here on the high wire. People in harm's way, malfeasance by pharmaceutical companies. We're talking about all sorts of corruption as we talked about here, taking over our government, lying to the people, putting out a product that wasn't properly safety tested, and then not taking care of those that had been injured by that product. There's no one that stands to do more damage right now in the position after having one than Senator Ron Johnson. And it is my absolute honor to be joined by him right now.

Senator Johnson, let me just say how incredibly thankful we are for your service and how excited we all. are that you won. Congratulations. Well, Della, I certainly appreciate all the good work you've done around the subject and look forward to working with you and the other people that have courage. And unfortunately, there have not been as many as we all would like to see in terms of the medical community, but I understand the threats are after.

Take look what they're doing to Dr. McCulloch right now. Yeah. Taking away his certifications, trying to bankrupt him. So I understand the threats. I understand the COVID-Cardt tell the power they have. But this was the main reason I ran for for office again. I've, I've been with the vaccine injured, Brie and Joel and Maddie and Cheryl and Cheryl and Steph. I mean, you know him. You've interviewed these people too. How could you possibly turn your

back on these people who are just, they want to be heard, they want to believe, they want to be treated. They want to be healed. And until the powers, you know, to be in Washington, D.C., and the federal health agencies, the medical establishment, unless until they actually acknowledge the fact that these vaccine injuries are real and they are real and they are severe and people are dying. These people are having very difficult time getting help. You know, it's absolutely true and how many more will be injured in the future, not just by this vaccine, but this approach by government. If we're going to call everything in emergency use authorization, we're seeing with other drugs now, Paxlovid, things like that, things that are proving, you know, benefit

of hindsight to have real deleterious effects on humanitarian. This approach has got to change. There is clearly something wrong with our regulatory agencies that are not protecting citizens from the industry, but protecting the industry from the citizens in blocking our ability to sue. There's no free market forces involved here. So as you look into that and you were holding this in mind, I mean, this was a long drawn-out. I mean, your boat was hanging there. I was up to late at night, and I'll be honest.

It was clear that, you know, a lot of the things that were promised in this election and, you know, the type of wave that they expected, you know, sort of going against, you know, the current administration wasn't really happening. But my wife and I were there, and I just kept saying, I just want to know about Ron John. I don't really care, you know, about one election. What was it like the moment, because you were patient when they finally made the call. What is it like to be a senator in that moment? What are the emotions that happened there? Well, it was far more emotional in 2016 where we called my race within about a.

hour and a half of the polls closing. This thing dragged on through the night into the following morning. So it's just a matter of a little bit of exhaustion. We knew the result. The network simply wouldn't call the race. They knew the result as well. They could have called this thing probably midnight, 1 o'clock, but they didn't. I think they're being pressured by my opponent's campaign, see if there's some way they could manufacture some votes. And I'd also say, Del, I think the mainstream media just hates my guts so much. They didn't want to give me that satisfaction either, of being able to make an acceptance speech and talk about what my priorities were. So, you know, in the end, all we really did is issue a statement, this campaign was over.

And I turned my attention immediately to start contacting doctors. I was very pleased, by the way, Dr. Corey, Dr. Merrick, Dr. Susan Rohr came from South Dakota to my election event. They were the stars to show. I'm not one of these candidates that sits in a hotel room. You know, I go in the ballroom and thank everybody. But it was just fun to watch how many people came there and were. just, you know, starstruck by those heroes and they were heroes. I mean, you know them. These doctors have been vilified. They've put their careers on the line and yet they stood

strong and they had the courage and compassion to treat not only COVID patients but provide the public, the information that the public needs. So I'm just honored to be standing with those individuals and want to work with them to continue to expose the truth. And now, Del, one thing we all have to take some solace in as frustrating as it's been, as slow as the progress has been, we should take some comfort in the fact that there aren't many toddlers that are getting the vaccine because the word is getting out

and parents are exercising, I think, proper caution with this experimental therapy. You know, I, it's true and we are having success. And when people try to say, you know, they talk, I always say, stop saying the day as though we're outnumbered. you know, there has been real shifts. And you represent one of the biggest shifts that's ever happened in this conversation.

And I want to say on behalf of the people that I represented, you know, as a journalist back when I made vaccines and first got into this discussion of vaccine injury. These families all across this country and all around the world have been said that they're lying, that they're crazy, that they're making this up. And so I wonder if you're aware or if you think about it. There's clearly you have a lot of issues you represent. You represent a lot of different constituents. There's all sorts of things going on in this country. But I can officially say that you are the first politician that we have ever had representing the truth about vaccine injury and running on it. You stood in it all the way through COVID.

You had, as we said, you had Bree Larson and all these different vaccine injured in front of our own. Senate. And then you stood in that as you spoke to me and said, the reason I'm running is to try and end this. Do you realize that you are representing a group of people that have been sidelined and silenced for at least two decades, if not longer? And now you are representing a new shift in the conversation. And the fact that you've won standing in that means so much to so many people that were told there would never be any hope for them. Well, I absolutely don't realize that because

one of the main reasons I won is because I got the financial support from people all over the country. They were vaccine injured. I was, you know, one of the top fundraisers online because of those people that appreciated what I had done. And, you know, when you

have a hundred million dollars spent against you, more than $100 million spent to convey lies, distort anything you say, assassinate your character, you need the resources to fight back. And a lot of the vaccine injured community stepped out the plate and provided me those types of resources. But, you know, Dell, to me, as soon as I started seeing these Veyer's numbers, and this was probably, late March, early April, and there were a few thousand deaths. And I was comparing that to

the Ivermectin, the hydroxychloriclorine on the off of the Fayer system, the FDA adverse event system and there's such a clear difference you go back to you know in 19706 i believe it was the swine flu vaccine they shut that program down after four or five hundred cases of gillam berry disease a couple dozen deaths yeah uh and here we are up to we're going to thousands i asked francis collins about this in person i said aren't you concerned and you just blew it off said you know said or people die so i mean just the callousness uh the complete willful ignorance of a our federal health agencies certainly opened my eyes. And then my event with the, you know,

Bree and with Cheryl and Maddie in Milwaukee in June of 2021. And again, what the mainstream media did to me there, they put my picture above the fold in every Gannett paper in Wisconsin with the headlines so fundamentally dangerous. And you start realizing the power of the media and what they have done. And then you read books like dissolving illusions, turtles all the way down. Bobby Kennedy's the real answer to Fouacchi,

and you start educating yourself. So, no, you become a real skeptic real quick. And, you know, it's not courage on my part. It's outrage. And it's pursuit of the truth, which is what we really ought to be doing here. So this is just trying to uncover and expose the truth. That's, I think, what the American people deserve.

So, I mean, I don't want to take up too much of your, time. I know this has been an exhausting experience, I'm sure, and I just want to, you know, obviously we are so thankful as we look forward. I mean, I want you to know not only did you, you know, have so many people's support going into this election,

but you now have the support of, you know, hundreds of thousands or not millions of Americans now and millions, if not billions around the world as you are leading one of the most important discussions and investigations we've seen. Uh-oh. Oh, there we are.

Something happened. Okay, very good. And so I just want to just ask you, as we are watching this vote count come in, there's still a significant, you know, issue at foot. What will be the difference in what you can do should the Republicans, you know, gain the Senate versus if they don't move in that sort of majority position? Does that have a great effect on your work? Well, first of all, I'm going to pursue this whether in the majority or the minority. With the majority, I'd be chairman of the permit subcommittee investigations. I'd have the gavel. I'd have full subpoena power. But if I don't have that, I'll continue to do events. I'm talking to the doctors right now about assembling a convening a gathering in Washington, D.C., of all the doctors, all the medical researchers, you know, have a day meeting where we just assemble and organize what is known, what the public needs to know first, how we need to convey it, what are the next steps.

and then what I'd like to do the following day is hold another event like a second opinion to update the public in terms of what the current state of knowledge is. So again, whether I get the gavel or not, we're going to start pursuing this immediately. Well, that's incredibly exciting. I have said that I won't rest until, you know, we see, you know, Tony Fauci behind bars. I know it's a tall order, but man, this guy has got to be held accountable. suit to the Deborah Berks's and the, you know, Redfields and, you know, all of these guys that are a part of the corrupt part of this government. It's great knowing that we got a guy now. We got a guy inside of the Beltway. It's so exciting. I wasn't able to really get into this right

before the election because we're a nonprofit, but now that you're elected, I just want to say the high wire is so excited and we want to congratulate you on the victory. And we look forward to working with you as we uncover and untangle this mess so we can get back to scientific integrity inside the government in the United States of America. Congratulations and thank you. Thank you and thanks for all your efforts. Take care. Absolutely. Take care. Talk to you soon. I mean, you know, it almost brings tears to your eyes to think for how long have so many people been waiting for a representative in government that wasn't afraid to tell the truth. Now we've got one. He's going to need our support in every way.

talking a lot about how the informed consent action network, our nonprofit that oversees the high wire, how the legal efforts that we make, that we also get involved in handing those materials over to Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, to Santas, Lattapo, everyone that wants to look at the evidence that we're bringing together. This is why Senator Johnson is in this position because he's able to be handed evidence and facts and science. And this is how we're going to bring this thing crashing down. spent a fortune trying to make sure that Senator Ron Johnson didn't get reelected.

Farma has lost again. And once again, we are hashtag winning. All right, moving on. It's time for the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey Jackson. I'd be lying if I didn't say I was pumped, man. The people we wanted in, they got in. It's a very exciting time in America for people that believe in health, freedom, medical freedom.

And really, I think that represents freedom in general. What a turning. What a turning. We're witnessing right now. We're living through in the United States especially. And over in Europe as well. We're going to report on that in a second. But I can't believe I'm seeing the day.

And thank God for Ron Johnson. I thank God for the people speaking out in politics on this issue. Now, a lot of people watching probably have family, friends, colleagues. I know we do overseas that want to get to America for the holidays. Well, President Biden just released a presidential proclamation. It's a directive on public policy, and that directed the TSA to make this security directive. This is it right here. And what are the actions in this?

Now, this started yesterday, and it goes through January 8th, 2023. So that's the holidays. That's Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's. This is what it says. The aircraft operator, that's an airline, any airline flying into the United States, must require that each covered individual prior to boarding a flight to the United States and consistent with the CDC order and technical instructions has one presented paper or digital documentation of proof of being fully vaccinated against COVID-19. So it also says this, you know, for one of the reasons,

why are they doing this? You know, we've shown that the vaccine doesn't stop transmission. It's been admitted by our CDC, our FDA by Wienski. In fact, it's even been admitted by people in Pfizer in the European Union. This doesn't stop transmission. So, This is what that security directive from the TSA says. They're doing it. Given the resumption of air travel as worldwide restrictions due to the COVID pandemic begin to ease, these policies will advance and say the safety and security of the air traveling public began to ease. They've been beginning to ease a year ago.

It's almost like someone cut and pasted this paragraph and just threw it in there as an excuse to allow. And this vaccine has nothing to do with making it ease or any better. I mean, it's absolutely had no ability to stop transmission. so it's not protecting anybody. And as we've reported, the hospitalizations seem to be just as high, if not higher, with the negative efficacy. So the entire thing is such a fraud. It makes you want to gag.

But, you know, this is who was elected president of the United States. You can't say that we didn't warn people that this was the world you're going to live in, a world without reason under these circumstances. And some abilities for travelers really slipped through the gaps here with this bureaucratic paper pushing. So last year in November, they were allowing all the way up to June, and this was the headline, testing requirements to get on the plane. So you could test, you could have a negative test to get on the plane if you did it right before a flight coming into America, or you could show that you recovered within 90 days natural immunity.

And in June 2022, the U.S. dropped that COVID testing requirement for international travelers because, you know, it was admitted as endemic. There was not quite as much of an emergency as there was at the beginning when they shut this down. So this was the actual document here when they rescinded this requirement for negative pre-departure COVID-19 test result or documentation of recovery for COVID-19 for all airline or other aircraft passengers arriving to the United States from any foreign country. So what does it mean now? So now you have to be fully vaccinated to come into the country. What does that mean? We go to the CDC's own website to try to understand this because this thing's been like whackamil.

Is it one dose? Is it two doses? Is it five doses? And it says here, when are you up to date? You are up to date with your COVID-19 vaccines. If you have completed a COVID-19 vaccine primary series, that's two, and received the most recent, the most recent booster dose recommended for you by CDC. Well, the most recent one, you go on the website, there's this like drop-down menu.

You have to look at your age. Are you immunocompromise? You know, and remember just a couple weeks ago, Biden came out and said, just one more shot. We have the new booster for Omicron, one more shot per year. So, I mean, we're talking up to five for some people, I believe it is here. So now there is there is an exception. It's called an accepted covered individual.

And this is what this looks like. So you have to dig into this a little bit. So if you want to travel now to United States from a foreign country, here's the exceptions. And you notice highlighted there. If you're under 18 years or older, you can get a disclosure and attestation document. And you can have the parent sign that. And that basically brings back the testing requirement. So all they have to do is get tested once they arrive in the United States, the child three to five days after arriving or have documentation they recover in the past 90 days.

And then they have to attest that if they do test positive, that they'll quarantine. But that is, you know, I'm not going to say a loophole, but that's one thing. You know, if the parents are vaccinated, but they didn't want to get their kids vaccinated, they can they can travel with their kids here. But let's look at what the word is. But, you know, one of the things, Jeffrey, that I mean, as I sit here and not to sort of start a firestorm, in a totally different topic. But as we sit here, the irony that we are blocking people coming in from other countries, first world countries that have enough money are affluent enough to buy plane tickets,

you still can't come into this country to visit your family members for the holidays unless you are fully vaccinated. Meanwhile, the same administration that keeps pushing this upon us is leaving open the southern border so that anybody. So apparently, if you fly from the UK or Australia or, you know, wherever New Zealand into Mexico, then you can walk across or swim across the board. We have no problem with that. Thousands and thousands and thousands of people pouring in and doing nothing about that but blocking those people that have always been able to travel legally. And, you know, so, I mean, it just, the hypocrisy of all of it is just stunning and nonsensical.

At its base, it's obviously counterintuitive. It's scientifically ignorant. But what it also does on the world stage, it sends a signal to people in the U.S. and throughout the world. Let's go to kayak.com. This is a travel aggregator for tickets. And they have a map here. And so if you're not fully vaccinated, here are the international travel restrictions by country. And all you need to do is look at this.

And you see these two big red beacons. And it's not red because it's freedom. It's red because those are the restrictive countries. And that's America and China. Those are the two leading countries now with restrictive travel arrangements. So you cannot come into the country unless you're fully vaccinated. And that's who we're aligning with by policy. So that's a really important issue.

I really think people need to understand when they're looking at this and when they're, they're really reading these documents and saying, why is this going on? So again, November 8th is when this thing either gets rescinded or renewed. We'll be there to report on that. But if you're over in the UK, if you're, over in the European Union, there is one thing that you are doing over there or your media is doing that is not happening here in the United States. And that is reporting on excess mortality after the vaccination, the COVID-19 vaccination program has rolled out. So this, we're covering

this story for quite some time now. But this week in this excess mortality news cycle, we have a member of parliament in the UK has spoken out. He's a conservative member of the parliament, Andrew Bridgen, and this is what he had to say. Take a listen. The excess deaths we're suffering at the moment in this country across Europe and in the Americas. What analysis is the government making of these excess deaths? But even a casual glance at the data shows that there's a very strong correlation between vaccine uptake and the level of excess deaths being found in that country. Surely we must have an investigation.

These are tens of thousands of people who are dying more than we're expected. It's really, really important. And I think if we don't get this right, no one's going to believe we're going to lose trust in politicians, and we're going to lose trust in our medicine and our medical system. These statements are amazing when we see them, Jeffrey, coming from politicians. Again, that's sort of like the Ron Johnson there in England. These people, we watch the European Union making similar statements. The cat is clearly out of the bag.

Yeah, and, you know, I was watching this run up to the midterms, and hats off to everybody that had some courageous talking points, but I didn't see one person bring this up. Not one person, not one person in office currently. This is not a talking point that has really taken over, and it should have in the United States. And what's interesting on a side note on this, Andrew Bridgen faced a suspension over a separate issue after he spoke out,

over lobbying breaches here. So that's just a side note to this. It's kind of interesting, the timing on that. But let's look at the headlines. These are the headlines. This was in August. This is when some of the reporting really started going mainstream. This is out of the silent crisis of soaring excess deaths gripping Britain is only the tip of the iceberg. And it says Britain is in the grip of a new silent health crisis.

For 14 of the past 15 weeks, England and Wales have averaged around 1,000 extra deaths each week, none of which are due to COVID. If the current trajectory continues, the number of non-COVID excess deaths will soon outstrip deaths from the virus this year and be even more deadly than the Omicron. wave. Unfortunately, that has already happened now. So now we fast forward to current headlines. Let's look at what they have to say. This is the headline. Crisis adds excess deaths soar to levels higher than during COVID pandemic. It says there have been 18,734 deaths due to COVID this year. But since May, there have been 24,440 deaths where the primary cause was another condition. Over the past six months, non-COVID excess deaths have been running at three times the rate of COVID deaths and understand we lock down the country, we lock down the world, and we can't even

get an investigation with excess deaths compared to what happened during the COVID response. So let's go over now and look at some of the actual raw numbers and the graphs. So the European mortality monitoring, it's called Euromomo. It looks at 26 participating countries in this graph. And it's cumulative excess mortality. We're looking at ages zero to over 85. And this is the most recent one. It's up to November 6. It's week 44. And you can see here, the baseline dotted line at the bottom. That's your baseline.

2020 is the gray line. And you can see it jumps up there after week 10. 2021 is the dark blue line. And then we have 2022 is the light blue line. And you can see it around week 30 at the bottom there. That blue line has divorced itself from the other two lines and have risen above it. So that's where we have, obviously, we have a signal here, a big time problem. Now, this is all ages.

So one of the most... Just for people that sometimes when we look at these graphs and if we haven't been in, you know, math class or, you know, physics or something for a while, just look at that left access to everybody as we're looking at. Those are hundreds of thousands. So though that may seem like, well, it's pretty close. We're talking about a rise of tens of thousands of deaths during those time periods that is putting that light blue line.

And remember, there's multiple things we should be thinking about here. If the vaccine worked at all, the lines should be good. going down since we came through what was supposed to have been a deadly pandemic. I mean, even if you didn't vaccinate everybody, just 50% or 30%, we should have seen that effect that the vaccine actually saved some lives. So there's no way you can make the statement that the vaccine has somehow curbed death when we are watching this virus disappear into our rearview mirror, at least in its severity for the time being. And yet the death rate is continuing to soar and go even higher. Folks,

You know, we have a problem. Right. And that was all ages. So now let's dig into one of the most concerning age groups, which is zero to 14. Zero to 14 year olds in this Euro-Momo data shows a gigantic rise. Again, you're going to want to focus on the light blue line. That's this year 2022. And you can see here, it just takes off like a meteor right after week 20.

And off it goes and it's blown away anything we saw in 2020 and 2021. So someone has to explain. We're not hundreds of thousands now before everyone. like really loses. We look at your left access, again, excess deaths, but it is really shocking. Just look at 2020 when there was no vaccine. When we talk about the fact that there was no risk to children from COVID, you can see it is really close to the baseline all the way through there, even 2021, but you start giving this vaccine out, and then all of a sudden you're recommending it for kids, and what happens suddenly that kids go off the Richter scale. I mean, people can say it's

anecdotal, but someone has got to explain what else happened during 2022 that would have shifted the death rate of kids. What else is out there? Did a hole open up the ground and a brand new virus we've never heard of show up? No. Right. Exactly. And one of the countries that is not included in these charts specifically is Germany. So I went over to the information from the Federal Republic of Germany. And this is from the website here. And you can see a similar trend. Now for here you have 2019, 2020, 2021, and then that purplish line is 22. And again, same trend. You see that purplish line really taking off. It divorces itself around July. And that again, the Y axis now we're tens of thousands over there. But you see a huge jump there.

And almost every year, 2019 is that green line. You can see that that baseline is long gone. Those days are gone apparently. But this year, again, we have excess mortality yearly, all causes and this is what's happening. And that's, and that that is another graph. It just cooperates the data from Yuramomo as well. And this is why these are in the headlines. This information is in the headlines. And there's a lot of, there's a lot of scratching of the heads. Well, is it, well, we had the lockdown. We opened back up. Is it the rush to people not taking care of themselves, not take care of their cancers or their heart attacks? I mean, people don't really know. They're just kind of speculating at this point because there's been no investigation. And we keep talking about

look all of that should be on the table obviously good science does not just project what it thinks may be the issue but what is so disturbing in many of and really most of these articles and most of these investigations around the world they're throwing in lockdowns they're throwing in masks as possible reasons for this they're throwing in the fact that there's not enough ambulances or people aren't being picked up or they didn't get their diabetes medication during COVID or they didn't go in for their cancer checkup but with all of that what should be on the table What we're not hearing about is this totally experimental product that jumped out of its safety trials that we only know in the animal trials before rushing out to human beings, you know,

was killing animals in the animal trials, seriously problematic product to the fact that we even watched, you know, our own scientists step before the Congress and say we shouldn't rush this vaccine out. That didn't matter anybody. So given all of those concerns, knowing that it causes anaphylaxis, knowing that it causes heart swelling, knowing that it causes blood clots and thrombocytes opinion, none of this, none of this is refuted anybody yet no one in media will say should we be looking at the vaccines a potential reason for this rise and death and bring up that last German graph again because I just want to make sure I know we have a lot of new people that are watching and aren't used to being

showed evidence on the news this is how we do it here that purple line look at right at September it breaks free of everything else that means if you look at all those years all the way back to 2015 the last seven years in September are this death rate in Germany goes higher than It's ever been in September since 2015 and probably before. And it's continued to rise. If it continues to rise at that rate, it's going to outpace 2021. It is skyrocketing, folks. And it should be like nothing short of terrifying under the circumstances,

especially when you have governments not looking at the one obvious thing that had shifted in the lives of humanity across the world. And Del, you mentioned medications, since we're talking about medications, hospitals, NHS. Remember that drug? It was called Ivermectin. It was an anti-parasite medication, 40-year safety track record, impeccable, used all over the world. All of a sudden, it became called a horse paste when Joe Rogan started taking it and talking about it. Remember the news? This is what it looked like. All right. Words of warning earlier this week, the Department of Health

reiterated its warning against the use of a drug called Ivermectin. A new false cure for COVID in high demand. Ivermectin. Be aware that Ivermectin has not been proven as a way to prevent or treat COVID-19. Rumors circulating on social media about its use specifically for COVID-19 in India. That is not based in reality or fact. There is no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19. The FDA, the NIH, the World Health Organization, and academic institutions across the world,

not just the U.S., are not recommending Ivermectin for COVID management. COVID management. With doctors unwilling to prescribe it for COVID, people have rushed to farm supply stores, buying and taking large doses meant to deworm livestock. Subtractor supply stores even posting these signs alerting people that the ivermectin dewormers and injectables they carry for animals have not been approved by the FDA for people and could result in injury or death. Public health officer and agriculture commissioner warned against taking livestock drug for COVID-19. This story blows my mind because you've got some anti-vaxxers who are unwilling to take an FDA-approved vaccine. Millions of people have taken at this point, by the way.

But at the same time, they are willing to put a horse-deworming medicine in their bodies. What would you tell someone who is considering taking that drug? There's no clinical evidence that indicates that this works. Yeah, be sure to call if you have taken this drug that doesn't. doesn't treat COVID, but could put you in a coma. It is really hard. We've played that obviously before. It is so hard to watch that level of propaganda, an attack on a drug that, you know,

really could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and put an end to this pandemic here in America. We've stood and we've showed all the evidence on this. It was, you know, and the moment, you know, Pierre Corey puts it all in the line, all these doctors and scientists. And then for that, misrepresentation, the one reporter they're saying, I can't believe people wouldn't take an FDA-approved vaccine. I have news for you, honey, it was not approved by the FDA. It was an emergency use authorization.

It was never properly safety tested. And now we are reaping the benefits of taking products that weren't tested. Meanwhile, studies all around the world, I'm sure you're going to get into that. But just watching that again, it just makes your blood boil. Really just for the amount of people that listened to that and were affected by that. Yeah, yeah. It's a really low point in history. No science, no clinical evidence.

They say, well, just really quick, let's take a look at the science and the most recent clinical evidence. And this is it right here, Ivermectin for COVID-19. 90 studies from 963 scientists, over 130,000 patients in 27 countries down in the middle there, 83%, 62%, 39% improvement for prophylactics, early and late treatment, 51% lower mortality from 47 studies, and that's up until September 22, and that's continuing to grow. But why are we talking about this? So COVID-19 is a highly contagious respiratory infection. And what else is a highly contagious respiratory infection? RSV, that's the respiratory-sincential virus that's been going around seasonally every year. We've reported on the fact that it's out of season now. It's affecting

kids out of season. But we have some research here from a university in the Netherlands. And boy, we're going to go from horse paste to I guess cow patties here. Rachel Maddow, I hope you're listening. So let's check this out. This is the headline. This is late October. So this is just recently, bovine RSV challenge model successful at preclinical evaluation of human vaccine candidates. So let's put ivermectin aside for second. Let's just talk about this. So the bovine RSV challenge model of Juan Hennigan bio-veterinarian research, as WBVR proves to be successful to offer pre-clinical evaluation of human vaccine candidates based on the calf model. WBVR project leader, Renique DeJong, and her team show that a human RSV vaccine candidate,

CHA, D-155 RSV, protects young calves from bovine RSV disease. And she says here, both variants are genetically highly related, and bovine RSV symptoms and young caps share many aspects of severe RSV and human infants, including fever, runny nose, coughing, and labor breathing, says De Jong. So here we have a human vaccine. They say, hey, you know, this RSV virus that all these kids and adults are getting, it kind of resembles genetically and symptomatically what's happening in these young calves. Let's take this human vaccine and do a challenge trial and put it in these calves and see what happens. And so this is what they're doing at this biobatronary university. It goes on to say this. It's so, it's so identical. It's so,

They actually have this headline here, respiratory infections, RSV in children and calves. Related to the disease in calves, the human RSV, it says, is closely related genetically to a variant of the virus that occurs in calves with respiratory problems. That's the BRSV. Remember that acronym. Because the progress of the infection is similar, calves are being studied to better understand

the infection process to develop safe and effective intervention strategies. Well, now let's dig into a little bit of the scientific literature that we may have missed during 2020. during 2021. And now we enter ivermectin back into the fold. And here's the headline. This is an article in 2021. Ivermectin also inhibits the replication of bovine respiratory viruses. You don't say, which one, BRSV. There's the bovine RSV and four other ones in vitro. So it says in this article, in this research, IVM Ivermectin is also reported to have antiviral potential against several

RNA and DNA viruses. Since therapeutic use of Ibermectin in COVID-19 cases has recently been postulated, remember this is 2021, the potential antiviral activity of Ivermectin against bovine respiratory viruses, including BRSV, there it is, and those four other ones, those are all viruses are evaluated in this study. And it says, finally, this study shows for the first time that Ivermectin can inhibit infection of bovine respiratory disease-related viral antigens, namely all five of those those viruses that the that cows get at concentrations of 2.5 to five micrometers consequently ivermectin which is licensed for antiparacetic indications also deserves to be evaluated as a broad spectrum antiviral for brd that's bovine respiratory diseases

cases caused by viral pathogens so here in the literature wow you have you have a college saying the rsv and calves are the pretty much the same genetically and symptomatically and the kids and they're saying here in this study, Ivermectin, which is going to basically take care of this RSV in caps, but don't touch it. If you're, if you're a human, don't touch this thing. You're going to end up in a coma, says Rachel Maddo. It's unbelievable. And Jeffrey, the way you've pieced that together, I hope people that you're watching out there, watch the level of investigations going on here. In the beginning, if you turn off the channel, you would think we're promoting an RSV vaccine. You have a child and adult, a human RSV vaccine. You have a child, a human RSV.

vaccine and we showed you that there's a similar virus in cows and they decided, hey, let's try this human vaccine on cows, right? And obviously, we know we're all related and where do we usually start with these things? Animal trials before human trials, right? But what that does is it shows that they showed, look, this human product works in cows. And then you go back and look at, well, what, what do we look at with bovine and RSV? And we see that they were actually using ivermectin back when that was a conversation for human beings. While they were screaming horse paste and all these other things, good scientists were saying, hey, we're seeing the results in human beings.

Let's try this on the cow version of RSV. And what did they discover? Lo and behold, this stuff works great. It totally blocks it, not just for the one version of RSV that a vaccine would provide, but for all five of them. And saying things like what we've now to do, what we have to do is redefine this drug as not just being an anti-parasitic like Rachel Maddiv, Mado would have you believe, or maybe Tony Fauci, but it clearly has antiviral properties.

And Jeffrey, it really makes you start to wonder with the level of attack and how quickly they came out to attack this. Number one, we know that there was a real reason for that, probably because it would have erased the emergency use authorization for the vaccine, because as we know, the FDA has to prove that there's no other available treatment and especially a prophylactic treatment, right? If they can prevent you from getting a disease, then you cannot bring this experimental product and say, we need to take the risk. There's no need to take the risk because we had ivermectin the whole time. Ivermectin doesn't even have cross-relation issues with other drugs, one of the safest drugs.

We know it would have obliterated the emergency use authorization. But beyond that, what we were questioning when we were talking about this back then, if you don't remember, is is it possible that Ivermectin is opening a doorway into dealing with viruses that the pharmacy, pharmaceutical industry doesn't want us to know about because you can buy this stuff for pennies on the dollar. What if it does have antiviral properties? Could it deal with Ebola? Could it deal with all the other things that we're being told we're going to need vaccines for the future? Is it possible that ivermectin stands in the way of the modern vaccine program where they could vaccinate the whole world and make billions and trillions of dollars where they're only going to make pennies if ivermectin works? Man, all of this, you know, is opening up right now and it's such an interesting conversation. And to see how to see how. they're trying to shut down this science is really incredible. I want to say something while we were watching the video, I had one of the people here in the office run out to my car and said, guess what? Literally, I just picked this up, folks. And look, I'm never going to tell you what to do with your life. But I will say this. I myself have already just re-uped. I don't know if we can get in close it up on that, but this is ivermectin. Given the nature of these conversations,

Jeffrey, it sure looks like ivermectin is going to be successful against a lot of lot of different viruses. Now, let me be clear to people that are watching. I don't rush to drugs first. I'm a vitamin guy. I take lots of vitamin C. I keep my vitamin D levels up. I use good, healthy eating and exercise as my number one approach to health. I didn't even take Ivermectin when I ended up having COVID, mostly because it was all gone and I happened to be out of town, so I use heavy doses of vitamin C. And that's where I start. But I also want these things inside of my house in case someone in my family looks like they're having some dramatic issues. And there, I believe, from the science that we've looked at, that this is a good product

for me to own, you decide what you want. On the High Wire, we're not here telling you what to do or what to think. We're trying to show you where to find your information. And as I pointed out before, all of the data, all the science, even this Bovine study, if you're interested, will be in your inbox to read the whole thing yourself. All you have to do is when you're watching at thehighwire.com or go to our website, if you're watching from Rumble or somewhere else, just go down the page and type in your email right there. It's that easy.

Click, subscribe, and now you have all the evidence, all the science that we're talking about, all the remedies that we discuss, and how to use them, and the websites you can go to to get information. And so it's really just such a brilliant tool we're giving you. We call it the High Wire Protocol, total transparency in news. We don't just tell you, you know, have experts on to tell you,

what they think, we are going to send you the evidence and demand from them that they provide the evidence for what they're talking about. So, you know, this Ivermectin story isn't going away. We're not going to let it go away. And we're really waiting with bated breath as we're going to be releasing Pierre Corrie's book on Ivermectin just around the corner here. So really excited about that. Lastly, in the Ivermectin conversation, we sent out a letter from I-Can, you know, about RSV and children recently to the FDA. This would that look like. Aaron Siri, who helps us do this,

took to Twitter to tweet out about this just a little bit. Here's what he said. Moderna Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials involving children identified elevated rate of respiratory-sostitial virus, RSV. This is in the trials. They saw that the vaccinated children had a higher rate. It goes on to say,

FDA's vaccine committee even voiced concerns. RSV now spiking in children. CDC's befuddling advice on RSV is to recommend more COVID-19 vaccines. You know, Jeffrey, when we look at this, this is what is shocking about this conversation right now. They're promoting this vaccine for children in everywhere except Florida, where Governor DeSantis and the Surgeon General, Dr. Latipo, have come out against the vaccine for kids. But one of the things that we've been concerned about is the fact that there's no risk of COVID-19 to kids. we saw it in the graphs you were showing us out of Europe, right? There was no risk from COVID-19,

but in the trials we saw an increased risk of RSV. RSV kills far more babies and children than COVID-19 ever dreamed of. And our question right now, in this letter, hundreds of children hospitalized with RSV in San Diego. This is what's happening right now. What to know about RSV, a virus surging among young children in Canada. It's happening all across the world. Soaring RSV rates and parts of Quebec lead national cases, strain hospital staff, Austinville, elementary going virtual after RSV flu outbreaks. You know, we're watching schools shutting down. And the question that we have to the FDA right now in this letter is, are you increasing the risk of RSV with this vaccine as we saw in the trials? And under what circumstances then

do you feel justified in recommending this? We are going to keep pressing on this, Jeffrey. I think that there may be a lawsuit in the future. They keep pushing a product. When we think about that risk-reward benefit ratio. We now know that you'd had no risk from COVID-19. So if you're saying you've got to get it to protect grandma, well, we know that's not true. It doesn't stop transmission. Now we're finding it's raising your risk of the more deadly virus for babies' RSV, very, very problematic, and we're going to be taking it to the FDA. Jeffrey, incredible investigation there in great reporting. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right. Talk to you soon. All right, good. We'll see you next week.

All right, well, look, you are watching what the high wire does. I don't know what other news agency you're watching that not only does investigations, investigations that we could point to, you know, over a year ago discussing ivermectin, continue to follow up and go after the FDA and write letters to the FDA. You know, this is a part of the process. For those of you that are new, when we've brought lawsuits, we have one of the most powerful legal teams, one of the greatest constitutional legal attorneys heading that team, Aaron's Series, fighting for us.

We've won against the CDC, Health and Human Services, the National Institute of Health, you know, the list goes on, FDA, just mounting all of these wins that you are making possible when you donate to us. But not only are we winning those, then we take those the next step and we're able to go into courtrooms and fight for you. We're also handing these things to Senator Ron Johnson, to Rand Paul, to Ron DeSantis and Lattapo. We're giving this evidence that we are unearthing through our legal back. I want to and it starts out with a letter. It always starts out with a letter. We say, hey, do you have some information for us? We make them respond because remember they work for us. We don't work for them. And then when they don't respond correctly, then we bring lawsuits to out them and shut them down. This is a letter I wanted to bring to your attention that we've just sent out. And this one is regarding Peter Marks at the FDA. One of the heads of the FDA, he's the head of the vaccine department, director's center for biologic evaluation and research at the FDA. He basically just broke the law. And we've pointed out, we're sending a letter about this, and the law is regards to how you can advertise this emergency use vaccine.

Here's what the letter says. Dear Director Marks, on behalf of Informed Consent Action Network, we write regarding two recently released videos in your just a minute series, namely the November 3rd, 2022 video titled, Why Should I Get the Updated COVID-19 Vaccine Now? And the November 7th, 2020 video titled, Why Should I Get My Child in U.S. updated COVID-19 vaccine. The videos are in violation of both Pfizer's and Moderna's emergency use authorizations, EUA, as the videos fail to meet the required conditions related to printed matter, advertising, and promotion.

And let me lay out the points. As providing the EUA for each, all descriptive printed matter, advertising promotional material relating to the use of the Pfizer, Beyond Tech, and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state as applicable. We're not writing this, by the way.

This is in the EUA. They clearly and conspicuously must state the following that the Pfizer-Beyon-Tec vaccine and the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine by bailant has not been approved or licensed by the FDA. It hasn't been approved. They had to say that. They did it. But has been authorized for emergency use by the FDA under an EUA to prevent coronavirus disease. You also have to conspicuously say the emergency use of this product is only authorized

for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist, justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product. under Section 564, Act unless the declaration is determined, is terminated and authorization revoked sooner. So neither of those things were done that is in the law of the EUA because the videos are promotional material

which both advertise and promote fathers of the Moderna's EUA by bailant COVID-19 vaccines, they're required to contain this language. I can request that you, as the director of the Senate for Biologics Evaluation and Research, immediately remove these videos and explain why a director within the FDA would violate its, own EUA conditions. I can look forward to your prompt response. And it better be a good one.

It better be a good one, Peter, because we are on you. Folks, this is what you're funding us to do. You are allowing us to bring these lawsuits, not just against bad actors, but government bad actors that are breaking their own rules and laws. You know, they want to make us wear a mask to go around. They want us to stand six feet from each other. Stand up, wear your mask, sit down, okay, all that is sanity. Well, guess what? We're doing that to them. Don't you want to get to do that to them? Don't you want to see Peter Marks dance around like a little rabbit? Well, that's what we're doing to him because you allow us to do it. If you want to be a part of this awesome experiment, making our political leaders dance around for breaking the law, we're going to hold their feet to the fire. We're going to do it in major ways. As I said, these start out as little letters. They turn into lawsuits that we end up winning, and we're putting those in the quiver of Ron Johnson, of Senator Ron. Paul, Rand Paul, and Ron DeSantis, and others that are standing up for our freedom. We are a part of changing this in America so that we change it across the world. If you want to say that you're a part of that, please become a recurring donor right now.

Go to the www.The highwire at the top of the page, donate to ICANN. Just click there. I want to donate now. And we're asking become a recurring donor so we know how many lawsuits we can bring, whether we'll be able to fight this thing all the way to the end, whether it takes a year or 10 years. years. We're asking for $22 a month for 2022. That's going to go up in 2023. So get involved now. We're making it easy for you. Text donate to 72022 and we will send you a link right there. There is nowhere else where your dollar is being used for a more positive result. You get to make your government dance. You get to make them change and you allow us to bring

lawsuits like the one we brought in Washington, D.C. that struck down a lot of law that was passed allowing minor consent for vaccinations 12-year-old kids allowed to vaccinate themselves without parental approval in fact it mandated that the school had to lie to the parents and give them a fake vaccine card it mandated that the doctors had to lie to the parents and give them a fake vaccine receipt it mandated that the insurance company had to lie to the parents that they were being charged for something that they didn't know about. All of that in a law, dividing the government against the parents, grabbing your child, pulling them in, brainwashing them,

and saying their parents are bad. We struck that down. You want to strike other laws like that down? Please help us. We know all the help we can get. We're coming into the end of the year. It's a tax write off. We're a nonprofit, and we're working really hard for you.

All right. We have been, you know, living, on a roller coaster of I told you so is here at the high wire. Nobody's been more accurate at predicting the fall of the vaccine, the disaster, the lack of transmission. We predicted it the day it was being released to humanity. And we've been right. How are we right? Because it wasn't just the COVID vaccine investigation. It was the vaccine of how all these vaccines were being tested and put onto the market. Well, one of the conversations we had very early on, as the trials were beginning, before this vaccine was even out of trials as it was entering the trials. Remember, we threatened the lawsuit

against the FDA during the Moderna and Pfizer trials because they weren't going to have a saline placebo group. And we wrote a letter saying if you don't bring a saline placebo into those trials, we're going to cry fraud and say you didn't do a proper safety trial. Within seven days, they changed their program and added the saline placebo. Now, that would have been great until the EUA came along just weeks later and essentially erase the trial and put the vaccine out without being properly tested to the world. I want to look at one specific part of these trials that we found alarming then. We still find it alarming for new reasons. Here's what that is. Now remember, when they were doing trials, they basically looked to the Justice League. They try and find the superheroes out there in this

country that can withstand anything because they want their trials to look good. So you can't be drinking any alcohol. You have to be really fit. You have to be eating good food. You have to take a whole questionnaire said only our best and brightest in the trials. Doesn't matter that people with diabetes and autoimmune disease and cancer will be told to get it and we won't know how it's going to affect them. We're going to give it to our healthiest and see how they do. Well, there was a very curious part of this trial that we don't, we have never seen, I'm not saying it doesn't exist, maybe it's hidden somewhere, but we had never seen this in looking at the other trials that were going on. that curious section. It said, as far as the participants, male participant reproductive

inclusion criteria. Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate, I want you to focus on this, folks, to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention. We want to eliminate a reproductive safety risk of the study interventions. So here's what you're going to do. You're going to refrain from donating sperm if you're in this trial. We're afraid for some reason we're not telling you that your sperm may be corrupted by this vaccine trial.

Plus, either be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as they're preferred in usual lifestyle and agreed to remain abstinent. That was all a part of this trial. Never saw that before. What were they concerned about with the sperm when it came to this vaccine? I thought you were telling us it was just going to stay in the arm and, you know, I wouldn't go anywhere and then we would create antibodies. They also had a section similar for women.

Female participant reproductive inclusion criteria. Female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding. And at least one of the following condition applies. Remember, we don't want you if you're pregnant. We don't want you if you're breastfeeding. We think there may be a problem there. We're worried about it. And is not a woman of childbearing potential.

So meaning or is a woman of child bearing, meaning if you're sterile, okay, then you're okay if you're passed, the ability to have children, you're okay. Or if you are a woman of child bearing potential and you need to be using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of the study intervention. The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention. All right, so obviously, they don't want anyone getting pregnant.

We're really worried about the sperm of men that are in this trial. We're really worried about women getting pregnant, so you are not allowed to get pregnant if you're in our trial, right? Well, we've never seen that. What was their concern? This is what our concerns. What was your concern? But here's what's really troubling.

Remember, that is the criteria of the trial. They're running along in the trial, and then literally about two to three weeks after the magic. majority of them all get a second dose. They promise to not get pregnant. They promise to not give their sperm or share it anywhere. And then all of a sudden, instead of finishing out that two-year trial where we might see what they meant and even those that accidentally did get pregnant, let's see what happens with them, they bail out. And then when they bail out, they give the vaccine and recommend it to everybody in the world. Without what? Without any recommendation

that you not go to a sperm bank, that you not have intercourse or deliver your sperm, you know, through, you know, for you homeschoolers out there, I'll let it leave it to your imagination. But for 28 days after the second shot, they don't tell the regular public that. They don't tell them, don't get pregnant, you know, why you're getting this vaccine. They don't tell them that. Why? What was it? They were, and here's the advertiser, protect yourself and your baby from COVID-19. Get vaccinated. What was it? They were so concerned about in the trials, that even before they did the trials, and by the way, didn't study this problem they had because they kept all the pregnant women out that made them perfectly happy to just give it to every pregnant woman out there. Well, that's how these studies were done. I can't answer that for you. We are looking into it. But here's what's troubling. We're now just nearly two years out from this vaccine. There's a study that just came out of Germany by the German government itself. Fertility declines near the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence of the 22 birth declines. in Germany and Sweden. Okay, look what it says. The seasonally adjusted monthly total fertility rate of Germany dropped from 1.5 to 1.6 in 2021 till 1.3 to 1.4 in 2022, a decline of about 14%. There's no association of the fertility trends with changes in unemployment. We looked at it. Or infection rates, we looked at it. Or COVID-19 deaths. We looked at that. However, there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programs and the fertility decline nine months after of this onset.

So this is what Germany is, this is what their government's saying. Like we saw a really strange drop and they put up a graph. Look at this graph, folks. Here we are going along 2000, 2002. That's the fertility rate. Kind of really peaks there around 2016, slumps a little bit, 2018, 2020. Then all of a sudden, boom, nine months, nine months after we tell the pregnant women go out and get vaccinated, boom, fertility crashes. It crashes right there. Yeah, that is alarming,

especially since you seem to be upset or concerned in the middle of the vaccine trials, and then you didn't share that concern with all the innocent people that were turned basically into lab rats around the world. Well, this is our conversation now. And we're in a difficult position now, right? Because they erased the group, they erased the control group in these trials, right? As soon as they had an EUA, they told us the public, get this. I mean, this is how insidious this whole thing is, right? Well, yes, we had a saline placebo group, but now that we have this great vaccine that's 95% effective at stopping transmission, not, but lying about it, it just doesn't seem right to have this placebo group stuck as the placebo group for the next two years.

so we can continue to evaluate the success and health of this vaccine. We want to offer the vaccine because it's 95% effective at stopping transmission, not to those people, and they did it. They erased our control group. So now we are left with anecdotal stories around the world, trying to figure out what's happening in the world, where they're all getting a vaccine, and no one is telling them there's a problem out there.

So we are left as journalists, those of us bold enough to look, Those doctors and scientists and nurses that are bold enough to see what they're seeing with their own eyes, we're left with those stories. And that is what we're going to talk about today, because those stories are starting to pop up all over the country, and they look like this. I can definitely say since the vaccine rollout started, we have seen in our practice a decrease in new OB numbers, which would be infertility by about 50%.

We've also seen an increase in miscarriage rate by about 50%. And I would say there's probably about a 25% increase in abnormal pap smears as well as cervical malignancies in our area. Miscarriage is increased by a massive number. Fetal malformation, a specific fetal malformation, cystic hygroma, fetal cardiac abnormalities, fetal cardiac arrhythmias, fetal cardiac malformations, fetal cardiac malformations, fetal cardiac cardiac arrest. 23 of my cohort got vaccinated.

And in those months from September to March, 17 of those 23 subsequent miscarriage. Oh, for goodness sake. There's a signal here as far as I'm concerned. And it seems that if you achieve a pregnancy in the one or two cycles since vaccination, you might end up running into trouble because we've got an inflammatory surface

that the embryo is trying to implant it. severe placental problems causing intrauterine growth restriction, severely unable to grow fetuses, a significant increase, and this is all compared with appropriate controls. We know that you can have a regular menstruation after this. We know that ACE receptors are all through the reproductive tract, but we know the ovaries are at least a source of concentration for the nanoparticle carrier for the vaccine. Do these impact on our ovarian function? I don't know. What am I doing trying to help these people get pregnant when when nearly half of them are miscarrying? There's something not right. Well, you know, it takes a lot

for doctors to step forward and point out issues like this as we've seen and as everyone knows, it's not lost on them that there will be attacks from the hospital systems that are promoting these products, from mandates coming down from bureaucrats like Tony Fauci inside of our government. We're losing track of the doctor-patient relationship here. It's being destroyed. It's a very, very scary time for medicine and science. It's always an honor to get to talk to one of these doctors that is brave enough to talk about what they're seeing. And today is my honor and pleasure to be joined by Dr. James Thorpe.

Dr. Thorpe, over the last year, you've been becoming increasingly more vocal on this issue of fertility. on miscarriages, on, you know, the rise in menstrual bleeding, which they're now even admitting is a side effect of this vaccine. So to begin with, what is your background? What is it, you know, in your career that you feel like you have a credible voice in this conversation? Well, Del, first, thank you very much for your incredible work. Your incredible platform. I can. Aaron, Siri, Jeffrey.

You guys are just doing amazing work. And I really appreciated your segment and your focus on my patience. And I'm speaking for my patients, all of them. I'm very happy to hear and see Senator Ron Johnson on your program. And he's my favorite politician. And I love him. And I vote. I want him focus.

I love to see him focus. He's the only politician, the only politician in the United States of America that has focused on my patients, pregnant patients and pre-born babies. And, you know, not so much with Dr. Lodapo and Dr. DeSantis, governor of Desantis. He's not a doctor. Not for sure where Dr. Lodapo was during his OB rotation. But I just want to remind him that all the children, and I applaud you guys in Florida, I'm in Florida. What you're doing or recommending strongly bashing the vaccine in children should never have been given. I want to remind you this, though, Dr. Lidavre, your children start in the womb.

And the greatest, most egregious violation of medical ethics is not pushing the vaccine in children. It's pushing the vaccine at my patients, my pregnant women. It's a greatest, most egregious violation in ethics in the entire history of medicine. And nobody will focus on it except Senator Ron Johnson and yourself. Thank you so much. What is my background? I'm 69 years old. I have been doing high risk obstetrics for 43 years.

I'm extremely busy. I am very well for doing. to speak on this. I have, you know, focused my entire career on my high-risk patients and just to define those women of reproductive age, my pregnant woman, my pre-born babies and my newborn babies. I am speaking for my pre-born babies who don't have a voice. I am speaking for my OBGYN colleagues, 25,000 of you who apparently don't have a voice and you've been. and illegitimately, illegally silenced by a gag order just one year ago, by all the boards

and by the Federation of State Medical Boards, the American Board of OBGYN, the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, the American College of OBGYN. So for those patients out there, you really can't trust any doctor or nurse anywhere in the United States of America. We're all under a gag order.

And if they wanna collect their bride paycheck, then the only way they can do it is by following orders. So I, listen, my credentials speak for themselves. I'm extensively published. I was asked to, by the Bush administration, after the turn of the century, to provide my expertise in the United States Senate for my expertise

for in uterof fetal therapy. I served on the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, board director. I've even served in the American Board of OBGYN and I have 200 plus publications. I got 20 or more publications, including an upcoming book just in the last two years, mostly focused on COVID. So, and if that weren't enough, I just had to turn in my credentials to reapply for my credentials. Well, I have seen over 23,000 high risk of being patients. Wow. just in last years.

Just in the last three years. So how many, you thank you very much for this. And I really, really appreciate the focus on your whistleblower and Aaron Syria and I can't. And hopefully we'll see our whistleblower coming up. But we need more of you, my OBGYN colleagues, 25,000 of you. Your primary responsibility is to uphold not your hospital. not the medical boards threat to gag you. It's to uphold your commitment, your moral responsibility

to provide a physician-patient relationship with appropriate informed consent. You cannot give informed consent when you don't have any idea what's in the vaccine. And our CDC and FDA are corrupt, and they've admitted it, and they've admitted that they have not released the Pfizer 5.3.6,

nor have they surrendered the V-safed data. Well, look, obviously you, I mean, I don't think it's lost in anyone, the passion you have about this issue. It seems very serious just from your energy right now, so we're gonna get into why you are so serious about this. This is a conversation that we first visited back, I remember it was Dr. Michael Yeadon had put out

that he was questioning some of the issues with the Sincetin, like this point, placental line, you know, and look, all of this was people guessing, scientists trying to look at things that might be happening, but we have more and more evidence coming in. Now, I just laid out what I thought was concerning about these trials in that they excluded pregnant women, and then as soon as they get an emergency youth authorization, they even say we're worried about reproductive abilities, but then without, you know, you would have wanted pregnant women, unfortunately, in the trial, risking their pregnancies so we could see what happens. They avoid doing that, but then they

recommend it to every woman as though they've done a trial saying it's safe. So they protect their trial participants, but they don't protect the world. I mean, was that, I mean, I'm assuming you were looking at that at that moment, too. What were your thoughts on how they were approaching the science around this vaccine? I was just totally distraught. Your points that you made earlier on before I came on, You know, I designed a V-trial in August, September of 2020 is what I do. I've done clinical research my whole life. I designed an appropriate randomized double-blinded placebo control trial that should have been used by the medical industrial complex and pharma. And it was a very simple trial.

It was randomized. It was double-blinded. And I had planned that, and I published it on social media to then-president Trump. at Fauci and Gates, didn't hear a word from. But how did we done that study? I based that study of power analysis on, I alleged that I wanted to study, zero to five-fold increase, five-fold increase in deaths from one on 100,000 to five-and-a-hundred-thousand-a-hundred thousand after 10 years.

Would have taken me 70,000 patients, 30,000 in each arm, 35,000. Okay. And haven't we done that study? One year afterward, the interim analysis definitely would have shown a dramatic increase in mortality and morbidity, as was evidenced by the various database. But as you suggested before, they have basically contaminated all of the placebo groups. So that can never be done. Right. Okay.

So let's get to where we're at now. I know there's a huge journey as I've had and you've had over the last year and a half, nearly two years watching this vaccine. vaccine. Obviously, your area of expertise is in problematic pregnancies. So you look at, you know, all sorts of ultrasounds and things. I imagine not just of your own patients, but from around the country and around the world, people will look to your expertise to look at these things. So let's get into you. I know you have, you know, a preprint study you're working on right now. What is it? I'm going to let you take it from here. What is it all my audience? And many in our audience are younger, right? We're watching this generation coming out of college, very

confused by what just happened this pandemic. People going, you know, is it okay? Should I get vaccinated? The doctors, I can't believe doctors are telling their patients, if you're going to get pregnant, you need to get the vaccine. If you are already pregnant, get the vaccine. Are you seeing a difference in your work after this vaccine program has ramped up in pregnant women? Absolutely. It's been absolutely horrible. Like I said, 23,000 high risk obese, you know, just scans that I've seen in the last high risk obstetrical ultrasound images of fetuses in the womb, God's children, just over the last three years. I did not see significant feed loss rates in my central part of the United States of America. I didn't see it in my practice. And by the way, the numbers on the graph that we discussed and I provided for you, you'll look at a very stable rate of fetal death rate. And blue line is the vital statistics of North America.

You know, 40 years ago, you know, the stillbirth rate was probably about 10 per thousand. And over my career, over the last, you know, 40, 45 years, it's dropped to 5.8 or there are about per 1,000 births. Okay. And that's due to reasons. But when I aggregate those three years, 2017, 2018, and 2019, and I compare them with 2020, a really interesting thing happens. When in 2020, when COVID-19 was rampant, the national fetal death rates decreased. Not statistically significant, say from 5.85 to 5.75 thereabouts.

There you go. 5.74. Okay, yeah. There you go. So this is what I want to show you here that it's very important that we understand that COVID-19 does not cause a problem with fetal death. Doesn't cause a problem. And the other thing that I would like to point out is that what did I first notice? Well, you know, listen, you talked a lot about Iremectin, and Iremectin is a miracle drug.

But I don't want to leave my answer. Another miracle drug, Hydroxychloroquine. You know, the beautiful bride, Maggie, who's an attorney, and we write and work together. We published a paper just last week in America Out Live with Malcolm. And my beautiful bride found, it was great. From the CDC and the FDA, it had to be five years ago or maybe 10 years ago, pushing hydroxychloroquine. How safe it is.

It's so safe in pregnancy. First trimester breastfeeding moms, use it in your children over Africa, pushing it. And that's been my experience. I have used hydroxy quipotwin for over 40 years, 43 years, OBGYN docs, rheumatology docs, intramedicine practice doctors. Patients that have autoimmune disease are put on hydroxychloroquine. they get pregnant, they're not even taken off in the first trimester. Never had a problem with it. It's safer than aspirin. It's safer than Tylenolk. And what happened? The fraudulent medical

industrial complex bashed it just like they bashed ivermecta. And they did it very unethically. They published, they bought off the lanthet and they bought off the lead cardiovascular surgeon at Harvard that published it completely fraudulent. They didn't even alter the data. It was completely fraudulent. And that was in May of 2020. So it completely destroyed the credibility. No physicians would feel comfortable with it.

Now, pharmacists would feel comfortable with it, with this massive disinformation campaign. All right, let me just take the opportunity. Hold on one second. I just want to take an opportunity because I'm just hearing from my science team here to make it clear that if you are pregnant, you can't take ivermectin. I just held up ivermectin that I, you know, had purchased for my family.

But if you're pregnant, hydroxychloroquine is safe during pregnancies, has been rated as safe. Ivermectin is not. So I want to make sure that we get that across. All right, obviously there's been a huge in 20 talks I give out there. Yeah, go ahead. I just want to correct it. No, I'm not in agreement with you saying Ivermectin is unsafe of pregnancy. Okay.

I think safe in pregnancy. I just would not prescribe it in the first trimester just simply because we don't have any more near as much experience as I do with hydroxyclor. I think that Ivermectin is fine in pregnancy. Okay. All right, so let's get back to what we are seeing then. You're saying in your direct practice,

you're not really seeing there's a concern about miscarriage, things like that. But you've been very outspoken. So what are you outspoken about? And why? Okay. I am very concerned about all the complications. I am especially concerned about my patients because we have never, ever used investigational, any kind of investigational drugs in pregnancy.

It's an absolute contraindication. It's been a golden rule of all humanity. Don't have to be a doctor to realize it. So I've been focused on VERS. I've been focused on my colleagues all over the world. I've talked to colleagues and research groups on every continent and actively involved with them. I've seen just dramatic death and destruction

and carnage from this vaccine in my women of a reproductive age, especially my pregnant woman. Listen, the fraudulent article from the New England Journal of Medicine that was published last year, June of 2021, pushing the vaccine in pregnancy. It is a completely fraudulent article. They alleged that there was a miscarriage rate on par with the population of 13% because they lied. They underhandedly took 700 patients that never got the vaccine in the first trimester. They got it in this third trimester. It's impossible to have a miscarriage in the third trimester. They falsely,

fraudulently shifted those 700 patients from the third trimester to the first trimester and decrease the miscarriage rate from 82%. When you say impossible to have a miscarriage in third trimester, that's because it wouldn't be called a miscarriage, correct? I mean, you know, it has a different definition. If you're an early pregnancy, I mean early delivery or something like that. And I truly believe that if you look at their data, Clearly, those patients that got it in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate.

It's in their own data. But when they push it there, it's just like it's written in holy scripture if it's published in the corrupt fraudulent, your own medicine. Like all of the other flagship journals of the medical industrial complex. So it's very, very disconcerving that the FDA is corrupt. Most of the medical journals are corrupt. You know, most of the hospital systems are corrupt. You know, I listen to Senator Ron Johnson complain about, you know, millions of dollars that have been used to discredit him. Okay.

And, you know, he's a strong. I love him. He's a valiant warrior. How about not tens of millions, not hundreds of millions, but how about tens of billions of dollars that were spent? from the Department of Health and Human Services, funneled through the COVID-19 Coalition Corps, funneled into every sector of our society, including the medical boards,

who are completely corrupt, completely corrupt. And every single sector of our society... I know. Well, look, we talk about that all the time on this show. And so for pregnant women that are watching right now, what would you say to them about this vaccine? Is there a risk? Is there something we can see? Because obviously we don't have trials we can trust.

There's no placebo group anymore. Everything's been rushed out. So we're left with, you know, the real world data that's coming in. So as a real world physician, what is it you're seeing that you think that we should know about? Well, first of all, I'll just harken back to my incredible clinical experience. experience, highly, very, very visit clinical experience. I can tell you that after the vaccine rolled out, our fetal deaths still births significantly increased.

Yes, the miscarriage is probably increased too, but the reason why I don't focus on those deaths is because there's such a variance in the risk of miscarriage depending on the gestational age. What's the difference between the fetal death and the miscarriage for people? that are out there because I think we would equate them as being the exact same thing. They're not. They are to the lay people, but a miscarriage by definition cannot occur at 20 weeks. At 19 weeks and six days it's a miscarriage. At 20 weeks and zero days, it's a fetal death. It's and it might not make any sense to you, but that's our definition. We have to pick a cut off somewhere.

Okay. But if you take a miscarriage at say like four weeks, that the, chance of a normal pregnancy miscarrying at four or six weeks is extremely high. But after you, it's 12 weeks, it's extremely rare. And as you get up to 19 weeks, it's very, very rare to lose a pregnancy at 19 weeks, but it would be called a miscarriage. So you're seeing that. What you're saying is it'd be very hard under natural circumstances to see a shift in miscarriage,

because honestly, if the seed hasn't found correct purchase, it doesn't make it through the process. You know, so that's happening a lot. But once the process is along, we're fertilized, we're moving, we're past 19 weeks, going to 20 weeks, there we really expect more stability than you're seeing, and now you're seeing an incredible rise there of women losing their babies after that 20-week period is what you're saying. That's exactly right. And what you'll see with the whistleblower data, the data from California, you see, the practice that I'm in as a maternal fetal medicine specials, there we go, we can talk about

that, right? Please do. Yep. But understand that California and maybe some other parts of the country, but mostly California and Washington have the highest tax rates in the country. And so they, I would guess, and I'm just guessing, that probably 80 to 90% of pregnant women are vaccinated in California. In Canada, it's even higher.

But I would say that in Florida is probably on power with my middle, Midwest practice. And the vaccination rate is much lower. I would guess, I'm guessing, because I'm not allowed to look and do clinical work through surveys and through the clinical records that I would usually do. Otherwise, I'll get fired. So we don't have the ability to do a formal study, but that doesn't stop me from observing. My guess is that our fetal death rates are much lower. They're much higher from the vaccine. I would guess they're probably double the national rate, probably in Florida, maybe a little bit more than double. Same with the Midwest. But as you'll see with this data,

from California that you can put up. It's frightening. Okay, here we go. So I think we're going to have Ms. Michelle on. If she comes and she'll tell you the story. But this is a data, and this is a data from a nursing administrative supervisor that runs two hospitals in a pretty moderate-sized California city. I won't mention that.

Nor will I mention that. But they do about 9,000 deliveries a year. So, and again, from this data, we talked about COVID-19 was not causing any stillbirths in 2020. Right. But then in 2021, this nursing supervisor over of women's services sent an email to all the nurses in her department stating this data that I plotted out and saying that in August, July of 2021, they had the peak ever, 22. dead babies, still births. And then in August of this year, the same record was achieved.

So it's stunning. And let me go through the metrics with you a little bit, Dell. I don't want to get too sophisticated here. But if you look at that line and you look at the y-axis, you think about how tight that blue line is. If you know, you've all seen the normograms where there's a dotted line above and below, main line that represents a 95% confidence interval.

That 95% confidence interval is plus or minus two standard deviations. A standard deviation on this graph is probably my experts tell me it's 0.5 fetal death or stillbirth per thousand. Now you do the metrics on the numbers that they gave me. Their still birth rate is 29.3 in July of 2021. in August of 2022, it's designated by the triangle, the red triangle. Wow. So we're up from 5.74 to, you know, 29.3 potentially. I mean, that's incredible.

So let's, because you've been talking about it, let's go ahead. You have introduced us to a new whistleblower, as you will, that is starting to speak out. This is Michelle Gersman joins me now. Michelle, what is your area expertise? My understanding is you're a nurse. So just tell me a little bit about your career. Oh, and I'm honored to be here on this show. Thank you for coming.

Absolutely. You're welcome. So I work at a trauma center, a large hospital in Central California, and I'm a postpartum nurse. So I take care of babies when they're about two hours old. They come to my floor, and I help a, them, make sure everything is progressing well so that they can go home with their mothers, you know, after 24 hours or so. And I've worked there for two years. So, you know, during COVID,

before the vaccines, moms were delivering their babies and the babies seemed pretty healthy in general, and the moms also. And then, you know, they'd go home. So in March of 2021, it was about two months after the vaccines really started to roll out. I noticed that in the NICU, a neonatal intensive care unit where they have the babies that may have some health issues, you know, on any day, it used to always have about 50 babies in there. And all of a sudden in March 2021, there were 80 babies in the NICU. So that's a very high number for the NICU. And then in April of 2021, I started noticing that there were fetal demises on the board in labor and delivery. A fetal demise is a baby that passed away in utero, but they're usually full term.

So, you know, anywhere from 32 weeks to 40 weeks even is considered full term. Well, 37 weeks or above is considered full term, but these babies were, you know, 32, 33 weeks, and then they'd have a fetal demise. and I would look on their charts when I could. It's kind of hard to get access to charts, but if the patient came to me, of course I can check. And I was noticing that a lot of these mothers had received the vaccine. And a lot of times they had received it like one week before, and then they went into labor.

And they delivered a baby that either passed away already or they had to go to NICU because they were too early to survive outside the womb without help. So I was just noticing this. I really was paying attention. I was blown away by what I was seeing, the health problems that all of a sudden were seeing in the mothers. Before I worked on postpartum,

I was working on the cardiac floor. And so I saw a lot of heart issues all the time. This is before the vaccine, kidney issues, respiratory issues. And so I was so happy to go to the baby floor because people are healthier there. And then in April and May of 2021, I felt like, oh my God, I'm back on the cardiac floor because this is ridiculous, like how much extra work we're doing helping these mothers. And I'm not complaining about doing the extra work, but I'm blown away because this is not natural.

This shouldn't be happening. And so I was getting really frustrated with work because of all these new help. Very quickly. Let me just ask you questions so I fully understand what you're suggesting. That, you know, the NICU is exploding. It's nearly double the amount of babies that are going in. there. You're seeing what appears to be sort of a rise in field demise. And you're also saying that what you're seeing is women giving birth early. They're not going full term really. They're

delivering a lot more than usual around 30, 32 weeks. Is that what you, am I saying that correctly? Yes. And when you looked at the charts, you're seeing that many of these that are having an early birth earlier than usual had just recently, many of them, gotten the COVID vaccine. Yes, that's correct. So, and I recognize this is just anecdotal evidence. I know you're not necessarily making any accusations. I think we should make that clear, but it is something that you're observing and are questioning, you know, is there a real connection here?

Because suddenly we see a rise in this early, you know, birth rate. and we're seeing this vaccine being given right before then. Correct. This is based on observations. You know, I've just really been keeping my eyes open. Since that shot rolled out, I had a bad feeling about it. And so I've just been keeping my eyes open. When I've talked to other nurses around me,

they have not been paying attention. It seems like not like I have. Some of them have said all these health problems are coming from something in the water or pesticides. and they're just kind of oblivious to the fact that it could possibly be this new experimental drug. Right. Okay. So let me bring Dr. Thorpe back in here if we can. As, you know, obviously, you know, you're working with whistleblowers as are we. When you heard this story, did this seem like it was out of the ordinary from what you've heard from other doctors behind the scenes,

Dr. Thorpe or other nurses. Is this an anomaly happening in the hospital? Well, yeah, it's a huge amount. It's a 40 Sigma event. It's a 40 standard deviation more above the baseline of that 5.8 per thousand still bursts that it should be having. But yes, absolutely, I've heard the same story all over the world and I've seen it with my own eyes. As I suggested before, the danger signals in the field deaths and the problems are going to be more attenuated in the Midwest of this country where I practice in Florida, where I practice, because I don't think 90% of our patients are getting the vaccine like they do in Michelle's area. And even so in Canada. But I've seen the exact same thing. I have three very similar slides, and I don't know that we'll have time to show them.

But I have got whistleblower data from communities up in Canada and they're worse. Wow. Look at this. This is a fetal stillbirth rate. And it's Ontario, Canada, region number one. And look at that stillbirth rate. 41.5. Okay, it was only 29 in mid-California.

And I'm guessing in my practice, probably it's only about 10. But this is probably all the patients are getting vaccinated and nearly all of them. Here's number two, region number two. Same thing. We're looking, look at the X-axis now. That's a 59.4. You're looking at this, you know, remember, keep in mind a standard deviation is only 0.5 per thousand. So you're looking at 50 or 60 sigma here.

I mean, this cannot occur by chance alone. It's unprecedented in these locations. And from my whistleblowers in Canada, these come from multiple different care providers giving me the same numbers. Unfortunately, of interest, the Canadian government, to the best of my ability, stopped reporting in mid-2021. Oh, my God. And the hospitals are hiding the data.

And they're hiding the data here too. everybody is throwing my patients under the bus, throwing my vaccine injured under the bus, and denying that there's a problem with the vaccine or the experimental gene therapy. Michelle, you know, thank you, Dr. Thorpe. Michelle, so you described leaving sort of the cardiac floor and you went to the neonatal floor, right? And so you're there, you're postpartial. What would be the normal rate? I mean, obviously we can talk big rates and worldwide, but just inside of your hospital, in your experience prior to the COVID vaccine and this timing

and this change you're seeing, what would be the average rate of, you know, stillborn field demise on your floor? I'm glad you asked when I started working there in November 2020 there used to be one or two every two or three months. Okay, maybe. Okay. And then since March of 2021, April 2021, I started to notice more and more that when I would check the labor and delivery board, there were one or two each week or so. Wow. So it's a pretty big increase. All right. So folks out there, you know, there's one thing, and these are obviously anecdotal stories.

It's all we have because the proper science has been done. CDC and FDA, I am in total agreement with Dr. Thorpe is corrupt. They've been promoting a vaccine that has been properly tested on our babies, on our children, and maybe most egregiously on the developing fetuses inside of pregnant women. But again, we could just say, well, this is just opinion or this is just Michelle's opinion. Today, she has bravely released to us an internal document, an email from that hospital system that was sent out to those working there. I'm going to share this with you now. I want to, first of all, say that this is not her opinion now any longer.

This is the perspective of the hospital itself. I'm not sure what they're going to say about us showing this, but I want to say that Michelle, we had a very deep conversation beforehand, and she feels it's necessary for people to see this. So we're going to bring up this email right now. This went out to the staff. Good evening, everyone. Well, it seems as though the increase of demise patients that we are seeing is going to continue. There were 22 demises in August, which ties the record number of demises in July.

2021 and so far in September there have been seven and it's only the eighth day of the month now these statistics include redacted so you haven't seen all of them and some have also gone through the eds and ORs but there have still been so many in our department it's a lot of work for you as the bedside RNs and it's also a lot of work for me demises have taken a lot of my time away from the other groups of patients that I serve, so I hope this trend doesn't continue indefinitely. Know of a few more that are scheduled to deliver in the week ahead, so unfortunately the process is going to be very familiar with all of you. Once again, I do so appreciate the time and attention that you give to the patients. When I follow up with them, they remember your names

and the way you help them get through a very difficult time. That is the first time I have seen that email. We discussed beforehand. We're very busy putting the show together. I have to say I feel like the oxygen has just been sucked out of my lungs. To read that from someone that is as objective, I guess, as you could get, working for the system itself, it now corroborates what you're seeing with your own eyes. And for anyone that was having a question anywhere around the world now, this is a shocking, shocking email. Were you shocked when you received it? How much, you know?

Oh, absolutely. I couldn't work for the first half of my shift. I was so distraught. I just kept thinking, why is nobody talking about this? The media should be outraged. We're talking about babies. You know, babies are given to us by God. They're here to bring us love and joy.

And if somebody is taking that away from us, that's evil. Dr. Thorpe, I know that you're aware of this email. I don't know that I've ever read anything as shocking as what I just read there. Well, Del, you're absolutely right. I was just praying that you would stop and not read anymore because the rest of the email, which I think is about twice as long as what you read, is really, really upsetting. It starts talking about stuff that I can't even talk about that is, not appropriate to talk about.

Okay. And we are, we're going to leave that for courtrooms and other things to decide. I think we get the point here. And so let me ask you this, you know, Michelle, in your practice, do you see doctors recommending, are there doctors recommending this vaccine, or do you think these pregnant women are just getting it on their own because of what they're seeing in the media? I do believe that they are being coerced into taking. taking this vaccine. One doctor would write in his notes when he'd take care of a mother who just delivered. He would put patient received COVID vaccine. Or if they didn't, he would say patient did not receive

vaccine and then he would quote what they'd say. And if they didn't receive it, he would quote how he provided education on why it should be taken, why it's important. And so I do believe that he is coercing them when they come to see him in his office. before they deliver. And so I think 90% of these mothers are getting the vaccine while they're pregnant. Dr. Thorpe, do we forgive? I mean, I really grappled with this. When I started this conversation at the beginning of COVID, I was speaking all over the country and I would say, look, doctors don't know better. They're being lied to by the CDC. They're being lied to by the FDA. That's basically the clergy of this medical religion or orthodoxy. But man, at a certain point,

I did a story on remdesivir where, you know, these wives of young husbands that are lost in hospitals are watching their husbands being put on dialysis because of kidney failure. And then when they ask how many of the patients on kidney failure, you know, dialysis right now got the COVID vaccine and said all of them. And you start asking yourself, how is it these doctors are not seeing? COVID doesn't cause kidney failure. So obviously this treatment you're using must be doing it. Why is it not registering in doctors' minds? In this case, this doctor is promoting a product, and probably many of them are because they're being told to do it.

How is it they're not seeing this rise in demise of infants and fetuses? I talk about four levels, hierarchical levels of cognitive dissonance. going from the individual physician to the individual's family, number two, number three, to the individual's friends, and number four, finally, to the doctor's patients. And every single time you take the shop, the doctor takes the first one, crossed a line, and can't ever take it back. It's done. So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

And then they will lose their paycheck and get fired. So their paycheck is really a bribe. And I think that's something that has been promoted by Department of Health and Human Services through that CCC. All of these medical boards, the medical boards are all fraudulent. They're all contaminated. The American College of OBGYN, the American Board of Obstetrics and Conicology, the Society for Maternal Field Medicine, all of which I've been formally associated with, one way. or the other and they're more focused on changing the language to politically correct language

than they really care about my patients. They don't really care about patients dying and injured from the job. They care about their massive amount of profit that they get from pushing the vaccine. So I don't think that, you know, we had a discussion on this earlier. What was a motive for? that email being released. What is a motive of the doctor that's pushing it? I think it's so difficult to know somebody's heart to judge them. I just do that. I want to stick with the facts that I know to be true and I know for sure beyond a shadow of a doubt and I have data and proof that this vaccine is killing and injuring my patients and it needs to stop now. Michelle, you know, one of the issues, you know, obviously we're talking about how the fetus is affected.

It's just reasonable to imagine you have a product that is an MRNA or a DNA technology, you know, messing the reproductive system. But one of the things that we've heard a lot about in non-pregnant people is, you know, blood clots and strokes and heart attacks and things like that. We're talking about babies. Have you seen any effect on the mothers themselves, or any issues that went on when delivering that you think are outside the ordinary of what you're used to witnessing? Yes, I have a friend who's a crisis nurse at the same hospital that I work at, and she got the booster dose and didn't know she was pregnant. And then a week later, she started having blood clots.

She had to have some surgeries done, and she delivered her baby early. and she admitted to everybody. She said, this is from the shot. If I didn't get that shot, my baby and I would have been fine. She is okay, thank God, and her baby's doing okay. He's a month old, but it's scary because they both almost lost their lives. And she knows that it happened right after getting that shot.

So she doesn't feel comfortable speaking forward right now because she's taking care of her newborn baby. And I understand that. But that's just one. And then I've been taking care of moms who have, they now have high blood pressure issues. And so they have to be on, you know, critical medications for that. There have been moms that have had blood clots. One mother had a stroke while she delivered her baby and she passed away. That was around Christmas last year. So we've been seeing all kinds of unusual stuff. And then same with the babies. They've had to do a lot of echocardiogram. which is where they check the baby's heart with an ultrasound because the babies are having arrhythmias and then they're checking other things like spinal issues and and then there's no way to know what's going to happen to these babies as they grow up this is only while they're newborns that we're seeing these unusual health problems so definitely I have seen an increase in health

problems in the moms and the babies. Dr. Thorpe you look at a lot of ultrasounds and things we have some images that you sent forward. Let me bring up a few of these and maybe you can explain some of the things that you're seeing here. What are we looking at here and why is this problematic? I don't know if you... Yeah, and I want to make it real clear to you, Dell, and our audience here. These are placentas that, and I get images from ultrasounds all over the country and from what I call my trojan horses that are all over the country, nurses and synographers and obese, and I won't mention the facilities of the names,

and I redo them a lot. It's been kind of a consensus of that's what a placenta will look like, the one that you just showed about eight weeks after a Pfizer exam, this one, the one on the left, that's a placenta. You see all the calcification, you see some of the, drop out the black areas. The white areas are calcification. It's just an abnormal placenta.

It doesn't necessarily mean that there's a severe problem, but it's a almost, if you will, a surrogate that I've noticed as being associated with the vaccination, say six to eight weeks earlier. Here's some more of the same. Now this is interesting. This is a patient that got the Pfizer Vax long ago, three of them, but this is a subsequent pregnancy, and it's still there, which is a little bit concerning to me. This is all anecdotal data.

I can't make conclusions of this, but it's just a pattern, kind of an instant pattern recognition that I picked up, and other very experienced sonographers and doctors picked up as well. What would you say? I mean, Michelle, right now, obviously it takes a lot of courage to publicly talk about these things. I know it's not lost on you that many doctors and scientists around the world are being pressured as soon as they speak out. We don't know how your hospital is going to react to showing, you know, this very important document. And I want to thank you so much because it really is important that we verify the truth. As I said to you beforehand, we're about transparency on the high wire,

and we really like to show the evidence of what we're saying. And so I want to thank you for doing that. What is it you hope to accomplish by being here on the high wire? What would you like to see happen in the immediate in the future as it goes with delivering babies and your concern around this vaccine program? Well, first of all, I would hope that pregnant women would not get the shot. but I do think that it might be too late. I think that many of them already have

because they were all kind of coerced, you know, when the shot came out. But since they already most likely got it, don't get another one. And I just hope that people gain their power back. I hope that people become more connected. I do kind of think that these shots have caused like a disconnect and that people have lost sense of,

humanity. And I say that because my mom was killed in November 2021. She was given room to disappear against her will. And I wasn't allowed to be there for her. I wasn't allowed to save her life. And the charge nurse told me, I know you're a nurse, but you need to wear a glove. Or I know that it's your mom, but you need to wear a glove when you're in this room. I was holding my mom's hand before she died. She said, you're a nurse and you know better. And so I said, what kind of nurse am I if I didn't even get the chance to save my own mother. So I want her to hear that. I think that what good is being a nurse if I can't save my own mother, if I can't save babies, if I'm just going to work just to get a paycheck, I don't want it. I don't need to be a

nurse. So I also used to complain to my mom before she died that I can't stand poking babies. I can't stand checking their blood sugars, poking them with needles, because these babies' bodies deserve respect. They should be handled with respect. They are baby humans, and mothers should be protective of them. They shouldn't let people come in and just poke them with things, poke them with needles, hurting them. It's not right. And so my mom said, don't quit. Those babies need you, and you're saving them. So my mom passed away, and I've thought about quitting multiple times because of all the carnage that I've been seeing. And when I think about quitting, I hear my mom say, don't quit. Those babies need you. You're saving them. You can take away my job. You can take away my nurse's

license. But they shouldn't have killed my mother. Well, I want to thank you for sharing both your eyewitness accounts and now this internal memo because I believe you may have just taken the greatest step person can take to save lives. I know for fact, and I want to share this with you, travel the country and I walk through airports and restaurants, people come up to me and they said, you saved my baby's life. I didn't get a vaccine because of what you said there, I assure you now millions of people that are watching this show and millions that will share your testimony here will be saved. And so I want to thank you for this brave and courageous moment for you. Dr. Thorpe, last words. I know there's so much we could talk about. You're deeply

involved in this. I want to let you get back to that work. But as we watch this, you know, there's so much a part of us that just wants to say that cannot be possible. These are, you know, doctors are good people. Hospitals are there to heal people. You know, I just have a hard time believing this. You know, for those out there, and we should be skeptical, what do you want to say to the audience that maybe considering that they're pregnant or they're about to be pregnant, You know their doctors are telling them she get the vaccine. What do you want them to think about? Number one, the COVID-19 experimental gene therapy is absolutely contraindicated in pregnancy.

Never take it. Number two, you're looking at the bravest woman in the entire world right now. One of my heroes, Michelle. And, you know, Dale, I'll say this, that, you know, I think you had Dr. Kimberly Biss on the clip. Okay, this is my opinion, but you know, Dr. Kimberly Biss came out, I think, because of Michelle. And I would beg you, Adele, to have your folks put up the whistleblower line, the email line, and I would beg my patriots, my doctors, my colleagues around the country, of which there's 25,000 OBGYNs, I would beg you to honor the physician-patient relationship.

don't worry about, you know, what other people or the board or your hospital things. Do the right thing for your patient. And please call me or call Dell. Go to that number. There's 100,000 nurses in postpartum nurses or labor and delivery nurses. I know that you've seen the carnage like Michelle. Please come out. Dell and Aaron Siri and Jeffrey will protect you.

They have it right now. Yep. So here is our whistleblower line, whistleblower at I Can Decide.org. I want to be clear. We have extensive conversation with people like Michelle, Michelle, to make sure she's ready to be public with the information that she's sharing. We have never, ever, I never will force anybody to present information before you're ready. If you want to begin that conversation to discuss, just simply get it off your chest

and talk about what you're seeing. and discuss whether or not you want to publicly state it. It also helps us do our investigation, know where to look, whistleblower at I can decide.org. And then we will take your information, you know, enlist people like Dr. Thorpe that know what to do with it or help us understand what it is we are looking at.

Michelle, Dr. Thorpe is right. You are courageous and beautiful. And I think we all feel your heart and connection in this and I know and I've said it from the beginning for those that said you know I can't work if I don't get this vaccine I can't work if I tell the truth then I said what kind of job is that and I think that there's for people that speak the truth and those around us that have been brave enough there's been nothing but blessings there's other blessings in this world that come from being a truthful and honest person so I hope that this hospital actually stands behind what they sent in that email

recognizes that, you know, what you're doing is just trying to limit this carnage. It's unfortunate that they're having to accept this rise and say it looks like it's going to continue this way. Obviously, you're trying to stop that any way you can. So I hope that you were treated fairly, but know that we're here to support you. If you need any support and anything that's going on, if you need any legal help, we're also here to make that happen. Dr. Thorpe, you have been outspoken. You are also a courageous doctor and, you know, putting it all in the line. So I want to thank you for taking the time today to join us.

Thank you, Del. All right. You both take care. I want to look at this email one more time because I don't want us to ever forget it. Remember, it just there is talking about evidence and then there's actually seeing it. I just want to read this opening line because it is so shocking. well, it seems as though the increase of demise patients that we're seeing is going to continue. That is unacceptable.

That should be unacceptable to every doctor, every OB, every surgeon, every human being on this planet. If it's not unacceptable to you, check in with yourself. It is time to, you know, wake up. We all need to wake up. We got to get to the truth. your help. If you want information, you know, and sometimes you want to share things, we're going to cut this video down to shorter pieces because we all have friends out there that maybe you don't want to sit through a whole conversation. For those reasons,

we've created short snippets from our shows. It's called Get Vaccinated and it looks like this. Folks, it's time for you to get vaccinated. The Highwire is launching a brand new campaign to arm you with the facts. In short videos, you can share anywhere featuring the world's leading experts on COVID-19, vaccines, and everything in between. Natural immunity appears to be robust, complete, and durable. These are the drop-the-mic, fully cited facts to help you, the super spreaders of truth in this real war of misinformation. Share the link, download the short video, and post to your favorite social media platform. All you have to do is go do the highwire.com slash

Get vaccinated for all of the latest short videos. And make sure to grab your Get Vaccinated merch at thehighwire.com. Click shop for the latest in Highwire gear. We want you armed with the facts online and on the front lines. Get the facts, lose the fear at the highwire.com. Wow. I mean, it's incredible to witness truth coming through in such a important and at such an important and critical time like that. I want to say there are other news agencies

that might just show you that information, but we're doing something about it. As we were working on this show and realizing that we were going to have breaking evidence like that, we decided it was time to write a letter based on the things I opened this segment with. How is it that the CDC banned pregnancy and banned sperm from the trials,

because they were so concerned about the reproductive issues, and then, without any evidence, having blocked their own science to look into it, then let every, and recommended to every man and woman, go out as you were, get pregnant, no problems here. We want to know how they came to that conclusion. So we're sending a letter, and believe me, behind this letter is probably a future lawsuit. This is the letter that we are just sent out earlier today from Syrian Glimstad, from the informed consent action network.

It goes on to say, dear Commissioner Caliph, Director Wollenski, and Deputy Director, write, on behalf of informed consent action network, we write regarding COVID-19 vaccines and their impact on reproduction. I can not read you the whole letter. You will get it if you were part of our newsletter. I can request that you provide the following. An explanation as to why the conditions concerning reproduction that were part of Pfizer's trial were not part of the use instructions when the vaccines were offered to the American public. Number two, while it is no substitute for clinical trial data, please provide any in all studies that led the FDA and CDC to conclude that the vaccine would not adversely affect reproductive health when authorizing licensing and recommending Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine to all American ages six months and older.

And number three, any other relevant studies that have been conducted or are being conducted by Pfizer federal health agencies or any third parties that are looking at these reproductive issues and that have not. been made public. I can look forward to your prompt response to this alarming concern. Remember those of you at the CDC, the NIH, Health and Human Services, the FDA? We got guys in Washington now. We got Senator Ron Johnson. We have Senator Rand Paul. We've got Surgeon General Joseph Latipo who is speaking to doctors all over this country. We have a governor in Florida that has the greatest experimental test case going on. And yes, We're going to see if he'll also come out against giving this vaccine to pregnant women based on the data that we have because we are connected now. That's right.

We got friends in high places that are overseeing your jobs. We're coming after you. I promise you we would. And thanks to last week, we are winning. For all of you watching the high wire, this is a proud moment. We are in the middle of a crisis. Children, babies, fetuses, pregnant women, adults, elderly are being injured every day, many dying from this vaccine program. All-cause mortality is skyrocketing all over the world.

We're told now that the rising number one cause of death in Canada is sudden unexplained adult death syndrome. It's time to do something about it. We've talked about it. I told you so is they're not going to save the planet. We need your help. Please donate so that we can continue to this work, so we can help the whistleblowers get their story out in whatever way they want to do it.

Become a recurring donor. $22 a month is making a difference in this world. We are winning. We do not have a vaccine passport, tracking us where we're going, getting into restaurants. I think we've won there. We have a failing confidence in our CDC,

the lowest we've ever seen in the FDA, and rightfully so. And let me be perfectly clear, I'm not against regulatory agencies. A regulatory agency is supposed to be protecting me from the industries, not doing the industry's bidding, not making sure that they don't test the proper things. In fact, what is so bizarre to me as I look at this, and from the years now of investigation into these Pfizer trials, into these Moderna trials, what's really weird is that in all

the anomalies we'd start seeing in real world data, when we go back to the trials to see what did they see in the trials, that is the exact issue that they literally built a hundred foot wall around to make sure they never got answers to it. That's so strange. It's almost like you knew what problems this vaccine was going to have and made sure your studies made sure that we had no evidence inside the trials to see it. I could be wrong. That's why we've sued and that's why we're getting the Pfizer data. It's why we have the B-Safe data. It's why we're trying get the written inboxes that they're trying to hide from us, man, we are not letting up. You owe us. You're the government. You're our dogs. You're on our leash. And we are holding it

tight. In fact, I'm buying a choker chain this year. And we're going to pull that sucker tight. So keep watching the high wire. It's about to get really interesting. And I'll see you next week.