The Highwire with Del Bigtree - mRNA VACCINE CONTAMINATION ISSUES WORSEN

Episode Date: November 15, 2023

New data unearths extensive DNA contamination within mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Now, regulators in Canada and Europe are acknowledging its presence. Meanwhile, researchers in a new preprint paper, are finding correlations with DNA contamination levels and severe adverse reactions.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Another story here we're talking about one of the ones we've been tracking, and that's the DNA contamination within these COVID-19 vaccines. So this really kicked off because of two people. One of them was Kevin McKernan. He's a genomics researcher and also Philip Buckholz. He's also a genomics researcher. And we covered his Senate hearing at South Carolina talking about this, really raising the alarm. It's been on the radar of a lot of people over the last month or two since this happened. And it's really one of the big stories amongst all of them with this.

And so what really was the situation was they used two processes, Pfizer-Moderna, Pfizer especially, they used two processes. The first process was the vaccines that they did the mock-ups for the clinical trials. They used the PCR to amplify and create the DNA. But when they kind of got the green light from regulators, they said, well, we need to make billions of copies of this. So they use this circular bacterial DNA plasmid to replicate. this. And in order to do that, they fed it in there and it just replicated all of these, all of these, um, RNA DNA sample copies. Problem was that it left a lot of kind of junk DNA in

there, contaminated the vaccine. So we have a study now from Kevin McCurnan and co-authors that, that was out, this was out in October, DNA fragments detected in monovolent and bivalent biser and moderna vaccines from Ontario, Canada. So the ones, you know, process two, Those are the ones out being injected into people. So those are out there for researchers to grab these vials and start testing them. And so that's what that's what these authors and these researchers did. They took 27 RNA vials in Ontario, Canada, and it was taken from 12 different lots. So what they looked at, they used methods to check out how much DNA was in here.

And this was their conclusion. Let's just jump right to that. It says in conclusion, these data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of billions of DNA molecules per dose. in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10 nanograms per dose by 188 to 509 old. So, let's break that down. I mean, that's not like that's not 500 percent. That's 500 times the amount that's acceptable. I just want to take a moment, Jeffrey, because I think people watching this show say, wait a minute, you already covered this last week, right? We've already covered this DNA contamination.

But for those that are watching this show, you know, we investigate, you know, issues like this, like there is a serial killer on the loose. Folks, there is a serial killer on the loose. This story keeps growing. This isn't last week's study. These investigators, detectives, if you will, are getting deeper and deeper into what is going on here. What is the footprint? What is the fingerprint? Who's on it?

And what we're talking about is, why is it the CDC talking about this? Why is in the FDA? Imagine a manhunt where the individual. The FBI is caught covering up where they were just last seen. Or you start seeing, wait a minute, are our government agencies involved? Why aren't they doing anything? Why are they recommending it? This is a huge, huge story.

We're talking about we were told that there's no way this vaccine alters your DNA in any way. And what these guys, genomic specialists, when it comes to your genome, this is their area. They are the best in the world. And they are calling bull crap on that statement that was made, which, means we've been lied to and now this product is creating all sorts of problems in human beings all around the world. So if you're thinking, well, I just going to check. I mean, I get it. We geek out here, but this is a very serious investigation and it's happening all around the world. And I just want to make it clear for those who are like, you know, used to just seeing science and you just pass

over it. Well, listen to the details. What we're talking about every week, this story is getting deeper and deeper and more and more horrifying. Okay, go ahead, Jeffrey. In both those researchers, they're focusing on the regulatory aspects of this because there was a lot that was missed. They're saying, look, this is a regulatory, this is first and foremost a regulatory problem. It obviously is individual people have to take responsibility as well. But the researchers found that the plasma DNA, this contamination, if you will, was likely in the lipid nanoparticles. So remember, the lipid nanoparticles is a new technology right before COVID happened. There's these these

circular kind of lipid globules that house the MRI and the DNA contamination, and they usher that into the cell. So why is that important? Let me just point out to, Jeffrey, something we've covered before, that the lipid nanoparticle was originally designed to deliver drugs like potentially chemotherapy cancer drugs into the brain. The whole idea was something that could cross the blood brain barrier and get to places where other products might not. So this technology, though they told us,

oh, it's going to shoot you an arm and stay there. It's insane because what you use as a delivery system was designed to not stay there. The entire point was so that it could get to your brain and other organs in your body. So this story, this is what we're talking about. There is a cover-up. There's a set of lies that are really, really scary here.

And so now what you're saying is this DNA that is now being found inside of this delivery system, they can go anywhere in your body. Yeah. And one of the issues here was when we talked about, I mean, this story has a lot of offshoots as well to investigate. So in the conclusion there, they said that it exceeded the FDA and WHO's guidelines for DNA contamination.

Those guidelines were put in place by the FDA and WHO in the mid 80s into the 90s. That was way before the lipid nanoparticle technology existed. So that was put to cover essentially a whole different conversation. And it also doesn't cover what's called cumulative dosing. So booster one, booster two, booster three. So we're continually injecting with this lipidanoparticle that has potential DNA contamination. So those guidelines, I mean, from my view at that point are worthless. They need to be rewritten for this new age and this new, this new technology.

So let me get this straight. What you're saying then is that we have this 10 nanograms, as a limited amount of DNA particulates could be in a product based in the 1980. 80s. But that was this idea that, well, I mean, if you're injected with something like that, your immune system's going to just kill it off or do something. It'll probably won't get very far. It's okay. But now we're saying that they never had this, you know, this technology to deliver. So even if you took that 10 nanograms and then protected it and put it in a spaceship, if you will, they can get to your brain or get to your heart, that would seem like 10 nanograms

might be too much. And so what we're not, but we're not, we're not at 10 nanograms. We're at like potentially 500 times the amount, billions of these fragments being housed in delivery weapon systems that's going to your brain, to your heart, in women's ovaries, in all of these things. So it's almost exponentially worse than we can imagine. And that's the concern. And that's why these researchers are saying, wake up regulatory agencies, we really need to do something here. Do we need to pull these products? Do we need to investigate them further? We need to do tests. And we need to do them now. And a lot of people have to repeat these results because we have to confirm these. This is just a small study. But what these

researchers did, they went a step further. They actually looked, because they had the lot numbers. So they cross-reference the lot numbers with the VERS reporting, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. And they said this. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events. We have a chart here from the actual study. And again, it's Pfizer that seems to have the most contamination, at least in this study when they're talking about this. And it was Pfizer that had the dose response relationship. You can see here, you have the serious adverse events on the side, and then the DNA contamination in that nanogram per dose. And it goes up almost right together.

So that's, you know, that's an exploratory analysis, but it's something obviously has to be looked at a lot further by a lot. So how are they doing this? They're tracking the lot numbers and they know how much contaminants they found in that lot. And based on that lot, they find more. VERS reports for that lot than say the one that had low. Is it sort of based on the lot numbers that they know? Is that how they're figuring this out? Yeah, from my understanding, absolutely. Okay, all right.

And so there's another conversation here, another offshoot on this, on this. So some of that DNA contamination is what's called the SV40 promoter. So when I say SV40, our audience will think of the polio vaccine and the monkey kidney cells and then the cancer causing. The SV40 promoter is- Meaning simian retrovirus, Simeon virus, this was a virus that was carried over by accident as our understanding that contaminated the polio vaccine caused cancer for millions and millions of people. So that is what we're

talking about, this is SV40. Yes. And in gene therapy, this is actually something that's used quite a bit in gene therapy. It's called the SV40 promoter. And what it does is it's called a nuclear targeting sequence. It's what it has within it. So what that does is it takes the DNA and it drives it into the nucleus of cells. So it's really great for gene therapies. It does not have the tumor-causing gene in there. That's obviously removed, but it still has a function. So they found that the researchers found that this SV40 enhancer promoter was also among this DNA,

this DNA contamination. So some people actually put that forward to the regulatory agencies and said, hey, by the way, this is a pretty important one. on top of all that DNA contamination, did Pfizer disclose that to you when they put forward all of their information to regulatory agencies? And this is from Canada. This is Health Canada confirms undisclosed presence of DNA sequence in Pfizer shot. And Health Canada said Pfizer did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence. So they're saying we understood that they used plasmids to kind of replicate this DNA, but we didn't understand that that contained the SV40 sequence. So

why did they not show that? Well, it turns out the European Medicines Agency, same thing. European regulator confirms Pfizer did not highlight DNA sequence in COVID-19 vaccine. And the whole conversation to this is important because COVID vaccines did not do genotoxicity studies for regulatory approval, which means genomic contamination. So does it affect your genome? Does it insert itself in those DNA strands we all know about, does it put a little row in there that's not supposed to be there? Does it insert itself in, right? Is one of the things that we're really questioning. And by the way, what we're talking about folks is why on the high wire we were saying warp speed of science is the stupidest concept the world has ever known. Let's just be clear.

Warp speed in science, rushing science is why all of this is turning in this dramatic story that's going to affect lives all around the world. And there's a whole area, obviously, of science, genomics, gene therapy that looks specifically at this expertise in this specific, very nuanced piece. And it sure would be great if, you know, there were some people from that that were overseeing the vaccine approval when this operation works for you was being introduced. Well, in Australia, we have Senator Gerald Renick, and he recently had a conversation with one of those people. Take a listen to how it went.

All right. Gene therapies are a delicate intentional process encapsulating the desired gene. Manufacturing gene therapies is challenging and it requires certain steps including transfection. That is on Pfizer's own website from the table at. And then, and also from the website of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, because the vaccine, it's referring to the COVID-MRNA vaccine, introduces new genetic material into cells for a short period of time to induce antibodies. It is a gene therapy as defined by the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. And then the TGA's own FISA non-ethnical report, page 19,

says the proposed commercial scale manufacturing process includes use of linearized plasma DNA template for MRNA production. So we've now got FISA themselves who admit that the M RNA vaccines are gene therapy. The American Society of Gene and Cell therapy admits the MRA and a gene therapy and we've got the TGA themselves admit the DNA was used in the manufacturing process. Why wasn't the actual MRNA vaccine tested for genotoxicity and why didn't the Office of Genetic OTGR therapeutics look at it in terms of a gene technology? Okay, Dr Rajbollah gene technology regulator. Thank you for your question, Senator. I think the first part about the genotoxicity that question has been asked before.

because the Therapeutic Goods Administration was the approving authority for the vaccine products. That is a question for TGA or genotoxicity. In relation to your question around manufacturing, I think it's useful to put a bit of context around that and that the committee is aware the MRNA COVID-19 vaccines were fully formulated and imported into Australia, which meant that there was actually no manufacture of the MRNA COVID-19 vaccines were fully formulated and imported into Australia, which meant that there was actually no manufacture of the MRNA or the vaccine product itself here in Australia. If indeed the MRNA was being manufactured here and it's correct that gene technology was used and the modification of the MRNA, then under the Gene Technology Act and approval would have been required

for that manufacturing step. Well, that contradicts what you've said previously. you've said previously gene therapy gene technology wasn't used now you're saying because it's produced in another country that you're not responsible for checking the gene therapy so the gene technology act doesn't reach into manufacturing in other countries but it still involves transfection here it goes in it transfix cells of Australian citizens no i disagree with that well that's what for i to say even though admit transfection is a part of gene therapy Senator. So you're disagreeing with Pfizer the people who actually made the vaccine, that

transfection isn't a part of gene therapy? I think she's disagreeing with you at the moment. Well it's not my word. I've just read out what Pfizer said. Welcome to my world. I think it comes down to a definition of what is a gene therapy. Yep, that's right. I'm relying on the manufacturer. Just depends on if there's a difference of a gene therapy. That's right. That's why I'm relying on the manufacturer that says that it is. I mean, that is incredible. And this is, and what we're watching, and this is, we've watched this for years, Jeffrey, in all the lawsuits we've brought, it's this compartmentalizing that gets, that's how they get away with it, right? The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Therefore, no, but like, how do you arrest anybody? How do you

figure out what's going on? In this case, she's saying, well, we didn't manufacture, even though I'm like the head of gene technologies in Australia, and I'm here to make sure, the regulatory agency that makes sure that you're not getting a dangerous gene therapy product made by us. But if it's not made by us, we don't look at it at all. I mean, this is literally like, sorry that that food products killing you in America is made in China and that has nothing to do with us. I mean, it's really a crazy argument that they're making and then trying to say, well, and, well, I don't believe it transfects, even though I didn't do the job my regulatory agency

was supposed to do to prove that. Right. And if you really pin them, there's no, just plain no. I'm not just no, I'm not going to answer that question. Right. So they're looking at the entire, I mean, how do we get here? Looking at this entire pandemic response, there seems to be two camps. There's a camp of saying, well, we want some amnesty because, you know, this was an emergency.

We did the best. We gave it the darned a shot we could. And we did really good under circumstances. There's a whole other camp that said, look, you had the data. You had the information while you were making these decisions. You knew these decisions would be harmful. The lockdowns would be harmful. You didn't test the vaccine to stop transmission.

You knew all this and you went ahead anyway, and it really hurt society. And obviously, here we are still unraveling some of these issues with this vaccine. Well, one of the people I gave it a very blunt analysis is another senator from Australia, Malcolm Roberts. He held a 10-hour COVID inquiry last year. And at the end of it, he grabbed the microphone and said this. It's become clear that people in this country and globally have been steamrolled. It is also clear that it has been coordinated. globally. It is also clear that it has been integrated not just over six months, not just over

two and a half years, but it has been planned over decades. The changes to legislation in this country were done so that they could control doctors and people. But the people are waking, and it's thanks to people like Dr. Altman and all the presenters here today, thanks to people like Senator Babette and Craig Kelly. We know and we knew that this is all bribed and that we been had. But we are going to hound you down the people that are guilty. We are going to hound you down and hold you accountable. And we will expose your global agenda so that the people of Australia can be free in the future. Because I love my kids and I'm looking forward to my grandkids. And we are going to save this country. It's amazing when I think, you know, all this going on in

the world, some very, very touchy subjects that you just can't say one thing about without getting attacked by somebody. But meanwhile, probably the biggest thing, story there is in the world. Something that's killing more than probably any war right now is this vaccine that was forced on citizens all around this world. And we're all tuned to watching bombs dropping in Ukraine and Israel and Gaza and all this. And my heart goes out to all of the pain that is going on there. But we are distracted when our own government agencies are continuing to push a product that very well may be destroying millions of people's lives over the next couple of years, you know, we are really distracted. It's why, you know, we're focused here. I know a lot of

you, you know, we're not weighing into things that have nothing to do with help because I think this is the biggest story. This is a war on humanity right here. And we're really being distracted by other things around the world. So it's, it's really, this is an outrageous story. And it's great to see more and more politicians starting to make statements like that. We are going to hound you down. Well, welcome to the high wire team. We plan on hounding. I love to term hounding any and Anthony Fauci down and you know putting him behind bars as he should be