The Highwire with Del Bigtree - NEW CA BILL SEEKS TO MANDATE DANGEROUS HPV

Episode Date: March 19, 2023

California legislators continue their reign of vaccine mandate terror with the proposed Assembly Bill 659, which would require children to be vaccinated for HPV before entering 8th grade. Attorney, Michael Baum, Esq., discusses his law firm’s fight to block this bill, which would stop countless crippling injuries, especially in the absence of proof of efficacy.#AB659 #GardasilInjury #HPVvaccine #Gardasil #WisnerBaumBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Once again, California is finding itself under attack from the vaccine lords. This is what that looks like. Should middle schoolers be required to get the HPV vaccine in order to go to school? A California bill has been introduced in Sacramento to require students entering eighth grade to get the HPV vaccine. This proposed legislation would require all incoming eighth graders in California's public and private schools to get the HPV vaccine. More than 42 million people have HPV, and every year another 14 million Americans or so pick up the virus. So getting vaccinated early enough to prevent infection is key. The HPV vaccine has been on the market since 2006 when the FDA approved it as a way to prevent cervical cancer in women.

But it also benefits men in the prevention of penile cancer. Assembly member Cecilia Aguilar Curry, who proposed this new bill, points out because this vaccine would be administered years. After kids get their MMR shots, they can determine if they have any adverse reaction. Parents and vaccine vulnerable children have plenty of time to take advantage of the medical exemption that is in the bill. This vaccine has been around since 2006 and many hundreds of millions of doses have been given and there are no appreciable side effects. People keep saying, well, it's just a woman's issue.

No, it's not just a woman's issue. It's a people issue. and I have a philosophy is that anything I can do to prevent cancer, I'm going to do that. If it's a decision of a poke in your arm versus a future risk of cancer, it's like actually one of the easier vaccines to recommend. I've said it so many times. The most powerful lobby in Washington is the pharmaceutical lobby. I don't believe any of these decisions are ever made about children's health or people's health. This is just about the bottom line.

seen this company when this headline came out last year. Basically, Merck is nearing completion of a one billion Gardasil manufacturing push. It's a 2023 doubling of production. Where are you going to go with that doubling of production on a population that's already been being injected with this for many, many years? Well, obviously, you've got to force it onto those that have decided that they don't want. This is what that bill actually looks like. CA bill would mandate HBV vaccine for all students entering eighth grade. The entrance is in eighth grade. Obviously, it's going after all teenagers, the hope to get it there. Assembly bill number 6.59. I want to say, you know, and here's here's the co-authors that all signed on to this bill. I'm not sure if they're all brain dead or

if they're bought or maybe they just think they're doing the right thing. That would take further investigation, which I haven't had the time to do. But I will say this. To all of those that have signed on this bill, no one has been more involved in a deep. investigation, the safety of vaccines. And of all the vaccines prior to COVID, I believe the Gardasil HPV vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine that had ever been made, certainly the most dangerous that's anywhere near the childhood schedule. And so many issues around that. A great book was written, HPV, Gardasil vaccine on trial, which everyone should read. A brilliant book by Mary Holland, Kim Mack Rosenberg, and Eileen Roryo. It just, you got to do your own.

investigations on this, folks. If you find your teenagers in harms, you know, being offered this, I really wanted to do your investigation because when I was traveling with the documentary Vax, which catapulted me into the middle of this conversation, some of the most horrific interviews we did were of those parents whose children had received this vaccine that is supposed to stop cervical cancer, now penile cancer. There's absolutely no evidence at all that that has ever achieved that. The trials never proved that. But besides the fact, these parents were telling us stories of their children being paralyzed by the vaccine. One terrible story, remember, the daughter had died after getting the HPV vaccine.

But what was so weird about, I don't know of what the science behind her, if there is any science, but every time I heard the story, they would talk about how their child was a star athlete, star soccer player, star track athlete, star softball player, and then all of their dreams were wiped out by one single vaccine. There is a story that we were doing and covering while we're on tour with Vaxed that really changed my life forever. For those of you that maybe haven't seen all that we've done, this may be a first. But this is the story of Colton. I just want to share this one interview we did with him because I think it says it all. Take a look at this.

Colton was a 13-year-old, healthy, strong boy. He loved anything that has to do with an adrenaline rush. Motorcross was his passion. We went to the doctor's office and the doctor says, hey, he's the age that you should get the HPV vaccine. I said, okay. So he was administered the vaccine. And on the third round,

two weeks after, he started having a really bad neckache. And then this is the last day he got to ride that big boy bike. And that day he came home, he was Kale, starting to feel nauseous, really sore neck. It didn't feel good. He went to bed and the next day I checked on him. He still didn't want to get out of bed. I just thought, man, you're just really weak and exhausted.

And that evening when he sat up to take a drink of water, he said, Mom, can you, can you give that to me in my left hand? I can't use my right arm very good. It's weak. And he tried to lift up, and all of a sudden he just flopped back. And his head just hit the pillow, and I went, Colton, are you going paralyzed? They immediately took him down to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake.

When the doctor came out and asked me questions, they said, well, has he been sick? Has he had any changes or any other things? I said, no, he hasn't been sick. He had the HPV vaccine on February 1st and they went, oh, well, we'll be reporting that to Vars. And they did. I did do a lot of sports. He was my favorite.

But now I have the sit on sideline. Just watch everybody. I'm angry that they're still giving out the vaccine. They don't care that people are getting hurt. Mm-hmm. It's a joke. You've got to do your research. Like, you can't just trust a doctor anymore.

I remember when I was standing right there watching my co-producer Polyt Tommy conduct that interview and thinking to myself as I was watching this machine on the side of him breathing through the tube that was pierced through his throat and thinking how often I'm told that vaccinations got rid of the iron lung. And I was standing, I said, we didn't get rid of the iron lung. We just made it smaller. and now thousands of people are wearing these across America, many of whom have been injured by vaccines. You know, this is just a horrible story, but it wasn't, Colton wasn't the only one. He will be missed. He ended up taking his life because of the difficulties of his life and what he thought it was doing for his family.

It's just a really heartbreaking story, but he's not alone. I'm telling you thousands of these people across America have gone through this and around the world. Many of those that were in the trials for Gardasil haven't been treated properly and been injured and not being listened to. There was even an incredible story out of Columbia where hundreds of girls got the vaccine in the same town all ended up having massive side effects and paralysis. And they ruled that they were all, the all hundreds of them were just suffering a mass psychosis event. It had something to do with all of them just panicking together. There is this level of insanity that demands the most thorough investigations, the most powerful lawsuits there are. And so the irony of the same moment that this terrible, terrible vaccine, they're going to attempt to mandate it in California.

One of the most important lawsuits of all times in this vaccine space is taking place. In fact, it's going into discovery, which is something that some people said would never happen when it came to the vaccine issue because of the protection. of the 1986 vaccine injury compensation program. The law firm involved in this lawsuit, Wisner Baum, has a historic record of being one of the most powerful environmental attorneys, legal firms. They brought us the Monsanto case, the multi-billion dollar Monsanto case.

They've proven that that causes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Brett Wisner has been on our show talking about it. So it's an absolute honor to get to talk to these. guys, I'm being joined right now by Michael Baum of Wisner and Baum, an illustrious career working for the best interests of humanity, fighting industries when they were destroying the lives of people. I think more successful than almost any other law firm out there. Of course, he's worked directly with our good friend Robert Kennedy Jr.

And is so in this case against the HPV vaccine. Now, Michael, I want to thank you for taking the time to join us today. You're very welcome, Del. Good to see again. Good to see you, too. So my first question is how did this case get to this point? I mean, one of the issues has been because of the 1986 Act, the protections on the manufacturers. We have never been able to get a vaccine onto trial where we could actually get into discovery and start demanding that type of information we get on the other. drug cases when we look at Monsanto or we look at Vioxx, we're able to find out that they

always knew there was side effects, but they hit it from the public. How is it that this got outside of that 1986 protection? Well, there actually is a fairly not well-known provision in the act that says that you're required to go through the vaccine court program, but if you stay in it for 240 days or you get a... get a decision that you're not satisfied with, you can opt out of the program and file a civil suit. And almost nobody knew that. I certainly didn't know that. Wow. Most people are under the impression, most lawyers are under the impression that there's an absolute immunity that prevents discovery and lawsuits from going forward. However, what we discovered and have been

exercising is filing suits in the vaccine program. If the, the, you know, vaccine program makes a decision, gives someone a result that they're happy with, and they settle out. But if they get one they're not happy with, they're permitted to go and file a lawsuit in civil court, which we've done so far for around 85 people now that are filed in either state or federal court around the country. We have about another 195, 115 that are in the program, another 80 that have finished their 240 days. If that being in the program, if they end for 240 days, and there's not a decision adjudicating what their case is worth. According to the program, they're allowed to opt out. So we've got 115 that are in going through the process, 80 that are out, getting about to be filed in the federal court system where they've been consolidated in Charlotte, North Carolina, and we have about 85 presently filed.

There are an unfortunate thing is that there's very limited statute of limitations for. for filing cases in the vaccine program. And it's ostensibly runs from three years from the date that the injuries start, the injury symptoms began. Okay. And whether or not you're a minor, I mean, which is, you know,

a lot of the people who are vaccinated are kids. And so there ought to be some sort of provision to allow a statute of limitations. It is prior when they're adults. especially when in the case of this injury, doctors are gaslighting, for the most part, these parents, when they, you know, if they ask the question, is it possible? As in the story we just showed Colton, you tell the mother, you know, what happened? They got the vaccine and said, oh, it wouldn't be the vaccine.

So so many of these parents tell the story being lied to for years until they finally come around to the conclusion because they meet enough specialists and now it's too late for them to be in court. And then when we think about, when you think about pushing a bill like this, there shouldn't be one Colton out there. There shouldn't be one child whose life is completely destroyed. And you've already listed, you know, nearly 200 that are just have somehow gotten to this gauntlet, somehow got to the truth, somehow we're able to get their story forward on time. And yet this vaccine, what other product out there is allowed to injure and destroy hundreds of lives? And you know, that's just a tiny percentage of those that's actually happened to that continue to sell and profit and have our government mandate them. So there's like 2,000 more individuals that we would like to proceed with who have they found out too late.

Wow. And we think it's unfair that they found out too late. So we want to litigate that as well because it's just you're right. They got gas litigate by physicians, some of whom were just, in my opinion, and deceived by the company. I agree. The CDC about the safety and efficacy. Oh, there's no adverse events.

So we've got this guy, for instance, Dr. Jacob Lalazar, who was one of the guys that ran one of the clinical trials up in the San Francisco area for Gardasil. And he says with this HPV vaccine, there is no legitimate debate. There are no side effects. There's no toxicity. And it's now shown unequivocally to prevent infections and cancer. So there's no reason why every young person shouldn't get this vaccine. If that's the message is being conveyed, that is gaslighting because every single one of those facts stated are false.

It is there's like, what, 64,000 adverse events. Until COVID vaccine, it had more adverse events reported against Gardasil than all other vaccines in the history of the vaccine. event reporting system. Wow. We found, and the work that we have found, we've found already 600 more conditions like pots-like conditions and neurological, autoimmune neurological conditions like Coltons in our database, and that's, we're just beginning. Right. And if you look at the thing called a disproportionate reporting ratio. You look at how Gartesol compares to all other vaccines over time. There's like 20 times more potts conditions, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, which means that when you stand up, you faint. And they have a lot of, it's an autoimmune condition

that has large effects across the body. People end up kids, athletic kids, end up, wheelchair bound. One of the mechanisms of action for that occurring is called damage associated molecular pattern. When you get cells damaged, they release toxins. And athletes happen to be have their immune systems activated in a way that means that they're sort of hyperstimulated because they're banging around. And that that was one, as I said, that was one of the things that.

that I didn't know there was any science behind it, but it was the story I kept hearing, which is that it's the athletic kids, the ones that were like really, really athletic. I was just like, it's just, we don't, you know, as a journalist, you just start saying, man, there's a repetition of the type of story that I'm hearing here. Really quickly, I want to point out that your law firm actually put forward a letter to all the legislators in California telling them that you have this case going on, expressing how many brilliant lawyers are working on it, the level of science that you're working with. I like this just quote that was in the middle of it. We provide this information not to toot our own horns,

but to illustrate the caliber of the lawyers conducting this litigation and so that the assembly will appreciate that such lawyers will have done their due diligence concerning guardisoles risks and benefits. Whether the company failed to warn about the known risks and whether the company committed fraud and its conduct and reporting of its Gardasil studies. We have extensively studied the literature, engaged scientists from some of the top universities in the nation, including Stanford, Columbia, and Johns Hopkins and have amassed millions of pages of internal Merck documents that not even the FDA gets to see. This is, you know, it's an important warning. And by the way, lawyers, especially in law firms as large as yours, don't tend to just waste your time. Do you?

I mean, you have to make sure that there's a case there. Yeah, we have to make sure there's a case there. And it was through things like Mary Holland and Eileen Iorio and Kim McRosenberg's book, HBV vaccine on trial. They did a great job of documenting a lot of the problems with the clinical trials and the adverse events that were being showing up after the vaccine got approved. You know, what are the point you making this? Well, hold on one of the points you're making the letter, and I think you're about to get this anyway, is this idea they say, well, we've reduced cancers.

When we've looked at the evidence from, with our science team, we don't see any drop in cervical cancer whatsoever. In some cases, when you look at it, it looks like it's rising. This is from the CDC, folks. This is after the great introduction of the Gardasil vaccine. We see no, I mean, do you see anything? There it is. I mean, it's up and down. In fact, those last sort of several years.

It's gone up. So the idea that the introduction of this vaccine had any effect, when we look at the trials themselves, they didn't actually prove that they could stop cervical cancer, did they? No, they were testing whether they stopped cervical lesions, which are abnormal displacements, abnormal cell formations on the cervix. And most of those resolve, over 90% self-resolved. And the way the clinical trials were designed,

where they were designed to see, What do these, does the vaccine stop lesions associated with these particular strains of HPV that are in the vaccine? And so there's a whole bunch of layers of misinformation in there. Number one, there's a couple hundred strains of HPV. Right. The vaccines only address a handful of them. Seven of them in the Garcell 9 are related to oncogenic related. lesions, but there are the vaccine actually just creates antibodies against those seven strains.

And so if there are other HPV strains in the environment that a person get exposed to, it'll progress anyway. And if the person that's been vaccinated thinks that they're now invulnerable to HPV infection because they've been vaccinated, they may not do the precautionary things like getting pap smears, which pap smears have virtually eliminated cervical cancer in the developed nations. Wherever there is a pap smear program, cervical cancer is on a big decline, 80% decline, just tremendous decline. And among older people who have not been vaccinated, that decline continues. Among younger people who have been vaccinated, it's starting to tick up.

And that's partly because, I think, that the kids, when they get vaccinated, they're told, oh, this is preventing cancer. You're not going to get HPV infections. They don't get the concept, they are not advised well that it is only preventing infection amongst a particular strain. And there's a condition called type replacement.

Other HPV strains come in and proliferate in the same tissue and develop the same problems, but they are not being detected by pap smear because the kids are not thinking that they have a risk. I remember we had an interview with a world-renowned gynecologist Dr. Lee, and he said to us, you know, this was never a necessary vaccine because pap smears, if you catch these lesions, when they appear, if you're getting, you know, doing your annual checkups,

you know, with your gynaecologist, if it gets severe, they cut them out, there's no problem. He said literally, if you get cervical cancer under regular gynecological care, it's grounds for malpractice. That is how easy it is to stop this. This vaccine, my understanding, was really made, and Mary Holland gets into this in the book with Kim, Mack Rosenberg, but this vaccine was made for the third world that don't have pap smears,

don't have doctors, they aren't getting care all the time, and whether or not it's even good for them, you know, is a different kind of. conversation, but it really was just a financial decision to bring it to America. We didn't need it. We had the care. And now this vaccine, as you're pointing out, could really risk children, you know, and teenagers continuing that care because now they can be promiscuous they think. Now they can go out. I'm totally covered. And it's just not the case. Do you, you know, when we look at these injuries, we look at what's going on. And you said in that letter, we are seeing things that

that not in the FDA is seeing. What do you feel like, you know, and we're going into discovery. And when I look at that book, you know, so much of what we know, but we haven't, some of it, we need proof of it. What do you think is, you know, what's going to happen with this case? And how important is it when it comes to this vaccination? And how dumb would it be for legislators to push a vaccine right at the moment where a legal case by the same team that just won against Monsanto?

Can you imagine having pushed Roundup as a mandated product on all, you know, crops just a year before, you know, at that point, I think was Baumheadland, but now Wisner Baum had the case. I mean, when you sent this letter, what is it you're trying to get through to legislators in California right now? We want them to know that the vaccine does, is toxic, and particularly for certain individuals, it comes. causes devastating injuries that are debilitating, that its design is actually to cause an extremely exaggerated immune response that in some people results in debilitating autoimmune conditions. It is one of the most toxic vaccines in the history of vaccines. It has more adverse events, more serious adverse events than all other vaccines, combined up until the COVID vaccines. So it's a false idea that it's safe and it's a false idea

that it's affected, that the idea that it's a cancer prevention vaccine is untrue because it never was tested on cancer provision prevention. It was only tested on whether it prevents abnormal cell formation cervical lesions. And because it most of those resolve either on their own or with a treatment through post-PAP smear treatments, it's not a condition that is requires a vaccine to prevent most of the problems. It's not the type of thing you want to be mandating when there is the highest number of adverse events, the highest number of serious adverse events, and you have debilitating event things occurring where kids become former athletes become wheelchair bound. It cannot be in light, have to wear headphones because sound is so intense and are shaking. And it's just, it's horrific.

and for legislators and physicians to be running around saying it's not toxic, it is completely safe and it prevents cancer, those things are untrue. And it's a misconception that is being fed to them. And some people are feeding for the purpose of making that vaccine be more used, more money for Merck to be made, more money for physicians who have these completed vaccine programs. They have, you know, there's, it's not appropriate for a vaccine of this sort to be mandated. And the way this act is designed, there's no out. I mean, they're saying, you know, you saw that, you know, someone has one of the sponsors saying, oh, well, you know, you can get you a medical exemption because you've had plenty of time to determine that with the MMR.

Well, the MMR is a different vaccine, number one. Right. I mean, the idea that if you've been injured by some other vaccine, then that would be the only reason you might have an reaction to this. I'll also point out in our research, we have an aluminum load and an aluminum product inside of here that's never been tested, has been hidden really from proper investigation. Hopefully you're going to get to the bottom of that.

Michael, I just want to say that, you know, clearly this case is one of the most important of all times, especially in this vaccine space. This is one of the most popular new vaccines that was created. It doesn't achieve, just like COVID vaccine does not achieve what they state it does, does cause injury. We just showed the open bears while you were speaking there, which shows tens of thousands of reports of injuries there. You talked about the thousands that would like to be a part of this case that can't. And yet they will tell us there's no proof that we have any issue whatsoever. I want

to thank you for your time and know you're really busy. Just your last thoughts because, you know, people will say well, Michael, I mean, there are parents out there that are going to be listening to you right now and they might not get this Gardasil vaccine because of what you're saying. You're still

in the middle of the case. How do you talk about this with your friends if they ask you about their teenagers and what would you say? I'd say, do not have them get the Gardasel vaccine? The adverse event database for vaccines shows a very high level for adverse events themselves. The one I was getting rid of the scariest ones is it causes premature ovarian failure. A study just came out that it was like a hundred times greater rate of premature ovarian

failure reports for girls given guardisle. And compared to all other vaccines over all time, and that's the Tatatang study, T-A-T-A-N-G, that ought to spook the hell out of any mother or parent, father, of a girl getting a vaccine because it can result in premature ovarian failure for a disease that may not occur until they're 55 or 60, and it'll be prevented by doing regular pap smears. it's it's it's it's mind-boggling that anyone would consider it to be a safe and effective thing to do uh i if someone really wants it i mean there's i'm not saying to ban it yeah uh but i am saying that they ought to know what the actual risks are yeah and they ought to know uh what sort of

people ought not to be taking it there are there are risk factors that are for some people it is really a bad idea. Like you've got already a hyperstimulated immune system. So high impact athletes, allergies, a recent infection. Don't be, especially don't get it if you have a current HPV infection. Right. There are studies that show that there's elevated cancer rates after injecting someone with an active HPV infection. They don't screen those people out. They don't screen out the allergies. They don't screen out people that are having damage associated molecular patterns. That's from the injuries. They don't screen those out. And those people are extreme risk because the whole way Gartasil works through

that aluminum adjuvant, it's considered the most immunogenic adjuvant, which is something to boost the immune response. It's so strong of a immune booster that it overwhelms the immune, the vaccinated person's immune system's ability to tell the difference between self and non-self. That's immune tolerance. That gets overwhelmed. And the people who have the most risk of that don't get screened out.

And that's dangerous. Absolutely. It's a subtle thing. You take your healthy kid and think you go, well, this is not going to be a problem. Well, if that is a healthy kid as an athlete's got some damage associated molecular proteins floating around. And you can boost the immune system with this adjuvant that's like 100 times more immunogenic than the actual HPV virus live. That overwhelms an immune system's ability to talk. tell the difference to itself and non-self.

When that happens, you get autoimmune diseases. And autoimmune diseases in the brain, and the heart, in the nervous system result in debilitating permanent conditions that you do not want to have your child go through. Absolutely. Michael Baum, thank you for fighting for America's children. Once again, you've been doing it.

You know, really your whole career, we're excited to have you, and we're excited that you've moved into a space that we were told we would never get to. So best of luck to you, we'll continue to spread the word. And is there anything, can people get involved? Can they help in any way? Is there anything that you need from our audience right now?

Well, one message is that if you have a child that received guardesal and is experiencing symptoms, that you're concerned about, like we've been talking about, these autoimmune conditions, hurry up and get to a lawyer who get that case into the vaccine program before the statute of limitation expires. Okay. It's a it's a gnarly one and a lot of people don't know that they need to get in

three years from the date that the symptoms started. We're trying to fix that, but until that's fixed, you need to get in. So they can contact our law firm. We're connected with some of the vaccine program lawyers. There's the Lanier law firm, Morgan and Morgan, Drew Downing, Andrew Downing. What are the, you know, there's all the, some of the biggest there are as you said in your letters. Yeah. There's some great lawyers out there that are very willing to help and help get this get you into the program, get you through that program and able to file a lawsuit if needed.

Very important. Michael Baum, thank you for taking the time to sort of illuminate all these important issues and best of luck. We'll stay in touch. Yeah, happy to talk. All right. Great. Take care. You know, I mean, these are, it's so important.

I'm telling you, I have seen too many lives destroyed by this one. You really need to get on top. And I'll just say this. Look, in the end, it just comes down to your own research. If you give this vaccine to your child and you did not at least take the step to read the book, HBV vaccine trial, then the guilt will be yours. I mean, you had an opportunity. You have right now. And for those of you out there, I would buy that book for your friends.

If they have teenagers, try to get them to do some investigation before they get into it. Because eventually I think this lawsuit is going to prove what we've always known. Maybe this time we'll shut down Merck for good. I don't know. They're still good at making billions even when they destroy countless lives.