The Highwire with Del Bigtree - NEW EMAILS: COVID VACCINE HEART RISK WITHHELD FOR MONTHS

Episode Date: October 21, 2025

Unredacted government emails obtained by Senator Ron Johnson show that health officials identified a myocarditis risk from mRNA vaccines months before informing the public. While Pfizer and Moderna were quietly notified, Americans were not. Jefferey Jaxen breaks down the evidence and new studies showing how mRNA and spike proteins affect heart tissue. Del Bigtree calls it a defining moment for accountability in public health.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Let me bring it down to the focus of the COVID shot. We have these Western and Eastern alliances. They're forming to push a shot that should not be on the market right now. It certainly shouldn't be on the market for children and adolescents. And you're still seeing headlines like this. COVID eligibility. Younger people are finding ways to get this shot despite the confusion at the top. And you can see the byline here it says, but parents are having more difficulty getting infants and toddlers vaccinated.

This again, this is never on the market. story. You want to talk about, I call liars on all those reporters right now. Nobody is like, how am I going to get my COVID shot? This is such a contrived piece of baloney. You know, maybe there's three lunatics right now in America that are struggling, searching the streets for their COVID shot. Oh my God. As though, hurry up, get behind me. Line starts behind me. I'm going to get the last COVID shot. Yeah, we fell for that. We're that stupid. But again, Jeffrey, I hope they keep doing it. I mean, it just shows how far ahead we are. Like when people, people say, oh, we're the minority. No, we are not the minority. These morons writing,

these articles are trying every stupid approach they can to make you think you want one of these things. There's a line and we're running out. There's a scarcity. Make sure you get one now. Quickly, run. Unbelievable. And again, for people, the last people on Earth still buying this, if the regulatory agencies would have done any part of their job, they had the signal when it came to myocarditis. And I want to go over this timeline because it's very important because we should not even be having this conversation right now. Here's Ron Johnson looking at unredacted emails that he received, his office received, and he put together a timeline that happened in 2021 when the shot was rolling out. It should have all ended right there. It didn't. And this is why. On February 28, 2021,

Israeli health officials notified CDC quote of large reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people following the administration of the Pfizer vaccine. Again, that's February 28, 2021. two and a half months after the emergency use authorization. On April 12th, over a month later, a DOD consultant raises concerns to CDC and FDA officials about their ability to monitor and track cardiac-related adverse events. The consultant notes, quote, if you do not ask, you will not see it. But does that mean it does not exist? Unquote.

Around the same time, in mid-April, 2021, CDC officials discussed safety signals for myocarditis, quote, for myocryditis with MRNA vaccines based on DOD and Israeli data, but do not take immediate steps to warn the public. From May 17th to May 21, 2021, CDC officials discuss whether to issue a formal health warning called a health alert network message on myocryditis, noting that, quote, providers aren't reporting these case surveyors. They knew they weren't. They knew they existed.

They knew they weren't reporting him. A couple days later during a May 24, 2021 vaccine safety meeting, notes show that FDA and CDC officials ask, quote, is Veyers signaling for myopyrgydeitis now? Question mark and are told for the age group 16 to 17 years and 18 to 24 years. Yes. Yes, they saw a safety signal in Vayers. Yet, from May 25th to May 27,

CDC officials provide up-to-date information on the state. status of the Han to Pfizer and Moderna representatives. Not to the public. They're warning the injection manufacturers, indicating CDC's preference to keep those companies more informed about vaccine adverse events than the American people. We cannot play that video enough. Thank God for Senator Ron Johnson. An inconvenient study is only possible because he published this study on the Senate website. He's been like a dog with a bone on this issue. I've watched him listen to parents of injury, the empathy he has, the passion he has for this. And what he's laying out there is absolutely criminal. You're seeing the signal, you know it's causing myocarditis, paracrititis,

and you are not warning the public. In fact, you're doing a PR job inside telling the companies that are making it. You're going to have this little PR issue. How are we going to cover it up? I mean, it's absolutely, it's our government, right? This is crazy that this is coming out now. And we need to keep playing that. They sat on it for three months, regulatory agency, sat on for three months, they punted it to the pharmaceutical manufacturers. They were supposed to put out a health alert to the public. They didn't. They watered it down. They walked it back was the words they used. And what they were supposed to do, they were actually, they had it already written. They wanted doctors to possibly consider kids that came in with myocarditis to not do competitive sports, not do rigorous

activity for at least three months, just that. And our regulatory agencies at the time said, no, that's too radical. Let's just let this run. And so the public had no idea what was going on. I seem to recall at the time there was some people talking to the public about this and trying to warn them. Look like this. If you'll remember, now former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, he sold out his entire population to be test subjects for Pfizer. So he received the Pfizer vaccine, basically inoculated most of the population. And then you get these headlines. Israeli reports link, Israel reports link between rare cases of heart inflammation and COVID-19 vaccination and young men.

And it says in this study, 90% of the cases picked up in Israel appeared in men. And although myocarditis is normally more common among young men, the rate among those vaccinated was somewhere between five and 25 times the background rate, the report says. The Israeli report was the first really extensive study linking this heart inflammation to vaccinated individuals. And they're saying somewhere between like one in 3,000 and one and 6,000 people who received that Pfizer shot went on to develop. myocarditis. But now we're bringing it over here in the States. And the CDC is saying, you know, similar things, not so much with the numbers of the study, but they're saying CDC says vaccine linked to heart inflammation is stronger than previously thought. They're saying teenagers and those

in their 20s. And just a just a reminder in the U.S., Pfizer has the only emergency use authorization for 12 to 17-year-olds. That's incredible, Jeffrey. When you think about right today, people are still lying about this issue. No one at MSNBC has ever told you there's myocarditis or paracoditis as an advanced risk or CNN for that matter. And it's good to point out for those of you that are here for the first time. You probably wouldn't have gotten this vaccine if you've been watching the high wire because we were on it. Right when Senator Johnson's telling you they're lying about it, we're there in June of 2021 telling you there is an obvious signal, five to 25 times higher risk of myocarditis, paracoditis, amongst those young men getting the vaccine. Where would we be?

if that had been the news across all of the major networks, Jeffrey. Where would we be? We wouldn't be seeing the cancer rates driving. All-cause mortality is still higher. All the issues that we've seen. That lie by our government, that holding back of the truth, and all of mainstream media, which is owned by Pharma, slowly, I'm glad those commercials are being changed

because that is the crime. That's how they got away with it, was all the funding Farma had in the TVs that should have told you what, Jeffrey, you were telling us all the way back in June. And that's why I love you, man. It's why this show continues to go on. If people want the truth, they now know where they have to go

to be getting it. And I appreciate that. Thank you. And regulatory agencies punted again. They told pharmaceutical companies first. They told them, they warned them. So what the pharmaceutical companies had to say, well, Stefan Bonzel, the CEO of Moderna, he was given the opportunity in a congressional hearing to tell

us what he thought, to tell us all that information he received from our regulatory agencies. This is what you had to say on myocarditis. Is there a higher interest or a higher incidence of myocarditis among adolescent males 16 to 24 after taking your vaccine? So thank you for the question, Senator. First, let me say we get deeply about safety and we're working closely with the CDC and the FDA. Pretty much a yes or no.

Is there a higher incidence of myocarditis among boys 16 to 24 after they take your vaccine? The data have shown actually, I've seen, sorry, from the CDC actually shown that there's less Americanitis for people who get the vaccine versus who get COVID infection. You're saying that for ages 16 to 24 among males who take the COVID vaccine, their risk of myocarditis is less than people who get the disease. That is my understanding.

That is not true. And I'd like to enter into the record six peer-reviewed papers from the Journal of Vaccine, the annals of Medicine that say the complete opposite of what you say. I also spoke with your president just last week, and he readily acknowledged in private, that yes, there is an increased risk of myocarditis. The fact that you can't say in public is quite disturbing. And there you have it. There you have it. In the words. Yeah.

So we have more science now. So those alliances on the East and the West that are trying to vaccinate, give the COVID vaccine to everybody if they have a pulse, are going against the science because we have a lot of science, but we have the newest research right now. This is benchwork. This is tabletop benchwork in science for beakers. using beakers and petri dishes and is looking at the mechanisms of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-induced myocarditis. So before, we've had a lot of observational studies. Now it says

this. Here the researchers talk about what they do. They say, here we transfected AC-16 cardiomyocytes. Those are cardio cells with in vitro transcribe, COVID-19, MRNA modified with N-methal cirdeuridein. So those are the instructions. That's the MRNA instructions that delivered to the cells. And they did that to assess its inflammatory potential. The result, the results. results demonstrated that the in vitro transcribed MRI elicited a robust inflammatory response in cardiomyocytes. You don't want robust inflammation in your heart, but this is what it did. Markedly upregulating the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 twofold. It also goes on to say,

under inflammatory conditions, IVTM RNA further exacerbated IL6 secretion twofold and increased cardiomyosite apoptosis. That's cardio cell death, 1.3fold. Additionally, IVTMRNA significantly elevated the levels of myocardial injury biomarkers, specifically creakine kinase mb, 1.5 fold, and cardiac troponin twofold. And remember listening to all of these, the VIRPAC committee, the ASA committee, during that time when they were approving this for adolescents, they're saying, look, we know the cardiac troponin levels are elevated in these children with myocarditis, but it doesn't really mean that it's a bad thing. That sometimes can just go away. They'll have a great life. This is saying it literally has cell death, cardiac cell death. And the researchers go on

and say this, not we should consider pausing this vaccination campaign. We should consider reevaluating this MRNA platform for COVID. They say this. They say these results underscore the importance of avoiding critical microRNA binding sites and the design of next generation mRNA vaccine sequences to approve safety. So keep going, guys. All good. So this builds. So now we have, okay, so we have the M RNA, the actual message that goes into the the cell that tells the cell to create that spike protein. But we have also evidence of another mechanism. We recovered this in 2022. This was a case study looking at about 15 patients with intramiocardial inflammation after their COVID-19 vaccine, and they found that there's spike

protein. The vaccine encoded spike protein seems to reach the heart, they say, where it may trigger an inflammatory response resulting in the development of myocarditis. But they say there's also a causal relationship between the vaccine and the occurrence of myocardial inflammation. and it cannot be established based on these findings, and that was 2022. So now we're building on these findings, but they have the cardiac detection of the spike protein. They have the CD4 plus T-cell-dominated inflammation, and this relationship, this close temporal relationship argued that this vaccine triggered auto-meaning reaction is happening. And you can see the picture here. You see on the first two slides as Pfizer's vaccine, the next one, third one's Moderna's vaccine. And you can

see literally the finding the spike protein in the heart. So not only is the messaging that tells the cell to make the spike protein causing inflammation, but the spike protein itself is causing the inflammation. So basically two out of three of the components, lip nanoparticle is the third one. They're all causing this inflammation. And so what are we doing here at ICANN? We're reporting on this. We're trying to get this out, but we're also working with informed consent action networks, legal team to get more information to the public on this. So we have the science. Here's one. CDC, we ask them, hey, can you tell us how long the spike protein is in the body? And can you tell us when it clears the body? We ask them that under a legal,

question basically and they have no records found for that request. They cannot tell us. Now, this COVID vaccine is still being manufactured. They're updating just like the flu shot, these new boosters for the fall immunization campaign. And so I can't also ask, they're demanding full transparency on the safety data that's used by Moderna and Novavax on these COVID-19 vaccines. So the second we get this, the public will know, we will open source all of this information for any doctor, research, or scientists that wants to look at this and publish their own studies, and then we can get to this conversation where this vaccination should be paused. It definitely should be paused for children, should be paused for elderly people, everybody, until these things

are worked out. Because if we don't do it, what's going to happen is it will be built upon for something like, I don't know, food allergies. That's the next headline here. Future MRNA vaccines may prevent food and seasonal allergies. So we go into this article and they quote Drew Weissman. Drew Weissman won the Nobel Prize for the MRNA vaccine technology. They quote him in Europe because he's the one working on this vaccine. He says this, quote, we saw MRNA vaccines save lives during the pandemic and as the most tested type of vaccine in history, we know it's the safest and most effective vaccine ever created. All right, every one of those statements is essentially false. And the problem with using false,

statements is they're building the foundation upon the false statements to move forward. And this is Weissmann's study. And they're looking at this MRNA lipid nanoparticle platform as a therapy for allergies. Some may say allergies are some of the chronic conditions that are created by vaccines. So now we're using vaccines to basically go against that. And it's interesting because in this study, just as a side note to finish with this, they challenge the mice. So they give the mice this MRNA lipid nanoparticle, and it's an OVA-M-R-Na lipid nanoparticles. That's the Ova-Bulam, it's part of the egg white shell. And so they inject the mice with this, but then to challenge the mice, they give them an

aluminum adjuvant. It says this in the study. It says sensitized with Ova protein mixed with aluminum adjuvant to elicit allergic reaction to see if the vaccine works. So that's interesting because the aluminum adjuvant is riddled within the first year of the childhood schedule given to babies. So how interesting is that? And now we're using vaccines with the M&A platform to combat allergies. Just a side note moving forward for those researchers out there that want to dig further into this. Unbelievable. For anyone watching for the first time, let me try to make that as simple as I possibly can.

In order to create an allergy in this mice, they give them an egg protein, and they give them aluminum because aluminum incites the immune system, and makes that egg protein the enemy. And by doing that, you have an allergic reaction. That way, they can test if their new mRNA vaccine actually reduces that allergic reaction. Here is the news flash. Injecting aluminum causes allergic reactions to proteins in your body. If you want to understand one of the major hypotheses of why we have food allergies, peanut allergies,

all of these issues about allergies that is rampant in our children, the vaccines you're giving your kid have aluminum. They're trying, what they want to believe is that it's making your body feel like it's allergic to the protein, so it'll incite your immune system to just attack that protein, this case a virus. What they seem to not understand is what if your baby has a peanut protein or an egg protein or any other protein they ate, maybe even breast milk or whatever it is, you just told the body, every protein in your body right now when we just did this injection is your enemy. And now all of a sudden, I don't know why we have peanut allergies.

You idiots, you're inciting the body to believe that the proteins in the body are allergic allergens based on this shot. It's so obvious. And they do it right there and don't, they never put two and two together. It's mind-blowing. I'm just a reporter. I'm just a reporter. Let me make it clear.

I'm not a scientist. I'm not a doctor. I'm just a man with some common, damn sense. Like many of you watching.