The Highwire with Del Bigtree - NEW EVIDENCE OF IMMUNE SYSTEM “FLARE UPS” POST COVID SHOT

Episode Date: December 20, 2023

NEW EVIDENCE OF IMMUNE SYSTEM “FLARE UPS” POST COVID SHOTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

It feels like the clouds are parting just a little bit wider than, you know, we've had a lot of successes. But this is a big one. I mean, you have some real focus now on all-cause mortality. This vaccine, it's moving. And Del, where, obviously, where were all the doctors? Where are they now? Well, they're speaking up. They're starting to speak up one by one.

And just understand, this isn't over yet because we're dealing with the wake of the damage and the injuries that this vaccine. has caused. The medical community, the people that are still in this and still not really subscribing to the fact that this COVID vaccine is questionable, or maybe there should be long-term studies done on this. You better wake up quick. And one of the doctors we haven't heard from was really Dr. Drew Wiseman. He was the co-recipient of the Nobel Prize for helping get this vaccine technology out to the public. Well, listen to him on an interview. Did he warn about this technology? Take a listen. All right.

So how can we be sure that this vaccine will not cause long-term negative impact in humans? Like, that's one of our big questions that we hear a lot. So, I mean, the first is to understand what the vaccine is. The MRNA in the vaccine is identical to the RNA in your cells. So the RNA in yourselves isn't causing long-term adverse events. so the RNA and the vaccine won't either. The RNA is degraded probably within a week. It's completely gone.

The lipid nanoparticles contain four types of fat. Two of the fats are identical to what's in our cells. They're physiologic. The other two are present at incredibly low levels. They are gone within 24 to 48 hours. hours. They're just, the body degrades them. They're gone. So nothing of the vaccine is left after days to a week or so. The question that comes, well, then how do you get a long-term adverse event? Well, you can't from any components of the vaccine because they're gone. It's just hard

to imagine how it could have long-term effects. 90% of adverse events, the vaccines, happened in the first six weeks. We haven't seen anything. 15 million people have gotten the vaccine already. The only really serious adverse event is this anaphylaxis-like reaction that we're seeing in about 1 and 100,000 people. Other than that, there really nothing, you know, 15 million people have been injected. That's a lot of people.

And if we were going to see an unusual, adverse event. You know, if, would you care about something that occurred less than one in 15 million? I mean,

besides the fact that this guy is totally full of it, I know you're about to get into this. This is just a lesson to our audience. Number one, stop going to a doctor that tells you you need the booster. And don't inject yourself with anything made by Uncle Fester.

I mean, it's just, this guy, seriously. But I know you have more information on the depth of this beyond the fact that he looks like he's the walking dead himself. Those are just laughable statements that he was making. But, you know, like you said, the world is turning on this vaccine. Mark Siegel on Fox is questioning this, saying that there's no long-term studies. He's calling it the elephant in the room.

Remember, to be clear, this is an old bit. Like, this is early on, right? This isn't him this week, right? Okay. No, correct, correct. This is early on. But, again, it's just a couple days. It's degrades.

Everything's natural in this. well, you know, how do you get a patent on living nanopiricals if they're all natural? You can't patent anything natural. I think Kevin McCurnan pointed that out. But also, he's saying this is just going to go away. What about the machinery at kickstarts in your body? And that's what we're going to talk about. But just back to Mark Siegel for a second.

We and so many others were censored. We took the hits. So Mark Siegel now has the luxury to throw out these softball questions that everybody sees now. So we're seeing the rise in all-cause mortality. And we're seeing the issues. Now, these deeper issues we're getting into now. We're getting into actual cellular machinery that this vaccine has been reprogramming and the shedding. So Pierre Corey, Dr. Pierre Corey, just talked about the spike protein and the shedding of the spike protein.

Well, we now have a study that just came out. This is the detection of recombinant spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. So remember, I was just going to stick around for a couple days. Well, this is what the authors wrote, the results. The specific p-p spike fragment was found in 50%, 5-0% of the biological samples analyzed. and its presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody tighter. The minimum of maximum time at which P.P. spike was detected after vaccination was 69 and 187 days respectively. So this thing's hanging around for like six months. This guy literally said it won't be

there for two or three, two or three days and then it's kicked out of the body just like it would be if it's natural. And what I find incredible about this moment right now and what we're reading, you have his testimony basically not realizing if he's telling you this will be. be out of the body in three days. If it wasn't, yeah, sure, if it was lasting longer than that. I mean, how do you get long-term side effects if something disappears? You don't. I don't even know if that's true, but here, based on his own principle, the only way you'd have long-term effects is if my product was still in you 60, 180 days later. Now we know for a fact it is, so your entire argument on why this is safe is now in your face. Either you knew and you were lying

or you didn't do proper testing to know. Either way, you're dead wrong and based on your own, you know, clinical, you know, point of view, anything that lasts and persist then can have long-term lasting and persisting problems, which is what we're talking about now. And Dr. Weismanism is saying, well, look, the lipidano pyricles, that delivery system that delivered it to the cells, basically is saying that's gone in a couple days. So it's like saying the car with the bomb in it, that delivered the bomb into your house,

the car's gone, so there shouldn't be any problems. There's a smoking bomb in your house. Right. So let's go back to this study here. We have a chart just to break it down if you want to listen to me, read anymore. You can just check out this chart from the study. There's the spike protein, P.P. Spike, that's the spike that the MRI coded for that you injected yourself with.

Days after vaccination, you can see there, it's over 180 days. And then to the right, you see that little blip of an orange line. That's after infection of the non-vaccinated. So that's naturally infected. You get that spike protein for a couple days and your body clears it. The way it's supposed to, when you actually let nature and your body deal with this the natural way, it lasts for a day or two. So no, you have not recreated God Weissman. You have failed.

You've done something that's now persisting in the body and won't go away even after clearly the immune systems of these people is trying to fight it and create antibodies and get it out of the body. It can't clear it. And remember, Mark Siegel, well, there's no long-term studies. Well, these are the new studies. This is the new kind of horizon that we're on here. This is what we're finding out. And this is mainstream news now, telegraph one in four who had Pfizer-COVIDs experience unintended immune response. Listen to this. And it is a hat tip to Weissman in here. Research in the field spanning decades has been slow work. It often stalled because RNA itself is often attacked by the bodies, by the bodies a foreign invader. That's autoimmune

people. But in 2023, the Nobel Prize for Medicine went to a pair of scientists who had spent years working to fix the problem. It was done by taking one of the RNA bases, uridine, and swapping it is in swapping in a very similar synthetic alternative. It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problem in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge Medical Research Council toxicology unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogs. Because it is not a perfect fit for what is expected. There can be a momentary pause, which causes the process to stutter and a letter in the code can get skipped, much like a bike slipping a gear. It goes on to say,

this issue caused by the Jabs code throws the process completely out of sync and the entire subsequent code becomes garbled. This is being called a Frameship. Yeah, and the title is it's called a frame ship. Now, it goes on finally to say, in the case of the COVID Jabs, the end result is a nonsensical and harmless proteins, so they say. The team found, which the body attacks and leads to an immune system flare-up. Can you imagine immune system flare-up is nonsensical? I got, yeah, well, you know, don't worry about it, but your immune system's going to go totally haywire. But don't worry, it's not doing anything.

Exactly. So they say the new study published in nature found this occurred in around 25 to 30% of people. So here we go. Your body's making a new protein. I want to stop right here because I'm going to make our team do a little bit of research. I want us to go back right now while we're talking here, Jeffrey, because the telegraph is now finally talking about this pseudouridine. Can we find out the first time that was mentioned on the high wire when we first introduced this idea of this synthetic pseudouridine, you know, mutating and changing the spike protein so that would never leave the body? I just want to remember how long ago we told you this was never going to, you know, was going to persist and cause problems.

Right, right. So again, new protein, this nonsensical protein, no idea what it does. They are saying it's harmless. They have no science to support that, but it's so harmless. It's causing your immune system to flare up. That's, again, autoimmune issues in your body, 25 to 30% of people with this thing. So another issue on this is they're saying it garbles up the system. It throws the code off.

It shortens the code. The code gets skipped when it's making these proteins. Well, we go to a study from 2018, and this was by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, researchers. And this study, the title of this article reporting on the scientists find cancer drivers hiding in a new place. And it says if the mRNA copy doesn't include all the exons in a gene or is cut short, then the protein made from that mRNA will also be truncated. It may no longer function properly. And if that protein is a tumor suppressor, one that protects against cancer, then that could spell problems. Now, in that article, people, so many people were pointing this article at the beginning of the pandemic,

had to put a little disclaimer on it saying this has nothing to do with the COVID vaccine. But now as science is starting to catch up, there's a question here that what happens if this truncated protein, this thing that got cut short by this nonsensical protein, this nonsensical pseudoridine was in a protein that was a tumor suppressor. Now we got a problem. So all this talk about cancer, we have Dr. Weissman. He's the co-recipient in his Nobel Prize. What's he doing?

Is he riding off in the sunset? Is he patting himself on the back? Well, that was a great pandemic. I really had a great time with that. Well, no, he's doing this type of research. New headline, Godfather of MRNA vaccines reveals plant-to-immunized people against cancer years before tumors strike to prevent disease from ever appearing. He's focusing all his attention on cancer now.

And the mutations in the body, these silent mutations, you're going to try to figure those out so they won't appear. That's his main focus now. Great. Kind of makes you wonder. Got it dead wrong to begin with. either lied to you or I was too stupid to know the difference. And now I'm going to go on and make more problematic vaccines. I found that we have the date on episode 234, September 23rd, 2021. All the way back

then, we mentioned to you back in 2021 of September, we said there's this pseudo-uridine and we believe it's going to do what caused cancer. That was the show we did all the way back then. And now finally, even, you know, scientists like Mark Siegel and all these scientists that telegraphs reporting on are finally getting around to it. I'm just putting that out because when, you know, we're talking about needing some sponsorship here. Pharma is funding you to be lied to it by a bunch of people that are blocking us on the internet so they can't even get this information, but you can.