The Highwire with Del Bigtree - NEW STUDY MRNA VACCINES MAY ALTER HUMAN DNA

Episode Date: March 10, 2022

After nearly two years of fact-checkers promising mRNA Covid shots do not alter the human genome, new research is coming out to possibly contradict this point. Since no genotoxicity investigations were required or done prior to the Covid shot rollout, the public is left to wonder where the truth lies.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Talking about fact checkers, we have these type of articles we've seen over the last two years of the vaccine rollout. Fact check, this is out of our friends at the Pointer Institute. Will a COVID-19 vaccine alter your DNA? Well, we've been told throughout this pandemic, throughout this vaccine rollout, that will not. However, the new study has just come to light, and we're going to cover that right now. Here's the title of this, intercellular reverse transcription of Pfizer-Biointech COVID-19. RNA vaccine. It's BNT 162 in vitro in human liver cell line. So what these authors wrote, and this, you know, I hope everyone's paying attention here. We're going to get into some science,

but it's very important. These authors wrote, our results indicate a fast uptake of BNT162b2 in human liver cell line HUH7, leading to changes in line one expression and distribution. They go on to right, we also show that BNT 162B2MRNA is reverse transcribed intercellularly into DNA in as fast as six hours upon BNT 162 B2 exposure. Now, the reverse transcription is basically that MRI writing the genetic material into the DNA of the human genome forevermore. And this is what they're finding in here. There's a, there's an image that we're going to show here. So what they basically just very simply put, and I was looking at some graphs on this, and we'll get details, you know, in the weeks to come as we describe this. But MRNA, what they're saying is it's not DNA.

It doesn't interfere with DNA. But they know for a fact that MRNA is absorbed through the lining of the cell, that it can do this transition to become DNA, write itself as a single-strand DNA, ultimately become a double strand, and then insert itself into the genomic sequence and then start producing that new mutation. I mean, and so this is basically what they're saying can happen with the vaccine in these liver cells. Right, right. And how did they find this? Well, they did a test.

And so they had a PCR test was performed to figure this out. And it was they used RNA extracted from the cells. And here's a picture of this from the study. So they set the primers on this PCR. The primers are kind of like the target of what you're looking for. And they targeted the BN, the Pfizer's vaccine, the sequence and the BNT 162, and we can see here. And we can see here across there at the top, it says six H. That's six hours across 24 hours and then the bottom square rectangle there is 48 hours.

And you can see BNT is, there's line dashes there. This PCR test was picking up the bands corresponding with those with those extracted cells. And that is, that's the proof that these researchers say like they are finding this in here. However, this is one of the first studies. of its kind when it's showing this. It has been pretty explosive. A lot of people are quoting it, but this is just early research. Sadly, it's coming almost two years after the entire world's been, you know, injected with a lot of these vaccines. But they used a cell model. The cell model they use was a carcinoma cell line. So this is a cancer cell line. It was that H-U-H-7. It was originally

taken from a liver tumor cell. It's very common for research. It's an immortal cell line. So this may act differently than regular liver cells. This is something that can be questioned in further research. And this was what they call a tabletop exercise. So this was in a petri dish, a test tube. This wasn't in a rat or a human being, so to speak. So these were actual cells being looked at by researchers. So just a quick caveat there on that.

And once again, for people watching the show, maybe for the first time, we take our science very seriously here. We're not just trying to give you some explosive headline and you go running with your hair on fire. We are showing what the conversations are. and really how we need to look at this. What we need to see this as right now is a signal. This is a signal that more studies need to be done in this area

and that these caveat statements across the nation by the propagandists in our mainstream media, that there's no way this affects your DNA. That's being challenged right now, as it should be. The scientific method demands that science challenge a theory. We've got to get away from censorship of anyone that challenges the idea. Of course, Beyond Tech, the Pfizer and Moderna, are going to say no because they're making tens of billions of dollars off of these products.

Our government agencies like CDC and FDA are probably going to say it doesn't exist because they're promoting and selling these products to us and forcing them upon us. So we need independent science and so what we're presenting to you here is brand new science that we should have to be skeptical, just as skeptical of that science as we are of what we've been being told by the media, but we're presenting it here. So just to make that clear. So continue on. Right, right. And yes, as we're seeing this study, hopefully a lot of people are asking, why has this just been done now? And why weren't people asking questions before? Well, people were asking questions before. This gentleman here, he's a Croatian geneticist. He was specializing, he is, specializing in evolutionary genetics. And he wrote a paper in July 2021 titled MRNA vaccines. Why is the biology of retroposition ignored? Retroposition is just the integration of a sequence derived from the RNA that goes. into the DNA genome. So that's basically what we're talking about with a cell line we just covered. And he writes here, here I discuss the pervasive claim that MRNA-based vaccines cannot

alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the MRNA vaccine literature, but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. He goes on, and he states all of the papers that he basically said there's 40 years of research that fly in the face of those comments. And he concludes, it remains puzzling why and how the RNA vaccinology field neglected the retroposition biology of L1 retro elements and is theoretical links to possible vaccine MRNA retroposition if one considers the volume, visibility, and significance of the L1 and retroposition research.

And L1 being that line one that was referenced in this study that we're talking about, right? This is exactly where he's saying we would have seen this transcription taking place. Correct, correct. And this is someone who's been studying evolutionary genetics and how these things incorporate into the genome. And he's saying an MRNA vaccine technology or the MRNA technology has been around for about 30 years being tinkered with in the background. At the same time that we know that these things can integrate into the genome through cell therapy and gene therapy, that's also a decades old, several decades old research. And there's tons of science to support this. And why was there not any cross talk between the vaccine makers and this cell therapy that's known to integrate in the genome? And what's the concern here, Jeffrey? I mean, for those of us, they're like MRN, DNA, genomic. I mean, what is the concern if it actually is somehow inserting itself in the genomic sequence? What does that lead to?

Number one, really, one of the red flag things is genotoxicity. So you have a toxic nature of this genetic material. get into the cell and then as it replicates you're talking you know poor replication cancers things like that so those would be some of the major issues there obviously one of the number one issues