The Highwire with Del Bigtree - OMG, OMICRON!

Episode Date: December 6, 2021

Omicron Takes Center Stage; Latest Science Sheds New Light on Myocarditis Concerns; Doctor’s Fight Exposes Oregon Medical Board Mafia; Del’s ‘Football Analogy’ Revisited.Guests: Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Paul ThomasBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are out there in the world, we're all going to step out onto the high wire. I hope those of you in the United States of America had a beautiful Thanksgiving dinner last week and around the world. I hope you had a beautiful week. We certainly enjoyed ourselves, and it was almost like everything was going to be okay. Just when you thought it was okay, we're all sitting down, not too many masks, not too many paranoid family members, at least not in my family.

We had another, you know, Lollapalooza-style Thanksgiving at my house. Then we had almost 50 people in my house celebrating Thanksgiving. But it was almost like while we're seeing their eating and celebrating and talking, it was outside the windows, that movie shot. It was looking at us from the distance. Just when you thought it was safe to go home at night. It was Omicron. When I was elected, I said I would always be honest with you.

So today I want to take a few moments to talk about the new COVID variant, Leomdecrone. The Omicron variant is constantly. causing worldwide worry. The U.S. is bracing for the new Omicron variant. That new COVID variant that the World Health Organization says poses a very high risk around the globe. This variant is a cause for concern, not a cause for panic. President Biden ordering a travel ban for visitors coming from South Africa and seven other African countries. Of course, Canada and the EU, also the UK, all taking the same action.

We need to slow down the seeding of this variant. calling on New Yorkers both vaccinated and unvaccinated to wear masks indoors. We are recommending highly that people wear masks indoors. You cannot go on the subway and you cannot go to a health care facility in the state of New York without wearing a mask. Travel restrictions for the vaccinated were being lifted, but some countries are reversing course, including Japan. Tonight, closing its borders to all foreign travelers. I'm both vaccinated and have the booster shot. So, but that doesn't mean that. I'll be protected.

We don't yet exactly know how effective our vaccines will be against Omicron. So it's more vital than ever that people get their jabs and we get those boosters into arms as fast as possible. The CDC is strengthening its recommendation that all adults should get their booster shots. If you're eligible for a booster, my goodness, go in and get that booster. If you haven't gotten boosted, get your booster. Make sure you have your booster. Now is the time to get that booster.

We're going to boost the booster campaign. I mean, I'm saying this absolutely clearly to go and get a booster shot. I know you're tired of hear me say this. Go get the booster shot today. Oh, M-G, Omicrom. Well, you know, we're going to look at this because I'm sure you were sitting there thinking, are you freaking kidding me? I mean, really, right at the moment where you're trying to push a booster shot that nobody

wants and you cannot seem to get frontline doctors or nurses to get vaccinated. You're having to fire people. All of a sudden, you know what we need? Would it be really great right now would be a new virus. We're done with Delta. Delta doesn't seem to be getting the job done. You know, I don't know if Omicrom is real. I don't know if it should be called the Moron Khan. Whatever it is, let's get to the bottom of it. Let's see what they know and what they don't know, shall we? Because I think that that's where the news actually lies. This is a great article that brought up what we know about Omicron. This is from the new scientist. Omicron. How dangerous is the new variant first found in South Africa? It goes on to say, other mutations may help the virus bypass

our immune systems, make it more transmissible and less susceptible to treatments, according to the HSA, as though we're ever going to allow you to take treatments. I love that word. What treatments? Hydroxyl chloroquine, Ivermectin, Budescinide. It'd be really great if we were using treatments. But anyway, not to get off the track. But the body notes that this has not been proven. What? It is not been proven? What the mutations mean is currently theoretical and based on experience of past mutations, not the one we're talking about, of SARS-CoV-2 rather than lab tests. Wendy Barclay at Imperial College London, the College of Exaggeration that brought us the Imperial model says, we don't really know if it will reduce the effectiveness of vaccines. Wow. There is more that we don't know than we do,

Tullio de Oliveari at Stellenbos University of South Africa said yesterday that the full significance of the variance mutations remain uncertain. Peacock adds, it's important to stress how much we don't know this new variant. Well, there you have it. I mean, I guess that's worthy of shutting down the stock market in the United States of America, stopping flights in and out of countries around the world.

I guess, but let's be honest. We have talked about the fact that there may be a deadly variant one day out there. We're pressuring it, I'm going to get into that. So I don't want to, you know, undermine this. But of all the things that we're going to be panicked about, Is Ammocrine it? Is this really the one we should be terrified of? I mean, when we look at this,

I want you to remember that just when we're interviewing Dr. Gert van der Boch, just one week before Thanksgiving, we played a clip where Paul Offutt, one of the co-authors of the most important vaccine book in the world Plotkin on vaccines, he had this to say about the number of mutations that are out there. Take a look at this. I think that the viruses, there's probably been already

about 12,000 mutations. on this virus already. I mean, it's, and I think you, you may get to the point if they're resisting all immunity, or meaning, meaning that you're, it's as if you never got the vaccine, you've never got naturally affected. I think that's probably a lethal mutation. Yeah. So in other words, you're kind of running the runway out on the virus's ability to change itself. Let's right. Let's not lethal to us. That's right. Let's right. 12,000 variants. Can we bring up the graph? This is a graph of what some of these variants when they try and track and this is what looks like. Look at all the different variants. This graph right here is tracking and how it's

spreading and where it's going. But 12,000 mutations, this Omnacron must be something special to rise up amongst the 12,000 to be the terrified one. But there certainly is a lot of uncertainty about what we know and what we don't know. But that doesn't mean that the WHO didn't want to jump on board because they, in their headline, put it in this category. Let's look at their headline. classification of Omicron B-1-1-529, SARS-CoV-2 is a variant of concern. Now, that sounds concerning, and we were wondering, well, how does the WHO determine what a variant of concern is? The truth is it's not actually the first, you know, line of concern.

There's actually a variant of interest. But you know what? When we looked at it, they never even called this a variant of interest. I mean, we're supposed to think they're tracking this stuff, right? Obviously, the 12,000 variants, you're looking at the bad ones. Here's a definition of what a variant of interest would have been, the working definition, a SARS-Co-2 variant with genetic changes that are predicted or known to affect virus characteristics such as transmissibility, disease severity, immune escape, diagnostic or therapeutic escape,

and identified to cause significant community transmission or multiple COVID-19 clusters in multiple countries with increasing relative prevalence alongside increasing number of cases over time or other apparent epidemiological impacts to suggest an emerging risk to global public health. Remember, that's a variant of interest. And we just read articles where they said they don't know if any of this is true. They have no idea how effective it is.

They don't know if it transmits much. They don't know if it's going to escape the vaccine. Yet it seemed like to be called a variant of interest. It needed to do like most of those things. But they went right to variant of concern. So let's leave what a variant of concern should be. A variant of concern by the WHO. Here's their working definition.

A SARS-CoV-2 variant that meets the definition of a variant of interest here below, and through a comparative assessment has been demonstrated to be associated with one or more of the following changes at a degree of global public health. So it started out as a variant of interest if we had done this right. This one did not. But then we have these added benefits of it increases in transmissibility or detrimental change in COVID-19 epidemiology, or an increase in the virulence or change in clinical disease presentation, or decrease in effectiveness of public health and social measures, or available diagnostic vaccines and therapeutics.

So it's going to escape all of those things. Obviously, this is what we think it is. It's now a variant of concern. Somehow the WHO said, throw the rest of it away. We weren't tracking it, but we should have been because this is the big green monster. And you're really going to get the sense of that when you hear from this doctor in South Africa,

where this is happening, describing this incredible new variant. Take a look at this. The majority of what we are presenting to primary healthcare practitioners are extremely mild cases, so as mild to moderate. And so these patients means they don't need to be hospitalized for now. And we try to get the message out there to the world to say, listen, we not say this is not going to be a disease going forward that's going to cause severe disease. It will cause severe disease.

But if we can get this disease, if this disease can cause to more than the majority of people, mild symptoms easily treatable at home, no need for admission. Just to reiterate one point here so people hear it clearly. Now, this could change. I understand it's the early stages. But right now, the patients you're seeing with this new variant, you're dealing with very mild to moderate symptoms. You are seeing no or very little severe disease, correct?

Yes. Wow. Holy cow. Stop the presses. We have a variant. It appears to be mild for everybody that's gotten it. It's so mild that we think you can treat it at home. It's almost as if the scientist was saying,

boy, I wish Amacron would replace Delta because this thing doesn't do anything to anybody. But let's go ahead, let's shut down our airports. Let's panic. Let's shut down our economy and definitely get out there and get your booster shot immediately because you just don't know. I mean, we don't know if the booster shot will do anything,

but how could it possibly hurt to get another one? If you've had three, go for four. If you've had four, go for five. Six might be the charm, but we'll figure out for those. when you first get there. Anyway, this is where Amacrom is at. We have barely any understanding of it.

What we do know from the people where it apparently originated in South Africa that is so mild you can treat it at home. All right, but why South Africa, right? I mean, is that with the 12,000 variants, my understanding is variants should kind of be everywhere, right? Isn't that sort of the way nature works is sort of mutating and it's all over the planet?

But we have singled out South Africa. Well, we decided to look at, look at this. We looked at the top infection rates in the world right now. These are the top 16. And if you imagine those are at the 100% level. All together, they make 100% of the most infected in the world. So that's that orange line going up. Don't really need to pay attention to that.

We need to pay attention to is who really is having a major outbreak of concern. I think Poland looks pretty bad. Germany, the UK and France are doing terribly. Ukraine behind them, Turkey, Russia, Italy is coming down. USA, you know, we're not doing too bad right now. But there's South Africa. I mean, look how far down the list. Why in the hell did we go out of our way to isolate that?

is where our area of concern is. Oh my God, South Africa's under attack. Really? How about what is the variant in Poland right now? That's what I want to know. I think whatever's going on in South Africa looks just fine to me. But maybe the reason we're isolating South Africa is because some of the headlines have been coming out of Africa in South Africa, like maybe this headline. South Africa, this is right, but this is before Omicron. Remember, South Africa asked J&J Pfizer to stop sending vaccines. We don't need them. Frankly, we don't think they're doing much. And we think we've got this all under control. Or this headline, scientists are mystified and wary as Africa avoids the COVID disaster. They are the least vaccinated this article went on to say, yet for some reason they're doing

better than everyone else in the world. Well, we can't have that, can we? We can't have those that aren't vaccinated looking like they're doing better than everybody else. What would be great is that the next deadly variant happened in the unvaccinated world. Well, I don't know. I don't want to put words in anybody's mouth. I'm just saying it's a little bit suspicious when you have a virus that appears to do absolutely nothing to anybody, at least so far, and it's happening in a country where they're doing just great and a nation is doing just great and a continent that's really doing better than the rest of the first world. But here's the thing. It's not even true. This thing doesn't even come from South Africa. As the headlines now tell us, Amacrom was in Europe

long before travel bans on South Africa. What? What? So this thing doesn't even originate in this place and this tiny little place that's having a little bit of affection? No. It's already, as we would well know, it's already out there and moving around. Now, when I first started seeing these headlines, of course, I thought of Geert Bandon Bosch, who we're going to continue to talk to. We're going to continue to reference him, and we did reach out with Omicron. Because what has he been talking about? I hope you have all watched our interview with Geert Bandon Bosch, perhaps the most important

interview I've ever done in my life. If you haven't, go back to a week before Thanksgiving. There it is the November 18th, 242 episode. must understand what this guy is saying, or you do not understand what's happening in the world with this virus. Just like the WHO doesn't understand it. The CDC, the FDA, the NHS, I could go on and on. But you, the viewers of the high wire, you understand it. But let's go over it really quickly.

Geert-Brand and Bosch is worried that we're going to continue to pressure this virus to create more and more variants that are eventually going to escape the vaccine, be unstoppable, and then we're going to have a pathogen that could wipe out a gigantic part of our species and our population. So we asked him, is Omnacron it? Is this the one? Is this what we're worried about? Well, he wrote an article in response. This was his article. Continued mass vaccination will only push the evolutionary capacity of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein beyond the Omicron version. Now, he starts out by talking about how ridiculous is we've selected this one amongst all that are out there. But he goes on to say mass vaccination promotes viral resistance to C-19 vaccines.

Viral resistance drives enhanced infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2, e.g. Omicron. And may ultimately enable SARS-CoV-2 to utilize alternative cell surface determinants to enter permissive cells. He goes on to say scientific naivete combined with arrogant megalomania has led the mighty alliance of what do we call this? What is PHO? Remember what that says? public health key opinion leaders, okay, public health key opinion leaders and industry to dramatically underestimate the evolutionary capacity of SARS-CoB2 when it is put under widespread

immune pressure. There can be no doubt that Omicron is only one such example of this and that other variants harboring a similar panoply of S-directed mutations will soon emerge in other countries. There is indeed no reason to believe that identical conditions of suboptimal population level immune pressure on SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness combined with widespread infectious pressure would lead to different results. Alternatively, countries which, thanks to mass vaccination, have prepared their populations to serve as an excellent breeding ground for more infectious variants will exhibit a high level of hospitality to Omicron and its peers. It is undeniable that mass vaccination will only drive the virus to fully exploit its evolutionary capacity,

including, if needed, its ability to use alternate receptor domains on permissive cells. The fitness costs that may come with such a dramatic mutation is likely to be rewarded with enhanced pathogenicity. I am truly afraid that these dynamics will eventually allow for the natural selection of individuals with uncompromised innate immunity while eliminating those without it. While such natural selection would lead to an eradication of SARS-CoV-2 as innate immunity sterilizes the virus, those that aren't vaccinated, remember, are the ones that have the innate immunity and blocks transmission. The consequence would be unimaginable. The price paid for ending the pandemic by virus eradication is not comparable to the one paid for by generating herd immunity and allowing the

virus to enter an endemic state. Those who are enforcing mass vaccination are opting for the former instead of the latter, an act that will be remembered as the deadliest sin ever. Well, what this article is really saying is that we don't know, amacrom looks like a nothing burger right now. And frankly, in many ways, so did Delta. And Alpha being the biggest nothing burger of all of them. They are getting more transmissible. This is mutating. It's moving in the wrong direction like we've never seen because, as Gert van de Bostas said, we've never pressured a virus by vaccinating the entire world for it. But mark my words, whether it's Ammachrom or some other variant, it appears that Geert Bandenbosch is no longer alone, not just by those like Dr. Robert Malone that is now in meetings

around the world and supporting what Geert Bandenbosch has to say amongst other things, Robert Malone being the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology himself, but the fact that even the detractors seem to be jumping on board with the idea that we could be pressuring the virus to become vaccine resistant. Except, of course, if you don't want to agree with Geert, but you agree with what he's saying, you need a different bad guy. I want to tweet. All right, here's the point. They're talking about who is actually spreading this. Is it the vaccinated? Is it the unvaccinated? They want to say it's the unvaccinated, but here's the truth. The four cases were detected among travelers who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive on routine pre-travel testing. The preliminary

report revealed that all the four had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19. Here's my point. They're trying to tell you you need a booster shot, that it's the unvaccinated that are causing this, But Gerben & Bosch is telling us it's not the unvaccinated. They have a brilliant innate immune system that's going to eradicate this. It's the vaccinated they're doing it. And the big fear we better shut down the airports before it gets to America. Oops. It's already here.

Now we have CDC confirms first U.S. case of Omicrom COVID variant has been detected in California. Who brought it here? What do they do? Certainly they were unvaccinated. White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Bouchy said the patient who was fully vaccinated had just returned to the San Francisco area on November 22nd after traveling in South Africa and testing positive on November 29th. You see, there it is.

Only the vaccinated are traveling, apparently, in and out of countries because they're supposed to be safe, yet they're the ones that are carrying this thing in every situation we know of, the four cases in Africa and now the one case in California. So who knows? We'll keep our eyes on this. Right now, Omnacrom looks like it is not much of anything,

except that is carried by the vaccinated and it appears to be caused by the vaccinated. Do not forget that. I'm going to get into more details about that later. Okay, so I have a huge show coming up as always. We're going to be sitting down and talking with Dr. Paul Thomas, who is under fire right now because what does he want to do? He wants to continue to run a gigantic study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children, starting from the time they're zero years old until 18.

Sounds like a great idea, right? Let's get all of that data. Well, it would be a great idea at any other time in the universe on the planet Earth amongst our human species except now. When deciding to do something like that brings you under fire and now the medical board is trying to take his license. They are relentless. You can't imagine what it's like to live on the front line like that. We're going to talk to Paul Thomas about what that's about. And then, after that, a very, very disturbing discovery is now being published. one of the biggest heart journals in the world. It appears that the vaccine is now unequivocally

raising your chances, maybe even doubling your chances of having heart disease in the future. This is an incredible article. There are scientists and doctors speaking out about it all around the world. We are going to talk to Dr. Peter McCullough and see what he has to say about this groundbreaking study. He's obviously out there in the news. We are very happy to have him with us. But now we are still trying to get Jeffrey Jackson. Well, how about we jump forward then? Should we jump forward then to what I want to do after Jeffrey Jackson? Hold on a second.

I don't know why Jeffrey Jackson isn't online. We're trying to figure that out. Okay, here's computer crash. Let's go ahead and jump ahead. I think we can do this. But this is big. This is something that took a lot of plenty, so I'm really throwing a whopper jaw at this.

I want to talk about an article. So remember, when we're talking about the fact that, you know, I've told you, they're going to keep trying to blame the unvaccinated, right? It's the unfaccinated that are putting us all in hospitals. The unvaccinated are causing these things to spread. Well, there's an article, and this was the one I was just about to reference anyway, that came out where that's exactly what they're saying. Here's what this article had to say. Fortune magazine, Georgetown medical professor and immunologist predicts there will be a fully vaccine-resistant COVID variant by the spring. Okay, fully vaccine resistance. So he's right there with

Geert van and Bosch, right? Okay. I think by March, April, or May, we will have a fully vaccine-resistant variant. There's simply no way, look at this, you can have such low rates of vaccination around the world with a virus ping ponging between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. So there it is. It doesn't matter that we are going to see variants because it's the unvaccinated causing. It's the exact opposite of what Geert-Band-Bosch is saying. But we now have evidence that this guy is full of it. There's a great study that just came out. And this is about who's actually carrying the variance, who's causing the variance. Take a look at this study.

Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, beta, gamma, and delta variant compared to alpha variant in vaccinated individuals. Okay, this should be interesting, looking at, you know, who is carrying the variants. Here, we analyze 28,578 sequenced SARS-CoV2 samples from individuals with known immune status obtained through national community testing in the Netherlands from March to August 2021. All right. We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the beta, the gamma, or the delta variants compared to the alpha variant after vaccination.

So what that's saying is you have an increased risk of carrying one of the variants after you've been vaccinated than you do of carrying the alpha variant, the more mild variant that was not killing that many people. So it goes on to say this. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with beta, gamma, or delta variance relative to alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity. What's infection-induced immunity?

That's natural immunity. That's where you got the memory cells that came up, that memory immunity, the acquired natural immunity. All those who have naturally acquired immunity in this study, we're not carrying delta or beta or what was the other one beta whatever it was the other three so it's only those that are vaccinated that are carrying and shedding and spreading these variants and now we're hearing those flying are the ones carrying omicrom it's not the unvaccinated well why would that be how is it we know that well i actually did an example i did an analogy for you guys almost nine months ago

using a football game plan analogy. Now, I'm going to do it again with a little bit more detail because so many of you have come up to me and said that really made it make sense. And since our audience is exploding and growing, you know, really exponentially thanks to so much of your support, let me go ahead and do this with a little bit more detail. So let's take it over the screen, shall we?

All right, here we are. Now, here's what we're talking about. The innate immune system, the national immune system you're born with, as Gert Bandonbach so clearly explained, two weeks ago on the high wire. You have non-specific antibodies. You are born. From the moment you're born, you have these innate antibodies that are non-specific. They say they have low affinity, meaning they don't really, they don't specifically look for one type of virus. They look at all viruses and bacteria. They recognize little motifs that are similar amongst bacteria and viruses.

So for some reason, the second your baby is born, they will recognize a pathogen that maybe only exists on the other side of the planet. This is how brilliant the design is. And so by having a non-specific antibody, think of it as a football game. This is our team, and this is all of the now, we all have all that this is 12 of the variants that are out there that we're talking about, including alpha, beta, delta, amacrom. These other ones exist too. So we're up against this football team. This is what's out there. Now, when we began this thing, obviously alpha, that's what we called the Wuhan strain. Well, the Wuhan strain is the alpha right here. Hold on a second. Let me try that again.

Boom. Here's the alpha, right? We all know this. This is what the vaccine is for. This is what we thought was circulating. It really was what was circulating in the beginning. Well, if Alpha, which is the stark quarterback, won the Heisman trophy, huge, got picked up, has a multimillion dollar deal. Well, obviously Alpha gets the ball.

This entire team says, look out for Alpha. Let's nail it. Boom, we got it. Alpha's out. We stopped the play. But the beauty of the innate, non-specific antibodies is that they don't think. care if it's alpha. They don't care if somebody else gets it. So beta could get it. Bata gets the ball tries to get through. Boom. They come in from all sides. The non-specific recognize anyone on that

team. They could do a trick play. They could decide to run Kappa from here, toss the ball forward. He comes through. It doesn't matter. Boom. Kappa goes down because of non-specific antibodies. Got it? Now here's the genius of our health committee and our health departments, what they decided to do. Let's have an experiment. Let's not let natural immunity win the day, because this, by the way, is how we've handled every variant, every virus since the dawn of man. This nonspecific innate immune system we have is why our species is still here. There has never been a virus that has overcome this brilliant innate immune system, not with all the mutations in the world. But hey, let's erase this innate immune system.

Let's take this away from everyone on the planet. This will be a great experiment. So what did they do? They decided, let's change it out. Oh, wait, I got to do this differently. Hold on. How do I get rid of that? Yeah, it'll change over.

This is what we did. So instead of having the non-specific, we've now turned everybody that we can, everybody that's been vaccinated, into the specific antibodies for alpha. Everyone on the planet is being vaccinated for alpha. Now remember, this is great. This is great if that's the Heisman Trophy winner,

and we paid a lot of money for them. We know Alpha's going to get the ball. So if Alpha comes over, boom, this team is ready to go. They're designed to go after Alpha. We got it nailed. There's no way that person's ever going to get into the end zone, right? But you get where this is going. But what happens if the team over there decides, you know what?

We've got so many people keyed on Alpha. We just can't get in the end zone. So let's go ahead and hand it to somebody else. Let's hand it to Delta. So Alpha tosses the Delta. Delta takes it. And whoa, it doesn't matter what Delta does. it doesn't even look like this team knows he's there.

He's running all the way to the end zone. Touchdown, Delta wins. That's your breakthrough case. That's when Delta started becoming the number one virus in the United States of America and around the world. Delta started winning in every single football game there was. Because this entire team, given us by Tony Fauci, the WHO, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson, and Johnson,

taught us all to only look for Alpha. Do you see where this is going? And so now comes Omicrom. And they're saying, hey, let's give everybody another booster shot of alpha. That'll really do it. Really? Really, let's go ahead and give them a totally incorrect last year's model, you know, vaccine. And here it comes Omicrom.

And what do they say? The four that were on the plane, those that are flying into California, no one touched it. He's running straight in the end zone. And now, when we look at a world, maybe it's Amacrom. Maybe it's another one that becomes to be that variant because it's not going to be Alpha. Alpha is the only thing that we took out. Alpha is no longer here. But we're about to have World War III brought upon us

by every single other variant that's growing and becoming stronger and stronger because this moronic football team is only looking for the one virus we know we don't have anymore. And this right here will be the end of us. This is where this is going.

Everybody that's trying to give you a booster shot, this is that end. this is where that leads. You're getting a booster shot for an obsolete virus. Your child that once had an innate immune system could handle anything, you're bragging on Facebook. Look, I just got my kid involved. He just got his booster shot. She just got her booster shot. All you did was set us up for this. Gear Vannebosch is telling us what needs to happen here. We need to release this pressure. We need to now decide, now that it's going to be Delta, then it's Delta. Fine. Let's focus on Delta. The only way we focus is to get unfoferral. focused. We've got to get back to this. We've got to make sure that every one of our children, every one of you that is considering, do I, you know, have to get vaccinated or to hold on to my job? What if you hold on to your job, but we lose the war? You are so critical right here. Every single unvaccinated person right now in the world is the only ones. You're the only ones with remaining nonspecific antibodies that can fight any single one of these.

No matter what happens, no matter where we go, whoever gets the ball, boom, it ends right there. You're not going to carry it. This study, these studies are showing us no one with natural immunity is going to let any of those variants through to spread to anybody. You heard it here first. You're going to hear it over and over again. Let it sink in.

Get it to your friends. Get it to your family. Because the news owned by the morons and the Neanderthals of science will continue to try to lie to everybody. All right. Let's get back to the Jackson Report. All right, Jeffrey, we're up and running. We got your computer going again.

It's good to have you here. I just laid it out, man. I mean, whether it's Amicron or not, this thing seems like the tail wagging the dog. It's over and over again. It's like Groundhog Day. I keep thinking I'm waking up the morning hearing, I got you, babe. So what else is happening in the world?

Yes, as we're seeing all amongst vaccinated individuals with Amacron, and like we've covered a couple weeks ago, the headlines are still coming out of, I don't know what we're going to call it, I guess, vaccine failure. Check out this headline. It was Vermont a couple weeks ago. Now it's all five states. COVID cases are surging in the five most vaccinated states, Vermont, Rhode Island, Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts, all seeing surges.

If anybody decides to read that article, no reason given. Just stats. Just, well, I don't know. Here's the stats and like move along. L.A. County, we're seeing that as well. This is what they're doing. You see the words mystery always when they don't know what's happening. Mystery emerges among COVID-19 patterns in Los Angeles County. Officials are trying to understand why some of L.A.'s highest coronavirus rates are currently in the communities with highest vaccine rates. Well, you know what? We can say this now is not a mystery to anybody that just watched our beautiful. football analogy. You get it, folks. This is what we're talking about. It's not a mystery. The most vaccinated places will be the highest rates of infection with all these new variants, which they cannot stop for the reasons we just described. So what are our public health officials are doing? What's the answer? Let's look at the CDC. This is what they're saying. CDC, U.S. says all adults should get COVID booster shots. Now in the UK, you're seeing a different pattern. UK is a little bit in front of us. Remember, with their booster shot campaign,

they've just up the time frame. So instead of six months after your shots, they're saying now they're going to half that. U.K.'s minimum gap for COVID booster jabs to be half to three months. They're also saying a fourth booster dose for immunocompromised. So we've got to look out for that too. That's amazing because we've been saying it, right? We've been saying from the beginning,

it appears that the beginning of the fall of your antibodies from the vaccine is starting at six weeks, at 10 weeks dropping as much at 50%. So I was always wondering, what is this six months? What are you talking about? This vaccine isn't lasting anywhere near six months. It's more like two to three months at the very best. Really rather, I think you have about four solid weeks of what might be some sort of immune support. So, and now they're admitting it, right?

Now they're saying, and in America, don't even worry about it. Doesn't matter if you got it three months ago. Get that booster shot now. I mean, it's like watching clowns. Clowns make decisions about our health around the world. And here's some results. Let's look at this headline, this next one, and get a little forensic with it. and see what it really means. So this is out of the Guardian. Just 40% of frontline NHSS National

Health Service staff in England had a booster COVID vaccine and fewer than three in 10 care home staff are triple jabbed. So this was six weeks into their booster campaign. They're saying basically 60% of their health care workers aren't taking the shot despite being first in line to get this shot. They were opening up first for that for that group. This is huge importance. Now, understand here, as it says in the article, the UK introduced what was called a no-jab, no-job policy for care home staff earlier this month. And that was just for the first two shots, not the booster. And what happened there, that policy caused about 60,000 people to be forced out of their jobs. That same policies coming down on NHS staff workers or healthcare workers in April.

So what we're seeing here are the leftovers of the people basically that- When you're saying 60% of the people that aren't getting that third booster, we're really talking about the believers. Those that went out and did their due diligence, did what the government told them, did what they always do. They got their two shots. Amongst the believers, only 40% are believing strong enough to go to a third vaccine. That is a complete destruction and falloff. So more than 50% of those who believed now no longer believe in the mandates coming from their government. That's incredible.

Right. And that should be a really a warning sign here as we're moving forward. As this booster campaign moves forward, this may be what we're also going to see in the United States. And we have some legal points, some breaking legal news that we're going to cover in just a moment. So what's the answer here? The booster jabs are coming out. People aren't taking the booster jabs. What's the answer?

This is what we're looking to in the European Union. They're considering mandatory vaccination. EU countries should debate mandatory vaccination, says Vandr Leyen. That's Ursula von der Leyen. She's the president of the European Commission. He says potentially they're going to potentially start to think about mandatory vaccination within the European Union. Wow. Now, over here in the United States, that's interesting, an interesting idea.

If that ever was tried, how would they enforce that? A breaking Breitbart article just maybe shed some light on that. A tool to enforce Orwellian rules. 80 House Republicans help pass bill to fund federal vaccination database. Let's go right into the article here. Representative Mary Miller, who was one of 130 Republicans to vote no told Breitbart News exclusively on Wednesday that the legislation would enable the federal government to track unvaccinated Americans who, quote, will be targeted and forced to comply with Biden's crazy global vaccination vision, end quote. It goes on to say the text specifically outlines an expansion of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Public Health Department capabilities and the ability for state and local health departments as well as public. private health care providers to share data with the federal government. And it finally, it ends by saying

this in a statement the bill's main sponsor, Democratic rep, Ann Custer said the system would be used to, quote, remind patients when they are due for a recommended vaccine, end quote, and identify areas with low vaccination rates to, quote, ensure equitable distribution of vaccines, end quote. Notably, the bill has four Republican co-sponsors. That's reps Larry Bouchon, James Burr, David McKinney and Brian Fitzpatrick. Now, one Democrat voted in opposition to this bill. Wow, but it's shocking that 80 Republicans, I think, did, even though it was it 120 did not or something like that. This is a very, very disturbing bill. I mean, this is Orwellian. This is tracking people down. And by the way, do we really need the federal government here? I mean, that's what your doctor does,

right? If you go to your doctor, you get vaccinations, they're already calling you and telling you it's time to get your vaccinations. Why does the federal government need to get involved with this? It's total overreach. It's really, really dangerous and what it could lead to as we see, you know, this administration continue to push illegal measures, which I know we're going to talk about in just a minute. We need to stop this thing. We really need to stop this thing, folks. Later on in the show, I'm going to talk about, you know, how we can do something about it. That's amazing. Incredible stuff. Let's jump into some science here. There's some breaking studies that really need covering. So a lot of people are wondering how do they bolster their immune system to have the best possible chance?

If they do encounter the SARS-CoV-2 or one of these variants, there's a study here. It's inevitable, folks. I mean, I've been saying this from the beginning. At one point or another, whether you're innate immune system, you probably already have in some ways caught it, but do we call it catching in if you don't get sick? That asymptomatic response means you're not getting antibodies. You're not going to test positive because your innate immune system is doing such a good job at B. this thing. That's what's happening. But let it be known. You are coming in contact with it.

It's everywhere. So at some point or another, hopefully you keep having a great innate immune system, which, remember, makes these temporary antibodies that then clean up the mess and then throw them all out. It doesn't remember it. It decides, let me just stay clean. Let me just keep that sort of low affinity, that, you know, that non-specific antibodies. That's what we want. But even for those that then get a big infection, do get symptomatic naturally, they go on and have very robust and a broad-based, specific immune response that is handling every single variant that we know. So that's where you want to be. All right.

Continue on. Right, right, absolutely. And so look at this study here. This is a study. It's called COVID-19 mortality risk correlates inversely with vitamin D3 status. These are results of a systematic review to meta-analysis. So these researchers were looking at all the available data out there, all the available research.

And this is what they looked at. This is the background of the study they wrote. Much research shows that blood, D.E. three levels correlate strong with SARS-CoV-2 infection severity. There is an open discussion regarding whether low D3 is caused by the infection or if deficiency negatively affects immune defense. So they found here, and this is the point that should be on every headline, regression suggested a theoretical point of zero mortality at approximately 50 nanograms and milliliters of D3. That's the blood, that's the blood levels. And they concluded the data sets provide strong evidence

that low D3 is a predictor rather than just a side effect of the infection. Despite ongoing vaccinations, we recommend rising serum 25-oh-H-D levels. That's basically the major circulating form of vitamin D in the body. We recommend raising serum 25-O-HD levels to above 50 nanograms-a-millimeter to prevent or mitigate new outbreaks due to escape mutations or decreasing antibody activity. Wow. So the question there was, is the D3-D3? appearing because of the virus or did you not have enough and that's why you caught it.

And what did they came to the determination was that it appears that low D3 levels made you vulnerable to severe disease. And they're saying, and I know they're very careful to say, we're not saying it's a cure, but it looks like anybody that had vitamin D levels above that 50 nanograms per liter could not, did not die. It took away any risk of dying from this virus. So folks, you know, we try to give you information out there. A lot of you ask, what do I do in this world where the vaccine is pressuring and is creating more and more barriers that may be more dangerous for everybody. Well, here you know, and let's make it clear.

We're not saying vitamin D is a cure, but it does appear if you want to really up your chances of having a good outcome when you do finally, you know, your immune system gets down or maybe somehow you come in contact with this. Obviously having high vitamin D levels above 50 nanograms is where you, you know, you're you want to be to have the best success. That's something we can all do. You can go out and get a blood test today based on this study. And what does it hurt? It may not protect you. I'm not saying that you're never going to catch it. But what does it hurt if the science is showing us, if you're at those levels, you have a really good chance of survival. I know what I'm going to do

tomorrow. Now, on the back of these headlines showing all of these highly vaccinated states or countries even or counties getting infection surges in COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2, check out this study. Transmission potential of vaccinated and an unvaccinated person is infected with a SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a federal prison. This is from July to August 2021. Now, remember, that was when the CDC said the Delta variant had taken over. It was over 90% of the cases.

The authors rate this. During a SARS-Co-2 delta variant outbreak among incarcerated persons with high vaccination rates in a federal prison, We assess markers of viral shedding in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons. And they found no significant differences were detected in duration of RTPR positivity among fully vaccinated participants, median 13 days, versus those not fully vaccinated, a medium of 13 days, or in duration of culture positivity, a medium of five days. And what they concluded, listen to this, they concluded that clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS. COVID-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. Wow. I mean, we, this is, we talked, there was another study that was very similar to this talking about viral load. When they studied the

viral load in those that were vaccinated compared to those that were unvaccinated after coming in contact and being infected with SARS-CoV-2, they said you could not tell the difference. And now we're seeing that the vaccine is not in any way reducing that viral load. They're just as infectious. But I think more specifically in this study, it's not even reducing the amount of time that you're shedding. That five-day period where you are infectious, it's not even reducing that amount of time. This vaccine is doing absolutely nothing to protect your neighbors. And frankly, I think as we start to look around the world, I don't think it's doing anything to protect you from severe illness either, which was the only caveat it had, which makes it really

not a vaccine at all. It doesn't stop immunizations. It just, I mean, it doesn't stop, you know, you from, you know, catching it or transmitting it, it's there only to protect you. So another study that says, why the heck are we having two classes of people, those that are unvaccinated and those that are vaccinated, masks or, you know, getting into concerts. When it is clear, it makes absolutely no difference. Do you see how crazy this is, people? This is the world we live in. Andell, it's been, it's been a very bad week for Biden's vaccine mandates. Headlines after headlines after headlines,

and we're still, the week's not over yet. So let's go over these headlines in chronological order because for people that don't want to be under these mandates, these are hopeful headlines. So let's check this first one out. This was from Missouri. Missouri judge deals major blow to Biden's vaccine mandate for health care workers in 10 states.

It says here the case applies to Medicare and Medicaid certified medical establishments in. Listen up if you're in one of these states, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, Alaska, and Arkansas. The injunction concerns the federal vaccine. mandate from the centers for Medicare and Medicaid services, CMS. Now remember, he's using the CMS, his administration is using the CMS services to push this mandate. They're going directly through them. So this injunction, really it's kind of a legal win. Let's listen to the Missouri Attorney General speak on this. Check it out. The court agreed that we were likely to succeed in establishing

that CMS, that the CMS vaccine mandate is arbitrary and capricious. because there is a lack of evidence showing that the vaccination status has a direct impact on spreading COVID in health care facilities, among other things. And the court noted that the mandate will cause a loss of staffing in many instances that would result in, and I quote, no care at all as some facilities will be forced to close altogether, end quote. We're going to continue to fight to halt OSHA's vaccine mandate on private employers. We're going to continue to fight the vaccine mandate on federal contractors because here's news for the Biden administration. I have talked to the real people here in Missouri, not just health care workers, not just small businesses who are struggling to find employees to make a living for their families, but everyday citizens as well, moms and dads, families who believe that they can actually make these decisions themselves. And they don't need the government to dictate those decisions to them. Wow, fantastic.

Really great. That's how you want your attorney general to talk, I would imagine, if you're a health care worker and you don't want to lose your job and you want to keep your choice. Now, what's he talking about? No care at all in some of these health care areas and hospitals. Well, check out this study. This is what it looks at. This is called COVID-19 vaccination coverage among hospital-based health care personnel reported to the Department of Health and Human Services, the Unified Hospital Data Surveillance System. This was from January 21st, I'm sorry, January 20th, 2021 to September 15th, 2021.

Now, this article is reviewed by the CDC, and it says here, among 3,357,348 hospital-based HCP, that's healthcare personnel, included in this analysis, a substantial percentage, approximately 30% remain unvaccinated. Remember, we're seeing headlines of hospital wings closing, of elective surgeries being canceled, of rural hospitals having to cancel certain wings because their specialists are forced to leave. So that's exactly what a lot of these mandates, these judges are halting this thing for because that is a crisis in itself. It's amazing that, you know, the shutdown of hospitals is a symptom of a much bigger problem,

which is there are 30%, one third really, of all health care workers in America do not believe in this vaccine. In fact, I would say it goes beyond belief. If you just didn't believe in it, you would probably take it and say, fine, you know, it's not going to do much, but I'll take it anyway. When you have 30% of people standing there and saying, I will walk out the door on my dream, on my passion, on my life, on my career, if you make me take that, that sounds like one third of our health care department in this country are terrified of the vaccine. They are worried. And why would that be? Well, it has to be that it's not just VERS that is capturing the highest levels of death and destruction from any vaccine. here's where we're at, folks. We now have reports. These reports, 19,249 reports of death,

97,000 hospitalizations, 101,000 urgent care visits, 143,000 office visits, 8,000 cases of antiphylaxis, 11,000 cases of Bell's palsy. And I know I'm going to get attacked. Every time you talk about bears, the New York Times, the Washington Post, or, you know, the Daily Mail or somebody who's going to attack us and say, well, you know, we don't trust bears. The CDC says that you can't rely on bears. Well, the CDC uses bears all the time when it benefits them, but in this case, you know, they'll be against us. But those numbers are shocking. They are very shocking. And it's probably why. I have to imagine these hospital workers are looking down at these people and saying, my God, you're sick. What did you do recently? I don't know. I got that vaccine

and now I can't walk. Now I'm on my deathbed. Now I'm so sick with COVID. I don't know what to do. And 30% of the hospital workers are saying, not for me, man. Nope, not me. Not now. Not ever. Amazing. Now let's look at this next headline. The court's handed another legal blow to Biden. So Judge Halts Biden's COVID vaccine mandate for health care workers nationwide. This is Louisiana-based federal judge Terry Daugty. He issued a preliminary injunction as well.

And that covers all the states that the Missouri injunction does not cover. So now we're looking at a nationwide halt on this health care mandate. And then slip it through the cracks was this one in Kentucky, a Kentucky-based judge, President Joe Biden's vaccine mandate, blocked by Kentucky federal judge. This was U.S. District Judge in Kentucky, and it blocked the federal contractor mandate. So that's a little different than the health care mandate. And he blocked it for Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee. So those three states, that was a small win there.

But one of the bigger stories that's emerging over the last really month is the unions. We saw the unions in New York with the firefighters, the police. Now we're getting the United Auto Workers Union, the UAW. involved in this. Now, this is their statement directly from their website. Statement of the COVID-19 joint task regarding voluntary vaccination status disclosure. And it says here, Detroit, at a meeting Monday evening, the COVID-19 Joint Task Force comprised of the UAW for General Motors and Stalantis has aligned on a policy of voluntary and confidential disclosure of vaccination status for UAW workers. And they said that there is a understanding that there are personal reasons that may prevent

some members from being vaccinated such as health issues or religious beliefs. They're standing behind their workers on this, not forcing them to comply, saying it is voluntary. And throughout this whole mess of headlines, we had the Biden administration come out and try to grab the news cycle and failed miserably with this headline. Biden says federal agencies can delay firing noncompliant workers until after the holidays. It's a very scrogy house. Oh, my God, it's going to take responsibility for what the are forcing him to do saying, I'm going to give you the holidays off. No, they already got the holidays off because every judge that looks at this knows that this is an illegal mandate by the Biden administration. Nice job trying to hop on and take credit for that, Joe. You're such a nice guy.

Let me go ahead and let you get through the holidays. Amazing. Right. Very scrooge-esque headline there. And so those are legal wins. And remember, this is only one week. This is only one week. There's so many more court cases going on. So I'm sure we're going to be seeing. cycles of news stories like this every week moving forward now going into December through December. You know, it's really amazing because I know there were so many people that were, you know, terrified. It doesn't matter. We don't get political here. I'm politically marooned. I don't really trust anybody at this point. It seems like everybody is pulling the string for somebody else. All these politicians, the amount of money it takes to get elected right now means that you're just

going to be controlled by special interest. In this case, pharma being one of the biggest funding in politics, the biggest, the number one lobby in Washington. But, you know, I keep thinking back to my Bible stories, like growing up, and it's making me think about not to get too, you know, spiritual here for those in our audience, they might be uncomfortable. But remember if you, you know, are either Jewish or Christian, I suppose, the story of Pharaoh and Moses, and, you know, Moses would come down and throw down his staff and it would turn into a serpent and, you know, let my people go. And Pharaoh would say, all right, get out of here. I can't handle like that level of truth. You obviously have something behind you. I do not understand. And then Moses,

would leave. And then the Bible would always say, but God hardened Pharaoh's heart. And then you'd say, no, stop them, don't let them go. And then Moses would come back and there'd be frogs from the sky and blood in the water. And every time, Pharaoh would be like, but God hardened Pharaoh's heart. And remember talking to my dad saying, I don't understand why God's playing both sides of this. And now, when I look at this right now, you have to imagine that as scary as it is, that the federal government is trying to take our rights away, literally destroy our constitution with these vaccine mandates. It's as though God put him there because look what it's doing. What is doing it is in a casing and like an indelible barrier to our protection saying in multiple courtrooms now, which we weren't here

a year ago. We were not here. We didn't know where the federal government. I had to debate Alan Dershowitz. I told Alan, you're going to lose on this, Alan. I'd love to go up against you in court. If you think the federal government can force this vaccine, guess who's proving to be right? We wouldn't have this had we not had an administration overstepping its bounds. And now we're learning almost unequivocally. Every single court is saying the federal government cannot do this to you, which is incredible. This is a powerful moment for this movement. And to see so many people waking up to the reality that their rights to control their own body,

body autonomy, we're going out the door to see all these AGs. And now every single state in the nation is protected against the federal government mandate, incredible. And Jeffrey, I like to think that we might have just a little bit to do with that. And this incredible audience has been watching this waking up their brothers, their sisters, their relatives, and their politicians. Keep up the good work, Jeffrey. I think we're really making a difference.

Yeah, I'll see you next week. All right, make sure to go to our website and check out the Jackson Report at our website where he gets into a lot more details on these issues for those of you that like to read. if you can still read. I'm pretty sure everyone in our audience can read. I'm not sure about the rest of the country. All right. So I want to talk to you about something really quick. We're coming to the end of this year and it's been an incredible year. Clearly, as you see these court cases and so many of these cases, by the way, we have our own attorneys in Aaron Siri and the team that we fund to do the work for the informed consent action network. Whether or not we work directly with those AGs,

we're sending the information that we've discovered through our FOIA request, through our legal wins against the CDC, the FDA, the National Institute of Health, Health and Human Services. You've been a part of this if you've been watching this show over the last couple of years. But if you're brand new, maybe you don't know this is what we knew. Maybe you don't know that half of the funding

that we get is going to legal cases all around the country. There's the legal wins against our own government agencies. And we're now up to five wins against the government health departments themselves. This information that's going out is what is being used by the government. attorney generals to win in these courtrooms. It's what's being presented in their documents. So we feel like we're having a huge effect on this. And so when you watch this show and you think

nobody else is giving me that information, I want to ask you a question right now because we looked at this last week. Obviously, we're growing exponentially. We're being watched all around the world. And so I said, you know what? What is our total number of people that donate, since this is a nonprofit, you don't have any commercials here. We're not selling, as I said, at the top of show, diapers or gasoline or baby food or clearly not drugs or vaccines. It's only on a donation basis. We're a nonprofit. The informed consent action network makes this show happen. So I want to ask you something. As you watch this show and you see that our set is getting better and all of you that are donating or feeling, wow, I'm really feeling like we're making a difference. What percentage

of our audience do you think actually donates to make all this happen? Well, you might be surprised. They took the number of viewers we had during the week of Garrett Van de Bosch, and I divided it into the number of total people that have donated to the high wire over the last couple of years. Guess what that percentage is? Well, it's not 80%, certainly not 100%, but it's not 80%. That's what you're hoping for. It's not 60%, it's not 40%, it's not 20%, it's not 20%. It's not 10%. It's not 5%.

It's not even 3%. Would you be surprised that all of this that we do is on the backs of 1.8% of the amount of viewers that are watching our show on a given week? That's right. I want you to think about that for a second. Just because imagine, look at all that we've achieved. Look at what we've achieved. Look how many of you are tuning into this show and saying, I am getting pieces of information. Even for my short attention span friends, we've got get vaccinated campaign.

or I can just send one of the clips that our team is here isolating out for you so you can just watch maybe one of the interviews that you think someone in your family will use. All of that material, all of this database that we hand you, all this information. If you're on our newsletter, you know that on Monday, if you simply signed up for free to our website, that on Monday you will receive hyperlinks to every study we're going to talk about in the show this week. Every single one of the articles of the news programs are going to be in your inbox so that you don't have to go to your friends and say, hey, this is what Del Bigtree said last week. You're going to say, no, this is what the CDC just said.

The CDC study just said that 30% of hospital workers aren't vaccinated. That's right. Not Del Bigtree. It's not wishful thinking. It's a CDC study. All of that's in your hands. And to do all of that, to make all this happen, to fly out, to march with people in front of state capitals, to talk to politicians, to do all that we do, that is all being made

possible by 1.8% of it. you today. So here's what I want to say. I am so thankful. I am so grateful. I'm not upset. It's amazing what we're able to do. But we have got to win this. We are winning, but you know that the assault is coming. The attack on the unvaccinated will be relentless as they start dropping like flies as these variants get more and more intense. And we keep trying to tell you, stop vaccinating. We need to get that word out there. We need to compete. So I, I want to put this out there. If you have a television set in your house and it plays CNN or MSNBC who's lying to you about this on a constant basis,

let's go ahead and throw in Fox and NBC and CBS. I'm not going to isolate any one of them. 100% of you that have that on your television are donated to them through your cable bill. But you're watching this show where you're getting the truth and you're relying on 1.8% of you to save the day, to continue to make all of this possible to win? Does that sound like a winning recipe? I'm just asking me. Just to be honest with you.

Does that sound like we can win if 1.8% of us are dedicated enough to maybe just give a dollar a month? Come on. We have the fight of our lives coming up next year. If you do not see this coming, whether we will live in freedom or we will live in tyranny,

I believe will be decided next year. I want you to look around you and ask yourself, how many networks are fighting for me? How many people are using their information and suing to get to my attorney generals and getting to our governors so that they will stand up and fight for me? How many are telling me what I need to call my senator and tell them? How many are doing that? We are going to win this.

We are moving and doing so well, but please, come on. We've got to stop thinking that 1.8% of us is going to get this job done. So if you want to make a difference, if you want to see, us win this, then be a part of it, be a part of the revolution. Join us. All you have to do right now in the top corner of this website that you're watching right now, just click on that donate to I can button. I don't care if it's $1, $5 a cup of coffee, or maybe a dinner every week, $100 a month, but become a recurring donor. We were saying for 2021 while the year still lasts, get in on being a recurring donor at $21 a month.

But whatever it is, it's not just that I want you to help fund the work that we're doing. I want you to feel what it feels like to not just be in the tiny 1%, but to recognize we are the majority, we are the growing body. I want your confidence. I want to report to you in a couple of weeks or months or the beginning of next year. Guess what? 50% of us are now fighting this fight together. 50% of us are funding the revolution, quietly, anonymously,

through the work that you're doing at the high wire. It's the end of the year. I want you to think about what you donate to. Sure, I would love to have monarch butterflies last forever. Rhinoceruses are really important. Trees are important. But our children, our freedom, all right to walk down the street and breathe God's given air,

is hanging in the balance. Give yourself a gift this year. Give your family a gift. Please become a recurring donor. look what we've done with 1.8% of you helping out. Imagine what we could do if say all of the 40% of the unvaccinated of this country decided to fund the truth. You're going to get a free T-shirt. This is why this is up.

Get vaccinated T-shirt for everybody that decides to donate today or this week. Go ahead. Hit that donate button. Become a recurring donor. Become a recurring donor. And you get a free, get-vaccinated T-shirt, even if it's only $1 a month. We're going to win this. We're going to do this together.

Please, let's start showing the world how much we care about these issues. All right. Moving on. There is an article, or actually an abstract for a study that just came out that is so incredibly shocking. And again, I feel like every week we put out at least one piece of information that should just stop this vaccination program immediately. I always say to myself, if we had CNN's, if I had, you know, Chris Cuomo, Chris Cuomo, I think he's suspended now for using funds or trying to help out his brother in the situation he was in. So just give us Chris Cuomo's spot.

Imagine I'm on Chris Cuomo's spot for one hour with the high wire for one week. And these are the types of studies that we bring to America. You ask yourself how long this vaccine program lasts because this is shocking, terrifying, horrifying, awful. And it's the truth. Here it is in circulation journal. Abstract 107-1-2 MRNA COVID vaccines dramatically increased endothelial inflammatory markers and ACS risk as measured by the PULS cardiac test. This is a warning by Stephen R. Gundry.

Our group has been using the PL Plus cardiac test, GD Biosciences, Irvine, California, a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers, which generates a score predicting the five years. year risk, the percentage chance of a new acute coronary syndrome, meaning occurring, you know, basically overnight, shocking you, acute. Here it is. The score has been measured every three to six months in our patient population for eight years. This is a long-term study, folks, and in many ways it's accidental because they've been tracking these people. Every three to six months, they measure their population over the last eight years. Recently, with the advent of the MRI COVID-19 vaccines by

Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the plus score become apparent in most patients. In most patients, what? This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 points, age 28 to 97, male and female ratio one to one seen in a preventive cardiology practice, had a new pulse test drawn from two to 10 weeks following the second COVID shot and was compared to the previous pulse score drawn three to five months previous before the shot. Remember? So we have before and after, right? Here's what they discovered. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35 to negative over to negative 20 above the norm. All the rest of

these numbers above the norm. Let's get to what would make sense to most of us to speak English. AGF increased from 42 over negative 12 above the norm, above the norm pose back. Here's the point. These changes resulted in an increase of the pulse score from 11% in a five-year risk association to 25%. That means 25% these people are now in a high risk category of having a cardiac event compared to 11% of them. It doubled. The vaccine is doubling the heart risk. Folks, I don't know what that means to you. I don't know if 11 and 25% sounds like a lot. This is the number one cause of death is heart disease. Over 650,000 people every year die in the United States of America from heart disease. Can you imagine doubling that? Well, I'm not the only one alarmed. Scientists all

around the world are alarmed. This is just a great interview by a cardiologist in England that is trying to bring attention to this, and he even leaks out that he knew other studies like this were showing the same thing. Take a look at this. This abstract publication circulation, I was concerned about it for a number of reasons. So first and foremost, we have to understand that there's been a shift in understanding of heart disease over the years. that we know now it's a chronic inflammatory condition that is exacerbated by something called incident resistance, which we talked about on the show before, which is related to poor lifestyle. Now, what this abstract has shown, what this research has shown is that Mark has associated

with increasing the risk of heart attack and probably even progression of underlying heart disease and people have already got some heart disease, has been significantly increased risk from 11% of five years, risk of heart attack, to 25%. Now, that's a huge increase. If this is true, then it's very concerning indeed. But in medicine, in good science, we never rely on one study. We need to replicate these findings. However, what I will share with you today on GB News is a few days ago after this was published,

somebody from a very prestigious British institution, cardiology department, researcher, a whistleblower, if you like, contacted me to say that researchers in this department had found something similar within the coronary arteries linked to the vaccine, inflammation from imaging studies around the conary arteries. And they had a meeting and these researchers at the moment have decided they're not going to publish their findings because they are concerned about losing research money from the drug industry. Now, this person was very upset about it and I wanted to obviously share this on GB News today. What I would say is that we then, knowing this information, which is very concerning,

Stephen Gundry's paper in circulation, and also anecdotal evidence. I mean, I have a lot of interaction with the cardiology community across the UK. And anecdotally, I've been getting told by colleagues that they are seeing younger and younger people coming in with heart attacks. Now, what does this mean in terms of the data? We have to put the jigsaw for the pieces together. We know since July there's been almost 10,000 excess non-COVID deaths.

And most of those are significant proportion of those are being driven by circulatory disease, in other words, heart attack and stroke. There's been a 30% increase in people have dying at home. And often these are because of cardiac arrests. Of course, this is also something close to my heart because my own father is one of those statistics. He had a cardiac arrest at home July the 26th. So when these data, since this data has been collected. So where do we go from here?

I think the signal is quite strong. I personally think that this needs investigating. So I think the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunization should absolutely investigate this. I think that the researchers, I really hope that they take a look in the mirror and realize the ones from where this whistleblowers come from, they realize that they should publish this stuff because their duty primarily is to patients, not the interest of the drug drug industry. And I think the third thing, and this has been a discussion that's been ongoing, I think now it's high time that policy makers around the world put an end to the mandates. because I think if this signal is strong and if it's correct, then history will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it, Alex.

So this is very concerning. It needs investigating and hopefully it can be resolved very soon. That was Dr. Asim Mahaltra speaking to a news station in the UK. Obviously, this study has got him alarmed. I wanted to speak to someone I trusted, so I gave Dr. Peter McCullough a call. he joins me now. Dr. McCullough, this article, first of all, tell me, you know, what are the beats of this article? So there, we have this study that I understand it looks for certain proteins, which lead to an understanding of your future risk of heart issues and conditions. And we're seeing

essentially a doubling of these sort of markers. Is that, is that the basic sense of it? Well, thanks for having me on the show, Del. Yeah. So the conference, context here is that this is the American Heart Association annual scientific sessions. And this was an abstract. It's actually a very highly valued. It's heavily vetted. It's actually hard to get an abstract accepted. I mean, I know I've been going that meeting for decades.

It's very hard to get an abstract accepted. So this is high science, first off. Second off, this is a multi-marker panel that's been used previously and it uses a lot of innovative factors, interleukin, fatty essence, synthetase, and others that predict when an atherosclerotic plaque is going to rupture and trigger a heart attack, trigger my cardinal infarction. And I think that the shocking news is how significantly these factors are elevated from baseline and how sustained it is.

And we now have data coming forward from Bruce Patterson with the respiratory infection showing that the spike protein is recoverable in human monocytes for up to 15 months. Now Bruce Patterson on the McCullery report just last week gave the data on the vaccine And again, the spike protein, not just the S1 segment, but in the vaccinated, the S1 and S2 segment are in the body for months after vaccination. And we have data now with this study suggesting the spike protein and probably what's triggered by it, these interleukins and other factors are providing this critical chain of logic to suggest that the vaccine, the vaccination process of vaccination and its biological sequelae could trigger a mycardion infarction. Now, this is separate from myocarditis. Myocarditis is a separate process where we now know that the spike protein directly damages periscites around the blood vessels and heart.

We're talking about probably older individuals with atherosclerosis, having a myocardial infarction. You know, the VAIR system, the vaccine-averse event reporting system does record myocardin farts. There's thousands of them. And I can tell you what I've learned as a cardiologist is I think for patients coming in with chest pain and suspected heart attack, one of the box. we should check is actually whether or not they've received a COVID-19 vaccine and probably in the last three or six months step of window. Do you think when you look at this, I mean one of the things that was really I think shocking about this study is just how in-depth it was that they were actually tracking these people beforehand. We have the data. This wasn't just sort of looking back and trying to cherry-pick information.

This is a group of individuals as I understand that we have been following and sort of every six months study these biomarkers. So when they started getting vaccination, we have a very clear understanding of this effect. And so, you know, are you, I mean, obviously we just saw from Dr. Mahaltra in England. Is this a conversation now amongst cardiologists? Is this really the type of thing that could break the back of this sort of vaccine mandate, do you think? Well, it's certainly a research conversation. And I agree with Dr. Mahatra. You know, there needs to be research funding. to start to investigate vaccine injuries. You know, we're approaching a million vaccine injuries in the United States.

That's like going to be more than all the heart attacks in the United States combined across different organ systems. And he's right, we need to study this. The vaccine manufacturers have been so many stakeholders that have profited so greatly. They clearly have funds to support research into vaccine injuries. You know, the concerning thing is we had a paper from our institution last year with the respiratory infection that when in the middle of a heart attack, when we put a stent in, if someone is actually having active COVID, they have a 20% chance doubt of clogging off the stent. And I can tell you that rate normally is way less than 1%. What that taught us is that COVID-19,

the respiratory illness is a hyper-coagable state. Patients can develop life-threatening blood clots. And I can tell you, when the stents clog off, it's actually worse than the native heart attack, the index case that comes in. So I'm concerned now that we've got a milieu that, that it looks like it can trigger a heart attack, it can destabilize atheroscotic plaque. And we know that the post-vaccine milieu is also hypercoagable, that blood clots can form. So now we're looking at big trouble

as we begin to vaccinate over and over again, particularly boosters. Remember, all the elderly now are uncovered. We have 22 studies showing the vaccines basically ran out of protection after six months. And so now we're gonna have a whole round of boosters in the elderly. Those are the ones prone for these atheroscotic events.

You've been very vocal on all of this. You've obviously put your career on the line. These are the types of conversations that are difficult. As Dr. Mahaltra so clearly put there, he's talking to doctors and scientists off the record that are saying, we saw similar things. We don't want to publish it because we're so afraid of the pushback from the pharmaceutical institutions,

the funding to our, you know, research. We don't want to lose that. That really seems to be like there's this bullying going on around the world because of all the funding and all of the fingers that, pharma has you know in the pots it seems of medicine uh yet you're speaking out are is you know are you feeling like you're gaining ground are there more politicians or there are more people starting to listen because this is one of many as you said this is in addition to the myocarditis the then periocarditis issue that's really affecting the youth that are getting this vaccine amongst

all the other you know um adverse events are taking place is there a listening that is starting to happen in this nation and around the world do you think You know, there certainly is, Dahl, and I think your program's gone a long way to help really the world understand where we are. One of the things that doctors in my circles are doing is we're doing public programs, where we'll go into cities. We'll have a pre-program with lawmakers and with doctors, sometimes two or three private presentations, and we just go over the data, just like you did. We go over the data, present the information, and then we move into big public programs. These are attracting 500 to 5,000 people at a time. people are at the edge of their seats.

They want to learn about COVID-19. They want to see the data. You know, not they don't want to see a media filter. They want to see the published manuscripts. What, you know, how do we treat COVID-19? Where are the data? Where are the data and what the vaccines do from a beneficial perspective? And then what are the downsides of the vaccines?

And this is a scientific reawakening across the country. And it's sad, you know, where are the medical schools doing this? Where are the departments of public health? people all over the world two years into this, and they haven't really had any fundamental education on the pandemic. The CDC just reported that 30% of the medical establishment, front-line doctors and nurses, have not received this vaccine or refusing to. That's an astronomical number of people that usually promote vaccinations.

My theory is that they're seeing failure of the vaccine to even protect against COVID, But beyond lack of protection, I have to imagine they're seeing adverse events that are scaring them and keeping them from making the decision that would help them move on with the rest of their career. Do you think we're seeing a noticeable rise now in adverse events from this vaccine to the place where your usual zealots may really just have to face the fact? Or are we still, is it still hiding? Are we still sort of seeing this hiding? Are they just writing it off as, well, it would have been a regular heart attack or it would have been something else? Or is it becoming more obvious to the establishment? I have a little different interpretation, respectfully, that 30% number.

But I think that 30% number is really comprised on the efficacy side, meaning that a part of that is people have had COVID-19, the respiratory illness, and they've been following it. They know they can't get it a second time. They know that their immunity is robust, complete, and durable. Now, even the CDC admits it, you can't get 18 a second time and spread it to someone. they see no value in getting a vaccine because of respiratory illness. And remember in health care, particularly in the labor force,

it's very gender imbalance. A large number of weighing age are in that group. And many have just looked at their mercantial and fetal health and said, you know what, I just don't want to take the risks. We don't have any safety studies. We don't have any assurances that a woman, a childbearing potential, won't be injured or her future child be injured. or have problems with birth defects.

And we certainly don't have any reassuring data in pregnant women. So I think that's probably the 30% group. The larger question is, is a physician population and is the extenders, the nurse practitioners and physician assistants, are they gonna start to field these vaccine injuries? Del, I can tell you in my practice,

in the last two months, I've seen for the first time of my career, blood clots in the arms of, in fact, two women about my age, now about four to six months after the vaccine where the injection was in the same arm. I've never seen that in my career. This has taken interventions with blood clotting, dissolving agents. And I think there's going to be just so many of these. And at some point in time, there's going to be capitulation. And the doctors are going to have to say, listen, we just don't. These are just too rare to keep coming up over and over again. And the same thing with myocarditis, you know, the back of the envelope calculation is the United States,

we should have for children and adolescents, we should have 600 to 800 cases in the United States as a background rate for the entire country and we're already past 13,000 cases in the VAR system. In fact, the University of Toronto Hospital reported a few weeks ago, they had over 100 active cases of vaccine-induced myocarditis. I really hope people wake up to the vaccine injuries so we can actually start to get. get clinical trials and research programs and learn how to treat these vaccine injuries and get people restored back to health. It's so important.

You're playing such a huge role, obviously, in getting the word out. I know we are both committed. It's just they're going to wake up. We're going to understand it. It's just a matter of when. How many lives will have to be lost? How many lives will have to be destroyed before we admit the obvious. This has been a scientific blunder of epic proportions.

it needs to stop. So I'm going to let you get back to it. I know you're squeezing us in. I want to thank you for your time. Keep up the great work, Dr. McCullough, and I look forward to speaking with you again soon. Okay, thank you, Adele. You too.

All right, you take care. You know, when we talk about this, myocarditis, we talk about our children. Now we're looking at adults. Even the elderly are going to be affected by this new finding. But how would we really get to the bottom of it? At some point, we're going to have to start doing true long-term studies of people who receive vaccines

and those that don't. I'm talking about the Vax versus Unvax study. And we've had a doctor that has gone far enough in his own practice and collected enough data to actually get to the bottom of some of those questions. He wants to take it a step further, but to remind you of the great work that Dr. Paul Thomas has done, here's just a recap for the last time we spoke with him. You come under a lot of fire we had you on before

because you have a practice of 10,000 children and you were able to compare you're fully vaccinated, you're partially vaccinated, to you're completely unvaccinated. That date is now out. It's published. Five days, was it after being published? Yep. They are going after your license. Yeah, my attorney gave me a phone call and said, I've got some bad news for you. Last Thursday, he called me on a Friday or Saturday. The board had an emergency meeting and they have emergently suspended your license to practice medicine. Now we were already under board review for numerous other things. They've just been going after me one thing after another pretty much since my book was published. So this was a clear

response to the publication of that data and that data, it's just powerful, powerful, powerful data. If you take the body from head to toe and you look at the unvaxed, which I had 561 unvaccinated patients in my practice, for eye infections, way up in the vaccinated ear infections, throat infections, allergies, and then you go on down for lung infections, take it to the whole body, ADD, ADHD, anemia, all significantly increased. I mean, the curves are just astounding. You'll see on the summary, the orange curve for those with vaccines just goes up and up and up over the years, and it's almost flat line for the unvaxed.

I mean, this is what I was feeling was going on in my practice because I just, my unvaxed were never ill. but to see it in a peer-reviewed, rigorously reviewed journal article, the data which was blinded and then reviewed and brought to the public speaks for itself. Well, Dr. Paul Thomas is a good friend of the high wire, and I think the work that he is doing is critical when we think of the health of our children moving forward in this world. Of course, we covered the story of his incredible vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. Back in December, we spoke to him again in February when his license was

under review. It is my honor right now to bring back Dr. Paul Thomas to discuss sort of where we're at now. So first of all, Dr. Paul, I just want to thank you for taking the time. And I want to thank you for your passion to be putting up with what you're putting up with in order to do what's right for children. So thank you for your work. Oh, thanks, Del. I mean, you're one of my heroes as well. You had to do the same thing that I've done, which is you were at the doctor's show. You were being forbidden. to talk about what you were seeing and what you knew needed to be talked about.

So you went out and created the high wire. So that is exactly what needs to happen. When we're faced with facts and information that we're being told we cannot share, what do we do, brother? We have to share this information. Absolutely. And I think why I think this conversation,

though we're not specifically talking about COVID-19 or the COVID vaccine, we are seeing a huge shift in the conversations around vaccinations now of parents across America, and I'm sure the world as we are watched, the high wire is viewed all around the world. But here's what I'm hearing a lot now. I'm hearing a lot of people talking about, you know, to friends,

those of us that have sort of always been in the community of not vaccinating our children or perhaps just strongly involved in health choice matters. But those friends that are brand new to this, that are just turning down the COVID-19 vaccine because they don't like the way they've seen the science done, They don't like being bullied by the government. We're now seeing pushback by our judicial system,

showing that it appears that the Biden administration has attempted to break the law in enforcing this COVID vaccine. But here's what I'm hearing now. So many parents are saying, I'm never going to give this COVID vaccine to my child. And frankly, I didn't take them back to our pediatrician for the vaccines that are supposed to get this year. I'm having a whole new look at this vaccine program because of how the government has handled this. And I think because of that, and I'm sure. I'm not the only one hearing that. We are hearing that, you know, there's been a huge decline in children getting their measles vaccinations and all these other vaccinations across the country.

And so I think that the pushback is really coming because of what the government has done, because of what the CDC has done, because of what the FDA has done, to really override parental instincts, to override parental powers. And now the repercussions of that, I believe they're turning on you because they don't want your information out there. They don't want, doctors that have been involved in seeing both sides of this. And so, you know, you're in a lot of heat now because of this vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. But for people that didn't see our last two episodes, sort of take me through the timeline. How many patients did you have in your practice when you sort of studied them? And you had fully vaccinated compared to fully unvaccinated.

How many, you know, how big is your practice exactly? So in 2008, Dell, I left my group practice and started Integrative Pediatrics. And about a thousand patients joined me. We grew that practice to over 15,000 active patients over a matter of just a few years. And it was in around the time, oh, 2016, I wrote the vaccine-friendly plan. That sort of put the attention on my practice and the fact that, hey, there's this guy out in Oregon

who's taking a shot at the CDC schedule. And that was just a science-based book to say, folks, it does not have to be one-size-fits-all. Right. That started this journey of the medical board coming after me. And in 2019, as you mentioned in the intro here, they actually challenged me. They said prove that the vaccine friendly plan is as safe as the CDC schedule. That's when I created the data set that became the publication published in a peer review journal,

this Vaxed Unvax study that's based on real world data of over 3,000 patients, all every single patient born into my practice from the day I opened my door to the day we closed this data set was included. No exclusions like you see done by the pharma studies that they cherry pick who they're going to look at. This is every single patient born into the practice. And what we did to really make sure we were comparing apples to apples was there were 500 and some unvaccinated, no vaccines at all. We age matched those 500 to 500 vaccinated kids. Now, realize, these are variably vaccinated. They're not CDC scheduled vaccinated kids. Right. There's virtually no kids born into my practice who follow the CDC schedule because we honor and form consent.

That's that process where you say, here's the risks, here's the benefits, and you go through each vaccine and they go, no, I don't want to give a hepatitis B to my newborn. So we end up with almost no patients fully vaccinated. But the data that you shared, it's there. It's powerful. And that was published on. Even in the lighter vaccine schedule, you see this dramatic difference in all of these illnesses in just those that had this lighter vaccine schedule. compared to those that didn't get the vaccines at all. I also want to add, Dr. Paul, that if I was to have received the question you did, show us that your vaccine-friendly plan is as safe as the CDC schedule.

I would say, please show me how the CDC schedule has ever been proven to be safe. Because as we've reported here on the high wire multiple times, the Institute of Medicine investigated the vaccine program in the 2011 IOM study and concluded that studies designed to examine the loan. long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted. Existing research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule. The committee generally found a posse of information scientific or otherwise that addressed

the risk of adverse events in association with the complete recommended immunization schedule. There it is, in the words of the Institute of Medicine themselves, and nothing about that has ever changed. They've never studied the entire schedule. So there is no study showing that giving 72 vaccines over the course of 18 years, which is about the average in America, is safe for our children. They could never point to it. So it would be really hard for you to compare your vaccine-friendly plan and the safety against

a product and an approach that has never been proven to be safe. I just want to add that in there. Thank you. And that is exactly why when I opened that letter and read that I literally laughed. I thought this is insanity. They've never shown, they changed the schedule every year, Dell. they always add they never remove and they've never shown that one schedule's better than the other so right that aside actually some wise person it might have been you i forget who said why don't you do

a quality assurance analysis of your data i thought yeah why don't i i mean in medicine if you do an intervention like any change to what's normally being done a really ethical thing to do is to look at the outcome of that intervention so that's what we did on november 23rd 2020 we published this study in a peer review journal in Dell, it was rigorously peer reviewed. It took months to get it through that process. That was the data that the board asked me to provide them. I didn't just give them raw data. I published it in a peer review journal. And five days after it was available online on December 3rd, I got a call for my attorney. The Oregon Medical Board had an emergency meeting and suspended your license. You are a threat to public health. So it was like you give them what they asked for.

and they apparently weren't happy with what they got. I also want to say this for people out there that, you know, obviously one of the things I've campaigned for around the world is for the vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. Robert Kennedy Jr. and I, and several luminaries of this movement, met at the National Institute of Health with Tony Fauci, Francis Collins, all the other heads of our biology departments in a meeting set up by Donald Trump, and we demanded exactly that.

We said, why don't you take the database that the CDC, is sitting on called the VSD, the vaccine safety data link that has the records of 10 million people and tens of thousands of unvaccinated individuals and simply do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparative study. You know what they said to us? They said, we will never do that study because we can't figure out how to do that study. I mean, it was the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard in my life. These are the best scientists in the world, including Todi Fauci, and you can't figure out how to compare two groups to each other. It says to me they've done that study every way sideways,

and they always get the same result. And I bring this up because I have seen both published and unpublished studies of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, some that are so damning that they're terrified to publish it. I hope one day it happens by people that have never even gone near this issue. But here's what we see. It's almost identical. What I found fascinating was your study is almost identical.

is almost identical to the study done, I believe, is in Mississippi. We see many of the same numbers, the same, you know, averages of asthma and neurological disorders that we see in your study. So there's this commonality that exists amongst multiple studies now. I think yours being the most defined that has been done with the largest group and cohorts there is. And so for your license to get pulled for what appears to be the exact same information we see every time we do this comparison is shocking. But you pushed back, right? So I think the last time we talked to you, you were going to push back. And you got your license reinstated. Did you not? Yeah. So in May, my attorney, I said, I had to be able to sue the board for what they've done because I've done

nothing wrong. They've yanked my license. I gave them what they asked for. I said, how do I retain my right to sue? And he submitted the legal tort process so that I have that right. That was in May of this year. A month later, my license was reinstated. The board negotiated with my attorney. He told me the only way I would get them to agree to reinstate it was I had to agree not to see well children, not to do any vaccine information, not to talk to any of my providers in my clinic about vaccines. I could just see sick children. So to save my practice, because financially it was going down, I decided to go ahead and do that. So I have been seeing the sick kids in my practice since July. I haven't made a penny this past year in my practice. That's just the

nature of what they've done to the whole economics of my practice, but I am seeing patients. So that's a good thing. Now, the board complaints keep coming. So interesting about a month ago or so, my attorney says, hey, I've got a really good deal for you. I have to laugh when they say really good deal from a medical board that's trying to take your license. Here's what they offered. So, Paul, you are not to ever do any research. You're not to ever see anybody under the age of 18. and you have to remove all liability of the medical board. So they want to get out of jail free card for everything they've done and prevent me from doing research.

What's the board got to do with research? The board's only responsibility is to ensure that dangerous doctors are removed from practice. Research has nothing to do with dangerous doctors. Dangerous doctors in the old days were people who were compromised by either they were sexually and molesting their patients or they were inebriated on the job. You know, they were intoxicated and compromised in that way.

Now the whole thing's morphed into, let's get rid of doctors who are sharing the truth that the system doesn't want shared. But let me share with you what's just happened because this has led me to come on your show and say I need some help. So about after all that transpired, and I'm going, I can't take that deal.

They send me a 20 page document with over 100 complaints. They're filing for, $10,000 fines per complaint. These complaints basically all boil down to the fact that I have given informed consent. My patients have chosen how they want to vaccinate. And the board is interpreting that as the fact

that I am not forcing. Well, they don't use the word forcing. I'm not supporting the CDC schedule. And nothing could be further than the truth. Every well visit, we show our patients the CDC schedule. We tell them that's the recommended schedule. And then we have an honest discussion about the pros and the cons and the alternatives.

and the alternatives. That's informed consent folks. It is. So I spent Thanksgiving weekend. Just because when I hear a complaint, I usually think that means that a patient feels like the doctor handed them incorrectly. Are these complaints coming from patients?

Not at all. That's the other piece of this that's just bizarre. It is stuff generated from the board itself. There's maybe one or two actual patient complaints and those, even those are not really legitimate. So the main one, they keep recycling, is a is a mom who came in in 2013. Mind you, I have not seen her since 2013 and I saw her twice.

Yeah. And in the first visit at the two-month visit, we discussed vaccines. She said, yeah, eventually I want to do all the vaccines, but I want to go slow for now. And so she signed a vaccine refusal form, and we only did a couple vaccines. She's married to a doctor. I think she went home, and her doctor husband must have said, oh, hell no, or whatever their conversation was. Right.

But now she's changed the story to the fact that I coerced her out of doing the CDC schedule, et cetera. That's the actual only patient complaint. Most of the other, if not all of them, are just the board trying to manufacture a problem that doesn't exist. Okay. And so now I think a lot of people are saying to themselves, all right, but the study's already done. You know, why take this risk? But you are actually not, you haven't stopped at this vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. You actually have a dream that's being caught in the crossfire here.

Tell me about that dream. Yeah. So, Del, you know, when I started, I was a pro vaccine doctor, trained mainstream. And when I started hearing patients telling me and I started seeing it for myself, healthy, normal kids regressing into severe autism, for example. And then just all these medical chronic conditions that are clearly more prevalent in the highly vaccinated. I thought, wow, how do we ever get the world to see what I'm seeing? And I thought of the Framingham heart study that was done in the night started in the 1950s in Framingham, Massachusetts, they enrolled 5,000 residents, basically almost every adult

in that town. And they just tracked health outcomes based on the choices that those people made. It's called a registry. That was the registry that figured out that cigarettes cause heart disease and lung cancer. And that registry has spawned over 1,200 publications. I thought, why not do that for kids? Let's create a registry and we'll track their health outcomes based on the decisions the parents make. So I started FOI, Pediatric Health Outcomes Initiative, and it's a nonprofit, p-hoinitiative.org,

and we have already enrolled almost a thousand patients. They're enrolled as newborns, and we will simply track their health. Now, I have not participated in FOIA since I had my ruling not to do research. Frankly, to be honest, no research has been done with FOI. We are merely registering newborns so that down the road, other scientists can have access to a database and we can actually figure out what's going on. I believe they are petrified about what this registry might show because right after Thanksgiving, I come home and I've got two new complaints from the board, another one that's 24 pages long that I haven't had a chance to look at yet.

And then this shorter one that's specifically about FOI, the pediatric health outcomes initiative. And I thought to myself, aha, that's what they're after. They are trying to shut down research that might expose the truth. And folks, that's when I realized I've had a mission all along to just get to the truth and let's help this world figure out what is causing all our problems because it seems pretty apparent to you and I, Dell, but we have to get data in a way that people will understand it. And so now I realize my mission wasn't just to save my license.

Actually, it never was. This is not about saving my license. This is about doing the right thing so we can get to the bottom of what's really going on. You mentioned COVID, and you know what? It occurred to me. We've got 30 years of vaccine data in VERS, and you've shown this on your show.

And in one year of COVID, we've got more deaths than those 30-year combined of all vaccines. More reported deaths. People are waking up. I want to add this word. We've got to always say more reported deaths, more reported injuries, than every other vaccine all put together.

Now, those are reports. Do those end up being cases? You know, I get arguments. I get pushed back from all the fact checkers out there. So I always want to be clear. I said reported deaths. The highest reports of deaths ever seen. I think we're nearing 20,000 reported deaths.

And I always put out the caveat this, that even the CDC says that is not an accurate measurement, though they use bears all the time to do their own data when it suits their needs. Anytime you use that bear's data to try and make a point of your own, oh, well, it's unreliable data. Well, it's unreliable in the wrong direction. They have never, ever shown a single circumstance where the bearers has proved to be overreporting anything. In fact, it's always been proven to be underreporting. Look at this.

Harvard Medical School. Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. So if there's an error, it's in the fact that it is clearly under reporting those numbers. But I want to put all that caveat out there because you are under attack and I, constantly under attack for spreading misinformation. So let's be perfectly clear what we know and what we don't know. What we know is bears is the only real capture system that doctors are allowed to use in the United States of America. The CDC has been asked to fix bears and make it a better capturing platform, especially when you're going to release an experimental product like the COVID vaccine on our population with virtually no safety trials. And when they come back and say, well,

we just don't trust bears. That's terrifying. You've had since the 1980s to make. a capture system that works. We are the home of IBM, of Microsoft, of Apple, and yet we don't have a capture system that you can trust. In fact, I can get better data on vaccines out of India than I can the United States of America. It's an embarrassment with the CDC. It's why Tony Fauci and others should be fired. I'm done with my diatribe, but that is my caveat. We don't trust bears, but bears is showing us, you know, a tiny glimpse of what is probably a massive tidal wave of injuries that we're hearing from doctors on the front lines as we speak. Yeah.

No, thank you for that clarification, Della, and you are spot on. And it is the fact that they have just overplayed their hand with this COVID vaccine that is so, so dangerous, if you even want to call it a vaccine, let's not go there right now. Right. But they, people are waking up. And so people are going to wake up. And what I have now and what I've been talking about is the data that we've already known, those of us who have our eyes open to what's happening to children and their health.

So the battle before us here is we cannot let them turn us off. We will not be silenced by a medical board. And so I'm taking this fight to you, your viewers. Join me at Dr. Paul's Fight.com. You'll have the opportunity there. If you just want to pray for me, I believe in the power of prayer. If you've got the ability to help out with finances, my attorney says it's going to be about $250,000 just to get through the January trial.

I haven't made a penny in my practice this past year, so I'm coming for some support. But I'm in this fight for everybody. This is my mission. And thank you, Del. All right. I just want to add into that. And let me just put a little emphasis here to our audience. First of all, people will accuse Dr. Paul Thomas of having a bias that he wants to do vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies.

And that's dangerous. I have news for you. That's how science works. We're supposed to have scientists that cover the gamut of perspectives. And they come from those perspectives, and every scientist, everyone working at Pfizer has a bias that vaccines are fantastic and are so great that we don't even need to do safety tests on them. Therefore, I have no problem that there's going to be scientists out there like Dr. Paul Thomas, who has seen with his own eyes the regression of the health of children over the years of his practice and decided to start comparing the two groups, and he has always left his practice open to both. I also want to say this. Dr. Paul Thomas comes under attack by the true vaccine abolitionist or the powerful anti-vaxers

that believe that vaccines are so dangerous that Dr. Paul Thomas is putting kids at risk by giving them vaccines. His stance has always been, I let the parents choose. I give them all the information that I have on both sides because truly I think he represents the people as a doctor should. It's a doctor-patient relationship. And you have always stood in the idea that everyone should. have the right to choose, you give them the information. So my hat is off to you on all those perspectives. But here's the point. When I was first talking to you about this just over a month ago, the only thing that they were, we were happening to be speaking together, and you said they want me to

just stop treating children, and then they will let me hold onto my license. And you were saying to me, I'm considering doing that because at least it will allow me to do my research so that I can do this study, which is really where my heart is at, and it's where I can do the most good in the world. And I said to you, not that I am prophetic about this, I said they're going to try and move you out so that they can do what they did to Andy Wakefield. Say, we pulled him. He no longer treats children. They'll make it sound like they pulled your license. And then they'll try and put, you know, that smudge and attack upon the study that you're doing. I said, don't do it. I think you need to stand and fight. And as you're sitting here now just weeks later, obviously now it's clear they're going

after your research. And so I want to say this to our audience. So many of you, you know, obviously make the high wire happen. You're supporting the work that we do here. But we, you know, we need your help to help other scientists that are doing the work that is going to be reported on the high wire in the years to come. For those of us that are curious about our children's health, for those of us that are trying to explain to our friends what's really happening with the vaccine program, for those millions and billions of people around the world that are now questioning, why am I being pressured with products? How long have they been tested? Are they actually safe? What would it look?

like if I compare to an unvaccinated child to a vaccinated child, there is no one in the world doing this. And the CDC is sitting, as I said, on the vaccine safety data link, the database that has all the children we could do this study. When the CDC, I want to make this clear too, the Institute of Medicine, which is outside of our government, these are Nobel laureates, the best scientists that we have in America, were asked to investigate the VSD by our Congress to see, could you do a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study. They said yes, and it should be done. Our own CDC has been funded to do this study and then took the VST out of our government

hands and put it into a private organization so that the scientists around the world couldn't use FOIA requests like you see us do here on the high wire where it's you work for us, the government works for us. They knew that Paul Thomas and other scientists could get their hands on that data and do vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies. So they hit it from the part. public. It should be all, I mean, I think it should be considered illegal what the CDC has done there, but this is how much they are hiding this information from us. So with all of that said, you have a

doctor and Dr. Paul Thomas that is putting it all on the line and is developing the type of study that is going to need to be done that will lead to the advancements of science, maybe even the advancements of better vaccines for those people that want them. I mean, I don't think that, you know, Paul, you're not going to call yourself anti-vaccine. You're still delivering vaccines. But how are we going to make the system better? And so, folks, I'm asking you right now, as we go into these holidays, yes, we need your support here on the high wire. But for those of you out there, Dr. Paul Thomas needs all of our support now, not just for

this legal case, but for the future of the most important study that will ever be done, an ongoing study over the next years of the lives of all of those children that are enrolling themselves and those babies. And I'm sure if you are about to give birth and you want to enroll your child, then I would reach out to Dr. Paul Thomas about that too. But we need to stand together. This is forget about, you know, you're donating to the Save the Monarch Butterfly or a Rhinocerous this year or all those things we care about. We need to donate to save our children. And this is where we do that now. So please help me. And by the way, if you are one of those very, you know, well to do, the life

is treated you well. I hope you will reach out to Paul Thomas because he's going to need real angels supporting, real funding to put that, you know, that study into place and be able to take care of all the doctors that are going to support that information going in there. Dr. Thomas, I just want to say that you are a true pioneer. I'm glad you are standing up and fighting this establishment. They're never going to go away. There's no offer that's going to be good enough for them until they've shut you down and shut down this critical information. So I'm honored to have you on the show and to our audience out there, please, let's bring it up one more time, his website. Here's his website.

You can donate at this website. There it is. Dr. Paul's Fight for Medical Freedom. It's at www. www.org. Dr. Paul's Fight.com. This is how we make a difference in this world. If you're really pissed off at Tony Fauci, you're tired of being swung around by these lunatics,

then hit them where it counts. Go ahead and support the doctors that support. support our perspectives. Dr. Paul Thomas, we're going to do everything we can to make sure that this database is up and running, that this information starts to pour out over the years that we get to the bottom of this. I believe what you're doing is appropriate and good science. I know that you truly care about your patients.

I know your patients have not died on you. There has been no risk to them. And as you pointed out, you're unvaccinated patients, even though the CDC wants to say is dangerous, they're the healthiest patients you have. So lastly, you know, what is it that makes someone like you? Why aren't we seeing every doctor stand up? I mean, you're all signing the Hippocratic oath. What is it in how you're wired that you find yourself in the situation in many ways all alone?

Wow. That's a very good question, Del. I mean, for me personally, it goes back to my childhood. I grew up in Africa. I was involved in civil rights for the freedom of the people in the country, Zimbabwe, Rhodesia when I was there. You know, I was very involved with that movement. And I was raised by missionary parents who taught me when you see evil or you see something that's unjust, unjust.

You don't just stand by. I mean, you stand for what's right. And so it's in my DNA, basically. And then I was just put in this place, Del. It's an interesting circumstance because I'm very uniquely positioned compared to almost any other pediatrician in the country. in that in my town, Portland, Oregon, the other practices are discharging patients who won't follow the CDC schedule. Now, this has been going on for 10, 15, 20 years, but it's really reached a crescendo the past few years. So what that did was where five years ago, I may have had just two, three hundred patients who were unvaccinated.

Now I have over a thousand. And so they're all congregated in my office. So I get to see this. other doctors don't treat patients who are unvaccinated so they have no idea how incredibly healthy they are. I have a waiting room for well kids and a waiting room for sick kids and my sick kid waiting room hardly ever has anybody in it. Wow. What the heck?

That's how it's supposed to be. So I feel like I have to share what I'm experiencing, but I have to do it in a scientific way. And so thank you for pointing out that that's exactly what I'm trying to do. This is not a good business decision, by the way. Like I mentioned earlier, I haven't made a penny all year. So people will accuse me always doing this for unethical reasons. No, this is the most ridiculous move for me personally, financially, to be taking this stand, knowing that my license is at risk

and that I'm, you know, I've walked away from a million dollars a year in vaccine profits. Every single year I lose over a million dollars in just administration fee, vaccine profits. I mean, I'd be sitting pretty if I wanted to just play the game. And I won't do that. But why other pediatricians don't get it? Some do, Dell. I think more and more are actually behind the scenes. They're just afraid for their livelihoods. I mean, a pediatric practice won't make it without vaccines, not the way it's structured today. And so what do you do? This is what you've put all your energy into. You find yourself a pediatrician and you've been, I'll just call it brainwashed, because that's what it is. You've been brainwashed to believe that vaccines is the most important thing you can do for children's health.

I used to feel that way, so I know how you feel. If you're a pediatrician, you're hearing me, you think I've gone nuts. No, I haven't gone nuts. I have data. Real world patients. There's nothing more powerful than that. Remember, when you talk to your patients and they tell you what's going on, you listen. I just simply listen, Del. And when I heard this story hundreds and hundreds of times, it's not a coincidence anymore. Now it's a matter of how do we show the world that what I'm seeing is real. And so that's why we're doing what we're doing here. We've presented the retrospective data. Oh, by the way, we should just mention to your audience that study was retracted. Yeah. And that's not a surprise, folks. The only retracted studies, there's about 24 of them, I believe, that had been published as retracted,

were all studies that showed vaccines in a negative light. They never retract the ridiculous, bogus studies that are positive about vaccines. So that's just the strategy. You discredit the which is why they yanked my license and then you get the study retracted, which they were able to do. And frankly, it wasn't retracted properly. A single complaint that we weren't allowed to address accused us of reaching improper conclusions. They didn't like our methodology. Well, we had a methodology that was more robust than the simple yes, no, did you have this disease? We actually looked at how many times you came in for that Pacific disease. So it showed severity. That's all. That's all. That's.

That's the methodology that I would propose everybody should use if you're going to look at comparative effects of vaxed or unvaxed or maybe taking a drug or not taking a placebo. Look at all the outcomes and look at the severity of those outcomes. That's the way we should be doing studies. Amen. Look, you are such a light in medicine right now at a time that is so dark. I think we are going to look back at these times like the Salem witch trials. What medicine is doing, I think they're murdering people in hospitals, denying them

hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin. We're seeing doctors not act appropriately, not care about their patients. You were the exact opposite of that. I just want to make one more point that I think came to me as you were saying that. It's not just about you, Dr. Paul. If we allow them to take your license, the goal of that is what we call now sort of jokingly wakefielding. They want to wakefield you in a way to scare all of those other pediatricians that are going to follow in your footsteps, that want to also do those type of studies, that want to have a more clear look and an honest look at vaccinations

and how well they're working in their patients. They want to scare everybody away from ever running a practice like that or allowing unvaccinated people into those practice for all of us that want a future in medicine that accepts all of us and all kinds and is truly about health freedom. It is critical that we help you hold on to this license

at least in the best way we can. Obviously, you're in a sense. a kangaroo court, but I believe you're going to win this. And I want you to bring all the power and the lawsuits against, you know, anybody that is trying to pressure you, this medical board. So I hope that over this next week, you'll get to see the power of our audience and how active we actually are. We are not sitting in bark loungers and whining and complaining and hoping someone else will fix the world. The highwire and the high wire heroes that watch it are active participants. and I think you're going to see a real difference this week.

Dr. Paul Thomas, thank you for taking the time. Thank you for being such a beacon of light and hope in these dark times. And I look forward to seeing what we learn from your work in the years and decades to come. All the best. Thank you, Dal. Take care. All right. Well, you know, every one of these guests, sometimes they go on and it lasts for 30 minutes or an hour, an hour and a half.

That's why so many of you said, I just can't get it through to my, you know, my brother or my sister or my uncle or my aunt that's got ADD. And that's why we've started the get vaccinated campaign. It works like this. Folks, it's time for you to get vaccinated. The Highwire is launching a brand new campaign to arm you with the facts. In short videos, you can share anywhere featuring the world's leading experts on COVID-19, vaccines, and every. everything in between. Natural immunity appears to be robust, complete, and durable. These are the drop the mic fully cited facts to help you, the super spreaders of truth,

in this real war of misinformation. Share the link, download the short video, and post to your favorite social media platform. All you have to do is go do the highwire.com slash debt vaccinated for all of the latest short videos. And make sure to grab your debt vaccinated merch at the highwire.com. Click shop for the latest in highwire gear.

We want you armed with the facts online and on the front lines. Get the facts, lose the fear at the highwire.com. All right, well, it's just an amazing time to be alive. I've tried to say it over and over again. I hope you feel the positive energy coming from this show. We are now drawing the best scientists from around the world that are coming to the high wire because this is where they are allowed to speak the truth. And because of so much of your support going to some of those doctors, like Dr. Paul Thomas,

taking care of him, it really shows that we are active participants now in this world. This is what had to happen. We're exactly where we want to be, where we need to be. Yes, they are terrifying developments in Australia, in the UK, in Austria, in America, around the world. New York, California. My God, what's happening in California? going to be out there in just a couple weeks speaking, by the way, in San Diego. But the point is that we are reaching a crescendo point.

All of this has been in the works for decades, if not longer. They've been trying to take over our lives. They just didn't expect us to wake up in time, but we are. The high wire is a huge part of that. And so I hope you're feeling this move. I hope you feeling us winning. I'm hoping that watching our own courtrooms now weigh in on and, words like medical freedom and body autonomy coming from attorney generals in our states from around

the country. This is fantastic. We are moving. We are proving that our federal government is out of hand. It is acting illegally against us, trying to take away our rights. And while they're losing and losing and losing, they're trying to pass a bill right now to track the unvaccinated. We've got to stop that. I want to just bring attention because this is what we do. Not only do we sit here and watch. We've got to be active participants. So we've got to stop this bill. It just went to the Congress. It was the Breitbart article we talked about earlier where they have passed through the Congress, this law that's basically an infrastructure bill. It's going to spend, I think, $400 million in taxpayer dollars to track you. How about $400 million to fix the freaking bear system so that

we can figure out how many millions of people you're about to murder with a vaccine that was never test for safety? How about funding that, all of you Democrats and Republicans? That's what needs to happen. That's what the high wire is going to fight for. But right now, I want you to know you need to reach out to your senator. There is a website you can go to right here. Go to www.bit.L.L.Y slash find senator. You can go in there and find who your senators are in your state. You need to reach out. I know it's weird. I know none of us like doing this, but frankly, it only takes you a few minutes. Get uncomfortable with it. Call them and say, and usually it's just a secretary. They say, What would you like to say? You say, I want to stop that bill immediately that is trying to track

vaccination status across this country. If my senator votes for it, I will vote that senator out. Let your voice be heard. We are having the power and trust me. This isn't like weird times anymore. It's one of those vaccine freaks that called. We happen to have the majority. We happen to have half this nation now suing the federal government. This is the time we push. This is the time we drive this thing over the top. So please do your part, call your senators, and stop that bill in his tracks. Let them know while the Democrats are holding on and all of them voting unanimously to take away your rights, that their jobs are on the line and we're coming after you in 2022. It doesn't matter if a Republican. I don't care if you're a Democrat. If you're not voting for

medical freedom, then you're out of there. This is how the revolution happens. This is what we do. We are still free people in a free nation. We must hold on to that freedom. We must walk the streets of that freedom. We must stand side by side in that freedom. Who told you the revolution would not be televised? They didn't know that we had 1.8% of our population funding to make it happen. Let's make it more. Let's go big next year. Help us do that. Please become a recurring donor. In fact, at Christmas time, why you hand that Get Vaccinated T-shirt you got for free to one of your loved ones and say, you know what? I'm donating in your name on behalf of you. You are now funding one of the most important shows and the works that's happening to save not only you,

your children, our grandchildren, and the future of our species. That's what we think we're a part of here. If you want to be actively a part of it, please, whether it's a dollar or $5 or $20, whatever you can give, it is going to make such a huge difference. What better gift is there to give to someone you actually love? Give them the gift of their free future. Welcome to the Revolution, and I'll see you next week. We will not comply with the institutions, sick illusion.

No, it won't be televised. Welcome to the revolution. Choice is a voice for the voices they try. If you don't have a purpose, if you read a verse, You don't know who we verse. Shut your mouth. They comply. That's the message.

Want you to rest.