The Highwire with Del Bigtree - PFIZER DOCS: FDA HID PREGNANCY & BABY HARMS

Episode Date: June 11, 2022

Investigative Journalist and former Clinton Advisor, Dr. Naomi Wolf, details alarming new data from the latest Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine document dump, and the potential harm they hid from pregnant women.#NaomiWolf #TheBodiesOfOthers #BabyDieOffBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Here is an issue that is not just an adult, it's not just a kid, it is maybe the most vulnerable among us. That growing infant, when we think about pregnancy, when you think about the recommendations for the pregnant, have you asked yourself, huh, I wonder how much science was supporting this? Getting COVID-19 could be bad. Being pregnant and catching the virus could be even worse. Now the centers are issuing an urgent health advisory for pregnant women to get vaccinated. The CDC issued its strongest guidance yet urging pregnant women to get the COVID vaccine. Multiple studies indicate there is more risk in not getting vaccinated. There's nothing about the vaccines that have been licensed so far that raise any red flags for people who are pregnant. The data are really very, very strong.

If you look at the tens and tens of thousands of pregnant women who have gotten vaccinated, there's no safety signal of concern at all. The vaccines benefits outweigh any known or suspected risk, and they are recommending them aggressively for women, either before pregnancy or in any of the trimesters. We know tens of thousands of women have been vaccinated who are pregnant already in the United States, so so far it looks safe.

I'm really worried about the long-term effects. What about when the baby's five years old? It's important to remember that this is an MRI vaccine, and that's the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine. Moderna vaccines. They are not live vaccines and importantly they don't cross over to the through the placenta to the baby. There is not an increased risk of miscarriage and in fact there is no biological mechanism by which that could happen because we don't think that the vaccine actually crosses the placenta and affects the baby. There's new evidence that getting vaccinated

against COVID-19 while pregnant can also provide protection to the baby. The antibodies that the mother has can go through the breast milk to the baby and may only serve, you know, maybe to protect the baby a little bit, but there's absolutely no harm. It's very safe. Despite the lack of controlled trials in pregnant women, their babies have been just as healthy as their counterparts who weren't vaccinated. This is a safe thing to do for yourself and for your baby. Honestly, I can't think of a single reason why a woman wouldn't get vaccinated while they're pregnant. I suppose we could have all stayed asleep and gone on believing that the CDC was right and all of this was actually news and not propaganda. But luckily for us, a group of world-renowned scientists and experts hired Aaron Siri, the same lawyer that we use here at the informed consent action network and for the high wire to go after the FDA that wanted 75 years before they released the data on the trials for the Pfizer vaccine.

Well, obviously, we've reported here that Aaron Siri both won in the court and on appeal, and all of that information has been dumping into our laps and is due to all be presented, not 75 years, but within this very one year. It's an amazing victory for Aaron Siri. You can find those documents on our website, but this is a part of how we are changing the world and how we do things. It's really about open source, right? Let's get this information and let's let the whole world jump in on it. And what's happened here is proof of how brilliantly that works because one of the great investigative minds, one of these people that has been in politics for a very long time, you know, knows where the bodies are buried.

Of course, I'm talking about Naomi Wolf. She took a team of people to dig through this incredible amount, tens of thousands of documents to get to the bottom of this discussion. And specifically around pregnancy, she has some shocking new details to share. and it's my honor to be joined by Naomi Wolf now. Thank you so much for having me, Del. I appreciate it. And thank you to Aaron Siri. I wish I could thank him and his team as well. They really changed history with their persistence in getting these documents to the public. I agree. So tell me, first of all, what is the group you're working with?

Who is it that you've got sort of plowing through this material? It's obviously a lot. How do you approach tens of thousands of documents? as an investigator. Yeah. So it's a fantastic new model that's really yielding fruit. Basically, a call went out from us on Steve Bannon's War Room and also on our own news site, DailyClout.io, to ask for experts to convene to read through these documents

because, of course, you know, a layperson like myself or other journalists, even if we could read through 55,000 documents, they're highly technical. So we got an amazing response. Now it's 3,000 volunteers. They range from physicians and RNs to biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians, biological scientists. And they are in six teams. And they're going through the Pfizer documents systematically. They've issued about 17 reports. And the headlines they found are absolutely shocking. I can bring you up to speed with some of the major headlines, or I can focus primarily on the most recent headline, which is, I think, the biggest story of our time, and of course, all the major legacy media are ignoring it.

There is a baby die-off to vaccinated women, and there are harms to vaccinated women, and the mechanism is clear in the Pfizer documents. So all those clips you had of all those spokesmodels of pharma and government, they are lying, and what's worse, if they were with the FDA or aligned with the FDA with the CDC related to Pfizer-D-all, they knew they were lying. When you reached out to us last week, you sort of laid out six major points to this work that you've done.

Why don't we start there? Because I just think the people need to hear, you know, exactly the details. Because hearing it, it's shocking, yes, but take us through it. What is it that this incredible team has uncovered in the Pfizer documents that come, These come from their trials mostly, or is it also upon release to the public? What is it we're looking at? I mean, these are, there's a table of adverse events that are from reports from the public. And there you see, and this is well known, more than 42,000 adverse events in a short span of months.

More than 1,200 people died, and 4 people died on the day that they were injected. But the volunteers have found other shocking things. And then I'll get to the babies, but I want to give you a little bit of background. Sure. The volunteers found that Pfizer knew in December of 2020 that the vaccines did not work. The internal documents, and I've seen these, have categories vaccine failure and waning efficacy. Also, they show that one side effect you get when you're vaccinated is COVID. They knew that a month after the rollout.

But they didn't tell anyone. People thought, you know, I'll have two shots, I'll be done. The president said, have two shots, he'll be done. Pfizer knew that what we didn't find out until April of the following year with an Israeli study, that the vaccines weighed in efficacy. So, oh, you need a booster. Oh, you need two boosters. You need three boosters.

We found the document that shows there going to be six boosters. And in fact, Sweden just rolled out a fifth for pregnant women. And I'll get to why that's so dangerous. Pfizer knew that the injection did not stay in the deltoid, which all the doctors, you know, licensing boards, CDC claimed. I had doctors say, of course it stays in the deltoid. It doesn't. They knew that the spike protein, the mRNA, and the lipid nanoparticles go within 48 hours

through your bloodstream. A Japanese study has confirmed this as well. But they lodge these are the Pfizer documents in your lymph nodes, liver, spleen, adrenals, and if you're female in your ovaries. And I got deplatformed in March of last year from Twitter and widely attacked for noting an early signal of menstrual dysregulation in women. Well, now we see one possible mechanism. And now a year and something later, the NIH has confirmed that on average women are menstruating on average a day more a month. The Pfizer knew that the 100 microgram.

Let me interject really quickly, Naomi, just because I want to give a detail to. this, the lipid nanoparticle, I was just at an event where I was talking to Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, and they all said the same thing, which was, I hadn't wrapped my head around it, that the lipid nanoparticle technology, that they're sort of wrapping this, this MRNA in to send into the body, was actually designed for cancer drugs, and the specific purpose was to get the drug into the brain, which is really hard to get a delivery system for a drug dealing with brain cancer. So this lipid nanoparticle, I found this fascinating, was actually designed to get past the blood brain barrier.

That's what it for. So when they used it in this vaccine to deliver the vaccine and then said to us, it'll stay there. How is that possible you're using the technology that was designed to not stay there, but to go to the brain and other organs in the body? I just wanted to sort of add that detail in there. It's just shocking. Yeah, I want to add to what you just said.

I personally chose not to get vaccinated when I looked up lipid nanoparticle technology and found, and I'm a tech CEO. And I found that there was a lot more excitement about the technology in the biotech industry journalism, you know, newsletters than there was in medical journals. And so I recognize this is a, this is a bubble. You know, someone's going to have a big exit after all the damage is done. And I didn't want, you know, to participate in someone else's big exit at my expense. But lipid nanoparticles, indeed, were used to deliver medicine to people with brain tumors. So, yes, they knew it crossed membranes.

But also, it's used when things are drastic, right, for, you know, a cost benefit that is, you know, otherwise you're going to die of a brain tumor. Right. But absolutely, the technology, it is not surprising, crosses and our volunteers found this, the placental barrier. So it enters these, people have to understand, they're tiny, but they're hard, fatty casings. These are zooming around your bloodstream, right? And they're crossing, as one scientist put it, every membrane in the human body or traversing. So this is the fetal environment where the baby is gestating. And so just skipping ahead, I guess, for sake of time, to the babies, right?

And there are other horrible headlines I can share with you. But getting to the babies, I asked the volunteers to drill into pregnancy, childbirth, and lactation. Because I didn't understand with, you know, eighth grade biology, how if this is happening, how babies are going to be safe. And indeed, they found that Pfizer excluded, you know, all pregnant women were excluded from all trials, right? But the claim that it's safe and effective, which you just heard all these spokesmodels echoing, is based on a study of 42 French rats. What? Followed for a period of 44 days.

The scientists who ran the study were investors or employees of Pfizer or Bio-Ntech. They didn't let these poor mother rats actually give birth and check to see if their babies were developing normally, growing normally. They autopsy the fetal rats. And they decided that these, you know, fetal rats were fine. So therefore, the vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant human women and their babies. And not just four pregnant women, but like every pregnant woman. They study 40 rats. I mean, you can't even make the stuff up.

40 rats and decide the fate of humanity. 44 rats for 4. 42 days they followed them. Exactly. One four rats for 42 days and that gave us enough information, didn't watch one of them give birth to say to the world if you're pregnant, go out and get this vaccine that we know

crosses blood-brain barrier, therefore must cross every barrier, lie to the public, lie to the news. I mean, these people, I'm telling Naomi, they've got to go to jail, but let's get to that, you know, let's hear the rest of these details. Okay, yeah, no, I have to tell you

the rest. So you've got to understand. Again, pregnant women were excluded from the EUA. No one knew just as you said. Why? All these people didn't know what would happen except, right? The stuff is designed to cross every human membrane. So then the Pfizer documents show that nonetheless, 270 women did get pregnant in the trials.

And they lost about 230 of those women's records. They don't show up. They're not followed. However, 36 women. six women did give birth who were vaccinated. And Pfizer knew that 28 of those women lost their babies. The babies died. Pfizer knew that.

Pfizer knew that there's a baby that died after lactating, nursing from a vaccinated mother. The baby died with an inflamed liver after GI distress and agitation. Now I'm going to fast forward. I'm hearing signals around the country of babies of vaccinated mothers that are having GI distress, failure to thrive, meaning they're not growing appropriately, and sleeplessness and agitation. What the studies show is that polyethylene glycol is one of the ingredients in the MRANA vaccine. Polyethylene glycol is a petroleum product.

It's used in things like white strips, right? You're not supposed to ingest it. this is one of the ingredients that's going into these pregnant women's lactating women's bloodstream. Well, you know, breast milk is made from, you know, from blood and lymph. It's supported by blood and lymph. And so these model, you know, these spokesmoles you just show were like, oh, it can't possibly affect your breast milk. Well, the NIH study that I cite in my most recent substack shows that they knew perfectly well. They found polyethylene glycol in trace amounts in vaccinated women's breast milk. They decided it was negligible.

How much of a petroleum product is negligible when you're a tiny newborn with no immunities? And this is your only food. And the study acknowledged that the vaccinated mothers, babies are having agitation and sleeplessness and gastrointestinal issues. They acknowledge that. And they're like, more study is needed. Now I want to fast forward to the real shocker, but which now should not be even, you know, so surprising because we understand some possible. mechanisms. A Tana Hecht and Israeli journalist who reports on what our volunteers are doing, she put together news stories from around the world and she found that there is a baby die-off

in vaccinated countries and of vaccinated mothers. And here's what I mean. In Ontario, Canada, one province, they usually baseline five or six neonatal deaths in a quarter, in 12. 2021 after almost the whole province was vaccinated because you can't do anything in Canada if you're not, 86 babies died. So dramatic a spike that there was a parliamentary announcement about it. But it didn't stop Canada from vaccinating pregnant women. In Scotland, where I used to live, a highly vaccinated country, there has been a doubling of neonatal deaths. Twice the number, the normal number of babies are dying. And in Rombom Hospital in Haifa, they show that there's a 34% increase in spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, and neonatal deaths in vaccinated mothers compared with

unvaccinated. So you've got to now listen to what I just said, Dell, and expanded over 190 vaccinated countries. There's a war against babies and a war against, a war against against the right of mothers to know what's going into their body. None of this was disclosed to them. So this is all illegal, according to the Nuremberg laws and every code of ethics. And there's a war against a woman's ability to sustain a baby with her own body, which is one of the most miraculous things the human body can do. So just to sort of summarize, because you laid out so much there, we need to

decided the safety of this vaccine on pregnancy using 44 rats. We in the trial accidentally, unfortunately, I'm sure for the trial, people hosting the trials, women went out and ended up getting pregnant. And instead of saying, well, good. And by the way, you said there was something like, what, 267 women, was that what it was? That got pregnant? 270 women got pregnant, but about 230 of them can't be found. We don't know what happened. I mean, so when we think, and it makes me think is that just because they were pregnant or is the data collection that bad on a trial that they're just letting people drop off that we just won't know what happened? Either way you tell that story, it looks really bad for people that are in an emergency situation, passing an

emergency use authorization, knowing full well this thing is being rushed and every piece of data should be like gold because people's lives are hanging the balance and you are disappearing the majority of people that are, you know, representing an important group that you are telling to get this vaccine. And so you're saying we have this mysterious disappearance of over 230 of these women that got pregnant, but the ones that they did follow, how many was that? 30 something? 28 of the 36 babies died. Wow. I mean, there's, I want to put it out there, that we can't extrapolate the math as that percentage because we don't know what happens.

in this other group. I'm not going to jump to conclusions, but one could suspect that there's a reason that those cases are missing. They probably didn't look good. I would think at this point they would be trying to get every survival baby into this so that it didn't out them, especially as they're throwing the data out to the public. If that is not getting out to the public, I would imagine we have a real problem. And as you said, so when we look at this, Naomi, you have what happened in the controlled clinical world. We have missing data, But that then is corroborated as we look around the country. We all have friends. I have a friend now is having difficulty with their baby eating.

They're having serious gastric distress. They did get the vaccine. Obviously not a close friend because they didn't ask me about it before they decided to do that. But I'm hearing these stories too. And then you see Scotland. You look at Bears COVID vaccine reproductive health related reports. This is miscarriages by reported date and miscarriages by Vax date. I mean, look at that. It's outrageous. What we're seeing in this data, that's Vairs, that's mostly America, as you said, Scotland, Israel. These stories are lining up everywhere. So as you, you know, at one point, you know, there's a headline there where you're starting to accuse, can I say accuse experts, CDC, FDA of negligence, not even that, like wrongful death or for,

this, you know, when you're moving into this languaging, you know, you've been in politics, you've been in media longer than I have, you are, you know, a pillar of these institutions. What allows you to cross over to saying it's an accident, the CDC didn't really realize, hopefully they do now, to saying, I believe they're killing babies? How do you, how do you, how do you, go ahead. Sure. Yeah, no, that's a fair question. And I'm glad to see. say that in addition to our 3,000 medical and scientific researchers, we have 250 volunteer lawyers and three legal teams taking the evidence that the volunteers on the scientific side who compiled and using it. They've written four attorney general letters in four different states,

and they're preparing a range of actions that range from fraud to, you know, to criminal offenses. But I personally, I'm not a lawyer, I'm not a doctor, I'm not a medical doctor. I have studied genocide. And I'm the granddaughter of a survivor of a family that lost nine brothers and sisters to the Holocaust. And what is clear to me from the Pfizer documents, and we've just talked about a handful of things that they found. But what I can tell you overall, quite apart from the babies and the baby deaths, is that there are such, vast scales of undisclosed harms ranging from, and things that people I love and care about were baffled by, you know, crippling muscle pain myalgia is one of the top harms, crippling joint pain.

No one tells you about that on the CDC website that you might have to limp, you know, after you get vaccinated. So many forms of clotting events, so much thrombocytopinia, so many stroke-like events, encephaly, you know, so. so many neurological harms, you know, I personally shied away because I thought the structure of this is going to lead to neurological damage, and I'm a layperson. And indeed, the neurological harms, Guillain-Barre, Bell's palsy, you know, MSs are off the charts. So the point is looking at this and knowing as I do the history of 1930 to 1933 in very great detail when even before the Nazis were officially in power, they were weaponizing boards of health, and they were

weaponizing medical licensing boards and professional organizations of doctors precisely to stigmatize, you know, the clean and the unclean, the fit and the unfit, and to kind of politicize medicine. And that, you know, was, and to say, like, you're worthy of being saved and you're not, right? All the way to nine years later, mangalist experiments. Initially, before I saw the Pfizer documents, I thought, comparing this to Dr. Mangala is rhetorical, it's excessive, there's no cause for it. Now I've seen these documents, these people knew for 14 months to this day, right? They know that these injections kill babies, that these injections cause neurological harms, cause strokes, claws clotting. They know, you know, people I know are collapsing and there's like

a meme on social media of athletes collapsing. Doctors are mystified. I looked at the SEC filings of Bioentech. One of the things biointech discloses to the SEC, but no one disclosed to you and me is that fainting so hard you could hurt yourself is an identified side effect of these injections. Right. So what do you call that? I mean, they knew that babies were dying and they kept going. They knew that people were having strokes and heart attacks that there was cardiac damage to kids. And they kept going, right? And they kept saying, yes, we're authorizing this for teenagers. Yes, you're author. We're, we're. We're authorizing this for, you know, young children. Now we want to authorize it for babies to five-year-olds. We have never seen that before in history, but genocide is narrowly defined legally as targeting a population that's ethnic or racial. That's just a legal definition in international law. But genocide, in terms of its root structure, means the killing of a people. Well, the intentional killing, intentional. It's intentional if you don't stop it, right? If you know and you don't stop, and if you say, and even legally, right, a lot of the lawyers are looking at conspiracy,

you know, RICO type things, racketeering. If you know there are dangerous harms and you expose children to them, that's a criminal offense. If you know that someone can get, die and you, you know, do it anyway, that's at least medical malpractice, if not manslaughter. I mean, these are categories of harms we haven't seen before, but the effect is to target the human race. You know, they're vaccinating everyone.

And they literally did not know what would happen except that they were seeing, you know, the tallies come in of people being injured, broken, miscarriages, abortions, you know, spontaneous abortions and dead babies. So, yeah, I call it, what I call it is it turns out there can be a happenstance genocide. Wow. Naomi, you're doing such great work. I know there's so many other things that you, at the top of this, you talked about other issues that you've uncovered.

So if people want to do a deeper dive into your work, where's the best place to find that work and where you're reporting at? Thank you. So again, I'm not doing this research. It's these extraordinary experts and you can find all the reports on daily clout.io. So if there's a complete media blackout, I'm asking everyone to kind of step up and tell people about these harms, show them these reports. All of the primary citations are in the reports. They're right there. And we have to educate each other. even if you get kicked out of the PTA or they don't invite you to that cocktail party. Now is the time to be a little selfless to save, you know, humanity. And if you want to support us and the lawyers work, please go ahead. And my own book came out two days ago.

Amazon is already telling people they can't have it after it hit number one in 24 hours. This is the bodies of others. And it is the backstory of how we got here. And the die off of the babies is one last piece of evidence that there's a war on humanity that started two years ago with a pandemic. Is Amazon the best place to get your book right now? No, thank you. Please order it from all seasons press.com

or from your local bookstore, which we want to support, of course. Okay, so go to your local bookstore, All Seasons Press. Obviously, I'm sure that's going to be a fantastic read. You're such a brilliant interview. It's such an honor. These are those moments, Naomi, where I grew up watching, not that you're older than me, but I just wasn't as engaged in the world as you were. But, you know, you're a superstar.

And when I get to sit here thinking, you know, some of those people that I watch it. And by the way, back, and we've talked about this the last time you were all. Back when I was a liberal, you were just an amazing liberal out there, you know, you know, sounding the alarms. And here you are like me. I think just like me, I would guess. I said, look, if my side started doing what I think the other side is doing, I would call it out. And here we are. I'm calling it out.

This is not right. I'm now considered myself politically marooned. This isn't a political conversation, but we're all shocked that regulatory agencies and government agencies are killing people. I don't know how it's to put it. You're killing people. You are knowingly putting children in people in harm's way, and you know it. It's maybe, you know, I think about the old Sting song, Murder by Numbers, right? It's as easy as one, two, three.

These power brokers just accept casualties as a part of their daily, you know, coffee routine. So when you think, my last question to you, when we think, you know, if there's a place to it at the tack or where the real harm is, are you more angry at Pfizer and Moderna and Ash's end of these pharmaceutical industries? Or is it more our regulatory agencies? We could only fix one thing. What is it you think we need to fix to write this ship? Because, you know. Well, yeah. I mean, obviously the FDA uses our tax dollars.

to pay their employees and their brief is to protect us from exactly these harms. And they did more than fail, right? This is not failure. Again, at the bottom of these documents, it says FDA confidential. So they saw, they knew they cannot escape, you know, criminal charges and civil charges themselves. These people need to be locked up. But I do blame them even more than Pfizer and Biointech because it is my view that we're under, that this is a national security attack and that these injections are aimed at our national security.

It turns out my earlier reporting shows a lot of partnership between Bio-Intech and the Chinese Communist Party. And actually, the SEC filing shows that there was a tech transfer of 100% at the end of 2021 from Bio-N-Tech to China. They use that word, China. They don't say a Chinese company or a Chinese entity. to China. So it's my analysis that we're under attack right now. Our southern border is open. You know, I think our administration is hostage to an adversary who's not our friend. And the fact that these injections cause too much damage and we're forced on our military is a national security issue. So I think Pfizer is not just a pharmaceutical company. I think it's being used by other actors. It's a gigantic global entity with all kinds of other partners. And we don't know yet,

you know, the full extent of that, but there's no way to look at the harms in the Pfizer documents and not see a national security threat that has been successful. Let's put it that way, to our well-being. Amazing. Naomi, I agree with absolutely 100% of everything you just said. We are completely aligned when we look at this, which makes me think there's got to be so many reporters I said before you came on at these news agencies. They know. We weren't all, there's just not that many stupid reporters. You know the truth.

You're not speaking out. You work at these pharmaceutical industries. You're not speaking out. You work at the CDC, the FDA. You're not speaking out. This is the year of the whistleblower. It is time to step forward, make a difference in this world. Save lives.

Be a hero. And by the way, there's millions to be made. So if you want to be a whistleblower, you need legal assistance. You can do that. Just go to whistleblower. at I Can Decide.org and we will make sure to take care of you, make sure that your story is not out there until you're safe. Naomi, one more time. Tell me about your book and your favorite place for us to buy it. Thank you. It's called The Bodies of Others, COVID-19, the new

authoritarian's and the war against the human. And you can buy it at all-seasonspress.com. You can actually buy it at dailycloud.io, your local bookstore and Amazon, if they'll let you. Let's put it that way. All right, Naomi, you're a superstar. Thanks for taking the time. I know you're on a huge press junket right now. I can't wait to read the book. I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Thanks for having me. I appreciate you so much. Take care. Take care.