The Highwire with Del Bigtree - SAFE AND EFFECTIVE: A SECOND OPINION
Episode Date: October 4, 2022Oracle Films in partnership with News Uncut, present ‘Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion.’ Download and share this film. This film is being provided at no cost.To Support the work of Oracle and Ne...ws Uncut:DONATE at buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms, today!#SafeAndEffective #OracleFilms #NewsUncutBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Your safety will always come first and a COVID-19 vaccine will only be approved by us,
the UK's Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, once it has met robust standards
on safety, quality and effectiveness.
I was vaccinated because I'm a carer.
I've had all three and I have the flu one as well.
As far as the government is concerned, I believe they are
doing the best thing for the nation.
I got an eight-year-old and I just didn't want to catch it
where I didn't have to, to be fair.
If this was going to prevent me from having it,
then it was all good for me.
I wanted to go on holiday.
I just thought it was better than I get it done.
I wanted to protect other people.
The COVID vaccine has been hailed as a medical and logistical success.
It's claimed that millions of lives have been saved,
but there's growing evidence that the jab can have devastating consequences.
They actually told my wife and two children
They had no hope and if I did survive it would be from the way stopped.
I thought I was going to die.
I would go to bed at night not thinking I was going to wake up.
Those injured by the vaccine feel unrecognised and abandoned by the NHS and the government they trusted.
You take one for the team, so I took the vaccine, but now the team's running the opposite direction.
Just let people know that when it goes wrong, there's like no help at all.
The doctors don't know what to do with us.
we're literally keeping each other alive.
Safety is our watchword,
and we are globally recognised
for requiring the highest standards
of safety, quality and effectiveness
for any vaccine.
Having been double-jabbed
and being one of the first to take
the Pfizer vaccine,
I have, after several months,
critically appraising the data,
speaking to eminent scientists
in Oxford, Stanford and Harvard,
speaking to two investigative medical journalists
and being contacted by two Pfizer whistleblowers
reluctantly concluded that this vaccine is not completely safe
and has unprecedented harms,
which leads me to conclude that it needs to be suspended
until all the raw data has been released for independent analysis.
Dr Malhotra is a respected and influential,
figure in medicine. And he's not alone in calling for the suspension of COVID vaccines.
Many more international scientists are alarmed at what's developing into a global issue.
I'm John Boe, and I'm going to shine a light on an issue that cannot be ignored.
Millions of COVID vaccine injuries and thousands of deaths are being reported through official
channels all across the world. Our government has been accused of covering up the emerging
data and the media of telling only one side of the story.
We'll look at how and why.
But first and foremost, we give the vaccine injured a voice.
My mum was standing on the drive.
She'd been looking after the dogs while we'd been away.
And she was talking to the neighbour.
And I remember getting out of the car.
And I burst into tears.
And I said, please don't be alarmed.
how I'm walking.
And it was then I really realized, I think,
after the tremors on the Sunday,
that there was something seriously wrong.
And I'd been fine up until, like,
I'd been healthy, perfectly fine,
up until the point of me having my second vaccine.
No one.
Breathe, breathe.
Breathe, breathe.
Okay, come on.
No one.
It's really funny because I look at these videos,
and I watch them and I either get really emotional watching them or I just go, wow, look at how far I've come.
And look at where I was.
I was on a Zimmerframe.
I was in a wheelchair.
I kind of feel like I'm looking at somebody else sometimes and not me.
I still suffer now.
I suffer with a lot of fainting.
I suffer with my legs giving way.
As a result of the damage that the vaccine has done to me,
I've ended up registered, disabled.
Before I took the vaccine, I was a 57 or 56 year old scaffolder,
absolutely no underlying health conditions.
I worked hard, five tonne of steel a day, never been ill.
I had a very active private life.
I was in a band.
I left the band about a year ago, but I still went to about four or five gigs a week.
Nothing now. I don't do any of that anymore.
Trying to get into places is not easy,
either on a wheelchair or on crutches.
The prosthetic leg is great when it works.
I'm still very early, so it's not working the way it should to a certain extent.
The doctors actually said that the clots that were in my system were enough that should have been fatal.
I've lost my left leg. I'm lucky that I've lost my left leg.
I should have been both legs.
both legs. I'm now going blinding my right eye. Thanks, AstraZeneca. It's the gift that keeps
on giving. That's the honest answer.
My husband was 32. He was due to start a job at Great Ormond Street Hospital as a senior
clinical psychologist. I remember him coming home and saying that he'd been offered
AstraZeneca and he was really, really excited, really proud that it was the British one. He was
He was funny, he was kind, he was generous, he did everything.
You know, he worked two jobs and still came home and helped with the children.
Even that day he helped put the kids to bed, you know, when he was having a stroke.
He's just my best friend.
The last time I saw him was walking towards the ambulance.
I must have known on some level that that might have been the last time that I was going to see him.
For months, this doctor's widow was forced to see him.
widow was forced to use the local food bank because she was living on benefits.
She's finally received government compensation and she accepts it as some vindication.
But she says it's not enough.
It will never be enough.
Charlotte is still awaiting an inquest, but across the UK coroners have confirmed deaths
from the vaccine.
They are usually framed as very rare.
But how rare?
Adverse reactions should be reported to the Yellow Card Scheme
operated by the MHRA, the UK's Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.
Their figures to August the 24th show over 430,000 reported reactions,
of which 2,240 were fatal.
America's VARE system has almost one and a half million reports
with over 30,000 deaths.
Not all these reports will be confirmed as vaccine induced, but then again, not all reactions are reported.
The figures surely demand investigation.
Absolutely. I absolutely. I don't think anybody can deny that there has been harm.
You can argue about how much, but you can't deny that there has been harm.
It's just a scandal of such epic proportions that I think people don't know where to begin with it.
It's frightening to even approach it.
The government is in denial on vaccine injuries, according to one of its own MPs.
Other jurisdictions have taken the view that fully compensating those who do the right thing for public health reasons by having a vaccine
should be looked after by the state if the consequences of having that vaccine result in disability or injury.
This approach is taken in order to promote vaccine confidence amongst those who might other people.
be hesitant about having a vaccine.
This government's approach, however, seems to be to try and promote vaccine confidence
by covering up the adverse consequences for some of having been vaccinated.
Sir Christopher is pursuing a private member's bill, trying to speed up compensation and increase
the maximum amount from £120,000.
But for the vaccine injured, recognition and a return to good health are paramount.
Take Caroline Pover.
She runs a pickling business, writes books and is a public speaker.
For 10 years, she supported a village in Japan, which was devastated by the tsunami.
And to make her annual visit, she took the jab.
My life has completely changed now.
It's not, it's, it's unrecognizable compared to how it was.
Sorry.
For about five months, I did hardly anything.
I couldn't function at all.
at all I was exhausted constantly I was in constant pain head and eye pain was
relentless I couldn't function I couldn't walk very far I couldn't read things and I'm
do a lot of I write as well as running my business so I couldn't write anything I
had trouble processing information so I couldn't work in my business because I
couldn't follow the recipes and I didn't have a
any physical strength.
I've now, I got to the stage where I can function at about 30%
of how I could function before the vaccine.
On a good day, I can maybe do a couple of hours in the kitchen,
but then after a while I have such chest pain
that I have to come and lie down in here.
And I used to do 12 hours on my feet working in there.
It's not about money, it's about having a sense of purpose
with your day, isn't it?
Jobs and work is for all of the work.
us. And if you can't do those things, you do get to the point where you think, I cannot live
like this. Life is no longer worth living. And we have lost people in the vaccine-injured community
to suicide. I didn't want to live when it was at its worst. I just couldn't see the point.
These vaccines were tested thoroughly for safety and effectiveness at every stage of the development
and manufacturing process.
They are also continually being monitored,
now they are being used in the wider population.
This means we can be confident
that the vaccines are safe and highly effective.
Safe and effective?
Would millions have been so confident
if they'd known how different these gene therapies were?
The word vaccine may have served as a reassurance,
but by no traditional definition were these
vaccines.
The definition in the authorities are using is not what people understand the word vaccine
to mean.
The public's perception of a vaccine is, you know, we're thinking about polio and about measles
and the conventional vaccines where you have a very inert part of the virus being used and
it prevents the illness.
These, what we're using now is a different technology.
It's new and it doesn't prevent the illness.
Although it's not my traditional area of expertise, my understanding.
standing looking at the data of the mechanism of harm from the vaccine is that the spike protein
which we believed initially to be localized to the arm appears to be distributed throughout
the body in every major organ system for several months, causing either a direct reaction through
toxicity or an autoimmune reaction. And that is the most likely explanation behind the mechanism
of harm from the MRNA products. Development of the jabs was done at
warp speed, so much so that governments had to indemnify the drug companies against any future
injury claims and invest billions up front.
They knew they were taking risks.
As I understand it then from what you're saying is that it may be that there needs to
be some compromise in some of the safety measures that would normally be expected to create
a vaccine because time is so crucial.
Well, of course, if you want to wait and see if a side effect shows up two years later, that takes two years.
When vaccine efficacy was declared at 95 percent, relieved governments gave the green light.
But Dr. Malhotra argues that the methodology was flawed.
Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention,
clearly which would be in the interest of people trying to sell you something,
in this case the pharmaceutical industry.
So if, for example, you have 1,000 people in a trial that didn't have the vaccine
versus 1,000 people that did.
In the placebo group, in the dummy group, you may have two people dying,
and in the intervention group you may have just one person dying.
And that's a reduction of 50% 1 over 2, is a 50% relative risk reduction.
but actually you've only saved one life out of 1,000.
So the absolute risk reduction is only one in 1,000.
It's a big difference.
The guidance has been for many years
that we must always use absolute risk reduction
in conversations with patients,
not just relative risk reduction alone.
Otherwise, it's considered unethical.
The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer's relative risk figure
of 95% efficacy,
when the absolute risk was a mere zero.
0.84%. In other words, you'd have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just one from catching COVID.
So we were basically sold on something that ultimately, in retrospect now, was very, very misleading.
Red flags should have been raised when the FDA locked away Pfizer's trial data for 75 years, while the vaccines were being rolled out.
A US court finally ordered their release, and the initial disclosures,
are alarming.
Alexandra Latipova is one of a group of experts who studied the documents.
Among her shocking allegations are these.
Pfizer skipped major categories of safety testing altogether.
The toxicity of the COVID-19 vaccine's MRNA active ingredient was never studied.
The FDA and Pfizer knew about major toxicities associated with gene therapy class of medicines.
The CDC, FDA and Pfizer lied about vaccine staying in the injection site.
My examination of leaked Moderna documents also revealed that vaccine-induced antibody-enhanced disease
was identified as a serious risk.
AstraZeneca also met with controversy.
In March 2021, its use was temporarily halted in several European countries because of fears of blood clots.
In the UK, it is now not recommended for anyone under 40.
We asked the DHSC whether they were aware of allegations of inadequate and possibly flawed trial data.
This is not something that DHSC will be responding to.
The pharmaceutical companies have also been reluctant to comment.
Scientists prefer to emphasize the 20 million lives they claim to have been saved.
So the suggestion that the vaccine has saved 20 million lives is really, I think, science fiction, not scientific fact,
because the study that comes from is a very poor quality observational study.
And when you look at a higher quality level of evidence,
in fact, even Pfizer's own randomized control trial
didn't show any reduction in COVID mortality of statistical significance.
It showed no reduction in all-cause mortality.
So this, really, this statement is almost implausible.
To be honest, it sounds more like an advert from the drug industry than true science.
With so many questions about the benefits and safety,
of the vaccines.
Why were they authorized so quickly by the MHRA?
And what exactly is the relationship between the regulators
and the companies they regulate?
A recent article in the British Medical Journal questioned their independence.
The MHRA chief executive June Rain insists that safety and independence are vital.
But this year she admitted that the agency had changed from watchdog to enabler.
Enabler.
Rules are written on tablets of stone and there's a lot of policemen in these places that go
around factories, find problems with trials and generally hold things up.
We tore up the rule book and we allowed companies to immediately start juxtaposing, not
sequential phases of clinical trials, but overlapping, beginning the next one before the previous
had been finished.
Doctors, patients and members of the public must be.
be aware that regulators cannot be trusted to be independent as long as they continue to be
captured by industry.
You know, recent evidence that submerged from a BMJ investigation real that 8.6% of the funding
of the MHRA comes from the drug industry.
And that's a huge conflict of interest.
We asked the MHRA for their observations, but they merely refer to their official guidance
on the safety of COVID vaccines.
What was happening with informed consent was hugely concerning.
I think what concerned me the most were doctors who weren't informing themselves.
They've been very busy and they haven't done their own research.
They've just accepted everything that they're told.
A government guideline comes.
And we've seemed to have disrupted the doctor-patient relationship.
There were many, many doctors who were getting all of their information from the BBC
in their lunch breaks and who accepted at face value because of the word vaccine
that these were going to be safe and effective.
That was a real dereliction of duty.
I think the lack of acknowledgement
of vaccine injuries being a major issue
is rooted in willful blindness.
Specifically, human beings turned a blind eye
to feel safe, avoid conflict,
reduce anxiety, and to protect prestige.
The General Medical Council responded,
It is not within the remit or expertise of the GMC
to assess the scientific or evidential basis
for the recommendation made by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization
or the decisions made by government and public health bodies.
But we do regularly share and discuss our guidance
and its application with government health officials and other relevant stakeholders.
We expect doctors to follow the principles in our guidance
and use their judgment about how to apply these in the circumstances of the pandemic.
Later, why did the government continue driving the vaccine campaign?
When scientists had learned it didn't prevent infection, it didn't prevent transmission.
And statistics show the vast majority of the population was never at risk from serious illness.
And Dr. Jones, a consultant pediatrician who's always been pro-vaccination, has this stark warning.
The children are at low risk, they don't need this vaccine,
and the harms are real.
Hi folks, I'm here at St Thomas's where I've just had my first AstraZeneca vaccine
and quite literally I did not feel the thing and I cannot stress how important it is for everybody
to get their vaccination.
Get your jab when you're asked to do so.
It's good for you, it's good for your family and it's a great thing for the whole country.
So please get your jab.
Thanks very much.
Can I ask why did you get vaccinated?
to minimise the threat of COVID on everybody and myself.
Well, just trying to stop me dying from COVID-19 was a pretty big one.
That and I wanted to go on holiday.
Why did I get vaccinated?
Because I didn't want the COVID, but I still got it anyway.
I was ill all over Christmas, and I don't know quite what it was,
but they said it's not COVID.
It was something to do with COVID.
But I know that I could have quite used to have called an ambulance.
I was that ill.
told about any potential side effects from the vaccine?
Um, no. And when I did ask, especially about reproductive issues that it may cause in the future,
nobody really gave me any answers. And the other thing is after I've had my vaccinations,
I noticed some changes. To be fair, I don't feel that we was given enough information,
but because it was such a big outburst, it kind of scared me to having it to
done and I've had it done and luckily I haven't had any bad repercussions from it.
Millions of people took the COVID jabs without serious side effects.
But for those who did suffer, the physical pain and debility is made even worse by the frustration
and mental stress of being ignored.
They feel neglected by the NHS, misunderstood by the public and betrayed by the government.
Before I was fit and healthy, used to do boxing, we'd do...
CrossFit, you know, do a lot of weight training and you know keep myself in good shape.
When I had my Pfizer booster, that's from my world to just totally crumble.
I remember one time, grabbing on two, they said, Dolly said,
I'm going to dive.
I can't even get to the toilet.
They'd be so frightened.
His body was shaking, it was jerk.
It was horrendous.
Absolutely horrendous.
My heart got elevated when it was on standing.
I got really sick.
I was being sick for six weeks, I was retching and being sick
and thrown up every single day.
My heart cramped.
It felt like somebody had grabbed my heart and twisted it three times.
I had brain fog.
I developed a slur.
slur. I would slur my words and I developed a stammer. I had seizures. My body can't regulate
temperature anymore. It's taught my life. This is my life now. Stuck in my bed every day.
We no help with anybody. It's not only life form, it's an existence and nobody. I tell you,
think I hold of Boris Johnson. I would tell Boris Johnson, I would tell Boris Johnson exactly.
I think of them, help these kids, help them, help these people that are injured.
But I can't live like this. I can't, I can't, I can't live my life in my bed.
I'm only 36 year. It's supposed to be getting married this year.
I thought I was going to die. I would go to bed at night not thinking I was going to wake up
because of how much pain in my heart was in, and the fact I couldn't breathe.
80, Max and Katie Kallison. Congratulations.
We were ranked.
number six in the entire world for amateur ballroom and Latin dancing and the 10 dance
championship and we were one of the highest ranking couples in the UK and subsequently
the world. Our ambition is to become world professional 10 dance champions, European,
international and British professional champions and we aim to do that within the next eight years.
So I got my second jab and for the first two to three days, complete normal I was dancing
I was preparing for the world championships.
So this is, you know, I'm going to the gym every day and practicing.
After the fourth and fifth, I started getting a small pain in my heart.
And I thought it was just genuine heartburn.
I was still dancing.
And I'm told now that that could have been very dangerous
and caused long-term health problems because of what could have happened.
Originally it was pericoditis.
And I was then told, just before Christmas, actually is paring myocarditis.
So it's actually worse because I've got pericoditis and the myocoditis.
damage so I have scarring on three parts of my heart and still the lining the muscle
of my heart has got the inflammation which constricts it so that's when my heart
rate goes up that's what's constricting my heart and sopping me from breathing I
don't trust myself I don't trust my body you know I don't know what my heart's
doing you know I can have a small pain now and ten seconds I'm gonna be on the
floor you know that's just the consequences of what's happened music's a very
beautiful and powerful thing if you understand it and if you enjoy it and just
to be able to go into floor and do what I think I was born to do in front of thousands of
people. That was, it's the most special thing in the world. And, you know, having lost that,
I can't even begin to tell you how bad it feels.
Days with experienced New Yorker and we're about to jump off this cliff. I used to be in the
Olympic team for synchronised something. It's to train six days a week, 10 hours a day,
incredibly hyperactive.
I was also always known as the person
that was like running around set,
doing stupid things, backflips
when I shouldn't be doing them and stuff like that.
I'd go out and party and dance with my friends
and then I'd be back home at 7am
and then shooting a commercial at 10am.
So really putting my limits.
The industry required me to have
be double vaccinated to work on films
and I immediately regretted it
as soon as she put it in my arm.
I just thought,
what what have I done?
Over that period of two weeks,
I just got worse and worse and worse and worse.
And eventually this awful headache
that was like someone was inside my,
actually inside my skull, like pushing out.
I can't explain how awful it was and I was dizzy.
I was literally crawling.
Like, I really thought my life was over.
Because I couldn't even cook for my soul.
I couldn't even stand up. I couldn't care for myself. My mum would come and see me.
I think like twice a week to change my bed sheets for me, do a food shop for me, clean my house for me.
I just couldn't do anything at all. But I just thought this isn't living. If my mess with my life is going to be like this,
then I would rather not be here, but it was in the sense of desperation for help.
help and I wouldn't have had those feelings and my mind wouldn't have gone there if I had literally
if someone had just said I see you I'm going to help you those who were in perfect health
before their vaccine have encountered too much ignorance and skepticism when seeking medical help
for some their GPs have refused to engage and that has reached the extent that they are
made to feel gaslighted madam deputy speaker with their physical pain
being dismissed or explained away as mental illness.
How insulting and humiliating is that?
And how at odds were the principles of the National Health Service?
It was the most terrifying, terrifying experience
to be told that what's going on with you is psychological
and that it's not physical when you're in physical pain.
Genevieve and many of her fellow vaccine injured
have spent thousands of pounds,
seeking treatments.
They'll try anything to help ease their pain and disabilities.
I found a private phlebotomy service,
and she comes to the house, and she takes a pint of blood out.
And literally sit here, she takes a pint of blood out,
and I come alive again, and I'm me again.
I can talk properly, I can move properly.
My body feels different.
Everything feels different.
I did a series of auction therapy treatments.
with Janie at the wellness lab.
I'd come into the auction therapy
and I'd have a migraine and I'd leave without one
and feeling like so much better.
I'm very fortunate in the fact that I'm 70% recovered.
I'm back working, just pacing myself.
But there's no such thing as autopilot.
There's no such thing as easy.
For John Watt, just making the journey for treatment
is a trial.
Like many of his fellow sufferers,
he has pots,
postural orthostatic tachycardi.
syndrome. A walk of just 20 metres is enough to send his heart rage soaring.
So it's seen 134, 135. I can only stand for three minutes, five minutes and then I start to
black out, you know. So that's why I'm always having to lie down in that as well.
He's trying a course of treatment called Golddick, where blood is taken from the arm,
infused with gold particles and then spun to remove the reactive cells.
We've had to be about tens of thousands.
My husband and I were getting ready to remortgize your house to get more treatment for him.
He said every single treatment we can possibly give him to get him better.
It's important to note that John suffered a heart attack before getting any of his jabs.
But he was back in the gym and back to health taking his first two jabs without problems.
It was after the Pfizer booster that he collapsed.
In regards to people,
getting their vaccine, that's their choice.
I've never told anyone not to get their vaccine.
But just let people know that when it goes wrong,
there's like no help at all.
Don't be serious.
You don't have any help at all.
They'll use your mental health against you.
Georgia Segal also paid for private Goldick treatment
and had some encouraging results.
Although the treatment that I've had
has helped me dramatically and significantly,
and given me back a certain quality of life,
it's not the quality of life I had before I had the vaccine.
None of these treatments guarantee a cure.
And the tragedy is that for most healthy people under the age of 70,
there's very low risk from COVID-19.
The benefits of vaccination are questionable.
One thing that's become very clear now
is that the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission.
and in fact has very limited efficacy, if any, in preventing infection.
Therefore, it becomes an issue of individual choice.
And certainly, when you look at age groups that are under 70,
the harms clearly seem to outweigh the benefits for most people.
This chart reflects deaths of people with COVID up to May 2022.
And the numbers increase dramatically as the age groups rise.
The vast majority are over 70 years old.
and especially over 80.
We asked the DHSC why the vaccine campaign targeted all age groups
and whether it accepted that the vaccines were not preventing infection or transmission.
This is not something that DHSC will be responding to.
Let's now look at the data after the vaccinations began.
These are deaths from any cause amongst 15 to 44-year-olds in England and Wales.
There is a notable increase in 2020.
the year of vaccination, higher even than 2020, when COVID emerged.
Young men seemed particularly prone to myocarditis, inflammation of the heart.
This data from America shows the expected rate of myocarditis in blue against actual cases in yellow,
within seven days of a vaccine.
Note the increase in younger age groups, particularly 18 to 24s.
It's hard to ignore reports of sudden deaths.
and collapses in particular on the sports field.
It's just been unbelievable how many people, not just footballers, sports people in general,
you know, you've had tennis players, cricketers, basketball players,
just how many are just keeling over.
And at some point, surely you have to say, this isn't right, this needs to be investigated,
you know?
And it might turn out that it's because,
They've had COVID, and this is what COVID has perhaps done to their hearts.
It might be that the vaccines are causing these problems, but we need to find out why.
Why in 2022 are many more people than usual dying, as confirmed by the Office of National Statistics.
For instance, deaths are up 11.7% in 10 to 14-year-olds and almost 15% in the 55-29 age group.
Overall, that could equate to over 75,000 excess deaths in England and Wales this year,
and not from COVID.
The Daily Telegraph is reporting that deaths in the aftermath of lockdown could be greater than COVID itself.
There are calls for an investigation, mentioning lack of health care, stress, long COVID, even the cost of living.
Why on earth isn't COVID vaccination under suspicion when there are so many reports
of adverse reactions here and around the world.
It beggars belief.
And yet, when there are so many questions
on the efficacy and safety of COVID injections,
the government still pushes ahead
with a program of immunization.
And for children.
Last April, the NHS began a rollout of jabs
for those aged between five and 11.
Letters of information were distributed
to parents across the nation.
And in Southeast London, the NHS went further still.
sending bright, smiley envelopes directly to the children.
Inside there was a packet of sunflower seeds to, quote,
bring some joy and sunshine into children's lives.
Directly below the vaccination message, quote,
to give them the best protection.
It all marked a major U-turn in policy.
The likelihood of children having significant detriment
if they catch COVID-19 is very, very low.
So this is an adult vaccine for the adult population.
Nevertheless, this summer, the NHS added COVID-19
to the regular vaccination schedule for 5 to 15-year-olds,
even though the government does not recommend Pfizer for under 12s
and AstraZeneca for under 40s.
It was a move that prompted 78 leading professors, doctors and analysts
to write this to the MHRA.
strongly challenge the addition of COVID-19 vaccination into the routine child immunisation
program despite no demonstrated clinical need, known and unknown risks, and the fact that these
vaccines still only have conditional marketing authorisation. I'm so deeply concerned at the lack
of balance and the risk of harm that is, and that's really why I've been speaking out. I feel
I have a moral obligation, an ethical obligation to at least let us.
many parents as possible know that they don't need to get their children vaccinated.
This is not necessary.
The children are at low risk.
They don't need this vaccine, and the harms are real.
Now, government advice seems to have changed yet again.
From September 1st, children who turn 5 can only get a first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccination
if they are either at high risk due to a health condition
or living with someone with a weakened immune system.
And it appears that children aged between 12,
can only be boosted if they too are at high risk.
So, if the jabs really are safe and effective, why are they now being limited?
We asked about the changes.
This is not something that DHSC will be responding to.
If some of the contents of this program have surprised you, in our final part, we'll show you how
and why the mainstream media only told you one side of the story, and how the game
government used psychological techniques to nudge the nation into compliance.
You come in?
It's going to be good.
Come on, mate.
Come on, let's go.
Don't miss out on your two COVID jabs.
Don't miss out on the good times.
When they went for their jabs, those who were injured thought they were doing the right
thing in following government instructions.
They might even have lined up behind you.
And yet the government, the NHS, the media, all those who encouraged vaccine take up,
They've all backed away.
So people have had to help themselves
through groups like UKCV family,
VIB UK and others.
My charity organisation for the vaccine injured
has created a call centre to support people.
The indifference that we've all experienced
is unnecessary and cruel.
We want to support each other.
That's the main thing our group is doing
is supporting each other
because we've got no one else to talk to.
The doctors don't know what to do with us.
Nobody else really knows what to do, so we're just trying to help each other.
On a weekly basis, I get told that someone is suicidal.
Caroline and I have both had to call the police before
because we've found an online suicide note.
We have frequently found ourselves in regular contact with somebody,
private messaging, saying someone who's literally on the edge at that moment.
And these support groups are keeping people alive.
We get abuse from both sides.
We're kind of stuck right in the middle.
There are people who are very pro-vaccine who hate you.
There are people who are very against this vaccine,
if not all vaccines, they hate you two,
all for different reasons.
This is the feeling that you get from people
and you're stuck in the middle.
And that's a very, very lonely place to be.
The plight of the vaccine injured
will be on the agenda when Baroness has,
Heather Hallett finally holds her COVID inquiry.
But she must also investigate SAGE,
the government's scientific advisory group,
and especially their so-called Nudge Unit,
otherwise known as Spy B.
Why did they drive such a culture of fear?
From this evening, I must give the British people
a very simple instruction.
You must stay at home.
Earlier, on the very day of that historic Boris Johnson's speech, Sage met to discuss
SpyB's methods of achieving behavioural change.
The tactics were agreed.
The influence is clear.
The coronavirus is the biggest threat this country has faced for decades, and this country
is not alone.
All over the world, we're seeing the devastating impact of this invisible killer.
And though huge numbers are complying, and I think that we're going to be a lot of the world.
Thank you all. The time has now come for us all to do more. You should not be meeting friends.
If your friends ask you to meet, you should say no. You should not be meeting family members
who do not live in your home. You should not be going shopping except for essentials like food
and medicine. And you should do this as little as you can. If you don't follow the rules,
the police will have the powers to enforce them.
including through fines and dispersing gatherings.
The way ahead is hard, and it is still true that many lives will sadly be lost.
This is an important update from the government about coronavirus.
Someone on your street, at your supermarket or in your park is highly likely to have COVID-19.
Do not go out unless absolutely necessary.
Do not meet up with anyone outside your household.
Do not put the lives of your loved ones in danger.
This is a national health emergency.
Around one in three people have no symptoms and are spreading it without knowing.
Keep your distance.
Exercise, don't socialize.
Stop the spread.
Stick to the rules.
If you bend the rules, people will die.
I think what's important to understand is over the last two years,
there has been the promotion of unethical, psychological techniques
to encourage behavioural change, such as the use of fear,
artificially increasing the sense of being afraid
in order to get people to change their behaviours.
And so fear drove the lockdown.
It was the strictest of peacetime regimes
with untold damage to businesses, education,
mental health and family life.
In this atmosphere,
deepened by fatality numbers
which experts now tell us were inflated,
the only way out, apparently, was vaccination.
People have got to understand
vaccination is going to be in the end
your route to liberty.
For the world at large,
normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.
And once vaccines were approved, the promotional campaign went into overdrive worldwide.
Our fellow Americans, the science is clear.
These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease.
My name is Michael Kane.
I've just had a vaccine for COVID.
It's really important to know that the vaccines have all been through
and met the necessary safety and quality standards.
There's no evidence that it affects fertility.
So roll up your sleeve.
It's not just your own life you'll be saving.
It's other people's lives too.
Trust the science and get on with it.
The vaccine rollout was a logistical triumph
and may well have prevented hospital admissions and deaths.
But when 9 million adults in the UK chose to remain jab free,
the nudge became a threat.
No jab, no job, vaccine passports,
and vilification of what were termed the anti-vaxxers.
The nut jobs, the anti-vaxers, dangerous obsessives.
I don't want them sitting next to me in the theatre.
I don't want them standing next to me at the theatre bar.
I don't want them next to me or anywhere near me
or even in the same carriage on the train.
Frankly, if you're not vaccinated at the moment
and you're eligible and you've got no health reason
for not being vaccinated. You're not just irresponsible. I mean, you're an idiot.
When you use unethical psychology on a population, you actually start to see splits and divisions
occurring. And that's really dangerous because you also encourage othering or the demonization
of people. So we see that kind of not just fear being raised, but also anger being raised as well.
They deserve to be punished. And I've told my friends as well. In fact, I have blocked my friends
who have said they're not getting a jab.
deadhood in my eyes.
Tens of thousands of people would not bow to the drive for mass vaccination.
They demanded choice, and they accused the mainstream media of promoting government propaganda.
Let's return to the sage playbook. It says, use media to increase a sense of personal threat,
a sense of responsibility to others, and to promote positive messaging.
Immediately, the regulator ofcom asked broadcasters to take note of the significant
potential harm that could be caused by material misleadingness in relation to the virus or public
policy regarding it. They warned of taking appropriate regulatory action on any breaches.
And note the date. It's the same day the SAGE document was approved and the Prime Minister
spoke to the nation. Cue the BBC.
Just to let you on a journalistic point here. We actually don't, as a matter of editorial policy,
We don't debate with anti-vaxxers, whether they're right or wrong.
We actually don't do that.
So the BBC doesn't engage with so-called anti-vaxxers,
even when they may be right.
And when several huge marches took place in London and across the UK,
they were virtually ignored by the BBC and the rest of the media.
These are the images they didn't want you to see,
the story they didn't want you to know.
Tens of thousands of citizens from all walks of law,
life raising genuine concerns.
The people the media painted as dangerous anti-vaxxers.
And it just so happens that the government has spent an estimated half a billion pounds of
public money for media advertising.
Then there's the Trusted News Initiative, which the BBC says is an industry collaboration
of major news and global tech organizations working together to stop the spread of disinformation.
The partners include the BBC, Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft.
It sounds laudable, but what it really means is that governments, the media, and the big tech
companies are working to a common script.
Their script, their version of the truth.
We asked the BBC what happened to free speech, balanced reporting and impartiality.
I'm afraid we won't be commenting.
The real truth is that anybody who questions the official narrative is generally suppressed
and cancelled or labelled as a spreader of disinformation on social media.
And that includes eminent scientists, doctors, and disgracefully, the vaccine injured.
We had thousands of people on that support group all over the world who were vaccine injured.
And we got shut down by Facebook.
And I was quite shocked that that could happen.
Your story is misinformation, you're anti-vaccine, your anti-science, you know, you're killing people.
I've been told that.
You're killing people telling your story.
People won't take the vaccine if you tell your story.
Please be quiet.
This conspiracy of editorial control between mainstream and social media is stifling democratic discussion.
A proper debate might have led to better informed choice on the vaccines and potentially fewer.
injuries. Instead, we've been subjected to psychological pressure under that dubious mantra,
safe and effective. Proper balanced science must come to a sound conclusion. We need to know
the truth.
Through the madness and the last, as they're holding back the truth, no matter what
matter what they try, I will always fight for you. I will save your innocence. They are trying to remove.
I am here at your defense and I will always fight for you. Yes, I will always fight for you.
I will stand here in the way
And I will not give up on
You'll shield you
In the bath
There is evil on
But I hope that you can't feel
That I will always fight for you
So to every single mother father
Stand up for your sons and daughters
Do not back down
Don't let up
You are armor
So make this a war to win
Look in their eyes and tell them
That I will
I will stand guard at the gate
And I will not give up on you
I will stop each shot they take
Yes I will always fight for you
I will always fight for you
Thank you.
