The Highwire with Del Bigtree - SHOCKING – ‘INDEPENDENT’ COVID VACCINE EVALUATOR ALSO AN ADVISOR TO PFIZER

Episode Date: December 30, 2022

ICAN Lead Attorney, Aaron Siri, Esq., discusses his historic cross-examination of leading vaccinologist, Dr. Kathryn Edwards, regarding her conflict of interest being an advisor to Pfizer while also sitting on Pfizer’s ‘Independent’ Data Safety Monitoring Board for the COVID-19 Vaccine.#PfizerTrial #AdvisorToPfizer #TwitterFilesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

We had the opportunity to actually depose the vaccinologist that sat on Pfizer's data safety monitoring board, which was initially a five-member committee that oversaw the safety of Pfizer's clinical trial. This is the data safety monitoring board, an independent group of experts who monitor patient safety and treatment efficacy data while a clinical trial is going on. The name of who you're talking about, Catherine Edwards. She actually, right? Dr. Catherine Edwards, we've talked about this book right here. This is literally the textbook on Vaccinology. It's called Plotkin's Vaccines.

You have deposed Stanley Plotkin. We may play a clip a little bit later. For those you've been watching the high wire for some time, it's one of our great claims of fame. But one of the things that we're doing, right, is, and I've said to you, there are a lot of cases around the country that will bring in these super high-powered experts, sometimes randomly with the Plotkin situation,

who's the godfather of the vaccine program. You have a divorce case where the dad wants the vaccine, the kid, the mom doesn't, and for some reason they bring in literally the most powerful witness they could. And that overpowers most lawyers. I have said, we will fund. If we can reach out or somehow they reach out to us, I can will fund you to go in. and do the depositions so you get that done right so this is one of those

scenarios that took place this year with Catherine Edwards right dr. Catherine Edwards is uh... dr. Stanley Plotkin is the godfather of vaccines and she's the godmother of vaccines i mean currently in the country i don't uh... you know those four folks on that book are are they're it and so uh... the other ones i think being walter ornstein and uh... dr. paul off all off it so in this case

there were going to be three experts dr edwards and two other experts who were going to tell about a vaccine issue. And so I got a phone call asking if I would agree to just handle that piece of the case. The case was a lot larger. There were 15 other witnesses and experts. And I was just going to deposing and cross-examining those three experts on the, because they were related to the vaccine issue in that case. Yeah. So Dr. Edwards at the time was sitting on the data safety monitoring board for the Pfizer clinical. I think this video pretty much speaks for itself.

Let's take a look at this. And isn't it true that you've also been an advisor to Pfizer? Yes, sir. I've been an advisor to Pfizer and I've been working very, very closely with Pfizer, particularly with their COVID vaccines and going over lots of reactions and adverse events. So yes, I am working and being paid by Pfizer for my assessment of vaccine safety. You're part of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for the Pfizer-Code vaccine.

That's what you meant when you just said that. You're one of the only five members of that data safety monitoring board over the Pfizer, COVID-19, vaccine, right? Yes, sir. And that's supposed to be an independent data safety monitoring board, correct? It is an independent data safety monitoring board. That's the board that all of us in America, are hoping on and relying upon is going to independently make sure that safety is properly assessed

as the clinical trial for that Pfizer-Coase or COVID-19 vaccine is ongoing, correct? That's true and let me tell you that we have worked very hard to put over this and look very very hard to do that in D.E. as comprehensively as we possibly have. And since it's supposed to be independent, it's critical that the members of that independent data safety monitoring board are in fact independent of the pharmaceutical company whose product is being evaluated correct that's correct but isn't it true that directly before becoming a member of the independent data safety modern board of the figer and co-19 vaccine you were an advisor to fiser fiser fiser pays me to evaluate

the safety of their vaccines because i'm an So I do get paid to do the work that I've been doing, that I've been doing the work conscientiously and comprehensive. My question was, before you became a member of the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board for the Pfizer-COVID-19 vaccine, isn't it true that you were separately, before you held that independent position, you were an advisor to Pfizer? Yes, sir. Yes, sir, but I think what you're presuming is that because I've been an advisor makes me on their dole,

or makes me going to say what they want me to say, that is not and has never been a part of my being. I say what I believe based on my expertise. So you don't think that financial incentives can sway people's judgment at all? It does not sway my judgment, sir. Why by having an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board? Why doesn't Pfizer just have some of its employees on it? Because we are independent. Meaning folks who were never advisors to Pfizer.

We are independent from Pfizer in this assessment. What I love about that, it's like the, it's like the sort of the slowest movie, you know, you just like slowly pushing in and she sees it coming, right? She sees the conflict of interest that you're, and she's trying to work the way around, but there's no way out of it. You just, in the end, you cannot call this an independent, you know, advisory committee if you are, literally, as she described it, on the dole with Pfizer. I mean, her words, not mine.

You know, there's something I just saw in here that's really funny as it went by. She says, yes, I've been looking at lots of reactions and adverse events from the COVID vaccines and the trials. You know, it's just a part of like, that's what I'm doing. And I'm thinking, lots? We're being told there were none. I mean, I just found that, like, interesting, like, just, I'm just wondering what she's actually looking at.