The Highwire with Del Bigtree - TESS LAWRIE EXPOSES THE W.H.O.

Episode Date: December 23, 2023

Former W.H.O. Consultant, Tess Lawrie, MD, PhD, discusses why global health regulatory agencies’ motives are no longer about solving health crises and the powerful influence they have on governments worldwide.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Though it does seem in many ways, not only did we kill more people during COVID, do we have more people dying of excess mortality, we also tend to be the last ones to admitting the problems that are happening. There are other nations that are not even going near the COVID vaccine with their kids. They're still pushing it here at the CDC because, as I'm going to continue to say, I think they're morons. Or they're dangerous and deadly. I don't know. But what seems to be happening is the United States of America is no longer leading. We're not leading in truth. We're not the beacons of light and hope right now, which needs to change immediately,

but we seem to be pawns of something so much bigger. What's bigger than the United States? Why would we hand that away? I've said it time and time again. It feels like our country is being run from something outside of our borders. Because none of these agendas, they're not making it easier for any of us to buy a house. They're not making it easier for any of us to, like, pay for some gas. They're not making any easier to start a business or keep a business going.

They're not making it any easier to stay healthy. In fact, the things that they're giving us are proving to make us sicker and sicker and sicker. And they're even telling us like we can't go to work or go to school unless we take these untested products. That's what's happening in the United States of America. And we're seeing it around the world. Is there something bigger, marioneting all that? Well, that's what I'm going to ask Tess Lorry about. She worked for the WHO and now she's singing like a bird and we're going to see what she's singing about.

This is Tess Lorry. Dr. Tess Lorry. Dr. Tess Lorry. CEO of EBMC Square, health-focused think tank, medical doctor and a research consultant, an external analyst for The Who. I'm a mother of three and practicing medicine in Africa and the UK. The COVID-19 vaccine has only been around for, as you know, 18 months, and it already has 3.8 million adversity event reports.

I've had to re-look at a lot of the things that I've held to be true. And one of those things was preventing disease through vaccination. It is not safe and effective and it's potentially fatal. And the official data do not support the use of these genetic vaccines. It's really time for us to give a voice to independent doctors and scientists around the world who have been raising concerns. It doesn't matter what other people say, we are the ones who are tasked with you and we have the experience to look at the data and reassure everybody that this cheap and effective

treatment will save lives. So how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily? I am a warrior of the light. I stand up for the truth. I always have and I always will. Well, it's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by the co-founder of the World Council for Health, Tess, Lori, Tess. Hi, Dahl. It's my pleasure. It's really great having you in studio here joining us today. For people that don't know, how would you describe what is the World Council for Health and sort of the goal or mission of the work that you're doing? Yeah. Well, firstly, we are the alternative to the World Harm's Organization.

I mean, the World Vaccine Organization. We believe people need a choice. So we envision a world where everybody has access to the information they need, and the resources they need to protect and sustain their own health, as well as the health of their families, their communities, and their environments. So what I find interesting, and when we first met, your work, I mean, you have worked with the WHO for many years. So I guess my question always is, you know, at what point you were doing, you know, research and, you know, ethics review of studies? being done by the WHO and things like that.

So it seems like at one point where you're sort of a pro-medicine science, vaccines, I mean. Well, you know, I was so pleased to be invited by the World Health Organization in 2012 to assist with it guideline development as an external consultant. So I always worked as an external consultant and they would hire me and my company

in to help with guideline development. evaluating bodies of evidence and then helping panels make recommendations, whether to recommend something or not for clinical practice. And you know, I always thought I was in a position to make a big difference and help people. And as the years rolled on, it was clear that we weren't making a difference and, you know, health disease or disease and poverty were just skyrocketing. And there was no suggestion that what we were doing was making. making a difference.

And then COVID came along and it was clear that the strategies they were following weren't evidence based at all. And I mean prior to that I'd also become aware that there was a huge lobbying from external funders, donors, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which was very disturbing and disconcerting because it meant that, you know, they had a huge influence on what on what guidelines we developed and what was recommended. So you were starting to see that even before COVID, that this work that you were doing,

that there was an influence and outside influence that wasn't just going based on the evidence you were looking at. Yes, and I was working in the reproductive health team, so I wasn't in the COVID team, you know, there wasn't really an obvious way in to assist with the COVID evidence. Reproductive health. That's interesting. I hadn't really thought about that because I just feel like there's one question that's out there right now. It's really on this idea of birth. I mean, we have really low birth rates now across the world, you know, and there's all sorts of issues around that. And, you know, when you think of WHO now, I think it really connects very strongly with WEF, with Bill and Linda Gates Foundation. And a lot of the of voices talking about population reduction as a part of the agenda. They had a lot of money going into contraception and sexual health.

That is a separate department on its own. So the work that I was doing was on pregnancy and childbirth and I helped prepare a number of guidelines on antinatal care, or positive pregnancy experience and then also a positive childbirth experience. So, you know, those guidelines I really felt were a big shift in the WHO approach because previously it was a guideline to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality. So it was always about preventing death. Well, there's a lot more to pregnancy than getting out alive, you know.

So COVID comes along and then obviously I think a lot of, I mean, almost I would say anybody that has blood moving through their brain would say, wait a minute. I mean, I thought the WHO was there to assist in health decisions, certainly in third world nations where underserved countries, but now all of a sudden it became this dictating machine to the world or by which, you know, this message of... Yes, it was quite a funny transition because it was always apparent when I was working for them that the,

Western countries didn't really pay attention to what the WHO said. You know, the Americans followed the American guidelines and the British followed the British guidelines in the years. It was almost like people thought that the WHO was making guidelines for developing countries, the poorer people, you know. And then suddenly when COVID came along, everybody's following the WHO guidelines and they're not evidence-based. So with absolutely without question, every government around the world was following their guidelines. So it was very strange to see from both the inside and the outside how that came about.

And when we, early in 2021, tried to share the evidence of a rigorous systematic review with the American, you know, with the FDA, the NIH, Canadian authorities, the UK authorities and the World Health Organization, they were just not interested. Yeah. you know I mean you've I know you're like all of us you sit there and try and figure what what happened what is really going on as you look at that was it is it just because there's so much power from these NGOs coming as this outside influence and agenda is it and I guess the question was is it always what the WHO was the WHA let me ask you this did the

WHO always think it was speaking for the whole world it's just the first world nations just weren't listening to them and then suddenly we started listening or were they focused on you know developing underdeveloped nations and then suddenly got this mandate oh let's expand yeah I realize you know my core skill is evidence synthesis integrating making jigsaw puzzles really right you know and it's quite clear now that um that there's far more going on and what we've been witnessing is is the end game of a long game of stealth So yes, the WHO was making guidance for the whole world and the Western countries were not listening, but the, you know, the WHO is controlled by supranational entities.

And now, you know, it's clear there's a military-industrial complex, there's a world economic forum, there's certain states that have huge influence, and powerful individuals as well, wealthy and wealthy individuals who use foundations to influence health policy. And this has been going on a very long time. So we're sort of seeing the end game. And in a way, you know, it seems like they're aware that we're aware. People are waking up. And so there's this sort of last minute thrashing about.

to get as much done as possible and as quickly. Is that making sense? Yeah. It was like, I sort of see it now as a sort of, you know, a parasite in a way that's been, that's in its sort of death throws and there's this struggle. You finally realize, oh my God, I don't feel very good what's going on

and it's, you know, in stage. And not to, I don't want, I mean, I want to get to, you know, sort of on the other side of this, But I would agree with you. I mean, it feels like this, there's a long-term goal here that's finally in a end, you know, was just on the verge of its, you know, taking, you know, like having control over humanity,

like having control over the world and the populations of the world, all the way down to how many births there are and resources and all of this, you know, idea that we need to be in control of all of these things. And I feel like a lot of people talk about the they, you know, the they, and this big, you know, these invisible people or power structures

that are running everything. And whatever they is, it seems to me, that there was always going to be, if there was this plan, it was coming along, there was always gonna be this one unpredictable moment that they were gonna have to deal with, which is we can get to their children, we can be forced vaccinating, children all over,

we could get people, but a certain point, you're gonna have to reach the average citizen, and take their rights away. You're going to have to get them to accept tracking systems and, you know, that they don't have control over their own bodies, that there's a, you know, supernatural or international force, if you will, that actually owns their bodies. They had to know we can get this thing all the way to that moment,

but there's going to be this very visible hand that's going to come out and have to seize control of humanity. And at that moment, you know, I always feel like that was the one, unpredictable part. I mean, they may, they've been studying our psychology. They even have all the AI, like everything we're buying, everything we're doing on our cell phones. They're watching all that. But I always think that the one place that they just, I don't think they would ever know, and probably COVID was the test of that, is what happens when we actually go to take people's rights away? Like that final step, I think they were shocked. I think they were shocked that at least as far

as I'm concerned, this idea of you're going to hand your body over and just be vaccinated, you're going to sign up for a tracking system, you're going to not be allowed into certain buildings if you aren't complying with what we are saying health is. Though it was successful on some level here in America, you know, 70% back, but 30% totally resisted the vaccine here. You know, even more, I think, when you think about 30% didn't go along with it at all, what percent that did didn't want to but really just felt like I can't have my job, I can't, like we're really coerced into it. That to me probably puts 50% of America.

I would think 20% really were reticent. And now you have this massive turn against CDC. I mean, I think by the last I saw under 5% getting the latest booster shot. you know, more and more. I think they're saying 40 to 50% of parents are now questioning some part of the childhood vaccine program. So there's people that will say, oh, this was just step one in the takeover. I'm like, no, I just, you know, or they planned on it to go like this. I'm like, I don't think so. I mean, and if this is just a test, this is a very, it was a test that's backfired. It woke up a lot of people to say, wait a minute.

And now I imagine they still have this agenda they need to complete, but they've got everybody watching them. So I feel like they failed. I feel like they have failed in a major way. I'm not one of these people's like, oh, they just expected us to act like this. I don't think they did. What is your feeling? I totally agree with you. I think they are struggling now because there's this push for this legally binding treaty to go through.

I don't know if you saw there was a tweet by Ted Ross, the Director General, you know, saying that there's all this misinformation out there and the comments you know the people are so awake and aware that he cannot get away with saying those things on social media anymore it's just people know yeah and and these documents I hope you will reference them that there's a the compilation of amendments to the international health regulations it's on our website and we've highlighted in read the amendments it's it's incredible when you look at it it's like the whole document is read

And in that document, it clearly shows that the WHO will be given legally binding authority to declare fakes, public health emergencies of international concern, and then be in charge of the self-perpetuating industry to a pandemic industry or emergency industry, because they get to declare the quarantines, the interventions, the vaccines, whatever. So people are awake and they're not going to put up with it. But they're awake to an extent. So they're awake about vaccines, but they haven't quite got the health security part of it. The security part comes with the digitalization. And digitalization is absolutely part and parcel of this globalist agenda.

So while COVID was happening, there was also, while everyone was locked up, and all of that, the vans putting in the 5G networks who all aren't busy working all around the world. And the digitalization, this surveillance, has been scaled up to such an extent. And I think people have been, you know, they've been not very keen to engage in the 5G issue, which is another, it's just like the vaccine industry

in that it's an unregulated technology. The vaccine is an unregulated technology. unregulated medical technology. We've never had these sorts of vaccines before. So we have these two unregulated technologies running side by side and they need these two things together to succeed in their plan because for a body and an internet of bodies which is what they're planning they need the microwave technology. Right. I mean and I think about that, you know, I had a friend that was waking up that bought in a house here in Austin.

and they have really these smart areas now. And he's like, yeah, when I got the house, like they told me, this neighborhood's awesome. There's a camera on every streetlight on the street. He said, my oven talks to my doorbell. And he's like, oh, it's like, everything's, you know, monitored. And he's like, and it felt, he's like, when I moved in, he's like, this is awesome.

My family would be safe. And then as COVID came in, he started going, oh, my God, I'm under, my house has got me under surveillance on a constant. basis. Yeah, I would like to just give your viewers an alternative thought about the word smart. It's actually, apart from the E, is the word, spells master. And they are setting up a slave system. And a lot of this is through the use of word spells, making us feel smart to be using the

smart technology, these smart meters. It's a slave system they are setting up. And we are the products of their industrial revolution. We are to be hackable animals that are chipped and tagged and tracked and jabbed to their prescription. And so the technology and the smart master system is part of this agenda. You know, as you say that, I think about one of the most amazing things that happened And just through COVID was this mantra basically in all of media, even newspapers, which was people who do their own research are idiots.

People who trust the authorities are smart. Like they use that, you know, if you're, you're, I mean, literally that, like asking questions. Like I, you know, I grew up as a kid and remember they would tell you in school, there's no stupid question, always ask questions, now the world is changing. ask any people who ask questions are stupid right people who just go along with the authorities and trust the science those are the smart people and and it's interesting as you think that like a master slave system is don't question the master any longer is taken care of for you to be smart just being compliance just do what we say and tetros is saying exactly that right we've got to work on

COVID showed us that people are not as compliant as we needed to know all this misinformation got in our way of achieving that's why we need more authoritative control so that we can control this misinformation and I've said on the show the only misinformation I know of was coming from the WHO you were wrong about the virus wasn't nearly as deadly as you said it was the vaccine was a total disaster lockdowns didn't work mass didn't work all the science shows us that so what misinformation are you talking about right it's the information that said that you're supposed to think for yourself that's now

misinformation. And these and these new documents and the amendments enshrine the WHO's position. When we talk about the WHA you must know it's not the WHA, it's the supranational entities who are informing and influencing but it enshrines their position as the you know the knower of all science and and information and they are the ones who will declare what the what information we have have access to you because apparently we're not capable of making our own minds up. Which leads me on to our approach with World Council for Health is health sovereignty, as opposed to health disease security, vaccine security, we are for health sovereignty.

And people don't actually know what sovereignty means. So, you know, I mean, personally, I have to say a few years ago, I thought sovereignty was something related to the queen or a gold coin, you know, because the word has been hidden from us. Sovereignty is what we are meant to be as human beings and that is self-determining, you know, self-governing. We should be acting on our conscience. We should know right from wrong. We shouldn't need someone else to tell us and we certainly don't follow orders. We make our own minds up, even if it's sometimes wrong, you know, we learn from our mistakes. And we don't tolerate interference from others with regard to our inalienable human rights.

which is freedom to speak and to travel and to talk. And this is our property, you know, and it may not be trespassed upon. And this is, you know, sovereignty is absolutely essential to our health and how we thrive in this world, which is what we're supposed to do. Thrive and create. We human beings are naturally creative and courageous. So they do not want us to be creative and courageous. They want us to be fearful and dependent.

As World Council for Health, we are doing and we're a grassroots organization. We're not imposing anything on anybody. We have partners in 55 countries now, 220 organizations, some small, some big, but we are really working to uplift people, empower them with the tools they need. We are basically messengers, educators to help people get the tools they need to keep themselves well. that's sovereign. You know, I find, and I speak to a lot of audiences, I'm traveling a lot right now, I think that that's harder than we think, really understanding, first of all, sovereign, is you right, what is the sovereign body, but also what tools do I use to achieve health? I feel like,

you know, we've reached a place of waking up, which is like, okay, I'm awake to what's going on, but I'll say to the audience, how many of you are taking prescription drugs right now to get through the day. I mean, you're taking four or five for this and then have the side effects. I've been saying, you know, and what really triggers me on this since I'm, I probably upset a lot of people, but one of the big stories is people who can't get an organ transplant without getting vaccinated, right? We get this call all the time. Like you got to, I need a legal help. I can't get an organ transplant because I need to get the vaccine. It's a horrible, horrible situation. But it brings about, you know, a conflict for me because I think there's still

a lot of people that think their health is dependent on the hospital system, but they want to have control over it. And at least in this interim period, what I think is going to be the scary part of what we're going into here is we've essentially recognized that this medical health system is being controlled by the very entities that starts with this international controlling WHO through NIH, CDC, all every, they're all a part of this. What we watched with COVID was hospitals just turned over our lives, literally just hooked up some machines that are killing nine out of ten people and robbing us of anything that actually could cure or help us or protect us hydroxychloroquine. More and more studies showing how effective that is and would have been.

Ivermectin, so when we watch the hospital system, it killed people. And what I'm trying to say to audiences now is, what do you think happens when you call out the system? We are saying you cannot trust this hospital system anymore. You can't trust the doctors, though I think they mean well. For what it's worth, most doctors show that they will just go along with whatever they're told, and that's being dictated down from, you know, the pharmaceutical companies, yeah. pharmaceutical companies and all of it.

And so how are we going to get to an idea of sovereignty and health if most people still look at the doctors the way that they get to health? And so that's a real job that we don't have a lot of time to work out. It's really interesting that you raise that because what COVID has shown is really that we have outsourced our health to politicians and governments and the military industrial complex and whatever. And so we are complicit in what's happened, and we need to recognize that we can't actually just blame the WHO and blame the pharmaceutical companies and all of that. Obviously, they have been, they are enormously powerful, owning most of mainstream media or influencing and so on. So they have a really unfair advantage, and they have used our kindness and our desirable convenience. Also our fear of dying.

Yes, fear of dying. Exactly. So our sort of disconnection from nature and so on, it's all been exploited so that we feel our destiny is basically to get sick one day, get a disease, get some pills and then die eventually and have declining health until we die. That's what we expect. But that does not have to be the case. What we would like to do is see people living in optimum health until they die and then saying, oh, I think I've had enough. I'm going to sit down and of the tree over there and have a long sleep now. And that is possible, but I would like to, I would like your views to reflect on what they do for their car and what they do for themselves. So every year in the UK you have to send your car

for an MOT. I didn't know what MOT stands for, but anyway, it's an annual checkup. And that doesn't mean a whole lot of tests necessarily. It means changing the oil, you know, whatever, cleaning, or whatever, all that stuff. all that stuff, but people don't do that for their bodies, you know. And you would never dream if you've got a diesel car of putting petrol in the tank.

You would always, you know, you wouldn't drive with flat tires. Yet, you know, we put so much bad stuff into our bodies and then think, oh, well, you know, I'll just go to the doctor when I get sick eventually. How are we happy with that deal? How are we happy with that? Surely we want to live now. This is the vehicle that we have to enjoy this world and to be physically active and to do all the things

we love to do and dream of doing. And so we should keep in good nick, you know, and that's not just going to the gym every day. It's, you know, whatever, doing the things and making sure that you're having checkups with a trusted health professional, I would say not a doctor. Right.

Because a doctor will want to hold a little, They'll do... They'll test... They're drug pushers. I mean, that's all doctors have become it. There's a pharmaceutical answer for everything. That's who's walking through their door. That's what they're being trained to do.

So if you don't want to be on drugs, then don't go to the drug dealer. Exactly. That's really what it comes down to. And also mind health, you know, if you just consider how we all expect to be feeling, we all want to feel great and happy. But what we put into our minds, the horror and the hyperestine, sexual stuff and the violence and the fear from the news and the social media that we put in, you know, drives everybody to go on to feel they need antidepressants or anti-anxiety drugs

because, you know, because they're simply not taking care of their mind health. Right. You know, which actually requires that we have quiet time, that we're not busy all the time, that we actually, you know, have time in nature and have have family time, have family dinners and that sort of thing. So if we want to get healthy and if we want to point fingers at drug companies and so on, we need to take responsibility too and start taking better care of ourselves and recognizing that when we're not feeling that great, we need to change something. Yeah, I agree.

And it's a very, very important message. And it comes even down to, I mean, are you happy? You know, what I think people should be asking themselves is, how much am I stifling my life, right? I mean, all disease, ultimately, cancers. I mean, several people recently that I've found are just not healthy. I've been watching them for years either in a relationship that's not working for them, not able to speak their truth. But how many people are going to jobs?

I mean, just think of this statement. People come up to me and they'll say, man, I was this close. My job almost made me get a vaccine. And I was like, no, your job almost gave you a reason to get a different job. And then I think, you know, I was just speaking at a conference recently, and I said, you go to these conferences like yours

and people just feel this light. They get to hear these great speakers and they're maybe doing a meditation class and they're really finding something. And then they leave and it's within days, it's like it all just disappears in the background. Then they're back to just barely hanging on, 10 cups of coffee in the morning get going, you know, five drinks at night to get to sleep and just burning the candle at all sides.

At what point are we going to recognize that your life should be fulfilled, that you should be working a job that you actually love to do that work and that you deserve to have good relationships. And I mean, I just feel like this darkness everyone's worried about disappears the moment you actually become a lighter. person and more in charge of all the things you want from life. I mean, I think you're right. We've sort of let, you know, health and everything be somebody else's job, but it's also spiritual, right? It's also our mental experience. Yeah, I mean, so many people are worried about money, and it's money that keeps them trapped in unhappy relationships, unhappy jobs, you know, unsatisfying jobs. and people are being squeezed from all angles. You know, the number of people sitting in front of computers all day long.

You know, we're not designed for that. We're not designed to be serving coffee all day long. We work far too long hours and we're sedentary. We're actually part of nature. And we're actually supposed to be spending a lot of time outdoors. So, you know, a whole new approach is needed. And I feel what we're seeing really with all of this is the end of a civilization. I feel we're seeing the end of a material-orientated civilization, a merchant civilization.

You might say where money has been the goal of, we've been deceived. in a way to think that money is going to give us happiness and a, you know, a job that pays so much will automatically bring satisfaction or, you know, if you get into Bitcoin or whatever, you'll get lucky, or you might become a millionaire if you win this or whatever. So, you know, we're always looking outside ourselves for that happiness and imagine, oh, I'll be able to retire and when I retire, I'm going to go on cruises every year, whatever it is, you know, without taking each day at a time, one day at a time and saying, you know, having quiet time and feeling, thinking how are you feeling and how you're going to enjoy your day to day and what you're going to do.

So it feels, as I say, we're on the death throes of this civilization that we're realizing doesn't work is extremely exploitative and they're about to lock us in a cage for good. And we have the opportunity to birth something new. So I know people don't really want to talk about COVID anymore and fair enough. Let's not. You know, let's talk about the sort of world we want and what we can do to create it. Yeah. I think pry ourselves out of that, that iron lung we've been living in. That's sustaining our life.

We don't need it to sustain our life. You know, it's really, I mean, it's so important your message. And I love the idea that, you know, you have the WHO, but the antithesis of that, you know, which when we first spoke, he's like, I want something else for the world. So how is the World Council for Health, you know, achieving, you know. So we have an individual strategy for, because basically, we see the individual as the foundation block of a healthy society. So if we, you know, if we build a society on individuals who are well, we're going to have a healthy communities, healthy families, healthy societies. So our focus is on the individual rather than the whole world.

And we have a number of resources for people at this particular time, because I know there are lots of people worried about, they're concerned about the vaccines now, whether they've been jabbed or not, whether they're ill or not. People want to know more and they want some advice on that. So we're providing those resources. We're teaching people about their rights. We have new guides coming out on complementary.

therapy for cancer. Obviously that's also on everybody's mind. And so we have those sorts of resources, leaflets and things for individuals. We just did a conference in Asia where we had our amazing Asian partners sharing integrative health approaches, traditional medicine and natural therapies. I mean Asia is an apothecary of nature, of nature's medicine and the expertise there is phenomenal. So we, wonderful speakers and so much wisdom shared. And we're having these community outreached, like the Bettaway Conference as well,

you know, that's all part of our strategy. But further to that, we're decentralizing World Council for Health. So we don't need more hierarchical institutions. We are decentralizing so that every country has its own Council for Health and they make their own policies that are suited to their local needs,

the local medicines, they accredit their own health practitioners, they will create their own integrated centres of excellence for health. And in the event of another fake, which stands for public health emergency of international concern, we will all get together. Our steering committees and representatives from these different country councils, we do already get together every month, and we are discussing the atrogenic injuries,

from the COVID vaccines, iatogenic meaning caused by the medical, pharmaceutical industry. But in the event of any future emergencies, we will be getting together and providing real solutions for people and for countries. And we're also, you know,

in solidarity, showing solidarity in the event of further mandates and, you know, of unlawful mandates, I will add, for further, for masking, injections and so on. and we will be working together to restore law and order. So, you know, it's very important that the WHO and the World Economic Forum and these supernational bodies know that they are not going to be the dictator of the world.

The people want choice and they have choice. And we, you know, we encourage, we've set up 10 country councils so far and we will be rolling out, we will be announcing more as the months go by. Is there a clock ticking for the work that you're doing? I mean, do you have a sense that since COVID and we, you know, we've talked about WHO, these international powers, you know, do you think there's going to be like another event? Will they use another catastrophic, terrifying thing to try and get compliance?

or do you think it's slow rolls now in some way, it's more subtle? Who knows? You know, there's so much speculation, and they are the ones saying, you know, more pandemics. So Gavi Foundation and Tedros of World Health Organization in 2021 said the next pandemic will be Marburg, which is a hemorrhagic disease. So, you know, I'm sort of hesitant to speculate on things. But it does mean that we do not. need to be aware that there is this predatory component to these new, this new supernatural entity that they're trying to establish called the conference of the parties and a sort of one world government, you know, they're trying to sort of rally us all into.

So we need to be paying attention and we need to be preparing for different eventualities, getting ourselves well and being prepared to stand up for the truth and to seek the truth and to take actions. And I think ultimately the work that you're doing and that we're attempting to do with ICANN and the high wire is

to know where you're going to find the truth when things get confusing again. Who can you go to the trust? What's why I think having you know, this decentralized system where it's, it caters to in my environment. Texas is not New York City. Like we have different issues here. If there's going to be a problem, we would probably handle them differently.

So this idea of developing, you know, an international family, if you will, right, that have different talents and different ways of approaching it. But that can communicate in the moments where it's now. necessary to be able to communicate. Yes, and I think also that solidarity is important, because I think especially for the United States, it's always, you know, you've always been able to sort of sort yourself out and make your own decisions and policies that often would influence the rest of the world, but not necessarily weren't solidarity with the rest of the world.

Whereas what's clear now, I mean, you only get one vote, this whole country in the, in the, you know, you're one country and there are 194 countries. So, and, you know, I think many of the amendments have come from this country too, one way or the other. So it sounds like your government would be for the WHO situation. So the USA needs the support and the solidarity of all those other countries, not just in escaping the allopathic system or finding alternatives to allopathic health care, because there's the most incredible natural solutions and innovative solutions that are coming out of non-farmar, non-hospital-based health care and health promotion.

But also in solidarity to stand up to these unlawful mandates that are being rolled out everywhere. So just on that matter, because I don't want to forget this, We are working with wonderful legal experts and we have Dr. Willem van Art, who's an international human rights specialist preparing a document for us. It's almost ready on the abuse of public health emergencies and how to prevent them. Because part of the reason we're in the situation we're in is because healthcare practitioners, lawyers, nobody really knows the law around health emergencies. And this is the way totalitarian

ambitions have always been fulfilled through declaring unlawful state of emergencies. And then, you know, and then one thing leads to another. And people need to watch this here in America. We see these bills coming up in states where they're, you know, under an emergency governor gets these all-encompassing powers. Like, hold on. I mean, we've got, This is where citizens, we've got to watch, is they're trying to consolidate their power. And emergency is the way by which they do that. Luckily, here in America, many of these orders ended up have proven to be unlawful. Masking on airplanes got pulled back.

I think we were going to win that case. And then, of course, the Biden administration withdrew so that we didn't set precedence there. So all of it, you know, I think, is coming around. But we really have to be vigilant and awake. I think that's a lot of what you're doing with your work. And so in sort of, you know, sort of wrapping this up, do you have hope and what do you think is the takeaway for people right now?

What is it that, you know, people need to know or be thinking about? Well, certainly people need to be thinking about detoxing from the COVID vaccines and other things that are, you know, and it's not just people who've been vaccinated. I urge everybody to look at our detox guide. Dr. Peter McCullough, who's one of our advisors, has also come out of.

with a basic bromelaine, curcumin and naticinase base, which you can add other things to. There's a whole range of remedies, but immune boosting supplements and teas that one can take. And I urge everybody to consider what they can do to improve their immune system. But on a general level, I just would like to urge people to consider on a daily basis what they're doing to change things for the better because there's a lot of anger and stuff on social media and a lot of oh my goodness did you see this and the sharing of which actually feeds the rage and it feeds the sense of disempowerment and how it makes these megalomaniacs seem so powerful but it's not really helpful you know there's lots of freedom groups that are you know but

they're not really doing they're they're feeding the the monster of fear rather than providing solutions. So, you know, I would urge people to realize, A, they can't comply their way out of tyranny. You know, if you appease a bully, they just keep on bullying and increasing the things. So you can't react your way out of tyranny either. You know, you can't just, oh, look at this, look at this, you know.

You have to create your way out of tyranny. So we're in the most amazing creation process. we're birthing something new and wonderful. And if people can just hold that, step away from fear and remove themselves from all the fake restraints that we are imposed on us and we feel are imposed on us, just remove those and say, what is it that I would do if I didn't have to worry about money?

And do those things, you know, so just do those things. going to and and I just want to get in there. Our job is to protect the children. There's no body coming to save our children. It is our job to save them from this military industrial complex that has our children in their sites, both through vaccines, through technology, through this antidepressants, the gender issues, all of these things, sex, sexualization, all of these things are aimed at at owning our children, controlling our children.

So please, our job, if there's one thing that I can, if there's one motivating factor, I just ask people if they can please protect the children. So, and finally, I would just like to say, you know, please, perhaps I'll just say it like this, please stand up for truth and justice because they can't crucify all. all of us. So that's my final message. And of course, there's a better way. We're creating a better

world. And to paraphrase Arundati Roy on a quiet day, if you sit still, you will hear her breathing. Beautiful Tess. Thank you for all your incredible work. We can continue to follow it, and we're here to support you in any way that we can. Thank you so much, Del.