The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE HIGHWIRE 300TH EPISODE

Episode Date: December 31, 2022

Say Goodbye to Fauci; Dutch Farms Impediment to Mega City?; Green New Deal Falling Through; Big Food Bureaucrat Buyout; Rigged: Olivia’s Story Guests: Olivia TeseniarBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

Did you notice that this show doesn't have any commercials? I'm not selling you diapers or vitamins or smoothies or gasoline. That's because I don't want corporate sponsors telling us what to investigate and what to say. Instead, you're our sponsors. This is a production by our nonprofit, the Informed Consent Action Network. If you want more investigations, more hard-hitting news. If you want the truth, go to Ican Decide.org and donate now. Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you're.

are out there in the world. It's time to step out onto the last High Wire of 2022. And what an amazing year has it has been. I mean, we have really seated all, haven't we, over the last few years? And Highwire has grown exponentially. I wanted to thank all of you that joined us this year, all the friends and families out there that shared our videos to your friends and said, hey, man, check out the High Wire. They're the only ones that seem to be getting any of this right. I want to thank my incredible international team of scientists and experts that help us put the show together every week. And of course, our legal team run by Aaron, Siri, that has just been

instrumental in shifting this conversation around vaccine, safety, and efficacy, not just in the United States of America, but around the world. And as we look to the new year and everything that we're planning on and we reflectively look back at everything we've been through, we find ourselves asking a lot of questions right now. But one question, that perhaps we aren't going to be asking ourselves is whether or not we're going to miss this guy. With me today is Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Dr. Anthony Fauci. Chief Medical Advisor to the president. Dr. Fauci. Dr. Fauci. Dr. Anthony Fauci.

She's had the flu for 14 days. Should she get a flu shot? Well, no. If she got the flu for 14 days, she's as protected as anybody can be, because the best vaccination is to get infected yourself. And if she really has to be. If she really has, has the flu, if she really has the flu, she definitely doesn't need a flu vaccine. If you take it and then a year goes by and everybody's fine, then you say, okay, that's good. Now let's give it to 500 people and then a year goes by and everything's fine. I say, well, now let's give it to thousands of people and then you find out that it takes 12 years for all hell to break loose.

I've heard some parents claim that measles vaccine can cause brain inflammation on an encephalitis. Is that true? Is that true? Brain inflammation, encephalitis. Can measles vaccine cause encephalitis? The vaccine. The vaccine. There's no cases of that...

There is... Rare. A Wuhan coronavirus. Bottom line, we don't have to worry about this one, right? This is not a major threat for the people in the United States, and this is not something that the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about. Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.

You're sure of it, because people are listening really closely to this. Right now, people should not be walked. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. Now, early on, when we were in a situation in which,

there was a real concern about the lack of personal protective equipment. We were thinking we would run out of masks and other things for them. So the recommendation was not to wear a mask because of the shortage of it. A lot of folks are hearing now about double masking, wearing two masks or trying to get one of those N95 medical grade masks. So if you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on. It just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective. We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, A, for their own protection, for the protection of their

family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You want to be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. If you've been vaccinated, can you give the virus to others and should you still wear a mask? You can give it to others. You should wear a mask. You have to do something that's rather draconian. And sometimes when you do draconian things, it has collateral negative consequences.

Just like when you shut things down, even temporarily, it does have deleterious consequences on the economy, on the school children. You know that, but you have to make a balance. And I'm wondering why you're asking me about. lockdowns because there were not complete lockdowns in this country. I didn't shut down anything. We are certainly right now in this country out of the pandemic phase. Here we are going into the third year of it and we are still in the middle of a pandemic. This paper that you were referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function. What was, let me finish. Take an animal virus and you

increase his responsibility to humans, you're saying that's not gain of function. Yeah, that is correct. And Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. As attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. Because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science. So if you are trying to do, you know, get at me as a public health official and a scientist, you're really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science.

And anybody that looks at what's going on clearly sees that. Senator Cruz told the Attorney General you should be prosecuted. Yeah. I'd have to laugh at that. I should be prosecuted. That's right. you should be prosecuted. And by the way, it doesn't matter

that we're moving into a new year. There are plenty of senators and congressmen that now have on their docket and investigation into Anthony Fauci. And I've told you, I won't sleep until we've done everything we can to put this man behind bars. I believe he is guilty of crimes against humanity.

And whether or not he considers himself science itself. I think he's more like the pace car of science that got lost in a dead-end cold. Tulsaac somewhere around the AIDS epidemic and has only been destroying us ever since. So I look forward to continues investigations into Tony Mcouch. I'll be honest with you. I'll be honest right now. If this guy truly disappears, I will be amazed. Because when you have built a world around lying and disinformation and misinformation and misinformation and mealy-mouthing your way around all sorts of answers for decades, in the end, you're the only one that can hold up all of those

lies. So I really wonder how they're going to replace a man and all of the, you know, the stacks and stacks and stacks of half truths and lies that now sit as the library at the National Institutes of Health. Who can keep that all together other than Tony Fauci? I guess we'll have to see, but something tells me you'll see this guy lurking around because someone's going to have to keep holding and pinning and sewing it all together as we move forward. But as we have watch on the high wire this year and I'm sure there are many, many more insiders and, you know, people that are going to bring us the truth from whether it's media or medicine or even legislation around the world. So many questions, so many of the right questions are now being

asked. The one thing that I find myself, you know, wondering is how do they think they are going to get away with all of this? Well, we certainly will see as we go into the new year and you're going to see a whole new attack from us, whether it's a legal attack on laws that are trying to take away our rights, our freedoms, our liberty, or whether or not we're just going to attack all the dis and misinformation being spewed upon us by mainstream media. We've been here the whole time. We are not going anywhere. And I want to thank all of you that have joined us throughout the last few years. It's only going to get better as we bring this thing to a close. Out there in the future for all of us somewhere is the answer. That moment when truth really does prevail, we plan on sticking

a flag in that moment. So until then, why don't we talk about what's happening right now this year, at the end of this year, it's time for the Jackson Report. My God, Jeffrey, 22 went by in a flash. Maybe it's because I've been traveling so much, but I just, it's incredible to think that, you know, all of this is just flying by. We're so busy and there's so much information. But here we are. Last episode of 2022. And I got to say, I'm not going to miss reporting on Anthony Fauci's double speak for the rest of my life. I'm done. It's put a fork in that reporting. We're done with that unless there's prosecutions happening and then I guess we can bring that back up again. But farewell to that chapter of the high wire, I guess. But one of the, you know, one of the most important

stories that was reported throughout the summer. It's still been going on in the background. And we forget about this because it's in another country here in America. But it's in the Netherlands. We have the Dutch farmers. And they've been protesting because their farms are being really closed in upon by the government. The government put nitrogen restrictions of up to 95% on Dutch farmers. And the Netherlands is really the bright basket of one of the bread baskets of Europe. As far as this land size, there's a lot of farmers. There's a lot of farmers. they're proportionate to its population. So it's a very interesting, you know, if you want to call it attack on farmers via this

sustainable matrix. And they were asked to cut their fertilizer. They were asked to cut their heads of cattle. And they were already implementing a lot of these, a lot of these things, but it wasn't enough. So the government really moved in on them. And you saw a lot of protests throughout the summer months. And now we're seeing kind of the next phase ratchet up here into this.

And, you know, it's not an accident. We're reporting on this. because this is such an important topic at the end of the year, her moving into this next into 2023. Here's the headline now as we're closing out 2022. Netherlands to close up 3,000 farms to comply with EU rules. It says here, farmers will be offered a deal well over the worth of the farm according to the government plan that is targeting the closures of 2,000 to 3,000 farms.

Earlier leaked versions of the plan put the figure at 120% of the farm's value, but that figure has not yet been confirmed by ministers. This is the nitrogen minister. says there's no better offer coming. The kind of playing hardball here. This is Christian Van der Waal, nitrogen minister told MPs on Friday. She said compulsory purchases would be made with pain in the heart if necessary.

I'm sure that will be painful for the government to make compulsory purchases. So what's going on here? We're looking at this happening and people are saying, you know, we're moving into a food crisis. There's, you know, there's inflation. People can't really afford groceries. And you're shutting down the farmers in the Netherlands. Well, the World Economic Forum has a plan that's kind of coming to light here, and it's really shedding a different angle on this.

And a lot of the farmers had also said this may have been the plan. Check out this video from the WEF. It's amazing when I watch these videos coming out from the World Economic Forum. I just wonder who's their head of promotion and PR. I mean, it always seems like this is the worst advertisement for whatever you're dreaming up here that we could possibly imagine. but this idea of just being stacked on top of each other. I'll be honest with you. You know what this reminded me of when I was working on as a producer

on the CBS Talk Show, The Doctors, we went to Haiti right after the big earthquake that just killed an incredible amount of people. And being there, what you realize is these giant tent cities, like nothing I'd ever seen in my personal life before, but those were all people that used to be farmers and out in the country and just over the years as sort of industrial agriculture took over

all of these people just forced into the cities. And so that's where you really had just amazing amounts of squalor and sewage running down between these tents and children, no clothes. And it just reminded me of that sort of progress, right, where we go away from people having jobs and working and being able to be a part of the land to just stacking them on top of each other with just very little to even survive on. And if that's some dream for our future, I hope below the no box, there's definitely like a check. Hell no. Oh, hell no.

Right. And, you know, it may not be, it may not be really easy to see what's going on in someplace like China or, as it said in the video in Africa, when they're packing everybody in these cities, you know, hundreds of millions of people. But in the Netherlands, this is all pretty much farmland. And they're trying to kill this farmland as quick as possible. And on the top of that, all of a sudden, this Megalopolis tri-state city. This is what it's being called. This is an article from 2017. This is when it really started to roll. But the farmers weren't under this much pressure. They were still feeling some pressure from this net zero push, but they weren't getting

this heavy hand from the government like they are now. So here's the headline in 2017. Dutch investors launched new marketing program for the Netherlands, tri-state city it's called. They said a group of institutional investors in the Netherlands have joined forces to present the Netherlands plus parts of Belgium and Germany. Germany as a single city network named Tri-State City, the project backed by Dutch employer organization, VNO NCW, that's the largest employer's organization in Netherlands, by the way, says the region's population of 30 million people creates a sustainable urban powerhouse.

The project supporters include property developers and pension funds as well as Utrecht's Economic Board. That's one of the larger cities there. It goes on to say, you know, why are they doing this? We had talked about this, Del. Why are they doing this? According to these people, the Netherlands must present itself as one of the most powerful and sustainable city networks in the world, the project's backer says. It is about how Dutch companies present themselves to companies such as Apple or big Chinese firms. Prologis Benelux director Bram Venerhuvian told Finansela Dagblad.

That's one of the papers in Netherlands. So it's not about, you know, individuality, independence, really helping communities grow, it's about how we present ourselves to Apple and big Chinese firms. We have to look at on the international stage. That's why we're going to do this. We're going to get rid of farms to do this too. That's amazing. Reading between the lines here is what it's looking like.

So this is actually, they have a website, tri-statecity.n.l. And if you go there, you can see kind of these dream plans for this megacity. You have this megalopolis with a population around 45 million people extending across the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, and maybe not as many farms there anymore. if this comes to fruition. And we've seen, you know, in these megacities, even in the smaller cities that wouldn't be considered a megalopolis, but cities like Oxford or Canterbury,

we had reported on this before. These cities become so big and their traffic becomes really bad. And we're getting situations like this, a 15-minute city within the city. And this was the headline we reported on just a couple of months ago. Oxford set to cut its famous traffic jams by degrees. The university city will be divided into six districts and motorists would find if they leave their neighborhood too often.

And in Canterbury, this is the same thing that was happening there. This is now moving forward. This is the latest headline from that. Canterbury traffic zones like post-war Berlin without the wall. They're talking about the segmentation that they have going on there. So this is what's going on when they think this interconnected sustainable powerhouse, well, it's going to be divided up like pies. And you're going to need permits according to these plans to go from districts of the city to other districts.

Wow. I mean, it's horrifying. But I think, you know, in some ways, many of us that have been in cities, like we were in Los Angeles before we moved out to Texas, I mean, that kind of already is a mega city, right? I mean, you can drive from, you know, I don't know, at this point, Ventura all the way down to San Diego and you never get a sense that the city is leaving. And more and more as you go up through Bakersfield on your way to Las Vegas, you could easily imagine a point where all of that is connected and just becomes this giant, uh cesspool of you know mask lovers it's yeah and and you you can drive in l a unless there's some issue with the electronic grid or the electric grid and you have an electric vehicle and that brings us kind of in the next conversation here is this move you know this is kind of on par with with what we're talking about here in the netherlands moving away from farming

bringing it to the to the more urban development but also now we have this switch to the the the electric energy grid and the vehicles as well. So John Kerry was just an interview recently. And, you know, we're racing towards the electric vehicles. I believe California said they're by 2030. They want all electric vehicles. This is what John Kerry just said. John Kerry says green energy transition isn't happening fast enough.

Everything has to accelerate. He's talking a 20 times faster for electric vehicles. But as we've talked about, there's a problem here. He said screaming into his cell phone from his own private jet, you know. Right. Yeah, exactly. So there's a problem with that, though, because these batteries, they require lithium. They require coal ball. And lithium in South America's lithium flats and in the Congo with the coalobout mining. You have basically slave labor and kids that are working down there doing this. And it's an environmental disaster. And here's, you know, luckily we have some balance in the reporting here. Here's one of the headlines here, elephant in the room, clean energies need for unsustainable minerals. So they're finally realizing people are finally, this is like a topic. at dinner tables now that these minerals are unsustainable and we're rushing this push into this and we don't really have a contingent plan for how we're going to find all these minerals.

But also the renewables themselves, they rely on energy storage, not where we're talking about cars, but we're talking about tire grids for cities. And some more conversations are coming out to balance this. And people are saying, look, this isn't really realistic. This is a study just recently. This is the headline here. Lack of energy storage makes renewables only grids a pipe dream. And it says in here, renewables only grids require large amounts of electricity storage to make them viable.

However, the world currently lacks any power storage technology that is both affordable and scalable. As the paper's author Francis Menton explains the amount of storage required is very large, perhaps as much as two months of average demand. The cost then becomes absurd. You can spend all of your GDP on batteries every year, and it would still not be enough. Hydrogen is better, he goes on to say, but it's astonishingly expensive. It's very insufficient to really power this. So we have this grid, you know, in this perfect world, we have this grid. It's great even if we did have the minerals for it.

And even if we did have this storage technology. But what happens when, you know, people like Switzerland have an energy crisis going into the winter like they're having right now? So we have Switzerland, which has over half of its energy is hydroelectric. but in the winter months, they have to rely pretty much on imports. And we're obviously in the winter in Europe there in a lot of these countries, and they're having energy issues, heating their houses. And so when there's an emergency, this is what Switzerland plans to do. Headlines, Switzerland could ban electric vehicle use during energy crisis.

This is a report. And so they're talking about basically banning electric car use for non-essential travel. So we go back to the same thing, right, during the power, you know, sort of rolling blackouts they're having in California. You know, there was people that are being told don't charge your electric vehicles right now, which is amazing because aren't they, you know, in California, they're trying to have like all electric by, you know, what, 10, 15 years from now or something. Yeah, yeah, exactly. So they're saying that's great, we can have that. But if there's any issues with the power grid, electric vehicles are banned.

And in this contingency plan in Switzerland, they're talking about only keeping your refrigerator to a certain degree and so on and so forth. We've heard those headlines before. but that all goes into effect in Switzerland, you know, coming into these winter months if they have problems with imports. And we know there's a lot of problems with imports as we reported on before as well. And then another angle and kind of a final angle to this I want to put in here is this thing called ESG. This is environmental, social, and governmental investing. And there's an explosion of looking through investments decisions through this ESG lens. And asset management industry has responded to this by offering sustainable social responsible funds.

for people to invest in. But there's an issue with that as well. This is Harvard business law. And there's a lot of great research going into this now to uncover an inconvenient truth about ESG investing. And it goes on to study a lot of reports showing showing where to some of the issues with this. But one of the studies we'll look at here is a title here. It says, do ESG funds make stakeholder friendly investments? It says using a comprehensive study of self-labeled ESG mutual funds as identified by Morningstar in the United States from 2010 to 2018, we find that these funds hold portfolio firms with worst track records for compliance with labor and environmental laws relative to portfolio firms held by non-ESG funds managed by the same financial institutions

in the same years. It also goes on to say, finally, ESG funds appear to underperform financially relative to other funds with the same asset manager and year. And to charge higher fees. Our findings suggest that socially responsible funds do not appear to follow through on proclamations of concerns for stakeholders. So as you're seeing, it's kind of, it's kind of an issue there. And not only are they now returning the capital, but even for people saying, well, I'll take a little bit of sacrifice on my returns to help the environment. They're not seeming to do that. So what's the answer? We're seeing huge backlash now. And from one of the biggest one of the biggest portfolios, Vanguard. This was out of Reuters. This is mainstream headlines.

Now, Vanguard quits net zero climate efforts citing need for independence. Vanguard manages, about $7 trillion in assets. They're one of the top ones next to BlackRock in this, and they've exited. They've really become the biggest ones to do this. So this is a major blow to this ESG investment, a paradigm or scheme, or however you want to look at it. It's all so confusing, because we've talked about Vanguard

before and BlackRock, these two monolithic companies that essentially own the world between the two of them. And you would imagine they're the ones investing in World Economic Forum and all these things that are pushing these agendas. And all of a sudden, when they say, no, we don't want to be a part of this. It's not sustainable or financially intelligent. You know, it leaves me just looking forward to next year and all the investigations we need to do to figure out what the heck is going on here. Right. And maybe 2023 is the year of gray area and, you know, no more polarization.

You know, things may not be exactly what they seem, black or white, plus or minus. And so this also, goes to states now states are taking a stance on this as well and withdrawing some of their portfolios now this this really talks about black rock and concerns them directly state treasuries yank one billion from black rock due to esg worries this is south carolina Utah Louisiana Arkansas Missouri they're all backing out of this now again black rock holds multi-billion dollar investments so this is a small drop in the pot but is a drop nonetheless and one of the biggest people to pull out recently was Florida here's the headline here They're the largest, they're taking out the largest amount.

Florida pulls $2 billion from BlackRock and largest anti-ESG divestment. And we go to their finance manager at Florida. This is his Twitter account. He says, using Florida's cash to fund BlackRock's social engineering project isn't something we signed up for. It's not, it's got nothing to do with maximizing returns and is the opposite of what an asset manager is paid to do. We are divesting from BlackRock. And so a lot of the headlines that were reporting on this saying, oh, it's just a couple

Republican states, but we have now a Democratic-run state in North Carolina that is making, you know, maybe not such a bold move because they're keeping their assets at the firm, but North Carolina treasurer wants BlackRock's CEO to go. So they're asking the CEO to step down because they're not really treating the funds correctly. So this is Larry Fink. That's the head of CEO. So that's a good move, I guess, on that part for people that are really seeing the balance of this ESG conversation. Well, and when we say just a couple of Republican states, and now maybe one, you know, Democrat state. These couple of states get to sort of stand as a historical reference point

as these things move further and further down the road, and you start watching what states invested correctly and how their finances are doing, just like I think we're now reflecting on Florida and Ron DeSantis' decision to pull out of the COVID lockdowns earlier than almost anyone else, being told that he was going to destroy humanity and certainly the humanity inside of Florida.

Instead, he's got sky. skyrocketing numbers and everyone moving there. I think that, you know, slowly but surely one state, five states, 15 states, you know, this is how change really happens. It starts in this grassroots space and it's where politically, you know, I've said growing up progressive liberal that, you know, I'm now politically maroon, but one of the tenants I really do, I'm starting to appreciate more and more of is this idea of localized government, you know, bringing the power of government closer to you, the smaller the government, the more power should have. So give city and county councils more power than the state than state over the federal

because we just, it's so hard to affect federal government and change there. Whereas if it's close to us, we can elect and de-elect those that aren't representing us. And so these states stepping forward and watching them really find that power, I think it's kind of exciting. Absolutely. And local government, your voice and your needs has a greater percentage of being heard and being valued, well and you know as we're going to these conversations especially move into this new year the COVID conversation starts to blur with the climate conversation starts to blur with you know the exposing of the conflicts of interest and all of these agencies we're really in new territory here

because we have a population that is more educated than ever before that we're speaking to so we're you know our organization along with many others we're taking we're taking people along with us in these investigations and sometimes they're as smarter not smarter than us with these conversations. So it's pretty exciting time and the population is really awake and aware. And, you know, moving to the health conversation here, we're going to need a really activated population because here's the headlines coming out here. Let's talk about diabetes, obesity.

Type 2 diabetes cases among young people skyrocketing due to rising obesity rates. Remember, type 2 is lifestyle-related diabetes. And here's obesity nation's obesity epidemic is growing 19 states, have adult obesity rates above 35% up from 16 states last year. And even this headline, you know, it goes all the way into cognitive issues, ultra-processed food intake linked with cognitive decline study. And so where can we point to this? Well, there is an organization.

They started in 1917. They have the roots. And it's called the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. And they're responsible. If you go to their website, they say this is their mission. The academy is committed to improving the nation's health in advancing the profession of dietetics through research education and advocacy. Dell, this reminds me a little bit of HHS, saying their mission is to enhance the health

and well-being of Americans through scientific research and public health. So we have this organization, and boy, on their watch, they're really not doing a good job. So what gives? Well, scratch under the surface a little more, thanks to the U.S. right to know. It's a nonprofit organization. We have some FOIA emails. And here's the headline out of The Guardian, Reveals, Group Shaping U.S. nutrition, receives millions from big food industry.

It goes on to say the Academy, they call them, accepted at least 15 million from corporate and organizational contributors from 2011 to 2017, and over 4.5 million in additional funding went to the Academy's Foundation, which is that nonprofit foundation they have. Among the highest contributions came from companies such as Nestle, PepsiCo, Hershey, Kellogg's, General Mills, Conagra, and then National Dairy Council and the Baby Formula producer, Abbott Nutrition, Nadell. hold on and listen to this. It goes on to say the email reveals the Academy in 2015 was in a

sponsorship deal with Abbott and was discussing how the Academy could use its dietitians influence in pediatrician's offices to push Pediature one of the pharmaceutical giants infant infant nutritional products. Abbott at the time had in place a two-year $300,000 sponsorship deal. It goes on to say the Academy also owned Abbott stock at the time of the deal and plans a record show it also owned stock in companies with which it had a sponsorship deal pipsico as well as financial contributors like nestley this is gary ruskin he's the head of us right to know he says this is astounding that belongs in the conflicts of interest hall of fame it is off the charts he says and then it goes on to say separately in 2015 a partnership between the academy and craft ignited controversy when the

academy agreed to allow the company to put its kids eat healthy seal on craft singles packaging which suggests an source verified the product's nutritional value, but you and I know that they didn't. Wow. So you want to talk about the baby formulas just as a side note to that. Remember, there was a recall of Simulac in this country. This was a big story here. And this was one of the headlines. The legal industry really jumped on this because they were pushing suits for infant deaths, wrongful infant deaths. In wake of Simulac recall, FD announces strategy to keep coronabacter out of infant formula products. That's the bacteria. So Abbott had to close his plants because of a necrotizing enterocolitis. That's the NEC. These are lawsuits from kids in the NICU that were given this

formula. And, you know, they basically passed away because it was, it was this stomach, basically a stomach of formula that was eating their stomach. It was a pretty terrible situation. But Abbott, you know, internal emails show that Abbott knew about this and they still market it to the hospitals, you know, the typical corporate playbook. But this is what's going on behind the scenes here. There's, you know, there's real damage when these organizations that, you know, I've heard some people say, oh, it's agency capture is great. It helps them work more closely with the industry.

Oh, my God. Not to the evidence I've seen. And so here's the paper. Those FOIA documents, those internal emails were actually incorporated into a research paper. And this is the paper, if anyone wants to read it, it's a long read and it's amazing. The corporate capture of the nutrition profession in the USA, the case of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Now understand, they are influential at setting the U.S. dietary guidelines.

So that's a huge thing. They're also big in lobbying for any changes of the state for health and nutrition. So that's a big deal because that's where a lot of these guidelines really do come from. And so we have this organization, really a bohemist organization that's a front for our companies. But we also have as a last stopgap measure, like the ASIP committee, we have this, independent advisory committee that sets the dietary guidelines it's the dietary guidelines advisory committee and so this was a study uh showing how how they were balanced was there conflicts of interest within this committee remember this is kind of the last stopgap independent committee for these

dietary guidelines here's the here's the headline conflicts of interest for members of the us 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee says here results researchers right our analysis found that 95% of the committee members had conflict of interest with food and or pharmaceutical industries. And that particular actors, here we go again, including Kellogg, Abbott, Kraft, Mead Johnson, General Mills, Danon, and the international life science had connections with multiple members. Research funding and membership of an advisory executive board jointly accounted for

more than 60% of the total number conflicts of interest documented. So their top heavy, their leadership is conflicted. So you know what's going to come below that is more conflicts of interest. And so, you know, the reason we report on this so much, people say, I know, this story, I know the story, but until we can clean this up, until we can get everyone on the same page and realize that these industries and these watchdogs may not be working in our best interests, that's one of the biggest first steps to changing culture and to changing how we live in everyday lives when it comes to these overarching agencies. Yeah, I mean, it truly is the regulatory

swamp. I think, you know, at this point, I'm, I'm resigned to just assuming every regulatory agency that says it's looking out for my own good is probably, uh, most, you know, most, you mostly being staffed by executives from the very industries I'm supposed to be being protected from, whether it's aviation, drugs, vaccines, food, I mean, the environment, you name it, it just seems like regulatory capture is complete. And anybody that thinks it's a good idea, then there's a couple bridges in this country I'd like to sell you. These are outrageous times. It is really the forefront of our work, Jeffrey.

And it's what I'm really excited about it. People have been watching throughout this year. We really are taking this knowledge that you and I and our team has gained through being very specific early on for the last, you know, five or more years, however long we've been doing the high wire now since 2017. But that work was really specifically around vaccines and that research. Well, we really have, I think, completed all the research that needed to be done or could be done on the childhood vaccine program. Now we're going to be connecting the dots of the COVID vaccine to the, that program so people understand it, but our understanding that we've gained in going down all of those rabbit holes opening every door, talking to all the legislatures involved, we now see the

pattern and are understanding these other issues, whether it's banking or energy, food supply, all of that, which is why it's been so exciting to be stepping into these other spaces, and we're going to be doing a lot more of that, as we've discussed, as we've moved in the next year, really broadening our view, and we're still going to hold on to. to this sort of transparency, you know, that we're talking about. We talk about the High Wire Protocol, but moving into these other sectors that I think are really going to be affecting our lives and certainly our children's and grandchildren's lives. But it all comes down to this generation, this moment.

And I'm just so proud of the work that you did throughout this year. And, of course, all the way through COVID, just you're such a fantastic team player. And it's just an honor to know you. And I look forward to, you know, getting even deeper. these issues in the new year. Oh, thanks, Del. That's really sweet to say thank you so much. And I'm looking forward to bringing our integrity to these spaces of research and our transparency as well, really to just blow these things wide open. So let's do it.

All right. Have a happy new year. And I'll see you in 2023. All right. Thanks so much. All right. Take care. Well, look, folks, you know, this is that, this is the last moment. It's the last moment of 2022 where you can give a donation that is tax deductible. I want you to think about that just for a moment. When you think about things like you, you're thinking, well, what's the last thing I sort of want to invest, you know, my money into that will give me a tax deduction? Imagine a tax deduction for funding the very group that is going to be doing deep investigations and bringing more lawsuits against that very same government. There's an irony to making your money work doubly so.

And I think that that is really what's going on here. And as Jeffrey said, there's so much that we encapsulate as a company, and a lot of it we don't talk about. I mean, really, you can just watch the High Wire and just say it's a great news agency, which we are. I think that our motto of full transparency, the High Wire Protocol, meaning every Monday, we are putting all of our evidence for every story that we're bringing into your hands

so you can read the entire document. We don't want you to get used to us cherry picking it so that we can move through this story quickly. We want you to understand the whole story. And that's because I don't want you to, you know, all of us, we've all gotten used to this. I mean, I remember days when I used to repeat Rachel Maddow without even checking her thinking, oh, she's always right. And, you know, I paid the price for that years ago. But it also taught me I'm never going to do that again. And I don't want people switching over the high wire and just saying whatever they say goes, even though we are diligent.

about making sure we get it right. What you really want to be able to say to your friends and loved ones is not Del Beechree just said last week, but look at this study by the CDC, look at the study by the WHO, their own study, or look at this published in JAMA or Lancet, or look at what was just retracted. Did you know about this? All of that is happening here at the high wire. And what I really love about many of you that are watching when I run into you, what you talk about is there are other, you know, podcasters and blogs and spaces where you go that really jump out to get it first. And sometimes they get it right, sometimes you get it wrong, but they certainly throw up red flags when you want to look at

it. But so many of you are using those places to just look at what you're curious about, but then come into the high wire to see what is actually able to be proven to be true. And we are holding down that space. We're not giving up that space. It would be exciting to break every story before everyone else. But if the story is not ready to go and we can't prove its existence or don't have enough contacts triangulating that truth, you won't hear it from us. That's why you don't get a bunch of retractions from us, but why the integrity of what we've said has stood the test of time. All of that's just our network. On the other side of it, our nonprofit, the informed consent action network, has won more lawsuits in this space of vaccine safety, transparency than

any other nonprofit on this planet right now. We have been more successful winning lawsuits against the National Institutes of Health, FDA, Health and Human Services, the CDC. We were responsible for, you know, bringing you the B-Safe data, which was the CDC's database. We have been directly involved in helping in the Army cases, in the Air Force cases, trying to make sure that they are allowed to hold on to their religious exemptions. Amazing as they fight for freedom around the world. who's fighting for them when it's their butts that are on the chopping block, the informed consent action network is. And then, of course, our work in legislation and helping with, you know, great events that just happened a few weeks ago,

like Senator Ron Johnson's hearings that were directly involved with trying to bring that group together, help him make that as efficient as it could be, and then getting it broadcast out to the world for multiple networks to carry on their own network sites. all of this is made possible by all of the brilliant donors at the end of this year are patting themselves on the back and saying look what we accomplished and i mean we you are our partners we are not going to be captured by exon or pamper's or you know even some vitamin company because we want to investigate whatever truth we think affects humanity and which is why we work for humanity, we work for you. If you want to be involved in that process and you want to be

involved into further deeper investigations and you can't imagine how much you don't see the information we're sending to Rand Paul and Senator Ron Johnson, investigations that maybe are too political for us to even discuss here, but the things we find we're supplying to those that are doing investigations inside of our capital. We're helping everywhere we can and you make this possible. There is nothing like this. This is an experiment in media that I don't think has ever happened before where we're not only reporting on the news. We are making the news. We're not holding a camera and watching someone get shot. We're throwing down the camera and jumping in and trying to help. Now, maybe that breaks some of the rules of journalism, but this is the future for the high wire and it's the way we're going to practice this. This is about standing for what is right. And when you support us, you are standing with us. So please, right now, Now, in this last moment, if you want to give a charitable gift to the informed consent action network, all you have to do is click on that donate button at the top of the screen, whether you're on thehighwire.com or I Can Decide.org and scroll down, put in your information.

If you want to make one big gift at the end of this year, it would be really helpful getting us launched in the next year, or if you just want to set up for next year becoming a recurring donor, I'm pretty sure we're going to ask for $23 a month in about a week here. So hop on the bandwagon of $22 is a number that sounds better to you. If you can do more, obviously all that helps. I know there's so many of you that donate to large organizations, but I want you to ask yourself, what organization has done more to protect you, your children, your liberty, your freedom?

We feel very good about how our work has aged over these last few years. We've stood in the face of attack, whether it's the New York Times, the Washington Post, being shut off by Facebook or YouTube. all of that made us stronger because we are wired to win. All right. All of that being said, our investigations go into a lot of different places, but what puts us on the map and what brings us here started with my work on Vaxed, which was all about the injured children from the MMR vaccine.

Well, now the vaccine, de jure, the one the world is talking about, is bringing injuries like we've never seen it. And so this week, it's another. chance for an episode of what we are calling rigged. Operation Warp Speed. The speed did not compromise safety, nor did it compromise scientific integrity. A nationwide pediatric vaccine trial.

I need to take this out. Maddie? Maddie. Push, Maddie. The vaccine is so critical to be able to get us through this pandemic and back to normal. If I could go back in time, I would not have done the trial.

If the government won't help us. If the drug companies won't help us. Who will help us? In the last segment of Rigg, we interviewed Maddie deGerry and her family who were involved in the Pfizer trials. Well, this week, we're going to feature the story of Olivia, who was in the Moderna trials.

This is Olivia's story. Well, today marks the start of a critical week for vaccine developers as phase three human trials began for some of the most promising vaccines. One of those is the Moderna vaccine developed along with the National Institutes of Health as part of Operation Warp Speed. In August of 2020 is when I started participating in Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine trial. I have a history at Coastal Carolina Research Center. I had been going there 10 years off and on and participated in four migraine studies. So they knew me as a very healthy volunteer. I wanted to get vaccinated for COVID-19

because my son has asthma and my mother had a heart attack about a year prior to the pandemic and I didn't want to give them COVID. I had my first dose of the Moderna vaccine, August 25th of 2020. They made me sit there for about 20 minutes to see how I was doing. It was about maybe five minutes after I received the shot that my arm was burning. She just kind of dismissed it. And then they told me I was free to go. I sent them a message and asked them if I could still be in the study if I didn't get the second dose because my arm was hurting that bad, but they didn't respond. So I went in for my second shot on September 28th, 2020.

Dr. Santiago came in. And she asked me about my arm. She said it, she thought it was probably a bicep injury. She didn't think that it was caused by the vaccine and that she would leave it up to me. So I said, okay, well, I get it then. Four days after I received the second dose of the vaccine is when I started to feel really bad. I was like stuttering and I couldn't remember like words. I was having really bad brain fog.

I was really off balance, like things were falling out of my hands. I was kind of walking funny like I had stick legs, like kind of wobbling back and forth. I called the clinic and told them something was wrong that I didn't feel right. When I got to the clinic, Dr. Santiago came in. She was behind a glass, and she asked me, what was my worst symptom? And I said, the pressure inside my head. She didn't respond. She just looked at me.

Nothing sent me on my way. I feel like they left me on my own, and I feel like Coastal Carolina Research Center didn't take me serious at first when I told them something was wrong with me. I became more aware of how bad my shoulder was hurting. I seen my general doctor. She said, you need an MRI. I contacted Dr. Strout. I know I asked her at least five times. Can you ask Moderna to get me an MRI?

And her last answer was, well, I asked them. and they're not going to do it. So the best way to do it is through my insurance company. So for the next two months, I was having nerve pain and I was having what they called zingers or burners, where you would lose all the feeling here, like through your shoulder and throughout your arm and then it would come back.

As soon as the approval came through, I had my MRI. The MRI revealed that I had a high grade tear of the super spinautus, which requires surgery. The MRI had also, reveal that I had two significantly swollen lip notes under my back's arm. Dr. DeMarco, my orthopedic surgeon, said that the damage to my shoulder wasn't caused by improper needle placement when I was being injected, that it was actually to the vaccine.

It was my inflammation response to the vaccine itself that caused the damage in my shoulder. Five months after the second vaccine, I was on the surgery table, getting surgery on my shoulder from the vaccine. I had to sleep upright for a month. I had to wear a sling for six weeks. I had to do about five months of physical therapy. Oh, it was miserable. It was the most miserable time.

Well, obviously, you know, things were not going well for Olivia. She is asking for the help to get MRIs and having difficulty. modern to help with that which i just think is shocking uh just in itself you're in a trial whatever takes place whether you think it's happening from the vaccine or not this is a trial this is a brand new technology nobody knows how it works everything the patient is experiencing i think any of us that would be in a trial would assume that that's going to be taken care of immediately and we'll figure out later whether or not it was caused by the vaccine but you're dedicating your life to science, you're dedicating yourself to, you know, a purpose to try and

save the world, you would think that we were taking care of these people. But nothing could be further from the truth, because as we followed Olivia's story, it didn't stop with just an issue in her shoulder that needed surgery. She started having other adverse events further down the road. Four months after my shoulder surgery, I was back in the operating room under general anesthesia, getting some lip nodes removed from up under my back's arm. He told me he had to take three that they were very large and they were melted together and they were very odd in color, and he's never seen lip nodes like that in anyone who didn't have cancer. They tested them and they were negative for cancer and he did a skin biopsy and it came back positive for a

connective tissue disorder. This got so bad where I was just losing my will to live. To this day, I have a lot of pain that I don't have an explanation for. I have joint pain in both knees. They hurt all the time. My shoulder is still hurting. I have awful fatigue. The last doctor that I saw was a lupus specialist.

Her hypothesis about my lip nose is that it's an ongoing reaction to the vaccine. I don't have the energy to have the same life that I had before. I was a type of person. I could go to the beach, come home, clean the house, still exercise. And now, I mean, just anything just wears me out so much. I thought if anything went wrong with me, that they would be interested in. what was going on and that they would provide medical care or send me to a doctor that they approved of, at least, but they did not do any of that.

I very much regret getting the vaccine. If I could go back in time, I would not have done the trial. Just this little bitty shot, a vial, I mean, how could it cause so much harm? I just feel foolish for risking my health. my health. So Olivia was having ongoing issues, moving from issues in her arm, shooting pains through, and then discovering that there were lymph node issues and lymph nodes that needed to be removed. So multiple surgeries to deal with all of these issues.

And what's unique about this story is in this case, the doctors that are working with Olivia are saying, I believe this is the result. Your shoulder pain is the result, not of misplacement of the needle, but of your reaction to the vaccine. Same thing with the doctor that's talking about the lymph nodes and looking to lupus and things like that, saying it appears you are having adverse reactions to this experimental vaccine that you are literally in an experiment with. Now, that was going to be the end of our interview and this story, but as things go in our world, as we were working on this project and developing it and working on Maddie's story and others that are coming in the future,

some time passed. And that time allowed for Olivia to move into a different set of issues. In fact, issues that we've been discussing here on the high wire, as we've talked about the mechanisms by which we are seeing in this vaccine, as we've said, you know, we've had on Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist that talked about his concern, that the toll-like receptors, which is the sort of guardians of your immune system, they have purposely put them to sleep with this vaccine by altering the DNA structure of the spike protein that's in the vaccine. We've talked about how the real concern is, you know, future illnesses and inability to stop infections or perhaps even lead to cancers. And so where this story might have

have ended, it wouldn't have been the full story because now things are shifting for Olivia. And she has a new struggle that she's involved with. It's been just a little over two years since I joined the Moderna trial and I've been to the doctor probably 200 times. I know I had four surgeries and I've gotten worse. I went into my dermatologist for this itch on my back that was driving me crazy. had been itching and itching and I couldn't stand it anymore, I couldn't sleep. So she did a biopsy and almost two weeks go by and then she calls me and she says, we saw something that looks suggestive

of T-cell lymphoma. So they did four more biopsies, one on my right arm, one on my back, one on my stomach, and then one on my left back's arm. And they all came back just suggestive of T-cell lymphoma except for the one on my back's arm came back definite T-cell lymphoma. They told me that you have a very slow-moving cancer and don't worry and everything's gonna be fine. Sure enough, a month later, I had a rash on my stomach and a rash on my back.

They treated me with a very powerful retinoid called acetritin, but unfortunately, and I had a lot of severe side effects from it. Heart palpitations, extreme dizziness. I lost a lot of hair, about 40%, My eyelashes and eyebrows were falling out, and I started to get heart problems. It seemed to work on my skin for about a month or two,

but then it just stopped working. And I just had like this lymphoma explosion all over my skin. Very uncomfortable, like bubbly rash. It burned and clothing bothered me. I could only wear nightgowns around the house that were very soft and loose dresses when I went anywhere. anywhere. So they wanted to do another blood test and then the cesare cells showed up. That's what they called T-cell lymphoma and with blood involvement, they're called

cesare cells. It's only been five months since I was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma and they told me that it would take 20 or 30 years before it moved to the blood and it's moved to the blood already. It's a rare cancer that has been, has been, has, has, become aggressive fast. You would start out at like usually 1A or 1B, but mine's already 3A, and I just got it. It means that I'm going to have chemotherapy, that I'm going to have a lot harder time controlling the lymphoma, suppressing it. If you Google it, it says your survival is due for years. I'm not doing well at all. I'm just sick all the time and I'm 80% covered in rashes. I'm losing weight even though I keep eating. I don't sleep very well.

I feel like I am coming down with the flu all the time. With T-cell lymphoma, there's no cure. There's only suppression. The biggest problem is that I have a son that I don't want to leave. My fear is that lymphoma will progress rapidly, unexpectedly, and I'll be too sick to do anything at all. I'll be too sick to take care of my son and that I'll just want to die. I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it's supposed to. This is beyond my control. My only option is to just have faith in God. It's hard to imagine going through any one of the issues that Olivia has been struggling with.

But let's go ahead and find out from her where she's at and what's going on here. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined by Olivia. Olivia, first of all, I want to thank you for sharing your story. It can't be easy to have to sort of share those details of your life, but I think it's important. What was it like as you were watching us play those videos? It was just breaking my heart. I try not to think about it all the time.

Well, it's constant, right? It's a constant part of your life now. It must be difficult to not think about. That's true. Yeah. But every day, almost every moment is a struggle of not feeling like the person that I used to. Take me through some of this. I want to sort of go back to the beginning.

What really is your first issue is this pain in your arm. When you first really brought that up with the people that were running the trial, what did they say to you? Do they say we're going to get right on that? We're going to take care of you. How were you handled by the people that had sort of put this, were running the trial? Well, in the beginning, they were just ignoring me when I was telling them about my problems.

And then they wanted to bring me in for a COVID test, but they were only concerned on whether or not I had COVID. They weren't really worried about any of the other problems that I was having. So you're saying I'm having pain, having issues. My head has major pressure. My arm really hurts. And they're there just testing you for COVID. When you show up for this trial and you're one of the participants, is it just like a nurse in a regular hospital? Or what is the experience like? Well, I went to their office and they made me go in a side door. And then the doctor was behind glass. And the nurse that was there to draw

eight vials of blood. She had on like full protective gear. Was that weird to see doctors basically in hazmat suits dealing with you at, you know, when you're a participant in a trial? It was weird in a way, but in a way it wasn't weird because the media had everyone so freaked out about COVID. Now tell me about, you know, getting the MRI. You said basically you report I have this issue and the head of the trial is telling you I'm reaching out to Moderna. What were you expecting Moderna to do with this injury to your arm? What do you think they should have done? I was expecting them to follow the contract that said that if I was

injured by a result of the study drug that they would get me proper medical care and they didn't do any of that. I asked them several times to get me an MRI because that's what my general practitioner ordered for me, but my insurance company denied it at first. They wanted me to do two months of physical therapy before they even would pay for the MRI, which I had to do, but I couldn't do physical therapy. I had to go twice a week, but when I got there, I couldn't do anything. I just lay there and I wouldn't even let them massage me because it hurts so bad. Like it would provoke the nerve pain that I was feeling.

So they would just like rub my neck. I couldn't let them go anywhere near my shoulder. So we have what, you know, was a part of your signing, you know, into this trial and what they promised to you. Let me read that right now for our audience. This is will you receive compensation if you're injured as a result of the study? This was in the document that Olivia was given. If you become sick or injured as a direct result of a study procedure or properly administered study vaccine called a 24-hour telephone contact number list on the first page of this consent form.

Additionally, appropriate medical care for the treatment of the illness or injury will be provided to you. The sponsor may pay for the reasonable and necessary costs associated with this care. Provision of medical care does not imply any fault or wrongdoing on the part of the sponsor, your study doctor, or the study center. By signing and dating this document, you will not lose any of your legal rights or release anyone involved in the research from responsibility for mistakes. So I take it you call this hotline they're talking about.

You tell them you have major arm pain and they don't do anything about it. They leave you just to yourself. You've got to figure this out on your own. Right. I called the front page which was actually Coastal Carolina Research Center to Dr. Strout and I told her several times and she said, okay, well I'll ask them. And I also called, there's a number on the research center. the back page of the informed consent that for atvara and atvara is an organization that's supposed to

look out for trial members and i reported it to them too but they did they were no help they just took down the information so nobody's doing anything you're on your own your insurance company is pushing back which i have to say i find it shocking that the insurance company would push back at all you are a trial participant in a totally brand new technology this is an expert beyond anything we've done. Nobody knows what M RNA means that we don't know what it's going to do to your DNA. We don't know what's going on. And I think any reasonable person would imagine that insurance companies

that are apparently supporting people going into these trials, because we're being told by our government that these trial participants are trying to help us get this vaccine out so that we can all feel safe and protected by it. And the insurance company would think, say, hey, we don't know what's going on, but you're a trial participant. I would think as soon as I have a trial participant,

As soon as I read that, get her whatever she needs. Instead, they're making you get painful massages and try to do exercise when they don't even know what the issue is that's going on. That is shocking. You must have been so frustrated. I was in agony. I was very frustrated. I had to file grievances with the insurance company to try to get them to cover the MRI.

I know that, I mean, I knew that I needed surgery. and you can't get an MRI. I mean, you can't get surgery until you've had the MRI so they could see what they're supposed to do. So, yeah, I was in pure agony at that time. Let me ask you this, because you are not getting help from the Moderna. You're not getting help from the doctors that are running the trials. No one's returning your call, so you're left with your own general practitioners.

And ultimately, you get to an orthopedic surgeon. I imagine it's looking your arm. that surgeon is telling you I need an MRI in order to see what's going on. Did that doctor say, yeah, go ahead and do physical therapy. That'll fix it. Or were they saying, no, you need an MRI? Who told you you needed physical therapy? Was it the insurance company?

Yes, it was the insurance company who said I needed physical therapy. That was the only way that I could get the MRI was to do physical therapy. That's what they told my general practitioner. So then she wrote a prescription for physical therapy and I had to go. Even though I couldn't do it, I had to go. What's amazing about this is Moderna is not responding and you're being left to your own, you're finding your own doctors, you're on your own path. I want to bring up that that doctor looking at your shoulder did state he believed this was a

vaccine injury. We have proof of that. This is rare. So I want to read this. This is a referral by this doctor. And he diagnoses it as a T-50-759S. which is an adverse effect of vaccine sequela. He basically said to you, this isn't what we've heard about,

like an injury because they put the needle in the wrong place in the muscle. This is your body actually having an adverse reaction. It's reacting, your immune system is reacting to your arm and it's causing the problem that is, you know, requiring surgery. When you look at that now and think, you have a doctor writing that this is caused by the vaccine, vaccine and Moderna is still not doing anything about it. So even though they said in the release,

whether or not it's caused by the vaccine, we'll take care of you. Now they know it is. And Moderna, do they ever call you and say, really sorry about this? We saw that your doctor's now connected to the vaccine. What can we do to help? No, Moderna never contacted me, not once. So then we get beyond the shoulder issue. You get surgery for that. Tell you. Tell me about the lymph node issue. When did, how did you start having issues with lymph nodes and what was that about? What did that feel like? What were the symptoms?

Well, when I finally got the MRI of my shoulder, they saw that the lymph nodes were swollen. I hadn't realized it because, I mean, I was crooked like this. I was, yeah, I was stuck like this before I had my surgery. So I didn't realize the limp notes were swollen. And I didn't think too much of it at first because I thought maybe the limp nodes were swollen because of all the shoulder problems. But then I had other limp nodes swell up around, I'm saying March 2021, I believe, on the right side. So then they needed to, you know, find out what was happening. So they had to outrule breast cancer.

the first thing they do if a woman has swollen limp notes. And then they decided that they needed to take one and find out what was going on. And they decided that the ones on my left side were the worst ones that needed to come out. So to be clear, all of this is happening starts really initially on the side you got the vaccine. You're trying to just live with it. Then it starts shifting the other side. That that obviously, and I'm imagine. You're imagining that the doctor, you said they're sort of discovering it as they're in surgery, your doctor's aware, look, you're having an immune reaction to the vaccine that's affecting your shoulder. So then when they get to the lymph nose, they must think, well, this must be connected somehow, but were they thinking maybe that after surgery, the shoulder that maybe would relax your body and somehow you processors? Or was there an immediate decision that we need to get into the lymph nose and see what's happening there?

How long was that period, I guess, between the shoulder, surgery and the lymph node surgery? Well, when they first discovered that my lymph nodes were swollen under my Vax arm, they said, well, they're saying that that's a normal reaction, that a lot of people are getting swollen lymph nodes on their VAC's arm, and it'll go down on a few months at most. But it was when the other side swelled that it became a concern to the doctors. And I also did develop other symptoms. I developed night sweats at that time too.

Really bad night sweats at the exact same time that the right lymph nodes swelled. So tell me the moment your doctor removes these lymph nodes and then says to you, I have only seen lymph nodes like this when it involved cancer. Right. When you heard, I mean, obviously that's the word nobody wants to hear. What were your thoughts in that moment? Well, at first he told me that they were benign, but that they were odd, and he had to take three because they were stuck together. And he never seen limp nodes like that in anyone that didn't have cancer.

But at the same time, he was telling me that they tested benign. so I was just relieved that they were benign. And obviously that's sort of you had those removed. That would have been the end of our story. But then ultimately you start having these skin issues. And through the investigation of that, which just looks incredibly uncomfortable and difficult to deal with. You get biopsies and then one of the three ends up, you know, discreetly. discovering lymphoma and cancer.

Now, let me ask you this, were they connected? Is the lymph node issue where your doctor is saying, I've never seen this, where it's usually cancer when the lymph nodes are acting like this? Do you think those things are connected, or are these two separate events? I think that they're definitely connected, and that's where the lymphoma started,

was in those odd lip nodes that they removed under my back's arm. I had to call that surgeon because that surgeon's with a different hospital system than the hospital system that diagnosed me with lymphoma. So I called him and I said, hey, well guess what? I ended up, it ended up being cancer after all, I have lymphoma.

Because I think that's what they were looking for. Yeah, so they didn't find it at first. What did he say then? Was he? He was like, well, the lab I sent it to said it was, it was, you know, it was negative. He was like it was negative that, That's what the lab said.

That's what the lab reports came out to be. And I said, well, maybe it was just too early. Now, when they diagnose this type of lymphoma, I found it interesting that they told you really there's not a lot to worry about. This is a very slow-moving cancer. It's not aggressive. They said that it would be, did you say 20 years before you would really have serious complications from it? Right. When they first diagnosed me with lymphoma, they noticed, I mean, they noted that I had the lymphoma rash pretty much covering most of my body. But with the blood work, it came out that I didn't have any in my blood. So then they gave me this one subtype called quirky gliderma, which is a slow moving kind. And they said I wouldn't have any problems.

for like 20 years. But then I just got this lymphoma explosion all over. The medication wasn't working. And I feel worse, started feeling much worse. And they did another blood test. And this time the T-cell lymphoma did show up in the blood, which is leukemia. So I'm just waiting on more blood work right now to see how it's progressing now. So can I assume, you know, we're way past the arm situation.

We have the lymph nodes at every one of these stages are you updating the site, the trial site and the doctors that were involved there. And is Moderna aware that you're having these progressing issues? Well, I finally got out of the trial last month. The director at Coastal Carolina Research Center said that she still wants me to report any new findings, but I don't know if she's going to report them to Moderna or not. But at this point, I'm finally out of the trial as of last month. So what was the last report that you gave that Moderna would have received? Do they know, did you report this lymphoma?

As lymphoma happened since you were past the term of the trial? Oh, no, I was diagnosed with lymphoma in April of 2022, so they have the lymphoma. You recently, we're going to go in for a final meeting, I guess, with the head of the trial that you were involved with, and you decided to bring an undercover camera and record that. And so for those of you watching right now, this is Olivia's last part. as she tries to seek some answers. I want you to try and take a moment and put yourself in her shoes. First of all, think about how scary it must be to be recording this and going in and trying to,

you know, just take care of this technically. But then also remember all the physical issues she's dealing with, and I want you to ask yourself, is this good care? Is this how a doctor, how you'd expect to be being treated by the person that represents modern at this trial site. Here we go. Undercovered camera. Today I'm going to my last appointment for the Moderna trial COVID vaccine at Coastal Carolina Research Center. So I'm going to walk into those doors 24 months later.

Now having lymphoma, leukemia, shoulder damage, joint pain. It's not over for me. Nice to see you too. All right. I just want to ask you, I mean, because this is like my last, my last visit and probably the last time you'll ever see me. And, you know, I have questions. Okay. I have questions.

Like, here it says, if you become sick or injured, appropriate medical treatment will be provided to your illness or energy and injury as a result of the study drug. What did Moderna say when you said to them she needs to get an MRI of her shoulder? So I think you have a fair shot. This is the original one, right? So I have to ask them if you want, you have insurance, right? I do. But I walked around for three months like this in agony, meaning surgery and you told me that you asked Moderna to provide that MRI for me did you?

Hmm I'm trying to think back I have to look look back at the sequence of things because they they will cover something that we say we think is related but they have to make that decision so we'd have to submit things and say that you want compensation I'm not asking for compensation I'm asking for confirmation because no medical care was provided for me. You guys just, everyone just left me on my own. Yeah, yeah, I know it was confusing me. I mean, because we couldn't do this,

I mean, it wouldn't have been anything that we could have done here. Did you tell them about my adverse reactions? Yeah, sure, absolutely. Back in, you know, 2020. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. All that's reported. Because, I mean, here it says, they would not have actually,

because it says if you have any, you know, any problems, any illnesses, to contact. You. Yes. And I told you, but Moderna never, I mean, what did Madonna save you? So what the modern would expect is that you would get treated somehow.

I mean, since I don't do that, we would want you to see your own doctor get treated for it. And then Moderna possibly would pay for it. If they feel like it is related to their drug, you can make the case that they should pay for it, not you or your insurance. So there's nothing that Moderna wouldn't have treated your shoulder. You did the right thing. You went to your own doctor. My primary doctor ordered an MRI, but my insurance company wouldn't cover it.

Yeah. So I was just left hanging, and Madonna didn't. They did not follow through on this and that I know for sure. And I just want to know what they said to you. Like, no. They wouldn't, they wouldn't, um, they wouldn't, um, they wouldn't, um, they wouldn't, um, they wouldn't, them say, oh, it really would have been left to your own doctor to provide the care. Dr. DeMarco said he thought, you know, the shoulder surgeon, he said he thought it was like

the actual substance itself, the way that it happened, not that the nurse jabbed me wrong. Right. Additionally, appropriate medical care for the treatment surgery will be provided to you. So what Lodern is seeing there is that my job is to try to help you get the care. that you needed back then. And I didn't get it. You didn't get it fast enough, maybe fast enough. So was that the only one who had, like, all these, like, adverse reactions and stuff from? You were, like, far the worst.

I'm so sorry. The worst. Yeah, well, we had, you know, over two years and some of the folks were older, yeah, we did have people who had various things that went to the hospital for this and that. But nothing, nothing like what you've gone through. I mean, I've been doing clinical trials for 20. almost 25 years. I've done studies on drugs that didn't make it

because they had big issues. It's not a perfect process. Things go on the market that we sometimes find out later when you give it to lots and lots of people that there's issues. So it's not perfect. You are the one out of the 300. And I don't know.

That's not a big number. No. But this study was like 20,000 people in this study with data that they have. This was never submitted to the FDA. My adverse reactions were never submitted to the FDA by Moderna. It wasn't in the report when they submitted for emergency use authorization. It wasn't there.

I read it. The shoulder? Anything, any of my, the neurological, anything wasn't in there. Well, yeah, they don't always, I don't know how they write up their reports and stuff. So you did report the adverse reaction in Moderna. Oh, yeah. But they don't always report them to the FDA. What if you said, they don't always do that?

Well, I don't know how they summarize things. You know, like if they have 20,000 people and they have all these different things going on. Like the dizziness or the neurologic may have been grouped under neurologic and just not easy to spot, I guess is what I'm saying. It didn't say anything about CERVA, I mean, shoulder injuries, like CERVA. Living in there at all. Hmm. Do you imagine, like, having that and just feeling that way?

It's an unfortunate, crummy complication of, of several vaccines, not just the COVID vaccine. Do you think that what is wrong with me, all of these health problems, is the result of the vaccine or not? I think your shoulder. Okay, you don't think the cancer? I don't know.

I'll be watching, I'm open, you know, there's data that will come out that will show that there's problems, just like with the Jansen vaccine. We did that study and I was like, holy mackle, there's some real issues with that. Now we don't, we're not gonna do that vaccine. anymore. I don't know how that video affects you while you're watching it out there in the audience, but I will say this. I remember at times my life maybe buying a bum car from a used car agent

and going back and saying, what do you know here, and then just sort of getting the runaround. We're watching someone get the runaround on an injection of an experimental product that is spielunking into the immune system in ways we have never attempted to do it. do it before and to be talking to not just some nurse or some side person, but literally the head of this site trial, the amount of information that she's at least trying to say she doesn't know, whether she does or not, we don't know, but she's clearly playing what we would call playing stupid. And she's a doctor.

She's the head of this entire investigation of 300 people for Moderna. It's really hard for me to sit through how much. she really doesn't know how this all works. And if that is the case, if she really doesn't know, then we are, then the bar on what is expected by doctors in the middle of one of the most important medical trials in the history of mankind, one of the largest ever done, faster and more rushed than has ever been done. And Tony Fauci is saying we spared no expense. You have a spared expense on who you were hiring or what they were being taught to talk about or how to deal with it.

Anyway, obviously, it's frustrating as a journalist for me to watch this because there are human lives at stake. But Olivia, you know, as you sat there and thank you for help, you know, it would just be hearsay, right? It would just be, well, that was your interpretation of what was being said there. You had been, you know, with this doctor multiple times. Is that sort of how it always went? Was it always kind of like, you know, just diversion tactics?

And I don't really know. And did you just really, that's not what I want to hear from my doctor. I want someone talking to me with a sense of knowledge. Was this? Right. No. No, none of the other studies went like that at all where she didn't know. I mean, she even said in there that Moderna would,

that I would get medical care somehow. I mean, somehow. Yeah. Well, I mean, that's what's shocking. I mean, when we look at that statement that you signed off on, we will take care of whatever issues you have. And I wanted to bring that up. This idea, you know, just expressing my frustration of watching your story

because, you know, there is an expectation of how someone should be treated that is putting their life. And I said this from the very beginning here on the high wire that, you know, there may be people that have opinions about this vaccine going in. But I said, I truly believe that the people that are involving themselves in trials are heroes. You are taking a great risk. And I said, I hope these people are being told what a risk this is because we had investigated the science behind this. We'd seen a history of real problems with coronavirus vaccines in animal trials rushing into this vaccine trial. seemed very dangerous to us, but I wanted to honor and I still honor the fact that people like yourself

put yourself in harm's way, potentially, to try and establish safety to see if a product would work for all of us. I would say this would be, and I said it on the show, this would be like you being one of the first astronauts to attempt to go to Mars and hope that somehow we could, you know, populate Mars and do all those things. We don't know where you're going. We don't know how it's going to go when you're going there, but you are jumping in to be one of the first to do this, but under those circumstances, with not only a trial going on, but our government funding billions and billions of dollars into these trials, handing it right to the drug companies, I think we all assume there are billions of dollars there for these people to get whatever MRIs, to investigate anything that's going on,

and most importantly, to not be left going to a doctor that has no idea. of what you've just injected to yourself. And this is the point. When she says to you, well, you know, you were supposed to go to your own doctor. Really? A doctor that has no understanding of an MRNA technology. This is hidden science that they don't even want to release it. Luckily, my nonprofit is sued, and we're starting to see what they did and did not know about this.

But you're being told to go to a doctor that has no idea what is happening inside of your body, no idea what this technology is doing, and they're supposed to figure this out? I mean, I would expect that. that you would be immediately taken up by the greatest science institute we have, the National Institute of Health, that they would be bringing in Moderna professionals to say, what is happening with this patient? We need to get the bottom of it.

Let us see what you saw in the animal. What do we know about what's going on inside of the body? Nobody's doing that. Nobody is meeting with you with any authority or understanding of this technology. Is that correct? That is right. I mean, how could my primary care doctor possibly treat me when she has no idea what was in the shot or what's wrong with me.

So how can anyone treat me? How could I just somehow get care when it was in the contract that they were supposed to provide medical care if I was injured with their product? Absolutely right. My other issue in this video is that when you bring up all of the issues you've had and you're asking, going back to the arm issue,

why did I have to wait months? you know, to get help here. I'm getting a run around and getting an MRI. And you said, what did Moderna tell you? And she reacts as though, I got to really search my mind and memory of this. And here's where, as a journalist, this is where red flags go off for me. On the one hand, she's telling you that you're the only one out of 300 people that really, that she only has 300 in her part of this study.

This is one of the arms of the study. She has 300 people. She's telling you you're the only one that had issues like this. So it's not locked into memory. The only person I really had to do this for? I can't remember what it is exactly I did. That just doesn't, that defies reason. Now, if there was many different people that had injuries

and she was trying to track all the injuries, that to me would look like, ah, let me try to remember your exact case because I was dealing with so many that were having issues. So somewhere in here, there is either an incredible disconnect or I think what's happening is she's trying to cover for her bosses, which is really Moderna. What is your sense because you were sitting in the room? What is happening? She doesn't seem like a mean person.

I want to put this out there. She doesn't seem like a mean person. She doesn't necessarily seem like a bad person, but she is not dealing with you in a natural way. What do you think is happening there as someone that was sitting in the? room well i think that possibly she was trying to cover up that she didn't at first i thought i had always believed that she had asked them like she said she did but then somewhere else um in that recording she had said that she didn't turn in my reactions to moderna until january and it's like and that's january of 2021 you know

know what about everything that happened in 2020 when I first got it? So I think that I called her in a lie. So I don't know if she's protecting Moderna or if she's protecting herself because she didn't ask them to help me like she really said. It's one of the other, but I'm not sure which one. I want to be clear. I'm not either. I give people the benefit of the doubt. But one thing, you know, is clear.

that the care that any human on this planet would expect that you would get as a part of this trial, clearly you did not get this. This is why we have this series we're doing called Rigged, because ultimately there is a similarity amongst the stories of those that are injured in the trials. Now, I want to ask you something specifically because you referenced to her, you said when I looked at the trial information for Moderna, they didn't list my sequela, my injury in those that were injured. So what did they list? And how did you, you know, what document are you talking about? The application for emergency use authorization that Moderna presented to the FDA when applying for emergency use, I read those documents. And they only had four adverse

four subjects that had adverse reactions listed and I wasn't one of those. I remember specifically it was a man that came down with RA that was in there and I didn't understand what the other three were. Okay, so rheumatoid arthritis. I didn't understand what the other three were. Okay and but you did not and you didn't see the reference to any issue with your arm Would that EUA would have happened? Did that EUA happen before you were having the issues with your lymph nodes? I believe so because I, yeah. Okay.

So, but these issues should have been listed. They weren't listed at all. Honestly, millions, hundreds of millions of innocent people have now received this vaccine because the FDA has had it safe. you have inside information that the company that made the vaccine you were given is at least lying about one of you, which is you. And we have to assume more. What is the thought that went through your mind when you said, oh, my God, they're not even listing my injury in here? I wasn't surprised at that point because the way that they didn't help me with all the medical problems that I had from their product,

I kind of wasn't surprised that they were covering it up. I was about 50-50 thinking that maybe it would be in there and maybe it wasn't. I mean, and I tried my best to tell everyone, everyone that I met or even talked to, even if I called customer service because I didn't get my shipment, I told everyone that the Moderna vaccine was bad. I want to just commend you on, you know, even in the middle of your own issues, going out and trying to warn people and protect people is truly an amazing instinct. And the fact that you've reached out and that you worked with us, all of this is very commendable. I want to point to something though that's happened because we, you know, I don't know how to pass judgment on the undercover footage.

of the doctor involved. And I want to say that, to her credit, it appears that she has not just let this case be buried in the sand or stick her head in the sand, at least at the moment, because after we had the opportunity to receive that video, Olivia just received an email talking about bears from this doctor, and I want to read this very quickly

so you understand what she ends up saying. She says, I did get the confirmation number from VERS, meaning she had submitted to VERS. But when I use that number, this is the doctor speaking, to look up the report, it said there is no report for that number. So I've asked them, what is it going on, but haven't heard back from them yet. We have proved that that VERS, we have the actual VERS report. This is that VERS report. So it was submitted. And so this is very, very concerning.

Because Olivia, one of the questions that we're having is where does the pharmaceutical cover-up and our government regulatory agency cover-up begin? Because that's a lot of the issues that we're now seeing. The Peter Marks that is supposed to be looking at these things for the FDA, this idea that VERS, which is our government system, We have a doctor that has filled out this VAERS report, submitted it, had a VAERS number, and is now telling you your case not only doesn't appear from Moderna in asking the FDA for an emergency use authorization.

Literally the government website that captures this information has now erased your file, or at least it's not there at the moment. What were your thoughts when you receive this email? Well, I was shocked on that one because that's from the trial doctor actually filing the VERS report. So I was shocked that they deleted hers. Right. This isn't just somebody that doesn't have any idea. We hear sometimes VERS is all. It's submitted by regular people that don't really know what they're talking about.

In this case, it's not only a doctor is the lead authority of the trial group being run there. and they don't even take her seriously, that bears has been taken down. One of the things that is so great about you telling your story is the people that are out there trying to make a difference with these stories. And there is no greater champion out there for the people, at least when we talk about the politics around this,

than Senator Ron Johnson. We're ecstatic that he has been reelected because he promised me he is going to bring investigations on the. this and he recently reached out to you and has promised to bring your story as one of the stories that he is going to ask questions about with Moderna. So even though the EUA, you may not have been listed and maybe whether or not the doctor you're talking to drop the ball, you know, the senator that is not going to let this ball be dropped is going to take this question for

you. I just want to read this document. This is Senator Ron Johnson. Senator Ron Johnson. Johnson asked Moderna and Pfizer what steps they've taken to assist individuals who have experienced adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. In it, one of the trial participants received MRNA 1273 Moderna Inc. vaccinations on August 26th and September 28th, 2020 at the Coastal Carolina Research Center. The vaccines were from lots. He has the lot numbers there, respectively. She was told to report any adverse events to Coastal Carolina Research Center or Advera Independent Review Board. you did both. In my discussions with her, it appears that neither organization took her reports seriously or provided any medical help or assistance. It appears that she was ignored and forgotten.

She has searched modernist emergency use authorization submission and does not believe her adverse event was included. You are now a part of an investigation being done by at least one member of the government of the United States of American Senator Ron Johnson. And how does that feel? Well, thank God for Ron Johnson. I mean, it restores my faith in politicians. You know how a lot of people are saying that the pandemic brought out the best and the worst of some people.

And it's good to see that there are some politicians that actually care about people and who are trying to protect us. I totally agree. And I know Senator Johnson's not playing around. he really only ran again, he said, to deal with this issue, which, you know, I said to him when he won re-election that you now are the first politician that has ever fully stood as a representative to those injured by vaccines. And so you have a champion. We're going to continue to, you know, give him all the information that we're finding through our research around the world with our investigation team.

I hope that Senator Ron Johnson also tries to save the children from all the vaccines, not just the COVID vaccine, but looks at all the vaccines and it gets a real investigation going on what type of harm that they're causing our children. I agree with you and I think that that is some of the conversations that we're going to be having as we move into a deeper investigation on this. COVID has really outed the problem with the Tory agencies. And so that's part of the work that we're going to continue to do here. What is going on in your mind now as you look into your future?

You have a beautiful son that you mentioned that you want to be able to take care of. And as you're waiting for blood work and things, what is on your mind now? I just want to just give it all to God. I can't I can't deal with it. There's nothing that I can do about it. I just want to try to live like with the quality of life. And just rely on God to get me through. One thing I want to change though when I said that I regret getting the vaccine.

I've had different thoughts about that. even though that I've been hurt so bad. If I hadn't, if I hadn't have had all these adverse reactions, I probably would have had my son vaccinated with Pfizer. So, I mean, I would wether it be me than him. And I feel like God has placed me here for a purpose because he knows I'm not going to be quiet. I'm not just going to go bury myself like in the sand, like you said.

I'm going to tell the truth. Well, we are sure thankful that you were here to tell the truth. We're thankful to have a platform in which millions of people will be able to hear your story. How much of the future do you think about with your son? Your son has some of his own complicated issues, is my understanding. So who takes care of that if you're busy dealing with medical issues? It's just me. It's just me and him.

He's high functioning, but he was actually injured by the MMR instantly. He met all his milestones before. He had a lot of language. He said mama at four months. He would say mama, baby, bye, and just lots of babble. You know how babies just babble all the time. And he had the MMR at only 13 months old. And just a look on his face when I took him home from the doctor, kind of took my breath away, like, because he looked at me and he was so angry.

And he never looked like that. He never had that kind of look in his eyes. And then he didn't have any language for like two years. And he was diagnosed as being autistic. But they also told me he had something called neurofibromatosis type one, which ended up not being true. which was just a clinical diagnosis at the time, but they have genetic testing now. And he has nothing wrong with his genes. His genes are absolutely perfect.

He has no markers of unspecised significance or anything. And so it was always my thought that, okay, he's got neurofibiotosis and the MMR, you know, just kind of kick that in and that's what's wrong with them. like the two, but no, it was just the MMR that has made him autistic. But he is high functioning. So I'm thankful for that. Can I ask you, there are a lot of people that watch this show that have been involved with injuries to their children.

And I would imagine they would be surprised that you decided to get into a vaccine trial after you thought there was a potential vaccine injuries. So how is it, how is it you know, we're thinking about it? it was this just different or were you so into protecting others around you like how did you come to the decision well um first of all i was very ignorant to think that only the mmr vaccine is bad but i had enough sense in my head not to get him not to get the gartersill i had just heard somewhere that you know something was wrong with it so he did ain't it garterill thank god but i was just ignorant in thinking that only the MMR was really bad.

And then I also had some sort of hope that, well, maybe this new technology is going to be healthier for children since it doesn't have preservatives. So I was really wrong about that one. So you're thinking and that makes sense that we don't have the same adjuvants involved. We don't have mercury and aluminum and things that your average person might be thinking is an issue.

this technology could be cleaner, so you were hopeful that it would be different. Yes, and I couldn't have been more wrong. You know, you said you're talking to people, and we have millions of people watching right now, and many are... What I think is concerning about your story, to be really honest, is most of the injuries we've discussed so far on our show, and the stories in Rigg that we've followed, show an immediate reaction. DeGerry has a fairly immediate reaction. She ultimately has been left in a wheelchair trying to struggle with the issues that she's having neurological issues.

You are representing a huge concern that we have had on the high wire, which was the long-term effects. You had both short-term effects, but even after, and now, when we imagine this trial ended at two years, my concern is how many people, could potentially start developing cancers in things, which seems to be, you know, down the road from this. The doctor at the clinic said, I'm not sure, I definitely think the arm was caused by the vaccine, but I'm not sure about this cancer. We've done a lot of research. There is real concern that there's going to be a big shift in risk to cancer because of this vaccine and the mechanisms in it.

You may be the first canary in this coal mine. And so that is what makes your story unique. Were these trials long enough, you know, given what you're looking at right at the moment where now they will say we never saw it in the trials, we didn't see lymphoma in our trials, but things like lymphoma take longer than two years many times to develop. What do you think about that as the trial? Should these trials have been longer? Yes, the trial wasn't nowhere near as long as the last trial I was in just for a headache drug. That was a three-year trial. I had just gotten out of that trial before I entered into the Moderna trial. Wow.

So a headache trial goes three years, a potentially DNA-altering product that has never been injected to humans before, only two years. Not only that, when I was in the headache trial, whenever I would go in for a visit, they would actually check you to see if you're okay whenever you would do follow-up visits. Like they would do EKGs and blood pressure and stuff like that. And the Moderna trial, they didn't really check anything. All they did was take your blood, like eight vials. And I have no idea what they were doing with all that blood. Wow. But they never did, they never checked your heart, you know, or anything like that, like they

normally do in trials. Which is shocking in itself because from the beginning, one of the biggest concerns and biggest reported issues was myocarditis, an issue with the heart, raised troponin levels. We've just, you know, spoke with Dr. Peter McCullough on all these issues. It was one of the things that absolutely should have been in these trials, of all the things. That was something that we knew had potential, as Peters pointed out. COVID itself, coronavirus has some issues with causing heart issues in animals. So if you have a vaccine that is creating antibodies to all these things,

you would have to think that this was something you should have been worried about. You know, these stories are shocking. Yours is incredible how much you have been through. What is your inspiration? what motivates you to get up and continue to spread your word? Well, what motivates me to get up is that I love my son and I want to raise him to be a godly man. And I still have hope that maybe I'm going to feel better,

that I'll still have some type of life that I can. and enjoy and I'm just I'm just driven to tell people what happened. I'm I'm just driven to try to help, you know, save people from the same thing that happened to me or whatever else, you know, they're cooking up or planning for us. And another thing that inspires me is you. You're like the coach. It's like I you just like you help people be braver than they were. Well, you are more brave than I could dream to be. It is incredible that you have shared your story.

The way you have marched forward and you are, you are going to save millions of people by telling your story. It is truly an honor to get to spend this time with you. Our prayers are with you. I too will be holding in my mind that you have, you know, relief from these issues that we see them cured and that you move on. And we will do everything we can to make sure that you have the best and brightest addressing you so many times when we have these stories, doctors and people reach out to us. We'll filter some of that and forward the conversations that are happening. But I want to, you know, just thank you for your time.

I want to thank your family and for allowing you to be a part of this experience and just know that we are praying for you. Thank you. Take care. Well, one of the issues is, you know, we see a system that doesn't care about people. We have VERS systems and how do I report it? What do I do? Where are the doctors out there? Do I have any, you know, legal things that I can do if I've been injured by a vaccine?

We want to do our best to help you. So this is how we can do that. If you or a loved one has been injured after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, including if you are a participant in a clinical trial, go to Injured by COVID vaccine.com. Submissions are confidential. We are here to help provide support, including connecting with medical specialists

and potentially securing legal representation. To assure the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for, Everyone, it is imperative that every person injured by this product report their injury. We can provide assistance completing a report to the CDC's vaccine adverse events reporting system. So if you or a loved one has suffered an injury from a COVID-19 vaccine, go to Injured by COVID vaccine.com now. Well, there's really nothing that sinks in more than hearing personal stories. I want to thank Olivia for sharing her story with our team

and our prayers go out to you and your family. This is what it's all about. We're all family, and if you are out there and you have needed to either call our line because you've been injured or you've just tuned in, I just want you to know that this movement for scientific transparency and medical freedom is built on people that all really at one point,

believed in the vaccine program and the process. And so I don't think that we should ever feel guilty for what we didn't know we didn't know. It's about learning, it's about moving forward. And once we have the truth, it's about then understanding it, doing our research as best as we can, and then waking up as many people as we can.

That is how we make a difference. That is how we make amends for who we've been and the mistakes that we've made. And it's part of the process that the high Highwire loves to be a part of. So many of you come up to me around the world, wherever I'm traveling, and just say, you know, one of my favorite things about it is when you come up and say to me, you know, Del, I tune in to the Highwire every week because it gives me a sense of hope. And I mean, and I find that amazing because we share a lot of information that is quite scary.

But the truth is, is that everyone here on our team has a lot of hope because we've been seeing how much growth is happening, how many people are waking up, how few were and fewer and fewer people are believing in these regulatory agencies, are taking these vaccines, you know, more and more standing up against the idea of vaccine passports. And I believe you're going to see some real battles over energy in Europe as we go through this winter. And as they try to mask us down and lock us down over every virus that we survived our entire lives, which it was a flu or a cold or RSV or whatever it is, we know they want to mask us. We know they want to inject us. We know they want us locked in our houses for some crazy reason, but we all got to make

a pact here to stop electing these fools to lead us, okay? Can we at least do that? Can we not like, you know, be brainwashed by, you know, the advertising from the very networks that have been lying to us? And can we start supporting groups that aren't lying to us? That's what this is all about. I want to celebrate this moment because this is our 300th episode of the High Wire officially. It's amazing that closing out this year, 2022, we've hit that incredible number, 300 episodes. Every one of you out there that's been donating has made this possible. All of the reporting we've done, and of course what I've said earlier about all the legal work and the legislation we've achieved. We've only just begun. There is a road ahead. There is a battle ahead.

This isn't over. But what we've shown ourselves in working together, you and I, is that together, arm in arm, hand in hand with, you know, with fortitude and confidence, we actually can change this world. I think 2023 is going to be a huge year for us. This is the year that those of us that are awake, the growing numbers, get to see if we can double our numbers. And I believe if we double those numbers next year, we become the majority of the world. And then anything is possible. to celebrate that possibility and the greatness that makes us who we are, the gift that's handed down from our creator to us,

that is controlled by us, not our governments. That is what the high wire is all about. It's what we celebrate. It's what we believe in. And I will see you next year.