The Highwire with Del Bigtree - THE PUSH TO ENGINEER HUMANITY

Episode Date: May 20, 2024

Patrick Wood, Editor-in-Chief, Technocracy.news, breaks down the dangers of the global push of technocracy and transhumanism, and how the mRNA vaccines and the WHO are part of this agenda.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-highwire-with-del-bigtree--3620606/support.

What's really behind all of this? I mean, we're just talking about vaccines. Why are they so important? Injecting people, okay, it's a problem. WHO, pandemic treaty, do they really just want to push vaccines? Do they want to just make us do crazy things like staying six feet apart and put plastic bubbles over our desk stool and tear our masks so we can play our clarinets just so they can laugh at us? What's really behind all of it? Well, there's a guy that's been writing about it.

His name is Patrick Wood. some of what he's been reporting on. His name is Patrick Wood. Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on sustainable development, green economy, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, and Historic Technocracy. Transhumanism is a reformation of humanity itself. Claufe Schwab, F.WF, would call it Humanity 2.0. They're going to create a fourth industrial revolution to restructure the planet,

but they also believe that they must restructure the people. who are going to live in that planet. What the Technotronic era does is it creates a system of control, not controlled necessarily by an individual, but the system is the controller of society. Transhumanism promotes an interdisciplinary approach to understanding and evaluating the opportunities for enhancing the human condition and the human organism, opened up by the advancement of technology.

They decided that if it were possible to extend life and achieve immortality, that this would be the way to do it through science. This control over resources is clearly where everything is moving today. This is what sustainable development is all about. Twisting the resources out of the hands of the people and putting it into the hands of the elite. That's the scam. Getting the resources away from you and me and putting it in to the hands of a global trust.

They're handing over the operation of this entire thing to the non-governmental private sector entities and international partners like the World Health Organization. Now that the CRISPR technology and other gene editing technologies have advanced to the point where they are today, they are saying we will be the intelligent designers of the future. You have the massive surveillance that's going on today with a total awareness society.

This was an original specification from technology. in 1930s. You cannot manage what you cannot monitor. They don't believe in God. They don't have any use for God. However, they do believe now that the scientific tools are available to manipulate and take over the genome and to engineer life the way they want to engineer life. Sounds like science fiction. It's not. Once they get control of the economic mechanism, they will have control over virtually over life itself. they'll be able to make the peoples of the world dance like Puppas on a string. His latest book is called The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism.

He's written six books really on subjects just like this. It's my honor and pleasure to be joined now by Patrick Wood. Patrick, thank you so much for joining us today. Good to be with you, Nett, Dell. You've done such a great job at being a battering ram to, knock this whole thing down. Congratulations. We have more work to do for sure, but this is the crack in the dam that we've been waiting for. Yeah, I agree. I agree. You know, you've written six books. We've got, you know, a few minutes here to have a conversation. This could go a million places,

but you said something in that video piece that we just played is kind of where I want to start because, you know, Chris Cuomo is suddenly waking up this week. He's suddenly waking up to mistakes that were made and saying things like nobody knew during COVID what the vaccine would do or any of this. But similarly, we act like the COVID pandemic was brand new, this attack on our sovereignty and this idea of a world health organization trying to rule the world. It's now in our attention, but you said something that piece that this goes back to, I think it's the 1930s or something. And what do you mean by that?

I mean, how much was this laid out and how long ago? Well, if you look at it historically, you'll see all the markers back then that we're dealing with today, not genetics necessarily. They bother, but in terms of control over energy, the economy, surveillance issues, et cetera, they were all specified back then. And, you know, when they talked about creating a new economic system back then, it wasn't, they weren't just crackpots. They were engineers and scientists from Columbia University, the cream of the crop, so to speak. And these people thought that they could do better than the world was doing at that point.

And we see this pretty much playing out right now. Now, how much of the conversations then? This is where I really get confused. Because, like, for instance, take Joe Biden. This is not a political show. I'm just looking at him as a political leader. I feel like when I watched him running for president, he was using slogans like Build Back Better. That's not a slogan written by an ad agency here inside the United States of America.

What came from the World Economic Forum, which is a globalist group of people outside of our own borders. And so much of what I now see is that this World Economic Forum, there Klaus Schwab brags about the fact that he's trained many of those in cabinets all around the world. And we see images of Barack Obama there. All of this to say, what shocks me is, I feel like, like if I was president of the United States, I'd be like, I have the most powerful position in the world. America's number one. Let me do what I can, whether I'm a good person, I want to, you know, put out and be the shining light of freedom and democracy to the world. But more and more,

it looks like all of our sovereignty. You know, Joe Biden is behind the world health organization and giving up our sovereignty. At what point did the United States of America, which is where I was born. And so if someone, you know, we have an international audience and maybe saying, boy, you're really full of yourselves. But we are in America. We're full of ourselves. We really think we have the Constitution that should represent to the whole world how you should be governed. At what point did leaders maybe inside this country start thinking the borders of our country don't matter?

In fact, this should be more of a global system. When did that start? We see the genesis of this. the crystallizing of this in 1992, I do believe, when the Rio de Janeiro conference took place to produce Agenda 21 for one, and also the Biodiversity Treaty at that time as well. We see all of these things coming forward from that time,

especially genetic engineering. That apparently, that period of time in Rio de Janeiro, That was swarmed by the biotech industry, the big pharma industry. They were staking their claim, if you will, to genetic engineering processes that has resulted in all seeds, all animals, all fish, all insects, you know, everything else but humans.

And now we see humans being genetically altered as well. This was really the, the, the point of inflection, I believe. It goes back farther than that, but that was really, I think, where it really crystallized into the initiative. We have an excerpt of several videos that you wanted us to show. We put them all together talking about this ability

to sort of impact DNA and essentially genetically modify, as you're saying now, human beings. Take a look at this. I'm here today to tell you that we're actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease. We are probably one of the last generations of Homo sapiens because in the coming generations we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds. We've reached the point when we can hack not just computers.

We can hack human beings and other organisms. We have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale. Future entities will be more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals. You know, the only difference between us and Neanderthals is just a few genetic mutations, which led to changes in brain structure and hormonal system and so forth. So we now acquire the technology, maybe not in the next 10 years, but in the next 100 years, of making even bigger changes, intentionally to our DNA, to our bodies, to our brains.

And in addition, we have the breakthrough in AI, which could lead either to combinations of organic bodies with computers, which are known as cyborgs, or to the creation of completely inorganic entities, completely inorganic beings, that could be far more intelligent and capable than us. By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to re-engineer the future of life itself.

Because once you can hack something, you can usually also engineer it. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. Not the intelligent design of some God above the world. the clouds. But our intelligent design and the intelligent design of our clouds, the IBM cloud, the Microsoft Cloud, these are the new driving forces of evolution. One of the features of this forced Industrial Revolution is that it doesn't change what we are doing,

but it changes us. This forced industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing. changes you if you take a genetic editing just as an example it's you who are changed and of course this has a big impact on your identity in every cell there's this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short that transmits the critical information from the DNA our genes to the protein which is really the stuff we're all made out of this is the critical information that determines what a cell will actually do And so we think of it like an operating system. And it's not just in every cell of our body,

it's actually in every cell of every organism alive. It's the same thing. Humans are now hackable animals. You know, the whole idea that humans have, you know, they have this soul or spirit and they have free will and nobody knows what's happening inside me. So whatever I choose, whether in the election or whether in the supermarket, this is my free will.

will, that's over. If you could actually change that, which we call the software of life, if you could introduce a line of code or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything. That last line is incredibly creepy given that it's one of the heads of Moderna saying that, you know, if we could change basically the written DNA of life, we can change everything. And they just, as I just said in my demonstration, injected a product that is manipulating your MRNA, manipulating your DNA, is designed to last longer than a virus itself, is designed wrapped in a fatty lipid, designed to go to the blood brain barrier, which the virus can't do on its own. What's really happening here? I mean, I guess I'm asking a question.

What is transhumanism? Well, transhumanism is the philosophy of the dogma that we can transcend our human condition. That's exactly what Klaus Schwab says. It's pretty much the accepted definition. Taken to extreme, however, it ends up setting you up to be your own God in the end because you will become immortal. Eventually, you will be tied into the internet, like with NeuroLink or whatever. And you will become omniscient and perhaps omnipresent, a precedent.

If you get in a nose cone of a spaceship and you can go to Mars or whatever as a virtual entity, these people are so unplugged. It's just not even funny. They really have a God complex that they can do anything they want to do with the rest of humanity. And they're doing it. That's the problem is all of these new modalities of vaccines, including MRNA and the jet, the Astra ejection, these are all classified as GMOs. they you know who who would have known if they were given the opportunity to get to understand that the

every one of these shots were GMOs would they have done it right i don't think so that that's one reason they couldn't declare uh that there was anything like a consent agreement but um you know this is be when i say a GMO this is actually admitted on the application that the UK has, for instance, with the Astra and other scientists have said this just recently that all of these things should be considered GMOs. They should have all fallen under the label of a GMO and never approved any other way.

But nevertheless, this is this as an assault on human beings, on humanity at this point. How many people have taken these vaccines around the world? 72%, 73% of the whole population of the world? You've got to be kidding. This is a wholesale transformation of humanity. Let me just put the exclamation point on that because we just read through a bunch of science and to your point, when we look at the Cleveland Clinic study, you have genetically altered your body now where you are more susceptible to every coronavirus in the future

than had you not genetically altered your body, had you not changed, had you stayed natural, had you had a natural infection, you would be blocking future viruses is what we see. That is how the system's designed to work. Now you have a genetic alteration that is inhibiting your body's ability

to fight off infection from coronaviruses. We've known this. It's true for the protustis vaccine. Studies now show that once you've gotten that vaccine, you are going to catch pertustis over and over and over again. You may not be symptomatic. The virus blocks your symptoms, but you are now, you know, perpetually vulnerable to being a carrier, which means you're not the same human being you would have been prior to having that vaccine. You know, we're not even going into, you know, people say, oh, transhumanism is injecting, you know, micro robots in your body and guaranteed that science is being done, but that's not even necessary, right? We're talking about just changing your DNA code and how your immune system works. Once you manipulate it and you can't undo it, now you are. And we've talked about this a little bit. I'm sure you're aware of this.

We've seen that there's been companies trying to patent DNA. Patent certain, you know, physical attributes. It's illegal. You can't patent nature until. you alter it? Once you alter the DNA strand of a plant or, you know, or in this case, maybe a human being, now you can own that being. Now you can be an owner. Now you can trade it on the stock market because you've claimed ownership by manipulating it. Is that a part of what's going on here? I think it probably is. This is not really talked about too much in circles like

people that research this stuff. I think it's I think there's something to it because that was part of the negotiations that I mentioned from agenda 21 yeah 1992. There was a lot of talk about patenting everything. Of course we know that seeds for instance have been patented as they get GMO'd. We know that for instance, Monsanto has patented everything that ever touched and they license it back to the grovers now. And, you know, they make huge piles of money. We've seen Monsanto sue the farm downwind that has the seed, the pollen blow in. And they go in and say, though you didn't plant our seeds, those are now our seeds because we've contaminated you and you owe us money.

I mean, this is how sick this gets. All right. So at the horn. It really does. Yeah. The question I have then is, you know, we're watching the WHO treaty. Ron Johnson has just gotten, you know, every Republican senator to sign on to a letter to say to Joe Biden, this thing's dead in the water, don't even think about it. And we've been really pushing back on that. But this is what I really want to ask you about.

Is it just about the WHO? If we stop the WHO, what is it about health that's being used? And how important is the WHO as far as some global, what's really going on here? Is it just about health? Well, no, it's not just about health, but we need to stop the treaty for sure. We also, I mean, I would recommend that we just throw the whole United Nations complex into the Atlantic Ocean. You know, they don't belong here. They're enemies to the people of our country. But, you know, aside, there is a larger agenda going on here.

And we see, for instance, the heartbeat of our country. of this treaty concerns this thing called one health. That's a new concept, sort of historically. When you talk about one health now, this is- All right, let me read this. Article 5, this is from the World Health, I'm gonna read it real quick. World Health Organization, Article 5,

One Health Approach to Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response, the parties commit to promote a one-health approach for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response that is coherent, comprehensive, integrated, coordinated, coordinated and collaborative among relevant actors and sectors. What is one health? Wow, that's when they combine all the things of living things

and some in order or other things like rocks and whatever. They talk about humans, animals, the ecosystems, the plants of the earth, and everything else being wrapped into one thing. So it's just not, it's just not taking. taking a view of human health, all these other things come into play. And they talk about either economic issues and supply chain issues and everything else that surrounding all these things gives, for instance, gives the latitude to declare an emergency for climate relating to health.

not related but they're they're gearing up for this uh if uh if a herd of cattle for instance gets bird flu they say well that could jump you know and we all get sick and die from it but the answer is now let's just kill all the cattle because a few of them get it get the bird flu that can't really, I don't know how they can determine that, but nevertheless, this is what they're doing. They've, they've killed hundreds of millions of chickens, hogs, cattle around the world now. And this is just going to be continuing. We see this as an assault on agriculture and our food systems, honestly. Right.

And then that's where I really, you know, and then you hear from the same people, you know, a constant discussion about population control. we need to reduce the population. But if you ever bring up that you, or you call them eugenicists or anything that smacks of what ultimately got a bad name because Hitler just made eugenics not look so attractive, but you're sidelined. But really at the heart of this is eugenics. Is it not? Yes, it is. It really is. And they have new tools now, obviously, like things like CRISPR. There's others, but that's a big one. And these tools, now can because they're scientists now you know they have a coat and a pocket protector and the

pens whatever and the stethoscope they're their their respected members of society now but back of the day when Hitler was prosecuting eugenics it wasn't nearly as pretty but it's the same philosophy today that predicts well at least wants to reduce the human population population of planet Earth. There's no doubt. They've written about this for the last 50 years. It's really coming to now to fruit because we see so many people dying from these injections. And honestly, I think it's going to get worse, not better, over time.

We can hope that there's only 60 days effect, maybe 90 days effect, but evidence is kind coming out now that these things are made, destroy so many people in the future with these new types of things like turbo cancers, et cetera. This is an unknown. It may be able to kill so many millions of people in the world. It's just incredible.

It really is incredible. And the fact that, you know, I'm glad Chris Coleman was waking up, but they're psyched about this technology. At the moment where Deborah Burks really isn't sure how many injuries there are. I'm glad she's calling for some data collection, as I have been, and many like us for, you know, many, many years now. But this MRNA technology is, talk about turbo. It's a turbo cancer in the medical industry. It's everywhere. I mean, they are, I mean, they're basically going to start trying to manipulate our MRNA on,

you know, all sorts of different viruses and cancers and things like that. Yeah. You're right, you're right. There's another aspect of this. MRNA is a big thing, obviously, because it causes things to express in your body. Moderna would call that that's the application phase, you know, when something gets expressed, like a spike protein. But there's also another process that's going on called reverse transcription of this stuff, the other stuff that's in the shut. that's getting back into your DNA directly. That means your DNA is being changed as these other things are going on. Right.

And this is demonstrated now by some, many scientists, I've seen several studies that document this now. This is not even being talked about. This is the serious part of DNA modification. We don't want our DNA to be modified in any way, shape, or form. But this is what GMO technology will do to us because it's engineered to do that. That's what the synthetic part of genetic engineering is all about. They want to create this stuff in the laboratory with computer algorithms first

to produce an effect in our bodies that is not natural. natural. It's going to change us in expression. It's going to change us fundamentally in our DNA as well. This is where, for instance, all of this talk about this turbo cancers that are just devastating to people. This is how it gets started. When some cells in your body go wacko because they have this new DNA inserted in them, they start to. multiply, the body can't take care of it, they just explode, and all of a sudden you die. I mean, that's what's amazing. I've said this for so long.

You know, Teresa Deischer is something that I've had on. She's a gene specialist, you know, dealing with stem cells and the focus on that. And she once said to me, you know, we've all talked about gene therapies. For decades now, we've been waiting for a CRISPR technology to come along where we can cure cancer by changing that DNA susceptibility you had by inserting, you know, some fix to your DNA code. She's like, why do you think you haven't seen it? It hasn't come about. It's been a dream for decades in science. I've been at the forefront of it.

The reason you never see a, you still don't see a technical gene therapy on the market, because no matter what we do, you can't. can't get it to land exactly right, no matter how good that insert may be, if it could get there, as soon as it mislands or, you know, it immediately starts causing cancer. That in all of our studies, we just, we accelerate cancer every time. And as she pointed out, she said, I once said to a, you know, one of these gene therapy specialists that's at the top of their game, you know, we know that if we have small fragments of DNA and we're inserting them into people, they're going to try and insert into the DNA code, correct? He's like, yeah, I mean, that's the heart of our technology. She said, do you know that

our vaccines do that? That time she's talking about MMR vaccine, aborted beetle cell lines. Now MRI technology is taking this to another place. It's not rocket science. This causes cancer. It has never gotten out of a lab and been used on people until now because it causes cancer. And thank God Donald Trump was able to rush this right onto the market and get it out to us in a few months when for decades they've been holding onto it because it only causes cancer and here we are. So, you know, the question ultimately ends up being. So this one health, and you point out something that has been just mind-boggling to me, which is how is it climate is now being attached to health? They're literally saying, because of, we're going to stop disease by, you know, by stopping CO2

in the air. And right now, as we speak, I just reported last week, Joe, Biden is looking at claiming, calling for a climate emergency so that he could have emergency powers as though we are under attack by Russia, but this time it's the sun and CO2, and he's going to do something about it. Where does this brainchild come from? This, I tell you, this is embedded into the treaty first. Article 5, you just saw the sub-a- some of it but this has been embedded in in our country since at least 2002 it's been ramping up in our country in other words whereas full blossom at this point the CDC other agencies have been infected with the stuff with this ideology we we have mastered apparently secretly nobody talked

about it along the way I didn't hear it 10 years ago I didn't have any clue but you see it now and you can people can search for one health and then the government you'll see all over the place what where this comes stuff come through it from but the the the ideology behind it is absolutely insane you can't wrap everything together in one package and think you can have one health. That's stupid because what basically what they're going to say is, well, over here we have an issue with the ecosystem, it's you humans that caused it, therefore you need to stop eating red meat. Right, right. Yeah, you know, okay, well, how does that play out? Well, they're not related. It's totally not related. And when you kill off the entire population, right, and look at, look at

though you can see how devious it is. Number one, if we want you to stop eating red meat, which is what Bill Gates and these people have stated publicly they want to do, we coal all of your beef or most of it, saying that there's a terrifying bird flu that could miraculously make a jump that we haven't seen in zoology or anything for since the dawn of man, but it might just happen. And so therefore we're going to kill all your cows. And if not all your cows, what we will certainly do is kill enough cows at the cost of the remaining cows will be so high that only Bill, Gates will be able for to have that stake. And we're going to see this in so many different ways.

This is essentially, it looks like to me, how they're going to control this entire narrative. So to sort of sum all of this up, you've written six books. Clearly, you've been on this for some time. Is there a they? And this is the question I ask of the people that come on this show. Is there a they? Is there this group of, you know, superpower families that are, you know, have this diabolical grasp on the world and are looking to just own everything. Do they have a plan? Are they evil? Or is it more, you know, accidental and haphazard? Personally, I think it's evil, for one. I've traced the Trilado Commission, for instance, back to 1973. I've written extensively about it over the years.

This was the modern genesis of globalization, I believe. When they got together, Zabigna Prasinski and David Rockefeller got together to form this commission. They brought people from around the world, including from America, of course. And they're the ones that said they were going to create a new international economic order. That's what they said. it is all over their writings. I've traced this as forward over the years to today. They're in the middle of every single horrible thing

has happened to us ever since, including genetic modification. So there's one group you can study for sure. Is there anybody outside the Trilada Commission? Is there another body above that? I don't know. I can't really say for sure. we can see people like the world economic forum certainly toots the horn for the united nations is it tedros no i don't think so but uh you know we we have a lot of operatives uh that are in this whole thing

but when you when you look back at the trinatal commission what they started back then we can see their fingerprint almost everything has happened including trade treaties agenda 21 in the Rio conference agenda 2030 all this stuff has their fingerprint oh by the way immigration policy yeah that was something that eminated at the trail out of commission in the first place whereas we're suffering suffering from this today i'm in arizona as you know yeah and uh we see it every time every day what part of what do you mean by that that they they want to have an open border? I mean, they talk about that? What is the... Oh, absolutely. This was all, this was, this was, this was spread around Europe several years ago

before he died by a Trilado commissioner who was head of the Goldman Sachs, international, I think was board. And here you have a guy who wanted to promote, multicultural society where all of the people from the from the mid-east will be moving forward into Europe to basically conquer the nation. We know now, but this policy was set in place by this guy as special envoys, his name was Peter Sutherland, by the way, he was a special envoy to the United Nations

who set the quotas for these nations in Europe to receive all these people from the South. And then when it started and they got nervous, he went around again and said, you can't go back on your quota. You said you're going to do it. You can't, you know, you're not going to renege. This is the same policy that's been prosecuted against us as well. You don't see anybody get into China. you don't see anybody get into Sudan or Uganda.

If they wanted to. There's no other place on the world except us and Europe who got this treatment. This was an intentional policy and is still being worked out today. Incredible. I mean, we were watching all this. We're reporting all this. I want to thank you for all of your work. If we want to find your books, where do we find your latest book?

Certainly on my website, technocracy. News, also on Amazon.com and other places that books are sold. If you want to get it in a paper, a bag, a brown bag, go to a bookstore and ordered it. They'll get it for you and hand it to you. Otherwise, you can get it off of my website, technocracy. News. Well, I mean, look, you're one of those figures that's been on this for a very long time. In many ways, I feel like I'm just waking up to it. I'm a little bit ahead of Chris Cuomo, thank God. But I appreciate the work that you've done and that you're continuing to do.

I think it's really important. This is the conversation of our time. And as you're pointing out, and I think as we're all sensing, at least people watching the high wire, it feels imminent. It feels like the end game for them is near. I think luckily, maybe it was always inevitable once they'd made a jump like they did during the pandemic. I've always said that they can put all the pieces in place. But when you finally really try to make that final moment where you oppress all of humanity at one time,

they're going to react and we have reacted. Do you think there's time? Do you think we can stop this? Yeah. Well, I have to have hope that they will or that we will. Who knows? but you know we at this point we have the goods right yep we have the good we have to tell everybody in the world what we have and we it what we have in our hands is defensible you can't refute it

when you look at it it's obvious it's obvious on the surface under the surface any way you look at it we have all the stuff top to bottom these people need to be hung out to dry, period. All right, well, we're gonna work to that end. Patrick Wood, thank you for your time today. I really appreciate it. Thanks, thanks, Del. Great job.

Take care.